Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer

Evaluation of efficacy and fertility after nonradical surgical therapy (extra fascial hysterectomy or cone biopsy, with pelvic lymphadenectomy) for stage IA1, IA2, and IB1 cervical cancer (GOG-0278)

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the efficacy and perioperative morbidity of nonradical surgery (simple hysterectomy [SH] or cone biopsy [CB] plus pelvic lymphadenectomy [PLND] and to report pregnancy outcomes after CB.

METHODS

Prospective international study with 3-year follow-up of patients with stage IA1 (lymphovascular space invasion-positive) to IB1 (≤2 cm) cervical cancer stratified by fertility preservation (CB) or none (SH) (both with PLND). Criteria included ≤10 mm stromal invasion and negative margins on loop electrosurgical excision procedure or CB.

RESULTS

We enrolled 224 patients: 72 (32 %) CB and 152 (68 %) SH. Of those, 23 patients (5 CB; 18 SH) were deemed ineligible or refused surgery; 14 % had stage IA1, 28 % stage IA2, and 58 % stage IB1 disease; and 65 % had squamous carcinoma, 32 % adenocarcinoma, and 3 % adenosquamous carcinoma. We found adverse events (grade ≥ 3) within 30 days of surgery in 1 CB and 7 SH patients. In the CB group, 31 patients desired pregnancy during the study and 16 pregnancies occurred. Of those, 4 were spontaneous abortions, 3 were preterm deliveries, and 9 were full-term deliveries. After a median follow-up of 37 months (range 0.2-93 months), 3 patients in the CB group experienced recurrence (3-year recurrence-free survival, 94.8 %, and subsequently underwent hysterectomy), compared to none in the SH group.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer appears safe, with low morbidity. Patients treated by CB and PLND can achieve successful pregnancies. Recurrences in the cervix after CB can occur and require diligent surveillance to attain high cure rates.

Treatment advances across the cervical cancer spectrum

Cervical cancer is preventable with screening and vaccination approaches; however, access to these preventative measures is limited both nationally and globally and thus many women will still develop cervical cancer. Novel treatments and practice-changing research have improved cervical cancer outcomes over the past few decades. In this Review, we discuss clinical trials that have refined or redefined the treatment of cervical cancers across the early stage, locally advanced, persistent, recurrent and/or metastatic disease settings. Advances for patients with early stage disease have been achieved through trials evaluating less extensive and fertility-preserving surgeries, different surgical approaches (open versus minimally invasive), and sentinel versus full pelvic lymph node dissection. We also discuss results from trials testing the use of neoadjuvant, induction and adjuvant chemotherapy as well as immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with locally advanced disease. Finally, we review the progress made with systemic chemotherapy and novel therapeutics, including anti-angiogenic agents, immune-checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates, in the setting of metastatic and/or recurrent cervical cancer. The advances highlighted in this manuscript have reduced morbidity and improved overall survival for patients with this challenging-to-treat disease, while also inspiring additional research and trials in the field.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Ia1-Ib1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Multi-Center Study with 10 Years' Experiences in the Real World

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IA1 IB1 patients with low-risk cervical cancer (CC), which was defined as tumor ≤ 2cm, less than 1/2 stromal invasion and no lymph node involvement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with CC who underwent radical hysterectomy across three hospitals between 2010 and 2020. The patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups based on risk factors (tumor size, lymph nodes and stromal invasion depth). Within each group, the survival outcomes of open abdominal radical hysterectomy (OARH) and LRH were compared using the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

In the low-risk group (LRH: N = 320; OARH: N = 525), LRH demonstrated equivalence to OARH regarding 5-year overall survival (OS; 98.6% versus 99.3%, P = 0.571) and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 97.6% versus 98.4%, P = 0.418). Subsequently, a stratified analysis based on lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) status revealed no significant differences in 5-year OS and PFS between LRH and OARH in this group. Conversely, in the high-risk group (LRH: N = 355; OARH: N = 926), LRH exhibited significantly lower 5-year OS and PFS than OARH (91.3% versus 94.8%, P = 0.049; 84.0% versus 88.8%, P = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Among FIGO 2018 stage IA1-IB1 patients with low-risk CC, LRH demonstrates survival outcomes comparable to OARH. For patients with early-stage and low-risk CC, the appropriate surgical approach (LRH) can be chosen based on preoperative enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI, which is clinically feasible.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy at the time of hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

Standard management of early-stage cervical cancer is hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node evaluation. Based on the final results of the prospective international SENTIX Trial, we sought to determine the cost-effectiveness (CE) of type of lymph node assessment for early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was created using TreeAgePro 2023 software to evaluate the strategies of routine full lymph node dissection (LND) without para-aortic node dissection verses sentinel lymph node dissection (SNLD) at the time of hysterectomy. It was assumed that patients in the SLND group underwent unilateral or bilateral full LND in the event of unilateral or bilateral non-mapping, respectively. Outcomes included cost, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), perioperative complications, lymphedema, and recurrence 24 months after surgery. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses investigated the impact of the strategies.

RESULTS

In a theoretical cohort of 1000 women, SLND was the dominate strategy resulting in 1804 QALYs, cost $28.54 M, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) -$83,693, compared to routine LND. This strategy resulted in 53 total peri-operative complications and a 77 % reduction in lymphedema cases. At 24 months, the recurrence rate was 62 in the SLND group and 89 in the full LND group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to routine full LND, SLND is CE with a reduction in post-operative complications and lymphedema with an ICER of -$83,693. When feasible, this surgical technique should be considered at the time of hysterectomy.

Investigating the impact of persistent HPV infection on recurrence of lesions post-surgery for early-stage cervical cancer and related influencing factors

Objective

To explore the influencing factors of recurrence after surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (stages IA1-IIA1) and to investigate the relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and postoperative recurrence of lesions.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 242 patients who underwent surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IA1-IIA1) at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University between 2015 and 2022. Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the relationship between persistent postoperative HPV infection and lesion vaginal local recurrence while identifying the associated risk factors for persistent HPV infection following surgery.

Results

Within 12 months postoperatively, the HPV clearance rate was 88.11%. HPV infection persisted beyond 12 months in 19 patients (7.9%), with 3 cases demonstrating the same HPV genotypes (types 52, 58) as those identified preoperatively. Multivariate analysis identified persistent postoperative HPV infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.14 to 5, p=0.001*) as an independent risk factor for recurrence. Additionally, smoking (OR 7.49, 95% CI 1.19 to 47.13, p=0.032), abnormal vaginal microbiota (OR 0.663, 95% CI 0.403 to 1.088, p=0.001*), and the type of surgical procedure (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.91, p=0.033) were significantly associated with a higher rate of persistent HPV infection.

Conclusion

Persistent HPV infection after surgery is an independent risk factor for postoperative recurrence in early-stage cervical cancer. Surgical approach, abnormal vaginal microbiota, and smoking are associated factors for persistent HPV infection after surgery.

A reproducible framework for monitoring the impact of randomized clinical trials on clinical practice using large-scale real-world data: application to gynaecological surgical trials using the French national healthcare database

Background

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are fundamental to evidence-based medicine, but their real-world impact on clinical practice often remains unmonitored. Leveraging large-scale real-world data can enable systematic monitoring of RCT effects. We aimed to develop a reproducible framework using real-world data to assess how major RCTs influence medical practice, using two pivotal surgical RCTs in gynaecologic oncology as an example-the LACC (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer) and LION (Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms) trials.

Methods

We utilized data from the French National Health Insurance Database (SNDS), covering 98.8% of France's population. We analysed patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (2013-2022) and patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer (2014-2022). Bayesian structural time series analysis assessed the causal effects of the LACC and LION trials on the discontinuation of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and lymphadenectomy, respectively. Analyses were stratified by hospital type, academic status, research mission, domain expertise, human resources, and financial condition.

Findings

Our nationwide cohorts included 7108 cervical cancer and 23,090 ovarian cancer patients treated across 596 centres. The LACC trial led to a 14.1% reduction in radical hysterectomies by MIS (275 fewer surgeries; 95% CI: -407 to -140), with academic centres showing 27.9% reduction compared to 2.5% increase in nonacademic centres. The LION trial resulted in a 22.6% reduction in lymphadenectomies (2358 fewer surgeries; 95% CI: -2708 to -2003), with academic centres achieving 31.1% reduction versus 15% in nonacademic centres. Significant variation was observed across medical settings. Centres with academic status, high research missions, substantial expertise, and robust resources were more responsive to trial outcomes, highlighting the influence of institutional and human factors on adopting new practices.

Interpretation

This study demonstrates that large-scale real-world data can effectively monitor the impact of RCTs on clinical practice. While validated here using surgical trials, this reproducible framework is adaptable to various health domains and can be implemented in any country with national electronic health databases. Systematic monitoring is essential to ensure effective implementation of RCT findings and to address disparities in the adoption of evidence-based practices.

Funding

None.

Approach to radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial and associated complications: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study

BACKGROUND

The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer study results revolutionized our understanding of the best surgical management for this disease. After its publication, the guidelines state that the standard and recommended approach for radical hysterectomy is an open abdominal approach. Nevertheless, the effect of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial on real-world changes in the surgical approach to radical hysterectomy remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the trends and routes of radical hysterectomy and to evaluate postoperative complication rates before and after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial (2018).

STUDY DESIGN

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to examine radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed between 2012 and 2022. This study excluded vaginal radical hysterectomies and simple hysterectomies. The primary outcome measures were the trends in the route of surgery (minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy) and surgical complication rates, stratified by periods before and after the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial in 2018 (2012-2017 vs 2019-2022). The secondary outcome measure was major complications associated specifically with the different routes of surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 3611 patients included, 2080 (57.6%) underwent laparotomy, and 1531 (42.4%) underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. There was a significant increase in the minimally invasive surgery approach from 2012 to 2017 (45.6% in minimally invasive surgery in 2012 to 75.3% in minimally invasive surgery in 2017; P<.01) and a significant decrease in minimally invasive surgery from 2018 to 2022 (50.4% in minimally invasive surgery in 2018 to 11.4% in minimally invasive surgery in 2022; P<.001). The rate of minor complications was lower in the period before the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial than after the trial (317 [16.9%] vs 288 [21.3%], respectively; P=.002). The major complication rates were similar before and after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial (139 [7.4%] vs 78 [5.8%], respectively; P=.26). The rates of blood transfusions and superficial surgical site infections were lower in the period before the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial than in the period after the trial (137 [7.3%] vs 133 [9.8%] [P=.012] and 20 [1.1%] vs 53 [3.9%] [P<.001], respectively). In a comparison of minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy radical hysterectomy during the entire study period, patients in the minimally invasive surgery group had lower rates of minor complications than in those in the laparotomy group (190 [12.4%] vs 472 [22.7%], respectively; P<.001), and the rates of major complications were similar in both groups (100 [6.5%] in the minimally invasive surgery group vs 139 [6.7%] in the laparotomy group; P=.89). In a specific complications analysis, the rates of blood transfusion and superficial surgical site infections were lower in the minimally invasive surgery group than in the laparotomy group (2.4% vs 12.7% and 0.6% vs 3.4%, respectively; P<.001; for both comparisons), and the rate of deep incisional surgical site infections was lower in the minimally invasive surgery group than in the laparotomy group (0.2% vs 0.7%, respectively; P=.048). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the route of radical hysterectomy was not independently associated with the occurrence of major complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.65).

CONCLUSION

Although the proportion of minimally invasive radical hysterectomies decreased abruptly after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial, there was no change in the rate of major postoperative complications. In addition, the hysterectomy route was not associated with major postoperative complications.

Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions

In alignment with the World Health Organization's strategy to eliminate cervical cancer, substantial progress has been made in the treatment of this malignancy. Cervical cancer, largely driven by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, is considered preventable and manageable because of its well-established etiology. Advancements in precision screening technologies, such as DNA methylation triage, HPV integration detection, liquid biopsies, and artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostics, have augmented traditional screening methods such as HPV nucleic acid testing and cytology. Therapeutic strategies aimed at eradicating HPV and reversing precancerous lesions have been refined as pivotal measures for disease prevention. The controversy surrounding surgery for early-stage cervical cancer revolves around identifying optimal candidates for minimally invasive and conservative procedures without compromising oncological outcomes. Recent clinical trials have yielded promising results for the development of systemic therapies for advanced cervical cancer. Immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and targeted therapy have demonstrated significant effectiveness, marking a substantial advancement in cervical cancer management. Various combination therapies have been validated, and ongoing trials aim to enhance outcomes through the development of novel drugs and optimized combination regimens. The prospect of eradicating cervical cancer as the first malignancy to be eliminated is now within reach. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest scientific insights, with a particular focus on precision managements for various stages of cervical disease, and explore future research directions in cervical cancer.

Current opinions: updates on the changing landscape in the management of cervical cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the recent updates in the management of cervical cancer across all stages of the disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

After decades of minor advances, the landscape in cervical cancer is now rapidly changing. Recent studies have reported across the cervical cancer spectrum and on different therapeutic modalities. First, less radical surgery in the assessment and management of patients with early-stage, low-risk disease has been shown to be a safe option with reduced morbidity. The role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in combination with chemotherapy and radiation has demonstrated improved survival outcomes, moving immunotherapy to earlier lines of therapy. The options for systemic therapy continue to include checkpoint inhibitors as well as treatment with antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in the recurrent setting. Additional research continues to focus on targeting biomarkers in this disease.

SUMMARY

In this paper, we will review the practice-changing trials impacting early stage, locally advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer patients. Despite advances, the limited survival for these patients continues to highlight the need for access to preventive healthcare (vaccine/cytology) and clinical trials to continue to make advances.

Lymph node assessment at the time of robotic hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: A cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness (CE) of lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN).

METHODS

A decision analytic model was created to evaluate the strategies of routine full LND, sentinel lymph node dissection (SNLD), SNLD without advancing to full LND in the event of non-mapping, and full LND based on Mayo Criteria, versus no LND. Patients in the no LND group and those in the SLND group without advancement to full LND in the event of non-mapping who were found to have EC on final pathology and suspicious post-operative imaging underwent full LND. Model inputs were derived from the literature. Outcomes included cost, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), lymphedema, and 12-month post-operative complications. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed.

RESULTS

In a theoretical cohort of 1000 women, no LND was the dominate strategy with 960 QALYs and cost $21.94 M. This strategy resulted in 29 peri-operative complications and 11 cases of lymphedema. PSA indicated that LND based on frozen pathology is not CE compared to no LND. When comparing lymph node assessment strategies, SLND without escalation to full LND was the dominate strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to no LND, no strategy of LND was CE. However, if SLND was performed, escalation to full LND in the event of non-mapping resulted in worse CE. With this in mind, it is reasonable to consider either forgoing LND altogether or performing SLND without advancing to full LND to improve costs and reduce complications.

A Multicenter Study on the Relationship of Tumor Lesion Location with Bilateral Parametrial Involvement and Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the relationship of cervical tumor lesion location (CTLL) with bilateral parametrial involvement (PI) and pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM).

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic and imaging data of patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) retrieved from multiple centers. According to the CTLL, patients were allocated to three groups: a middle one third group, a unilaterally dominant group, and the entire-region group. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the preoperative risk factors related to PI and pelvic LNM. The rates of PI and pelvic LNM at the tumor-ipsilateral side and the tumor-contralateral side were compared using the Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 776 cases. The CTLL was an important preoperative risk factor for both PI and pelvic LNM. Parametrial involvement occurred solely on the tumor-ipsilateral side (3.57 %) in the unilaterally dominant group, whereas the rate of pelvic LNM on the tumor-ipsilateral side was 11.22 %, significantly higher than on the contralateral side (5.1 %), with no pelvic LNM found on the tumor-contralateral side of patients with tumors smaller than 3.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical SCC exhibits the characteristic of more accessible tumor-ipsilateral PI and pelvic LNM. When evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows that the tumor lesion does not involve the contralateral one third of the cervix, a reduction in the resection scope of the contralateral parametrium can be considered, avoiding resection of the para-aortic lymph nodes, and if the tumor is smaller than 3.5 cm, a reduction in the resection scope of the tumor-contralateral pelvic lymph nodes also can be considered.

Integrating Practice-Changing Studies in Gynaecologic Oncology Through Clinical Illustrations

Advances in gynaecologic oncology research lead to continuous updates in clinical guidelines. However, undergraduate medical education often lacks in-depth coverage of recent developments, limiting students' preparedness for evidence-based management of gynaecological cancers. This study aimed to bridge the educational gap by integrating case-based analyses of practice-changing studies into the undergraduate obstetrics and gynaecology course. We aimed to enhance students' understanding of relevant gynaecologic oncology concepts and improve their skills in analysing scientific literature related to cancer management. An educational method was introduced to 5th-year medical students (n = 46) over a 2-week course. Using clinical case scenarios, students were presented with examples of practice-changing trials along with research findings incorporated into clinical practice. Following the course, 36 students completed a feedback survey evaluating their knowledge and research interpretation skills before and after the course. Descriptive statistical methods and Fisher's exact test were used to assess students' self-reported knowledge improvement. There were significant increases in students' self-reported knowledge level on the covered topics, including a distinction between chemotherapy types (p < 0.0001), surgical treatment (p < 0.0001), maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer (p < 0.0001), molecular classification (p < 0.0001) and immunotherapy in endometrial cancer (p < 0.0001). Understanding of inclusion criteria and endpoints in scientific articles also improved, rising from 22 to 86% (p < 0.0001, OR 21, 95% CI 5.62-78.48). Incorporating practice-changing studies into clinical teaching significantly enhances students' perceived comprehension of gynaecologic oncology and strengthens their self-reported research interpretation skills. This methodological approach highlights the value of connecting case-based learning with current research.

Sexual Health and Quality of Life in Patients With Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Results From GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE Trial Comparing Simple Versus Radical Hysterectomy

PURPOSE

Simple hysterectomy and pelvic node assessment (SHAPE) is a phase III randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01658930) reporting noninferiority of simple compared with radical hysterectomy for oncologic outcomes in low-risk cervical cancer. This study presents secondary outcomes of sexual health and quality of life (QOL) of the SHAPE trial.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive either radical or simple hysterectomy. Sexual health was assessed up to 36 months postoperatively using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised and QOL using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Cervical Cancer-Specific Module (QLQ-CX24) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Among participants with at least one QOL measure, clinical and pathologic characteristics were balanced and with no differences in preoperative baseline scores for sexual health or QOL between groups. FSFI total score met the cutoff for dysfunction up to 6 months (P = .02) in the radical hysterectomy group. Group differences favored simple hysterectomy for FSFI subscales: desire and arousal at 3 months (P ≤ .001) and pain and lubrication up to 12 months (P ≤ .018). Both groups met the cutoff for sexual distress but was higher in radical hysterectomy at 3 months (P = .018). For QLQ-CX24, symptom experience was significantly better up to 24 months (P = .031) and body image better at 3, 24, and 36 months (P ≤ .01) for simple hysterectomy. Sexual-vaginal functioning was significantly better up to 24 months (P ≤ .022) and more sexual activity up to 36 months (P = .024) in the simple hysterectomy arm. Global health status was significantly higher at 36 months for simple hysterectomy (P = .025).

CONCLUSION

Simple hysterectomy was associated with lower rates of sexual dysfunction than radical hysterectomy, with a lower proportion of women having sustained sexual-vaginal dysfunction. These results further support the benefit of surgical de-escalation for low-risk cervical cancer.

Role of MRI in Assessing the Feasibility of Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Early-Stage Endometrial and Cervical Cancers

Fertility-sparing treatment (FST) has become a key aspect of managing gynecologic cancers in reproductive-age patients who wish to preserve fertility. Several leading clinical societies, including the European Society of Gynecological Oncology, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the European Society of Pathology, and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, have recently published evidence-based guidelines on fertility-sparing strategies and posttreatment surveillance of patients with early-stage gynecologic cancers, in particular endometrial and cervical cancers. These guidelines highlight MRI as essential to initial patient selection and follow-up. Properly tailored pelvic MRI protocols and clear MRI reports are key to performing accurate staging, assessing eligibility, and confirming the initial and ongoing feasibility of FST. Accordingly, radiologists, particularly those specializing in gynecologic imaging, play a critical role in the multidisciplinary approach to FST. They should be well-versed in FST eligibility criteria and key MRI finding before and after FST, ensuring these details are comprehensively communicated in structured MRI reports.

Surgical Deescalation Within Gynecologic Oncology

Importance

The goal of surgical deescalation is to minimize tissue damage, enhance patient outcomes, and reduce the adverse effects often associated with extensive or traditional surgical procedures. This shift toward less invasive techniques has the potential to revolutionize surgical practices, profoundly impacting the methods and training of future surgeons.

Objective

To evaluate adoption of surgical deescalation within the field of gynecologic oncology using The National Cancer Database.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used prospectively collected data from the National Cancer Database from January 2004 to December 2020. Eligible participants included women in the US who received a diagnosis of clinical stage I to IV endometrial, ovarian, cervical, or vulvar cancer within this time frame. Data were analyzed between January and June 2024.

Exposure

Diagnosis of stage I to IV endometrial, ovarian, cervical, or vulvar cancer.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was surgical deescalation, which included evaluation of receipt of surgical intervention, the surgical approach, the type of lymph node assessment, and salvage interventions for disease-affected organs. A Poisson model was applied to estimate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in the receipt of surgical treatment.

Results

A total of 1 218 490 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 61.2 [13.7] years) were included. Over the study period, the percentage of patients undergoing surgery decreased from 47.4% to 39.9% for those with cervical cancer (AAPC, -1.3%; 95% CI, -1.6% to -1.1%), from 72.0% to 67.9% for those with ovarian cancer (AAPC, -0.5%; 95% CI, -0.6% to -0.4%), from 83.7% to 79.1% for those with endometrial cancer (AAPC, -0.5%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 11 -0.4%), and from 81.1% to 72.6% for those with vulvar cancer (AAPC, -1.3%; 95% CI, -1.6% to -0.9%). The use of minimally invasive surgery increased from 45.8% to 82.2% for those with endometrial cancer (AAPC, 4.6%; 95% CI, 4.5% to 4.8%) and from 13.3% to 37.0% for those with ovarian cancer (AAPC, 9.4%; 95% CI, 9.0% to 9.7%). Sentinel lymph node dissection increased from 0.7% to 39.6% for patients with endometrial cancer (AAPC, 51.8%; 95% CI, 50.5% to 53.2%), from 0.2% to 10.6% for patients with cervical cancer (AAPC, 44.0%; 95% CI, 39.3% to 48.9%), and from 12.3% to 36.9% for patients with vulvar cancer (AAPC, 10.7%; 95% CI, 8.0% to 13.5%) cancers, whereas the rate of complete lymphadenectomies decreased in all 3 groups. The rate of fertility-sparing surgery for patients with cervical cancer younger than 40 years rose from 17.8% to 28.1% (AAPC, 3.1%; 95% CI, 2.3%-3.9%).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that over the past 15 years, the field of gynecologic oncology has moved toward surgical deescalation through an overall reduction in the number of patients who undergo surgery, increased use of minimally invasive surgical techniques, and increased use of sentinel lymph node techniques. Future research should focus not only on understanding the impact of surgical escalation on patients (including disease outcomes, quality of life, and equitable access to these services), but also on surgical training.

Minimally invasive compared to open surgery in patients with low-risk cervical cancer following simple hysterectomy: An exploratory analysis from the Gynegologic Cancer Intergroup/Canadian Cancer Trials Group CX.5/SHAPE trial

OBJECTIVE

The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial demonstrated that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with worse disease-free survival and overall survival among women with early-stage cervical cancer. It is unknown whether this applies to patients with low-risk disease following simple hysterectomy.

METHODS

Among patients who underwent simple hysterectomy in the Simple Hysterectomy And PElvic node assessment trial, univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to assess the association of minimally invasive versus open surgery with clinical outcomes, including pelvic and extra-pelvic recurrence-free survival, overall recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. Other variables included age, race, performance status, body mass index, stage, histologic type and grade, diagnostic procedure, lymphovascular space invasion before surgery and on final pathology, lymph node status, residual disease, and lesions >2 cm on final pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 338 patients underwent simple hysterectomy. Of those, 281 (83%) were performed by minimally invasive surgery and 57 (17%) by open surgery. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, a total of 12 (4.3%) recurrences were observed in 281 patients having simple hysterectomy by minimally invasive surgery versus 3 in 57 (5.3%) having open surgery (p = .73 from Fisher exact test). Although not randomized, the 2 groups were comparable except for histology and residual disease in the hysterectomy specimen. Patients with minimally invasive surgery had more adenocarcinoma and less adenosquamous compared to open surgery (35.9% versus 22.9% and 3.6% versus 14%, respectively; p = .005). Significantly fewer patients treated by minimally invasive surgery had residual disease in the hysterectomy specimen compared to open surgery (43.1 versus 57.9%; p = .04). No statistically significant difference between minimally invasive and open surgery in pelvic and extra-pelvic recurrence-free survival, overall recurrence-free survival, or overall survival was found.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate no statistical evidence that minimally invasive surgery is associated with poorer clinical outcomes for patients meeting the SHAPE criteria who underwent simple hysterectomy. Because the surgical approach was not a randomization factor, a large prospective trial is needed to confirm our results before a routine simple hysterectomy by minimally invasive surgery can be recommended.

Gynecologic oncology in 2024: breakthrough trials and evolving treatment strategies for cervical, uterine corpus, and ovarian cancers

This review summarized the results of clinical trials in 2024 that were believed to have a significant impact on clinical practice in the field of gynecologic oncology. The SHAPE trial, INTERLACE and KEYNOTE-A18 trials, and BEATcc and COMPASSION-16 trials were included in early-stage, locally advanced, and recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, respectively. For uterine corpus cancer, updated survival data of the four trials (NRG-GY018, RUBY, AtTEnd, DUO-E) for endometrial cancer and the first survival data of LMS-04 trial for leiomyosarcoma were described. For ovarian cancer, the final overall survival results of PRIMA study were followed by DUO-O, ATHENA-combo, and FIRST-ENGOT-OV44 trial in different disease conditions. Finally, the results of DESTINY-PanTumor02, a basket trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan, were briefly addressed.

Clinical practice guidelines for cervical cancer: an update of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Guidelines

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

Remodeling of tumor microenvironment by cellular senescence and immunosenescence in cervical cancer

Cellular senescence is a response to various stress signals, which is characterized by stable cell cycle arrest, alterations in cellular morphology, metabolic reprogramming and production of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). When it occurs in the immune system, it is called immunosenescence. Cervical cancer is a common gynecological malignancy, and cervical cancer screening is generally recommended before the age of 65. Elderly women (≥65 years) are more often diagnosed with advanced disease and have poorer prognosis compared to younger patients. Despite extensive research, the tumor microenvironment requires more in-depth exploration, particularly in elderly patients. In cervical cancer, senescent cells have a double-edged sword effect on tumor progression. Induction of preneoplastic cell senescence prevents tumor initiation, and several treatment approaches of cervical cancer act in part by inducing cancer cell senescence. However, senescent immune cell populations within the tumor microenvironment facilitate tumor development, recurrence, treatment resistance, etc. Amplification of beneficial effects and inhibition of aging-related pro-tumorigenic pathways contribute to improving antitumor effects. This review discusses senescent cancer and immune cells present in the tumor microenvironment of cervical cancer and how these senescent cells and their SASP remodel the tumor microenvironment, influence antitumor immunity and tumor initiation and development. Moreover, we discuss the significance of senotherapeutics that enable to eliminate senescent cells and prevent tumor progression and development through improving antitumor immunity and affecting the tumor microenvironment.

Survival After Simple Compared With Radical Hysterectomy for Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect on overall survival of simple hysterectomy with lymph node staging compared with radical hysterectomy with lymph node staging for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with early cervical carcinoma of 2 cm or smaller (stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion through IIA1, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging) from 2010 to 2019. After 1:1 propensity score matching, we compared patients who underwent simple hysterectomy with lymph node staging and those with radical hysterectomy with lymph node staging. The variables used for matching were age, tumor size, race and ethnicity, lymphovascular space invasion, year of diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, histology, and surgical approach. The primary outcome was overall survival at the end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate and 30- and 90-day mortality rates.

RESULTS

In total, 4,167 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 2,637 patients (63.3%) underwent radical hysterectomy and lymph node staging and 1,530 patients (36.7%) underwent simple hysterectomy and lymph node staging. After propensity score matching, 1,529 patients in each group were included. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients who underwent simple hysterectomy and those who underwent radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI, 0.91-1.73, P =.17). Subgroup analysis by histology, lymphovascular space invasion, tumor size, and surgical approach did not reveal statistically significant differences in overall survival according to hysterectomy type. The hysterectomy groups also did not significantly differ in 30-day readmission rate (4.6% vs 4.2%, P =.73), 30-day mortality rate (0.1% vs 0%, P =.14), or 90-day mortality rate (0.1% vs 0.1%, P =.93).

CONCLUSION

Patients with low-risk cervical cancer could undergo less radical surgery without a negative effect on their oncologic outcomes.

[A 2024 inventory in oncology news]

The editorial board of the Bulletin du cancer has compiled a summary of the news from 2024 in oncology, based on the main results presented at international congresses or published over the past year. After a year marked by the success of the Olympic Games, the selection of data is presented and discussed in podiums of three main results by topic. Emphasis is placed on studies that have an immediate impact on practice and on data that raise important questions for the year 2025.

Methods of surgical quality assurance in cervical and endometrial cancer trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgery quality in gynecology oncology trials varies, potentially biasing results. This systematic review examines methods for assuring surgical quality in multi-center gynecologic oncology trials and the impact on patient outcomes. A systematic search (2000-2023) was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. Multi-center randomized controlled trials reporting on surgical endometrial and cervical cancer trials and lymph node harvest, short-term mortality, or conversion rate were included. Studies were assessed using a 10-point checklist to determine surgical quality. This was used to assess the association with variation in lymph node harvest, post-operative mortality, and conversion rate. Overall, 5963 titles and abstracts were screened for their eligibility and 10 studies reporting on 22 surgical-only arms were included for further analysis. The total number of included patients was 7434 from 366 centers. Analysis showed that standardization of surgical approach (β = -6.6, 95%, p = .043), standardization of the extent of lymphadenectomy (β = -2.432, p = .004), video assessment pre-trial (β = -3.492, p = .04) and monitoring of data including clinical outcome measures (β = -4.018, p = .009) were significantly associated with reducing variation in lymph node harvest. It also showed that standardization of the extent of lymphadenectomy (β = -0.718, p < .001) and pre-trial case/procedure volume assessment (β = -0.531, p = .049) were significantly associated with reducing short-term mortality. The regression model showed standardization of the extent of lymphadenectomy (β = -3.123, p = .034) was significantly associated with reducing conversion rate. In conclusion, the heterogeneity of surgical quality measures showed that there is no clear consensus on the approach to delivering surgical quality assurance in gynecology oncology trials. The analysis in this evidence synthesis has shown a potential association between different aspects of surgical quality assurance and clinical outcomes. Further research is required to develop a framework ensuring surgical quality deliverance in gynecology oncology trials.

Cervical cancer: a new era

Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Depending on stage, histology, and patient factors, the standard management of cervical cancer is a combination of treatment approaches, including (fertility- or non-fertility-sparing) surgery, radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and novel systemic therapies such as bevacizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. While ambitious global initiatives seek to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the management of cervical cancer continues to evolve with major advances in imaging modalities, surgical approaches, identification of histopathological risk factors, radiotherapy techniques, and biomarker-driven personalized therapies. In particular, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has dramatically altered the treatment of cervical cancer, leading to significant survival benefits in both locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent settings. As the landscape of cervical cancer therapies continues to evolve, the aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive discussion of the current state and the latest practice-changing updates in cervical cancer.

Para-aortic lymph node recurrence in surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer without para-aortic lymph node surgical staging

OBJECTIVE

The standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer includes radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node staging ± bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy may be considered; however, its role remains controversial. The objective of this study was to assess the para-aortic lymph node recurrence rate in patients undergoing surgery for apparent early-stage cervical cancer without para-aortic lymph node surgical staging.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients with presumed early-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 IA1-IB2, IIA1) cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. Pelvic lymph node assessment included sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy or had an indication to receive adjuvant para-aortic radiotherapy were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-year recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 432 patients were included. The median age was 43.7 years (IQR 38.1-51.6). Sixteen (3.7%) patients were staged IA1 at diagnosis, 24 (5.6%) IA2, 208 (48.1%) IB1, 177 (41%) IB2, and 7 (1.6%) IIA1. At final pathology, the stage distribution was as follows: 36 (8.3%) stage IA1-IA2, 323 (74.8%) stage IB1-IB3, 17 (3.9%) stage II, and 56 (13%) stage IIIC1. Eighty-two patients (19%) underwent concurrent pelvic chemoradiotherapy, 20 (4.6%) radiotherapy alone, and 3 (0.7%) chemotherapy alone. Thirty-eight (8.8%) patients experienced a recurrence with a median time of 18 months (IQR 12-29). The median follow-up time for the remaining 394 (91.2%) patients was 70 months (IQR 36-98). Two patients (0.5%) had a recurrence in the para-aortic lymph nodes. The 5-year recurrence-free survival in the overall cohort was 90% (95% CI 87.4% to 93.3%).

CONCLUSION

Given the low rate of para-aortic lymph node recurrence in surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer and the well-established peri-operative complications associated with para-aortic lymphadenectomy, our study aligns with recent evidence supporting the omission of this procedure in such patients.

Contemporary Review of Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix

OPINION STATEMENT

Among cervical cancers, adenocarcinoma is less common than squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix; however, the incidence of these cancers is rising. The incidence has changed largely due to a shift in risk factors as well as the evolution of the diagnosis and classification of adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma of the cervix is composed of a diverse group of neoplasms that can be classified by various factors. In this review article, preinvasive disease, updated classifications of adenocarcinoma, and treatment options for cervical adenocarcinoma are discussed with a focus on current and future therapies. Advances in antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and immunotherapy have increased the treatment options available for usual-type adenocarcinoma but there is still a lack of variety of treatment options for the remaining 25% of non-usual-type adenocarcinomas.

The prognosis of stage IA cervical cancer: Subgroup analysis of the SCCAN study

OBJECTIVE

Patients with TNM T1a cervical cancer have excellent prognosis; however, the risk for recurrence remains an issue of concern and management guidelines are based on limited data. Here we performed subgroup analysis of the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer (SCCAN) consortium with the objective of defining the prognosis of T1a cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

SCCAN was an international, multicentric, retrospective cohort study of patients with cervical cancer undergoing surgical treatment in tertiary centers. Inclusion criteria included: histologically confirmed cervical cancer treated between 2007 and 2016; TNM T1a; primary surgical management; and at least 1-year of follow-up data availability. Exclusion criteria included treatment with primary chemo-radiation, and missing treatment-related or clinical data.

RESULTS

Out of 975 patients included, 554 (57 %) were T1a1 and 421 (43 %) T1a2. The majority had squamous-cell carcinoma (78 %). 79 patients (8.1 %) had lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). 455 patients (47 %) underwent radical hysterectomy/ parametrectomy. Laparoscopic and open surgery was performed in 401 (41 %) and in 361 (37 %) patients, respectively. Adjuvant treatment was administered to 56 patients (5.7 %). Assessment of lymph nodes (LN) was performed in 524 patients (54 %), with LN involvement found in 15 (2.9 %). There were 40 (4.1 %) recurrences, occurring at a median of 26 months (4-106), out of which 33 (82.5 %) occurred in pelvis. Among T1a1 cases, there were 10 recurrences (2.0 %) if LVSI was negative, and 3 recurrences (6.7 %) if LVSI was positive. Among T1a2 cases, there were 23 recurrences (6.7 %) if LVSI was negative, and 4 recurrences (5.1 %) if LVSI was positive. There were 3 recurrences in the LN+ group (recurrence rate 20 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of recurrence in T1a cervical cancer was 4.1 % corresponding to the rates seen in patients with FIGO 1B cancer in recently published prospective trials. LN involvement represents a risk factor for disease recurrence. Our results indicate that stage T1a cervical cancer, apart from T1a1 LVSI negative disease, should follow the same principles in the management as that of FIGO stage 1B cancer.

Too much of a good thing? Projecting the need for gynecologic oncologists over the next 20 years

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of growth in gynecologic oncology fellowships in the United States on surgical volume for trainees and practicing gynecologic oncologists over the next 20 years.

METHODS

Using 2010-2019 age-specific gynecologic cancer incidence estimates from US Cancer Statistics, significant changes in incidence were identified with Joinpoint software. Statistically significant changes in annual rates were projected forward five years, and these estimates were used to generate projections of cancer cases in the population from the U.S. The number of practicing gynecologic oncologists was projected through 2045 based on current fellowship enrollment. For sensitivity analysis, we varied the number of new fellows and fellowships based on data trends from the last five years.

RESULTS

Over the next 20 years, cancer cases will increase by 14 % with the majority being endometrial. With current trainee numbers, the average annual number of new surgical cancer patients per practicing gynecologic oncologist will decrease from 73 to 51 (30 % decrease). An increase of one fellow per year nationally to the total number of trainees will further decrease new surgical cancer cases to 43 cases/gynecologic oncologist annually (41 % decrease). When accounting for one additionally trainee nationally per year over the next 20 years, the average number of oncologic surgical cases per fellow/year will decrease from 208 to 160 (23 % decrease). Under the assumption of no additional fellowship positions, surgical cases will increase from 208 to 226 per fellow/year (9 % increase).

CONCLUSION

The gynecologic cancer caseload of practicing gynecologic oncologists is estimated to decrease by nearly 41 % and trainee case volume will drop by 23 % over the next 20 years with minimal continued addition of training positions. Careful consideration should be given to creating an appropriate balance between the number of practicing gynecologic oncologists, potential dilution of programs' case volume per trainee, and the effects on the needs of future patients.

Assessing minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low risk cervical cancer: set up for the LASH trial

After the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, open surgery has become the standard approach for radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Recent studies assessed the role of a non-radical approach in low risk cervical cancer and showed no survival difference compared with radical hysterectomy. However, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low risk cervical cancer. This review offers an overview of the current evidence on the role of the minimally invasive approach in low risk cervical cancer and raises the need for a new clinical trial in this setting.

The evaluation of surgical content in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy videos on YouTube

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of surgical content in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) videos on YouTube.

STUDY DESIGN

On February 20, 2024, a search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword "laparoscopic radical hysterectomy," filtering videos with durations over 20 min and sorting by relevance. Two experienced gynecologists assessed the first 250 videos retrieved to determine if they illustrated anatomical landmarks and surgical procedures in a standardized step-by-step manner.

RESULTS

Forty videos met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Sixty percent (24 out of 40) of these videos presented the complete list of predetermined surgical steps. According to the LAP-VEGaS assessment tool, only 32.5 % (13 out of 40) of the videos achieved a total score of 11 or higher, and 12.5 % (5 out of 40) scored 12 or higher. Videos with a LAP-VEGaS score of 11 or above had a statistically higher number of views per day (4.64 [IQR: 10.47]) compared to those with a lower score (1.48 [IQR: 3.40], p = 0.019). Additionally, videos featuring a didactic voice were significantly more popular, with higher views per day compared to those with music or no audio (8.66 [IQR: 32.75] vs. 1.69 [IQR: 3.12], p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The majority of LRH videos on YouTube lacked comprehensive surgical content and received low LAP-VEGaS scores. Videos with a didactic voice and higher LAP-VEGaS scores tended to attract more viewers.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of simple hysterectomy compared to radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: analysis from the GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE trial

OBJECTIVE

SHAPE (Simple Hysterectomy And PElvic node assessment) was an international phase III trial demonstrating that simple hysterectomy was non-inferior to radical hysterectomy for pelvic recurrence risk, but superior for quality of life and sexual health. The objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing simple vs. radical hysterectomy for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

Markov model compared the costs and benefits of simple vs. radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer over a 5-year time horizon. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated from health utilities derived from EQ-5D-3L surveys. Sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty around key parameters. Monte Carlo simulation estimated complication numbers according to surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Simple hysterectomy was more effective and less costly than radical hysterectomy. Average overall costs were $11,022 and $12,533, and average gains were 3.56 and 3.54 QALYs for simple and radical hysterectomy, respectively. Baseline health utility scores were 0.81 and 0.83 for simple and radical hysterectomy, respectively. By year 3, these scores improved for simple hysterectomy (0.82) but not for radical hysterectomy (0.82). Assuming 800 early cervical cancer patients annually in Canada, the model estimated 3 vs. 82 patients with urinary retention, and 49 vs. 86 patients with urinary incontinence persisting 4 weeks after simple vs. radical hysterectomy, respectively. Results were most sensitive to variability in health utilities after surgery, but stable through wide ranges of costs and recurrence estimates.

CONCLUSION

Simple hysterectomy is less costly and more effective in terms of quality-adjusted life expectancy compared to radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01658930.

SEOM-GEICO Clinical Guidelines on cervical cancer (2023)

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of mortality in women worldwide. It is strongly associated with high-risk human papillomavirus infection. High-income countries that have implemented human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening programs have seen dramatic reductions in CC incidence, while developing countries where these programs are not available continue to experience high rates of CC deaths. In early-stage CC, the primary treatment is surgery or radiotherapy, whereas concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) remains the conventional approach in locally advanced stages until the upcoming approval of immunotherapy. The incorporation of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) in first line and as monotherapy in second line after platinum-based chemotherapy, has significantly increased overall survival (OS) in recurrent or metastatic CC. The purpose of this guideline is to summarize the most relevant evidence in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CC and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

Personalized strategies for brachytherapy of cervix cancer

Among most tailored approaches in radiation oncology, the development of brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer patients has benefited from various technological innovations. The development of 3D image-guided treatments was the first step for treatment personalization. This breakthrough preceded practice homogenization and validation of predictive dose and volume parameters and prognostic factors. We review some of the most significant strategies that emerged from the ongoing research in order to increase personalization in uterovaginal brachytherapy. A better stratification based on patients and tumors characteristics may lead to better discriminate candidates for intensification or de-escalation strategies, in order to still improve patient outcome while minimizing the risk of treatment-related side effects.

Reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer - results of the multicenter FERTISS study

INTRODUCTION

Fertility-sparing treatment (FST) for patients with cervical cancer intends to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to those after radical treatment while maximizing reproductive outcomes, including the ability to conceive and minimizing the risk of prematurity.

METHODOLOGY

International multicentre retrospective FERTISS study focused on patients treated with FST analysed timing of FST relative to pregnancy, conception attempts and methods, abortion rates, prophylactic procedures reducing the risk of severe prematurity, pregnancy duration, and delivery mode.

RESULTS

Of the 733 patients treated at 44 centres in 13 countries, 49.7% attempted to conceive during median follow-up of 72 months and 22.6% (166/733) patients achieved a successful pregnancy. Success rate was significantly higher after non-radical surgery (63.2%; 122/193) compared to radical trachelectomy (25.7%; 44/171, p < 0.001). Available perinatological data shows that 89.5% (111/124) of the patients became pregnant naturally. There was no significant difference in the abortion rate in the first pregnancy nor delivery success rates between non-radical and radical procedures patients. Preterm delivery (<38 weeks gestation) occurred more frequently after radical than non-radical procedures (76.5% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.15). Almost all patients (97.3%; 73/75) who underwent regular ultrasound cervicometry in pregnancy with subsequent prophylactic procedures delivered a live fetus, compared to 30.6% (15/49) women without such management, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent non-radical surgery had significantly higher pregnancy rates. Most pregnancies resulted in a viable fetus, but radical trachelectomy led to a higher rate of preterm births in the severe prematurity range. Half of the patients did not attempt pregnancy after FST.

Postoperative urinary retention by void trial methodology following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES

Radical hysterectomy is the standard of care for management of early-stage cervical cancer and is associated with postoperative urinary retention. No clear consensus exists regarding optimal voiding trial methodology for mitigating postoperative urinary retention. Our objective was to evaluate the association between type of postoperative voiding trial and risk of urinary retention after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for apparent early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 Stage IA2-IB2) between January 2014 and February 2023. We compared incidence of urinary retention and perioperative outcomes based on method of postoperative voiding trial (timed, autofill, or backfill). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine association of type of void trial with absence of urinary retention within 30 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 115 patients identified, 48 (41.8%) patients completed a timed void trial, 40 (34.7%) an autofill void trial, and 27 (23.5%) a backfill void trial. 44.3% of patients developed postoperative urinary retention with no differences based on void trial (p = 0.17). Urinary retention was more likely to resolve by 7 (p = 0.012) and 30 days (p = 0.01) for patients undergoing backfill voiding trials, compared to other trials. In multivariate models, backfill void trial was associated with absence of 30-day urinary retention, compared to other trials (aOR 15.1; 95% C.I. 1.5-154.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of urinary retention following radical hysterectomy do not differ based on postoperative void trial methodology. A backfill void trial following radical hysterectomy may lead to increased rates of resolution of postoperative urinary retention.

Risks of Cervical Cancer Recurrence After Fertility-Sparing Surgery and the Role of Human Papillomavirus Infection Types

Cervical cancer is a largely preventable malignancy of the uterine cervix. The tendencies in cervical cancer morbidity and mortality have remained similar for the past decade, albeit with increasing frequency in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Moreover, in the majority of LMICs, cervical cancer is the second most prevalent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death among reproductive-age women. High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections have been proven to be associated with up to 95% of cervical cancer cases, with HPV-16 and HPV-18 types being responsible for approximately 70% of all cervical cancers, with the other high-risk HPV types accounting for up to a further 25%. More recently, the latest data appear to confirm there is a change in the frequency of HR-HPV occurrence, especially HPV-16 and HPV-18, as a reflection of the implementation of preventive vaccination programs. Owing to the growing incidence of cervical cancer among reproductive-age women and with the development of cancer management approaches, fertility-sparing options have been proposed for early-stage cervical cancer management as an option for young women, especially those with unaccomplished reproductive desires. However, methods applied for this purpose (cold-knife conization, loop electrosurgical excision, trachelectomy) have variable outcomes and do not prevent risks of relapse. Multiple factors are involved in cervical cancer recurrence, even in cases treated at the early stage of the disease. In this review, the authors unveil whether HPV infection and virus type could be one of the key factors associated with cervical cancer recurrence after fertility-sparing surgery. Reviews of the literature reveal that recurrent and persistent HR-HPV infection is a strong predictor of cervical lesions' relapse. In particular, HPV-16 and HPV-18 infections and their persistence have been reported to be associated with cervical cancer recurrence. HR-HPV genotyping before and after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer could facilitate a personalized approach and improve the overall survival rate. Screening for HR-HPV is essential during the follow-up of cervical cancer-treated women and will help to predict possible cancer recurrence.

Highlights from the 25th European Congress on Gynaecological Oncology in Barcelona: the ENYGO-IJGC Fellow Interviews

In March 2024, 12 European Network of Young Gynae Oncologists-International Journal of Gynaecological Cancer (ENYGO-IJGC) Editorial Fellows conducted 10 interviews with senior opinion leaders on original and controversial topics in the field of gynecologic oncology presented during the 25th European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Congress in Barcelona, Spain. This article provides a summary and overview of the content of these discussions summarizing key points presented at the meeting. These selected interviews were chosen by consensus by the ENYGO-IJGC Editorial Fellows based on novelty and relevance to the field of gynecologic oncology.

Trends of minimally invasive surgery in the primary treatment of cervical cancer

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures, has rapidly advanced in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies worldwide. However, its adoption and insurance coverage in AOFOG countries remain limited, particularly for advanced uterine and ovarian cancers. This limitation poses a challenge to the widespread use of MIS, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive evaluation of its role and the skills required by gynecologic oncologists to ensure safe and effective treatment. Furthermore, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial significantly impacted perceptions of MIS, revealing higher recurrence rates and inferior overall survival for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIS-RH) compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy. Subsequent studies confirmed these findings, raising questions about the suitability of MIS-RH, particularly in centers with limited experience. Key issues affecting MIS outcomes include surgical expertise and tumor spillage prevention. As the landscape of cervical cancer treatment evolves, the integration of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immune therapies has challenged the traditional reliance on surgical monotherapy. There also exists ongoing debate over the optimal use of MIS in primary treatment and salvage surgery for cervical cancer to refine MIS techniques and explore their role in preserving fertility and managing residual disease post-chemoradiotherapy. For ensuring MIS as a viable treatment option, it is continuously necessary accumulating real-world data and reassessing surgical strategies to balance efficacy, safety, and patient preferences.

Stage migration and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer at Stage IIIC according to the 2018 FIGO staging system: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To summarize stage migration and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer at Stage IIIC according to the 2018 FIGO staging system, and to investigate prognostic factors influencing Stage IIIC1.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Clinical Trials.gov were searched from inception to February 6, 2024. The analysis was conducted using STATA 16.0.

Results

A total of 25 studies with 82954 cervical cancer patients were included in the analysis. The migration rates to FIGO 2018 Stage IIIC ranged from 18% to 37% for early-stage tumors (Stage IB to IIA) in FIGO 2009, and from 32% to 52% for advanced stage tumors (Stage IIB to IIIB). The overall survival (OS) for Stage IIIC1 is poorer compared to Stage IB1 (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.80, p=0.003) and Stage IB2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.85, p=0.004). It is comparable to Stage IB3, yet it shows better survival outcomes than Stages IIB (HR 2.91, 95% CI 1.01-8.39, p=0.047), IIIA (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.78-2.17, p=0.000), and IIIB (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.35, p=0.031). Tumors size ≥4cm (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.92, p=0.00), metastatic lymph node ≥ 3 (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.56-3.15, p=0.000) and T stage are prognostic factors for OS of Stage IIIC1.

Conclusions

The migration rates to FIGO 2018 Stage IIIC varied between 18% and 52% for patients initially classified under FIGO 2009 Stages IB1 to IIIB. The FIGO 2018 staging system underscores the pivotal role of lymph node metastasis in predicting prognosis and provides valuable insights into the distinct prognostic implications associated with different stages, particularly for early stages. For advanced stages, incorporation of tumor-related factors such as T stage might better elucidate survival differences and guide clinical treatment decisions.

Protocol registration

CRD 42023451793.

Unmet needs in cervical cancer - can biological therapies plug the gap?

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer remains one of the most common gynecologic malignancies worldwide. A disproportionate burden of cases occurs in developing countries due to inadequate screening and treatment. Even among patients adequately treated, in the presence of locally advanced or recurrent disease, outcomes tend to be poor. The introduction of biologic therapy into treatment has increased overall survival; however, a considerable opportunity still exists to improve current standards in treatment. Biologics have shown antitumor activity in multiple tumor types and are actively being pursued for the management of cervical cancer.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we will discuss the historical evolution of biologic therapy in cervical cancer including use of angiogenesis inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and vaccines. We will review how these therapies have been integrated into current treatment recommendations and discuss ongoing investigations intended to improve clinical outcomes. We also postulate on persistent gaps in care.

EXPERT OPINION

Biologic therapies have had a tremendous impact on our current approach to managing cervical cancer. We anticipate that significant more research and development will be committed to the continued investigation of biologics in cervical cancer in an effort to improve a historically difficult to treat malignancy.

Best original research presented at the 25th European Congress on Gynaecological Oncology: best of ESGO 2024

The 'Best of ESGO 2024' article includes a selection of the most highly rated original research presented during the 25th Annual Congress of the European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO), held in Barcelona, Spain, March 7-10, 2024. Of 1218 asbtracts submitted, 35 studies presented during the best oral sessions, mini oral sessions, best three minute presentations session, and young investigator session were selected by the ESGO abstract committee and the authors of the European Network of Young Gynae Oncologists (ENYGO). There was a strong focus on the surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer and the management of advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers using induction therapy, immunotherapy, and maintenance therapy. With this work, ENYGO and ESGO aim to focus the attention of clinicians, scientists, patients, and all stakeholders interested in gynecologic oncology on research advances in the field.

Impact of Various Treatment Modalities on Long-Term Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Survivors

Introduction Given treatment advancements and the long life expectancy of mostly young patients with cervical cancer, their post-treatment quality of life (QoL) is essential to consider. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term QoL in cervical cancer survivors treated with various approaches. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Cervical Cancer Module 24 (EORTC-QLQ-CX24) questionnaires and involved members of the online cervical cancer patient support group (01/2024-02/2024). Eligible participants were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with stage IA2-IIB cervical cancer, and had completed their treatment. Respondents were stratified into four management groups: neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery +/- radiation therapy (RT), surgery + RT, RT alone, and surgery alone. Results Overall, 173 patients participated: 20 (11.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery +/- RT, 50 (28.9%) had surgery + RT, 69 (39.9%) had RT alone, and 34 (19.7%) had surgery alone. Patients after surgery alone had significantly better global QoL (p<0.001). Their physical (p<0.001), role (p=0.037), emotional (p=0.024), and social (p=0.006) functioning were also substantially better. This group also reported the lowest severity of fatigue (p=0.001), nausea and vomiting (p<0.001), and diarrhea (p<0.001). Sexual functioning was better in the surgery-alone group in almost all aspects. There were no major differences in QoL among the groups, receiving RT alone or combined with other treatments. Conclusions Cervical cancer survivors who underwent surgery alone reported the highest QoL and lower symptom intensity compared to those treated with RT or treatment combinations. RT combined with other modalities did not appear to substantially decrease QoL compared to RT alone.

Preoperative brachytherapy of early-stage cervical cancer: A multicenter study by the SFRO brachytherapy group

OBJECTIVE

To report the results of a multicenter cohort of preoperative brachytherapy (PBT) for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer (ESCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted among five French comprehensive cancer centers on behalf of the SFRO Brachytherapy Group to examine the outcome of patients with ESCC who received PBT between 2001 and 2019 because of adverse prognostic factors (tumor size >2 cm, presence of lymphovascular invasion, adenocarcinoma).Brachytherapy was followed 4-8 weeks later by surgery. Local relapse free, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free, and overall survival and adverse effects were examined. Uni- and multivariate analyses were conducted looking for oncological prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 451 patients were identified, with a mean tumor size of 24.7 mm. Adenocarcinoma accounted for 43.5% of cases, and lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) was present in 15.7%. A complete histological response was observed in 69.6%. With a mean follow-up of 75.4 months, DFS, LRFS, and OS rates at five years were 88% [95% CI (84-91), 98% [95% CI (96-99), and 92% [95% CI (87-95)], respectively. At the last follow-up, 8.2% of patients had died, including 31 (6.8%) from cervical cancer. Severe side effects range from 1.1% to 2%. At multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma histological type, tumor size ≥2 cm, and the presence of residual tumors were prognosticators for DFS and DMFS.

CONCLUSION

PBT shows excellent oncological outcomes in this cohort of patients with adverse histoprognostic factors. Favorable survival rates and low complications rates were observed, supporting this strategy in the management of ESCC.