Prolonged Survival in Stage III Melanoma with Ipilimumab Adjuvant Therapy

Management of In-transit Disease: Regional Therapies, Intralesional Therapies, and Systemic Therapy

In-transit (IT) melanoma represents a distinct, heterogeneous pattern of disease that arises as superficial tumors along the track between the primary site and the draining regional lymph node basin. Many therapies have been explored for treatment of this disease with the goal of maximizing delivery of the therapeutic agent to the tumor while minimizing systemic toxicities. These include regional chemotherapies, intralesional injections, checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulators, and vaccines in various combinations or as monotherapy. Here, we review the general managemnt of patients with ITmelanoma, the range of currently available treatment options, and recommendations for specific therapies for individual patients.

Adoptive T-Cell Therapy in Melanoma: How This Will Impact Surgical Practice and the Role of Surgeons

Melanoma is one of a small number of cancers where there is a clear role for surgery in selected patients with metastatic disease. However, the role of surgery for metastatic melanoma in the age of immune checkpoint blockade is not clearly delineated. Adoptive cell therapies, which include tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, often require metastasectomy to obtain the tumor-specific immune cells and/or antigens necessary to create personalized cell-based products. It is, therefore, essential that the surgeon be well-versed in techniques for procuring appropriate tissue and familiar with their delivery to ensure appropriate preoperative planning and postoperative recovery.

Return to work after neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma patients

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma has recently been shown to improve event-free and distant metastasis-free survival compared to adjuvant therapy. Pathologic response allows for subsequent personalization of surgery and omission/application of adjuvant therapy. We addressed the question whether neoadjuvant therapy allows an earlier and more to a more extent return to work in this curatively treated patient population.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective analysis of patients participating at the Netherlands, we interviewed via the telephone 88 stage III melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy in regards of their stopping work during therapy, and when returning partially or fully to work.

RESULTS

Six, 12, and 24 months post start of therapy at least partially worked 80% versus 61%, 84% versus 73%, and 91% versus 82% in the neoadjuvant versus adjuvant groups. Full return to work was observed at 6 months in 52% versus 48%, at 1 year in 71% versus 52%, and at 2 years 82% versus 62%, respectively. Return to work (RTW) started in general in both groups after finishing the systemic therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the manner of therapy (neoadjuvant versus adjuvant) and potentially its treatment duration might be major factors influencing the timing and extent of RTW.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

A faster and full RTW is not only of importance for the patient's well-being and QoL, but has also a significant financial impact on patients and their families.

Recommendations of perioperative systemic therapies considering age or comorbidities in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and quality of cited evidence

IMPORTANCE

Perioperative therapy for cancer is offered to reduce the recurrence and improve overall long-term outcomes. Age and comorbidities of patients can influence the effectiveness and/or safety of perioperative therapy. It is important that key national guidelines, such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, reflect the benefit of perioperative therapy for key subpopulations of patients. However, this has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perioperative treatment guidance, with regards to age and comorbidities, reported in the NCCN guidelines DESIGN SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: NCCN age and comorbidity in perioperative treatment guidelines.

INTERVENTION

Age and Comorbidities MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The existence of age or comorbidity-specific guidelines for perioperative therapy, the presence of literature support for these specific guidelines, and where they exist.

RESULTS

Only 2 of the 10 cancer types studied had specific guidelines on perioperative therapy based on age, and 4/10 had guidelines on perioperative therapy considering patients' comorbidities. 5 of the 10 cancer guidelines and 4/10 had vague advice on consideration of age and comorbidities respectively. A total of 30 recommendations made across the guidelines studied. Studies that are cited to support these recommendations were often pooled analyses of RCTs or subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (33%).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study shows the lack of age and comorbidity-specific guidelines for many cancer types in the NCCN guidelines. In addition, several of these recommendations, where they exist, are also not supported by strong evidence such as RCTs. There is a need for more comprehensive guidelines that make recommendations accounting for patient-intrinsic factors.

Survival Correlates With Adjuvant Choice in Sentinel Node Positive Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and immunotherapy for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) positive head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM).

METHODS

Patients with primary HNCM and positive SLNB in the 2020 National Cancer Database (NCDB) Melanoma file were reviewed. The frequency of CLND and immunotherapy was tracked from 2012 to 2019. Clinicodemographic features of patients were evaluated with respect to their post-SLNB treatment choice. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of diagnosis, and the association of therapy choice with survival was determined using a multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The rates of CLND declined from 66% to 18% while adjuvant immunotherapy increased to a peak of approximately 40%, with an inflection point occurring in 2016. Multivariate survival analysis indicated that immunotherapy use alone, though not CLND, was associated with improved prognosis (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.93). Patient characteristics associated with immunotherapy administration included age (p < 0.01), insurance type (p = 0.002), income (p < 0.001), and healthcare facility type (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective NCDB-based study, we find that the modern management of SLNB-positive patients has shifted towards greater use of adjuvant immunotherapy and a decline in CLND; the use of immunotherapy is associated with improved OS. Patients treated with immunotherapy were more likely to be younger, of higher income, and with private health insurance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

National Trends in Management of the Nodal Basin for Pediatric Patients With Occult Stage III Melanoma in the United States

BACKGROUND

Following the publication of recent trials (MSLT-I, MSLT-II, DeCOG), routine completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is no longer recommended for adults with melanoma, while adjuvant immunotherapy (IO) was approved for selected patients with positive SLNB. Given the exclusion of pediatric patients from these studies, we aimed to characterize trends in nodal management for pediatric patients with Stage III melanoma.

PROCEDURE

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for pediatric patients (age ≤20 years) with melanoma (clinical Stage I/II; pathologic Stage III) who underwent resection from 2012 to 2019. The primary objective was to examine trends in the extent of nodal surgery, the number of lymph nodes examined, and adjuvant IO utilization. Secondary objectives included comparing overall survival (OS) by nodal management and receipt of adjuvant IO using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Overall, 98 patients met inclusion criteria. From 2012 to 2019, the percentage of patients receiving SLNB alone increased (from 13% to 89%); conversely, therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) decreased (from 60% to 0%), as did CLND (from 27% to 11%). Median lymph nodes examined decreased from 2012 to 2019 (from 22 to 2), while receipt of adjuvant IO increased (from 33% to 44%). OS did not differ by nodal management nor receipt of adjuvant IO.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study support clinical observation after SLNB in pediatric patients with melanoma, as we noted de-escalation in the extent of nodal surgery without compromising OS. We also noted increasing utilization of adjuvant IO among patients with positive SLNB. Multidisciplinary discussion remains vital for managing melanoma in pediatric patients.

The role and clinical significance of tumor-draining lymph nodes in tumor progression and immunotherapy

Tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) play a pivotal role in tumor growth and the immune response, activating immune cells such as CD8 + T cells and natural killer cells to combat tumors. However, tumors can subvert TDLNs to avoid immune attack. Initially, TDLNs stimulate a robust antitumor response, but as tumor evolve, they infiltrate with immunosuppressive cells that alter the TDLN environment and potentially promote metastasis. Immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), have emerged as a potential solution to this challenge by reconfiguring the TDLN environment to enhance immune responses and influence the immune status of the primary tumor. The integrity of the TDLNs is crucial for the efficacy of immunotherapy. Conventional surgery often removes TDLNs, but this may impede immune system function and the effectiveness of immunotherapy. It is therefore recommended that removal of TDLNs be considered after neoadjuvant treatment rather than before adjuvant treatment. Accurate identification of patients who require post-neoadjuvant TDLN removal and the determination of metastatic nodes is of paramount importance in tailoring treatment plans, optimizing of patient outcomes, and improving quality of life.

Revealing the mechanisms and therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint proteins across diverse protein families

Host immune responses to antigens are tightly regulated through the activation and inhibition of synergistic signaling networks that maintain homeostasis. Stimulatory checkpoint molecules initiate attacks on infected or tumor cells, while inhibitory molecules halt the immune response to prevent overreaction and self-injury. Multiple immune checkpoint proteins are grouped into families based on common structural domains or origins, yet the variability within and between these families remains largely unexplored. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying the co-suppressive functions of CTLA-4, PD-1, and other prominent immune checkpoint pathways. Additionally, we examine the IgSF, PVR, TIM, SIRP, and TNF families, including key members such as TIGIT, LAG-3, VISTA, TIM-3, SIRPα, and OX40. We also highlight the unique dual role of VISTA and SIRPα in modulating immune responses under specific conditions, and explore potential immunotherapeutic pathways tailored to the distinct characteristics of different immune checkpoint proteins. These insights into the unique advantages of checkpoint proteins provide new directions for drug discovery, emphasizing that emerging immune checkpoint molecules could serve as targets for novel therapies in cancer, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, and transplant rejection.

Adjuvant dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in melanoma: insights into immune cell dynamics and clinical evidence from a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most efficient antigen-presenting cells and play a central role in the immune system, orchestrating immune response against tumors. We previously demonstrated that DC-based vaccination effectively induces anti-tumor immunity, yet at the same time showing a robust safety profile, making this treatment a potential candidate for effective adjuvant immunotherapy. To explore this possibility, we designed a randomized phase II trial (EudraCT no. 2014-005123-27) to provide a complementary autologous DC vaccination to patients (pts) with resected stage III/IV melanoma.

METHODS

Overall, a total of 18 eligible pts were included in this study, 10 of whom received 6 monthly DC vaccination cycles combined with IL-2 administration (arm A), and 8 pts were enrolled in the follow-up observational cohort (arm B). A deep immune biomarkers profiling by multiplex immunoassay, human leukocyte antigens (HLA) typing, multiparametric flow cytometry and in situ tumor microenvironment analysis was performed for the entire pts cohort. The immunological response was assessed in vivo by DTH test and ex vivo against selected melanoma-associated antigens applying the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay.

RESULTS

Pts receiving DC vaccination showed a better relapse-free survival compared to the observational cohort (median 6.6 months, 95% CI, 2.3-not reached (nr) (arm A) vs 5.2 months, 95% CI, 2.5-nr (arm B), not significant), with a favorable trends for female pts (median 15.5 months, 95% CI, 2.6-nr (female) vs 3.3, 95% CI, 2.3-nr (male)), pts with less than 60 years (median 22.5 months, 95% CI, 2.6-nr (age < 60) vs 4.7 months, 95% CI, 2.3-nr (age ≥ 60), and pts with wild-type BRAF status (median 22.5 months, 95% CI, 8.6-nr (BRAF wt) vs 3.8 months, 95% CI, 2.3-nr (BRAF mutated). The toxicity profile was favourable, with no severe adverse events and only mild, manageable reactions. Moreover, additional immune response data suggested increased immune modulation in vaccinated patients, which may reflect a shift in immune dynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the safety and tolerability of DC vaccination as an adjuvant treatment for melanoma, demonstrating significant immune modulation at both the tumor site and peripherally in relapsed and non-relapsed patients. These results highlight the potential of autologous, personalised DC-based therapies and pave the way for the development of innovative immunotherapy combinations in future treatment strategies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02718391; EudraCT no. 2014-005123-27.

Circulating Tumor DNA in High-Risk Stage II/III Cutaneous Melanoma: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapies reduce recurrence in patients with clinical stage IIB/IIC/III melanoma; however, better risk stratification and patient selection are needed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a marker of micrometastatic residual disease is being explored for such purposes in other malignancies. We aimed to explore the feasibility of serial ctDNA monitoring in patients with stage II/III melanoma, as well as the association of ctDNA elevation with disease burden and outcomes.

METHODS

A single-institution prospective study was conducted on patients with clinical stage IIB/IIC/III melanoma. Primary tumor was sent to Natera for generation of a tumor-informed mPCR-NGS assay (Signatera™). Peripheral blood was collected for analysis at pre-specified timepoints. Patients were stratified by ctDNA elevations both pre- and postoperatively to compare tumor characteristics and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Overall, 30 patients were enrolled. The median Breslow depth was 4.4 mm and 70% were ulcerated. Signatera™ assays were successfully created for all 30 patients. Median follow-up from the time of surgery was 16 months and 13 patients recurred with median RFS of 19 months. Eight of these 13 patients (62%) had detectable ctDNA levels predating their clinical or radiographic recurrence. Elevated ctDNA at the first post-operative timepoint was associated with worse RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA monitoring is feasible for patients with high-risk cutaneous melanoma. Our findings suggest that detectable ctDNA post-operatively may be associated with worse outcomes. Elevations during surveillance may predict subsequent clinical recurrence; however, the role of ctDNA in adjuvant therapy decision-making and surveillance is not yet ready for broad application.

Relapse-free survival with adjuvant dabrafenib/trametinib therapy after relapse on a prior adjuvant CPI in BRAF V600-mutated stage III/IV melanoma

BACKGROUND

In BRAF-mutated high-risk melanoma, targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy have durable benefits as first-line (1L) adjuvant therapy. Based on differing action mechanisms of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and CPI immunotherapies, there is interest in evaluating the activity of 2L adjuvant targeted therapy in decreasing the risk of subsequent recurrence after repeat resection following relapse on/after 1L adjuvant CPI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of BRAF V600-mutated resected stage III/IV melanoma patients in the United States, Australia, and The Netherlands who received 1L adjuvant CPI immunotherapy, relapsed locoregionally/distantly, were again resected to no evidence of disease, and received dabrafenib/trametinib (dab/tram) as 2L adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) from initiation of 2L adjuvant dab/tram (RFS-2), analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included (median age 50 years, 63% male, 87% stage III, median follow-up 19 months from 2L dab/tram initiation). Median dab/tram duration was 10.1 months (range: 1 day-22.7 months), with half discontinuing due to progression or adverse events. Median (95% CI) RFS-2 was 18.9 (14.9-28.1) months, with 91%, 81%, and 58% remaining relapse-free at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Most patients remained distant metastasis-free at 6, 12, and 18 months (97%, 85%, and 71%, respectively). Two patients were deceased at the last follow-up, with 97% alive at 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 80% of patients remained relapse- and metastasis-free at 12 months after 2L dab/tram initiation, with only 2 deaths observed. Dab/tram appears to have activity in the 2L adjuvant setting, although more follow-up is required.

Sequencing of Immunotherapy and Outcomes in Operable Clinical Stage III Melanoma: A National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) on overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable stage III melanoma remains unknown. We sought to identify factors associated with receipt of NIT and survival outcomes in patients with clinical stage III melanoma undergoing surgery.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2016-2020) was used to identify patients with clinical stage III melanoma who underwent surgery and received either NIT or adjuvant immunotherapy (AIT) only. Multivariable regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazard methods were used to analyze variables of interest.

RESULTS

Patients with clinical N3 disease had 2.5 times the odds of NIT compared to those with N1 disease (95% CI 1.74-3.49). There was no difference in 3-year OS between the two cohorts: 79% (95% CI 73%-85%) for NIT patients and 75% (95% CI 73%-76%) for AIT patients (p = 0.078). Patients with N2/N3 disease had improved 3-year OS of 79% with NIT versus 71% for AIT-only (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.97, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

NIT is given more selectively to clinical stage III patients with more advanced N category disease. Despite significant differences in N category between groups, there was no difference in OS observed at 3 years, and NIT was associated with a survival advantage among N2/N3 patients.

Outcomes of Immunotherapy Treatment in Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma has poor survival despite multimodality treatment. While the impact of immunotherapy (IT) on metastatic cutaneous melanoma is well-defined, there are relatively little data on sinonasal mucosal melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define immunotherapy outcomes in patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients treated with IT during their overall treatment strategy for SNMM. Patient demographics, treatment, and survival outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

52 patients had IT treatment for SNMM from 2000 to 2022, with an average age of 69.1 ± 11.9 years. The most common treatment was surgery with radiation and IT (n = 26, 50%). Most regimens consisted of a combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (n = 17, 32.7%) or pembrolizumab (n = 14, 26.9%). 44.2% of patients experienced reported complications. Overall survival at 1-, 2-, and 5 years was 86.9%, 74.1%, and 39.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of patients will have a local response following immunotherapy, but it is rare to have improvement at metastatic locations. Further research within our group will assess optimal timing and markers that are predictive of response.

Changes in the surgical management of melanoma and measures to implement change

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous malignant melanoma has traditionally been a surgically managed disease. Recent clinical trials highlight major shifts in surgical management of this disease, emphasizing a multidisciplinary approach.

METHODS

Clinical trials evaluating the role of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in the management of sentinel lymph node positive patients and more recent trials evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on patients presenting with clinically advanced but surgically resectable melanoma are reviewed, as well as ongoing trial evaluating surgical margins.

RESULTS

Both DeCOG and MSLT-II trials confirmed that CLND is no longer standard management of the sentinel node positive patient. CLND offers no melanoma-specific survival benefit. Associated surgical morbidity justifies a surveillance and observation approach, combined with adjuvant therapy. Patients presenting with clinically advanced surgically resectable disease are best served by neoadjuvant therapy. This approach demonstrates significantly improved melanoma-specific survival compared to upfront surgery, underscoring the need for rapid adoption by surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in surgical management of melanoma have been dramatic and offer patients improved outcomes though both reduction in the magnitude of surgery, as well as improved disease specific survival for patients with advanced surgically resectable disease.

Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immune Microenvironment in Hepatoblastoma Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing

Hepatoblastoma (HB) is a common paediatric liver malignancy characterised by significant intratumoral heterogeneity and a complex tumour microenvironment (TME). Using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), we analysed 43,592 cells from three tumour regions and adjacent normal tissue of an HB patient. Our study revealed distinct cellular compositions and varying degrees of malignancy across different tumour regions, with the T1 region showing the highest malignancy and overexpression of HMGB2 and TOP2A. Survival analysis demonstrated that high HMGB2 expression is associated with poor prognosis and increased recurrence, suggesting its potential as a prognostic marker. Additionally, we identified a diverse immune microenvironment enriched with regulatory T cells (Tregs) and CD8+ effector memory T cells (Tem), indicating potential immune evasion mechanisms. Notably, CTLA-4 and PD-1 were highly expressed in Tregs and Tem cells, highlighting their potential as immunotherapy targets. Myeloid cells, including Kupffer cells and dendritic cells, also exhibited distinct functional roles in different tumour regions. This study provides the first comprehensive single-cell atlas of HB, revealing critical insights into its intratumoral heterogeneity and immune microenvironment. Our findings not only advance the understanding of HB biology but also offer new directions for precision medicine, including the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Rational Design and Optimization of a Potent IDO1 Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC)

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an immunosuppressive protein that inhibits antitumor immunity through both tryptophan metabolism and nonenzymatic functions. Drugs targeting IDO1 enzyme activity have failed to improve the overall survival of patients with cancer. Developing new therapeutics that neutralize both enzyme- and nonenzyme-derived immunosuppressive IDO1 effects is therefore of high interest. We previously described a novel proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC), NU223612, that degrades IDO1 in cultured human glioblastoma (GBM) cells, as well as in well-established brain tumors, in vivo. In this study, we rationally optimized the structure of our lead series to create NU227326, which degrades IDO1 with a DC50 of 5 nM in human GBM cells. Mechanistic studies showed that IDO1 degradation occurred through the ubiquitin-proteasome system and was sustained for at least 2 days, supporting NU227326 as a highly potent IDO1 PROTAC suitable for further studies in GBM and other human cancers.

The TMBIM1-YBX1 axis orchestrates MDSC recruitment and immunosuppressive microenvironment in pancreatic cancer

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is notorious for its profoundly immunosuppressive nature. The complex crosstalk between diverse immune cell types and heterogeneous tumor cell populations shapes this challenging tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). In this study, the role of transmembrane BAX inhibitor motif-containing 1 (TMBIM1) in modulating the TIME and its potential as a therapeutic target in PDAC were investigated. Methods: RNA sequencing was used to assess differential gene expression between PANC-1 cells with TMBIM1 knockdown and control cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing further validated the role of TMBIM1 in modulating the expression of CCL2 and PD-L1. Mechanistic insights were gained through chromatin immunoprecipitation, ELISA, real-time quantitative PCR, and flow cytometry experiments. To evaluate the impact of TMBIM1 on immune cell dynamics, we employed an in vitro chemotaxis assay and an in vivo C57BL/6J mouse xenograft model to examine CD8+ T-cell activation and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) infiltration. Additionally, the therapeutic potential of TMBIM1 knockdown combined with anti-PD-1 antibody treatment was investigated in PDAC animal models. Results: TMBIM1 was significantly upregulated in pancreatic cancer tissues and cell lines, driving pancreatic cancer cell proliferation, growth, and migration both in vitro and in vivo. Elevated TMBIM1 expression induced high infiltration of MDSCs and fostered an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Mechanistically, TMBIM1 binds to the transcription factor Y box binding protein 1 (YBX1), which in turn increases the affinity of YBX1 for the PD-L1 and CCL2 gene promoters. This interaction results in their upregulation, leading to increased MDSC infiltration, thereby facilitating the immunosuppressive TIME in PDAC. Notably, the combination of TMBIM1 knockdown with anti-PD-1 therapy had a more potent antitumor effect than anti-PD-1 therapy alone. Conclusions: Our study reveals that the TMBIM1/YBX1 axis is a key driver of immune evasion in PDAC and shapes the immunosuppressive TIME through the upregulation of CCL2 and PD-L1 expression. These findings highlight TMBIM1 as a potential therapeutic target to sensitize PDAC to immunotherapy.

LIM domain only 7: a novel driver of immune evasion through regulatory T cell differentiation and chemotaxis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

With advancements in genomics and immunology, immunotherapy has emerged as a revolutionary strategy for tumor treatment. However, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), an immunologically "cold" tumor, exhibits limited responsiveness to immunotherapy. This study aimed to address the urgent need to uncover PDAC's immune microenvironment heterogeneity and identify the molecular mechanisms driving immune evasion. Using single-cell RNA sequencing datasets and spatial proteomics, we discovered LIM domain only 7 (LMO7) in PDAC cells as a previously unrecognized driver of immune evasion through Treg cell enrichment. LMO7 was positively correlated with infiltrating regulatory T cells (Tregs) and dysfunctional CD8+ T cells. A series of in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated LMO7's significant role in promoting Treg cell differentiation and chemotaxis while inhibiting CD8+ T cells and natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Mechanistically, LMO7, through its LIM domain, directly bound and promoted the ubiquitination and degradation of Foxp1. Foxp1 negatively regulated transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) expression by binding to sites 2 and I/III, respectively. Elevated TGF-β and CCL5 levels contribute to Treg cell enrichment, inducing immune evasion in PDAC. Combined treatment with TGF-β/CCL5 antibodies, along with LMO7 inhibition, effectively reversed immune evasion in PDAC, activated the immune response, and prolonged mouse survival. Therefore, this study identified LMO7 as a novel facilitator in driving immune evasion by promoting Treg cell enrichment and inhibiting cytotoxic effector functions. Targeting the LMO7-Foxp1-TGF-β/CCL5 axis holds promise as a therapeutic strategy for PDAC. Graphical abstract revealing LMO7 as a novel facilitator in driving immune evasion by promoting Tregs differentiation and chemotaxis, inducing CD8+ T/natural killer cells inhibition.

Adjuvant Atezolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype with a high incidence in young patients, a high incidence in non-Hispanic Black women, and a high risk of progression to metastatic cancer, a devastating sequela with a 12- to 18-month life expectancy. Until recently, one strategy for treating early-stage triple-negative breast cancer was chemotherapy after surgery. However, it was not known whether the addition of immune therapy to postsurgery chemotherapy would be beneficial.

Objective

To evaluate the addition of immune therapy in the form of atezolizumab to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with the high-risk triple-negative breast cancer subtype.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this open-label international randomized phase 3 trial conducted in more than 330 centers in 31 countries, patients undergoing surgery as initial treatment for stage II or III triple-negative breast cancer were enrolled between August 2, 2018, and November 11, 2022. The last patient follow-up was on August 18, 2023.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive standard chemotherapy for 20 weeks with (n = 1101) or without (n = 1098) the immune therapy drug atezolizumab for up to 1 year.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (time between randomization and invasive breast cancer in the same or opposite breast, recurrence elsewhere in the body, or death from any cause).

Results

The median age of enrolled patients was 53 years and most self-reported as being of Asian or White race and neither Latino nor Hispanic ethnicity. The study independent data monitoring committee halted enrollment at 2199 of 2300 planned patients. All patients stopped atezolizumab following a planned early interim and futility analysis. The trial continued to a premature final analysis. With invasive disease-free survival events in 141 patients (12.8%) treated with atezolizumab-chemotherapy and 125 (11.4%) with chemotherapy alone (median follow-up, 32 months), the final stratified invasive disease-free survival hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.87-1.42; P = .38). Compared with chemotherapy alone, the regimen of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with more treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (54% vs 44%) but similar incidences of fatal adverse events (0.8% vs 0.6%) and adverse events leading to chemotherapy discontinuation. Chemotherapy exposure was similar in the 2 treatment groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

The addition of the immune therapy drug atezolizumab to chemotherapy after surgery did not provide benefit among patients with triple-negative breast cancer who are at high risk of recurrent disease.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03498716.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2024

A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to two-centimeter safety margins. For a correct stage classification and treatment decision, a sentinel lymph node biopsy shall be offered in patients with tumor thickness ≥ 1.0 mm or ≥ 0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("Tumor Board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in completely resected stage IIB-IV. In stage II only PD-1 inhibitors are approved. In stage III anti-PD-1 therapy or dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with BRAFV600 mutated melanoma can be discussed. In resected stage IV, nivolumab can be offered, as well as ipilimumab and nivolumab, in selected, high-risk patients. In patients with clinically detected macroscopic, resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy according to pathological response and BRAF status can be offered. Neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab followed by complete surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab is also recommended. For patients with disease recurrence after (neo) adjuvant therapy, further treatment should consider the type of (neo) adjuvant therapy received as well as the time of recurrence, i.e., on or off therapy. In patients with irresectable stage III/IV disease systemic treatment is always indicated. For first line treatment PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 or LAG-3 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAFV600 mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy, in selected cases. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAFV600 mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second line. Other second line therapies include therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors not used in first line. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Cognitive impairment in patients with melanoma before adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and associations with brain gray matter, catechol-O-methyltransferase genotype, and psychological factors

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant concern in patients with cancer but understanding its prevalence and risk factors in patients with malignant melanoma (MMPs) remains limited. This study explores CRCI via a multifaceted approach integrating neurobiological, genetic, and psychological assessments.

METHODS

Cognitive functioning across multiple domains was assessed via neuropsychological tests in 47 MMPs before adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, compared with 53 matched healthy controls (HCs). Self-reported cognitive complaints, brain gray matter (GM) properties, catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genotype, and psychological and behavioral factors were evaluated. Between-group differences were analyzed with t-tests and χ2 tests, and associations were explored with correlation analyses. GM properties were assessed in a subset of 23 MMPs and 47 HCs.

RESULTS

MMPs exhibited significantly lower cognitive functioning across multiple tests (all p < .05), with a high CRCI prevalence (68.1% vs. 26.4% in HCs). MMPs reported higher fatigue, anxiety, and insomnia severity and poorer sleep quality and quality of life (all p < .01). Self-reported cognitive complaints in MMPs were associated with some cognitive test scores (all p < .05), fatigue (p < .001), and anxiety (p = .045). GM analyses revealed a smaller left cuneus volume in MMPs and significant associations between MMPs' processing speed and cortical thickness (right precentral and left inferior parietal regions) and between delayed verbal memory and right postcentral GM volume (all p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the need for comprehensive assessments in MMPs to better understand and address CRCI. A multifaceted approach would provide valuable insights that could inform future interventions and improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Rational Design and Optimization of a Potent IDO1 Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC)

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is a potently immunosuppressive protein that inhibits antitumor immunity through both tryptophan metabolism and non-enzymatic functions. Pharmacological therapies targeting IDO1 enzyme activity have generally failed to improve the overall survival of patients with cancer. Developing new therapeutic agents that are capable of neutralizing both enzyme-and non-enzyme-derived immunosuppressive IDO1 effects is therefore of high interest. We previously described the development of a novel Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC), NU223612, that degrades IDO1 in cultured human glioblastoma (GBM) cells, as well as in well-established brain tumors, in vivo . In this study, we rationally optimized the composition, rigidity, and linker orientation of the PROTAC structure to create NU227326, which degrades IDO1 with a DC 50 of 5 nM in human GBM cells. Mechanistic studies showed that IDO1 degradation occurred through the ubiquitin-proteasome system and was sustained for at least 2 days, supporting NU227326 as a highly potent IDO1 PROTAC suitable for further studies in GBM and other human cancers.

X and Y Differences in Melanoma Survival Between the Sexes

Marked differences in survival from melanoma are noted between men and women that cannot be accounted for by behavioral differences. We and others have provided evidence that this difference may be due to increased expression of immune-related genes from the second X chromosome because of failure of X inactivation. In the present review, we have examined evidence for the contrary view that survival differences are due to weaker immune responses in males. One reason for this may be the loss of Y chromosomes (LOY), particularly in older males. The genes involved may have direct roles in immune responses or be noncoding RNAs that regulate both sex and autosomal genes involved in immune responses or tumor growth. Loss of the KDM6C and KDM5D demethylases appeared to common genes involved. The second factor appears to be the activation of androgen receptors (AR) on melanoma cells that increase their invasiveness and growth. Induction of T-cell exhaustion by AR that limits immune responses against melanoma appeared a common finding. The development of treatments to overcome effects related to gene loss on Y poses challenges, but several avenues related to AR signaling appear worthy of further study in the treatment of metastatic disease.

Overcoming Resistance Mechanisms to Melanoma Immunotherapy

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized treatment of advanced melanoma. While most patients derive survival benefit from established immunotherapies, notably monoclonal antibodies blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, a subset does not optimally respond due to the manifestation of innate or acquired resistance to these therapies. Combination regimens have proven efficacious relative to single-agent blockade, but also yield high-grade treatment toxicities that are often dose-limiting for patients. In this review, we discuss the significant strides made in the past half-decade toward expanding the melanoma immunotherapy treatment paradigm. These include newly approved therapies, adoption of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and studies in the clinical trials pipeline targeting alternative immune checkpoints and key immunoregulatory molecules. We then review how developments in molecular and functional diagnostics have furthered our understanding of the tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving immunotherapy resistance, as well as highlight novel biomarkers for predicting treatment response. Throughout, we discuss potential approaches for targeting these resistance mechanisms in rational combination with established immunotherapies to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Disparities in utilization of novel cancer therapies in advanced stage III and IV melanoma and variance in outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Significant gains in advanced melanoma have been made through immunotherapy trials. Factors influencing equitable access and survival impact of these novel therapies are not well-defined.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis using National Cancer Database of patients with advanced stage III and IV melanoma from 2004 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the use of immunotherapy and Cox proportional hazard regression to evaluate overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

47,427 patients with increasing utilization of immunotherapy from 13.78% in 2004 to 65.88% by 2021. Inequitable adoption were impacted by age, sex, socioeconomic status/affordability, insurance types and residential educational/income level. Receiving immunotherapy was associated with a 44% improvement in OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.54-0.57) and receiving a clinical trial-based therapy was associated with a 37% improvement (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.75). Among patients who received immunotherapy or clinical trial-base therapy, there was 40% worse survival in non-Hispanic Black patients (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.69) compared to non-Hispanic Whites.

CONCLUSION

There are disparities in utilization of immunotherapy that is influenced by socioeconomic status. Race and ethnicity had a significant influence in differential impact on survival outcomes of immunotherapies highlighting the importance of increasing underrepresented population participation in trials that lead to novel therapies.

Annals of Surgical Oncology Practice Guidelines Series: Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Melanoma

Surgery has always been the mainstay of melanoma treatment, but the risk of recurrence after curative-intent surgery remains high for some stages of the disease. In this Annals of Surgical Oncology Guidelines Review, we provide an overview of practice changing studies, review international guidelines, and highlight current recommendations and areas of controversy when treating melanoma patients in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. Recent clinical trials have established important roles for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in conjunction with surgery for selected patients with stage II, stage III, and even resectable stage IV melanoma. Patients with melanoma should be evaluated for multimodality therapy, including a combination of surgery, systemic therapy (i.e., BRAF-targeted therapy or checkpoint blockade immunotherapy), and at times radiotherapy. With the rapid pace of advances in the field, it is crucial for surgical oncologists to remain updated on the latest guidelines and recommendations for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy and to continue to be leaders in this paradigm shift. Given the complex and evolving nature of treatment, this report reviews the latest practice guidelines in the context of modern multidisciplinary management of melanoma.

Cytokine release syndrome induced by anti-programmed death-1 treatment in a psoriasis patient: A dark side of immune checkpoint inhibitors

In recent years, cancer immunotherapy has introduced novel treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies, which have facilitated targeted therapies against tumor cells. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is an immune checkpoint expressed in T cells that regulates the immune system's activity to prevent over-activation and tissue damage caused by inflammation. However, PD-1 is also expressed in tumor cells and functions as an immune evasion mechanism, making it a therapeutic target to enhance the immune response and eliminate tumor cells. Consequently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an option for certain tumor types. Nevertheless, blocking immune checkpoints can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as psoriasis and cytokine release syndrome (CRS), as exemplified in the clinical case presented by Zhou et al involving a patient with advanced gastric cancer who received sintilimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1. Subsequently, the patient experienced exacerbation of psoriasis and CRS. The objective of this editorial article is to elucidate potential immunologic mechanisms that may contribute to the development of CRS and psoriasis in patients receiving ICIs. It is crucial to acknowledge that while ICIs offer superior safety and efficacy compared to conventional therapies, they can also manifest irAEs affecting the skin, gastrointestinal tract, or respiratory system. In severe cases, these irAEs can lead to life-threatening complications such as circulatory shock or multiorgan failure. Consequently, it is recommended that patients receiving ICIs undergo regular monitoring to identify and manage these adverse events effectively.

Self-delivering RNAi immunotherapeutic PH-762 silences PD-1 to generate local and abscopal antitumor efficacy

Objective

Immunotherapeutic inhibition of PD-1 by systemically administered monoclonal antibodies is widely used in cancer treatment, but it may cause severe immune-related adverse events (irSAEs). Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibition before surgery has shown promise in reducing recurrence by stimulating durable antitumor immunity. Local intratumoral (IT) immunotherapy is a potential strategy to minimize irSAEs, but antibodies have limited tumor penetration, making them less suitable for this approach. Therapeutic self-delivering RNAi (INTASYL) is an emerging modality well-suited for neoadjuvant immunotherapy. This study presents preclinical proof-of-concept for PH-762, an INTASYL designed to silence PD-1, currently in clinical development for advanced cutaneous malignancies (ClinicalTrials.gov#NCT06014086).

Methods and analysis

PH-762 pharmacology was characterized in vitro, and in vivo antitumor efficacy was evaluated using a murine analogue (mPH-762) in syngeneic tumor models with varying PD-1 responsiveness. Bilateral Hepa1-6 models assessed abscopal effects of local treatment. Ex vivo analyses explored mechanisms of direct and abscopal efficacy.

Results

PH-762 was rapidly internalized by human T cells, silencing PD-1 mRNA and decreasing PD-1 surface protein, enhancing TCR-stimulated IFN-γ and CXCL10 secretion. In vivo, IT mPH-762 provided robust antitumor efficacy, local and lymphatic biodistribution, and was well tolerated. Ex vivo analyses revealed that IT mPH-762 depleted PD-1 protein, promoted leukocyte and T cell infiltration, and correlated with tumor control. IT mPH-762 also demonstrated efficacy against untreated distal tumors (abscopal effect) by priming systemic antitumor immunity.

Conclusion

These data support PH-762 as a promising candidate for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in clinical studies.

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and Emerging Intralesional Immunotherapies for Metastatic Melanoma: A Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the incidence of cutaneous melanoma continues to rise worldwide, its heterogeneous presentation proves challenging for managing and preventing relapse.

RECENT FINDINGS

While surgery remains a mainstay in staging and treatment of locoregional metastatic melanoma, intralesional therapies have emerged as a new tool to treat unresectable in-transit and nodal metastases and reduce the risk of relapse through immunomodulatory mechanisms. In this review, we will provide an overview of intralesional therapies for melanoma with a particular focus on talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and its future uses. We then discuss the landscape of current and emerging intralesional therapies.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Rheumatoid Arthritis

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer therapy over the past decade. Unfortunately, immune related adverse events (irAEs) are common, including rheumatologic adverse events. These rheumatologic irAEs include de novo rheumatoid arthritis-like presentations or flares of pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis, collectively called ICI-associated rheumatoid arthritis. In this article we review the different mechanisms of disease activity and management approaches including use of conventional (cs) DMARDs and biologic (b) DMARDs in this patient population. Other forms of ICI-induced inflammatory arthritis e.g., PMR-like or Spondylarthritis-type IA, are beyond the scope of this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

The heterogeneous presentations of inflammatory arthritis in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors has made this a challenging area to study. Nonetheless, recent studies are providing better understanding on the mechanisms of de novo disease and flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. About half of patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis flare after receiving checkpoint inhibitors. Persistent arthritis is often encountered in patients receiving combination immune checkpoint inhibitors. Outcomes on overall survival do not differ in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors compared to their non-arthritis counterparts. Rheumatologist play a critical role in the management of active rheumatoid arthritis induced by checkpoint inhibitors. Collaboration with oncology colleagues will continue to be a crucial component in providing quality care to these patients. While the use of glucocorticoids is often the first line therapy for active inflammatory arthritic disease, we recommend earlier consideration of DMARDs just as we inverted the treatment pyramid several decades ago, for rheumatoid arthritis.

The Role of Radiation, Immunotherapy, and Chemotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cutaneous Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Skin cancer impacts a significant proportion of the population. While surgical management is often the mainstay of treatment, advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies require additional local and/or systemic therapies.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed studying the use of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies.

RESULTS

A summary of the present literature on the management of locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies is presented across cutaneous head and neck basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. The addition of multidisciplinary therapies to resection is often associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The management of cutaneous head and neck malignancies requires an approach integrating multiple specialties, to optimize outcomes and minimize toxicities.

Resistance Management for Cancer: Lessons from Farmers

One of the main reasons we have not been able to cure cancers is that treatments select for drug-resistant cells. Pest managers face similar challenges with pesticides selecting for pesticide-resistant insects, resulting in similar mechanisms of resistance. Pest managers have developed 10 principles that could be translated to controlling cancers: (i) prevent onset, (ii) monitor continuously, (iii) identify thresholds below which there will be no intervention, (iv) change interventions in response to burden, (v) preferentially select nonchemical control methods, (vi) use target-specific drugs, (vii) use the lowest effective dose, (viii) reduce cross-resistance, (ix) evaluate success based on long-term management, and (x) forecast growth and response. These principles are general to all cancers and cancer drugs and so could be employed broadly to improve oncology. Here, we review the parallel difficulties in controlling drug resistance in pests and cancer cells. We show how the principles of resistance management in pests might be applied to cancer. Integrated pest management inspired the development of adaptive therapy in oncology to increase progression-free survival and quality of life in patients with cancers where cures are unlikely. These pest management principles have the potential to inform clinical trial design.

A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related diabetes mellitus: incidence, clinical features, management, and prognosis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related diabetes mellitus (ICI-DM) is a rare complication that medical oncologists seldom encounter in routine practice. The sporadic nature and intrinsic complexity of ICI-DM make it challenging to analyze comprehensively in experimental settings. In this review, we examine phase 3 clinical trials on ICIs and published case reports of ICI-DM, aiming to summarize its incidence, clinical features, management, and prognosis. Phase 3 clinical trials reveal that the incidence of ICI-DM is higher with combination therapies, such as anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-L1, compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. ICI-DM typically presents as severe hyperglycemia with a fulminant onset and is often associated with diabetic ketoacidosis, accompanied by unexpectedly low HbA1c and C-peptide levels. ICI-DM shares similarities with classic type 1 diabetes, particularly in terms of autoimmunity and genetic predisposition. This includes a high prevalence of islet autoantibodies and susceptibility to certain HLA haplotypes, often with concurrent endocrine gland dysfunction. This suggests that genetic susceptibility and exposure to ICIs may both be necessary for triggering islet autoimmunity and inducing ICI-DM. Notably, patients with positive islet autoantibodies, such as glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody and islet-associated antigen 2 antibody, tend to experience rapid onset of ICI-DM after ICI exposure. Although patients with ICI-DM generally show a high objective response rate to immunotherapy, a significant proportion also face the need to permanently discontinued treatment. Further research is urgently needed to determine whether permanent discontinuation of immunotherapy is necessary and whether this discontinuation negatively impacts overall survival.

Reporting of late-onset immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors in VigiBase

BACKGROUND

To date, evidence on late-onset immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is limited to a small number of clinical cases. This study aimed to identify drug- and patient-related characteristics potentially associated with the reporting of late-onset irAEs with ICIs in VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs).

METHODS

Observational study comparing deduplicated ICSRs with ICIs reporting late-onset irAEs (occurred >90 days after ICI discontinuation) versus ICSRs with ICIs not reporting late-onset irAEs, collected in VigiBase from 2011 to December 31, 2022. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between drug-related and patient-related characteristics of ICSRs and the reporting of late-onset irAEs. Significance was determined for variables with the lower bound of the 95% CI of the reporting OR (ROR) higher than 1 and a p value <0.05.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 6006 ICSRs with ICI-related irAEs (4574, 76.2%, originated from Europe; 3900, 64.9%, involved males; median patient age was 67 years, IQR 59-74 years). Of these, 344 (5.7%) ICSRs reported a total of 388 late-onset irAEs, among which the most frequent were thyroiditis (n=45), pneumonitis (n=37), interstitial lung disease (n=25), hepatitis (n=23) and vitiligo (n=19). Median time to onset since ICI discontinuation was 167 days (IQR 115-294 days), with negligible proportion (3.2%) of co-reported antineoplastic agents during the discontinuation period. Logistic regression models showed disproportionate reporting of late-onset irAEs with ICI combination therapy (ROR 2.33, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.57), reporting of multiple irAEs (ROR 3.96, 95% CI 2.85 to 5.52), reporting of cutaneous irAEs (ROR 1.83, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.71), and melanoma (ROR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This global pharmacovigilance study provides the largest case series of late-onset irAEs with ICIs to date and identifies characteristics of ICSRs associated with disproportionate reporting. Dedicated prospective observational studies focused on long-term sequelae, quality of life and survival of patients developing late-onset irAEs with ICIs should be planned to confirm whether these reporting characteristics are predictors of actual occurrence. Furthermore, translational research should be encouraged to clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying late-onset irAE development.

Oncology Dose Selection in Subsequent Indications: What Can We Learn From FDA-approved Oncology Drugs?

PURPOSE

The modern oncology drug development landscape has shifted away from traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies. Following their initial approvals, many oncology drugs have been approved in subsequent indications either as monotherapy or in combination to benefit a broader patient population. To date, dose selection strategies for subsequent indications have not been systematically reviewed. This review examines how approved dosing regimens were selected in subsequent indications for FDA-approved oncology drugs.

METHODS

The Drugs@FDA database was used to identify FDA-approved new molecular entities (NMEs) between 2010 and 2023. NMEs with more than 1 approved indication were included in the analysis. In total, the dosing regimens for 67 novel oncology drugs that obtained FDA approvals for multiple indications were evaluated.

FINDINGS

Overall, in subsequent indications, 72% of NMEs used the same or clinically equivalent alternative dosing regimens to those approved in the initial indications. Amongst the 28% of NMEs that used different dosing regimens, safety/tolerability was the leading cause of a dosing regimen changes in both monotherapy and combination therapy settings. Other factors leading to changes in dosing regimens include differences in tumor biology, disease burden, pharmacokinetics, and overall benefit-risk profiles obtained from dose-finding studies.

IMPLICATIONS

Our analysis highlighted the importance of selecting a safe, tolerable, and yet efficacious dosing regimen for the initial indication as a suboptimal initially approved regimen could lead to dosing regimen changes in later indications. Preclinical and clinical data could be leveraged to understand the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic differences between indications and thus support dose selection in subsequent indications.

Comprehensive characterization of circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA in patients with metastatic melanoma

Advances in therapeutic approaches for melanoma urge the need for biomarkers that can identify patients at risk for recurrence and to guide treatment. The potential use of liquid biopsies in identifying biomarkers is increasingly being recognized. Here, we present a head-to-head comparison of several techniques to analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in 20 patients with metastatic melanoma. In this study, we investigated whether diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) combined with multimarker flow cytometry (FCM) increased the detection of CTCs in blood compared to the CellSearch platform. Additionally, we characterized cfDNA at the level of somatic mutations, extent of aneuploidy and genome-wide DNA methylation. Both CTCs and cfDNA measures were compared to tumor markers and extracranial tumor burden on radiological imaging. Compared to the CellSearch method applied on peripheral blood, DLA combined with FCM increased the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs from 35% to 70% (P = 0.06). However, the median percentage of cells that could be recovered by the DLA procedure was 29%. Alternatively, cfDNA mutation and methylation analysis detected tumor load in the majority of patients (90% and 93% of samples successfully analyzed, respectively). The aneuploidy score was positive in 35% of all patients. From all tumor measurements in blood, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly correlated to variant allele frequency (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the presence of CTCs in DLA was associated with tumor burden (P < 0.001), whereas the presence of CTCs in peripheral blood was associated with number of lesions on radiological imaging (P < 0.001). In conclusion, DLA tended to increase the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs but was also associated with low recovery. Both cfDNA and CTCs were correlated with clinical parameters such as LDH levels and extracranial tumor burden.

Seven-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in stage III melanoma in the EORTC1325 / KEYNOTE-054 trial

In the previously reported primary analyses of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) than placebo in patients with resected high risk stage III melanoma. Stability of these benefits when the median follow-up was 3.5 and 5 years was published. Here we report results with a longer follow-up.

METHODS

We randomized 1019 patients to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses. RFS in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients with melanoma positive for the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) were co-primary endpoints. DMFS in these two populations was a secondary and progression/recurrence-free survival 2 (PRFS2) an exploratory endpoint.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.9 years. In the overall intention-to-treat population, RFS was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.53 to 0.74). RFS at 7 years was 50 % (95 % CI 46 % to 55 %) in the pembrolizumab and 36 % (95 % CI 32 % to 41 %) in the placebo group. Positive effects were present both for loco-regional recurrences and distant metastases, and across substages IIIA-IIIB-IIIC, and PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative as well as for BRAF mutant and BRAF wild type populations. DMFS was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.54 to 0.76). DMFS at 7 years was 54 % (95 % CI 50 % to 59 %) in the pembrolizumab and 42 % (95 % CI 37 % to 46 %) in the placebo group. PRFS2 was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.57 to 0.84). PRFS2 at 7 years was 61 % (95 % CI 57 % to 66 %) in the pembrolizumab and 53 % (95 % CI 49 % to 57 %) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-year analysis of adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a sustained improvement in the long-term RFS, DMFS and PRFS2 compared with placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma.

Outcomes With Postrecurrence Systemic Therapy Following Adjuvant Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Resected Melanoma in CheckMate 238

PURPOSE

In phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and tumor PD-L1 status and randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients with recurrence in each group were assessed for PFS and OS from subsequent systemic therapy (SST) initiation per recurrence timing (≤12 months [early] v >12 months [late] from initial therapy).

RESULTS

Recurrences occurred in 198 (44%) of 453 nivolumab-treated patients (122 early, 76 late) and 232 (51%) of 453 ipilimumab-treated patients (160 early, 72 late). Median PFS on next-line systemic therapy for nivolumab-treated patients recurring early versus late was 4.7 versus 12.4 months (24-month rates, 16% v 31%); median OS was 19.8 versus 42.8 months (24-month rates: 37% v 73%). In response to subsequent therapy, patients on nivolumab with late versus early recurrence were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nivolumab-treated patients with either an early or late recurrence benefitted from an ipilimumab-based therapy or targeted therapy, each with similar OS.

CONCLUSION

Postrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Balancing Tumor Immunotherapy and Immune-Related Adverse Events: Unveiling the Key Regulators

Tumor immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach in cancer treatment in recent years, offering vast potential. This method primarily involves targeting and inhibiting the suppressive checkpoints present in different immune cells to enhance their activation, ultimately leading to tumor regression. However, tumor cells exploit the surrounding immune cells and tissues to establish a tumor microenvironment (TME) that supports their survival and growth. Within the TME, the efficacy of effector immune cells is compromised, as tumor cells exploit inhibitory immune cells to suppress their function. Furthermore, certain immune cells can be co-opted by tumor cells to facilitate tumor growth. While significantly enhancing the body's tumor immunity can lead to tumor regression, it can also result in severe toxic side effects and an inflammatory factor storm. As a consequence, patients often discontinue treatment due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or, in extreme cases, succumb to toxic side effects before experiencing tumor regression. In this analysis, we examined several remission regimens for irAEs, each with its own drawbacks, including toxic side effects or suppression of tumor immunotherapy, which is undesirable. A recent research study, specifically aimed at downregulating intestinal epithelial barrier permeability, has shown promising results in reducing the severity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) while preserving immune function. This approach effectively reduces the severity of IBD without compromising the levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ, which are crucial for maintaining the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy. Based on the substantial similarities between IBD and ICI colitis (combo immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced colitis), this review proposes that targeting epithelial cells represents a crucial research direction for mitigating irAEs in the future.

The many faces of autoimmune-mediated melanocyte destruction in melanoma

Melanoma is the most severe form of skin cancer with an incidence that is increasing all over the world. Melanoma cells derive from normal melanocytes and share different melanocyte-specific antigens, the same antigens against which an immune reaction develops in vitiligo, a skin disease characterized by autoimmune-mediated melanocyte destruction. The purpose of this review is to present the autoimmune-mediated melanocyte destruction associated with melanoma development, progression and treatment. Patients with vitiligo seem to have a lower chance of developing melanoma. On the other hand, patients with melanoma can develop depigmented lesions even at distant sites from the primary tumor, defined as melanoma-associated leukoderma (MAL). Drug-associated leukoderma (DAL) was also described in melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy and it seems to be a favorable prognostic factor. Clinically, MAL and DAL can be diagnosed as vitiligo and there are few differences between these three entities. In this review, the incidence of DAL in melanoma patients treated with different therapies was researched in the literature and patient outcome was recorded, with studies showing a prolonged disease-free survival in melanoma patients with DAL, treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further studies are however needed to understand the dynamics of autoimmune-mediated melanocyte destruction.

Immunogenic cell death signatures from on-treatment tumor specimens predict immune checkpoint therapy response in metastatic melanoma

Melanoma is a highly malignant form of skin cancer that typically originates from abnormal melanocytes. Despite significant advances in treating metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, a substantial number of patients do not respond to this treatment and face risks of recurrence and metastasis. This study collected data from multiple datasets, including cohorts from Riaz et al., Gide et al., MGH, and Abril-Rodriguez et al., focusing on on-treatment samples during ICB therapy. We used the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) method to calculate immunogenic cell death scores (ICDS) and employed an elastic network algorithm to construct a model predicting ICB efficacy. By analyzing 18 ICD gene signatures, we identified 9 key ICD gene signatures that effectively predict ICB treatment response for on-treatment metastatic melanoma specimens. Results showed that patients with high ICD scores had significantly higher response rates to ICB therapy compared to those with low ICD scores. ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC values for both the training and validation sets were around 0.8, indicating good predictive performance. Additionally, survival analysis revealed that patients with high ICD scores had longer progression-free survival (PFS). This study used an elastic network algorithm to identify 9 ICD gene signatures related to the immune response in metastatic melanoma. These gene features can not only predict the efficacy of ICB therapy but also provide references for clinical decision-making. The results indicate that ICD plays an important role in metastatic melanoma immunotherapy and that expressing ICD signatures can more accurately predict ICB treatment response and prognosis for on-treatment metastatic melanoma specimens, thus providing a basis for personalized treatment.

Adjuvant anti-PD1 immunotherapy of resected skin melanoma: an example of non-personalized medicine with no overall survival benefit

Randomized clinical trials demonstrated a recurrence-free survival benefit with adjuvant anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) inhibitors of resected stage IIB-IV melanoma. However, no improvement in overall survival has been observed thus far. Furthermore, there are no predictive markers for immunotherapy response in melanoma, therefore adjuvant treatment is offered to all comers based exclusively on the pathological and clinical stages. Additionally, one year of treatment duration and the risk of chronic immune-related adverse effects may negatively impact patients´ quality of life. In this review, we will try to answer whether the currently available data on adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy of stage IIB-IV resected melanoma is sufficient to make this strategy available to all patients. We will also discuss the economic impact of this therapy on healthcare system budgets. Recent studies suggest that the high cost of cancer drugs may affect access to these agents globally by raising questions of sustainability for patients and society.

Adverse effects of anti-cancer biologics on the ocular surface

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer immunotherapy is one of the most emerging and rapidly growing fields.Ocular side effects associated with these therapies are common and can be present in up to 70% of patients.The cornea may be involved in different pathogenic mechanisms triggered by different immunotherapeutic agents, and corneal disease varies from mild symptoms to severe corneal ulceration and melting with visual loss.We aimed to review the incidence, mechanism, and management of ocular surface side effects in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the recent use of immunotherapeutic agents in cancer patients, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, ocular surface and corneal involvement are common side effects.These patients can be at risk of sight threatening complications that warrant prompt diagnosis and careful monitoring and management.

SUMMARY

Immunotherapy- related corneal complications in cancer patients are associated with a decreased quality of life. Prompt recognition and an interdisciplinary approach between ophthalmologists and oncologists are crucial to handle immune related ocular adverse events in these patients, in order to maintain ocular surface integrity and avoid a vision threatening complication.

Adjuvant Therapy in Acral Melanoma: A Systematic Review

Background

Acral melanoma presents distinct biological characteristics compared to cutaneous melanoma. While adjuvant therapeutic strategies for high-risk resected acral melanoma closely resemble those for cutaneous melanoma, the evidence supporting the clinical application of adjuvant therapy for acral melanoma remains inadequate. Our aim was to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety profile of adjuvant therapy in acral melanoma.

Methods

This systematic review adhered to a pre-registered protocol. We comprehensively searched four electronic databases and reference lists of included articles to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was therapeutic efficacy, and the secondary outcome was adverse events (AEs).

Results

This systematic review included 11 studies with 758 acral melanoma patients undergoing adjuvant therapy. High-dose interferon α-2b (IFN) regimens showed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS), though the longer regimen was linked to increased hepatotoxicity. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated varying efficacy, with improved RFS in patients who experienced immune-related AEs. Targeted therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib achieved high 12-month RFS in patients with BRAF-mutated acral melanoma. Comparative studies suggested that adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy is similarly effective to IFN in prolonging survival for high-risk acral melanoma patients. Additionally, prior treatment with pegylated IFN enhanced RFS in patients receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab.

Conclusion

High-dose IFN was widely used as adjuvant therapy for acral melanoma, but serious AEs prompted the search for alternatives. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy shows promise, though it may be less effective than in non-acral melanoma. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal adjuvant treatment for acral melanoma.

Outcomes of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in melanoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma has improved the outcomes for patients. However, real-world data on efficacy and safety are limited. We investigated outcomes of melanoma patients treated with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the Ghent University Hospital.

METHODS

Patients with melanoma (stage III-IV), who received at least one cycle of ICI as adjuvant treatment between 2018 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Primary outcomes were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Other outcomes of interest were relapse patterns and safety.

RESULTS

59 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 36 months. Disease recurrence or death of any cause was observed in 25/59 (42.4%) of the patients. The median RFS was 56.0 months (95%CI 36.1-75.9 months). At 48 months, RFS and OS were 55.9% and 84%, respectively. 9/23 (39%) recurrences were locoregional and 14/23 (60.9%) patients developed distant metastasis as first recurrence, including 2 (3.4%) with brain metastasis. Median time to recurrence was 9 months (range 2-56 months). 35/59 (59.3%) completed one year of adjuvant treatment, 12/59 (20.3%) stopped because of recurrence and 10/59 (16.9% because of toxicity. Immune-related adverse events wereseen in 29/59 (49.4%) patients, 10/59 (16.9%) developed grade 3-4 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the real-world efficacy and safety of adjuvant ICI for melanoma, achieving RFS and OS comparableto the pivotal clinical trials. About 40% of patients develop arelapse, mainly during the adjuvant treatment. The outcomes ofpatients progressing during adjuvant ICI are poor, emphasizing the need of prospective and real-world studies on optimal management after progression on (neo)adjuvant treatment.

Tumor lysate particle only vaccine (TLPO) vs. Tumor lysate particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine (TLPLDC) to prevent recurrence in resected stage III/IV melanoma patients: Results of a phase I/IIa trial

BACKGROUND

The autologous tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is produced from dendritic cells (DC) loaded ex vivo with autologous tumor lysate (TL). TLPLDC has been shown to decrease recurrence in resected Stage III/IV melanoma patients in a Phase IIb trial. The TL particle only (TLPO) vaccine is produced by loading of yeast cell wall particles with autologous TL and direct injection allowing for in vivo DC loading. We have compared the TLPO and TLPLDC vaccines in an embedded Phase I/IIa trial of a larger Phase IIb trial of the TLPLDC vaccine.

METHODS

Patients rendered clinically disease-free after surgery were randomized 2:1 to receive the TLPO or TLPLDC vaccine and followed for recurrence and death. Patients had scheduled intradermal inoculations at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after enrollment. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were randomized, 43 TLPO and 20 TLPLDC. Patients randomized to the TLPO arm were more likely to be female (37.2% vs. 10.0 %, p = 0.026), but otherwise no significant clinicopathological differences were identified. No differences in related adverse events (AE) were found between treatment arms. At a median follow-up of 20.5 months, the DFS (60.8% vs. 58.7 %, p = 0.714) and OS (94.6% vs. 93.8 %, p = 0.966) were equivalent between the TLPO and TLPLDC groups, respectively. No statistical differences were found in subgroup analyses between vaccine types, which accounted for receipt of immunotherapy and the use of G-CSF pre-blood draw.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized, double-blind Phase I/IIa trial, there were no differences in DFS or OS in resected Stage III/IV melanoma patients receiving adjuvant TLPO versus TLPLDC vaccines. Given manufacturing advantages, further efficacy testing of TLPO is warranted in a Phase III trial.

Real-Life Outcomes of Adjuvant Targeted Therapy and Anti-PD1 Agents in Stage III/IV Resected Melanoma

This study was carried out at the Dermatologic Clinic of the University of Turin, Italy, to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant therapy in patients who received either targeted therapy (TT: dabrafenib + trametinib) or immunotherapy (IT: nivolumab or pembrolizumab) for up to 12 months. A total of 163 patients participated, including 147 with stage III and 19 with stage IV with no evidence of disease. The primary outcomes were relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). At 48 months, both TT and IT approaches yielded comparable outcomes in terms of RFS (55.6-55.4%, p = 0.532), DMFS (58.2-59.8%, p = 0.761), and OS (62.4-69.5%, p = 0.889). Whilst temporary therapy suspension was more common among TT-treated patients compared to IT-treated individuals, therapy discontinuation due to adverse events occurred at comparable rates in both groups. Predictors of relapse included mitoses, lymphovascular invasion, ulceration, and positive sentinel lymph nodes. Overall, the proportion of BRAF-mutated patients receiving IT stood at 7.4%, lower than what was observed in clinical trials.

False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: a single-surgeon experience

BACKGROUND

The status of the regional lymph node basin is of prognostic importance in patients with melanoma, making the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) a key component of patient care management, particularly with the advent of immunotherapy for adjuvant treatment. The primary goal of our study was to assess the false-negative rate of SLNBs among patients with melanoma.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with melanoma undergoing SLNB by a single surgeon between Jan. 1, 2005, and Dec. 31, 2020. We extracted and cross-referenced patient demographic and pathologic information.

RESULTS

During the study period, 501 patients underwent an SLNB. Of these, 97 (19.4%) patients had pathologically positive sentinel lymph nodes and 404 (80.6%) patients had negative results. The latter were subject to further review; 84 (20.8%) patients subsequently developed recurrence, with 25 (6.2%) recurrences within the primary nodal basin. Isolated regional recurrence occurred in 11 (2.7%) patients and conjunction with a false-negative rate was 10.2%. Unadjusted recurrence rates were similar across each lymph node basin, including the axilla (2.7%), groin (3.6%), and neck (1.4%).

CONCLUSION

The false-negative SLNB rate was 10.2% for isolated regional recurrences. These findings need to be considered in the era of using adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with melanoma.

Terrein Exhibits Anti-tumor Activity by Suppressing Angiogenin Expression in Malignant Melanoma Cells

BACKGROUND/AIM

Malignant melanoma is a tumor with a poor prognosis that can metastasize distally at an early stage. Terrein, a metabolite produced by Aspergillus terreus, suppresses the expression of angiogenin, an angiogenic factor. However, the pharmacological effects of natural terrein have not been elucidated, because only a small amount of terrein can be extracted from large fungal cultures. In this study, we investigated the antineoplastic effects of terrein on human malignant melanoma cells and its underlying mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human malignant melanoma cell lines were cultured in the presence of terrein and analyzed. Angiogenin production was evaluated using ELISA. Ribosome biosynthesis was evaluated using silver staining of the nucleolar organizer region. Intracellular signaling pathways were analyzed using western blotting. Malignant melanoma cells were transplanted subcutaneously into the backs of nude mice. The tumors were removed at 5 weeks and analyzed histopathologically.

RESULTS

Terrein inhibited angiogenin expression, proliferation, migration, invasion, and ribosome biosynthesis in malignant melanoma cells. Terrein was shown to inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis in animal models.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that terrein has anti-tumor effects against malignant melanoma. Furthermore, chemically synthesized non-natural terrein can be mass-produced and serve as a novel potential anti-tumor drug candidate.