Improved survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction with significant left ventricular dysfunction undergoing invasive coronary procedures

Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI). However, current data on trajectories and determinants of EF are scarce. The present study aimed to describe the epidemiology of EF after MI.

METHODS

Data from a single-center prospectively-designed registry of consecutive patients hospitalized at a large tertiary cardiology center were utilized.

RESULTS

Out of 1,593 patients in the registry, 1,065 were hospitalized for MI type I (65.4% STEMI) and had no previous history of heart failure or MI. At discharge, EF < 40% was present in 238 (22.3%), EF 40-50% in 326 (30.6%) and EF > 50% in 501 (47.0%). Patients with EF < 40% were often those who suffered subacute and anterior STEMI, had higher heart rate at admission and higher maximal troponin level, and had more often HF signs requiring intravenous diuretics. Among subjects with EF < 40%, the follow-up EF was available in 166 (80% of eligible). Systolic function recovered to EF > 50% in 39 (23.1%), slightly improved to EF 40-50% in 44 (26.0%) and remained below 40% in 86 (50.9%). Systolic function improvement to EF > 40% was predicted by lower severity of coronary atherosclerosis, lower leukocyte count, and the absence of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recent improvements in in-hospital MI care, one in five patients has systolic dysfunction at hospital discharge. Out of these, EF improves in 51%, and full recovery is observed in 23%. The severity of coronary atherosclerosis, inflammatory response to MI, and atrial fibrillation may affect EF recovery.

Assessment of Selected Baseline and Post-PCI Electrocardiographic Parameters as Predictors of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction after a First ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of ten electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters regarding the prediction of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) after a first ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

We analyzed 249 patients (74.7% males) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) included into a single-center cohort study. We sought associations between baseline and post-PCI ECG parameters and the presence of LVSD (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤ 40% on echocardiography) 6 months after STEMI.

RESULTS

Patients presenting with LVSD (n = 52) had significantly higher values of heart rate, number of leads with ST-segment elevation and pathological Q-waves, as well as total and maximal ST-segment elevation at baseline and directly after PCI compared with patients without LVSD. They also showed a significantly higher prevalence of anterior STEMI and considerably wider QRS complex after PCI, while QRS duration measurement at baseline showed no significant difference. Additionally, patients presenting with LVSD after 6 months showed markedly more severe ischemia on admission, as assessed with the Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia score, smaller reciprocal ST-segment depression at baseline and less profound ST-segment resolution post PCI. In multivariate regression analysis adjusted for demographic, clinical, biochemical and angiographic variables, anterior location of STEMI (OR 17.78; 95% CI 6.45-48.96; p < 0.001), post-PCI QRS duration (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.22-2.00; p < 0.001) expressed per increments of 10 ms and impaired post-PCI flow in the infarct-related artery (IRA; TIMI 3 vs. <3; OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.04-0.46; p = 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of LVSD (Nagelkerke's pseudo R2 for the logistic regression model = 0.462). Similarly, in multiple regression analysis, anterior location of STEMI, wider post-PCI QRS, higher baseline number of pathological Q-waves and a higher baseline Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia score, together with impaired post-PCI flow in the IRA, higher values of body mass index and glucose concentration on admission were independently associated with lower values of LVEF at 6 months (corrected R2 = 0.448; p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our study, baseline and post-PCI ECG parameters are of modest value for the prediction of LVSD occurrence 6 months after a first STEMI.

Determinants and Prognostic Impact of Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Acute Coronary Syndrome Settings

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Contemporary data on the incidence and prognosis of heart failure (HF) and the influence of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are scant. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between LVEF and HF with long-term prognosis in a cohort of patients with ACS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of 6208 patients consecutively admitted for ACS to 2 different Spanish hospitals. Baseline characteristics were examined and a follow-up period was established for registration of death and HF rehospitalization as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Among the study participants, 5064 had ACS without HF during hospitalization: 290 (5.8%) had LVEF<40%, 540 (10.6%) LVEF 40% to 49%, and 4234 (83.6%) LVEF ≥ 50%. The remaining 1144 patients developed HF in the acute phase: 395 (34.6%) had LVEF<40%, 251 (21.9%) LVEF 40% to 49%, and 498 (43.5%) LVEF ≥ 50%. Patients with LVEF 40% to 49% had a demographic and clinical profile with intermediate features between the LVEF <40% and LVEF ≥ 50% groups. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that mortality and HF readmissions were statistically different depending on LVEF in the non-HF group but not in the HF group. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% was an independent prognostic factor in the non-HF group only.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACS, long-term prognosis is considerably worse in patients who develop HF during hospitalization than in patients without HF, irrespective of LVEF. This parameter is a strong prognostic predictor only in patients without HF.

Effect of age on the prognostic value of left ventricular function in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A prospective registry study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to study the prognostic impact of left ventricular function on mortality and examine the effect of age on the prognostic value of left ventricular function.

METHODS

We examined the myocardial ischaemia national audit project registry (2006-2010) data with a mean follow-up of 2.1 years. Left ventricular function was categorised into good (ejection fraction ⩾50%), moderate (ejection fraction 30-49%) and poor (ejection fraction <30%) categories. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to examine the prognostic significance of left ventricular function in different age groups (<65, 65-74, 75-84 and ⩾85 years) on all-cause mortality adjusting for baseline variables.

RESULTS

Out of 424,848 patients, left ventricular function data were available for 123,609. Multiple imputations were used to impute missing values of left ventricular function and the final sample for analyses was drawn from 414,305. After controlling for confounders, 339,887 participants were included in the regression models. For any age group, mortality was higher with a worsening degree of left ventricular impairment. Increased age reduced the adverse prognosis associated with reduced left ventricular function (hazard ratios of death comparing poor left ventricular function to good left ventricular function were 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.88-2.37 for age <65 years and 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.36 for age ⩾85 years). Older patients had a high mortality risk even in those with good left ventricular function. Hazard ratios of mortality for ⩾85 compared to <65 years (hazard ratio = 1.00) within good, moderate and poor ejection fraction groups were 5.89, 4.86 and 3.43, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute coronary syndrome, clinicians should interpret the prognostic value of left ventricular function taking into account the patient's age.

Different prognostic factors according to left ventricular systolic function in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Initial left ventricular (LV) systolic function is a main determinant of clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study was performed to investigate whether AMI patients have different prognostic factors according to their baseline LV systolic function.

METHODS

A total of 12,988 patients with AMI from a nationwide database were analyzed. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within 12months of AMI, including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization, were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients were stratified into two groups according to LV ejection fraction (LVEF): those with LVEF<40% and those with LVEF≥40%. Patients with LVEF<40% (n=1962, 15.1%) were older and had more unfavorable cardiovascular risk factors than those with LVEF≥40% (n=11,026, 84.9%). The rate of MACE was higher in patients with LVEF<40% than in those with LVEF≥40% (26.8% vs 11.4%, p<0.001). Independent predictors of 12-month MACEs in patients with LVEF≥40% were history of MI, high Killip stage, three-vessel disease, and lower renal function, which are already known as risk factors. However, diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.40; p=0.008), and the use of rennin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; p=0.029) were independent factors for 12-month MACE in patients with LVEF <40%.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic factors determining 12-month MACE after AMI are different according to LVEF. Management following AMI should be tailored according to their LV systolic function.

Usefulness of C-reactive protein as a marker of early post-infarct left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Objective

To assess the usefulness of in-hospital measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration in comparison to well-established risk factors as a marker of post-infarct left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) at discharge.

Materials and methods

Two hundred and four consecutive patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were prospectively enrolled into the study. CRP plasma concentrations were measured before reperfusion, 24 h after admission and at discharge with an ultra-sensitive latex immunoassay.

Results

CRP concentration increased significantly during the first 24 h of hospitalization (2.4 ± 1.9 vs. 15.7 ± 17.0 mg/L; p < 0.001) and persisted elevated at discharge (14.7 ± 14.7 mg/L), mainly in 57 patients with LVSD (2.4 ± 1.8 vs. 25.0 ± 23.4 mg/L; p < 0.001; CRP at discharge 21.9 ± 18.6 mg/L). The prevalence of LVSD was significantly increased across increasing tertiles of CRP concentration both at 24 h after admission (13.2 vs. 19.1 vs. 51.5 %; p < 0.0001) and at discharge (14.7 vs. 23.5 vs. 45.6 %; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated CRP concentration at discharge to be an independent marker of early LVSD (odds ratio of 1.38 for a 10 mg/L increase, 95 % confidence interval 1.01–1.87; p < 0.04).

Conclusion

Measurement of CRP plasma concentration at discharge may be useful as a marker of early LVSD in patients after a first STEMI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction

Patients who have had a myocardial infarction (MI) are at high risk for developing left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), which predisposes them to heart failure and is associated with an increased mortality risk. Early coronary revascularization, either with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, plays an important role in the preservation and restoration of left ventricular function after MI. This article discusses the effects of primary and nonemergent percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures on survival, left ventricular function, and the occurrence of complications, such as recurrent MI and stroke, compared with the effects of thrombolytic therapy. In addition, this article describes rescue revascularization procedures for patients who failed thrombolysis and those presenting relatively late or with negative electrocardiographic findings. Advanced interventional techniques, such as percutaneous ventricular assist devices and bioabsorbable stents, are very promising and may potentially help improve the outcomes of post-MI patients with LVD; however, the use of these techniques requires further validation.

Gender differences in mortality after acute myocardial infarction with mild to moderate heart failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is associated with poor outcome after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Women have higher mortality rate than men after AMI, however, it is unknown whether women with HF after AMI have different prognosis than men.

AIM

To compare the prognosis of men and women with AMI and mild-moderate HF.

METHODS

We analyzed data of 3456 consecutive patients with AMI hospitalized in all cardiac care units in Israel during two nationwide surveys.

RESULTS

Among patients with AMI and HF on admission: women were older, had more risk factors, and were less likely to undergo percutaneous coronary angiography/intervention. Women with HF had higher (7-days, 30-days, and 1-year) crude mortality rates than men. However, adjusted mortality rates were not significantly different between genders.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with AMI complicated by HF had higher crude mortality rate than men that was eliminated after multivariate analysis, suggesting that the higher mortality rate may be attributed to increased prevalence of risk factors and lower rate of revascularization and medical therapies among women. Women with AMI and HF should be considered as a high-risk subgroup with adverse outcome. It remains to be determined whether more intensive management will improve their prognosis.

Epidemiology of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction

The development of heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction has long been regarded as an ominous complication, significantly increasing the morbidity and short- and long-term mortality of survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Although the incidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction has fallen over the last few decades, it remains common, complicating up to 45% of infarcts. Moreover, up to 60% of myocardial infarcts will result in left ventricular systolic dysfunction, depending on the exact definition used. Those at greatest risk of developing heart failure are the elderly, females, and those with prior myocardial infarction. Advances in the management of acute myocardial infarction have led to reduced in-hospital mortality (even when complicated by heart failure), but longer-term mortality remains high in these patients.

Medical treatment of patients with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Management of ischemic patients with pre-existing or new-onset left ventricular (LV) dysfunction poses a special challenge in terms of the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and appropriate adjunctive medications to optimize outcome while minimizing risk. In a systematic fashion, this review attempts to provide a management scheme for patients with heart failure or LV dysfunction that present with stable angina, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. By addressing therapeutic approaches to acute or decompensated heart failure and timing of coronary angiography based on severity of ischemia, we provide evidence-based recommendations for medications to initiate before, during, and following PCI.

Restrictive diastolic filling predicts death after acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the magnitude of the survival deficit associated with a restrictive filling pattern after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

Online databases were searched for prospective echocardiography outcome studies of patients after AMI. All authors were contacted to seek confirmation of their data. Restrictive filling was compared with all non-restrictive filling patterns. Review Manager Version 4.2.7 software was used for analysis.

RESULTS

3855 patients in 16 studies were identified. Follow up varied from two weeks to five years (> 1 year, 10 studies; and > 4 years, four studies). 776 (20%) of patients had a restrictive filling pattern at baseline. 580 patients died (247 in the restrictive group), and the overall odds ratio for death (restrictive filling worse) was 4.10 (95% confidence interval 3.38 to 4.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality is about four times higher in patients with a restrictive filling pattern than in those with non-restrictive filling patterns after AMI. Echocardiographic assessment of diastolic filling pattern is an important part of the echocardiographic assessment of patients after myocardial infarction and provides important prognostic information about such patients.

Epidemiology of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic importance

The development of heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) results in significant risk far above that of AMI independently. In patients admitted to the hospital for AMI, concomitant heart failure and/or LVSD on hospital admission or development of either or both of these conditions during admission are among the strongest predictors of inhospital death and are associated with significant increases in inhospital, 30-day, and long-term mortality and rehospitalization rates. Given the high risks in this population, aggressive treatment, comprising early initiation and sustained use of evidence-based treatments, is essential for improving prognosis.

Improved survival for stenting vs. balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction

While earlier studies of balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction suggested high late mortality, a study directly comparing coronary stenting and BA has not been performed. Since stenting provides a more durable revascularization, we sought to compare long-term survival in patients undergoing stenting vs BA in patients with decreased left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF). We evaluated consecutive patient procedures performed in our institution from 1996 through 1999. Patients were considered part of the stent group if they received at least one stent. To be included, patients had to have a technically adequate angiographic LV gram with a calculated LVEF<or=50%. Patients with prior CABG were excluded. Mortality data was retrieved using the United States Social Security Death Index. Follow-up ranged from 3.5 to 6.5 years. Statistical analysis was performed and tests were significant with a P-value<0.05. A total of 238 patients fulfilled our criteria. Mean age was 57.5+/-12 years, mean LVEF was 39+/-10%, 67% were males, 71.5% received stents, 62% had a recent MI, and 19% died during follow-up. Overall 5-year survival was 84% for stenting and 77% for BA (P=NS). Patients with an LVEF<or=40% (n=110) had better survival at 5 years if they received a stent compared with BA alone (76% for stents vs. 53% for BA; P<0.05). Stenting was found to be significant predictor of late survival on Cox Hazard Regression analysis in patients with an LVEF<or=50% and LVEF<or=40%. This study demonstrates improved 5-year survival for patients undergoing stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with LVEF<or=40%.

Acute coronary syndromes complicated by symptomatic and asymptomatic heart failure: does current treatment comply with guidelines?

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) complicated by heart failure (HF) are at increased risk of death. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta-blockers, and early invasive risk stratification are recommended for these patients.

AIM

The purpose of the current study was to assess adherence to treatment guidelines of patients with ACS complicated by HF in Europe and the Mediterranean region.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of the 10,484 patients who participated in Euro-Heart ACS survey, 9587 had known HF status and were without cardiogenic shock; 7058 (74%) did not have symptomatic HF and 2529 (26%) presented with or developed symptomatic HF during hospitalization. HF patients were older and had more cardiovascular risk factors. ACEI were more commonly used in HF patients (75% vs 56%, P < .01), whereas beta-blockers were less frequently used (75% vs 82%, P < .01). Coronary angiography and in hospital revascularization rates were lower among HF patients (42% vs 57% for coronary angiography, P < .01, and 32% vs 42% for revascularization, P < .01). Similar trends were noticed among patients with left ventricular dysfunction (symptomatic and asymptomatic).Adjusted in-hospital mortality risk was higher among patients with ACS complicated by symptomatic HF regardless of electrocardiographic type of ACS: (ST-elevation ACS, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.9; non-ST-elevation ACS, OR 8.9,95% CI 4.5-17.7; undetermined-ECG ACS, OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.5-34).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ACS complicated by HF were at increased risk of dying. A relatively high percentage of HF patients were treated with ACEI and beta-blockers in accordance with current recommendations. Rates of coronary angiography and revascularization were significantly lower in ACS patients with HF versus those without HF, which potentially contributed to their worse mortality [corrected]

Timing of aspirin administration as a determinant of survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis

Unlike thrombolytic agents, there are conflicting data regarding the time-dependent effect of aspirin treatment on outcome in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to evaluate the impact of timing of aspirin administration (before vs after thrombolysis) on mortality of patients with AMI. Our study included 1,200 patients with ST elevation AMI treated with thrombolysis. Early (n = 364) versus late (n = 836) users were defined as those receiving emergency aspirin before versus after initiation of thrombolysis, respectively. Time (median) from symptom onset to initiation of aspirin treatment was significantly shorter in early versus late users (1.6 vs 3.5 hours; p <0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to baseline clinical characteristics. Early aspirin users were more likely to develop reischemia, to be treated with beta blockers, to be referred to coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Early users experienced lower mortality at 7 days (2.5% vs 6.0%, p = 0.01), 30 days (3.3% vs 7.3%, p = 0.008), and 1 year (5.0% vs 10.6%, p = 0.002) than late users. This survival benefit persisted for patients with and without previous aspirin therapy or revascularization and after adjustment for baseline characteristics and therapies at 7 days (odds ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.79), at 30 days (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.82), and at 1 year (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.74). Our study proposes a time-dependent benefit from aspirin in patients with AMI treated with thrombolysis.