Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint

Mid-term efficacy of OLIF combined with unilateral pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases

Unilateral pedicle screw (UPS) fixation has been applied in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). However, the internal fixation strength required by OLIF is still controversial. Although satisfactory short-term outcome has been achieved with OLIF combined with UPS, the maintenance of stability in the fused segment remains a concern due to the lack of mid-term to long-term clinical follow-up reports. In this study, we compared the mid-term to long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of unilateral (n = 100) versus bilateral (n = 86) instrumented one-level OLIF for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).The mean follow-up duration was 75.09 ± 5.08 months. A significant decrease occurred in operative time, blood loss in UPS group. No statistical difference was detected regarding complication rate and fusion rate between the two groups. The VAS of low back pain at 6 months postoperatively was better than that of the BPS group. However, there were no significant differences in VAS and ODI at any other follow-up time point. The incidence of ASD was 12% lower in the UPS group than the 18.6% observed in the BPS group at the final follow-up. The standardized cross sectional area (SCSA) and degree of fat infiltration (DFF) of the multifidus muscle (MM) were better than those of the BPS group in the same period. The current data show that OLIF-UPS for the treatment of single-level LDD could achieve satisfactory mid-term to long-term outcomes comparable to BPS fixation, with less surgical time, less blood loss, and less DFF of the MM.

Evaluation of GPT-4 concordance with north American spine society guidelines for lumbar fusion surgery

Background

Concordance with evidence-based medicine (EBM) guidelines is associated with improved clinical outcomes in spine surgery. The North American Spine Society (NASS) has published coverage guidelines on indications for lumbar fusion surgery, with a recent survey demonstrating a 60% concordance rate across its members. GPT-4 is a popular deep learning model that receives knowledge training across public databases including those containing EBM guidelines. There is prior research exploring the potential utility of artificial intelligence (AI) software in adherence with spine surgery practices and guidelines, inviting opportunity to further investigate application in the setting of lumbar fusion surgery with current AI models.

Methods

Seventeen well-validated clinical vignettes with specific indications for or against lumbar fusion based on NASS criteria were obtained from a prior published research study. Each case was transcribed into a standardized prompt and entered into GPT-4 to obtain a decision whether fusion is indicated. Interquery reliability was assessed with serial identical queries utilizing the Fleiss' Kappa statistic. Majority response among serial queries was considered as the final GPT-4 decision. Queries were all entered in separate strings. The investigator entering the prompts was blinded to the NASS-concordant decisions for the cases prior to complete data collection. Decisions by GPT-4 and NASS guidelines were compared with Chi-square analysis.

Results

GPT-4 responses for 15/17 (88.2%) of the clinical vignettes were in concordance with NASS EBM lumbar fusion guidelines. There was a significant association in clinical decision-making when determining indication for spine fusion surgery between GPT-4 and NASS guidelines (χ² = 9.75; p<.01). There was substantial agreement among the sets of responses generated by GPT-4 for each clinical case (K = 0.71; p<.001).

Conclusions

There is significant concordance between GPT-4 responses and NASS EBM indications for lumbar fusion surgery. AI and deep learning models may prove to be an effective adjunct tool for clinical decision-making within modern spine surgery practices.

Advances in implants and bone graft types for lumbar spinal fusion surgery

The increasing prevalence of spinal disorders worldwide necessitates advanced treatments, particularly interbody fusion for severe cases that are unresponsive to non-surgical interventions. This procedure, especially 360° lumbar interbody fusion, employs an interbody cage, pedicle screw-and-rod instrumentation, and autologous bone graft (ABG) to enhance spinal stability and promote fusion. Despite significant advancements, a persistent 10% incidence of non-union continues to result in compromised patient outcomes and escalated healthcare costs. Innovations in lumbar stabilisation seek to mimic the properties of natural bone, with evolving implant materials like titanium (Ti) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and their composites offering new prospects. Additionally, biomimetic cages featuring precisely engineered porosities and interconnectivity have gained traction, as they enhance osteogenic differentiation, support osteogenesis, and alleviate stress-shielding. However, the limitations of ABG, such as harvesting morbidities and limited fusion capacity, have spurred the exploration of sophisticated solutions involving advanced bone graft substitutes. Currently, demineralised bone matrix and ceramics are in clinical use, forming the basis for future investigations into novel bone graft substitutes. Bioglass, a promising newcomer, is under investigation despite its observed rapid absorption and the potential for foreign body reactions in preclinical studies. Its clinical applicability remains under scrutiny, with ongoing research addressing challenges related to burst release and appropriate dosing. Conversely, the well-documented favourable osteogenic potential of growth factors remains encouraging, with current efforts focused on modulating their release dynamics to minimise complications. In this evidence-based narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of non-degradable spinal implants and bone graft substitutes, emphasising their applications in lumbar spinal fusion surgery. We highlight the necessity for continued research to improve clinical outcomes and enhance patient well-being.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Spinal Stabilization Using Adeolu's Technique: A Prospective Study from Nigeria

Background

Due to resource constraints, advanced spinal stabilization methods such as pedicle screws are unavailable at our center. Adeolu's technique, which employs low-cost and readily available vertical struts and spinal process wires, has been used as an adjunct in treating various spinal conditions to achieve rigid spinal constructs. This study evaluates the long-term clinical outcomes of this technique.

Methods

Nineteen patients treated with Adeolu's technique were prospectively followed to assess clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes included symptom reduction, absence of adverse events or need for re-intervention, and radiological evidence of stabilization and unrestricted mobilization. Secondary outcomes included back pain intensity, implant-related complications (rotation, migration, back-out, fracture), wound infection, worsening neurological status, and need for implant removal Data were analyzed using SPSS with simple descriptive statistics.

Results

The average follow-up period was 4.1 years (Range: 0.1 - 9.0 years). Patients' ages ranged from 20 to 81 years (Mean: 48.5). Indications for surgery included lumbar spondylosis (7, 36.8%), spinal trauma with unstable fractures (4, 21.1%), spinal tumors (4, 21.1%), and Pott's disease (4, 21.1%). All patients achieved satisfactory primary outcomes. Implant rotation was observed in 4 patients (21.1%), and implant migration in 1 patient (5.3%), requiring removal. Superficial surgical site infection occurred in 2 patients (10.5%). No implant fractures, deep infections, or worsening neurological status were noted.

Conclusion

Adeolu's technique is effective for a range of spinal pathologies, with favorable long-term clinical outcomes.

Patient-reported Physical and Mental Health Outcomes Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion versus Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement

BACKGROUND

Total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) are reliable surgical procedures for alleviating pain and optimizing function. Spinal fusion has also been shown to be beneficial, however the comparative benefit of THA/TKA to lumbar spinal fusion is incompletely understood.

METHODS

This study analyzed a single-center database of patients who underwent primary lumbar spinal fusion, elective primary TKA, or THA. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included Veterans-Rand (VR12) Physical and Mental Component Score (PCS/MCS) for TKA/THA and PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Global Mental and Physical Health (GPH/GMH) for spinal fusion.

RESULTS

A total of 356 patients who underwent TKA, 290 who underwent THA, and 125 who underwent spinal fusion were included. Joint replacement patients were older, with higher body mass index in the TKA group. Spine patients had a lower improvement in physical health than the joint patients (TKA: 9.4 ± 11.2, THA: 15.2 ± 11.2, Spine: 6.2 ± 8.7, P < 0.001) and a lower proportion of patients reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Spine patients had higher GMH improvements compared with TKA patients (TKA: -1.1 ± 10.7, THA: 1.1 ± 11.9, Spine: 1.8 ± 8.4, P = 0.009) and the highest proportion of patients reaching the MCID.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal fusion, total knee arthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty all significantly improved PROMs at 1-year follow-up. At baseline, spinal fusion patients had better physical function scores and worse mental health scores compared with joint arthroplasty patients, while spinal fusion resulted in mean smaller gains in patient reported physical function and higher gains in patient reported mental health function compared with arthroplasty.

The projected increase of vertebral osteomyelitis in Germany implies a demanding challenge for future healthcare management of aging populations

PURPOSE

Since an increase in the occurrence of native vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) is expected and reliable projections are missing, it is urgent to provide a reliable forecast model and make it a part of future health care considerations.

METHODS

Comprehensive nationwide data provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany were used to forecast total numbers and incidence rates (IR) of VO as a function of age and gender until 2040. Projections were done using autoregressive integrated moving average model on historical data from 2005 to 2019 in relation to official population projections from 2020 to 2040.

RESULTS

The IR of VO is expected to increase from 12.4 in 2019 to 21.5 per 100,000 inhabitants [95% CI 20.9-22.1] in 2040. The highest increase is predicted in patients over 75 years of age for both men and women leading to a steep increase in absolute numbers, which is fourfold higher compared to patients younger than 75 years. While the IR per age group will not increase any further after 2035, the subsequent increase is due to a higher number of individuals aged 75 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that increasing IR of VO will seriously challenge healthcare systems, particularly due to demographic change and increasing proportions of populations turning 75 years and older. With respect to globally fast aging populations, future health care policies need to address this burden by anticipating limitations in financial and human resources and developing high-level evidence-based guidelines for prevention and interdisciplinary treatment.

Intervertebral disc injury triggers neurogenic inflammation of adjacent healthy discs

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Intervertebral disc degeneration is common and may play an important role in low back pain, but it is not well-understood. Previous studies have shown that the outer layer of the annulus fibrosus of a healthy disc is innervated by nociceptive nerve fibers. In the process of disc degeneration, it can grow into the inner annulus fibrosus or nucleus pulposus and release neuropeptides. Disc degeneration is associated with inflammation that produces inflammatory factors and potentiates nociceptor sensitization. Subsequently neurogenic inflammation is induced by neuropeptide release from activated primary afferent terminals. Because the innervation of a lumbar disc comes from multisegmental dorsal root ganglion neurons, does neurogenic inflammation in a degenerative disc initiate neurogenic inflammation in neighboring healthy discs by antidromic activity?

PURPOSE

This study was based on animal experiments in Sprague-Dawley rats to investigate the role of neurogenic inflammation in adjacent healthy disc degeneration induced by disc injury.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an experimental study.

METHODS

Seventy-five 12-week-old, male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to 3 groups (sham group, disc injury group and disc injury+TrkA antagonist group). The disc injury group was punctured in the tail disc between the eighth and ninth coccygeal vertebrae (Co8-9) to establish an animal model of tail intervertebral disc degeneration. The sham group underwent only skin puncture and the disc injury+TrkA antagonist group was intraperitoneally injected with GW441756 two days before disc puncture. The outcome measure included quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Disc injury induced an increase in aggrecan, NGF, TrkA, CGRP, SP, IL-1β, and IL-6 mRNA levels in the injured (Co8-9) and adjacent discs (Co7-8), which reached a peak on day 1, then gradually decreased, and returned to normal on day 14. After intraperitoneal injection of GW441756 prior to puncture, the mRNA levels of the above indicators were down-regulated in Co7-8 and Co8-9 intervertebral discs on the 1st and 7th days. The protein content of the above indicators in Co7-8 and Co8-9 intervertebral discs showed roughly the same trend as mRNA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Degeneration of one disc can induce neurogenic inflammation of adjacent healthy discs in a rat model.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This model supports a key role of neurogenic inflammation in disc degeneration, and may play a role in the experience of low back pain.

Perioperative Blindness in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Literature Review

Perioperative vision loss (POVL) is a devastating surgical complication that impacts both the recovery from surgery and quality of life, most commonly occurring after spine surgery. With rates of spine surgery dramatically increasing, the prevalence of POVL will increase proportionately. This scoping review aims to aggregate the literature pertinent to POVL in spine surgery and consolidate recommendations and preventative measures to reduce the risk of POVL. There are several causes of POVL, and the main contribution following spine surgery is ischemic optic neuropathy (ION). Vision loss often manifests immediately following surgery and is irreversible and severe. Diffusion weighted imaging has recently surfaced as a diagnostic tool to identify ION. There are no effective treatments; therefore, risk stratification for counseling and prevention are vital. Patients undergoing prone surgery of long duration and/or with significant expected blood loss are at greatest risk. Future research is necessary to develop effective treatments.

Risk Factors for Unexpected Conversion From Ambulatory to Inpatient Admission Among One-level or Two-level ACDF Patients

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the conversion of patient status from ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to inpatient.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgeries are increasingly performed in an ambulatory setting in an era of rising healthcare costs and pressure to improve patient satisfaction. ACDF is a common ambulatory cervical spine surgery, however, there are certain patients who are unexpectedly converted from an outpatient procedure to inpatient admission and little is known about the risk factors for conversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent one-level or two-level ACDF in an ambulatory setting at a single specialized orthopedic hospital between February 2016 to December 2021 were included. Baseline demographics, surgical information, complications, and conversion reasons were compared between patients with ambulatory surgery or observational stay (stay <48 h) and inpatient (stay >48 h).

RESULTS

In total, 662 patients underwent one-level or two-level ACDF (median age, 52 yr; 59.5% were male), 494 (74.6%) patients were discharged within 48 hours and 168 (25.4%) patients converted to inpatient. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that females, low body mass index <25, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) ≥3, long operation, high estimated blood loss, upper-level surgery, two-level fusion, late operation start time, and high postoperative pain score were considered independent risk factors for conversion to inpatient. Pain management was the most common reason for the conversion (80.0%). Ten patients (1.5%) needed reintubation or remained intubated for airway management.

CONCLUSIONS

Several independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay after ambulatory ACDF surgery were identified. Although some factors are unmodifiable, other factors, such as procedure duration, operation start time, and blood loss could be potential targets for intervention. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for life-threatening airway complications in ambulatory-scheduled ACDF.

Augmented Reality-Supported Rod Bending in Multilevel Spinal Fusion Using the ADVISE Software

BACKGROUND

One of the most common reasons for poor patient outcomes and revision surgery in spinal fusion is hardware failure. Screw loosening or pullout occurs in up to one-quarter of all cases. It is known that even small screw-rod misalignments can cause significant mechanical overloads during rod fixation, which can result in hardware failure. To address this crucial surgical step, a novel augmented reality-assisted software was developed to generate custom rod templates that are precisely adapted to the individual patient.

METHODS

The novel software, which runs on a tablet, is used in spinal fusion surgery and is based on the use of a specific pedicle screw system, in which the polyaxial screw heads are connected to detachable guides. These guides can be recognized by the tablet camera and a light detection and ranging scanner. This image information is processed to determine the spatial positions of the screw heads and to calculate an ideally fitting rod template.

RESULTS

The calculated rod template is displayed in a 1-to-1 scale on the tablet screen. This template is used to cut and bend the rods of the pedicle screw system. Finally, the custom bent rod can be inserted into the screw heads without tension.

CONCLUSIONS

The augmented reality-assisted software is intended to give surgeons access to patient-specific intraoperative real-time data, helping them in bending rods that are more precisely adapted to the individual patient compared with the freehand technique.

National spine surgery registries' characteristics and aims: globally accepted standards have yet to be met. Results of a scoping review and a complementary survey

BACKGROUND

Surgery involving implantable devices is widely used to solve several health issues. National registries are essential tools for implantable device surveillance and vigilance. In 2017, the European Union encouraged Member States to establish "registries and databanks for specific types of devices" to evaluate device safety and performance and ensure their traceability. Spine-implantable devices significantly impact patient safety and public health; spine registries might help improve surgical outcomes. This study aimed to map existing national spine surgery registries and highlight their features and organisational standards to provide an essential reference for establishing other national registries.

METHODS

A scoping search was performed using the Embase, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the terms "registry", "register", "implantable", and all terms and synonyms related to spinal diseases and national registries in publications from January 2000 to December 2020. This search was later updated and finalised through a web search and an ad hoc survey to collect further detailed information.

RESULTS

Sixty-two peer-reviewed articles were included, which were related to seven national spine registries, six of which were currently active. Three additional active national registries were found through the web search. The nine selected national registries were set up between 1998 and 2021. They collect data on the procedure and use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified nine currently active national spine surgery registries. However, globally accepted standards for developing a national registry of spine surgery are yet to be established. Therefore, an international effort to increase result comparability across registries is highly advisable. We hope the recent initiative from the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) to establish an international collaboration will meet these needs.

Projections From Surgical Use Models in Germany Suggest a Rising Number of Spinal Fusions in Patients 75 Years and Older Will Challenge Healthcare Systems Worldwide

BACKGROUND

Spinal fusion is a well-established procedure in the treatment of degenerative spinal diseases. Previous research shows that the use of this operative treatment has been growing in recent decades in industrialized countries and has become one of the most cost-intensive surgical procedures. It seems that in some countries such as Germany-with its large, industrialized, European population-this increase is mainly driven by demographic changes with low fertility rates, increasing life expectancy, and an aging population. Based on current projections, however, Germany faces a population trend that many other countries are likely to follow within a few decades. An increasingly shrinking and aging working population may eventually put the healthcare system under enormous pressure, with greater demands for spinal fusions and associated higher costs. Thus, we aimed to provide reliable projections regarding the future demand for posterior spinal fusion procedures including age- and gender-related trends up to 2060, which will be necessary for future resource planning and possible improvements in actual treatment strategies.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How is the use of posterior spinal fusions in Germany expected to change from 2019 through 2060, if currents trends continue? (2) How is the use of posterior spinal fusions in Germany expected to change depending on patients' age and gender during this time period?

METHODS

Comprehensive nationwide data provided by the Federal Statistical Office, the official institution for documenting all data on operations and procedures performed in Germany, were used to quantify posterior spinal fusion rates as a function of calendar year, age, and gender. Because there is a lack of evidence regarding future trends in the use of posterior spinal fusions, an autoregressive integrated moving average model on historical procedure rates from 2005 to 2019 in relation to official population projections from 2020 to 2060 was chosen to forecast future absolute numbers and incidence rates of this procedure in Germany. Long-term forecasting is more prone to unexpected disruptions than forecasting over short-term periods; however, longer spans facilitate estimates of how trends may challenge future healthcare systems if those trends continue, and thus are useful for research and planning.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of posterior spinal fusion was projected to increase by approximately 83% (95% CI 28% to 139%) to 102% per 100,000 inhabitants (95% CI 71% to 133%) in 2060, with a 1.3-fold higher rate of women undergoing surgery in terms of absolute numbers. The highest increase identified by the model occurred in patients 75 years and older with 38,974 (95% CI 27,294 to 50,653) posterior spinal fusions in 2060, compared with 14,657 in 2019. This trend applied for both women and men, with a 246% (95% CI 138% to 355%) increase in the total number of posterior spinal fusions for women 75 years and older and a 296% (95% CI 222% to 370%) increase for men 75 years and older. At the same time, posterior spinal fusions in all age groups younger than 55 years were projected to follow a constant or even negative trend up to 2060.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that increasing use of posterior spinal fusion, particularly in patients 75 years and older, will challenge healthcare systems worldwide if current trends persist. This study may serve as a model for many other industrialized countries facing similar demographic and procedure-specific developments in the future. This emphasizes the need to focus on frailty research as well as appropriate financial and human resource management. Effective perioperative medical management, multidisciplinary treatment, and interinstitutional protocols are warranted, especially in older patients as we attempt to manage these trends in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, economic and decision analysis.

Biomechanics after spinal decompression and posterior instrumentation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to elucidate segmental range of motion (ROM) before and after common decompression and fusion procedures on the lumbar spine.

METHODS

ROM of fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaver lumbar segments (L1/2: 4, L3/4: 5, L5/S1: 5) was evaluated in six loading directions: flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), axial rotation (AR), and axial compression/distraction (AC). ROM was tested with and without posterior instrumentation under the following conditions: 1) native 2) after unilateral laminotomy, 3) after midline decompression, and 4) after nucleotomy.

RESULTS

Median native ROM was FE 6.8°, LB 5.6°, and AR 1.7°, AS 1.8 mm, LS 1.4 mm, AC 0.3 mm. Unilateral laminotomy significantly increased ROM by 6% (FE), 3% (LB), 12% (AR), 11% (AS), and 8% (LS). Midline decompression significantly increased these numbers to 15%, 5%, 21%, 20%, and 19%, respectively. Nucleotomy further increased ROM in all directions, most substantially in AC of 153%. Pedicle screw fixation led to ROM decreases of 82% in FE, 72% in LB, 42% in AR, 31% in AS, and 17% in LS. In instrumented segments, decompression only irrelevantly affected ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of posterior decompression significantly impacts ROM of the lumbar spine. The here performed biomechanical study allows creation of a simplified rule of thumb: Increases in segmental ROM of approximately 10%, 20%, and 50% can be expected after unilateral laminotomy, midline decompression, and nucleotomy, respectively. Instrumentation decreases ROM by approximately 80% in bending moments and accompanied decompression procedures only minorly destabilize the instrumentation construct.

A smart coating with integrated physical antimicrobial and strain-mapping functionalities for orthopedic implants

The prevalence of orthopedic implants is increasing with an aging population. These patients are vulnerable to risks from periprosthetic infections and instrument failures. Here, we present a dual-functional smart polymer foil coating compatible with commercial orthopedic implants to address both septic and aseptic failures. Its outer surface features optimum bioinspired mechano-bactericidal nanostructures, capable of killing a wide spectrum of attached pathogens through a physical process to reduce the risk of bacterial infection, without directly releasing any chemicals or harming mammalian cells. On its inner surface in contact with the implant, an array of strain gauges with multiplexing transistors, built on single-crystalline silicon nanomembranes, is incorporated to map the strain experienced by the implant with high sensitivity and spatial resolution, providing information about bone-implant biomechanics for early diagnosis to minimize the probability of catastrophic instrument failures. Their multimodal functionalities, performance, biocompatibility, and stability are authenticated in sheep posterolateral fusion model and rodent implant infection model.

Ultrasound-guided lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for sacroiliac joint pain after lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery

Our study evaluated the clinical feasibility of ultrasound-guided lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain after lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery (LSFS). This prospective study included a total of 46 patients who were diagnosed with SIJ pain after LSFS, did not respond to conservative treatment and therefore underwent ultrasound-guided SIJ radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) from January 2019 to January 2022. These patients were followed up for twelve months after the procedure. Patients were assessed with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preprocedural and postprocedural for 1 month, 6 months and 12 months follow-ups. There was a significant improvement in postprocedural NRS and ODI scores (p < 0.001). Thirty-eight patients (82.6%) had a satisfactory response and good global perceived effect (GPE) after twelve months. No significant complications were observed during the 12-month follow-up. The ultrasound-guided radiofrequency device designed as a safe, easily applied and encouraging method could avoid revision surgery. It is a promising technique and has shown good results in providing intermediate pain relief. In addition to the limited series reported in the literature, future studies will add meaning to this topic by including it in routine practice.

Improvements in Outcomes and Cost After Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery Between 2008 and 2019

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery have improved over the past decade.

BACKGROUND

Surgery for ASD is an effective intervention, but one that is also associated with large initial healthcare expenditures. Changes in the cost profile for ASD surgery over the last decade has not been evaluated previously.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ASD patients who received surgery between 2008 and 2019 were included. Analysis of covariance was used to establish estimated marginal means for outcome measures [complication rates, reoperations, health-related quality of life, total cost, utility gained, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), cost-efficiency (cost per QALY)] by year of initial surgery. Cost was calculated using the PearlDiver database and represented national averages of Medicare reimbursement for services within a 30-day window including length of stay and death differentiated by complication/comorbidity, revision, and surgical approach. Internal cost data was based on individual patient diagnosis-related group codes, limiting revisions to those within two years (2Y) of the initial surgery. Cost per QALY over the course of 2008-2019 were then calculated.

RESULTS

There were 1236 patients included. There was an overall decrease in rates of any complication (0.78 vs . 0.61), any reoperation (0.25 vs . 0.10), and minor complication (0.54 vs . 0.37) between 2009 and 2018 (all P <0.05). National average 2Y cost decreased at an annual rate of $3194 ( R2 =0.6602), 2Y utility gained increased at an annual rate of 0.0041 ( R2 =0.57), 2Y QALYs gained increased annually by 0.008 ( R2 =0.57), and 2Y cost per QALY decreased per year by $39,953 ( R2 =0.6778).

CONCLUSION

Between 2008 and 2019, rates of complications have decreased concurrently with improvements in patient reported outcomes, resulting in improved cost effectiveness according to national Medicare average and individual patient cost data. The value of ASD surgery has improved substantially over the course of the last decade.

Index Surgery Cost of Fluoroscopic Freehand Versus Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Instrumentation: An Age, Sex, and Approach-Matched Cohort Comparison

BACKGROUND

Spine surgery costs are notoriously high, and there are already criticisms and concerns over the economic effects. There is no consensus on cost variation with robot-assisted spine fusion (rLF) compared with a manual fluoroscopic freehand (fLF) approach. This study looks to compare the early costs between the robotic method and the freehand method in lumbar spine fusion.

METHODS

rLFs by one spine surgeon were age, sex, and approach-matched to fLF procedures by another spine surgeon. Variable direct costs, readmissions, and revision surgeries within 90 days were reviewed and compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine rLFs were matched to 39 fLF procedures. No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes. rLF had higher total encounter costs (P < 0.001) and day-of-surgery costs (P = 0.005). Increased costs were mostly because of increased supply cost (0.0183) and operating room time cost (P < 0.001). Linear regression showed a positive relationship with operating room time and cost in rLF (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

rLF is associated with a higher index surgery cost. The main factor driving increased cost is supply costs, with other variables too small in difference to make a notable financial effect. rLF will become more common, and other institutions may need to take a closer financial look at this more novel instrumentation before adoption.

L5-S1 nonunion occurrence even after anterior column support combined with iliac screw fixation in long fusion for adult spinal deformity: CT-based analysis at 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Iliac screw fixation and anterior column support are highly recommended to prevent lumbosacral pseudarthrosis after long-level adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite modern instrumentation techniques, a considerable number of patients still experience nonunion at the lumbosacral junction. However, most previous studies evaluating nonunion relied only on plain radiographs and only assessed when the implant failures occurred. Therefore, using CT, it is important to know the prevalence after iliac fixation and to evaluate risk factors for nonunion at L5-S1.

METHODS

Seventy-seven patients who underwent ≥ 4-level fusion to the sacrum using iliac screws for ASD and completed a 2-year postoperative CT scan were included in the present study. All L5-S1 segments were treated by interbody fusion. Lumbosacral fusion status was evaluated on 2-year postoperative CT scans using Brantigan, Steffee, and Fraser criteria. Risk factors for nonunion were analyzed using patient, surgical, and radiographic factors. The metal failure and its association with fusion status at L5-S1 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 77 patients, 12 (15.6%) showed nonunion at the lumbosacral junction on the 2-year CT scans. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression revealed that only higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade was a risk factor for nonunion (OR 25.6, 95% CI 3.196-205.048, p = 0.002). There were no radiographic parameters associated with fusion status at L5-S1. Lumbosacral junction rod fracture occurred more frequently in patients with nonunion than in patients with fusion (33.3% vs 6.2%, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Although iliac screw fixation and anterior column support have been performed to prevent lumbosacral nonunion during ASD surgery, 15.6% of patients still showed nonunion on 2-year postoperative CT scans. High ASA grade was a significant risk factor for nonunion. Rod fracture between L5 and S1 occurred more frequently in the nonunion group.

Establishing a Reference Procedure Length for Anterior Cervical Fusions: The Role for Standards in Surgical Process Improvement

Surgical process improvement strategies are increasingly being applied to specific procedures to improve value. A critical step in any process improvement strategy is the identification of performance benchmarks. Procedure length is a performance benchmark for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures; therefore, we sought to establish reference procedure lengths for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs at both teaching and non-teaching institutions and to describe methods for using this information to advance surgical process improvement initiatives. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive ACDFs performed at a resident teaching institution (RT) and a non-teaching institution (NT) for all 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs. Mean case lengths and patient outcomes were calculated for individual surgeons and institutions. After limiting cases to 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs and applying all exclusion criteria, 991 cases at the RT institution and 131 cases at the NT institution (a total of 1122 cases) were available for analysis. The mean (SD) procedure length for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs at the RT versus NT institutions were 121.9 min (36.3 min) and 73.6 min (29.7 min) (p<0.001), 172.7 min (44.8 min) and 112.0 min (43.0 min) (p<0.001), and 218.3 min (54.9 min) and 167.6 min (54.2 min) (p<0.001), respectively. Thirty-day outcomes were the same between institutions, except that the RT institution had a shorter mean hospital length of stay for 2-level ACDFs (1.6 days versus 2.9 days, p=0.001). This study is the first to attempt to establish a standard reference procedure length for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs. These data can guide efforts in surgical process improvement.

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, controlled observational study of short-term outcome

Instrumented stabilization with intersomatic fusion can be achieved by open (O-TLIF) or minimally invasive (MIS-TLIF) transforaminal surgical access. While less invasive techniques have been associated with reduced postoperative pain and disability, increased manipulation and insufficient decompression may contradict MIS techniques. In order to detect differences between both techniques in the short-term, a prospective, controlled study was conducted. Thirty-eight patients with isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis or degenerative disk disease were included in this prospective, controlled study (15 MIS-TLIF group vs. 23 O-TLIF group) after failed conservative treatment. Patients were examined preoperatively, on the first, third, and sixth postoperative day as well as after 2, 4, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Outcome parameters included blood loss, duration of surgery, pre- and postoperative pain (numeric rating scale [NRS], visual analog scale [VAS]), functionality (Timed Up and Go test [TUG]), disability (Oswestry Disability index [ODI]), and quality of life (EQ-5D). Intraoperative blood loss (IBL) as well as postoperative blood loss (PBL) was significantly higher in the O-TLIF group ([IBL O-TLIF 528 ml vs. MIS-TLIF 213 ml, p = 0.001], [PBL O-TLIF 322 ml vs. MIS-TLIF 30 ml, p = 0.004]). The O-TLIF cohort showed significantly less leg pain postoperatively compared to the MIS-TLIF group ([NRS leg 3rd postoperative day, p = 0.027], [VAS leg 12 weeks post-op, p = 0.02]). The MIS group showed a significantly better improvement in the overall ODI (40.8 ± 13 vs. 56.0 ± 16; p = 0.05). After 3 months in the short-term follow-up, the MIS procedure tends to have better results in terms of patient-reported quality of life. MIS-TLIF offers perioperative advantages but may carry the risk of increased nerve root manipulation with consecutive higher radicular pain, which may be related to the learning curve of the procedure.

THORACOLUMBAR FUSION IN THE UNIFIED HEALTH SYSTEM: PRE-COVID-19 TEMPORAL

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the temporal trends of thoracolumbar fusion procedures performed by the United Health System in Brazil from 2009 to 2019. Methods: This was an observational ecological study based on data collected from the information systems under the aegis of DATASUS, especially the Hospital Information System, which manages the Hospital Admission Authorizations (Autorizações de Internação Hospitalar - AIHs). All patients who had undergone the procedures of interest, that is, elective and emergency short and long thoracolumbar arthrodeses, were included. The temporal trends of the procedures performed in Brazil and in its five regions were calculated using polynomial regression. Results: The temporal trend of elective thoracolumbar arthrodesis decreased, while that of emergency arthrodesis increased, with the peak in 2015, followed by a marked decline. Short fusions were more frequent in both elective and emergency modalities, and the South and Central-West Regions had the highest indices of procedures per million inhabitants during the entire 2009 to 2019 period. Conclusions: The temporal trends of thoracolumbar fusions performed by SUS have decreased over the last decade, a phenomenon which may be explained by the growing criticism of indications of the procedure in the current literature. Level of evidence III; Retrospective Comparative Study.

Increasing Cost Efficiency in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Identifying Predictors of Lower Total Costs

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of a prospective multicenter database.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of lower total surgery costs at 3 years for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ASD surgery involves complex deformity correction.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria: surgical ASD (scoliosis ≥20°, sagittal vertical axis [SVA] ≥5 cm, pelvic tilt ≥25°, or thoracic kyphosis ≥60°) patients >18 years. Total costs for surgery were calculated using the PearlDiver database. Cost per quality-adjusted life year was assessed. A Conditional Variable Importance Table used nonreplacement sampling set of 20,000 Conditional Inference trees to identify top factors associated with lower cost surgery for low (LSVA), moderate (MSVA), and high (HSVA) SRS Schwab SVA grades.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixtee of 322 ASD patients met inclusion criteria. At 3-year follow up, the potential cost of ASD surgery ranged from $57,606.88 to $116,312.54. The average costs of surgery at 3 years was found to be $72,947.87, with no significant difference in costs between deformity groups (P > 0.05). There were 152 LSVA patients, 53 MSVA patients, and 111 HSVA patients. For all patients, the top predictors of lower costs were frailty scores <0.19, baseline (BL) SRS Activity >1.5, BL Oswestry Disability Index <50 (all P < 0.05). For LSVA patients, no history of osteoporosis, SRS Activity scores >1.5, age <64, were the top predictors of lower costs (all P < 0.05). Among MSVA patients, ASD invasiveness scores <94.16, no past history of cancer, and frailty scores <0.3 trended toward lower total costs (P = 0.071, P = 0.210). For HSVA, no history of smoking and body mass index <27.8 trended toward lower costs (both P = 0.060).

CONCLUSION

ASD surgery has the potential for improved cost efficiency, as costs ranged from $57,606.88 to $116,312.54. Predictors of lower costs included higher BL SRS activity, decreased frailty, and not having depression. Additionally, predictors of lower costs were identified for different BL deformity profiles, allowing for the optimization of cost efficiency for all patients.Level of Evidence: 3.

Routine In-Hospital Radiographs Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: Neither Necessary nor Cost-Effective?

Background

Despite a paucity of evidence or literature to support routine in-hospital post-operative radiographs (POXR) of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery, it remains accepted practice. Most spinal surgeons consider it part of their standard post-operative routine for ACDF despite nearly always documenting a ’satisfactory intra-operative image’ at the end of the operation. With an increasing financial pressure on NHS resources, our investigations should be clinically justified and evidence-based.

Purpose

To evaluate whether a post-operative radiograph of the cervical spine before discharge is either clinically justified or cost-effective in patients who have undergone an ACDF, despite having satisfactory intra-operative imaging.

Design

A retrospective review of 101 consecutive ACDF patients of radiographs performed before discharge, associated length of inpatient stay, and any complications involved.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 101 ACDF patients who had single or multi-level instrumentation for degenerative spinal disease from a single neurosurgical centre from all surgeons. Seventy-eight had an in-hospital post-operative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiograph, 23 did not. In 95 of these, it was documented that there was ‘satisfactory intra-operative imaging’ before the closure of skin, six lacked documentation of this. All patients had intra-operative imaging of completed instrumentation on the radiology system. Any post-operative complications were noted, and the length of hospital stay (LOS) was recorded. Six patients underwent ACDF following trauma, therefore leaving 95 elective cases. Study parameters also included: number of levels operated on, whether or not a plate was used with a cage, hospital costings for 2-view imaging and additional days of inpatient stay. 

Results

There was one out of our 101 patients where the post-operative radiograph confirmed unsatisfactory placement of metalwork and warranted a return to surgery. However, the decision to perform this x-ray was based purely on the deteriorating post-operative clinical picture. In the cohort that had POXR’s, the average length of stay was 66.7 hours. Without POXR, it was 21 hours. The additional cost to the trust of performing the in-hospital radiographs was calculated to be £71,523 per year.

Conclusion

In patients who undergo ACDF surgery with an uneventful post-operative course and have satisfactory intra-operative imaging, in-hospital post-operative radiographs serve no clinical purpose and delay discharge. This gives additional cost to the trust, unnecessary radiation exposure and occupies potential bedspace.

Independent Predictors of Revision Lumbar Fusion Outcomes and the Impact of Spine Surgeon Variability: Does It Matter Whether the Primary Surgeon Revises?

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of information regarding treatment strategies and variables affecting outcomes of revision lumbar fusions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of primary vs different surgeon on functional outcomes of revisions.

METHODS

All elective lumbar fusion revisions, March 2018 to August 2019, were retrospectively categorized as performed by the same or different surgeon who performed the primary surgery. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and clinical variables were collected. Multiple logistic regression identified multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of independent variables analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 130 cases, 117 (90%) had complete data. There was a slight difference in age in the same (median: 59; interquartile range [IQR], 54-66) and different surgeon (median: 67; IQR, 56-72) groups (P = .02); all other demographic variables were not significantly different (P > .05). Revision surgery with a different surgeon had an ODI improvement (median: 8; IQR, 2-14) greater than revisions performed by the same surgeon (median: 1.5; IQR, -3 to 10) (P < .01). Revisions who achieved minimum clinically important difference (MCID) performed by different surgeon (59.7%) were also significantly greater than the ones performed by the same surgeon (40%) (P = .042). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a different surgeon revising (OR, 2.37; [CI]: 1.007-5.575, P = .04) was an independent predictor of MCID achievement, each additional 2 years beyond the last surgery conferred a 2.38 ([CI]: 1.36-4.14, P < .01) times greater odds of MCID achievement, and the anterior lumbar interbody fusion approach decreased the chance of achieving MCID (OR, 0.19; [CI]: 0.04-0.861, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

All revision lumbar spinal fusion approaches may not achieve the same outcomes. This analysis suggests that revision surgeries may have better outcomes when performed by a different surgeon.

A Deep-Learning-Based, Fully Automated Program to Segment and Quantify Major Spinal Components on Axial Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Images

OBJECTIVE

The paraspinal muscles have been extensively studied on axial lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for better understanding of back pain; however, the acquisition of measurements mainly relies on manual segmentation, which is time consuming. The study objective was to develop and validate a deep-learning-based program for automated acquisition of quantitative measurements for major lumbar spine components on axial lumbar MRIs, the paraspinal muscles in particular.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional observational design. From the Hangzhou Lumbar Spine Study, T2-weighted axial MRIs at the L4-5 disk level of 120 participants (aged 54.8 years [SD = 15.0]) were selected to develop the deep-learning-based program Spine Explorer (Tulong). Another 30 axial lumbar MRIs were automatically measured by Spine Explorer and then manually measured using ImageJ to acquire quantitative size and compositional measurements for bilateral multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas muscles; the disk; and the spinal canal. Intersection-over-union and Dice score were used to evaluate the performance of automated segmentation. Intraclass coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to examine intersoftware agreements for various measurements.

RESULTS

After training, Spine Explorer (Tulong) measures an axial lumbar MRI in 1 second. The intersections-over-union were 83.3% to 88.4% for the paraspinal muscles and 92.2% and 82.1% for the disk and spinal canal, respectively. For various size and compositional measurements of paraspinal muscles, Spine Explorer (Tulong) was in good agreement with ImageJ (intraclass coefficient = 0.85 to approximately 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Spine Explorer (Tulong) is automated, efficient, and reliable in acquiring quantitative measurements for the paraspinal muscles, the disk, and the canal, and various size and compositional measurements were simultaneously obtained for the lumbar paraspinal muscles.

IMPACT

Such an automated program might encourage further epidemiological studies of the lumbar paraspinal muscle degeneration and enhance paraspinal muscle assessment in clinical practice.

Prediction of the influence of vertical whole-body vibration on biomechanics of spinal segments after lumbar interbody fusion surgery

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that for healthy spine, cyclic loading encountered due to whole-body vibration exposure generated higher responses in spinal tissues than static loading. However, how whole-body vibration affects spine biomechanics after interbody fusion surgery is poorly understood. This study aimed at comparing the effects of vibration loading on spinal segments between postsurgical and healthy lumbar spines.

METHODS

A validated finite element model of healthy human lumbosacral spine was modified to simulate interbody fusion at L4-L5 level considering the statuses immediately after surgery (before bony fusion) and after bony fusion. Biomechanical responses at its adjacent levels for the healthy and fusion models to a sinusoidal axial vibration load of ±40 N and the corresponding static axal loads (-40 N and 40 N) were computed using transient dynamic and static analyses, respectively.

FINDINGS

For both healthy and fusion models, vibration amplitudes of the predicted responses were significantly higher than the corresponding changing amplitudes under static loads. Specifically, the increasing effect of vibration load in disc bulge, disc stress and intradiscal pressure at L3-L4 level reached 255.9%, 215.0% and 224.4% for the healthy model, 157.4%, 177.8% and 171.8% for the fusion model (before bony fusion), 141.9%, 152.6% and 160.1% for the fusion model (after bony fusion).

INTERPRETATION

Although whole-body vibration is still more dangerous for the lumbar spine after interbody fusion surgery than static loading, the sensitivity of adjacent segment in postsurgical spine to vibration loading is decreased compared with healthy spine, especially when reaching to bony fusion.

Cold pain hypersensitivity predicts trajectories of pain and disability after low back surgery: a prospective cohort study

Improving the ability to predict persistent pain after spine surgery would allow identification of patients at risk and guide treatment decisions. Quantitative sensory tests (QST) are measures of altered pain processes, but in our previous study, preoperative QST did not predict pain and disability at single time-points. Trajectory analysis accounts for time-dependent patterns. We hypothesized that QST predict trajectories of pain and disability during 1 year after low back surgery. We performed a trajectory analysis on the cohort of our previous study (n = 141). Baseline QST included electrical, pressure, heat, and cold stimulation of the low back and lower extremity, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation. Pain intensity and Oswestry Disability Index were measured before, and 2, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Bivariate trajectories for pain and disability were computed using group-based trajectory models. Multivariable regressions were used to identify QST as predictors of trajectory groups, with sociodemographic, psychological, and clinical characteristics as covariates. Cold pain hypersensitivity at the leg, not being married, and long pain duration independently predicted worse recovery (complete-to-incomplete, incomplete-to-no recovery). Cold pain hypersensitivity increased the odds for worse recovery by 3.8 (95% confidence intervals 1.8-8.0, P < 0.001) and 3.0 (1.3-7.0, P = 0.012) in the univariable and multivariable analyses, respectively. Trajectory analysis, but not analysis at single time-points, identified cold pain hypersensitivity as strong predictor of worse recovery, supporting altered pain processes as predisposing factor for persisting pain and disability, and a broader use of trajectory analysis. Assessment of cold pain sensitivity may be a clinically applicable, prognostic test.

Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems

PURPOSE

Biomechanical comparison between rigid and non-rigid posterior stabilization systems following lumbar interbody fusion has been conducted in several studies. However, most of these previous studies mainly focused on investigating biomechanics of adjacent spinal segments or spine stability. The objective of the present study was to compare biomechanical responses of the fusion devices when using different posterior instrumentations.

METHODS

Finite-element model of the intact human lumbar spine (L1-sacrum) was modified to simulate implantation of the fusion cage at L4-L5 level supplemented with different posterior stabilization systems including (i) pedicle screw-based fixation using rigid connecting rods (titanium rods), (ii) pedicle screw-based fixation using flexible connecting rods (PEEK rods) and (iii) dynamic interspinous spacer (DIAM). Stress responses were compared among these various models under bending moments.

RESULTS

The highest and lowest stresses in endplate, fusion cage and bone graft were found at the fused L4-L5 level with DIAM and titanium rod stabilization systems, respectively. When using PEEK rod for the pedicle screw fixation, peak stress in the pedicle screw was lower but the ratio of peak stress in the rods to yield stress of the rod material was higher than using titanium rod.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional rigid posterior stabilization system, the use of non-rigid stabilization system (i.e., the PEEK rod system and DIAM system) following lumbar interbody fusion might increase the risks of cage subsidence and cage damage, but promote bony fusion due to higher stress in the bone graft. For the pedicle screw-based rod stabilization system, using PEEK rod might reduce the risk of screw breakage but increased breakage risk of the rod itself.

A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Effective alternatives to lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions have remained elusive. Anterior total disc replacement does not address facet pathology or central/recess stenosis, resulting in limited indications. A posterior-based motion-preserving option that allows for neural decompression, facetectomy, and reconstruction of the disc and facets may have a role.

PURPOSE

The purpose was to compare one-year patient-reported outcomes for a novel, all-posterior, lumbar total joint replacement (LTJR - replacing both the disc and facet joints) against transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative lumbar conditions warranting fusion (degenerative spondylolisthesis, recurrent disc herniation, severe foraminal stenosis requiring facet removal, and adjacent segment degeneration).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data comparing outcomes for LTJR patients to TLIF patients at an academic teaching hospital.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Analysis was conducted on 156 adult TLIF patients who were propensity matched to the 52 LTJR patients for a total sample of 208.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain were compared preoperatively, 3 months and 1 year after surgery.

METHODS

The implant is a motion-preserving lumbar reconstruction that replaces the function of both the disc and facets and is implanted using a bilateral transforaminal approach with complete facetectomies. Adult patients with degenerative lumbar pathology undergoing either LTJR or open TLIF were analyzed. These degenerative conditions included: grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis, recurrent disc herniation, adjacent segment disease, disc degeneration with severe foraminal stenosis). Trauma, tumor, grade 2 or higher spondylolisthesis, spinal deformity, and infection cases were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed to ensure parity between the cohorts. Multivariable regression analyses were done to compare the 1-year results as measured by 3 different standards to assess procedure success.

RESULTS

At 3 months, both the LTJR and TLIF cohorts showed significant and similar improvements in ODI and NRS back and leg pain. At 1 year, the LTJR cohort showed continued improvement in ODI and NRS back pain, while the TLIF group showed a plateau for ODI, back and leg pain. In a series of three multivariable logistic regressions, LTJR was shown to provide 3.3 times greater odds of achieving the minimal clinical symptom state in disability and pain (ODI <20%, NRS back and leg pain <2) and 2.4 and 4.1 times greater odds of achieving substantial clinical benefit (18% reduction in ODI) and minimal clinically important difference (30% reduction in ODI) as compared to TLIF.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we present a comparative analysis for the first 52 patients undergoing a novel, posterior-based LTJR for the lumbar spine versus TLIF for degenerative pathology. The approach for the LTJR allows for wide neural decompression, facetectomy, and complete discectomy, with the implant working to replace the function of the disc and facets to preserve motion. At 1 year, the LTJR cohort showed significant improvement in ODI and NRS back and leg pain as compared to TLIF. These results suggest that wide neural decompression combined with motion preservation using this novel LTJR may represent a viable alternative to TLIF for treating certain degenerative conditions. A prospective controlled trial is under development to further evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of this procedure.

Microcomputed tomographic, biomechanical and histological analyses of lumbar interbody fusion with iliac crest bone graft in a pig model

The main goal of this study was to assess the progress of vertebral stability after lumbar interbody fusion related to microcomputed tomography (micro CT), biomechanical analysis, and histological assessment towards spine fusion. Twelve male pigs were used; each underwent L2-3 discectomy and implantation of an iliac crest bone graft in two groups; six spines were harvested eight weeks (A1) and six spines 16 weeks (A2) after surgery (7 native spines for biomechanical analysis). The CT was performed by GE phoenix datos|x 2.0 with a sample drift correction. The samples were divided according to fusion quality. Biomechanical evaluation was carried out on the MTS Mini Bionix testing system. In the nondestructive mode, three cycles of pure bending moments were applied (5 Nm load limit) at a rate of 20 °/min in flexion (+40 °) and extension (-40 °). Two representative histological sections from four samples were obtained (A1, n = 2; A2, n = 2); areas of mature bone were quantified. In micro CT, better results were achieved in group A2 (not significant). Eight weeks after the operation, flexural stiffness decreased to 48% of its initial value for native cadavers (P < 0.05); after 16 weeks it was comparable to native cadavers, demonstrating the suitability of the implanted graft (P < 0.05). The newly formed bone tissue occupied an average area of 94.205 mm2 (A1) and 26.240 mm2 (A2). It was confirmed that micro CT, biomechanical analysis, and histological assessment are technically feasible and suitable for the evaluation of results of other methods of large bone defect treatment.

Are Guidelines Important? Results of a Prospective Quality Improvement Lumbar Fusion Project

BACKGROUND

United States (U.S.) healthcare is a volume-based inefficient delivery system. Value requires the consideration of quality, which is lacking in most healthcare disciplines.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether patients who met specific evidence-based medicine (EBM)-based criteria preoperatively for lumbar fusion would achieve higher rates of achieving the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) than those who did not meet the EBM indications.

METHODS

All elective lumbar fusion cases, March 2018 to August 2019, were prospectively evaluated and categorized based on EBM guidelines for surgical indications. The MCID was defined as a reduction of ≥5 points in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Multiple logistic regression identified multivariable-adjusted odds ratio of EBM concordance.

RESULTS

A total of 325 lumbar fusion patients were entered with 6-mo follow-up data available for 309 patients (95%). The median preoperative ODI score was 24.4 with median 6-mo improvement of 7.0 points (P < .0001). Based on ODI scores, 79.6% (246/309) improved, 3.8% (12/309) had no change, and 16% (51/309) worsened. A total of 191 patients had ODI improvement reaching the MCID. 93.2% (288/309) cases were EBM concordant, while 6.7% (21/309) were not.In multivariate analysis, EBM concordance (P = .0338), lower preoperative ODI (P < .001), lower ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) (P = .0056), and primary surgeries (P = .0004) were significantly associated with improved functional outcome. EBM concordance conferred a 3.04 (95% CI 1.10-8.40) times greater odds of achieving MCID in ODI at 6 mo (P = .0322), adjusting for other factors.

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides validation of EBM guideline criteria to establish optimal patient outcomes. The EBM concordant patients had a greater than 3 times improved outcome compared to those not meeting EBM fusion criteria.

Understanding Health Economics in Spine Surgery

»

The United States has faced substantial increases in health-care expenditure, with specifically large increases in spine surgery costs.

»

Many different formulas are utilized to determine value in spine surgery, including cost- benefit analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and cost-utility analyses, with the overall determination of value being quality/cost.

»

Quality often is calculated indirectly using either process measures or outcome measures and represents the potential benefit of a given intervention, usually over a specific time period to yield quality-adjusted life years.

»

Costs are particularly difficult to calculate given the interhospital, regional, national, and global variability, as well as indirect costs of an intervention, and many different methods are utilized to estimate costs.

»

Spine surgeons should be familiar with the elements that compose cost-effectiveness and their potential shortcomings in order for providers and health-care policy makers to identify the highest-quality studies and interventions that provide the greatest benefit to patients.

A cost benefit analysis of increasing surgical technology in lumbar spine fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Numerous advances have been made in the field of spine fusion, such as minimally invasive (MIS) or robotic-assisted spine surgery. However, it is unknown how these advances have impacted the cost of care.

PURPOSE

Compare the economic outcomes of lumbar spine fusion between open, MIS, and robot-assisted surgery patients.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of a single center spine surgery database.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Three hundred sixty propensity matched patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs, EuroQol-5D (EQ5D), cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY).

METHODS

Inclusion criteria: surgical patients >18 years undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on procedure type: open, MIS, or robotic. Open patients undergoing poster spinal fusion were considered as the control group. MIS patients included those undergoing transforaminal or lateral lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous screws. Robotic patients were those undergoing robot-assisted fusion. Propensity score matching was performed between all groups for the number of levels fused. Costs were calculated using the PearlDiver database, which reflects both private insurance and Medicare reimbursement claims for ICD-9 codes. For robotic cases, costs were reflective of operational fees and initial purchase cost. Complications and comorbidities and major complications and comorbidities were assessed according to CMS.gov manual definitions. QALYs and cost per QALY were calculated using a 3% discount rate to account for residual decline to life expectancy (78.7 years). Costs per QALY were calculated for both 1 year and life expectancy, assuming no loss of benefit. A 10,000 trial Monte Carlo simulation with probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) assessed our model parameters and costs.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty propensity matched patients (120 open, 120 MIS, 120 robotic) met inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics for the cohort were: age 58.8±13.5, 50% women, BMI 29.4±6.3, operative time 294.4±119.0, LOS 4.56±3.31 days, estimated blood loss 515.9±670.0 cc, and 2.3±2.2 average levels fused. Rates of post-op complications were significantly higher in robotic cases versus open and MIS (43% vs. 21% and 22% for open and MIS, p<.05). However, revision rates were comparable between all groups (3% open, 3% MIS, 5% robotic, p>.05). After factoring in complications, revisions, and purchasing and operating fees, the costs of robotic cases was significantly higher than both open and MIS surgery ($60,047.01 vs. $42,538.98 open and $41,471.21 MIS). In a subanalysis of 42 patients with baseline (BL) and 1Y EQ5D data, the cost per QALY at 1Y for open, MIS, and robot-assisted cases was $296,624.48, $115,911.69, and $592,734.30. If utility gained was sustained to life expectancy, the cost per QALY was $14,905.75, $5,824.71, $29,785.64 for open, MIS, and robot-assisted cases. Results of the PSA were consistent with MIS surgery having the most incremental cost effectiveness when compared to open and robotic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous advances have been made in the field of spine surgery, however, there has been limited discussion of the effect these advances have on economic outcomes. When matched for levels fused, robot-assisted surgery patients had significantly higher rates of complications and 30% higher costs of surgery compared to minimally invasive and open spine surgery patients. While 1 year economic outcomes were not optimal for robotic surgery cases, the projected costs per QALYs at life expectancy were well below established acceptable thresholds. The above findings may be reflective of an educational learning curve and emerging surgical technologies undergoing progressive refinement.

Sudden painless loss of vision following spine surgery: lessons learnt in darkness

A 26-year-old male driver presented with a history of pain in the neck for the past 1 week following trauma due to a road traffic accident. The patient had no neurological deficit. He had type 1 diabetes and was on regular oral hypoglycemics. After radiological investigations, the patient was diagnosed to have traumatic AO Spine Classification type C translational injury involving anterolisthesis of C6 over C7. After a detailed preoperative assessment, the patient was taken up for surgery. The patient underwent posterior stabilisation with instrumentation from C5 to T2. On extubation from anaesthesia, he immediately complained of complete painless loss of this vision in his left eye. Ophthalmological investigations attributed the cause to be due to central retinal artery occlusion. The patient was discharged with reassurance on the 20th postoperative day with minimal improvement in his vision and at 6-month follow-up, his vision improved to 1/60 and was advised for close follow-up.

Long-term (> 10 years) clinical outcomes of instrumented posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis

PURPOSE

Despite the rapid increase in instrumented spinal fusions for a variety of indications, most studies focus on short-term fusion rates. Long-term clinical outcomes are still scarce and inconclusive. This study investigated clinical outcomes > 10 years after single-level instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis with neurological symptoms.

METHODS

Cross-sectional long-term follow-up among the Dutch participants of an international multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing osteogenic protein-1 with autograft. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D-3L and visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, as well as questions on satisfaction with treatment and additional surgery.

RESULTS

The follow-up rate was 73% (41 patients). At mean 11.8 (range 10.1-13.7) years after surgery, a non-significant deterioration of clinical outcomes compared to 1-year follow-up was observed. The mean ODI was 20 ± 19, mean EQ-5D-3L index score 0.784 ± 0.251 and mean VAS for leg and back pain, respectively, 34 ± 33 and 31 ± 28. Multiple regression showed that diagnosis (degenerative vs. isthmic spondylolisthesis), graft type (OP-1 vs. autograft) and 1-year fusion status (fusion vs. no fusion) were not predictive for the ODI at long-term follow-up (p = 0.389). Satisfaction with treatment was excellent and over 70% of the patients reported lasting improvement in back and/or leg pain. No revision surgeries for non-union were reported.

CONCLUSION

This study showed favourable clinical outcomes > 10 years after instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion and supports spondylolisthesis with neurological symptoms as indication for fusion surgery.

Trends in lumbar spinal fusion-a literature review

Over the past several decades, there has been an upward trend in the total number of spinal fusion procedures worldwide. Advanced spinal fusion techniques with or without internal fixation, additional innovations in surgical approaches, innovative implants including a wide variety of interbody devices, and new alternatives in bone grafting materials are some reasons for the increasing number of spine fusion procedures. Moreover, the indications for spinal fusion have broadened over time. Initially developed for the treatment of instability and deformity due to tuberculosis, scoliosis, and traumatic injury, spinal fusion surgery has now a wide range of indications like spondylolisthesis, congenital or degenerative deformity, spinal tumors, and pseudarthrosis, with degenerative disorders as the most common indication. This review emphasizes current lumbar fusion techniques and their development in the past decades.

Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting

STUDY DESIGN

Two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, intra-patient controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing a bone graft substitute (AttraX Putty) with autograft in instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) surgery.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare PLF rates between 1 and 2 years of follow-up and between graft types, and to explore the role of bone grafting based on the location of the PLF mass.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are indications that bony fusion proceeds over time, but it is unknown to what extent this can be related to bone grafting.

METHODS

A total of 100 adult patients underwent a primary, single- or multilevel, thoracolumbar PLF. After instrumentation and preparation for grafting, the randomized allocation side of AttraX Putty was disclosed. The contralateral posterolateral gutters were grafted with autograft. At 1-year follow-up, and in case of no fusion at 2 years, the fusion status of both sides of each segment was blindly assessed on CT scans. Intertransverse and facet fusion were scored separately. Difference in fusion rates after 1 and 2 years and between grafts were analyzed with a Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) model (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

The 2-year PLF rate (66 patients) was 70% at the AttraX Putty and 68% at the autograft side, compared to 55% and 52% after 1 year (87 patients). GEE analysis demonstrated a significant increase for both conditions (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5-2.7, P < 0.001), but no difference between the grafts (P = 0.595). Ongoing bone formation was only observed between the facet joints.

CONCLUSION

This intra-patient controlled trial demonstrated a significant increase in PLF rate between 1 and 2 years after instrumented thoracolumbar fusion, but no difference between AttraX Putty and autograft. Based on the location of the PLF mass, this increase is most likely the result of immobilization instead of grafting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

A cost utility analysis of treating different adult spinal deformity frailty states

The aim of this study was to investigate the cost utility of treating non-frail versus frail or severely frail adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. 79 surgical ASD patients >18 years with available frailty and ODI data at baseline and 2-years post-surgery (2Y) were included. Utility data was calculated using the ODI converted to the SF-6D. QALYs utilized a 3% discount rate to account for decline to life expectancy (LE). Costs were calculated using the PearlDiver database. ICER was compared between non-operative (non-op.) and operative (op.) NF and F/SF patients at 2Y and LE. When compared to non-operative ASD, the ICER was $447,943.96 vs. $313,211.01 for NF and F/SF at 2Y, and $68,311.35 vs. $47,764.61 for NF and F/SF at LE. Frail and severely frail patients had lower cost per QALY compared to not frail patients at 2Y and life expectancy, and had lower ICER values when compared to a non-operative cohort of ASD patients. While these results support operative correction of frail and severely frail patients, it is important to note that these patients are often at worse baseline disability, which is closely related to frailty scores, and have more opportunity to improve postoperatively. Furthermore, there may be a threshold of frailty that is not operable due to the risk of severe complications that is not captured by this analysis. While future research should investigate economic outcomes at extended follow up times, these findings support the cost effectiveness of ASD surgery at all frailty states.

Relationship between straight leg-raising test measurements and area of fat infiltration in multifidus muscles in patients with lumbar disc hernation

BACKGROUND

A few studies have noted that paraspinal muscle training is important to reduce pain for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, little is known about the exact signs for necessary training of lumbar multifidus muscles (LMM).

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to analyze the relationship between the straight leg-raising test (SLR) and the area of fat infiltration in LMM for patients with LDH.

METHOD

One hundred and fourteen LDH patients were involved in this study. Clinical data were collected from a medical record system. On the MRI images, the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of bilateral fat infiltration in LMM were measured by picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

RESULT

For 61 patients with inclusive LDH, the positive side of SLR was positively correlated with the side of the larger total CSA of fat infiltration in LMM of L2-S1 (r= 0.75, p⁢ï⁢¼⁢ 0.01), and the CSA of fat infiltration on the side of SLR with a positive result was significantly larger than that on the side of SLR with a negative result only at L3-4 and L4-5 levels (p⁢ï⁢¼⁢ 0.01).

CONCLUSION

SLR may be used as an important sign for dysfunction of LMM and can identify the more severe side.

Pharmacokinetics of double-dose cefuroxime in porcine intervertebral disc and vertebral cancellous bone-a randomized microdialysis study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Postoperative pyogenic spondylodiscitis is associated with prolonged antimicrobial therapy and high relapse rates. Cefuroxime is a time-dependent antimicrobial widely used for intravenous perioperative prophylaxis in spine surgery. A previous study has indicated that a single dose of cefuroxime (1.5 g) provides insufficient spine tissue concentrations for spine procedures lasting more than 2 to 3 hours.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the time with concentrations above relevant minimal inhibitory concentrations (T>MIC) in plasma, subcutaneous adipose tissue, vertebral cancellous bone, and intervertebral disc after a twofold increase of the standard dosage of 1.5 g cefuroxime given as one double dose (1×3 g) or two single doses (2×1.5 g) with a four-hour interval.

METHODS

Sixteen pigs were randomized into two groups: Group 1 received one double dose of cefuroxime (1×3 g) as an intravenous bolus and Group 2 received two single doses of cefuroxime (2×1.5 g) as an intravenous bolus with a four-hour interval. Cefuroxime measurements were obtained from plasma, subcutaneous adipose tissue, vertebral cancellous bone, and intervertebral disc for eight hours thereafter. Microdialysis was applied for sampling in solid tissues. The cefuroxime concentrations were determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. This work was supported by grants from the Health Research Foundation of Central Denmark Region (Level E). The funding source did not play any role in the investigation.

RESULTS

The time with concentrations above the Staphylococcus aureus clinical breakpoint minimal inhibitory concentration of 4 μg/mL was higher in all compartments for Group 2 compared to Group 1. The mean T>MIC (4 μg/mL) in all compartments ranged between 47% and 67% for Group 1 and 72% and 92% for Group 2. Furthermore, a delayed tissue penetration into all tissues for both groups was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that cefuroxime should be given at least 45 minutes prior to spine procedures and as two single doses at a maximum interval of four hours for extended spine procedures. Clinical studies verifying these results are warranted.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Administering cefuroxime as two single doses (2×1.5 g) with a four-hour interval compared to one double dose (1×3 g) resulted in higher T>MIC. Furthermore, we found delayed and incomplete cefuroxime tissue penetration.

Spinal implant-associated infections: a prospective multicentre cohort study

This study evaluated the clinical, laboratory, microbiological, radiological and treatment characteristics of patients with early-onset and late-onset spinal implant-associated infections. Patients diagnosed with spinal implant-associated infection between 2015-2019 were prospectively included and treated according to a standardised algorithm. Infections were classified as early-onset (≤6 weeks) and late-onset (>6 weeks). Among 250 patients, 152 (61%) had early-onset and 98 (39%) had late-onset infection. Local inflammatory signs was the most common manifestation in early-onset infections (84%), whereas late-onset infections presented mainly with persisting or increasing local pain (71%). Sonication fluid was more often positive than peri-implant tissue samples (90% vs. 79%; P = 0.016), particularly in late-onset infections (92% vs. 75%; P = 0.005). Predominant pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Cutibacterium spp. Debridement and implant retention was the most common surgical approach in early-onset infections (85%), whereas partial or complete implant exchange was mainly performed in late-onset infections (62%). Of the 250 patients, 220 (88%) received biofilm-active antibiotics, and median treatment duration was 11.7 weeks. Moreover, 49 patients (20%) needed more than one revision for infection and six patients (2.4%) died during hospital stay. Concluding, most spinal implant-associated infections were acquired during surgery and presented within 6 weeks of surgery. Infections presented mainly with local inflammatory signs in early-onset and with persisting or increasing pain in late-onset infections. Sonication was the most sensitive microbiological method, particularly in late-onset infections. Debridement and implant retention was used in well-integrated implants without loosening, independent of the time of infection onset.

Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Versus Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Lumbar Fusion: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

This is a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (RhBMP) and autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

RhBMP has been emphasized in lumbar fusion due to high fusion success rate. However, ICBG remains the criterion standard graft approach for lumbar fusion. The safety and effectiveness of rhBMP are controversial.

METHODS

Prospective randomized controlled trials were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails by using Medical Subject Headings terms "bone morphogenetic protein,' "bone transplantation,' and "spinal fusion.' Two independent investigators screened eligible studies, assessed the bias of original articles, extracted data including fusion success, Oswestry disability index improvement, improved short form 36 questionnaire scores, adverse events and re-operation, and a subgroup analysis. The GRADE approach was used to grade quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized controlled trials (2185 patients) met the inclusion criteria. There were higher fusion success rate (odds ratio [OR] 3.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88-7.63, P = 0.0002), better improvement of Oswestry Disability Index (mean difference 1.54, 95% CI 0.18-2.89, P = 0.03), and lower re-operation rate (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80, P = 0.0007) in rhBMP group. Heterogeneity was obvious in fusion success rate (I = 58%); hence, a subgroup analysis, based on protein type (rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7), was performed, which suggested that only rhBMP-2 was better than ICBG for lumbar fusion. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between rhBMP and ICBG (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.70-1.18, P = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

In lumbar fusion, rhBMP-2 exhibited a higher fusion success rate and reduced the risk of re-operation. No difference in complication rate is between rhBMP (rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7) and ICBG. We suggest rhBMP especially rhBMP-2 as an effective substitute for ICBG for lumbar fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Can quantitative sensory tests predict failed back surgery?: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a pain condition refractory to therapy, and is characterised by persistent low back pain after spinal surgery. FBSS is associated with severe disability, low quality of life and high unemployment. We are currently unable to identify patients who are at risk of developing FBSS. Patients with chronic low back pain may display signs of central hypersensitivity as assessed by quantitative sensory tests (QST). This can contribute to the risk of developing persistent pain after surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that central hypersensitivity as assessed by QST predicts FBSS.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Three tertiary care centres.

PATIENTS

141 patients scheduled for up to three segment spinal surgery for chronic low back pain (defined as at least 3 on a numerical rating scale on most days during the week and with a minimum duration of 3 months) due to degenerative changes.

OUTCOMES

We defined FBSS as persistent pain, persistent disability or a composite outcome defined as either persistent pain or disability. The primary outcome was persistent pain 12 months after surgery. We applied 14 QST using electrical, pressure and temperature stimulation to predict FBSS and assessed the association of QST with FBSS in multivariable analyses adjusted for sociodemographic, psychological and clinical and surgery-related characteristics.

RESULTS

None of the investigated 14 QST predicted FBSS, with 95% confidence intervals of crude and adjusted associations of all QST including one as a measure of no association. Results remained robust in all sensitivity and secondary analyses.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that assessment of altered central pain processing using current QST is unlikely to identify patients at risk of FBSS and is therefore unlikely to inform clinical decisions.

Incremental value of FDG-PET/CT to monitor treatment response in infectious spondylodiscitis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the added value of serial 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) uptake analysis in predicting clinical response to treatment in infectious spondylodiscitis (IS). We sought to analyze changes in quantitative FDG-PET/CT parameters among patients with clinical response or treatment failure and to compare the sensitivity and specificity of serial FDG-PET/CT and MRI in predicting treatment response in IS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of 68 FDG-PET/CT examinations in 34 patients performed before and after at least 2 weeks of antibiotic treatment. Serial MRI scans were available in 32 (94%) patients before and after treatment. FDG-avid lesions were quantified as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), partial-volume corrected lesion metabolic volume (LMV), and partial-volume corrected lesion metabolic activity (LMA).

RESULTS

All FDG-PET/CT parameters significantly decreased in patients with clinical improvement (31/34, 91%, P < 0.001), while patients with disease progression did not show FDG-PET/CT improvement. FDG uptake decrease was similar between patients undergoing early assessment (< 6 weeks) compared with those performing FDG-PET/CT after 6 weeks of treatment. SUVmax, LMV, and LMA decrease over time was 39.0%, 97.4%, and 97.1%, respectively. In predicting clinical responses, SUVmax reduction > 15% and > 25% showed 94% and 89% sensitivity and 67% and 100% specificity compared with 37% and 50% of MRI, respectively. Low degree of agreement with clinical response was shown for MRI compared with FDG-PET/CT parameters using the Cohen kappa coefficient.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET/CT monitoring is a valuable tool to predict clinical response to treatment in IS and has greater sensitivity and specificity compared with MRI.

Use of instrumented lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions: trends and costs over time in Ontario, Canada

Background

Instrumented lumbar surgeries, such as lumbar fusion and lumbar disc replacement, are increasingly being used in the United States for low back pain, with utilization rates approaching those of total joint arthroplasty. It is unknown whether there is a similar pattern in Canada. We sought to determine utilization rates and total medical costs of instrumented lumbar surgeries in a single-payer system and to compare these with the rates and costs of total hip and knee replacements.

Methods

We included Ontarians aged 20 years and older who underwent instrumented lumbar surgery or total knee or total hip replacement between April 1993 and March 2012. Utilization and medical cost of the procedures were evaluated and compared using linear regression in a time-series analysis. Instrumented lumbar surgical procedures were stratified by age and main indication for surgery.

Results

Utilization of instrumented lumbar surgeries rose from 6.2 to 14.2 procedures per 100 000 population between 1993 and 2012 (p < 0.001), well below the utilization of knee and hip arthroplasties. Patients were younger than 50 years for 29.2% of all instrumented lumbar surgery cases; annual procedure rates among those older than 80 years rose 7.6-fold. Direct medical costs of instrumented lumbar surgeries from 2002 to 2012 totaled $176 million. Spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis were the most common indications for instrumented lumbar surgeries.

Conclusion

Use of instrumented lumbar surgeries in Ontario’s single-payer system has increased rapidly, especially among patients older than 80 years. In contrast to the situation in the United States, these rates were well below those of total joint arthroplasties. These data provide useful insights about resource allocation for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disorders.

Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study

Purpose

Biofilm-active antibiotics are suggested to improve the outcome of implant-associated infections; however, their role in infections after spinal instrumentation is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of patients with spinal implant-associated infections treated with and without biofilm-active antibiotics.

Methods

The probability of infection-free survival was estimated for treatment of spinal implant-associated infections with and without biofilm-active antibiotics using the Kaplan–Meier method; Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to identify factors associated with treatment failure.

Results

Among 93 included patients, early-onset infection was diagnosed in 61 (66%) and late-onset in 32 infections (34%). Thirty patients (32%) were treated with biofilm-active antibiotic therapy and 63 (68%) without it. The infection-free survival after a median follow-up of 53.7 months (range, 8 days-9.4 years) was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55–82%) after 1 year and 58% (95% CI 43–71%) after 2 years. The infection-free survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% (95% CI 85–99%) and 84% (95% CI 71–93%) for patients treated with biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively, and 57% (95% CI 39–80%) and 49% (95% CI 28–61%) for those treated without biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively (p = 0.009). Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.77), infection with Staphylococcus auras (HR, 2.19, 95% CI 1.04–4.62) and polymicrobial infection (HR, 2.44, 95% CI 1.09–6.04) were significantly associated with treatment outcome. Severe pain was observed more often in patients without biofilm-active antibiotic therapy (49% vs. 18%, p = 0.027).

Conclusion

Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics was associated with better treatment outcome and less postoperative pain intensity.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.