A Randomized Trial Comparing Skin Antiseptic Agents at Cesarean Delivery

Povidone Iodine vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate in Alcohol for Preoperative Skin Antisepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Preoperative skin antisepsis is an established procedure to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). The choice of antiseptic agent, povidone iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate, remains debated.

Objective

To determine whether povidone iodine in alcohol is noninferior to chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol to prevent SSIs after cardiac or abdominal surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Multicenter, cluster-randomized, investigator-masked, crossover, noninferiority trial; 4403 patients undergoing cardiac or abdominal surgery in 3 tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland between September 2018 and March 2020 were assessed and 3360 patients were enrolled (cardiac, n = 2187 [65%]; abdominal, n = 1173 [35%]). The last follow-up was on July 1, 2020.

Interventions

Over 18 consecutive months, study sites were randomly assigned each month to either use povidone iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate, each formulated in alcohol. Disinfectants and skin application processes were standardized and followed published protocols.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days after abdominal surgery and within 1 year after cardiac surgery, using definitions from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network. A noninferiority margin of 2.5% was used. Secondary outcomes included SSIs stratified by depth of infection and type of surgery.

Results

A total of 1598 patients (26 cluster periods) were randomly assigned to receive povidone iodine vs 1762 patients (26 cluster periods) to chlorhexidine gluconate. Mean (SD) age of patients was 65.0 years (39.0-79.0) in the povidone iodine group and 65.0 years (41.0-78.0) in the chlorhexidine gluconate group. Patients were 32.7% and 33.9% female in the povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate groups, respectively. SSIs were identified in 80 patients (5.1%) in the povidone iodine group vs 97 (5.5%) in the chlorhexidine gluconate group, a difference of 0.4% (95% CI, -1.1% to 2.0%) with the lower limit of the CI not exceeding the predefined noninferiority margin of -2.5%; results were similar when corrected for clustering. The unadjusted relative risk for povidone iodine vs chlorhexidine gluconate was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.69-1.23). Nonsignificant differences were observed following stratification by type of surgical procedure. In cardiac surgery, SSIs were present in 4.2% of patients with povidone iodine vs 3.3% with chlorhexidine gluconate (relative risk, 1.26 [95% CI, 0.82-1.94]); in abdominal surgery, SSIs were present in 6.8% with povidone iodine vs 9.9% with chlorhexidine gluconate (relative risk, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.46-1.02]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Povidone iodine in alcohol as preoperative skin antisepsis was noninferior to chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol in preventing SSIs after cardiac or abdominal surgery.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03685604.

Effectiveness of two scrub methods with different chlorhexidine combinations for surgical field antisepsis in cats

Objective

Assessing effectiveness of circular (CM) and linear (LM) scrub methods using 3 different combinations of chlorhexidine in surgical field antisepsis in cats.

Animals and procedure

Surgical field antisepsis was applied with 2 scrub methods (CM and LM) and 3 different chlorhexidine combinations (A1, A2, and A3) in 51 female cats undergoing ovariectomy. Sterile swabs collected from the surgical field pre- and post-antisepsis were inoculated in the laboratory and colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were quantified.

Results

Following the application of antisepsis, the number of positive samples decreased in all groups (P < 0.05) when using both CM and LM, except for CM in the A1 group (P = 0.063). The CFU/mL counts also decreased after antisepsis with both CM and LM in all groups (P < 0.05). A high reduction in CFU/mL counts was observed after antisepsis with both CM and LM in all groups, but no significant differences were observed between the 2 scrub methods (P > 0.05).

Conclusion and clinical relevance

Surgical field antisepsis in cats with CM and LM scrub methods, using 2% chlorhexidine combined with 70% ethyl or 70% isopropyl alcohol, or 1% chlorhexidine combined with 70% ethyl alcohol, can effectively reduce the bacterial load on the skin.

Surgical site antiseptic preparations for otolaryngology - Head and neck surgery: A current review

OBJECTIVE

To review current literature and guidelines on antiseptic surgical site preparations for preventing surgical site infections with consideration of contraindications specific to head and neck surgery.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, accessdata.fda.gov, Manufacturer websites.

REVIEW METHODS

A scoping review on the literature and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of different surgical site preparations. Studies were included if they were a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing at least two commonly used and available antiseptic preparations. Additionally, a compilation of warnings and contraindications from manufacturer labels and articles are included. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials concerning antiseptic preparation use in head and neck surgery specifically, an additional search was executed for articles not limited to randomized controlled trials that compared different antiseptic preparation used in surgeries concerning the head and neck.

RESULTS

Of 56,983 resulting abstracts and 3798 of them being screened, 25 RCTs were included. These RCTs included a variety of surgeries including gastrointestinal, obstetric, gynecologic, orthopedic, and vascular procedures. When searching for abstracts concerning head and neck surgeries, 9 studies were found and included.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce surgical site infections and avoid application in situations with contraindications, practicing surgeons need to be familiar with the existing literature regarding different surgical preparations and what warnings manufacturers have listed on the products. Optimal surgical site preparation for head and neck surgery is challenging as proximity to oxygen contraindicates newer alcohol-based options that are potentially flammable. We summarize evidence-based surgical site preparation for head and neck surgery.

Which antiseptic to use for a caesarean section? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Guidelines for pre-operative skin antisepsis recommend using chlorhexidine in an alcohol-based solution. However, other antiseptics such as aqueous povidone-iodine or alcohol-based solutions continue to be used. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in caesarean section are rare and do not include all possible comparisons of antiseptics. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy (reduction of surgical site infections) of chlorhexidine at two different concentrations (0.3% and 2%) and povidone-iodine in aqueous or alcohol-based solutions using a network meta-analysis, including only RCTs of caesarean sections. Fragility indices and prediction intervals were also estimated. A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were performed. RCTs published up to February 2024 were collected from PubMed, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library. Interventions included alcohol-based povidone-iodine, aqueous povidone-iodine, and alcohol-based chlorhexidine 2% and 0.3%. The primary outcome measure was surgical site infection. Nine RCTs with 4915 patients and four interventions were included in the network meta-analysis. All credible intervals of the compared interventions overlapped. Alcohol-based 2% chlorhexidine had the highest probability of being effective in preventing surgical site infections, followed by alcohol-based povidone-iodine. The fragility index ranged from 4 to 18. The prediction intervals were wide. On the basis of rank probabilities, chlorhexidine 2% in an alcohol-based solution was most likely to be effective in preventing surgical site infections after caesarean section, followed by alcohol-based povidone-iodine. Given the paucity of literature and the relatively small difference between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine found in our meta-analysis, we suggest that either can be used in an alcohol-based solution as antisepsis for planned or emergency caesarean section.

Perioperative Antibiotics and Other Factors Associated with Postcesarean Infections: A Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine modifiable risk factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) and postpartum endometritis. We hypothesized that inappropriate surgical antibiotic prophylaxis would be a risk factor for both types of infections.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center case-control study of SSI and endometritis after cesarean delivery over a 2-year period from 2016 to 2017. Cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis codes, infection control surveillance, and electronic medical records search and were subsequently confirmed by chart review. Three controls were randomly selected for each case from all cesareans ± 48 hours from case delivery. Demographic, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics were abstracted. Separate multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with SSI and endometritis. Postpartum outcomes, including length of stay and readmission, were also compared.

RESULTS

We identified 141 cases of SSI and endometritis with an overall postpartum infection rate of 4.0% among all cesarean deliveries. In adjusted analysis, factors associated with both SSI and endometritis were intrapartum delivery, classical or other (non-low-transverse) uterine incision, and blood transfusion. Factors associated with SSI only included inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis, public insurance, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, and nonchlorhexidine abdominal preparation; factors only associated with endometritis included β-lactam allergy, anticoagulation therapy, and chorioamnionitis. Among cases, 34% of those with SSI and 25% of those with endometritis did not receive adequate antibiotic prophylaxis, compared with 12.9 and 13.5% in control groups, respectively. Failure to receive appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of SSI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-15.6) but not endometritis (aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4-2.0).

CONCLUSION

Inadequate surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of SSI but not postpartum endometritis, highlighting the different mechanisms of these infections and the importance of prioritizing adequate surgical prophylaxis. Additional potentially modifiable factors which emerged included blood transfusion and chlorhexidine skin preparation.

KEY POINTS

· Inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with a four-fold risk in surgical site infections.. · The most common cause for failure to achieve adequate surgical prophylaxis was inappropriate timing of antibiotics at or after skin incision.. · Blood transfusions are strongly associated (>10-fold risk) with both SSI and endometritis..

Preoperative Application of Chlorhexidine to Reduce Infection with Cesarean Delivery after Labor (PRACTICAL): A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether use of both preoperative 2% chlorhexidine gluconate abdominal cloth and 4% chlorhexidine gluconate vaginal scrub is effective in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cesarean delivery after labor.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a single-center, randomized clinical trial in which patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cloth applied to the abdomen in addition to the application of 4% chlorhexidine gluconate vaginal scrub versus standard of care. The primary outcome was rate of SSIs, including endometritis, by 6 weeks postdelivery. The secondary outcomes were other wound complications (erythema at the operative site, skin separation, drainage, fever, hematoma, seroma) by 6 weeks postdelivery, hospital readmission for wound complications, and day of discharge after cesarean delivery.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients between September 2018 and February 2021 met eligibility criteria: 160 were randomized to the chlorhexidine gluconate abdominal cloth and vaginal scrub group and 159 were randomized to the standard of care group. The groups did not have significant differences in maternal demographic characteristics. Of the 302 (95%) individuals included in primary analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in SSI and endometritis rate by 6 weeks postdelivery (6.6% in chlorhexidine vs. 5.3% standard of care, p = 0.65). Secondary outcomes were also similar among the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The combination of preoperative 2% chlorhexidine gluconate abdominal cloth and 4% chlorhexidine gluconate vaginal scrub does not appear to reduce the risk of SSI with cesarean delivery after trial of labor when compared with standard of care.

KEY POINTS

· Preoperative chlorhexidine abdominal cloth/vaginal scrub does not decrease SSI in cesarean after labor.. · Preoperative chlorhexidine abdominal cloth/vaginal scrub does not decrease other wound complications in cesarean after labor.. · There was no difference in discharge day, 2-week or 6-week SSI rates..

Risk Factors, Trends, and Outcomes Associated With Postpartum Sepsis Readmissions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence, timing, clinical risk factors, and adverse outcomes associated with postpartum readmissions for maternal sepsis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of delivery hospitalizations and 60-day postpartum readmissions for females aged 15-54 years with and without sepsis using the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Temporal trends in sepsis diagnoses during delivery hospitalizations and 60-day postpartum readmissions were analyzed with the National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint Regression Program to estimate the average annual percent change with 95% CIs. Logistic regression models were fit to determine whether delivery hospitalization characteristics were associated with postpartum sepsis readmissions, and unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs were reported. Adverse outcomes associated with sepsis during delivery hospitalization and readmission were described, including death, severe morbidity, a critical care composite, and renal failure.

RESULTS

Overall, 15,268,190 delivery hospitalizations and 256,216 associated 60-day readmissions were included after population weighting, of which 16,399 (1.1/1,000 delivery hospitalizations) had an associated diagnosis of sepsis at delivery, and 20,130 (1.3/1,000 delivery hospitalizations) had an associated diagnosis of sepsis with postpartum readmission. A sepsis diagnosis was present in 7.9% of all postpartum readmissions. Characteristics associated with postpartum sepsis readmission included younger age at delivery, Medicaid insurance, lowest median ZIP code income quartile, and chronic medical conditions such as obesity, pregestational diabetes, and chronic hypertension. Postpartum sepsis readmissions were associated with infection during the delivery hospitalization, including intra-amniotic infection or endometritis, wound infection, and delivery sepsis. Sepsis diagnoses were associated with 24.4% of maternal deaths at delivery and 38.4% postpartum, 2.2% cases of nontransfusion severe morbidity excluding sepsis at delivery and 13.6% postpartum, 15.6% of critical care composite diagnoses at delivery and 30.1% postpartum, and 11.1% of acute renal failure diagnoses at delivery and 36.4% postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Sepsis accounts for a significant proportion of postpartum readmissions and is a major contributor to adverse outcomes during delivery hospitalizations and postpartum readmissions.

Infection and Sepsis Trends during United States' Delivery Hospitalizations from 2000 to 2020

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to evaluate trends, risk factors, and outcomes associated with infections and sepsis during delivery hospitalizations in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

 The 2000-2020 National Inpatient Sample was used for this repeated cross-sectional analysis. Delivery hospitalizations of patients aged 15 to 54 with and without infection and sepsis were identified. Common infection diagnoses during delivery hospitalizations analyzed included (i) pyelonephritis, (ii) pneumonia/influenza, (iii) endometritis, (iv) cholecystitis, (v) chorioamnionitis, and (vi) wound infection. Temporal trends in sepsis and infection during delivery hospitalizations were analyzed. The associations between sepsis and infection and common chronic health conditions including asthma, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and obesity were analyzed. The associations between clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics, and infection and sepsis were determined with unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models with unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals as measures of association.

RESULTS

 An estimated 80,158,622 delivery hospitalizations were identified and included in the analysis, of which 2,766,947 (3.5%) had an infection diagnosis and 32,614 had a sepsis diagnosis (4.1 per 10,000). The most common infection diagnosis was chorioamnionitis (2.7% of deliveries) followed by endometritis (0.4%), and wound infections (0.3%). Infection and sepsis were more common in the setting of chronic health conditions. Evaluating trends in individual infection diagnoses, endometritis and wound infection decreased over the study period both for patients with and without chronic conditions, while risk for pyelonephritis and pneumonia/influenza increased. Sepsis increased over the study period for deliveries with and without chronic condition diagnoses. Risks for adverse outcomes including mortality, severe maternal morbidity, the critical care composite, and acute renal failure were all significantly increased in the presence of sepsis and infection.

CONCLUSION

 Endometritis and wound infections decreased over the study period while risk for sepsis increased. Infection and sepsis were associated with chronic health conditions and accounted for a significant proportion of adverse obstetric outcomes including severe maternal morbidity.

KEY POINTS

· Sepsis increased over the study period for deliveries with and without chronic condition diagnoses.. · Endometritis and wound infection decreased over the study period.. · Infection and sepsis accounted for a significant proportion of adverse obstetric outcomes..

Skin Antisepsis before Surgical Fixation of Extremity Fractures

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating surgical-site infection have had conflicting results with respect to the use of alcohol solutions containing iodine povacrylex or chlorhexidine gluconate as skin antisepsis before surgery to repair a fractured limb (i.e., an extremity fracture).

METHODS

In a cluster-randomized, crossover trial at 25 hospitals in the United States and Canada, we randomly assigned hospitals to use a solution of 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (iodine group) or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine group) as preoperative antisepsis for surgical procedures to repair extremity fractures. Every 2 months, the hospitals alternated interventions. Separate populations of patients with either open or closed fractures were enrolled and included in the analysis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection, which included superficial incisional infection within 30 days or deep incisional or organ-space infection within 90 days. The secondary outcome was unplanned reoperation for fracture-healing complications.

RESULTS

A total of 6785 patients with a closed fracture and 1700 patients with an open fracture were included in the trial. In the closed-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 77 patients (2.4%) in the iodine group and in 108 patients (3.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.00; P = 0.049). In the open-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 54 patients (6.5%) in the iodine group and in 60 patients (7.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odd ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27; P = 0.45). The frequencies of unplanned reoperation, 1-year outcomes, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with closed extremity fractures, skin antisepsis with iodine povacrylex in alcohol resulted in fewer surgical-site infections than antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol. In patients with open fractures, the results were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03523962.).

Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is a commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide. There is limited good-quality evidence regarding subcuticular skin closure with absorbable sutures in transverse incisions after cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare poliglecaprone-25 (3-0) and polyglactin-910 (4-0) sutures for subcuticular skin closure in Pfannenstiel incisions among women undergoing cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial among women undergoing cesarean delivery (elective and emergency), 200 women were randomized (Group 1-subcuticular skin closure with poliglecaprone-25 [3-0] vs Group 2-subcuticular skin closure with polyglactin-910 [4-0]). All women received similar preoperative and postoperative care. A sample size of 200 women was selected with the aim of reducing the composite wound complication rate from 15.8% to 3.6% with a power of 0.80 and a 2-tailed α of 0.05. Thus, 90 women were required in each group, but 100 were selected to account for attrition.

RESULTS

Composite wound complications (including surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, need for resuturing or readmission for wound complications) were similar in the 2 groups (Group 1 vs 2: 16 vs 10; P=.293; relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.79). Surgical site infection (8 vs 7; P=1.000; relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.83), hematoma (1 vs 2; P=.561; relative risk, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-3.31), seroma (8 vs 2; P=.052; relative risk, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.33), need for resuturing (4 vs 3; P=.700; relative risk, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.22), and need for readmission (4 vs 4; P=1.000) were similar in the 2 groups. Pain score on the visual analog scale at 3 days (3.2±1.0 vs 3.6±1.2) and 6 weeks after operation (1.6±0.8 vs 1.7±0.9;) was significantly lower in Group 1 (P=.023 and P=.033, respectively). There was no difference between observer and patient scar assessment scores measured at 6 weeks after operation (P=.069 and P=.431, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Poliglecaprone-25 (3-0) and polyglactin-910 (4-0) subcuticular sutures were comparable regarding composite wound complications (surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, wound separation or re-suturing, need for readmission) and cosmetic appearance (patient scar assessment score & observer scar assessment score) related to skin closure among women undergoing cesarean delivery through a Pfannenstiel incision in nonobese women (average body mass index, 25).

Antiseptic Skin Agents to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Clean Implant Surgery: Subgroup Analysis of the NEWSkin Prep Trial

Background: There remains debate as to the ideal skin preparation agent to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) after clean implant surgery. This study is a subgroup analysis of all patients undergoing implant surgery in the NEWSkin prep trial. Patients and Methods: The NEWSkin prep trial is a randomized clinical trial (RCT; n = 3300) comparing the three antiseptic skin preparation agents commonly used prior to incisional surgery: chlorhexidine with alcohol (C-Alc), povidone iodine with alcohol (PI-Alc), and aqueous povidone iodine (PI-Aq). All participants who underwent clean incisional surgeries with implants from this trial were selected for analysis. The primary outcome was SSI rate; secondary outcomes were complication rates and re-admission rates. Results: A total of 712 patients in the NEWSkinPrep study underwent clean implant surgery between January 2015 and December 2018. Randomization resulted in the following distribution: C-Alc, 238; PI-Alc, 243; and PI-Aq, 231. Median age of participants was 63 years and 41% were female. Surgical site infection rates were: C-Alc, 10.13%; PI-Alc,11.52%; and PI-Aq, 11.26%. Povidone iodine with alcohol did not appear to be non-inferior to C-Alc (mean difference, 1.39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.17 to 6.95) and PI-Alc was not superior to PI-Aq (mean difference, 0.27%; 95% CI, -5.45 to 5.99; p = 0.9271). There were no differences seen in secondary outcomes between groups. Conclusions: These results indicate a similarity between PI-Alc and C-Alc and that PI-Alc was not superior to PI-Aq. Because this study was not powered to assess these differences in clean cases with implants, additional studies are needed to assess these agents.

Comparing the efficacy of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in preventing surgical site infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgical site infections (SSIs) post-surgery impact patient health and raise healthcare costs. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy of antiseptics, chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine, in reducing SSIs, including various types, to settle ongoing debates on their comparative effectiveness. A systematic literature search conforming to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was executed on four established databases without temporal restrictions. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients aged 18 years or older undergoing clean or potentially contaminated surgeries were included. Two independent evaluators carried out study selection, data extraction and quality assessment, adhering to Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests and the I2 index to evaluate heterogeneity, and meta-analyses were conducted employing either fixed-effects or random-effects models as warranted by the heterogeneity assessments. A total of 16 RCTs were included after rigorous selection from an initial pool of 1742 articles. The studies demonstrated low levels of heterogeneity, supporting the use of a fixed-effects model. Chlorhexidine exhibited statistically lower rates of overall SSIs (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.88; p < 0.001), superficial SSIs (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.47-0.82; p < 0.001) and deep SSIs compared to povidone-iodine. The study furnishes compelling evidence in favour of chlorhexidine as a more efficacious antiseptic agent over povidone-iodine in minimizing the risk of various types of SSIs.

FIGO good practice recommendations on surgical techniques to improve safety and reduce complications during cesarean delivery

FIGO is actively contributing to the global effort to reduce maternal morbidity, mortality, and disability worldwide. Cesarean delivery rates are increasing globally, without signs of slowing down. Bleeding associated with cesarean delivery has become an important cause of hemorrhage-related maternal deaths in many low- and middle-income countries. Correct surgical techniques to improve safety and reduce complications of cesarean delivery is of the utmost importance. This article presents FIGO's good practice recommendations for effective surgical techniques to reduce cesarean complications. Evidence-based information is included where data are available. An expanded WHO Surgical Safety Checklist for maternity cases is suggested. Different incision techniques through the layers of the abdominal wall with appropriate indications are discussed. Hysterotomy through a transverse incision is described, as are indications for low vertical and classical incisions. Important precautions when extracting the fetus are explained. Uterine closure includes a safe method ensuring adequate reapproximation of the upper segment if a vertical incision is made. The paper concludes with the management of two common bleeding problems following delivery of the placenta.

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site wound infection: A meta-analysis

A systematic evaluation was conducted to assess the efficacy of two disinfectants, chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine, as primary components in preventing surgical site infection (SSI). A comprehensive computerised search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine disinfection for the prevention of SSI from inception until July 2023. Two independent researchers completed literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Ultimately, 20 RCTs were included, which included 13 133 patients, with 6460 patients in the chlorhexidine group and 6673 patients in the povidone-iodine group. The meta-analysis results revealed that the incidence rate of surgical site wound infections [odds ratio (OR): 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.78, p < 0.001)], superficial SSI rate (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46-0.75, p < 0.001) and deep SSI rate (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.79, p = 0.003) were all lower in patients subjected to chlorhexidine disinfection compared to those patients receiving povidone-iodine disinfection. Existing evidence suggests that chlorhexidine is more effective than povidone-iodine at preventing SSI. However, owing to the potential quality limitations of the included studies, further validation through high-quality large-scale RCTs is warranted.

Comparison of olanexidine versus povidone-iodine as a preoperative antiseptic for reducing surgical site infection in both scheduled and emergency gastrointestinal surgeries: A single-center randomized clinical trial

Aim

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common postoperative complications in gastrointestinal surgery. To clarify the superiority of 1.5% olanexidine, we conducted a randomized prospective clinical trial that enrolled patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with operative wound classes II-IV.

Methods

To evaluate the efficacy of 1.5% olanexidine in preventing SSIs relative to 10% povidone-iodine, we enrolled 298 patients in each group. The primary outcome was a 30-day SSI, and the secondary outcomes were incidences of superficial and deep incisional SSI and organ/space SSI. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

The primary outcome of the overall 30-day SSI occurred in 38 cases (12.8%) in the 1.5% olanexidine group and in 53 cases (18.0%) in the 10% povidone-iodine group (adjusted risk ratio: 0.716, 95% confidence interval: 0.495-1.057, p = 0.083). Organ/space SSI occurred in 18 cases (6.1%) in the 1.5% olanexidine group and in 31 cases (10.5%) in the 10% povidone-iodine group, with a significant difference (adjusted risk ratio: 0.587, 95% confidence interval: 0.336-0.992, p = 0.049). Subgroup analyses revealed that SSI incidences were comparable in scheduled surgery (relative risk: 0.809, 95% confidence interval: 0.522-1.254) and operative wound class II (relative risk: 0.756, 95% confidence interval: 0.494-1.449) in 1.5% olanexidine group.

Conclusion

Our study revealed that 1.5% olanexidine reduced the 30-day overall SSI; however, the result was not significant. Organ/space SSI significantly decreased in the 1.5% olanexidine group. Our results indicate that 1.5% olanexidine has the potential to prevent SSI on behalf of povidone-iodine.

Vaginal cleansing before unscheduled cesarean delivery to reduce infection: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is the most performed major surgery among women, and surgical-site infections following a cesarean delivery are a significant source of postoperative morbidity. It is unclear if vaginal cleansing before a cesarean delivery decreases post-cesarean delivery infectious morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate if preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine among women undergoing a cesarean delivery after labor decreases postoperative infectious morbidity.

STUDY DESIGN

This randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 3, 2015 to January 28, 2021, with 30 days of follow-up and the final follow-up completed on February 27, 2021. Patients met the inclusion criteria if they underwent a cesarean delivery after regular contractions with cervical dilation, rupture of membranes, or any cesarean delivery performed at >4 cm dilation. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either abdominal cleansing plus vaginal cleansing with 1% povidone-iodine or abdominal cleansing alone. The primary outcome was composite infectious morbidity including surgical-site infection, fever, endometritis, and wound complications within 30 days after the cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the composite, length of hospital stay, postoperative hospitalization or outpatient treatment related to infectious morbidity, and empirical treatment for neonatal sepsis.

RESULTS

A total of 608 subjects (304 vaginal cleansing group, 304 control group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in the primary composite outcome between the 2 groups (11.8% vs 11.5%; P=.90; relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.6). Individual components of the composite and secondary outcomes were also not significantly different between the groups. Similar findings were observed in the as-treated analysis (11.3% vs 11.8%; P=.9; relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.6).

CONCLUSION

Vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine before an unscheduled cesarean delivery occurring after labor did not reduce the postoperative infectious morbidity. These findings do not support the routine use of vaginal cleansing for women undergoing a cesarean delivery after labor.

Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update

The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute-care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their surgical-site infection (SSI) prevention efforts. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.

Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery

Cesarean delivery is the most common major surgical procedure performed among birthing persons in the United States, and surgical-site infection is a significant complication. Several significant advances in preventive measures have been shown to reduce infection risk, while others remain plausible but not yet proven in clinical trials.

Quality of lower limb preoperative skin preparation using colorless versus colored disinfectants-results of an experimental, randomized study in a close to reality setting

BACKGROUND

Appropriate preoperative skin cleansing is important to control surgical site infections. Both colored and colorless skin disinfectants are available, however certain types of skin preparation, such as octenidine-dihydrochloride with alcohol have a long residual antimicrobial effect but are available only in colorless form. We hypothesized that colorless skin disinfectants lead to more incomplete skin preparation of lower limbs compared to colored agents.

METHODS

We randomly assigned healthy volunteers to undergo a determined skin cleansing protocol for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position to either a colored or colorless skin cleansing protocol. The adequacy of skin preparation was compared between orthopedic consultants and residents. The colorless disinfectant was mixed with a fluorescent dye and missed skin areas were visualized using UV lamps. Both preparations were photo-documented following standardized protocols. The primary outcome of interest was the number of legs with an incomplete scrubbed area. The secondary outcome was the cumulative skin area not disinfected.

RESULTS

Fifty-two healthy volunteers (104 legs; 52 colored and 52 colorless) underwent surgical skin preparation. The number of legs incompletely disinfected was significantly higher in colorless compared to colored disinfectant group (38.5% (n = 20) vs. 13.5% (n = 7); p = 0.007). Regardless of the disinfectant, consultants performed better than the residents. When using colored disinfectant, residents incompletely prepared the site in 23.1% (n = 6) compared with 57.7% (n = 15) with a colorless disinfectant (p = 0.023). Conversely consultants using colored disinfectant incompletely prepared the site in 3.8% (n = 1) compared with 19.2% (n = 5) for colorless disinfectant (p = 0.191). The total amount of uncleansed skin was significantly higher using colorless skin disinfectant (mean ± standard deviation: 8.78 cm2± 35.07 vs. 0.65 cm2 ± 2.66, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Application of colorless skin disinfectants for hip arthroplasty cleansing protocol led to decreased skin coverage among consultants and residents compared to colored preparations. Colored disinfectants remain the gold standard in hip surgery, however we should be aiming to develop newer colored disinfectants with long residual antimicrobial effects to enable visual control during the scrubbing process.

Association Between Surgeon Gender and Maternal Morbidity After Cesarean Delivery

Importance

The stereotype that men perform surgery better than women is ancient. Surgeons have long been mainly men, but in recent decades an inversion has begun; the number of women surgeons is increasing, especially in obstetrics and gynecology. Studies outside obstetrics suggest that postoperative morbidity and mortality may be lower after surgery by women.

Objective

To evaluate the association between surgeons' gender and the risks of maternal morbidity and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after cesarean deliveries.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study was based on data from the Tranexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery (TRAAP2) trial, a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that took place from March 2018 through January 2020 (23 months). It aimed to investigate whether the administration of tranexamic acid plus a prophylactic uterotonic agent decreased PPH incidence after cesarean delivery compared with a uterotonic agent alone. Women having a cesarean delivery before or during labor at or after 34 weeks' gestation were recruited from 27 French maternity hospitals.

Exposures

Self-reported gender (man or woman), assessed by a questionnaire immediately after delivery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the incidence of a composite maternal morbidity variable, and the secondary end point was the incidence of PPH (the primary outcome of the TRAAP2 trial), defined by a calculated estimated blood loss exceeding 1000 mL or transfusion by day 2.

Results

Among 4244 women included, men surgeons performed 943 cesarean deliveries (22.2%) and women surgeons performed 3301 (77.8%). The rate of attending obstetricians was higher among men (441 of 929 [47.5%]) than women (687 of 3239 [21.2%]). The risk of maternal morbidity did not differ for men and women surgeons: 119 of 837 (14.2%) vs 476 of 2928 (16.3%) (adjusted risk ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77-1.13]). Interaction between surgeon gender and level of experience on the risk of maternal morbidity was not statistically significant. Similarly, the groups did not differ for PPH risk (adjusted risk ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.85-1.13]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Risks of postoperative maternal morbidity and of PPH exceeding 1000 mL or requiring transfusion by day 2 did not differ by the surgeon's gender.

The Level of Surface Coverage of Surgical Site Disinfection Depends on the Visibility of the Antiseptic Agent-A Virtual Reality Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) have a significant impact on outcome associated with surgical treatment. Therefore, skin antisepsis has evolved as a standard preoperative procedure in the operating room to reduce the perioperative risk of an SSI. In their "Global Guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections", the World Health Organization (WHO) recommend the use of an agent with remanent additives and considers colored agents as helpful. However, colored and remanent disinfectants are not available in Germany. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether using a colored antiseptic solution increases the quality of preoperative skin antisepsis.

METHODS

This study was designed as a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial. To examine the level of coverage of skin antisepsis, an appropriate virtual reality (VR) environment was generated. Participants could see a movable surgical clamp with a swab in their hand. When touching the skin, the participants recognized an optical change in the appearance of the skin: Using a colored antiseptic solution resulted in orange-colored skin. Using an uncolored agent, a shiny wet look was visible without a change in natural skin color.

RESULTS

Data of 141 participants (female: 61.0% (n = 86); mean age: 28 y (Range 18-58 y, SD = 7.53 y)) were included in the study. The level of disinfection coverage was higher in the group using the colored disinfectant. On average, 86.5% (sd = 10.0) of the leg skin was covered when a colored disinfectant was used, whereas only 73.9% (sd = 12.8) of the leg skin was covered when the participants had to use an uncolored agent (p < 0.001, effect size: f = 0.56, η2 = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an uncolored disinfectant leads to a lower surface coverage of the perioperative skin disinfection. Thus far, it is unclear whether using uncolored disinfectants is associated with higher risks for perioperative infections compared with the use of non-remanent disinfectants. Therefore, further research is necessary and current German guidelines should be re-evaluated accordingly.

A standardized infection prevention bundle for reduction of CSF shunt infections in adult ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery performed without antibiotic-impregnated catheters

OBJECTIVE

Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion and revision surgeries are some of the most common procedures that are performed by neurosurgeons. Shunt infections within the adult population are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and rates remain high. The objective of the current study was to use quality improvement (QI) methodology to create a standardized infection prevention bundle aimed at reducing the rate of shunt infections.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, single-surgeon QI study was undertaken. Patients were included if they were 18 years of age or older and were undergoing a VP shunt insertion or revision. The primary outcome of the study was the development of a shunt-related surgical site infection, within 1 year of surgery, as defined according to the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program guidelines. There was no standardized protocol prior to July 2013. A bundle coined as the Calgary Adult Shunt Infection Prevention Protocol (CASIPP) was implemented on July 1, 2013, and updated on July 1, 2015, when 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol replaced povidone-iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis. Protocol compliance was regularly monitored using a standardized process. No antibiotic-impregnated catheters were used.

RESULTS

A total of 621 consecutive VP shunt insertions and revisions were included in the study. The rate of shunt infection was 5.8% during the period in which there was no standardized shunt protocol. After the implementation of the CASIPP the infection rate decreased to 4.0%, and after introduction of the chlorhexidine/alcohol skin antisepsis, the infection rate was 0% in 379 consecutive procedures (p < 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the use of chlorhexidine/alcohol with CASIPP was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of developing a shunt infection (OR 0.032, 95% CI 0-0.19, p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a standardized shunt infection prevention bundle within the adult population, without the use of antibiotic-impregnated catheters, significantly reduced the rate of shunt infections which was sustained over many years. The use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for preoperative antisepsis may have played a significant role. Multicenter studies should be completed to verify the effectiveness of the authors' protocol.

Continuous versus disrupted subcutaneous tissue closure in cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To compare rates of surgical-site infections following continuous, as compared with interrupted, subcutaneous tissue closure technique during cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study during 2008-2018. The study group included women who underwent either elective or emergent CD with continuous subcutaneous tissue closure, while the control group comprised those with interrupted subcutaneous tissue closure. We excluded women with suspected infectious morbidity before CD. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection (SSI) rate.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 6281 women. We performed continuous subcutaneous tissue closure in 37.4% (1867/4988) of scheduled CD, and 45.8% (592/1293) of emergent CD. The rate of SSI was significantly lower following continuous than interrupted subcutaneous tissue closure, in both elective CD (2.7% versus 4.5%, respectively, P = 0.031) and emergent CD (3.2% versus 5.4%, respectively, P = 0.036) in nulliparous and multiparous women. Similarly, secondary outcomes such as re-admission rates, postoperative maternal fever, and need for antibiotic treatment were significantly lower following continuous subcutaneous closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous subcutaneous closure technique during CD yields a lower rate of surgical-site complications compared with the interrupted technique.

[The cesarean procedure: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]

OBJECTIVE

To identify procedures to reduce maternal morbidity during cesarean.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE® method with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases. The quality of the evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and a (i) strong or (ii) weak recommendations or (iii) no recommendation were formulated. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with external reviewers (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations.

RESULTS

Of the 27 questions, there was agreement between the working group and the external reviewers on 26. The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide a recommendation on 15 questions. Preventing hypothermia is recommended to increase maternal satisfaction and comfort (weak recommendation) and to reduce neonatal hypothermia (strong recommendation). The quality of the evidence of the literature did not allow to recommend the skin disinfectant to be used nor the relevance of a preoperative vaginal disinfection nor the choice between the use or nonuse of an indwelling bladder catheterization (if micturition takes place 1 hour before the cesarean section). The Misgav-Ladach technique or its analogues should be considered rather than the Pfannenstiel technique to reduce maternal morbidity (weak recommendation) bladder flap before uterine incision should not be performed routinely (weak recommendation), but a blunt (weak recommendation) and cephalad-caudad extension of uterine incision (weak recommendation) should be considered to reduce maternal morbidity. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended to reduce maternal infectious morbidity (strong recommendation) without recommendation on its type or the timing of administration (before incision or after cord clamping). The administration of carbetocin after cord clamping does not significantly decrease the incidence of blood loss>1000 ml, anemia, or blood transfusion compared with the administration of oxytocin. Thus, it is not recommended to use carbetocin rather than oxytocin in cesarean. It is recommended that systematic manual removal of the placenta not to be performed (weak recommendation). An antiemetic should be administered after cord clamping in women having a planned cesarean under locoregional anaesthesia to reduce intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting (strong recommendation) with no recommendation regarding choice of use one or two antiemetics. The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide any recommendation concerning single or double-layer closure of the uterine incision, or the uterine exteriorization. Closing the peritoneum (visceral or parietal) should not be considered (weak recommendation). The quality of the evidence of the literature was not sufficient to provide recommendation on systematic subcutaneous closure, including in obese or overweight patients, or the use of subcuticular suture in obese or overweight patients. The use of subcuticular suture in comparison with skin closure by staples was not considered as a recommendation due to the absence of a consensus in the external review rounds.

CONCLUSION

In case of cesarean, preventing hypothermia, administering antiemetic and antibiotic prophylaxis after cord clamping are the only strong recommendations. The Misgav-Ladach technique, the way of performing uterine incision (no systematic bladder flap, blunt cephalad-caudad extension), not performing routine manual removal of the placenta nor closure of the peritoneum are weak recommendations and may reduce maternal morbidity.

Protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric derisomaltose to oral ferrous sulfate for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: The IVIDA2 trial

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common during pregnancy and associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Treatment with iron supplementation is recommended during pregnancy, but the optimal delivery route is unclear. Oral iron risks has high risk of gastrointestinal side effects and low absorption. Intravenous iron is infused directly but is expensive. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommends oral iron to treat IDA in pregnancy with intravenous iron reserved as second-line therapy, if needed. This approach is associated with persistent anemia, increasing the risk of peripartum blood transfusion. We aim to provide data on optimal route of iron repletion for IDA in pregnancy.

METHODS

In IVIDA2, a double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter randomized trial in the United States, 746 pregnant people with moderate-to-severe IDA (hemoglobin <10 g/dL and ferritin <30 ng/mL) at 24-28 weeks' gestation will be randomized 1:1 to either a single 1000 mg dose of intravenous ferric derisomaltose and oral placebo (1-3 times daily) or a single placebo infusion with 1-3 times daily 325 mg ferrous sulfate (65 mg elemental iron) tablet. The primary outcome is peripartum blood transfusion (blood transfusion from delivery to 7 days postpartum). Secondary outcomes include adverse medication reactions, maternal and neonatal hematologic indices, and offspring neurodevelopment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

A central ethical review board-Advarra-granted ethical approval (Pro00060930). Participating centers-Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, University of Michigan Medical Center, Washington University School of Ethics and dissemination: A central ethical review board-Advarra-granted ethical approval (Pro00060930). Participating centers-Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, University of Michigan Medical Center, Washington University School of.

PA, Phelps K, Bosse M, Karunakar M, Kempton L, Sims S, Hsu J, Seymour R, Churchill C, Mayfield A, Sweeney J, Jaeblon T, Beer R, Bauer B, Meredith S, Talwar S, Domes CM, Gage MJ, Reilly RM, Paniagua A, Dupree J, Weaver MJ, von Keudell AG, Sagona AE, Mehta S, Donegan D, Horan A, Dooley M, Heng M, Harris MB, Lhowe DW, Esposito JG, Alnasser A, Shannon SF, Scott AN, Clinch B, Weber B, Beltran MJ, Archdeacon MT, Sagi HC, Wyrick JD, Le TT, Laughlin RT, Thomson CG, Hasselfeld K, Lin CA, Vrahas MS, Moon CN, Little MT, Marecek GS, Dubuclet DM, Scolaro JA, Learned JR, Lim PK, Demas S, Amirhekmat A, Dela Cruz YM. Aqueous skin antisepsis before surgical fixation of open fractures (Aqueous-PREP): a multiple-period, cluster-randomised, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Chlorhexidine skin antisepsis is frequently recommended for most surgical procedures; however, it is unclear if these recommendations should apply to surgery involving traumatic contaminated wounds where povidone-iodine has previously been preferred. We aimed to compare the effect of aqueous 10% povidone-iodine versus aqueous 4% chlorhexidine gluconate on the risk of surgical site infection in patients who required surgery for an open fracture.

METHODS

We conducted a multiple-period, cluster-randomised, crossover trial (Aqueous-PREP) at 14 hospitals in Canada, Spain, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with an open extremity fracture treated with a surgical fixation implant. For inclusion, the open fracture required formal surgical debridement within 72 h of the injury. Participating sites were randomly assigned (1:1) to use either aqueous 10% povidone-iodine or aqueous 4% chlorhexidine gluconate immediately before surgical incision; sites then alternated between the study interventions every 2 months. Participants, health-care providers, and study personnel were aware of the treatment assignment due to the colour of the solutions. The outcome adjudicators and data analysts were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was surgical site infection, guided by the 2017 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network reporting criteria, which included superficial incisional infection within 30 days or deep incisional or organ space infection within 90 days of surgery. The primary analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle and included all participants in the groups to which they were randomly assigned. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03385304.

FINDINGS

Between April 8, 2018, and June 8, 2021, 3619 patients were assessed for eligibility and 1683 were enrolled and randomly assigned to povidone-iodine (n=847) or chlorhexidine gluconate (n=836). The trial's adjudication committee determined that 45 participants were ineligible, leaving 1638 participants in the primary analysis, with 828 in the povidone-iodine group and 810 in the chlorhexidine gluconate group (mean age 44·9 years [SD 18·0]; 629 [38%] were female and 1009 [62%] were male). Among 1571 participants in whom the primary outcome was known, a surgical site infection occurred in 59 (7%) of 787 participants in the povidone-iodine group and 58 (7%) of 784 in the chlorhexidine gluconate group (odds ratio 1·11, 95% CI 0·74 to 1·65; p=0·61; risk difference 0·6%, 95% CI -1·4 to 3·4).

INTERPRETATION

For patients who require surgical fixation of an open fracture, either aqueous 10% povidone-iodine or aqueous 4% chlorhexidine gluconate can be selected for skin antisepsis on the basis of solution availability, patient contraindications, or product cost. These findings might also have implications for antisepsis of other traumatic wounds.

FUNDING

US Department of Defense, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, McMaster University Surgical Associates, PSI Foundation.

Implementation of an evidence-based bundle to reduce surgical site infection after caesarean section - Review of the interventions

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication post caesarean section (CS) with a significant impact on women and health services. A bundle approach incorporating previously studied individual interventions has shown increased reductions in SSI.

AIM

To assess compliance with a SSI intervention bundle and to examine readmission rates for SSI.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of women who underwent CS at a regional hospital in Queensland, Australia pre-intervention (February 2015-January 2017) and post-intervention (February 2018-December 2020).

RESULTS

There was good compliance with vaginal cleansing (27.7% vs 84.8%), chlorhexidine skin preparation (90.4% vs 98.4%), BMI-based antibiotic dose adjustment (48.8% vs 74.3%), and Alexis retractor use (9.9% vs 66%), pre and post-implementation periods respectively. There was a reduction in documented hair shaving (2.1% vs 0.5%). There was a trend towards less admission for SSI, a trend that could have been even better had there not been an increasing number of women with high BMI over the years. Fewer cases needed return to theatre post-implementation. Endometritis rates were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Good compliance can be achieved with good collaboration. There was a reduction in admission rates for SSI. Larger prospective studies are needed to further examine these findings.

Surgical solutions for preoperative skin preparation in total hip arthroplasty: A cost-effectiveness analysis of Betadine® and Chloraprep™

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to compare the cost of surgical site skin preparation using ChloraPrep™ (2% chlorhexidine gluconate [CHG] and 70% isopropyl alcohol [IPA]) with skin cleansing using Betadine® Surgical Scrub and Betadine® 5% solution (povidone-iodine [PVI]) in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis was that the ChloraPrep™ skin disinfection protocol reduces the cost of perioperative antisepsis.

METHODS

A prospective database was created for all THAs performed at our university hospital between November 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2020. Each surgeon was randomly assigned one type of antiseptic prior to the start of the study: one surgeon to the ChloraPrep™ group and one to the Betadine® group. In both groups, the enrollment stopped at the 15th patient. The costs related to consumables, waste disposal, and operating room occupancy time of each protocol were then assessed for each patient.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the ChloraPrep™ protocol was 3.5±0.3minutes compared to 13.5±0.9minutes for the Betadine® protocol. The overall cost of a surgical site skin preparation involving all three steps was on average €46.8±4.2 for the ChloraPrep™ group compared to €155±10.9 for the Betadine® group (p<0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Not only is the effectiveness of ChloraPrep™ already recognized but it also appears to have health economic benefits. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case control study.

Efficacy of different preoperative skin antiseptics on the incidence of surgical site infections: a systematic review, GRADE assessment, and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common postoperative complication and substantially increases health-care costs. Published meta-analyses and international guidelines differ with regard to which preoperative skin antiseptic solution and concentration has the highest efficacy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of different skin preparation solutions and concentrations for the prevention of SSIs, and to provide an overview of current guidelines.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared different preoperative skin antiseptics in the prevention of SSIs in adult patients undergoing surgery of any wound classification. We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL, published up to Nov 23, 2021, that directly compared two or more antiseptic agents (ie, chlorhexidine, iodine, or olanexidine) or concentrations in aqueous and alcohol-based solutions. We excluded paediatric, animal, and non-randomised studies, and studies not providing standard preoperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. Studies with no SSIs in both groups were excluded from the quantitative analysis. Two reviewers screened and reviewed eligible full texts and extracted data. The primary outcome was the occurrence of SSI (ie, superficial, deep, and organ space). We conducted a frequentist random effects network meta-analysis to estimate the network effects of the skin preparation solutions on the prevention of SSIs. A risk-of-bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment were done to determine the certainty of the evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021293554.

FINDINGS

Overall, 2326 articles were identified, 33 studies were eligible for the systematic review, and 27 studies with 17 735 patients reporting 2144 SSIs (overall incidence of 12·1%) were included in the quantitative analysis. Only 2·0-2·5% chlorhexidine in alcohol (relative risk 0·75, 95% CI 0·61-0·92) and 1·5% olanexidine (0·49, 0·26-0·92) significantly reduced the rate of SSIs compared with aqueous iodine. For clean surgery, we found no difference in efficacy between different concentrations of chlorhexidine in alcohol. Seven RCTs were at high risk of bias, 24 had some concerns, and two had low risk of bias. Heterogeneity across the studies was moderate (I²=27·5%), and netsplitting did not show inconsistencies between direct and indirect comparisons. Five of ten studies that mentioned adverse events related to the skin preparation solutions reported no adverse events, and five reported a total of 56 mild events (mainly erythema, pruritus, dermatitis, skin irritation, or mild allergic symptoms); none reported a substantial difference in adverse events between groups.

INTERPRETATION

For adult patients undergoing a surgical procedure of any wound classification, skin preparation using either 2·0-2·5% chlorhexidine in alcohol or 1·5% olanexidine is most effective in the prevention of SSIs. For clean surgery, no specific concentration of chlorhexidine in alcohol can be recommended. The efficacy of olanexidine was established by a single randomised trial and further investigation is needed.

FUNDING

Dutch Association for Quality Funds Medical Specialists.

A pragmatic randomized trial evaluating pre-operative aqueous antiseptic skin solutions in open fractures (Aqueous-PREP): statistical analysis plan

Background

Approximately 1 in 10 patients with a surgically treated open fracture will develop a surgical site infection. The Aqueous-PREP trial will investigate the effect of 10% povidone-iodine versus 4% chlorhexidine in aqueous antiseptic solutions in reducing infections after open fracture surgery. The study protocol was published in April 2020.

Methods and design

The Aqueous-PREP trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, randomized multiple period cluster crossover trial. Each participating cluster is randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to provide 1 of the 2 study interventions on all eligible patients during a study period. The intervention periods are 2 months in length. After completing a 2-month period, the participating cluster crosses over to the alternative intervention. We plan to enroll a minimum of 1540 patients at 14 sites.

Results

The primary outcome is surgical site infection guided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Network reporting criteria (2017). All participants’ surgical site infection surveillance period will end 30 days after definitive fracture management surgery for superficial infections and 90 days after definitive fracture management surgery for deep incisional or organ/space infections [1]. The secondary outcome is an unplanned fracture-related reoperation within 12 months of the fracture.

Conclusion

This manuscript serves as the formal statistical analysis plan (version 1.0) for the Aqueous-PREP trial. The statistical analysis plan was completed on February 28, 2022.

Postoperative C-reactive protein as a predictive marker for surgical site infection after cesarean section: Retrospective analysis of 748 patients at a Japanese academic institution

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common but potentially serious maternal complication of cesarean section (CS). C-reactive protein (CRP) can be used in early detection of SSI. However, its predictive value for post-cesarean SSI has never been investigated. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of CRP for the development of SSI. This was a hospital-based retrospective cohort study of 748 pregnant women who underwent CS at our university hospital between January 2017 and December 2019. CRP was measured on postoperative days 1, 3, and 6. The predictive values of CRP for SSI were evaluated using receiver operating characteristics analysis. Forty-seven (6.3%) patients developed SSI, of whom 38 (80.9%) underwent emergency CS. Serum CRP levels were significantly higher in the SSI group than in the non-SSI group from postoperative day 1 (64 vs. 81 mg/L, p = 0.001); the difference became more evident on postoperative days 3 and 6. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for CRP on days 1, 3, and 6 was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.68), 0.70 (0.62 to 0.78) and 0.73 (0.65 to 0.81), respectively. The optimal cutoff value for day 3 and 6 CRP was 66.4 mg/L (sensitivity = 76.1% and specificity = 54.4%) and 22.2 mg/L (sensitivity = 76.5% and specificity = 63.2%), respectively. CRP on postoperative days 3 and 6 can be used as a predictive marker for the development of SSI after CS. Further studies to validate the predictive value in different populations is essential.

Antimicrobial persistence of two alcoholic preoperative skin preparation solutions

BACKGROUND

Normal skin flora and suboptimal skin antisepsis are the primary drivers of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Antimicrobial persistence of preoperative skin preparation is necessary to limit microorganisms on the skin and help minimize their entry into an incision or device-insertion site after application.

AIM

To assess the antimicrobial persistence of two preoperative skin preparation solutions.

METHODS

A randomized, single-centre, partially blinded, clinical study was conducted in 103 healthy volunteers to evaluate the persistent antimicrobial properties of BD ChloraPrep™ (2% w/v chlorhexidine gluconate [CHG] + 70% v/v isopropyl alcohol [IPA]) and BD PurPrep™ (8.3% w/w povidone-iodine [PVP-I] + 72.5% w/w IPA) skin preparations out to 7 days and 96 hours, respectively, on abdomen and groin testing sites. An additional 32 healthy volunteers participated in a neutralization procedure to ensure the study recovery solution was non-toxic to microorganisms, and a spore-recovery procedure to demonstrate that microorganisms could be successfully recovered from the PVP-I+IPA film-forming product.

RESULTS

Both CHG+IPA and PVP-I+IPA produced a mean bacterial log₁₀ reduction >2 and >3 on the abdomen and groin, respectively, 10 minutes after application. CHG+IPA maintained antimicrobial persistence out to 7 days post-application, while PVP-I+IPA maintained antimicrobial persistence out to 96 hours post-application, the longest timepoint selected for this product.

CONCLUSION

CHG+IPA and PVP-I+IPA were both found to be effective persistent antiseptic skin preparations. Overall, skin irritation was uncommon, and only 1 adverse event occurred following product application, which was not considered product related but was considered procedure related.

Monkeypox in pregnancy: virology, clinical presentation, and obstetric management

The 2022 monkeypox outbreak, caused by the zoonotic monkeypox virus, has spread across 6 World Health Organization regions (the Americas, Africa, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, Western Pacific, and South-East Asia) and was declared a public health emergency of international concern on July 23, 2022. The global situation is especially concerning given the atypically high rate of person-to-person transmission, which suggests viral evolution to an established human pathogen. Pregnant women are at heightened risk of vertical transmission of the monkeypox virus because of immune vulnerability and natural depletion of population immunity to smallpox among reproductive-age women, and because orthopoxviral cell entry mechanisms can overcome the typically viral-resistant syncytiotrophoblast barrier within the placenta. Data on pregnancy outcomes following monkeypox infection are scarce but include reports of miscarriage, intrauterine demise, preterm birth, and congenital infection. This article forecasts the issues that maternity units might face and proposes guidelines to protect the health of pregnant women and fetuses exposed to the monkeypox virus. We review the pathophysiology and clinical features of monkeypox infection and discuss the obstetrical implications of the unusually high prevalence of anogenital lesions. We describe the use of real-time polymerase chain reaction tests from mucocutaneous and oropharyngeal sites to confirm infection, and share an algorithm for the antenatal management of pregnant women with monkeypox virus exposure. On the basis of the best available knowledge from prenatal orthopoxvirus infections, we discuss the sonographic features of congenital monkeypox and the role of invasive testing in establishing fetal infection. We suggest a protocol for cesarean delivery to avoid the horizontal transmission of the monkeypox virus at birth and address the controversy of mother-infant separation in the postpartum period. Obstetrical concerns related to antiviral therapy with tecovirimat and vaccinia immune globulin are highlighted, including the risks of heart rate-corrected QT-interval prolongation, inaccuracies in blood glucose monitoring, and the predisposition to iatrogenic venous thromboembolism. The possibility of monkeypox vaccine hesitancy during pregnancy is discussed, and strategies are offered to mitigate these risks. Finally, we conclude with a research proposal to address knowledge gaps related to the impact of monkeypox infection on maternal, fetal, and neonatal health.

Alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation or triclosan-coated sutures to reduce surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

WHO and the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommend alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation and triclosan-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). Existing meta-analyses that include studies at high risk of bias, combined with the recent publication of large, randomised trials, justify an updated meta-analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to test the rates of SSI according to skin preparation solutions (ie, alcoholic chlorhexidine vs aqueous povidone-iodine) and types of sutures (ie, coated vs uncoated).

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases, with no language restrictions, to identify high-quality RCTs testing either alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation (vs aqueous povidone-iodine) or triclosan-coated sutures (vs uncoated sutures), or both, published from database inception to Sept 1, 2021. Patients who received clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgery were included. We predefined the characteristics of a high-quality trial through an expert consensus process to develop an enhanced Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool specifically for RCTs with a primary outcome of SSI. Data were extracted from published reports. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO, CRD42021267220.

FINDINGS

Of 942 studies identified, 933 were excluded. Four high-quality RCTs (n=7467 patients) were included that tested alcoholic chlorhexidine. No significant difference in SSI rates was noted between alcoholic chlorhexidine and aqueous povidone-iodine (17·9% [667 of 3723 patients] vs 19·8% [740 of 3744 patients]; odds ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·65-1·06]; p=0·21, I²=53·1%). Five high-quality RCTs were included that tested triclosan-coated sutures (n=8619 patients), with no significant difference noted between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures (16·8% [733 of 4360 patients] vs 18·4% [784 of 4259 patients]; OR 0·90 [95% CI 0·74-1·09]; p=0·29, I²=36·4%).

INTERPRETATION

Contrary to previous meta-analyses, this study did not show a benefit from either alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation or triclosan-coated sutures, both of which are more expensive than other readily available alternatives. Global and national guidance should be reconsidered to remove recommendations for their routine use.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit.

Effect of Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen on SSI Among Adults with Lower-Extremity Fractures at Increased Risk for Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Supplemental perioperative oxygen is a low-cost intervention theorized to reduce the risk of surgical site infections, but its effect among patients undergoing surgery for a tibial plateau, tibial pilon, or calcaneal fracture is unknown. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 , 80%) versus low FiO 2 (30%) in reducing surgical site infections in these patients.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted at 29 U.S. trauma centers. We enrolled 1,231 patients who were 18 to 80 years of age and had a tibial plateau, tibial pilon, or calcaneal fracture and were thought to be at elevated risk for infection based on their injury characteristics. Patients were randomized to receive 80% FiO 2 (treatment group) or 30% FiO 2 (control group) in the operating room and for up to 2 hours in the recovery room. The primary outcome was a composite of either deep surgical site infection (treated with surgery) or superficial surgical site infection (treated with antibiotics alone) within 182 days following definitive fixation. Secondary outcomes included these surgical site infections at 90 and 365 days after surgery.

RESULTS

The modified intention-to-treat analysis included 1,136 patients with 94% of expected follow-up through 182 days. Surgical site infection occurred in 40 (7.0%) of the patients in the treatment group and 60 (10.7%) of the patients in the control group (relative risk [RR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.96; risk difference [RD], -3.8%; 95% CI, -7.2% to -0.4%; p = 0.03). The treatment intervention demonstrated a similar effect at 90 days (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.93) and 365 days (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.87). Secondary analyses demonstrated that the effect was driven by a reduction in superficial surgical site infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Among tibial plateau, pilon, or calcaneal fracture patients at elevated risk for surgical site infection, a high perioperative FiO 2 lowered the risk of surgical site infection. The findings support the use of this intervention, although the benefit appears to mostly be in reduction of superficial infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The effect of preoperative skin preparation on clinical outcomes with incisional surgery: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative skin antiseptics are used prior to surgery to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). There is debate as to which is the most effective. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the effectiveness of different skin preparations at reducing SSIs in patients undergoing incisional surgery.

METHODS

The study protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD4202181599) a priori with predefined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria. The skin preparations for comparison were: chlorhexidine/alcohol (CHA), chlorhexidine/water (CHW), poviodine/alcohol (PVIA), poviodine/water (PVIW). The records identified were screened by two authors independently by title, abstract and in full text. The revised tool for risk-of bias (ROB2) assessment was used.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine RCTs involving 15 796 patients were included in the NMA. A significant but small increase in the odds of infection was seen in the PVIW group compared to the CHA group (OR 1.34, 95%CrI 1.09-1.64), but other comparisons were not statistically significantly different. Ranking the treatment arms showed there was a 64% probability that CHA is the most effective and a 62.7% probability that PVIW is the least effective treatment.

CONCLUSION

Chlorhexidine/alcohol (CHA) was found to be the most effective for prevention of superficial and deep SSI while PVIW was the least. There was no differences seen between CHA and PVIA, or CHW and PVIW. The superiority of CHA is likely due to the effect of the alcohol in the base. Hence the choice between CHA and PVIA should be based on health and cost considerations.

Antiseptic Skin Agents to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Incisional Surgery: A Randomized, Three-armed Combined Non-inferiority and Superiority Clinical Trial (NEWSkin Prep Study)

OBJECTIVE

To compare SSI rates between the skin preparation agents: PI-Aq, povidone-iodine with alcohol (PI-Alc), and chlorhexidine with alcohol (C-Alc).

BACKGROUND

Guidelines suggest that alcohol-containing chlorhexidine solutions are the gold standard for skin preparation before surgery. It remains difficult to determine whether it is the chlorhexidine component or the addition of alcohol that confers the most benefit.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, combined non-inferiority (PI-Alc vs C-Alc) and superiority (PI-Alc vs PI-Aq) randomized clinical trial. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive either C-Alc, PI-Alc, or PI-Aq. The primary outcome was SSI rate as defined by the Centers for Disease Control. Secondary outcomes were complication rates, length of hospital stay, readmissions, and skin reactions.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and December 2018, 3213 patients were randomized (C-Alc: 1076, PI-Alc: 1075, and PI-Aq: 1062). Mean age of participants was 57% and 55% were female. SSI rates were: C-Alc 11.09%, PI-Alc 10.88%, and PI-Aq 12.56%. PI-Alc was found to be non-inferior to C-Alc (mean difference, -0.21%; 95% confidence interval, -2.85 to 2.44; P = 0.0009 non-inferiority), whereas PI-Alc was not superior to PI-Aq (mean difference, -1.68%; 95% confidence interval, -4.40 to 1.05; P = 0.2302). There were no differences seen in secondary outcomes between groups and no treatment related adverse events or deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

PI-Alc is non-inferior to C-Alc and not superior to PI-Aq. This is at odds with current guidelines that suggest alcohol-based chlorhexidine solutions should routinely be used for surgical skin preparation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ANZCTRN12615000021571. www.anzctr.org.au.

Endoscopic excision as a viable alternative to major resection for early duodenal cancers: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Duodenal cancer presents an elusive therapeutic challenge for clinicians to treat because of its highly malignant behavior and anatomical complexity. Endoscopic excision has been administered to treat early-stage cancers of upper gastrointestinal tract, especially esophagus and stomach cancer. There is currently a scarcity of data regarding the application and efficacy of endoscopic resection for early duodenal cancer due to its rarity. This study aimed at exploring the prevalence and efficacy of endoscopic excision in treatment for early duodenal cancer in comparison with major surgery.

METHODS

This cohort study retrospectively collected patients with primary Tis/T1-N0-M0 duodenal cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2017. Prevalence of endoscopic excision in duodenal cancer treatment, overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients who received different tumor-resection procedures were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 1354 patients with Tis/T1-stage duodenal cancer were identified. Most patients (69.4%) underwent tumor resection as initial treatments. Among them, 65.7% underwent endoscopic excision, while 34.3% underwent major surgery. The multivariable Cox analyses revealed that endoscopic excision was associated with a significantly favorable OS (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.95, p = 0.02) and DSS (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.17-0.60, p < 0.001), compared to major surgery, for Tis/T1-stage cancer patients. In addition to cancer-related deaths (p < 0.001), endoscopic resection manifested significantly lower cumulative mortality rate of post-operative infectious diseases (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic resection currently accounted for approximately two-thirds of all procedures to resect Tis/T1-stage duodenal tumor. Endoscopic resection represents a viable therapeutic option in the management of Tis/T1-stage duodenal cancer for its oncological superiorities to major surgery and its capacity to reduce operative traumas and morbidities.

Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Post-Surgical Mediastinitis in Adults Consensus Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular Infections (SEICAV), the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) and the Biomedical Research Centre Network for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES)

This is a consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular Infections (SEICAV), the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) and the Biomedical Research Centre Network for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES). These three entities have brought together a multidisciplinary group of experts that includes anaesthesiologists, cardiac and cardiothoracic surgeons, clinical microbiologists, infectious diseases and intensive care specialists, internal medicine doctors and radiologists. Despite the clinical and economic consequences of sternal wound infections, to date, there are no specific guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and management of mediastinitis based on a multidisciplinary consensus. The purpose of the present document is to provide evidence-based guidance on the most effective diagnosis and management of patients who have experienced or are at risk of developing a post-surgical mediastinitis infection in order to optimise patient outcomes and the process of care. The intended users of the document are health care providers who help patients make decisions regarding their treatment, aiming to optimise the benefits and minimise any harm as well as the workload.

Evidence-based Prevention of Surgical Site Infection

Surgical site infection (SSI) remains an important complication of surgery. SSI is estimated to affect 2% to 5% of all surgical patients. Local and national efforts have resulted in significant improvements in the incidence of SSI. Familiarity with evidence surrounding high-quality SSI-reduction strategies is desirable. There exists strong evidence for mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation in colorectal surgery, smoking cessation before elective surgery, prophylactic antibiotics, chlorhexidine-based skin antisepsis, and maintenance of normothermia throughout the perioperative period to reduce SSI. Use of other practices should be determined by the operating surgeon and/or local hospital policy.

Surgical Site Infections

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common and most costly health care-associated infections, leading to adverse patient outcomes and death. Wound contamination occurs with each incision, but proven strategies exist to decrease the risk of SSI. In particular, improved adherence to evidence-based preventive measures related to appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis can decrease the rate of SSI. Aggressive surgical debridement and effective antimicrobial therapy are needed to optimize the treatment of SSI.

Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine as preoperative skin antisepsis for prevention of surgical site infection in cesarean delivery-a pilot randomized control trial

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of chlorhexidine–alcohol and povidone–iodine as preoperative antiseptic skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after cesarean delivery (CD).

Materials and methods

A total of 311 eligible women who underwent CS were recruited in the study after fulfilling all the eligibility and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomized into two groups (153 in chlorhexidine–alcohol group and 158 in povidone–iodine group) by a computer-generated randomization table. Patients were followed for a period of 30 days in postoperative period to monitor for SSI.

Results

The rate of SSI in the chlorhexidine–alcohol group is 5.4% and that of the povidone–iodine group is 8.6%. E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii were the most common organisms isolated. E. coli was found in 9.5% of the total SSI cases.

Conclusions

The study found that the patients who received chlorhexidine–alcohol as skin antiseptic had less chance of developing SSI than those who received povidone–iodine; however, it did not reach a statistical significance.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2018/05/014294. Registered on May 31, 2018

Efficacy comparison of chlorhexidine and iodine preparation in reduction of surgical site infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine are the most common disinfectants used in preoperative skin preparation. However, there is no consistent conclusion regarding the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) and bacterial culture data.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in the prevention of postoperative SSI and relevant bacterial data.

DESIGN

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis SETTINGS: N/A PARTICIPANTS: N/A METHOD: Literature relevant to "skin antisepsis" and "surgical site infections" was retrieved from PUBMED, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINHAL and CNKI. The incidence of SSI was the primary outcome, while the secondary outcome was bacterial data from the infected incision. All data were analyzed with Revman 5.3 and Stata Statistical Software.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies were identified in this study, which included 16,872 participants. This study revealed that chlorhexidine is superior to povidone-iodine in the prevention of postoperative SSI (risk ratio [RR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.87; p = 0.019, I² = 39%). Further meta-regression analysis revealed that the effect of chlorhexidine was directly associated with the type of incision, but failed to differentiate between the subgroups divided according to the type of incision. With respect to bacteria colonization, the most common bacteria for chlorhexidine arm were propionibacterium's, while the most common bacteria for the iodine arm were staphylococci species.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine showed better results in preventing postoperative SSI.

A Multifaceted Surgical Site Infection Prevention Bundle for Cesarean Delivery

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infections (SSI, including wound infections, endometritis, pelvic abscess, and sepsis) may complicate cesarean section (C/S). We report outcomes before and after the introduction of an SSI prevention bundle that did not include antibiotics beyond routine prophylaxis (cefazolin, or gentamicin/clindamycin for penicillin-allergic patients).

STUDY DESIGN

The prevention bundle was introduced following an increase in C/S-associated SSI, which itself was associated with an institutional switch in preoperative scrub from povidone-iodine to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)/isopropanol. Components of the bundle included: (1) full-body preoperative wash with 4% CHG cloths; (2) retraining on surgeon hand scrub; (3) retraining for surgical prep; and (4) patient education regarding wound care. Patients delivered by C/S at ≥24 weeks of gestation were segregated into four epochs over 7 years: (1) baseline (18 months when povidone-iodine was used); (2) CHG scrub (18 months after skin prep was switched to CHG); (3) bundle implementation (24 months); and (4) maintenance (24 months following implementation).

RESULTS

A total of 3,637 patients were included (n = 667, 796, 1098, and 1076, respectively, in epochs 1-4). A rise in SSI occurred with the institutional switch from povidone-iodine to CHG (i.e., from baseline to the CHG scrub epoch, 8.4-13.3%, p < 0.01). Following the intervention (maintenance epoch), this rate decreased to below baseline values (to 4.5%, p < 0.01), attributable to a decline in wound infection (rates in the above three epochs 6.9, 12.9, and 3.5%, respectively, p < 0.01), with no change in endometritis. In multivariable analysis, only epoch and body mass index (BMI) were independently associated with SSI. The improvement associated with the prevention bundle held for stratified analysis of specific risk factors such as chorioamnionitis, prior C/S, obesity, labor induction, and diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a prevention bundle was associated with a reduction in post-C/S SSI. This improvement was achieved without the use of antibiotics beyond standard preoperative dosing.

Using Waterless Alcohol-based Antiseptic for Skin Preparation and Active Thermal Support in Laboratory Rats

Rodents are frequently used for models that require surgical procedures. At our institution, laboratory rats are increasingly preferred for investigations of neurologic disorders, cardiovascular interventions, and assessment and treatment of addictive and depressive behaviors. For these types of studies, surgical preparations of the head and neck areas are necessary for catheterization and instrumentation. Based upon our former work in laboratory mice, we sought to improve rat surgery outcomes and confirm the efficacy of a waterless alcohol-based (WAB) antiseptic for skin disinfection prior to incision. In addition, we wanted to investigate whether active warming efforts improved perioperative body temperatures for rats to aid in return to consciousness. Prior to cranial surgical incision and placement in stereotactic equipment, rats were assessed after skin preparation with WAB and after thermal interventions, including prewarming cages for 30 min before anesthesia and delivery of warmed fluid (NaCl) supplementation. Core temperatures were recorded and aerobic culture swabs collected from surgical sites at multiple time points. As previously shown in mice, bacterial counts in rats were effectively diminished by WAB agents. Assessment of intraoperative body temperature trajectories did not identify appreciable differences between control rats and rats that were exposed to prewarming or warmed fluid supplementation or both. However, heavier male rats recovered more rapidly from isoflurane anesthesia than did lighter male and female rats. Although these thermal support measures did not significantly improve anesthetic recovery times in rats, animals warmed for 30 min trended toward a faster return to righting reflex after exposure to isoflurane. These findings confirm that WAB antiseptic is an acceptable option for skin preparation in rats and suggest that continued evaluation of thermal interventions remains of interest for improved outcomes in rat surgery.

Risk for and temporal trends in cesarean surgical complications

OBJECTIVE

It is possible that in the setting of increasing patient comorbidity and obesity, risk for surgical injury and need for reoperation is increasing. It is also possible that with differential uptake of evidence-based recommendations and increasing prevalence of risk factors such as obesity, risk for surgical site complications is increasing. The objective of this study was to evaluate trends in, risk factors for, and racial disparities related to cesarean complications.

METHODS

This repeated cross-sectional study evaluated cesarean deliveries in the 2002-2014 National Inpatient Sample for women age 15-54. The primary outcome was a cesarean surgical complication composite including (i) surgical injuries, (ii) reoperation, and (iii) surgical site complications. Surgical injuries, reoperation, and surgical site complications were additionally evaluated individually as outcomes. Univariable and multivariable log linear regression models including demographic, clinical, and hospital factors were performed to assess risk for outcomes with unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as measures of association. Temporal trends were estimated using average annual percentage change from a joinpoint regression model. A stratified analysis was performed restricted to non-Hispanic black women. Data was weighted to provide national estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 16.2 million estimated cesarean deliveries (3.2 million unweighted cesarean deliveries) from 2002 to 2014 were included in this analysis. The prevalence of the cesarean surgical complication composite was 1.14%, surgical site complications occurred in 0.60%, surgical injuries in 0.49%, and reoperations in 0.10%. Comparing the end of the study (2012-2014) to the beginning of the study (2002-2003), adjusted risk for the composite was similar (aRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92, 0.95). In comparison, surgical site complication risk was lower at the end of the study (aRR 0.77, 95% CI 0.75, 0.79) while risks for surgical injury (aRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.15, 1.22) and reoperation (1.18, 95% CI 1.10, 1.26) were higher. Non-Hispanic black women were at increased risk for surgical site complications (aRR 1.83, 95% CI 1.80, 1.87) and reoperation (aRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.37, 1.51), but not surgical injury (aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97, 1.02). In analyses stratified for non-Hispanic black women, there was a reduction in risk for surgical site complications at the end of the study period compared to the beginning similar to the primary analysis (aRR 0.76, 95% 0.72, 0.81) with a modest decrease in overall risk for the composite outcome (aRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81, 0.89).

CONCLUSION

A decrease in risk for surgical site complications was offset by slightly increased risk for surgical injury and reoperation in adjusted analyses. Among non-Hispanic black women, surgical site complication risk decreased proportionately with this group still at significantly higher overall risk.

Cefazolin prophylaxis in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery - are dosage and timing appropriate? Prospective study using resampling simulation

OBJECTIVE

Cefazolin is a widely used antimicrobial prophylactic agent, however the appropriate dosage, timing, pharmacology and microbial coverage have not been well-established for gynecologic procedures. We aimed to describe serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of Intravenous cefazolin given to women prior to scheduled minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries, and to determine whether appropriate antimicrobial coverage had been achieved in short time from prophylactic administration to surgical start time.

METHODS

A prospective cohort analysis study, using a resampled dataset, of women undergoing scheduled gynecological surgeries in a university affiliated tertiary medical center. IV cefazolin (1 or 2 gr) was administered prior to incision to women weighing <80 kg (Group A) and ≥80 kg (Group B), respectively. Cefazolin serum levels were obtained at the time of skin incision (Time 0) and 30 min later (Time 30), measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Appropriate antimicrobial coverage was defined when cefazolin serum levels were above minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for Enterobacteriaceae.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 women were included. The mean time interval between drug administration and incision did not differ between the two groups (18 ± 10 min vs. 11 ± 10 min, respectively, p = .0.25). A hierarchical mixed linear regression model, using a simulation of multiple random bootstrap resampling (n = 1,000), revealed that cefazolin serum levels exceeded MIC, regardless of the timing of administration in the sampling intervals. Mean cefazolin serum levels in time 0 and time 30 min were not affected by BMI in patients receiving 1 gr.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of IV cefazolin given shortly prior to skin incision provides serum concentrations above minimal inhibitory concentrations for susceptible pathogens in most women undergoing scheduled minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.