Cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation: one-year results of a 2-center prospective randomized trial

Efficacy of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine after lung transplantation: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Little data supports using tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression concerning acute rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome/Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction CLAD complications following lung transplantation (LTx). Our goal was to evaluate the use of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in preventing these complications after LTx.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through January 10th, 2024. We pooled dichotomous data using the risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using the mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We included Four RCTs with a total of 677 patients. Tacrolimus was significantly associated with decreased risk of acute rejection (RR: 1.21, 95% CI [1.03, 1.42], I2 = 25%, P = 0.02) compared with cyclosporine, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome/CLAD (RR: 1.87, 95% CI [1.26, 2.77], I2 = 52%, P = 0.002), and treatment withdrawal (RR: 3.11, 95% CI [2.06, 4.70], I2 = 0%, P =  < 0.00001). However, tacrolimus significantly increased the risk of new-onset diabetes (RR: 0.33, 95% CI [0.12, 0.91], I2 = 0%, P = 0.03), and kidney dysfunction (RR: 0.79, 95% CI [0.66, 0.93], I2 = 0%, P = 0.006). In contrast, there was no difference in the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 91, 95% CI [0.68, 1.22], I2 = 0%, P = 0.53), arterial hypertension (RR: 2.40, 95% CI [0.41, 14.21], I2 = 92%, P = 0.33), and new cancer (RR: 1.57, 95% CI [0.79, 3.10], I2 = 4%, P = 0.20).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus has decreased acute rejection episodes and CLAD rate than cyclosporine, but it increased the risk of new-onset diabetes and kidney dysfunction.

Effect of once-per-day tacrolimus versus twice-per-day ciclosporin on 3-year incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation in Scandinavia (ScanCLAD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence is low regarding the choice of calcineurin inhibitor for immunosuppression after lung transplantation. We aimed to compare the use of tacrolimus once per day with ciclosporin twice per day according to the current definition of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after lung transplantation.

METHODS

ScanCLAD is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial in Scandinavia evaluating whether an immunosuppressive protocol based on anti-thymocyte globulin induction followed by tacrolimus (once per day), mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids reduces the incidence of CLAD after de novo lung transplantation compared with a protocol using ciclosporin (twice per day), mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Patients aged 18-70 years who were scheduled to undergo double lung transplantation were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either oral ciclosporin (2-3 mg/kg before transplantation and 3 mg/kg [twice per day] from postoperative day 1) or oral tacrolimus (0·05-0·1 mg/kg before transplantation and 0·1-0·2 mg/kg from postoperative day 1). The primary endpoint was CLAD at 36 months post transplantation, determined by repeated lung function tests and adjudicated by an independent committee, and was assessed with a competing-risks analysis with death and re-transplantation as competing events. The primary outcome was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as those who underwent transplantation and received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02936505) and EudraCT (2015-004137-27).

FINDINGS

Between Oct 21, 2016, and July 10, 2019, 383 patients were screened for eligibility. 249 patients underwent double lung transplantation and received at least one dose of study drug, and were thus included in the mITT population: 125 (50%) in the ciclosporin group and 124 (50%) in the tacrolimus group. The mITT population consisted of 138 (55%) men and 111 (45%) women, with a mean age of 55·2 years (SD 10·2), and no patients were lost to follow-up. In the mITT population, CLAD occurred in 48 patients (cumulative incidence 39% [95% CI 31-48]) in the ciclosporin group and 16 patients (13% [8-21]) in the tacrolimus group at 36 months post transplantation (hazard ratio [HR] 0·28 [95% CI 0·15-0·52], log-rank p<0·0001). Overall survival did not differ between groups at 3 years in the mITT population (74% [65-81] for ciclosporin vs 79% [70-85] for tacrolimus; HR 0·72 [95% CI 0·41-1·27], log-rank p=0·25). However, in the per protocol CLAD population (those in the mITT population who also had at least one post-baseline lung function test allowing assessment of CLAD), allograft survival was significantly better in the tacrolimus group (HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·26-0·91], log-rank p=0·021). Adverse events totalled 1516 in the ciclosporin group and 1459 in the tacrolimus group. The most frequent adverse events were infection (453 events), acute rejection (165 events), and anaemia (129 events) in the ciclosporin group, and infection (568 events), anaemia (108 events), and acute rejection (98 events) in the tacrolimus group. 112 (90%) patients in the ciclosporin group and 108 (87%) in the tacrolimus group had at least one serious adverse event.

INTERPRETATION

Immunosuppression based on use of tacrolimus once per day significantly reduced the incidence of CLAD compared with use of ciclosporin twice per day. These findings support the use of tacrolimus as the first choice of calcineurin inhibitor after lung transplantation.

FUNDING

Astellas, the ALF-agreement, Scandiatransplant Organization, and Heart Centre Research Committee, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Preemptive immune globulin therapy in sensitized lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Sensitized lung transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing donor-specific antibodies, which have been associated with acute and chronic rejection. Perioperative intravenous immune globulin has been used in sensitized individuals to down-regulate antibody production.

METHODS

We compared patients with a pre-transplant calculated panel reactive antibody ≥25% who did not receive preemptive immune globulin therapy to a historical control that received preemptive immune globulin therapy. Our cohort included 59 patients, 17 patients did not receive immune globulin therapy and 42 patients received therapy.

RESULTS

Donor specific antibody development was numerically higher in the non-immune globulin group compared to the immune globulin group (58.8% vs 33.3%, respectively, odds ratio 2.80, 95% confidence interval [0.77, 10.79], p = 0.13). Median time to antibody development was 9 days (Q1, Q3: 7, 19) and 28 days (Q1, Q3: 7, 58) in the non-immune globulin and immune globulin groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of primary graft dysfunction at 72 h post-transplant or acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

These findings are hypothesis generating and emphasize the need for larger, randomized studies to determine association of immune globulin therapy with clinical outcomes.

Pediatric Lung Transplant Outcomes Based on Immunosuppressive Regimen at Discharge: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-World Evidence From the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

This retrospective analysis of the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was undertaken to obtain real-world evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients to support a supplemental New Drug Application.

METHODS

Overall, 725 pediatric recipients of a primary deceased-donor lung transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2017, were followed for up to 3 years post-transplant based on an immunosuppressive regimen at hospital discharge: immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC)+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC+azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA)+MMF, or CsA+AZA. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of graft failure or death (all-cause) at 1 year post-transplant, calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The use of TAC+MMF increased over time. During 2010 to 2017, 91.7% of pediatric lung transplant recipients were receiving TAC+MMF at the time of discharge. The proportion of recipients continuing their discharge regimen at 1 year post-transplant was 83.7% with TAC+MMF and 40.4% to 59.7% with the other regimens. Cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant was 7.7% with TAC+MMF, 13.9% with TAC+AZA, 8.9% with CsA+MMF, and 9.1% with CsA+AZA. There was no significant difference in the risk of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant between groups from 1999 to 2005 (the only era when adequate numbers on each regimen allowed statistical comparison). No increase in hospitalization for infection or malignancy was seen with TAC+MMF.

CONCLUSION

The real-world evidence from the US database of transplant recipients supported the Food and Drug Administration's approval of tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients.

Timing of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy Defines its Immunosuppressive Effects in a Rat Lung Transplantation Model

Cell therapy using mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is being studied for its immunosuppressive effects. In organ transplantation, the amount of MSCs that accumulate in transplanted organs and other organs may differ depending on administration timing, which may impact their immunosuppressive effects. In vitro, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) suppress lymphocyte activation under cell-to-cell contact conditions. However, in vivo, it is controversial whether ADMSCs are more effective in accumulating in transplanted organs or in secondary lymphoid organs. Herein, we aimed to investigate whether the timing of ADMSC administration affects its immunosuppression ability in a rat lung transplantation model. In the transplantation study, rats were intramuscularly administered half the usual dose of tacrolimus (0.5 mg/kg) every 24 h after lung transplantation. ADMSCs (1 × 106) were administered via the jugular vein before (PreTx) or after (PostTx) transplantation. Cell tracking using quantum dots was performed. ADMSCs accumulated predominantly in the lung and liver; fewer ADMSCs were distributed in the grafted lung in the PreTx group than in the PostTx group. The rejection rate was remarkably low in the ADMSC-administered groups, particularly in the PostTx group. Serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ, and interleukin (IL)-6 levels showed a greater tendency to decrease in the PreTx group than in the PostTx group. The proportion of regulatory T cells in the grafted lung 10 days after transplantation was higher in the PostTx group than in the PreTx group. PostTx administration suppresses rejection better than PreTx administration, possibly due to regulatory T cell induction by ADMSCs accumulated in the transplanted lungs, suggesting a mechanism different from that in heart or kidney transplantation that PreTx administration is more effective than PostTx administration. These results could help establish cell therapy using MSCs in lung transplantation.

Pharmacotherapy of chronic lung allograft dysfunction post lung transplantation

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the primary cause of death in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) in spite of improvements in immunosuppression management. Despite advances in knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of CLAD, treatments that are currently available are usually ineffective and delay progression of disease at best. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines for the optimal treatment of CLAD, and management varies widely across transplant centers. Additionally, there are minimal publications available to summarize data for currently available therapies and outcomes in LTRs. We identified the major domains of the medical management of CLAD and conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases to identify articles published from inception to December 2021 related to CLAD in LTRs. Studies published in English pertaining to the pharmacologic prevention and treatment of CLAD were included; highest priority was given to prospective, randomized, controlled trials if available. Prospective observational and retrospective controlled trials were prioritized next, followed by retrospective uncontrolled studies, case series, and finally case reports if the information was deemed to be pertinent. Reference lists of qualified publications were also reviewed to find any other publications of interest that were not found on initial search. In the absence of literature published in the aforementioned databases, additional articles were identified by reviewing abstracts presented at the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation and American Transplant Congress annual meetings between 2010-2021. This document serves to provide a comprehensive review of the literature and considerations for the prevention and medical management of CLAD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Lung Transplant Outcomes in Adults in the United States: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-world Evidence from the SRTR

BACKGROUND

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was retrospectively analyzed to provide real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens in adult lung transplant recipients in the United States.

METHODS

Adult recipients (N = 25 355; ≥18 y) of a primary deceased-donor lung transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2017, were followed for 3 y posttransplant based on immunosuppressive regimen at discharge: immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC + azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA) + MMF, or CsA + AZA. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of graft failure or death (all-cause) at 1 y posttransplant (calculated via a modified Kaplan-Meier method).

RESULTS

Discharge immunosuppressive regimens in lung transplant recipients changed over time, with a substantial increase in the use of TAC + MMF. TAC + MMF was the most common immunosuppressive regimen (received by 61.0% of individuals at discharge). The cumulative incidence of graft failure or death at 1 y posttransplant in adult lung transplant patients receiving TAC + MMF was 8.6% (95% confidence interval 8.1-9.1). Risk of graft failure or death was significantly higher in adults receiving CsA + MMF or CsA + AZA compared with TAC + MMF, with no significant difference seen between TAC + MMF and TAC + AZA. TAC + MMF had the highest continued use at 1 y posttransplant (72.0% versus 35.4%-51.5% for the other regimens). There was no increase in the rate of infection or malignancy in the TAC + MMF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world evidence from the most comprehensive database of transplant recipients in the United States supports the use of TAC in combination with MMF or AZA as maintenance immunosuppression in adult lung transplant recipients.

A Safety and Tolerability Study of Thin Film Freeze-Dried Tacrolimus for Local Pulmonary Drug Delivery in Human Subjects

Due to the low and erratic bioavailability of oral tacrolimus (TAC), the long-term survival rate following lung transplantation remained low compared to other solid organs. TAC was reformulated and developed as inhaled formulations by thin film freezing (TFF). Previous studies reported that inhaled TAC combined with 50% w/w lactose (LAC) was safe and effective for the treatment of lung transplant rejection in rodent models. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of TFF TAC-LAC in human subjects. The formulation can be delivered to the lung as colloidal dispersions after reconstitution and as a dry powder. Healthy subjects inhaled TAC-LAC colloidal dispersions at 3 mg TAC/dose via a vibrating mesh nebulizer in the first stage of this study and TAC-LAC dry powder at 3 mg TAC/dose via a single dose dry powder inhaler in the second stage. Our results demonstrated that oral inhalation of TAC-LAC colloidal dispersions and dry powder exhibited low systemic absorption. Additionally, they were well-tolerated with no changes in CBC, liver, kidney, and lung functions. Only mild adverse side effects (e.g., cough, throat irritation, distaste) were observed. In summary, pulmonary delivery of TFF TAC-LAC would be a safe and promising therapy for lung transplant recipients.

Desensitization and management of allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) limits the success of lung transplantation. Among the risk factors associated with CLAD, we recognize pretransplant circulating antibodies against the human leukocyte antigens (HLA), acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This review will summarize current data surrounding management of desensitization, ACR, AMR, and CLAD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Strategies in managing in highly sensitized patients waiting for lung transplant include avoidance of specific HLA antigens and reduction of circulating anti-HLA antibodies at time of transplant. Several multimodal approaches have been studied in the treatment of AMR with a goal to clear circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and to halt the production of new antibodies. Different immunosuppressive strategies focus on influence of the host immune system, particularly T-cell responses, in order to prevent ACR and the progression of CLAD.

SUMMARY

The lack of significant evidence and consensus limits to draw conclusion regarding the impact of specific immunosuppressive regimens in the management of HLA antibodies, ACR, and CLAD. Development of novel therapeutic agents and use of multicenter randomized clinical trials will allow to better define patient-specific treatments and improve the length and quality of life of lung transplant recipients.

Immunosuppressive strategies in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a viable option for those with end-stage lung disease which is evidenced by the continued increase in the number of lung transplantations worldwide. However, patients and clinicians are constantly faced with acute and chronic rejection, infectious complications, drug toxicities, and malignancies throughout the lifetime of the lung transplant recipient. Conventional maintenance immunosuppression therapy consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), anti-metabolite, and corticosteroids have become the standard regimen but newer agents and modalities continue to be developed. Here we will review induction agents, maintenance immunosuppressives, adjunctive therapies and other strategies to improve long-term outcomes.

Anti-Tumor Potential of IMP Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: A Century-Long Story

The purine nucleotides ATP and GTP are essential precursors to DNA and RNA synthesis and fundamental for energy metabolism. Although de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis is increased in highly proliferating cells, such as malignant tumors, it is not clear if this is merely a secondary manifestation of increased cell proliferation. Suggestive of a direct causative effect includes evidence that, in some cancer types, the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo GTP biosynthesis, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), is upregulated and that the IMPDH inhibitor, mycophenolic acid (MPA), possesses anti-tumor activity. However, historically, enthusiasm for employing IMPDH inhibitors in cancer treatment has been mitigated by their adverse effects at high treatment doses and variable response. Recent advances in our understanding of the mechanistic role of IMPDH in tumorigenesis and cancer progression, as well as the development of IMPDH inhibitors with selective actions on GTP synthesis, have prompted a reappraisal of targeting this enzyme for anti-cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the history of IMPDH inhibitors, the development of new inhibitors as anti-cancer drugs, and future directions and strategies to overcome existing challenges.

Tacrolimus exposure early after lung transplantation and exploratory associations with acute cellular rejection

AIMS

To (i) describe tacrolimus (TAC) pre-dose concentrations (C₀), (ii) calculate apparent oral TAC clearance (CL/F_HCT) adjusted for measured haematocrit (HCTi) and standardised to a HCT of 45%, across three observation time points and (iii) explore if low TAC C₀ or high mean CL/F_HCT are associated with an increased risk of rejection episodes early after lung transplantation.

METHODS

TAC whole blood concentration-time profiles and transbronchial biopsies were performed prospectively at weeks 3, 6 and 12 after lung transplantation. The TAC pre-dose concentration (C₀) was measured, and CL/F_HCT was determined using non-compartmental analysis. The associations between TAC C₀ and CL/F_HCT and rejection status were explored using repeated measures logistic regression.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients provided 377 TAC whole blood concentrations. Considerable variability around the median (IQR) CL/F_HCT 6.8 (4.2-15.9) L h^-1, and the median C₀ 12.7 (9.9-16.6) μg L^-1 was noted. Despite adjustment for haematocrit, a significant decrease was observed in CL/F_HCT in all patients over time: CL/F_HCT 14 (5.4-23) at week 3, CL/F_HCT 7.7 (4.5-12) at week 6 and CL/F_HCT 3.9 (2.4-11) L h^-1 at week 12 (p < 0.01). Seven (38.9%) patients experienced a single grade 2 rejection, whilst 11 (61.1%) patients experienced no rejection. Higher TAC C₀ were associated with a reduced risk of rejection OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.51-0.91, p = 0.02), and greater mean CL/F_HCT was associated with an increased risk of rejection OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.01-1.81 p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Monitoring TAC C₀, HCT and CL/F_HCT in patients after lung transplantation may assist clinicians in detecting patients at risk of acute rejection and may guide future research into TAC and HCT monitoring after lung transplantation.

Microbiological findings in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from lung transplant patients in Sweden

Background

Lung transplant patients experience a high risk of airway infections and microbial colonization of the lung due to constant exposure to the environment through inhaled microorganisms, denervation, reduced ciliary transport, and decreased cough.

Methods

In this nationwide prospective study on Swedish lung transplant patients, we evaluated the microbiological panorama of bacteria, fungi, and virus found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) obtained the first year after lung transplantation (LTx). Differences in microbiological findings depending of concomitant signs of infection and background factors were assessed.

Results

A total of 470 bronchoscopies from 126 patients were evaluated. Sixty‐two percent (n = 293) of BALF samples had positive microbiological finding(s). Forty‐six percent (n = 217) had bacterial growth, 29% (n = 137) fungal growth, and 9% (n = 43) were positive in viral PCR. In 38% of BALF samples (n = 181), a single microbe was found, whereas a combination of bacteria, fungi or virus was found in 24% (n = 112) of bronchoscopies. The most common microbiological findings were Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and coagulase negative Staphylococcus (in 42 (33%), 36 (29%), and 25 (20%) patients, respectively). Microbiological findings were similar in BALF from patients with and without signs of lung infection and the frequency of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria was low. No significant association was found between background factors and time to first lung infection.

Conclusion

This study gives important epidemiologic insights and reinforces that microbiological findings have to be evaluated in the light of clinical symptoms and endobronchial appearance in the assessment of lung infections in lung transplant patients.

Adenovirus-A Deadly Disease in the Solid Organ Transplant Population: Risk Factors and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The importance of adenoviruses (AdV) in the immunocompromised population has been more recognized in recent decades. We aimed to assess the risk factors and outcomes associated with AdV in solid organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of solid organ transplant recipients who tested positive for AdV between January 1, 2004, and March 12, 2014. The subjects were divided in 2 groups: AdV asymptomatic infection and AdV disease. The characteristics and outcomes of the groups were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher exact tests; logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 9.79 years (16.54); 49.6% were male, and 20.8% had AdV disease. No significant risk factors were found for AdV disease by univariate analyses. Comparing patients with disease and with asymptomatic infection, rejections during the first year after testing positive for AdV were 7 (26.92%) vs 17 (17.17%); mortality at 1 year post-transplantation was 26.92% vs 6.06% (P = .006), respectively, and at 1 year after testing positive for AdV was 38.46% vs 11.11% (P = .002), respectively.

CONCLUSION

No independent risk factor for AdV disease was identified, but patients with AdV disease had a significantly higher mortality compared with those with asymptomatic infection.

Historical perspectives of lung transplantation: connecting the dots

Lung transplantation is now a treatment option for many patients with end-stage lung disease. Now 55 years since the first human lung transplant, this is a good time to reflect upon the history of lung transplantation, to recognize major milestones in the field, and to learn from others' unsuccessful transplant experiences. James Hardy was instrumental in developing experimental thoracic transplantation, performing the first human lung transplant in 1963. George Magovern and Adolph Yates carried out the second human lung transplant a few days later. With a combined survival of only 26 days for these first 2 lung transplant recipients, the specialty of lung transplantation clearly had a long way to go. The first "successful" lung transplant, in which the recipient survived for 10.5 months, was reported by Fritz Derom in 1971. Ten years later, Bruce Reitz and colleagues performed the first successful en bloc transplantation of the heart and one lung with a single distal tracheal anastomosis. In 1988, Alexander Patterson performed the first successful double lung transplant. The modern technique of sequential double lung transplantation and anastomosis performed at the mainstem bronchus level was originally described by Henri Metras in 1950, but was not reintroduced into the field until Pasque reported it again in 1990. Since then, lung transplantation has seen landmark changes: evolving immunosuppression regimens, clarifying the definition of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), establishing the lung allocation score (LAS), introducing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to transplant, allowing donation after cardiac death, and implementing ex vivo perfusion, to name a few. This article attempts to connect the historical dots in this field of research, with the hope that our effort helps summarize what has been achieved, and identifies opportunities for future generations of transplant pulmonologists and surgeons alike.

New frontiers in immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive therapy is arguably the most important component of medical care after lung transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival and long-term allograft function. However, the benefits of immunosuppressive therapy must be balanced against the side effects and major toxicities of these medications. Immunosuppressive agents can be classified as induction agents, maintenance therapies, treatments for acute rejection and chronic rejection and antibody directed therapies. Although induction therapy remains an area of controversy in lung transplantation, it is still used in the majority of transplant centers. On the other hand, maintenance immunosuppression is less contentious; but, unfortunately, since the creation of three-drug combination therapy, including a glucocorticoid, calcineurin inhibitor and anti-metabolite, there have been relatively modest improvements in chronic maintenance immunosuppressive regimens. The presence of HLA antibodies in transplant candidates and development of de novo antibodies after transplantation remain a major therapeutic challenge before and after lung transplantation. In this chapter we review the medications used for induction and maintenance immunosuppression along with their efficacy and side effect profiles. We also review strategies and evidence for HLA desensitization prior to lung transplantation and management of de novo antibody formation after transplant. Finally, we review immune tolerance and the future of lung transplantation to limit the toxicities of conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

Individualizing immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Immunosuppression management after lung transplantation continues to evolve, with an increasing number of agents available for use in various combinations allowing for more choice and individualization of immunosuppressive therapy. Therapeutic developments have led to improved outcomes including lower acute rejection rates and improved survival. However, a one size fits all approach for any immunosuppressive strategy may not be best suited to the individual patient and ultimately patient specific factors must be considered when designing the immunosuppressive regimen. Recipient factors including age, race, co-morbidities, immunologic risk, genetic polymorphisms, concomitant and previous pharmacotherapy, and overall immunosuppression burden should be considered. There are several significant drug-drug interactions with select immunosuppressive agents utilized in lung transplant pharmacotherapy that must be considered when choosing and devising a dosing strategy for an individual immunosuppressive agent. Herein, considerations for immunosuppression management in the individual patient will be reviewed.

Prevention of chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Long-term survival after lung transplantation (LTx) is limited by chronic rejection (CR). Therapeutic strategies for CR have been largely unsuccessful, making prevention of CR an important and challenging therapeutic approach. In the current review, we will discuss current clinical evidence regarding prevention of CR after LTx.

Immunosuppression Drug Therapy in Lung Transplantation for Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common indication for lung transplantation (LTx) in children and adults with severe and irreversible lung disease. In the setting of LTx in the CF population, immunosuppressive medications are used to prevent allograft rejection despite the majority of these patients being chronically infected with numerous, and often antibiotic-resistant, pathogens. There is limited evidence for the optimal post-LTx immunosuppression regimen in patients with CF, particularly in children. This article provides a review of immunosuppression regimens in the pediatric and adult CF post-LTx population, investigating drug dosing and monitoring, and medication combinations. Currently used immunosuppressive medications and related systemic adverse effects are reviewed. With limitations of data in the pediatric population, future research should address immunosuppression in these children to help guide pediatric drug management as a means to optimize clinical outcomes after LTx.

New Antiproliferative Immunosuppressive Agents

Since the early 1980s, the combination of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone has been the mainstay tripledrug immunosuppressive regimen used in transplantation. However, advances in drug research, design, and development have allowed for the introduction of new agents that have greatly increased the number of immunosuppressive agents available for use in transplant recipients. Particularly, the newer antiproliferative immunosuppressive drugs (agents that directly inhibit the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes) have had an important impact on patient outcomes posttransplant. These agents are mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus.

New directions for rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin(®)) in solid organ transplants, stem cell transplants and autoimmunity

In the 30 years since the rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) Thymoglobulin^® was first licensed, its use in solid organ transplantation and hematology has expanded progressively. Although the evidence base is incomplete, specific roles for rATG in organ transplant recipients using contemporary dosing strategies are now relatively well-identified. The addition of rATG induction to a standard triple or dual regimen reduces acute cellular rejection, and possibly humoral rejection. It is an appropriate first choice in patients with moderate or high immunological risk, and may be used in low-risk patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing regimen from time of transplant, or if early steroid withdrawal is planned. Kidney transplant patients at risk of delayed graft function may also benefit from the use of rATG to facilitate delayed CNI introduction. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, rATG has become an important component of conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens, following demonstration of reduced acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. More recently, a role for rATG has also been established in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. In autoimmunity, rATG contributes to the treatment of severe aplastic anemia, and has been incorporated in autograft projects for the management of conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s disease, and systemic sclerosis. Finally, research is underway for the induction of tolerance exploiting the ability of rATG to induce immunosuppresive cells such as regulatory T-cells. Despite its long history, rATG remains a key component of the immunosuppressive armamentarium, and its complex immunological properties indicate that its use will expand to a wider range of disease conditions in the future.

Future direction of immunosuppression in lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immunosuppression regimens have helped improve rejection episodes following lung transplantation, but long-term outcomes are still not comparable with cardiac, hepatic, or renal transplantation. This review summarizes the immunobiology that contributes to rejection events and future opportunities in outcomes on the basis of providing optimized delivery of the immunosuppression based on immune-monitoring techniques, taking into account individual patient pharmacokinetics and phenotypic variance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drug toxicities, narrow therapeutic drug monitoring windows, and current immunoassays currently do not assist in detecting the global degree of immunosuppression. The currently available randomized control trials for induction therapy or maintenance therapies do not provide additional benefits compared with previously reported retrospective trials. To push beyond the current barriers, transplant teams are focusing on the role of pharmacokinetics, assessing phenotypic variable to potentially modify to quadruple therapy and using extracorporeal photopheresis.

SUMMARY

Conventional practice for the choices of immunosuppression is being evaluated on the basis of randomized control trials as opposed to retrospective studies or single-center trials. The future direction of immunosuppression will be continued by dynamic processes taking into consideration measures to improve tolerance, reducing treatment burden, and providing the best level of evidence while accounting for rejection, infections, renal function, and other comorbidities.

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation can be a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage lung diseases. Unfortunately, long term graft and patient survival are limited by both acute and chronic allograft rejection, with a median survival of just over 6 years. Immunosuppressive regimens are employed to reduce the rate of rejection, and while protocols vary from center to center, conventional maintenance therapy consists of triple drug therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), antiproliferative agents [azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate, sirolimus (srl), everolimus (evl)], and corticosteroids (CS). Roughly 50% of lung transplant centers also utilize induction therapy, with polyclonal antibody preparations [equine or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)], interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) (daclizumab or basiliximab), or alemtuzumab. This review summarizes these agents and the data surrounding their use in lung transplantation, as well as additional common and novel therapies in lung transplantation. Despite the progression of the management of lung transplant recipients, they continue to be at high risk of treatment-related complications, and poor graft and patient survival. Randomized clinical trials are needed to allow for the development of better agents, regimens and techniques to address above mentioned issues and reduce morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date

The enduring success of lung transplantation is built on the use of immunosuppressive drugs to stop the immune system from rejecting the newly transplanted lung allograft. Most patients receive a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative and corticosteroids. Induction therapy with either an antilymphocyte monoclonal or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist are prescribed by many centres aiming to achieve rapid inhibition of recently activated and potentially alloreactive T lymphocytes. Despite this generic approach acute rejection episodes remain common, mandating further fine-tuning and augmentation of the immunosuppressive regimen. While there has been a trend away from cyclosporine and azathioprine towards a preference for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, this has not translated into significant protection from the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the main barrier to the long-term success of lung transplantation. This article reviews the problem of lung allograft rejection and the evidence for immunosuppressive regimens used both in the short- and long-term in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of rabbit ATG in the prophylaxis of acute rejection in lung transplantation

ATG-Fresenius S (ATG-F) is a polyclonal anti-human-T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin preparation that has been clinically developed to prevent episodes of acute cellular rejection. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ATG-F at doses of 5 and 9 mg/kg versus placebo in adult recipients of a primary lung allograft. The primary efficacy composite end point was defined as death, graft loss, acute rejection and/or loss to follow-up within 12 months of transplantation. The interim analysis showed the ATG-F 5 mg/kg treatment to be inefficacious, and it would be impossible to enroll enough patients to power the study to show a difference between the 9 mg/kg arm and the placebo arm. Therefore, the main focus of the study shifted to the safety end points and a descriptive analysis of the primary end point. At 12 months posttransplant, the efficacy failure rate was not significantly different between the ATG-F 9 mg/kg group and the placebo group (40.2% vs. 36.7%, respectively). This large study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in acute cellular rejection, graft loss or death with single-dose induction therapy with ATG-F within the first year after lung transplantation.

Immunosuppression effects on airway mucociliary clearance: comparison between two triple therapies

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate have now become the most widely used combination for maintenance immunosuppressive regimens after lung transplantation in comparison with cyclosporine and azathioprine. However, limited information is available with respect to their effects on cells, other than those from the immunologic compartment. We hypothesized that different triple therapies could have different effects on airway mucociliary clearance, playing an important role in respiratory infections observed after lung transplantation.

METHODS

Ninety rats were assigned to three groups (n = 30 each): control = vehicle, therapy 1 = tacrolimus + mycophenolate + prednisone, and therapy 2 = cyclosporine + azathioprine + prednisone. After 7, 15, or 30 days of treatment by gavage, the animals were killed and the following parameters were studied: mucus transportability, ciliary beating frequency, mucociliary transport velocity, and neutral and acid mucus production.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in ciliary beating frequency, mucociliary transport velocity, and neutral mucus production in all immunosuppressed animals; indeed, both therapies, mainly therapy 1, caused an increase in acid mucus production for as long as 15 days of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Both triple therapies impaired airway mucociliary clearance of rats, but therapy 1 had a more deleterious effect. These data suggest that these undesirable effects can contribute to the high incidence of respiratory infections observed in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppression for lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a well-accepted treatment for people with most end-stage lung diseases. Although both tacrolimus and cyclosporin are used as primary immunosuppressive agents in lung transplant recipients, it is unclear which of these drugs is better in reducing rejection and death without causing adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for primary immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 10 April 2013 through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. We also searched Science Citation Index Expanded and the Transplant Library to 20 April 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared any dose and duration of administration of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppressive treatment in lung transplant recipients. Our selection criteria required that all included patients received the same additional immunosuppressive therapy within each study.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors extracted data. For dichotomous data we used risk ratio (RR) and used mean difference (MD) for continuous data, each with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological components of the included studies were used to assess risk of systematic errors (bias). Trial sequential analysis was used to assess risk of random errors (play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

We included three studies that enrolled a total of 413 adult patients that compared tacrolimus with microemulsion or oral solution cyclosporin. All studies were found to be at high risk of bias. Tacrolimus seemed to be significantly superior to cyclosporin regarding the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.74), lymphocytic bronchitis score (MD -0.60, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.16), treatment withdrawal (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.46), and arterial hypertension (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.89). However, the finding for arterial hypertension was not confirmed when analysed using a random-effects model (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.73). Furthermore, trial sequential analysis found that none of the meta-analyses reached the required information sizes and cumulative Z-curves did not cross trial sequential monitoring boundaries. Diabetes mellitus occurred more frequently among people in the tacrolimus group compared with the cyclosporin group when the fixed-effect model was applied (RR 4.24, 95% CI 1.58 to 11.40), but no difference was found when the random-effects model was used for analysis (RR 4.43, 95% CI 0.75 to 26.05). Again, trial sequential analysis found that the required information threshold was not reached and cumulative Z-curve did not cross the trial sequential monitoring boundary. No significant difference between treatment groups was observed regarding mortality (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.49), incidence of acute rejection (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03), numbers of infections/100 patient-days (MD -0.15, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.00), cancer (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.16), kidney dysfunction (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.14), kidney failure (RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.28 to 8.94), neurotoxicity (RR 7.06, 95% CI 0.37 to 135.19), and hyperlipidaemia (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.20). Trial sequential analysis showed the required information thresholds were not reached for any of these outcome measures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus may be superior to cyclosporin regarding bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, lymphocytic bronchitis, treatment withdrawal, and arterial hypertension, but may be inferior regarding development of diabetes. No difference in mortality and acute rejection was observed between patients treated with tacrolimus and cyclosporin. There were few studies comparing tacrolimus and cyclosporin after lung transplantation, and the numbers of patients and events in the included studies were limited. Furthermore, the included studies were deemed to be at high risk of bias. Hence, more RCTs are needed to assess the results of the present review. Such studies ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic errors (bias) and of random errors (play of chance).

Calcineurin inhibitors and Clostridium difficile infection in adult lung transplant recipients: the effect of cyclosporine versus tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (FK506) has a superior immunosuppressive effect compared with cyclosporine (CSA) without a significant increase in generalized infectious complications. Differences in specific infections such as Clostridium difficile (CDI) have not been reported. We investigated the relationship between calcineurin inhibitors and CDI, hypothesizing that choice of calcineurin inhibitor (CSA or FK506) after lung transplantation would have no effect on the incidence of CDI.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of lung transplant recipients between June 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005, at a single institution. Positive CDI assays through December 11, 2011, were also recorded. We used Student's t- and chi-squared tests (α = 0.05) to compare CSA and FK506 groups. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios for CDI using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

We identified 217 lung transplant recipients: 106 patients in the CSA group and 111 patients in the FK506 group. A total of 31 patients (27.9%) in the FK506 group developed CDI postoperatively compared with 20 patients (18.9%) in the CSA group (P = 0.16). The adjusted hazard ratio for CDI in the FK506 group was not significantly higher (1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-2.98). There was no significant difference in the intensive care unit or total length of stay, in-hospital incidence rate, time to first CDI episode, or recurrence rate between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDI rates were not significantly higher in the FK506 group than the CSA group in our study. These data are consistent with previous studies on FK506 that show no increase in infectious complications over CSA, and demonstrate its continued safety in lung transplantation.

Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressive pharmacologic agents prescribed to patients with diffuse interstitial and inflammatory lung disease and lung transplant recipients are associated with potential risks for adverse reactions. Strategies for minimizing such risks include administering these drugs according to established, safe protocols; monitoring to detect manifestations of toxicity; and patient education. Hence, an evidence-based guideline for physicians can improve safety and optimize the likelihood of a successful outcome. To maximize the likelihood that these agents will be used safely, the American College of Chest Physicians established a committee to examine the clinical evidence for the administration and monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs (with the exception of corticosteroids) to identify associated toxicities associated with each drug and appropriate protocols for monitoring these agents.

METHODS

Committee members developed and refined a series of questions about toxicities of immunosuppressives and current approaches to administration and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out by the American College of Chest Physicians. Committee members were supplied with this information and created this evidence-based guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that these guidelines will improve patient safety when immunosuppressive drugs are given to lung transplant recipients and to patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease.

Advances in immunosuppression after lung transplantation

Immunosuppression in transplantation has experienced changes in recent years as a result of the introduction of new drugs that act upon the different pathways of the host immune response with the purpose of securing more individualized immune suppression, with fewer side effects. Although following in the steps of other solid organ transplant modalities, lung transplantation, because of its special characteristics, has not yielded similar middle- and long-term results. Improved understanding of the underlying rejection mechanisms, the pharmacodynamic control of drugs, new administration routes designed to reduce the side effects, and new drug substances or immune modulating processes will all contribute to improve the expectations associated to lung transplantation in the near future.

Conventional and novel approaches to immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive therapy has contributed significantly to improved survival after solid organ transplantation. Nevertheless, treatment-related adverse events and persistently high risk of chronic graft rejection remain major obstacles to long-term survival after lung transplantation. The development of new agents, refinements in techniques to monitor immunosuppression, and enhanced understanding of transplant immunobiology are essential for further improvements in outcome. In this article, conventional immunosuppressive regimens, novel approaches to preventing graft rejection, and investigational agents for solid organ transplantation are reviewed.

Timing of basiliximab induction and development of acute rejection in lung transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection affects more than 36% of recipients within the first year post-transplantation. The interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor antagonist basiliximab has been associated with decreased frequency and severity of acute rejection. We investigated whether the timing of induction administration would impact the frequency and severity of acute rejection in the first year after transplantation.

METHODS

In this study we reviewed 119 patients who underwent lung transplantation at Henry Ford Hospital from October 1994 to January 2009. Prior to January 2000 no patients received induction. From January 2000 to March 2006 the initial dose was given after implantation, and from March 2006 to 2009 basiliximab was given prior to implantation. The primary outcome was cumulative acute rejection score (CAR) in the first post-operative year comparing post- vs pre-implant induction.

RESULTS

The CAR score for pre-implant basiliximab was 2.5 ± 2.3. This was significantly lower than CAR score of 4.6 ± 3.9 in the post-implant group (p = 0.025). The no-induction group had the highest CAR score at 6.3 ± 3.8 (p = 0.077 compared with the post group). The mean follow-up times in the post and pre group were 5.9 ± 2.3 and 2.3 ± 0.7 years, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference in freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), survival or invasive infections between pre- and post-implant induction groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab prior to implant is associated with a lower cumulative acute rejection score over 1 year compared with induction post-implantation. Despite a lower cumulative acute rejection score, there was no significant difference in freedom from BOS or survival.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): 25 years and new frontiers in solid organ transplantation and haematology

The more than 25 years of clinical experience with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), specifically Thymoglobulin, has transformed immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and haematology. The utility of rATG has evolved from the treatment of allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease to the prevention of various complications that limit the success of solid organ and stem cell transplantation. Today, rATG is being successfully incorporated into novel therapeutic regimens that seek to reduce overall toxicity and improve long-term outcomes. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rATG in recipients of various types of solid organ allografts, recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants who are conditioned with both conventional and nonconventional regimens, and patients with aplastic anaemia. Over time, clinicians have learnt how to better balance the benefits and risks associated with rATG. Advances in the understanding of the multifaceted mechanism of action will guide research into new therapeutic areas and future applications.

Inhaled cyclosporine and pulmonary function in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Chronic rejection, manifesting as bronchiolitis obliterans, is the leading cause of death in lung transplant recipients. In our previously reported double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing inhaled cyclosporine (ACsA) to aerosol placebo, the rate of bronchiolitis-free survival improved. However, an independent analysis of pulmonary function, a secondary endpoint of the trial, was not performed. We sought to determine the effect of ACsA, in addition to systemic immunosuppression, on pulmonary function.

METHODS

From 1998-2001, 58 patients were randomly assigned to inhale either 300 mg of ACsA (28 patients) or placebo aerosol (30 patients) 3 days a week for the first 2 years after transplantation. Longitudinal changes in pulmonary function of ACsA patients were compared to aerosol placebo patients. In another analysis, the rate of decline from 6-month maximum FEV(1) in randomized patients was compared to the rate of decline in patients receiving conventional immunosuppression from the Novartis transplant database (644 patients, 12 centers worldwide, transplanted from 1990-1995).

RESULTS

The average duration of ACsA and aerosol placebo was 400 days +/- 306 and 433 +/- 256, respectively. The change in FEV(1) of ACsA patients (adjusted for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatch and transplant type, followed for a maximum duration of 4.6 years) was superior to the aerosol placebo controls (9.0 +/- 71.4 mL/year vs. -107.9 +/- 55.3, p = 0.007). The FEF(25-75) decreased by -220.3 +/- 117.7 L/(second x year) vs. -412.2 +/- 139.2, p = 0.07, respectively. Similarly, percent FEV(1) decline from maximal values was improved in ACsA patients compared to aerosol placebo and Novartis controls (ACsA -0.43 +/- 1.12%/year vs. aerosol placebo -4.08 +/- 1.4, p = 0.04; ACsA vs. Novartis -4.7 +/- 0.31, p = 0.007). Single-lung recipients receiving ACsA showed improvement in FEV(1) compared to Novartis controls (FEV(1) -0.8 +/- 1.8%/year vs. -4.94 +/- 0.4, p = 0.03) but double-lung recipients showed improvement compared to aerosol placebo controls only (FEV(1) -0.28 +/- 1.22%/year vs. -8.53 +/- 5.95, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center trial, ACsA appears to ameliorate important pulmonary function parameters in lung transplant recipients compared to aerosol placebo and historical control patients. Single- and double-lung transplant recipients may not respond uniformly to treatment, and ongoing randomized trials in lung transplant recipients using ACsA may help elucidate our findings.

[Early postoperative management and immunosuppressive treatment following lung transplantation]

Lung transplantation is now considered a valid option in the management of end-stage respiratory failure. The postoperative period remains a key stage that will influence the average long-term prognosis of the patients. Primary graft failure, postoperative bleeding, infection, acute rejection and complications linked to the surgery, and to vascular or bronchial anastomoses, are risk factors for mortality and morbidity. These must be taken care of quickly via collaboration with the surgical team. The immunosuppressive treatment essential for tolerance induction with regard to the transplanted organ will be introduced during the intraoperative period and continued for life. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent and corticosteroids remains the conventional procedure. The role of new molecules as mTor inhibitors remains to be determined.

[Medical complications of lung transplantation]

In 2010, lung transplantation is a valuable therapeutic option for a number of patients suffering from of end-stage non-neoplastic pulmonary diseases. The patients frequently regain a very good quality of life, however, long-term survival is often hampered by the development of complications such as the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, metabolic and infectious complications. As the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is the first cause of death in the medium and long term, an intense immunosuppressive treatment is maintained for life in order to prevent or stabilize this complication. The immunosuppression on the other hand induces a number of potentially severe complications including metabolic complications, infections and malignancies. The most frequent metabolic complications are arterial hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and osteoporosis. Bacterial, viral and fungal infections are the second cause of mortality. They are to be considered as medical emergencies and require urgent assessment and targeted therapy after microbiologic specimens have been obtained. They should not, under any circumstances, be treated empirically and it has also to be kept in mind that the lung transplant recipient may present several concomitant infections. The most frequent malignancies are skin cancers, the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, Kaposi's sarcoma and some types of bronchogenic carcinomas, head/neck and digestive cancers. Lung transplantation is no longer an exceptional procedure; thus, the pulmonologist will be confronted with such patients and should be able to recognize the symptoms and signs of the principal non-surgical complications. The goal of this review is to give a general overview of the most frequently encountered complications. Their assessment and treatment, though, will most often require the input of other specialists and a multidisciplinary and transversal approach.

Mechanisms behind local immunosuppression using inhaled tacrolimus in preclinical models of lung transplantation

Inhaled immunosuppression with tacrolimus (TAC) is a novel strategy after lung transplantation. Here we investigate the feasibility of tacrolimus delivery via aerosol, assess its immunosuppressive efficacy, reveal possible mechanisms of action, and evaluate its airway toxicity. Rats received 4 mg/kg TAC via oral or inhaled (AER) administration. Pharmacokinetic properties were compared, and in vivo airway toxicity was assessed. Full-thickness human airway epithelium (AE) was grown in vitro at an air-liquid interface. Equal TAC doses (10-1,000 ng) were either added to the bottom chamber (MED) or aerosolized for gas-phase exposure (AER). Airway epithelium TAC absorption, cell toxicity, and interactions of TAC with NFκB activation were studied. Single-photon emission computed tomography demonstrated a linear tracer accumulation within the lungs during TAC inhalation. The AER TAC generated higher lung-tissue concentrations, but blood concentrations that were 11 times lower. Airway histology and gene expression did not reveal drug toxicity after 3 weeks of treatment. In vitro AE exposed to TAC at 10-1,000 ng, orally or AER, maintained its pseudostratified morphology, did not show cell toxicity, and maintained its epithelial integrity, with tight junction formation. The TAC AER-treated AE absorbed the drug from the apical surface and generated lower-chamber TAC concentrations sufficient to suppress activated lymphocytes. Tacrolimus AER was superior to TAC MED at preventing AE IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-13, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (RANTES) and TNF-α up-regulation. Tacrolimus inhibited airway epithelial cell NFκB activation. In conclusion, TAC can be delivered easily and effectively into the lungs without causing airway toxicity, decreases inflammatory AE cytokine production, and inhibits NFκB activation.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for adult lung transplant recipients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus and cyclosporine are the 2 major immunosuppressants for lung transplantation. Several studies have compared these 2 drugs, but the outcomes were not consistent. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to compare the beneficial and harmful effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine as the primary immunosuppressant for lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

We conducted searches of electronic databases and manual bibliographies. We performed a meta-analysis of all RCTs comparing tacrolimus with cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression for lung transplant recipients. Extracted, pooled data for mortality, acute rejection, withdrawals, and adverse events were analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel tests with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Three RCTs including 297 patients were assessed in this study. Mortality at 1 year or more was comparable between lung recipients treated with tacrolimus and cyclosporine (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-2.10; P = .88). Tacrolimus-treated patients experienced fewer incidences of acute rejection (MD = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.01; P = .04). Pooled analysis showed a trend toward a lower risk of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) among tacrolimus-treated patients, although it did not reach significances (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25-1.12; P = .10). Fewer patients stopped tacrolimus than cyclosporine (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.48; P = .003). The rate of new-onset diabetes was higher among the tacrolimus group (OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.17-11.62; P = .03). The incidence of hypertension and renal dysfunction were comparable in these 2 groups (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.03-1.70; P = .15; and OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.70-3.96; P = .25, respectively). There was a trend toward lower risk of malignancy in tacrolimus-treated patients, although it did not reach significance either (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-1.13; P = .07). The incidence of infection was comparable in these 2 groups (MD = -0.29, 95% CI, -0.68 to 0.11; P = .16).

CONCLUSION

Using tacrolimus as primary immunosuppressant for lung transplant recipient resulted in comparable survival and reduction in acute rejection episodes when compared with cyclosporine.