Hepatic cytoreduction followed by a novel long-acting somatostatin analog: a paradigm for intractable neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: a contemporary review of treatment strategies

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are globally increasing in prevalence and the liver is the most common site of metastasis. Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) are heterogeneous in clinical presentation and prognosis. Fortunately, recent advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies have improved the multidisciplinary management of this challenging condition. When feasible, surgical resection of NELM offers the best long-term outcomes. General indications for hepatic resection include performance status acceptable for major liver surgery, grade 1 or 2 tumors, absence of extrahepatic disease, adequate size and function of future liver remnant, and feasibility of resecting >90% of metastases. Adjunct therapies including concomitant liver ablation are generally safe when used appropriately and may expand the number of patients eligible for surgery. Among patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. For patients who are not surgical candidates, liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization can provide locoregional control and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options also exist for patients with advanced or progressive disease. Ongoing research efforts are needed to identify novel biomarkers that will define the optimal indications for and sequencing of treatments to be delivered in a personalized fashion.

Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that vary in their clinical presentation, behavior and prognosis. The most common site of metastasis is the liver. Surgical resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is thought to afford the best long-term outcomes when feasible. Initial preoperative workup should include surveillance for carcinoid syndrome, screening for evidence of liver insufficiency, and performance of imaging specific to neuroendocrine tumors such as a somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography scan. Standard surgical principles apply to hepatic surgery for NELM, namely prioritizing low central venous pressure anesthesia, minimizing blood loss, knowledge of liver anatomy, generous use of intraoperative ultrasound, as well as safe parenchymal transection techniques and practices to avoid bile leakage. Knowledge of established prognostic factors may assist with patient selection, which is important for optimizing short- and long-term outcomes of hepatic resection. Adjunct therapies such as concomitant liver ablation are used frequently and are generally safe when used appropriately. For patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. Primary tumor resection in the setting of unresectable metastatic disease is more controversial, however generally recommended if morbidity is acceptable. For patients who are not surgical candidates, due to either patient performance status or burden of liver disease, several liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization are available to assist with locoregional control, extend progression-free survival (PFS), and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options exist for patients with metastatic PNET which are often prioritized for those patients with advanced or progressive disease. A systematic approach in a multi-disciplinary setting is likely to result in the best long-term outcomes for patients with pancreatic NELM. Ongoing research is needed to determine the optimal patient selection for hepatic surgery as well as the ideal treatment sequencing for those patients with NELM.

Contemporary indications for and outcomes of hepatic resection for neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Although surgical resection is associated with the best long-term outcomes for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), the current indications for and outcomes of surgery for NELM from a population perspective are not well understood.

AIM

To determine the current indications for and outcomes of liver resection (LR) for NELM using a population-based cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the 2014-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and targeted hepatectomy databases was performed to identify patients who underwent LR for NELM. Perioperative characteristics and 30-d morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 669 patients who underwent LR for NELM, the median age was 60 (interquartile range: 51-67) and 51% were male. While the number of metastases resected ranged from 1 to 9, the most common (45%) number of tumors resected was one. The majority (68%) of patients had a largest tumor size of < 5 cm. Most patients underwent partial hepatectomy (71%) while fewer underwent a right or left hepatectomy or trisectionectomy. The majority of operations were open (82%) versus laparoscopic (17%) or robotic (1%). In addition, 30% of patients underwent intraoperative ablation while 45% had another concomitant operation including cholecystectomy (28.8%), bowel resection (20.2%), or partial pancreatectomy (3.4%). Overall 30-d morbidity and mortality was 29% and 1.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 3 [odds ratios (OR), OR = 2.089, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.197-3.645], open approach (OR = 1.867, 95%CI: 1.148-3.036), right hepatectomy (OR = 1.618, 95%CI: 1.014-2.582), and prolonged operative time of > 230 min (OR = 1.731, 95%CI: 1.168-2.565) were associated with higher 30-d morbidity while intraoperative ablation and concomitant procedures were not.

CONCLUSION

LR for NELM was performed with relatively low postoperative morbidity and mortality. Concomitant procedures performed at the time of LR did not increase morbidity.

Treatment options for PNET liver metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms. About 40-80% of patients with PNET are metastatic at presentation, usually involving the liver (40-93%). Liver metastasis represents the most significant prognostic factor. The aim of this study is to present an up-to-date review of treatment options for patients with liver metastases from PNETs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify all pertinent studies published up to May 2018.

RESULTS

The literature search evaluated all the therapeutic options for patients with liver metastases of PNETs, including surgical treatment, loco-regional therapies, and pharmacological treatment. All the different treatment options showed particular indications in different presentations of liver metastases of PNET. Surgery remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option in patients with PNETs and resectable liver metastases, even if relapse rates are high. Efficacy of medical treatment has increased with advances in targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, and the introduction of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Several techniques for loco-regional control of metastases are available, including chemo- or radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with PNET metastases should be multidisciplinary and must be personalized according to the features of individual patients and tumors.

Systematic literature review of the antitumor effect of octreotide in neuroendocrine tumors

AIM

To provide a comprehensive examination of the existing evidence of the antitumor effect of long-acting octreotide in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

METHODS

A systematic literature review of clinical trials and observational studies was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane through January 18, 2017. Conference abstracts for 2015 and 2016 from 5 scientific meetings were also searched.

RESULTS

Of 41 articles/abstracts identified, 13 unique studies compared octreotide with active or no treatment. Two of the 13 studies were clinical trials; the remaining were observational studies. The phase 3 Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study of the Effect of Octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors clinical trial showed that long-acting octreotide significantly prolonged time to tumor progression compared with placebo in patients with functionally active and inactive metastatic midgut NETs; no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed, possibly due to the crossover of placebo patients to octreotide. Retrospective observational studies found that long-acting octreotide use was associated with significantly longer OS than no octreotide use for patients with distant metastases although not for those with local/regional disease.

CONCLUSION

The clinical trial and observational studies with informative evidence support long-acting octreotide’s antitumor effect on time to tumor progression and OS. This review showed the rarity of existing studies assessing octreotide’s antitumor effect and recommends that future research is warranted.

Cytoreductive debulking surgery among patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis: a multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Management of neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM) in the setting of unresectable disease is poorly defined and the role of debulking remains controversial. The objective of the current study was to define outcomes following non-curative intent liver-directed therapy (debulking) among patients with NELM.

METHODS

612 patients were identified who underwent liver-directed therapy of NELM from a multi-institutional database. Outcomes were stratified according to curative (R0/R1) versus non-curative ≥ 80% debulking (R2).

RESULTS

179 (29.2%) patients had an R2/debulking procedure. Patients undergoing debulking more commonly had more aggressive high-grade tumors (R0/R1: 12.8% vs. R2: 35.0%; P < 0.001) or liver disease burden that was bilateral (R0/R1: 52.8% vs. R2: 75.6%; P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 51 months, median (R0/R1: not reached vs. R2: 87 months; P < 0.001) and 5-year survival (R0/R1: 85.2% vs. R2: 60.7%; P < 0.001) was higher among patients who underwent an R0/R1 resection compared with patients who underwent a debulking operation. Among patients with ≥50% NELM liver involvement, median and 5-year survival following debulking was 55.4 months and 40.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Debulking operations for NELM provided reasonable long-term survival. Hepatic debulking for patients with NELM is a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with grossly unresectable disease that may provide a survival benefit.

Optimizing Somatostatin Analog Use in Well or Moderately Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues, aiming to control tumor secretion or growth, constitute the most attractive therapeutic option for patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art knowledge gaps and potential opportunities for future development and optimization of this therapeutic modality.

METHOD

A contextualized systematic review with a narrative component was conducted using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Titles were screened, and non-English, duplicate, or irrelevant entries were excluded. Selection criteria for articles included the following: publication in English between 1995 and 2016, patients with GEP-NETs, analysis of efficacy, safety, practical management considerations, predictive factors, and/or strategies for overcoming resistance, concerning somatostatin analogs.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven studies out of 2771 screened publications met the inclusion criteria (16 randomized clinical trials, 27 phase II trials, 3 phase I trials, 3 subgroup analyses of clinical trials, 1 open-label extension of a randomized trial, 1 phase IV trial, 32 observational studies, and 14 basic research articles). The nature and scope of literature was diverse with most articles dedicated to drug efficacy or indications of use (n = 49), pharmacological issues (n = 8), assessment or predictors of response (n = 4), practical management (n = 11), combination therapy or other means to overcome resistance (n = 19), receptors and signaling pathways (n = 3), and subgroup analyses (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

In this appraisal, we have found some practical aspects that can help to the optimization of somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in patients with well-differentiated GEP-NETs. We have also identified areas of uncertainty in an effort to guide clinical research in the coming years.

The Role of Cytoreductive Hepatic Surgery as an Adjunct to the Management of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic neuroendocrine cancers to the liver often present with disabling endocrinopathies and pain associated with bulky disease. Quality of life for these patients is poor and can require long-term therapy with somatostatin analogs for control of their symptoms. Alternative therapies to decrease tumor burden and subsequent hormone release have been investigated. Of these, cytoreductive surgery was found to have the most consistent and profound impact on symptom regression and overall survival.

METHODS

Several cases are reported that illustrate an aggressive multimodality approach in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine cancers to the liver. The literature is reviewed and the role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases is discussed.

RESULTS

Cytoreductive surgery can be performed safely with minimal morbidity and mortality. Regression of symptoms occurs in the majority of patients and survival is prolonged.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention as part of an aggressive multimodality treatment plan results in improved outcomes for patients with advanced hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine origin. Future directions may include earlier surgical intervention with adjuvant therapies reserved for aggressive recurrent disease.

Long-Term Survival with Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues Plus Aggressive Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Long-acting somatostatin analogues (S-LAR) improve recurrence-free survival in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) from gastrointestinal (GI) primary, but their impact on overall survival when combined with aggressive cytoreductive surgery is unclear.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed our institutional cancer database to identify patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for metastatic NET from GI primary between December 1997 and June 2013. Additionally, a cohort selected from 3,384 metastatic neuroendocrine cases in the SEER-Medicare database (January 2003 to December 2009) was used to verify and expand on our results.

RESULTS

Most of the 49 patients from our institution had primary lesions in the small intestine (22 of 49 [44.9%]) or pancreas (14 of 49 [28.6%]); 37 patients (75.5%) had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. These patients underwent 1 (32 of 49 [65.3%]), 2 (11 of 49 [22.4%]), or at least 3 (6 of 49 [12.3%]) surgical procedures; 33 patients (67.3%) underwent resection plus ablation, 19 (38.7%) underwent major hepatectomy, and 34 (69.4%) received S-LAR (29.4% administered preoperatively). Median follow-up was 112 months. Rates of 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were 94%, 78%, 64%, and 31%, respectively, in the 34 patients undergoing aggressive cytoreductive surgery plus S-LAR. Of the SEER-Medicare population, 1,741 patients met inclusion criteria. The DSS for the 104 patients treated with combination therapy was 68.3% at 5 years and 60.6% at 10 years, as compared with 54.7% and 51.8%, respectively, for the 202 patients receiving surgery alone, and 50.0% and 36.0%, respectively, for the 342 patients receiving S-LAR alone (p < 0.0001). The group receiving neither treatment (n = 1,093) had 5-year and 10-year DSS of 34.3% and 26.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-acting somatostatin analogues combined with aggressive cytoreductive surgery improves the long-term survival of select patients with metastatic NET from GI primary.

Curative versus palliative surgical resection of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

The role of surgical therapy in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is unclear. In this study, the results obtained with curative or palliative resection, by reviewing recent literature and performing a meta-analysis, were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published between January 1990 and October 2013 were performed. Studies that evaluated the different survival between patients treated by curative or palliative surgical resection of hepatic metastases from NETs were considered. The collected studies were evaluated for heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality. To calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) estimate and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI), a fixed-effects model was applied.

RESULTS

After the literature search, 2,546 studies were found and, among 38 potentially eligible studies, 3 were considered. We did not find a significant longer survival in patients treated with curative surgical resection of hepatic metastases when compared to palliative hepatic resection HR 0.40 (95% CI: 0.14-1.11). In one study, palliative resection of hepatic metastases significantly increased survival when compared to embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Curative and also palliative surgery of NETs liver metastases may improve survival outcome. However, further randomized clinical trials are needed to elucidate this argument.

Gastric neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are increasingly recognised, and management decisions may be difficult due to an incomplete understanding of aetiology, natural history and optimum therapy. This article presents a current understanding based on recent advances in epidemiology, classification, molecular profiling, and treatment.

METHODS

Relevant medical literature was identified from searches of PubMed and references cited in appropriate articles identified. Selection of articles was based on peer review, journal and relevance.

RESULTS

Gastric NETs may be divided into three clinical prognostic groups: type I is associated with autoimmune atrophic gastritis and hypergastrinaemia, type II is associated with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and type III lesions are gastrin-independent, have the greatest metastatic potential and poorest prognosis. There has been an increased frequency of gastric NETs reported. Management approaches have evolved in parallel with advances in endoscopic staging and surgery, as well as improved understanding of the biology and natural history of NETs.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric NETs present a spectrum of activity from indolent tumours to metastatic malignancy. Treatment decisions for patients must be individualised and are best managed by a multidisciplinary team approach. The current evidence base is limited to small series and efforts to treat patients within clinical networks of expertise are warranted.

Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) most commonly metastasize to the liver. Hepatic resection of NET hepatic metastases (NETHM) has been shown to improve symptomology and survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of clinical studies before September 2010 was performed to examine the efficacy of hepatic resection for NETHM. As a secondary end-point, the impact of treatment on safety and symptomology were determined and prognostic variables were identified. The quality of each study was also assessed using predefined criteria incorporating 9 characteristics. Clinical outcome was synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine included reported survival outcomes with a median 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival of 83% (range, 63-100%), 70.5% (range, 31-100%), and 42% (range, 0-100%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months (range, 13-46 months) and median 1-,3-,5- and 10-year PFS of 63% (range, 50-80 %), 32% (range, 24-69%), 29% (range, 6-66%) and 1% (range, 0-11%), respectively. Poor histologic grade, extra-hepatic disease and a macroscopically incomplete resection were associated with a poor prognosis. Studies reported a median rate of symptomatic relief from surgery in 95% of patients (range, 50-100%).

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection for NETHM provides symptomatic benefit and is associated with favourable survival outcomes although the majority of patients invariably develop disease progression.

[Extent of resection for neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine]

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine have been diagnosed with increasing frequency over the past 35 years and presently account for approximately 2% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. While most of these tumors are discovered incidentally during emergency laparotomy or in the clinical setting of unknown primary cancer with hepatic metastases, the growing awareness of this rare entity and improved diagnostic methods promote earlier diagnosis. The classical carcinoid syndrome with flush, diarrhea and cardiac strain is observed only in 20-30% of patients. The clinical symptoms necessitate a special preoperative preparation of the patient including evaluation of cardiac function.Prospective studies assessing the efficacy of surgical treatment strategies for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine do not exist. However, retrospective studies have demonstrated that curative as well as palliative resection of the primary tumor improves the prognosis and the quality of life of patients. Besides limited resection of the small bowel in order to avoid postoperative short bowel syndrome an effective clearance of the regional lymph nodes is essential. A primary tumor site in the terminal ileum requires dissection of the lymph nodes on the right side of the ileocolic artery which usually implies an additional resection of the right colon. In cases of a primary tumor site located in the lower ileum up to the distal jejunum, a cone-shaped resection of the mesenterium of the small bowel with extension of lymphadenectomy into adjacent segments with preservation of vascularization is performed.

Surgical treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases

Management of Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is challenging. The presence of NELM worsens survival outcome and almost 10% of all liver metastases are neuroendocrine in origin. There is no firm consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for NELM. A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed from 1995-2010, to collate the current evidence and formulate a sound management algorithm. There are 22 case series with a total of 793 patients who had undergone surgery for NELM. The overall survival ranges from 46-86% at 5 years, 35-79% at 10 years, and the median survival ranges from 52-123 months. After successful cytoreductive surgery, the mean duration of symptom reduction is between 16-26 months, and the 5-year recurrence/progression rate ranges from 59-76%. Five studies evaluated the efficacy of a combination cytoreductive strategy reporting survival rate of ranging from 83% at 3 years to 50% at 10 years. To date, there is no level 1 evidence comparing surgery versus other liver-directed treatment options for NELM. An aggressive surgical approach, including combination with additional liver-directed procedures is recommended as it leads to long-term survival, significant long-term palliation, and a good quality of life. A multidisciplinary approach should be established as the platform for decision making.

Predictors of response to radio-embolization (TheraSphere®) treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) frequently metastasize to the liver. NET liver metastasis has been shown to respond to Yttrium-90 microspheres therapy. The aims of the present study were to define factors that predict the response to radio-embolization in patients with NET liver metastases.

METHODS

From January 2006 until March 2009, all patients with NET liver metastasis that received radio-embolization using TheraSphere® (glass microspheres) were reviewed. The response was determined by a change in the percentage of necrosis (ΔN%) after the first radio-embolization based on the modified RECIST criteria (mRECIST) criteria. The following confounding variables were measured: age, gender, size of the lesions, liver involvement, World Health Organization (WHO) classification, the presence of extra-hepatic metastasis, octereotide treatment and previous operative [surgery and (RFA)] and non-operative treatments (chemo-embolization and bland-embolization).

RESULTS

In all, 25 patients were identified, with a median follow-up of 21.7 months. The median age was 64.6 years, 28% had extra-hepatic metastasis and 56% were WHO stage 2. Post-treatment, the mean ΔN% was 48.4%. Previous surgical therapy was a significant predictor of the response with a response rate of 66.7 ΔN% vs. 31.5 ΔN% (P= 0.02). Bilateral liver disease, a high percentage of liver involvement and large metastatic lesions were inversely related to the degree of tumour response although did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Radio-embolization increased the necrosis of NET liver metastasis mainly in patients with less bulky disease. This may imply that surgical therapy before radio-embolization would increase the response rates.

Multimodal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The incidence of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) has increased over the past three decades. Hepatic metastases which occur in up to 75% of NET patients significantly worsen their prognosis. New imaging techniques with increasing sensitivity enabling tumour detection at an early stage have been developed. The treatment encompasses a panel of surgical and non-surgical modalities.

METHODS

This article reviews the published literature related to management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

RESULTS

Abdominal computer tomography, magnetic resonance tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy are widely accepted imaging modalities. Hepatic resection is the only potentially curative treatment. Liver transplantation is justified in highly selected patients. Liver-directed interventional techniques and locally ablative measures offer effective palliation. Promising novel therapeutic options offering targeted approaches are under evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases still needs to be standardized. Management in centres of expertise should be strongly encouraged in order to enable a multidisciplinary approach and personalized treatment. Development of molecular prognostic factors to select treatment according to patient risk should be attempted.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases

This review summarizes regional strategies for management of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NLM), including hepatic resection, ablation, liver transplantation, and hepatic arterial embolization/chemoembolization. Despite early disease recurrence and/or progression, resection of NLM with or without combined ablation provides long-term survival and symptom improvement. When complete resection of gross liver disease is not feasible, resection as a tumor debulking strategy should be considered in patients with extreme hormonal symptoms refractory to other treatments or with tumors in locations that would affect short-term quality of life. Hepatic arterial embolization with or without local instillation of chemotherapy may induce disease response, symptomatic improvement, and prolonged survival in patients with unresectable NLM. Early disease recurrence, high postoperative mortality, the absence of extensive experience, and lack of universal indications for organ allocation preclude orthotopic liver transplantation as an option for most patients with unresectable NLM.

Liver transplantation and neuroendocrine tumors: lessons from a single centre experience and from the literature review

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) metastases represent at this moment the only accepted indication of liver transplantation (LT) for liver secondaries. Between 1984-2007, nine (1.1%) of 824 adult LTs were performed because of NET. There were five well differentiated functioning NETs (four carcinoids and one gastrinoma), three well differentiated non functioning NETs and one poorly differentiated NET. Indications for LT were an invalidating unresectable tumor (4x), and/or a diffuse tumor localization (3x) and/or a refractory hormonal syndrome (5x). Median post-LT patient survival is 60.9 months (range 4.8-119). One-, 3- and 5-year actuarial survival rates are 88%, 77% and 33%; 1, 3 and 5 years disease free survival rates are 67%, 33% and 11%. Due to a more rigorous selection procedure, results improved since 2000; three out of five patients are alive disease-free at 78, 84 and 96 months. Review of these series together with a review of the literature reveals that results of LT for this oncological condition can be improved using better selection criteria, adapted immunosuppression and neo- and adjuvant surgical as well as medical treatment. LT should be considered earlier in the therapeutic algorithm of selected NET patients as it is the only therapy that can offer a cure.

Metastatic carcinoid tumor: changing patterns of care over two decades

BACKGROUND

Metastatic carcinoid tumors (MCTs), an important subgroup of neuroendocrine tumors, occur infrequently and often have an indolent course, limiting data on long-term treatment outcomes. We aimed to assess treatment trends at a single center over time and the impact on the outcome.

STUDY

Patients diagnosed with carcinoid tumors in the North West Adelaide Health Service between January 1, 1985 and March 1, 2007 were identified from the South Australian Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

We identified 92 patients with carcinoid tumors; 49 had MCT. Although treatment options increased over time, the most significant change was to access octreotide therapy, with 24 receiving long-acting somatostatin analogs. Survival improved over time and the median overall survival for patients receiving long-acting somatostatin analogs was 112 months compared with 53 months for those who did not (P=0.021, hazard ratio: 2.46). Ten year survival was 40% and 22%, respectively. About 75% of evaluable patients had a biochemical response to initial therapy and a measurable response occurred in 3 of 24 (13%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This single center experience has provided insight into current treatment options for MCT, and suggests the use of long-acting somatostatin analogs may impact on disease control and survival. However, the uptake of other treatment options seems limited and there is a need for agents that target tumor progression.

Liver resection versus other treatments for neuroendocrine tumours in patients with resectable liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours are tumours of cells, which possess secretory granules and originate from the neuroectoderm. While liver resection is generally advocated in patients with resectable liver metastases, recent studies have shown good survival in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours who underwent thermal ablation using radiofrequency.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of liver resection versus other treatments in patients with resectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and LILACS until July 2008 for identifying the randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing liver resection (alone or in combination with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) versus other interventions (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, or immunotherapy) and those comparing liver resection and thermal ablation (radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) in patients with resectable liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

We were unable to identify any randomised clinical trial suitable for inclusion in this review. We were also unable to identify any quasi-randomised studies, cohort studies, or case-control studies that could inform meaningfully.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from randomised clinical trials comparing liver resection versus other treatments in patients with resectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Liver resection appears to be the main stay curative treatment for neuroendocrine liver metastases based on non-randomised studies. Further randomised clinical trials comparing liver resection alone or in combination with chemoembolisation or radionuclide therapy are needed. Further randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation in selected patients may also be appropriate.

Palliative cytoreductive surgery versus other palliative treatments in patients with unresectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours are tumours of cells which possess secretory granules and originate from the neuroectoderm. While liver resection is generally advocated in patients with resectable liver alone metastases, the management of patients with liver metastases, which cannot be completely resected, is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if cytoreductive surgery is better than other palliative treatments in patients with liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, which cannot be completely resected.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and LILACS until July 2008 for identifying the randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing liver resection (alone or in combination with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) versus other palliative treatments (chemotherapy or hormone-therapy or immunotherapy) or no treatment in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours, which cannot be completely resected, were considered for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

We were unable to identify any randomised clinical trial suitable for inclusion in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The literature provides no evidence from randomised clinical trials in order to assess the role of cytoreductive surgery in non-resectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. High-quality randomised clinical trials may become feasible to perform if their conduct and study design is thoroughly considered in all their practical and methodological aspects. Pilot randomised clinical trials, which can guide the study design of definitive randomised clinical trials, are necessary.

Histologic grade is correlated with outcome after resection of hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The behavior of neuroendocrine neoplasms is poorly defined, and predictors of outcome after surgical resection have yet to be identified. Consequently, guidelines for treatment remain unclear. Current pathologic classification systems do not permit meaningful discrimination of hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

METHODS

The authors reviewed prospectively maintained databases from 2 institutions of patients who underwent hepatic resection for neuroendocrine neoplasms between 1990 and 2006. Patient, tumor, and operative characteristics were analyzed to identify factors associated with overall survival, progression-free survival, and symptom control. Hepatic neoplasms were stratified by using a 3-tier pathologic classification system based on the number of mitotic figures and the presence of tumor necrosis that was recently validated for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were identified from the databases. Low-grade, intermediate-grade, and high-grade neoplasms were identified in 53%, 37%, and 10% of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 51 months, the median overall survival for all patients was 91 months, and it was 108 months when 7 patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas were excluded. Progressive disease was eventually observed in 81% of patients, and the median progression-free survival was 17 months. The median time to the onset of symptoms was 39 months for patients who presented with hormonal symptoms and 80 months for all patients. Histologic grade was associated with poorer overall and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

When performed in a context of aggressive multimodality therapy, long-term outcomes after partial hepatectomy for hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms were favorable; however, disease progression was eventually observed in the majority of patients. Several oncologic variables were associated with significant differences in survival after resection. A novel pathologic classification system appears to enhance prognostic stratification of patients with hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic disease to the liver

A number of cancers present with synchronous or metachronous hepatic metastases. Historically, many of these patients were considered unresectable and were treated with either systemic chemotherapy or supportive care. Today, a variety of options exist for the management of hepatic metastases. Newer agents for systemic therapy continue to be introduced and are providing improved progression-free and overall survival and increased resectability of liver metastases. However, complete surgical resection of isolated hepatic metastases remains the optimal management for these patients. Surgical interventions can be offered to patients with hepatic-only metastases. Hepatic artery chemotherapy represents an adjunct for those patients undergoing resection and can improve survival. This benefit may be even more pronounced when combined with systemic chemotherapy. Newer generation biologic agents can improve results. New therapeutic modalities to treat lesions that are unresectable include ablative techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation. This article will examine modalities of diagnosis of hepatic metastases and highlight the data regarding hepatic resection for metastases of several types of primary cancers, the rationale for, and efficacy of, hepatic arterial chemotherapy, in both the postoperative adjuvant setting and in unresectable liver disease, and review the current literature for ablative techniques in the treatment of liver metastases.

Cyto-reduction of neuroendocrine tumours using Sandostatin LAR in combination with Infergen: results of a case series

Historically, limited trials evaluating biotherapy in treating metastatic neuroendocrine tumours have yielded mixed results. In this study, the efficacy of a novel combination therapy featuring longacting Sandostatin LAR plus alpha-interferon was evaluated. In a prospective case series, 12 patients with unresectable metastatic neuroendocrine tumours refractory to treatment initiated therapy with Infergen and Sandostatin LAR. Radiological response was followed serially at 3-month intervals. A biochemical response was considered significant if marker levels decreased by > or = 50% compared with baseline. Inhibition of tumour growth lasting for greater than 3 months (mean response 22.6+/-17.7 months) was seen in eight patients. Complete tumour regression was observed in one patient, lasting for 40 months; three patients exhibited partial tumour regression (mean response 29.3+/-24.0 months), and four patients maintained a stable tumour response (mean response 13.3+/-9.2 months). Four patients showed no response to therapy (mean response 5.0+/-6.0 months). All enrolled patients are alive currently. The biochemical response seen in seven patients did not correlate with the radiological response. These results suggest that the novel combination of longacting Sandostatin LAR with an alpha-interferon may be at least as effective as either combination therapy with short-acting octreotide or monotherapy with Sandostatin LAR.

Clinical Presentation and Management of Carcinoid Tumors

The generally indolent nature of neuroendocrine tumors is an advantage in the management of patients who have localized disease, and surgery alone is often curative. This same property presents a challenge in the treatment of patients who have metastatic disease, in whom standard cytotoxic chemotherapy has a limited benefit. In such patients, the use of somatostatin analogs, interferon, and the treatment of hepatic metastases may provide effective palliation. The highly vascular nature of carcinoid tumors has led to the investigation of antiangiogenic agents in this setting. Preliminary reports of activity associated with agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway suggest that such strategies may play a role in the future treatment of patients who have this disease.

Surgery for hepatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single institutional experience in Japan

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection has been advocated as an effective treatment for hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (HNETs) in Western countries, but few data are available to define its indications. We evaluated the results of Japanese patients to determine the prognostic factors and the feasibility of our aggressive surgical approach.

METHODS

The records of all consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for HNETs at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were selected for surgery if all tumors were deemed resectable, regardless of their extent.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were identified. Bilobar disease was present in 13 patients (62%). Eleven patients (52%) underwent major hepatectomy, which included right trisectionectomy, extended right or left hepatectomy and right hepatectomy. No in-hospital death occurred. The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 95, 68 and 41%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 34 months. Metastatic HNETs from bronchopulmonary primaries exhibited significantly poor outcome compared with other primary sites (P = 0.04). Patients who underwent curative resection had an improved overall 5-year survival rate of 73% compared with palliative resection (0%, P = 0.01). The longest survival in the latter group was 57 months. Complete symptom resolution rate was 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study from Asia demonstrating the safety of aggressive hepatic resection for HNETs. Significant symptom relief and long-term survival were achieved irrespective of the extent of disease or the magnitude of operation. Metastatic HNETs from bronchopulmonary primaries may represent a more lethal subset of tumors.

Selective hepatic artery embolization for treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoid and pancreatic endocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Prognosis in patients with carcinoid and pancreatic endocrine tumors with diffuse, unresectable liver metastases is poor. Palliation is often difficult despite the use of somatostatin analogs, interferon alpha, or systemic chemotherapy. Several reviews have suggested that hepatic artery embolization, with or without intraarterial chemotherapy, can be used for control of symptoms and for cytoreduction in patients with liver dominant metastases.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2002, 161 embolizations using polyvinyl alcohol or microspheres were performed on 84 patients with carcinoid or pancreatic endocrine tumors metastatic to the liver. A retrospective review was performed to evaluate symptomatic response, biochemical response, adverse effects, and duration of survival. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography scans were also assessed to determine radiographic response rates. Further analysis of survival was performed to assess the possible impact of various postembolization therapies.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients underwent bland hepatic artery embolizations during the study period. Among 55 symptomatic patients, 44 patients had fewer symptoms, and among 35 patients whose tumor markers were followed, 28 had a major biochemical response. Objective radiographic responses were observed in 11 of 23 patients. No deaths occurred during therapy, and major toxicities were rare. Median overall survival was 36 months from time of initial embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic artery embolization frequently results in clinical and radiographic responses in patients with unresectable liver metastases from carcinoid or pancreatic endocrine tumors. Morbidity is low when appropriate supportive care is provided. Hepatic artery embolization often results in regressions in patients with unresectable liver metastases from carcinoid or pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Therapeutic options for gastrointestinal carcinoids

Although wide surgical resection is the optimal curative therapy for carcinoid tumors, in most patients the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis usually renders excision a palliative procedure. This nevertheless decreases tumor burden, facilitates symptom control, and prevents complications caused by bleeding, perforation, or bowel obstruction resulting from fibrosis. In the stomach (types I and II) and rectum endoscopic excision may be adequate provided the lesion(s) are local. Long-term therapy is focused on symptom alleviation and improvement of quality of life using somatostatin analogues, particularly in a subcutaneous depot formulation. In some instances interferons may have a role but their usage often is associated with substantial adverse events. Conventional chemotherapy and external radiotherapy either alone or in a variety of permutations are of minimal efficacy and should be balanced against the decrease in quality of life often engendered by such agents. Hepatic metastases may be amenable to surgery, radiofrequency ablation, or embolization either alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents or isotopically loaded microspheres. Rarely hepatic transplantation may be of benefit although controversy exists as to its actual use. Peptide-receptor-targeted radiotherapy for advanced disease using radiolabeled octapeptide analogs (111In/90Yt/177Lu-octreotide) appear promising but data are limited and its status remains investigational. A variety of antiangiogenesis and growth factor-targeted agents have been evaluated, but as yet have shown little promise. The keystone of current therapy remains the long-acting somatostatin analogues that alleviate symptomatology and substantially improve quality of life with minimal adverse effects.

Radiofrequency ablation of neuroendocrine liver metastases: the Middlesex experience

BACKGROUND

Current treatment options for neuroendocrine liver metastases are not widely applicable or not that effective. Image-guided thermal ablation offers the possibility of a minimally invasive, albeit palliative, treatment that decreases tumor volume, preserves most of the normal liver, and can be repeated several times. We report our experience with image-guided thermal ablation in 25 patients with unresectable liver metastases.

METHODS

Since 1990 we have treated 189 tumors at 66 treatment sessions in 25 patients (12 female, 13 male; median age, 56 years; age range, 26--78 years). Thirty treatments were performed with a solid-state laser, and 36 treatments were performed with radiofrequency ablation. All but one treatment was performed percutaneously under image guidance. Sixteen patients had metastases from carcinoid primaries, three from gastrinoma, two from insulinoma, and four from miscellaneous causes. Fourteen of 25 had symptoms from hormone secretion.

RESULTS

Imaging follow-up was available in 19 patients at a median of 21 months (range, 4--75 months). There was a complete response in six patients, a partial response in seven, and stable disease in one; hence, tumor load was controlled in 14 of 19 patients (74%). Relief of hormone-related symptoms was achieved in nine of 14 patients (69%). The median survival period from the diagnosis of liver metastases was 53 months. One patient with end-stage cardiac disease died after a carcinoid crisis. There were eight (12%) complications: five local and three distant, four major and four minor.

CONCLUSIONS

As a minimally invasive, readily repeatable procedure that can be used to ablate small tumors, preferably before patients become severely symptomatic, radiofrequency ablation can provide effective control of liver tumor volume in most patients over many years.

Rare endocrine tumours of the GI tract

Functional pancreatic endocrine tumors other than gastrinoma and insulinoma are quite rare. The principles of management include the diagnosis and management of the functional hormonal syndrome, and management of the potentially malignant tumor. Optimally, control of the hormonal syndrome is achieved preoperatively to stabilize the patient status for the operation, however, resection may be an important part of the control of the hormonal syndrome. Ultimately, the only curative treatment for these neoplasms is complete tumour resection, when feasible.

Endocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Management of metastatic endocrine tumours

Gastroenteropancreatic tumours are rare. They compromise a heterogenous class of neoplasm. If there is no hypersecretion syndrome, symptoms may be uncharacteristic and thus diagnosis occurs rather late after the first manifestations of the disease. The most important prognostic parameters are histological classification, the localisation of the primary, the tumour size and stage at diagnosis, and the presence or absence of metachronous or synchronous neoplasia. The article will focus on the importance of each of these parameters for the various treatment options in patients with metastatic disease.

Palliative management strategies of advanced gastrointestinal carcinoid neoplasms

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Optimal management of gastrointestinal carcinoid neoplasms that metastasize to the liver is controversial. Although operative resection seems to be the most effective approach to metastatic disease, hepatic metastases are usually multicentric and often non-resectable. We investigated the effectiveness of several forms of palliative tumor cytoreduction followed by administration of somatostatin analogues in advanced carcinoid neoplasms.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with 34 patients with gastrointestinal carcinoid neoplasms. Eighteen patients had metastases and 14 had hormonal symptoms. Twenty-two patients underwent radical surgery, ten with multiple liver metastases were treated with a combination of debulking (resection, radiofrequency ablation, chemoembolization), followed by medical treatment with long-acting octreotide and eventually by radiolabelled somatostatin analogues, and two patients with intractable disease received only biotherapies.

RESULTS

The six patients with metastatic disease who underwent radical curative liver resection had a median survival of 52 months, compared with a median survival of 48 months in the ten patients who underwent palliative debulking. Symptomatic improvement was observed in all the patients after debulking procedures. The two patients who underwent only medical treatment died after 9 and 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive tumor debulking should be performed in patients with liver metastases already at diagnosis even when complete resection is not feasible because the combination of cytoreductive procedures followed by biotherapies may provide good long-term survival and achieves symptom control in most patients with advanced disease.

Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids

Gastrointestinal (GI) carcinoids are ill-understood, enigmatic malignancies, which, although slow growing compared with adenocarcinomas, can behave aggressively. Carcinoids are classified based on organ site and cell of origin and occur most frequently in the GI (67%) where they are most common in small intestine (25%), appendix (12%), and rectum (14%). Local manifestations--mass, bleeding, obstruction, or perforation--reflect invasion or tumor-induced fibrosis and often result in incidental detection at emergency surgery. Symptoms are protean (flushing, sweating, diarrhea, bronchospasm), usually misdiagnosed, and reflect secretion of diverse amines and peptides. Biochemical diagnosis is established by elevation of plasma chromogranin A (CgA), serotonin, or urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), while topographic localization is by Octreoscan, computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan, or endoscopy/ultrasound. Histological identification is confirmed by CgA and synaptophysin immunohistochemistry. Primary therapy is surgical excision to avert local manifestations and decrease hormone secretion. Hepatic metastases may be amenable to cytoreduction, radiofrequency ablation, embolization alone, or with cytotoxics. Hepatic transplantation may rarely be beneficial. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have minimal efficacy and substantially decrease quality of life. Intravenously administered receptor-targeted radiolabeled somatostatin analogs are of use in disseminated disease. Local endoscopic excision for gastric (type I and II) and rectal carcinoids may be adequate. Somatostatin analogues provide the most effective symptomatic therapy, although interferon has some utility. Overall 5-year survival for carcinoids of the appendix is 98%, gastric (types I/II) is 81%, rectum is 87%, small intestinal is 60%, colonic carcinoids is 62%, and gastric type III/IV is 33%.

Enteroendocrine tumors other than carcinoid: a review of clinically significant advances

Only relatively recently has there been an increased clinical recognition and characterization of the heterogeneous group of rare gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Most have endocrine function and exhibit varying degrees of malignancy. This review summarizes the derivation of these tumors and the advances in their diagnosis and treatment over the past decade and a half. They are varied in their biological behavior and clinical courses and, depending on their cell type, can produce different hormones causing distinct clinical endocrine syndromes (insulinoma [hypoglycemia], gastrinoma [Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES)], vasoactive intestinal peptideoma [VIPoma], watery diarrhea, hypokalemia-achlorhydria [WDHA], glucagonoma [glucagonoma syndrome], and so forth). In addition to surgery for cure or palliation (by excision and a variety of other cytoreductive techniques), they each are treated with anti-hormonal agents or drugs targeted to each tumor's specific product or its effects. The majority have benefited from the gut hormone-inhibiting action of somatostatin analogs. Because of their usual slow rate of growth it is recommended that, even when they are advanced and incurable, unlike in patients with common and more malignant cancers, patients with neuroendocrine tumors often can be palliated and appear to survive longer when managed with an active approach using sequential multimodality treatment. Advances in these various therapies are reviewed and the beneficial emergence of global self-help patient support groups is noted.

Major hepatectomy with simultaneous pancreatectomy for advanced hepatobiliary cancer1 1No competing interests declared

BACKGROUND

Combined major hepatectomy with pancreatectomy (MHP) is a rarely used operation for the treatment of hepatobiliary cancer. Few reports have discussed the utility of this procedure and its indications are poorly defined. The aim of this study was to review our experience with MHP.

STUDY DESIGN

A review of our prospective hepatobiliary surgical database between January 1994 and July 2000 identified 17 patients who had undergone MHP. Preoperative radiographic and laboratory data, intraoperative findings, hospital outcomes, and longterm followup were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 3,579 patients with hepatobiliary malignancy were seen at our institution, of which 1,280 underwent resection and 17 (1.3%) had an MHP. The median age was 58 years (range 24 to 76). Histology was as follows: eight neuroendocrine carcinoma, three sarcoma, two cholangiocarcinoma, one ampullary carcinoma, one gallbladder carcinoma, one gastric carcinoma recurrence, and one benign fibrosis. All 17 patients underwent resection of two or more hepatic segments. Nine patients underwent a distal pancreatectomy and eight underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Median operative time was 6 hours (range 4 to 8) and the median blood loss was 900 mL (range 150 to 2,500). Postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (47%), and there were three perioperative deaths (18%). All three deaths occurred in patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with a hemi-hepactomy or greater. Eight patients are free of disease with a median followup of 54 months. Six patients have recurred, two of whom have died of disease with a median disease-free interval of 8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

MHP is associated with a high morbidity and mortality and should only be considered in highly selected patients when a significant potential oncologic benefit is possible.

[Solitary hepatic carcinoid tumor in a man with prior treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma. Rapid growth without carcinoid syndrome]

We describe a case of hepatic carcinoid tumor that was diagnosed after right hepatectomy. The tumor was initially believed to be metastases from a rectal adenocarcinoma for which surgery had been performed seven years earlier. We highlight the localization of the tumor in the liver only, its large size and rapid growth, as well as the absence of carcinoid syndrome. Diagnostic studies of function and localization are presented. The absence of neoplasia in other locations suggested that this neoplasm was probably a primary hepatic carcinoid tumor. The association of carcinoid tumors with other neoplasms is well-known. However, because of our patient's history and the absence of symptoms, the preoperative diagnosis was incorrect. The definitive diagnosis was confirmed by pathological analysis, allowing specific studies of function and localization to be performed and therapeutic and follow-up measures to be adopted. Although surgery plays a crucial role in the treatment of these tumors, it should be performed in the context of the multidisciplinary management recommended for this disease.

Aggressive surgery for metastatic liver neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (carcinoids, pancreatic endocrine tumors) have low malignant potential but can decrease survival rates if they spread to the liver (LNET).

METHODS

The records of 16 patients with LNET primarily from gastrointestinal carcinoids treated surgically were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 12 women and 4 men. Median age was 56 years (range 25 to 75). Thirteen (81%) had a carcinoid tumor and 5 had gastrinoma. Two patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 had both a gastric carcinoid and a jejunal gastrinoma. Eight patients (50%) had the carcinoid syndrome. Each patient had all identifiable LNET either resected or ablated. Ten patients had liver wedge resections, 1 right trisegmentectomy, 5 left hepatic lobectomies, and 2 radiofrequency ablations. Thirteen (81%) patients had concomitant bowel resections. Two patients had concomitant total gastrectomies to remove stomach primaries. The final patient had an extraintestinal pelvic primary or a liver primary. There were no operative deaths, and all 8 (100%) patients with the carcinoid syndrome had amelioration of symptoms. The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 82% with a median follow-up of 32 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that liver and concomitant extrahepatic surgery can be performed safely in patients with liver metastases because of carcinoids or pancreatic endocrine tumors. It results in excellent long-term survival and amelioration of symptoms. Surgery should be the first-line therapy for patients with LNET.

Staging of digestive endocrine tumours using helical computed tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy

BACKGROUND

In patients with digestive endocrine tumours, complete pre-operative staging is essential in planning proper management and evaluating treatment efficacy. To date, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) is considered the 'gold standard' imaging procedure, and very few data are available concerning the use of helical computed tomography (hCT). This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy and the ability to modify the surgical management of hCT, alone or combined with SRS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were staged before surgery by hCT, SRS and tumour markers, and included in group 1 if suitable for radical surgery, otherwise in group 2. All patients underwent laparotomy followed by subsequent re-staging.

RESULTS

SRS sensitivity was 77%, 48% and 67% for primary, lymph-node and liver lesions, respectively. hCT sensitivity was 94%, 69% and 94% for primary, lymph-node and liver lesions, respectively (P = 0.02 versus SRS, for liver lesions). During pre-operative evaluation, hCT correctly staged 92% and SRS 75% of patients (P = 0.02). hCT provided additional information in 17% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Since hCT has been shown to be extremely accurate, providing essential information for the planning of surgical treatment compared with that of SRS, both techniques should be used in the pre-operative work-up of digestive endocrine tumours.