Dofetilide: a new pure class III antiarrhythmic agent

Opposite Contractile Effects of Amphetamine-Related Hallucinogenic Drugs in the Isolated Human Atrium

The present study examined three hallucinogenic amphetamine derivatives, namely, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) as well as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) and 4-methylmethcathinone (mephedrone). The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that DOI, DOM, and mephedrone would increase the contractile force in isolated human atrial preparations in a manner similar to amphetamine. To this end, we measured contractile force under isometric conditions in electrically stimulated (1 Hz) human atrial preparations obtained during open surgery. DOI and DOM alone or in the presence of isoprenaline reduced the contractile force concentration-dependently in human atrial preparations. These negative inotropic effects of DOM and DOI were not attenuated by 10 µM atropine. However, mephedrone increased the contractile force in human atrial preparations in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. Furthermore, these effects were attenuated by the subsequent addition of 10 µM propranolol or pretreatment with 10 µM cocaine in the organ bath. Therefore, it can be concluded that amphetamine derivatives may exert opposing effects on cardiac contractile force. The precise mechanism by which DOI and DOM exert their negative inotropic effects remains unknown at present. The cardiac effects of mephedrone are probably due to the release of cardiac noradrenaline.

Proarrhythmic risk assessment using conventional and new in vitro assays

Drug-induced QT prolongation is a major safety issue in the drug discovery process. This study was conducted to assess the electrophysiological responses of four substances using established preclinical assays usually used in regulatory studies (hERG channel or Purkinje fiber action potential) and a new assay (human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs)-field potential). After acute exposure, moxifloxacin and dofetilide concentration-dependently decreased I_Kr amplitude (IC₅₀ values: 102 μM and 40 nM, respectively) and lengthened action potential (100 μM moxifloxacin: +23% and 10 nM dofetilide: +18%) and field potential (300 μM moxifloxacin: +76% and 10 nM dofetilide: +38%) durations. Dofetilide starting from 30 nM induced arrhythmia in hiPSC-CMs. Overnight application of pentamidine (10 and 100 μM) and arsenic (1 and 10 μM) decreased I_Kr, whereas they were devoid of effects after acute application. Long-term pentamidine incubation showed a time- and concentration-dependent effect on field potential duration. In conclusion, our data suggest that hiPSC-CMs represent a fully functional cellular electrophysiology model which may significantly improve the predictive validity of in vitro safety studies. Thereafter, lead candidates may be further investigated in patch-clamp assays for mechanistic studies on individual ionic channels or in a multicellular Purkinje fiber preparation for confirmatory studies on cardiac conduction.

Atrial Fibrillation: The Science behind Its Defiance

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia in the world, due both to its tenacious treatment resistance, and to the tremendous number of risk factors that set the stage for the atria to fibrillate. Cardiopulmonary, behavioral, and psychological risk factors generate electrical and structural alterations of the atria that promote reentry and wavebreak. These culminate in fibrillation once atrial ectopic beats set the arrhythmia process in motion. There is growing evidence that chronic stress can physically alter the emotion centers of the limbic system, changing their input to the hypothalamic-limbic-autonomic network that regulates autonomic outflow. This leads to imbalance of the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems, most often in favor of sympathetic overactivation. Autonomic imbalance acts as a driving force behind the atrial ectopy and reentry that promote AF. Careful study of AF pathophysiology can illuminate the means that enable AF to elude both pharmacological control and surgical cure, by revealing ways in which antiarrhythmic drugs and surgical and ablation procedures may paradoxically promote fibrillation. Understanding AF pathophysiology can also help clarify the mechanisms by which emerging modalities aiming to correct autonomic imbalance, such as renal sympathetic denervation, may offer potential to better control this arrhythmia. Finally, growing evidence supports lifestyle modification approaches as adjuncts to improve AF control.

Dofetilide in Overdose: A Case Series from Poison Center Data

Dofetilide is a class III antiarrhythmic used for treating atrial dysrhythmias. Though its adverse effects are well described in routine use, very little is known about dofetilide toxicity in overdose. This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients reported to our poison center after dofetilide overdose. Twenty-seven cases were included. Seventeen patients were treated at a healthcare facility, and of these, eight were admitted. Twenty-one patients took one extra capsule, four took someone else's medication, one took three extra capsules, and one had a large intentional overdose. Ten patients had co-ingestants reported, including three QT-prolonging agents. No one required cardioversion, defibrillation, CPR, or overdrive pacing. The patient who reported taking 90 times his usual dose in suicide attempt was the only patient to have significant clinical effects. He experienced an 8-beat run of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, frequent multifocal PVCs, and ventricular bigeminy. He received magnesium sulfate and potassium chloride supplementation. In this series, unintentional small overdoses did not result in significant clinical effects and were often managed successfully at home, despite the fact that information showing a single capsule can cause torsades. This study is limited by its small sample size, retrospective design, and reliance on incomplete information.

Chronotropic Modulation of the Source-Sink Relationship of Sinoatrial-Atrial Impulse Conduction and Its Significance to Initiation of AF: A One-Dimensional Model Study

Initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with pharmacologically or pathologically induced bradycardic states. Even drugs specifically developed in order to counteract cardiac arrhythmias often combine their action with bradycardia and, in turn, with development of AF, via still largely unknown mechanisms. This study aims to simulate action potential (AP) conduction between sinoatrial node (SAN) and atrial cells, either arranged in cell pairs or in a one-dimensional strand, where the relative amount of SAN membrane is made varying, in turn, with junctional resistance. The source-sink relationship between the two membrane types is studied in control conditions and under different simulated chronotropic interventions, in order to define a safety factor for pacemaker-to-atrial AP conduction (SASF) for each treatment. Whereas antiarrhythmic-like interventions which involve downregulation of calcium channels or of calcium handling decrease SASF, the simulation of Ivabradine administration does so to a lesser extent. Particularly interesting is the increase of SASF observed when downregulation G Kr, which simulates the administration of class III antiarrhythmic agents and is likely sustained by an increase in I CaL. Also, the increase in SASF is accompanied by a decreased conduction delay and a better entrainment of repolarization, which is significant to anti-AF strategies.

Proarrhythmia Risk Assessment in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Using the Maestro MEA Platform

Evaluation of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (SC-CM) using multi-electrode array (MEA) has attracted attention as a novel model to detect drug-induced arrhythmia. An experiment was conducted to determine if MEA recording from human induced pluripotent SC-CM (hiPSC-CM) could assess proarrhythmic risk. Ten hERG blockers, 4 Na(+) blockers, and 1 IKs blocker were evaluated blindly. Eight drugs are associated with Torsades de Pointes (TdP) and 4 are not. Multiple parameters, including field potential duration (FPD), Na(+) slope, Na(+) amplitude, beat rate (BR), and early after-depolarization (EAD) were recorded. Minimum effective concentrations (MEC) that elicited a significant change were calculated. Our results determined that FPD and EAD were unable to distinguish torsadogenic from benign compounds, Na(+) slope and amplitude could not differentiate Na(+) channel blockade from hERG blockade, BR had an inconsistent response to pharmacological treatment, and that hiPSC-CM were, in general, insensitive to IKs inhibition. A ratio was calculated that relates MEC for evoking FPD prolongation, or triggering EAD, to the human therapeutic unbound Cmax (MEC/Cmax). The key finding was that the ratio was sensitive, but specificity was low. Consistently, the ratio had high positive predictive value and low negative predictive value. In conclusion, MEA recordings of hiPSC-CM were sensitive for FPD and EAD detection, but unable to distinguish agents with low- and high-risk for TdPs. Although some published reports suggested great potential for MEA recordings in hSC-CM to assess preclinical cardiac toxicity, the current evaluation implies that this model would have a high false-positive rate in regard to proarrhythmic risk.

Coronary artery disease potentiates response to dofetilide for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Dofetilide, a class III antiarrhythmic, is one of the few alternatives to amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure or coronary artery disease (CAD). While amiodarone has been extensively studied, little is known about predictors of response to dofetilide. We sought to identify clinical parameters associated with dofetilide success in a large cohort of patients with AF.

METHODS/RESULTS

A total of 287 patients with AF started on dofetilide between 2001 and 2008 were included. Dofetilide was deemed "completely effective" if the patient remained on dofetilide at follow-up and had no recurrences of AF clinically or by electrocardiogram. Dofetilide efficacy was analyzed in relation to clinical variables relevant to AF and AF recurrence. After a follow-up of 10.2 ± 7.7 months, 54.7% of the patients remained on dofetilide and it was completely effective in 26.8%. The discontinuation rate during initial hospitalization was 13.3% from excessive QT prolongation and one patient with torsades de pointes (successfully treated). A history of CAD was the only univariate predictor of efficacy (odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-4.01, P < 0.05). CAD remained the only significant factor associated with efficacy of dofetilide in a multivariate regression model (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.11-3.70, P < 0.05, n = 270). The overall efficacy of dofetilide in patients with CAD was 41.1%, compared to 23.5% in those without CAD (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients with AF, underlying coronary disease was significantly associated with dofetilide success. This finding may have utility for clinical decisions regarding initiation of dofetilide.

Dofetilide-induced long QT and torsades de pointes

Dofetilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic agent, has been approved as an antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Dofetilide selectively inhibits the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current resulting in a prolongation of the effective refractory period. Like other drugs that affect potassium currents, the prolonged QT interval occurring in the patients treated with dofetilide can be complicated by torsades de pointes. We report four cases of dofetilide-induced QT prolongation and torsades de pointes. We discuss the risk factors for the development of dofetilide-induced long QT and torsades de pointes and review the current literature.

Pharmacologic targets for atrial fibrillation

Despite advances in treatment, atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most common arrhythmia in humans. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy continues to be a cornerstone of AF treatment, even in light of emerging non-pharmacologic therapies. Conventional antiarrhythmic drugs target cardiac ion channels and are often associated with modest AF suppression and the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia. Ongoing drug development has focused on targeting atrial-specific ion channels as well as novel non-ionic targets. Targeting non-ionic mechanisms may also provide new drugs directed towards the underlying mechanisms responsible for AF and possibly greater antiarrhythmic potency. Agents that act against these new targets may offer improved safety and efficacy in AF treatment.

Benzopyran sulfonamides as KV1.5 potassium channel blockers

K(V)1.5 blockers have the potential to be atrium-selective agents for treatment of atrial fibrillation. The benzopyrans provide a template for the synthesis of potent and selective K(V)1.5 blockers.

Validation and clinical application of time-frequency analysis of atrial fibrillation electrocardiograms

INTRODUCTION

Fibrillatory rates can reliably be obtained from surface ECGs during atrial fibrillation (AF) and correspond with right atrial (RA) and coronary sinus (CS) rates, while both the relation with pulmonary venous (PV) rates and determinants of fibrillatory waveform are unknown. Class III antiarrhythmic drugs prolong atrial refractoriness and decrease its dispersion, effects that may be reflected in ECG parameters. Consequently, this study sought (1) to investigate the relation between ECG fibrillatory rate and waveform characteristics with intraatrial/PV fibrillatory activity and (2) to noninvasively monitor class III antiarrhythmic drug effects in patients with AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with drug-refractory AF who underwent catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation and had AF at the beginning of the procedure were studied. A positive correlation between V1 rates obtained by time-frequency analysis and RA (R = 0.97, P < 0.001), CS (R = .71, P < 0.001), and PV rates (R = 0.65, P = 0.001) was found. Exponential decay defined as decay of the curve that connects power maxima of dominant and harmonic frequency components correlated with RA rate dispersion (R = 0.53, P = 0.004). In amiodarone-treated patients (n = 7), V1 rate (286 +/- 64 vs. 371 +/- 40 fpm, P < 0.001) and exponential decay (1.06 +/- 0.29 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.38, P = 0.034) were lower than in patients without amiodarone (n = 29). In 19 additional patients with persistent AF, oral dofetilide treatment decreased mean fibrillatory rate from 377 +/- 57 to 294 +/- 50 fpm (P < 0.001) and exponential decay from 1.24 +/- 0.43 to 0.85 +/- 0.22 (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrillatory waves of surface ECG lead V1 closely reflect right atrial, and, to a lesser degree, left atrial activity. Time-frequency analysis allows noninvasive monitoring of antiarrhythmic drug effects on fibrillatory rate and waveform.

Block of HERG-carried K+ currents by the new repolarization delaying agent H 345/52

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze the block of HERG-carried membrane currents caused by H 345/52, a new antiarrhythmic compound with low proarrhythmic activity, in transfected mouse fibroblasts.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the whole-cell configuration of the voltage patch clamp technique, it was demonstrated that H 345/52 concentration-dependently blocked HERG-carried currents with an IC50 of 230 nM. H 345/52 preferentially bound to the open channel with unusually rapid kinetics and was trapped by channel closure. Voltage-independent behavior of H 345/52 was observed during both square-pulse and action potential clamp protocols. In contrast, the Class III agents dofetilide (10 nM) and almokalant (250 nM) demonstrated significant membrane potential-dependent effects during square-pulse clamp protocols. When using action potential clamp protocols, voltage dependence was seen with dofetilide but not with almokalant. Mathematical simulations of human ventricular action potentials predicted that the different voltage-dependent behaviors would not produce marked variations in action potential duration prolongation patterns.

CONCLUSION

We propose that block of IKr is the principal mechanism by which H 345/52 delays repolarization in human myocardium. The voltage independence of HERG/IKr block is unlikely to underlie the low proarrhythmic potential, and ancillary effects on other membrane currents must be considered.

Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: comparative efficacy and results of trials

In managing atrial fibrillation (AF), the main therapeutic strategies include rate control, termination of the arrhythmia, and the prevention of recurrences and thromboembolic events. Safety and efficacy considerations are important in optimizing the choice of an antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of AF. Recently approved antiarrhythmics, such as dofetilide, and promising investigational drugs, such as azimilide and dronedarone, may change the treatment landscape for AF. For medical conversion of recent-onset AF, class IC antiarrhythmic drugs, administered as an oral bolus, have been demonstrated to be the most efficacious pharmacologic conversion agents. Intravenous ibutilide and oral dofetilide both have efficacies superior to placebo in controlled trials for converting persistent AF. Comparative trials in paroxysmal AF have demonstrated that flecainide, propafenone, quinidine, and sotalol are equally effective in preventing recurrences of AF. Amiodarone has been demonstrated to be more efficacious than propafenone or sotalol in the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation. In persistent AF, twice-daily dofetilide has been shown to be as or more effective than low-dose sotalol given twice daily for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Trials have demonstrated that subjective adverse effects are less frequent with class IC drugs, sotalol, and dofetilide compared with such drugs as quinidine. In patients without structural heart disease, flecainide, propafenone, and D,L-sotalol are the initial drugs of choice, given their reasonable efficacy, low incidence of subjective side effects, and lack of significant end-organ toxicity. Treating AF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction can be difficult because of associated electrophysiologic derangements, potential proarrhythmic concerns, and negative inotropic effects of antiarrhythmics. Some data exist suggesting that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers can prevent AF either by preventing atrial dilation and stretch-induced arrhythmias or by blocking the renin-angiotensin system. In post-myocardial infarction patients, D,L-sotalol, dofetilide, and amiodarone-and in congestive heart failure patients, amiodarone and dofetilide-have demonstrated neutral effects on survival in controlled trials. In the Congestive Heart Failure Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy (CHF-STAT), amiodarone lowered the frequency of AF development and improved left ventricular ejection fraction over time. In CHF-STAT, there was lower mortality in patients who converted from AF to sinus rhythm. Dofetilide decreased rehospitalization for congestive heart failure in the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide (DIAMOND) trials. Neutral effects on survival and favorable hemodynamics have positioned amiodarone and dofetilide as the antiarrhythmics of choice in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. In post-myocardial infarction patients, sotalol is an additional agent to consider for treatment of AF in this setting.

A Benefit-Risk Assessment of Class III Antiarrhythmic Agents

With beta-blockers as the exception, increasing doubt is emerging on the value of antiarrhythmic drug therapy following a series of trials that have either shown no mortality benefit or even an excess mortality. Vaughan Williams class I drugs are generally avoided in patients with structural heart disease, and class IV drugs are avoided in heart failure. Unfortunately, arrhythmias are a growing problem due to an increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation and sudden death. The population is becoming older and more patients survive for a longer time period with congestive heart failure, which again increases the frequency of both supraventricular as well as ventricular arrhythmias. Class III antiarrhythmic drugs act by blocking repolarising currents and thereby prolong the effective refractory period of the myocardium. This is believed to facilitate termination of re-entry tachyarrhythmias. This class of drugs is developed for treatment of both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide, and ibutilide are examples of class III drugs that are currently available. Amiodarone and sotalol have other antiarrhythmic properties in addition to pure class III action, which differentiates them from the others. However, all have potential serious adverse events. Proarrhythmia, especially torsade de pointes, is a common problem making the benefit-risk ratio of these drugs a key question. Class III drugs have been evaluated in different settings: primary and secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias and in treatment of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Based on existing evidence there is no routine indication for antiarrhythmic drug therapy other than beta-blockers in patients at high risk of sudden death. Subgroup analyses of trials with amiodarone and dofetilide suggest that patients with atrial fibrillation may have a mortality reduction with these drugs. However, this needs to be tested in a prospective trial. Similarly, subgroups that will benefit from prophylactic treatment with class III antiarrhythmic drugs may be found based on QT-intervals or - in the future - from genetic testing. Class III drugs are effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion. This is currently by far the most important indication for this class of drugs. As defined by recent guidelines, amiodarone and dofetilide have their place as second-line therapy except for patients with heart failure where they are first line therapy being the only drugs where the safety has been documented for this group of high risk patients.

Effects of the class III antiarrhythmic agent dofetilide (UK-68,798) on L-type calcium current from rabbit ventricular myocytes

The methanesulphonanilide agent dofetilide (UK-68,798) exerts Class III antiarrhythmic effects by inhibiting the cardiac rapid delayed rectifier potassium current (I(Kr)) encoded by HERG. The aim of the present study was to determine whether dofetilide also exhibits Class IV (L-type calcium-channel blocking) effects. L-type calcium current (I(Ca,L)) was measured from rabbit isolated ventricular myocytes, using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique under selective recording conditions. Positive control experiments demonstrated inhibition of I(Ca,L) elicited by pulses to + 10 mV by both nifedipine and externally applied Ni2+ ions. Three concentrations of dofetilide were tested: 100 nM, 1 microM and 10 microM. I(Ca,L) magnitude was not significantly reduced by any of the concentrations tested (P > 0.05; n = minimum of seven cells per drug concentration). The inactivation time-course of I(Ca,L) was also unaffected by 10 microM dofetilide. Heterologously expressed HERG current (I(HERG)) recorded from Chinese Hamster Ovary cells was extensively inhibited by 100 nm and 1 microM dofetilide, with inhibition at 1 microM not significantly different from 100% (P > 0.1). It is concluded that dofetilide produced no I(Ca,L) blocking effects at concentrations up to and exceeding that required for maximal I(HERG) inhibition. The findings support the notion that dofetilide is a highly selective Class III antiarrhythmic agent, devoid of Class IV antiarrhythmic activity.