1
|
Bennett MJ, Center JR, Perry L. Author response to an editorial. Osteoporos Int 2024:10.1007/s00198-024-07157-7. [PMID: 38916657 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07157-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Bennett
- Department of Endocrinology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
- Department of Endocrinology, Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, NSW, Australia.
- St George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
| | - Jacqueline R Center
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical School, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lin Perry
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital & Community Health Services, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cross AJ, Hawthorne D, Kouladjian O'Donnell L, Lee K, Page AT. Pharmacists working in residential aged care: a survey of pharmacist interest and perceived preparedness. Int J Clin Pharm 2024; 46:506-514. [PMID: 38315305 PMCID: PMC10960889 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01686-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacists involvement in residential aged care facilities has traditionally been limited to that of an external contractor providing medication reviews, or medication supply. AIM To explore Australian pharmacists' interest and perceived preparedness to work as on-site pharmacists in residential aged care. METHOD National cross-sectional anonymous online survey open for two weeks (September 17th to October 1st 2022) consisting of Likert-type, multiple choice and multiple selection questions. Australian pharmacists were recruited using a broad advertising strategy which included social and traditional media platforms, and snowball sampling. Data were collected on pharmacist self-reported interest and perceived preparedness to work as on-site aged care pharmacists in residential aged care. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Responses were received from 720 participants, 643 were eligible. Most participants were female (n = 466, 73%) and mean (SD) age was 43.5 (SD 12.5) years. Over half the participants were interested or extremely interested in working as an on-site aged care pharmacist (56%, n = 360), and agreed or strongly agreed (n = 475, 76%) that they felt prepared to work as an on-site aged care pharmacist. Most pharmacists felt prepared to engage in a variety of roles within the facilities (> 73% for each role), including resident and system level roles, and the majority agreed they felt prepared to engage with stakeholders, including general practitioners (93%) and medical specialists (86%). CONCLUSION Pharmacists reported they are interested and feel prepared to work as on-site aged care pharmacists. These findings will inform the roll-out of this new model of care to enhance multidisciplinary collaboration in residential aged care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Cross
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| | - Deborah Hawthorne
- Western Australian Centre for Health & Ageing, School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Lisa Kouladjian O'Donnell
- Laboratory of Ageing and Pharmacology, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kenneth Lee
- Centre for Optimisation of Medicines, School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| | - Amy Theresa Page
- Western Australian Centre for Health & Ageing, School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Centre for Optimisation of Medicines, School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rhee J, Carey M, Zucca A, Lambkin D. Exploring patients' advance care planning needs during the annual 75+ health assessment: survey of Australian GPs' views and current practice. Aust J Prim Health 2023; 29:637-642. [PMID: 37558212 DOI: 10.1071/py22227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 75+ health assessment has been identified as a suitable trigger to introduce advance care planning (ACP) to general practice patients. Australian general practitioners (GPs) were surveyed to explore their perceptions, attitudes and practices in introducing ACP during 75+ health assessments. METHODS A cross-sectional postal survey of Australian GPs covering their personal, professional and workplace characteristics, their current practice regarding ACP within a 75+ health assessment, and their attitude towards ACP. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse the factors associated with routinely discussing ACP as part of the 75+ health assessment. RESULTS A total of 185 (19.2%) out of 964 eligible GPs returned a completed survey. Most GPs reported that patients interested in ACP were supported by the GPs or the practice nurse. Two factors, (1) attitude that ACP is an essential component of the 75+ health assessment, and (2) regional or rural location of the practice, had a statistically and clinically significant association with the GP's self-reported discussion of ACP during 75+ health assessments. CONCLUSIONS GPs showed a high level of support and involvement in discussing ACP during 75+ health assessments. ACP support during 75+ health assessments was often provided directly by the GP or via the practice nurse. Given the international evidence that ACP training programs improve skills and knowledge, and foster positive attitudes towards ACP, there is an important need to continue funding ACP training programs for GPs and practice nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Rhee
- The Discipline of General Practice, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and General Practice Academic Unit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Mariko Carey
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; and Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison Zucca
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; and Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - David Lambkin
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krass I, Twigg MJ, Mitchell B, Wilson F, Mohebbi M, Trinder P, Shih STF, Carter R, Versace VL, McNamara K. Participant and GP perspectives and experiences of screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in community pharmacy during the Pharmacy Diabetes Screening Trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1337. [PMID: 38041094 PMCID: PMC10693079 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10269-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Pharmacy Diabetes Screening Trial (PDST) evaluated three approaches to screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in community pharmacy: (1) paper-based risk assessment (AUSDRISK) alone; and AUSDRISK followed by a point of care test if AUSDRISK ≥ 12; with either (2) HbA1c; or (3) small capillary blood glucose Test (scBGT). This paper reports the perspectives and experiences of the pharmacy screening service of two key stakeholder groups: screening participants and general practitioners (GPs). METHODS All referred participants (n = 2242) received an online survey to determine the outcome of the referral, as well as their level of satisfaction with the service. In addition, a random sample of 2,989 (20%) of non-referred participants were surveyed to determine their overall experience and level of satisfaction with the service. GPs to whom participants were referred were contacted to establish if, since the date of the screening service, their patient had (1) been to see them; (2) had further tests performed (FBG, RBG, OGTT, HbA1c); or (3) been diagnosed with diabetes or prediabetes. Descriptive statistics were reported for quantitative data. Factors associated with visiting the GP following screening were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS Response rates 16% (n = 369) and 17% (n = 520) were achieved for the three-month referred and non-referred participant surveys, respectively. Over 90% of respondents were very positive about the screening service (n = 784/853) and would recommend it to a family member or friend (n = 784/853). Participants also reported making significant improvements in diet and exercise, because of the screening. Among referred respondents, those who received a POC test were twice as likely to visit their GP compared to those who received a risk assessment only (OR 2.11 95% CI 1.46-3.06). GPs (15.8% response rate, n = 57/361) indicated that the referral worked well and that recommendations for follow-up care by the pharmacist were appropriate. CONCLUSION Opportunistic screening of individuals during routine encounters with the community pharmacy in a previously undiagnosed population has been shown to foster positive engagement with consumers and GPs, which may assist in reducing the burden of T2DM on the individual and the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Krass
- School of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Michael J Twigg
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, NR47TJ, UK
| | | | - Frances Wilson
- School of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Peta Trinder
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Sophy T F Shih
- Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rob Carter
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Vincent L Versace
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Kevin McNamara
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kollikowski A, Gabriel KMA, Schiffmann L, Gágyor I, Güthlin C, Heuschmann PU, Langhorst J, Keil T, Löffler C. Complementary Medicine in Acute Care Hospitals: Questionnaire Survey with Heads of Bavarian Hospitals. Complement Med Res 2023; 30:415-423. [PMID: 37673058 DOI: 10.1159/000531930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The demand for complementary medicine (CM) is well studied in the outpatient sector, but representative data on type and extent of inpatient care using CM are missing. Therefore, our aim was to examine the range of CM treatments offered and the types of indications for using CM in acute care hospitals in the German state of Bavaria. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey by contacting the medical heads of all 388 Bavarian acute care hospitals between November 2020 and April 2021. The questionnaire included a wide range of CM to assessed availability of CM supply, most frequent indications, and medical specialities. Furthermore, we assessed basic information about the hospital and the participating medical staff. RESULTS A total of 101 (26%) hospitals participated in the survey. At least one CM treatment was offered by 92% of the responding hospitals and 75% offered at least 5 therapy modalities (mean of 10 treatments, range: 0-25). These were most commonly massage therapies (68%), relaxation techniques (63%), phytotherapy (60%), mindfulness-based treatments (53%), art, diet, and exercise therapies (each 48%), aromatherapy (46%), acupuncture, and compresses/poultices (both 42%). The most reported medical conditions for CM treatments (in descending order) were chronic pain, mental disorders, degenerative affections, sleep disorders, fatigue syndrome, functional gastrointestinal disorders, and acute pain. CONCLUSION According to the Bavarian acute care hospitals that participated in our postal survey, a considerable part offered CM. Further research should include personal interviews and more detailed assessments of indications and attitudes for the use of CM in acute care hospital settings. Einleitung Die Nachfrage nach Komplementärmedizinischen Verfahren (CM) ist für den ambulanten Sektor gut untersucht, aber es fehlen Daten über Art und Umfang der komplementärmedizinischen Versorgung im stationären Bereich. Unser Ziel war es daher, das CM-Angebot und die medizinischen Indikationen in Akutkrankenhäusern im Bundesland Bayern zu untersuchen. Methoden Wir führten eine Querschnittsbefragung durch, bei der die klinischen Leitungen aller 388 bayerischen Akutkrankenhäuser zwischen November 2020 und April 2021 angeschrieben wurden. Der Fragebogen inkludierte ein breites Spektrum an CM-Verfahren und erfasste deren Verfügbarkeit, die häufigsten Indikationen und Anwendungsgebiete. Ergänzend wurden grundlegende Informationen des Krankenhauses und des medizinischen Personals erfragt. Ergebnisse Insgesamt nahmen 101 (26%) Krankenhäuser an der Befragung teil. Die meisten Ausfüllenden hatten mindestens zwei Jahrzehnte klinische Berufserfahrung. Mindestens eine CM Behandlung wurde von 92% der teilnehmenden Krankenhäuser angeboten und 75% boten mindestens 5 Therapiemodalitäten an (Mittelwert: 10 Behandlungen; Spanne: 0–25). Dabei handelte es sich am häufigsten um Massagen (68%), Entspannungstechniken (63%), Phytotherapie (60%), achtsamkeitsbasierte Behandlungen (53%), Kunst-, Ernährungs-und Bewegungstherapie (jeweils 48%), Aromatherapie (46%), Akupunktur und Kompressen/Umschläge (jeweils 42%). Die häufigsten genannten Indikationen für CM-Behandlungen waren (in absteigender Reihenfolge) chronische Schmerzen, psychische Störungen, degenerative Erkrankungen, Schlafstörungen, Erschöpfungssyndrom, funktionelle Magen-Darm-Beschwerden und akute Schmerzen. Schlussfolgerung Nach Angaben der bayerischen Akutkrankenhäuser, die an unserer postalischen Umfrage teilgenommen haben, bietet ein erheblicher Teil CM an. Weitere Untersuchungen sollten persönliche Interviews und detailliertere Bewertungen der Indikationen und Einstellungen für den Einsatz von CM in Akutkrankenhäusern umfassen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kollikowski
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Katharina M A Gabriel
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Schiffmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ildiko Gágyor
- Department of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Corina Güthlin
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Peter U Heuschmann
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jost Langhorst
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Bamberg, Germany
- Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Keil
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- State Institute of Health I, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Löffler
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McMorrow R, Hunter B, Hendrieckx C, Speight J, Emery J, Manski-Nankervis JA. Assessing and addressing diabetes distress among adults with type 2 diabetes: An online survey of Australian general practitioners. Prim Care Diabetes 2022; 16:692-697. [PMID: 35953418 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Diabetes distress is experienced by up to 36% of adults with type 2 diabetes. Australian type 2 diabetes guidelines recommend annual assessment of diabetes distress in general practice. This study explores general practitioners' knowledge, current practice, and factors influencing implementation of guidelines, including Person Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) use. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was disseminated via e-mail to 4776 Australian general practitioners listed on the Australasian Medical Publishing Company database. RESULTS 264 (5%) surveys were returned. 75% indicated that general practitioners were the most appropriate professionals to assess diabetes distress. Sixteen percent reported asking about diabetes distress during type 2 diabetes consultations more than half the time, with 13% using a PROM more than half the time: 64% use the Kessler-10, and 1.9% use the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale. While general practitioners had positive beliefs about the consequences of assessing and addressing diabetes distress, they also reported barriers in motivation, environment, and knowledge of guidelines. CONCLUSION Most respondents endorsed general practitioners' role in assessing diabetes distress, but few ask about or assess diabetes distress in routine consultations. To support uptake of guideline recommendations for diabetes-specific PROM use, environmental factors, specifically time, need to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita McMorrow
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; NHMRC CRE in Digital Technology to Transform Chronic Disease Outcomes, The Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Barbara Hunter
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christel Hendrieckx
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Speight
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; NHMRC CRE in Digital Technology to Transform Chronic Disease Outcomes, The Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zucca AC, Carey M, Sanson‐Fisher RW, Rhee J, Nair B(KR, Oldmeadow C, Evans T, Chiu S. Effect of a financial incentive on responses by Australian general practitioners to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2022; 216:585-586. [PMID: 35545957 PMCID: PMC9540103 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alison C Zucca
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Newcastle NSW
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Newcastle NSW
| | - Mariko Carey
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Newcastle NSW
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Newcastle NSW
| | - Rob W Sanson‐Fisher
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Newcastle NSW
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Newcastle NSW
| | - Joel Rhee
- University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute Wollongong NSW
| | - Balakrishnan (Kichu) R Nair
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Newcastle NSW
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Newcastle NSW
| | | | | | - Simon Chiu
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI) Newcastle NSW
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schaffler-Schaden D, Mergenthal K, Avian A, Huter S, Spary-Kainz U, Bachler H, Flamm M, Siebenhofer A. COVI-Prim Longitudinal Survey: Experiences of Primary Care Physicians During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:761283. [PMID: 35265636 PMCID: PMC8898947 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.761283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background General practitioners (GPs) are the mainstay of primary care and play a critical role in pandemics. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, this international study aimed to explore changes in the workload of general practitioners, as well as their interactions with patients and colleagues, and their self-confidence and concerns. Methods An online survey was conducted among GPs in Austria and Germany. Participants were asked to answer a basic questionnaire and participate in a subsequent longitudinal survey containing closed and open-ended items. All data were pseudonymized. Results Overall, 723 general practitioners from Austria and Germany took part in the longitudinal survey over a period of 12 weeks (April 3–July 2, 2020). The majority of GPs had less direct contact with patients at the beginning of the survey (96 vs. 49% at the end of the study period). At first, doctors were mainly concerned with pandemic-related issues and had to care for the patients of GP colleagues that were in quarantine, which meant they had less time for routine work such as screenings and treating chronic diseases. Over the survey period, GPs' self-confidence increased and their concerns about income loss decreased. Conclusions Following a difficult initial phase when protective equipment and information were lacking, physicians in primary care adapted quickly to new situations. Experience with telemedicine should help them face future challenges and may help prevent a decline in the delivery of routine health care and care for chronically ill patients. Registration Trial registration at the German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00021231.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagmar Schaffler-Schaden
- Institute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Karola Mergenthal
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alexander Avian
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
- *Correspondence: Alexander Avian
| | - Sebastian Huter
- Institute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ulrike Spary-Kainz
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence Based Health Services Research, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Herbert Bachler
- Institute of General Practice, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria Flamm
- Institute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andrea Siebenhofer
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence Based Health Services Research, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Quarantine is an essential practice during pandemics but it could have negative effects. There are currently no studies on the experiences of health care workers (HCWs) in quarantine during the coronavirus disease pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the psychosocial effects of quarantine on tertiary hospital HCWs who were exposed to coronavirus. A cross-sectional study on the psychological wellbeing, needs and resources of HCWs during quarantine was conducted using an online survey in a large tertiary hospital. In total, 148 quarantined HCWs participated in this study. Overall self-reported psychological wellbeing scores were high (5.22 ± 1.11). Physicians had higher psychological wellbeing compared to nurses (5.58 ± 1.05 and 4.83 ± 1.21, respectively). Being a nurse, separation from family during quarantine, experiencing public shaming and longer quarantine period were associated with lower psychological wellbeing and higher needs. Working from home and confidence in safety at work was associated with fewer needs during quarantine. Nurses might be a risk group for the negative influences of quarantine. The ability to remain connected to work by working from home could have a protective effect on HCWs’ psychological wellbeing. More efforts should be implemented in order to support HCWs in quarantine and after their return to work. During the COVID-19 crisis, health care workers (HCWs) were at the frontline of this pandemic and therefore were exposed to its risks and negative impact. One of the challenges during this time was the frequent quarantines of HCWs as a result of their exposure to patients. Although quarantine is important to stop the infection, it may effect mental and physical health. This study examined HCWs’ experience during quarantine, their well-being and ways of coping. We sent HCWs who are working in a tertiary hospital an online questionnaire and 148 replied. We found that the average well-being of HCWs in quarantine was high, with physicians having the highest reported well-being and nurses having the lowest. HCWs who reported low sense of well-being also reported on having more difficulties coping with the quarantine and reported more public shaming due to being in quarantine. We also found that HCWs who were working from home during quarantine and those who reported they felt safe in their place of work reported less difficulties coping with the quarantine. Our study suggests that nurses are more vulnerable to the negative impact of quarantine. It also suggests that being connected to work during quarantine can improve well-being. It is important to address stigma toward quarantined individuals and to provide more resources to support HCWs in quarantine and after their return to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neta HaGani
- Social Work Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
- Corresponding author. E-mail:
| | - Yael Eilon
- Internal Auditor Office, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Sagit Zeevi
- Social Work Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Liat Vaknin
- Occupational and Environmental Clinic (Personnel Clinic), Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Hagar Baruch
- Nursing Administration, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hennrich P, Arnold C, Wensing M. Effects of personalized invitation letters on research participation among general practitioners: a randomized trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:247. [PMID: 34773971 PMCID: PMC8590365 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01447-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Participation of general practitioners is crucial for health care studies. However, recruiting them is an ongoing challenge and participation rates of general practitioners around the globe are often low. One feasible and cost-efficient approach to potentially enhance participation rates among general practitioners are personalized invitation letters, since they may increase one’s attention to and appreciation of a study. Still, evidence whether this method actually affects participation is scarce and ambiguous in relation to physicians. Methods We undertook a randomized trial in a sample of general practitioners from three German states in the context of a large, observational study on physicians’ coordination and uptake of recommended cardiovascular ambulatory care. An intervention group (n = 757 general practitioners) received a personalized invitation to participate in the observational study, the control group (n = 754 general practitioners) received a generic invitation. Both groups were blinded to group assignment. Eventual participation rates as well as the number and types of responses overall were compared between arms. Besides the main intervention, sociodemographic and geographical context factors were considered as well. Results The overall participation rate among physicians was 2.6% (2.8% in the intervention group and 2.4% in the control group). No statistically significant effect of personalization on participation of physicians was found (relative risk to participate when receiving a personalized invitation of 1.17 [95%-CI: 0.62, 2.21]). However, the number of responses to the invitation varied significantly between the geographical regions. Conclusions Personalization of first written contact alone did not improve research participation among general practitioners, which was overall very low. Trial registration The study in which the trial was embedded has been registered prospectively at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) under registration number DRKS00019219. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01447-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Hennrich
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Christine Arnold
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Park JS, Page AT, Shen PH, Price K, Tennant M, Kruger E. Management of dental emergencies amongst Australian general medical practitioners - A case-vignette study. Aust Dent J 2021; 67:30-38. [PMID: 34591999 DOI: 10.1111/adj.12878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Australia, because of inequity in dental service accessibility and affordability, patients can see general medical practitioners (GPs) for acute dental conditions. METHODS This cross-sectional study consisted of surveys distributed to the board registered GPs practising in Australia. The main outcome measures included statistical analysis of GPs managing different dental emergency scenarios and their confidence and expectations in managing dental emergencies. RESULTS A total of 425 GPs participated in the study. The sample primarily consisted of GPs practising in metropolitan clinics (n = 315). Most participants reported that they would refer to the dentist for mobilized tooth (n = 402). There was a negative correlation between GPs with 5-29 years of experience and traumatized tooth management (P < 0.05). GPs aged between 40 and 49 years were more inclined to treat patients with mobilized teeth [Multivariate (MV): 0.42(0.09-0.74)]. However, GPs with 0-5 years of experience were less likely to manage patients with dental abscess [MV: -0.52(-0.80 to -0.24)]. CONCLUSION Most GPs referred dental emergencies to dentists. GP management of dental emergencies were predominantly palliative. Therefore, opportunities for collaborative practice models amongst GPs and dentists may be needed to bridge the gap in the regional and remote locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Park
- International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.,UWA Dental School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.,Monash Health Dental Services, Monash Health, Dandenong, Victoria, Australia
| | - A T Page
- Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Optimisation of Medicines, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - P-H Shen
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - K Price
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Tennant
- International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - E Kruger
- International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Siebenhofer A, Huter S, Avian A, Mergenthal K, Schaffler-Schaden D, Spary-Kainz U, Bachler H, Flamm M. COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251736. [PMID: 34111120 PMCID: PMC8191874 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents a significant challenge to health care systems around the world. A well-functioning primary care system is crucial in epidemic situations as it plays an important role in the development of a system-wide response. METHODS 2,187 Austrian and German GPs answered an internet survey on preparedness, testing, staff protection, perception of risk, self-confidence, a decrease in the number of patient contacts, and efforts to control the spread of the virus in the practice during the early phase of the COVID-pandemic (3rd to 30th April). RESULTS The completion rate of the questionnaire was high (90.9%). GPs gave low ratings to their preparedness for a pandemic, testing of suspected cases and efforts to protect staff. The provision of information to GPs and the perception of risk were rated as moderate. On the other hand, the participants rated their self-confidence, a decrease in patient contacts and their efforts to control the spread of the disease highly. CONCLUSION Primary care is an important resource for dealing with a pandemic like COVID-19. The workforce is confident and willing to take an active role, but needs to be provided with the appropriate surrounding conditions. This will require that certain conditions are met. REGISTRATION Trial registration at the German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00021231.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Siebenhofer
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence based Health Services Research, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sebastian Huter
- Institute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Alexander Avian
- Institute for Medical Informatics, and Statistics and Documentation, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
- * E-mail:
| | - Karola Mergenthal
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Dagmar Schaffler-Schaden
- Institute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ulrike Spary-Kainz
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence based Health Services Research, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Herbert Bachler
- Institute of General Practice, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria Flamm
- Institute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sargent L, Taylor J, Lowe J. Barriers and facilitators to general practitioners participating in implementation research: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 19:1354-1361. [PMID: 34111044 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-20-00187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the review is to critically appraise and synthesize quantitative and qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators to general practitioners participating in implementation research for the purposes of evaluating translation of evidence into practice. INTRODUCTION General practice is a distinct medical specialty that requires its own specific research; therefore, general practitioner participation in research is key in translating new knowledge into practice. However, recruiting general practitioners to research as participants is challenging. Understanding general practitioner behavior in relation to their participation in implementation research is critical. INCLUSION CRITERIA Implementation studies that include general practitioners in primary health care settings will be considered. This review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies from developed countries investigating barriers and facilitators to general practitioners participating in implementation research. METHODS The review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for mixed methods systematic reviews. The main databases accessed will be MEDLINE and Scopus, and include studies published in English between 2008 and the present. Two independent reviewers will read and screen relevant articles, assess for quality, extract study characteristics, and synthesize data. This review is taking an integrated approach involving transformed quantitative data. Primary outcome measures will include study details and outcomes related to the research question. Qualitative and transformed quantitative data will be mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework at extraction phase. Synthesis will include identified barriers and facilitators categorized using the Theoretical Domains Framework indicators to provide future research and implementation recommendations for recruiting general practitioners to implementation research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO (CRD42020176759).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Sargent
- School of Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Carey M, Zucca A, Rhee J, Sanson-Fisher R, Norton G, Oldmeadow C, Evans T, Nair K. Essential components of health assessment for older people in primary care: a cross-sectional survey of Australian general practitioners. Aust N Z J Public Health 2021; 45:506-511. [PMID: 33970553 DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine general practitioners' views about how health assessments for older people should be conducted. METHODS General practitioners were randomly sampled from a national database of medical practitioners and invited to complete a survey. Survey items explored general practitioners' views about essential components of a 75+ Health Assessment and who should assess each component, consultation time, use of standardised templates and tools, and home visits. RESULTS Overall, 185 (19.2%) general practitioners participated. Of 61 items presented, 24 were rated 'essential' by ≥70% of practitioners, with an average estimated consultation time of 65 minutes. Of the 24 essential items, it was perceived that 21 could be assessed by either a general practitioner or clinic nurse. Most practitioners indicated a standardised template (86%) and standardised tools for complex issues (79%) should be used, and home visits conducted (75%). CONCLUSIONS General practitioners agreed on 24 items as essential for every health assessment, with assessments estimated to take more than one hour. Implications for public health: Increases to remuneration for prolonged assessments or mechanisms for improving efficiency and quality of assessments are needed. Acceptable mechanisms may include standardised patient-reported tools, standardised templates and the use of non-medical staff to assist with assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Carey
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales
| | - Alison Zucca
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales
| | - Joel Rhee
- General Practice Academic Unit, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, New South Wales.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, New South Wales
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales
| | - Grace Norton
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales
| | | | | | - Kichu Nair
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Seckler E, Regauer V, Krüger M, Gabriel A, Hermsdörfer J, Niemietz C, Bauer P, Müller M. Improving mobility and participation of older people with vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders in primary care using a care pathway: feasibility study and process evaluation. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:62. [PMID: 33794802 PMCID: PMC8017844 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01410-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community-dwelling older people are frequently affected by vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders (VDB). We previously developed a care pathway (CPW) to improve their mobility and participation by offering standardized approaches for general practitioners (GPs) and physical therapists (PTs). We aimed to assess the feasibility of the intervention, its implementation strategy and the study procedures in preparation for the subsequent main trial. METHODS This 12-week prospective cohort feasibility study was accompanied by a process evaluation designed according to the UK Medical Research Council's Guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Patients with VDB (≥65 years), GPs and PTs in primary care were included. The intervention consisted of a diagnostic screening checklist for GPs and a guide for PTs. The implementation strategy included specific educational trainings and a telephone helpline. Data for mixed-method process evaluation were collected via standardized questionnaires, field notes and qualitative interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, qualitative data using content analysis. RESULTS A total of five GP practices (seven single GPs), 10 PT practices and 22 patients were included in the study. The recruitment of GPs and patients was challenging (response rates: GP practices: 28%, PT practices: 39%). Ninety-one percent of the patients and all health professionals completed the study. The health professionals responded well to the educational trainings; the utilization of the telephone helpline was low (one call each from GPs and PTs). Familiarisation with the routine of application of the intervention and positive attitudes were emphasized as facilitators of the implementation of the intervention, whereas a lack of time was mentioned as a barrier. Despite difficulties in the GPs' adherence to the intervention protocol, the GPs, PTs and patients saw benefit in the intervention. The patients' treatment adherence to physical therapy was good. There were minor issues in data collection, but no unintended consequences. CONCLUSION Although the process evaluation provided good support for the feasibility of study procedures, the intervention and its implementation strategy, we identified a need for improvement in recruitment of participants, the GP intervention part and the data collection procedures. The findings will inform the main trial to test the interventions effectiveness in a cluster RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION Projektdatenbank Versorgungsforschung Deutschland (German registry Health Services Research) VfD_MobilE-PHY_17_003910, date of registration: 30.11.2017; Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German Clinical Trials Register) DRKS00022918, date of registration: 03.09.2020 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Seckler
- Centre for Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024 Rosenheim, Germany
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 17, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Verena Regauer
- Centre for Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024 Rosenheim, Germany
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 17, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Krüger
- Institute of Sports Science, Leibniz University Hannover, Am Moritzwinkel 6, 30167 Hannover, Germany
| | - Anna Gabriel
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992 Munich, Germany
| | - Joachim Hermsdörfer
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992 Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Niemietz
- Centre for Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024 Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Petra Bauer
- Faculty for Applied Health and Social Sciences and Centre for Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024 Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Martin Müller
- Faculty for Applied Health and Social Sciences and Centre for Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024 Rosenheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lech S, O'Sullivan JL, Wellmann L, Supplieth J, Döpfmer S, Gellert P, Kuhlmey A, Nordheim J. Recruiting general practitioners and patients with dementia into a cluster randomised controlled trial: strategies, barriers and facilitators. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:61. [PMID: 33784967 PMCID: PMC8008594 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01253-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recruitment of general practitioners (GPs) and their patients is reported as one of the most challenging steps when undertaking primary care research. The present paper describes the recruitment process of a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) aiming to improve dementia care in the primary care setting. Methods Recruitment data was analysed descriptively using frequency tables to investigate comparisons of recruitment rates and results of different recruitment strategies as well as reasons for participation and non-participation of GPs, patients with dementia (PwD) and their caregivers. Results Over a period of 23 months, N = 28 GPs were successfully included in the cRCT. This represents an overall recruitment rate of 4.6%. The most efficient strategy in terms of high response and low labour-intensity involved the dissemination of calls for participation in a GP research network. Most frequently reported reasons for GP’s participation were Improvement of patient’s well-being (n = 22, 79%) followed by Interest in dementia research (n = 18, 64%). The most common reasons for non-participation were Lack of time (n = 71, 34%) followed by Not interested in participation (n = 63, 30%). On a patient level, N = 102 PwD were successfully recruited. On average, each GP referred about n = 7 PwD (range: 1–17; mdn = 6; IQR = 3.5) and successfully recruited about n = 4 PwD (range: 1–11; mdn = 3; IQR = 3.5). Conclusion First, our findings propose GP research networks as a promising strategy to promote recruitment and participation of GPs and their patients in research. Second, present findings highlight the importance of including GPs and their interests in specific research topics in early stages of research in order to ensure a successful recruitment. Finally, results do not support cold calls as a successful strategy in the recruitment of GPs. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry (Trial registration number: ISRCTN15854413). Registered 01 April 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Lech
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Julie L O'Sullivan
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonard Wellmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Juliana Supplieth
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Döpfmer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of General Practice, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Gellert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adelheid Kuhlmey
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Nordheim
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thomas E, Chih H, Gabbe B, Fitzgerald M, Cowen G. A cross-sectional study reporting concussion exposure, assessment and management in Western Australian general practice. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:46. [PMID: 33653287 PMCID: PMC7927406 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01384-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background General Practitioners (GPs) may be called upon to assess patients who have sustained a concussion despite limited information being available at this assessment. Information relating to how concussion is actually being assessed and managed in General Practice is scarce. This study aimed to identify characteristics of current Western Australian (WA) GP exposure to patients with concussion, factors associated with GPs’ knowledge of concussion, confidence of GPs in diagnosing and managing patients with concussion, typical referral practices and familiarity of GPs with guidelines. Methods In this cross-sectional study, GPs in WA were recruited via the RACGP WA newsletter and shareGP and the consented GPs completed an electronic survey. Associations were performed using Chi-squared tests or Fisher’s Exact test. Results Sixty-six GPs in WA responded to the survey (response rate = 1.7%). Demographics, usual practice, knowledge, confidence, identification of prolonged recovery as well as guideline and resource awareness of GPs who practised in regional and metropolitan areas were comparable (p > 0.05). Characteristics of GPs were similar between those who identified all symptoms of concussion and distractors correctly and those who did not (p > 0.05). However, 84% of the respondents who had never heard of concussion guidelines were less likely to answer all symptoms and distractors correctly (p = 0.039). Whilst 78% of the GPs who were confident in their diagnoses had heard of guidelines (p = 0.029), confidence in managing concussion was not significantly associated with GPs exposure to guidelines. It should be noted that none of the respondents correctly identified signs of concussion and excluded the distractors. Conclusions Knowledge surrounding concussion guidelines, diagnosis and management varied across GPs in WA. Promotion of available concussion guidelines may assist GPs who lack confidence in making a diagnosis. The lack of association between GPs exposure to guidelines and confidence managing concussion highlights that concussion management may be an area where GPs could benefit from additional education and support. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01384-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Thomas
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.,Division of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - HuiJun Chih
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Research Excellence, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
| | - Belinda Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.,Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Sarich Neuroscience Research Institute Building, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Gill Cowen
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Enticott JC, Shawyer F, Brophy LM, Russell G, Mazza D, Wilson-Evered E, Weller PJ, Slade M, Edan V, Meadows GN. REFOCUS-PULSAR Recovery-Oriented Practice Training in Adult Primary Mental Health Care: Exploratory Findings Including From a Pretest-Posttest Evaluation. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:625408. [PMID: 33790816 PMCID: PMC8006334 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.625408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Australian general practitioners (GPs) are pivotal in mental health care. The REFOCUS-PULSAR (Principles Unite Local Services Assisting Recovery) primary care study aimed to improve personal recovery outcomes in adults with mental health problems consulting GPs. Design: Modified from an intended stepped-wedge cluster study, an exploratory (pre- and post-intervention) design employed cross-sectional surveys of patients consulting GPs. Setting: Eighteen primary care sites (clusters) in Victoria, Australia in 2013-2017. Participants: From 30 GPs recruited, 23 participated (76%), with 235 patient surveys returned from adults aged <75 years receiving mental health care. Intervention: A co-delivered face-to-face training intervention for GPs in recovery-oriented practice (ROP), with personal recovery a key focus, used multimedia, mnemonics, and targeted interview schedules to encourage ROP-with availability of support sessions for 1 year. Outcome Measures: Primary: the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery full-scale score (outcome). Secondary: INSPIRE (experience), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) (outcomes). Other: General-practice-Users Perceived-need Inventory (experience). Results: Small positive significant effects indicated primary-outcome post-intervention improvements [t-test (233) = -2.23, p = 0.01], also improvement in two secondary outcomes (WEMWBS t(233) = -2.12, p = 0.02 and K10 t(233) = 2.44, p = 0.01). More patients post-intervention reported "no need" for further help from their GP; but in those reporting needs, there was greater unmet need for counseling. Conclusions: ROP implementation, internationally influential in specialist mental health care, here is explored in primary care where it has had less attention. These exploratory findings suggest better patient outcomes followed introducing GPs to ROP in routine practice conditions. Higher unmet need for counseling post-intervention reported by patients might be a sign of limited supply despite ROP facilitating better identification of needs. Challenges in project implementation means that these findings carry risks of bias and flag the importance establishing research infrastructure in primary care. Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov/, The Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ACTRN12614001312639.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne C Enticott
- Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Frances Shawyer
- Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisa Mary Brophy
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Grant Russell
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Penelope June Weller
- Graduate School of Business and Law, College of Business, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mike Slade
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Vrinda Edan
- Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Graham Nicholas Meadows
- Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ertmann RK, Nicolaisdottir DR, Kragstrup J, Siersma V, Overbeck G, Wilson P, Lutterodt MC. Selection bias in general practice research: analysis in a cohort of pregnant Danish women. Scand J Prim Health Care 2020; 38:464-472. [PMID: 33242291 PMCID: PMC7782229 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1847827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to examine selection in a general practice-based pregnancy cohort. DESIGN Survey linked to administrative register data. SETTING AND SUBJECTS In spring 2015, GPs were recruited from two Danish regions. They were asked to invite all pregnant women in their practice who had their first prenatal care visit before 15 August 2016 to participate in the survey. OUTCOME MEASURES The characteristics of GPs and the pregnant women were compared at each step in the recruitment process - the GP's invitation, their agreement to participate, actual GP participation, and the women's participation - with an uncertainty coefficient to quantify the step where the largest selection occurs. RESULTS Significant differences were found between participating and non-participating practices with regards to practice characteristics such as the number of patients registered with the practice, the age and sex of doctors, and the type of practice. Despite these differences, the characteristics of the eligible patients differed little between participating and non-participating practices. In participating practices significant differences were, however, observed between recruited and non-recruited patients. CONCLUSION The skewed selection of patients was mainly caused by a high number of non-participants within practices that actively took part in the study. We recommend that a focus on the sampling within participating practices be the most important factor in representative sampling of patient populations in general practice. Key points Selection among general practitioners (GPs) is often unavoidable in practice-based studies, and we found significant differences between participating and non-participating practices. These include practice characteristics such as the number of GPs, the number of patients registered with the GP practice, as well as the sex and age of the GPs. •Despite this, only small differences in the characteristics of the eligible patients were observed between participating and non-participating practices. •In participating practices, however, significant differences were observed between recruited and non-recruited patients. •Comprehensive sampling within participating practices may be the best way to generate representative samples of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth K. Ertmann
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
- CONTACT Ruth K. Ertmann The Research Unit for General Practice, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen KDK-1014, Denmark
| | - Dagny R. Nicolaisdottir
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Jakob Kragstrup
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Volkert Siersma
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Gritt Overbeck
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Philip Wilson
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
- Centre for Rural Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Melissa C. Lutterodt
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roth H, Homer CSE, Arnott C, Roberts L, Brown M, Henry A. Assessing knowledge of healthcare providers concerning cardiovascular risk after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: an Australian national survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:717. [PMID: 33228597 PMCID: PMC7684922 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03418-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) affect 5-10% of pregnant women. Women after HDP have 2-3 times increased risk of heart attack, stroke and diabetes, as soon as 5-10 years after pregnancy. Australian healthcare providers' knowledge of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks for women after HDP is unknown, and this study aimed to explore their current knowledge and practice regarding long-term cardiovascular health after HDP, as a precursor to producing targeted healthcare provider education on health after HDP. METHODS A custom-created, face-validated online survey explored knowledge about long-term risks after HDP. Distribution occurred from February to July 2019 via professional colleges, key organisations and social media. The objective was to assess current knowledge and knowledge gaps amongst a group of healthcare providers (HCP) in Australia, regarding long-term cardiovascular health after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), specifically gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. RESULTS Of 492 respondents, 203 were midwives, 188 obstetricians, 75 general practitioners (GP), and 26 cardiologists. A risk knowledge score was computed with 0-6 considered low, 6.1-8.9 moderate and 9-12 high. Most participants (85%) were aware of increased cardiovascular disease after preeclampsia and gestational hypertension (range 76% midwives to 100% cardiologists). There were significant differences in average knowledge scores regarding health after preeclampsia; high for cardiologists (9.3), moderate for GPs and obstetricians (8.2 and 7.6 respectively) and low for midwives (5.9). Average knowledge scores were somewhat lower for gestational hypertension (9.0 for cardiologists, 7.4 for obstetricians and GPs, 5.1 for midwives). Knowledge was highest regarding risk of chronic hypertension, moderate to high regarding risk of ischaemic heart disease, stroke and recurring HDP, and low for diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. Only 34% were aware that risks start < 10 years after the affected pregnancy. CONCLUSION(S) Participants were aware there is increased cardiovascular risk after HDP, although less aware of risks after gestational hypertension and some specific risks including diabetes. Findings will inform the development of targeted education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Roth
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Caroline S E Homer
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Burnet Institute, Maternal and Child Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare Arnott
- The George Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, RPA, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lynne Roberts
- St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,St George & Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Brown
- St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,St George & Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda Henry
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The George Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Recruitment and participation of a survey in a public-private primary care setting: experience from the QUALICOPC Malaysia. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2020; 21:e51. [PMID: 33213564 PMCID: PMC7681175 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423620000511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this paper is to describe the recruitment strategies, the response rates and the reasons for non-response of Malaysian public and private primary care doctors in an international survey on the quality, cost and equity in primary care. BACKGROUND Low research participation by primary care doctors, especially those working in the private sector, is a challenge to quality benchmarking. METHODS Primary care doctors were sampled through multi-stage sampling. The first stage-sampling unit was the primary care clinics, which were randomly sampled from five states in Malaysia to reflect their proportions in two strata - sector (public/private) and location (urban/rural). Strategies through endorsement, personalised invitation, face-to-face interview and non-monetary incentives were used to recruit public and private doctors. Data collection was carried out by fieldworkers through structured questionnaires. FINDINGS A total of 221 public and 239 private doctors participated in the study. Among the public doctors, 99.5% response rates were obtained. Among the private doctors, a 32.8% response rate was obtained. Totally, 30% of private clinics were uncontactable by telephone, and when these were excluded, the overall response rate is 46.8%. The response rate of the private clinics across the states ranges from 31.5% to 34.0%. A total of 167 answered the non-respondent questionnaire. Among the non-respondents, 77.4 % were male and 22.6% female (P = 0.011). There were 33.6% of doctors older than 65 years (P = 0.003) and 15.9% were from the state of Sarawak (P = 0.016) when compared to non-respondents. Reason for non-participation included being too busy (51.8%), not interested (32.9%), not having enough patients (9.1%) and did not find it beneficial (7.9%). Our study demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining favourable response rate in a survey involving doctors from public and private primary care settings.
Collapse
|
22
|
Glette MK, Kringeland T, Røise O, Wiig S. Would you be interested in participating in a study about hospital readmissions…? TIDSSKRIFT FOR OMSORGSFORSKNING 2020. [DOI: 10.18261/issn.2387-5984-2020-02-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
23
|
Hains I, Raffoul N, Yoo J. Evaluation of academic detailing visits on GP knowledge and practice for statin use and management. Aust J Prim Health 2020; 26:492-499. [PMID: 33004108 DOI: 10.1071/py20062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Dyslipidaemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is routinely managed by GPs. Lipid-modifying medicines, commonly statins, are used to treat dyslipidaemia and prevent CVD in high-risk individuals. A national education program for over 8000 Australian GPs was delivered and evaluated. The program aimed to optimise the use of statins and provide GPs with an Australian-developed statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) management algorithm supporting assessment and management of suspected SAMS. Retrospective pre-test and control questionnaires were administered to measure changes in knowledge and intended practice following the education program. A total of 226 participant GPs and 150 control GPs completed the questionnaires. The program led to positive changes in GP knowledge and intended practice around the use of absolute CVD risk to make prescribing decisions. Participant GPs demonstrated increased knowledge, compared with control GPs, about the use of CVD risk calculators as the most effective approach to lipid management, and adequately trialling a statin before considering a second agent. One of the greatest improvements in participant GP-intended practice related to the assessment and management of suspected SAMS, with participant GPs more likely to appropriately identify and manage suspected SAMS than control GPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isla Hains
- NPS MedicineWise, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - Natalie Raffoul
- NPS MedicineWise, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012, Australia
| | - Jeannie Yoo
- NPS MedicineWise, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lightfoot KL, Burford JH, England GCW, Bowen IM, Freeman SL. Mixed methods investigation of the use of telephone triage within UK veterinary practices for horses with abdominal pain: A Participatory action research study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238874. [PMID: 32966300 PMCID: PMC7510986 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telephone triage is an integral part of modern patient care systems in human medicine, and a key component of veterinary practice care systems. There is currently no published research on telephone triage within the veterinary profession. OBJECTIVE To investigate current approaches to telephone triage of horses with abdominal pain (colic) in veterinary practice and develop new resources to support decision-making. STUDY DESIGN Participatory action research using mixed-methods approach. METHODS An online survey assessed current approaches to telephone triage of horses with colic in UK veterinary practices. Structured group and individual interviews were conducted with four equine client care (reception) teams on their experiences around telephone triage of colic. Evidence-based resources, including an information pack, decision flow chart and recording form, were developed and implemented within the practices. Participant feedback was obtained through interviews six months after implementation of the resources. RESULTS There were 116 participants in the online survey. Management and client care staff (53/116) felt less confident giving owner advice (p<0.01) and recognising critical indicators (p = 0.03) compared to veterinary surgeons and nurses (63/116). Thirteen themes were identified in the survey relating to owner advice; exercise and owner safety were most frequently mentioned, but conflicting guidance was often given. Fourteen client care staff were interviewed. They were confident recognising colic during a telephone conversation with an owner and identified the most common signs of critical cases as sweating and recumbency. The new resources received positive feedback; the decision flow chart and information on critical indicators were identified as most useful. After resource implementation, there was an increase in confidence in recognising critical cases and giving owners advice. MAIN LIMITATIONS Limited sample population. CONCLUSIONS This study described existing approaches to telephone triage, identified variations in advice given, and worked with client care teams to develop new resources to aid decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie L. Lightfoot
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| | - John H. Burford
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| | - Gary C. W. England
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| | - I. Mark Bowen
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah L. Freeman
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
O'Donovan R, Van Dun D, McAuliffe E. Measuring psychological safety in healthcare teams: developing an observational measure to complement survey methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:203. [PMID: 32727374 PMCID: PMC7387873 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01066-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Psychological safety is a dynamic team-level phenomenon which exists when team members believe that it is safe to take interpersonal risks. In healthcare teams, the presence of psychological safety is critical to delivering safe care. Scholars have highlighted a need for alternative measures which compliment survey-based measures of psychological safety in healthcare teams. Methods The exploratory phase of this study raised concerns about whether current survey measures could provide a sufficient understanding of psychological safety within healthcare teams to inform strategies to improve it. Thus, previously validated psychological safety surveys and a meeting observation measure were adapted for use in healthcare teams. First, two group feedback sessions were held with 22 healthcare professionals, as well as a systematic literature review. Then, the members of eleven healthcare teams in Ireland and The Netherlands (n = 135) took part in the pilot test of the adapted composite measure. Results The final composite measure has two parts: a team meeting observation measure and an adapted survey. The observation measure has 31 observable behaviours fitting seven categories: voice, defensive voice, silence behaviours, supportive, unsupportive, learning or improvement-oriented and familiarity type behaviours. The survey part consists of 19 items in three sub-dimensions related to; the team leader, other team members and the team as a whole. Three additional items capture the perceived representativeness of the observed team meeting compared to other similar meetings. Final adaptations were made in order to integrate the observation and survey measure. Conclusions The resulting composite measure combines the strengths of observational and survey measures and is tailored for use in healthcare teams. It is uniquely co-developed with healthcare professionals and grounded in the psychological safety and healthcare literature. This composite measure can enable longitudinal research on psychological safety and inform future research to develop and test interventions to improve psychological safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Róisín O'Donovan
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (IRIS), UCD Health Sciences Centre, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Desirée Van Dun
- Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Eilish McAuliffe
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (IRIS), UCD Health Sciences Centre, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Casey AN, Islam MM, Schütze H, Parkinson A, Yen L, Shell A, Winbolt M, Brodaty H. GP awareness, practice, knowledge and confidence: evaluation of the first nation-wide dementia-focused continuing medical education program in Australia. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:104. [PMID: 32522153 PMCID: PMC7285709 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01178-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Dementia is under-diagnosed in primary care. Timely diagnosis and care management improve outcomes for patients and caregivers. This research evaluated the effectiveness of a nationwide Continuing Medical Education (CME) program to enhance dementia-related awareness, practice, knowledge and confidence of general practitioners (GPs) in Australia. Methods Data were collected from self-report surveys by GPs who participated in an accredited CME program face-to-face or online; program evaluations from GPs; and process evaluations from workshop facilitators. CME participants completed surveys at one or more time-points (pre-, post-program, six to 9 months follow-up) between 2015 and 2017. Paired samples t-test was used to determine difference in mean outcome scores (self-reported change in awareness, knowledge, confidence, practice) between time-points. Multivariable regression analyses were used to investigate associations between respondent characteristics and key variables. Qualitative feedback was analysed thematically. Results Of 1352 GPs who completed a survey at one or more time-points (pre: 1303; post: 1017; follow-up: 138), mean scores increased between pre-CME and post-program for awareness (Mpost-pre = 0.9, p < 0.0005), practice-related items (Mpost-pre = 1.3, p < 0.0005), knowledge (Mpost-pre = 2.2, p < 0.0005), confidence (Mpost-pre = 2.1, p < 0.0005). Significant increases were seen in all four outcomes for GPs who completed these surveys at both pre- and follow-up time-points. Male participants and those who had practised for five or more years showed greater change in knowledge and confidence. Age, years in practice, and education delivery method significantly predicted post-program knowledge and confidence. Most respondents who completed additional program evaluations (> 90%) rated the training as relevant to their practice. These participants, and facilitators who completed process evaluations, suggested adding more content addressing patient capacity and legal issues, locality-specific specialist and support services, case studies and videos to illustrate concepts. Conclusions The sustainability of change in key elements relating to health professionals’ dementia awareness, knowledge and confidence indicated that dementia CME programs may contribute to improving capacity to provide timely dementia diagnosis and management in general practice. Low follow-up response rates warrant cautious interpretation of results. Dementia CME should be adopted in other contexts and updated as more research becomes available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Nicole Casey
- Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, AGSM Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - M Mofizul Islam
- Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Heike Schütze
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.,School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Anne Parkinson
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, NSW, 2601, Australia
| | - Laurann Yen
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, NSW, 2601, Australia
| | - Allan Shell
- Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, AGSM Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Margaret Winbolt
- Dementia Training Australia, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, AGSM Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. .,Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. .,Academic Department for Old Age Psychiatry, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Screening for atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias in primary care. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:79. [PMID: 32375662 PMCID: PMC7201749 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01151-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and other arrhythmias are prevalent and often encountered by general practitioners (GPs). In response to the growing prevalence and to assist practitioners in the diagnosis and management of AF, the Cardiac Society of Australia & New Zealand and Heart Foundation of Australia published the first Australian AF Guidelines in 2018. We aimed to examine (a) the proportion of GPs who performed any form of AF screening and identify the methods they applied, (b) GPs’ awareness of the AF Guidelines and approaches to arrhythmia screening, (c) the roles of conventional 12-lead ECG and mobile health devices, and (d) GPs’ confidence in ECG interpretation and need for training. Methods A cross-sectional online survey titled “GPs Screen their patients for Atrial Fibrillation and othEr aRrhythmia (GPSAFER)” was conducted from October 2018 to March 2019. The participants were recruited via various GP networks across Australia. Ethics approval was granted by The University of Sydney. Results A total of 463 surveys were completed. Many GPs (394/463, 85.1%, 95% CI 81.5–88.2%) performed some forms of AF screening and applied at least one AF screening method, most frequently pulse palpation (389/463, 84.0%). Some (299/463, 64.6%) GPs considered assessing their patients for other arrhythmias (237/299, 79.3% for complete heart block and 236/299, 78.9% for long-QT). Most GPs (424/463, 91.6%) were not using mobile ECG devices in their practice but some (147/463, 31.7%) were contemplating it. One third (175/463, 37.8%) of GPs were aware of the Australian AF Guidelines; those aware were more likely to perform AF screening (98.9% vs 76.7%, p < 0.001). Factors significantly and positively associated with AF screening were “awareness of the AF Guidelines” (p < 0.001), “number of years working in general practice” (p < 0.001), and “confidence in ECG interpretation of AF” (p = 0.003). Most GPs reported that they were very or extremely confident in interpreting AF (381/463, 82.3%) and complete heart block (266/463, 57.5%). Many GPs (349/463, 75.4%) would like to receive online ECG interpretation training. Conclusions Assessment of arrhythmias is common in general practice and GPs are open to further training in ECG interpretation and using mobile ECG devices to aid their clinical practice. Increasing awareness of AF Guidelines and improving confidence in ECG interpretation may increase AF screening.
Collapse
|
28
|
Perceptions of Family Physicians About Fall Risk Screening, Fall Risk Assessment, and Referral Practices for Fall Prevention in Malaysia. TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION 2020. [DOI: 10.1097/tgr.0000000000000252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
29
|
Gray SE, Brijnath B, Mazza D, Collie A. Australian General Practitioners' and Compensable Patients: Factors Affecting Claim Management and Return to Work. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2019; 29:672-678. [PMID: 30715662 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-019-09828-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Purpose General Practitioners (GPs) play an important role in personal injury compensation systems yet system processes have been perceived as burdensome. Objectives were to (1) determine attitudes of Australian GPs on health benefits of return to work (RTW) after injury/illness and (2) identify associations between GP characteristics and agreement with issues surrounding treating compensable patients. Methods Cross-sectional postal survey of 423 Australian GPs to determine agreement with issues associated with compensable patients (including patient advocacy, conflicting opinions between GPs and compensation systems, fitness-for-work certification, and refusal to treat). Results The vast majority of GPs agreed there was a health benefit to early RTW. GPs with 16-20 years' experience had significantly higher odds of agreeing that the certificate of work capacity is the primary method of communication between RTW stakeholders (OR 2.36 [1.13-4.92]) than those with greater experience. 49% of GPs agreed they should be able to refuse to treat compensable patients. Female GPs had significantly lower odds (OR 0.60 [0.40-0.90]) of agreeing with right to refuse than male GPs, as did those from remote or regional practices (OR 0.43 [0.20-0.94]; OR 0.60 [0.39-0.92]) than GPs from urban practices. Conclusions Reducing administrative barriers identified by Australian GPs and improving communication with compensation systems will likely have a positive impact on their refusal to treat compensable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon E Gray
- Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.
| | - Bianca Brijnath
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168, Australia
- National Ageing Research Institute, 34-48 Poplar Rd, Parkville, 3052, Australia
- School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Building 108 Brand Dr, Bentley, 6102, Australia
| | - Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168, Australia
| | - Alex Collie
- Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Karampela M, Ouhbi S, Isomursu M. Connected Health User Willingness to Share Personal Health Data: Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e14537. [PMID: 31774410 PMCID: PMC6906622 DOI: 10.2196/14537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Connected health has created opportunities for leveraging health data to deliver preventive and personalized health care services. The increasing number of personal devices and advances in measurement technologies contribute to an exponential growth in digital health data. The practices for sharing data across the health ecosystem are evolving as there are more opportunities for using such data to deliver responsive health services. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore user attitudes toward sharing personal health data (PHD). The study was executed within the first year after the implementation of the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) legal framework. METHODS The authors analyzed the results of an online questionnaire survey to explore the willingness of 8004 people using connected health services across four European countries to share their PHD and the conditions under which they would be willing to do so. RESULTS Our findings indicate that the majority of users are willing to share their personal PHD for scientific research (1811/8004, 22.63%). Age, education level, and occupation of the participants, in addition to the level of digitalization in their country were found to be associated with data sharing attitudes. CONCLUSIONS Positive attitudes toward data sharing for scientific research can be perceived as an indication of trust established between users and academia. Nevertheless, the interpretation of data sharing attitudes is a complex process, related to and influenced by various factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sofia Ouhbi
- United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gillespie R, Mullan J, Harrison L. Deprescribing for older adults in Australia: factors influencing GPs. Aust J Prim Health 2019; 24:463-469. [PMID: 30423283 DOI: 10.1071/py18056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is increasing among older Australians, raising their risk of experiencing medication-related harm. As part of the prescribing continuum, deprescribing is a strategy proposed to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy. This study explored factors that influence deprescribing among Australian GPs using a new 21-item survey to measure GP attitudes and practices. The 85 GP responses indicated that many factors are supportive of deprescribing. GPs suggest that they are willing to explore their older patients' deprescribing preferences; they believe that they have enough information about the potential harms and benefits of medication to inform their deprescribing decisions and are confident to communicate this information to their patients. GPs did not consider their patients would interpret deprescribing as being 'given up on'. Limited time to review medications, poor communication between prescribers and a perception that other prescribers do not respect their role as overall coordinators of their older patients' medications were considered by respondents to be unsupportive of deprescribing. Overall, despite GPs reporting many supportive factors for deprescribing, the influence of unsupportive factors appears to remain strong, as deprescribing is not routinely considered in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Gillespie
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
| | - Judy Mullan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
| | - Lindsey Harrison
- School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hains I, Meyers J, Sterling K, Yoo J, Reddel H, Weston C. Difficult-to-treat and severe asthma in general practice: delivery and evaluation of an educational program. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:99. [PMID: 31301742 PMCID: PMC6626400 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0991-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Asthma, a common yet complex airway disorder affecting about 11% of Australians, is well-controlled in only 54% of people with asthma. Those with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma are more likely to experience recurrent and potentially life-threatening exacerbations. It is therefore important that GPs can initiate a systematic approach for the management of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma to identify those whose condition may improve by addressing contributory factors and those who require specialist input. We therefore aimed to develop and deliver an educational program for GPs on the systematic management of patients with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma and evaluate the effectiveness of this program. Methods We developed an educational program on the management of difficult-to-treat and severe asthma in primary care that was delivered to GPs and other health professionals between January and June 2018. We evaluated the effectiveness of the program using a retrospective pre-test with post-survey, administered to GPs directly after program participation. Results Over 1000 general practice health professionals participated in the educational program, including 890 GPs of whom 226 (25%) completed the survey. Following program participation, a greater proportion of GPs identified factors they would assess in managing a patient with poor asthma control, particularly for considering the risk of future adverse outcomes (+ 51%), changes in lifestyle (+ 38%), and self-management strategies (+ 35%). GPs indicated a greater awareness of the biologic therapies that specialists could consider prescribing to their patients with severe asthma (+ 75%), of the requirements for a patient to be prescribed a biologic therapy (+ 73%) and that patients with different phenotypic characteristics can respond differently to standard therapy (+ 67%). The proportion of GPs who would refer appropriate patients to a specialist also significantly increased. Conclusions This study suggests that an evidence-based educational program can improve GP knowledge, confidence and intended practice in managing patients with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0991-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isla Hains
- NPS MedicineWise, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW, 2012, Australia.
| | - Josh Meyers
- NPS MedicineWise, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW, 2012, Australia
| | - Kirsten Sterling
- NPS MedicineWise, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW, 2012, Australia
| | - Jeannie Yoo
- NPS MedicineWise, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW, 2012, Australia
| | - Helen Reddel
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Clare Weston
- NPS MedicineWise, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW, 2012, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lewis NV, Dowrick A, Sohal A, Feder G, Griffiths C. Implementation of the Identification and Referral to Improve Safety programme for patients with experience of domestic violence and abuse: A theory-based mixed-method process evaluation. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2019; 27:e298-e312. [PMID: 30868711 PMCID: PMC6617800 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) is a training and support programme to improve the response to domestic violence and abuse (DVA) in general practice. Following a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial, IRIS has been implemented in over 30 administrative localities in the UK. The trial and local evaluations of the IRIS implementation showed an increase in referrals from general practice to third sector DVA services with a variation in the referral rates within and across practices. Using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), we aimed to understand the reasons for such variability by identifying factors that influenced the implementation of IRIS in the National Health Service (NHS). We conducted a mixed-method process evaluation which included: (a) a case study (100 hr of participant observation, 19 interviews); (b) a survey (n = 118); (c) qualitative analysis of free-text comments from the survey; (d) qualitative interviews (n = 8); (e) document review (n = 44). Data were collected from NHS and third sector staff across five London boroughs from August 2015 to December 2017, analysed descriptively and thematically and triangulated using the NPT constructs coherence, cognitive participation, collection action and reflexive monitoring. The survey showed wide variation in the extent to which practice staff saw IRIS as a normal part of their daily work. Qualitative data and documents illuminated drivers of DVA work, implementation barriers and suggested solutions. The drivers were related to individual professional's characteristics and relationships. The barriers were linked to the differing sense-making and legitimisation of DVA work and differing contexts between the NHS and third sector. Solutions were adaptations to IRIS relative to these contextual differences. The suggested solutions can be used to update IRIS commissioning guidance, training for trainers and training for general practice. The updates should reflect the importance of ongoing support of IRIS from practice leads and commissioners, extended funding periods for IRIS and continuity of the IRIS team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia V. Lewis
- Centre for Primary Care and Public HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolBristolUK
| | - Anna Dowrick
- Centre for Primary Care and Public HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Alex Sohal
- Centre for Primary Care and Public HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Gene Feder
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolBristolUK
| | - Chris Griffiths
- Centre for Primary Care and Public HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schäfer WL, Boerma WG, van den Berg MJ, De Maeseneer J, De Rosis S, Detollenaere J, Greß S, Heinemann S, van Loenen T, Murante AM, Pavlič DR, Seghieri C, Vainieri M, Willems S, Groenewegen PP. Are people's health care needs better met when primary care is strong? A synthesis of the results of the QUALICOPC study in 34 countries. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2019; 20:e104. [PMID: 32800009 PMCID: PMC6609545 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423619000434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2018] [Revised: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This article synthesises the results of a large international study on primary care (PC), the QUALICOPC study. BACKGROUND Since the Alma Ata Declaration, strengthening PC has been high on the policy agenda. PC is associated with positive health outcomes, but it is unclear how care processes and structures relate to patient experiences. METHODS Survey data were collected during 2011-2013 from approximately 7000 PC physicians and 70 000 patients in 34, mainly European, countries. The data on the patients are linked to data on the PC physicians within each country and analysed using multilevel modelling. FINDINGS Patients had more positive experiences when their PC physician provided a broader range of services. However, a broader range of services is also associated with higher rates of hospitalisations for uncontrolled diabetes, but rates of avoidable diabetes-related hospitalisations were lower in countries where patients had a continuous relationship with PC physicians. Additionally, patients with a long-term relationship with their PC physician were less likely to attend the emergency department. Capitation payment was associated with more positive patient experiences. Mono- and multidisciplinary co-location was related to improved processes in PC, but the experiences of patients visiting multidisciplinary practices were less positive. A stronger national PC structure and higher overall health care expenditures are related to more favourable patient experiences for continuity and comprehensiveness. The study also revealed inequities: patients with a migration background reported less positive experiences. People with lower incomes more often postponed PC visits for financial reasons. Comprehensive and accessible care processes are related to less postponement of care. CONCLUSIONS The study revealed room for improvement related to patient-reported experiences and highlighted the importance of core PC characteristics including a continuous doctor-patient relationship as well as a broad range of services offered by PC physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemijn L.A. Schäfer
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N. St Clair Street, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- NIVEL – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO box 1568, 3500BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wienke G.W. Boerma
- NIVEL – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO box 1568, 3500BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael J. van den Berg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam
| | - Jan De Maeseneer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sabina De Rosis
- Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Institute of Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, piazza Martiti della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy
| | - Jens Detollenaere
- KCE – Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Kruidtuinlaan 55, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefan Greß
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipziger Str. 123, 36037 Fulda, Germany
| | - Stephanie Heinemann
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipziger Str. 123, 36037 Fulda, Germany
- Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Tessa van Loenen
- Pharos – Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, PO box 13318, 3507 LH Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Maria Murante
- Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Institute of Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, piazza Martiti della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy
| | - Danica R. Pavlič
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Chiara Seghieri
- Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Institute of Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, piazza Martiti della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy
| | - Milena Vainieri
- Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Institute of Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, piazza Martiti della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy
| | - Sara Willems
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter P. Groenewegen
- NIVEL – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO box 1568, 3500BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Sociology and Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
de Moel-Mandel C, Graham M, Taket A. Snapshot of medication abortion provision in the primary health care setting of regional and rural Victoria. Aust J Rural Health 2019; 27:237-244. [PMID: 31070843 DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify enablers and barriers to the provision of medication abortion in the primary health care setting of regional and rural areas of Victoria, Australia. DESIGN An online cross-sectional questionnaire was used. SETTING Regional and rural areas of Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-nine GPs and 30 primary health care nurses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Abortion views, medication abortion knowledge and practice, interest in medication abortion training and provision, and perceived uptake barriers. RESULTS Most participants reported being consulted by women with unintended pregnancies and most of them included abortion counselling in their consultation. However, familiarity with provision of medication abortion was limited, and only five GPs and two primary health care nurses were currently medication abortion providers. The majority of participants expressed a high level of interest in receiving medication abortion training, but indicated a wide range of barriers to service provision, such as a lack of training opportunities, legal uncertainties or surgical access concerns in case of complications. CONCLUSIONS Findings demonstrate the need for education on medication abortion and training opportunities. Most identified barriers to service uptake are addressable and relate to a lack of local support services, including the absence of a 24-hour contact advice service, insufficient follow-up access and a lack of local ultrasound facilities. These barriers require educational programs at professional, organisational and community level to ensure that interested rural and regional primary health care providers can start offering medication abortion for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline de Moel-Mandel
- Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa Graham
- Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ann Taket
- Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Innes SI, Leboeuf-Yde C, Walker BF. Attempting to explore chiropractors and their clinical choices: an examination of a failed study. Chiropr Man Therap 2019; 27:15. [PMID: 30984368 PMCID: PMC6446310 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-019-0236-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recent studies have shown that psychological factors, attitudes and beliefs impact on the quality of chiropractic student clinical decisions. This association has not been studied among qualified chiropractors. Our objective was to investigate if personality, psychological factors and/or unorthodox beliefs among chiropractors are related to choices of management in specific clinical scenarios. Method In February 2018, a subsample of chiropractors (N = 700) from a practitioner-based research network in Australia known as ACORN (N = 1680), were invited to respond to an on-line anonymous questionnaire. Questions included items relating to management of specific clinical scenarios, intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and the 'Big-5' personality score, adoption of a prescriptive technique system, self-rating of chiropractic abilities, and the level of importance of subluxation and chiropractic philosophy in the delivery of care. Descriptive analysis was to be reported and associations examined between i) personality and psychology factors, unorthodox beliefs and ii) scores obtained for management of specific clinical scenarios, numbers of interdisciplinary referrals, and guideline-based X-ray use. Results The number of respondents was 141 (20%) and 33 of their responses were largely incomplete resulting in a final response rate of 108 (15.4%). In addition, some questions were left unanswered. These related mainly to IU and Big-5 personality measurements. Some sample characteristics (age, number of patients per week, hours worked per week) were similar to the larger ACORN project sample. However, the low response rate indicated that the final study sample was unlikely to be truly representative of the study population and the low number of participants made association testing unsuitable. Conclusion and recommendations The low response rate and small study sample in this study made any substantive analysis inappropriate. For these reasons, the study was not concluded. However, the potential reasons for the low response from this large database of volunteer research participants are of interest and need to be investigated. Clearly, it is necessary to engage this population better to explore sensitive issues such as personality inventories and different practice profiles in the interest of effective health care delivery and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley I Innes
- 1College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia
| | - Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
- 1College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.,2Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odens, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bruce F Walker
- 1College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gaupp-Berghausen M, Raser E, Anaya-Boig E, Avila-Palencia I, de Nazelle A, Dons E, Franzen H, Gerike R, Götschi T, Iacorossi F, Hössinger R, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Rojas-Rueda D, Sanchez J, Smeds E, Deforth M, Standaert A, Stigell E, Cole-Hunter T, Int Panis L. Evaluation of Different Recruitment Methods: Longitudinal, Web-Based, Pan-European Physical Activity Through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA) Project. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e11492. [PMID: 31066715 PMCID: PMC6533046 DOI: 10.2196/11492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Sufficient sample size and minimal sample bias are core requirements for empirical data analyses. Combining opportunistic recruitment with a Web-based survey and data-collection platform yields new benefits over traditional recruitment approaches. Objective This paper aims to report the success of different recruitment methods and obtain data on participants’ characteristics, participation behavior, recruitment rates, and representativeness of the sample. Methods A longitudinal, Web-based survey was implemented as part of the European PASTA (Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches) project, between November 2014 and December 2016. During this period, participants were recruited from 7 European cities on a rolling basis. A standardized guide on recruitment strategy was developed for all cities, to reach a sufficient number of adult participants. To make use of the strengths and minimize weakness, a combination of different opportunistic recruitment methods was applied. In addition, the random sampling approach was applied in the city of Örebro. To reduce the attrition rate and improve real-time monitoring, the Web-based platform featured a participant’s and a researchers’ user interface and dashboard. Results Overall, 10,691 participants were recruited; most people found out about the survey through their workplace or employer (2300/10691, 21.51%), outreach promotion (2219/10691, 20.76%), and social media (1859/10691, 17.39%). The average number of questionnaires filled in per participant varied significantly between the cities (P<.001), with the highest number in Zurich (11.0, SE 0.33) and the lowest in Örebro (4.8, SE 0.17). Collaboration with local organizations, the use of Facebook and mailing lists, and direct street recruitment were the most effective approaches in reaching a high share of participants (P<.001). Considering the invested working hours, Facebook was one of the most time-efficient methods. Compared with the cities’ census data, the composition of study participants was broadly representative in terms of gender distribution; however, the study included younger and better-educated participants. Conclusions We observed that offering a mixed recruitment approach was highly effective in achieving a high participation rate. The highest attrition rate and the lowest average number of questionnaires filled in per participant were observed in Örebro, which also recruited participants through random sampling. These findings suggest that people who are more interested in the topic are more willing to participate and stay in a survey than those who are selected randomly and may not have a strong connection to the research topic. Although direct face-to-face contacts were very effective with respect to the number of recruited participants, recruiting people through social media was not only effective but also very time efficient. The collected data are based on one of the largest recruited longitudinal samples with a common recruitment strategy in different European cities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen
- Institute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Raser
- Institute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Esther Anaya-Boig
- Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ione Avila-Palencia
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Audrey de Nazelle
- Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Evi Dons
- Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.,Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium
| | | | - Regine Gerike
- Chair of Integrated Transport Planning and Traffic Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Götschi
- Physical Activity and Health Unit, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Reinhard Hössinger
- Institute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Rojas-Rueda
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julian Sanchez
- London Borough of Newham, London, United Kingdom.,The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emilia Smeds
- Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manja Deforth
- Physical Activity and Health Unit, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Arnout Standaert
- Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium
| | | | - Tom Cole-Hunter
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Air Pollution, Energy and Health Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Luc Int Panis
- Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.,Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Winter J, McNaughton SA, Nowson CA. Nutritional care of older patients: experiences of general practitioners and practice nurses. Aust J Prim Health 2019; 23:178-182. [PMID: 27697113 DOI: 10.1071/py16021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Older people living in the community face unique nutritional issues that put them at risk of undernutrition, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Primary healthcare staff such as general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) are well placed to identify nutritional problems early and intervene. The aim of this study was to understand the experiences and current practices in a sample of GPs and PNs with regards to nutritional care of elderly patients. An online survey of GPs and PNs working in regional Victoria was conducted. Among the 45 respondents, 89% reported encountering consultations with a nutritional component for older patients within the previous 3 months, and 94% of those took some action, most commonly referrals, dietary advice or prescribing supplements. Although the majority (63%) felt confident in providing appropriate nutritional recommendations for patients, 68% reported a desire for further professional development in the area. Given the frequency of nutritional issues presenting, further work is required to determine how well equipped primary healthcare staff are to provide nutritional advice to older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Winter
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia
| | - Sarah A McNaughton
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia
| | - Caryl A Nowson
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Therapeutic alternatives for supporting GPs to deprescribe opioids: a cross-sectional survey. BJGP Open 2019; 2:bjgpopen18X101609. [PMID: 30723795 PMCID: PMC6348329 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background GPs are central to opioid strategy in chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). Lack of treatment alternatives and providers are common reasons cited for not deprescribing opioids. There are limited data about availability of multidisciplinary healthcare providers (MHCPs), such as psychologists, physiotherapists, or dietitians, who can provide broader treatments. Aim To explore availability of MHCPs, and the association with GP opioid deprescribing and transition to therapeutic alternatives for CNCP. Design & setting Cross-sectional survey of all practising GPs (N = 1480) in one mixed urban and regional Australian primary health network. Method A self-report mailed questionnaire assessed the availability of MHCPs and management of their most recent patient on long-term opioids for CNCP. Results Six hundred and eighty-one (46%) valid responses were received. Most GPs (71%) had access to a pain specialist and MHCPs within 50 km. GPs' previous referral for specialist support was significantly associated with access to a greater number of MHCPs (P = 0.001). Employment of a nurse increased the rate ratio of available MHCPs by 12.5% (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.125, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.001 to 1.264). Only one-third (32%) of GPs reported willingness to deprescribe and shift to broader CNCP treatments. Availability of MHCPs was not significantly associated with deprescribing decisions. Conclusion Lack of geographical access to known MHCPs does not appear to be a major barrier to opioid deprescribing and shifting toward non-pharmacological treatments for CNCP. Considerable opportunity remains to encourage GPs' decision to deprescribe, with employment of a practice nurse appearing to play a role.
Collapse
|
40
|
White R, Hayes C, Boyes AW, Chiu S, Paul CL. General practitioners and management of chronic noncancer pain: a cross-sectional survey of influences on opioid deprescribing. J Pain Res 2019; 12:467-475. [PMID: 30774416 PMCID: PMC6348964 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s168785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background General practitioners’ (GPs) views about deprescribing prescription opioid analgesics (POAs) may influence the care provided for patients experiencing chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). There are limited data addressing GPs’ beliefs about deprescribing, including their decisions to deprescribe different types of POAs. Aim To determine the proportion of GPs who hold attitudes congruent with local pain stewardship, describe their deprescribing decisions, and determine whether type of POA influences deprescribing. Design and setting In 2016, a cross-sectional survey of all GPs (n=1,570) in one mixed urban and regional primary health network (PHN) in Australia was undertaken. Methods A mailed self-report questionnaire assessed agreement with local guidelines for treating CNCP; influences on deprescribing POAs and likelihood of deprescribing in a hypothetical case involving either oral codeine or oxycodone. Results A response rate of 46% was achieved. Approximately half (54%) of GPs agreed POAs should be reserved for people with acute, cancer pain or palliative care and a third (32%) did not agree that a medication focus has limited benefits for peoples’ long-term quality of life and function. Most (77%) GPs were less likely to deprescribe when effective alternate treatments were lacking, while various patient factors (eg, fear of weaning) were reported to decrease the likelihood of deprescribing for 25% of GPs. A significantly higher proportion of GPs reported being very likely to deprescribe codeine compared to the equivalent opioid dose of oxycodone for a hypothetical patient. Conclusions Many GPs in the PHN hold attitudes at odds with local guidance that opioids are a nonsuperior treatment for CNCP. Attitudinal barriers to deprescribing include: a lack of consistent approach to deprescribing opioids as a class of drugs, perceived lack of effective treatment alternatives and patient fear of deprescribing. Therefore, the next step in this target population is to appropriately train and support GPs in how to apply the evidence in practice and how to support patients appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth White
- Hunter Integrated Pain Service, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, NSW, Australia, .,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia,
| | - Chris Hayes
- Hunter Integrated Pain Service, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, NSW, Australia,
| | - Allison W Boyes
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia, .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Simon Chiu
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine L Paul
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia, .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
McIntyre A, Mackenzie L, Harvey M. Engagement of general practitioners in falls prevention and referral to occupational therapists. Br J Occup Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/0308022618804752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anne McIntyre
- Senior Lecturer, Clinical Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK
| | - Lynette Mackenzie
- Associate Professor, Discipline of Occupational Therapy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michele Harvey
- Research Assistant, Chelsea Children’s Therapy, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Do Physicians Prefer to Complete Online or Mail Surveys? Findings From a National Longitudinal Survey. Eval Health Prof 2018; 42:41-70. [DOI: 10.1177/0163278718807744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Survey response rates for physicians are falling generally, and surveys of physicians tend to have lower response rates than those of the general population. To maximize response, respondents are often given a choice of modes in which to respond. The aim of this article is to describe mode response patterns and identify factors related to physicians’ decisions to complete surveys online rather than by mail. The data are from the fifth annual wave of the Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life longitudinal survey of physicians, in which there was a 43.5% response rate (10,746/24,711) and 33.7% of respondents completed the survey online. Online completion was more likely when the physician had completed the survey online in the previous wave, was a general practitioner rather than other medical specialist or doctor-in-training, worked in a remote location, and was young and male. Free-text spontaneous comments from respondents indicated that mode choice was based on a combination of preference, previous experience, and feasibility. These results provide support for the use of mixed mode survey designs, which can accommodate doctors with different mode preferences and cast doubt over the possibility of tailoring mode based on respondent characteristics.
Collapse
|
43
|
Põlluste K, Kosunen E, Koskela T, Mattila KJ, Schäfer WLA, Boerma WGW, Lember M. Primary health care in transition: Variations in service profiles of general practitioners in Estonia and in Finland between 1993 and 2012. Health Policy 2018; 123:37-44. [PMID: 30322719 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the early 1990s, the Estonian and Finnish health systems have undergone various changes which are expected to have impacted the type and range of services provided by general practitioners (GPs). OBJECTIVE To compare GP services between Estonia and Finland in 1993 and 2012 and draw a parallel with transformations occurred in the health systems of both countries during these two decades. METHODS Data were collected through surveys among 129 and 288 GPs from Estonia and Finland in 2012 and 139 Estonian and 239 Finnish GPs in 1993. Descriptive statistics were used to compare between countries and years. RESULTS Between 1993 and 2012, the number of working hours per week and consultations per day increased in Estonia and decreased in Finland. In 2012, GPs in were more often the first contact for psychosocial and women´s and children´s in Estonia, whereas this decreased in Finland. The frequency of treating acute patients mostly decreased in both countries. We observed a decrease in medical procedures in Finland and an increase in Estonia. Finnish GPs still conducted more procedures in 2012. CONCLUSION Due to partly opposite changes, the services provided by Finnish and Estonian GPs became more similar. Still, there are large differences in services provided, possibly arising from differences in the organisation of health services, the training of doctors and patients' preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja Põlluste
- University of Tartu, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tartu, Estonia.
| | - Elise Kosunen
- University of Tampere, School of Medicine, Department of General Practice, Tampere, Finland; Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Centre of General Practice, Finland
| | - Tuomas Koskela
- University of Tampere, School of Medicine, Department of General Practice, Tampere, Finland
| | - Kari J Mattila
- University of Tampere, School of Medicine, Department of General Practice, Tampere, Finland
| | - Willemijn L A Schäfer
- NIVEL - the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wienke G W Boerma
- NIVEL - the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Margus Lember
- University of Tartu, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tartu, Estonia; Tartu University Hospital, Internal Medicine Clinic, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Li A, Cronin S, Bai YQ, Walker K, Ammi M, Hogg W, Wong ST, Wodchis WP. Assessing the representativeness of physician and patient respondents to a primary care survey using administrative data. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2018; 19:77. [PMID: 29848292 PMCID: PMC5977493 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0767-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND QUALICOPC is an international survey of primary care performance. QUALICOPC data have been used in several studies, yet the representativeness of the Canadian QUALICOPC survey is unknown, potentially limiting the generalizability of findings. This study examined the representativeness of QUALICOPC physician and patient respondents in Ontario using health administrative data. METHODS This representativeness study linked QUALICOPC physician and patient respondents in Ontario to health administrative databases at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. Physician respondents were compared to other physicians in their practice group and all Ontario primary care physicians on demographic and practice characteristics. Patient respondents were compared to other patients rostered to their primary care physicians, patients rostered to their physicians' practice groups, and a random sample of Ontario residents on sociodemographic characteristics, morbidity, and health care utilization. Standardized differences were calculated to compare the distribution of characteristics across cohorts. RESULTS QUALICOPC physician respondents included a higher proportion of younger, female physicians and Canadian medical graduates compared to other Ontario primary care physicians. A higher proportion of physician respondents practiced in Family Health Team models, compared to the provincial proportion for primary care physicians. QUALICOPC patient respondents were more likely to be older and female, with significantly higher levels of morbidity and health care utilization, compared with the other patient groups examined. However, when looking at the QUALICOPC physicians' whole rosters, rather than just the patient survey respondents, the practice profiles were similar to those of the other physicians in their practice groups and Ontario patients in general. CONCLUSIONS Comparisons revealed some differences in responding physicians' demographic and practice characteristics, as well as differences in responding patients' characteristics compared to the other patient groups tested, which may have resulted from the visit-based sampling strategy. Ontario QUALICOPC physicians had similar practice profiles as compared to non-participating physicians, providing some evidence that the participating practices are representative of other non-participating practices, and patients selected by visit-based sampling may also be representative of visiting patients in other practices. Those using QUALICOPC data should understand this limited representativeness when generalizing results, and consider the potential for bias in their analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allanah Li
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Shawna Cronin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yu Qing Bai
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kevin Walker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mehdi Ammi
- School of Public Policy & Administration, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
| | - William Hogg
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sabrina T Wong
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kielich K, Mackenzie L, Lovarini M, Clemson L. Urban Australian general practitioners' perceptions of falls risk screening, falls risk assessment, and referral practices for falls prevention: an exploratory cross-sectional survey study. AUST HEALTH REV 2018; 41:111-119. [PMID: 27096324 DOI: 10.1071/ah15152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective The study aimed to explore Australian general practitioners' (GPs) perceptions of falls risk screening, assessment and their referral practices with older people living in the community, and to identify any barriers or facilitators to implementing evidence-based falls prevention practice. Methods Hardcopy surveys and a link to an online survey were distributed to 508 GPs working at one Medicare Local (now part of a Primary Care Network) located in Sydney, Australia. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and key themes were identified from open text responses. Results A total of 37 GPs returned the survey. Only 10 (27%) GPs routinely asked older people about falls, and five (13.5%) asked about fear of falls during clinical consultations. Barriers to managing falls risk were identified. GPs estimated that they made few referrals to allied health professionals for falls interventions. Conclusions GPs were knowledgeable about falls risk factors but this did not result in consistent falls risk screening, assessment or referral practices. Due to the small sample, further research is needed with a larger sample to augment these results. What is known about the topic? Falls are a common and serious health issue for older people and fall prevention is vital, especially in the primary care setting. General practitioners (GPs) are key health professionals to identify older people at risk of falls and refer them to appropriate health professionals for intervention. Evidence-based falls prevention interventions exist but are not easily or routinely accessed by older people. What does this paper add? GPs believe that previous falls are an important falls risk factor but they do not routinely ask about falls or fear of falls in clinical practice with older people. GP referral rates to allied health professionals for falls prevention are low, despite evidence-based falls prevention interventions being provided by allied health professionals. There are several barriers to GPs providing falls prevention assessment and intervention referrals, particularly using the current primary health systems. What are the implications for practitioners? GPs need to recognise their potential significant contribution to falls prevention in the community and may require tailored training. Sustainable evidence-based referral pathways need to be developed so that older people can be referred to allied health professionals for falls prevention interventions in the primary care setting, and better local networks need to be developed to allow this to occur. Policy makers may have to address the identified barriers to multidisciplinary practice and funding of services to facilitate effective falls prevention programs in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kajtek Kielich
- Ageing Work and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, 75 East Street, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | - Lynette Mackenzie
- Ageing Work and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, 75 East Street, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | - Meryl Lovarini
- Ageing Work and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, 75 East Street, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | - Lindy Clemson
- Ageing Work and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, 75 East Street, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Improving early exclusion of acute coronary syndrome in primary care: the added value of point-of-care troponin as stated by general practitioners. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2017; 18:386-397. [PMID: 28462739 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423617000135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To investigate general practitioners' (GPs') desire and perceived added value of point-of-care (POC) troponin, its effect on referral decisions, and test requirements. BACKGROUND Excluding acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in primary care remains a diagnostic challenges for GPs. Consequently, referral rates of chest pain patients are high, while the incidence of a cardiovascular problem is only 8-15%. Previous studies have shown that GPs are interested in a POC troponin test. This test could enhance rapid exclusion of ACS, thereby preventing unnecessary patient distress, without compromising safety and while reducing costs. However, using this test is not recommended in current guidelines due to uncertainty in the test's potential added value, and the lower sensitivity early after symptom onset as compared with troponin tests in a regular laboratory. METHODS An online survey containing 34 questions was distributed among 837 Dutch GPs in June 2015. Findings A total of 126 GPs (15.1%) completed at least 75% of the questions. 67.1% of GPs believe that POC troponin tests have moderate to very high added value. Although the availability of a POC test is expected to increase the frequency at which troponin tests are used, it likely decreases (immediate) referral rates. Of the responding GPs, 78.3% only accept 10 min as the maximum test duration, 78.1% think reimbursement of the POC device is required for implementation, and 68.9% consider it necessary that it can be performed with a finger prick blood sample. In conclusion, according to GPs, the POC troponin test can be of added value to exclude ACS early on. Actual test implementation will depend on test characteristics, including test duration, type of blood sample required, and reimbursement of the analyzer.
Collapse
|
47
|
Lewis NV, Larkins C, Stanley N, Szilassy E, Turner W, Drinkwater J, Feder GS. Training on domestic violence and child safeguarding in general practice: a mixed method evaluation of a pilot intervention. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2017; 18:33. [PMID: 28259143 PMCID: PMC5336644 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-017-0603-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Children’s exposure to domestic violence is a type of child maltreatment, yet many general practice clinicians remain uncertain of their child safeguarding responsibilities in the context of domestic violence. We developed an evidence-based pilot training on domestic violence and child safeguarding for general practice teams. The aim of this study was to test and evaluate its feasibility, acceptability and the direction of change in short-term outcome measures. Methods We used a mixed method design which included a pre-post questionnaire survey, qualitative analysis of free-text comments, training observations, and post-training interviews with trainers and participants. The questionnaire survey used a validated scale to measure participants’ knowledge, confidence/ self-efficacy, and beliefs/ attitudes towards domestic violence and child safeguarding in the context of domestic violence. Results Eleven UK general practices were recruited (response rate 55%) and 88 clinicians attended the pilot training. Thirty-seven participants (42%) completed all pre-post questionnaires and nine were interviewed. All training sessions were observed. All six trainers were interviewed. General practice clinicians valued the training materials and teaching styles, opportunities for reflection and delivery by local trainers from both health and children’s social services. The training elicited positive changes in total outcome score and knowledge and confidence/ self-efficacy sub scores which remained at 3-month follow up. However, the mean sub score of beliefs and attitudes did not change and the qualitative results were mixed. Two interviewees described changes in their clinical practice. Participants’ suggestions for improving the training included incorporating more ethnic and class diversity in the material, using cases with multiple socio economic disadvantages, and addressing multi-agency collaboration in the context of changing and under-resourced services for children. Conclusions The pilot training for general practice on child safeguarding in the context of domestic violence was feasible and acceptable. It elicited positive changes in clinicians’ knowledge and confidence/ self-esteem. The extent to which clinical behaviour changed is unclear, but there are indications of changes in practice by some clinicians. The pilot training requires further refinement and evaluation before implementation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0603-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia V Lewis
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Cath Larkins
- School of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Harrington Building, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Nicky Stanley
- School of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Harrington Building, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Eszter Szilassy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - William Turner
- School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Social Science Complex, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| | - Jessica Drinkwater
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK
| | - Gene S Feder
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Brijnath B, Bunzli S, Xia T, Singh N, Schattner P, Collie A, Sterling M, Mazza D. General practitioners knowledge and management of whiplash associated disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder: implications for patient care. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2016; 17:82. [PMID: 27440111 PMCID: PMC4955143 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0491-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background In Australia, general practitioners (GPs) see around two-thirds of people injured in road traffic crashes. Road traffic crash injuries are commonly associated with diverse physical and psychological symptoms that may be difficult to diagnose and manage. Clinical guidelines have been developed to assist in delivering quality, consistent care, however the extent to which GPs knowledge and practice in diagnosing and managing road traffic crash injuries concords with the guidelines is unknown. This study aimed to explore Australian GPs knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the diagnosis and management of road traffic crash injuries, specifically whiplash associated disorders (WAD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Method A cross-sectional survey of 423 GPs across Australia conducted between July and December 2014. We developed a questionnaire to assess their knowledge of WAD and PTSD, confidence in diagnosing and managing WAD and PTSD, frequency of referral to health providers, barriers to referral, and attitudes towards further education and training. Factor analysis, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple ordered logistic regressions were performed. Results Overall, GPs have good level knowledge of WAD and PTSD; only 9.6 % (95 % CI: 7.1 %, 12.8 %) and 23.9 % (95 % CI: 20.8 %, 28.2 %) of them were deemed to have lower level knowledge of WAD and PTSD respectively. Key knowledge gaps included imaging indicators for WAD and indicators for psychological referral for PTSD. GPs who were male, with more years of experience, working in the urban area and with higher knowledge level of WAD were more confident in diagnosing and managing WAD. Only GPs PTSD knowledge level predicted confidence in diagnosing and managing PTSD. GPs most commonly referred to physiotherapists and least commonly to vocational rehabilitation providers. Barriers to referral included out-of-pocket costs incurred by patients and long waiting times. Most GPs felt positive towards further education on road traffic crash injury management. Conclusion This study has enhanced understanding of the knowledge skills and attitudes of GPs towards road traffic crash injury care in Australia, and has identified areas for further education and training. If delivered, this training has the potential to reduce unnecessary imaging for WAD and optimise the early referral of patients at risk of delayed recovery following a road traffic crash.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Brijnath
- Department of General Practice, School of Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. .,School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6152, Australia.
| | - Samantha Bunzli
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ting Xia
- Department of General Practice, School of Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nabita Singh
- Department of General Practice, School of Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Schattner
- Department of General Practice, School of Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex Collie
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michele Sterling
- Recover Injury Research Centre, NHMRC CRE in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, School of Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Brodribb WE, Mitchell BL, van Driel ML. Practice related factors that may impact on postpartum care for mothers and infants in Australian general practice: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:244. [PMID: 27400740 PMCID: PMC4940844 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1508-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While there is a significant focus on the health and well-being of women during pregnancy, labour and birth, much less emphasis is placed on the care of postpartum women and their infants in primary care following the birth. Some studies have investigated the role of GPs in postpartum care, and others examined facilitators and barriers to mothers accessing care. However there is little information available to investigate the effect of practice related factors on access to care of mothers and infants at this time. Methods A 20-item questionnaire for completion by the practice managers was mailed to 497 general practices in Southern Queensland, Australia between February and July 2013. Questionnaire items included practice demographics, practice procedures and personnel including appointment scheduling, billing, practice nurse function and qualifications and a free-text option for comments. Descriptive statistics are presented as numbers and percentages. Chi Squared test compared practice location with methods of identification of postpartum women, practice size with other Queensland data and ANOVA compared practice size with the number of postpartum appointments. Logistic regression was used to predict variables that were related to booked appointment times. Free text responses were grouped in common themes. Results The response rate was 27.4 %. At 67.2 % of the practices, mothers had to self-identify as needing a postpartum consultation and most consultations were allocated 15 minutes or less. Only 20 % of practices accepted the government insurance payment (bulk-billing) for all maternal and infant services, with more practices bulk-billing children only. Out-of-pocket expenses ranged from $10-$60. Nearly 80 % of practice nurses saw postpartum mothers or infants ‘nearly always’ or ‘sometimes’. Approximately 30 % had midwifery or child health training. There were higher odds of longer booked appointment times for solo practitioner practices (unadj OR 3.30 95%CI 1.03-10.57), but no other variables predicted booked appointment times Conclusions This study identified a number of practice related factors that, if addressed, could positively impact on postpartum care. These include ensuring ongoing practice relationships to assist with booking appropriate consultation times and guaranteeing that there are no financial impediments to women accessing care. Some factors can easily be adapted within practices. Others would require changes of policy at a local or national level. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1508-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy E Brodribb
- Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland, Health Sciences Building, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia.
| | - Benjamin L Mitchell
- Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland, Health Sciences Building, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia
| | - Mieke L van Driel
- Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland, Health Sciences Building, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Groenewegen PP, Greß S, Schäfer W. General Practitioners' Participation in a Large, Multicountry Combined General Practitioner-Patient Survey: Recruitment Procedures and Participation Rate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE 2016; 2016:4929432. [PMID: 27047689 PMCID: PMC4800081 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4929432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Accepted: 02/14/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Background. The participation of general practitioners (GPs) is essential in research on the performance of primary care. This paper describes the implementation of a large, multicountry study in primary care that combines a survey among GPs and a linked survey among patients that visited their practice (the QUALICOPC study). The aim is to describe the recruitment procedure and explore differences between countries in the participation rate of the GPs. Methods. Descriptive analyses were used to document recruitment procedures and to assess hypotheses potentially explaining variation in participation rates between countries. Results. The survey was implemented in 31 European countries. GPs were mainly selected through random sampling. The actual implementation of the study differed between countries. The median participation rate was 30%. Both material (such as the payment system of GPs in a country) and immaterial influences (such as estimated survey pressure) are related to differences between countries. Conclusion. This study shows that the participation of GPs may indeed be influenced by the context of the country. The implementation of complex data collection is difficult to realize in a completely uniform way. Procedures have to be tuned to the context of the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter P. Groenewegen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Sociology and Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Stefan Greß
- Hochschule Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Leipziger Straße 123, 36037 Fulda, Germany
| | - Willemijn Schäfer
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|