1
|
Hosack VB, Arce-McShane FI. 3D directional tuning in the orofacial sensorimotor cortex during natural feeding and drinking. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.07.02.601741. [PMID: 39005288 PMCID: PMC11244964 DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.02.601741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
Directional tongue movements are essential for vital behaviors, such as feeding and speech, to position food for chewing and swallowing safely and to position the tongue for accurate sound production. While directional tuning has been well-studied in the arm region of the sensorimotor cortex during reaching tasks, little is known about how 3D tongue direction is encoded in the orofacial region during natural behaviors. Understanding how tongue direction is represented in the brain has important implications for improving rehabilitation for people with orolingual dysfunctions. The goal of this study is to investigate how 3D direction of tongue movement is encoded in the orofacial sensorimotor cortex (OSMCx) during feeding and drinking, and how this process is affected by the loss of oral sensation. Using biplanar video-radiography to track implanted markers in the tongue of behaving non-human primates (Macaca mulatta), 3D positional data was recorded simultaneously with spiking activity in primary motor (MIo) and somatosensory (SIo) areas of the orofacial cortex using chronically implanted microelectrode arrays. In some sessions, tasks were preceded by bilateral nerve block injections to the sensory branches of the trigeminal nerve. Modulation to the 3D tongue direction was found in a majority of MIo but not SIo neurons during feeding, while the majority of neurons in both areas were modulated to the direction of tongue protrusion during drinking. Following sensory loss, the proportion of directionally tuned neurons decreased and shifts in the distribution of preferred direction were observed in OSMCx neurons. Overall, we show that 3D directional tuning of MIo and SIo to tongue movements varies with behavioral tasks and availability of sensory information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria B Hosack
- Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Fritzie I Arce-McShane
- Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Neuroscience, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lamorie-Foote K, Kramer DR, Sundaram S, Cavaleri J, Gilbert ZD, Tang AM, Bashford L, Liu CY, Kellis S, Lee B. Primary somatosensory cortex organization for engineering artificial somatosensation. Neurosci Res 2024; 204:1-13. [PMID: 38278220 DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
Somatosensory deficits from stroke, spinal cord injury, or other neurologic damage can lead to a significant degree of functional impairment. The primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices encode information in a medial to lateral organization. SI is generally organized topographically, with more discrete cortical representations of specific body regions. SII regions corresponding to anatomical areas are less discrete and may represent a more functional rather than topographic organization. Human somatosensory research continues to map cortical areas of sensory processing with efforts primarily focused on hand and upper extremity information in SI. However, research into SII and other body regions is lacking. In this review, we synthesize the current state of knowledge regarding the cortical organization of human somatosensation and discuss potential applications for brain computer interface. In addition to accurate individualized mapping of cortical somatosensation, further research is required to uncover the neurophysiological mechanisms of how somatosensory information is encoded in the cortex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista Lamorie-Foote
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Daniel R Kramer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Shivani Sundaram
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Jonathon Cavaleri
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Zachary D Gilbert
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Austin M Tang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Luke Bashford
- Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, T&C Chen Institute for Neuroscience, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Y Liu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Spencer Kellis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Brian Lee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dadarlat MC, Sun YJ, Stryker MP. Activity-dependent recruitment of inhibition and excitation in the awake mammalian cortex during electrical stimulation. Neuron 2024; 112:821-834.e4. [PMID: 38134920 PMCID: PMC10949925 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Electrical stimulation is an effective tool for mapping and altering brain connectivity, with applications ranging from treating pharmacology-resistant neurological disorders to providing sensory feedback for neural prostheses. Paramount to the success of these applications is the ability to manipulate electrical currents to precisely control evoked neural activity patterns. However, little is known about stimulation-evoked responses in inhibitory neurons nor how stimulation-evoked activity patterns depend on ongoing neural activity. In this study, we used 2-photon imaging and cell-type specific labeling to measure single-cell responses of excitatory and inhibitory neurons to electrical stimuli in the visual cortex of awake mice. Our data revealed strong interactions between electrical stimulation and pre-stimulus activity of single neurons in awake animals and distinct recruitment and response patterns for excitatory and inhibitory neurons. This work demonstrates the importance of cell-type-specific labeling of neurons in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Dadarlat
- Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
| | - Yujiao Jennifer Sun
- Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London EC1V 9EL, UK
| | - Michael P Stryker
- Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumaravelu K, Grill WM. Neural mechanisms of the temporal response of cortical neurons to intracortical microstimulation. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:365-381. [PMID: 38492885 PMCID: PMC11090107 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is used to map neuronal circuitry in the brain and restore lost sensory function, including vision, hearing, and somatosensation. The temporal response of cortical neurons to single pulse ICMS is remarkably stereotyped and comprises short latency excitation followed by prolonged inhibition and, in some cases, rebound excitation. However, the neural origin of the different response components to ICMS are poorly understood, and the interactions between the three response components during trains of ICMS pulses remains unclear. OBJECTIVE We used computational modeling to determine the mechanisms contributing to the temporal response to ICMS in model cortical neurons. METHODS We implemented a biophysically based computational model of a cortical column comprising neurons with realistic morphology and synapses and quantified the temporal response of cortical neurons to different ICMS protocols. We characterized the temporal responses to single pulse ICMS across stimulation intensities and inhibitory (GABA-B/GABA-A) synaptic strengths. To probe interactions between response components, we quantified the response to paired pulse ICMS at different inter-pulse intervals and the response to short trains at different stimulation frequencies. Finally, we evaluated the performance of biomimetic ICMS trains in evoking sustained neural responses. RESULTS Single pulse ICMS evoked short latency excitation followed by a period of inhibition, but model neurons did not exhibit post-inhibitory excitation. The strength of short latency excitation increased and the duration of inhibition increased with increased stimulation amplitude. Prolonged inhibition resulted from both after-hyperpolarization currents and GABA-B synaptic transmission. During the paired pulse protocol, the strength of short latency excitation evoked by a test pulse decreased marginally compared to those evoked by a single pulse for interpulse intervals (IPI) < 100 m s. Further, the duration of inhibition evoked by the test pulse was prolonged compared to single pulse for IPIs <50 m s and was not predicted by linear superposition of individual inhibitory responses. For IPIs>50 m s, the duration of inhibition evoked by the test pulse was comparable to those evoked by a single pulse. Short ICMS trains evoked repetitive excitatory responses against a background of inhibition. However, the strength of the repetitive excitatory response declined during ICMS at higher frequencies. Further, the duration of inhibition at the cessation of ICMS at higher frequencies was prolonged compared to the duration following a single pulse. Biomimetic pulse trains evoked comparable neural response between the onset and offset phases despite the presence of stimulation induced inhibition. CONCLUSIONS The cortical column model replicated the short latency excitation and long-lasting inhibitory components of the stereotyped neural response documented in experimental studies of ICMS. Both cellular and synaptic mechanisms influenced the response components generated by ICMS. The non-linear interactions between response components resulted in dynamic ICMS-evoked neural activity and may play an important role in mediating the ICMS-induced precepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Valle G, Katic Secerovic N, Eggemann D, Gorskii O, Pavlova N, Petrini FM, Cvancara P, Stieglitz T, Musienko P, Bumbasirevic M, Raspopovic S. Biomimetic computer-to-brain communication enhancing naturalistic touch sensations via peripheral nerve stimulation. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1151. [PMID: 38378671 PMCID: PMC10879152 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45190-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial communication with the brain through peripheral nerve stimulation shows promising results in individuals with sensorimotor deficits. However, these efforts lack an intuitive and natural sensory experience. In this study, we design and test a biomimetic neurostimulation framework inspired by nature, capable of "writing" physiologically plausible information back into the peripheral nervous system. Starting from an in-silico model of mechanoreceptors, we develop biomimetic stimulation policies. We then experimentally assess them alongside mechanical touch and common linear neuromodulations. Neural responses resulting from biomimetic neuromodulation are consistently transmitted towards dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord of cats, and their spatio-temporal neural dynamics resemble those naturally induced. We implement these paradigms within the bionic device and test it with patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03350061). He we report that biomimetic neurostimulation improves mobility (primary outcome) and reduces mental effort (secondary outcome) compared to traditional approaches. The outcomes of this neuroscience-driven technology, inspired by the human body, may serve as a model for advancing assistive neurotechnologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Valle
- Laboratory for Neuroengineering, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Natalija Katic Secerovic
- Laboratory for Neuroengineering, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
- The Mihajlo Pupin Institute, University of Belgrade, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dominic Eggemann
- Laboratory for Neuroengineering, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Oleg Gorskii
- Laboratory for Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
- Laboratory for Neuromodulation, Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia
- Center for Biomedical Engineering, National University of Science and Technology "MISIS", 119049, Moscow, Russia
| | - Natalia Pavlova
- Laboratory for Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Paul Cvancara
- Laboratory for Biomedical Microtechnology, Department of Microsystems Engineering-IMTEK, Bernstein Center, BrainLinks-BrainTools Center of Excellence, University of Freiburg, D-79110, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Stieglitz
- Laboratory for Biomedical Microtechnology, Department of Microsystems Engineering-IMTEK, Bernstein Center, BrainLinks-BrainTools Center of Excellence, University of Freiburg, D-79110, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Pavel Musienko
- Laboratory for Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
- Sirius University of Science and Technology, Neuroscience Program, Sirius, Russia
- Laboratory for Neurorehabilitation Technologies, Life Improvement by Future Technologies Center "LIFT", Moscow, Russia
| | - Marko Bumbasirevic
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Stanisa Raspopovic
- Laboratory for Neuroengineering, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu GK, Ardeshirpour Y, Mastracchio C, Kent J, Caiola M, Ye M. Amplitude- and frequency-dependent activation of layer II/III neurons by intracortical microstimulation. iScience 2023; 26:108140. [PMID: 37915592 PMCID: PMC10616374 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) has been used for the development of brain machine interfaces. However, further understanding about the spatiotemporal responses of neurons to different electrical stimulation parameters is necessary to inform the design of optimal therapies. In this study, we employed in vivo electrophysiological recording, two-photon calcium imaging, and electric field simulation to evaluate the acute effect of ICMS on layer II/III neurons. Our results show that stimulation frequency non-linearly modulates neuronal responses, whereas the magnitude of responses is linearly correlated to the electric field strength and stimulation amplitude before reaching a steady state. Temporal dynamics of neurons' responses depends more on stimulation frequency and their distance to the stimulation electrode. In addition, amplitude-dependent post-stimulation suppression was observed within ∼500 μm of the stimulation electrode, as evidenced by both calcium imaging and local field potentials. These findings provide insights for selecting stimulation parameters to achieve desirable spatiotemporal specificity of ICMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangying K. Wu
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Yasaman Ardeshirpour
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Christina Mastracchio
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Jordan Kent
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
- Scientific Publications Department, Society for Neuroscience, Washington DC, USA
| | - Michael Caiola
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Meijun Ye
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abbasi A, Lassagne H, Estebanez L, Goueytes D, Shulz DE, Ego-Stengel V. Brain-machine interface learning is facilitated by specific patterning of distributed cortical feedback. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadh1328. [PMID: 37738340 PMCID: PMC10516504 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh1328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
Neuroprosthetics offer great hope for motor-impaired patients. One obstacle is that fine motor control requires near-instantaneous, rich somatosensory feedback. Such distributed feedback may be recreated in a brain-machine interface using distributed artificial stimulation across the cortical surface. Here, we hypothesized that neuronal stimulation must be contiguous in its spatiotemporal dynamics to be efficiently integrated by sensorimotor circuits. Using a closed-loop brain-machine interface, we trained head-fixed mice to control a virtual cursor by modulating the activity of motor cortex neurons. We provided artificial feedback in real time with distributed optogenetic stimulation patterns in the primary somatosensory cortex. Mice developed a specific motor strategy and succeeded to learn the task only when the optogenetic feedback pattern was spatially and temporally contiguous while it moved across the topography of the somatosensory cortex. These results reveal spatiotemporal properties of the sensorimotor cortical integration that set constraints on the design of neuroprosthetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dorian Goueytes
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI), 91400 Saclay, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gerasimova SA, Beltyukova A, Fedulina A, Matveeva M, Lebedeva AV, Pisarchik AN. Living-Neuron-Based Autogenerator. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:7016. [PMID: 37631552 PMCID: PMC10458024 DOI: 10.3390/s23167016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
We present a novel closed-loop system designed to integrate biological and artificial neurons of the oscillatory type into a unified circuit. The system comprises an electronic circuit based on the FitzHugh-Nagumo model, which provides stimulation to living neurons in acute hippocampal mouse brain slices. The local field potentials generated by the living neurons trigger a transition in the FitzHugh-Nagumo circuit from an excitable state to an oscillatory mode, and in turn, the spikes produced by the electronic circuit synchronize with the living-neuron spikes. The key advantage of this hybrid electrobiological autogenerator lies in its capability to control biological neuron signals, which holds significant promise for diverse neuromorphic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana A. Gerasimova
- Department of Control Theory and System Dynamics, Neurotechnology Department, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Anna Beltyukova
- Department of Control Theory and System Dynamics, Neurotechnology Department, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Anastasia Fedulina
- Department of Control Theory and System Dynamics, Neurotechnology Department, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Maria Matveeva
- Department of Control Theory and System Dynamics, Neurotechnology Department, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Albina V. Lebedeva
- Department of Control Theory and System Dynamics, Neurotechnology Department, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Alexander N. Pisarchik
- Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Greenspon CM, Shelchkova ND, Valle G, Hobbs TG, Berger-Wolf EI, Hutchison BC, Dogruoz E, Verbarschott C, Callier T, Sobinov AR, Okorokova EV, Jordan PM, Prasad D, He Q, Liu F, Kirsch RF, Miller JP, Lee RC, Satzer D, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Warnke PC, Miller LE, Boninger ML, Ajiboye AB, Graczyk EL, Downey JE, Collinger JL, Hatsopoulos NG, Gaunt RA, Bensmaia SJ. Tessellation of artificial touch via microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.06.23.545425. [PMID: 37425877 PMCID: PMC10327055 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.23.545425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
When we interact with objects, we rely on signals from the hand that convey information about the object and our interaction with it. A basic feature of these interactions, the locations of contacts between the hand and object, is often only available via the sense of touch. Information about locations of contact between a brain-controlled bionic hand and an object can be signaled via intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of somatosensory cortex (S1), which evokes touch sensations that are localized to a specific patch of skin. To provide intuitive location information, tactile sensors on the robotic hand drive ICMS through electrodes that evoke sensations at skin locations matching sensor locations. This approach requires that ICMS-evoked sensations be focal, stable, and distributed over the hand. To systematically investigate the localization of ICMS-evoked sensations, we analyzed the projected fields (PFs) of ICMS-evoked sensations - their location and spatial extent - from reports obtained over multiple years from three participants implanted with microelectrode arrays in S1. First, we found that PFs vary widely in their size across electrodes, are highly stable within electrode, are distributed over large swaths of each participant's hand, and increase in size as the amplitude or frequency of ICMS increases. Second, while PF locations match the locations of the receptive fields (RFs) of the neurons near the stimulating electrode, PFs tend to be subsumed by the corresponding RFs. Third, multi-channel stimulation gives rise to a PF that reflects the conjunction of the PFs of the component channels. By stimulating through electrodes with largely overlapping PFs, then, we can evoke a sensation that is experienced primarily at the intersection of the component PFs. To assess the functional consequence of this phenomenon, we implemented multichannel ICMS-based feedback in a bionic hand and demonstrated that the resulting sensations are more localizable than are those evoked via single-channel ICMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M Greenspon
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Giacomo Valle
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Taylor G Hobbs
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ev I Berger-Wolf
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Brianna C Hutchison
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Efe Dogruoz
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ceci Verbarschott
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Thierri Callier
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Anton R Sobinov
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Patrick M Jordan
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Dillan Prasad
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Qinpu He
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Fang Liu
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Robert F Kirsch
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jonathan P Miller
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- The Neurological Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
- Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ray C Lee
- Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - David Satzer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Peter C Warnke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael L Boninger
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Abidemi B Ajiboye
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Emily L Graczyk
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - John E Downey
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jennifer L Collinger
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert A Gaunt
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Greenspon CM, Valle G, Hobbs TG, Verbaarschot C, Callier T, Okorokova EV, Shelchkova ND, Sobinov AR, Jordan PM, Weiss JM, Fitzgerald EE, Prasad D, van Driesche A, Lee RC, Satzer D, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Warnke PC, Miller LE, Boninger ML, Collinger JL, Gaunt RA, Downey JE, Hatsopoulos NG, Bensmaia SJ. Biomimetic multi-channel microstimulation of somatosensory cortex conveys high resolution force feedback for bionic hands. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.02.18.528972. [PMID: 36824713 PMCID: PMC9949113 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.18.528972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
Manual interactions with objects are supported by tactile signals from the hand. This tactile feedback can be restored in brain-controlled bionic hands via intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of somatosensory cortex (S1). In ICMS-based tactile feedback, contact force can be signaled by modulating the stimulation intensity based on the output of force sensors on the bionic hand, which in turn modulates the perceived magnitude of the sensation. In the present study, we gauged the dynamic range and precision of ICMS-based force feedback in three human participants implanted with arrays of microelectrodes in S1. To this end, we measured the increases in sensation magnitude resulting from increases in ICMS amplitude and participant's ability to distinguish between different intensity levels. We then assessed whether we could improve the fidelity of this feedback by implementing "biomimetic" ICMS-trains, designed to evoke patterns of neuronal activity that more closely mimic those in natural touch, and by delivering ICMS through multiple channels at once. We found that multi-channel biomimetic ICMS gives rise to stronger and more distinguishable sensations than does its single-channel counterpart. Finally, we implemented biomimetic multi-channel feedback in a bionic hand and had the participant perform a compliance discrimination task. We found that biomimetic multi-channel tactile feedback yielded improved discrimination over its single-channel linear counterpart. We conclude that multi-channel biomimetic ICMS conveys finely graded force feedback that more closely approximates the sensitivity conferred by natural touch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M. Greenspon
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Giacomo Valle
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Taylor G. Hobbs
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ceci Verbaarschot
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Thierri Callier
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Anton R. Sobinov
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Patrick M. Jordan
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jeffrey M. Weiss
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Emily E. Fitzgerald
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Dillan Prasad
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ashley van Driesche
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ray C. Lee
- Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - David Satzer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Peter C. Warnke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lee E. Miller
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael L. Boninger
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jennifer L. Collinger
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Robert A. Gaunt
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - John E. Downey
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Sliman J. Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Berry JA, Marjaninejad A, Valero-Cuevas FJ. Edge Computing in Nature: Minimal pre-processing of multi-muscle ensembles of spindle signals improves discriminability of limb movements. Front Physiol 2023; 14:1183492. [PMID: 37457034 PMCID: PMC10345157 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1183492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple proprioceptive signals, like those from muscle spindles, are thought to enable robust estimates of body configuration. Yet, it remains unknown whether spindle signals suffice to discriminate limb movements. Here, a simulated 4-musculotendon, 2-joint planar limb model produced repeated cycles of five end-point trajectories in forward and reverse directions, which generated spindle Ia and II afferent signals (proprioceptors for velocity and length, respectively) from each musculotendon. We find that cross-correlation of the 8D time series of raw firing rates (four Ia, four II) cannot discriminate among most movement pairs (∼ 29% accuracy). However, projecting these signals onto their 1st and 2nd principal components greatly improves discriminability of movement pairs (82% accuracy). We conclude that high-dimensional ensembles of muscle proprioceptors can discriminate among limb movements-but only after dimensionality reduction. This may explain the pre-processing of some afferent signals before arriving at the somatosensory cortex, such as processing of cutaneous signals at the cat's cuneate nucleus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine A. Berry
- Brain-Body Dynamics Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Ali Marjaninejad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Francisco J. Valero-Cuevas
- Brain-Body Dynamics Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lycke R, Kim R, Zolotavin P, Montes J, Sun Y, Koszeghy A, Altun E, Noble B, Yin R, He F, Totah N, Xie C, Luan L. Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112554. [PMID: 37235473 PMCID: PMC10592461 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) enables applications ranging from neuroprosthetics to causal circuit manipulations. However, the resolution, efficacy, and chronic stability of neuromodulation are often compromised by adverse tissue responses to the indwelling electrodes. Here we engineer ultraflexible stim-nanoelectronic threads (StimNETs) and demonstrate low activation threshold, high resolution, and chronically stable ICMS in awake, behaving mouse models. In vivo two-photon imaging reveals that StimNETs remain seamlessly integrated with the nervous tissue throughout chronic stimulation periods and elicit stable, focal neuronal activation at low currents of 2 μA. Importantly, StimNETs evoke longitudinally stable behavioral responses for over 8 months at a markedly low charge injection of 0.25 nC/phase. Quantified histological analyses show that chronic ICMS by StimNETs induces no neuronal degeneration or glial scarring. These results suggest that tissue-integrated electrodes provide a path for robust, long-lasting, spatially selective neuromodulation at low currents, which lessens risk of tissue damage or exacerbation of off-target side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy Lycke
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Robin Kim
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Pavlo Zolotavin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Jon Montes
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Yingchu Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Aron Koszeghy
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Esra Altun
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Material Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Brian Noble
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Applied Physics Program, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Rongkang Yin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Fei He
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Nelson Totah
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Chong Xie
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
| | - Lan Luan
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) aim to treat sensorimotor neurological disorders by creating artificial motor and/or sensory pathways. Introducing artificial pathways creates new relationships between sensory input and motor output, which the brain must learn to gain dexterous control. This review highlights the role of learning in BMIs to restore movement and sensation, and discusses how BMI design may influence neural plasticity and performance. The close integration of plasticity in sensory and motor function influences the design of both artificial pathways and will be an essential consideration for bidirectional devices that restore both sensory and motor function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Dadarlat
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA;
| | - Ryan A Canfield
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Amy L Orsborn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Washington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bensmaia SJ, Tyler DJ, Micera S. Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands. Nat Biomed Eng 2023; 7:443-455. [PMID: 33230305 PMCID: PMC10233657 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-00630-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 85.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Individuals who have lost the use of their hands because of amputation or spinal cord injury can use prosthetic hands to restore their independence. A dexterous prosthesis requires the acquisition of control signals that drive the movements of the robotic hand, and the transmission of sensory signals to convey information to the user about the consequences of these movements. In this Review, we describe non-invasive and invasive technologies for conveying artificial sensory feedback through bionic hands, and evaluate the technologies' long-term prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology, and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Dustin J Tyler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Silvestro Micera
- The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
- Translational Neural Engineering Laboratory, Center for Neuroprosthetics and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Multi-finger receptive field properties in primary somatosensory cortex: A revised account of the spatiotemporal integration functions of area 3b. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112176. [PMID: 36867529 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The leading view in the somatosensory system indicates that area 3b serves as a cortical relay site that primarily encodes (cutaneous) tactile features limited to individual digits. Our recent work argues against this model by showing that area 3b cells can integrate both cutaneous and proprioceptive information from the hand. Here, we further test the validity of this model by studying multi-digit (MD) integration properties in area 3b. In contrast to the prevailing view, we show that most cells in area 3b have a receptive field (RF) that extends to multiple digits, with the size of the RF (i.e., the number of responsive digits) increasing across time. Further, we show that MD cells' orientation angle preference is highly correlated across digits. Taken together, these data show that area 3b plays a larger role in generating neural representations of tactile objects, as opposed to just being a "feature detector" relay site.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lycke R, Kim R, Zolotavin P, Montes J, Sun Y, Koszeghy A, Altun E, Noble B, Yin R, He F, Totah N, Xie C, Luan L. Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.02.20.529295. [PMID: 36865195 PMCID: PMC9980065 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.20.529295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) enables applications ranging from neuroprosthetics to causal circuit manipulations. However, the resolution, efficacy, and chronic stability of neuromodulation is often compromised by the adverse tissue responses to the indwelling electrodes. Here we engineer ultraflexible stim-Nanoelectronic Threads (StimNETs) and demonstrate low activation threshold, high resolution, and chronically stable ICMS in awake, behaving mouse models. In vivo two-photon imaging reveals that StimNETs remain seamlessly integrated with the nervous tissue throughout chronic stimulation periods and elicit stable, focal neuronal activation at low currents of 2 μA. Importantly, StimNETs evoke longitudinally stable behavioral responses for over eight months at markedly low charge injection of 0.25 nC/phase. Quantified histological analysis show that chronic ICMS by StimNETs induce no neuronal degeneration or glial scarring. These results suggest that tissue-integrated electrodes provide a path for robust, long-lasting, spatially-selective neuromodulation at low currents which lessen risks of tissue damage or exacerbation of off-target side-effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy Lycke
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Robin Kim
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Pavlo Zolotavin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Jon Montes
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Department of Bioenginering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Yingchu Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Aron Koszeghy
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE); University of Helsinki; Helsinki; 00790; Finland
| | - Esra Altun
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Material Science and NanoEngineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Brian Noble
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Applied Physics Program; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Rongkang Yin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Fei He
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Nelson Totah
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE); University of Helsinki; Helsinki; 00790; Finland
- Faculty of Pharmacy; University of Helsinki; Helsinki; 00790; Finland
| | - Chong Xie
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Department of Bioenginering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| | - Lan Luan
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
- Department of Bioenginering; Rice University; Houston; Texas; 77005, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gupta A, Vardalakis N, Wagner FB. Neuroprosthetics: from sensorimotor to cognitive disorders. Commun Biol 2023; 6:14. [PMID: 36609559 PMCID: PMC9823108 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04390-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroprosthetics is a multidisciplinary field at the interface between neurosciences and biomedical engineering, which aims at replacing or modulating parts of the nervous system that get disrupted in neurological disorders or after injury. Although neuroprostheses have steadily evolved over the past 60 years in the field of sensory and motor disorders, their application to higher-order cognitive functions is still at a relatively preliminary stage. Nevertheless, a recent series of proof-of-concept studies suggest that electrical neuromodulation strategies might also be useful in alleviating some cognitive and memory deficits, in particular in the context of dementia. Here, we review the evolution of neuroprosthetics from sensorimotor to cognitive disorders, highlighting important common principles such as the need for neuroprosthetic systems that enable multisite bidirectional interactions with the nervous system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur Gupta
- grid.462010.1Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, IMN, UMR 5293, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Fabien B. Wagner
- grid.462010.1Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, IMN, UMR 5293, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Granley J, Relic L, Beyeler M. Hybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 2022; 35:22671-22685. [PMID: 37719469 PMCID: PMC10504858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Sensory neuroprostheses are emerging as a promising technology to restore lost sensory function or augment human capabilities. However, sensations elicited by current devices often appear artificial and distorted. Although current models can predict the neural or perceptual response to an electrical stimulus, an optimal stimulation strategy solves the inverse problem: what is the required stimulus to produce a desired response? Here, we frame this as an end-to-end optimization problem, where a deep neural network stimulus encoder is trained to invert a known and fixed forward model that approximates the underlying biological system. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this hybrid neural autoencoder (HNA) in visual neuroprostheses. We find that HNA produces high-fidelity patient-specific stimuli representing handwritten digits and segmented images of everyday objects, and significantly outperforms conventional encoding strategies across all simulated patients. Overall this is an important step towards the long-standing challenge of restoring high-quality vision to people living with incurable blindness and may prove a promising solution for a variety of neuroprosthetic technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Granley
- Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara
| | - Lucas Relic
- Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara
| | - Michael Beyeler
- Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Valle G. Peripheral neurostimulation for encoding artificial somatosensations. Eur J Neurosci 2022; 56:5888-5901. [PMID: 36097134 PMCID: PMC9826263 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The direct neural stimulation of peripheral or central nervous systems has been shown as an effective tool to treat neurological conditions. The electrical activation of the nervous sensory pathway can be adopted to restore the artificial sense of touch and proprioception in people suffering from sensory-motor disorders. The modulation of the neural stimulation parameters has a direct effect on the electrically induced sensations, both when targeting the somatosensory cortex and the peripheral somatic nerves. The properties of the artificial sensations perceived, as their location, quality and intensity are strongly dependent on the direct modulation of pulse width, amplitude and frequency of the neural stimulation. Different sensory encoding schemes have been tested in patients showing distinct effects and outcomes according to their impact on the neural activation. Here, I reported the most adopted neural stimulation strategies to artificially encode somatosensation into the peripheral nervous system. The real-time implementation of these strategies in bionic devices is crucial to exploit the artificial sensory feedback in prosthetics. Thus, neural stimulation becomes a tool to directly communicate with the human nervous system. Given the importance of adding artificial sensory information to neuroprosthetic devices to improve their control and functionality, the choice of an optimal neural stimulation paradigm could increase the impact of prosthetic devices on the quality of life of people with sensorimotor disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Valle
- Laboratory for Neuroengineering, Department of Health Sciences and TechnologyInstitute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cometa A, Falasconi A, Biasizzo M, Carpaneto J, Horn A, Mazzoni A, Micera S. Clinical neuroscience and neurotechnology: An amazing symbiosis. iScience 2022; 25:105124. [PMID: 36193050 PMCID: PMC9526189 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decades, clinical neuroscience found a novel ally in neurotechnologies, devices able to record and stimulate electrical activity in the nervous system. These technologies improved the ability to diagnose and treat neural disorders. Neurotechnologies are concurrently enabling a deeper understanding of healthy and pathological dynamics of the nervous system through stimulation and recordings during brain implants. On the other hand, clinical neurosciences are not only driving neuroengineering toward the most relevant clinical issues, but are also shaping the neurotechnologies thanks to clinical advancements. For instance, understanding the etiology of a disease informs the location of a therapeutic stimulation, but also the way stimulation patterns should be designed to be more effective/naturalistic. Here, we describe cases of fruitful integration such as Deep Brain Stimulation and cortical interfaces to highlight how this symbiosis between clinical neuroscience and neurotechnology is closer to a novel integrated framework than to a simple interdisciplinary interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cometa
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Falasconi
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marco Biasizzo
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - Jacopo Carpaneto
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - Andreas Horn
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Department of Neurology, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alberto Mazzoni
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvestro Micera
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
- Translational Neural Engineering Lab, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fèdèrale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sombeck JT, Heye J, Kumaravelu K, Goetz SM, Peterchev AV, Grill WM, Bensmaia S, Miller LE. Characterizing the short-latency evoked response to intracortical microstimulation across a multi-electrode array. J Neural Eng 2022; 19:10.1088/1741-2552/ac63e8. [PMID: 35378515 PMCID: PMC9142773 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac63e8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Persons with tetraplegia can use brain-machine interfaces to make visually guided reaches with robotic arms. Without somatosensory feedback, these movements will likely be slow and imprecise, like those of persons who retain movement but have lost proprioception. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) has promise for providing artificial somatosensory feedback. ICMS that mimics naturally occurring neural activity, may allow afferent interfaces that are more informative and easier to learn than stimulation evoking unnaturalistic activity. To develop such biomimetic stimulation patterns, it is important to characterize the responses of neurons to ICMS.Approach.Using a Utah multi-electrode array, we recorded activity evoked by both single pulses and trains of ICMS at a wide range of amplitudes and frequencies in two rhesus macaques. As the electrical artifact caused by ICMS typically prevents recording for many milliseconds, we deployed a custom rapid-recovery amplifier with nonlinear gain to limit signal saturation on the stimulated electrode. Across all electrodes after stimulation, we removed the remaining slow return to baseline with acausal high-pass filtering of time-reversed recordings.Main results.After single pulses of stimulation, we recorded what was likely transsynaptically-evoked activity even on the stimulated electrode as early as ∼0.7 ms. This was immediately followed by suppressed neural activity lasting 10-150 ms. After trains, this long-lasting inhibition was replaced by increased firing rates for ∼100 ms. During long trains, the evoked response on the stimulated electrode decayed rapidly while the response was maintained on non-stimulated channels.Significance.The detailed description of the spatial and temporal response to ICMS can be used to better interpret results from experiments that probe circuit connectivity or function of cortical areas. These results can also contribute to the design of stimulation patterns to improve afferent interfaces for artificial sensory feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Sombeck
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America
| | - Juliet Heye
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Karthik Kumaravelu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Stefan M Goetz
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Angel V Peterchev
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Sliman Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lassagne H, Goueytes D, Shulz DE, Estebanez L, Ego-Stengel V. Continuity within the somatosensory cortical map facilitates learning. Cell Rep 2022; 39:110617. [PMID: 35385729 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The topographic organization is a prominent feature of sensory cortices, but its functional role remains controversial. Particularly, it is not well determined how integration of activity within a cortical area depends on its topography during sensory-guided behavior. Here, we train mice expressing channelrhodopsin in excitatory neurons to track a photostimulation bar that rotated smoothly over the topographic whisker representation of the primary somatosensory cortex. Mice learn to discriminate angular positions of the light bar to obtain a reward. They fail not only when the spatiotemporal continuity of the photostimulation is disrupted in this area but also when cortical areas displaying map discontinuities, such as the trunk and legs, or areas without topographic map, such as the posterior parietal cortex, are photostimulated. In contrast, when cortical topographic continuity enables to predict future sensory activation, mice demonstrate anticipation of reward availability. These findings could be helpful for optimizing feedback while designing cortical neuroprostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henri Lassagne
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France
| | - Dorian Goueytes
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France
| | - Daniel E Shulz
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France
| | - Luc Estebanez
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France
| | - Valerie Ego-Stengel
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pandarinath C, Bensmaia SJ. The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands. Physiol Rev 2022; 102:551-604. [PMID: 34541898 PMCID: PMC8742729 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in our understanding of brain function, along with the development of neural interfaces that allow for the monitoring and activation of neurons, have paved the way for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which harness neural signals to reanimate the limbs via electrical activation of the muscles or to control extracorporeal devices, thereby bypassing the muscles and senses altogether. BMIs consist of reading out motor intent from the neuronal responses monitored in motor regions of the brain and executing intended movements with bionic limbs, reanimated limbs, or exoskeletons. BMIs also allow for the restoration of the sense of touch by electrically activating neurons in somatosensory regions of the brain, thereby evoking vivid tactile sensations and conveying feedback about object interactions. In this review, we discuss the neural mechanisms of motor control and somatosensation in able-bodied individuals and describe approaches to use neuronal responses as control signals for movement restoration and to activate residual sensory pathways to restore touch. Although the focus of the review is on intracortical approaches, we also describe alternative signal sources for control and noninvasive strategies for sensory restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chethan Pandarinath
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology, and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fifer MS, McMullen DP, Osborn LE, Thomas TM, Christie B, Nickl RW, Candrea DN, Pohlmeyer EA, Thompson MC, Anaya MA, Schellekens W, Ramsey NF, Bensmaia SJ, Anderson WS, Wester BA, Crone NE, Celnik PA, Cantarero GL, Tenore FV. Intracortical Somatosensory Stimulation to Elicit Fingertip Sensations in an Individual With Spinal Cord Injury. Neurology 2022; 98:e679-e687. [PMID: 34880087 PMCID: PMC8865889 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000013173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The restoration of touch to fingers and fingertips is critical to achieving dexterous neuroprosthetic control for individuals with sensorimotor dysfunction. However, localized fingertip sensations have not been evoked via intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). METHODS Using a novel intraoperative mapping approach, we implanted electrode arrays in the finger areas of left and right somatosensory cortex and delivered ICMS over a 2-year period in a human participant with spinal cord injury. RESULTS Stimulation evoked tactile sensations in 8 fingers, including fingertips, spanning both hands. Evoked percepts followed expected somatotopic arrangements. The subject was able to reliably identify up to 7 finger-specific sites spanning both hands in a finger discrimination task. The size of the evoked percepts was on average 33% larger than a finger pad, as assessed via manual markings of a hand image. The size of the evoked percepts increased modestly with increased stimulation intensity, growing 21% as pulse amplitude increased from 20 to 80 µA. Detection thresholds were estimated on a subset of electrodes, with estimates of 9.2 to 35 µA observed, roughly consistent with prior studies. DISCUSSION These results suggest that ICMS can enable the delivery of consistent and localized fingertip sensations during object manipulation by neuroprostheses for individuals with somatosensory deficits. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT03161067.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Fifer
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL.
| | - David P McMullen
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Luke E Osborn
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Tessy M Thomas
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Breanne Christie
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Robert W Nickl
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Daniel N Candrea
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Eric A Pohlmeyer
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Margaret C Thompson
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Manuel A Anaya
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Wouter Schellekens
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Nick F Ramsey
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - William S Anderson
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Brock A Wester
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Nathan E Crone
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Pablo A Celnik
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Gabriela L Cantarero
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Francesco V Tenore
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Su S, Chai G, Meng J, Sheng X, Mouraux A, Zhu X. Towards optimizing the non-invasive sensory feedback interfaces in a neural prosthetic control. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac4e1b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. The somatotopic interface (SI) and non-somatotopic interface (NI) are commonly used to provide non-invasive sensory feedback. Nevertheless, differences between SI and NI are rarely reported, and objective evaluations of the corresponding brain response are missing as well. Few studies have reported how to design the stimulation encoding based on the two interfaces. The objective of this study was to investigate the difference in sensory characteristics between SI and NI, and propose an optimal encoding method for non-invasive feedback interfaces. Approach. We recruited seven amputees and compared the tactile sensitivity to stimulated positions and intensities between SI (phantom finger area) and NI (upper arm) in a tactile discrimination task. Electroencephalography (EEG) evaluation task was subsequently conducted to objectively evaluate the stimulus-evoked brain response. Finally, the two kinds of tactile information (stimulated position and intensity) was applied to an object recognition task. Specifically, the object size was reflected by the prosthetic finger position through stimulated position encoding, and the object stiffness was reflected by the contact force of prosthetic fingers through stimulated intensity encoding. We compared the performance under four feedback conditions (combinations between two kinds of tactile information and two interfaces). Results. Behavioral results showed that NI was more sensitive to position information while SI was more sensitive to intensity information. EEG results were consistent with behavioral results, showing a higher sensitivity of sensory alpha ERD for NI in the position discrimination, while the trend was opposite in the intensity discrimination. The feedback encoding allowed amputees to discriminate the size and stiffness of nine objects with the best performance of 62% overall accuracy (84% for size discrimination, 71% for stiffness discrimination) when position and intensity information was delivered on the NI and SI, respectively. Signicance. Our results provided an instructive strategy for sensory feedback via non-invasive solutions.
Collapse
|
26
|
Amoruso E, Dowdall L, Kollamkulam MT, Ukaegbu O, Kieliba P, Ng T, Dempsey-Jones H, Clode D, Makin TR. Intrinsic somatosensory feedback supports motor control and learning to operate artificial body parts. J Neural Eng 2022; 19:016006. [PMID: 34983040 PMCID: PMC10431236 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac47d9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Considerable resources are being invested to enhance the control and usability of artificial limbs through the delivery of unnatural forms of somatosensory feedback. Here, we investigated whether intrinsic somatosensory information from the body part(s) remotely controlling an artificial limb can be leveraged by the motor system to support control and skill learning.Approach.We used local anaesthetic to attenuate somatosensory inputs to the big toes while participants learned to operate through pressure sensors a toe-controlled and hand-worn robotic extra finger. Motor learning outcomes were compared against a control group who received sham anaesthetic and quantified in three different task scenarios: while operating in isolation from, in synchronous coordination, and collaboration with, the biological fingers.Main results.Both groups were able to learn to operate the robotic extra finger, presumably due to abundance of visual feedback and other relevant sensory cues. Importantly, the availability of displaced somatosensory cues from the distal bodily controllers facilitated the acquisition of isolated robotic finger movements, the retention and transfer of synchronous hand-robot coordination skills, and performance under cognitive load. Motor performance was not impaired by toes anaesthesia when tasks involved close collaboration with the biological fingers, indicating that the motor system can close the sensory feedback gap by dynamically integrating task-intrinsic somatosensory signals from multiple, and even distal, body-parts.Significance.Together, our findings demonstrate that there are multiple natural avenues to provide intrinsic surrogate somatosensory information to support motor control of an artificial body part, beyond artificial stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Amoruso
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - L Dowdall
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M T Kollamkulam
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - O Ukaegbu
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - P Kieliba
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - T Ng
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - H Dempsey-Jones
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Clode
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - T R Makin
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sense of agency for intracortical brain-machine interfaces. Nat Hum Behav 2022; 6:565-578. [PMID: 35046522 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01233-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Intracortical brain-machine interfaces decode motor commands from neural signals and translate them into actions, enabling movement for paralysed individuals. The subjective sense of agency associated with actions generated via intracortical brain-machine interfaces, the neural mechanisms involved and its clinical relevance are currently unknown. By experimentally manipulating the coherence between decoded motor commands and sensory feedback in a tetraplegic individual using a brain-machine interface, we provide evidence that primary motor cortex processes sensory feedback, sensorimotor conflicts and subjective states of actions generated via the brain-machine interface. Neural signals processing the sense of agency affected the proficiency of the brain-machine interface, underlining the clinical potential of the present approach. These findings show that primary motor cortex encodes information related to action and sensing, but also sensorimotor and subjective agency signals, which in turn are relevant for clinical applications of brain-machine interfaces.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kumaravelu K, Sombeck J, Miller LE, Bensmaia SJ, Grill WM. Stoney vs. Histed: Quantifying the spatial effects of intracortical microstimulation. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:141-151. [PMID: 34861412 PMCID: PMC8816873 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is used to map neural circuits and restore lost sensory modalities such as vision, hearing, and somatosensation. The spatial effects of ICMS remain controversial: Stoney and colleagues proposed that the volume of somatic activation increased with stimulation intensity, while Histed et al., suggested activation density, but not somatic activation volume, increases with stimulation intensity. OBJECTIVE We used computational modeling to quantify the spatial effects of ICMS intensity and unify the apparently paradoxical findings of Histed and Stoney. METHODS We implemented a biophysically-based computational model of a cortical column comprising neurons with realistic morphology and representative synapses. We quantified the spatial effects of single pulses and short trains of ICMS, including the volume of activated neurons and the density of activated neurons as a function of stimulation intensity. RESULTS At all amplitudes, the dominant mode of somatic activation was by antidromic propagation to the soma following axonal activation, rather than via transsynaptic activation. There were no occurrences of direct activation of somata or dendrites. The volume over which antidromic action potentials were initiated grew with stimulation amplitude, while the volume of somatic activation increased marginally. However, the density of somatic activation within the activated volume increased with stimulation amplitude. CONCLUSIONS The results resolve the apparent paradox between Stoney and Histed's results by demonstrating that the volume over which action potentials are initiated grows with ICMS amplitude, consistent with Stoney. However, the volume occupied by the activated somata remains approximately constant, while the density of activated neurons within that volume increase, consistent with Histed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Sombeck
- Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Lee E. Miller
- Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Sliman J. Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL,Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL,Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Warren M. Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC,Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC,Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC,Correspondence: Warren M. Grill, Ph.D., Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rm. 1427, Fitzpatrick CIEMAS, 101 Science Drive, Campus Box 90281, Durham, NC, 27708, USA, , 919 660-5276 Phone, 919 684-4488 FAX
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fernandez E. Selective Induction of Fingertip Sensations for Better Neuroprosthetic Control. Neurology 2021; 98:261-262. [PMID: 34880097 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000013177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Fernandez
- Bioengineering Institute and Cátedra Bidons Egara, University Miguel Hernández, 03202 Elche, Spain. .,CIBER Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER BBN), 28029 Madrid, Spain.,John Moran Eye Center and Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 84132 Salt Lake City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Osborn LE, Christie BP, McMullen DP, Nickl RW, Thompson MC, Pawar AS, Thomas TM, Alejandro Anaya M, Crone NE, Wester BA, Bensmaia SJ, Celnik PA, Cantarero GL, Tenore FV, Fifer MS. Intracortical microstimulation of somatosensory cortex enables object identification through perceived sensations. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2021; 2021:6259-6262. [PMID: 34892544 DOI: 10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Advances in brain-machine interfaces have helped restore function and independence for individuals with sensorimotor deficits; however, providing efficient and effective sensory feedback remains challenging. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of sensorimotor brain regions is a promising technique for providing bioinspired sensory feedback. In a human participant with chronically-implanted microelectrode arrays, we provided ICMS to the primary somatosensory cortex to generate tactile percepts in his hand. In a 3-choice object identification task, the participant identified virtual objects using tactile sensory feedback and no visual information. We evaluated three different stimulation paradigms, each with a different weighting of the grip force and its derivative, to explore the potential benefits of a more bioinspired stimulation strategy. In all paradigms, the participant's ability to identify the objects was above-chance, with object identification accuracy reaching 80% correct when using only sustained grip force feedback and 76.7% when using equal weighting of both sustained grip force and its derivative. These results demonstrate that bioinspired ICMS can provide sensory feedback that is functionally beneficial in sensorimotor tasks. Designing more efficient stimulation paradigms is important because it will allow us to 1) provide safer stimulation delivery methods that reduce overall injected charge without sacrificing function and 2) more effectively transmit sensory information to promote intuitive integration and usage by the human body.
Collapse
|
31
|
Deo DR, Rezaii P, Hochberg LR, M Okamura A, Shenoy KV, Henderson JM. Effects of Peripheral Haptic Feedback on Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface Control and Associated Sensory Responses in Motor Cortex. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS 2021; 14:762-775. [PMID: 33844633 PMCID: PMC8745032 DOI: 10.1109/toh.2021.3072615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) provide people with paralysis a means to control devices with signals decoded from brain activity. Despite recent impressive advances, these devices still cannot approach able-bodied levels of control. To achieve naturalistic control and improved performance of neural prostheses, iBCIs will likely need to include proprioceptive feedback. With the goal of providing proprioceptive feedback via mechanical haptic stimulation, we aim to understand how haptic stimulation affects motor cortical neurons and ultimately, iBCI control. We provided skin shear haptic stimulation as a substitute for proprioception to the back of the neck of a person with tetraplegia. The neck location was determined via assessment of touch sensitivity using a monofilament test kit. The participant was able to correctly report skin shear at the back of the neck in 8 unique directions with 65% accuracy. We found motor cortical units that exhibited sensory responses to shear stimuli, some of which were strongly tuned to the stimuli and well modeled by cosine-shaped functions. In this article, we also demonstrated online iBCI cursor control with continuous skin-shear feedback driven by decoded command signals. Cursor control performance increased slightly but significantly when the participant was given haptic feedback, compared to the purely visual feedback condition.
Collapse
|
32
|
Shokur S, Mazzoni A, Schiavone G, Weber DJ, Micera S. A modular strategy for next-generation upper-limb sensory-motor neuroprostheses. MED 2021; 2:912-937. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
33
|
Versteeg C, Rosenow JM, Bensmaia SJ, Miller LE. Encoding of limb state by single neurons in the cuneate nucleus of awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 2021; 126:693-706. [PMID: 34010577 PMCID: PMC8409958 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00568.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The cuneate nucleus (CN) is among the first sites along the neuraxis where proprioceptive signals can be integrated, transformed, and modulated. The objective of the study was to characterize the proprioceptive representations in CN. To this end, we recorded from single CN neurons in three monkeys during active reaching and passive limb perturbation. We found that many neurons exhibited responses that were tuned approximately sinusoidally to limb movement direction, as has been found for other sensorimotor neurons. The distribution of their preferred directions (PDs) was highly nonuniform and resembled that of muscle spindles within individual muscles, suggesting that CN neurons typically receive inputs from only a single muscle. We also found that the responses of proprioceptive CN neurons tended to be modestly amplified during active reaching movements compared to passive limb perturbations, in contrast to cutaneous CN neurons whose responses were not systematically different in the active and passive conditions. Somatosensory signals thus seem to be subject to a "spotlighting" of relevant sensory information rather than uniform suppression as has been suggested previously.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The cuneate nucleus (CN) is the somatosensory gateway into the brain, and only recently has it been possible to record these signals from an awake animal. We recorded single CN neurons in monkeys. Proprioceptive CN neurons appear to receive input from very few muscles, and their sensitivity to movement changes reliably during reaching relative to passive arm perturbations. Sensitivity is generally increased, but not exclusively so, as though CN "spotlights" critical proprioceptive information during reaching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Versteeg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Joshua M Rosenow
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Grossman Institute of Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology, and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zeng M, He Y, Zhang C, Wan Q. Neuromorphic Devices for Bionic Sensing and Perception. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:690950. [PMID: 34267624 PMCID: PMC8275992 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.690950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuromorphic devices that can emulate the bionic sensory and perceptual functions of neural systems have great applications in personal healthcare monitoring, neuro-prosthetics, and human-machine interfaces. In order to realize bionic sensing and perception, it's crucial to prepare neuromorphic devices with the function of perceiving environment in real-time. Up to now, lots of efforts have been made in the incorporation of the bio-inspired sensing and neuromorphic engineering in the booming artificial intelligence industry. In this review, we first introduce neuromorphic devices based on diverse materials and mechanisms. Then we summarize the progress made in the emulation of biological sensing and perception systems. Finally, the challenges and opportunities in these fields are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Qing Wan
- School of Electronic Science & Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lutz OJ, Bensmaia SJ. Proprioceptive representations of the hand in somatosensory cortex. CURRENT OPINION IN PHYSIOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cophys.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
36
|
Yadav AP, Li S, Krucoff MO, Lebedev MA, Abd-El-Barr MM, Nicolelis MAL. Generating artificial sensations with spinal cord stimulation in primates and rodents. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:825-836. [PMID: 34015518 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients who have lost sensory function due to a neurological injury such as spinal cord injury (SCI), stroke, or amputation, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may provide a mechanism for restoring somatic sensations via an intuitive, non-visual pathway. Inspired by this vision, here we trained rhesus monkeys and rats to detect and discriminate patterns of epidural SCS. Thereafter, we constructed psychometric curves describing the relationship between different SCS parameters and the animal's ability to detect SCS and/or changes in its characteristics. We found that the stimulus detection threshold decreased with higher frequency, longer pulse-width, and increasing duration of SCS. Moreover, we found that monkeys were able to discriminate temporally- and spatially-varying patterns (i.e. variations in frequency and location) of SCS delivered through multiple electrodes. Additionally, sensory discrimination of SCS-induced sensations in rats obeyed Weber's law of just-noticeable differences. These findings suggest that by varying SCS intensity, temporal pattern, and location different sensory experiences can be evoked. As such, we posit that SCS can provide intuitive sensory feedback in neuroprosthetic devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol P Yadav
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA; Paul and Carole Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Shuangyan Li
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Tianjin, 300130, PR China; Tianjin Key Laboratory Bioelectromagnetic Technology and Intelligent Health, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300130, PR China
| | - Max O Krucoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin & Froedtert Health, Wauwatosa, WI, 53226, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University & Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA
| | - Mikhail A Lebedev
- Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 30 Bolshoy Bulvar, Moscow, 143026, Russia
| | | | - Miguel A L Nicolelis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Natal, 59066060, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Elyahoodayan S, Jiang W, Lee CD, Shao X, Weiland G, Whalen JJ, Petrossians A, Song D. Stimulation and Recording of the Hippocampus Using the Same Pt-Ir Coated Microelectrodes. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:616063. [PMID: 33716647 PMCID: PMC7943859 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.616063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Same-electrode stimulation and recording with high spatial resolution, signal quality, and power efficiency is highly desirable in neuroscience and neural engineering. High spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio is necessary for obtaining unitary activities and delivering focal stimulations. Power efficiency is critical for battery-operated implantable neural interfaces. This study demonstrates the capability of recording single units as well as evoked potentials in response to a wide range of electrochemically safe stimulation pulses through high-resolution microelectrodes coated with co-deposition of Pt-Ir. It also compares signal-to-noise ratio, single unit activity, and power efficiencies between Pt-Ir coated and uncoated microelectrodes. To enable stimulation and recording with the same microelectrodes, microelectrode arrays were treated with electrodeposited platinum-iridium coating (EPIC) and tested in the CA1 cell body layer of rat hippocampi. The electrodes' ability to (1) inject a large range of electrochemically reversable stimulation pulses to the tissue, and (2) record evoked potentials and single unit activities were quantitively assessed over an acute time period. Compared to uncoated electrodes, EPIC electrodes recorded signals with higher signal-to-noise ratios (coated: 9.77 ± 1.95 dB; uncoated: 1.95 ± 0.40 dB) and generated lower voltages (coated: 100 mV; uncoated: 650 mV) for a given stimulus (5 μA). The improved performance corresponded to lower energy consumptions and electrochemically safe stimulation above 5 μA (>0.38 mC/cm2), which enabled elicitation of field excitatory post synaptic potentials and population spikes. Spontaneous single unit activities were also modulated by varying stimulation intensities and monitored through the same electrodes. This work represents an example of stimulation and recording single unit activities from the same microelectrode, which provides a powerful tool for monitoring and manipulating neural circuits at the single neuron level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Elyahoodayan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Neural Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wenxuan Jiang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Neural Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Xiecheng Shao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Neural Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Dong Song
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Neural Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dong J, Jensen W, Geng B, Kamavuako EN, Dosen S. Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:580385. [PMID: 33679292 PMCID: PMC7930737 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.580385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person’s quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities. Methods Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories. Results Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials. Conclusion Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Dong
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.,Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Winnie Jensen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Bo Geng
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako
- Centre for Robotics Research, Department of Informatics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Strahinja Dosen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kramer DR, Lamorie-Foote K, Barbaro M, Lee MB, Peng T, Gogia A, Nune G, Liu CY, Kellis SS, Lee B. Utility and lower limits of frequency detection in surface electrode stimulation for somatosensory brain-computer interface in humans. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 48:E2. [PMID: 32006952 DOI: 10.3171/2019.11.focus19696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been successful in evoking artificial somatosensation in both humans and animals, but much is unknown about the optimal stimulation parameters needed to generate robust percepts of somatosensation. In this study, the authors investigated frequency as an adjustable stimulation parameter for artificial somatosensation in a closed-loop brain-computer interface (BCI) system. METHODS Three epilepsy patients with subdural mini-electrocorticography grids over the hand area of S1 were asked to compare the percepts elicited with different stimulation frequencies. Amplitude, pulse width, and duration were held constant across all trials. In each trial, subjects experienced 2 stimuli and reported which they thought was given at a higher stimulation frequency. Two paradigms were used: first, 50 versus 100 Hz to establish the utility of comparing frequencies, and then 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, or 100 Hz were pseudorandomly compared. RESULTS As the magnitude of the stimulation frequency was increased, subjects described percepts that were "more intense" or "faster." Cumulatively, the participants achieved 98.0% accuracy when comparing stimulation at 50 and 100 Hz. In the second paradigm, the corresponding overall accuracy was 73.3%. If both tested frequencies were less than or equal to 10 Hz, accuracy was 41.7% and increased to 79.4% when one frequency was greater than 10 Hz (p = 0.01). When both stimulation frequencies were 20 Hz or less, accuracy was 40.7% compared with 91.7% when one frequency was greater than 20 Hz (p < 0.001). Accuracy was 85% in trials in which 50 Hz was the higher stimulation frequency. Therefore, the lower limit of detection occurred at 20 Hz, and accuracy decreased significantly when lower frequencies were tested. In trials testing 10 Hz versus 20 Hz, accuracy was 16.7% compared with 85.7% in trials testing 20 Hz versus 50 Hz (p < 0.05). Accuracy was greater than chance at frequency differences greater than or equal to 30 Hz. CONCLUSIONS Frequencies greater than 20 Hz may be used as an adjustable parameter to elicit distinguishable percepts. These findings may be useful in informing the settings and the degrees of freedom achievable in future BCI systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Kramer
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and.,2Neurorestoration Center, and
| | | | - Michael Barbaro
- 3Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and
| | - Morgan B Lee
- 3Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and
| | - Terrance Peng
- 3Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and
| | - Angad Gogia
- 3Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; and
| | | | - Charles Y Liu
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and.,2Neurorestoration Center, and
| | - Spencer S Kellis
- 2Neurorestoration Center, and.,5Department of Biology and Biological Engineering and.,6Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Brian Lee
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and.,2Neurorestoration Center, and
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bekrater-Bodmann R. Factors Associated With Prosthesis Embodiment and Its Importance for Prosthetic Satisfaction in Lower Limb Amputees. Front Neurorobot 2021; 14:604376. [PMID: 33519413 PMCID: PMC7843383 DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.604376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Perceptual integration of a prosthesis into an amputee's body representation, that is, prosthesis embodiment, has been proposed to be a major goal of prosthetic treatment, potentially contributing to the user's satisfaction with the device. However, insufficient knowledge about individual or prosthetic factors associated with prosthesis embodiment challenges basic as well as rehabilitation research. In the present study, hierarchical multiple regression analyses on prosthesis embodiment—as assessed with the recently introduced Prosthesis Embodiment Scale—were applied to the survey data of a large sample of prosthesis-using lower limb amputees, entering relevant objective-descriptive (i.e., unbiased characteristics of the amputation or the prosthesis) and subjective-evaluative variables (i.e., the amputee's perceptions related to the amputation or the prosthesis) as first- or second-level regressors, respectively. Significant regressors identified in these analyses together explained R2 = 36.3% of prosthesis embodiment variance in the present sample, with a lower level of amputation, less intense residual limb pain, more realistic visual appearance of the device, higher prosthetic mobility, and more positive valence of prosthesis-induced residual limb stimulations representing significantly associated factors. Using the identical set of regressors hierarchically complemented by prosthesis embodiment on measures of prosthetic satisfaction—as assessed with the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales—revealed that prosthesis embodiment was significantly and positively associated with aesthetic as well as functional prosthesis satisfaction. These findings emphasize the importance of psychological factors for the integration of a prosthesis into the amputee's body representation, which itself represents a crucial factor associated with prosthesis satisfaction. The results might have important implications for future prosthetic treatment; however, replication of the findings in an independent sample is required, as well as sophisticated experimental designs in order to elucidate the causality of effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Bekrater-Bodmann
- Department of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Brack R, Amalu EH. A review of technology, materials and R&D challenges of upper limb prosthesis for improved user suitability. J Orthop 2021; 23:88-96. [PMID: 33442223 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hand amputation significantly challenges one's independence in carrying out daily activities. With the UK and Italy recoding circa 5200 and 3500 upper limb (UL) amputations (ULAs) yearly, respectively, and about 541,000 Americans losing ULs in 2005, incidence victims constitute a considerable proportion of our population and should be adequately supported. The use of upper limb prosthesis (ULP) offers amputees a new opportunity of living a quality life - but poses challenges on the physically and psychologically traumatised. With reports that up to 20% of adult UL amputees choose not to use a prosthesis, roughly 26% of adults and 45% of children and adolescents are dissatisfied with their devices and abandon them with reasons of poor solution to basic needs, a review of ULP for suitability has become crucial. Objectives These include, to review UL prosthetic technology (PT), the materials used in the manufacturing of ULP, challenges in research and development of ULP, and to advise on the suitability of different devices to the needs of amputees. Methods They involve an extensive review of relevant literature and application of statistics to analyse data obtained from literature. Results ULAs are characterised to show affected bones in seven types of amputations. The characterisation depicts key causes of incidences that lead to amputations while advising on device suitability. PT is classified in terms of cost, nature, functions/operations of each type of device while providing the design challenges. Users' opinions on PT materials are analysed and used to suggest new materials for the next generation of the devices. R&D challenges hindering future developments of PT is reviewed and results used to identify characteristics for the next generation of the technology. Conclusions To increase user satisfaction and reduce device abandonment, amputees need useful information on the trend in PT and engineers need information about device field performance for improvements. The use of better performing ULP will improve users' everyday lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robbie Brack
- Department of Engineering, School of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK
| | - Emeka H Amalu
- Department of Engineering, School of Computing, Engineering and Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Callier T, Suresh AK, Bensmaia SJ. Neural Coding of Contact Events in Somatosensory Cortex. Cereb Cortex 2020; 29:4613-4627. [PMID: 30668644 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Manual interactions with objects require precise and rapid feedback about contact events. These tactile signals are integrated with motor plans throughout the neuraxis to achieve dexterous object manipulation. To better understand the role of somatosensory cortex in interactions with objects, we measured, using chronically implanted arrays of electrodes, the responses of populations of somatosensory neurons to skin indentations designed to simulate the initiation, maintenance, and termination of contact with an object. First, we find that the responses of somatosensory neurons to contact onset and offset dwarf their responses to maintenance of contact. Second, we show that these responses rapidly and reliably encode features of the simulated contact events-their timing, location, and strength-and can account for the animals' performance in an amplitude discrimination task. Third, we demonstrate that the spatiotemporal dynamics of the population response in cortex mirror those of the population response in the nerves. We conclude that the responses of populations of somatosensory neurons are well suited to encode contact transients and are consistent with a role of somatosensory cortex in signaling transitions between task subgoals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierri Callier
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Aneesha K Suresh
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Eles JR, Stieger KC, Kozai TDY. The temporal pattern of Intracortical Microstimulation pulses elicits distinct temporal and spatial recruitment of cortical neuropil and neurons. J Neural Eng 2020; 18. [PMID: 33075762 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abc29c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The spacing or distribution of stimulation pulses of therapeutic neurostimulation waveforms-referred to here as the Temporal Pattern (TP)-has emerged as an important parameter for tuning the response to deep-brain stimulation and intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). While it has long been assumed that modulating the TP of ICMS may be effective by altering the rate coding of the neural response, it is unclear how it alters the neural response at the neural network level. The present study is designed to elucidate the neural response to TP at the network level. APPROACH We use in vivo two-photon imaging of ICMS in mice expressing the calcium sensor Thy1-GCaMP or the glutamate sensor hSyn-iGluSnFr to examine the layer II/III neural response to stimulations with different TPs. We study the neuronal calcium and glutamate response to TPs with the same average frequency (10Hz) and same total charge injection, but varying degrees of bursting. We also investigate one control pattern with an average frequency of 100Hz and 10X the charge injection. MAIN RESULTS Stimulation trains with the same average frequency (10 Hz) and same total charge injection but distinct temporal patterns recruits distinct sets of neurons. More-than-half (60% of 309 cells) prefer one temporal pattern over the other. Despite their distinct spatial recruitment patterns, both cells exhibit similar ability to follow 30s trains of both TPs without failing, and they exhibit similar levels of glutamate release during stimulation. Both neuronal calcium and glutamate release train to the bursting TP pattern (~21-fold increase in relative power at the frequency of bursting. Bursting also results in a statistically significant elevation in the correlation between somatic calcium activity and neuropil activity, which we explore as a metric for inhibitory-excitatory tone. Interestingly, soma-neuropil correlation during the bursting pattern is a statistically significant predictor of cell preference for TP, which exposes a key link between inhibitory-excitatory tone. Finally, using mesoscale imaging, we show that both TPs result in distal inhibition during stimulation, which reveals complex spatial and temporal interactions between temporal pattern and inhibitory-excitatory tone in ICMS. SIGNIFICANCE Our results may ultimately suggest that TP is a valuable parameter space to modulate inhibitory-excitatory tone as well as distinct network activity in ICMS. This presents a broader mechanism of action than rate coding, as previously thought. By implicating these additional mechanisms, TP may have broader utility in the clinic and should be pursued to expand the efficacy of ICMS therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Eles
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES
| | - Kevin C Stieger
- Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES
| | - Takashi D Yoshida Kozai
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Fifth Ave, 5059-BST3, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kumaravelu K, Tomlinson T, Callier T, Sombeck J, Bensmaia SJ, Miller LE, Grill WM. A comprehensive model-based framework for optimal design of biomimetic patterns of electrical stimulation for prosthetic sensation. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:046045. [PMID: 32759488 PMCID: PMC8559728 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abacd8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Touch and proprioception are essential to motor function as shown by the movement deficits that result from the loss of these senses, e.g. due to neuropathy of sensory nerves. To achieve a high-performance brain-controlled prosthetic arm/hand thus requires the restoration of somatosensation, perhaps through intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of somatosensory cortex (S1). The challenge is to generate patterns of neuronal activation that evoke interpretable percepts. We present a framework to design optimal spatiotemporal patterns of ICMS (STIM) that evoke naturalistic patterns of neuronal activity and demonstrate performance superior to four previous approaches. APPROACH We recorded multiunit activity from S1 during a center-out reach task (from proprioceptive neurons in Brodmann's area 2) and during application of skin indentations (from cutaneous neurons in Brodmann's area 1). We implemented a computational model of a cortical hypercolumn and used a genetic algorithm to design STIM that evoked patterns of model neuron activity that mimicked their experimentally-measured counterparts. Finally, from the ICMS patterns, the evoked neuronal activity, and the stimulus parameters that gave rise to it, we trained a recurrent neural network (RNN) to learn the mapping function between the physical stimulus and the biomimetic stimulation pattern, i.e. the sensory encoder to be integrated into a neuroprosthetic device. MAIN RESULTS We identified ICMS patterns that evoked simulated responses that closely approximated the measured responses for neurons within 50 µm of the electrode tip. The RNN-based sensory encoder generalized well to untrained limb movements or skin indentations. STIM designed using the model-based optimization approach outperformed STIM designed using existing linear and nonlinear mappings. SIGNIFICANCE The proposed framework produces an encoder that converts limb state or patterns of pressure exerted onto the prosthetic hand into STIM that evoke naturalistic patterns of neuronal activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Thierri Callier
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Joseph Sombeck
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Sliman J. Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lee E. Miller
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Deptartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Warren M. Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Makin TR, Flor H. Brain (re)organisation following amputation: Implications for phantom limb pain. Neuroimage 2020; 218:116943. [PMID: 32428706 PMCID: PMC7422832 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Following arm amputation the region that represented the missing hand in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) becomes deprived of its primary input, resulting in changed boundaries of the S1 body map. This remapping process has been termed 'reorganisation' and has been attributed to multiple mechanisms, including increased expression of previously masked inputs. In a maladaptive plasticity model, such reorganisation has been associated with phantom limb pain (PLP). Brain activity associated with phantom hand movements is also correlated with PLP, suggesting that preserved limb functional representation may serve as a complementary process. Here we review some of the most recent evidence for the potential drivers and consequences of brain (re)organisation following amputation, based on human neuroimaging. We emphasise other perceptual and behavioural factors consequential to arm amputation, such as non-painful phantom sensations, perceived limb ownership, intact hand compensatory behaviour or prosthesis use, which have also been related to both cortical changes and PLP. We also discuss new findings based on interventions designed to alter the brain representation of the phantom limb, including augmented/virtual reality applications and brain computer interfaces. These studies point to a close interaction of sensory changes and alterations in brain regions involved in body representation, pain processing and motor control. Finally, we review recent evidence based on methodological advances such as high field neuroimaging and multivariate techniques that provide new opportunities to interrogate somatosensory representations in the missing hand cortical territory. Collectively, this research highlights the need to consider potential contributions of additional brain mechanisms, beyond S1 remapping, and the dynamic interplay of contextual factors with brain changes for understanding and alleviating PLP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar R Makin
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Herta Flor
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Germany; Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Garenfeld MA, Mortensen CK, Strbac M, Dideriksen JL, Dosen S. Amplitude versus spatially modulated electrotactile feedback for myoelectric control of two degrees of freedom. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:046034. [PMID: 32650320 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aba4fd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Artificial proprioceptive feedback from a myoelectric prosthesis is an important aspect in enhancing embodiment and user satisfaction, possibly lowering the demand for visual attention while controlling a prosthesis in everyday tasks. Contemporary myoelectric prostheses are advanced mechatronic systems with multiple degrees of freedom, and therefore, to communicate the prosthesis state, the feedback interface needs to transmit several variables simultaneously. In the present study, two different configurations for conveying proprioceptive information of wrist rotation and hand aperture through multichannel electrotactile stimulation were developed and evaluated during online myoelectric control. APPROACH Myoelectric recordings were acquired from the dominant forearm and electrotactile stimulation was delivered on the non-dominant forearm using a compact interface. The first feedback configuration, which was based on spatial coding, transmitted the information using a moving tactile stimulus, whereas the second, amplitude-based configuration conveyed the position via sensation intensity. Thirteen able-bodied subjects used pattern classification-based myoelectric control with both feedback configurations to accomplish a target-reaching task. MAIN RESULTS High task performance (completion rate > 90%) was observed for both configurations, with no significant difference in completion rate, time to reach the target, distance error and path efficiency, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE Overall, the results demonstrated that both feedback configurations allowed subjects to perceive and interpret two feedback variables delivered simultaneously, despite using a compact stimulation interface. This is an encouraging result for the prospect of communicating the full state of a multifunctional hand prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Garenfeld
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Frederik Bajers Vej 7D, 9220, Aalborg Ø, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Loutit AJ, Potas JR. Dorsal Column Nuclei Neural Signal Features Permit Robust Machine-Learning of Natural Tactile- and Proprioception-Dominated Stimuli. Front Syst Neurosci 2020; 14:46. [PMID: 32848640 PMCID: PMC7399364 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Neural prostheses enable users to effect movement through a variety of actuators by translating brain signals into movement control signals. However, to achieve more natural limb movements from these devices, the restoration of somatosensory feedback is required. We used feature-learnability, a machine-learning approach, to assess signal features for their capacity to enhance decoding performance of neural signals evoked by natural tactile and proprioceptive somatosensory stimuli, recorded from the surface of the dorsal column nuclei (DCN) in urethane-anesthetized rats. The highest performing individual feature, spike amplitude, classified somatosensory DCN signals with 70% accuracy. The highest accuracy achieved was 87% using 13 features that were extracted from both high and low-frequency (LF) bands of DCN signals. In general, high-frequency (HF) features contained the most information about peripheral somatosensory events, but when features were acquired from short time-windows, classification accuracy was significantly improved by adding LF features to the feature set. We found that proprioception-dominated stimuli generalize across animals better than tactile-dominated stimuli, and we demonstrate how information that signal features contribute to neural decoding changes over the time-course of dynamic somatosensory events. These findings may inform the biomimetic design of artificial stimuli that can activate the DCN to substitute somatosensory feedback. Although, we investigated somatosensory structures, the feature set we investigated may also prove useful for decoding other (e.g., motor) neural signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair J. Loutit
- School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
- The Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Jason R. Potas
- School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
- The Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mazurek KA, Schieber MH. Injecting Information into the Mammalian Cortex: Progress, Challenges, and Promise. Neuroscientist 2020; 27:129-142. [PMID: 32648527 DOI: 10.1177/1073858420936253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
For 150 years artificial stimulation has been used to study the function of the nervous system. Such stimulation-whether electrical or optogenetic-eventually may be used in neuroprosthetic devices to replace lost sensory inputs and to otherwise introduce information into the nervous system. Efforts toward this goal can be classified broadly as either biomimetic or arbitrary. Biomimetic stimulation aims to mimic patterns of natural neural activity, so that the subject immediately experiences the artificial stimulation as if it were natural sensation. Arbitrary stimulation, in contrast, makes no attempt to mimic natural patterns of neural activity. Instead, different stimuli-at different locations and/or in different patterns-are assigned different meanings randomly. The subject's time and effort then are required to learn to interpret different stimuli, a process that engages the brain's inherent plasticity. Here we will examine progress in using artificial stimulation to inject information into the cerebral cortex and discuss the challenges for and the promise of future development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A Mazurek
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.,Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Marc H Schieber
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.,Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Devecioğlu İ, Güçlü B. Psychophysical detection and learning in freely behaving rats: a probabilistic dynamical model for operant conditioning. J Comput Neurosci 2020; 48:333-353. [PMID: 32643083 DOI: 10.1007/s10827-020-00751-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We present a stochastic learning model that combines the essential elements of Hebbian and Rescorla-Wagner theories for operant conditioning. The model was used to predict the behavioral data of rats performing a vibrotactile yes/no detection task. Probabilistic nature of learning was implemented by trial-by-trial variability in the random distributions of associative strengths between the sensory and the response representations. By using measures derived from log-likelihoods (corrected Akaike and Bayesian information criteria), the proposed model and its subtypes were compared with each other, and with previous models in the literature, including reinforcement learning model with softmax rule and drift diffusion model. The main difference between these models was the level of stochasticity which was implemented as associative variation or response selection. The proposed model with subject-dependent variance coefficient (SVC) and with trial-dependent variance coefficient (TVC) resulted in better trial-by-trial fits to experimental data than the other tested models based on information criteria. Additionally, surrogate data were simulated with estimated parameters and the performance of the models were compared based on psychophysical measures (A': non-parametric sensitivity index, hits and false alarms on receiver operating characteristics). Especially the TVC model could produce psychophysical measures closer to those of the experimental data than the alternative models. The presented approach is novel for linking psychophysical response measures with learning in a yes/no detection task, and may be used in neural engineering applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İsmail Devecioğlu
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, 59030, Tekirdağ, Turkey
| | - Burak Güçlü
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Boğaziçi University, Kandilli Campus, Çengelköy, 34684, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wilke MA, Hartmann C, Schimpf F, Farina D, Dosen S. The Interaction Between Feedback Type and Learning in Routine Grasping With Myoelectric Prostheses. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS 2020; 13:645-654. [PMID: 31870991 DOI: 10.1109/toh.2019.2961652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
While prosthetic fitting after upper-limb loss allows for restoration of motor functions, it deprives the amputee of tactile sensations that are essential for grasp control in able-bodied subjects. Therefore, it is commonly assumed that restoring the force feedback would improve the control of prosthesis grasping force. However, the literature regarding the benefit of feedback is controversial. Here, we investigated how the type of feedback affects learning and steady-state performance of routine grasping with a prosthesis. The experimental task was to grasp an object using a prosthesis and generate a low or high target-force range (TFR), both initially unknown, in three feedback conditions: basic auditory feedback on task outcome, and additional visual or vibratory feedback on the force magnitude. The results demonstrated that the performance was rather good and stable for the low TFR, whereas it was substantially worse for the high TFR with a pronounced training effect. Surprisingly, learning curve and steady-state performance did not depend on the feedback condition. Hence, in the specific context of routing grasping with a prosthesis controlled via surface EMG, the basic feedback on task outcome was not outperformed by force-related end-of-trial feedback and hence seemed to be sufficient for accomplishing the task.This conclusion applies to the context of routine grasping using a myoelectric prosthesis with surface EMG electrodes, which means that the control signals are variable and the feedback is perceived and processed at the end of the trial (motor adaption).
Collapse
|