Efficacy, tolerability, and kinetics of lamotrigine in infants

Influence of UGT2B7, UGT1A4 and ABCG2 Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Efficacy of Lamotrigine in Patients with Epilepsy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A substantial inter-individual variability has been observed in the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of genetic polymorphism of the metabolizing enzymes (UGT2B7, UGT1A4) and transporter (ABCG2) on the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of lamotrigine in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

The genetic analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms was conducted using polymerase chain reaction sequence. High-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry was employed to measure the plasma concentrations of lamotrigine. The efficacy of lamotrigine was assessed by evaluating the reduction rate of epileptic seizure frequency.

RESULTS

This study included a cohort of 331 patients who were treated with lamotrigine as monotherapy. A linear correlation was observed between the lamotrigine concentration and daily dose taken (r = 0.58, p < 2.2e-16). Statistically significant differences were found in both the median plasma concentration and dose-adjusted concentration (C/D ratio) when comparing the ineffective to the effective group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that UGT1A4 rs2011425, ABCG2 rs2231142 polymorphisms and age had a significant relationship with the lamotrigine concentrations (p < 0.05). Age was a predictive factor for C/D ratio (p < 0.001). Lamotrigine concentration and weight were good predictive factors for effective seizure outcomes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.715, 95% CI 0.658-0.776, p < 0.001; OR = 0.926, 95% CI 0.901-0.951, p < 0.001, respectively). The cut-off values of lamotrigine trough concentrations for clinical outcomes in the age-related groups were determined as 2.49 μg/ml (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.828, 95% CI 0.690-0.966), 2.70 μg/ml (AUC: 0.805, 95% CI 0.745-0.866) and 3.25 μg/ml (AUC: 0.807, 95% CI 0.686-0.928) for the adult group, adolescent group, and toddler and school-age group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

UGT1A4 rs2011425 and ABCG2 rs2231142 were correlated with lamotrigine concentrations. Lower lamotrigine trough concentration was found in the ineffective group and the troughs were associated with seizure outcomes.

Magnitude of Lamotrigine Exposure Through Breastfeeding

Importance: Lamotrigine use during breastfeeding has significantly increased in the recent years, whereas breast milk lamotrigine pharmacokinetics data are still sparse. Objectives: To assess lamotrigine exposure in breastfed infants by monitoring maternal serum and breast milk concentrations. Methods: Breastfeeding women treated with lamotrigine were recruited to this study. Maternal trough breast milk and serum samples were collected, and additional breast milk samples were collected 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 hours after lamotrigine consumption. Trough breast milk/serum ratios (M/S ratio) and breast milk area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated. Results: Twenty-one breastfeeding women were recruited to this study, and the final dataset was based on the samples collected from 17 women. Lamotrigine trough serum and mother's milk concentrations were 5.1 ± 3.3 mg/L and 3.1 ± 1.9 mg/L, respectively (mean ± standard deviation). The trough M/S ratio of lamotrigine was 0.66 ± 0.22. The lamotrigine breast milk average AUC was 41.7 ± 24.6 mg·h/L. The estimated infant dose of lamotrigine was 0.52 ± 0.31 mg/kg/day and 0.26 ± 0.15 mg/kg/day for fully and partially breastfed infants, respectively. Significant correlation was found between the maternal lamotrigine serum trough concentrations and the breast milk parameters: trough breast milk concentrations (Spearman's rho = 0.986, p < 0.0001) and breast milk AUC values (Spearman's rho = 0.941, p < 0.0001). No significant correlation was found between the maternal lamotrigine daily dose and serum trough concentrations, breast milk trough concentrations, and breast milk AUC values (Spearman's rho = 0.294, 0.285, and 0.438, p = 0.252, 0.396, and 0.078, respectively). Conclusion and Relevance: High correlation between the maternal lamotrigine trough serum concentrations and the breast milk AUC values was found, implying that monitoring the maternal lamotrigine serum concentrations can be useful for prediction of exposure of infants to lamotrigine through the breast milk. The trial was registered in the Israeli trials registry MOH_2021-09-05_010243 at September 5, 2021 Retrospectively registered https://my.health.gov.il/CliniTrials.

Redefining the age-specific therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine for patients with epilepsy: A step towards optimizing treatment and increasing cost-effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine exhibits age-related characteristics. Nevertheless, current evidence regarding the therapeutic range of lamotrigine has been derived almost exclusively from studies in adult patients, and the applicability of this therapeutic range to the pediatric population remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to establish the appropriate age-specific therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine corresponding to adequate clinical responses for patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study of therapeutic drug monitoring included 582 Chinese epilepsy patients receiving lamotrigine monotherapy. Patients were divided into three age-related subgroups: (1) toddler and school-age group (2-12 years old, n = 168), (2) adolescent group (12-18 years old, n = 171), and (3) adult group (>18 years old, n = 243). Patients with a reduction in seizure frequency of 50 % or greater than baseline were defined as responders, and the remaining patients were non-responders. The relationship between lamotrigine serum concentrations and clinical response was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to determine the representative cut-off values of lamotrigine trough levels, to distinguish responders from non-responders. The upper margin of the therapeutic range of lamotrigine was determined by developing concentration-effect curves for the three age-related subgroups.

RESULTS

The median trough levels of lamotrigine were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders from all three age-related groups (P < 0.0001). Results of logistic regression analysis revealed that higher serum concentrations of lamotrigine predicted a higher probability that seizure frequency would be reduced by more than 50 % compared to baseline (adjusted odds ratio: 1.228, 95 % CI: 1.137-1.327; P < 0.0001), and younger children were less likely to be responders (adjusted odds ratio: 1.027, 95 % CI: 1.012-1.043; P = 0.001). Based on a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, the optimal cut-off values for lamotrigine trough concentrations corresponding to clinical response were 3.29 mg/L, 2.06 mg/L, and 1.61 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, adolescent group, and adult group, respectively. By reducing interpatient variability, the results of the concentration-effect curves suggested no additional clinical benefit from a continued increase of doses for lamotrigine concentrations exceeding 9.08 mg/L, 8.43 mg/L, and 10.38 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, adolescent group, and adult group, respectively. In conclusion, the therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine trough concentrations corresponding to adequate clinical response were 3.29-9.08 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, 2.06-8.43 mg/L in the adolescent group, and 1.61-10.38 mg/L in the adult group.

CONCLUSIONS

The study determined age-specific therapeutic ranges corresponding to optimal clinical efficacy for lamotrigine. Our findings lay the foundation for catalyzing novel opportunities to optimize treatment and reduce therapeutic costs. Based on the age-specific therapeutic ranges identified in this study, individualized and cost-effective algorithms for lamotrigine treatment of epilepsy patients may be developed and validated in larger cohort studies of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Potential induction of epileptic spasms by nonselective voltage-gated sodium channel blockade: Interaction with etiology

PURPOSE

Epileptic spasms are often preceded by focal (or multifocal) seizures. Based on a series of case reports suggesting that carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine may induce epileptic spasms, we set out to rigorously evaluate the potential association between exposure to voltage-gated sodium channel blockade and latency to epileptic spasms.

METHODS

We identified 50 cases (children with focal seizures and evolution to epileptic spasms) and 50 controls (children with focal seizures without evolution to epileptic spasms). For each patient, we reviewed all sequential neurology encounters between onset of epilepsy and emergence of epileptic spasms. For each encounter we recorded seizure-frequency and all anti-seizure therapy exposures. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, we evaluated the association between voltage-gated sodium channel exposure (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lacosamide, or phenytoin) and latency to epileptic spasms onset, with adjustment for etiology and seizure-frequency.

RESULTS

Latency to epileptic spasms onset was independently associated with exposure to sodium channel blockade (hazard ratio = 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.2; P = 0.03) and high-risk etiology (hazard ratio = 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.1; P = 0.001). With assessment for interaction between sodium channel blockade and etiology, we identified an estimated 7-fold increased risk of epileptic spasms with the combination of sodium channel blockade and high-risk etiology (hazard ratio = 7.0, 95% CI 2.5-19.8; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that voltage-gated sodium channel blockade may induce epileptic spasms among children at risk on the basis of etiology. Further study is warranted to replicate these findings, ascertain possible drug- and dose-specific risks, and identify potential mechanisms of harm.

Dosing Recommendations for Lamotrigine in Children: Evaluation Based on Previous and New Population Pharmacokinetic Models

Lamotrigine is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug with high interindividual variability in serum concentrations in children. The aims of this study were to evaluate the predictive performance of pediatric population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models published on lamotrigine, to build a new model with our monitoring data and to evaluate the current recommended doses. A validation cohort included patients treated with lamotrigine who had a serum level assayed during therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). PPK models published in the literature were first applied to the validation cohort. We assessed their predictive performance using mean prediction errors, root mean squared errors, and visual predictive checks. A new model was then built using the data. Dose simulations were performed to evaluate the doses recommended. We included 270 lamotrigine concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 17.9 mg/L from 175 patients. The median (range) age and weight were 11.8 years (0.8-18 years) and 32.7 kg (8-110 kg). We tested 6 PPK models; most had acceptable bias and precision but underestimated the variability of the cohort. We built a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination, allometric scaling, and effects of inhibitor and inducer comedications. In our cohort, 22.6% of trough concentrations were below 2.5 mg/L. In conclusion, we proposed a PPK model that can be used for TDM of lamotrigine in children. In our population, a high percentage of children had low trough concentrations of lamotrigine. As the intervals of recommended doses are large, we suggest aiming at the higher range of doses to reach the target concentration.

The Effectiveness of Lamotrigine and Its Blood Levels for Pediatric Epilepsy

This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of lamotrigine (LTG) over 2 years and the usefulness of measuring its blood levels during the follow-up of patients with epilepsy. We measured peak blood LTG levels of 32 patients with epilepsy (9.16 ± 3.34 years old; mean ± SD). The blood levels were measured at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after reaching the LTG maintenance dosage. The effectiveness of LTG was evaluated to determine the seizure reduction rate. The patients were classified as effective cases (mean of own seizure reduction rates >50%) and ineffective cases (≤50%). The results were that the dosage and blood level showed positive correlations in the case of combination use with sodium valproate (VPA) (r = 0.690), carbamazepine and/or phenobarbital (r = 0.940), and others (r = 0.548). In several groups, the blood levels and efficacies did not show any positive correlations. In the cases of combination use with VPA, the blood levels of effective cases and ineffective cases were significantly different (P = 0.001). The optimal range was 8-11.5 μg/mL based on the average and SD values in the effective cases. No patients had any side effects. In conclusion, no precise definition of the therapeutic range was possible because of the incomplete correlation between the blood level and seizure frequency. We recommend the optimal range of LTG as a therapeutic target without any side effects, and it was established that the range in the combination with VPA was 8-11.5 μg/mL.

Current and Emerging Therapies of Severe Epileptic Encephalopathies

In this article, we review the treatment options for the pediatric epileptic encephalopathies and provide an update on the new and emerging therapies targeted at the underlying pathophysiology of many of these syndromes. We illustrate how the identification of the specific genetic and autoimmune causes has made possible the evaluation and development of novel, better targeted therapies, as and at times, avoidance of potentially offending agents.

Treating disorders of the neonatal central nervous system: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations with a focus on antiepileptics

A major consideration in the treatment of neonatal disorders is that the selected drug, dose and dosage frequency is safe, effective and appropriate for the intended patient population. Thus, a thorough knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the chosen drug within the patient population is essential. In paediatric and neonatal populations two additional challenges can often complicate drug treatment - the inherently greater physiological variability, and a lack of robust clinical evidence of therapeutic range. There has traditionally been an overreliance in paediatric medicine on extrapolating doses from adult values by adjusting for bodyweight or body surface area, but many other sources of variability exist which complicate the choice of dose in neonates. The lack of reliable drug dosage data in neonates has been highlighted by regulatory authorities, as only ~50% of the most commonly used paediatric medicines have been examined in a paediatric population. Moreover, there is a paucity of information on the pharmacokinetic parameters which affect drug concentrations in different body tissues, and pharmacodynamic responses to drugs in the neonate. Thus, in the present review, we draw attention to the main pharmacokinetic factors that influence the unbound brain concentration of neuroactive drugs. Moreover, the pharmacodynamic differences between neonates and adults that affect the activity of centrally-acting therapeutic agents are briefly examined, with a particular emphasis on antiepileptic drugs.

Safety of lamotrigine in paediatrics: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To identify adverse drug reactions associated with lamotrigine in children and compare the safety profile with other antiepileptic drugs.

SETTING

Databases EMBASE (1974-April 2015), MEDLINE (1946-April 2015), PubMed and the Cochrane library for randomised controlled trials were searched for studies on safety of lamotrigine.

PARTICIPANTS

All studies involving paediatric patients aged ≤ 18 years who have received at least a single dose of lamotrigine with safety as an outcome measure were included.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was safety of lamotrigine. Drug interaction of lamotrigine was the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 78 articles involving 3783 paediatric patients were identified. There were 2222 adverse events (AEs) reported. Rash was the most commonly reported AE, occurring in 7.3% of the patients. Stevens-Johnson syndrome was rarely reported, with a risk of 0.09 per 100 patients. Discontinuation due to an adverse drug reaction (ADR) was recorded in 72 children (1.9% of all treated patients). Fifty-eight per cent of treatment discontinuation was attributed to different forms of rash and 21% due to increased seizures. Children on lamotrigine monotherapy had lower incidences of AEs. Headache (p=0.02), somnolence (<0.001), nausea (p=0.01), vomiting (p<0.001), dizziness (p<0.001) and abdominal pain (p=0.01) were significantly lower among children on monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Rash was the most common ADR of lamotrigine and the most common reason for treatment discontinuation. Children receiving polytherapy have a higher risk of AEs than monotherapy users.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42013006910.

Influence of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase inducers and inhibitors on the plasma lamotrigine concentration in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy

This study evaluated the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the plasma concentration of lamotrigine (LTG) in pediatric patients with epilepsy. We retrospectively reviewed 1653 plasma samples from 709 patients (aged 6 months to 16 years) and compared the concentration-to-dose ratio (CD ratio) of LTG among different AED regimens. The median CD ratio of patients receiving LTG monotherapy was 1.25 μg/mL/mg/kg. In patients receiving LTG plus VPA, the CD ratio was increased by about 140%. The CD ratio was elevated from a low VPA concentration (<40 μg/mL) and the increase was VPA concentration-dependent. In contrast, the median CD ratio of patients treated with LTG plus the inducers phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine was 0.42, 0.63, and 0.66, respectively, and phenytoin significantly reduced the CD ratio in comparison with phenobarbital or carbamazepine (p < 0.001). Pediatric patients of all ages beyond infancy showed similar susceptibility to VPA or inducers, but infants had higher CD ratios compared with the other age groups. Among other AEDs, topiramate, ethosuximide, and rufinamide reduced the CD ratio. These findings should be useful for estimating interactions between LTG and concomitant AEDs.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new-generation antiepileptic drugs at the extremes of age: an update

Epilepsies occur across the entire age range, and their incidence peaks in the first years of life and in the elderly. Therefore, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly used at the extremes of age. Rational prescribing in these age groups requires not only an understanding of the drugs' pharmacodynamic properties, but also careful consideration of potential age-related changes in their pharmacokinetic profile. The present article, which updates a review published in 2006 in this journal, focuses on recent findings on the pharmacokinetics of new-generation AEDs in neonates, infants, children, and the elderly. Significant new information on the pharmacokinetics of new AEDs in the perinatal period has been acquired, particularly for lamotrigine and levetiracetam. As a result of slow maturation of the enzymes involved in glucuronide conjugation, lamotrigine elimination occurs at a particularly slow rate in neonates, and becomes gradually more efficient during the first months of life. In the case of levetiracetam, elimination occurs primarily by renal excretion and is also slow at birth, but drug clearance increases rapidly thereafter and can even double within 1 week. In general, infants older than 2-3 months and children show higher drug clearance (normalized for body weight) than adults. This pattern was confirmed in recent studies that investigated the pediatric pharmacokinetics of several new AEDs, including levetiracetam, rufinamide, stiripentol, and eslicarbazepine acetate. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, drug clearance is generally reduced compared with younger adults because of less efficient drug-metabolizing activity, decreased renal function, or both. This general pattern, described previously for several AEDs, was confirmed in recent studies on the effect of old age on the clearance of felbamate, levetiracetam, pregabalin, lacosamide, and retigabine. For those drugs which are predominantly eliminated by renal excretion, aging-related pharmacokinetic changes could be predicted by measuring creatinine clearance (CLCR). Overall, most recent findings confirm that age is a major factor influencing the pharmacokinetic profile of AEDs. However, pharmacokinetic variability at any age can be considerable, and the importance of other factors should not be disregarded. These include genetic factors, co-morbidities, and drug interactions, particularly those caused by concomitantly administered AEDs which induce or inhibit drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Lamotrigine and its applications in the treatment of epilepsy and other neurological and psychiatric disorders

Lamotrigine is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug, initially approved in 1994 for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults and for the generalized seizures of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in pediatric (>2 years old) and adult populations. Its role in the treatment of bipolar disorder type I has also been well established. In addition, lamotrigine has been successfully used for the management of other neurological conditions such as migraines and neuropathic pain, and preliminary data show promising results. It has favorable pharmacokinetic properties and is generally well tolerated. The small risk of serious skin rash can be minimized with slow titration of the drug and dose adjustment with concomitant medications. Lamotrigine has demonstrated particular benefit in the treatment of women and elderly patients with epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drugs and breastfeeding

INTRODUCTION

This review provides a synopsis for clinicians on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the breastfeeding mother.

METHODS

For each AED, we collected all retrievable data from Hale's "Medications and Mother Milk" (2012), from the LactMed database (2013) of the National Library of Medicine, and from a MedLine Search of relevant studies in the past 10 years.

RESULTS

Older AEDs, such as carbamazepine, valproic acid, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone are considered to have a good level of safety during lactation, due to the long term clinical experience and the consequent amount of available data from the scientific literature. On the contrary, fewer data are available on the use of new AEDs. Therefore, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, tiagabine, pregabalin, leviracetam and topiramate are compatible with breastfeeding with a less documented safety profile. Ethosuximide, zonisamide and the continue use of clonazepam and diazepam are contraindicated during breastfeeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the current available advice on the use of AEDs during breastfeeding, given by different accredited sources, present some contradictions, most AEDs can be considered safe according to our review.

Treatment of infantile spasms

BACKGROUND

Infantile spasms (West's Syndrome) is a syndrome that includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure-the spasms-and an electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormality often called hypsarrhythmia. Psychomotor retardation is frequently found at follow-up. Approximately two-thirds of affected infants will have a detectable underlying neurological abnormality, but still little is known about the pathophysiological basis for infantile spasms, and treatment remains problematic.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of single pharmaceutical therapies used to treat infantile spasms in terms of control of the spasms, resolution of the EEG, relapse rates, psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, side effects, and mortality.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify published data, we searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (October 2012), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 9), MEDLINE (1946 to September Week 4, 2012), EMBASE (1980 to March 2003), and the reference lists of all retrieved articles.To identify unpublished data, we searched the ISRCTN Register (www.controlled-trials.com), corresponded with colleagues and drug companies, and made requests at international conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the administration of drug therapy to patients with infantile spasms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection from all relevant publications was independently undertaken by three review authors (before 2010) or by two review authors using a standard proforma. Analysis included assessment of study quality and a search for sources of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 16 small RCTs (fewer than 100 patients enrolled) and 2 larger RCTs (more than 100 patients enrolled). These 18 studies looked at a total of 916 patients treated with a total of 12 different pharmaceutical agents. Overall methodology of the studies was poor, in part because of ethical dilemmas such as giving placebo injections to children. Two studies showed that placebo was not as good as active treatment in resolving the spasms. The strongest evidence suggested that hormonal treatment (prednisolone or tetracosactide depot) leads to resolution of spasms faster and in more infants than does vigabatrin. Responses without subsequent relapse may be no different. The same study suggests that hormonal treatments might improve the long-term developmental outcome compared with vigabatrin in infants not found to have an underlying cause for their infantile spasms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date, few well-designed RCTs have considered the treatment of infantile spasms, and the numbers of patients enrolled have been small. In the majority, methodology has been poor, hence it is not clear which treatment is optimal in the treatment of this epilepsy syndrome. Hormonal treatment resolves spasms in more infants than vigabatrin, but this may or may not translate into better long-term outcomes. If prednisolone or vigabatrin is used, high dosage is recommended. Vigabatrin may be the treatment of choice in tuberous sclerosis. Resolution of the EEG features may be important, but this has not been proven. Further research using large studies with robust methodology is required.

Treatment strategies

There has been important progress in the identification of antiepileptic compounds and their indications in children over the past 15 years: their number has doubled and specific pediatric trials are being performed to document their effect according to seizures and syndromes as well as their tolerability in pediatrics. The improved understanding of pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions has helped to optimize treatment. Specific issues specific of infants have also been studied although new antiepileptic drugs are still dramatically lacking for this age group. Before reaching a syndromic diagnosis, the choice of a first- line agent goes to compounds with the largest range of efficacy and least identified risks. Subsequent choices are mainly based on the epilepsy syndrome and seizure type in addition to good clinical practice to determine dose, adverse effect profile, risk of aggravating seizures and drug interactions, clinician's experience, cultural habits, and availability of drugs. If there are several options, preference is given to the compound that exhibits the best risk/benefit ratio, or the most rapid titration when seizure frequency is the major issue. For new antiepileptic compounds, price is often a limiting factor in countries with poor insurance coverage. Third generation anti-epileptic drugs are emerging which also seem to be promising.

Newer anticonvulsant medications in pediatric neurology

OPINION STATEMENT

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of treatment for recurrent seizures. Uncontrolled seizures may cause medical, developmental, and psychological disturbances. The medical practitioner should thus strive to eliminate or minimize seizures. Treatment advances in epilepsy include 1) identification of the basic mechanisms of epilepsy and action of AEDs, 2) the introduction of new AEDs, and 3) the use of neurostimulation, including vagus nerve stimulation. Treatment with AEDs involves balancing each AED's efficacy against its side effects. In some patients, effective AEDs must be discontinued because of intolerable side effects. Although all AEDs have a proven efficacy, the choice of AEDs should be based on better efficacy for individual seizure types or epilepsy syndromes. Side effects also differ from drug to drug and must be taken into account. This article focuses on studies and expert opinion consensus to guide the choice of AEDs.

Neuroprotection of lamotrigine on hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in neonatal rats: Relations to administration time and doses

Lamotrigine (LTG), an antiepileptic drug, has been shown to be able to improve cerebral ischemic damage by limiting the presynaptic release of glutamate. The present study investigated further the neuroprotective effect of LTG on hypoxic-ischemic brain damage (HIBD) in neonatal rats and its relations to administration time and doses. The HIBD model was produced in 7-days old SD rats by left common carotid artery ligation followed by 2 h hypoxic exposure (8% oxygen). LTG was administered intraperitoneally with the doses of 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg 3 h after operation and the dose of 20 mg/kg 1 h before and 3 h, 6 h after operation. Blood and brain were sampled 24 h after operation. Nissl staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase biotin-dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) immunohistochemical staining were used for morphological studies. Water content in left cortex and NSE concentration in serum were determined. LTG significantly reduced water content in the cerebral cortex, as well as the number of TUNEL staining neurons in the dentate gyrus and cortex in hypoxic-ischemia (HI) model. Furthermore, LTG significantly decreased the NSE level in serum and increased the number of NSE staining neurons in the cortex. These effects, except that on water content, were dose-dependent and were more remarkable in the pre-treated group than in the post-treated groups. These results demonstrate that LTG may have a neuroprotective effect on acute HIBD in neonates. The effect is more prominent when administrated with higher doses and before HI.

The safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs in children and adolescents

The newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) provide more therapeutic options and overall improved safety and tolerability for patients. To provide the best care, physicians must be familiar with the latest tolerability and safety data. This is particularly true in children, given there are relatively fewer studies examining the effects of AEDs in children compared with adults. Since we now have significant paediatric literature on each of these agents, we provide a comprehensive and current literature review of the newer AEDs, focusing on safety and tolerability data in children and adolescents. Because the safety profiles in children differ from those in adults, familiarity with this literature is important for child neurologists and other paediatric caregivers. We have organized the data by organ system for each AED for easier reference.

Treatment of infantile spasms

BACKGROUND

Infantile spasms (West's Syndrome) is a syndrome which includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure, the spasms, and an electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormality often called hypsarrhythmia. Psychomotor retardation is frequently found at follow up. Approximately two thirds of affected infants will have a detectable underlying neurological abnormality, but still little is known about the pathophysiological basis for infantile spasms and treatment remains problematic.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of single pharmaceutical therapies used to treat infantile spasms in terms of control of the spasms, resolution of the EEG, relapse rates, psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, side effects, and mortality.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published data: Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all retrieved articles.Unpublished data: ISRCTN Register (www.controlled-trials.com), correspondence with colleagues and drug companies, and requests at international conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of the administration of drug therapy to patients with infantile spasms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection from all relevant publications was independently undertaken by three review authors using a standard proforma. Analysis included assessment of study quality and looking for sources of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 12 small RCTs (less than 60 patients enrolled) and two larger RCT (more than 100 patients enrolled). These 14 studies looked at a total of 681 patients treated with a total of nine different pharmaceutical agents. Overall methodology of the studies was poor, partly because of ethical dilemmas such as giving placebo injections to children. Two studies showed that placebo was not as good as active treatment in resolving the spasms. The strongest evidence suggested that hormonal treatment leads to resolution of spasms faster and in more infants than does vigabatrin. Responses without subsequent relapse may be no different. The same study suggests that hormonal treatments (prednisolone or tetracosactide) might improve the long-term developmental outcome compared with vigabatrin in infants not found to have an underlying cause for their infantile spasms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date, there have been few well-designed RCTs that considered the treatment of infantile spasms, and the numbers of patients enrolled have been small. Overall methodology has been poor, hence it is not clear which treatment is optimal in the treatment of this epilepsy syndrome. Hormonal treatment resolves spasms in more infants than vigabatrin but this may or may not translate into a better long-term outcome. If prednisone or vigabatrin are used then high dosage is recommended. Vigabatrin may be the treatment of choice in tuberous sclerosis. Resolution of the EEG features may be important but this has not been proven. Further research using large studies with robust methodology is still required.

Long-term tolerability and efficacy of lamotrigine in infants 1 to 24 months old

This open-label study was designed to evaluate the long-term tolerability and efficacy of lamotrigine in 1- to 24-month-old infants with partial seizures. The study enrolled both lamotrigine-naïve patients and patients who had been previously exposed to lamotrigine in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients (n = 204) received lamotrigine according to a dosing schedule that depended on prior experience with lamotrigine and concurrent antiepileptic drug therapy for up to 48 weeks or their second birthday, whichever occurred last. Total duration of lamotrigine exposure (which included exposure during the placebo-controlled study in lamotrigine-experienced patients) was >/=24 weeks in 92% of patients, >/=48 weeks in 70% of patients, and >/=72 weeks in 20% of patients. A total of 20 (10%) patients (8 lamotrigine-naïve patients and 12 lamotrigine-experienced patients) transitioned to lamotrigine monotherapy. The most common adverse events were pyrexia (45% of patients), upper-respiratory tract infection (28%), and ear infection (22%). The only adverse event considered reasonably attributable to study medication in >2% of patients was irritability (n = 10; 5% of patients). No cases of serious rash were reported. The median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency in the sample as a whole was 74%. Seizure frequency was reduced by >/=50% from pre-lamotrigine baseline in 62% of patients in the sample as a whole, 60% of the lamotrigine-naïve subgroup, and 63% of the lamotrigine-experienced subgroup. In the sample as a whole, 13% of patients were seizure free during the Treatment Phase. Investigators considered clinical status at the last clinic visit to be improved (mildly, moderately, or markedly) relative to prelamotrigine clinical status in 76% of patients (150/197) and to be unchanged in 19% (37/197). In this study-the first large prospective investigation of the long-term tolerability and efficacy of an antiepileptic drug in a patient population 2 years and younger-lamotrigine administered for up to approximately 72 weeks was well tolerated and associated with good seizure control.

Lamotrigine in breast milk and nursing infants: determination of exposure

OBJECTIVE

Although lamotrigine use during pregnancy has substantially increased over the past decade secondary to accumulated reproductive safety data, systematic data on lamotrigine during breastfeeding remains sparse. We sought to characterize the determinants of lamotrigine concentrations in breast milk and nursing-infant plasma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women who enrolled in a prospective investigation of perinatal medication pharmacokinetics, were treated with lamotrigine, and chose to continue lamotrigine while breastfeeding were included in the analysis. Breast milk samples were collected via breast pump from foremilk to hindmilk from a single breast to determine the excretion gradient and serial samples over 24 hours to determine the time course of excretion. Paired maternal/infant plasma samples were also collected. Lamotrigine concentrations in all of the samples were determined by using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Statistical analyses of breast milk and infant plasma concentrations and their determinants were conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty women and their nursing infants participated in the study, providing a total of 210 breast milk samples. The mean milk/plasma ratio was 41.3%. There was a nonsignificant trend for higher lamotrigine concentrations in breast milk 4 hours after the maternal dose. Infant plasma concentrations were 18.3% of maternal plasma concentrations. The theoretical infant lamotrigine dose was 0.51 mg/kg per day, and the relative infant lamotrigine dose was 9.2%. Mild thrombocytosis was present in 7 of 8 infants at the time of serum sampling. No other adverse events were observed or reported in the breastfed infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previous investigations of medications in breast milk, the lamotrigine milk/plasma ratio is highly variable. The rate of lamotrigine excretion into human breast milk is similar to that observed with other antiepileptic drugs. These data expand the extant literature on lamotrigine in breastfeeding and demonstrate relatively comparable nursing-infant exposure to lamotrigine compared with other antiepileptic drugs.

Lamotrigine in children and adolescents: the impact of age on its serum concentrations and on the extent of drug interactions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of age and co-treatment with other drugs on the serum concentrations of lamotrigine in children and adolescents.

METHODS

A review of routine serum concentration measurements of lamotrigine performed in our laboratory yielded a total of 744 serum samples from 296 subjects (110 males, 186 females, age: 2-19 years) suitable for statistical analysis. The primary outcome variable was the dose-corrected lamotrigine serum concentration, expressed as the lamotrigine concentration/dose (C/D) ratio. A linear mixed model that allowed multiple observations from the same patient was used to identify and quantify the effect of factors influencing the lamotrigine C/D ratio.

RESULTS

According to the model, the lamotrigine C/D ratio decreases by 6% per year of age. Valproate and levetiracetam were found to raise the lamotrigine C/D ratio, whereas the following co-medications reduced it: carbamazepine, clobazam, fluoxetine, clonazepam and ethinyl estradiol. The effect of carbamazepine decreased with increasing age. No gender difference was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Age is an important factor with respect to the pharmacokinetics and the extent of drug interactions of lamotrigine in children and adolescents. In this population, older individuals will need higher doses than younger ones in order to achieve the same serum concentrations.

Maternal lamotrigine treatment and elevated neonatal gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

Lamotrigine is an antiepileptic drug with a low adverse-effect profile. This report describes an infant born to an epileptic mother treated with lamotrigine, who had a highly elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase level after birth. There was no other clinical or biochemical evidence of liver or bile duct dysfunction. Infant serum level of lamotrigine, which crosses the placenta, was within therapeutic limits. Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase levels declined slowly during the following months. We suggest that, in the absence of additional markers of tissue damage, the infant's gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase elevation was caused by maternal intake of lamotrigine. Liver function tests should be monitored in infants of lamotrigine treated mothers, as enzyme elevation might still suggest liver damage.

Topiramate monotherapy in infantile spasm

Infantile spasm is an age-related refractory epilepsy. Topiramate is a new anticonvulsant with multiple mechanisms of action, and it may be effective for treating pediatric epilepsies. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of first-line topiramate treatment for infantile spasm, 20 patients received topiramate monotherapy during this study. They were treated with an initial dose of 1mg/kg/day, with a progressive titration of 1 mg/kg a week until their spasms were controlled and a maximum dose of 12 mg/kg/day was achieved. The evaluation of the treatment efficacy was based on the spasm frequency data that was obtained by the scalp and video-EEG, and by the parental count of spasm. Thirty percent of the subjects became spasm-free during the study. Six of 20 subjects (30%) had cessation of spasm and disappearance of hypsarrhythmia as seen via the video EEG; four (50%) of eight idiopathic patients had a response, whereas two (17%) of 12 patients with symptomatic infantile spasm responded. Seventy of the patients, including the spasm-free patients, had a reduction in their seizure frequency of more than 50%, and 10% of the patients had a reduction in their seizure frequency of less than 50%. The clusters of spasm frequency decreased from 10.6 +/- 8.5 to 3.5 +/- 1.4 clusters/day. Topiramate is effective and tolerated in those patients suffering from infantile spasm. Our results suggest that this drug should be considered as a new first-line drug for treating infantile spasm.

Pharmacokinetic variability of new antiepileptic drugs at different ages

Newer generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly used to treat epilepsies in infants, children, and the elderly. For rational prescribing in these populations, it is essential to understand the pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging. Data obtained in recent years indicate that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, tiagabine, zonisamide, vigabatrin, and felbamate is considerably higher in children than in adults,the magnitude of the difference being on average in the order of 20%to 120%, depending on the drug and the age distribution of the assessed population. Information on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in newborns is completely lacking or very sparse. Studies in the elderly have demonstrated that significant pharmacokinetic changes also occur at the other extreme of age. On average, CL/F values of newer generation AEDs have been found to be reduced by 10% to 50% compared with those found in young or middle-aged adults. These pharmacokinetic changes are clinically important and con-tribute to age-related differences in dosage requirements.

Epilepsy in children: the evidence for new antiepileptic drugs

Childhood epilepsy remains a challenge to treat. Despite the availability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), >25% of children with childhood epilepsy continue to have seizures. Conventional AEDs have been the mainstay of therapy for many years but are often poorly tolerated and have a tendency to interact with other drugs. Current American Academy of Neurology guidelines support the use of four of the newer AEDs (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine) as adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in children, based on class I evidence. This paper includes a summary of the results from a recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which shows that levetiracetam is also effective and well tolerated in this pediatric population, and provides evidence supporting its use in refractory partial seizures in children.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of New-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs at the Extremes of Age

In recent years, several new-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced in clinical practice. These agents, which include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide, are being increasingly used in the treatment of epilepsy at the extremes of age. For a rational prescribing of these drugs in specific age groups, major pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging need to be taken into consideration. A review of available evidence indicates that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of new-generation AEDs in children is increased by 20-170% (depending on the type of drug and characteristics of the patients studied) compared with adults, with the highest CL/F values usually being observed in the youngest age groups. These findings do not necessarily apply to the first weeks of life, when drug eliminating capacity is still undergoing maturation, as in the case of lamotrigine for which preliminary data suggest that CL/F in neonates aged <2 months can be much lower than in infants aged 2-12 months. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, CL/F is almost invariably reduced (on average by 10-50%) compared with values found in non-elderly adults. Age-related CL/F changes, together with the large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, contribute to the need for individualised dosage requirements in these patients. Measurement of serum drug concentrations can be useful as an aid to dosage individualization in these age groups but interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring data should also take into account the possibility of age-related changes in pharmacodynamic sensitivity and, for neonates and the elderly, alterations in drug binding to serum proteins.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range. The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured. For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.

Adverse reactions of Topiramate and Lamotrigine in children

PURPOSE

To review the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of Topiramate and Lamotrigine among children in Israel, and to compare the two drugs, based on their side effect profile and tolerability among this population.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study. Four paediatric neurologists from three different tertiary medical centres in Israel documented all cases of children from birth to the age 18 years, treated with Topiramate and/or Lamotrigine in their respective outpatient clinics and hospital wards. All present ADRs and their characteristics were recorded.

RESULTS

Reports on 45 and 65 children treated with Topiramate and Lamotrigine respectively, were received. Half of the children treated with Topiramate suffered from one or more ADRs, as opposed to one-third of the children treated with Lamotrigine (p = 0.03). Most reactions were considered mild to moderate. There were no deaths or hospitalisations, but the drug had to be discontinued in about 10% of the patients due to ADRs. Most Topiramate and Lamotrigine ADRs appeared early in the treatment and were more frequent when Topiramate was an add-on versus a monotherapy drug. Most ADRs of both Topiramate and Lamotrigine were related to the central nervous system; while poor appetite, drowsiness, speech difficulties and weight loss were observed only with Topiramate, and rash and headaches only with Lamotrigine. Nervousness and seizure aggravation were more frequent ADRs of Topiramate whereas sleep disturbances were observed more in children treated with Lamotrigine.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study indicate that Lamotrigine causes ADRs less frequently than Topiramate; however both medications are generally well tolerated. Topiramate and Lamotrigine differ in their central nervous system side effect profile.

Pharmacologic treatment of the catastrophic epilepsies

Treatment of the catastrophic epilepsies [infantile spasms (IS), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), and progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME)] remains a challenge to clinicians. For IS, adrenocorticotropic hormone has traditionally been the drug of choice in the United States but may be associated with serious side effects in some patients. Vigabatrin has shown promise in treating IS patients, particularly those with tuberous sclerosis. However, the drug is associated with visual field loss and is not commercially available in the United States. Newer antiepilepsy drugs (AEDs), such as zonisamide, topiramate (TPM), and lamotrigine (LTG), may be useful in patients with IS. Although LTG, TPM, and felbamate are approved in the United States for the treatment of LGS, the overall effectiveness of therapy in patients with LGS is poor. For PME, valproate is a first-line treatment. Zonisamide and levetiracetam also show promise. Supplementation with certain cofactors to correct deficiencies and increase mitochondrial function may be useful in some patients with PME, but response to such therapy is not well documented. Advances in our understanding of the etiologies, mechanisms, and genetics underlying the catastrophic epilepsies may facilitate more effective pharmacologic interventions.

Correlation of Lamotrigine Concentrations Between Serum and Saliva

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the relationship between serum and salivary concentrations of lamotrigine in pediatric and adult epilepsy populations.

DESIGN

Paired-sample pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

University neurology clinic.

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven patients with epilepsy, aged 2-60 years, who were taking lamotrigine and whose physicians had ordered a lamotrigine serum concentration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients spit a minimum of 0.25 ml into a cup to provide saliva samples. Blood samples were obtained by phlebotomy. Serum and salivary lamotrigine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate correlations. Six patients' results were omitted due to the lack of a serum or saliva specimen or clearly erroneous results, leaving 31 patients for analysis. There was a strong correlation between the serum results reported by two reference laboratories (coefficient of correlation [r] = 0.988). The correlations between salivary and serum lamotrigine concentrations were similar for reference laboratory A (r = 0.81) and reference laboratory B (r = 0.84). Saliva:serum concentration ratios ranged from 0.41-1.26 (mean +/- SD 0.62 +/- 0.19) for reference laboratory A and from 0.40-1.19 ((mean +/- SD 0.64 +/- 0.18) for reference laboratory B.

CONCLUSION

There is a good correlation between salivary and serum concentrations for lamotrigine. However, there is wide interpatient variability in the saliva:serum ratio. The data suggest that salivary monitoring may play a role in the monitoring of lamotrigine for adult and pediatric patients.