1
|
Lax SJ, Van Vogt E, Candy B, Steele L, Reynolds C, Stuart B, Parker R, Axon E, Roberts A, Doyle M, Chu DK, Futamura M, Santer M, Williams HC, Cro S, Drucker AM, Boyle RJ. Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 8:CD015064. [PMID: 39105474 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015064.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema (atopic dermatitis) is the most burdensome skin condition worldwide and cannot currently be prevented or cured. Topical anti-inflammatory treatments are used to control eczema symptoms, but there is uncertainty about the relative effectiveness and safety of different topical anti-inflammatory treatments. OBJECTIVES To compare and rank the efficacy and safety of topical anti-inflammatory treatments for people with eczema using a network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries on 29 June 2023, and checked the reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included within-participant or between-participant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people of any age with eczema of any severity, but excluded trials in clinically infected eczema, seborrhoeic eczema, contact eczema, or hand eczema. We included topical anti-inflammatory treatments used for at least one week, compared with another anti-inflammatory treatment, no treatment, or vehicle/placebo. Vehicle is a 'carrier system' for an active pharmaceutical substance, which may also be used on its own as an emollient for dry skin. We excluded trials of topical antibiotics used alone, complementary therapies, emollients used alone, phototherapy, wet wraps, and systemic treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Primary outcomes were patient-reported eczema symptoms, clinician-reported eczema signs and investigator global assessment. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, long-term control of eczema, withdrawal from treatment/study, and local adverse effects (application-site reactions, pigmentation changes and skin thinning/atrophy were identified as important concerns through patient and public involvement). We used CINeMA to quantify our confidence in the evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included 291 studies involving 45,846 participants with the full spectrum of eczema severity, mainly conducted in high-income countries in secondary care settings. Most studies included adults, with only 31 studies limited to children aged < 12 years. Studies usually included male and female participants, multiple ethnic groups but predominantly white populations. Most studies were industry-funded (68%) or did not report their funding sources/details. Treatment duration and trial participation were a median of 21 and 28 days (ranging from 7 days to 5 years), respectively. Interventions used were topical corticosteroids (TCS) (172), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) (134), phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitors (55), janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (30), aryl hydrocarbon receptor activators (10), or other topical agents (21). Comparators included vehicle (170) or other anti-inflammatory treatments. The risk of bias was high in 242 of the 272 (89.0%) trials contributing to data analyses, most commonly due to concerns about selective reporting. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was only possible for short-term outcomes. Patient-reported symptoms NMA of 40 trials (6482 participants) reporting patient-reported symptoms as a binary outcome ranked tacrolimus 0.1% (OR 6.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 32.98), potent TCS (OR 5.99, 95% CI 2.83 to 12.69), and ruxolitinib 1.5% (OR 5.64, 95% CI 1.26 to 25.25) as the most effective, all with low confidence. Mild TCS, roflumilast 0.15%, and crisaborole 2% were the least effective. Class-level sensitivity analysis found potent/very potent TCS had similar effectiveness to potent TCI and was more effective than mild TCI and PDE-4 inhibitors. NMA of 29 trials (3839 participants) reporting patient-reported symptoms as a continuous outcome ranked very potent TCS (SMD -1.99, 95% CI -3.25 to -0.73; low confidence) and tacrolimus 0.03% (SMD -1.57, 95% CI -2.42 to -0.72; moderate confidence) the highest. Direct information for tacrolimus 0.03% was based on one trial of 60 participants at high risk of bias. Roflumilast 0.15%, delgocitinib 0.25% or 0.5%, and tapinarof 1% were the least effective. Class-level sensitivity analysis found potent/very potent TCS had similar effectiveness to potent TCI and JAK inhibitors and mild/moderate TCS was less effective than mild TCI. A further 50 trials (9636 participants) reported patient-reported symptoms as a continuous outcome but could not be included in NMA. Clinician-reported signs NMA of 32 trials (4121 participants) reported clinician signs as a binary outcome and ranked potent TCS (OR 8.15, 95% CI 4.99, 13.57), tacrolimus 0.1% (OR 8.06, 95% CI 3.30, 19.67), ruxolitinib 1.5% (OR 7.72, 95% CI 4.92, 12.10), and delgocitinib 0.5% (OR 7.61, 95% CI 3.72, 15.58) as most effective, all with moderate confidence. Mild TCS, roflumilast 0.15%, crisaborole 2%, and tapinarof 1% were the least effective. Class-level sensitivity analysis found potent/very potent TCS more effective than potent TCI, mild TCI, JAK inhibitors, PDE-4 inhibitors; and mild TCS and PDE-4 inhibitors had similar effectiveness. NMA of 49 trials (5261 participants) reported clinician signs as a continuous outcome and ranked tacrolimus 0.03% (SMD -2.69, 95% CI -3.36, -2.02) and very potent TCS (SMD -1.87, 95% CI -2.69, -1.05) as most effective, both with moderate confidence; roflumilast 0.15%, difamilast 0.3% and tapinarof 1% were ranked as least effective. Direct information for tacrolimus 0.03% was based on one trial in 60 participants with a high risk of bias. For some sensitivity analyses, potent TCS, tacrolimus 0.1%, ruxolitinib 1.5%, delgocitinib 0.5% and delgocitinib 0.25% became some of the most effective treatments. Class-level analysis found potent/very potent TCS had similar effectiveness to potent TCI and JAK inhibitors, and moderate/mild TCS was more effective than mild TCI. A further 100 trials (22,814 participants) reported clinician signs as a continuous outcome but could not be included in NMA. Investigator Global Assessment NMA of 140 trials (23,383 participants) reported IGA as a binary outcome and ranked ruxolitinib 1.5% (OR 9.34, 95% CI 4.8, 18.18), delgocitinib 0.5% (OR 10.08, 95% CI 2.65, 38.37), delgocitinib 0.25% (OR 6.87, 95% CI 1.79, 26.33), very potent TCS (OR 8.34, 95% CI 4.73, 14.67), potent TCS (OR 5.00, 95% CI 3.80, 6.58), and tacrolimus 0.1% (OR 5.06, 95% CI 3.59, 7.13) as most effective, all with moderate confidence. Mild TCS, crisaborole 2%, pimecrolimus 1%, roflumilast 0.15%, difamilast 0.3% and 1%, and tacrolimus 0.03% were the least effective. In a sensitivity analysis of low risk of bias information (12 trials, 1639 participants), potent TCS, delgocitinib 0.5% and delgocitinib 0.25% were most effective, and pimecrolimus 1%, roflumilast 0.15%, difamilast 1% and difamilast 0.3% least effective. Class-level sensitivity analysis found potent/very potent TCS had similar effectiveness to potent TCI and JAK inhibitors and were more effective than PDE-4 inhibitors; mild/moderate TCS were less effective than potent TCI and had similar effectiveness to mild TCI. Longer-term outcomes over 6 to 12 months showed a possible increase in effectiveness for pimecrolimus 1% versus vehicle (4 trials, 2218 participants) in a pairwise meta-analysis, and greater treatment success with mild/moderate TCS than pimecrolimus 1% (based on 1 trial of 2045 participants). Local adverse effects NMA of 83 trials (18,992 participants, 2424 events) reporting application-site reactions ranked tacrolimus 0.1% (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.53, 3.17; moderate confidence), crisaborole 2% (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.18, 3.81; high confidence), tacrolimus 0.03% (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.10, 2.09; low confidence), and pimecrolimus 1% (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01, 2.04; low confidence) as most likely to cause site reactions. Very potent, potent, moderate, and mild TCS were least likely to cause site reactions. NMA of eight trials (1786 participants, 3 events) reporting pigmentation changes found no evidence for increased pigmentation changes with TCS and crisaborole 2%, with low confidence for mild, moderate or potent TCS and moderate confidence for crisaborole 2%. NMA of 25 trials (3691 participants, 36 events) reporting skin thinning found no evidence for increased skin thinning with short-term (median 3 weeks, range 1-16 weeks) use of mild TCS (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.12, 4.31), moderate TCS (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.16, 5.33), potent TCS (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.21, 4.43) or very potent TCS (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.31, 2.49), all with low confidence. Longer-term outcomes over 6 to 60 months showed increased skin thinning with mild to potent TCS versus TCI (3 trials, 4069 participants, 6 events with TCS). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Potent TCS, JAK inhibitors and tacrolimus 0.1% were consistently ranked as amongst the most effective topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema and PDE-4 inhibitors as amongst the least effective. Mild TCS and tapinarof 1% were ranked amongst the least effective treatments in three of five efficacy networks. TCI and crisaborole 2% were ranked most likely to cause local application-site reactions and TCS least likely. We found no evidence for increased skin thinning with short-term TCS but an increase with longer-term TCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J Lax
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Eleanor Van Vogt
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bridget Candy
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lloyd Steele
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Free London, London, UK
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Clare Reynolds
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Emma Axon
- Cochrane Methods Support Unit, Cochrane, London, UK
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Nottingham Support Group for Carers of Children with Eczema, Nottingham, UK
| | - Megan Doyle
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Derek K Chu
- Department of Medicine, and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Masaki Futamura
- Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Suzie Cro
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Aaron M Drucker
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Research and Innovation Institute and Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert J Boyle
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Section of Inflammation and Repair, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roy A, Priyadarshini SR, Das S. Filamentary keratitis: A review. Ocul Surf 2024; 34:22-29. [PMID: 38857689 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
Filamentary keratitis (FK) is a clinical sign of underlying ocular and systemic conditions. FK can cause significant irritation, tearing, and photophobia in the eye. It is a refractory debilitating condition caused by dry eye that affects the day-to-day activities of patients. The etiopathogenesis of FK is not well known; there are numerous predisposing causes. The condition starts as a sub-epithelial or Bowman's membrane dysfunction and leads to the shedding of epithelial cells that take a strand-like form and attach to the cornea. These strands are surrounded by mucin and continue to elongate to become filaments. The filament formation is further aided by the shearing action caused by eyelid movements. Several management approaches, such as addressing the underlying causes of filamentary keratitis, administering copious lubricants, topical corticosteroids, mucolytic agents, bandage contact lenses, punctal plugs, and mechanical removal of filaments are available. The prognosis is fair, and most cases resolve with occasional recurrences. Traditionally FK has been treated with lubricants, mechanical removal, and bandage contact lenses. The newer treatments are topical immunomodulators especially that treat filamentary keratitis associated with aqueous deficient dry eye. The review describes the treatment as well as pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aravind Roy
- Cornea & Anterior Segment Service, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, 521134, India
| | | | - Sujata Das
- Cornea & Anterior Segment Service, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751024, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lazar M, Zhang AD, Vashi NA. Topical Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis: An Expansive Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2185. [PMID: 38673458 PMCID: PMC11050343 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin condition found worldwide. It impacts patient quality of life (QoL) and is thought to arise as an inflammatory response to epidermal barrier dysfunction and hypersensitivity. AD can lead to large out-of-pocket costs and increased healthcare expenses over a lifetime. An analysis of all randomized control trials conducted since 1990 on topical therapies for AD were reviewed, including 207 trials in the final analysis. It was found that an average of 226 patients were enrolled over 2.43 arms. Common topical treatments included corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The most utilized tools to identify treatment efficacy were the EASI, IGA, SCORAD, and PGA. There was a paucity of data on trials that evaluated efficacy, QoL, and cost of treatment simultaneously. This review highlights the need for comprehensive trials that evaluate multiple aspects of treatment, including financial cost and QoL impact, to ensure each patient has the best treatment modality for the management of their AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Neelam A. Vashi
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, 609 Albany St., J502, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cherian LM, Liu S, Hon K, Ramezanpour M, Hu H, Javadiyan S, Stafford I, Wormald PJ, Psaltis AJ, Vreugde S. Hydrocortisone metabolism by Staphylococcus: Effects on anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial action. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:711-715. [PMID: 37466463 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
KEY POINTS Hydrocortisone 21-hemisuccinate (HCHS) influenced the growth and metabolism of Staphylococcus aureus S. aureus metabolic activity was high and antibiotic susceptibility low at 1.4 mg/mL HCHS S. aureus metabolized HCHS to cortisol and reduced poly(I:C)-induced IL-6 secretion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Mary Cherian
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Sha Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| | - Karen Hon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| | - Mahnaz Ramezanpour
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| | - Hua Hu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| | - Shari Javadiyan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| | - Irene Stafford
- Department of Cardiology, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| | - Alkis James Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| | - Sarah Vreugde
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Traidl S, Heinrich L, Siegels D, Rösner L, Haufe E, Harder I, Abraham S, Ertner K, Kleinheinz A, Schäkel K, Wollenberg A, Effendy I, Quist S, Asmussen A, Wildberger J, Weisshaar E, Wiemers F, Brücher JJ, Weidinger S, Schmitt J, Werfel T. High recurrence rate of eczema herpeticum in moderate/severe atopic dermatitis -TREATgermany registry analysis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2023; 21:1490-1498. [PMID: 37814394 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema herpeticum (EH) is a disseminated skin infection caused by herpes simplex virus in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. The frequency of EH and the clinical features of EH patients have not yet been investigated in a larger cohort. METHODS We sought to investigate the TREATgermany cohort, a multicenter, non-interventional clinical registry of moderately to severely affected AD patients in Germany. Baseline characteristics of patients included between December 2017 and April 2021 were compared between patients without, single, and multiple EH. RESULTS Of the 893 patients, 195 (21.8%) had at least one EH. Of the 195 patients with EH, 107 had multiple EH (54.9%), representing 12.0% of the total study population. While there were no differences in demographic characteristics, previous treatment, and disease scores at enrollment (itch, IGA, oSCORAD, EASI), patients with EH had more frequent atopic comorbidities and sensitizations to house dust mite, food, and mold. DISCUSSION TREATgermany registry data suggest a high prevalence and recurrence rate of EH, while there appears to be no specific clinical phenotype, besides an increase in allergies, to identify EH patients in the daily routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Traidl
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Hannover Medical School, Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover, Germany
| | - Luise Heinrich
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Doreen Siegels
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lennart Rösner
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Hannover Medical School, Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover, Germany
| | - Eva Haufe
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Inken Harder
- Center for Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Susanne Abraham
- Department of Dermatology, University Allergy Center, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | - Knut Schäkel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Isaak Effendy
- Department of Dermatology, OWL University Hospital of Bielefeld University, Campus Clinic Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Sven Quist
- Dermatology Clinic, Helix Medical Ecellence Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea Asmussen
- Practice Dr. med. Andrea Asmussen, Dermatology at Lesum, Bremen, Germany
| | - Julia Wildberger
- Practice Dr. med. Julia Wildberger Hautmedizin, Bad Soden, Germany
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Division of Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jens-Joachim Brücher
- Practice Dr. med. Jens-Joachim Brücher, Hautambulatorium Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Weidinger
- Center for Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Hannover Medical School, Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Traidl S, Heinrich L, Siegels D, Rösner L, Haufe E, Harder I, Abraham S, Ertner K, Kleinheinz A, Schäkel K, Wollenberg A, Effendy I, Quist S, Asmussen A, Wildberger J, Weisshaar E, Wiemers F, Brücher JJ, Weidinger S, Schmitt J, Werfel T. Hohe Rezidivrate des Eczema herpeticatum bei mittelschwerer bis schwerer atopischer Dermatitis - eine TREATgermany Registeranalyse. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2023; 21:1490-1499. [PMID: 38082531 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15205_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungHintergrundDas Eczema herpeticatum (EH) ist eine disseminierte Hautinfektion, die durch Herpes‐simplex‐Viren bei Patienten mit atopischer Dermatitis (AD) verursacht wird. Die Häufigkeit des EH und die klinischen Charakteristika von EH Patienten wurden bisher noch nicht in einer größeren Kohorte untersucht.Methodik87 Patienten des TREATgermany Registers, einem multizentrischen, nichtinterventionellen klinischen Register mit moderat bis schwer betroffenen AD‐Patienten in Deutschland, wurden in dieser Analyse betrachtet. Patienten, die zwischen Dezember 2017 und April 2021 in das Register eingeschlossen wurden, wurden unterteilt in die Gruppen ohne, mit einem und mit mehreren EH und basierend auf den klinischen Charakteristika verglichen.ErgebnisseVon 893 Patienten berichteten 195 (21,8%) über mindestens eine EH. 107 der 195 Patienten mit EH hatten sogar mehrere EH in der Anamnese (54,9%), was 12,0% der gesamten Studienpopulation entspricht. Während hinsichtlich demographischer Merkmale, Vorbehandlungen und Krankheitsscores (Juckreiz, IGA, oSCORAD, EASI) keine Unterschiede festgestellt wurden, litten Patienten mit EH häufiger an atopischen Begleiterkrankungen und Sensibilisierungen gegen Hausstaubmilben, Nahrungsmittel und Schimmelpilze.SchlussfolgerungenDie Daten des TREATgermany‐Registers deuten auf eine hohe Prävalenz und Rezidivrate des EH hin, während es neben einer Häufung von Allergien keinen spezifischen klinischen Phänotyp zu geben scheint, um EH‐Patienten in der täglichen Routine zu identifizieren.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Traidl
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Exzellenzcluster RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover
| | - Luise Heinrich
- Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
| | - Doreen Siegels
- Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
| | - Lennart Rösner
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Exzellenzcluster RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover
| | - Eva Haufe
- Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
| | - Inken Harder
- Zentrum für entzündliche Hauterkrankungen, Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
| | - Susanne Abraham
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Universitäts-Allergie-Centrum, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
| | | | | | | | - Andreas Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Isaak Effendy
- Hautklinik, Universitätsklinikum OWL der Universität Bielefeld, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld
| | - Sven Quist
- Hautklinik, Helix Medical Ecellence Center Mainz
| | - Andrea Asmussen
- Praxis Dr. med. Andrea Asmussen, Hautarztpraxis an der Lesum, Bremen
| | | | - Elke Weisshaar
- Abteilung für Berufsdermatologie, Hautklinik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
| | | | | | - Stephan Weidinger
- Zentrum für entzündliche Hauterkrankungen, Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Exzellenzcluster RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohamed AA, El Borolossy R, Salah EM, Hussein MS, Muharram NM, Elsalawy N, Khalil MG, Mahmoud MO, El-Amir RY, Elsanhory HMA, Ahmed N, Adaroas AS, Montaser M, El Kholy AA. A comparative randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus hydrocortisone as a topical treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1202325. [PMID: 37799965 PMCID: PMC10547881 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1202325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) aetiology is not exactly identified, but it is characterized by pruritic skin reactions with elevation in the levels of inflammatory markers. Despite the fact that Corticosteroids are the mainstay therapy in the management of AD, they have many local and systemic adverse effects. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus ointment in comparison to topical hydrocortisone cream in the management of the AD of children diagnosed with AD. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on 200 children with AD. They were simply randomized into two groups, the tacrolimus group treated with 0.03% topical tacrolimus ointment and the hydrocortisone group treated with 1% hydrocortisone cream twice daily during the 3 weeks study period. Results: At the end of the study, both the tacrolimus and hydrocortisone groups showed a significant decline in the mean serum level of IL-10, IL-17, and IL-23 (p < 0.05) when compared to their baseline levels. However, the tacrolimus group showed a more significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the mean serum level of IL-10, IL-17, and IL-23 as compared to the hydrocortisone group [Mean differences = 1.600, 95% CI: 0.9858-2.214; 1.300, 95% CI: 1.086-1.514 and 4.200, 95% CI: 3.321-5.079]. Moreover, the median mEASI decreased similarly from 32 to 21 in the tacrolimus group and from 30 to 22 in the hydrocortisone group (p > 0.05) [Median difference = -2.000, 95% CI: -2.651 to -1.349; Median difference = 1.000, 95% CI: 0.3489-1.651]. Mild to moderate transient stinging and erythema were the main adverse effects that showed higher incidence in the tacrolimus group than in the hydrocortisone group (p < 0.05). In most cases, they resolved within 3-4 days. Besides, tacrolimus ointment did not cause skin atrophy as compared to the hydrocortisone group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Tacrolimus ointment is more beneficial than hydrocortisone cream in managing AD in children in terms of lowering the inflammatory markers, however, there is no difference on the dermatitis severity scale. Moreover, tacrolimus is safer with a better side effect profile compared to hydrocortisone. Trial Registration: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT05324618).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amal A. Mohamed
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Radwa El Borolossy
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Eman M. Salah
- Department of Dermatology, Andrology, Sexual Medicine and STDs, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Maha S. Hussein
- Department of Dermatology and Andrology, Medical Research and Clinical Studies Institute, National Research Center Cairo, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Nashwa M. Muharram
- Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Naglaa Elsalawy
- Department of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Mona G. Khalil
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Modern University for Technology and Information, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Maha O. Mahmoud
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Egyptian Russian University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reham Y. El-Amir
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Heba M. A. Elsanhory
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sinai University, East Kantara Branch, El Ismailiia, Egypt
| | - Nourelhuda Ahmed
- Clinical Pathology Department, Elsahel Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed S. Adaroas
- Clinical Pathology Department, Elsahel Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Montaser
- Department of Dermatology, Andrology and STDs, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
| | - Amal A. El Kholy
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sidbury R, Alikhan A, Bercovitch L, Cohen DE, Darr JM, Drucker AM, Eichenfield LF, Frazer-Green L, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, Silverberg JI, Singh AM, Wu PA, Davis DMR. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 89:e1-e20. [PMID: 36641009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New evidence has emerged since the 2014 guidelines that further informs the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) with topical therapies. These guidelines update the 2014 recommendations for management of AD with topical therapies. OBJECTIVE To provide evidence-based recommendations related to management of AD in adults using topical treatments. METHODS A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review and applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. RESULTS The workgroup developed 12 recommendations on the management of AD in adults with topical therapies, including nonprescription agents and prescription topical corticosteroids (TCS), calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (PDE-4), antimicrobials, and antihistamines. LIMITATIONS The pragmatic decision to limit the literature review to English-language randomized trials may have excluded data published in other languages and relevant long-term follow-up data. CONCLUSIONS Strong recommendations are made for the use of moisturizers, TCIs, TCS, and topical PDE-4 and JAK inhibitors. Conditional recommendations are made for the use of bathing and wet wrap therapy and against the use of topical antimicrobials, antiseptics, and antihistamines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Sidbury
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ali Alikhan
- Department of Dermatology, Sutter Medical Foundation, Sacramento, California
| | - Lionel Bercovitch
- Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David E Cohen
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer M Darr
- Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
| | - Aaron M Drucker
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence F Eichenfield
- University of California San Diego and Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Dermatology, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | | | - Amy S Paller
- Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Jonathan I Silverberg
- Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Anne Marie Singh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Peggy A Wu
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Dawn M R Davis
- Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moreno A, Renert-Yuval Y, Guttman-Yassky E. Shedding light on key pharmacological knowledge and strategies for pediatric atopic dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2023; 16:119-131. [PMID: 36705936 PMCID: PMC9947941 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2173172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disease affecting over 20% of the pediatric population, with 85% of cases presenting before the age of five. Recently, therapeutic options in pediatric patients have evolved rapidly, following extensive development in adult treatments. AREAS COVERED This review will encompass relevant molecular drivers, along with an overlook on treatment modalities in pediatric AD, as well as a summary of pipeline treatments in clinical trials for pediatric patients from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to July 2022. Topical corticosteroids are the mainstay for AD flares in adults and children. Topical approved agents in pediatric AD are calcineurin inhibitors, crisaborolecrisaborole, and ruxolitinib. Dupilumab is the only FDA approved biologic for patients with AD from six months of age. A Janus kinase inhibitor, upadacitinib, is a systemic treatment approved for pediatric AD patients (age >12 years). Systemic immunosuppressants used in pediatric AD include methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporinecyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil. EXPERT OPINION Data regarding disease prevention are conflicting, however, an abundance of research has transpired regarding amelioration of symptoms and induction of disease clearance by targeting numerous pathological mechanisms. Understanding the pediatric AD phenotype will further advance the field and the development of improved therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariana Moreno
- Laboratory for Investigative Dermatology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yael Renert-Yuval
- Laboratory for Investigative Dermatology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Dermatology and the Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emma Guttman-Yassky
- Department of Dermatology and the Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Krajewski PK, Szepietowski JC. Ruxolitinib cream for the short-term treatment of mild-moderate atopic dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022; 19:349-356. [PMID: 36542765 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2161511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, recurrent, itchy inflammatory skin disease with a vast influence on a patient's quality of life (QoL). Mild-moderate AD was classically managed with the use of topical corticosteroid (TCS) and calcineurin inhibitors (TCI). It was proven that the JAK pathway plays an important role in the development of AD. The introduction of topical JAK inhibitors may revolutionize the classical approach to the management of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. AREAS COVERED This review discussed the role of the JAK pathway in the development and exacerbations of AD with an emphasis on the newly introduced, topical selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor - Ruxolitinib (RUX) cream. It provides an extensive review of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of RUX cream in clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION Results from phase II and two phase III clinical trials have shown that RUX cream could be a promising topical treatment of mild-moderate AD. Its favorable safety profile and good efficacy make RUX cream a beneficial modality for patients with chronic TCSs and TCIs use. Future studies on younger patients and with a longer observational period are necessary to adequately assess the efficacy and safety of RUX cream in the whole AD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr K Krajewski
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Chalubinskiego Street 1, Wrocław 50-368, Poland
| | - Jacek C Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Chalubinskiego Street 1, Wrocław 50-368, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chew YL, Khor MA, Xu Z, Lee SK, Keng JW, Sang SH, Akowuah GA, Goh KW, Liew KB, Ming LC. Cassia alata, Coriandrum sativum, Curcuma longa and Azadirachta indica: Food Ingredients as Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Atopic Dermatitis-A Comprehensive Review. Molecules 2022; 27:molecules27175475. [PMID: 36080243 PMCID: PMC9457827 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditional medicine is critical in disease treatment and management. Herbs are gaining popularity for disease management and treatment. Therefore, they can be utilised as complementary and alternative treatment (CAT) ingredients. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the common non-communicable diseases. It is characterised by chronic inflammatory skin disease with intense pruritus and eczematous lesions. AD is associated with oxidative stress, microbial infection, and upregulation of inflammatory cytokines. Both children and adults could be affected by this skin disorder. The prevalence of AD is increasing along with the country’s level of development. This review revisited the literature on four medicinal herbs widely used as complementary medicine to manage AD. These therapeutic herbs are commonly eaten as food and used as spices in Asian cuisine. The four food herbs reviewed are Cassia alata, Coriandrum sativum, Curcuma longa Linn, and Azadirachta indica. Their traditional uses and phytochemical content will be covered. Four relevant pharmacological and biological activities of the plants crucial in AD management have been reviewed and discussed, including anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, antioxidant, and wound recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yik-Ling Chew
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +603-9101-8880; Fax: +603-9102-3606
| | - Mei-Ann Khor
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
| | - Zhao Xu
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
| | - Sue-Kei Lee
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
| | - Jing-Wen Keng
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
| | - Sze-Huey Sang
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
| | | | - Khang Wen Goh
- Faculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Nilai 71809, Malaysia
| | - Kai Bin Liew
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Cyberjaya, Cyberjaya 63000, Malaysia
| | - Long Chiau Ming
- PAP Rashidah Sa’adatul Bolkiah Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Umar BU, Rahman S, Dutta S, Islam T, Nusrat N, Chowdhury K, Binti Wan Ahmad Fakuradzi WFS, Haque M. Management of Atopic Dermatitis: The Role of Tacrolimus. Cureus 2022; 14:e28130. [PMID: 35990561 PMCID: PMC9387362 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a long-lasting inflammatory dermatological condition characterized by itchy, eczematous, sparsely tiny blisters that hold a clear watery substance. Additionally, the diseased skin can suppurate, occasionally with weeping with thickening of the affected skin. This is considered one of the top skin disorders involving both children and adult populations globally. The principal therapeutic intervention for AD is long-standing topical glucocorticoids, which have been used for several decades. Corticosteroid therapy brings several adverse drug effects (ADRs), including irreversible skin atrophy. Tacrolimus belongs to the class of calcineurin inhibitors, which is a type of immunomodulator possessing promising efficacy in treating AD. Topical tacrolimus is an effective and safe non-corticosteroid substitute treatment for AD. We reviewed the available literature to compare and institute the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of tacrolimus when equated to corticosteroid therapy in managing AD.
Collapse
|
13
|
Fatani MI, Al Sheikh AA, Alajlan MA, Alharithy RS, Binamer Y, Albarakati RG, Alenzi KA, Khardaly AM, Alomari BA, Almudaiheem HY, Al-Jedai A, Eshmawi MT. National Saudi Consensus Statement on the Management of Atopic Dermatitis (2021). Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2022; 12:1551-1575. [PMID: 35788543 PMCID: PMC9252549 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-022-00762-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with an increasing prevalence regionally and globally. It is characterized by intense itching and recurrent eczematous lesions. With the increase in the availability of treatment options for healthcare practitioner and patients, new challenges arise for treatment selection and approach. The current consensus statement has been developed to provide up-to-date evidence and evidence-based recommendations to guide dermatologists and healthcare professionals managing patients with AD in Saudi Arabia. By an initiative from the Ministry of Health (MOH), a multidisciplinary work group of 11 experts was convened to review and discuss aspects of AD management. Four consensus meetings were held on January 14, February 4, February 25, and March 18 of 2021. All consensus content was voted on by the work group, including diagnostic criteria, AD severity assessment, comorbidities, and therapeutic options for AD. Special consideration for the pediatric population, as well as women during pregnancy and lactation, was also discussed. The present consensus document will be updated as needed to incorporate new data or therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Afaf A Al Sheikh
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdulaziz Medical City (National Guard Health Affairs), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Ruaa S Alharithy
- Princess Nourah Bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yousef Binamer
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Khalidah A Alenzi
- Regional Drug Information and Pharmacovigilance Center, Ministry of Health, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amr M Khardaly
- Deputyship of Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Ahmed Al-Jedai
- Deputyship of Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maysa T Eshmawi
- King Abdullah Medical Complex, Prince Nayef Street, Northern Abhor, Jeddah, 23816, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Traidl S, Roesner L, Zeitvogel J, Werfel T. Eczema herpeticum in atopic dermatitis. Allergy 2021; 76:3017-3027. [PMID: 33844308 DOI: 10.1111/all.14853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory skin diseases leading to pruritic skin lesions. A subset of AD patients exhibits a disseminated severe HSV infection called eczema herpeticum (EH) that can cause life-threatening complications. This review gives an overview of the clinical picture, and characteristics of the patients as well as the diagnosis and therapy of EH. A special focus lies on the pathophysiological hallmarks identified so far that predispose for EH. This aspect covers genetic aberrations, immunological changes, and environmental influences displaying a complex multifactorial situation, which is not completely understood. Type 2 skewing of virus-specific T cells in ADEH+ patients has been implicated in immune profile abnormalities, along with impaired functions of dendritic cells and natural killer cells. Furthermore, aberrations in interferon pathway-related genes such as IFNG and IFNGR1 have been identified to increase the risk of EH. IL-4, IL-25, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) are overexpressed in EH, whereas antimicrobial peptides like human β-defensins and LL-37 are reduced. Concerning the epidermal barrier, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in skin barrier proteins such as filaggrin were identified in ADEH+ patients. A dysbalance of the skin microbiome also contributes to EH due to an increase of Staphylococcus aureus, which provides a supporting role to the viral infection via secreted toxins such as α-toxin. The risk of EH is reduced in AD patients treated with dupilumab. Further research is needed to identify and specifically target risk factors for EH in AD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Traidl
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
- Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155) Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
| | - Lennart Roesner
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
- Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155) Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
| | - Jana Zeitvogel
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
- Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155) Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
- Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155) Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Axon E, Chalmers JR, Santer M, Ridd MJ, Lawton S, Langan SM, Grindlay DJC, Muller I, Roberts A, Ahmed A, Williams HC, Thomas KS. Safety of topical corticosteroids in atopic eczema: an umbrella review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046476. [PMID: 34233978 PMCID: PMC8264889 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE An umbrella review summarising all safety data from systematic reviews of topical corticosteroids (TCS) in adults and children with atopic eczema. METHODS Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology map of eczema systematic reviews were searched until 7 November 2018 and Epistemonikos until 2 March 2021. Reviews were included if they assessed the safety of TCS in atopic eczema and searched >1 database using a reproducible search strategy. Review quality was assessed using version 2 of 'A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews' (AMSTAR 2 tool). RESULTS 38 systematic reviews included, 34 low/critically low quality. Treatment and follow-up were usually short (2-4 weeks). KEY FINDINGS TCS versus emollient/vehicle: No meta-analyses identified for skin-thinning. Two 2-week randomised controlled trials (RCTs) found no significant increased risk with very potent TCS (0/196 TCS vs 0/33 vehicle in children and 6/109 TCS vs 2/50 vehicle, age unknown). Biochemical adrenal suppression (cortisol) was 3.8% (95% CI 2.4% to 5.8%) in a meta-analysis of 11 uncontrolled observational studies (any potency TCS, 522 children). Effects reversed when treatment ceased.TCS versus topical calcineurin inhibitors: Meta-analysis showed higher relative risk of skin thinning with TCS (4.86, 95% CI 1.06 to 22.28, n=4128, four RCTs, including one 5-year RCT). Eight cases in 2068 participants, 7 using potent TCS. No evidence of growth suppression.Once daily versus more frequent TCS: No meta-analyses identified. No skin-thinning in one RCT (3 weeks potent TCS, n=94) or biochemical adrenal suppression in two RCTs (up to 2 weeks very potent/moderate TCS, n=129).TCS twice/week to prevent flares ('weekend therapy') versus vehicle: No meta-analyses identified. No evidence of skin thinning in five RCTs. One RCT found biochemical adrenal suppression (2/44 children, potent TCS). CONCLUSIONS W e found no evidence of harm when TCS were used intermittently 'as required' to treat flares or 'weekend therapy' to prevent flares. However, long-term safety data were limited. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018079409.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Axon
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joanne R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Matthew J Ridd
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Sandra Lawton
- Dermatology Department, Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK
| | - Sinead M Langan
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ingrid Muller
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amina Ahmed
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Tacrolimus after Topical Administration: Implications for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. Pharm Res 2020; 37:222. [PMID: 33067715 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-020-02921-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM The high doses of oral tacrolimus (TAC) (1,2) necessary to prevent acute rejection (AR) after vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) are associated with systemic adverse effects. The skin is the most antigenic tissue in VCA and the primary target of AR. However, the short-term use of topical TAC (Protopic®), as an off-label adjunct to oral TAC, to treat AR episodes pro re nata (PRN), has yielded inconsistent results. There is lack of data on the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of topical TAC in VCA, that hampers our understanding of the reasons for unreliable efficacy. Toward this goal, we evaluated the ability of topical TAC to achieve high local tissue concentrations at the site of application with low systemic concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of topical TAC (Protopic®, 0.03%) after single or repeated topical application in comparison to those after systemic delivery in rats. Animals received a single topical application of TAC ointment (Group 1) or an intravenous (IV) injection of TAC (Group 2) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. In another experiment, animals received daily topical application of TAC ointment (Group 3), or daily intraperitoneal (IP) injection of TAC (Group 4) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg for 7 days. TAC concentrations in blood and tissues were analyzed by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS-MS). RESULTS Following single topical administration, TAC was absorbed slowly with a Tmax of 4 h and an absolute bioavailability of 11%. The concentrations of TAC in skin and muscle were several folds higher than whole blood concentrations. Systemic levels remained subtherapeutic (< 3 ng/ml) with repeated once daily applications. CONCLUSION Topical application of TAC ointment (Protopic®, 0.03%) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day provided high concentrations in the local tissues with low systemic exposure. Repeated topical administration of TAC is well tolerated with no local or systemic adverse effects. This study confirms the feasibility of topical application of TAC for site specific graft immunosuppression and enables future applications in VCA.
Collapse
|
17
|
Yoon SB, Lee CH, Kim HY, Jeong D, Jeon MK, Cho SA, Kim K, Lee T, Yang JY, Gong YD, Cho H. A novel sphingosylphosphorylcholine and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 antagonist, KRO-105714, for alleviating atopic dermatitis. JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION-LONDON 2020; 17:20. [PMID: 32514255 PMCID: PMC7257206 DOI: 10.1186/s12950-020-00244-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Atopic dermatitis (eczema) is a type of inflammation of the skin, which presents with itchy, red, swollen, and cracked skin. The high global incidence of atopic dermatitis makes it one of the major skin diseases threatening public health. Sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) act as pro-inflammatory mediators, as an angiogenesis factor and a mitogen in skin fibroblasts, respectively, both of which are important biological responses to atopic dermatitis. The SPC level is known to be elevated in atopic dermatitis, resulting from abnormal expression of sphingomyelin (SM) deacylase, accompanied by a deficiency in ceramide. Also, S1P and its receptor, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) are important targets in treating atopic dermatitis. Results In this study, we found a novel antagonist of SPC and S1P1, KRO-105714, by screening 10,000 compounds. To screen the compounds, we used an SPC-induced cell proliferation assay based on a high-throughput screening (HTS) system and a human S1P1 protein-based [35S]-GTPγS binding assay. In addition, we confirmed the inhibitory effects of KRO-105714 on atopic dermatitis through related cell-based assays, including a tube formation assay, a cell migration assay, and an ELISA assay on inflammatory cytokines. Finally, we confirmed that KRO-105714 alleviates atopic dermatitis symptoms in a series of mouse models. Conclusions Taken together, our data suggest that SPC and S1P1 antagonist KRO-105714 has the potential to alleviate atopic dermatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sae-Bom Yoon
- Drug Discovery Platform Research Center, Therapeutics & Biotechnology Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 141 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong, Daejeon, 34114 Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Hoon Lee
- Drug Discovery Platform Research Center, Therapeutics & Biotechnology Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 141 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong, Daejeon, 34114 Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Young Kim
- Drug Discovery Platform Research Center, Therapeutics & Biotechnology Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 141 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong, Daejeon, 34114 Republic of Korea
| | - Daeyoung Jeong
- Drug Discovery Platform Research Center, Therapeutics & Biotechnology Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 141 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong, Daejeon, 34114 Republic of Korea
| | - Moon Kook Jeon
- Drug Discovery Platform Research Center, Therapeutics & Biotechnology Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 141 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong, Daejeon, 34114 Republic of Korea
| | - Sun-A Cho
- Department of Laboratory Animal Medicine, Research Institute for Veterinary Science, BK21PLUS Program for Creative Veterinary Science Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826 Republic of Korea
| | - Kwangmi Kim
- College of Pharmacy, Danguk University, 119 Dandae-ro, Cheonan, Chungnam, 31116 Republic of Korea
| | - Taeho Lee
- Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 702-701 South Korea
| | - Jung Yoon Yang
- Drug Discovery Platform Research Center, Therapeutics & Biotechnology Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 141 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong, Daejeon, 34114 Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Dae Gong
- Innovative Drug Library Research Center, Science College, Dongguk University, Seoul, 100-715 Republic of Korea
| | - Heeyeong Cho
- Drug Discovery Platform Research Center, Therapeutics & Biotechnology Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 141 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong, Daejeon, 34114 Republic of Korea.,Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacology, Korea University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Efficacy and safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2019; 36:752-759. [PMID: 31998006 PMCID: PMC6986278 DOI: 10.5114/ada.2019.91425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Calcineurin inhibitors, novel topical immunomodulators, may constitute a superior alternative for glucocorticosteroids in atopic dermatitis (AD) topical treatment. Aim Determination of efficacy and safety of each topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) formulation, 0.3% or 0.1% tacrolimus and 1% pimecrolimus, for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in comparison with glucocorticosteroids. Material and methods Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, GREAT database, trials registers and reference lists were searched up to February 2018. Randomised controlled trials of TCI, compared to corticosteroids (TCS), reporting efficacy or safety outcomes were selected. Quality of trials and evidence of each outcome were evaluated according to Cochrane Collaboration recommendations and tools. The primary outcomes were physician’s global assessment of improvement and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Results Fourteen trials involving 7376 children and adults with AD were included. Calcineurin inhibitors were significantly more effective than various potency TCS, neither least potent to lower mid-strength nor mid-strength to potent TCS (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06–1.44). The major AEs were skin burning and pruritus, their incidence was higher in TCI treatment (RR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.90–3.80; RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.34–1.80). Conclusions Calcineurin inhibitors seem to be more effective and contrarily they elicit more AEs than TCS.
Collapse
|
19
|
Darrigade AS. Traitements topiques et photothérapie dans la dermatite atopique. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2019; 146:12S85-12S95. [DOI: 10.1016/s0151-9638(20)30018-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
20
|
Hong CH, Gooderham M, Bissonnette R. Evidence Review of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors for the Treatment of Adult Atopic Dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg 2019; 23:5S-10S. [DOI: 10.1177/1203475419857669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) were approved in the early 2000s for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), and despite the recent introduction of newer topical and systemic therapies for AD, TCIs such as tacrolimus ointment (0.03% and 0.1%) and pimecrolimus cream (1%), remain recommended treatment options in contemporary management guidelines. The goal of this article is to review the evidence supporting the approved indications for TCIs in adults with AD, including short-term treatment of active disease and as intermittent or maintenance treatment for the prevention of flares. Other evidence reviewed in this article includes the treatment of specific body areas (such as the face and eyelids), combination or sequential use of TCIs with topical corticosteroids, and the comparative efficacy of the 2 commercially available TCIs. This review of the evidence confirms that TCIs remain an effective treatment option for the management of adult AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-ho Hong
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia and Probity Medical Research, Surrey, Canada
| | - Melinda Gooderham
- Queen’s University, SKiN Centre for Dermatology and Probity Medical Research, Peterborough, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kita T, Uchida K, Kato K, Suzuki Y, Tominaga M, Yamazaki J. FK506 (tacrolimus) causes pain sensation through the activation of transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) channels. J Physiol Sci 2019; 69:305-316. [PMID: 30478741 PMCID: PMC10717736 DOI: 10.1007/s12576-018-0647-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
FK506 (tacrolimus) is an immunosuppressant widely used as an ointment in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. However, local application of FK506 can evoke burning sensations in atopic dermatitis patients, and its mechanisms are unknown. In this study, we found that FK506 activates transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) channels. In Ca2+-imaging experiments, increases in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]i) by FK506 were observed in HEK293T cells expressing hTRPA1 or hTRPM8. FK506-induced currents were observed in HEK293T cells expressing hTRPA1 or mTRPA1, but less or not at all in cells expressing hTRPV1 or hTRPM8 using a patch-clamp technique. FK506 also evoked single-channel opening of hTRPA1 in an inside-out configuration. FK506-induced [Ca2+]i increases were also observed in TRPA1-expressing mouse primary sensory neurons. Furthermore, injection of FK506 evoked licking or biting behaviors and these behaviors were almost abolished in TRPA1 knockout mice. These results indicate that FK506 might cause pain sensations through TRPA1 activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomo Kita
- Department of Physiological Science and Molecular Biology, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1 Tamura, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0193, Japan
| | - Kunitoshi Uchida
- Department of Physiological Science and Molecular Biology, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1 Tamura, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0193, Japan.
| | - Kenichi Kato
- Department of Physiological Science and Molecular Biology, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1 Tamura, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0193, Japan
| | - Yoshiro Suzuki
- Division of Cell Signaling, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8787, Japan
| | - Makoto Tominaga
- Division of Cell Signaling, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8787, Japan
- Thermal Biology Group, Exploratory Research Center on Life and Living Systems, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8787, Japan
| | - Jun Yamazaki
- Department of Physiological Science and Molecular Biology, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1 Tamura, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0193, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chiricozzi A, Belloni Fortina A, Galli E, Girolomoni G, Neri I, Ricci G, Romanelli M, Peroni D. Current therapeutic paradigm in pediatric atopic dermatitis: Practical guidance from a national expert panel. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2019; 47:194-206. [PMID: 30268381 DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2018.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common cutaneous inflammatory disease in both adults and children. Although emerging therapeutic approaches are being investigated for the management of pediatric AD, it still needs to be managed with conventional treatments. This consensus document is aimed at providing an update on general management and therapies of pediatric AD, defining practical recommendations for using both topical and systemic agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS A panel of experts consisting of dermatologists and pediatricians were convened in order to define statements, through a Delphi process, standardizing the management of AD in pediatric subjects in a real-world setting. RESULTS A set of practical recommendations obtaining an at least 75% agreement was presented. CONCLUSIONS This set of practical recommendations represents a simple and fast snapshot on the pediatric use of common anti-AD therapeutics.
Collapse
|
23
|
Draelos ZD, Feldman SR, Berman B, Olivadoti M, Sierka D, Tallman AM, Zielinski MA, Ports WC, Baldwin S. Tolerability of Topical Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2019; 9:71-102. [PMID: 30680551 PMCID: PMC6380975 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-019-0280-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease that is accompanied by increased sensitivity to itch-provoking and pain-provoking stimuli. Patients with AD experience skin pain before initiation of therapy and have also reported painful application site reactions in clinical trials of emollients and prescription topical therapies, including topical corticosteroids (TCSs), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), and a topical phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor. To compare the sensory tolerability of prescription topical therapies for AD, a comprehensive literature search and analysis of published clinical trials was conducted. Sensory tolerability issues such as application site pain, burning, stinging, and pruritus were often among the most common adverse events or treatment-related adverse events in clinical trials for prescription topical therapies. Tolerability issues occurred at highest rates in trials of TCIs, followed by trials of the PDE4 inhibitor crisaborole and TCSs, although direct comparisons are not possible because of differences in study design. Tolerability issues in these clinical trials were generally mild to moderate and transient. This article also reviews published strategies for managing sensory tolerability issues in AD patients during treatment with topical therapies.Funding: Pfizer Inc., New York, NY.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe D Draelos
- Dermatology Consulting Services, High Point, NC, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yew YW, Zheng Q, Kok WL, Ho MSL, Teoh J, Wong YKY, Shi L, Chan ESY. Topical treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis. Hippokratia 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yik Weng Yew
- Department of Dermatology; National Skin Centre; Singapore Singapore
| | - Qishi Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology; Singapore Clinical Research Institute; Singapore Singapore
| | - Wai Leong Kok
- Department of Dermatology; National Skin Centre; Singapore Singapore
| | | | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Medicine; National University of Singapore; Singapore Singapore
| | | | - Luming Shi
- Department of Epidemiology; Singapore Clinical Research Institute; Singapore Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Bieber T, Christen-Zaech S, Deleuran M, Fink-Wagner A, Gieler U, Girolomoni G, Lau S, Muraro A, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Schäfer T, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Simon D, Szalai Z, Szepietowski JC, Taïeb A, Torrelo A, Werfel T, Ring J. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018; 32:657-682. [PMID: 29676534 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 530] [Impact Index Per Article: 88.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This guideline was developed as a joint interdisciplinary European project, including physicians from all relevant disciplines as well as patients. It is a consensus-based guideline, taking available evidence from other guidelines, systematic reviews and published studies into account. This first part of the guideline covers methods, patient perspective, general measures and avoidance strategies, basic emollient treatment and bathing, dietary intervention, topical anti-inflammatory therapy, phototherapy and antipruritic therapy, whereas the second part covers antimicrobial therapy, systemic treatment, allergen-specific immunotherapy, complementary medicine, psychosomatic counselling and educational interventions. Management of AE must consider the individual clinical variability of the disease; highly standardized treatment rules are not recommended. Basic therapy is focused on treatment of disturbed barrier function by hydrating and lubricating topical treatment, besides further avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Topical anti-inflammatory treatment based on glucocorticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors is used for flare management and for proactive therapy for long-term control. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, whereas tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are preferred in sensitive skin areas and for long-term use. Topical phosphodiesterase inhibitors may be a treatment alternative when available. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation, preferably with UVB 311 nm or UVA1. Pruritus is targeted with the majority of the recommended therapies, but some patients may need additional antipruritic therapy. Antimicrobial therapy, systemic anti-inflammatory treatment, immunotherapy, complementary medicine and educational intervention will be addressed in part II of the guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wollenberg
- Department Dermatology and Allergy, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.,Klinik Thalkirchner Straße, Munich, Germany
| | - S Barbarot
- Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - T Bieber
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - S Christen-Zaech
- Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M Deleuran
- Department Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A Fink-Wagner
- European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients' Associations (EFA), Global Allergy and Asthma Patient Platform (GAAPP), Konstanz, Germany
| | - U Gieler
- Department of Dermatology, University of Gießen and Marburg GmbH, Gießen, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Gießen and Marburg GmbH, Gießen, Germany
| | - G Girolomoni
- Department of Medicine, Section of Dermatology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - S Lau
- Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Muraro
- Centro di Specializzazione Regionale per lo Studio e la Cura delle Allergie e delle Intolleranze Alimentari presso l'Azienda Ospedaliera, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - T Schäfer
- Dermatological Practice, Immenstadt, Germany
| | - P Schmid-Grendelmeier
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
| | - D Simon
- Department Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Z Szalai
- Department of Dermatology, Heim Pál Children's Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - J C Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - A Taïeb
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, Hôpital St André, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Torrelo
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Niño Jesus, Madrid, Spain
| | - T Werfel
- Department Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - J Ring
- Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland.,Department Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ohtsuki M, Morimoto H, Nakagawa H. Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of adult and pediatric atopic dermatitis: Review on safety and benefits. J Dermatol 2018; 45:936-942. [PMID: 29927498 PMCID: PMC6099320 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.14501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) requires long-term management, mainly with topical anti-inflammatory agents. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) and tacrolimus ointment (TAC-O) are recommended as first-line treatments for AD. However, the long-term use of TCS is limited by cutaneous adverse events such as skin atrophy. For TAC-O, Japanese and US labelings were updated in 2003 and 2006, respectively, to include a boxed warning about a theoretical risk of skin cancer and lymphoma in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors. However, TAC-O has been used worldwide for longer than 15 years to treat adult and pediatric patients with AD. Available data suggest that TAC-O is effective and well tolerated, and can improve quality of life. TAC-O has successfully been used in the proactive management of AD consisting of long-term intermittent use to prevent, delay or reduce the occurrence of AD flares. Systemic drug absorption after TAC-O application is negligible and unlikely to result in systemic immunosuppression. There is currently no strong evidence of an increased rate of malignancy in treated patients, and observational data from postmarketing surveillance studies have shown no safety concerns. In the absence of robust evidence, the warning about the carcinogenic potential in the Japanese labeling for TAC-O does not appear justified and should be reconsidered. This mitigation of description would allow adult and pediatric patients with AD to receive the effective treatment more appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hidemi Nakagawa
- Department of DermatologyThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Papier A, Strowd LC. Atopic dermatitis: a review of topical nonsteroid therapy. Drugs Context 2018; 7:212521. [PMID: 29632548 PMCID: PMC5886549 DOI: 10.7573/dic.212521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects up to 20% of children and 3% of adults globally. Although topical corticosteroids are considered to be the first-line agents, they can be associated with cutaneous and systemic adverse effects. Since the early 2000s, two new classes of nonsteroid topical therapies, topical calcineurin inhibitors and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors, have been introduced and provide a safe treatment alternative. Method We performed a search and review of clinical trials that examined the safety and efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors and PDE4 inhibitors. The search was conducted using the PubMed database as well as preselected keywords and filters. This review focuses on the safety and efficacy of each therapy. Results Sixty-nine clinical trials identified in this study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of topical calcineurin and a single novel PDE4 inhibitor in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Topical calcineurin inhibitors have been shown to be effective in both achieving lesion clearance as well as reducing relapse when used long-term and proactively. Similarly, in clinical trials the PDE4 inhibitor showed success in lesion clearance and symptom management. All three therapies (pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, crisaborole) are associated with low systemic absorption. No clinical trials to date have shown an increased risk of systemic adverse events or malignancy such as lymphoma. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event across all three therapies was application-site discomfort, pain or pruritus. It is important to note that long-term studies are not yet available for the novel PDE4 inhibitor. Discussion Topical calcineurin inhibitors provide a safe and effective alternative to topical corticosteroid use in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) black box warning for topical calcineurin inhibitors remains, studies have not shown an increased risk of malignancy. These warnings have caused a decline in use in favor of topical steroids. A novel PDE4 inhibitor has shown efficacy and safety in studies up to one year. Further long-term safety data is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariana Papier
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Lindsay C Strowd
- Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Novel oleyl amine-modified polymannuronic acid micelle loading tacrolimus for therapy of allergic conjunctivitis. Int J Biol Macromol 2017; 104:862-873. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Revised: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
29
|
Boguniewicz M, Alexis AF, Beck LA, Block J, Eichenfield LF, Fonacier L, Guttman-Yassky E, Paller AS, Pariser D, Silverberg JI, Lebwohl M. Expert Perspectives on Management of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Addressing Current and Emerging Therapies. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2017; 5:1519-1531. [PMID: 28970084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease that affects children and adults. Until recently, the only Food and Drug Administration-approved systemic treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe AD was systemic steroids, which are not recommended by current guidelines and are commonly associated with disease rebound. Instead, clinicians choose from several off-label immunosuppressants, which can have serious adverse effects. A significant number of these patients go untreated. Research on the immunopathogenesis of AD has paved the way for new, targeted, systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe AD. In early 2017, the Food and Drug Administration approved dupilumab for adults with moderate-to-severe AD whose disease is not adequately controlled with topical therapies. Although the national guidelines can be very helpful to clinicians, the process for updating them does not allow for timely incorporation of novel therapies. A steering committee of AD experts, including dermatologists, allergists, and a patient advocacy group representative, developed recommendations on the basis of a literature review and expert opinion to help clinicians understand how new therapies fit into the current treatment paradigm and to provide practical recommendations for assessing AD severity, treatment response, and treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Boguniewicz
- Division of Allergy-Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colo.
| | - Andrew F Alexis
- Department of Dermatology, Skin of Color Center, Mount Sinai St Luke's and Mount Sinai West, New York, NY
| | - Lisa A Beck
- Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Julie Block
- National Eczema Association, San Rafael, Calif
| | - Lawrence F Eichenfield
- Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, Calif; Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, Calif
| | - Luz Fonacier
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, NYU Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY
| | - Emma Guttman-Yassky
- Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Amy S Paller
- Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - David Pariser
- Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School and Virginia Clinical Research, Inc, Norfolk, Va
| | - Jonathan I Silverberg
- Departments of Dermatology, Preventive Medicine and Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Mark Lebwohl
- Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Topical Therapy of AD: How to Reach Better Results. CURRENT DERMATOLOGY REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s13671-017-0183-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
31
|
Abstract
Tacrolimus ointment is the first of a new class of non-steroidal topical immunomodulators indicated for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Topical tacrolimushas been subject to an extensive clinical development program involving more than 16,000 patients. A clinical trial program, including vehicle-controlled studies, short- and long-term comparative studies and long-term safety studies, has investigated tacrolimus 0.1%and 0.03%ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults and children aged 24 months and older. Tacrolimusmonotherapy is rapidly effective, resulting in clinical improvements within three days of starting therapy, and produces a progressive increase in efficacy that is sustained during long-term treatment. Tacrolimus treats the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis, reduces the incidence of flares, and offers the potential for long-term disease control. No major safety concerns have been reported to date. Tacrolimusointment is generally well tolerated, the primary adverse events being mild to moderate and transient application-site reactions: skin burning, pruritus and erythema. Tacrolimus oint-ment is a significant advance in dermatology and provides physicians with an alternative to conventional topical corticosteroid therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kapp
- a Dept. of Dermatology and Allergology , Hannover Medical University , Hannover , Germany
| | - B R Allen
- b Dept. of Dermatology , University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre , Nottingham , UK
| | - S Reitamo
- c Dept. of Dermatology , Hospital for Skin and Allergic Diseases, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kondratyeva YS, Kokina OA, Vedler AA. 15 year experience of tacrolimus application in medical practice. VESTNIK DERMATOLOGII I VENEROLOGII 2016. [DOI: 10.25208/0042-4609-2016-92-5-63-71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The review presents modern literature data on the use of tacrolimus in medical practice. The results of national and international research on the effectiveness and safety of the drug at various dermatoses are presented.
Collapse
|
33
|
Broeders JA, Ahmed Ali U, Fischer G. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing topical calcineurin inhibitors with topical corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis: A 15-year experience. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 75:410-419.e3. [PMID: 27177441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.02.1228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2015] [Revised: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Calcineurin inhibitors are alternatives to corticosteroid for treatment of atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVES We sought to compare the beneficial effects and adverse events associated with these therapies in treating patients with atopic dermatitis. METHODS Four databases were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing topical calcineurin inhibitors versus corticosteroids in children and adults. Methodological quality was evaluated to assess bias risk. Clinical outcome and costs were compared. RESULTS Twelve independent randomized clinical trials comparing calcineurin inhibitors (n = 3492) versus corticosteroids (n = 3462) were identified. Calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids had similar rates of improvement of dermatitis (81% vs 71%; risk ratio [RR] 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.34; P = .01) and treatment success (72% vs 68%; RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.31; P = .04). Calcineurin inhibitors were associated with higher costs and had more adverse events (74% vs 64%; RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.05-1.58; P = .02) including a higher rate of skin burning (30% vs 9%; RR 3.27; 95% CI 2.48-4.31; P < .00001) and pruritus (12% vs 8%; RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.24-1.79; P < .00001). There were no differences in atrophy, skin infections, or adverse events that were serious or required discontinuation of therapy. LIMITATIONS Only a small number of trials reported costs. CONCLUSION Calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids have similar efficacy. Calcineurin inhibitors are associated with higher costs and have more adverse events, such as skin burning and pruritus. These results provide level-1a support for the use of corticosteroids as the therapy of choice for atopic dermatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris A Broeders
- Department of Dermatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Usama Ahmed Ali
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gayle Fischer
- Department of Dermatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nankervis H, Thomas KS, Delamere FM, Barbarot S, Rogers NK, Williams HC. Scoping systematic review of treatments for eczema. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundEczema is a very common chronic inflammatory skin condition.ObjectivesTo update the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) systematic review of treatments for atopic eczema, published in 2000, and to inform health-care professionals, commissioners and patients about key treatment developments and research gaps.Data sourcesElectronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched from the end of 2000 to 31 August 2013. Retrieved articles were used to identify further randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Review methodsStudies were filtered according to inclusion criteria and agreed by consensus in cases of uncertainty. Abstracts were excluded and non-English-language papers were screened by international colleagues and data were extracted. Only RCTs of treatments for eczema were included, as other forms of evidence are associated with higher risks of bias. Inclusion criteria for studies included availability of data relevant to the therapeutic management of eczema; mention of randomisation; comparison of two or more treatments; and prospective data collection. Participants of all ages were included. Eczema diagnosis was determined by a clinician or according to published diagnostic criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. We used a standardised approach to summarising the data and the assessment of risk of bias and we made a clear distinction between what the studies found and our own interpretation of study findings.ResultsOf 7198 references screened, 287 new trials were identified spanning 92 treatments. Trial reporting was generally poor (randomisation method: 2% high, 36% low, 62% unclear risk of bias; allocation concealment: 3% high, 15% low, 82% unclear risk of bias; blinding of the intervention: 15% high, 28% low, 57% unclear risk of bias). Only 22 (8%) trials were considered to be at low risk of bias for all three criteria. There was reasonable evidence of benefit for the topical medications tacrolimus, pimecrolimus and various corticosteroids (with tacrolimus superior to pimecrolimus and corticosteroids) for both treatment and flare prevention; oral ciclosporin; oral azathioprine; narrow band ultraviolet B (UVB) light; Atopiclair™ and education. There was reasonable evidence to suggest no clinically useful benefit for twice-daily compared with once-daily topical corticosteroids; corticosteroids containing antibiotics for non-infected eczema; probiotics; evening primrose and borage oil; ion-exchange water softeners; protease inhibitor SRD441 (Serentis Ltd); furfuryl palmitate in emollient; cipamfylline cream; andMycobacterium vaccaevaccine. Additional research evidence is needed for emollients, bath additives, antibacterials, specialist clothing and complementary and alternative therapies. There was no RCT evidence for topical corticosteroid dilution, impregnated bandages, soap avoidance, bathing frequency or allergy testing.LimitationsThe large scope of the review coupled with the heterogeneity of outcomes precluded formal meta-analyses. Our conclusions are still limited by a profusion of small, poorly reported studies.ConclusionsAlthough the evidence base of RCTs has increased considerably since the last NIHR HTA systematic review, the field is still severely hampered by poor design and reporting problems including failure to register trials and declare primary outcomes, small sample size, short follow-up duration and poor reporting of risk of bias. Key areas for further research identified by the review include the optimum use of emollients, bathing frequency, wash products, allergy testing and antiseptic treatments. Perhaps the greatest benefit identified is the use of twice weekly anti-inflammatory treatment to maintain disease remission. More studies need to be conducted in a primary care setting where most people with eczema are seen in the UK. Future studies need to use the same core set of outcomes that capture patient symptoms, clinical signs, quality of life and the chronic nature of the disease.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Nankervis
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Finola M Delamere
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sébastien Barbarot
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Natasha K Rogers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wollenberg A, Oranje A, Deleuran M, Simon D, Szalai Z, Kunz B, Svensson A, Barbarot S, von Kobyletzki L, Taieb A, de Bruin-Weller M, Werfel T, Trzeciak M, Vestergard C, Ring J, Darsow U. ETFAD/EADV Eczema task force 2015 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult and paediatric patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 30:729-47. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 267] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; Ludwig-Maximilian-University; Munich Germany
| | - A. Oranje
- Department of Dermatology (Pediatric Dermatology and Hair); Dermicis Skin clinic; Alkmaar and Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - M. Deleuran
- Department of Dermatology; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
| | - D. Simon
- Department of Dermatology; Inselspital; Bern University Hospital; University of Bern; Bern Switzerland
| | - Z. Szalai
- Heim Pal Childrens Hospital; Budapest Hungary
| | - B. Kunz
- Dermatologikum; Hamburg Germany
| | - A. Svensson
- Department of Dermatology; University Hospital UMAS; Malmö Sweden
| | - S. Barbarot
- Department of Dermatology; University of Nantes; Nantes France
| | | | - A. Taieb
- Service de Dermatologie et Dermatologie Pédiatrique; Centre de référence pour les maladies rares de la peau; INSERM 1035; Université de Bordeaux; Talence France
| | - M. de Bruin-Weller
- Department of Dermatology; University of Utrecht; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - T. Werfel
- Department of Dermatology; Hautklinik Linden; MHH; Hannover Germany
| | - M. Trzeciak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology; Medical University of Gdansk; Gdansk Poland
| | - C. Vestergard
- Department of Dermatology; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
| | - J. Ring
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein; Technische Universität München; Munich Germany
- Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE); Davos Switzerland
| | - U. Darsow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein; Technische Universität München; Munich Germany
- ZAUM - Center of Allergy & Environment; Munich Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Systematic review on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis. Dermatitis 2016; 26:122-32. [PMID: 25984688 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) are widely used as an alternative to topical corticosteroids (TCSs) in treating of atopic dermatitis, but their risk versus benefit compared with TCSs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE We performed a systematic review of the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TCI compared with TCS and emollients. METHODS Published meta-analysis, systematic reviews, and individual studies from January 2005 to January 2015 on the comparative efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TCI against emollients and TCS were included. RESULTS Tacrolimus is comparable to TCS in efficacy, safety profile, and cost-effectiveness. Pimecrolimus has a similar safety profile compared with TCS, emollients, and tacrolimus. It is superior to emollients but inferior to TCS and tacrolimus in efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The association of tacrolimus with malignancy remains uncertain. CONCLUSIONS Tacrolimus is an efficacious and cost-effective alternative to TCS, but its benefits need to be weighed against its still uncertain risk for malignancy. Pimecrolimus is appropriate for mild atopic dermatitis when TCS or tacrolimus is unsuitable.
Collapse
|
37
|
Thomas W, Werner A, Frank A, Matthias A, Tilo B, Thomas D, Regina FH, Uwe G, Annice H, Julia K, Alexander K, Alexander N, Katja N, Hagen O, Bernhard P, Martin R, Martin S, Peter SG, Jochen S, Thomas S, Doris S, Margitta W. Leitlinie Neurodermitis [atopisches Ekzem; atopische Dermatitis]. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2015; 14:e1-75. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.12884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aberer Werner
- Österreichische Gesellschaft für Dermatologie und Venerologie
| | - Ahrens Frank
- Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Allergologie und Umweltmedizin e.V
| | - Augustin Matthias
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gesundheitsökonomie und Evidenzbasierte Medizin der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
| | | | - Diepgen Thomas
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Berufs- und Umweltdermatologie der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
| | - Fölster-Holst Regina
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Pädiatrische Dermatologie der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
| | | | | | | | - Kapp Alexander
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allergologie und Klinische Immunologie
| | - Nast Alexander
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.V. (Moderation)
| | - Nemat Katja
- Berufsverband der Kinder- und Jugendärzte e.V
| | - Ott Hagen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin e.V
| | - Przybilla Bernhard
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Allergologie der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Staab Doris
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Neurodermitisschulung e.V
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mahajan VK, Chauhan PS, Mehta KS, Sharma AL. Erythema Dyschromicum Perstans: Response to Topical Tacrolimus. Indian J Dermatol 2015; 60:525. [PMID: 26538750 PMCID: PMC4601471 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.164452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Erythema dyschromicum perstans, a rare dermatosis of obscure etiopathogenesis and significant cosmetic morbidity, have no satisfactory treatment. Observations: Two patients with having characteristic asymptomatic and slowly progressive, slate-grey macular lesions with distinct red borders involving the face, neck, upper trunk and limbs were diagnosed clinicopathologically as erythema dyschromicum perstans. Both were treated successfully with topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment. Conclusions: Overall, response to several therapeutic modalities including clofazimine and dapsone therapy is said to vary from complete failure to variable or inconsistent. Topical tarolimus provides an effective and safe alternative therapeutic option in erythema dyschromicum perstans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram K Mahajan
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. R. P. Govt. Medical College, Kangra, Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Pushpinder S Chauhan
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. R. P. Govt. Medical College, Kangra, Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Karaninder S Mehta
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. R. P. Govt. Medical College, Kangra, Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Anju Lath Sharma
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. R. P. Govt. Medical College, Kangra, Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Treatment of Sjögren's syndrome dry eye using 0.03% tacrolimus eye drop: Prospective double-blind randomized study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38:373-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2014] [Revised: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
40
|
Management of Dry Eye in Sjögren’s Syndrome. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN RHEUMATOLOGY 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40674-015-0026-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
41
|
Cury Martins J, Martins C, Aoki V, Gois AFT, Ishii HA, da Silva EMK. Topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD009864. [PMID: 26132597 PMCID: PMC6461158 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009864.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atopic dermatitis (AD) (or atopic eczema) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects children and adults and has an important impact on quality of life. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are the first-line therapy for this condition; however, they can be associated with significant adverse effects when used chronically. Tacrolimus ointment (in its 2 manufactured strengths of 0.1% and 0.03%) might be an alternative treatment. Tacrolimus, together with pimecrolimus, are drugs called topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs). OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus for moderate and severe atopic dermatitis compared with other active treatments. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to 3 June 2015: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2015), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974), LILACS (from 1982), and the Global Resource of Eczema Trials (GREAT database). We searched six trials registers and checked the bibliographies of included studies for further references to relevant trials. We contacted specialists in the field for unpublished data.A separate search for adverse effects of topical tacrolimus was undertaken in MEDLINE and EMBASE on 30 July 2013. We also scrutinised the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) websites for adverse effects information. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (both children and adults) using topical tacrolimus at any dose, course duration, and follow-up time compared with other active treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened and examined the full text of selected studies for compliance with eligibility criteria, risk of bias, and data extraction. Our three prespecified primary outcomes were physician's assessment, participant's self-assessment of improvement, and adverse effects. Our secondary outcomes included assessment of improvement of the disease by validated or objective measures, such as SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis), the EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index), and BSA (Body Surface Area) scores. MAIN RESULTS We included 20 studies, with 5885 participants. The variability of drug doses, outcomes, and follow-up periods made it difficult to carry out meta-analyses.A single trial showed that tacrolimus 0.1% was better than low-potency TCS by the physician's assessment (risk ratio (RR) 3.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14 to 4.45, 1 study, n = 371, moderate-quality evidence). It was also marginally better than low-potency TCS on face and neck areas and moderate-potency TCS on the trunk and extremities by the physician's assessment (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.49, 1 study, n = 972, moderate level of evidence) and for some of the secondary outcomes. Compared with pimecrolimus 1%, people treated with tacrolimus were almost twice as likely to improve by the physician's assessment (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.42, 2 studies, n = 506, moderate quality of evidence). Compared with the lower concentration of 0.03%, the tacrolimus 0.1% formulation reduced the risk of not having an improvement by 18% as evaluated by the physician's assessment (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92, 6 studies, n = 1640, high-quality evidence). Tacrolimus 0.1% compared with moderate-to-potent TCS showed no difference by the physician's assessment, and 2 secondary outcomes (1 study, 377 participants) and a marginal benefit favouring tacrolimus 0.1% was found by the participant's assessment (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.29, 1 study, n = 974, low quality of evidence) and SCORAD.Based on data from 2 trials, tacrolimus 0.03% was superior to mild TCS for the physician's assessment (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.96 to 3.38, 2 studies, n = 790, moderate-quality evidence) and the participant's self-assessment (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.90, 1 study, n = 416, moderate quality of evidence). One trial showed moderate benefit of tacrolimus 0.03% compared with pimecrolimus 1% on the physician's assessment (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.98, 1 study, n = 139, low-quality evidence), but the effects were equivocal when evaluating BSA. In the comparison of tacrolimus 0.03% with moderate-to-potent corticosteroids, no difference was found in most of the outcomes measured (including physician's and participant's assessment and also for the secondary outcomes), but in two studies, a marginal benefit favouring the corticosteroid group was found for the EASI and BSA scores.Burning was more frequent in those using calcineurin inhibitors than those using corticosteroid tacrolimus 0.03% (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.96 to 3.14, 5 studies, 1883 participants, high-quality evidence), but no difference was found for skin infections. Symptoms observed were mild and transient. The comparison between the two calcineurin inhibitors (pimecrolimus and tacrolimus) showed the same overall incidence of adverse events, but with a small difference in the frequency of local effects.Serious adverse events were rare; occurred in both the tacrolimus and corticosteroid groups; and in most cases, were considered to be unrelated to the treatment. No cases of lymphoma were noted in the included studies nor in the non-comparative studies. Cases were only noted in spontaneous reports, cohorts, and case-control studies. Systemic absorption was rarely detectable, only in low levels, and this decreased with time. Exception is made for diseases with severe barrier defects, such as Netherton's syndrome, lamellar ichthyosis, and a few others, with case reports of a higher absorption. We evaluated clinical trials; case reports; and in vivo, in vitro, and animal studies; and didn't find any evidence that topical tacrolimus could cause skin atrophy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Tacrolimus 0.1% was better than low-potency corticosteroids, pimecrolimus 1%, and tacrolimus 0.03%. Results were equivocal when comparing both dose formulations to moderate-to-potent corticosteroids. Tacrolimus 0.03% was superior to mild corticosteroids and pimecrolimus. Both tacrolimus formulations seemed to be safe, and no evidence was found to support the possible increased risk of malignancies or skin atrophy with their use. The reliability and strength of the evidence was limited by the lack of data; thus, findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. We did not evaluate costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jade Cury Martins
- Universidade Federal de São PauloDepartment of DermatologyWagih Assad Abdalla 172São PauloSão PauloBrazil05651‐020
| | - Ciro Martins
- Belecara Premium Multispecialty CenterDepartment of Dermatology1427 Clarkview RoadSuite 300BBaltimoreMarylandUSA21210
| | - Valeria Aoki
- University of Sao Paulo Medical School Hospital das ClinicasDepartment of DermatologyAv. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguir255‐sala 3016‐ICHCSão PauloBrazil05403‐002
| | - Aecio FT Gois
- Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São PauloBrazilian Cochrane CentreRua Pedro de Toledo, 598São PauloSão PauloBrazil04039‐001
| | - Henrique A Ishii
- The University of Nottinghamc/o Cochrane Skin GroupA103, King's Meadow CampusLenton LaneNottinghamUKNG7 2NR
| | - Edina MK da Silva
- Universidade Federal de São PauloEmergency Medicine and Evidence Based MedicineRua Borges Lagoa 564 cj 64Vl. ClementinoSão PauloSão PauloBrazil04038‐000
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Danby SG, Chittock J, Brown K, Albenali LH, Cork MJ. The effect of tacrolimus compared with betamethasone valerate on the skin barrier in volunteers with quiescent atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2015; 170:914-21. [PMID: 24328907 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease arising as a result of immune system and skin barrier defects. Topical corticosteroids are safe and effective treatments for AD, when used in short courses. Prolonged use is associated with skin barrier damage. Topical calcineurin inhibitors are alternative immune-modulating treatments for AD purported to have no negative effects on the skin barrier. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of betamethasone valerate 0·1% cream (BMVc) and tacrolimus 0·1% ointment (TACo) on the skin barrier. METHODS Twenty volunteers with quiescent AD (no active signs for 6 months) participated in a randomized observer-blind study, wherein BMVc was applied to one forearm and TACo to the other, twice daily for 4 weeks. The biophysical/biological properties of the stratum corneum were assessed before and after treatment. Nine volunteers with active disease and 10 with healthy skin were assessed at untreated sites. RESULTS BMVc significantly reduced skin barrier function, integrity and cohesion, and the levels of pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (PCA) and urocanic acid (UCA) towards the subclinical barrier defect observed in patients with AD (nonlesional sites). TACo preserved skin barrier function, integrity, cohesion and PCA and UCA levels, while significantly increasing skin hydration to levels comparable with healthy skin. Both treatments reduced skin surface pH and trypsin-like protease activity, with TACo doing so to a significantly greater degree. CONCLUSION In quiescent AD, 4 weeks of BMVc treatment adversely affected the biophysical properties of the skin and reduced the levels of natural moisturizing factor, whereas TACo improved the condition of the skin barrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Danby
- The Academic Unit of Dermatology Research, Department of Infection and Immunity, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, The University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, U.K
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis is a very prevalent disease that affects children as well as adults. The disease has a severe impact on quality of life for the patients and their families. The skin in atopic dermatitis patients is a site of both a severe inflammatory reaction dominated by lymphocytes and decreased skin barrier function. The treatment of the disease is mainly aimed at reducing the inflammation in the skin and/or restoring the skin barrier function. However, most of the treatments used today singularly aim at reducing the inflammation in the skin. Depending on the severity of the disease, the anti-inflammatory treatment may be topical or systemic, but basic treatment, no matter the severity, should always be emollients. In addition, new studies have shown good effects of psychosocial interventions, such as eczema schools, for patients and their families. This review covers the latest trends in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.
Collapse
|
44
|
Grunwald MH, Ben Amitai D, Amichai B. Macrolactam Immunomodulators (Tacrolimus and Pimecrolimus): New Horizons in the Topical Treatment of Inflammatory Skin Diseases. J Dermatol 2014; 31:592-602. [PMID: 15492431 DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2004.tb00564.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2003] [Accepted: 03/30/2004] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are new macrolactam immunomodulators which were developed for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, mainly atopic dermatitis. In this article, we review the pharmacologic properties of the drugs, their side effects, and their clinical uses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo H Grunwald
- Department of Dermatology, Soroka Medical Center, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Clinical Management of Atopic Dermatitis: Practical Highlights and Updates from the Atopic Dermatitis Practice Parameter 2012. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2014; 2:361-9; quiz 370. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2014] [Revised: 02/25/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
46
|
Gelmetti C, Wollenberg A. Atopic dermatitis - all you can do from the outside. Br J Dermatol 2014; 170 Suppl 1:19-24. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C. Gelmetti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation; Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano; Via Pace, 9 Milan 20122 Italy
| | - A. Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; Ludwig Maximilian University; Frauenlobstr. 9-11 Munich 80337 Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Reitamo S, Remitz A. An update on current pharmacotherapy options in atopic dermatitis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014; 15:1517-24. [DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2014.915941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
48
|
Strasinger CL, Scheff NN, Stinchcomb AL. Prodrugs and codrugs as strategies for improving percutaneous absorption. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014. [DOI: 10.1586/17469872.3.2.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
49
|
Park SJ, Lee HA, Kim JW, Lee BS, Kim EJ. Platycodon grandiflorus alleviates DNCB-induced atopy-like dermatitis in NC/Nga mice. Indian J Pharmacol 2013; 44:469-74. [PMID: 23087507 PMCID: PMC3469949 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.99306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2011] [Revised: 02/22/2012] [Accepted: 04/30/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of crude extract from Platycodon grandiflorum (PG) roots on atopic dermatitis (AD)-like skin lesions in NC/Nga mice. Materials and Methods: To develop atopic dermatitis-like lesions, 200 μl of 0.3% 1-chloro-2, 4-dinitro benzene (DNCB) in acetone/olive oil (3:1) was applied 3 times a week for 2 weeks on the shaved skin of their backs. PG extract was dissolved in saline and orally administrated at concentrations of 300 and 500 mg/kg every day for 2 weeks. The therapeutic effect of PG on AD-like skin lesions was assessed by measuring skin severity scores and epithermal thickness, serum total immunoglobulin (Ig) E, histopathological findings for inflammatory cells including mast cells, macrophage and T cells, and mRNA expression of various cytokines related to the inflammatory and allergic response. The significance of inter-group differences was analyzed using the ANOVA test. Data were considered to be significant when P < 0.05 or P < 0.01. Results: Oral treatment of PG suppressed AD-like skin lesions according to the assessment of skin severity and epithermal thickness in the DNCB-treated NC/Nga mice. This alleviation was further correlated with a reduction of elevated serum total IgE or cytokine mRNA in the PG-treated group compared with vehicle-treated positive group. In addition, infiltrated inflammatory cells decreased on the skin lesions compared with vehicle-treated group. Conclusion: These results suggest that PG may have a potential therapeutic effect for AD via the inhibition of both inflammatory and allergic reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Joon Park
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Buk-gu, Daegu, Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schneider L, Tilles S, Lio P, Boguniewicz M, Beck L, LeBovidge J, Novak N, Bernstein D, Blessing-Moore J, Khan D, Lang D, Nicklas R, Oppenheimer J, Portnoy J, Randolph C, Schuller D, Spector S, Tilles S, Wallace D. Atopic dermatitis: a practice parameter update 2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 131:295-9.e1-27. [PMID: 23374261 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.12.672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2012] [Accepted: 12/18/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Atopic dermatitis: a practice parameter update 2012." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion. Published practice parameters of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters for Allergy & Immunology are available online at http://www.jcaai.org.
Collapse
|