Inhaled Fluticasone Furoate for Outpatient Treatment of Covid-19

Immunity and Coagulation in COVID-19

Discovered in late 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has caused the largest pandemic of the 21st century, claiming more than seven million lives. In most cases, the COVID-19 disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus is relatively mild and affects only the upper respiratory tract; it most often manifests itself with fever, chills, cough, and sore throat, but also has less-common mild symptoms. In most cases, patients do not require hospitalization, and fully recover. However, in some cases, infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus leads to the development of a severe form of COVID-19, which is characterized by the development of life-threatening complications affecting not only the lungs, but also other organs and systems. In particular, various forms of thrombotic complications are common among patients with a severe form of COVID-19. The mechanisms for the development of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 remain unclear. Accumulated data indicate that the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 is based on disruptions in the functioning of various innate immune systems. The key role in the primary response to a viral infection is assigned to two systems. These are the pattern recognition receptors, primarily members of the toll-like receptor (TLR) family, and the complement system. Both systems are the first to engage in the fight against the virus and launch a whole range of mechanisms aimed at its rapid elimination. Normally, their joint activity leads to the destruction of the pathogen and recovery. However, disruptions in the functioning of these innate immune systems in COVID-19 can cause the development of an excessive inflammatory response that is dangerous for the body. In turn, excessive inflammation entails activation of and damage to the vascular endothelium, as well as the development of the hypercoagulable state observed in patients seriously ill with COVID-19. Activation of the endothelium and hypercoagulation lead to the development of thrombosis and, as a result, damage to organs and tissues. Immune-mediated thrombotic complications are termed "immunothrombosis". In this review, we discuss in detail the features of immunothrombosis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and its potential underlying mechanisms.

The statistical design and analysis of pandemic platform trials: Implications for the future

The Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) Cross-Trial Statistics Group gathered lessons learned from statisticians responsible for the design and analysis of the 11 ACTIV therapeutic master protocols to inform contemporary trial design as well as preparation for a future pandemic. The ACTIV master protocols were designed to rapidly assess what treatments might save lives, keep people out of the hospital, and help them feel better faster. Study teams initially worked without knowledge of the natural history of disease and thus without key information for design decisions. Moreover, the science of platform trial design was in its infancy. Here, we discuss the statistical design choices made and the adaptations forced by the changing pandemic context. Lessons around critical aspects of trial design are summarized, and recommendations are made for the organization of master protocols in the future.

The first five years of SARS-CoV-2: inpatient treatment updates and future directions

INTRODUCTION

In December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in adults with pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

AREAS COVERED

It is now believed that several billion humans have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and more than ten million have died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2.

EXPERT OPINION

The first five years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have been marked by unfathomable suffering as well as remarkable scientific progress. This manuscript examines what has been learned about the treatment of inpatients with COVID-19 and explores how the therapeutic approach may evolve in the years ahead.

Association between serum levels of GDF-15, suPAR, PIVKA-II, sdLDL and clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

To quantify the circulating levels of novel serum biomarkers including GDF-15, PIVKA-II, sdLDL, suPAR, and of CRP in hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared with healthy subjects, and to evaluate their association(s) with outcomes in COVID-19. We considered patients with confirmed COVID-19, hospitalized in an Internal Medicine ward. The clinical characteristics were collected, including the number and type of comorbidities. Serum levels of GDF-15, PIVKA-II, suPAR, sdLDL, as well as CRP were measured. As outcomes, we considered Intensive Care Unit (ICU) transfer or death, as well as the length of stay (days) and in-hospital complications. Data were statistically analyzed, as appropriate, and a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Ninety-three patients and 20 healthy controls were enrolled. COVID-19 patients vs. controls showed higher median levels of GDF-15 (p < 0.0001), PIVKA-II (p < 0.0001) and sdLDL (p = 0.0002), whereas no difference was observed for suPAR. In COVID-19 patients, the most frequent comorbidities were arterial hypertension (62.4%) and cardiovascular disease (30.1%). GDF-15 levels positively correlated with age (r = 0.433, p < 0.0001), and this correlation was confirmed for suPAR (r = 0.308, p = 0.003) and CRP (Rho = 0.40 p < 0.0001), but not for PIVKA-II and sdLDL. Higher GDF-15 levels were associated with a higher number of comorbidities (p = 0.021). The median length of stay was 22 (15; 30) days. During hospitalization, 15 patients (16%) were ICU transferred, and 6 (6.45%) died. GDF-15 serum levels correlated with the length of stay (rho = 0.27 p = 0.010), and were associated with ICU transfer or death (p = 0.003), as well as PIVKA-II (p = 0.038) and CRP (p < 0.001). Moreover, higher GDF-15 and PIVKA-II serum levels were associated with infectious complications (p = 0.008 and p = 0.017, respectively). In this cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, novel inflammatory biomarkers, including GDF-15, suPAR and PIVKA II were associated with some patient's clinical characteristics, complications, and poor outcomes.

Equal Maintenance of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels Induced by Heterologous and Homologous Regimens of the BNT162b2, ChAdOx1, CoronaVac and Ad26.COV2.S Vaccines: A Longitudinal Study Up to the 4th Dose of Booster

Several technological approaches have been used to develop vaccines against COVID-19, including those based on inactivated viruses, viral vectors, and mRNA. This study aimed to monitor the maintenance of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in individuals from Brazil according to the primary vaccination regimen, as follows: BNT162b2 (group 1; 22) and ChAdOx1 (group 2; 18). Everyone received BNT162b2 in the first booster while in the second booster CoronaVac, Ad26.COV2.S, or BNT162b2. Blood samples were collected from 2021 to 2023 to analyze specific RBD (ELISA) and neutralizing antibodies (PRNT50). We observed a progressive increase in anti-RBD and neutralizing antibodies in each subsequent dose, remaining at high titers until the end of follow-up. Group 1 had higher anti-RBD antibody titers than group 2 after beginning the primary regimen, with significant differences after the 2nd and 3rd doses. Group 2 showed a more expressive increase after the first booster with BNT162B2 (heterologous booster). Group 2 also presented high levels of neutralizing antibodies against the Gamma and Delta variants until five months after the second booster. In conclusion, the circulating levels of anti-RBD and neutralizing antibodies against the two variants of SARS-CoV-2 were durable even five months after the 4th dose, suggesting that periodic booster vaccinations (homologous or heterologous) induced long-lasting immunity.

COVID-19 Severity and Mortality in Veterans with Chronic Lung Disease

Rationale: Chronic lung diseases (CLDs) have been variably associated with a risk for more severe manifestations and death with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Objectives: To determine the risk overall and by type of CLD for severity of COVID-19 outcomes in a U.S. national cohort. Methods: Using data from the Veterans Health Administration, we determined the risk associated with CLDs, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (mild or severe), asthma (mild, active, or severe), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), sarcoidosis, and other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) for outcomes among veterans with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive tests between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021. We used multinomial regression to estimate risk of four mutually exclusive COVID-19 outcomes within 30 days: outpatient management, hospitalization, hospitalization with indicators of critical illness, or death. We calculated the overall proportion with each outcome, the absolute risk difference, and risk ratios for each outcome between those with and without CLD. We also describe clinical and laboratory abnormalities by CLD in those hospitalized. Results: We included 208,283 veterans with COVID-19; 35,587 (17%) had CLD. Compared with no CLD, veterans with CLD were older and had more comorbidities. Hospitalized veterans with CLD were more likely to have low temperature, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and leukopenia and thrombocytopenia and were more likely to receive oxygen, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors. Veterans with CLD were significantly less likely to have mild COVID-19 (-4.5%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.95), and more likely to have a moderate (+2.5%; aRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.18-1.24), critical (+1.4%; aRR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.32-1.45), or fatal (+0.7%; aRR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10-1.20) outcome. IPF was most strongly associated with COVID-19 severity, especially mortality (+3.2%; aRR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.46-1.96), followed by other ILDs and COPD, whereas asthma was less likely to be associated with severity of COVID-19. In veterans younger than age 65 years, worse COVID-19 outcomes were generally more likely with IPF, sarcoidosis, and other ILDs. Conclusions: Veterans who had CLD, particularly IPF, other ILDs, and COPD, had an increased probability of more severe 30-day outcomes with COVID-19. These results provide insight into the absolute and relative risk of different CLDs with severity of COVID-19 outcomes and can help inform considerations of healthcare utilization and prognosis. Observational clinical epidemiology study registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04628039).

New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction

In the era of precision medicine, it has been increasingly recognized that individuals with a certain disease are complex and different from each other. Due to the underestimation of the significant heterogeneity across participants in traditional "one-size-fits-all" trials, patient-centered trials that could provide optimal therapy customization to individuals with specific biomarkers were developed including the basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs under the master protocol framework. In recent years, the successive FDA approval of indications based on biomarker-guided master protocol designs has demonstrated that these new clinical trials are ushering in tremendous opportunities. Despite the rapid increase in the number of basket, umbrella, and platform trials, the current clinical and research understanding of these new trial designs, as compared with traditional trial designs, remains limited. The majority of the research focuses on methodologies, and there is a lack of in-depth insight concerning the underlying biological logic of these new clinical trial designs. Therefore, we provide this comprehensive review of the discovery and development of basket, umbrella, and platform trials and their underlying logic from the perspective of precision medicine. Meanwhile, we discuss future directions on the potential development of these new clinical design in view of the "Precision Pro", "Dynamic Precision", and "Intelligent Precision". This review would assist trial-related researchers to enhance the innovation and feasibility of clinical trial designs by expounding the underlying logic, which be essential to accelerate the progression of precision medicine.

Investigational pharmacological agents for the treatment of ARDS

INTRODUCTION

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous form of lung injury with severe hypoxemia and bilateral infiltrates after an inciting event that results in diffuse lung inflammation with a high mortality rate. While research in COVID-related ARDS has resulted in several pharmacotherapeutic agents that have undergone successful investigation, non-COVID ARDS studies have not resulted in many widely accepted pharmacotherapeutic agents despite exhaustive research.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to discuss adjuvant pharmacotherapies targeting non-COVID Acute Lung Injury (ALI)/ARDS and novel therapeutics in COVID associated ALI/ARDS. In ARDS, variable data may support selective use of neuromuscular blocking agents, corticosteroids and neutrophil elastase inhibitors, but are not yet universally used. COVID-ALI/ARDS has data supporting the use of IL-6 monoclonal antibodies, corticosteroids, and JAK inhibitor therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Although ALI/ARDS modifying pharmacological agents have been identified in COVID-related disease, the data in non-COVID ALI/ARDS has been less compelling. The increased use of more specific molecular phenotyping based on physiologic parameters and biomarkers, will ensure equipoise between groups, and will likely allow more precision in confirming pharmacological agent efficacy in future studies.

Simnotrelvir as a potential treatment for COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Simnotrelvir is a selective 3-chymotrypsin-like oral protease inhibitor with activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

AREAS COVERED

On 18 January 2024, results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of simnotrelvir as a treatment for mild-to moderate COVID-19-were published, indicating the drug, when given in combination with ritonavir, shortened the time to resolution of symptoms.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment options for most outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 are limited. The protease inhibitor nirmatrelvir in combination with ritonavir has proven effective in patients who are high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, but there are no approved therapies for standard-risk patients, who now comprise the majority of the population. Simnotrelvir appears to be effective in standard-risk patients, including those who have completed primary vaccination against COVID-19 and have received a booster dose. This manuscript examines the rationale for the development of simnotrelvir and explores how this drug may be used in the future to treat COVID-19.

Effect of Inhaled Ciclesonide in Non-Critically Ill Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Multicenter Observational Study in Japan

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing global pandemic. Although systemic steroids play an important role in treating patients with severe COVID-19, the role of inhaled corticosteroids in non-critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remains unclear.

Methods

We analyzed findings in non-critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who were >18 years old and were admitted to 64 Japanese hospitals between January and September 2020. We performed propensity score matching analysis to evaluate 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates with or without inhaled ciclesonide within 2 days of admission. Sensitivity analyses using inverse probability weighting analysis, and generalized estimating equation method were also performed.

Results

Eligible patients (n = 3638) were divided into ciclesonide (n = 290) and control (n = 3, 393) groups. The 1-to-4 propensity score matching analysis included 271 ciclesonide users and 1084 nonusers. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for 28-day (3.3% vs 2.3%; risk difference, 1.0% [95% confidence interval, -1.2 to 3.3]) or in-hospital (4.8% vs 2.6%; risk difference, 2.2 [-.5 to 4.9]) mortality rates. The sensitivity analysis showed similar outcomes.

Conclusions

From this multicenter observational study in Japan, inhaled ciclesonide did not decrease 28-day or in-hospital mortality rates in non-critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Future large, multinational, randomized trials are required to confirm our results.