1
|
Wong Shee A, Donaldson A, Clapham RP, Aitken JC, Ananthapavan J, Ugalde A, Versace VL, Mc Namara K. Identifying health and healthcare priorities in rural areas: A concept mapping study informed by consumers, health professionals and researchers. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:105. [PMID: 39135114 PMCID: PMC11320881 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01163-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is vital that health service delivery and health interventions address patients' needs or preferences, are relevant for practice and can be implemented. Involving those who will use or deliver healthcare in priority-setting can lead to health service delivery and research that is more meaningful and impactful. This is particularly crucial in rural communities, where limited resources and disparities in healthcare and health outcomes are often more pronounced. The aim of this study was to determine the health and healthcare priorities in rural communities using a region-wide community engagement approach. METHODS This multi-methods study was conducted in five rural communities in the Grampians region, Western Victoria, Australia. It involved six concept mapping steps: (1) preparation, (2) generation (brainstorming statements and identifying rating criteria), (3) structuring statements (sorting and rating statements), (4) representation of statements, (5) interpretation of the concept map and (6) utilization. Community forums, surveys and stakeholder consultations with community members and health professionals were used in Step 2. An innovative online group concept mapping platform, involving consumers, health professionals and researchers was used in Step 3. RESULTS Overall, 117 community members and 70 health professionals identified 400 health and healthcare issues. Six stakeholder consultation sessions (with 16 community members and 16 health professionals) identified three key values for prioritizing health issues: equal access for equal need, effectiveness and impact (number of people affected). Actionable priorities for healthcare delivery were largely related to access issues, such as the challenges navigating the healthcare system, particularly for people with mental health issues; the lack of sufficient general practitioners and other health providers; the high travel costs; and poor internet coverage often impacting technology-based interventions for people in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS This study identified actionable health and healthcare priorities from the perspective of healthcare service users and providers in rural communities in Western Victoria. Issues related to access, such as the inequities in healthcare costs, the perceived lack of quality and availability of services, particularly in mental health and disability, were identified as priorities. These insights can guide future research, policy-making and resource allocation efforts to improve healthcare access, quality and equity in rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Wong Shee
- Grampians Health, 102 Ascot St Sth, Ballarat, VIC, 3350, Australia.
- Deakin Rural Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia.
| | | | - Renee P Clapham
- Deakin Rural Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia
- Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Vincent L Versace
- Grampians Health, 102 Ascot St Sth, Ballarat, VIC, 3350, Australia
- Deakin Rural Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia
| | - Kevin Mc Namara
- Grampians Health, 102 Ascot St Sth, Ballarat, VIC, 3350, Australia
- Deakin Rural Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ben Chmo M, Matricciani L, Kumar S, Graham K. "I know what I'm supposed to do, but I don't do it": patient-perceived risk factors that lead to their lower extremity amputations. J Foot Ankle Res 2023; 16:79. [PMID: 37957636 PMCID: PMC10642033 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00675-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to extend on our previous research by exploring patient-perceived factors that lead to their Lower Extremity Amputations (LEA). LEA are a serious complication of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), LEA are thought to be preventable with early detection and management of risk factors. Our previous study identified that these factors extend beyond the typical biological and modifiable risk factors and may also extend to patient awareness and competing priorities. Therefore, this research explored these issues in further detail, identifying patient-perceived factors that lead to their LEA. METHODS A qualitative descriptive methodology involving non-probability purposive sampling was used to recruit inpatients at a tertiary metropolitan hospital in South Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were transcribed verbatim. Data from the interviews were analysed using thematic analysis and the constant comparison approach. RESULTS A total of 15 participants shared their perspectives of risk factors for LEA. Two main themes emerged: intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Intrinsic factors identified in this study included identity, ambivalence, denial, inevitability, and helplessness. Extrinsic factors related to resources, rapport with healthcare professionals, and management of care. CONCLUSIONS Through identifying that a combination of perceived personal attributes (intrinsic) and system-level (extrinsic) factors likely contribute to LEA, this study highlights the complexity of factors that contribute to patients' perceptions of what led to their diabetes related LEA. These findings support the importance of a nuanced approach in managing patients with diabetes who are at risk of LEA as it's likely patients' personal circumstances, day-to-day life's requirements and responsibilities, their interaction with healthcare professionals all seemingly contribute to how risks are viewed and managed. Tackling this challenge will require reimagining diabetes care, acknowledgement of risk factors beyond the obvious and addressing persistent access and workforce issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelle Ben Chmo
- Allied Health & Human Performance, The University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Lisa Matricciani
- Clinical and Health Sciences, The University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Saravana Kumar
- Allied Health & Human Performance, The University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- Innovation, IMPlementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT in Health), The University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Kristin Graham
- Allied Health & Human Performance, The University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- Innovation, IMPlementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT in Health), The University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khatri RB, Assefa Y. Drivers of the Australian Health System towards Health Care for All: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2023; 2023:6648138. [PMID: 37901893 PMCID: PMC10611547 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6648138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Background Australia has made significant progress towards universal access to primary health care (PHC) services. However, disparities in the utilisation of health services and health status remain challenges in achieving the global target of universal health coverage (UHC). This scoping review aimed at synthesizing the drivers of PHC services towards UHC in Australia. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the literature published from 1 January 2010 to 30 July 2021 in three databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Search terms were identified under four themes: health services, Australia, UHC, and successes or challenges. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Drivers (facilitators and barriers) of PHC services were explained by employing a multilevel framework that included the proximal level (at the level of users and providers), intermediate level (organisational and community level), and distal level (macrosystem or distal/structural level). Results A total of 114 studies were included in the review. Australia has recorded several successes in increased utilisation of PHC services, resulting in an overall improvement in health status. However, challenges remain in poor access and high unmet needs of health services among disadvantaged/priority populations (e.g., immigrants and Indigenous groups), those with chronic illnesses (multiple chronic conditions), and those living in rural and remote areas. Several drivers have contributed in access to and utilisation of health services (especially among priority populations)operating at multilevel health systems, such as proximal level drivers (health literacy, users' language, access to health facilities, providers' behaviours, quantity and competency of health workforce, and service provision at health facilities), intermediate drivers (community engagement, health programs, planning and monitoring, and funding), and distal (structural) drivers (socioeconomic disparities and discriminations). Conclusion Australia has had several successes towards UHC. However, access to health services poses significant challenges among specific priority populations and rural residents. To achieve universality and equity of health services, health system efforts (supply- and demand-side policies, programs and service interventions) are required to be implemented in multilevel health systems. Implementation of targeted health policy and program approaches are needed to provide comprehensive PHC and address the effects of structural disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Resham B. Khatri
- Health Social Science and Development Research Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Yibeltal Assefa
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Turnock A, Fielding A, Moad D, Tapley A, Davey A, Holliday E, Ball J, Bentley M, FitzGerald K, Kirby C, Spike N, van Driel ML, Magin P. The prevalence and associations of Australian early-career general practitioners' provision of after-hours care. Aust J Rural Health 2023; 31:906-913. [PMID: 37488936 DOI: 10.1111/ajr.13022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Access to after-hours care (AHC) is an important aspect of general practice service provision. OBJECTIVE To establish the prevalence and associations of early-career GPs' provision of AHC. DESIGN An analysis of data from the New alumni Experiences of Training and independent Unsupervised Practice (NEXT-UP) cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Participants were early-career GPs (6-month to 2-year post-Fellowship) following the completion of GP vocational training in NSW, the ACT, Victoria or Tasmania. The outcome factor was 'current provision of after-hours care'. Associations of the outcome were established using multivariable logistic regression. FINDINGS Three hundred and fifty-four early-career GPs participated (response rate 28%). Of these, 322 had responses available for analysis of currently performing AHC. Of these observations, 128 (40%) reported current provision of AHC (55% of rural participants and 32% of urban participants). On multivariable analysis, participants who provided any AHC during training were more likely to be providing AHC (odds ratio (OR) 5.51, [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.80-10.80], p < 0.001). Current rural location and in-training rural experience were strongly associated with currently providing AHC in univariable but not multivariable analysis. DISCUSSION Early-career GPs who provided AHC during training, compared with those who did not, were more than five times more likely to provide after-hours care in their first 2 years after gaining Fellowship, suggesting participation in AHC during training may have a role in preparing registrars to provide AHC as independent practitioners. CONCLUSION These findings may inform future GP vocational training policy and practice concerning registrars' provision of AHC during training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Turnock
- University of Tasmania, School of Medicine, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- Department of Health, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Alison Fielding
- GP Synergy, NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dominica Moad
- GP Synergy, NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda Tapley
- GP Synergy, NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Davey
- GP Synergy, NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Holliday
- The University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jean Ball
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Clinical Research Design and Statistical Support Unit (CReDITSS), New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Bentley
- General Practice Training Tasmania (GPTT), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Kristen FitzGerald
- University of Tasmania, School of Medicine, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- General Practice Training Tasmania (GPTT), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Catherine Kirby
- Eastern Victoria General Practice Training (EVGPT), Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Neil Spike
- Eastern Victoria General Practice Training (EVGPT), Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, School of Rural Health, Churchill, Victoria, Australia
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mieke L van Driel
- Faculty of Medicine, General Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Parker Magin
- GP Synergy, NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Mayfield West, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jeffreys M, Ellison-Loschmann L, Irurzun-Lopez M, Cumming J, McKenzie F. Financial barriers to primary health care in Aotearoa New Zealand. Fam Pract 2023:cmad096. [PMID: 37696758 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmad096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Aotearoa New Zealand, co-payments to see a general practitioner (GP, family doctor) or collect a prescription are payable by virtually all adults. OBJECTIVE To examine the extent to which these user co-payments are a barrier to accessing health care, focussing on inequities for indigenous Māori. METHODS Pooled data from sequential waves (years) of the New Zealand Health Survey, 2011/12 to 2018/19 were analysed. Outcomes were self-reported cost barriers to seeing a GP or collecting a prescription in the previous year. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of barriers to care for Māori compared with non-Māori, sequentially adjusting for additional explanatory variables. RESULTS Pooled data included 107,231 people, 22,292 (21%) were Māori. Across all years, 22% of Māori (13% non-Māori) experienced a cost barrier to seeing a GP, and 14% of Māori (5% non-Māori) reported a cost barrier to collecting a prescription. The age- and wave-adjusted OR comparing Māori/non-Māori was 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61, 1.81) for the cost barrier to primary care and 2.97 (95% CI: 2.75, 3.20) for the cost barrier to collecting prescriptions. Sociodemographics accounted for about half the inequity for both outcomes; in a fully adjusted model, age, sex, low income, and poorer underlying health were determinants of both outcomes, and deprivation was additionally associated with the cost barrier to collecting a prescription but not to seeing a GP. CONCLUSIONS Māori experience considerable inequity in access to primary health care; evidence supports an urgent need for change to system funding to eliminate financial barriers to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Jeffreys
- Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora | Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
- Flax Analytics Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Maite Irurzun-Lopez
- Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora | Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jacqueline Cumming
- Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora | Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Fiona McKenzie
- Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora | Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
- Flax Analytics Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cunningham J, Bailie J, Warner S, Condon A, Cheung D, Minc A, Herbert S, Edmiston N. Determinants of access to general practice in a shared care model for people living with HIV: a qualitive study of patients' perspectives in an Australian rural community. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:179. [PMID: 37674116 PMCID: PMC10483738 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02142-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has resulted in improved life expectancy for people living with HIV and an ageing population with a significant comorbidity burden. Shared care models, involving the co-ordinated liaison between general practitioners and specialist physicians, have been advocated for in Australia to provide comprehensive care. People living with HIV in rural areas have reduced access to general practice and therefore shared care. This study explores the perspectives of people living with HIV on the barriers and enablers to accessing shared care in an Australian rural setting. METHODS In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults living with HIV who either resided in or accessed care in a rural area of Australia. Interviews were conducted via video conferencing, phone or face-to-face. Transcripts were imported into NVivo, coded and analysed in alignment with a conceptual framework of healthcare access defined by Levesque and colleagues. RESULTS Thirteen interviews were conducted in total. Participants' narratives demonstrated the substantial influence of accessibility to general practice on their ability to engage in effective shared care. Challenges included the perception that general practitioners would not provide additive value to participants' care, which restricted the ability to both seek and engage in the shared care model. Healthcare beliefs, expectations and experiences with stigma led participants to prioritise the perceived interpersonal qualities of specialist care above a shared care system. Access to shared care was facilitated by continuity of care in general practice but logistical factors such as affordability, transport and availability impacted the ability to access regular high-quality healthcare. CONCLUSIONS Navigating patient priorities and anticipated stigma in general practice within the resource limitations of rural healthcare were barriers to effective shared care. General practitioners' ability to build rapport and long-term relationships with participants was instrumental in the perception of valuable care. Strategies are required to secure continuity of care with interpersonally skilled general practitioners to ensure provision of quality primary care for people living with HIV, which can be supported by specialist physicians in a shared care model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Cunningham
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jodie Bailie
- University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sherridan Warner
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ashleigh Condon
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniel Cheung
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ariane Minc
- Northern New South Wales Sexual Health Service, North Coast Public Health, Mid North Coast Local Health District, Lismore, Australia
| | - Simone Herbert
- Northern New South Wales Sexual Health Service, North Coast Public Health, Mid North Coast Local Health District, Lismore, Australia
| | - Natalie Edmiston
- University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore, Australia.
- Northern New South Wales Sexual Health Service, North Coast Public Health, Mid North Coast Local Health District, Lismore, Australia.
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Millar L, Bhoyroo R, Molina YP, Watts J, Geagea A, Murphy J, Pollard CM. Intersection between health, health literacy and local government: a mixed methods approach to identifying ways to better connect people to place-based primary health care in western Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:63. [PMID: 36681825 PMCID: PMC9860229 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08872-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this year-long mixed methods research was to examine the intersection between health, health literacy and local government to identify ways to better connect people to place-based primary health care (PHC). METHODS Four local government areas located within the Perth metropolitan geographic area provided the setting for the current research. Researchers were co-located into the four local governments over a 10-month period to engage with community stakeholders and services. Two methodologies were used to achieve the objective: eight group model building (GMB) workshops were conducted with N = 148 participants to create causal loop diagrams of the barriers and enablers to people being healthy and well in each of the LGAs and develop potential action ideas from these. Surveys were used to collect health service use and health literacy, as measured using a validated Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), across the four LGAs (N = 409, approximately 100 respondents/area). RESULTS The causal loop diagram themes common across LGAs included: (1) mental health; (2) access to services; (3) health system capacity; (4) economics; and (5) physical wellbeing. Health literacy was relatively high for all nine domains of the HLQ. In the five domains rated from one to four the lowest score was 2.8 for 'appraisal of information' and the highest was 3.2 for 'feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers'. In the four domains rated from one to five; the lowest score was 3.7 for 'navigating the healthcare system' and the highest was 4.1 for 'understand health information well enough to know what to do'. Prioritised action ideas recommended increases in practitioners to meet local needs and training General Practitioners and other health staff in culturally sensitive and trauma informed health care. The survey findings and field notes from the GMB were used to construct personas embodied in vignettes highlighting general themes identified in the workshops including those relevant to local areas. CONCLUSIONS There are many possibilities for health care and local governments to work together to bring services to community members disengaged from the health system. Bringing together people from diverse backgrounds and organisations created synergies that resulted in novel and feasible potential strategies to improve community health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne Millar
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Kent Street, WA 6845 Perth, Australia
| | - Ranila Bhoyroo
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Kent Street, WA 6845 Perth, Australia
| | - Yesid Pineda Molina
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Kent Street, WA 6845 Perth, Australia
| | - Jessica Watts
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Kent Street, WA 6845 Perth, Australia
| | - Antoinette Geagea
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Kent Street, WA 6845 Perth, Australia
| | - Jennifer Murphy
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Kent Street, WA 6845 Perth, Australia
| | - Christina M Pollard
- grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Kent Street, WA 6845 Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Farnbach S, Fernando J, Coyte J, Simms M, Hackett ML. "I tried to get help about my addiction but he just gave me tablets:" male Aboriginal drug and alcohol rehabilitation clients' experiences and preferences speaking about substance use in primary care. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:25. [PMID: 36681795 PMCID: PMC9863190 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-01983-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary healthcare (PHC) services are crucial in supporting people who use substances. The aims of this study were to explore the experiences of Aboriginal males in NSW in treatment for substance use about speaking about their substance use with PHC staff, and their preferences for accessing PHC about their substance use. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with residential drug and alcohol rehabilitation treatment service clients. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes inductively and deductively. Two interviews were independently double coded by an Aboriginal researcher and the project was supported by an Aboriginal Advisory Group. RESULTS Twenty male adults who self-identified as Aboriginal participated (mean age 27 years). Half reported visiting PHC and talking about their substance use before their residential service stay. Two major themes developed: (1) speaking up about substance use or mental health problems linked with substance use, (2) ways to improve access to PHC about substance use. Although some males were offered treatment, some were not, and others had concerns about the treatments offered. CONCLUSION This research highlights opportunities to improve access and to better support Aboriginal males who use substances in PHC. Focus on culturally appropriate PHC and providing staff with training around substance use and treatment options may improve access. It is important to foster culturally appropriate services, develop PHC staff knowledge around substance use, focus on therapeutic relationships and have a range of treatment options available that can be tailored to individual circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Farnbach
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre and The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | | | - Joe Coyte
- CEO, The Glen Centre (Ngaimpe), Chittaway Point, Australia
| | - Matthew Simms
- South Coast Medical Service Aboriginal Corporation, Nowra, Australia
| | - Maree L Hackett
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, The University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leach MJ, Gunn K, Muyambi K. The determinants of healthcare utilisation in regional, rural and remote South Australia: A cross-sectional study. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e4850-e4863. [PMID: 35770728 PMCID: PMC10084113 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Accessibility of health services outside metropolitan centres in Australia is sub-optimal. Recognising the barriers and enablers of healthcare access in rural, remote and regional settings is necessary to improving health service access in these disadvantaged populations. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine the determinants of healthcare use in rural, remote and regional South Australia. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from adults living outside metropolitan Adelaide in South Australia between April 2017 and March 2018. Using a multi-modal recruitment campaign, eligible adults were invited to complete the 44-item consumer utilisation, expectations and experiences of healthcare instrument. Independent predictors of health service utilisation (dependent variable) were determined using negative binomial regression. The questionnaire was completed by 3926 predominantly female (52.5%) adults aged ≥50 years (56.7%), residing in regional South Australia (84.5%). Fifteen independent variables were significantly associated with health service utilisation using univariate analyses. Using negative binomial regression analysis, two predisposing factors (sex, remoteness), three enabling factors (income, health literacy, employment), two need factors (health rating, multimorbidity) and two personal health practices (alcohol, diet) were independently and significantly associated with healthcare use. Female sex (OR = 1.436, p < 0.001), good/excellent health rating (OR = 0.589, p < 0.001) and high multimorbidity (OR = 1.408, p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of health service use. These findings will help inform the development of targeted health promotion and service engagement strategies for regional populations, which in addition to addressing workforce shortages, may help address inequity in health outcomes, particularly for groups engaging with regional healthcare services infrequently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Leach
- National Centre for Naturopathic MedicineSouthern Cross UniversityEast LismoreNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Rural HealthUniversity of South AustraliaWhyalla NorrieSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Kate Gunn
- Department of Rural HealthUniversity of South AustraliaWhyalla NorrieSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Kuda Muyambi
- Department of Rural HealthUniversity of South AustraliaWhyalla NorrieSouth AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Borg DN, Bon JJ, Foster MM, Lakhani A, Kendall M, Geraghty T. Healthcare services for people with acquired disability in South-East Queensland, Australia: Assessing potential proximity and its association with service obstacles. SSM Popul Health 2022; 19:101209. [PMID: 36052155 PMCID: PMC9424535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This study described access potential in South-East Queensland, to healthcare services commonly used by people with acquired disability; and investigated the association between service proximity and perceived service obstacles. First, we described accessibility by conducting a spatial analysis to create maps of potential accessibility to health services in South-East Queensland. Queensland statistical area level 2 (SA2) locations were combined with the residential locations of participants from a longitudinal cohort study involving people with ABI and SCI. The locations of selected health services of interest were identified from Health Direct's National Health Service Directory. Travel times via motor vehicle were modelled with Robust Gaussian Stochastic Process, to smoothly interpolate between the sparse time-to-service observations. Probabilistic predicted values were generated from the model and were used to construct service accessibility maps of South-East Queensland. Disability population data were used to identify SA2s with relatively low service access but a high disability population. Second, we examined perceived service obstacles, by investigating the relationship between potential access to services and perceived service obstacles was examined using data from 63 people with ABI or SCI discharged from the specialist state-wide rehabilitation services, located in South-East Queensland. Obstacles to accessing service in relation to resource availability, transportation and finances were collected three-months after discharge, using the Service Obstacle Scale. Travel times to the closest health service were computed for each individual and were compared to their Service Obstacle Scale responses. Access potential was highly variable, particularly for allied health services. We identified several low-access, high-disability population areas. These hotpots of poor access were generally to the north and west of greater Brisbane. Longer travel times to allied health services were associated with 260% higher odds of agreeing that resource availability was an obstacle to accessing services. Policy makers should be concerned with the hotspots of poor access identified. There was considerable variability in access potential, which was generally greater for allied health than medical specialist services. We highlighted low-access high disability population areas, which were generally in outer suburbia. Poorer potential access to allied health services was associated with resource availability being rated as an service obstacle. We did not find any evidence that proximity to allied health services was associated with transportation or finance obstacles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David N Borg
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joshua J Bon
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michele M Foster
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ali Lakhani
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.,La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melissa Kendall
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,Division of Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Timothy Geraghty
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,Division of Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Santoyo-Sánchez G, Merino-Soto C, Flores-Hernández S, Pelcastre-Villafuerte BE, Reyes-Morales H. Content Validity of a Scale Designed to Measure the Access of Older Adults to Outpatient Health Services. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191610102. [PMID: 36011737 PMCID: PMC9407808 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this work was to validate the content of a scale formulated in Spanish for older adults in Mexico, with the aim of comprehensively measuring the access of this population group to outpatient primary-care services. To this end, we carried out a methodological content-validity study in four stages: (1) construction of the scale; (2) evaluation of item legibility; (3) quantitative content evaluation by two groups of judges selected by convenience: participant-judges including older adults with adequate reading comprehension, surveyed in person (n = 23), and expert-judges comprised of researchers specialized in the fields of health services, psychometrics and aging, surveyed online (n = 7); and (4) collection of qualitative feedback from several of the participant-judges (older adults, n = 4). The content was validated both by sequentially examining the level of consensus in the responses of both groups of judges, using the Tastle and Wierman method, and by calculating Aiken's Validity Coefficient with a 90% confidence interval. The scale contained 65 items pertaining to 10 dimensions of two major constructs: accessibility (n = 39) and personal abilities (n = 26). Five items were eliminated in accordance with the minimum-consensus criterion (0.5). This is the first psychometric scale to be developed in Mexico with the view of integrating the characteristics of health-care services and the abilities of the older adults in a single questionnaire designed to measure the access of this population group to outpatient primary-care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerardo Santoyo-Sánchez
- School of Public Health of Mexico, National Institute of Public Health, Avenida Universidad 655, Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
| | - César Merino-Soto
- Psychology Research Institute, San Martin de Porres University, Avenue Tomás Marsano 232, Lima 34, Peru
| | - Sergio Flores-Hernández
- Center for Evaluation and Surveys, National Institute of Public Health, Avenida Universidad 655, Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Blanca Estela Pelcastre-Villafuerte
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Avenida Universidad 655, Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Hortensia Reyes-Morales
- Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Avenida Universidad 655, Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +52-(777)-329-3028
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suckling B, Pattullo C, Liu S, James P, Donovan P, Patanwala A, Penm J. Persistent opioid use after hospital discharge in Australia: a systematic review. AUST HEALTH REV 2022; 46:367-380. [PMID: 35545810 DOI: 10.1071/ah21353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
ObjectiveThis systematic review identified studies that provided an estimate of persistent opioid use following patient discharge from hospital settings in Australia.MethodsA literature search was performed on 5 December 2020, with no date restrictions to identify studies that reported a rate of persistent opioid use following patient discharge from Australian Hospitals. The search strategy combined all terms relating to the themes 'hospital patients', 'prescribing', 'opioids' and 'Australia'. Studies that dealt solely with cancer, palliative care or addiction medicine were excluded. The databases searched in this review were Embase, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. Studies were assessed for bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and considered against international literature.ResultsIn total, 13 publications are included for final analysis in this review. Of these, 11 articles relate to post-surgical opioid use. With one exception, studies were of a 'good' quality. Methods of data collection in included studies were a mixture of those conducting follow up of patients directly over time and those utilising dispensing databases. Persistent opioid use among surgical patients generally ranged from 3.9 to 10.5% at between 2 and 4 months after discharge.ConclusionsHow rates of persistent opioid use following hospital encounters in Australia are established, and how long after discharge rates are reported, is heterogeneous. Literature primarily relates to post-surgical patients, with very few studies investigating other settings such as encounters with the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benita Suckling
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; and Caboolture Hospital Pharmacy Department, Metro North Health, Queensland Health, Caboolture, Qld, Australia
| | - Champika Pattullo
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland Health, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Shania Liu
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; and Department of Pharmacy, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Prudence James
- Redcliffe Hospital Pharmacy Department, Queensland Health, Redcliffe, Qld, Australia
| | - Peter Donovan
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland Health, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Asad Patanwala
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; and Department of Pharmacy, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Penm
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; and Department of Pharmacy, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
The Quality of Medical Care in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Pandemic, with Particular Emphasis on the Access to Primary Healthcare and the Effectiveness of Treatment in Poland. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163502. [PMID: 34441798 PMCID: PMC8396893 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Health has a significant influence on the quality of life of a society. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many countries to implement restrictive measures to prevent its wider spread, including, inter alia, the introduction of remote healthcare in the form of teleconsultations. Therefore, there is the question of how such a change affects the quality of treatment and the primary healthcare of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article aims to examine patient satisfaction with the access to primary healthcare and the effectiveness of treatment in a condition of remote medical care caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We also analyse the impact of access to primary healthcare on the treatment effectiveness. Patient satisfaction was measured using a questionnaire assessing the quality of primary medical care. Of the 36 items studied, seven were related to the accessibility dimension and four were related to the treatment effectiveness dimension. Our results suggest that the treatment effectiveness and the access to primary healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic through telemedicine are quite highly rated by patients. Hence, further implementation of telemedicine in primary healthcare should improve the quality of lives of the wide society. We have also identified the access to primary healthcare has a considerable impact on the treatment effectiveness. Therefore, we recommend increasing the contact between patients and GPs via telemedicine under lockdown conditions.
Collapse
|
14
|
Pereira RB, Brown TL, Guida A, Hyett N, Nolan M, Oppedisano L, Riley K, Walker G. Consumer experiences of care coordination for people living with chronic conditions and other complex needs: an inclusive and co-produced research study. AUST HEALTH REV 2021; 45:472-484. [PMID: 33588988 DOI: 10.1071/ah20108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to explore consumer experiences of care coordination within Barwon Health's Hospital Admission Risk Program (HARP) located in Geelong, Victoria. Methods The study design was qualitative description informed by phenomenology and inclusive and co-production methodology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of six consumers living with chronic conditions and other complex needs. Participants were asked about their lived experience related to accessing the service, communication, and health and supports before and after accessing the service using an interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified: (1) experiencing authentic, values-based care; (2) collaborative care and working together; (3) gaining independence; (4) improved health and quality of life; and (5) limited understanding of HARP at the start. Overall, participants' experiences were positive, which related to improved health, quality of life, and sustainable supports. Although gains were experienced, most of the participants identified that their knowledge of HARP was limited when services commenced, which is an area for service improvement. Conclusion This research begins to address the knowledge gap related to consumer experiences of care coordination. Findings highlight the importance of providing person-centred, authentic and values-based care, listening authentically, and promoting consumer voice within services. The study demonstrates that inclusive, co-design research is feasible in this service context, and further research is recommended into how stakeholders understand the function of care coordination services to promote health and prevent hospital readmissions, and improve consumer participation. What is known about the topic? Care coordination is multifaceted, with the primary purpose of facilitating person-centred care through appropriate and timely delivery of healthcare services. Despite the effectiveness of care coordination programs in preventing avoidable hospital admissions and reducing hospital length of stay, there is a paucity of research that has investigated consumer perspectives. There is also limited research that has adopted an inclusive research design of knowledge co-production where clinicians and consumers are included as equal members of the research team. What does this paper add? The study findings provide evidence into the value of care coordination from the perspective of consumers living with chronic conditions and other complex health and psychosocial issues. The findings also extend evidence into person- and consumer-centred care through understanding the qualities of care coordination practice that promote authenticity, integrity and positive health outcomes. Listening is identified as a critical element of authentic, values-based care, and as a care coordination intervention. Finally, the study demonstrates that inclusive, co-design research is feasible in this service context, and a larger-scale Experience-Based Co-Design study is recommended to investigate how stakeholders understand the function of care coordination services to promote health and prevent hospital readmissions and improve consumer participation. What are the implications for practitioners? The study informs practitioners of consumer lived experience of care coordination. Practitioners are recommended to apply the findings to practice by adopting an authentic, values-based and person-centred care approach described in the study findings. Service improvement initiatives are recommended to focus on increasing awareness of care coordination services through consumer participation and the meaningful inclusion of consumer voice, which could focus on education for referring health and social care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Pereira
- Hospital Admission Risk Program, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia; and Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - Timothy L Brown
- Hospital Admission Risk Program, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia. Emails: ;
| | - Alison Guida
- Hospital Admission Risk Program, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia. Emails: ;
| | - Nerida Hyett
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Vic., Australia.
| | | | | | | | - Grace Walker
- Complete Rehab Solutions, Margate, Qld, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cu A, Meister S, Lefebvre B, Ridde V. Assessing healthcare access using the Levesque's conceptual framework- a scoping review. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20:116. [PMID: 33962627 PMCID: PMC8103766 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01416-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Countries are working hard to improve access to healthcare through Universal Healthcare Coverage. To genuinely address the problems of healthcare access, we need to recognize all the dimensions and complexities of healthcare access. Levesque's Conceptual Framework of Access to Health introduced in 2013 provides an interesting and comprehensive perspective through the five dimensions of access and the five abilities of the population to access healthcare. The objectives of this paper are to identify and analyze all empirical studies that applied Levesque's conceptual framework for access to healthcare and to explore the experiences and challenges of researchers who used this framework in developing tools for assessing access. METHODS A scoping review was conducted by searching through four databases, for studies citing Levesque et al. 2013 to select all empirical studies focusing on healthcare access that applied the framework. An initial 1838 documents underwent title screening, followed by abstract screening, and finally full text screening by two independent reviewers. Authors of studies identified from the scoping review were also interviewed. RESULTS There were 31 studies identified on healthcare access using the Levesque framework either a priori, to develop assessment tool/s (11 studies), or a posteriori, to organize and analyze collected data (20 studies). From the tools used, 147 unique questions on healthcare access were collected, 91 of these explored dimensions of access while 56 were about abilities to access. Those that were designed from the patient's perspective were 73%, while 20% were for health providers, and 7% were addressed to both. Interviews from seven out of the 26 authors, showed that while there were some challenges such as instances of categorization difficulty and unequal representation of dimensions and abilities, the overall experience was positive. CONCLUSION Levesque's framework has been successfully used in research that explored, assessed, and measured access in various healthcare services and settings. The framework allowed researchers to comprehensively assess the complex and dynamic process of access both in the health systems and the population contexts. There is still potential room for improvement of the framework, particularly the incorporation of time-related elements of access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Cu
- Department of Health, Republic of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
| | - Sofia Meister
- Centre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et Université de Paris, Inserm ERL 1244, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Lefebvre
- University of Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, ARENES - UMR 6051, F-35000, Rennes, France
| | - Valéry Ridde
- Centre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et Université de Paris, Inserm ERL 1244, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Orefice R, Smythe J, Doherty DA, Lim B. Preventing early births in a regional tertiary maternity unit: Evaluating preterm and early term birth rates before and after implementation of the Preterm Birth Prevention Initiative in the Australian Capital Territory. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 61:693-699. [PMID: 33759176 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multifaceted preterm birth (PTB) prevention initiative was launched in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) in 2019. The aim of this initiative was to safely lower the rate of early births across the ACT and the surrounding areas in New South Wales. Modelled on the Western Australian PTB Prevention Initiative, the program included new clinical guidelines and a new PTB prevention clinic at the main tertiary hospital. AIM To evaluate the initiative and its effects on preterm and early term birth rates at the main tertiary hospital after 16 months of implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A before and after intervention study was conducted. Rates of preterm and early term birth before (previous five years) and after 16 months of implementation of the ACT PTB Prevention Initiative were evaluated. RESULTS At the main tertiary hospital in The Canberra Hospital, the rate of PTB was significantly reduced by 10% after 16 months of implementation of the initiative. Rates of PTB were lower than any of the preceding five years and resulted in 45 averted or delayed PTBs. The number of planned early term births with no medical indication was significantly reduced by 34.5% and resulted in 77 averted or delayed early term births. CONCLUSIONS The multifaceted PTB Prevention Initiative safely lowered the rates of early birth in the ACT context. These results highlight the importance of prioritising early birth prevention, education, research and expanding the initiative nationwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Orefice
- Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Julia Smythe
- Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Dorota A Doherty
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Boon Lim
- Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Glenister KM, Guymer J, Bourke L, Simmons D. Characteristics of patients who access zero, one or multiple general practices and reasons for their choices: a study in regional Australia. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:2. [PMID: 33388032 PMCID: PMC7777414 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01341-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Most people in Australia visit a General Practitioner each year and are free to choose their General Practitioner and/or practice on each occasion. A proportion of people visit multiple general practices, which can reduce continuity of care, a core value of general practice. Utilisation of multiple general practices is associated with metropolitan residence and younger age. However, it is unclear which factors are associated with utilisation of multiple general practices in rural areas, where there are often General Practitioner workforce shortages and higher proportions of patients who may benefit from continuity of care, including older people and people living with chronic disease. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of people in a rural Australian area who accessed multiple general practices in the previous year with people who had accessed one practice, or none. Methods A cross-sectional survey assessed self-reported utilisation and perspective of general practice services, uses of multiple practices, associated reasons, lifestyle advice and screening services received in four regional Victorian towns. Households were randomly selected and residents aged 16+ were eligible to participate in the adult survey. Results Most people had attended a single general practice (78.9%), while 14.4% attended more than one practice and 6.7% attended no practices in the previous 12 months. Compared with utilisation of a single general practice, multiple general practice attendance in the previous year was associated with younger age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR 95% confidence interval) 0.98 per year (0.97–0.99), residence in the regional centre aOR 2.90(2.22–3.78), emergency department (ED) attendance in the last 12 months aOR 1.65(1.22–2.21) and no out of pocket costs aOR 1.36(1.04–1.79)). Reasons for multiple general practice attendance included availability of appointments, cost and access to specific services. Compared with multiple general practice attendance, those attending single practices reported more screening tests but similar frequency of lifestyle advice. People who accessed multiple practices were less likely to report very high satisfaction (51.7% vs 62.9% p < 0.001) or excellent degree of confidence in their doctor (42.0% vs 49.8% p = 0.006) than single practice attendees. Conclusions Those attending single practices report higher satisfaction and confidence in their GP and were less likely to attend ED. Further studies are required to test whether increasing availability of appointments and reducing out-of-pocket expenses would increase single practice attendance and/or decrease healthcare costs overall. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-020-01341-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen M Glenister
- Research Fellow, University of Melbourne Department of Rural Health. 'The Chalet', Docker Street, Wangaratta, 3677, Australia.
| | - John Guymer
- Wyndham House Clinic, Shepparton, 3630, Australia
| | - Lisa Bourke
- University Department of Rural Health, University of Melbourne Department of Rural Health, 49 Graham Street, Shepparton, 3630, Australia
| | - David Simmons
- University Department of Rural Health, University of Melbourne Department of Rural Health, 49 Graham Street, Shepparton, 3630, Australia.,Macarthur Clinical School, Western Sydney University Narellan Road & Gilchrist Drive, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Farnbach S, Fernando J, Coyte J, Simms M, Hackett ML. "It's hard for me to tell my story" the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander male clients at a residential drug and alcohol rehabilitation centre using primary health care. Health Promot J Austr 2020; 32 Suppl 2:87-94. [PMID: 33370469 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED Aboriginal males who use drug and alcohol may experience unique barriers accessing primary health care. This study explores the perceptions of Aboriginal males in treatment for drug and alcohol use around their experiences accessing primary health care, and barriers to access. METHODS Twenty male Aboriginal clients at a fee-paying residential drug and alcohol rehabilitation centre completed semi-structured interviews about their primary health care experiences before their stay. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to inductively develop themes. RESULTS About half the males had regular General Practitioners at a mainstream primary health care service or Aboriginal Medical Service. Positive experiences included having medical needs met or understanding the health information provided; and negative experiences included inefficient health service or system processes or experiencing cultural bias or racism. Barriers included limited access to appointments or to the same GP regularly, long wait times, lack of access to transport, worry or fear about their health or the visit or their complex lives taking priority. CONCLUSION This research showed that the participants sought out health care and identified barriers to accessing care and potential improvements. SO WHAT?: Access to a regular General Practitioner, continuity of care and culturally appropriate and comprehensive communication techniques are important to facilitate access to primary health care by Aboriginal males. Efforts to enhance access may focus on inherent strengths within Aboriginal communities including focusing on relationships between clinicians and families, providing a welcoming environment and encouraging clients to bring a trusted family member to appointments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Farnbach
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre and The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Joe Coyte
- The Glen Centre (Ngampie), Chittaway Bay, Australia
| | - Matthew Simms
- South Coast Medical Service Aboriginal Corporation, Nowra, Australia
| | - Maree L Hackett
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW and The University of Central Lancashire, Sydney, Australia.,University of Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
A review of hospital-based interventions to improve inpatient influenza vaccination uptake for high-risk adults. Vaccine 2020; 39:658-666. [PMID: 33357955 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite positive steps towards transforming immunisation understanding and practice to better incorporate adults, coverage, especially those at higher risk, is not where it should be. One way to increase uptake is to take advantage of environments outside of primary care which present easy opportunities for vaccination. This study provides a narrative review of hospital-based strategies in acute care settings aimed at improving influenza vaccination rates for adult inpatients. METHODS A search was conducted using Scopus, Embase and PubMed databases for articles reporting on hospital-based interventions aimed at improving influenza vaccination for adults. Studies published in English were included and descriptively analysed. RESULTS A total of 31 articles were included. Tested interventions included 7 standing order protocols (SOP); 4 reminders; 4 assessment/administration programs; 1 patient education program; 1 organisational-based program; 7 multi-component strategies and 8 studies comparing SOPs with other strategies. One article was included in both SOPs and reminders categories. Studies were published between 1983 and 2017 and conducted in the USA, Canada, or Australia. 18 studies reported statistical significance. Individually, each type of intervention showed success. SOPs were significantly more effective than other individual interventions, but multi-component interventions (which included an SOP) were more effective than SOPs alone. Three articles reported no significant increase in uptake attributed mainly to patient refusals, even with a strategy involving patient education. Only three studies tested provider-level strategies including hospital campaigns, hospital reward programs and interdepartmental competitions, and showed success. CONCLUSIONS Hospital-based interventions are an effective means of improving opportunistic inpatient vaccination. Suggestions for future research include organisational or system-based interventions; qualitative review of barriers and enablers to inpatient vaccination programs; and re-examination of outpatient settings for vaccine delivery. Most studies were not randomised or controlled; therefore, we also recommend additional RCT studies to confirm existing findings on individual strategies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Smithman MA, Descôteaux S, Dionne É, Richard L, Breton M, Khanassov V, Haggerty JL. Typology of organizational innovation components: building blocks to improve access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19:174. [PMID: 33023575 PMCID: PMC7541234 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01263-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achieving equity of access to primary healthcare requires organizations to implement innovations tailored to the specific needs and abilities of vulnerable populations. However, designing pro-vulnerable innovations is challenging without knowledge of the range of possible innovations tailored to vulnerable populations' needs. To better support decision-makers, we aimed to develop a typology of pro-vulnerable organizational innovation components - akin to "building blocks" that could be combined in different ways into new complex innovations or added to existing organizational processes to improve access to primary healthcare. METHODS To develop the typology, we used data from a previously conducted a) scoping review (2000-2014, searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, citation tracking, n = 90 articles selected), and b) environmental scan (2014, online survey via social networks, n = 240 innovations). We conducted a typological analysis of the data. Our initial typology yielded 48 components, classified according to accessibility dimensions from the Patient-Centred Accessibility Framework. The initial typology was then field-tested for relevance and usability by health system stakeholders and refined from 2014 to 2018 (e.g., combined similar components, excluded non-organizational components). RESULTS The selected articles (n = 90 studies) and survey responses (n = 240 innovations) were mostly from the USA, Canada, Australia and the UK. Innovations targeted populations with various vulnerabilities (e.g., low income, chronic illness, Indigenous, homeless, migrants, refugees, ethnic minorities, uninsured, marginalized groups, mental illness, etc.). Our final typology had 18 components of organizational innovations, which principally addressed Availability & Accommodation (7/18), Approachability (6/18), and Acceptability (3/18). Components included navigation & information, community health worker, one-stop-shop, case management, group visits, defraying costs, primary healthcare brokerage, etc. CONCLUSIONS: This typology offers a comprehensive menu of potential components that can help inform the design of pro-vulnerable organizational innovations. Component classification according to the accessibility dimensions of the Patient-Centred Accessibility Framework is useful to help target access needs. Components can be combined into complex innovations or added to existing organizational processes to meet the access needs of vulnerable populations in specific contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélanie Ann Smithman
- Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada
| | - Sarah Descôteaux
- St. Mary's Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Émilie Dionne
- St. Mary's Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lauralie Richard
- Department of General Practice and Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Mylaine Breton
- Department of Community Health, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vladimir Khanassov
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jeannie L Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Spatial Analysis of the Neighborhood Risk Factors for Respiratory Health in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT): Implications for Emergency Planning. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17176396. [PMID: 32887415 PMCID: PMC7503909 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) experienced the worst air quality in the world for several consecutive days following the 2019–2020 Australian bushfires. With a focus on asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), this retrospective study examined the neighborhood-level risk factors for these diseases from 2011 to 2013, including household distance to hospital emergency departments (ED) and general practices (GP) and area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and demographic characteristics at a high spatial resolution. Poisson and Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression (GWR) were compared to examine the need for spatially explicit models. GWR performed significantly better, with rates of both respiratory diseases positively associated with area-level socioeconomic disadvantage. Asthma rates were positively associated with increasing distance from a hospital. Increasing distance to GP was not associated with asthma or COPD rates. These results suggest that respiratory health improvements could be made by prioritizing areas of socioeconomic disadvantage. The ACT has a relatively high density of GP that is geographically well spaced. This distribution of GP could be leveraged to improve emergency response planning in the future.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kessels R, Hoornweg A, Thanh Bui TK, Erreygers G. A distributional regression approach to income-related inequality of health in Australia. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19:102. [PMID: 32571408 PMCID: PMC7310143 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01189-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several studies have confirmed the existence of a significant positive relationship between income and health. Conventional regression techniques such as Ordinary Least Squares only help identify the effect of the covariates on the mean of the health variable. In this way, important information of the income-health relationship could be overlooked. As an alternative, we apply and compare unconventional regression techniques. Methods We adopt a distributional approach because we want to allow the effect of income on health to vary according to people’s health status. We start by analysing the income-health relationship using a distributional regression model that falls into the GAMLSS (Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape) framework. We assume a gamma distribution to model the health variable and specify the parameters of this distribution as linear functions of a set of explanatory variables. For comparison, we also adopt a quantile regression analysis. Based on predicted health quantiles, we use both a parametric and a non-parametric approach to estimate the lower tail of the health distribution. Results Our data come from Wave 13 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, collected in 2013-2014. According to GAMLSS, we find that the risk of ending up in poor, fair or average health is lower for those who have relatively high incomes ($80,000) than for those who have relatively low incomes ($20,000), for both smokers and non-smokers. In relative terms, the risk-lowering effect of income appears to be the largest for those who are in poor health, again for both smokers and non-smokers. The results obtained on the basis of quantile regression are to a large extent comparable to those obtained by means of GAMLSS regression. Conclusions Both distributional regression techniques point in the direction of a non-uniform effect of income on health, and are therefore promising complements to conventional regression techniques as far as the analysis of the income-health relationship is concerned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roselinde Kessels
- Department of Data Analytics and Digitalization, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, The Netherlands. .,Department of Economics, University of Antwerp, City Campus, Prinsstraat 13, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.
| | - Anne Hoornweg
- School of Economics, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15867, Amsterdam, 1001, NJ, The Netherlands
| | - Thi Kim Thanh Bui
- Department of Economics, University of Antwerp, City Campus, Prinsstraat 13, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.,School of Economics, Can Tho University, Campus II, 3/2 Street, Can Tho City, Vietnam
| | - Guido Erreygers
- Department of Economics, University of Antwerp, City Campus, Prinsstraat 13, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.,Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Bouverie Street 207, Carlton, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Senn N, Cohidon C, Breton M, Levesque JF, Zuchuat JC. Patterns of patient experience with primary care access in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland: a comparative study. Int J Qual Health Care 2020; 31:G126-G132. [PMID: 32179918 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Access to primary care (PC) is vital, but complex to define and compare between settings. We aimed to generate a typology of patients' access patterns across countries using a novel inductive approach. DESIGN Cross-sectional surveys. SETTING Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland between 2012 and 2014 as part of the QUALICO-PC project. PARTICIPANTS Data were collected from 1306 general practices and 10 000+ patients, with nine patients per practice. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Typology of access. RESULTS Three axes were retained, explaining 23% of the total variance: (i) 'temporal and geographical access'; (ii) 'frequency of access and unmet healthcare needs'; and (iii) 'affordability and frequency of access'.Based on the three axes, we identified four clusters of patients: (i) patients reporting overall good access to PC; (ii) frequent users with unmet healthcare needs; (iii) under-users with financial barriers; and (iv) users with poor time/geographical access.Better access to PC was experienced in Switzerland and New Zealand, while worst access was reported in Canada, where most of the time and geographical barriers were reported. Most financial barriers were observed in Australia and New Zealand. Frequent users with some level of unmet healthcare needs are prevalent in all four countries. CONCLUSIONS Four main groups of patients with different patterns of access were identified: (i) good access; (ii) geographical and time barriers; (iii) financial barriers; and (iv) frequent users with unmet healthcare needs. Differences in access between the four countries are substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Senn
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine, University of Lausanne, rue du Bugnon 44, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christine Cohidon
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine, University of Lausanne, rue du Bugnon 44, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mylaine Breton
- University of Sherbrooke, 150, place Charles-Le Moyne, C. P. 200 Longueuil (Québec) J4K 0A8, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jean-Fréderic Levesque
- Agency for Clinical Innovation, 67 Albert Avenue, Chatswood, NSW 2067, Australia.,Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Level 3, AGSM Building, UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Jean-Christophe Zuchuat
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine, University of Lausanne, rue du Bugnon 44, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cyr ME, Etchin AG, Guthrie BJ, Benneyan JC. Access to specialty healthcare in urban versus rural US populations: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:974. [PMID: 31852493 PMCID: PMC6921587 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4815-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Access to healthcare is a poorly defined construct, with insufficient understanding of differences in facilitators and barriers between US urban versus rural specialty care. We summarize recent literature and expand upon a prior conceptual access framework, adapted here specifically to urban and rural specialty care. Methods A systematic review was conducted of literature within the CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, PsycInfo, and ProQuest Social Sciences databases published between January 2013 and August 2018. Search terms targeted peer-reviewed academic publications pertinent to access to US urban or rural specialty healthcare. Exclusion criteria produced 67 articles. Findings were organized into an existing ten-dimension care access conceptual framework where possible, with additional topics grouped thematically into supplemental dimensions. Results Despite geographic and demographic differences, many access facilitators and barriers were common to both populations; only three dimensions did not contain literature addressing both urban and rural populations. The most commonly represented dimensions were availability and accommodation, appropriateness, and ability to perceive. Four new identified dimensions were: government and insurance policy, health organization and operations influence, stigma, and primary care and specialist influence. Conclusions While findings generally align with a preexisting framework, they also suggest several additional themes important to urban versus rural specialty care access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa E Cyr
- School of Nursing, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Anna G Etchin
- VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130, USA
| | - Barbara J Guthrie
- Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - James C Benneyan
- Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Russell G, Kunin M, Harris M, Levesque JF, Descôteaux S, Scott C, Lewis V, Dionne É, Advocat J, Dahrouge S, Stocks N, Spooner C, Haggerty J. Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027869. [PMID: 31352414 PMCID: PMC6661687 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Access to primary healthcare (PHC) has a fundamental influence on health outcomes, particularly for members of vulnerable populations. Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) is a 5-year research programme built on community-academic partnerships. IMPACT aims to design, implement and evaluate organisational innovations to improve access to appropriate PHC for vulnerable populations. Six Local Innovation Partnerships (LIPs) in three Australian states (New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia) and three Canadian provinces (Ontario, Quebec and Alberta) used a common approach to implement six different interventions. This paper describes the protocol to evaluate the processes, outcomes and scalability of these organisational innovations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The evaluation will use a convergent mixed-methods design involving longitudinal (pre and post) analysis of the six interventions. Study participants include vulnerable populations, PHC practices, their clinicians and administrative staff, service providers in other health or social service organisations, intervention staff and members of the LIP teams. Data were collected prior to and 3-6 months after the interventions and included interviews with members of the LIPs, organisational process data, document analysis and tools collecting the cost of components of the intervention. Assessment of impacts on individuals and organisations will rely on surveys and semistructured interviews (and, in some settings, direct observation) of participating patients, providers and PHC practices. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The IMPACT research programme received initial ethics approval from St Mary's Hospital (Montreal) SMHC #13-30. The interventions received a range of other ethics approvals across the six jurisdictions. Dissemination of the findings should generate a deeper understanding of the ways in which system-level organisational innovations can improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations and new knowledge concerning improvements in PHC delivery in health service utilisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant Russell
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marina Kunin
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jean-Frédéric Levesque
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Bureau of Health Information, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Descôteaux
- St. Mary’s Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Scott
- PolicyWise for Children & Families, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Virginia Lewis
- Australian Institute for Primary Care and Ageing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Émilie Dionne
- St. Mary’s Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jenny Advocat
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simone Dahrouge
- C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Elisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nigel Stocks
- Department of General Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Catherine Spooner
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeannie Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kenny A. Editorial. Aust J Prim Health 2019; 23:i-ii. [PMID: 29229023 DOI: 10.1071/pyv23n3_ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
27
|
Treatment by untrained providers among sick infants in rural Odisha, India. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2019; 20:e84. [PMID: 32800006 PMCID: PMC7306414 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423619000380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This study assessed the diagnosis, treatment and referral service provided by untrained providers for sick infants. Background: In rural India, lack of trained providers causes inopportune treatment of sick infants and results in increase in child morbidity and mortality. The untrained providers deliver a significant proportion of health care for rural infants; however, there is a paucity of information on their treatment practice. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three rural blocks of Odisha. A total of 337 prescriptions recommended for sick infants were collected from the 15 untrained providers using pre-designed prescription form – designed as per the Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness (IMNCI) guideline. The forms were collected through the periodic visit and regular follow-up to the providers. Findings: A total of 68% of infants were diagnosed with the possible serious bacterial infection, 56% fever, 10% feeding problems, 9% dysentery and 9% local bacterial infection. A total of 61% of sick infants prescribed antibiotics – cephalosporin was commonly prescribed (56%). Among severe persistent diarrhea-diagnosed infants, 76% prescribed oral rehydration salt (ORS), 48% zinc and 62% of them received various antibiotics. The untrained providers referred 23% of sick infants to trained providers/facilities. In rural settings, most of the sick infants sought care from untrained providers; however, none of them followed any standard treatment protocol. This study suggests there is a need for training on common disease algorithm and treatment using a standard guideline for untrained providers to reduce inopportuneness in the treatment of sick infants, promoting early diagnosis and referral services to public health systems.
Collapse
|
28
|
Song HJ, Dennis S, Levesque JF, Harris MF. What matters to people with chronic conditions when accessing care in Australian general practice? A qualitative study of patient, carer, and provider perspectives. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:79. [PMID: 31182041 PMCID: PMC6558875 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0973-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research underpinning the patient experience of people with chronic conditions in Australian general practice is not well developed. We aimed to ascertain the perspectives of key stakeholders on aspects of patient experience, more specifically with regards to accessing general practice in Australia. METHODS Using a qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone and face-to-face with people living with one or more chronic conditions, informal carers, and primary care providers between October 2016 and October 2017. Participants were recruited and selected from three demographically representative primary health networks across Sydney, Australia. Interview transcripts and researcher's reflective fieldnotes were coded and analyzed for key themes of access. Analysis and interpretation of data were guided by Levesque's model of access, a conceptual framework to evaluate access broadly and from corresponding patient- and provider-side dimensions. RESULTS A total of 40 interviews were included in the analysis. Most participants had attended their general practices for 10 years or more and had regular primary care providers. People with chronic conditions reported access barriers predominantly in their ability to reach services, which were related to illness-related disabilities (limited mobility, chronic pain, fatigue, frailty) and limitations in the availability and accommodation of health services to address patient preferences (unavailability of after-hours services, lack of alternative modes of service delivery). While cost was not a major barrier, we found a lack of clarity in the factors that determined providers' decisions to waive or reduce costs for some patients and not others. CONCLUSIONS People managing chronic conditions with a long-term primary care provider experienced access barriers in general practice, particularly in their ability to physically reach care and to do so on a timely basis. This study has important policy and practice implications, as it highlights patients' experiences of accessing care and possible areas for improvement to appropriately respond to these experiences. Themes identified may be useful in the design of a patient experience survey tool specific to this population. While it incorporates perspectives from patients, carers and providers, this study could be further strengthened by including perspectives from culturally and linguistically underrepresented patient groups and more carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jung Song
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sarah Dennis
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Jean-Frédéric Levesque
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood, New South Wales Australia
| | - Mark Fort Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Corscadden L, Levesque JF, Lewis V, Strumpf E, Breton M, Russell G. Factors associated with multiple barriers to access to primary care: an international analysis. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17:28. [PMID: 29458379 PMCID: PMC5819269 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-018-0740-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Disparities in access to primary care (PC) have been demonstrated within and between health systems. However, few studies have assessed the factors associated with multiple barriers to access occurring along the care-seeking process in different healthcare systems. Methods In this secondary analysis of the 2016 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Adults, access was represented through participant responses to questions relating to access barriers either before or after reaching the PC practice in 11 countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Norway, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and United States). The number of respondents in each country ranged from 1000 to 7000 and the response rates ranged from 11% to 47%. We used multivariable logistic regression models within each of eleven countries to identify disparities in response to the access barriers by age, sex, immigrant status, income and the presence of chronic conditions. Results Overall, one in five adults (21%) experienced multiple barriers before reaching PC practices. After reaching care, an average of 16% of adults had two or more barriers. There was a sixfold difference between nations in the experience of these barriers to access. Vulnerable groups experiencing multiple barriers were relatively consistent across countries. People with lower income were more likely to experience multiple barriers, particularly before reaching primary care practices. Respondents with mental health problems and those born outside the country displayed substantial vulnerability in terms of barriers after reaching care. Conclusion A greater understanding of the multiple barriers to access to PC across the stages of the care-seeking process may help to inform planning and performance monitoring of disparities in access. Variation across countries may reveal organisational and system drivers of access, and inform efforts to improve access to PC for vulnerable groups. The cumulative nature of these barriers remains to be assessed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12939-018-0740-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Corscadden
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4812, Australia. .,Bureau of Health Information, Level 11, 67 Albert Avenue, Chatswood, NSW, 2067, Australia.
| | - J F Levesque
- Bureau of Health Information, Level 11, 67 Albert Avenue, Chatswood, NSW, 2067, Australia.,Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - V Lewis
- Australian Institute for Primary Care & Ageing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3068, Australia
| | - E Strumpf
- Department of Economics and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, 855 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC, H3A 2T7, Canada
| | - M Breton
- Department of community health, University of Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne, Longueil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - G Russell
- General Practice Research, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, 270 Ferntree Gull Rd Notting Hill, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
| |
Collapse
|