Treatment of older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma

Front-line and second-line treatment for mantle cell lymphoma in clinical practice: A multicenter retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

There are few reports of clinical practice treatment patterns and efficacy in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied a large, multicenter, cohort of patients with MCL diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 in eight institutions.

RESULTS

536 patients were registered (73% male, median of 70 years). Front-line treatment was based on high-dose cytarabine, bendamustine, and anthracyclines in 42%, 12%, and 15%, respectively. The median PFS for all patients was 45 months; 68, 34, and 30 months for those who received high-dose cytarabine-based, bendamustine-based and anthracycline-based therapy. 204 patients received second-line. Bendamustine-based treatment was the most common second-line regimen (36% of patients). The median second-line PFS (sPFS) for the entire cohort was 14 months; 19, 24, and 31 for bendamustine-, platinum-, and high-dose cytarabine-based regimens, with broad confidence intervals for these latter estimates. Patients treated with cytarabine-based therapies in the front-line and those with front-line PFS longer than 24 months had a substantially superior sPFS.

CONCLUSION

Front-line treatment in this cohort of MCL was as expected and with a median PFS of over 3.5 years. Second-line treatment strategies were heterogeneous and the median second-line PFS was little over 1 year.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Treatment Evolution of Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Navigating the Different Entities and Biological Heterogeneity of Mantle Cell Lymphoma in 2024

Progress in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has led to significant improvement in outcomes of patients even in the real world (RW) setting albeit to a lesser degree. In parallel to the demonstration of benefit using combination therapy with rituximab plus high-dose cytarabine (R-AraC) as well as dose intensive therapy-autologous stem cell transplantation (DIT-ASCT) consolidation and maintenance, it became clear over the last 2 decades that MCL is a highly heterogenous disease at the molecular level, explaining differences observed in clinical behavior and response to therapy. While clinical prognostic factors and models have helped stratify patients with distinct outcomes, they failed to help guide therapy. The identification of molecular high-risk (HR) features, in particular, but not only, p53 aberrations (including mutations and deletions [del]), as well as complex karyotype (CK), has allowed to identify subsets of patients with poorer outcomes (median overall survival [OS] <2 years) regardless of conventional therapies used. The constant pattern of relapse seen in MCL has fueled sustained and productive efforts, with 7 novel agents approved in the United States (US), showing high and durable efficacy even in HR and chemo-refractory patients and likely curing a subset of patients in the relapsed or refractory (R/R) setting. Progress in diagnostics, in particular next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is accessible in routine practice nowadays, can help recognize patients with HR features, well beyond MIPI or Ki-67 prognostication, although the impact on decision making is still unclear. The era of integrating novel agents into our prior standard of care (SOC) has begun with a confirmed benefit, for example, ibrutinib (Ib) in the TRIANGLE study, defining the first new potential SOC in younger patients in over 30 years. Expanding on novel agents, either in combination, sequentially or to replace chemotherapy altogether, using biological doublets or triplets has led to a median progression-free survival (PFS) in excess of 72 months, certainly competitive with prior SOC and will continue to reshape the management of MCL patients. Achieving minimal residual disease negative (MRD-ve) status is becoming a new endpoint in MCL, and customizing maintenance and/or de-escalation/consolidation strategies is within reach, although it will require prospective, built-in MRD-based approaches, with the goal of eliminating subclinical disease and not simply delaying time to relapse. Taking into account the biological diversity of MCL is now feasible in routine clinical practice and has already helped recognize what not to do for HR patients (i.e., avoid intensive induction chemotherapy and/or ASCT for p53 mutated patients) as well as identify promising novel options. Ongoing and future work will help expand on these dedicated approaches, to further improve the management and outcomes of all MCL patients.

Paraneoplastic glomerulonephritis and kidney infiltration by mantle cell lymphoma: A diagnostic challenge

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare and aggressive type of lymphoma that can affect the kidneys. The disease can lead to kidney impairment, and glomerulonephritis (GN) is a rare but serious complication of MCL. We report a case of MCL with kidney interstitial infiltration and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis. A 75-year-old man presented recurrent acute kidney failure and worsening of nephrotic syndrome. Kidney biopsy revealed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis presented immunoglobulin and complement deposition, focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis of not otherwise specified type, and infiltration by mantle cell lymphoma. Bone marrow biopsy and PET/CT scan confirmed the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma. The patient was treated with R-CHOP21 chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide dose adjustment for nephroprotection. He achieved complete remission with normalization of hematological parameters, improvement of kidney function, and reduction of proteinuria and albuminuria. This case shows the importance of considering alternative diagnoses in patients with recurrent chronic kidney disease and worsening nephrotic syndrome. Early diagnosis and treatment of mantle cell lymphoma can lead to favorable outcomes.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Survival, and Economic Burden Among Elderly MCL Patients Previously Treated With cBTKis

BACKGROUND

While covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKis) have become a standard of care treatment for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL), response duration is limited and resistance to BTKi and/or adverse events develop in a subset of patients. However, little real-world evidence on post-cBTKi clinical and economic outcomes exists for these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study used 2010 to 2019 U.S. Medicare claims, to identify elderly (≥ 66 years) patients with newly-diagnosed MCL who received third-line (3L) treatment and had evidence of cBTKi use in a prior line of therapy. Outcomes were assessed ≥ 12-months post 3L-treatment initiation and included treatment patterns, all-cause and MCL-related HRU and costs, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The final sample contained 230 elderly patients with R/R MCL receiving 3L treatment who had cBTKi use in a prior line of therapy (mean age 75.0, 21.7% age > 80 years; 67.4% male; 93.9% White). Common 3L treatments included chemotherapy (26.1%), lenalidomide (18.7%), and bortezomib (18.3%); 1-quarter (25.7%) of patients received a cBTKi (17.8% ibrutinib; 7.8% acalabrutinib). Overall survival was poor from 3L treatment initiation (median OS = 9.4 months; 1-years survival rate = 43.7%). Patients exhibited high rates of HRU (73.6% experienced hospitalization) and substantial costs ($145,726) in the 12-months after 3L initiation.

CONCLUSION

A large unmet need exists in this patient subpopulation, highlighting the importance of ongoing development of novel therapeutics.

Predictive Value of Minimal Residual Disease for Efficacy of Rituximab Maintenance in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results From the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Elderly Trial

PURPOSE

The outcome of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved by the introduction of immunochemotherapy, followed by rituximab (R)-maintenance. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) represents a promising tool for individualized treatment decisions and was a prospectively planned part of the European MCL Elderly trial. We investigated how MRD status influenced the efficacy of R-maintenance and how MRD can enable tailored consolidation strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients with MCL age 60 years or older have been randomly assigned to R versus interferon-alpha maintenance after response to rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (R-FC) versus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP). MRD monitoring was performed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) following EuroMRD guidelines.

RESULTS

A qPCR assay with a median sensitivity of 1 × 10-5 could be generated in 80% of 288 patients in an international, multicenter, multilaboratory setting. More extensive tumor dissemination facilitated the identification of a molecular marker. The efficacy of R-maintenance in clinical remission was confirmed for MRD-negative patients at the end of induction in terms of progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.63]) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.68]), particularly in R-CHOP-treated patients (PFS-HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.52]; OS-HR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.52]). R-maintenance appeared less effective in MRD-positive patients (PFS-HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26 to 1.02]) overall and after R-CHOP induction (PFS-HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.28 to 1.26]). R-FC achieved more frequent and faster MRD clearance compared with R-CHOP. MRD positivity in clinical remission after induction was associated with a short median time to clinical progression of approximately 1-1.7 years.

CONCLUSION

The results confirm the strong efficacy of R-maintenance in patients who are MRD-negative after induction. Treatment de-escalation for MRD-negative patients is discouraged by our results. More effective consolidation strategies should be explored in MRD-positive patients to improve their long-term prognosis.

Phase I study of bendamustine, rituximab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax in relapsed, refractory mantle cell lymphoma

This dose-finding study evaluated safety of venetoclax plus Bendamustine-Rituximab-Ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory MCL. Six 28-day cycles were administered in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Dose level 1 (DL1) included Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on day 1-2, Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, and Ibrutinib 560 mg daily. Venetoclax was dosed with ramp-up and at 400 mg starting in Cycle 2 for 5 days. The most common adverse events were thrombocytopenia (80%), constipation (60%), and fatigue (60%). Rare hematologic grade 3-4 AEs, 1 dose-limiting toxicity at DL1 (prolonged grade 3 thrombocytopenia), and delayed hematologic toxicity were observed. DL-1 with Bendamustine dose-reduced to 70 mg/m2 (n = 3) revealed no significant toxicity. The overall and complete response rates were both 80% (8/10). This study underscored that venetoclax combined with chemoimmunotherapy is complicated by hematologic toxicity, limiting future development. Although a maximum tolerated dose was not formally established given early study closure, this study demonstrated preliminary tolerability and efficacy of Bendamustine-Rituximab-Ibrutinib-Venetoclax at DL-1.

Recent advances in genomics and therapeutics in mantle cell lymphoma

Over the past decades, significant strides have been made in understanding the pathobiology, prognosis, and treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The heterogeneity observed in MCL's biology, genomics, and clinical manifestations, including indolent and aggressive forms, is intricately linked to factors such as the mutational status of the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, epigenetic profiling, and Sox11 expression. Several intriguing subtypes of MCL, such as Cyclin D1-negative MCL, in situ mantle cell neoplasm, CCND1/IGH FISH-negative MCL, and the impact of karyotypic complexity on prognosis, have been explored. Notably, recent immunochemotherapy regimens have yielded long-lasting remissions in select patients. The therapeutic landscape for MCL is continuously evolving, with a shift towards nonchemotherapeutic agents like ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax. The introduction of BTK inhibitors has brought about a transformative change in MCL treatment. Nevertheless, the challenge of resistance to BTK inhibitors persists, prompting ongoing efforts to discover strategies for overcoming this resistance. These strategies encompass non-covalent BTK inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, BCL2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy, either as standalone treatments or in combination regimens. Furthermore, developing novel drugs holds promise for further improving the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. In this comprehensive review, we methodically encapsulate MCL's clinical and pathological attributes and the factors influencing prognosis. We also undertake an in-depth examination of stratified treatment alternatives. We investigate conceivable resistance mechanisms in MCL from a genetic standpoint and offer precise insights into various therapeutic approaches for relapsed or refractory MCL.

Assessing unmet need among elderly Medicare Beneficiaries with Mantle cell lymphoma: an analysis of treatment patterns, survival, healthcare resource utilization, and costs

Studies evaluating real-world outcomes and health care utilization for mantle cell lymphoma are limited. We utilized national Medicare claims (2009-2019) to examine treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, costs, and survival in 3664 elderly patients receiving 1 L treatment for MCL. Over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 40.3% received at least 2 L treatment. The most common 1 L regimen was bendamustine-rituximab (50.1%), with increased use of BTKi-based regimens observed in 2 L (39.4%). Half (51.8%) of patients had an all-cause hospitalization within 12 months of initiating 1 L; hospitalization rates were higher in later lines. Healthcare costs were substantial and most costs (>80%) were MCL-related. Overall survival was poorer among later lines of treatment (median OS from initiation of 1 L: 53.5 months; 2 L: 22.0 months; 3 L: 11.8 months; 4 L: 7.8 months). These results suggest a large unmet need and future work should evaluate whether novel therapies have improved outcomes among elderly patients with MCL.

Up-Front ASCT Overcomes the Survival Benefit Provided by HDAC-Based Induction Regimens in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Data from a Real-Life and Long-Term Cohort

BACKGROUND

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare malignancy with heterogeneous behavior. Despite the therapeutic advances recently achieved, MCL remains incurable. Currently, the standard of care for young and fit patients involves induction immunochemotherapy followed by up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, the role of more intensive induction regimens, such as those based on high doses of cytarabine (HDAC), remains controversial in the management of ASCT-eligible patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, and single-center study involved 165 MCL patients treated at the largest oncology center in Latin America from 2010 to 2022. We aimed to assess outcomes, determine survival predictors, and compare responses between different primary therapeutic strategies, with a focus on assessing the impact of HDAC-based regimens on outcomes in ASCT-eligible patients.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (38-89 years), and 73.9% were male. More than 90% of the cases had a classic nodal form (cnMCL), 76.4% had BM infiltration, and 56.4% presented splenomegaly. Bulky ≥ 7 cm, B-symptoms, ECOG ≥ 2, and advanced-stage III/IV were observed in 32.7%, 64.8%, 32.1%, and 95.8%, respectively. Sixty-four percent of patients were categorized as having high-risk MIPI. With a median follow-up of 71.1 months, the estimated 2-year OS and EFS were 64.1% and 31.8%, respectively. Patients treated with (R)-HDAC-based regimens had a higher ORR (85.9% vs. 65.7%, p = 0.007) compared to those receiving (R)-CHOP, as well as lower POD-24 rates (61.9% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.043) and lower mortality (43.9% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.004). However, intensified induction regimens with (R)-HDAC were not associated with a real OS benefit in MCL patients undergoing up-front consolidation with ASCT (2-year OS: 88.7% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.289). Up-front ASCT was independently associated with increased OS (p < 0.001), EFS (p = 0.005), and lower POD-24 rates (p < 0.001) in MCL. Additionally, CNS infiltration, TLS, hypoalbuminemia, and the absence of remission after induction were predictors of poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest Latin American cohort of MCL patients, we confirmed the OS benefit promoted by up-front consolidation with ASCT in young and fit patients, regardless of the intensity of the immunochemotherapy regimen used in the pre-ASCT induction. Although HDAC-based regimens were not associated with an unequivocal increase in OS for ASCT-eligible patients, it was associated with higher ORR and lower rates of early relapses for the whole cohort.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Tailoring Upfront Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

In this article, we will review current strategies for the front-line management of mantle cell lymphoma, an uncommon and biologically and clinically heterogeneous subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that remains incurable with current therapies. Patients invariably relapse with time, and as a result, treatment strategies involve persistent therapy over the course of months to years, including induction, consolidation, and maintenance. Topics discussed include the historical development of various chemoimmunotherapy backbones with continued modifications to maintain and improve efficacy while limiting off-target, off-tumor effects. Chemotherapy-free induction regimens were developed initially for elderly or less fit patients though are now being utilized for younger, transplant-eligible patients due to deeper, more prolonged remission durations with fewer toxicities. The historic paradigm of recommending autologous hematopoietic cell transplant for fit patients in complete or partial remission is now being challenged based in part on ongoing clinical trials in which minimal residual disease directed approaches influence the consolidation strategy for any particular individual. The addition of novel agents, namely first and second generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as immunomodulatory drugs, BH3 mimetics, and type II glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been tested in various combinations with or without immunochemotherapy. We will attempt to help the reader by systematically explaining and simplifying the various approaches for treating this complicated group of disorders.

Clinical outcome of Mantle Cell Lymphoma patients with high-risk disease (high-risk MIPI-c or high p53 expression)

Currently, treatment allocation of patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) is mainly based on age and medical fitness. The combined MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI-c) allows to predict prognosis using clinical factors (MIPI) and the Ki-67 index. However, high p53 expression as surrogate for TP53 alterations has demonstrated to be an independent predictor for poor outcome. We aimed to define a clear high-risk group based on the combination of MIPI, Ki-67 and p53 expression/TP53 alteration. A total of 684 patients from the prospective European MCL-Younger and MCL-Elderly trials were evaluable. The classification of high-risk disease (HRD) as high-risk MIPI-c or p53 expression >50% versus low-risk disease (LRD) as low, low-intermediate or high-intermediate MIPI-c and p53 expression ≤50% allowed to characterize two distinct groups with highly divergent outcome. Patients with HRD had significantly shorter median failure-free survival (FFS) (1.1 vs. 5.6 years, p < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (2.2 vs. 13.2 years, p < 0.0001) compared to those with LRD. These major differences were confirmed in two validation cohorts from the Italian MCL0208 and the Nordic-MCL4 trials. The results suggest that this subset of HRD patients is not sufficiently managed with the current standard treatment and is asking for novel treatment strategies.

Treatment of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the era of novel agents

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a highly heterogeneous presentation that ranges from an indolent disease to an extremely aggressive one. Several clinical and biological prognostic markers can assist in determining the aggressiveness of the disease. Such as MIPI, Ki-67, and TP53, NOTCH1, and CDKN2A mutations. While aggressive chemoimmunotherapy regimens combining rituximab and cytarabine, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation yield the most promising results, this treatment is too toxic for older patients. Several lower-intensity regimens have shown efficacy in older patients with reduced toxicity profiles. However, older relapsed/refractory patients have an extremely poor outcome. In the last several years, there is a major trend toward chemotherapy-free regimens, targeted therapies such as BTK, BCL-2 and PI3K inhibitors, and immunotherapies such as lenalidomide and CAR-T, which can provide a promising strategy for older patients. Herein we review the current therapies for older MCL patients, chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies.

Time to progression of disease and outcomes with second-line BTK inhibitors in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Time to progression of disease (POD) after first-line (1L) therapy is prognostic in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), although studies have included a broad range of 1L, second-line (2L), and subsequent lines of therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors predicting outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL exclusively initiating 2L Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) after 1L rituximab-containing therapy. Patients were accrued from 8 international centers (7 main, 1 validation cohort). Multivariable models evaluating the association between time to POD and clinical/pathologic factors were constructed and converted into nomograms and prognostic indexes predicting outcomes in this population. A total of 360 patients were included, including 160 in the main cohort and 200 in the validation cohort. Time to POD, Ki67 ≥ 30%, and MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) were associated with progression-free survival (PFS2) and overall survival (OS2) from the start of 2L BTKis. C-indexes were consistently ≥0.68 in both cohorts. Web/application-based calculators based on nomograms and prognostic indexes to estimate PFS2 and OS2 were constructed. The 2L BTKi MIPI identifies 3 groups with distinct 2-year PFS2, including high risk (14%), intermediate risk (50%), and low risk (64%). Time to POD, Ki67, and MIPI are associated with survival outcomes in patients with R/R MCL receiving 2L BTKis. Simple clinical models incorporating these variables may assist in planning for alternative therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, or novel agents with alternative mechanisms of action.

Adding venetoclax to lenalidomide and rituximab is safe and effective in patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, incurable hematological malignancy with a heterogeneous presentation and clinical course. A wide variety of chemotherapy-based regimens are currently used in patients who are untreated. Over the last several years, several targeted or small-molecule therapies have shown efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting and have since been explored in the frontline setting. Lenalidomide plus rituximab was explored in a phase 2 study of 38 patients with MCL who were untreated and ineligible to receive transplantation, in which the combination produced durable remissions. We looked to build upon this regimen by adding venetoclax to the combination. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm study to evaluate this combination. We enrolled 28 unselected patients with untreated disease irrespective of age, fitness, or risk factors. Lenalidomide was dosed at 20 mg daily from days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. The dose of venetoclax was determined using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. Rituximab was dosed at 375 mg/m2 weekly, starting on cycle 1, day 1 until cycle 2, day 1. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. All patients were treated with venetoclax at the maximum tolerated dose of 400 mg daily. The most common adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The overall and complete response rates were 96% and 86%, respectively. In total, 86% of patients achieved minimal residual disease undetectability via next-generation sequencing. The median overall and progression-free survivals were not reached. The combination of lenalidomide, rituximab, and venetoclax is a safe and effective regimen in patients with untreated MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03523975.

Long-term follow-up of rituximab plus bendamustine and cytarabine in older patients with newly diagnosed MCL

The combination of rituximab, bendamustine, and low-dose cytarabine (R-BAC) has been studied in a phase 2 prospective multicenter study from Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (RBAC500). In 57 previously untreated elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), R-BAC was associated with a complete remission rate of 91% and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68-89). Here, we report the long-term survival outcomes, late toxicities, and results of minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation. After a median follow-up of 86 months (range, 57-107 months), the median overall survival (OS) and PFS were not reached. The 7-year PFS and OS rates were 55% (95% CI, 41-67), and 63% (95% CI, 49-74), respectively. Patients who responded (n = 53) had a 7-year PFS of 59% (95% CI, 44-71), with no relapse or progression registered after the sixth year. In the multivariate analysis, blastoid/pleomorphic morphology was the strongest adverse predictive factor for PFS (P = .04). Patients with an end of treatment negative MRD had better, but not significant, outcomes for both PFS and OS than patients with MRD-positive (P = 0.148 and P = 0.162, respectively). There was no signal of late toxicity or an increase in secondary malignancies during the prolonged follow-up. In conclusion, R-BAC, which was not followed by maintenance therapy, showed sustained efficacy over time in older patients with MCL. Survival outcomes compare favorably with those of other immunochemotherapy regimens (with or without maintenance), including combinations of BTK inhibitors upfront. This study was registered with EudraCT as 2011-005739-23 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01662050.

Health resource utilization and costs of care for adult patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States: a retrospective claims analysis

OBJECTIVES

We assessed real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among US patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL) by line of therapy (LoT).

METHODS

We selected patients from MarketScan® (1/1/2016-12/31/2020): ≥1 claims of MCL-indicated first line (1L) therapies, ≥1 diagnoses of MCL pre-index date (1L initiation date), ≥6-month continuous enrollment pre-index date, second line (2L) therapy initiation, ≥18 years old at 2L, and no clinical trial enrollment. Outcomes included time to next treatment (TTNT), all-cause HRU, and costs.

RESULTS

The cohort (N = 142) was 77.5% male, aged 62 years (median). Sixty-six percent and 23% advanced to 3L and 4L+, respectively. Mean (median) TTNT was 9.7 (5.9), 9.3 (5.0), and 6.3 (4.2) months for 2L, 3L, and 4L+, respectively. Mean (median) per patient per month (PPPM) costs were $29,999 ($21,313), $29,352 ($20,033), and $30,633 ($23,662) for 2L, 3L, and 4L+, respectively. Among those who received Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mean (median) PPPM costs were $24,702 ($17,203), $31,801 ($20,363), and $36,710 ($25,899) for 2L, 3L, and 4L+, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

During the period ending in 2020, patients relapsed frequently, incurring high HRU and costs across LoTs. More effective treatments with long-lasting remissions in R/R MCL may reduce healthcare burden.

Efficacy of front-line immunochemotherapy for transplant-ineligible mantle cell lymphoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is no standard first-line immunochemotherapy regimen for transplant-ineligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) currently, and the efficacy of various treatment remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of all eligible randomized controlled trials. Pairwise comparisons and ranking of different first-line treatment options were performed.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the NMA, involving a total of 2897 MCL patients. The BR-Ibrutinib+R regimen showed the best progression-free survival (PFS), with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 0.89 and probability of being the best treatment (PbBT) of 69%. The VR-CAP regimen was the most potential intervention to improve overall survival (OS), with a SUCRA of 0.89 and PbBT of 63%. Compared with the R-CHOP regimen, the BR regimen achieved a better PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 [95% credible interval 0.2-0.96]). The BR-Ibrutinib+R regimen (HR 0.14 [0.02-0.99]), BR+R regimen (HR 0.19 [0.034-0.99]), and BR regimen (HR 0.3 [0.08-1.03]) were superior to CHOP regimen with better PFS. The R-FC regimen (HR 2.27 [1.01-5.21]) or FC regimen (HR 3.17 [1.15-8.71]) was inferior to the VR-CAP regimen with a worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presents the most promising first-line treatment strategy for transplant-ineligible MCL patients in terms of PFS and OS, which provides innovative treatment strategy for MCL treatment.

Mantle cell lymphoma-Update on molecular biology, prognostication and treatment approaches

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is clinically characterized by its heterogenous behavior with courses ranging from indolent cases that do not require therapy for years to highly aggressive MCL with very limited prognosis. The development and implementation of new targeted and immunotherapeutic approaches have already improved therapeutic options especially for refractory or relapsed disease. Nevertheless, to further optimize MCL treatment, early identification of individual risk profile and risk-adapted, patient-tailored choice of therapeutic strategy needs to be prospectively incorporated in clinical patient management. This review summarizes the current knowledge and standard of care regarding biology and clinical management of MCL, highlighting the implementation of new therapeutic approaches especially targeting the immune system.

Epigenetic targets in B- and T-cell lymphomas: latest developments

Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) comprise a diverse group of diseases, either of mature B-cell or of T-cell derivation, characterized by heterogeneous molecular features and clinical manifestations. While most of the patients are responsive to standard chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation and/or stem cell transplantation, relapsed and/or refractory cases still have a dismal outcome. Deep sequencing analysis have pointed out that epigenetic dysregulations, including mutations in epigenetic enzymes, such as chromatin modifiers and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), are prevalent in both B- cell and T-cell lymphomas. Accordingly, over the past decade, a large number of epigenetic-modifying agents have been developed and introduced into the clinical management of these entities, and a few specific inhibitors have already been approved for clinical use. Here we summarize the main epigenetic alterations described in B- and T-NHL, that further supported the clinical development of a selected set of epidrugs in determined diseases, including inhibitors of DNMTs, histone deacetylases (HDACs), and extra-terminal domain proteins (bromodomain and extra-terminal motif; BETs). Finally, we highlight the most promising future directions of research in this area, explaining how bioinformatics approaches can help to identify new epigenetic targets in B- and T-cell lymphoid neoplasms.

Maintenance regimen of GM-CSF with rituximab and lenalidomide improves survival in high-risk B-cell lymphoma by modulating natural killer cells

BACKGROUND

The treatment of high-risk B-cell lymphoma (BCL) remains a challenge, especially in the elderly.

METHODS

A total of 83 patients (median age 65 years), who have achieved a complete response after induction therapy, were divided into two groups: R²  + GM-CSF regimen (lenalidomide, rituximab, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]) as maintenance therapy (n = 39) and observation (n = 44). The efficacy of the R²  + GM-CSF regimen as maintenance in patient with high-risk BCL was analyzed and compared with observation.

RESULTS

The number of natural killer cells in patients increased after R²  + GM-CSF regimen administration (0.131 × 10⁹ /L vs. 0.061 × 10⁹ /L, p = 0.0244). Patients receiving the R²  + GM-CSF regimen as maintenance therapy had longer remission (duration of response: 18.9 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.001), and longer progression-free survival (not reached (NR) vs. 31.7 months, p = 0.037), and overall survival (OS) (NR vs. NR, p = 0.015). The R²  + GM-CSF regimen was safe and well tolerated. High international prognostic index score (p = 0.012), and high tumor burden (p = 0.005) appeared to be independent prognostic factors for worse PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The maintenance therapy of R²  + GM-CSF regimen may improve survival in high-risk BCL patients, which might be modulated by amplification of natural killer cells. The efficacy of the R²  + GM-CSF maintenance regimen has to be further validated in prospective random clinical trials.

Report of consensus panel 7 from the 11th international workshop on Waldenström macroglobulinemia on priorities for novel clinical trials

Recent advances in the understanding of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) biology have impacted the development of effective novel agents and improved our knowledge of how the genomic background of WM may influence selection of therapy. Consensus Panel 7 (CP7) of the 11th International Workshop on WM was convened to examine the current generation of completed and ongoing clinical trials involving novel agents, consider updated data on WM genomics, and make recommendations on the design and prioritization of future clinical trials. CP7 considers limited duration and novel-novel agent combinations to be the priority for the next generation of clinical trials. Evaluation of MYD88, CXCR4 and TP53 at baseline in the context of clinical trials is crucial. The common chemoimmunotherapy backbones, bendamustine-rituximab (BR) and dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide (DRC), may be considered standard-of-care for the frontline comparative studies. Key unanswered questions include the definition of frailty in WM; the importance of attaining a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), within stipulated time frame, in determining survival outcomes; and the optimal treatment of WM populations with special needs.

Personalized approaches for treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) can have diverse disease presentations, which vary in aggressiveness and prognosis, and can occur in patients with varying ability to tolerate therapy. Additionally, the options for treatment of MCL have expanded rapidly in the last decade, translating to improved outcome for patients.

AREAS COVERED

We review the initial evaluation of patients with MCL, identifying disease- and patient-specific prognostic factors, along with personalized therapies for patients with MCL. Specific scenarios include indolent and limited-stage MCL, advanced-stage disease in transplant-eligible and ineligible patients, and high-risk TP53 mutant disease. Ongoing trials and future directions in MCL treatment are also highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the wide array of disease and patient presentations with MCL, a personalized therapeutic approach is needed to optimize outcomes. The best therapeutic strategy should incorporate disease prognostic factors, patient status and comorbidities, goals of care, and response to treatment.

Treatment Outcomes and Roles of Transplantation and Maintenance Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results From Large Real-World Cohorts

PURPOSE

Commonly used first-line (1L) treatments for mantle cell lymphoma include high-dose cytarabine-based induction followed by autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) for younger patients and several chemoimmunotherapy regimens for older patients. Continuous debates exist on the role of ASCT in younger patients and maintenance rituximab (MR) after bendamustine plus rituximab (BR).

METHODS

Retrospective data from 4,216 patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the Flatiron Health electronic record-derived deidentified database diagnosed between 2011 and 2021, mostly in US community oncology settings, were evaluated for treatment patterns and outcomes. The efficacy findings with ASCT and MR were validated in an independent cohort of 1,168 patients from 12 academic centers.

RESULTS

Among 3,614 patients with documented 1L treatment, BR was the most used. Among 1,265 patients age < 65 years, 30.5% received cytarabine-based induction and 23.5% received ASCT. There was no significant association between ASCT and real-world time to next treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.03; P = .10) or overall survival (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; P = .4) among ASCT-eligible patients. Among MR-eligible patients, MR after BR versus BR alone was associated with a longer real-world time to next treatment (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.38; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.92; P < .001). The efficacy findings were consistent in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of patients treated primarily in the US community setting, only one in four young patients received cytarabine or ASCT consolidation, suggesting the need to develop treatments that can be delivered effectively in routine clinical practice. Together with the validation cohort, data support future clinical trials exploring regimens without ASCT consolidation in young patients, whereas MR should be considered for patients after 1L BR and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone.

Frontline Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: When Clinical Trial and Real-World Data Collide

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.A large number of frontline treatment options exist for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), making selection of therapy a challenge for the clinician. In this Oncology Grand Rounds article, the case of a 73-year-old woman with MCL who attained remission with bendamustine and rituximab is presented. The relevant literature regarding frontline therapy is then reviewed, with particular focus on selection of induction regimen and the potential roles for autologous transplantation and/or rituximab maintenance. This literature primarily consists of prospective phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials; however, added to this literature now is a growing body of large retrospective real-world cohorts, such as the new analysis by Martin et al,³⁵ the manuscript that accompanies this Oncology Grand Rounds article. In some cases, the real-world evidence is at odds with data from prospective clinical trials, such as regarding the role of rituximab maintenance after bendamustine plus rituximab induction. These important new real-world data are put into context of an ever-changing treatment landscape, in hopes of aiding clinicians in frontline treatment selection for patients with MCL.

Ibrutinib in mantle cell lymphoma: a real-world retrospective multi-center analysis of 77 patients treated in the Czech Republic

Ibrutinib revolutionized therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Real-world data on the outcome of unselected patients are still limited. We analyzed 77 R/R MCL patients receiving ibrutinib with at least one prior systemic anti-lymphoma therapy. After a median follow-up of 14.0 months, 56 patients relapsed/progressed, and 45 died. The overall response rate was 66%, with 31% of complete metabolic remissions on PET/CT. The median progression-free and overall survival (OS) rates were 10.3 and 23.1 months, respectively. The median OS from ibrutinib failure was 3.7 months. High proliferation rate by Ki67 (≥ 30%) and two or more previous therapy lines both negatively correlated with outcome (HR = 2.2, p = 0.04, and HR = 2.06, p = 0.08, respectively). Female gender borderline correlated with better outcome (HR = 0.53, p = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, Ki67 and response to ibrutinib both correlated with OS (p < 0.05). Importantly, ibrutinib appeared to better control nodal and extranodal lymphoma than bone marrow (BM) involvement. From 20 patients with detectable BM infiltration (before ibrutinib initiation) achieving complete (n = 13) or partial (n = 7) metabolic remission, none achieved remission in BM. We confirmed good efficacy of ibrutinib in unselected heavily pre-treated MCL patients. Our findings support the use of a combination of ibrutinib and rituximab in patients with BM involvement.

Ibrutinib improves survival compared with chemotherapy in mantle cell lymphoma with central nervous system relapse

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare phenomenon with dismal prognosis, where no standard therapy exists. Since the covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib is effective in relapsed/refractory MCL and penetrates the blood-brain barrier (BBB), on behalf of Fondazione Italiana Linfomi and European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network we performed a multicenter retrospective international study to investigate the outcomes of patients treated with ibrutinib or chemoimmunotherapy. In this observational study, we recruited patients with MCL with CNS involvement at relapse who received CNS-directed therapy between 2000 and 2019. The primary objective was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients treated with ibrutinib or BBB crossing chemotherapy. A propensity score based on a multivariable binary regression model was applied to balance treatment cohorts. Eighty-eight patients were included. The median age at study entry was 65 years (range, 39-87), 76% were males, and the median time from lymphoma diagnosis to CNS relapse was 16 months (range, 1-122). Patients were treated with ibrutinib (n = 29, ibrutinib cohort), BBB crossing chemotherapy (ie, high-dose methotrexate ± cytarabine; n = 29, BBB cohort), or miscellaneous treatments (n = 30, other therapy cohort). Both median OS (16.8 vs 4.4 months; P = .007) and median progression-free survival (PFS) (13.1 vs 3.0 months; P = .009) were superior in the ibrutinib cohort compared with the BBB cohort. Multivariable Cox regression model revealed that ibrutinib therapeutic choice was the strongest independent favorable predictive factor for both OS (hazard ratio [HR], 6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-21.3; P < .001) and PFS (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.7-12.5; P = .002), followed by CNS progression of disease (POD) >24 months from first MCL diagnosis (HR for death, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3; P = .026; HR for death or progression, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.6; P = .023). The addition of intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy to systemic CNS-directed therapy was not associated with superior OS (P = .502) as the morphological variant (classical vs others, P = .118). Ibrutinib was associated with superior survival compared with BBB-penetrating chemotherapy in patients with CNS relapse of MCL and should be considered as a therapeutic option.

Combined epigenetic and immunotherapy for blastic and classical mantle cell lymphoma

Classical MCL (cMCL) constitutes 6-8% of all B cell NHL. Despite recent advances, MCL is incurable except with allogeneic stem cell transplant. Blastic mantle cell lymphoma (bMCL) is a rarer subtype of cMCL associated with an aggressive clinical course and poor treatment response, frequent relapse and poor outcomes. We treated 13 bMCL patients with combined epigenetic and immunotherapy treatment consisting of vorinostat, cladribine and rituximab (SCR). We report an increased OS greater than 40 months with several patients maintaining durable remissions without relapse for longer than 5 years. This is remarkably better then current treatment regimens which in bMCL range from 14.5-24 months with conventional chemotherapy regimens. We demonstrate that the G/A870 CCND1 polymorphism is predictive of blastic disease, nuclear localization of cyclinD1 and response to SCR therapy. The major resistance mechanisms to SCR therapy are loss of CD20 expression and evasion of treatment by sanctuary in the CNS. These data indicate that administration of epigenetic agents improves efficacy of anti-CD20 immunotherapies. This approach is promising in the treatment of MCL and potentially other previously treatment refractory cancers.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Mantle Cell Lymphoma; Insights into Its Potential Role in the Era of New Immunotherapeutic and Targeted Therapies: The GETH/GELTAMO Experience

Allo-SCT is a curative option for selected patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL, but with significant NRM. We present the long-term results of patients receiving allo-SCT in Spain from March 1995 to February 2020. The primary endpoints were EFS, OS, and cumulative incidence (CI) of NRM, relapse, and GVHD. We included 135 patients, most (85%) receiving RIC. After a median follow-up of 68 months, 5-year EFS and OS were 47 and 50%, respectively. Overall and CR rates were 86 and 80%. The CI of relapse at 1 and 3 years were 7 and 12%. NRM at day 100 and 1 year were 17 and 32%. Previous ASCT and Grade 3–4 aGVHD were associated with a higher NRM. Grade 3–4 aGVHD, donor type (mismatch non-related), and the time-period 2006–2020 were independently related to worse EFS. Patients from 1995–2005 were younger, most from HLA-identical sibling donors, and were pretreated less. Our data confirmed that allo-SCT may be a curative option in R/R MCL with low a CI of relapse, although NRM is still high, being mainly secondary to aGVHD. The arrival of new, highly effective and low toxic immunotherapeutic or targeted therapies inevitably will relegate allo-SCT to those fit patients who fail these therapies, far away from the optimal timing of treatment.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is considered incurable with the available chemoimmunotherapy approaches, and therefore newer, effective targeted therapies such as Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors are increasingly used in MCL as chronic suppressive therapy, especially in the elderly. We aimed to describe the treatment patterns in MCL at different lines of therapy with a focus on BTK inhibitor use and compare outcomes with known prognostic factors using a nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database. We analyzed patient-level data from the period of 2011 to 2021. In this study of 4336 patients with MCL, we found that bendamustine plus rituximab chemotherapy was the most commonly used frontline regimen (42%). Maintenance rituximab or consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was administered to 31% of all patients. Also, for patients who received ASCT as consolidation therapy, only 34% subsequently received rituximab maintenance. BTK inhibitors were the most preferred agents in second or later lines of therapy (n=933, 57%), followed by bortezomib, lenalidomide, and venetoclax, respectively. Among patients treated with BTK inhibitors, the median real-world overall survival (rwOS) was 35 months (95%CI 27-50), 24 months (95%CI 22 - 30), and 18 months (95% CI 14 - 21), for first line, second line and for third or later line of therapy, respectively. Patients with deletion 17p/TP53 mutation and blastoid variant MCL had poor outcomes; however, BTK inhibitors appeared to mitigate the negative influence of del17p/TP53 mutated MCL with an HR of 1.17 (95%CI 0.88 - 1.55) on multivariable analysis.

Outcome of COVID-19 in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma—Report From the European MCL Registry

Data on outcome of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and COVID-19 infection are limited. The European MCL (EMCL) registry is a centralized registry of the EMCL network, collecting real-world information about treatments and disease courses. During the COVID-19 pandemic, additional data on MCL patients with COVID-19 infection were collected, aiming to identify risk factors for mortality from COVID-19. In our retrospective, multicenter, international study, we collected data from 63 MCL patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 44–84) in 9 countries with evidence of a COVID-19 infection between February 2020 and October 2021. The overall mortality rate was high (44.4%), especially in hospitalized patients (61%) and in patients with need for intensive care unit care (94%). Patients receiving rituximab had significantly poorer survival than patients not receiving rituximab (P = 0.04). Our data highlight the importance of prevention strategies and underline the need for effective vaccination in this vulnerable cohort.

Current and emerging monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies in treatment of lymphoma

The improvement in outcomes seen with the introduction of rituximab, a CD20 monoclonal antibody in combination with chemotherapy or as a single agent in the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas has paved the way for development of various forms of monoclonal antibodies that act in different ways against non-Hodgkin lymphoma tumor cells. These could directly target a single surface antigen resulting in various ways of tumor cells toxicity and killing. Other forms of monoclonal antibodies include antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies. The role of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of lymphoma will be reviewed, highlighting their mode of action, clinical efficacy, and side effects.

Prescription of Blood Lymphocyte Immunophenotyping in the Diagnosis of Lymphoid Neoplasms in Older Adults

Lymphoid neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of lymphoid neoplastic diseases with multiple presentations, and varying prognoses. They are especially frequent in older patients (OPs) and the atypism of this frail elderly population can make the diagnostic process even more difficult. Blood lymphocyte immunophenotyping (BLI) is essential in rapid noninvasive diagnosis orientation and guides complementary investigations. To our knowledge, BLI prescription has never been evaluated in OPs. We hypothesized that, when there is a suspicion of lymphoid neoplasm in the geriatric population, a BLI is performed in view of various clinical or biological abnormalities. This study aimed to: (1) describe the characteristics of hospitalized OPs having undergone BLI for suspected lymphoid neoplasm, (2) identify the causes leading to BLI prescription, and (3) identify the most profitable criteria for BLI prescription. This was a descriptive retrospective study on 151 OPs aged ≥75 years who underwent BLI over a 2-year period. Regarding BLI prescriptions, eight had lymphocytosis, constituting the “lymphocytosis group” (LG+), while the 143 others had BLI prescribed for reasons other than lymphocytosis (LG−), mainly general weakness and anemia. In the LG−, we compared OPs with positive and negative BLI results. The criteria found to be profitable for BLI prescription were lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, lymphocytosis, and thrombocytopenia. BLI identified circulating lymphoid neoplasms (positive BLI) in 21/151 OPs, mainly marginal zone lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In polymorbid OPs, as per our study population, the diagnostic and therapeutic complexity explained in part the sole use of indirect and minimally invasive diagnostic techniques such as BLI.

Evolving frontline immunochemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma and the impact on survival outcomes

Because there have been a dvances in frontline treatment for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) over the last 2 decades, we sought to characterize the changes in frontline treatment patterns and their association with outcomes. Patients with newly diagnosed MCL from September 2002 through June 2015 were enrolled in a prospective cohort study, and clinical characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients diagnosed from 2002 to 2009 (Era 1) compared with 2010 to 2015 (Era 2). Patient age, sex, and simplified MCL International Prognostic Index (sMIPI) score were similar between the 2 groups. In patients age 65 years or younger, there was less use of rituximab plus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (R-Hyper-CVAD) (16.1% vs 8.8%) but more use of rituximab plus maximum-strength cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-maxi-CHOP) alternating with rituximab plus high-dose cytarabine (R-HiDAC), also known as the Nordic regimen, and R-CHOP alternating with rituximab plus dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP) (1.1% vs 26.4%) and less use of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens (64.5% vs 35.2%) but more use of R-bendamustine (0% vs 12.1%) in Era 2 (P < .001). These changes were associated with improved event-free survival (EFS; 5-year EFS, 34.3% vs 50.0%; P = .010) and overall survival (OS; 5-year OS, 68.8% vs 81.6%; P = .017) in Era 2. In patients older than age 65 years, there was less use of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like therapy (39.0% vs 14.3%) and nonstandard systemic therapy (36.6% vs 13.0%) but more use of R-bendamustine (0% vs 49.4%). These changes were associated with a trend for improved EFS (5-year EFS, 25.4% vs 37.5%; P = .051) in Era 2. The shift from R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens to R-bendamustine was associated with improved EFS (5-year EFS, 25.0% vs 44.6%; P = .008) in Era 2. Results from this prospective cohort study provide critical real-world evidence for improved outcomes with evolving frontline patterns of care in patients with MCL.

Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Therapeutic Outcome in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Early changes in ctDNA dynamics are prognostic in untreated MCL.

Bortezomib maintenance after bortezomib-based induction therapy does not improve outcome in untreated MCL.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is biologically and clinically heterogeneous and would benefit from prognostic biomarkers to guide management. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a novel prognostic biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that may have applicability in MCL. We analyzed ctDNA dynamics in previously untreated patients with MCL who received induction therapy with bortezomib and DA-EPOCH-R for 6 cycles followed by random assignment to observation or bortezomib maintenance in responding patients in a prospective phase 2 study. Most patients also underwent initial treatment window of bortezomib alone prior to induction. Serum was collected pretreatment, after the window, after cycles 1 and 2, at the end of induction, and at each follow-up visit along with restaging computed tomography scans. Next-generation sequencing was used to identify and quantify ctDNA encoding the immunoglobulin receptor sequences in serum as markers of minimal residual disease. Fifty-three patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 12.7 years. Patients without detectable ctDNA after 2 cycles of induction had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those with detectable ctDNA (median PFS, 2.7 vs 1.8 years; overall P = .005; median OS, 13.8 vs 7.4 years; overall P = .03). Notably, in vivo assessment of ctDNA dynamics during the bortezomib window was not prognostic, and there was no difference in PFS or OS with bortezomib maintenance. ctDNA monitoring after induction showed that molecular relapse preceded clinical relapse in some cases. In conclusion, interim ctDNA negativity strongly correlates with improved survival and supports the investigation of response-adapted strategies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00114738.

Therapeutic options for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in which immunochemotherapy, with or without high-dose therapy, and autologous stem cell transplantation remain standard frontline therapies. Despite their clear efficacy, patients inevitably relapse and require subsequent therapy. In this review, we discuss the key therapeutic approaches in the management of relapsed MCL, covering in depth the data supporting the use of covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors at first or subsequent relapse. We describe the outcomes of patients progressing through BTK inhibitors and discuss the mechanisms of covalent BTKi resistance and treatment options after covalent treatment with BTKi. Options in this setting may depend on treatment availability, patient's and physician's preference, and the patient's age and comorbidity status. We discuss the rapid recent development of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, as well as the utility of allogenic stem cell transplantation and novel therapies, such as noncovalent, reversible BTK inhibitors; ROR1 antibody drug conjugates; and bispecific antibodies.

Rituximab and Bendamustine (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Bendamustine, and Cytarabine (R-BAC) in Previously Untreated Elderly Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Both BR, and R-BAC are suitable induction therapies in elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, the two regimens have not been compared before. We retrospectively analysed the outcome and the safety features of elderly patients with newly diagnosed MCL, treated with BR or R-BAC between 2008 and 2019 at eight institutions. We used propensity scores to reduce selection bias, thus analysing 156 patients (53 BR, 103 R-BAC). Patients treated with R-BAC achieved higher CR rate than BR (91% vs. 60%, p < 0.0001). The 2-year PFS was 87 ± 3% and 64 ± 7% for R-BAC and BR, respectively (p = 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 121 months for R-BAC and 78 months for BR (p = 0.08). R-BAC was associated with significantly more pronounced grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia than BR (50% vs. 17%). This study indicates that R-BAC is associated with significantly prolonged 2-year PFS than BR in elderly patients with MCL.

Abstract

Background: Rituximab plus bendamustine (BR), and rituximab, bendamustine, and cytarabine (R-BAC) are well-known induction therapies in elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), according to clinical guidelines. However, a direct comparison between the two regimens has never been performed. Methods: In this multicentre retrospective study, we compared the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed MCL, treated with BR or R-BAC. Primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Inclusion bias was assessed using a propensity score stratified by gender, age, MCL morphology, and MIPI score. Results: After adjusting by propensity score, we identified 156 patients (53 BR, 103 R-BAC) with median age of 72 (53–90). Median follow-up was 46 months (range 12–133). R-BAC was administered in a 2-day schedule or with attenuated dose in 51% of patients. Patients treated with R-BAC achieved CR in 91% of cases, as compared with 60% for BR (p < 0.0001). The 2-year PFS was 87 ± 3% and 64 ± 7% for R-BAC and BR, respectively (p = 0.001). In terms of toxicity, R-BAC was associated with significantly more pronounced grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia than BR (50% vs. 17%). Conclusions: This study indicates that R-BAC, even when administered with judiciously attenuated doses, is associated with significantly prolonged 2-year PFS than BR in elderly patients with previously untreated MCL.

Mantle cell lymphoma: A clinical review of the changing treatment paradigms with the advent of novel therapies, and an insight into Indian data

Background

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare type of mature B‐cell lymphoid malignancy with the pathologic hallmark of translocation t(11;14) (q13, q32), which leads to an overexpression of Cyclin D1 (CCND1). The disease is also characterized by the presence of a high number of recurrent genetic alterations, which include aberrations in several cellular pathways. MCL is a heterogeneous disease with a wide range of clinical presentations and a majority presenting with aggressive disease in advanced stages.

Recent findings

Management of MCL is bereft with challenges due to its resistant and relapsing pattern. Despite improvements in remission durations, the disease is currently incurable with standard therapy and has a median survival of about 3–5 years. The use of small molecules like the bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and BCL2 inhibitors, for treating relapsed MCL has been established leading to a diminishing role for conventional chemotherapy. Combinations of small molecule inhibitors with or without chemoimmunotherapy, are showing promising results. Cellular therapy in the form of CAR‐T cell therapy, has been approved recently.

Conclusions

Personalized cancer treatment and chemo‐free regimens are showing promise and results from well‐planned long‐term studies are evolving. In India, there is a paucity of epidemiological, clinical, and research data in this field.

Treatment Outcomes and Survival Patterns of Asian Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Background

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is widely considered an incurable malignancy even with current therapies and relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease to primary treatment remains common. With improved treatment guidelines and the advent of novel agents, patients are increasingly being treated with more lines of regimens. However, outcomes after each line of treatment remain poorly characterized, especially in the Asian population. In this paper, we described the survival outcomes in a group of R/R MCL patients.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 35 patients with R/R MCL between 1998 and 2020 at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Patients were followed longitudinally throughout their disease course. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The median OS and PFS from diagnosis were 105 and 40 months, respectively. After first relapse, the median OS and PFS were 52 and 19 months, post-second relapse 32 and 8 months, and post-third relapse 12 and 6 months, respectively. Patients older than 65 years at first relapse had shorter survival (median OS: 22 vs. 55 months, P = 0.0417; median PFS: 9 vs. 29 months, P = 0.001). Early treatment failure after first line therapy was also associated with worse survival outcomes (median OS: 13 vs. 55 months, P < 0.001; median PFS: 9 vs. 26 months, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

With each relapse, survival outcomes for patients with MCL are worse. Novel treatment and contemporary outcomes of R/R MCL are encouraging and support the need for continued research in this area.

Non-chemotherapy Options for Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Mantle cell lymphoma is a rare and incurable non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a heterogenous clinical presentation. Typically, treatment consists of frontline chemoimmunotherapy induction with or without autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as consolidation. However, this approach has the propensity to increase short- and long-term toxicities, such as secondary malignancies, without being curative. Genomic profiling of MCL will allow for greater impact of new targeted therapies in the future and may become a helpful tool to guide treatment. Based on the data discussed, use of non-chemotherapy options may become the preferred approach for frontline therapy as opposed to conventional chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

Advances in Classification and Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Mantle Cell

Mantle cell lymphoma is a rare, aggressive, and largely incurable form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There are a number of well-characterized prognostic features but nothing that can help guide therapy. Treatment with chemotherapy is generally effective in the short term, but relapse is inevitable and subsequent treatment is challenging. The use of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, however, has transformed practice. These agents are highly active in relapsed disease and are very well-tolerated drugs. Chemotherapy-free combinations using Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors look very exciting and will likely evolve to be part of frontline care in the future.

Exploiting gene mutations and biomarkers to guide treatment recommendations in mantle cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

While there has been an improvement in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in both median progression-free survival (PFS; >7-8 years) and overall survival (OS; >10-12 years), patients with high-risk features such as high risk MIPI (mantle cell international prognostic index), high Ki-67 (≥30%), or blastoid variants still carry poor outcome with a median OS of 3 years. Furthermore, patients with high-risk molecular features, such as TP53 mutations, show dismal outcome, with a median OS of 1.8 years, regardless of therapy used. Further studies have led to the development of six novel drugs approved for the treatment of relapse/refractory (R/R) MCL, leading to improved survival even in refractory or high-risk patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers clinical biological and molecular features that impact MCL outcome with current standards. Beyond the recognition of separate subentities, we review how high-risk molecular features have paved the way towards a new paradigm away from chemoimmunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Progress in novel therapies and in routine diagnostics, particularly next-generation sequencing (NGS), support the development of new treatment strategies, not based on the dose intensity/age dichotomy, which may prevent the need for chemotherapy and improve outcome across MCL including in high-risk subsets.

Ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax in relapsed and untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma: a phase 1/2 trial

Ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax demonstrate synergy in preclinical models of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). OAsIs (NCT02558816), a single-arm multicenter prospective phase 1/2 trial, aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of venetoclax in combination with fixed doses of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab, in relapsed MCL patients. At the venetoclax MTD, extension cohorts were opened for relapsed and untreated patients. Safety and efficacy were secondary objectives. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by allele-specific oligonucleotide quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Between 14 October 2015 and 29 May 2018, 48 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was reported, and venetoclax at 400 mg per day was chosen for extension. Eighteen (75%) relapsed and 8 (53%) untreated patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. The complete response rate assessed by positron emission tomography at the end of cycle 6 was 67% in relapsed and 86.6% in untreated patients. MRD clearance for evaluable patients was seen in 71.5% of relapsed (10/14 patients) and 100% of untreated MRD-evaluable patients (n = 12) at the end of 3 cycles. The median follow-up for relapsed patients was 17 months (range, 10-35 months). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 69.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.9%-91.4%) and 68.6% (95% CI, 49.5%-95.1%) for overall survival. The median follow-up was 14 months (range, 5-19) for untreated patients, the 1-year PFS was 93.3% (95% CI, 81.5%-100%). The combination of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax is well tolerated and provides high response rates, including at the molecular level, in relapsed and untreated MCL patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02558816.