1
|
Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Follmann D, Hachigian G, Strout C, Overcash JS, Doblecki-Lewis S, Whitaker JA, Anderson EJ, Neuzil K, Corey L, Priddy F, Tomassini JE, Brown M, Girard B, Stolman D, Urdaneta V, Wang X, Deng W, Zhou H, Dixit A, Das R, Miller JM. Long-term safety and effectiveness of mRNA-1273 vaccine in adults: COVE trial open-label and booster phases. Nat Commun 2024; 15:7469. [PMID: 39209823 PMCID: PMC11362294 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50376-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Primary vaccination with mRNA-1273 (100-µg) was safe and efficacious at preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the previously reported, blinded Part A of the phase 3 Coronavirus Efficacy (COVE; NCT04470427) trial in adults (≥18 years) across 99 U.S. sites. The open-label (Parts B and C) primary objectives were evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness of primary vaccination plus a 50-µg booster dose; immunogenicity was a secondary objective. Of 29,035 open-label participants, 19,609 received boosters (mRNA-1273 [n = 9647]; placebo-mRNA-1273 [n = 9952]; placebo [n = 10] groups). Booster safety was consistent with that reported for primary vaccination. Incidences of COVID-19 and severe COVID-19 were higher during the Omicron BA.1 than Delta variant waves and boosting versus non-boosting was associated with a significant, 47.0% (95% CI : 39.0-53.9%) reduction of Omicron BA.1 incidence (24.6 [23.4 - 25.8] vs 46.4 [40.6 - 52.7]/1000 person-months). In an exploratory Cox regression model adjusted for time-varying covariates, a longer median interval between primary vaccination and boosting (mRNA-1273 [13 months] vs placebo-mRNA-1273 [8 months]) was associated with significantly lower, COVID-19 risk (24.0% [16.0% - 32.0%]) during Omicron BA.1 predominance. Boosting elicited greater immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 than primary vaccination, irrespective of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Primary vaccination and boosting with mRNA-1273 demonstrated acceptable safety, effectiveness and immunogenicity against COVID-19, including emergent variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dean Follmann
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Cynthia Strout
- Coastal Carolina Research Center, Mount Pleasant, SC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lawrence Corey
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Essabbar A, El Mazouri S, Boumajdi N, Bendani H, Aanniz T, Mouna O, Lahcen B, Ibrahimi A. Temporal Dynamics and Genomic Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 After Four Years of Evolution. Cureus 2024; 16:e53654. [PMID: 38327721 PMCID: PMC10849819 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Since its emergence, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has undergone extensive genomic evolution, impacting public health policies, diagnosis, medication, and vaccine development. This study leverages advanced bioinformatics to assess the virus's temporal and regional genomic evolution from December 2019 to October 2023. Methods Our analysis incorporates 16,575 complete SARS-CoV-2 sequences collected from 214 countries. These samples were comparatively analyzed, with a detailed characterization of nucleic mutations, lineages, distribution, and evolutionary patterns during each year, using the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain as the reference. Results Our analysis has identified a total of 21,580 mutations that we classified into transient mutations, which diminished over time, and persistent mutations with steadily increasing frequencies. This mutation landscape led to a notable surge in the evolutionary rate, rising from 13 mutations per sample in 2020 to 96 by 2023, with minor geographic variations. The phylogenetic analysis unveiled three distinct evolutionary branches, each representing unique viral evolution pathways. These lineages exhibited a tendency for a reduced duration of dominance with a shortening prevalence period over time, as dominant strains were consistently replaced by more fit variants. Notably, the emergence of the Alpha and Delta variants in 2021 was followed by the subsequent dominance of Omicron clade variants that have branched into several recombinant variants in 2022, marking a significant shift in the viral landscape. Conclusion This study sheds light on the dynamic nature of SARS-CoV-2 evolution, emphasizing the importance of continuous and vigilant genomic surveillance. The dominance of recombinant lineages, coupled with the disappearance of local variants, underscores the virus's adaptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdelmounim Essabbar
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech) Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR
- Toulouse Cancer Research Center, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Toulouse, FRA
| | - Safae El Mazouri
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech) Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR
| | - Nassma Boumajdi
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech) Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR
| | - Houda Bendani
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech) Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR
| | - Tarik Aanniz
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech) Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR
| | - Ouadghiri Mouna
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech) Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR
| | - Belyamani Lahcen
- Émergency Department, Military Hospital Rabat Morocco, Rabat, MAR
- Mohammed VI Center For Research and Innovation, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health, Rabat, MAR
| | - Azeddine Ibrahimi
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech) Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin J, Anjum Huma F, Irfan A, Ali SS, Waheed Y, Mohammad A, Munir M, Khan A, Wei DQ. Structural plasticity of omicron BA.5 and BA.2.75 for enhanced ACE-dependent entry into cells. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2023; 41:10762-10773. [PMID: 36541923 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2022.2158944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The current study investigated the binding variations among the wilt type, Omicron sub-variants BA.2.75 and BA.5, using protein-protein docking, protein structural graphs (P SG), and molecular simulation methods. HADDOCK predicted docking scores and dissociation constant (KD) revealed tighter binding of these sub-variants in contrast to the WT. Further investigation revealed variations in the hub residues, protein sub-networks, and GlobalMetapath in these variants as compared to the WT. A very unusual dynamic for BA.2.75 and BA.5 was observed, and secondary structure transition can also be witnessed in the loops (44-505). The results show that the flexibility of these three loops is increased by the mutations as an allosteric effect and thus enhances the chances of bonding with the nearby residues to connect and form a stable connection. Furthermore, the additional hydrogen bonding contacts steer the robust binding of these variants in contrast to the wild type. The total binding free energy for the wild type was calculated to be -61.38 kcal/mol, while for BA.2.75 and BA.5 variants the T BE was calculated to be -70.42 kcal/mol and 69.78 kcal/mol, respectively. We observed that the binding of BA.2.75 is steered by the electrostatic interactions while the BA.5 additional contacts are due to the vdW (Van der Waal) energy. From these findings, it can be observed the Spike (S) protein is undergoing structural adjustments to bind efficiently to the hACE2 (human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) receptor and, in turn, increase entry to the host cells. The current study will aid the development of structure-based drugs against these variants.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junqi Lin
- School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Aiza Irfan
- Rawalpindi Medical University, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Syed Shujait Ali
- Center for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan
| | - Yasir Waheed
- Office of Research, Innovation & Commercialization, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University (SZABMU), Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Anwar Mohammad
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Muhammad Munir
- Division of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Abbas Khan
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biological Statistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Zhongjing Research and Industrialization Institute of Chinese Medicine, Zhongguancun Scientific Park, Nanyang, Henan, P.R. China
| | - Dong-Qing Wei
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biological Statistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Zhongjing Research and Industrialization Institute of Chinese Medicine, Zhongguancun Scientific Park, Nanyang, Henan, P.R. China
- Peng Cheng Laboratory, Nashan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muik A, Lui BG, Quandt J, Diao H, Fu Y, Bacher M, Gordon J, Toker A, Grosser J, Ozhelvaci O, Grikscheit K, Hoehl S, Kohmer N, Lustig Y, Regev-Yochay G, Ciesek S, Beguir K, Poran A, Vogler I, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. Progressive loss of conserved spike protein neutralizing antibody sites in Omicron sublineages is balanced by preserved T cell immunity. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112888. [PMID: 37527039 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Evolution of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant has led to the emergence of sublineages with different patterns of neutralizing antibody evasion. We report that Omicron BA.4/BA.5 breakthrough infection of individuals immunized with SARS-CoV-2 wild-type-strain-based mRNA vaccines results in a boost of Omicron BA.4.6, BF.7, BQ.1.1, and BA.2.75 neutralization but does not efficiently boost BA.2.75.2, XBB, or XBB.1.5 neutralization. In silico analyses showed that the Omicron spike glycoprotein lost most neutralizing B cell epitopes, especially in sublineages BA.2.75.2, XBB, and XBB.1.5. In contrast, T cell epitopes are conserved across variants including XBB.1.5. T cell responses of mRNA-vaccinated, SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals against the wild-type strain, Omicron BA.1, and BA.4/BA.5 were comparable, suggesting that T cell immunity against recent sublineages including XBB.1.5 may remain largely unaffected. While some Omicron sublineages effectively evade B cell immunity, spike-protein-specific T cell immunity, due to the nature of polymorphic cell-mediated immune responses, may continue to contribute to prevention/limitation of severe COVID-19 manifestation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Huitian Diao
- BioNTech US, 40 Erie Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Yunguan Fu
- InstaDeep, Ltd., 5 Merchant Square, London W2 1AY, UK
| | - Maren Bacher
- BioNTech, An der Goldgrube 12, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Aras Toker
- BioNTech, An der Goldgrube 12, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Katharina Grikscheit
- Institute for Medical Virology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hoehl
- Institute for Medical Virology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Niko Kohmer
- Institute for Medical Virology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yaniv Lustig
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Central Virology Laboratory, Public Health Services, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Gili Regev-Yochay
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; SPRI-Sheba Pandemic Preparedness Research Institute, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Sandra Ciesek
- Institute for Medical Virology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; DZIF - German Centre for Infection Research, External Partner Site, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Karim Beguir
- InstaDeep, Ltd., 5 Merchant Square, London W2 1AY, UK
| | - Asaf Poran
- BioNTech US, 40 Erie Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | - Özlem Türeci
- BioNTech, An der Goldgrube 12, 55131 Mainz, Germany; HI-TRON - Helmholtz Institute for Translational Oncology Mainz by DKFZ, Obere Zahlbacherstr. 63, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Ugur Sahin
- BioNTech, An der Goldgrube 12, 55131 Mainz, Germany; TRON gGmbH - Translational Oncology at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Freiligrathstraße 12, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chalkias S, Harper C, Vrbicky K, Walsh SR, Essink B, Brosz A, McGhee N, Tomassini JE, Chen X, Ying Chang, Sutherland A, Montefiori DC, Girard B, Edwards DK, Jing Feng, Zhou H, Baden LR, Miller JM, Das R. Three-month antibody persistence of a bivalent Omicron-containing booster vaccine against COVID-19. Nat Commun 2023; 14:5125. [PMID: 37612300 PMCID: PMC10447540 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38892-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
We previously presented day 29 interim safety and immunogenicity results from a phase 2/3 study (NCT04927065) comparing the Omicron-BA.1-containing bivalent vaccine mRNA-1273.214 (50-µg) to the 50-µg mRNA-1273 booster in adults who previously received the mRNA-1273 primary series (100-µg) and mRNA-1273 first booster (50-µg) dose. Primary endpoints were safety, non-inferiority of the neutralizing antibody (nAb) and seroresponse against Omicron BA.1, superiority of the nAb response against Omicron-BA.1, and non-inferiority of the nAb response against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 for second boosters of mRNA-1273.214 versus mRNA-1273 at days 29 and 91. The key secondary endpoint was the seroresponse difference of mRNA-1273.214 versus mRNA-1273 against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 at days 29 and day 91. Participants were sequentially enrolled and dosed with 50-µg of mRNA-1273 (n = 376) or mRNA-1273.214 (n = 437) as second booster doses. Here we present day 91 post-booster results. In participants with no pre-booster, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-infection (SARS-CoV-2), mRNA-1273.214 elicited Omicron-BA.1-nAb titers (95% confidence interval [CI]) that were significantly higher (964.4 [834.4-1114.7]) than those of mRNA-1273 (624.2 [533.1-730.9]) and similar to those of mRNA-1273 against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 at day 91. mRNA-1273.214 also induced higher binding antibody responses against Omicron BA.1 and alpha, gamma and delta variants than mRNA-1273. Safety profiles were similar for both vaccines. The Omicron-BA.1 bivalent vaccine improved antibody responses compared to mRNA-1273 through 90 days post-booster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Adam Brosz
- Meridian Clinical Research, Grand Island, NE, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Branche AR, Rouphael NG, Losada C, Baden LR, Anderson EJ, Luetkemeyer AF, Diemert DJ, Winokur PL, Presti RM, Kottkamp AC, Falsey AR, Frey SE, Rupp R, Bäcker M, Novak RM, Walter EB, Jackson LA, Little SJ, Immergluck LC, Mahgoub SM, Whitaker JA, Babu TM, Goepfert PA, Fusco DN, Atmar RL, Posavad CM, Netzl A, Smith DJ, Telu K, Mu J, Makowski M, Makhene MK, Crandon S, Montefiori DC, Roberts PC, Beigel JH. Immunogenicity of the BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Bivalent Boosts: Preliminary Results From the COVAIL Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 77:560-564. [PMID: 37036397 PMCID: PMC10443997 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
In a randomized clinical trial, we compare early neutralizing antibody responses after boosting with bivalent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines based on either BA.1 or BA.4/BA.5 Omicron spike protein combined with wild-type spike. Responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants exhibited the greatest reduction in titers against currently circulating Omicron subvariants for both bivalent vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela R Branche
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester VTEU, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Nadine G Rouphael
- Department of Medicine, Emory University Hope Clinic, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Cecilia Losada
- Department of Medicine, Emory University Hope Clinic, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Lindsey R Baden
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Evan J Anderson
- Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines (CCIV) of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University Department of Pediatrics, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anne F Luetkemeyer
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David J Diemert
- George Washington Vaccine Research Unit, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
| | - Patricia L Winokur
- Department of Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Rachel M Presti
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Angelica C Kottkamp
- Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU) Manhattan Research Clinic at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ann R Falsey
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester VTEU, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Sharon E Frey
- Saint Louis University, Center for Vaccine Development, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Richard Rupp
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Martín Bäcker
- Department of Medicine, NYU VTEU Long Island Research Clinic at NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Richard M Novak
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago-Project WISH, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emmanuel B Walter
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa A Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Susan J Little
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of CaliforniaSan Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lilly C Immergluck
- Department of Microbiology/Biochemistry/Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Siham M Mahgoub
- Department of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Jennifer A Whitaker
- Departments of Molecular Virology and Microbiology and Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tara M Babu
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Paul A Goepfert
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Dahlene N Fusco
- Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Robert L Atmar
- Departments of Molecular Virology and Microbiology and Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christine M Posavad
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Antonia Netzl
- Centre for Pathogen Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Derek J Smith
- Centre for Pathogen Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Kalyani Telu
- The Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Jinjian Mu
- The Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Mat Makowski
- The Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Mamodikoe K Makhene
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sonja Crandon
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Paul C Roberts
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - John H Beigel
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iwabuchi R, Harada M, Yamada A, Aomura D, Yamada Y, Sonoda K, Nakazawa H, Sakai K, Mizukami E, Hashimoto K, Kamijo Y. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titer after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in Japanese patients who underwent renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Clin Exp Nephrol 2023; 27:660-671. [PMID: 37095343 PMCID: PMC10124692 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-023-02348-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination is recommended for patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT), including hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KT). However, the difference in the immune response between RRT patients and healthy individuals after mRNA vaccines remains uncertain. METHODS This retrospective observational study evaluated the anti-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibody acquisition, titers and their changes, normal response rate (reaching titers of healthy individuals), factors associated with a normal response, and effectiveness of booster vaccination in Japanese RRT patients. RESULTS Most HD and PD patients acquired anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies after the second vaccination; however, their antibody titers and normal response rates (62-75%) were low compared with those of healthy subjects. Approximately 62% of KT recipients acquired antibodies, but the normal response rate was low (23%). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody waning occurred in the control, HD, and PD groups, while negative or very low titers remained in KT recipients. Third booster vaccination was effective in most HD and PD patients. However, the effect was mild in KT recipients - only 58% reached a normal response level. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that younger age, higher serum albumin level, and RRT other than KT were significantly associated with a normal response after the second vaccination. CONCLUSIONS RRT patients, particularly KT recipients, exhibited poor vaccine responses. Booster vaccination would be beneficial for HD and PD patients; however, its effect in KT recipients was mild. Further COVID-19 vaccinations using the latest vaccine or alternative procedures should be considered in RRT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryohei Iwabuchi
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
- Kashiwabara Clinic, 4565-1 Hotaka Kashiwabara, Azumino, 399-8304, Japan
| | - Makoto Harada
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
- Kashiwabara Clinic, 4565-1 Hotaka Kashiwabara, Azumino, 399-8304, Japan
| | - Aiko Yamada
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
- Kashiwabara Clinic, 4565-1 Hotaka Kashiwabara, Azumino, 399-8304, Japan
| | - Daiki Aomura
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Yosuke Yamada
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Kosuke Sonoda
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Nakazawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Kaoko Sakai
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Etsuko Mizukami
- Kashiwabara Clinic, 4565-1 Hotaka Kashiwabara, Azumino, 399-8304, Japan
| | - Koji Hashimoto
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Yuji Kamijo
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lyke KE, Atmar RL, Dominguez Islas C, Posavad CM, Deming ME, Branche AR, Johnston C, El Sahly HM, Edupuganti S, Mulligan MJ, Jackson LA, Rupp RE, Rostad CA, Coler RN, Bäcker M, Kottkamp AC, Babu TM, Dobrzynski D, Martin JM, Brady RC, Frenck RW, Rajakumar K, Kotloff K, Rouphael N, Szydlo D, PaulChoudhury R, Archer JI, Crandon S, Ingersoll B, Eaton A, Brown ER, McElrath MJ, Neuzil KM, Stephens DS, Post DJ, Lin BC, Serebryannyy L, Beigel JH, Montefiori DC, Roberts PC. Immunogenicity of NVX-CoV2373 heterologous boost against SARS-CoV-2 variants. NPJ Vaccines 2023; 8:98. [PMID: 37433788 PMCID: PMC10336079 DOI: 10.1038/s41541-023-00693-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
As part of a multicenter study evaluating homologous and heterologous COVID-19 booster vaccines, we assessed the magnitude, breadth, and short-term durability of binding and pseudovirus-neutralizing antibody (PsVNA) responses following a single booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 in adults primed with either Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273, or BNT162b2 vaccines. NVX-CoV2373 as a heterologous booster was immunogenic and associated with no safety concerns through Day 91. Fold-rises in PsVNA titers from baseline (Day 1) to Day 29 were highest for prototypic D614G variant and lowest for more recent Omicron sub-lineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1. Peak humoral responses against all SARS-CoV-2 variants were lower in those primed with Ad26.COV2.S than with mRNA vaccines. Prior SARS CoV-2 infection was associated with substantially higher baseline PsVNA titers, which remained elevated relative to previously uninfected participants through Day 91. These data support the use of heterologous protein-based booster vaccines as an acceptable alternative to mRNA or adenoviral-based COVID-19 booster vaccines. This trial was conducted under ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04889209.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten E Lyke
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Robert L Atmar
- Departments of Medicine and Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Clara Dominguez Islas
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Christine M Posavad
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Meagan E Deming
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Angela R Branche
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Christine Johnston
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hana M El Sahly
- Departments of Medicine and Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Srilatha Edupuganti
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
- Hope Clinic of Emory Vaccine Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark J Mulligan
- NYU Langone Vaccine Center and Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa A Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Richard E Rupp
- Sealy Institute for Vaccine Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Christina A Rostad
- Department of Pediatrics and Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rhea N Coler
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Martín Bäcker
- NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island Vaccine Center Research Clinic and Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, USA
| | - Angelica C Kottkamp
- NYU Langone Vaccine Center and Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tara M Babu
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Dobrzynski
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Judith M Martin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rebecca C Brady
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Robert W Frenck
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kumaravel Rajakumar
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Karen Kotloff
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nadine Rouphael
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
- Hope Clinic of Emory Vaccine Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Daniel Szydlo
- Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention (SCHARP), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rahul PaulChoudhury
- Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention (SCHARP), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Sonja Crandon
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brian Ingersoll
- Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention (SCHARP), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amanda Eaton
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Brown
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M Juliana McElrath
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathleen M Neuzil
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David S Stephens
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - Diane J Post
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bob C Lin
- Vaccine Immunology Program, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Leonid Serebryannyy
- Vaccine Immunology Program, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John H Beigel
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David C Montefiori
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul C Roberts
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rouphael NG, Branche AR, Diemert DJ, Falsey AR, Losada C, Baden LR, Frey SE, Whitaker JA, Little SJ, Kamidani S, Walter EB, Novak RM, Rupp R, Jackson LA, Babu TM, Kottkamp AC, Luetkemeyer AF, Immergluck LC, Presti RM, Bäcker M, Winokur PL, Mahgoub SM, Goepfert PA, Fusco DN, Atmar RL, Posavad CM, Netzl A, Smith DJ, Telu K, Mu J, Makowski M, Makhene MK, Crandon S, Montefiori DC, Roberts PC, Beigel JH. Immunogenicity of a Two Dose Regimen of Moderna mRNA Beta/Omicron BA.1 Bivalent Variant Vaccine Boost in a Randomized Clinical Trial. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.06.06.23290973. [PMID: 37333252 PMCID: PMC10275009 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.06.23290973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
In this brief report, we compare the magnitude and durability of the serologic response of one versus two doses (separated by 56 days) of a variant vaccine (Moderna mRNA-1273 Beta/Omicron BA.1 bivalent vaccine) in adults.
Collapse
|
10
|
Sathyaseelan C, Magateshvaren
Saras MA, Prasad Patro LP, Uttamrao PP, Rathinavelan T. CoVe-Tracker: An Interactive SARS-CoV-2 Pan Proteome Evolution Tracker. J Proteome Res 2023; 22:1984-1996. [PMID: 37036263 PMCID: PMC10108739 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has significantly mutated its genome during the past 3 years, leading to the periodic emergence of several variants. Some of the variants possess enhanced fitness advantage, transmissibility, and pathogenicity and can also reduce vaccine efficacy. Thus, it is important to track the viral evolution to prevent and protect the mankind from SARS-CoV-2 infection. To this end, an interactive web-GUI platform, namely, CoVe-tracker (SARS-CoV-2 evolution tracker), is developed to track its pan proteome evolutionary dynamics (https://project.iith.ac.in/cove-tracker/). CoVe-tracker provides an opportunity for the user to fetch the country-wise and protein-wise amino acid mutations (currently, 44139) of SARS-CoV-2 and their month-wise distribution. It also provides position-wise evolution observed in the SARS-CoV-2 proteome. Importantly, CoVe-tracker provides month- and country-wise distributions of 2065 phylogenetic assignment of named global outbreak (PANGO) lineages and their 177564 variants. It further provides periodic updates on SARS-CoV-2 variant(s) evolution. CoVe-tracker provides the results in a user-friendly interactive fashion by projecting the results onto the world map (for country-wise distribution) and protein 3D structure (for protein-wise mutation). The application of CoVe-tracker in tracking the closest cousin(s) of a variant is demonstrated by considering BA.4 and BA.5 PANGO lineages as test cases. Thus, CoVe-tracker would be useful in the quick surveillance of newly emerging mutations/variants/lineages to facilitate the understanding of viral evolution, transmission, and disease epidemiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chakkarai Sathyaseelan
- Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute
of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, Telangana State 502285,
India
| | | | - L. Ponoop Prasad Patro
- Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute
of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, Telangana State 502285,
India
| | - Patil Pranita Uttamrao
- Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute
of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, Telangana State 502285,
India
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Arunachalam PS, Lai L, Samaha H, Feng Y, Hu M, Hui HSY, Wali B, Ellis M, Davis-Gardner ME, Huerta C, Bechnak K, Bechnak S, Lee M, Litvack MB, Losada C, Grifoni A, Sette A, Zarnitsyna VI, Rouphael N, Suthar MS, Pulendran B. Durability of immune responses to mRNA booster vaccination against COVID-19. J Clin Invest 2023; 133:e167955. [PMID: 36951954 PMCID: PMC10178835 DOI: 10.1172/jci167955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMaintaining durable immunity following vaccination represents a major challenge, but whether mRNA booster vaccination improves durability is unknown.MethodsWe measured antibody responses in 55 healthy adults, who received a booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 and calculated the half-life of the antibody titers. We also measured memory B and T cell responses in a subset of 28 participants. In 13 volunteers who received a second booster vaccine, we measured serum antibody titers and memory B and T cell responses.ResultsThe booster (third immunization) dose at 6 to 10 months increased the half-life of the serum-neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers to 76 days from 56 to 66 days after the primary 2-dose vaccination. A second booster dose (fourth immunization) a year after the primary vaccination further increased the half-life to 88 days. However, despite this modestly improved durability in nAb responses against the ancestral (WA.1) strain, there was a loss of neutralization capacity against the Omicron subvariants BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 (48-, 71-, and 66-fold drop in titers, respectively, relative to the WA.1 strain). Although only 45% to 65% of participants demonstrated a detectable nAb titer against the newer variants after the booster (third dose), the response declined to below the detection limit in almost all individuals by 6 months. In contrast, booster vaccination induced antigen-specific memory B and T cells that persisted for at least 6 months.ConclusionThe durability of serum antibody responses improves only marginally following booster immunizations with the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabhu S. Arunachalam
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Lilin Lai
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hady Samaha
- Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Yupeng Feng
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mengyun Hu
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Harold Sai-yin Hui
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Bushra Wali
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Madison Ellis
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Meredith E. Davis-Gardner
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Christopher Huerta
- Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Kareem Bechnak
- Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Sarah Bechnak
- Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew Lee
- Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew B. Litvack
- Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Cecilia Losada
- Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Alba Grifoni
- Center for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alessandro Sette
- Center for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Veronika I. Zarnitsyna
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nadine Rouphael
- Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Mehul S. Suthar
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Bali Pulendran
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology and
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Antibody response durability following three-dose coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in people with HIV receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2023; 37:709-721. [PMID: 36545783 PMCID: PMC9994797 DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000003469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data exist regarding longer term antibody responses following three-dose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, and the impact of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection during this time, in people with HIV (PWH) receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). We quantified wild-type-specific, Omicron BA.1-specific and Omicron BA.5-specific responses up to 6 months post-third dose in 64 PWH and 117 controls who remained COVID-19-naive or experienced their first SARS-CoV-2 infection during this time. DESIGN Longitudinal observational cohort. METHODS We quantified wild-type-specific and Omicron-specific anti-Spike receptor-binding domain IgG concentrations, ACE2 displacement activities and live virus neutralization at 1, 3 and 6 months post-third vaccine dose. RESULTS Third doses boosted all antibody measures above two-dose levels, but BA.1-specific responses remained significantly lower than wild-type-specific ones, with BA.5-specific responses lower still. Serum IgG concentrations declined at similar rates in COVID-19-naive PWH and controls post-third dose (median wild-type-specific and BA.1-specific half-lives were between 66 and 74 days for both groups). Antibody function also declined significantly yet comparably between groups: 6 months post-third dose, BA.1-specific neutralization was undetectable in more than 80% of COVID-19 naive PWH and more than 90% of controls. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted antibody concentrations and function significantly above vaccine-induced levels in both PWH and controls, though BA.5-specific neutralization remained significantly poorer than BA.1 even post-breakthrough. CONCLUSION Following three-dose COVID-19 vaccination, antibody response durability in PWH receiving ART is comparable with controls. PWH also mounted strong responses to breakthrough infection. Due to temporal response declines, however, COVID-19-naive individuals, regardless of HIV status, would benefit from a fourth dose within 6 months of their third.
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang L, Møhlenberg M, Wang P, Zhou H. Immune evasion of neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2023; 70:13-25. [PMID: 36948931 PMCID: PMC9985919 DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Since its emergence at the end of 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the infection of more than 600 million people worldwide and has significant damage to global medical, economic, and political structures. Currently, a highly mutated variant of concern, SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, has evolved into many different subvariants mainly including BA.1, BA.2, BA.3, BA.4/5, and the recently emerging BA.2.75.2, BA.2.76, BA.4.6, BA.4.7, BA.5.9, BF.7, BQ.1, BQ.1.1, XBB, XBB.1, etc. Mutations in the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the spike protein, such as A67V, G142D, and N212I, alter the antigenic structure of Omicron, while mutations in the spike receptor binding domain (RBD), such as R346K, Q493R, and N501Y, increase the affinity for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Both types of mutations greatly increase the capacity of Omicron to evade immunity from neutralizing antibodies, produced by natural infection and/or vaccination. In this review, we systematically assess the immune evasion capacity of SARS-CoV-2, with an emphasis on the neutralizing antibodies generated by different vaccination regimes. Understanding the host antibody response and the evasion strategies employed by SARS-CoV-2 variants will improve our capacity to combat newly emerging Omicron variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidong Wang
- College of Medical Technology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China
| | | | - Pengfei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Hao Zhou
- College of Medical Technology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Branche AR, Rouphael NG, Losada C, Baden LR, Anderson EJ, Luetkemeyer AF, Diemert DJ, Winokur PL, Presti RM, Kottkamp AC, Falsey AR, Frey SE, Rupp R, Bäcker M, Novak RM, Walter EB, Jackson LA, Little SJ, Immergluck LC, Mahgoub SM, Whitaker JA, Babu TM, Goepfert PA, Fusco DN, Atmar RL, Posavad CM, Netzl A, Smith DJ, Telu K, Mu J, Makowski M, Makhene MK, Sonja C, Montefiori DC, Roberts PC, Beigel JH. Immunogenicity of the BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 SARS-CoV-2 Bivalent Boosts: Preliminary Results from the COVAIL Randomized Clinical Trial. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.01.31.23285306. [PMID: 37034641 PMCID: PMC10081431 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.31.23285306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
In a randomized clinical trial, we compare early neutralizing antibody responses after boosting with bivalent SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines based on either BA.1 or BA.4/BA.5 Omicron spike protein combined with wildtype spike. Responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants exhibited the greatest reduction in titers against currently circulating Omicron subvariants for both bivalent vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lindsey R Baden
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Evan J Anderson
- Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines (CCIV) of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University Department of Pediatrics, Atlanta, GA
| | - Anne F Luetkemeyer
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David J Diemert
- George Washington Vaccine Research Unit, George Washington University, Washington D.C
| | | | | | - Angelica C Kottkamp
- NYU VTEU Manhattan Research Clinic at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Sharon E Frey
- Saint Louis University, Center for Vaccine Development, St. Louis, MO
| | - Richard Rupp
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Martín Bäcker
- NYU VTEU Long Island Research Clinic at NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| | | | - Emmanuel B Walter
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Lisa A Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Susan J Little
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Siham M Mahgoub
- Howard University College of Medicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington D.C
| | - Jennifer A Whitaker
- Departments of Molecular Virology and Microbiology and Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Tara M Babu
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Robert L Atmar
- Departments of Molecular Virology and Microbiology and Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Christine M Posavad
- IDCRC Laboratory Operations Unit - Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Antonia Netzl
- Centre for Pathogen Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Derek J Smith
- Centre for Pathogen Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Mamodikoe K Makhene
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Crandon Sonja
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Paul C Roberts
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - John H Beigel
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhu KL, Jiang XL, Zhan BD, Wang XJ, Xia X, Cao GP, Sun WK, Huang PX, Zhang JZ, Gao YL, Dai EH, Gao HX, Ma MJ. Durability of neutralization against Omicron subvariants after vaccination and breakthrough infection. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112075. [PMID: 36774551 PMCID: PMC9906998 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Booster immunizations and breakthrough infections can elicit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariant neutralizing activity. However, the durability of the neutralization response is unknown. We characterize the sensitivity of BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.75, BA.4/BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1.1, and XBB against neutralizing antibodies from vaccination, hybrid immunity, and breakthrough infections 4-6 months after vaccination and infection. We show that a two-dose CoronaVac or a third-dose ZF2001 booster elicits limited neutralization against Omicron subvariants 6 months after vaccination. Hybrid immunity as well as Delta, BA.1, and BA.2 breakthrough infections induce long-term persistence of the antibody response, and over 70% of sera neutralize BA.1, BA.2, BA.4/BA.5, and BF.7. However, BQ.1.1 and XBB, followed by BA.2.75, are more resistant to neutralization, with neutralizing titer reductions of ∼9- to 41-fold, ∼16- to 63-fold, and ∼4- to 25-fold, respectively. These data highlight additional vaccination in CoronaVac- or ZF2001-vaccinated individuals and provide insight into the durability of neutralization against Omicron subvariants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka-Li Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing 10071, China; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China
| | - Xiao-Lin Jiang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Shandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250014, China
| | - Bing-Dong Zhan
- Department of Diseases Control and Prevention, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou 324000, China
| | - Xue-Jun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing 10071, China
| | - Xian Xia
- Department of Diseases Control and Prevention, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
| | - Guo-Ping Cao
- Department of Diseases Control and Prevention, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou 324000, China
| | - Wen-Kui Sun
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Shandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250014, China
| | - Peng-Xiang Huang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Shandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250014, China
| | - Jin-Zhong Zhang
- Department of Diseases Control and Prevention, Liaocheng Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Liaocheng 252000, China
| | - Yu-Ling Gao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
| | - Er-Hei Dai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
| | - Hui-Xia Gao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050021, China.
| | - Mai-Juan Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing 10071, China; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tauzin A, Nicolas A, Ding S, Benlarbi M, Medjahed H, Chatterjee D, Dionne K, Gong SY, Gendron-Lepage G, Bo Y, Perreault J, Goyette G, Gokool L, Arlotto P, Morrisseau C, Tremblay C, Martel-Laferrière V, De Serres G, Levade I, Kaufmann DE, Côté M, Bazin R, Finzi A. Spike recognition and neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants elicited after the third dose of mRNA vaccine. Cell Rep 2023; 42:111998. [PMID: 36656710 PMCID: PMC9826988 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.111998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Several severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants have recently emerged, becoming the dominant circulating strains in many countries. These variants contain a large number of mutations in their spike glycoprotein, raising concerns about vaccine efficacy. In this study, we evaluate the ability of plasma from a cohort of individuals that received three doses of mRNA vaccine to recognize and neutralize these Omicron subvariant spikes. We observed that BA.4/5 and BQ.1.1 spikes are markedly less recognized and neutralized compared with the D614G and other Omicron subvariant spikes tested. Also, individuals who have been infected before or after vaccination present better humoral responses than SARS-CoV-2-naive vaccinated individuals, thus indicating that hybrid immunity generates better humoral responses against these subvariants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Tauzin
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Alexandre Nicolas
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Shilei Ding
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Mehdi Benlarbi
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | | | | | - Katrina Dionne
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Shang Yu Gong
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | | | - Yuxia Bo
- Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, and Centre for Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
| | - Josée Perreault
- Héma-Québec, Affaires Médicales et Innovation, Quebec, QC G1V 5C3, Canada
| | | | - Laurie Gokool
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | | | | | - Cécile Tremblay
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Valérie Martel-Laferrière
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Gaston De Serres
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC H2P 1E2, Canada
| | - Inès Levade
- Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3R5, Canada
| | - Daniel E. Kaufmann
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Département de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marceline Côté
- Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, and Centre for Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
| | - Renée Bazin
- Héma-Québec, Affaires Médicales et Innovation, Quebec, QC G1V 5C3, Canada
| | - Andrés Finzi
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada,Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang Y, Long Y, Wang F, Li C, Liu W. Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 recombinants and emerging Omicron sublineages. Int J Med Sci 2023; 20:151-162. [PMID: 36619228 PMCID: PMC9812801 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.79116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron is currently the predominant circulating variant in the COVID-19 pandemic. The dominating Omicron sublineages respond to host immune pressure and develop advantageous mutations or genetic recombination, which result in variants that are more contagious or better at escaping immune responses in response to previous infection or vaccination. Meanwhile, multiple genetic recombination events have been reported in coinfection cases, the majority of which have resulted from the recombination between co-circulating Omicron BA.1 (or BA.1.1) and Delta variant or BA.2. Here, we review the knowledge and characterization of recombination for SARS-CoV-2 at the population level, provide an update on the occurrence of newly circulating Omicron sublineages, and discuss the effectiveness of novel vaccines/therapeutic drugs against the Omicron variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliang Wang
- Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yiyin Long
- Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Changlin Li
- Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Tianjin Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chalkias S, Feng J, Chen X, Zhou H, Marshall JC, Girard B, Tomassini JE, Kuter BJ, Montefiori DC, Das R. Neutralization of Omicron Subvariant BA.2.75 after Bivalent Vaccination. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:2194-2196. [PMID: 36416761 PMCID: PMC9730935 DOI: 10.1056/nejmc2212772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
Arunachalam PS, Lai L, Samaha H, Feng Y, Hu M, Hui HSY, Wali B, Ellis M, Huerta C, Bechnack K, Bechnack S, Lee M, Litvack M, Losada C, Grifoni A, Sette A, Zarnitsyna VI, Rouphael N, Suthar MS, Pulendran B. Durability of immune responses to the booster mRNA vaccination against COVID-19. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2022:2022.12.02.22282921. [PMID: 36482977 PMCID: PMC9727769 DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.02.22282921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Waning immunity to vaccination represents a major challenge in vaccinology. Whether booster vaccination improves the durability of immune responses is unknown. Here we show, using a cohort of 55 adult vaccinees who received the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, that a booster (i.e., 3 rd immunization) dose at 6 - 10 months increased the half-life of serum neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers to 76 days from 56 - 66 days estimated after the primary two-dose vaccination series. A second booster dose (i.e., 4 th immunization) more than a year after the primary vaccination increased the half-life further to 88 days. However, despite this modestly improved durability in nAb responses against the Wuhan strain, there was a loss in neutralization capacity against Omicron subvariants, especially the recently emerged variants, BA.2.75.2 and BQ.1.1 (35 and 50-fold drop in titers respectively, relative to the ancestral (WA.1) strain. While only 55 â€" 65% of participants demonstrated a detectable nAb titer against the newer variants after the booster (3 rd dose), the response declined to below the detection limit in almost all individuals by 6 months. Notably, even against BA.1 and BA.5, the titers declined rapidly in a third of the vaccinees and were below the detection limit at 6 months. In contrast, booster vaccination induced antigen-specific memory B and T cells that persisted for at least 6 months. Collectively, our data show that the durability of immune responses improves following subsequent booster immunizations; however, the emergence of immune evasive variants reduces the effectiveness of booster doses in preventing infection.
Collapse
|
20
|
Saito A, Tamura T, Zahradnik J, Deguchi S, Tabata K, Anraku Y, Kimura I, Ito J, Yamasoba D, Nasser H, Toyoda M, Nagata K, Uriu K, Kosugi Y, Fujita S, Shofa M, Monira Begum MST, Shimizu R, Oda Y, Suzuki R, Ito H, Nao N, Wang L, Tsuda M, Yoshimatsu K, Kuramochi J, Kita S, Sasaki-Tabata K, Fukuhara H, Maenaka K, Yamamoto Y, Nagamoto T, Asakura H, Nagashima M, Sadamasu K, Yoshimura K, Ueno T, Schreiber G, Takaori-Kondo A, Shirakawa K, Sawa H, Irie T, Hashiguchi T, Takayama K, Matsuno K, Tanaka S, Ikeda T, Fukuhara T, Sato K. Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.75 variant. Cell Host Microbe 2022; 30:1540-1555.e15. [PMID: 36272413 PMCID: PMC9578327 DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.75 variant emerged in May 2022. BA.2.75 is a BA.2 descendant but is phylogenetically distinct from BA.5, the currently predominant BA.2 descendant. Here, we show that BA.2.75 has a greater effective reproduction number and different immunogenicity profile than BA.5. We determined the sensitivity of BA.2.75 to vaccinee and convalescent sera as well as a panel of clinically available antiviral drugs and antibodies. Antiviral drugs largely retained potency, but antibody sensitivity varied depending on several key BA.2.75-specific substitutions. The BA.2.75 spike exhibited a profoundly higher affinity for its human receptor, ACE2. Additionally, the fusogenicity, growth efficiency in human alveolar epithelial cells, and intrinsic pathogenicity in hamsters of BA.2.75 were greater than those of BA.2. Our multilevel investigations suggest that BA.2.75 acquired virological properties independent of BA.5, and the potential risk of BA.2.75 to global health is greater than that of BA.5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akatsuki Saito
- Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan,Graduate School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan,Center for Animal Disease Control, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Tamura
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Jiri Zahradnik
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel,First Medical Faculty at Biocev, Charles University, Vestec, Prague, Czechia
| | - Sayaka Deguchi
- Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koshiro Tabata
- Division of Molecular Pathobiology, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yuki Anraku
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Science and Center for Research and Education on Drug Discovery, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Izumi Kimura
- Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jumpei Ito
- Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daichi Yamasoba
- Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,Faculty of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hesham Nasser
- Division of Molecular Virology and Genetics, Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan,Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Mako Toyoda
- Division of Infection and immunity, Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kayoko Nagata
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Keiya Uriu
- Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kosugi
- Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeru Fujita
- Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Maya Shofa
- Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan,Graduate School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - MST Monira Begum
- Division of Molecular Virology and Genetics, Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Ryo Shimizu
- Division of Molecular Virology and Genetics, Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Oda
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Rigel Suzuki
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hayato Ito
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Naganori Nao
- Division of International Research Promotion, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Institute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masumi Tsuda
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Institute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Jin Kuramochi
- Interpark Kuramochi Clinic, Utsunomiya, Japan,Department of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kita
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Science and Center for Research and Education on Drug Discovery, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kaori Sasaki-Tabata
- Department of Medicinal Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hideo Fukuhara
- Global Station for Biosurfaces and Drug Discovery, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Division of Pathogen Structure, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Katsumi Maenaka
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Science and Center for Research and Education on Drug Discovery, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Global Station for Biosurfaces and Drug Discovery, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Division of Pathogen Structure, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Mami Nagashima
- Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Sadamasu
- Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Takamasa Ueno
- Division of Infection and immunity, Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Gideon Schreiber
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Akifumi Takaori-Kondo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Kotaro Shirakawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Sawa
- Division of Molecular Pathobiology, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Division of International Research Promotion, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takashi Irie
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takao Hashiguchi
- Laboratory of Medical Virology, Institute for Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kazuo Takayama
- Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,AMED-CREST, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keita Matsuno
- One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,International Collaboration Unit, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Division of Risk Analysis and Management, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shinya Tanaka
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Institute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Corresponding author
| | - Terumasa Ikeda
- Division of Molecular Virology and Genetics, Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan,Corresponding author
| | - Takasuke Fukuhara
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan,Laboratory of Virus Control, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Japan,Corresponding author
| | - Kei Sato
- Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,International Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,International Vaccine Design Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan,Collaboration Unit for Infection, Joint Research Center for Human Retrovirus infection, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan,CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi, Japan,Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|