Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA

Temporal Trends in Stroke Management and Outcomes Between 2011 and 2020 in South Korea: Results From a Nationwide Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate temporal trends of advanced treatments and related clinical outcomes of ischemic stroke through a decade-long trend analysis, using data from a comprehensive, national, multicenter registry. We also seek to identify areas in need of improvement.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This analysis involved patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack registered prospectively in the CRCS-K-NIH (Clinical Research Center for Stroke in Korea-National Institute of Health) registry between 2011 and 2020. We examined temporal trends in risk factors, pathogenetic subtypes, acute management strategies, and outcomes for up to 1 year following a stroke. Generalized linear mixed models were used to account for center clustering. The average age of 77 662 patients increased 2.2 years in men and 2.4 years in women over the 10-year follow-up. Notably, in-hospital neurological deterioration, 3-month and 1-year mortality rate, and cumulative incidence of recurrent stroke within 1-year decreased over time after adjustments for age, sex, and initial stroke severity (P<0.01). However, functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year remained unchanged. Endovascular thrombectomy increased from 5.4% in 2011 to 10.6% in 2020. Use of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation, dual antiplatelet therapy, statins, and stroke unit care also increased. Contrarily, the rate of intravenous thrombolysis showed a slight decline.

CONCLUSIONS

This study points to a reduction in death and risk of recurrent stroke over the past decade, paralleling enhancement in acute and preventive stroke management. Nevertheless, the decline in the use of intravenous thrombolysis and the lack of improvement in functional outcomes following stroke are concerning trends that warrant thorough investigation.

Factor XI/XIa inhibitors: a potential solution to anticoagulation dilemmas

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombotic therapy is the cornerstone of stroke prevention, but standard of care therapies are underutilized and use is limited by bleeding rates, drug interactions, and renal elimination. Factor XI/XIa (FXI/XIa) inhibitors are a novel anticoagulation class that purportedly target thrombosis more than hemostasis, thereby raising the hope of reducing bleeding consequences while maintaining efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the mechanistic rationale for FXI/XIa inhibitors, describes the various molecule sub-classes, addresses barriers to current anticoagulation use, and reviews clinical trial data to date for this novel class of anticoagulants.

EXPERT OPINION

FXI/XIa inhibitors offer several advantages over DOACs in stroke prevention such as reduced bleeding, fewer drug interactions, and less renal elimination. However, clinical trials must demonstrate non-inferior efficacy and improved safety compared to DOACs. Additional barriers to use will include cost, inadequacy of antidotes, and overall anticoagulant underutilization. The potential for a small molecule or monoclonal antibody to reach the clinic is very high.

Secondary Risk Reduction after Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke

This article discusses the evolving definitions of transient ischemic attack and minor strokes, highlighting the shared risk factors and the similarities in approach and early management. It emphasizes the importance of early identification and basic workup for these patients, as well as the most effective early antithrombotic therapies to date. The article also emphasizes the significance of controlling risk factors and concludes with a discussion of treatment strategies based on specific stroke etiologies.

Dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in patients with non-cardioembolic acute ischemic stroke and baseline MRI

INTRODUCTION

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for secondary prevention after minor, non-cardioembolic stroke. We aimed to assess whether DAPT efficacy is modified by large artery atherosclerotic (LAA) etiology, and DAPT safety by stroke size on MRI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Post hoc analysis of the Phase 2 PACIFIC-STROKE randomized clinical trial, which enrolled patients with non-cardioembolic stroke, all with baseline MRI and compared the Factor XIa inhibitor asundexian with placebo on a background of DAPT or SAPT. We compared patients treated with DAPT versus SAPT. The efficacy endpoint was the rate of recurrent ischemic stroke, the safety endpoint was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding during follow-up.

RESULTS

1590 patients were included, median NIHSS was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-4), 40% received DAPT. Median follow-up was 11.5 months. The efficacy endpoint occurred in 4.4% and 4.8% in the DAPT group and SAPT group, respectively, with the strongest numerical benefit of DAPT over SAPT among patients with NIHSS ⩽ 3 not treated by intravenous thrombolysis. LAA index stroke etiology did not modify DAPT treatment effect. The safety endpoint occurred more often in the DAPT than in the SAPT group (4.6% vs 2.7%), with the numerically lowest risk among patients with NIHSS ⩽ 3 not treated by intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke size did not modify the effect of DAPT on the safety endpoint.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of major treatment effect heterogeneity with DAPT compared with SAPT in patients with and without LAA or by stroke size on MR-DWI.

Unveiling synergies: Integrating TCM herbal medicine and acupuncture with conventional approaches in stroke management

This review explores the mechanisms and treatment strategies of ischemic stroke, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Ischemic stroke results from the obstruction of blood flow to the brain, leading to significant neurological impairment. The paper categorizes ischemic stroke into subtypes based on etiology, including cardioembolism and large artery atherosclerosis, and discusses the challenges of current therapeutic approaches. Conventional treatments like tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and surgical interventions are limited by narrow windows and potential complications. The review highlights the promise of acupuncture, which offers neuroprotective benefits by promoting cerebral ischemic tolerance and neural regeneration. Integrating acupuncture with conventional treatments may enhance patient outcomes. Emphasis is placed on understanding the pathophysiology to develop targeted therapies that mitigate neuronal damage and enhance recovery.

Effects of tirofiban in preventing neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke with intracranial artery stenosis: A post hoc analysis of the TREND Trial

INTRODUCTION

The degree of culprit artery stenosis affects the risk of early neurological deterioration (END) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The TREND trial demonstrated the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS. We aimed to investigate whether the degree of intracranial artery stenosis affects the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of the TREND trial, which enrolled patients within 24 h of onset and randomly allocated to receive intravenous tirofiban or oral aspirin. We stratified the stenosis degrees into three subgroups: no stenosis, mild-to-moderate stenosis (stenosis <70%), and severe stenosis or occlusion (stenosis ⩾70%). The primary endpoint is END4 defined as an increase of the NIHSS ⩾4 within 72 h after randomization. Secondary outcomes include END2 (defined as an increase of NIHSS ⩾2) within 72 h after randomization, the proportion of mRS 0-1 and 0-2 at 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 296 patients were analyzed. In patients with severe stenosis or occlusion, tirofiban significantly reduced the incidence of END4 (5.7% vs 30.8%, adjusted OR 0.156, 95% CI 0.028-0.873, adjusted p = 0.034), whereas its effects in preventing END4 were similar to those of aspirin in patients with no stenosis (2.4% vs 4.6%, adjusted OR 0.193, 95% CI 0.018-2.083, adjusted p = 0.175) or mild-to-moderate stenosis (2.9% vs 10.0%, adjusted OR 0.171, 95% CI 0.015-1.943, adjusted p = 0.155). The p value for interaction between stenosis subgroups and treatment was 0.513. Furthermore, tirofiban significantly reduced the incidence of END2 in patients with mild-to-moderate stenosis (5.9% vs 22.5%, OR 0.146, 95% CI 0.022-0.951, adjusted p = 0.044) and severe stenosis or occlusion (11.4% vs 43.6%, adjusted OR 0.140, 95% CI 0.036-0.540, adjusted p = 0.004). A significant improvement in favorable outcomes with a 90-day mRS of 0-1 was observed only in patients with mild-to-moderate stenosis (85.3% vs 70.0%, adjusted OR 4.617, 95% CI 1.077-19.798, adjusted p = 0.039).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Tirofiban may significantly reduce the incidence of END in patients with severe arterial stenosis or occlusion. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of intracranial artery stenosis on the benefits of intravenous tirofiban.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT04491695.

Early Neurologic Deterioration and Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet in Anterior Versus Posterior Circulation Stroke

BACKGROUND

Anterior circulation stroke (ACS) differs from posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in several aspects. We hypothesize that the risk of early neurologic deterioration (END) and its responses to clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone may be different between stroke territories.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prespecified post hoc analysis of ATAMIS (Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial and included patients with definite infarct location who were classified into ACS and PCS according to stroke territory. Primary outcome was occurrence of END at 7 days, defined as ≥2-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score compared with baseline. We compared the treatment effects of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in each stroke territory. From 3000 patients, 2431 eligible patients (1780 with ACS [910 assigned into clopidogrel plus aspirin and 870 assigned into aspirin alone] and 651 with PCS [371 assigned into clopidogrel plus aspirin and 280 assigned into aspirin alone]) were included. Median age was 66 years and 35.1% were women. The occurrence of END was higher in ACS than PCS (6.8% versus 3.8%, P=0.007). clopidogrel plus aspirin was associated with lower risk of END in ACS (risk difference [95% CI]: -2.4% [-4.1% to -0.8%], P=0.004), but not in PCS (risk difference [95% CI]: -0.6% [-2.7% to 1.5%], P=0.57). No significant interaction was found (P=0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated END was higher in acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke with anterior circulation, who derived more benefit from clopidogrel plus aspirin than aspirin alone.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02869009.

Combination Antithrombotic Therapy for Reduction of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

BACKGROUND

Stroke secondary to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is associated with high recurrence risk despite currently available secondary prevention strategies. In patients with systemic atherosclerosis, a significant reduction of stroke risk with no increase in intracranial or fatal hemorrhage was seen when rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily was added to aspirin. However, there are no trials in ICAD using this combination. To facilitate the design of future ICAD trials, the CATIS-ICAD study (Combination Antithrombotic Treatment for Prevention of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease) assessed (1) the feasibility of recruitment, (2) the safety of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy, and (3) trends toward efficacy.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point pilot trial conducted in 10 Canadian centers. Eligible participants aged ≥40 years, with acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin or aspirin alone within 7 to 100 days of their index event. The primary safety outcome was hemorrhagic stroke. The main efficacy end point was the composite of ischemic stroke or covert brain infarct on magnetic resonance imaging at the end of the study.

RESULTS

A total of 101 participants were randomized. Average enrollment was 10 participants/site per year. Average follow-up was 20 months. Median time from index stroke to randomization was 67 days. The median age of participants was 67 years (±10.94), and 29% of participants were women. There was no hemorrhagic stroke in either arm. The composite efficacy outcome was less frequent in the combination arm (15.7%) compared with the aspirin arm (24.0%), with a hazard ratio of 0.78 ([95% CI, 0.32-1.93]; P=0.59) favoring the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A multicenter randomized trial comparing the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack due to ICAD is feasible and appears safe without an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. A numerical trend toward efficacy for the composite primary end point of symptomatic ischemic stroke and covert infarcts was observed. These findings will inform the design of a phase III trial.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04142125.

P2Y12 inhibitors plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular events: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitors (P2Y12i) with aspirin in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic cerebrovascular events remains a topic of ongoing debate. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to compare these drugs with aspirin alone.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the two treatment regimens in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular events. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, severe bleeding, and stroke recurrence. We performed subgroup analyses stratified by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. R software (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included, comprising 38,851 patients, of whom 19,483 (50.1 %) received P2Y12i plus aspirin. Follow-up ranged from 7 days to 3.4 years. P2Y12i plus aspirin significantly reduced stroke recurrence (RR 0.78; 95 % CI = 0.71-0.87; p < 0.05), but increased the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR 1.38; 95 % CI = 1.11-1.72; p < 0.05) and severe bleeding (RR 2.07; 95 % CI 1.61 to 2.66; p > 0.05) compared with aspirin. There was no significant difference between groups in all-cause mortality in patients with NIHSS ≤3 or ≤10.

CONCLUSION

P2Y12i plus aspirin reduced stroke recurrence, but increased all-cause mortality and severe bleeding in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic events. There was no difference between groups in all-cause mortality in patients with NIHSS scores ≤3 or ≤10.

Exploring Sex Differences in Outcomes of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients With Noncardioembolic Mild-to-Moderate Ischemic Stroke or High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the READAPT Study Cohort

BACKGROUND

Sex may impact clinical outcomes in patients with stroke treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We aimed to investigate the sex differences in the short-term outcomes of DAPT within a real-world population of patients with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack.

METHODS

We performed a propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric cohort study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]) by including patients with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-10) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of transient ischemic attack, presence of diabetes [ABCD2] ≥4) who initiated DAPT within 48 hours of symptom onset. The primary effectiveness outcome was the 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events. The secondary effectiveness outcomes were the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ordinal shift, vascular and all-cause mortality, and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcomes included the 90-day risk of moderate-to-severe and any bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 24-hour hemorrhagic transformation. Outcomes were compared between sexes using Cox and generalized ordinal logistic regression analyses, along with calculating risk differences and ratios.

RESULTS

From 2278 patients in the READAPT study cohort, we included 1643 mild-to-moderate strokes or high-risk transient ischemic attacks treated with DAPT (mean age, 69.8±12.0 years; 34.3% women). We matched 531 women and men. The 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events was significantly lower among women than men (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.28-0.99]; P=0.039). There were no significant differences in secondary effectiveness outcomes. The 90-day risk of safety outcomes was extremely low and did not differ between women and men (moderate-to-severe bleedings: 0.4% versus 0.8%; P=0.413; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: 0.2% versus 0.4%; P=0.563). Subgroup analysis for primary effectiveness outcome showed a lower 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events among women aged <50 years, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0 to 5, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score <2, large artery atherosclerosis cause, and no diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that women with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack treated with DAPT may have lower short-term risk of recurrent ischemic events than men. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind potential sex-based differences in outcomes after DAPT use.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in patients with nonminor ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Patients with ischemic stroke present a higher risk of stroke recurrence, neurological deterioration, and death. The benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) among patients with minor ischemic stroke is well established; however, robust evidence is lacking for those with nonminor stroke.

OBJECTIVE

 To describe the benefits and risks of DAPT versus SAPT in patients with nonminor ischemic stroke.

METHODS

 We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from inception to April 2024. Data were collected from randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing DAPT to SAPT following nonminor ischemic stroke, defined by a score ≥ 4 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).

RESULTS

 In total, 6 studies were included, comprising 12,480 patients. The NIHSS score at baseline from the selected studies ranged from 4 to 15. There was no significant difference between DAPT and SAPT for recurrent stroke (risk ratio [RR] = 0.91; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 0.82-1.01; p = 0.09; I2 = 0%), ischemic stroke (RR = 0.89; 95%CI = 0.80-1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 0%) or hemorrhagic stroke (RR = 1.23; 95%CI = 0.41-3.99; p = 0.66; I2 = 27%). Major bleeding was not significantly increased in the DAPT group compared with the SAPT group (RR = 0.87; 95%CI = 0.29-2.66; p = 0.81; I2 = 44%). The overall analysis did not show a significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.72; 95%CI = 0.50-1.02; p = 0.07; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

 There was no difference between DAPT and SAPT regarding recurrent stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, or overall mortality.

[Stroke in octogenarians]

Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability in older adults. It remains a common cause of death and permanent functional limitation in individuals who are older than 80 years. Approximately 50% of all strokes occur in people over the age of 75, and 30% in those over 85. Top priorities in primary stroke prevention include the treatment of hypertension, anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation, and lifestyle modifications such as smoking cessation.

Transient Ischemic Attack in Women: Real-World Hospitalization Incidence, Outcomes, and Risk of Hemorrhage and Stroke

BACKGROUND

Sex-specific differences in stroke risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcomes are well documented. However, little is known about real-world differences in transient ischemic attack (TIA) hospitalizations and outcomes between men and women.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of the 2016 to 2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database in the United States. Adult patients hospitalized for TIA were included. Annual incidences of TIA hospitalizations for men and women were calculated using the US Census Bureau data. Primary end points were 90-day readmission for ischemic stroke or hemorrhage and compared between men and women. Demographics and comorbidities were captured and used to adjust for confounders using propensity score matching and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 588 499 patients were identified; 326 794 (55.5%) were women. The estimated annual incidence of TIA hospitalizations was 42.4 (95% CI, 26.0-58.9) per 100 000 women and 36.2 (95% CI, 23.5-48.9) per 100 000 men (relative risk, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.13-1.21]; P<0.001). Overall, women were older, had higher rates of headache and psychiatric comorbidities, and had lower rates of vascular risk factors compared with men. Women were significantly less likely to be readmitted for ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.93]; P<0.001) and more likely to be readmitted for hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.20]; P<0.001), with similar rates of antithrombotic use at the time of readmissions (P>0.05). Compared with ischemic stroke, hemorrhage readmissions were significantly associated with lower odds of home discharge (odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.76-0.91]; P<0.001) and higher odds of death (odds ratio, 3.01 [95% CI, 2.35-3.87]; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women have a higher incidence of TIA hospitalizations than men, which may be due to higher rates of nonischemic causes of transient neurological symptoms as evidenced by differences in baseline characteristics and lower rates of subsequent ischemic stroke. Future studies are needed to better characterize transient neurological symptoms in women to avoid excess hospitalizations and unnecessary treatments that may increase hemorrhage risk.

Impact of duration of dual anti-platelet therapy on risk of complications after stent-assisted coiling of unruptured aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of intracranial aneurysms is unclear. Longer-term therapy may reduce thrombotic complications but increase the risk of bleeding complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively maintained data at 12 institutions was conducted on patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent SAC between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020, and were followed ≥6 months postprocedure. The type and duration of DAPT, stent(s) used, outcome, length of follow-up, complication rates, and incidence of significant in-stent stenosis (ISS) were collected.

RESULTS

Of 556 patients reviewed, 450 met all inclusion criteria. Nine patients treated with DAPT <29 days after SAC and 11 treated for 43-89 days were excluded from the final analysis as none completed their prescribed duration of treatment. Eighty patients received short-term DAPT. There were no significant differences in the rate of thrombotic complications during predefined periods of risk in the short, medium, or long-term treatment groups (1/80, 1.3%; 2/188, 1.1%; and 0/162, 0%, respectively). Similarly, no differences were found in the rate of hemorrhagic complications during period of risk in any group (0/80, 0%; 3/188, 1.6%; and 1/162, 0.6%, respectively). Longer duration DAPT did not reduce ISS risk in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuing DAPT >42 days after SAC did not reduce the risk of thrombotic complications or in-stent stenosis, although the risk of additional hemorrhagic complications remained low. It may be reasonable to discontinue DAPT after 42 days following non-flow diverting SAC of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Prognostic value of angiographic based quantitative flow ratio and anatomic features in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) are prone to stroke recurrence despite aggressive medical treatment. Further assessment of the anatomy and physiology of ICAS is urgently needed to facilitate individualized therapy. We explored the predictive value of angiography based hemodynamic and anatomical features for ICAS patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with moderate-to-severe stenosis of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) were enrolled. The hemodynamic assessment was performed using the single view Murray's law based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) approach. The locations of lesions were categorized as perforator rich segments of the MCA (pMCA) and others. Multivariate Cox models were developed to identify significant predictors. The primary outcomes were defined as stroke and transient ischemic attack.

RESULTS

Among the 333 patients (median (IQR) age, 56 (49-63) years, 70.3% men) over a median follow-up period of 64.5 months, 50 (15.0%) had the primary outcomes, and 80.0% occurred within 5 years. Patients with lower μQFR values (dichotomized at 0.73) had a higher risk of the 5 year primary outcomes (log rank P=0.023), and good collateral circulation may have attenuated the risk. In the multivariate analyses, μQFR (adjusted HR=0.345; 95% CI 0.155 to 0.766; P=0.009), lesion located in pMCA (adjusted HR=0.377; 95% CI 0.190 to 0.749; P=0.005), and diameter ratio of the internal carotid artery (adjusted HR=4.187; 95% CI 1.071 to 16.370; P=0.040) were significantly associated with the 5 year primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography based μQFR and anatomical features, namely plaque localization and internal carotid artery expansion, could serve as promising prognostic indexes for MCA atherosclerosis.

Association of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms with aspirin or clopidogrel resistance in ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ischemic stroke (IS) is a major public health concern worldwide. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and antiplatelet resistance in patients with IS.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, and WANFANG databases for articles published until February 2024. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to measure the association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and antiplatelet resistance in patients with IS. All the statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 11.0.

RESULTS

Eleven studies containing 2,228 cases and 2,556 controls met the inclusion criteria. Our results showed that aspirin resistance in patients with IS was significantly correlated with the polymorphism of ABCB1 rs1045642 (Allele model: OR=1.5, 95% CI [1.10, 2.05], P=0.010; Homozygote model: OR=2.02, 95% CI [1.01, 4.05], P=0.047; Heterozygote model: OR=1.37, 95% CI [0.91, 2.08], P=0.132; Dominant model: OR=1.75, 95% CI [1.09, 2.81], P=0.021; Recessive model: OR=1.61, 95% CI [1.01, 2.57], P=0.045). Meanwhile, we found that ABCB1 rs1045642 polymorphism might be significantly associated with clopidogrel resistance in IS (A. Homozygote model: OR=3.35, 95% CI [1.99, 5.63], P=0.000; B. Heterozygote model: OR=0.81, 95% CI [0.54, 1.21], P=0.895; C. Dominant model: OR=1.41, 95% CI [0.59, 3.36], P=0.435; D. Recessive model: OR=3.43, 95% CI [2.14, 5.51], P=0.000).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests a potential link between ABCB1 rs1045642 polymorphism and resistance to clopidogrel or aspirin in patients with IS.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy versus tenecteplase in patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus tenecteplase in minor non-disabling acute ischemic stroke. This retrospective observational study utilized data from our stroke database. All consecutive patients with minor non-disabling acute ischemic stroke treated with either DAPT or tenecteplase between January 2020 and June 2023 were included in the analysis. Of the 62 patients included in the analysis, the median (IQR) age was 66 (58-76) years, and 21 patients (34%) were female. Compared with patients receiving DAPT, those treated with tenecteplase were had higher NIHSS score at treatment (median [IQR], 4 [2-5] vs. 1 [1-2]; P = 0.01). At 90 days, 74.2% of patients (23/31) in the DAPT group and 71.0% (22/31) in the tenecteplase group had an excellent functional outcome (P = 0.78). Lower proportion of patients with minor bleeding events in DAPT group than tenecteplase group (3.2% [1/31] vs. 25.8% [8/31], P = 0.01). The findings in this study show that patients presenting with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of symptom onset, dual antiplatelet treatment was similar to intravenous tenecteplase with regard to excellent functional outcome at 90 days. However, more proportion of patients with bleeding events treated with tenecteplase.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Use in Patients With Ischemic Stroke on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy at Low Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines lack recommendations regarding the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) among patients at low risk for UGIB treated with dual antiplatelet therapy for ischemic stroke (IS). Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of PPIs in lowering the risk of significant UGIB in this patient group.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients at low risk for UGIB admitted for IS between 2014 and 2018 and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. The study used a nationwide claims database in Korea. The primary end point was significant UGIB during 12 months after IS. To evaluate the risk of significant UGIB based on PPI use, we performed a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Subgroup analyses and propensity score matching analysis were conducted for validation. Among 96 722 patients with IS at low risk for UGIB who were on dual antiplatelet therapy (mean age, 67.0 years; men: 63.0%), 16 084 (16.6%) were treated with PPIs. During 12 months of follow-up, 325 patients experienced significant UGIB, and 479 experienced any UGIB. PPI use was associated with a reduced risk of significant UGIB (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45-0.89]; P=0.009). This association was consistent in the subgroup and propensity score matching analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IS receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, PPI use reduced the risk of significant UGIB by 37% on average, even among low-risk patients. However, the use of PPIs in this patient group was limited, highlighting the need for additional prospective studies.

Dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with TIA or minor stroke with or without symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis (sCAS) is an essential cause of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. We aimed to evaluate whether the superiority of aspirin-ticagrelor over aspirin-clopidogrel varies between patients with sCAS or not.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc analysis of the High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II (CHANCE-2) trial, all of which were CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles carriers. The primary exposures of interest were the treatment group and sCAS status. The primary efficacy endpoint was the new stroke assessed within 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 5920 (92.3%) from 6412 were analysed, including 197 (3.3%) with sCAS and 5723 (96.7%) without sCAS. Stroke recurrence occurred in 13 (12.15%) and 11 (12.22%) patients with sCAS who received aspirin-ticagrelor and aspirin-clopidogrel, respectively (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.46 to 2.36; p=0.930). Among patients without sCAS, there were 158 cases (5.52%) of new strokes in the aspirin-ticagrelor group and 222 cases (7.76%) in the aspirin-clopidogrel group (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.86; p=0.0006). The treatment-by-sCAS subtype was not significant (p=0.405).

CONCLUSIONS

Genotype-guided dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin-ticagrelor may be beneficial for preventing recurrent strokes in patients without sCAS; however, it appears less effective in those with sCAS. No significant interaction was found between the treatment and sCAS subtypes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04078737.

Randomised controlled trials of dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack: an updated meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We explored the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for individuals diagnosed with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), incorporating the latest insights from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The emerging evidence surrounding DAPT in stroke and TIA plays a pivotal role in guiding clinical decisions.

METHODS

Our study included five RCTs (INSPIRES, THALES, POINT, CHANCE, FASTER) on DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor) initiated within 72 hours of acute stroke or TIA, which evaluated DAPT efficacy and safety over 21-90 days, focusing on new strokes and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular events and recurrent strokes. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were computed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The five RCTs involved 27,559 patients. Our analysis showed that DAPT significantly reduced stroke recurrence (OR 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.82; P <0.001, I2 = 0%) but increased major bleeding risk (OR 2.20; 95% CI 1.38-3.51, P = 0.0009, I2 = 30%). It lowered major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.85, P < 0.001, I2 = 5%) and recurrent ischaemic events (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.66-0.80, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%), but raised haemorrhagic stroke risk (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.14-3.84, P = 0.02, I2 = 8%).

CONCLUSION

Dual antiplatelet therapy - a combination of aspirin with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel - initated within 72 hours of a high-risk TIA or mild moderate ischaemic stroke is superior to aspirin alone in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke. However, DAPT comes with a higher risk of major bleeding.

Trends and cost structure of drug-based secondary prevention of ischemic strokes

BACKGROUND

Advances in secondary stroke prevention, including direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT), and cardiovascular risk management, have changed costs over the past decade. This study aimed to evaluate annual treatment costs and trends in drug-based secondary prophylaxis after ischemic strokes.

METHODS

Annual treatment costs were evaluated using the net costs per defined daily dosage (DDD) of discharge medications for ischemic stroke patients treated in 2020 at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany. Evaluated drugs included acetylsalicylic acid, adenosine diphosphate inhibitors, DOACs, vitamin K antagonists, lipid-lowering drugs (LLD), antihypertensives (AHT), and oral antidiabetics (OD). Kruskal-Wallis test examined intergroup differences in substance groups and stroke etiologies. DDD development between 2004 and 2021 was further evaluated for significant trend changes using an interrupted time series analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 422 patients (70.5 ± 12.9 years, 43.1% female). Etiologies divided into large-artery atherosclerosis (29.9%), cardioembolic (25.6%), cryptogenic (26.8%), and small-vessel disease (17.8%). The total estimated annual drug expenditure was € 241,808; of which 51.6% was due to DOACs (median € 1157 [Q1-Q3:1157-1157], p < 0.006), 20.0% to AHTs (€127.8 [76.7-189.8]), 15.7% to ODs (€525.6 [76.7-641.5]), and 8.7% to LLDs (€43.8 [43.8-43.8]). Cardioembolic strokes had the highest annual costs per patient (€1328.6 [1169.0-1403.4]) with higher expenditure for DOACs (p < 0.001) and AHTs (p < 0.026). DAPT costs were highest for large-vessel strokes (p < 0.001) and accounted for 2.5% of total costs. There was a significant trend change in DDDs for clopidogrel in 2010 (p < 0.001), for prasugrel in 2017 (p < 0.001), for ASA in 2015 (p < 0.001) and for DOACs in 2012 (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs for cardioembolic strokes were the primary cost driver in drug-based secondary stroke prevention, whereas permanent ASA and DAPT only accounted for a minor cost proportion. LLDs were associated with lower costs than AHTs and ODs. There were significant changes in DDDs for the respective substances, whereas the costs for DOACs as the most expensive pharmaceuticals remained widely stable across the last decade.

Dual antiplatelet therapy after minor strokes or high-risk TIA: Evidence from the Austrian stroke registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Three large, randomized trials demonstrated the benefit of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus monotherapy after non-cardioembolic minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of DAPT versus monotherapy on functional outcomes and safety in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Patients with minor stroke (NIHSS <4) or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 score ≥4) of non-cardioembolic origin without major vessel occlusion or revascularization therapy (thrombolysis or thrombectomy) treated between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed based on a prospective nationwide stroke unit registry. Data on risk factors, stroke etiology, admission stroke severity (NIHSS), functional status at 3 months (mRS), and mortality were extracted. Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at 3 months, early neurological deterioration (END), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and major extracranial bleeds were defined as study endpoints and adjusted for covariates using inverse probability of treatment weighted regression models.

RESULTS

Two Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-four of 8546 patients with non-cardioembolic minor stroke or high-risk TIA received DAPT. Patients treated with DAPT had significantly more risk factors and comorbidities compared to those treated with monotherapy. After robust statistical adjustment, DAPT was significantly associated with lower occurrence of END (OR 0.50 95% CI 0.35-0.72), increased odds of excellent outcome at 3 months (aOR 1.59; 95% CI 1.20-2.09) and equivalent frequencies of SICH (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 0.30-4.73) or major extracranial bleeding (aOR 0.84; 95% CI 0.16-4.56).

CONCLUSIONS

DAPT in non-cardioembolic minor stroke or high-risk TIA in a real-life setting appears to be safe and associated with improved functional outcome.

Dual Antiplatelet Treatment up to 72 Hours After Ischemic Stroke Stratified by Risk Profile: A Post Hoc Analysis

BACKGROUND

Risk profile of recurrence may influence the effect of antiplatelet therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel-aspirin initiated within 72 hours after symptom onset for acute mild stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack stratified by risk profile.

METHODS

This is a secondary post hoc analysis of the INSPIRES (Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute High-risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis) randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients 35 to 80 years old with acute mild ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack between 2018 and 2022. Patients were stratified into different groups based on the Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) and modified ESRS. The primary efficacy outcome was any new stroke within 90 days. The primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding within 90 days.

RESULTS

Among 6100 patients (3050 each in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and aspirin group), the median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 57-71 years), and 3915 (64.2%) were male. Clopidogrel-aspirin was associated with a reduced risk of new stroke in patients with an ESRS of <3 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.52-0.86]), but not in those with an ESRS of ≥3 (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.72-1.18]), compared with aspirin (Pinteraction=0.07). Similar results were found in patients stratified by modified ESRS (modified ESRS <6 in male and <5 in female: HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.55-0.83]; modified ESRS ≥6 in male and ≥5 in female: HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.82-1.59]; Pinteraction=0.01). The association between antiplatelet therapy and the moderate-to-severe bleeding did not differ across risk profile subgroups (ESRS of <3: HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.54-3.35]; ESRS of ≥3: HR, 3.21 [95% CI, 1.18-8.78]; Pinteraction=0.21; modified ESRS of <6 in male and <5 in female: HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 0.88-4.36]; modified ESRS of ≥6 in male and ≥5 in female: HR, 2.27 [95% CI, 0.70-7.39]; Pinteraction=0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

This post hoc analysis of the INSPIRES trial showed that patients with a low level of risk profile assessed by ESRS received greater benefit from clopidogrel-aspirin initiated within 72 hours after symptom onset than aspirin alone.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03635749.

N,N'-disubstituted Ureas as Novel Antiplatelet Agents: Synthesis, Pharmacological Evaluation and In Silico Studies

INTRODUCTION

Thrombotic disorders are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Drugs used in the prevention and treatment of atherothrombosis have pharmacokinetic limitations and adverse effects such as hemorrhagic conditions, highlighting the importance of developing more effective antiplatelet agents.

METHODS

In this work, we synthesized N,N'-disubstituted ureas 3a-3j and evaluated their antiplatelet profiles through in vitro, ex vivo, and in silico studies.

RESULTS

The synthesized derivatives exhibited a selective inhibitory profile against platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid (AA) in vitro, without significantly affecting other aspects of primary hemostasis and blood coagulation. The compounds that showed inhibition greater than 85% were submitted to the analysis of their potency by calculating the concentration required to inhibit 50% of platelet aggregation induced by AA (IC50). Urea derivative 3a was the most potent with IC50 of 1.45 μM. Interestingly, this derivative inhibited more than 90% of platelet aggregation induced by AA ex vivo, with a similar effect to acetylsalicylic acid. In the hemolysis assay, most of the urea derivatives presented values below 10% suggesting good hemocompatibility. Additionally, the compounds tested at 100 μM also showed no cytotoxic effects in HepG2 and Vero cells. The in silico results suggested that compound 3a may bind to the key residue of COX-1 similar to AA and known COX-1 inhibitors, and the results are also in agreement with our SAR, which suggests that the inhibition of this enzyme is the most likely mechanism of antiplatelet activity.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, these results demonstrated that N,N'-disubstituted ureas are promising candidates for the development of novel antiplatelet agents.

CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing a Neurointerventional Procedure

In neurovascular settings, including treatment and prevention of ischemic stroke and prevention of thromboembolic complications after percutaneous neurointerventional procedures, dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin is the standard of care. Clopidogrel remains the most commonly prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor for neurovascular indications. However, patients carrying CYP2C19 no-function alleles have diminished capacity for inhibition of platelet reactivity due to reduced formation of clopidogrel's active metabolite. In patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention, CYP2C19 no-function allele carriers treated with clopidogrel experience a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and multiple large prospective outcomes studies have shown an improvement in clinical outcomes when antiplatelet therapy selection was guided by CYP2C19 genotype. Similarly, accumulating evidence has associated CYP2C19 no-function alleles with poor clinical outcomes in clopidogrel-treated patients in neurovascular settings. However, the utility of implementing a genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy selection strategy in the setting of neurovascular disease and the clinical outcomes evidence in neurointerventional procedures remains unclear. In this review, we will (1) summarize existing evidence and guideline recommendations related to CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in the setting of neurovascular disease, (2) evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence on the relationship of clinical outcomes to CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel treatment in patients undergoing a percutaneous neurointerventional procedure, and (3) identify knowledge gaps and discuss future research directions.

Symptomatic Cervical Carotid Artery Stenosis: Evolving Paradigms in Risk Stratification and Intervention

Symptomatic carotid disease, characterized by atherosclerotic or non-atherosclerotic internal carotid artery disease with ipsilateral stroke symptoms, represents a critical condition in stroke neurology. This "hot carotid" state carries a high risk of stroke recurrence, with almost one-fourth of the patients experiencing recurrent ischemic events within 2 weeks of initial presentation. The global prevalence of significant carotid stenosis (conventionally defined as ≥50% narrowing) is estimated at around 1.8% in men and 1.2% in women and increases with age. Management of symptomatic carotid disease remains challenging, requiring a balance between urgent medical and surgical interventions and their associated risks. Current treatment approaches combine medical management, focusing on optimal antithrombotic therapy, with revascularization procedures such as carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting. However, decision making has evolved beyond considering stenosis degree alone, now incorporating advanced imaging data on plaque composition and intraluminal characteristics. Even though there are numerous randomized trials, uncertainties persist regarding optimal management, particularly in light of improved medical therapies and emerging concepts like symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease. Future research directions include exploring newer antithrombotic regimens, refining patient selection criteria for revascularization, and evaluating novel techniques like transcarotid artery revascularization.

TICA-CLOP STUDY: Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Acute Moderate and Moderate-to-Severe Ischemic Stroke, a Randomized Controlled Multi-Center Trial

BACKGROUND

Many studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ischemic stroke; none of these trials included North African participants, and all of these trials comprised only participants who experienced transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with first-ever noncardioembolic moderate or moderate-to-severe ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Our trial involved 900 first-ever noncardioembolic patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who randomly received either loading and maintenance doses of ticagrelor or clopidogrel within the first 24 h of stroke onset.

RESULTS

We involved 900 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 39 (8.7%) patients in ticagrelor arm and 62 (13.8%) in clopidogrel arm experienced a new stroke [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.83; P value = 0.006]. A total of 57 (12.7%) patients in ticagrelor group and 80 (17.8%) patients in clopidogrel group experienced composite of new stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or death due to vascular insults (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.43-0.82; P value = 0.004). Participants who received ticagrelor experienced less frequent unfavorable outcomes. We found no significant variation between our study's two arms concerning the hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients with noncardioembolic moderate or moderate-to-severe ischemic stroke who received ticagrelor within the first 24 h after ischemic stroke had better clinical outcomes based on recurrent stroke rates and unfavorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) rates compared with those who received clopidogrel. There were no significant variations between ticagrelor and clopidogrel regarding hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic complications.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number NCT05553613.

Contemporary Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke

In the past decade, adding mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of intracranial arterial occlusions to intravenous (IV) thrombolysis has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by expanding the therapeutic window to 24 h. Treatment decisions require establishing a high probability of AIS; confirming time since last known well (LKW); assessing severity of the neurological deficit; determining any contraindications to IV thrombolysis; and performing neuroimaging, usually noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT), to exclude intracerebral hemorrhage. If time since LKW is less than 4.5 h, patients with disabling stroke without contraindications can proceed immediately to IV thrombolysis while the decision about MT is under way. For some patients, the MT decision can be made on the basis of clinical assessment, NCCT, and CT angiography showing a large vessel occlusion. Others may require additional neuroimaging. Patients who are not candidates for IV thrombolysis within 4.5 h or MT should be immediately evaluated for eligibility for extended-window IV thrombolysis or early antiplatelet treatment.

Should patients with minor strokes be given thrombolytics?

Mild stroke symptoms are cited as the reason for not using tissue-type plasminogen activator in 29-43% of time-eligible patients. Previous studies suggested that not all of these patients had a good recovery or even survival to hospital discharge. Since then, stroke guidelines worldwide recommended thrombolysis in minor but disabling strokes.Dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel was more effective than aspirin alone for reducing subsequent events in patients with minor stroke if started within 24 hours of onset in both CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events) and POINT (Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischaemic Stroke) trials. Recently, both PRISMS (The Potential of rtPA for Ischemic Strokes With Mild Symptoms) trial and TEMPO-2 (Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) trial showed that treatment with thrombolysis versus antiplatelet did not increase the likelihood of favourable functional outcome at 90 days among patients with minor non-disabling acute ischaemic strokes. Therefore, a narrative review on thrombolysis for patients with minor strokes from published studies may help practicing clinicians.

From apoplexy in antiquities to cerebrovascular stroke in modernity: a narrative timeline and tale

Background

Stroke is one of the commonest encountered brain and neurological disorders worldwide. Stroke management has had a major shift in the last 50 years and precisely since the discovery and approval of thrombolysis as an acute management followed by multiple trials on mechanical thrombectomy and its approval. Yet, Stroke is as old as the history of mankind. Historically stroke symptoms’ description is older than the descriptions of the Greco-Roman civilization (500 BC – 800 AD). Before Stroke, the term apoplexy was described in ancient civilizations and evidence of suffering and managing it is preserved within the mummies, inscriptions, and papyri of the Egyptian civilization, clay tablets of the Mesopotamian civilization, medical books of the Chinese civilization, and although physicians and scientists consider the Greco-Roman civilization the base for modern medicine, yet the golden age of Islam (800 – 1200 AD) might have shared more in identifying bases of stroke. The European Renaissance beginning from 1400 AD with its famous anatomists and physicians greatly contributed too to stroke localization and vascular supply.

Conclusions

As medicine and science are in a continuous chain from the past to the future through the present, the current comprehensive review highlights the major important and documented shifts in the history of stroke over more than 4500 years starting from ancient civilizations BC up to 2024 AD.

Serial Examination of Platelet Function Tests Might Predict Prognosis of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke-A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated whether point-of-care platelet function measurements could predict favorable outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin, are known to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke by 20-30%. However, identifying nonresponders to therapy remains a clinical challenge. The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of serial Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100 measurements and hematological ratios in AIS patients.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on 212 AIS patients in Taiwan. Platelet function was assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 4 using PFA-100. The primary outcome was functional recovery, defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3, at 1-month and 1-year. Subgroup analyses compared outcomes between pre- and post-aspirin administrations. Statistical analyses examined the association between changes in platelet function and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Difference in collagen and epinephrine (CEPI) measurements between baseline and week 2 was associated with favorable mRS scores (p < 0.001). A difference in CEPI closure time greater than 99 seconds was most predictive of a favorable outcome with an adjusted odds ratio of 11.859 (95% CI 2.318-60.669) at 1-month follow-up. Subgroup analyses revealed predictive value in pre-aspirin measurements at 1-month follow-up (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial PFA-100 measurements and hematological biomarkers, specifically changes in on-treatment CEPI closure times, may help predict favorable clinical outcome in AIS patients. These findings suggest that dynamic platelet function assessment could play a role in optimizing antiplatelet therapy in AIS management.

Real-world comparison of dual versus single antiplatelet treatment in patients with non-cardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke: A propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and three prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24 h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage.

RESULTS

We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% vs. 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1%-6.1%); p = 0.047, risk ratio 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.07); p = 0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% vs. 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% (95% CI: 6.4%-13.4%); p < 0.001, risk ratio 1.65 (95% CI: 1.37-1.97); p < 0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and those who received antiplatelet loading dose.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill the criteria of landmark large clinical trials.

Transient brain ischemic symptoms and the presence of ischemic lesions at neuroimaging: Results from the READAPT study

BACKGROUND

According to the literature, about one third of patients with brain ischemic symptoms lasting <24 h, which are classified as Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) according to the traditional "time-based" definition, show the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. Recent evidence has shown that the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging may impact on the outcome of patients with transient ischemic symptoms treated with dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). This uncertainty is even more compelling in recent years as short-term DAPT has become the standard treatment for any non-cardioembolic TIA or minor ischemic stroke.

METHODS

This is a pre-specified subgroup analysis from a prospective multicenter real-world study (READAPT). The analysis included patients with time-based TIA-that is, those with ischemic symptoms lasting <24 h-who started DAPT. In the whole population, we assessed the presence of acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging and their association with the ABCD2 score. To assess the impact of acute brain ischemic lesions on 90-day prognosis, we performed a propensity score matching of patients with and without those lesions. We adopted a primary effectiveness outcome which was a composite of new stroke/TIA events and death due to vascular causes at 90 days.

RESULTS

We included 517 patients-324 (62.7%) male-with a median (interquartile range-IQR) age of 74 (IQR = 65-81) years; 144 patients (27.9%) had acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. The proportion of patients with brain ischemic lesions did not vary according to the ABCD2 score. At follow-up, 4 patients with brain ischemic lesions (2.8%) and 21 patients without lesions (5.6%) reported the primary effectiveness outcome, which was similar between the groups before (p = 0.178) and after matching (p = 0.518).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, patients with transient ischemic symptoms and acute ischemic lesions at brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had a risk of recurrent ischemic events similar to those without lesions. The risk of recurrent ischemic events was low in both groups.

Discovery of quinazoline-benzothiazole derivatives as novel potent protease-activated receptor 4 antagonists with improved pharmacokinetics and low bleeding liability

Protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR4) plays a critical role in the development of pathological thrombosis, and targeting PAR4 is considered a promising strategy for improving antiplatelet therapies. Here, we reported the design of a series of quinazoline-benzothiazole-based PAR4 antagonists using a scaffold-hopping strategy. Systematic structure-activity relationship exploration leads to the discovery of compounds 20f and 20g, which displayed optimal activity (h. PAR4-AP PRP IC50 = 6.39 nM and 3.45 nM, respectively) on human platelets and high selectivity for PAR4. Both of them also showed excellent metabolic stability in human liver microsomes (compound 20f, T1/2 = 249.83 min, compound 20g, T1/2 = 282.60 min) and favourable PK profiles in rats (compound 20f, T1/2 = 5.16 h, F = 50.5 %, compound 20g, T1/2 = 7.05 h, F = 27.3 %). More importantly, neither compound prolonged the bleeding time in the mouse tail-cutting model (10 mg/kg, p.o.). These results suggest that these compounds have great potential for use in antiplatelet therapies.

Dual antiplatelet versus alteplase in anterior and posterior circulation minor stroke

OBJECTIVE

The Antiplatelet versus R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischaemic Stroke trial has demonstrated the non-inferiority of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to alteplase in minor non-disabling stroke. This prespecified secondary analysis aimed to investigate whether the treatment effects were similar across stroke territories.

METHODS

Participants were divided according to stroke territory, which were subdivided into DAPT and alteplase. An excellent functional outcome at 90 days defined as modified Rankin Scale scoring 0-1 was primary outcome. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score change and early neurological improvement measured by a 2-point decline in NIHSS score at 24 hours were secondary outcomes. Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and bleeding events were safety outcomes. Primary analyses adjusted unbalanced baseline characteristics between treatments by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 719 patients were included: 566 in anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and 153 in posterior circulation stroke (PCS). Primary outcome was 94.1% in DAPT and 91.7% in alteplase among ACS patients (adjusted risk difference (RD) and 95% CI, 1.5% (-1.5% to 4.6%), p=0.32), while 91.2% in DAPT and 91.8% in alteplase among PCS patients (adjusted RD and 95% CI, -2.1% (-8.5% to 4.4%), p=0.53). Compared with alteplase, DAPT was associated with lower risk of sICH (p=0.03) and bleeding events (p<0.001) in ACS, but only lower risk of bleeding events (p=0.007) in PCS. Additionally, among ACS patients, the alteplase was superior to DAPT in terms of decrease in NIHSS score at 24 hours compared with admission (adjusted geometric mean ratio and 95% CI, -0.09 (-0.16 to -0.03), p=0.005) and early neurological improvement (adjusted RD and 95% CI, -7.2% (-11.6% to -2.7%), p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among ischaemic stroke with minor non-disabling symptoms, DAPT was similar with intravenous alteplase regarding long-term functional outcome and better safety regardless of ACS or PCS. The potential benefit of intravenous alteplase regarding early neurological improvement in patients with ACS warrants further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03661411.

Beyond RCTs: Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved the efficacy of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aimed at evaluating effectiveness and safety of short-term DAPT in real-world, where treatment use is broader than in RCTs.

METHODS

READAPT (REAl-life study on short-term Dual Antiplatelet treatment in Patients with ischemic stroke or Transient ischemic attack) (NCT05476081) was an observational multicenter real-world study with a 90-day follow-up. We included patients aged 18+ receiving short-term DAPT soon after ischemic stroke or TIA. No stringent NIHSS and ABCD2 score cut-offs were applied but adherence to guidelines was recommended. Primary effectiveness outcome was stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death due to vascular causes, primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding. Secondary outcomes were the type of ischemic and hemorrhagic events, disability, cause of death, and compliance to treatment.

RESULTS

We included 1920 patients; 69.9% started DAPT after an ischemic stroke; only 8.9% strictly followed entry criteria or procedures of RCTs. Primary effectiveness outcome occurred in 3.9% and primary safety outcome in 0.6% of cases. In total, 3.3% cerebrovascular ischemic recurrences occurred, 0.2% intracerebral hemorrhages, and 2.7% bleedings; 0.2% of patients died due to vascular causes. Patients with NIHSS score ⩽5 and those without acute lesions at neuroimaging had significantly higher primary effectiveness outcomes than their counterparts. Additionally, DAPT start >24 h after symptom onset was associated with a lower likelihood of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world, most of the patients who receive DAPT after an ischemic stroke or a TIA do not follow RCTs entry criteria and procedures. Nevertheless, short-term DAPT remains effective and safe in this population. No safety concerns are raised in patients with low-risk TIA, more severe stroke, and delayed treatment start.

Dual Versus Mono Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Mild-to-Moderate Stroke: A Multicentre Perspective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between different antiplatelet therapy regimens and the functional outcomes and bleeding complications among mild-to-moderate ischaemic stroke patients based on real-world data.

METHODS

We used data from the SEACOAST trial (Safety and efficacy of aspirin-clopidogrel in acute noncardiogenic minor ischaemic stroke) to analyse the data of patients with mild-to-moderate stroke within 72 h after onset who were treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of clopidogrel and aspirin from September 2019 to November 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences between groups. We performed an analysis to evaluate the association of different antiplatelet regimens and 90-day disability, which was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≥2, as well as disability ascribed to index or recurrent stroke by the local investigator. In terms of safety, we then compared the bleeding events between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2822 mild-to-moderate ischaemic stroke patients were treated with either clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 1726, 61.2%) or aspirin/clopidogrel (n = 1096, 38.8%). Of 1726 patients in the dual antiplatelet group, 1350 (78.5%) received less than or equal to 30 days of combined therapy. At 90 days, 433 (15.3%) patients were disabled. Patients who received combined therapy had a lower overall disability rate (13.7% versus 17.9%; OR 0.78 (0.6-1.01); P = 0.064). However, investigators found that index stroke was the reason for significantly fewer patients in the dual antiplatelet group having disability (8.4% versus 12%; OR, 0.72 (0.52-0.98); P = 0.038). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate to severe bleeding complications between the dual and mono antiplatelet drug regimens (0.4% versus 0.2%; HR 1.5 (0.25, 8.98); P = 0.657).

CONCLUSION

Aspirin plus clopidogrel was associated with a reduction in the incidence of disability attributed to index stroke. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate to severe bleeding complications between the two antiplatelet drug regimens.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900025214.

Mobile Stroke Unit Management in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis

Importance

Clinical trials have suggested that prehospital management in a mobile stroke unit (MSU) improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke who are potentially eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, but there is a paucity of real-world evidence from routine clinical practice on this topic.

Objective

To determine the association between prehospital management in an MSU vs standard emergency medical services (EMS) management and the level of global disability at hospital discharge.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study that included consecutive patients with a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke who received either prehospital management in an MSU or standard EMS management between August 1, 2018, and January 31, 2023. Follow-up ended at hospital discharge. The primary analytic cohort included those who were potentially eligible for IV thrombolysis. A separate, overlapping cohort including all patients regardless of diagnosis was also analyzed. Patient data were obtained from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) Program, a nationwide, multicenter quality assurance registry. This analysis was completed in May 2024.

Exposure

Prehospital management in an MSU (vs standard EMS management).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy end point was the utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (UW-mRS) score. The secondary efficacy end point was independent ambulation status. The coprimary safety end points were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Of 19 433 patients (median [IQR] age, 73 [62-83] years; 9867 female [50.8%]) treated at 106 hospitals, 1237 (6.4%) received prehospital management in an MSU. Prehospital management in an MSU was associated with a better score on the UW-mRS at discharge (adjusted mean difference, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05) and a higher likelihood of independent ambulation at discharge (53.3% [468 of 878 patients] vs 48.3% [5868 of 12 148 patients]; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13). There was no statistically significant difference in sICH (5.2% [57 of 1094] vs 4.2% [545 of 13 014]; aRR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.94-1.75]) or in-hospital mortality (5.7% [70 of 1237] vs 6.2% [1121 of 18 196]; aRR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.27) between the 2 groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with acute ischemic stroke potentially eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, prehospital management in an MSU compared with standard EMS management was associated with a significantly lower level of global disability at hospital discharge. These findings support policy efforts to expand access to prehospital MSU management.

Acute treatment and secondary prevention for patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of different antiplatelet treatment in minor strokes (MSs) or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and that of antiplatelet and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in MSs remain controversial.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible articles until April 12, 2024. Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality, excellent outcome, functional independence and recurrent stroke. Safety outcomes were any types of bleeding and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The associations were calculated for the overall data by using odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Twenty three high-quality studies with 10 RCTs and 13 non-RCTs were included, involving 47,135 patients with MSs or TIAs. In MSs or TIAs, dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPTs) significantly improved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores for patients with recurrent stroke, major vascular events and ischemic stroke although it was associated with an increased risk of ICH and bleeding when compared to aspirin. In MSs, compared to IVT, DAPT had a significant advantage in improving the mRMS scores and SAPT and DAPT significantly reduced the risk of any bleeding or sICH. IVT significantly reduced all-cause mortality, although it also increased the risk of sICH and ICH compared to no IVT.

CONCLUSIONS

In MSs or TIAs, compared to aspirin, DAPTs can effectively prevent the recurrence of post-stroke neurological dysfunction and ischemic events, but it may increase the risk of ICH together with moderate or severe bleeding. Dipyridamole + aspirin resulted in the lowest risk of bleeding. In MSs, compared to IVT, DAPT may be associated with better improvements in neurological function, and it may not increase the risk of bleeding.

Correlation between triglyceride-glucose index and early neurological deterioration in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke

Objective

The Triglyceride-glucose Index (TyG) index is a dependable metric for assessing the degree of insulin resistance, serving as a standalone predictor of ischemic stroke risk, but its precise relationship with early neurological deterioration (END) remains incompletely expounded within the context of acute mild ischemic stroke patients. This research is to examine the correlation of the TyG index with END among patients experiencing acute mild ischemic stroke in China.

Methods

This retrospective analysis was conducted to systematically gather data regarding patients experiencing their maiden episode of acute mild ischemic stroke and hospitalized at the Neurology Department of Nanjing Meishan Hospital, located in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China, over the period extending from January 2020 to December 2022. The severity of stroke was determined through the utilization of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores upon their admission. Demographic characteristics were collected, and measurements of fasting blood glucose, blood lipids, and glycosylated hemoglobin Alc levels were taken. END was defined as a one-point rise in the motor item function score on the NIHSS or a two-point increase in the overall score during the initial 72 h of hospitalization. For evaluating the correlation of the TyG index with END, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out. To investigate whether there is a nonlinear relationship between the TyG index and END, smoothed curves were utilized.

Results

The study included 402 patients diagnosed with acute mild ischemic stroke, with a mean age of 66.15 ± 10.04 years. Within this population, 205 were males (51.00%) and 197 were females (49.00%). Among these patients, 107 (26.62%) experienced END within 72 h of admission. Patients who developed END showed higher levels of the TyG index in comparison to those who remained stable (9.18 ± 0.46 vs. 8.87 ± 0.46, p < 0.001). In a comprehensive multivariate logistic regression analysis, the TyG index positively correlates with END (OR = 3.63, 95% CI: 1.75-7.54, p = 0.001). Furthermore, individuals in the fourth TyG index quartile exhibited a 2.36-fold heightened risk of END compared to those in the first quartile (95% CI: 1.38-8.19, p = 0.008). TyG index has a linear correlation with END in the generalized additive model (Log likelihood ratio test, p = 0.525).

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that TyG index has a significant, independent, and positive correlation with END in Chinese individuals diagnosed with acute mild ischemic stroke. This underscores the TyG index's potential usefulness as a valuable risk stratification tool for stroke patients.

Minor strokes: Addressing the challenges of recanalization therapies and secondary prevention

Minor strokes, which account for about 50 % of all ischemic strokes are not necessarily benign and carry a substantial risk of long-term disability. Due to persisting uncertainties regarding optimal recanalization strategies mild strokes may represent a therapeutical challenge for clinicians. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge and questions remaining to be answered.

Efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in the elderly for stroke prevention: a subgroup analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial

OBJECTIVES

Evidence of the optimal antiplatelet therapy for elderly patients who had a stroke is limited, especially those elder than 80 years. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in old-old patients compared with younger patients in the ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with aspirin in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events-II (CHANCE-2) trial.

METHODS

CHANCE-2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in China involving patients with high-risk transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. In our substudy, all enrolled patients were stratified by age: old-old (≥80 years), young-old (65-80 years) and younger (<65 years). The primary outcomes were stroke recurrence and moderate to severe bleeding within 90 days, respectively.

RESULTS

Of all the 6412 patients, 406 (6.3%) were old-old, 2755 (43.0%) were young-old and 3251 (50.7%) were younger. Old-old patients were associated with higher composite vascular events (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.98, p=0.048), disabling stroke (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.88, p=0.0002), severe or moderate bleeding (HR 8.40, 95% CI 1.95 to 36.21, p=0.004) and mortality (HR 7.56, 95% CI 2.23 to 25.70, p=0.001) within 90 days. Ticagrelor-aspirin group was associated with lower risks of stroke recurrence within 90 days in younger patients (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.91, p=0.008), which was no differences in old-old patients.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients aged over 80 in CHANCE-2 trial had higher risks of composite vascular events, disabling stroke, severe or moderate bleeding and mortality within 90 days. Genotype-guided DAPT might not be as effective in old-old patients as in younger ones.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04078737.

Dual Antiplatelet Versus Alteplase for Early Neurologic Deterioration in Minor Stroke With Versus Without Large Vessel Occlusion: Prespecified Post Hoc Analysis of the ARAMIS Trial

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was noninferior to alteplase in minor nondisabling strokes in the ARAMIS trial (Antiplatelet Versus R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke); however, early neurological deterioration (END) associated with vessel stenosis may benefit from DAPT. We investigated whether the efficacy of DAPT was greater than alteplase in minor strokes with no large vessel occlusion (LVO).

METHODS

This study was a prespecified post hoc analysis of the ARAMIS trial and included patients with responsible vessel examination in the as-treated analysis set of the ARAMIS trial who were divided into LVO group and non-LVO group. In each group, patients were further classified into DAPT and intravenous alteplase treatments. Primary outcome was END at 24 hours defined as more than or equal to 4-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score increase compared with baseline, and safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and bleeding events during study. The primary analysis was estimated with a risk difference calculated by a generalized linear model including adjusted different baseline characteristics between treatments.

RESULTS

Of 723 patients from the ARAMIS trial, 480 patients were included: 36 were categorized into LVO group and 444 into non-LVO group, of whom 20 patients had END. Compared with intravenous alteplase, a lower proportion of END was found after DAPT treatment in the non-LVO group (adjusted risk difference, -4.8% [95% CI, -6.9% to -2.6%]; P<0.001), but not in the LVO group (adjusted risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI, -17.6% to 22.3%]; P=0.82). The interaction was marginally significant between groups (P=0.06). In the non-LVO group, a lower proportion of bleeding events was found after DAPT treatment than intravenous alteplase (adjusted risk difference, -6.4% [95% CI, -8.9% to -3.9%]; P<0.001). Other safety outcomes were similar between the 2 treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Among minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke without LVO, DAPT may be superior to intravenous alteplase regarding preventing END with a better safety profile.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03661411.

Patient Acceptance and Adherence to the COMPASS Trial Drug Recommendations Following Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

The COMPASS trial demonstrated that in patients with atherosclerotic diseases, low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin provides greater protection against subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) than mono-antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) alone. Drug acceptance and adherence maximizes this benefit. We have assessed drug acceptance and adherence to the COMPASS drug regime in patients following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

METHODS

Following CEA, the views of 63 patients on the COMPASS drug regime were assessed using the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire and drug adherence was determined using the Sidorkiewicz scoring system. These views were compared with those of 54 patients on MAPT. Side effects (bleeding and drug reactions) and new MACE were recorded.

RESULTS

Post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen had strong positive views on the necessity to take these drugs (necessity scale 19.6 ± 3.6). Although there were some concerns about the COMPASS drug regimen, these were not strongly held (concern cscale 11.8 ± 4.9) and the necessity-concerns differential was positive (7.8 ± 6.2). The Drug Adherence Score was "High" to "Good" (level of drug adherence 1.7 ± 1.0). The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire scales and Drug Adherence Score of post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen were similar to those on MAPT. The incidence of post-CEA MACE and side effects were similar for those on the COMPASS drug regimen and MAPT.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen had positive views on taking the drugs and drug adherence was high. We did not identify any patient-related barriers to the use of the COMPASS drug regimen to further reduce cardiovascular events.

Time to treatment and disability attributed to index stroke in the POINT trial

BACKGROUND

In the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with reduced disability attributable to the index stroke compared to antiplatelet monotherapy. However, it is unknown whether earlier treatment with DAPT versus aspirin is associated with greater benefit.

METHODS

We analyzed patients enrolled in POINT with minor ischemic stroke who had available data recording the treatment initiation time and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Patients were randomized to DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) vs. aspirin alone within 12 h of symptom onset. We estimated the effect of DAPT on disability (defined as mRS>1) ascribed to the index event and major hemorrhage at 90 days, stratified by tertiles of time from symptom onset-to-treatment-initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 2559 patients were included; median onset-to-treatment-initiation time was 8.3 h (IQR:5.8-11.0). Comparing DAPT to aspirin, the rate of disability attributed to the index event at 90-day follow-up was 5.1 % vs. 8.6 % (OR 0.57; 95 % CI:0.33-0.99) in patients treated <6.7 h, 7.5 % vs. 9.9 % (OR 0.74; 95 % CI:0.45-1.19) in those treated 6.7-10.0 h, and 8.6 % vs. 10.6 % (OR 0.80; 95 % CI:0.50-1.26) in those treated >10.0 h after symptom onset (p for interaction=0.65). There was no difference in major hemorrhage across time strata.

CONCLUSIONS

While not statistically significant, these results suggest the possibility of greater efficacy at reducing disability ascribed to minor stroke with earlier treatment with DAPT compared to aspirin.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Identifier: NCT00991029.

Intravenous thrombolysis or antiplatelet therapy for acute nondisabling ischemic stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Uncertainties remain on the optimal treatment for acute minor stroke with nondisabling symptoms. The two most common therapeutic approaches are intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and antiplatelet therapy, notably dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We synthesized data from the literature to compare IVT to DAPT and identify the best treatment for this population.

METHOD

We systematically searched Pubmed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for randomized trials and observational studies comparing IVT, aspirin, and/or DAPT, started within 24 h of symptom onset in patients with minor stroke (NIHSS ⩽ 5) and nondisabling symptoms. Random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome at 3 months (mRS 0-1). Secondary outcomes included mRS 0-2, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and recurrent stroke.

FINDINGS

Four randomized trials and 2 observational studies (5897 patients for the analysis of the primary outcome) were included. Compared with IVT (alteplase), DAPT (clopidogrel + aspirin) was significantly associated with higher odds of mRS 0-1 (OR = 1.52, 95% CrI, 1.09-2.35), but aspirin alone was not (OR = 1.36, 95% CrI, 0.87-2.30). DAPT was also associated with lower odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage than alteplase (OR = 0.14, 95% CrI, 0.03-0.91). There were no significant differences between treatment groups regarding the other outcomes. For each outcome, the ranking for the best treatment was DAPT, then aspirin, and then IVT.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis suggests that DAPT may be the optimal treatment for acute nondisabling stroke, with higher odds of excellent functional outcome compared with IVT.Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42024522038.

Ischemic Stroke: Pathophysiology and Evolving Treatment Approaches

Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and disability, with ischemic stroke being the most common type. It occurs due to reduced cerebral blood flow, leading to a cascade of events initiated by oxygen and nutrient deprivation, triggering excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation and finally culminating in neuronal injury and death. Key molecular players in ischemic stroke include glutamate receptors, acid-sensing ion channels, and purinergic receptors, exacerbating cellular damage through calcium influx, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Understanding these mechanisms has shaped therapeutic strategies, such as neuroprotective agents and stem cell therapies. Current treatments such as tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) emphasize timely intervention, yet challenges persist in patient-specific variability and accessibility. This review provides an overview of ischemic stroke pathophysiology, emphasizing cellular responses to ischemia and current and future therapeutic approaches including stem cell therapies aimed at mitigating stroke-induced disabilities and improving long-term outcomes.

Possible clinical and radiological predictors of haemorrhagic transformation in acute stroke patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy: a clinical study

Background

The predictors of intracranial haemorrhagic transformation (HT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are not well known.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to identify the possible clinical and radiological predictors of HT in patients, irrespective of clinical indication for this treatment.

Design

This study is a monocentric cohort retrospective study.

Methods

We enrolled consecutive AIS patients, from our prospective register, admitted to Stroke Unit between June 2021 and June 2023 undergoing DAPT with Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel within 72 h from symptoms onset. According to current guidelines, DAPT indication was for patients with a minor stroke, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis and carotid angioplasty stenting. We collected clinical, demographical and radiological data. We used ABC/2 method to measure stroke volume in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences performed within 48 h. The primary outcome was the presence of HT at non-contrast brain computed tomography, performed 7 days after commencing DAPT.

Results

One hundred ninety-four patients were included. Twenty-eight (14.4%) presented HT. Higher NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and MRI/DWI lesion volume related to increased risk of HT (p < 0.001). Reperfusion therapy and mechanical thrombectomy (MT), stent placement and a loading dose (LD) of dual antiplatelet or Clopidogrel were associated with a higher occurrence of HT (p < 0.05). Furthermore, we individuated an NIHSS cut-off value >4 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.65) and a volume cut-off value >8.2 ml (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 0.79, specificity 0.80) associated with an increased risk of HT (respectively, adjusted odds ratio (adj. OR) 6.5, confidence interval (CI) 1.3-32.7, p = 0.024 and adj. OR 11.0, CI 3.1-39.2, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In clinical practice, MT treatment, antiplatelet LD administration, stent placement and clinical severity may relate to a higher risk of HT in patients with AIS and DAPT in the acute phase. In particular, we found that lesion volume cut-off could help to identify patients at greater risk of HT, regardless of the indication for DAPT.

Uptake of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack at a University Hospital

Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) significantly reduces the risk of subsequent stroke as compared to aspirin monotherapy after high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke. We sought to evaluate the uptake of DAPT after high-risk TIA at a single center. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive TIA patients admitted via the Emergency Department (ED) of Bern University Hospital (1/1/2018-12/31/2019). We use descriptive statistics to detail cohort characteristics and compared patients treated with DAPT to those not treated. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05 and all tests of comparison were two-sided. A total of 383 TIA patients were seen during the study period, 247 were eligible for DAPT. Among those eligible for DAPT, mean age was 72 years and 51% were female. A total of 49 (19.8%) eligible TIA patients were treated with DAPT; use of DAPT significantly increased from 2018 to 2019. Patients admitted to the stroke unit or intensive care unit (n = 33) had a significantly higher proportion of DAPT treatment as compared to those admitted to the general neurology ward or discharged to home from the ED. DAPT use was also significantly higher in patients with large artery atherosclerotic disease (n = 23) as compared to other etiological subtypes and significantly higher among patients who arrived to the ED within 24 h of symptom onset (n = 178). In conclusion, we found that only 2 out of every 10 high-risk TIA patients received DAPT in the years following its introduction in the clinical practice. Our results suggest that strategies to improve the uptake of new, evidence-based secondary stroke prevention treatment after high-risk TIA are needed.