Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances

Expert consensus on early orthodontic treatment of class III malocclusion

The prevalence of Class III malocclusion varies among different countries and regions. The populations from Southeast Asian countries (Chinese and Malaysian) showed the highest prevalence rate of 15.8%, which can seriously affect oral function, facial appearance, and mental health. As anterior crossbite tends to worsen with growth, early orthodontic treatment can harness growth potential to normalize maxillofacial development or reduce skeletal malformation severity, thereby reducing the difficulty and shortening the treatment cycle of later-stage treatment. This is beneficial for the physical and mental growth of children. Therefore, early orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion is particularly important. Determining the optimal timing for early orthodontic treatment requires a comprehensive assessment of clinical manifestations, dental age, and skeletal age, and can lead to better results with less effort. Currently, standardized treatment guidelines for early orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion are lacking. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the etiology, clinical manifestations, classification, and early orthodontic techniques for Class III malocclusion, along with systematic discussions on selecting early treatment plans. The purpose of this expert consensus is to standardize clinical practices and improve the treatment outcomes of Class III malocclusion through early orthodontic treatment.

Comparison of the effectiveness of skeletal and tooth-borne protraction methods with or without alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction protocol in patients with Class III malocclusion

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the efficiency of maxillary protraction achieved through facemask treatment with either a hybrid-hyrax (HH) or an acrylic cap splint (ACS) appliance when used in conjunction with alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) or conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) protocols.

METHODS

This study analyzed a total of 60 patients in 4 groups of 15 patients each and treated with HH-Alt-RAMEC protocol (HH-Alt, aged 10.38 ± 1.19 years), ACS-Alt protocol (aged 10.43 ± 0.99 years), HH-RME protocol (aged 9.74 ± 1.05 years) and ACS-RME protocol (aged 10.70 ± 0.98 years). Lateral cephalograms were taken before and after the facemask were compared. A 1-way analysis of variance with a Tukey honest significant difference post-hoc test was used for intergroup comparisons, whereas a paired sample t test was employed for intragroup comparisons.

RESULTS

Correction of Class III skeletal malocclusion was achieved in all groups. HH-Alt showed significantly more maxillary protraction with an increase in AVRP of 4.02 mm compared with 2.65 mm in ACS-Alt and 2.3 mm in ACS-RME (P <0.001). HH-RME also showed a significantly more maxillary protraction in AVRP of 3.58 mm compared with 2.3 mm in ACS-RME (P <0.001). The rate of protraction was higher in HH-Alt (0.61 ± 0.16) and HH-RME (0.56 ± 0.29) than in ACS-RME (0.31 ± 0.12). The maxilla showed significantly more rotation in ACS-Alt (-1.66° ± 1.13°) and ACS-RME (-1.97 ± 1.75°) than in HH-Alt (-0.49° ± 1.18°) and HH-RME (-0.35° ± 1.86°), whereas the mandible showed significantly more clockwise rotation in ACS-RME (2.08 ± 1.71) than in HH-Alt (0.80 ± 0.94) and HH-RME (0.63 ± 1.82). The maxillary skeletal effect in the overjet correction was greater in HH-Alt (71.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

All treatment options achieved maxillary protraction. In the short term, hybrid groups (HH-Alt and HH-RME) provide more effective maxillary skeletal protraction than ACS-RME and demonstrate superior control in the vertical dimension than in tooth-borne groups. The Alt-RAMEC protocol improved the amount of maxillary protraction of the tooth-borne appliance group. The choice of anchorage of the appliance (skeletal or tooth-borne) is found to be more critical than the expansion method (RME or Alt-RAMEC).

Post-pubertal effects of the Face Mask Protocol with and without Bite Block appliance in the orthopedic treatment of Class III malocclusion: a comparative evaluation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the dento-skeletal changes observed in growing Class III patients treated with the Face Mask Protocol (FMP) with and without Bite Block (BB).

MATERIALS

Thirty subjects (12 f, 18 m) who underwent FM/BB therapy were compared to a matched group (FM) of 29 patients (15 f, 14 m) treated without BB. All patients were evaluated before treatment (T0), at the end of active treatment (T1), and at a post-pubertal follow-up observation (T2). A control group (CG) of 20 subjects (10 f, 10 m) with untreated Class III disharmony was used for the comparison of post-pubertal changes. Intergroup statistical comparisons were performed with the independent samples t-test (P < .05).

RESULTS

The comparison between treated samples showed a significant improvement of SN^GoGn (FM/BB vs FM, -2.1°), Overbite (FM/BB vs FM, +1.2 mm), and vertical position of lower molars FM/BB vs FM, -3 mm). When compared with the controls, both treated groups revealed a significant improvement of SNA (FM/BB, +1.8°; FM +2.1°), ANB (FM/BB +1.6°, FM +2.4°), gonial angle (FM/BB -4.9°; FM -4°), incisor inclination (Upper, FM/BB +1.7°, FM +2.3°; Lower, FM/BB -2.5°, FM -2.7°), and Overjet (FM/BB +3.2 mm; FM +4 mm). Improvement of SN^GoGn (-2.1°), Overbite (+1.8 mm), and vertical position of lower molars (-3.8 mm) were observed when FM/BB was compared with CG.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations are related to the difficulty to recruit a larger contemporary long-term control group due to ethical reasons.

CONCLUSION

Both FM protocols induced favorable changes in the treatment of Class III malocclusion with a good post-pubertal stability. The BB allows a more efficient control of the vertical skeletal relationship.

Efficacy of SAVE: A Novel Maxillary Protraction Device-A Finite Element Analysis

Introduction

This study describes a novel device known as "SAVE" to effectively protract the deficient maxilla in class III malocclusion by quantifying and evaluating the changes in the maxilla through a finite element analysis (FEA).

Materials and methods

The patented novel SAVE device was three-dimensionally modeled using Autodesk Fusion 360. An existing computed tomography (CT) scan of a patient exhibiting class III malocclusion was used to generate a finite element (FE) model. The total number of nodes was 8,49,682 and 5,30,716 elements. The material of choice for the appliance was medical-grade polyetheretherketone (PEEK) polymer. The loading was performed to simulate maxillary protraction (after assigning material properties). The loading forces of 3.5, 5.5, and 9 N were simulated on each side with 30° angulations to the occlusal plane. The color changes in terms of areas of maximum (red) and minimum (blue) deformation.

Results

The FEA results with protraction forces of 3.5, 5.5, and 9 N showed deformation of the maxilla in the forward and downward directions. Equivalent von Mises stress on the SAVE appliance showed stress on the superior surface of the main frame and on the area below the struts where the force module was attached. In relation to the implant, the stress concentration was on the posterior and superior area around the implant.

Conclusion

The FEM analysis force vectors showed a forward and downward deformation of the maxilla with counterclockwise rotation, supporting the fact that the novel appliance could bring about effective maxillary protraction in a shorter duration.

How to cite this article

Shetty S, T NB, Amin V, et al. Efficacy of SAVE: A Novel Maxillary Protraction Device-A Finite Element Analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(12):1377-1382.

Evaluation of the Effects of Orthopedic Treatment on the Dentofacial Structure and Upper Airway of Subjects with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Objective

The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and face mask treatment on the upper airway in patients with maxillary retrusion in two dimensions using digital cephalograms and volumetric evaluation using acoustic rhinometric measurements.

Methods

A total of 22 individuals with a concave profile and skeletal and dental Class III malocclusion during growth and development with a mean age of 9.9±1.38 years were included in the study. A bonded RME appliance and a petit face mask were adapted for the patients. Before treatment (T0) and after maxillary protraction (T1), lateral cephalometric films and acoustic rhinometric recordings were obtained. The dependent sample t-test was used for statistical evaluation.

Results

Cephalometric analysis revealed forward movement of the maxilla and backward downward rotation of the mandible. A significant increase was observed in the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal regions of the upper airway. Three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway by acoustic rhinometry revealed only an increase in the volumes of the left nasal cavity after decongestant administration. A statistically significant increase in acoustic rhinometric measurements in nasal valves. When the correlation of the cephalometric findings of the nasopharyngeal region with the acoustic rhinometry findings was examined, no statistically significant relationship was found.

Conclusion

As a result of this study, we observed an increase in the cephalometric measurements of the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal areas. A significant increase was observed in the minimal cross-sectional area measured by acoustic rhinometry.

Predictors of Long-Term Protraction Headgear Success in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A 5-Year Follow-Up

Patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) characteristically present with maxillary hypoplasia and class III malocclusion. Protraction headgear (PHG) is a commonly used treatment for this type of malocclusion, with the goal of reducing future surgical needs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of PHG treatment and determine the pretreatment predictors of long-term PHG success in patients with CLP. Twenty-nine patients with CLP who had undergone PHG treatment from 2012 to 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were included if they had a lateral cephalogram or CBCT before, immediately after, and at least 5 years after their PHG treatment. Patients were divided into surgery and nonsurgery groups based on their 5-year follow-up clinical presentation. Student t tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a multivariate logistic regression model were used to compare pretreatment and post-treatment changes in both groups. Immediately post-treatment, the maxilla advanced 2.6 mm, the maxillary dentition advanced 4.7 mm, and the mandible rotated downward 5.0 mm and backward 2.6 mm. At long-term follow up the maxilla advanced 0.0 mm while the mandible advanced an additional 7.5 mm. Thus, PHG treatment is effective at improving class III malocclusion in the short term, but may not prevent future surgical need for patients with more severe skeletal discrepancies. Variables predictive of future surgical need include ANB, anterior facial height, overjet, and starting age of treatment, with ANB as the most reliable early predictor.

Clinical Management of Facemasks for Early Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: A Survey among SIDO Members

To evaluate whether there are differences among orthodontists in the clinical management of facemask treatment for early treatment of Class III malocclusion, a survey consisting of 16 questions was conducted among members of the Italian Society of Orthodontics (SIDO). Sixty percent of the respondents were Specialists in Orthodontics (S) whereas 40% were General Dentists practicing Orthodontics (GD). Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize the collected data. Differences in answers between S and GD were assessed with the Fisher's exact test for dichotomous variables, chi-square test for qualitative variables, and Mann-Whitney test for ordinal variables. A total of 151 clinicians participated in this survey. As for treatment timing, about 80% of the participants reported treating Class III patients with RPE and facemask between 5 and 8 years of age. Most of the participants requested the patients to wear the facemask in the afternoon and at night for a period of 9 or 12 months with recommended forces of 500 g per side. Comparisons between S and GD showed that S preferred the Petit facemask whereas GD favored the Delaire's type facemask (Fisher's Exact test, p = 0.0005). S and GD also differed significantly in their judgment of the most critical time of treatment, which for the majority of GD was the initial period but for the S was the final period (Chi-square test p = 0.0188). This survey showed that the facemask is not well received by the patients who, along with their parents, express concerns regarding its tolerability.

Long-term effects produced by early treatment of Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask followed by fixed appliances: A multicentre retro-prospective controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the short- and long-term dentoskeletal effects of early Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask (RME/FM) followed by fixed appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 44 patients (27 females, 17 males) treated consecutively with RME/FM were included from the archives of 3 centres. Three lateral cephalograms were available: T0 (before the start of RME/FM therapy, mean age 8.1 ± 1.8 years), T1 (immediately after RME/FM, mean age 9.8 ± 1.6 years), and T2 (long-term observation, mean age 19.5 ± 1.6 years). A control group of 17 untreated Class III subjects (12 females and 5 males) also was selected. Between-group statistical comparisons were performed with ANCOVA.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences for any of the cephalometric variables were found at T0. In the short term, the treated group showed significant improvements in ANB (+2.9°), Wits appraisal (+2.7 mm), SNA (+1.8°) and SNB (-1.1°). A significant closure of CoGoMe angle (-1.3°) associated with smaller increments along Co-Gn (-2.4 mm) also was found together with a significant increase in intermaxillary divergence (+1.3°). In the long-term, significant improvements in ANB (+2.6°), Wits appraisal (+2.7 mm) and SNB (-1.7°) were recorded together with a significant closure of the CoGoMe angle (-2.9°). No significant long-term changes in vertical skeletal relationships were found.

CONCLUSIONS

RME/FM therapy was effective in improving Class III dentoskeletal relationships in the short term. These changes remained stable in the long-term due mainly to favourable mandibular changes.

Comparative assessment of facemask therapy with and without skeletal anchorage in growing Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP): A single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the maxillary protraction effect of facemask therapy with and without skeletal anchorage in growing Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients (aged 9-13 years) with UCLP having a GOSLON score 3 were selected for this prospective clinical study. The patients were allocated into two groups using computer generated random number table. Group I (facemask therapy along with two I shaped miniplates, FM + MP) and Group II (facemask mask along with tooth-anchored appliance, FM). Skeletal and dental parameters were evaluated on pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms and pharyngeal airway on cone-beam computed tomography systems (CBCT) for assessment of the treatment changes.

RESULTS

Both methods proved to be effective with statistically significant improvements in skeletal and dental parameters (p < .05). Skeletal parameters (e.g., SNA, convexity-point A, ANB) with the FM + MP group showed greater change compared to those with FM group (SNA, 2.56°; convexity-point A, 1.22°; ANB, 0.35°). Significant proclination of maxillary incisors was observed in the FM group as compared to FM + MP group (U1 to NA, 5.4°; 3.37 mm). A statistically significant increase in pharyngeal airway volume was noted in both groups (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

While both therapies are effective in protracting the maxilla in growing patients with UCLP, the FM + MP allows for a greater skeletal correction, minimizing the dental side effects seen with FM therapy alone. Thus, FM + MP appears to be a promising adjunct in reducing the severity of Class III skeletal correction needed in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP).

Evaluation of orthodontic habits regarding the use of miniplates in the correction of Skeletal Class III

AIMS

To determine the habits of Orthodontists in the management of moderate skeletal class III patients by using miniplates, and to assess the relationship between the factors that may hinder the implementation of such treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire was carried out using the Google Form® platform, which included 18 questions relating to the seniority of the practice of the orthodontists, the preferential treatment, the difficulties encountered, the results obtained, and the frequency of a relapse.

RESULTS

Experienced orthodontists (more than 10 years) treated skeletal class III malocclusion with the conventional facemask therapy, whereas orthodontists with less than 5 years of experience shifted to the miniplate technique which presented less dental effect and more skeletal correction with a decreased frequency of relapse.

CONCLUSION

High financial cost and increased care load were considered the main obstacles regarding the placement of the titanium miniplates in treating skeletal class III patients.

Posttreatment Stability Following Facemask Therapy in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review

Background

Skeletal class III malocclusion is a challenging condition that orthodontists frequently come across. The facemask (FM) is a device commonly used to treat this malocclusion. However, the stability of this orthopedic correction remains unclear, and collective documentation of the short-, mid-, and long-term stability after FM therapy is necessary.

Aim

The aim of the systematic review was to assess posttreatment stability following FM therapy in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.

Materials and methods

Through a predefined search strategy, electronic searching was conducted in PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Cochrane, Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science until 30th June 2022. Eligible study selection, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias were performed independently by two review authors according to the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2.0 tool) and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for nonrandomized trials. A total of 14 studies were finally considered eligible. The systematic review revealed that the maxillo-mandibular differential reverted to class III. The maxillary changes achieved were variable, with SNA angles ranging between -0.7° and 1.9°. Changes in the mandible were greater with an increase in the SNB angle ranging between 0.33° and 3.62°. The lower anterior facial height increased. The maxillary and mandibular incisors were proclined, and the overjet and overbite decreased. The soft tissue changes were insignificant.

Conclusion

The effects of FM therapy were found to be stable in the short-term follow-up period. The long-term follow-up revealed that the effects of FM therapy remained stable for the maxilla. However, the mandible continued to grow in a horizontal and unfavorable direction until the adolescent growth spurt.

Clinical significance

The major variable that determines the long-term success of FM therapy is the amount and direction of mandibular growth during the adolescent growth spurt. More focus on restricting unfavorable mandibular growth and duration of retention is needed for post-FM therapy.

Others

PROSPERO (CRD42021218960).

How to cite this article

Raghupathy Y, Ananthanarayanan V, Kailasam V, et al. Posttreatment Stability Following Facemask Therapy in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(6):897-907.

Long-term effects of lateral nasal wall anchored facemasks compared with tooth-borne facemasks

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the long-term effect and stability of skeletally anchored facemasks (SAFMs) with lateral nasal wall anchorage compared with conventional tooth-borne facemasks (TBFMs) in growing patients with a Class III relationship.

METHODS

A total of 180 subjects treated with SAFMs (n = 66) and TBFMs (n = 114) were screened. Thirty-four subjects were qualified and grouped into the SAFM group (n = 17) and TBFM group (n = 17). Lateral cephalograms were taken at the initial observation, after the protraction, and at the final observation.

RESULTS

Greater advancement of the maxilla was attained with SAFM than with TBFM after protraction (initial observation - after the protraction) (P <0.05). In particular, advancement of the midfacial area (SN-Or) was prominent and maintained after the postpubertal stage (P <0.05). The intermaxillary relationship was also improved (ANB, AB-MP) (P <0.05), and greater counterclockwise rotation of the palatal plane (FH-PP) was observed in the SAFM group compared with the TBFM group (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TBFM, the orthopedic effects of SAFM were greater in the midfacial area. The palatal plane had a greater counterclockwise rotation in the SAFM group than in the TBFM group. Maxilla (SN-Or), intermaxillary relationship (APDI), and palatal plane angle (FH-PP) demonstrated a significant difference between the 2 groups after the postpubertal stage.

The effect of tooth borne versus skeletally anchored Alt-RAMEC protocol in early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a single-centre randomized clinical trial

TRIAL DESIGN

This was a randomized, controlled trial designed to compare outcomes between the use of dental and skeletal anchorage, using the Face mask/Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Contraction (FM/Alt-RAMEC) protocol.

METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS

The study was carried out at Mater Dei Hospital, Malta and included prepubertal skeletal Class III malocclusion patients where the aetiology was primarily maxillary hypoplasia.

INTERVENTIONS

Two groups were assigned. Group I was treated with FM/Alt-RAMEC and group II was treated with skeletally anchored FM/Alt-RAMEC. Wear-time (WT) of the FM was monitored using TheraMon microsensors. Patients were instructed to wear the FM for 12-14 hours/day for 9 months. Changes were evaluated with lateral cephalograms and analysed with Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests. ANOVA was used to analyse the effect of gender on compliance parameters. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between compliance and skeletal changes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in patients treated with these two protocols.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was to assess skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes in patients treated with skeletally anchored FM/RME and tooth-borne FM/RME; utilizing Alt-RAMEC protocol. The secondary outcome was compliance rate and adherence to FM wear among patients.

RANDOMIZATION

Randomizer software and the sealed envelope technique were used to randomly allocate patients 1:1 into either group I (tooth-borne FM/Alt-RAMEC) or group II (skeletally anchored FM/Alt-RAMEC).

BLINDING

It was not possible to blind to treatment allocation, but blinding was used when assessing the outcomes.

RESULTS

Numbers randomized and analysed. Thirty-five patients were allocated. Group I consisted of 18 subjects and group II consisted of 17 subjects. One patient in group I dropped out due to illness, so 17 subjects in each group completed the study.

OUTCOMES

Post-treatment changes in group I showed significant increases in SNA (2.10°), ANB (3.90°), Wits (4.70 mm), and overjet (5.40 mm). Group II showed significant increases in ANB (3.10°), Wits (3.20 mm), and overjet (4.50 mm). Wearing time for group I patients was 7.87 ± 2.88 hours/day and for group II was 6.98 ± 2.68 hours/day, with no significant difference between the groups.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of long-term follow-up post-treatment, making the conclusion applicable only in the short term.

HARMS

No harm was observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite the large difference between the measured and the patient-reported daily WT, both tooth-borne and skeletally anchored FM/Alt-RAMEC showed positive, similar, skeletal and dental effects.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN12197405.

Early Orthodontic Intervention in Cleft Lip-Palate and Noncleft Children with Developing Class III Malocclusion: A Clinical Study

Context

Orthopedic correction of skeletal class III malocclusion in a growing patient is crucial as it can circumvent future surgical procedures.

Aims

The aim of the study is to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of early orthodontic intervention of developing class III malocclusion.

Settings and design

A final sample of 38 children in the age-group of 6-14 years having skeletal class III malocclusion was selected. Subjects were divided into two groups; group I-included 18 children (male-10, female-8) with surgically repaired cleft lip and palate and group II-20 children (male-14, female-6) without any cleft lip and palate.

Materials and methods

Cemented rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances with 11 mm hyrax screws were used in all patients. Elastic traction forces were applied to the reverse-pull headgear worn by the patients. Both pre- and posttreatment records along with lateral cephalograms were taken.

Statistical analysis used

The pre- and posttreatment mean and standard deviation measurements of the angular and linear observations were statistically analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 13) and were correlated through independent t-test and paired t-test.

Results

Following headgear therapy, improvement was greater in the cleft group than noncleft group with greater advancement of maxilla along with clockwise rotation of mandible in clefts.

Conclusion

Protraction mechanics with expansion can be employed successfully in repaired cleft lip and palate and noncleft prepubertal children having developing class III malocclusion, showing concave profile, and retrusive maxilla.

Key message

Accurate diagnosis and understanding of the individual growth pattern are crucial in the early interception of a class III malocclusion to achieve a more favorable facial profile.

How to cite this article

Sahoo SS, Dash JK, Sahoo PK, et al. Early Orthodontic Intervention in Cleft Lip-Palate and Noncleft Children with Developing Class III Malocclusion: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(5):716-723.

A study of transverse maxillomandibular discrepancy and dental compensation in early mixed dentition with skeletal Class III malocclusion without posterior crossbite

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate transverse maxillomandibular discrepancy and dental compensation in first molar areas in 7- to 9-year-old children with skeletal Class III malocclusion without posterior crossbite using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODS

The sample of this retrospective study consisted of 60 children (7 to 9 years old), who were divided into the skeletal Class III malocclusion group (study group, skeletal Class III malocclusion without posterior crossbite, N = 31) and the Class I occlusion group (control group, Class I occlusion with one or two impacted teeth, N = 30). CBCT data were obtained from the database of the Department of Radiology of Hospital of Stomatology, Shandong University. For three-dimensional reconstruction of the head, the dental arch width, basal bone width, and buccolingual inclination angle were measured using MIMICS 21.0 software. Independent-sample t tests were used to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the children was 8.18±0.83years. The width of the maxillary basal bone was significantly smaller in the skeletal Class III malocclusion group (59.75 ± 3.14 mm) than in the Class I occlusion group (62.39 ± 3.01 mm) (P < 0.01). The mandibular basal bone width was significantly larger in the skeletal Class III malocclusion group (60.00 ± 2.56 mm) than in the Class I occlusion group (58.19 ± 2.42 mm) (P < 0.01). The difference in the width of the maxillary and mandibular bases in the skeletal Class III malocclusion group (-0.25 ± 1.73 mm) was significantly different from that in the Class I occlusion group (4.20 ± 1.25 mm) (P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the upper or lower dental arch width between the two groups (P > 0.05). The buccal inclination of the maxillary molars in the skeletal Class III malocclusion group (31.4° ± 8.9°) was significantly higher than that in the Class I occlusion group (17.64° ± 7.3°) (P < 0.01), as was the lingual inclination angle of mandibular molars (45.24° ± 8.3° vs. 37.96° ± 10.18°; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Transverse maxillary and mandibular discrepancies in the posterior area and transverse dental compensation were found in the early mixed dentition of patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion without posterior crossbite. This suggests that even in the absence of posterior crossbite, maxillary expansion can be attempted to correct the maxillomandibular transverse discrepancy.

Correction of late adolescent skeletal Class III using the Alt-RAMEC protocol and skeletal anchorage

This case report describes skeletal anchorage-supported maxillary protraction performed with the Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction (Alt-RAMEC) protocol over a treatment duration of 14 months in a 16-year-old female patient who was in the late growth-development period. Miniplates were applied to the patient's aperture piriformis area to apply force from the protraction appliance. After 9 weeks of following the Alt-RAMEC protocol, miniplates were used to transfer a unilateral 500-g protraction force to a Petit-type face mask. A significant improvement was observed in the soft tissue profile in measurements made both cephalometrically and in three dimensional photographs. Subsequently, the second phase of fixed orthodontic treatment was started and the treatment was completed with the retention phase. Following treatment completion, occlusion, smile esthetics, and soft tissue profile improved significantly in response to orthopedic and orthodontic treatment.

A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask

BACKGROUND

This study compared the skeletal and dental effects of a hybrid maxillary expander with mandibular miniplates (HE-MP) and Class III elastics to conventional tooth-borne rapid maxillary expander and face mask (RME-FM) in skeletal Class III treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 36 skeletal Class III patients. Eighteen patients (mean age 10.24 ± 1.31 years) were treated with a hybrid expander, two mandibular L-shaped miniplates and full-time Class III elastics (HE-MP group). Their results were compared to a group of patients treated with conventional RME-FM (n = 18; mean age 10.56 ± 1.41 year). Radiographs were taken before (T1) and after treatment (T2). All patients were in cervical maturation stages CS1-CS3 at T1. The measured outcomes were the changes in sagittal and vertical skeletal and dental cephalometric measurements.

RESULTS

Treatment time was approximately 15.5 ± 2.8 months with the HE-MP and 11.85 ± 3.41 months for the RME-FM. The Class III malocclusion was corrected in both groups with significant changes. The maxilla advanced more in the HE-MP group, with an increase in SNA of 4.26° ± 2.15° compared to 1.14 ± 0.93 in the RME-FM group (p < 0.001). The effect on the mandible was similar in both groups, while the overall skeletal change was significantly greater with HE-MP, with an increase in the ANB of 5.25° ± 2.03° and a Wits appraisal increase of 6.03 ± 3.13 mm, as opposed to 2.04° ± 1.07° and 2.94 ± 1.75 mm with the RME-FM (p < 0.001). Dental changes were significantly higher with RME-FM, with an increase in incisor inclination (U1-SN) of 5.02° ± 3.93° (p < 0.001), with no significant changes in the HE-MP group. The mandibular incisors retroclined by 5.29° ± 3.57° at L1-MP with the RME-FM, while they advanced slightly with the HE-MP by 2.87° ± 5.37° (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of skeletal anchorage for maxillary expansion and protraction significantly increases skeletal effects and reduces dental side effects compared to tooth-borne maxillary expansion and protraction. These results need to be investigated in the long term.

M. Effectiveness of Management of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion during Primary, Mixed, and Permanent Dentition Period – A Literature Review

Skeletal class III malocclusion is one of the most challenging conditions in clinical dental practice. Various treatment options are available for the management of the condition such as reverse twin block appliance, facemask appliance, chin cup therapy, bone anchorage maxillary protraction device, and tandem traction bow appliance. However, treatment timing is controversial. There are various advantages and disadvantages following the correction of skeletal class III malocclusion during primary, mixed and permanent dentition period. Hence, this review aims to compile the available literature regarding the effectiveness of correction of skeletal class III malocclusion during primary, mixed, and permanent dentition.

Lower Molar Distalization Using Clear Aligners: Bodily Movement or Uprighting? A Preliminary Study

Background: Lower molar distalization is considered to be one of the most difficult movements to obtain with clear aligners. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility to distalize the lower molars using clear aligners in adults without miniscrews. Material and methods: rx cephalograms of 16 patients (8 males, 8 females; mean age of 25.6 years), who underwent lower molar distalization, were analyzed. Cephalograms were taken before the beginning of treatment (T0) and after the end of treatment (T1). Dental and skeletal changes between T0 and T1 were evaluated. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: At T1, the lower second molar moved distally 2.47 mm, but there was a significant tipping (p = 0.027); the same result was found at the first molar, with a mean distal movement of 1.16 mm and a significant tipping (p = 0.003). No significant changes were detected on the sagittal and vertical skeletal variables. Conclusion: Clear aligner therapy can provide more distal tipping than bodily movement in the lower molars when a distalization is programmed. This movement could be sufficient to correct the initial malocclusion and gain a class I molar relationship.

Redirecting mandibular growth through orthodontic dentoalveolar height development in growing patients with Class III malocclusion undergoing maxillary orthopedic protraction

INTRODUCTION

To control mandibular growth could be the determining factor for any growing patients with Class III malocclusion undergoing maxillary orthopedics. It has been reported that orthodontic dentoalveolar height development (ODHD) through orthodontic total arch extrusion might redirect mandibular growth backward and downward in growing patients with Class III malocclusion. We hypothesized bimaxillary-ODHD (bimax-ODHD) should be equal to or exceed the mandibular condylar growth to redirect the mandible to grow downward and backward in growing patients with Class III malocclusion.

METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive growing patients with Class III malocclusion who underwent maxillary orthopedics (MO) were recruited in this study, including 13 control patients (aged 12.70 ± 2.09 years) who underwent treatment of MO with no ODHD and another 14 patients who underwent MO and ODHD (ODHD group; aged 12.75 ± 1.40 years). The pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) CBCT images were superimposed and measured for the amount of ODHD and maxillary downward growth (ODHD-Mx), ODHD in the mandible (ODHD-Mn), T2 - T1 changes on facial convexity, y-axis, maxillary and condylar growth, and mandibular posture. The data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The T2 - T1 treatment duration was 7.5 months, significantly (P = 0.028) shorter in the ODHD group. The maxillary and condylar growth were similar among the groups. The mandible grew forward and downward in the control group, the ODHD-Mx and ODHD-Mn were significantly (P = 0.011) more in the ODHD group, and the mandible significantly (P = 0.001) grew backward and downward. The mandible grew backward and downward when the bimax-ODHD (ODHD-Mx + ODHD-Mn) exceeded the condylar growth (r = 0.715; P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The bimax-ODHD, including the downward growth of the maxilla, should be equal to or exceed the mandibular condylar growth to redirect the mandible to grow downward and backward and improve the skeletal facial convexity in growing patients with Class III malocclusion.

Very early orthodontic treatment: when, why and how?

Introduction:

Several orthodontic problems should already be treated at an early age to prevent the necessity of future complex and expensive procedures. Scientific evidence suggests that posterior crossbites, mild to moderate Class III, as well as certain Class II malocclusions, open bites and arch length discrepancies can benefit from simple, but efficient interceptive therapy.

Objective:

To summarize the existing evidence-based literature on early orthodontic treatment, and to illustrate its application and effectiveness by showcasing multiple clinical examples.

Conclusion:

Early short-term interceptive orthodontic treatment with simple appliances, in the deciduous or early mixed dentition phase, can efficiently correct certain malocclusions and help to either reduce the complexity or even avoid the necessity of complex and expensive procedures during puberty. For certain patients with significant arch length discrepancy the concept of serial extractions should be part of the orthodontic armamentarium.

Management of skeletal Cl III malocclusion using simultaneous alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) and facemask protraction in adolescence

Cl III malocclusion with a significant skeletal component presents a therapeutic challenge during adolescence. This article presents the encouraging results of an individualized two-stage treatment approach adopted for successful nonsurgical correction of severe skeletal Cl III malocclusion in an adolescent girl after the onset of puberty. An orthopedic approach involving simultaneous alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) protocol and protraction facemask (PFM) therapy was adopted in phase 1 to correct the sagittal skeletal discrepancy. In phase 2, fixed orthodontic therapy aided by the interim use of a modified occlusal settling appliance was undertaken to obtain well-interdigitated occlusion. Meticulously planned and well-executed orthopedic and orthodontic approach, combined with good patient compliance and favorable growth pattern, helped establish well-balanced facial harmony with a proper maxillomandibular relationship and satisfactory overjet and overbite. The results remained stable during the 4-year follow-up. Alt-RAMEC-PFM therapy accompanied by fixed mechanotherapy is a viable option to treat severe skeletal Cl III malocclusion in adolescents.

Volumetric Analysis of the Jaws in Skeletal Class I and III Patients with Different Facial Divergence Using CBCT Imaging

Aim

The main objective was to evaluate any possible maxillary or mandibular volumetric difference between hyperdivergent skeletal Class III (CIII), normodivergent skeletal CIII, hypodivergent skeletal CIII, and normodivergent skeletal Class I (CI) patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Also, the secondary objective was to investigate any possible correlation between CBCT-derived lateral cephalometric variables and the mandibular and maxillary volumes (MdV and MxV, respectively).

Materials and Methods

80 CBCT images of patients between 18 and 32 years of age were taken with one CBCT imaging device (Scanora 3D®, Soredex, Tuusula, Finland). The sample consisted of four groups: 20 hypodivergent skeletal CIII (11 males and 9 females), 20 normodivergent skeletal CIII (7 males and 13 females), 20 hyperdivergent skeletal CIII (8 males and 12 females), and 20 normodivergent skeletal CI (5 males and 15 females). The volumes of both jaws and the ratio of MxV/MdV were obtained using Mimics™ 19 software (Materialise, NV, Belgium), and 2D variables were obtained from CBCT-derived lateral cephalogram using AudaxCeph™ software (Orthodontic software suite, Ljubljana, Slovenia). One-way ANOVA test and Kruskal–Wallis analysis were employed to detect any possible significant difference between the volumetric variables, whereas Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to detect any possible relationship between the 2D variables and the volumetric measurements.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in the maxillary volume or maxillary/mandibular ratio between the four groups (p=0.081 and 0.432, respectively). There was a significant difference in MdV between CIII hypodivergent (higher mean) and CIII hyperdivergent (p=0.039). There were some correlations between the MdV and 2D variables in the four studied groups especially in the posterior facial height (S-Go) and the facial depth (N-Go). There were some weaker correlations between the MxV and some 2D variables in the CIII hypodivergent and hyperdivergent groups.

Conclusions

The mandibular volume of the Class III hypodivergent patient was significantly greater than that of the Class III hyperdivergent patients. Correlations between the maxillary or mandibular volumes were found with some of the 2D variables. The volume of both jaws increased when the maxillofacial complex moved toward a horizontal growth pattern.

Intercepting of Class III Malocclusion with a Novel Mechanism Built on the Orthopaedic Appliance: A Case Report

AIM

The following case report aims to show a novel orthopaedic appliance to reduce the side effects of the orthopaedic Class III treatment through the use of two acrylic splints combined with a PowerScope device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This case report describes the treatment of a 6-year-old patient with a skeletal Class III relationship with a maxillary deficiency and a severe hyperdivergency. The patient underwent a sagittal orthopaedic treatment with a PowerScope device for 12 months. The retention period lasted 4 months.

RESULTS

The response of the craniofacial complex to the active orthopaedic treatment of the Class III malocclusion with the PowerScope™ device splints consisted of significant changes in maxillary growth and position. Both angular and linear sagittal measurements of the maxilla showed improvements during active treatment, respectively, of 0.6° and 1.2 mm (SNA from 75.8° to 76.4°; maxillary length from 38.8 mm to 40 mm). These effects allowed for a highly significant improvement in the maxillomandibular skeletal relationships. ANB improved by 1.6° and Wits appraisal by 4 mm. Using this appliance in a hyperdivergent patient, we obtained a vertical control of the mandible with a SN/Go-Gn stable value at 40° and a significant improvement of the ANS-PNS/GoGn angle from 30° to 28°.

CONCLUSION

The Class III orthopaedic treatment with the PowerScope™ telescopic and NiTi spring device mounted on the upper and lower resin splints in a Class III correction offered good vertical control during the early orthopaedic treatment by improving the skeletal discrepancy and controlling the hyperdivergency, which is one of the most difficult factors to control in Class III malocclusions.

The Practitioner’s Eye: The Ricketts Technique Elements in Non-Extraction Treatment Camouflaging Skeletal Class III with Bite Asymmetry—A Case Series Presentation

The study presents four cases of camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III with occlusal asymmetry in adult patients. Cephalometric analysis was performed using two different reference lines, S-N and FH. The treatment was carried out without the use of additional fixed appliances, no extraoral elastics for maxillary protection, and no extraction of teeth in the mandible. In addition to the characteristic elements and archwires taken from the Ricketts technique, NiTi, TMA, Wilcock archwires, Class III asymmetric intraoral elastic and criss-cross as well as individualized biomechanical systems were used. It has been proven that mild and moderate skeletal Class III with occlusal asymmetry can be treated with orthodontic camouflage, without additional fixed appliances for expansion or protraction of the maxilla. Moreover, it has been shown that it is possible to effectively treat this defect without extracting the teeth in the mand.

Protraction Headgear Compliance and Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

Assess cephalometric parameters and the need for orthognathic surgery (OS) and its relationship with compliance in protraction headgear (PHG).

Retrospective case series.

Hospital cleft-craniofacial center.

23 patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate and history of lip and palate repair.

Patients received PHG and orthodontic treatment. Compliant patients were compared to patients that were not. Protraction was applied with 170-gram elastics and patients were instructed to wear for at least 12 hours daily.

Cephalometric measurements at initial (T1), post-PHG (T2), and pre-surgical or post-orthodontic treatment (T3) of at least age 15 for females and 17 for males and the presence of OS were compared.

83% (19) of patients reported compliance with therapy. Of those compliant, 68% (13) had OS and 32% (6) did not (P = .99). Inter-group comparisons at T1 between compliant and noncompliant showed no significant differences and the non-OS patients started with larger nasolabial angles (P < .05). At T2, there were no significant cephalometric differences between groups. At T3, compliant patients showed significantly more upper incisor proclination than noncompliant patients. Between OS and non-OS, OS patients had significantly decreased ANB, Wits, convexity, overjet, and FMA and larger nasolabial angles (P < .05).

Patients compliant with PHG showed no difference in the need for OS. However, after orthodontic treatment, compliant patients showed more upper incisor proclination and OS patients with decreased ANB, Wits, convexity, overjet, FMA, and larger nasolabial angles.

Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage

OBJECTIVES

To investigate long-term outcomes of dentoskeletal changes induced by facemask therapy using skeletal anchorage in Class III patients and compare them to those of conventional tooth-borne anchorage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 20 patients who received facemask (FM) therapy with miniplates as anchorage for maxillary protraction (Miniplate/FM group, 10.6 ± 1.1 years old [mean ± SD]) and 23 patients who were treated with facemask with rapid maxillary expander (RME/FM group, 10.0 ± 1.5 years old [mean ± SD]). Dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms at pretreatment (T1), after facemask therapy (T2), and at the post-pubertal stage (T3). Cephalometric changes were compared between groups and clinical success rates at T3 were evaluated.

RESULTS

SNA and A to N perpendicular to FH increased significantly more in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group when comparing short-term effects of facemask therapy (T1-T2). ANB, Wits appraisal, Angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, and overjet decreased significantly more in the RME/FM group than in the Miniplate/FM group after facemask therapy (T2-T3). A more favorable intermaxillary relationship was observed in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group in long-term observations (T1-T3). Clinical success rate at T3 was 95% in the Miniplate/FM group and 85% in the RME/FM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage showed a greater advancement of the maxilla and more favorable stability for correction of Class III malocclusion in the long-term than conventional facemask therapy with tooth-borne anchorage.

Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis

Background

To evaluate morphologic differences between class III malocclusion success and failure treatment subjects in order to identify which variables are more predictive for long-term stability in early orthopedic treatment. In this retrospective study, 31 patients were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics (Rome Tor Vergata). Inclusion criteria were as follows: white ancestry, class III malocclusion, mixed dentition, cervical stage (CS) 1-2, no pseudo-class III. Pre-treatment radiographic and cast records were collected. Each patient underwent rapid maxillary expansion/facial mask/bite block (RME/FM/BB) orthopedic treatment until correction. At T1 (permanent dentition, CS4), records were recollected. According to treatment stability, relapse group (RG, 19) and success group (SG, 12) were identified. Sagittal and vertical cephalometric and digital cast measurements were performed. Student’s t tests were used for statistically significant differences inter and intra groups. For discriminant analysis, relapse or success status was added to each patient’s T0 data.

Results

At T0, RG showed larger upper anterior transversal width (p = 0.0266), while at T1 the upper anterior length was shorter than SG (p = 0.0028). Between T1 and T0, both groups showed larger upper anterior and posterior transversal widths. SG had greater upper anterior (p = 0.0066) and posterior (p = 0.449) sagittal length. RG presented larger lower anterior (p = 0.0012) and posterior (p = 0.0002) transversal widths, while there were no differences in SG lower arch. Discriminant analysis provided two predictive variables with an accuracy of 80.6%: upper anterior length and upper posterior length.

Conclusion

A shorter and wider maxilla could be a predisposing factor for relapse and failure of the early orthopedic treatment of class III malocclusion patients. The absence of mandibular changes could be predictable for treatment success.

The biological sex lens on early orthopaedic treatment duration and outcomes in Class III orthodontic patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Treatment outcomes for Class III orthopaedic treatment are highly unpredictable and dependent on the timing of interception, age, and biological sex.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of sex dimorphism on outcomes and duration of orthopaedic treatment for Class III malocclusion in young children.

SEARCH METHODS

Unrestricted search in six electronic databases until May 2021 was conducted. Supplemented by search in resources for published, unpublished literature, and ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials reporting the use of Class III growth modification appliances, with baseline and outcome data for both sexes, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study selection and data extraction were performed blindly and in duplicate by two reviewers. ROBINS-I, Cochrane Risk of Bias, and GRADE tools were used for certainty assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 2429 records were screened. Four trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, one was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing facemask and facemask with mini-screw. Two clinical trials evaluated the effects of facemask appliance, one had a control group, another was prospective non-controlled. One compared the effects of the maxillary protraction bow appliance to a no treatment control. Two of the clinical trials were appraised as low and one was appraised as high risk of bias. The overall certainty of the available evidence was assessed as moderate. There was significant clinical heterogeneity in terms of methodology, type of intervention, and the measured outcomes, precluding a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal variations in sagittal, vertical, and dentoalveolar post-treatment cephalometric changes were reported between sexes. The available evidence is unclear to support these variations. Long-term-powered RCTs assessing cephalometric outcomes between sexes until the end of growth spurt and without pooling are not available, therefore, much needed.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO database number CRD42020185797.

Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Pushing Splints 3 (PS3) device was recently introduced for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in children.

Objectives

To assess the effect on the sagittal maxillary position (SNA, primary outcome) of PS3 therapy compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy (RME/FM) and to compare skeletal and dento-alveolar effects in growing Class III patients.

Trial design

This trial was a single-centre randomized controlled trial with two groups randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio of equal size by sealed-envelope randomization, conducted at the Dentistry Unit of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS (Rome, Italy).

Methods

A total of 48 patients with Class III malocclusion were included in the study and randomly allocated to the two groups: PS3 therapy and RME/FM therapy. Only the RME/FM group underwent palatal expansion, and both groups were instructed to wear the appliances 14 hours/day. Pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) cephalograms were taken. An independent sample t-test and regression analysis were used to analyse the data (P value <0.05). Researchers involved in statistics and tracings were blinded to the treatment allocation.

Results

A total of 42 patients (21 for each group) completed the study. The maxillary sagittal position improved similarly in both groups (SNA = 0.4°; P = 0.547). A statistically significant decrease of SNPg angle (−1.6°; P < 0.001) and increase of ANPg angle (1.4°; P = 0.018) were found in the RME/FM group compared with PS3 group. CoGoMe angle significantly decreased in RME/FM group compared with PS3 group (−1.7°; P = 0.042). The regression analysis showed an association between SN/MP angle at T0 and the differences between T1 and T0 of SNPg (B = 0.13; P = 0.005) and SN/MP (B = −0.19; P = 0.034). Only three patients (PS3 = 2; RME/FM = 1) had breakages of the devices.

Limitations

Results are limited to short-term effects.

Conclusion

RME/FM therapy and PS3 are both effective therapies for the early correction of Class III malocclusion. The PS3 controlled better mandibular divergency reducing the clockwise rotation in patients with higher mandibular inclination.

Registration

This study was not registered in a clinical trial registry.

Sexual dimorphism in the long-term stability (10 years) of skeletal Class III treatment

BACKGROUND

Class III malocclusion is associated with high sexual dimorphism, especially in individuals older than 13 years of age, with significant differences in growth between males and females during the pubertal and postpubertal stages, and in adulthood. The aim of this research was to examine differences between males and females in long-term stability (10 years) of treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion.

METHODS

Thirty patients (15 males and 15 females) with skeletal Class III malocclusion, who had been treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) combined with face mask protraction followed by fixed appliances, were selected sequentially. Thirty patients (15 males and 15 females) with skeletal Class I and mesofacial patterns treated only with fixed appliances for dental problems served as the control group. Differences between groups and sexes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms taken at the start of treatment (T0), immediately after the end of treatment (T1), and after 10 years (T2). The long-term treatment success rate was calculated.

RESULTS

Ten years after Class III treatment, overjet and overbite relapse occurred similarly in females (- 0.68 ± 0.7 mm; - 0.38 ± 0.75 mm, respectively) and males (- 1.09 ± 1.47 mm; - 0.64 ± 0.9 mm, respectively); the ANB angle and Wits appraisal became significantly more negative in males (- 1.37 ± 1.06°; - 2.7 ± 2.53 mm) than in females (- 0.18 ± 1.26°; - 0.46 ± 1.94 mm). The success rate was 73.3% in males and 80% in females.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in the long-term stability of Class III treatment outcomes have been found between males and females, with a larger skeletal Class III relapse and lower long-term success rates in males.

A postero-anterior cephalometric evaluation of different rapid maxillary expansion appliances

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate dental and skeletal changes induced by tooth-bone-borne, tooth-tissue-borne, and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances using postero-anterior (PA) cephalometric radiographs.

METHODS

A total of 54 patients' (25 boys, 29 girls) PA cephalometric radiographs who had bilateral posterior crossbite and RME treatment were included and divided into three groups according to the type of appliance used during treatment: tooth-bone-borne RME appliance (hybrid Hyrax) (7 boys, 11 girls, mean age 13.28 ± 1.20 years), tooth-tissue-borne RME appliance (TTB) (8 boys, 10 girls, mean age 13.08 ± 1.06 years) and tooth-borne RME appliance (Hyrax) (10 boys, 8 girls, mean age 12.05 ± 1.35 years). Pretreatment (T0) and posttreatment (T1) PA cephalometric radiographs were analyzed with Dolphin software v. 11.7 (Chatsworth, CA). The comparisons of the groups were performed with Two-way analysis of variance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Significant and equal increase of right molar relationship and upper intermolar molar widths occurred in all groups. Dental midline discrepancy showed significant increase in only hybrid Hyrax group between T0 and T1. Significant increases were reported for lateronasal width in hybrid Hyrax and tooth-tissue-borne groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both skeletal and dental changes were observed after RME in all groups. However, the greatest skeletal changes were seen in hybrid Hyrax and tooth-tissue-borne groups.

Treatment of Class III Malocclusion with Activation-Deactivation Rapid Palatal Expansion and Reverse Headgear in a Growing Patient (Alternate-Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Contraction)

Treatment of Class III malocclusion is a challenge for orthodontists. The best time to intercept this malocclusion is as early as in the deciduous dentition. Orthopedic management of Class III individuals with retruded maxilla is by protraction facemask along with rapid maxillary expansion (RME). It results in forward and downward maxillary growth and backward mandibular rotation. Alternate RME and contraction (Alt-RAMEC) produces faster and more efficient results than maxillary protraction alone. The present case report describes the clinical application of Alt-RAMEC protocol for the treatment of a Class III malocclusion.

Effectiveness of Tongue Crib Combination Treating Severe Skeletal Angle Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition

Objective

To evaluate the treatment effects of tongue crib combination for treating severe skeletal Angle class III malocclusion in mixed dentition by X-ray cephalometric analysis.

Materials and methods

A sample of 22 patients with severe skeletal Angle class III malocclusion of deficiency maxilla and overgrown mandible in mixed dentition was prospectively collected and equally divided into two groups. The patients (males 6 and females 5; mean age 8.35 ± 1.6 years) in the study group were treated with tongue crib combination, and the untreated patients (females 5, males 6; mean age 8.12 ± 1.3 years) served as the control group. X-ray cephalometric films were measured before and after treatment for comparing the change of occlusion, maxilla, mandible, and soft tissue. A paired t-test was used by SPSS 21.0 statistical software. The intragroup data were compared by using the Wilcoxon test, and intergroup data were compared by using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05).

Results

In the study group, all patients got a favorable facial profile. Anterior and posterior teeth crossbite and upper and lower first molars relationships were improved. In cephalometric measurement, significant changes were noted in the maxillary skeletal component. The significant forward growth of the maxilla exhibited in a statistical increase of SNA, ANS-PNS, Wits appraisal, p < 0.05. The mandible revealed slightly posterior rotation by no significant decrease in SNB and no change Co-Gn. After 1-year of retention, the changes of the teeth showed self-correction and facial profile improved further. Regarding vertical changes, maintenance of growth was shown a small non-significant increase of FMA, N-Me, and ANS-Me. There is a significant difference from those in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Tongue crib combination is an effective device for the patients in the growing period with skeletal Angle class III malocclusion by improving the maxillary growth and limiting the mandibular growth.

How to cite this article

Zhao W, Chen Y, Kyung H-M, et al. Effectiveness of Tongue Crib Combination Treating Severe Skeletal Angle Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(6):668–676.

Comparison of Soft Tissue Changes Produced by Two Different Appliances on Mixed Dentition Children

Objective

This study was focused on comparing and analyzing the soft tissue changes induced by Reverse Twin-Block (RTB) and Reverse Pull Face Mask (RPFM) in early and late mixed dentition Malay children having Class III malocclusion.

Methods

This cross-sectional study includes a total sample of 95 Malay children of both early (8-9 years) and late (10-11 years) mixed dentition stages. The comparison was between 49 samples treated by RTB and 46 samples treated by RPFM. Both pre- and posttreatment changes were assessed with Holdaway's analysis using the CASSOS software. In each cephalogram, 71 anatomic landmarks were traced. Descriptive and multiple regression analyses were performed for statistical evaluation.

Results

Statistically significant changes were noticed in soft tissue facial angle, subnasale to H-line, skeletal profile convexity, upper lip strain, H-line angle, lower lip to H-line, and inferior sulcus to H-line measurements. Gender disparity was noticed in upper lip strain. Other significant changes were influenced by the type of appliance. However, the mean differences were minute to notice clinically. Age difference did not have any effect on the treatment changes.

Conclusions

RPFM revealed treatment outcome with more protruded upper lip than RTB.

Long-term maxillary anteroposterior changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Maxillary protraction with or without expansion is a widely known orthopedic treatment modality in growing skeletal Class III patients. However, limited data are available regarding the outcomes of long-term changes in the maxilla. Aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of the long-term maxillary anteroposterior changes following a facemask therapy with or without rapid maxillary expansion in growing skeletal Class III patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Embase. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, published up to Sep. 2020, with maxillary protraction and/or expansion as keywords were included in this meta-analysis. Risk of bias within and across studies were assessed using the Cochrane tools (RoB2.0 and ROBINS-I) and GRADE approach. Overall and subgroup comparisons with the random-effect model were performed in this meta-analysis. Meta-regression models were designed to determine potential heterogeneity.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase (Mean difference, 2.29°; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-2.73; and p < 0.001 after facemask (FM) protraction. Mean difference, 1.73°; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.11; and p < 0.001 after rapid maxillary expansion(RME) and facemask protraction) in the Sella-Nasion-A point (SNA) angle in the treatment groups as compared with the control groups, when measured during the less than 3-year follow-up period. However, no statistically significant changes (Mean difference, 0.28°; 95% confidence interval, -0.57-1.13; and p = 0.52 after facemask protraction. Mean difference, 0.34°; 95% confidence interval, -0.64-1.33; and p = 0.50 after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask protraction) were observed in the SNA angle in the groups, when measured after 3 years of follow-up. Meta-regression analysis also showed that with increased follow-up duration, the effectiveness of maxillary protraction decreased.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis revealed that maxillary protraction therapy could be effective for a short-term in correcting maxillary hypoplasia and the treatment result was not affected by mean age and sex. However, with increased follow-up duration, the sagittal maxillary changes gradually decreased. Limitations on this review were only the SNA angle was used and clinical heterogeneity was not discussed. The quality of evidence was moderate. Further long-term observational studies are necessary for a comprehensive evaluation of the effects on maxillary skeletal changes.

A comparative evaluation of midfacial soft tissue and nasal bone changes with two maxillary protraction protocols: Tooth-borne vs skeletal-anchored facemasks

OBJECTIVES

Greater advancement of the maxilla can be achieved with skeletal-anchored facemasks (SAFM) using miniplates than with conventional tooth-borne facemasks (TBFM). The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of TBFM and SAFM on midfacial soft tissue and nasal bone up to two years after treatment.

SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION

Sixty-seven growing patients with Class III malocclusions were treated with facemasks. They were divided into a SAFM group with 31 subjects (average age 11.1 years) and a TBFM group with 36 subjects (average age 11.0 years).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cephalometric analysis was conducted using linear and angular midfacial measurements. Lateral cephalograms were taken initially (T0), after treatment (T1) and at two years post-treatment (T2). Significance was assessed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Comparing changes in the midfacial area between the SAFM and TBFM groups during the traction period (T0-T1), angular measurements such as SNOr (1.34°), nasolabial angle (4.20°), nasal angles 1 and 2 (1.23°, 2.14°) and linear measurements such as Prn, Sn, A' distance (approximately 2 mm) increased significantly more in the SAFM group. Over the entire treatment period (T0-T2), the changes in SNOr (1.33°), nasolabial angle (6.54°), nasal angles 1 and 2 (1.45°, 2.99°) and Prn, Sn, A' distance (approximately 2 mm) remained significant (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of growing patients with Class III malocclusions with maxillary deficiency, it was possible to achieve significantly greater advancement in the midfacial area with SAFM treatment than with TBFM treatment. This significant difference was well maintained at two years post-treatment.

Comparison of two protocols for early treatment of dentoskeletal Class III malocclusion: Modified SEC III versus RME/FM

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term cephalometric outcomes of the protocols modified splints, Class III elastics, chincup (SEC III) and rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask (RME/FM) for the early treatment of growing subjects with Class III dentoskeletal malocclusion.

SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION

This retrospective observational study included 20 patients (11 males, nine females) treated with the modified SEC III protocol and 31 patients (16 males, 15 females) treated with the RME/FM one. The sample was evaluated before (T1, mean age 7.9 ± 1.0 years) and at the end of treatment (T2, mean age 9.0 ± 1.0 years). Statistical comparisons between the two groups were performed with independent sample t tests.

RESULTS

Both the modified SEC III and the RME/FM sample groups showed significantly favourable effects in terms of maxillary advancement (SNA +1.3° and +1.5°, respectively), control of mandibular projection (SNB -0.5° and -0.8°, respectively), and intermaxillary relationships (ANB +1.8° and +2.3°, respectively; Wits +3.4 and +1.9 mm, respectively). The modified SEC III group showed a statistically significant greater control in the intermaxillary divergency considering the SN to Pal. Pl. (P < 0.006) and Pal. Pl. to Mand. Pl. angle (P < 0.002) with a difference of 2.3 mm between the two groups.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and the short-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Early treatment of growing patients with dentoskeletal Class III disharmonies is efficient using either modified SEC III or RME/FM protocols. However, a higher vertical control is achieved with the modified SEC III.

Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage: A possible alternative to orthognathic surgery

Treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion in young patients is very challenging. Facemask therapy has been proven to be effective in early correction of Class III malocclusion. With the aid of skeletal anchorage, the orthopaedic effects are expected to be greater than the effects with conventional facemask with tooth-borne anchorage. However, only a few studies have reported on the long-term stability of facemask therapy combined with skeletal anchorage. This report examines two patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who were treated with facemask and skeletal anchorage followed by orthodontic treatment using fixed orthodontic appliances. The long-term effects of facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage are discussed and compared with the conventional facemask therapy.

Cephalometric outcomes of a new orthopaedic appliance for Class III malocclusion treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate dental and skeletal effects of a new orthopaedic appliance for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cephalometric study was performed on a sample of 18 patients with a skeletal Class III malocclusion (4 males; 14 females; mean age 8.8 ± 1.5 years) treated with the Pushing Splints 3 (PS3) protocol. The control group consisted of 18 subjects (5 males; 13 females; mean age 9.1 ± 1.8 years) selected from a database of subjects with untreated Class III malocclusion. The cephalometric analysis was performed at the beginning (T0) and the end of the orthopaedic therapy (T1). Significant differences between the treated and control groups were assessed with independent samples t-test (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

In the PS3 group, the post-treatment cephalometric values showed a forward displacement of the maxilla, resulting in a statistically significant increase of the SNA angle. ANPg and Wits appraisal improved significantly compared with the control group. Lingual inclination of mandibular incisors and buccal inclination of the upper incisors were significantly increased in comparison with the control group. No significant differences were recorded for backward mandibular rotation.

LIMITATIONS

This study presents a short-term evaluation of the treatment and the use of a historical control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The PS3 was effective for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients, with favourable maxillary advancement and control of the vertical skeletal relationships.

Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients With and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: An Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and compare the effects of maxillary protraction therapy on Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and Class III patients with noncleft.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled clinical trial.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six Class III patients with UCLP (mean age: 10.32 ± 1.29 years) and 26 Class III patients with noncleft (mean age: 9.82 ± 1.03 years) were included and treated with maxillary protraction therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Maxillary protraction therapy was performed with an intraoral Hyrax appliance and extraoral facemask. Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before and after treatment. Pretreatment skeletal and dental characteristics and treatment changes were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The average treatment duration was 18.44 ± 4.16 months in the UCLP group, which was substantially longer than the 12.46 ± 4.03-month average treatment duration in the noncleft group (P < .001). No significant difference was found in the maxillary changes (length, advancement of point A, and SNA angle) and improvement of intermaxillary relationship (ANB angle) between the 2 groups. The UCLP group had 1.40° more mandibular clockwise rotation (P = .034). Regarding dental changes, the UCLP group had more upper incisor proclination (P = .006) and less lower incisor retroclination (P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately extended maxillary protraction therapy in patients with UCLP could be as effective as in patients with noncleft. Further study is required to follow patients until completion of growth to elucidate the long-term stability of the treatment.

Maxillary dento-skeletal outcomes after orthopedic forward (class III) and backward (class II) traction in growing subjects

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study investigated the treatment effects produced by two orthopedic appliances, an extraoral orthopedic traction on Stephenson plate (SP) in skeletal Class II malocclusion and Delaire Facial Mask (FM) in skeletal Class III malocclusion.

METHODS

FM Group comprised 25 patients (13 males; 12 females, mean age 9.3 years, CS 1-2) undergoing Delaire Facial Mask therapy (mean treatment duration 1.5 years ± 1.2, 700-800 gr per side). SP Group comprised 24 patients (9 males; 15 females, mean age 10.5 years ± 1.9, CS 1-3) treated with extraoral orthopedic traction on Stephenson plate (mean treatment duration 1.6 years ± 0.8, 700-900 gr per side). For all subjects lateral cephalograms before (T0) and after (T1) therapy were obtained and traced. Descriptive statistics, t-test and Shapiro-Wilks test were calculated for each variable.

RESULTS

A mesial movement of the maxillary bone of 2.4 mm in the FM group and a distal movement in the PS group (0.4 mm) was found. SNA° was reduced 1.4° after SP and increased 0.7° after FM. The overjet decreased by 4 mm after SP, while it grew after FM by 2.4 mm, as well as molars relationships (4.5 vs. 0.8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Facemask induced greater skeletal movements than extraoral traction on Stephenson plate. PS produced a limited downward movement of the whole maxilla together with notable incisors and molars back corrections. Based on our results, it could be speculated that orthopedic mesial traction of maxillary bone may result easier than the distal movement.

Orthopaedic and orthodontic treatment with hyrax, Class III elastics on mandibular miniplates, maxillary mini-implants in a Class III adolescent: A case report

BACKGROUND

The treatment of Skeletal Class III malocclusion continues to be considered as one of the biggest challenges in orthodontics as the success of its correction is largely unpredictable. Early diagnosis and treatment are highly recommended to eliminate primary etiological factors and prevent an increase in severity of the existing malocclusion. However, if the diagnosis is delayed until adulthood, treatment becomes restricted to orthognathic surgery due to limited or no remaining growth potential left. The inherent risks involved with the surgical procedures often preclude the patients from opting for it, thus leaving the orthodontist with no option but to perform possible compensatory treatments to improve facial aesthetics and restore functional occlusion.

OBJECTIVE

To report the case of a 15-year old boy (adolescent) with Skeletal Class III malocclusion, a concave facial profile with an anterior crossbite and no incisor visibility during smile.

METHODS

Intra-oral skeletally anchored maxillary protraction (I-SAMP) and mini-implants associated with fixed appliance to aid in the correction of the skeletal bases and subsequently relieve the dental crowding.

RESULTS

After 36 months of treatment, functional normal occlusion with a Class I molar and canine relation was achieved. The consequential increase in upper lip thickness and decrease in lower lip fullness alongwith an increased exposure of maxillary incisors during smile resulted in a significant improvement of the patient's facial profile and an aesthetically pleasing smile.

Long-term maxillary three dimensional changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/purpose

Maxillary protraction with or without expansion appears to be an effective orthopedic treatment in skeletal class III growing patients, but the long-term effect on maxilla changes is less clear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate long-term three dimensional skeletal effects on maxilla through face mask (FM) with or without rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in skeletal CIII growing patients.

Materials and methods

We searched database including PubMed, Science Direct, Embase and Web of Science through Feb 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials or cohort studies recruiting growing patients who received maxillary protraction and/or expansion and comparing the treatment groups with untreated controls. The follow-up periods were more than 3 years. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tools (RoB2.0 and ROBINS-I). GRADE was used to qualify the evidence.

Results

This meta-analysis included 6 studies comprising 327 participants in total. No statistically significant changes were observed on the degree of Sella-Nasion-A point (SNA) in the treated groups when compared with the untreated controls. However, significant increase on maxillary rotation degree (mean difference: 8.20, 95% CI = 6.87–9.53, p < 0.001) and maxillary base width (mean difference: 2.27, 95% CI = 1.39–3.15, p < 0.001) in the treated groups, if compared with untreated controls.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that FM and FM/RME treatments might not be long-term effective on correcting maxillary anteroposterior hypoplasia in growing patients. Additionally, more long-term studies are still necessary to further assess its skeletal benefits on maxilla in vertical and transverse dimension.

Efficacy of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Associated With Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and maxillary protraction (MP) in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP) using the Goslon yardstick index.

Design:

Retrospective study.

Patients:

Dental casts of 34 Goslon 3 (G3) and Goslon 4 (G4) patients treated with RME and MP were evaluated which composed the treated sample (S1). The dental cast were taken before the RME (T1) and immediately after the use of face mask for MP was suspended (T2). In order to verify the stability of the treatment, dental casts of 17 of these patients were evaluated 1 year after the treatment was finished (T3). For the control sample (S2), dental casts of 20 untreated G3 and G4 patients were evaluated.

Results:

At T2, 85.7% of study sample patients initially G3 and 70% of patients initially G4 obtained improvement in occlusal index. At T3, the majority of patients initially classified as G3 and G4 returned to the same classification as in the beginning of the treatment. The evaluation of the control sample showed that patients initially classified as G3, 55.6% continued at this initial index, and 44.4% had it worsened. Those initially G4, 100%, continued at this initial index.

Conclusion:

The immediate result of RME and MP was satisfactory, and despite the instability of these results, the outcome of this treatment option was better than the untreated sample.

Management of skeletal Class III with facial asymmetry using skeletal anchorage: 4-year follow-up

Introduction:

Skeletal Class III malocclusion with asymmetry is one of the most difficult problems to correct in orthodontics. A functional shift of the mandible in growing patients may occur accompanying a Class III, due to constricted maxillary arch and occlusal interferences. Studies have indicated that posterior unilateral crossbite develops early and has a low rate of spontaneous correction. It may further lead to development of mandibular and facial asymmetry by growth and displacement of mandible if left untreated in growing patients.

Objective:

This article reports the clinical case of a thirteen-year-old female patient in CVMI transition stage that had maxillary hypoplasia with a developing facial asymmetry. Results: The case was successfully managed with bone-anchored facemask therapy and with elimination of occlusal interferences with guided occlusion. Reverse twin block in the retention phase maintained the results achieved.

Conclusion:

A four-year follow-up evaluation revealed successful maintenance of the treatment results.

Early Treatment of Anterior Crossbite with Eruption Guidance Appliance: A Case Report

The purpose of this investigation was to show how to manage an anterior crossbite in early mixed dentition with an eruption guidance appliance (EGA). The analyzed clinical case reported an anterior crossbite, a bimaxillary retrusion tendency, and a horizontal growth pattern. The anterior crossbite was an unfavorable occlusal condition that could lead to a class III malocclusion growth pattern. An early treatment approach was suggested to reach a correct sagittal jaw relationship. Hence, the selected approach acted on the dentoalveolar sector, aiming to have effects on the posterior vertical dimension and to improve the sagittal jaw's relation. An EGA was selected to treat the patient in early mixed dentition. After 7 months of therapy with night-time use, the dental malocclusion was completely resolved. The patient continued to be treated with the same device, used as active retention. With the EGA treatment, the erupting forces, rather than the active forces, were used to resolve the dental malocclusion. This approach allowed a low compliance requirement and had a minimum psychosocial and psychological impact on the patient. The early treatment was essential to give a functional occlusion and a good balance of the soft perioral tissues and muscles.