Phase 3 study of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in hemophilia B

Changes in Hemophilia Treatment in the Eastern Part of Germany between 2015 and 2021-Data from the Kompetenznetz Hämorrhagische Diathese Ost (KHDO)

INTRODUCTION

 Treatment options for patients with hemophilia (PWH) have changed substantially in the last years. This study aimed to compare hemophilia treatment in the eastern part of Germany in 2021 with data from 2015.

METHODS

 Substitution diaries and patient records of PWH from 2021 were collected in 13 hemophilia centers from the "Kompetenznetz Hämorrhagische Diathese Ost" (KHDO) and compared with 2015.

RESULTS

 A total of 130 children and 357 adults, 411 hemophilia A (HA) and 76 hemophilia B (HB), were included in 2021, and 359 were already analyzed in 2015. In 2021, 97.8% of children and 95.7% of adults with severe hemophilia had prophylaxis compared with 98.8 and 80.2% in 2015. Plasma-derived concentrates were used in 25.6%, recombinant in 30.2%, extended half-life (EHL) factor concentrates in 24.4%, and emicizumab in 19.8% of the children with severe HA (sHA). In adults with sHA, plasma-derived, recombinant concentrates, EHL, and emicizumab were used in 21.0, 33.2, 31.2, and 14.2%, respectively. All children and 93.3% of the adults with severe HB (sHB) were on EHL. Median annual factor consumption per body weight increased in adults with sHA, remained stable in children with sHA and adults with sHB, and decreased in children with sHB between 2015 and 2021. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) decreased in children with sHB and sHA.

CONCLUSION

 The use of EHL and emicizumab has changed hemophilia treatment. About 50% of the sHA patients switched to EHL or emicizumab and almost all sHB patients to EHL. More adults with sHA received prophylaxis and ABR decreased in children.

Real-world usage and effectiveness of recombinant factor IX Fc in haemophilia B from the B-SURE study in France

Background

More real-world data are needed to complement existing phase III studies on the efficacy and safety of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) in people with haemophilia B.

Objectives

We report final data from the B-SURE study, evaluating the real-world usage and effectiveness of rFIXFc in France.

Methods

Previously treated patients (all ages/severities) received on-demand or prophylactic rFIXFc during B-SURE. Annualised bleeding rate (ABR), injection frequency (IF) and factor consumption (FC) were prospectively evaluated for patients on rFIXFc prophylaxis (primary endpoints). Six months of retrospective factor IX (FIX) data were collected for comparison; patients with ⩾3 months of treatment pre- and post-switch to rFIXFc were analysed.

Design

B-SURE was a 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, real-world study across haemophilia treatment centres in France.

Results

Ninety-one male patients enrolled across 21 centres (34% <18 years, 89% severe haemophilia B). Eighty-four patients received prophylaxis at rFIXFc initiation; mean prospective observation period was 21.5 months. Sixty-eight of 84 patients had prior FIX prophylaxis; on rFIXFc prophylaxis, these patients achieved low median ABR (1.2), IF (47.45 injections/year) and mean FC (2844 IU/kg/year). Compared with previous FIX, mean ABR was reduced by 40% (n = 63); mean IF and FC were reduced by 38.20 injections/year and 1008 IU/kg/year (n = 57). In patients with prior FIX on-demand (n = 15), mean ABR reduced by 84% on rFIXFc prophylaxis (n = 14), mean IF reduced by 2.13 injections/year and mean FC increased by 381.8 IU/kg/year (n = 15). Most physicians and patients were satisfied/highly satisfied with rFIXFc prophylaxis. rFIXFc was well tolerated with no new safety concerns.

Conclusion

Findings support the safety and effectiveness of rFIXFc, with reduced IF and FC while maintaining/improving bleed protection. Trial registration: NCT03655340.

Recombinant factor VIIa: new insights into the mechanism of action through product innovation

Management of bleeding in persons with hemophilia and inhibitors involves treatment with bypassing agents, including recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Two rFVIIa products are commercially approved for use in the United States and the European Union. Eptacog alfa and eptacog beta share the same amino acid sequence but differ in posttranslational modifications. Although rFVIIa has been used to manage bleeding in persons with hemophilia and inhibitors for over 30 years, its mechanisms of action is still being studied. In vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that rFVIIa could promote hemostasis by (1) increasing tissue factor-dependent activation of factor (F)X (FX); (2) directly activating FX on the surface of activated platelets; and (3) downregulating protein C anticoagulant activity through binding to the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR). Studies of rFVIIa and rFVIIa variants in murine models demonstrate that platelet-dependent activity is sufficient for hemostatic efficacy. Dosing levels required in clinical practice are most consistent with a platelet-dependent mechanism of action. However, in vivo models also suggest that pathways involving EPCR binding contribute to rFVIIa hemostatic activity. Eptacog beta displays increased platelet- and EPCR-dependent endothelial cell binding compared to eptacog alfa. Thus, the relative contribution of these mechanisms to the overall hemostatic efficacy of eptacog alfa and eptacog beta may differ. Further research is required to assess the clinical relevance of these differences. A better understanding of the mechanisms by which rFVIIa promotes hemostasis in patients will provide insights when evaluating clinical outcomes of safety and efficacy for innovative bypassing therapies.

Bleed treatment with eptacog beta (rFVIIa) results in a low incidence of rebleeding in adult and adolescent patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Eptacog beta is a novel human recombinant FVIIa approved for use in the United States, European Union, United Kingdom and Mexico for the treatment and control of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors (≥12 years). It is also indicated for perioperative care in the same patient population in Europe and the United Kingdom.

AIM

To assess the incidence of rebleeding and review treatment outcomes in subjects with haemophilia with inhibitors enrolled in the phase 3 PERSEPT 1 clinical trial.

METHODS

To treat mild/moderate bleeding episodes (BEs), subjects administered an initial 75  or 225µg/kg dose of eptacog beta, followed (if necessary) by additional 75µg/kg doses at predefined intervals until bleed control. This analysis used subject-reported rebleeding to determine a rebleeding incidence for the first 24 h. Rebleeding through later timepoints was an exploratory, intention-to-treat analysis of bleed treatment data.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-five BEs were analysed. Through 24 h, the proportion of rebleeds was 0% (initial 75µg/kg dose) and 0.5% (initial 225µg/kg dose). Through 48 h, the proportion of rebleeds was 3.2% (75µg/kg initial dose) and 5.6% (225µg/kg initial dose); the difference between initial dose strategies was not statistically significant. The majority of rebleeds were controlled with a single dose of eptacog beta and no subject who treated a rebleed required hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Subjects with haemophilia with inhibitors who used eptacog beta to treat mild/moderate BEs experienced a low incidence of rebleeding. Rebleeds that did occur were effectively controlled with eptacog beta (median, one dose) without the need for hospitalization.

JTH in Clinic: deconstructing the ISTH hemophilia guidelines for the clinician

Recently, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Hemophilia Guidelines were published in this journal. The authors of these guidelines should be commended for a herculean task that took years to complete, and while this is no doubt a welcome addition to the literature, it does leave many questions for the clinician. This is primarily because 11 of the 13 recommendations are conditional, essentially meaning "that clinicians and patients need to consider individual preferences as well as the specific circumstances in which the decision is being made for implementation of the recommendation." So, in essence, most of the recommendations allow the clinician to decide whether to use them or not. In our view, most clinicians are seeking more concrete recommendations when they search for a guidelines paper. Unfortunately, numerous conditional recommendations have been developed because hemophilia is a rare disease and the ISTH Guidelines rely upon the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. We endeavored to "deconstruct" the ISTH recommendations and offer clinicians a more concrete path forward based in part on the guidelines but supplemented with more recent literature and our own extensive experience and perspective managing hemophilia patients of all ages from 4 continents.

Gene therapy for people with hemophilia B: a proposed care delivery model in Italy

BACKGROUND

Gene therapy is designed to provide people with hemophilia B with a steady and elevated factor (F)IX activity, thereby strengthening protection and relieving the burden of frequent replacement therapy infusions. The European Medicines Agency has approved gene therapy for the severe and moderately severe forms of hemophilia B that uses the FIX-Padua variant (etranacogene dezaparvovec).

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to provide a document dedicated to hemophilia B gene therapy and give a comprehensive overview of the topic.

METHODS

An Italian group of experts in hemophilia carried out a narrative review of the literature and discussed during a virtual meeting several key aspects of the delivery of this treatment in Italy. The discussion covered the organizational model, the role of the multidisciplinary team, the laboratory surveillance, and the patient's journey, from the follow-up to the identification of safety issues and outcome measures.

RESULTS

This article highlights the need to follow the Hub and Spoke organizational model and sheds light on the role of each professional figure within the multidisciplinary teams to favor patient engagement, management, and retention. Moreover, this article stresses the need to perform laboratory tests for patient screening and follow-up and proposes a checklist to help patient identification. Finally, the needs of Italian hemophilia centers have been considered to ensure an efficient implementation of the care delivery model.

CONCLUSION

It is crucial to ensure that centers are appropriately organized, equipped, and trained to adequately select patients, deliver the gene therapy, and perform follow-up.

Prophylaxis with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein reduces the risk of bleeding and delays time to first spontaneous bleed event in previously untreated patients with haemophilia B: A post hoc analysis of the PUPs B-LONG study

OBJECTIVES

Haemophilia B (HB), characterised by deficient factor IX (FIX), leads to spontaneous bleeds. Severe cases require prophylactic FIX replacement. This post hoc analysis assessed the first spontaneous bleeds among previously untreated patients (PUPs) with HB treated with recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) (NCT02234310) to identify factors influencing bleeds.

METHODS

Subjects included paediatric PUPs with HB (≤2 IU/dL endogenous FIX). Analyses described treatment patterns (on demand [OD] vs. prophylaxis) and prophylaxis type (started on vs. switched to prophylaxis). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed the time to first spontaneous bleed, including median time to event and fitting models with predictors for treatment regimen and/or baseline age.

RESULTS

PUPs B-LONG enrolled 33 subjects. Baseline age did not influence the time to first spontaneous bleed for any rFIXFc regimen. Those who started on prophylaxis with rFIXFc (n = 11), compared with those treated OD (n = 22), had an extended time to first spontaneous bleed. Starting prophylaxis afforded a 93% reduced risk of first spontaneous bleed versus starting OD (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.071 [0.009-0.592]) (p = .015).

CONCLUSION

rFIXFc prophylaxis, particularly starting early, reduced the risk of bleeding and delayed time to first spontaneous bleed compared with rFIXFc OD. Hence, initial treatment regimens impact bleed patterns in paediatric PUPs.

Pharmacokinetic model-based assessment of factor IX prophylaxis treatment regimens in severe hemophilia B

An important aspect of improving care for people with hemophilia B (HB) is developing optimal treatment strategies. Here we aimed to provide in-silico evidence, comparing the estimated optimal posology of factor IX (FIX) products to support the patient-physician decision-making process. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-based assessment comparing the performance of FIX products (rFIX, rIX-FP, rFIXFc, N9-GP) was developed. PopPK analyses were used to determine a product's optimal posology to target predefined steady-state FIX activity trough levels in a hypothetical population of 10,000 people with severe HB. Model-derived optimal posologies were compared across several parameters including trough levels, proportion of patients per regimen and consumption, considering 64 hypothetical patient scenarios of different FIX trough level targets and ages. Results indicated a marked difference between FIX products estimated to achieve target trough levels, consumption and dosing frequencies. rIX-FP was associated with higher trough levels than rFIX and rFIXFc, at a lower weekly dose and administration frequency, across all age groups. N9-GP use in adolescents and adults was associated with lower consumption compared with rIX-FP. Insights from this study may be utilized by clinicians to inform decision-making, by considering the model-generated estimated optimal posologies alongside multiple clinical factors and patient preferences.

International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis clinical practice guideline for treatment of congenital hemophilia A and B based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia is a rare congenital bleeding disorder that results from complete or partial deficiency of blood coagulation factor (F)VIII (hemophilia A) or FIX (hemophilia B) due to pathogenic variants in their coding genes. Hemophilia requires complex management. To date, there is no evidence-based clinical practice guideline on hemophilia treatment based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

OBJECTIVES

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis aims to provide an overview of evidence and support patients, caregivers, hematologists, pediatricians, other clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders in treatment decisions about congenital hemophilia A and B.

METHODS

The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel of physicians and patients with global representation, balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The panel prioritized a set of clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. A methodological team supported the guideline development process, including searching for evidence and performing systematic reviews. The GRADE approach was used, including GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. The recommendations were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel selected 13 questions, of which 11 addressed the treatment of hemophilia A and 2 the treatment of hemophilia B. Specifically, the panel addressed questions on prophylactic and episodic treatment with FVIII concentrates, bypassing agents, and nonfactor therapy (emicizumab) for hemophilia A (with and without inhibitors) as well as immune tolerance induction for hemophilia A. For hemophilia B, the panel addressed questions on prophylactic and episodic treatment of bleeding events with FIX concentrates. Agreement was reached for all 13 recommendations, of which 7 (54%) were based on evidence from randomized clinical trials, 3 (23%) on observational studies, and 3 (23%) on indirect comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Strong recommendations were issued for prophylactic over episodic treatment for severe and moderately severe hemophilia A and B. Only conditional recommendations were issued for the remaining questions. Future research should focus on direct treatment comparisons and the treatment of hemophilia B with and without inhibitors. Future updates of this guideline will provide an updated evidence synthesis on the current questions and focus on new FVIII and FIX concentrates, novel nonfactor therapies, and gene therapy for severe and nonsevere hemophilia A and B.

Factor IX stimulants in preclinical and early phase trials for hemophilia B treatment

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia B is a X-linked rare inherited bleeding disorder characterized by coagulation factor IX (FIX) deficiency. Therapy for hemophilia B is aimed at replacing the FIX deficiency by means of several plasma-derived or recombinant FIX products. The recent availability of recombinant FIX concentrates with a prolonged FIX half-life represented a great technological advance, permitting more spaced drug infusions and reducing treatment burden among hemophilia B patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the main preclinical and phase 1/2 studies investigating the innovative hemostatic products for hemophilia B replacement therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The significant recent technological advantages in the treatment of hemophilia B has led to the development of innovative FIX products aimed at further extending FIX half-life and using increasingly effective and convenient modes of administration. These novel hemostatic agents, currently in the preclinical or early clinical phase of development, carry the potential of improving patients' health status and quality of life. Continuous research is anyway needed to offer such patients a concrete chance of conducting a normal existence, like to non-affected age-matched individuals.

Joint health and pain in the changing hemophilia treatment landscape

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder. Bleeding, and in particular joint hemorrhage results in chronic arthropathy and disability. Acute and chronic pain are frequent and limit activity and participation and result in decreased health-related quality of life. Remarkable progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of hemophilia but bleeding continues to prove recalcitrant to currently available treatments and joint disease remains problematic. Physiotherapy and pain management are mainstays of current multidisciplinary integrated care of people with hemophilia (PWH). The focus of this review is on preservation of joint health in the era of new and innovative therapies.

AREAS COVERED

A search of the PubMed Central was conducted on 1 February 2024 using the MeSH Major Topic terms identified as keywords for the manuscript. This review will highlight what is known and unknown about joint bleeding and arthropathy, including insights on pain as a related complication.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advances in therapeutic interventions aimed at promoting healthy joints in PWH will be discussed, including both the pharmacological treatment landscape and related strategies to promote joint health.

Real-world usage and effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII/factor IX Fc in hemophilia A/B: final data from the 24-month, prospective, noninterventional PREVENT study in Germany

Background

Real-world experience with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor [F]VIII Fc fusion protein [rFVIIIFc]) and eftrenonacog alfa (a recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein [rFIXFc]) is needed to bridge evidence gaps.

Objectives

To describe rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc usage and effectiveness over a 24-month prospective period.

Methods

PREVENT (NCT03055611), a noninterventional study across 25 German hemophilia treatment centers, enrolled previously treated persons with hemophilia A and B (all ages/severities) on individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis before/at enrollment. Primary endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), injection frequency (IF), and factor consumption (FC). Additionally, up to 12 months of retrospective FVIII/FIX data were collected. Physician and patient satisfaction, and safety outcomes were also assessed.

Results

Overall, 150 patients received ≥1 rFVIIIFc dose and 47 patients received ≥1 rFIXFc dose, with median prospective follow-up of 20.6 and 21.0 months, respectively. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc demonstrated low median ABR (0.5/1.7), annualized IF (121.8/52.2 injections/y), and FC (4611.7/2423.9 IU/kg) in line with product labels. Compared with previous FVIII/FIX, there was a 56.0% reduction in ABR for rFVIIIFc (rate ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64), with no change for rFIXFc (rate ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31); rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc reduced annualized IF (rFVIIIFc, mean difference, -31.7; 95% CI, -40.3 to -23.1; rFIXFc, mean difference, -37.3; 95% CI, -46.9 to -27.8), while FC remained stable (rFVIIIFc, +374.1; 95% CI, +46.8 to +701.3; rFIXFc, +503.9; 95% CI, +95.4 to +912.4). Most physicians and patients were satisfied or highly satisfied with rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc were well tolerated, with no inhibitor development or treatment-related serious adverse events.

Conclusion

Real-world PREVENT data complement phase 3 trials and show that individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis provided stable bleed protection with low IF and maintained FC. Compared with previous FVIII, ABR was considerably reduced with rFVIIIFc, with stable annualized FC. For rFIXFc, bleed protection was maintained vs previous FIX while reducing annualized IF.

Cost-Effectiveness of Recombinant Factor IX Fc Prophylaxis and Recombinant Factor IX On-Demand Treatment in Patients with Haemophilia B Without Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant factor IX (rFIX) and recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) are standard half-life and extended half-life FIX replacement therapies, respectively, and represent established treatment options indicated for adults and children with haemophilia B. These FIX replacement therapies can be administered as prophylaxis (to prevent bleeding) or 'on-demand' (to stop bleeding). This analysis aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of once-weekly prophylaxis with rFIXFc versus on-demand treatment with rFIX in patients with haemophilia B without inhibitors in the Italian healthcare setting.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to assess a hypothetical cohort of adolescent or adult male patients (≥ 12 years) with haemophilia B (FIX level of ≤ 2 IU/dL) without inhibitors. Model inputs were derived from the pivotal phase 3 clinical studies for rFIXFc and rFIX, published literature and assumptions when published data were unavailable. The model employed a lifelong time horizon with 6-monthly transitions between health states, and it estimated total costs, total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), number of bleeds, number of surgeries and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with lower total costs per patient (€5,308,625 versus €6,564,510) and greater total QALYs per patient (15.936 versus 11.943) compared with rFIX on-demand; rFIXFc prophylaxis was therefore the dominant treatment strategy. The model also demonstrated that rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with fewer incremental bleeds (- 682.29) and surgeries (- 0.39) compared with rFIX on-demand.

CONCLUSIONS

rFIXFc prophylaxis provides improved health outcomes and lower costs, and represents a cost-effective treatment option compared with rFIX on-demand for adolescent and adult male patients with haemophilia B. This comparative assessment of cost-effectiveness should help to inform both clinicians and healthcare policy makers when making treatment decisions for patients with haemophilia B.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for the treatment of hemophilia B

Current hemophilia B treatment guidelines recommend routine prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) replacement products, tailored to maintain plasma activity at levels that will prevent bleeds. However, plasma FIX activity may not be the primary determinant or best indicator of hemostatic efficacy due to its extravascular distribution. FIX replacement therapy has evolved to include extended half-life (EHL) products that provide effective bleed protection when administered at intervals of 7 days or longer. rFIXFc is a recombinant fusion protein with an extended circulation time. rFIXFc has a biodistribution profile consistent with distribution into extravascular space, where it may support hemostasis at sites of vessel injury independent of circulating plasma activity levels. The safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis is well established in adults, adolescents and children including previously untreated patients with hemophilia B, with substantial evidence from clinical trials and real-world clinical practice. This review describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of rFIXFc, summarizes available safety and efficacy data, and evaluates the use of rFIXFc in special populations. Current hemophilia B treatment challenges, including target FIX plasma levels, perioperative use, and management of patients with comorbidities, are discussed together with the potential role of EHL products in the future treatment landscape of hemophilia B.

Pattern of use and clinical outcomes with rIX-FP in pediatric/adolescent patients with haemophilia B in Italy: Results from IDEAL real-world study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate pattern of use and clinical outcomes in pediatric/adolescent patients enrolled in the IDEAL study.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis of IDEAL retrospective-prospective observational study focused on patients <18 years, 100% on prophylaxis during the entire observation period.

RESULTS

Thirteen subjects (median age 10.0 years; 61.5% ≤ 11 years) were analyzed. The infusion frequency changed from 2/week in 84.6% (N = 11) of patients with previous rFIX, to less than 1/weekly in 76.9% (N = 9) with rIX-FP and the annualized number of infusions reduced of 57% (p = .002), from a mean ± SD of 95.1 ± 22.77 to 40.4 ± 6.79, respectively. Annualized mean consumption decreased of about 56% (p = .001), from 3748.4 ± 1155.40 IU/kg with previous rFIX, to 1656.8 ± 456.63 IU/kg of rIX-FP. Mean FIX trough level changed from 3.0% ± 1.98% to 10.92% ± 3.6%. Low mean Annualized Bleeding Rate was maintained across all prophylaxis regimens (0.8 ± 1.69 vs. 0.3 ± 0.89) and zero bleeding patients moved from 69.2% (N = 9) with previous rFIX to 84.6% (N = 11) with rIX-FP (p = .63). Two adverse events, none related to rIX-FP, occurred in two patients. No inhibitors development was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The results in this pediatric/adolescent subgroup support rIX-FP prophylaxis may reduce infusion frequency, while providing high FIX trough levels, stable annualized bleeding rate and a good safety profile.

Adeno-associated virus as a delivery vector for gene therapy of human diseases

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) has emerged as a pivotal delivery tool in clinical gene therapy owing to its minimal pathogenicity and ability to establish long-term gene expression in different tissues. Recombinant AAV (rAAV) has been engineered for enhanced specificity and developed as a tool for treating various diseases. However, as rAAV is being more widely used as a therapy, the increased demand has created challenges for the existing manufacturing methods. Seven rAAV-based gene therapy products have received regulatory approval, but there continue to be concerns about safely using high-dose viral therapies in humans, including immune responses and adverse effects such as genotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, thrombotic microangiopathy, and neurotoxicity. In this review, we explore AAV biology with an emphasis on current vector engineering strategies and manufacturing technologies. We discuss how rAAVs are being employed in ongoing clinical trials for ocular, neurological, metabolic, hematological, neuromuscular, and cardiovascular diseases as well as cancers. We outline immune responses triggered by rAAV, address associated side effects, and discuss strategies to mitigate these reactions. We hope that discussing recent advancements and current challenges in the field will be a helpful guide for researchers and clinicians navigating the ever-evolving landscape of rAAV-based gene therapy.

Six-Year, Real-World Use of Prophylaxis with Recombinant Factor IX-Albumin Fusion Protein (rIX-FP) in Persons with Hemophilia B: A Single-Center Retrospective-Prospective Study

Background: Extended half-life (EHL) factor IX (FIX) concentrates allow for prophylaxis with prolonged dosing intervals and high bleeding protection in persons with hemophilia B. Long-term real-world studies are lacking. Methods: In a retrospective-prospective study, the six-year use of prophylaxis with the EHL recombinant FIX-albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) was analyzed, comparing outcomes with previous standard half-life (SHL) FIX in patients already on prophylaxis. Results: Prophylaxis with rIX-FP was prescribed in 15 patients (10 severe, 5 moderate; follow-up: 57 ± 17 months). Based on a pharmacokinetic assessment and clinical needs, the first regimen was 47 ± 7 IU/Kg every 9 ± 2 days. All but one patient remained on rIX-FP prophylaxis, adjusting infusion frequency and/or dose; the last prescribed frequency was ≥10 days in 10/13 patients, being reduced in seven and increased in four vs. the first regimen. The weekly FIX dose was unchanged; FIX trough levels were >5% in all patients. The annual infusion number and FIX IU/Kg significantly decreased (~60%) in eight patients previously on SHL FIX prophylaxis, with similar concentrate costs. Very low bleeding rates (most traumatic bleeds and the last quartile of the infusion interval), improved orthopedic and pain scores, unchanged HEAD-US scores and problem joints, and high treatment adherence (>90%) and satisfaction were registered. Conclusions: Personalized, carefully adjusted rIX-FP regimens contribute to the diffusion and optimization of prophylaxis in persons with severe and moderate hemophilia B, with long-term favorable bleeding, joint, and patient-reported outcomes.

A post hoc comparative real-world analysis of HEAD-US score for joint health assessment of patients with severe haemophilia A and B in Spain

AIM

Joint damage due to haemarthrosis can be effectively monitored with point-of care ultrasound using the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with US (HEAD-US) scoring system. A post hoc comparative analysis of the joint status of patients with severe haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) was performed.

METHODS

The databases of two observational, cross-sectional studies that recruited patients with HA or HB from 12 Spanish centres were analysed to compare the status of the elbows, knees and ankles in patients with severe disease according to treatment modality. The HEAD-US score was calculated in both studies by the same trained operators.

RESULTS

Overall, 95 HA and 41 HB severe patients were included, with a mean age of 35.2 ± 11.8 and 32.7 ± 14.2 years, respectively. The percentage of patients who received prophylaxis, over on-demand (OD) treatment, was much higher in HA (91.6%) than in HB (65.8%) patients. With a similar number of target joints, the HEAD-US score was zero in 6.3% HA and 22.0% HB patients (p < .01), respectively. The HA population showed significantly worse HEAD-US scores. Whilst osteochondral damage occurred more frequently in patients OD or tertiary prophylaxis, our data suggest that articular damage is less prominent in primary/secondary prophylaxis, regardless of the type of haemophilia. These latter treatment modalities were also associated with a lower prevalence of synovial hypertrophy, particularly in HB patients.

CONCLUSION

This post hoc analysis indicates that joint status seems to be significantly influenced by haemophilia type (HA or HB) and treatment modality in these severe Spanish populations with severe disease. Continuing HEAD-US monitoring for the early detection and management of intra-articular abnormalities, as well as more efficiently tailored therapies should be warranted.

Efficacy and Safety of Adeno-Associated Virus-Based Clinical Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical trials of adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy have made remarkable progress in recent years. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to assess the efficacy and safety of AAV-based gene therapy for hemophilia. We systematically searched the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases, for clinical trials involving patients diagnosed with hemophilia and treated with AAV-mediated gene therapy. Data on the annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized infusion rate (AIR), the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), severe adverse events (SAEs), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were extracted as our outcomes. A total of 12 articles from 11 clinical trials were selected from 868 articles for meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that AAV-based gene therapy in hemophilia patients reduced the number of bleeding events and the number of factor infusion events by an approximate average of 7 per year and 103 per year, respectively. Eighty percent, 18%, and 63% of hemophilia patients had elevated TRAE, SAE, and ALT levels, respectively. Moreover, subgroup analysis found a significant reduction in ABR and AIR 2-3 years after the therapy. Additional findings that were not pooled including coagulation factor activity are presented in the accompanying tables. Our analysis supported the efficacy and safety of AAV-mediated gene therapy for hemophilia, providing evidence for its application as a therapeutic option for widespread clinical use in hemophilia patients in the future.

Nonacog beta pegol prophylaxis in children with hemophilia B: safety, efficacy, and neurodevelopmental outcomes for up to 8 years

Background

Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) is an extended half-life PEGylated factor (F)IX product with established efficacy and short-term safety in persons with hemophilia B (HB). Long-term safety has been evaluated for polyethylene glycol exposure but not N9-GP.

Objectives

To assess safety, neurodevelopmental, and efficacy outcomes of children with HB receiving N9-GP prophylaxis across 2 open-label, single-arm, phase 3 studies: paradigm5 (previously treated patients [PTPs]) and paradigm6 (previously untreated patients [PUPs]) in this interim analysis.

Methods

PTPs (aged ≤12 years) and PUPs (aged <6 years) with severe/moderate (≤2% FIX level) HB were recruited to N9-GP prophylaxis (40 IU/kg once weekly) in paradigm5 and paradigm6, respectively. Safety assessments included FIX inhibitor incidence, adverse events, neurocognitive and neurologic outcomes, polyethylene glycol concentration in plasma, and medical events of special interest. Efficacy endpoints included bleeds, N9-GP hemostatic effect, and FIX consumption.

Results

Overall, 25 patients in paradigm5 and 50 patients in paradigm6 received N9-GP and were followed for up to 8 and 6 years, respectively. No inhibitory antibodies were reported in PTPs; 4 of the 50 PUPs developed inhibitors. Extensive evaluation revealed no neurocognitive or neurologic concerns with N9-GP use in children during the study period. Across both studies, few adverse events were reported as possibly related to N9-GP. High hemostatic response rate, high treatment adherence, low annualized bleeding rates, and no new target joints were reported.

Conclusion

These data provide the longest follow-up for an extended half-life FIX and confirm the long-term efficacy of N9-GP prophylaxis in children with HB with no observed neurocognitive or neurologic safety concerns.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Recombinant Factor IX Albumin Fusion Protein Versus Recombinant Factor IX Fc Fusion Protein for Weekly Prophylactic Treatment of Hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Prophylactic treatment of hemophilia B with recombinant factor IX (rFIX) molecules with enhanced pharmacokinetics including rIX-FP (albutrepenonacog alfa; Idelvion©) and rFIXFc (eftrenonacog alfa; Alprolix©) have commonly been used in the clinic. In the absence of head-to-head comparative trials, the aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of rIX-FP versus rFIXFc using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs).

METHODS

MAIC analyses leveraged individual patient data from the PROLONG-9FP trial and published summary-level data from the B-LONG trial for subjects who received weekly prophylaxis regimens. Individual patient data were used to assign weights and balance subjects from PROLONG-9FP with subjects from B-LONG on baseline disease severity, age, prior FIX regimen, and body mass index (BMI). Six efficacy outcomes were analyzed including annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR), annualized joint bleeding rate (AjBR), and the proportion of subjects without bleeding events (for total, spontaneous, and joint bleeding events).

RESULTS

After adjustment for baseline disease severity, age, prior FIX regimen, and BMI, rIX-FP was associated with a statistically significant decrease in AsBR (rate ratio [RR] 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22, 0.82; P = 0.0107), and the proportion of patients without bleeding events (odds ratio [OR] 3.24; 95% CI 1.41, 7.45; P = 0.0057), spontaneous bleeding events (OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.56, 7.73; P = 0.0023), and joint bleeding events (OR 2.41; 95% CI 1.10, 5.26; P = 0.0274) compared with rFIXFc. Prophylactic treatment with rIX-FP was also associated with a numerically lower ABR (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.32, 1.75; P = 0.5095) and AjBR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.37, 1.82; P = 0.6178).

CONCLUSION

The MAICs demonstrated that weekly prophylaxis treatment of severe hemophilia B with rIX-FP resulted in favorable efficacy outcomes as compared to rFIXFc. These findings suggest rIX-FP may offer improved clinical benefits over rFIXFc.

A new population pharmacokinetic model for recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion concentrate including young children with haemophilia B

AIMS

Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIX-Fc) is an extended half-life factor concentrate administered to haemophilia B patients. So far, a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model has only been published for patients aged ≥12 years. The aim was to externally evaluate the predictive performance of the published rFIX-Fc population PK model for patients of all ages and develop a model that describes rFIX-Fc PK using real-world data.

METHODS

We collected prospective and retrospective data from patients with haemophilia B treated with rFIX-Fc and included in the OPTI-CLOT TARGET study (NTR7523) or United Kindom (UK)-EHL Outcomes Registry (NCT02938156). Predictive performance was assessed by comparing predicted with observed FIX activity levels. A new population PK model was constructed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling.

RESULTS

Real-world data were obtained from 37 patients (median age: 16 years, range 2-71) of whom 14 were aged <12 years. Observed FIX activity levels were significantly higher than levels predicted using the published model, with a median prediction error of -48.8%. The new model showed a lower median prediction error (3.4%) and better described rFIX-Fc PK, especially for children aged <12 years. In the new model, an increase in age was correlated with a decrease in clearance (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The published population PK model significantly underpredicted FIX activity levels. The new model better describes rFIX-Fc PK, especially for children aged <12 years. This study underlines the necessity to strive for representative population PK models, thereby avoiding extrapolation outside the studied population.

Indirect treatment comparisons of the gene therapy etranacogene dezaparvovec versus extended half-life factor IX therapies for severe or moderately severe haemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy for haemophilia B demonstrated superior efficacy at 24 months in reducing bleeds versus a ≥6-month lead-in period of prophylaxis with FIX products in the phase 3 trial, HOPE-B. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of etranacogene dezaparvovec versus FIX products, indirect treatment comparisons (ITC) can be used.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec versus rIX-FP, rFIXFc and N9-GP using ITC, and support HOPE-B results.

METHODS

Data were leveraged from Phase 3 pivotal trials: HOPE-B, PROLONG-9FP, B-LONG and Paradigm 2. Annualised bleeding rates (ABR), spontaneous (AsBR) and joint (AjBR) bleeding rates, percentage of patients with no bleeds, and FIX consumption were assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting and matching adjusted indirect comparisons.

RESULTS

Etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated statistically significantly lower bleeding rates versus all comparators. Rate ratios for ABR, AsBR and AjBR versus rIX-FP were 0.19 (p < .0001), 0.08 (p < .0001) and 0.09 (p < .0001), respectively. Rate ratios for ABR, AsBR and AjBR versus rFIXFc were 0.14 (p < .0001), 0.13 (p = .0083) and 0.15 (p = .0111), respectively. Rate ratios for ABR and AsBR, versus N9-GP were 0.24 (p = .0231) and 0.13 (p = .0071), respectively. Etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated significantly higher percentage of patients with no bleeds versus rIX-FP and rFIXFc; odds ratios: 17.60 (p < .0001) and 5.65 (p = .0037), respectively. Etranacogene dezaparvovec resulted in significantly lower FIX consumption than all comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

ITC suggests that etranacogene dezaparvovec offers patients with haemophilia B (≤2% of normal FIX expression) a single dose treatment that can significantly reduce bleeding rates and eliminate routine infusions associated with FIX therapies.

Real-World Amount of Clotting Factor Concentrates Dispensed and Annual Medical Expenditures for Japanese Patients with Hemophilia B

Introduction

Until extended half-life (EHL) factor IX (FIX) concentrates became available in Japan in 2010, patients with hemophilia B received intravenous FIX replacement therapy with standard half-life (SHL) FIX concentrates.

Purpose

To investigate the amount of factor dispensed and the associated medical expenditures for the treatment of hemophilia B in the real-world clinical setting in Japan.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised patients with hemophilia B (N=197) who had filled prescriptions for FIX concentrates reported in Japan's Medical Data Vision database from 2015 to 2019. Patients were included if they had 2 or more prescriptions for the same FIX concentrates within the first 6 months of the study period and the interval between prescriptions was at least 2 weeks.

Results

Since 2015, there was a decrease in the proportion of patients using SHL FIX concentrates and a corresponding increase in international units of dispensed EHL FIX concentrates. Median annualized dispensed dosages (IU/kg body weight) of EHL FIX concentrates were lower than for SHL concentrates for outpatient use only. Annual total health care expenditures per patient and annual expenditures for prescribed FIX concentrates increased each year during the study period. Following a switch from an SHL to an EHL concentrate, the median amount of prescribed FIX concentrate decreased slightly, although median total health care expenditures and FIX concentrate expenditures increased.

Conclusion

In the real-world setting in Japan, medical expenditures and the proportion of patients prescribed EHL FIX concentrates for the treatment of hemophilia B have increased.

Pharmacokinetic-guided versus standard prophylaxis in hemophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling more readily available and PK-guided prophylaxis endorsed by current hemophilia guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to summarize current evidence in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of PK-guided compared with non-PK-guided prophylaxis.

METHODS

We did not restrict inclusion to specific study design labels and included all studies consisting of at least one distinct cohort arm receiving PK-guided prophylaxis. We searched the following databases from inception to date of search: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the EU Clinical Trial Register. Following title, abstract, and full-text screening conducted independently by 2 review authors, we summarized studies qualitatively and synthesized included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) quantitatively by fitting random-effects models.

RESULTS

Search of databases on February 3, 2023, yielded 25 studies fitting our inclusion criteria. Of those, only 2 RCTs and 17 nonrandomized studies included a standard prophylaxis comparator group. Furthermore, risk of bias in the latter was substantial, primarily due to before-after study designs and retrospective comparator groups. Thus, nonrandomized studies were only presented qualitatively. A random-effects meta-analysis of the 2 identified RCT remained inconclusive with regards to bleeding outcomes (ratio of means, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.85-1.56) and factor consumption (ratio of means, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58-1.18).

CONCLUSION

Evidence in the literature suggesting a clinical benefit of PK-guided over standard fixed-dose prophylaxis was weak and mainly found in nonrandomized studies limited by lack of concurrent controls, heterogeneity in outcome reporting, small sample sizes, and high risk of bias.

Biodistribution of recombinant factor IX, extended half-life recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein, and glycoPEGylated recombinant factor IX in hemophilia B mice

Extended half-life recombinant FIX (rFIX) molecules have been generated to reduce the dosing burden and increase the protection of patients with hemophilia B. Clinical pharmacology studies with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) report a similar initial peak plasma recovery to that of rFIX, but with a larger volume of distribution. Although the pegylation of N9-GP results in a larger plasma recovery, there is a smaller volume of distribution, suggesting less extravasation of the latter drug. In this study, we set out to compare the biodistribution and tissue localization of rFIX, rFIXFc, and glycoPEGylated rFIX in a hemophilia B mouse model. Radiolabeled rFIX, rFIXFc, and rFIX-GP were employed in in vivo single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (SPECT/CT), microautoradiography (MARG), and histology to assess the distribution of FIX reagents over time. Immediately following injection, vascularized tissues demonstrated intense signal irrespective of FIX reagent. rFIX and rFIXFc were retained in joint and muscle areas through 5 half-lives, unlike rFIX-GP (assessed by SPECT). MARG and immunohistochemistry showed FIX agents localized at blood vessels among tissues, including liver, spleen, and kidney. Microautoradiographs, as well as fluorescent-labeled images of knee joint areas, demonstrated retention over time of FIX signal at the trabecular area of bone. Data indicate that rFIXFc is similar to rFIX in that it distributes outside the plasma compartment and is retained in certain tissues over time, while also retained at higher plasma levels. Overall, data suggest that Fc fusion does not impede the extravascular distribution of FIX.

Factor VIII and Factor IX Activity Measurements for Hemophilia Diagnosis and Related Treatments

Accurate measurement of clotting factors VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX) is vital for comprehensive diagnosis and management of patients with hemophilia A or B. The one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based clotting assay is the most commonly used method worldwide for testing FVIII or FIX activities. Alternatively, FVIII and FIX chromogenic substrate assays, which assess the activation of factor X, are available in some specialized laboratories. The choice of reagent or methodology can strongly influence the resulting activity. Variation between one-stage FVIII or FIX activities has been reported in the measurement of some standard and extended half-life factor replacement therapies and gene therapy for hemophilia B using different aPTT reagents. Discrepancy between one-stage and chromogenic reagents has been demonstrated in some patients with mild hemophilia A or B, the measurement of some standard and extended half-life factor replacement therapies, and the transgene expression of hemophilia A and B patients who have received gene therapy. Finally, the measurement of bispecific antibody therapy in patients with hemophilia A has highlighted differences between chromogenic assays. It is imperative that hemostasis laboratories evaluate how suitable their routine assays are for the accurate measurement of the various hemophilia treatment therapies.

Real-World Effectiveness of rFIXFc Prophylaxis in Patients with Haemophilia B Switched from Standard Half-Life Therapy in Three European Countries

INTRODUCTION

The current study describes real-world clinical outcomes and factor usage among patients with haemophilia B switching from standard half-life factor IX (SHL FIX) treatment to recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) prophylaxis in European treatment centres.

METHODS

This non-interventional, retrospective, multicentre chart review evaluated medical records from adult and paediatric patients with haemophilia B in Denmark, Germany and the UK. Patients had documented SHL FIX treatment, on-demand or prophylaxis, for ≥ 6 months before starting rFIXFc prophylaxis, and subsequent data for ≥ 6 months afterwards (up to 24 months). Primary endpoints included annualised bleeding rates (ABRs), prophylactic factor consumption and injection frequency.

RESULTS

Data from 30 patients (24/30 [80.0%] with severe disease) showed overall mean (standard deviation, SD) ABRs of 4.7 (6.3) on SHL FIX treatment and 1.7 (2.3) after switching to rFIXFc prophylaxis. The reduction in mean (SD) ABRs was greater when switching from SHL FIX on-demand treatment (n = 6), with a decrease from 10.5 (9.9) to 2.6 (4.5), than when switching from SHL FIX prophylaxis (n = 24), with a decrease from 3.3 (4.3) to 1.5 (1.4). Among prior SHL FIX prophylaxis patients, switching to rFIXFc prophylaxis increased the proportion of those with zero bleeds from 21.7% to 45.8% during the 6 months before and after switching, respectively. In the total population, five of six target joints (83.3%) present when patients started rFIXFc prophylaxis subsequently resolved. In patients switching from SHL FIX prophylaxis to rFIXFc prophylaxis, mean (SD) weekly injection frequency was reduced by 1.0 (0.7) and mean (SD) factor consumption was reduced by 27.7 (49.6) IU/kg/week.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of rFIXFc prophylaxis in real-world clinical practice. Improvements in both clinical effectiveness and factor usage associated with rFIXFc prophylaxis may potentially reduce patient burden and improve quality of life.

Long-term outcomes of prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII Fc or recombinant factor IX Fc in patients with hemophilia previously treated on demand

Background

Prophylactic factor replacement therapy is recommended over on-demand treatment for preserving long-term joint health in hemophilia. Extended half-life products, including efmoroctocog alfa/eftrenonacog alfa (recombinant factor VIII [FVIII]/FIX Fc fusion proteins; herein rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc), have the potential to reduce treatment burden with less frequent administration and improve bleed prevention.

Objectives

We report post hoc data from patients with hemophilia A or B (HA/HB) who switched from prestudy on-demand FVIII/FIX to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis at the start of A-LONG/B-LONG or start of/during ASPIRE/B-YOND phase 3 studies.

Methods

Patients with ≥6 months rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis were enrolled. Treatment exposure, dosing, annualized bleeding rates, joint health, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes were assessed. Results were also stratified by age.

Results

Sixty-seven patients with HA and 50 with HB were analyzed; ≥60% were from regions outside Europe/North America, predominately those aged 12 to ‍25 years. No subjects returned to on-demand treatment postswitch.After switch to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis, median annualized bleeding rates were reduced and sustained at low levels with stable factor usage across age groups (median treatment duration: 4.8/3.6 years). HRQoL outcomes improved for all ages; most pronounced changes were in the sports and leisure and physical health domains. After switch to rFVIIIFc prophylaxis, total modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score and joints with pain decreased in 64.6% and 29.2% of patients with HA. Insufficient data from patients with HB limited joint health evaluation of rFIXFc.

Conclusions

Findings add to existing evidence and demonstrate the clinical and HRQoL benefits of switching patients from on-demand treatment to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for major surgery in hemophilia B: factor IX plasma activity levels and effective hemostasis

Background

Major surgical procedures are associated with significant bleeding risk and infectious complications in patients with hemophilia, which may be minimized by factor replacement. Monitoring perioperative factor levels guides dosing to maintain adequate levels for hemostatic control.

Objectives

We report prospectively collected post hoc surgical data in patients with hemophilia B who underwent major surgery with extended half-life recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) in phase 3 studies (B-LONG/Kids B-LONG and B-YOND).

Methods

Achieved FIX plasma levels were described for those who underwent major surgeries with ≥1 peak and/or predose FIX assessment available on the day of surgery (Day 0 [D0]) from the central laboratory. Dosing, injection frequency, adverse events, and hemostatic responses were assessed. Two representative cases were described further including blood loss, transfusions, and concomitant medication assessment.

Results

Of 35 major surgeries, 17 (N = 16 subjects) with sufficient FIX measurements were included in this analysis; 13 of 17 surgeries were orthopedic. On D0, a median loading (preoperative) dose of 101.1 International Units (IU)/kg/injection achieved a median peak FIX of 103.3 IU/dL. Across postoperative Days 1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 14, the median predose levels were 75.1 IU/dL with 1 injection/d, 71.6 IU/dL with 0 to 1 injection/d, and 43.2 IU/dL with 0 to 1 injection/d, respectively. Hemostasis was rated excellent (14 of 16) or good (2 of 16) across surgeries. Both case studies (knee arthroscopy and ankle fusion) illustrate measured FIX levels with rFIXFc.

Conclusion

The aggregate analysis and representative cases of major surgeries demonstrate that rFIXFc can achieve FIX levels for effective hemostasis during invasive high-risk procedures.

Efficacy of rFIXFc versus N9-GP Prophylaxis in Patients with Hemophilia B: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of B-LONG and PARADIGM 2 Trials

Purpose

For patients with hemophilia B, extended half-life factor IX (FIX) products are available for prophylaxis and for treating bleeds. Different methods are used to extend the half-lives of recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) and nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP). This affects their biodistribution and plasma FIX levels, although differences do not always correlate with clinical outcomes. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of prophylaxis with rFIXFc and N9-GP was performed, based on licensed dosing in the European Union.

Patients and Methods

Combined rFIXFc data from the weekly and individualized interval prophylaxis arms of the B-LONG clinical trial, and N9-GP data from the 40 IU/kg once-weekly prophylaxis arm of PARADIGM 2 were used in a MAIC. Individual patient data for rFIXFc (n=87) were matched to aggregated data for N9-GP (n=29). Estimated annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for rFIXFc were recalculated using a Poisson regression model with adjustment for over-dispersion, and compared with ABRs reported for N9-GP, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

There was no evidence of significant differences in estimated ABRs between prophylaxis with rFIXFc and N9-GP. Analysis of pooled rFIXFc weekly and interval-adjusted dosing compared with N9-GP 40 IU/kg once weekly produced estimated ABRs of 2.59 versus 2.51 (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 0.56-1.89), as well as 1.34 versus 1.22 (IRR 1.10; 95% CI 0.42-2.91) and 1.13 versus 1.29 (IRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47-1.63) for overall, spontaneous, and traumatic bleeding events, respectively.

Conclusion

The study did not reveal any significant differences in the efficacy of rFIXFc and N9-GP prophylaxis. Given differences in trough levels (rFIXFc dosing was targeted to achieve a trough 1-3 IU/dL above baseline versus a reported estimated N9-GP mean trough of 27.3 IU/dL), interpreting plasma FIX levels as potential surrogate efficacy markers requires consideration of compound-specific pharmacokinetic profiles.

Post hoc longitudinal assessment of the efficacy and safety of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in hemophilia B

Long-term efficacy and safety of the extended half-life recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) has been established among previously treated patients with severe hemophilia B in 2 phase 3 trials (B-LONG [#NCT01027364] and Kids B-LONG [#NCT01440946]) and a long-term extension study (B-YOND [#NCT01425723]). In this study, we report post hoc analyses of pooled longitudinal data for up to 6.5 years for rFIXFc prophylaxis. In the B-LONG study, subjects ≥12 years received weekly dose-adjusted prophylaxis (WP; starting dose, 50 IU/kg), individualized interval-adjusted prophylaxis (IP; initially, 100 IU/kg every 10 days), or on-demand dosing. In the Kids B-LONG study, subjects <12 years received 50 to 60 IU/kg every 7 days, adjusted as needed. In the B-YOND study, subjects received WP (20-100 IU/kg every 7 days), IP (100 IU/kg every 8-16 days), modified prophylaxis, or on-demand dosing; switching between treatment groups was permitted. A total of 123 subjects from B-LONG and 30 from Kids B-LONG study were included, of whom 93 and 27, respectively, enrolled in the B-YOND study. The median cumulative duration of treatment was 3.63 years (range, 0.003-6.48 years) in B-LONG/B-YOND and 2.88 years (range, 0.30-4.80 years) in Kids B-LONG/B-YOND group. Annualized bleed rates (ABRs) remained low, annualized factor consumption remained stable, and adherence remained high throughout treatment. Low ABRs were also maintained in subjects with dosing intervals ≥14 days or with target joints at baseline. Complete resolution of evaluable target joints and no recurrence in 90.2% of baseline target joints during follow-up were observed. rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with sustained clinical benefits, including long-term bleed prevention and target joint resolution, for severe hemophilia B.

Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb gene therapy for patients with hemophilia B (congenital factor IX deficiency)

INTRODUCTION

Congenital hemophilia B (HB) is an X-linked bleeding disorder resulting in Factor IX (FIX) deficiency and bleeding of variable severity. There is no cure for HB. Typical management consists of prophylactic intravenous (IV) recombinant or plasma-derived FIX infusions. Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb (Hemgenix, AMT-061) is an adeno-associated virus serotype 5 (AAV5) vector containing a codon-optimized Padua variant of the human F9 gene with a liver-specific promoter. Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb received FDA approval on 22 November 2022 for the treatment of HB in adult patients who use FIX prophylaxis therapy, have current or historical life-threatening hemorrhage, or have experienced repeated, serious spontaneous bleeding episodes.

AREAS COVERED

This drug profile discusses the safety and efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb in patients with HB.

EXPERT OPINION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb therapy results in stable and sustained expression of near-normal to normal FIX levels in patients with HB regardless of neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 up to a titer of 678. Its use has led to significant reduction in bleeding and FIX prophylaxis. Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb was well tolerated; however, 17% of patients required corticosteroid therapy for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb therapy marks the beginning of an exciting era in HB treatment and opens questions regarding treatment longevity and long-term safety.

Etranacogene dezaparvovec for the treatment of adult patients with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec is the first gene therapy approved for treatment of adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the results of the clinical trial program of AMT-060 and etranacogene dezaparvovec, outlining the pharmacokinetic, clinical efficacy and safety data. With the entry of etranacogene dezaparvovec into the market, this review summarizes the treatment landscape in hemophilia B and discusses the current unknowns in the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Gene therapy appears to be a feasible option for adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B. Etranacogene dezaparvovec enables most patients to reach stable factor IX (FIX) levels after a single intravenous infusion, eliminating the need for regular prophylaxis; thus, drastically reducing treatment burden and avoiding variable bleeding risk owing to fluctuating FIX activity levels. Efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec has been demonstrated even in the presence of preexisting neutralizing antibodies (up to a titer of 1:678), with a relative low risk of transaminitis and its associated potential loss of transgene expression. However, long-term data are required to ascertain the durability of FIX levels achieved and safety. The cost-effectiveness and adoption of innovative payment models for reimbursement are key in choosing gene therapy over existing treatments.

Recombinant factor IX Fc prophylaxis reduces pain and increases levels of physical activity, with sustained, long-term improvements in patients with hemophilia B: post hoc analysis of phase III trials using patient-reported outcomes

Background

Pain is a common symptom of hemophilia that may adversely affect patients' quality of life (QoL). Previous post hoc analyses of prophylaxis with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) have been published for adults and adolescents, demonstrating improvements in health-related QoL (HRQoL) when assessed by the haemophilia-specific QoL (HaemAQoL) questionnaire.

Objective

To describe in depth the evolution of QoL, pain- and activity-related domains and questions for pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with hemophilia B treated with rFIXFc prophylaxis.

Design

A post hoc analysis of data from a series of clinical trials.

Methods

This post hoc, long-term analysis assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the Kids B-LONG (NCT01440946: pediatric) and B-LONG (NCT01027364: adults and adolescents) parent studies and the B-YOND (NCT01425723: all age groups) extension study.

Results

Ninety-two adult and adolescent patients that started in the B-LONG study were assessed, with a median (range) duration of follow-up of 58.9 (0.0-78.4) months. The Haem-A-QoL total score was significantly reduced from baseline by 4.45 (p ⩽ 0.01), as were the subdomains 'physical health' (9.10; p = 0.001), 'sports and leisure' (11.25; p ⩽ 0.01), 'treatment' (2.69; p = 0.05), and 'view of self' (5.81; p = 0.002). Thirty pediatric patients that started in the Kids B-LONG study were assessed, with a median (min-max) duration of follow-up of 36.7 (9.0-59.9) months. The high level of satisfaction demonstrated by the PROs at baseline was maintained.

Conclusion

rFIXFc prophylaxis reduced perceived pain and increased levels of physical activity with sustained, long-term improvements in QoL in adult and adolescent patients with hemophilia B and maintained high QoL scores in pediatric patients.

Extended half-life factor IX prophylaxis up to every 21 days in hemophilia B: a longitudinal analysis of the efficacy and safety in selected adult patients

Background

Extended half-life factor IX (FIX) products have revolutionized prophylactic treatment for patients with hemophilia B as patients maintain protective FIX levels with minimal occurrence of spontaneous bleeding. rIX-FP is an extended half-life FIX product that allows prolonged dosing intervals.

Objectives

To assess individualized and prolonged prophylactic dosing interval up to 21 days in adult patients (≥18 years) with hemophilia B in the rIX-FP clinical trial program.

Methods

Patients who were included in the PROLONG-9FP phase III study or who received rIX-FP during surgery could continue into an extension study for long-term assessment. Patients began 7-day prophylaxis with rIX-FP, and after 6 months, they could extend dosing intervals to every 14 days. In the extension study, adult patients could switch to a 21-day regimen if well-controlled on a 14-day regimen.

Results

Eleven patients transitioned from a 7-day prophylaxis regimen to a 14-day regimen and finally to a 21-day regimen, 5 of whom were treated on demand at enrollment. Patients who switched to the 21-day regimen had a median annualized spontaneous bleeding rate of 0.0 across all regimens. The median observed FIX activity remained >5 IU/dL until day 21 after a single 100-IU/kg dose of rIX-FP. After 6 months on the 21-day regimen, 2 patients switched back to a 14-day regimen. No inhibitors, anaphylactic reactions, or thromboembolic events occurred.

Conclusion

Patients who are well controlled on a once-weekly regimen might extend their treatment interval to 14 days, and in adult patients, further extension to up to 21 days (100 IU/kg) may be considered.

Eftrenonacog Alfa: A Review in Haemophilia B

Eftrenonacog alfa (Alprolix^®) is an extended half-life recombinant factor IX (rFIX)-Fc fusion protein (hereafter referred to as rFIXFc). Administered as an intravenous bolus, it is approved for prophylactic use and the treatment of bleeding in patients with haemophilia B in various countries worldwide, including those of the EU, as well as the USA. In multinational, phase III trials, rFIXFc was effective for the prophylaxis, perioperative management or on-demand treatment of bleeding in male patients with severe haemophilia B regardless of age and irrespective of whether or not they had been previously treated with FIX replacement products. Prophylactic efficacy was maintained over the longer term (up to 5 years) in previously treated patients. rFIXFc effectiveness in the real-world setting is supported by results of prospective studies, as well as the outcomes of several retrospective trials. rFIXFc was well tolerated in clinical trials in previously treated and untreated children, adolescents and/or adults with severe haemophilia B. Thus, rFIXFc continues to represent a useful treatment option among the haemophilia B patient population.

Current factor IX replacement options for hemophilia B and the challenges ahead

INTRODUCTION

Therapy for hemophilia B is aimed at replacing the congenital deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX). For replacement therapy, several FIX concentrates derived from donated human plasma or engineered by recombinant DNA technology are currently commercially available. The use of these products is well established and permit patients a relatively normal life. To further improve treatment efficacy, recombinant FIX products with a prolonged half-life have been developed, allowing relaxed prophylactic dosing and reducing treatment burden.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we explore the current FIX replacement options for hemophilia B patients by analyzing the outcomes of their main clinical trials. We cover advances in the FIX molecules with extended half-life (EHL). Published literature on products for replacement of hemophilia B was retrieved using PubMed with no temporal limits.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent introduction of recombinant EHL FIX products has represented a major advance in the therapeutic management of hemophilia B patients, permitting both a reduction of treatment burden and improving patients' compliance to prophylaxis and, ultimately, quality of life.

New directions to develop therapies for people with hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The past few decades have seen a tremendous advancement in the management of hemophilia. Whether it is improved methods to attenuate critical viruses, recombinant bioengineering with decreased immunogenicity, extended half-life replacement therapies to mitigate the burden of repeated infusion treatments, novel nonreplacement products to avoid the drawback of inhibitor development with its attractive subcutaneous administration and then the introduction of gene therapy, the management has trodden a long way.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review describes the progress in the treatment of hemophilia over the years. We discuss, in detail, the past and current therapies, their benefits, drawbacks, along with relevant studies leading to approval, efficacy and safety profile, ongoing trials, and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

The technological advances in the treatment of hemophilia with convenient modes of administration and innovative modalities offer a chance for a normal existence of the patients living with this disease. However, it is imperative for clinicians to be aware of the potential adverse effects and the need for further studies to establish causality or chance association of these events with novel agents. Thus, it is crucial for clinicians to engage patients and their families in informed decision-making and tailor individual concerns and necessities.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein compared with recombinant factor IX for the treatment of moderate-severe to severe hemophilia B in China

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) and recombinant factor IX (rFIX) for the treatment of hemophilia B (HB) in China.

METHODS

We developed a decision-analytic Markov model including three health states: alive, requiring surgery, and dead. This model estimated the lifetime cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of prophylaxis in childhood, followed by on-demand treatment in adulthood for moderate-severe to severe HB patients from China's healthcare system perspective. Efficacy data derived from pivotal clinical trials, clinical guideline recommendations, and expert consultation were applied to two scenarios (full dose and low dose). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to assess the robustness of the model.

OUTCOMES

Lifetime cost, QALYs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated, and the results were compared with willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of one to three times the gross domestic product per capita of China in 2021 ($12,551-$37,653).

RESULTS

RFIXFc was associated with lower cost and more QALYs than rFIX in both scenarios, which suggested that it is a dominant strategy (more effective and cheaper) for moderate-severe to severe HB in China. In the full-dose scenario, rFIXFc saved more money and yielded more QALYs than in the low-dose scenario (low doses are the typical clinical reality in China). PSA demonstrated that rFIXFc had an over 90% probability of being cost-effective with full-dose and low-dose treatment at WTP thresholds of $12,551-$37,653.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with rFIX, rFIXFc appears to be a cost-effective option for the lifetime management of moderate-severe to severe HB patients in China.

Long-term prophylaxis: what are our options and how to define success?

Currently, we are at an enviable place in hemophilia treatment. Although full prophylaxis with standard half-life recombinant or plasma-derived factor concentrates has been definitively shown to be inadequate for full protection against bleeding and arthropathy, a number of novel therapies with improved hemostatic enhancement are clinically available or in promising clinical trials. In order to compare outcomes among a number of very efficacious therapies, it is necessary to have sensitive tools employed in long-term follow-up for several years for participants with no or minimal joint disease. The tool kit must be comprehensive, with outcomes of bleeding, factor level restoration or hemostatic capacity, joint structure, joint function, pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. This article reviews the history of prophylaxis, the promise of emerging therapies, and the sensitive tools used to assess long-term efficacy for joint structure and function.

Strategies for developing long-lasting therapeutic nucleic acid aptamer targeting circulating protein: The present and the future

Aptamers are short, single-stranded DNA or RNA oligonucleotide sequences that can bind specific targets. The molecular weight of aptamers (<20 kDa) is lower than the renal filtration threshold (30∼50 kDa), resulting in very short half-lives in vivo, which limit their druggability. The development of long-lasting modification approaches for aptamers can help address the druggability bottleneck of aptamers. This review summarized two distinct kinds of long-lasting modification approaches for aptamers, including macromolecular modification and low-molecular-weight modification. Though it is a current approach to extend the half-life of aptamers, the macromolecular modification approach could limit the space for the dosage increases, thus causing potential compliance concerns due to large molecular weight. As for the other modification approach, the low-molecular-weight modification approach, which uses low molecular weight coupling agents (LMWCAs) to modify aptamers, could greatly increase the proportion of aptamer moiety. However, some LMWCAs could bind to other proteins, causing a decrease in the drug amounts in blood circulation. Given these issues, the outlook for the next generation of long-lasting modification approaches was proposed at the end, including improving the administration method to increase dosage for aptamer drugs modified by macromolecule and developing Artificial intelligence (AI)-based strategies for optimization of LMWCAs.

The More Recent History of Hemophilia Treatment

The availability first in the 1970s of plasma-derived and then in the 1990s of recombinant clotting factor concentrates represented a milestone in hemophilia care, enabling not only treatment of episodic bleeding events but also implementation of prophylactic regimens. The treatment of hemophilia has recently reached new landmarks. The traditional clotting factor replacement therapy for hemophilia has been substituted over the last 10 years by novel treatments such as bioengineered factor VIII and IX molecules with extended half-life and non-factor treatments including the bispecific antibody emicizumab. This narrative review is dedicated to these newer therapies, which are contributing significantly to improving the long-term management of prophylaxis in hemophilia patients. Another section is focused on the current state of gene therapy, which is a promising definitive cure for severe hemophilia A and B.

Managing surgery in hemophilia with recombinant factor VIII Fc and factor IX Fc: Data on safety and effectiveness from phase 3 pivotal studies

Background

Surgical procedures impose hemostatic risk to people with hemophilia, which may be minimized by optimal factor (F) replacement therapy.

Methods

This analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of extended half-life factor replacement recombinant FVIII and FIX Fc fusion proteins (rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc) during surgery in phase 3 pivotal (A-LONG/Kids A-LONG and B-LONG/Kids B-LONG) and extension (ASPIRE and B-YOND) studies. Dosing regimens were determined by investigators. Injection frequency, dosing, blood loss, transfusions, and hemostatic response were assessed.

Results

Forty-five major (n = 31 subjects) and 90 minor (n = 70 subjects) procedures were performed in hemophilia A; 35 major (n = 22) and 62 minor (n = 37) procedures were performed in hemophilia B. Unilateral knee arthroplasty was the most common major orthopedic procedure (hemophilia A: n = 15/34; hemophilia B: n = 8/24). On the day of surgery, median total dose in adults/adolescents was 81 IU/kg for rFVIIIFc and 144 IU/kg for rFIXFc; most major procedures required ≤2 injections (including loading dose). Through days 1-14, most major procedures had ≤1 injection/day. Hemostasis was rated excellent (rFVIIIFc: n = 39/42; rFIXFc: n = 29/33) or good (n = 3/42; n = 4/33) in evaluable major surgeries, with blood loss comparable with subjects without hemophilia. Most minor procedures in adults/adolescents required one injection on the day of surgery, including median loading dose of 51 IU/kg (rFVIIIFc) and 80 IU/kg (rFIXFc). No major treatment-related safety concerns were identified. No subjects developed inhibitors or serious vascular thromboembolic events.

Conclusions

rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc were efficacious and well tolerated for the management of perioperative hemostasis across a wide spectrum of major and minor surgeries in hemophilia.

Neurosurgery in a patient with severe hemophilia B: an experience using eftrenonacog alfa as perioperative management

Extended half‐life FIX (EHL‐FIX) concentrates have been developed with the purpose of reducing the frequency of infusions in patients with severe or moderate hemophilia B. We describe the case of a 63‐year‐old patient with severe hemophilia B (sHB) treated with FIX‐Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) who underwent neurosurgery.

Hemophilia patients may need surgical interventions for complications either related or not to their coagulopathy. Real‐life experience is still limited using eftrenonacog alfa. This case demonstrates that it is an effective and safe treatment option.

The Potential Role of Protease Systems in Hemophilic Arthropathy

Haemophilic arthropathy is characterised by joint damage following recurrent joint bleeds frequently observed in patients affected by the clotting disorder haemophilia. Joint bleeds or haemarthroses trigger inflammation in the synovial tissue which promotes damage to the articular cartilage. The plasminogen activation system is integral to fibrinolysis, and urokinase plasminogen activator or uPA in particular is strongly upregulated following haemarthroses. uPA is a serine protease that catalyses the production of plasmin, a broad-spectrum protease that can degrade fibrin as well as proteins of the joint extracellular matrix and cartilage. Both uPA and plasmin are able to proteolytically generate active forms of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The MMPs are a family of >20 proteases that are secreted as inactive proenzymes and are activated extracellularly. MMPs are involved in degradation of all types of collagen and proteoglycans that constitute the extracellular matrix, which provides structural support to articular cartilage. The MMPs have an established role in joint destruction following rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They degrade cartilage and bone, indirectly promoting angiogenesis. MMPs are also implicated in the pathology of osteoarthritis (OA) characterized by degradation of the cartilage matrix that precipitates joint damage and deformity. HA shares a number of overlapping pathological characteristics with RA and OA. Here we discuss how the plasminogen activation system and MMPs might exacerbate joint damage in HA, lending insight into novel possible therapeutic targets to reduce co-morbidity of haemophilia.

Surgical outcomes in patients with haemophilia A or B receiving extended half-life recombinant factor VIII and IX Fc fusion proteins: Real-world experience in the Nordic countries

Introduction

Perioperative dosing recommendations vary across Nordic haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) for extended half‐life (EHL) factor concentrates in haemophilia A/B (HA/HB) patients.

Aim

To summarise Nordic real‐world surgical experiences with EHL recombinant factor VIII/IX Fc (rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc) fusion proteins using retrospective data from clinical records at four HTCs in Finland, Sweden and Norway.

Methods

Factor dosing and surgical outcomes were recorded from HA/HB patients who underwent surgery and were treated with rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. Perioperative factor dosing regimens were clinician‐determined based on local practises.

Results

Twenty five surgeries were performed on 20 patients, all covered by bolus injections except one minor HA surgery; eight minor surgeries were in paediatric patients. Median preoperative rFVIIIFc dose for major HA surgeries (n = 8) was 48 IU/kg (range: 35–57), with total consumption up to Day 14 of 427 IU/kg (196–568). For the two major HB surgeries (in one patient), preoperative rFIXFc doses were 50 IU/kg and 20 IU/kg; total consumption up to Day 14 was 130 IU/kg and 40 IU/kg. Median preoperative rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc bolus doses for minor HA (n = 10) and HB (n = 4) surgeries were 50 IU/kg (24–79) and 47 IU/kg (40–71), with total consumption up to Day 5 of 138 IU/kg (49–404) and 100 IU/kg (43–125), respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative haemostatic responses were rated as at least good/excellent for 24/25 surgeries, with bleeding episodes reported in only three surgeries.

Conclusion

Nordic real‐world experiences suggest that EHL products can be used safely and effectively for peri‐operative haemostasis. Further research is required to develop local dosing guidelines for optimised treatment schedules.