1
|
Koungoulos LG, Hulme-Beaman A, Fillios M. Phenotypic diversity in early Australian dingoes revealed by traditional and 3D geometric morphometric analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:21228. [PMID: 39294146 PMCID: PMC11411105 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65729-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
The dingo is a wild dog endemic to Australia with enigmatic origins. Dingoes are one of two remaining unadmixed populations of an early East Asian dog lineage, the other being wild dogs from the New Guinea highlands, but morphological connections between these canid groups have long proved elusive. Here, we investigate this issue through a morphometric study of ancient dingo remains found at Lake Mungo and Lake Milkengay, in western New South Wales. Direct accelerated mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dates from an ancient Lake Mungo dingo demonstrate that dingoes with a considerably smaller build than the predominant modern morphotype were present in semi-arid southeastern Australia c.3000-3300 calBP. 3D geometric morphometric analysis of a near-complete Mungo cranium finds closest links to East Asian and New Guinean dogs, providing the first morphological evidence of links between early dingoes and their northern relatives. This ancient type is no longer extant within the range of modern dingo variability, but populations from nearby southeastern Australia show a closer resemblance than those to the north and west. Our results reaffirm prior characterisations of regional variability in dingo phenotype as not exclusively derived from recent domestic dog hybridisation but as having an earlier precedent, and suggest further that the dingo's phenotype has changed over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loukas G Koungoulos
- Department of Archaeology, School of Humanities, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, School of Culture, History and Language, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
- Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Ardern Hulme-Beaman
- Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, School of Histories, Languages and Cultures, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Melanie Fillios
- Department of Archaeology, School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, The University of New England, Armidale, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buckley RM, Ostrander EA. Large-scale genomic analysis of the domestic dog informs biological discovery. Genome Res 2024; 34:811-821. [PMID: 38955465 PMCID: PMC11293549 DOI: 10.1101/gr.278569.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Recent advances in genomics, coupled with a unique population structure and remarkable levels of variation, have propelled the domestic dog to new levels as a system for understanding fundamental principles in mammalian biology. Central to this advance are more than 350 recognized breeds, each a closed population that has undergone selection for unique features. Genetic variation in the domestic dog is particularly well characterized compared with other domestic mammals, with almost 3000 high-coverage genomes publicly available. Importantly, as the number of sequenced genomes increases, new avenues for analysis are becoming available. Herein, we discuss recent discoveries in canine genomics regarding behavior, morphology, and disease susceptibility. We explore the limitations of current data sets for variant interpretation, tradeoffs between sequencing strategies, and the burgeoning role of long-read genomes for capturing structural variants. In addition, we consider how large-scale collections of whole-genome sequence data drive rare variant discovery and assess the geographic distribution of canine diversity, which identifies Asia as a major source of missing variation. Finally, we review recent comparative genomic analyses that will facilitate annotation of the noncoding genome in dogs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben M Buckley
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Elaine A Ostrander
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Souilmi Y, Wasef S, Williams MP, Conroy G, Bar I, Bover P, Dann J, Heiniger H, Llamas B, Ogbourne S, Archer M, Ballard JWO, Reed E, Tobler R, Koungoulos L, Walshe K, Wright JL, Balme J, O’Connor S, Cooper A, Mitchell KJ. Ancient genomes reveal over two thousand years of dingo population structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2407584121. [PMID: 38976766 PMCID: PMC11287250 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2407584121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Dingoes are culturally and ecologically important free-living canids whose ancestors arrived in Australia over 3,000 B.P., likely transported by seafaring people. However, the early history of dingoes in Australia-including the number of founding populations and their routes of introduction-remains uncertain. This uncertainty arises partly from the complex and poorly understood relationship between modern dingoes and New Guinea singing dogs, and suspicions that post-Colonial hybridization has introduced recent domestic dog ancestry into the genomes of many wild dingo populations. In this study, we analyzed genome-wide data from nine ancient dingo specimens ranging in age from 400 to 2,746 y old, predating the introduction of domestic dogs to Australia by European colonists. We uncovered evidence that the continent-wide population structure observed in modern dingo populations had already emerged several thousand years ago. We also detected excess allele sharing between New Guinea singing dogs and ancient dingoes from coastal New South Wales (NSW) compared to ancient dingoes from southern Australia, irrespective of any post-Colonial hybrid ancestry in the genomes of modern individuals. Our results are consistent with several demographic scenarios, including a scenario where the ancestry of dingoes from the east coast of Australia results from at least two waves of migration from source populations with varying affinities to New Guinea singing dogs. We also contribute to the growing body of evidence that modern dingoes derive little genomic ancestry from post-Colonial hybridization with other domestic dog lineages, instead descending primarily from ancient canids introduced to Sahul thousands of years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassine Souilmi
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- The Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
| | - Sally Wasef
- Ancient DNA Facility, Defence Genomics, Genomics Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD4059, Australia
- Innovation Division, Forensic Science Queensland, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, QLD4108, Australia
| | - Matthew P. Williams
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA16802
| | - Gabriel Conroy
- School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD4556, Australia
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD4556, Australia
| | - Ido Bar
- Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD4111, Australia
| | - Pere Bover
- Fundación Agencia Aragonesa para la Investigacióny el Desarrollo (ARAID), Zaragoza50018, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ciencias Ambientales de Aragón (IUCA)-Grupo Aragosaurus, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza50009, Spain
| | - Jackson Dann
- Grützner Laboratory of Comparative Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
| | - Holly Heiniger
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), AdelaideSA5005, Australia
| | - Bastien Llamas
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), AdelaideSA5005, Australia
- National Centre for Indigenous Genomics, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, ActonACT2601, Australia
- Indigenous Genomics, Telethon Kids Institute, Adelaide, SA5000, Australia
| | - Steven Ogbourne
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD4556, Australia
| | - Michael Archer
- Earth and Sustainability Science Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, SydneyNSW2052, Australia
| | - J. William O. Ballard
- School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC3052, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Reed
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, AdelaideSA5005, Australia
| | - Raymond Tobler
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- Evolution of Cultural Diversity Initiative, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
| | - Loukas Koungoulos
- Archaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
- Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW2010, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
| | - Keryn Walshe
- School of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Auckland, Auckland1010, New Zealand
| | - Joanne L. Wright
- Queensland Department of Education, Kelvin Grove State College, Kelvin Grove, QLD4059, Australia
| | - Jane Balme
- School of Social Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA6009, Australia
| | - Sue O’Connor
- Archaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT2601, Australia
| | - Alan Cooper
- Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW2640, Australia
| | - Kieren J. Mitchell
- Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA5005, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), AdelaideSA5005, Australia
- Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research, Lincoln, Canterbury7608, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leon-Apodaca AV, Kumar M, del Castillo A, Conroy GC, Lamont RW, Ogbourne S, Cairns KM, Borburgh L, Behrendorff L, Subramanian S, Szpiech ZA. Genomic Consequences of Isolation and Inbreeding in an Island Dingo Population. Genome Biol Evol 2024; 16:evae130. [PMID: 38913571 PMCID: PMC11221432 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Dingoes come from an ancient canid lineage that originated in East Asia around 8,000 to 11,000 years BP. As Australia's largest terrestrial predator, dingoes play an important ecological role. A small, protected population exists on a world heritage listed offshore island, K'gari (formerly Fraser Island). Concern regarding the persistence of dingoes on K'gari has risen due to their low genetic diversity and elevated inbreeding levels. However, whole-genome sequence data is lacking from this population. Here, we include five new whole-genome sequences of K'gari dingoes. We analyze a total of 18 whole-genome sequences of dingoes sampled from mainland Australia and K'gari to assess the genomic consequences of their demographic histories. Long (>1 Mb) runs of homozygosity (ROHs)-indicators of inbreeding-are elevated in all sampled dingoes. However, K'gari dingoes showed significantly higher levels of very long ROH (>5 Mb), providing genomic evidence for small population size, isolation, inbreeding, and a strong founder effect. Our results suggest that, despite current levels of inbreeding, the K'gari population is purging strongly deleterious mutations, which, in the absence of further reductions in population size, may facilitate the persistence of small populations despite low genetic diversity and isolation. However, there may be little to no purging of mildly deleterious alleles, which may have important long-term consequences, and should be considered by conservation and management programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana V Leon-Apodaca
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Manoharan Kumar
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 1 Moreton Parade, Petrie, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andres del Castillo
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Gabriel C Conroy
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert W Lamont
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Steven Ogbourne
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kylie M Cairns
- Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Liz Borburgh
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Linda Behrendorff
- Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment & Science, K’gari, Australia
| | - Sankar Subramanian
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 1 Moreton Parade, Petrie, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Zachary A Szpiech
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leon-Apodaca AV, Kumar M, del Castillo A, Conroy GC, Lamont RW, Ogbourne S, Cairns KM, Borburgh L, Behrendorff L, Subramanian S, Szpiech ZA. Genomic consequences of isolation and inbreeding in an island dingo population. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.09.15.557950. [PMID: 37745583 PMCID: PMC10516007 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Dingoes come from an ancient canid lineage that originated in East Asia around 8000-11,000 years BP. As Australia's largest terrestrial predator, dingoes play an important ecological role. A small, protected population exists on a world heritage listed offshore island, K'gari (formerly Fraser Island). Concern regarding the persistence of dingoes on K'gari has risen due to their low genetic diversity and elevated inbreeding levels. However, whole-genome sequencing data is lacking from this population. Here, we include five new whole-genome sequences of K'gari dingoes. We analyze a total of 18 whole genome sequences of dingoes sampled from mainland Australia and K'gari to assess the genomic consequences of their demographic histories. Long (>1 Mb) runs of homozygosity (ROH) - indicators of inbreeding - are elevated in all sampled dingoes. However, K'gari dingoes showed significantly higher levels of very long ROH (>5 Mb), providing genomic evidence for small population size, isolation, inbreeding, and a strong founder effect. Our results suggest that, despite current levels of inbreeding, the K'gari population is purging strongly deleterious mutations, which, in the absence of further reductions in population size, may facilitate the persistence of small populations despite low genetic diversity and isolation. However, there may be little to no purging of mildly deleterious alleles, which may have important long-term consequences, and should be considered by conservation and management programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manoharan Kumar
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 1 Moreton Parade, Petrie, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Gabriel C. Conroy
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert W Lamont
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Steven Ogbourne
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kylie M. Cairns
- Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Liz Borburgh
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Linda Behrendorff
- Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment & Science, K’gari, Australia
| | - Sankar Subramanian
- School of Science, Technology & Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 1 Moreton Parade, Petrie, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Zachary A. Szpiech
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA
- Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cairns KM, Crowther MS, Parker HG, Ostrander EA, Letnic M. Genome-wide variant analyses reveal new patterns of admixture and population structure in Australian dingoes. Mol Ecol 2023; 32:4133-4150. [PMID: 37246949 PMCID: PMC10524503 DOI: 10.1111/mec.16998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Admixture between species is a cause for concern in wildlife management. Canids are particularly vulnerable to interspecific hybridisation, and genetic admixture has shaped their evolutionary history. Microsatellite DNA testing, relying on a small number of genetic markers and geographically restricted reference populations, has identified extensive domestic dog admixture in Australian dingoes and driven conservation management policy. But there exists a concern that geographic variation in dingo genotypes could confound ancestry analyses that use a small number of genetic markers. Here, we apply genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to a set of 402 wild and captive dingoes collected from across Australia and then carry out comparisons to domestic dogs. We then perform ancestry modelling and biogeographic analyses to characterise population structure in dingoes and investigate the extent of admixture between dingoes and dogs in different regions of the continent. We show that there are at least five distinct dingo populations across Australia. We observed limited evidence of dog admixture in wild dingoes. Our work challenges previous reports regarding the occurrence and extent of dog admixture in dingoes, as our ancestry analyses show that previous assessments severely overestimate the degree of domestic dog admixture in dingo populations, particularly in south-eastern Australia. These findings strongly support the use of genome-wide SNP genotyping as a refined method for wildlife managers and policymakers to assess and inform dingo management policy and legislation moving forwards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie M. Cairns
- Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mathew S. Crowther
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Heidi G. Parker
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Elaine A. Ostrander
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Mike Letnic
- Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahn B, Kang M, Jeon H, Kim JS, Jiang H, Ha J, Park C. Origin and population structure of native dog breeds in the Korean peninsula and East Asia. iScience 2023; 26:106982. [PMID: 37378348 PMCID: PMC10291505 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
To study the ancestry and phylogenetic relationships of native Korean dog breeds to other Asian dog populations, we analyzed nucleotide variations in whole-genome sequences of 205 canid individuals. Sapsaree, Northern Chinese indigenous dog, and Tibetan Mastiff were largely related to West Eurasian ancestry. Jindo, Donggyeongi, Shiba, Southern Chinese indigenous (SCHI), Vietnamese indigenous dogs (VIET), and Indonesian indigenous dogs were related to Southeast and East Asian ancestry. Among East Asian dog breeds, Sapsaree presented the highest haplotype sharing with German Shepherds, indicating ancient admixture of European ancestry to modern East Asian dog breeds. SCHI showed greater haplotype sharing with New Guinea singing dogs, VIET, and Jindo than with other Asian breeds. The predicted divergence time of East Asian populations from their common ancestor was approximately 2,000 to 11,000 years ago. Our results expand understanding of the genetic history of dogs in the Korean peninsula to the Asian continent and Oceanic region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byeongyong Ahn
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
| | - Mingue Kang
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyoim Jeon
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Seok Kim
- Department of Korean Jindo and Domestic Animal, Jindo 58927, Republic of Korea
| | - Hao Jiang
- College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130119, China
| | - Jihong Ha
- Korean Sapsaree Foundation, Gyeongsan 38412, Republic of Korea
| | - Chankyu Park
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Field MA, Yadav S, Dudchenko O, Esvaran M, Rosen BD, Skvortsova K, Edwards RJ, Keilwagen J, Cochran BJ, Manandhar B, Bustamante S, Rasmussen JA, Melvin RG, Chernoff B, Omer A, Colaric Z, Chan EKF, Minoche AE, Smith TPL, Gilbert MTP, Bogdanovic O, Zammit RA, Thomas T, Aiden EL, Ballard JWO. The Australian dingo is an early offshoot of modern breed dogs. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2022; 8:eabm5944. [PMID: 35452284 PMCID: PMC9032958 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm5944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Dogs are uniquely associated with human dispersal and bring transformational insight into the domestication process. Dingoes represent an intriguing case within canine evolution being geographically isolated for thousands of years. Here, we present a high-quality de novo assembly of a pure dingo (CanFam_DDS). We identified large chromosomal differences relative to the current dog reference (CanFam3.1) and confirmed no expanded pancreatic amylase gene as found in breed dogs. Phylogenetic analyses using variant pairwise matrices show that the dingo is distinct from five breed dogs with 100% bootstrap support when using Greenland wolf as the outgroup. Functionally, we observe differences in methylation patterns between the dingo and German shepherd dog genomes and differences in serum biochemistry and microbiome makeup. Our results suggest that distinct demographic and environmental conditions have shaped the dingo genome. In contrast, artificial human selection has likely shaped the genomes of domestic breed dogs after divergence from the dingo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matt A. Field
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Sonu Yadav
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, High St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Olga Dudchenko
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Meera Esvaran
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Benjamin D. Rosen
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Ksenia Skvortsova
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Richard J. Edwards
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, High St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Jens Keilwagen
- Julius Kühn-Institut, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484 Quedlinburg, Germany
| | - Blake J. Cochran
- School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Bikash Manandhar
- School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Sonia Bustamante
- Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Jacob Agerbo Rasmussen
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
- Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The GLOBE Institute University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard G. Melvin
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, 1035 University Drive, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
| | - Barry Chernoff
- College of the Environment, Departments of Biology, and Earth and Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
| | - Arina Omer
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zane Colaric
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eva K. F. Chan
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
- Statewide Genomics, New South Wales Health Pathology, 45 Watt St, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
| | - Andre E. Minoche
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Timothy P. L. Smith
- U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Rd 313, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA
| | - M. Thomas P. Gilbert
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
- University Museum, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ozren Bogdanovic
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, High St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Robert A. Zammit
- Vineyard Veterinary Hospital, 703 Windsor Rd, Vineyard, NSW 2765, Australia
| | - Torsten Thomas
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Erez L. Aiden
- The Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
- UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech University, Pudong 201210, China
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - J. William O. Ballard
- Department of Environment and Genetics, SABE, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
- School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stephan T, Burgess SM, Cheng H, Danko CG, Gill CA, Jarvis ED, Koepfli KP, Koltes JE, Lyons E, Ronald P, Ryder OA, Schriml LM, Soltis P, VandeWoude S, Zhou H, Ostrander EA, Karlsson EK. Darwinian genomics and diversity in the tree of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2115644119. [PMID: 35042807 PMCID: PMC8795533 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115644119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomics encompasses the entire tree of life, both extinct and extant, and the evolutionary processes that shape this diversity. To date, genomic research has focused on humans, a small number of agricultural species, and established laboratory models. Fewer than 18,000 of ∼2,000,000 eukaryotic species (<1%) have a representative genome sequence in GenBank, and only a fraction of these have ancillary information on genome structure, genetic variation, gene expression, epigenetic modifications, and population diversity. This imbalance reflects a perception that human studies are paramount in disease research. Yet understanding how genomes work, and how genetic variation shapes phenotypes, requires a broad view that embraces the vast diversity of life. We have the technology to collect massive and exquisitely detailed datasets about the world, but expertise is siloed into distinct fields. A new approach, integrating comparative genomics with cell and evolutionary biology, ecology, archaeology, anthropology, and conservation biology, is essential for understanding and protecting ourselves and our world. Here, we describe potential for scientific discovery when comparative genomics works in close collaboration with a broad range of fields as well as the technical, scientific, and social constraints that must be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylorlyn Stephan
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20817
| | - Shawn M Burgess
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20817
| | - Hans Cheng
- Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, East Lansing, MI 48823
| | - Charles G Danko
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Baker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850
| | - Clare A Gill
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
| | - Erich D Jarvis
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065
- HHMI, Chevy Chase, MD 20815
| | - Klaus-Peter Koepfli
- Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, George Mason University, Front Royal, VA 22630
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC 20008
| | - James E Koltes
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
| | - Eric Lyons
- School of Plant Sciences, BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
| | - Pamela Ronald
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
- The Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
- The Innovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
- Grass Genetics, Joint Bioenergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608
| | - Oliver A Ryder
- San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA 92027
- Department of Evolution, Behavior, and Ecology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Lynn M Schriml
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
| | - Pamela Soltis
- Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| | - Sue VandeWoude
- Department of Micro-, Immuno-, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80532
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
| | - Elaine A Ostrander
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20817
| | - Elinor K Karlsson
- Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655;
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cairns KM, Crowther MS, Nesbitt B, Letnic M. The myth of wild dogs in Australia: are there any out there? AUSTRALIAN MAMMALOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1071/am20055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Hybridisation between wild and domestic canids is a global conservation and management issue. In Australia, dingoes are a distinct lineage of wild-living canid with a controversial domestication status. They are mainland Australia’s apex terrestrial predator. There is ongoing concern that the identity of dingoes has been threatened from breeding with domestic dogs, and that feral dogs have established populations in rural Australia. We collate the results of microsatellite DNA testing from 5039 wild canids to explore patterns of domestic dog ancestry in dingoes and observations of feral domestic dogs across the continent. Only 31 feral dogs were detected, challenging the perception that feral dogs are widespread in Australia. First generation dingo × dog hybrids were similarly rare, with only 27 individuals identified. Spatial patterns of genetic ancestry across Australia identified that dingo populations in northern, western and central Australia were largely free from domestic dog introgression. Our findings challenge the perception that dingoes are virtually extinct in the wild and that feral dogs are common. A shift in terminology from wild dog to dingo would better reflect the identity of these wild canids and allow more nuanced debate about the balance between conservation and management of dingoes in Australia.
Collapse
|
11
|
Krofel M, Hatlauf J, Bogdanowicz W, Campbell LAD, Godinho R, Jhala YV, Kitchener AC, Koepfli K, Moehlman P, Senn H, Sillero‐Zubiri C, Viranta S, Werhahn G, Alvares F. Towards resolving taxonomic uncertainties in wolf, dog and jackal lineages of Africa, Eurasia and Australasia. J Zool (1987) 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Krofel
- Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
| | - J. Hatlauf
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management Vienna Austria
| | - W. Bogdanowicz
- Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences Warszawa Poland
| | - L. A. D. Campbell
- Department of Zoology Recanati‐Kaplan Centre; Tubney University of Oxford Wildlife Conservation Research Unit Oxfordshire UK
| | - R. Godinho
- InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão CIBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO Vairão Portugal
- Departamento de Biologia Faculdade de Ciências Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Y. V. Jhala
- Animal Ecology & Conservation Biology Wildlife Institute of India Dehradun India
| | - A. C. Kitchener
- Department of Natural Sciences National Museums Scotland Edinburgh UK
| | - K.‐P. Koepfli
- Smithsonian‐Mason School of Conservation George Mason University Front Royal VA USA
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Center for Species Survival National Zoological Park Front Royal VA USA
- Computer Technologies Laboratory ITMO University St. Petersburg Russia
| | - P. Moehlman
- IUCN/SSC Equid Specialist Group Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI) EcoHealth Alliance and The Earth Institute Columbia University Arusha Tanzania
| | - H. Senn
- WildGenes Laboratory Conservation and Science Programmes Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, RZSS Edinburgh UK
| | - C. Sillero‐Zubiri
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Zoology University of Oxford Tubney UK
- IUCN SSC Canid Specialist Group Oxford UK
- Born Free Foundation Horsham UK
| | - S. Viranta
- Faculty of Medicine University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | - G. Werhahn
- IUCN SSC Canid Specialist Group Oxford UK
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Zoology University of Oxford Tubney UK
| | - F. Alvares
- CIBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos InBIO Laboratório Associado Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning CIBIO Vairão Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reply to Dwyer and Minnegal: Genetics supersedes observational records regarding New Guinea canids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:2022368118. [PMID: 33723060 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2022368118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
13
|
Relationship between wild-living and village-living dogs in New Guinea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:2020432118. [PMID: 33723054 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020432118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
14
|
Schmidt TL, Jasper M, Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA. Unbiased population heterozygosity estimates from genome‐wide sequence data. Methods Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas L. Schmidt
- School of BioSciences Bio21 InstituteUniversity of Melbourne Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Moshe‐Elijah Jasper
- School of BioSciences Bio21 InstituteUniversity of Melbourne Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Andrew R Weeks
- School of BioSciences Bio21 InstituteUniversity of Melbourne Parkville VIC Australia
- cesar Pty Ltd Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Ary A Hoffmann
- School of BioSciences Bio21 InstituteUniversity of Melbourne Parkville VIC Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Natoli E, Bonanni R, Cafazzo S, Mills DS, Pontier D, Pilot M. Genetic inference of the mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs. Behav Ecol 2021; 32:646-656. [PMID: 34539241 PMCID: PMC8444980 DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arab011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Domestication has greatly changed the social and reproductive behavior of dogs relative to that of wild members of the genus Canis, which typically exhibit social monogamy and extended parental care. Unlike a typical gray wolf pack that consists of a single breeding pair and their offspring from multiple seasons, a group of free-ranging dogs (FRDs) can include multiple breeding individuals of both sexes. To understand the consequences of this shift in reproductive behavior, we reconstructed the genetic pedigree of an FRD population and assessed the kinship patterns in social groups, based on genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. Consistent with behavioral observations, the mating system of the study population was characterized by polygynandry. Instead of the discreet family units observed in wolves, FRDs were linked by a network of kinship relationships that spread across packs. However, we also observed reproduction of the same male-female pairs in multiple seasons, retention of adult offspring in natal packs, and dispersal between neighboring packs-patterns in common with wolves. Although monogamy is the predominant mating system in wolves, polygyny and polyandry are occasionally observed in response to increased food availability. Thus, polygynandry of domestic dogs was likely influenced by the shift in ecological niche from an apex predator to a human commensal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Natoli
- Canile Sovrazonale, ASL Roma 3 (Local Health Unit Rome 3), Via della Magliana 856H, 00148 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Daniel S Mills
- School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK
| | - Dominique Pontier
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Małgorzata Pilot
- Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Nadwiślańska 108, 80-680 Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu D, Lao S, Fan L. De-Domestication: An Extension of Crop Evolution. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2021; 26:560-574. [PMID: 33648850 DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
De-domestication or feralization is an interesting phenomenon in crops and livestock. Previously, evidence for crop de-domestication was based mainly on studies using phenotypic and genotypic data from limited molecular markers or gene segments. Recent genomic studies in rice, barley, and wheat provide comprehensive landscapes of de-domestication on a whole-genome scale. Here, we summarize crop de-domestication processes, ecological roles of de-domesticates, mechanisms underlying crop de-domestication syndromes, and conditions potentially favoring de-domestication events. We further explain how recent de-domestication studies have expanded our understanding of the complexity of crop evolution, and highlight the genetic novelties of de-domesticates beneficial for modern crop breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongya Wu
- Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sangting Lao
- Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Longjiang Fan
- Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Yonyou Industrial Park, Sanya 572025, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Studies of dogs have proliferated among canine scientists, aided in part by the logistical convenience of working with owned animals whose care is handled by others. These pet dogs are unlike most dogs that have lived in contemporary or prehistoric settings. In particular, many of the dogs studied by canine scientists are NATIVE dogs: (1) neutered, (2) alimented, (3) trained, (4) isolated, (5) vaccinated, and (6) engineered. The distinct genotypes and unusual environments of NATIVE dogs stand in contrast to the characteristics of dogs who have adapted to lives in other human communities and settings. For a holistic perspective on the evolution of dogs, it is helpful to study dogs in environments that share features of the settings in which dogs evolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Koster
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Pl. 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Metabolomics shows the Australian dingo has a unique plasma profile. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5245. [PMID: 33664285 PMCID: PMC7933249 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84411-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Dingoes occupy a wide range of the Australian mainland and play a crucial role as an apex predator with a generalist omnivorous feeding behaviour. Dingoes are ecologically, phenotypically and behaviourally distinct from modern breed dogs and have not undergone artificial selection since their arrival in Australia. In contrast, humans have selected breed dogs for novel and desirable traits. First, we examine whether the distinct evolutionary histories of dingoes and domestic dogs has lead to differences in plasma metabolomes. We study metabolite composition differences between dingoes (n = 15) and two domestic dog breeds (Basenji n = 9 and German Shepherd Dog (GSD) n = 10). Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, type II and type III ANOVA with post-hoc tests and adjustments for multiple comparisons were used for data evaluation. After accounting for within group variation, 62 significant metabolite differences were detected between dingoes and domestic dogs, with the majority of differences in protein (n = 14) and lipid metabolites (n = 12), mostly lower in dingoes. Most differences were observed between dingoes and domestic dogs and fewest between the domestic dog breeds. Next, we collect a second set of data to investigate variation between pure dingoes (n = 10) and dingo-dog hybrids (n = 10) as hybridisation is common in regional Australia. We detected no significant metabolite differences between dingoes and dingo-dog hybrids after Bonferroni correction. However, power analysis showed that increasing the sample size to 15 could result in differences in uridine 5′-diphosphogalactose (UDPgal) levels related to galactose metabolism. We suggest this may be linked to an increase in Amylase 2B copy number in hybrids. Our study illustrates that the dingo metabolome is significantly different from domestic dog breeds and hybridisation is likely to influence carbohydrate metabolism.
Collapse
|
19
|
Shipman P. What the dingo says about dog domestication. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2020; 304:19-30. [PMID: 33103861 PMCID: PMC7756258 DOI: 10.1002/ar.24517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Worldwide, dogs (Canis familiaris) are certainly the most common domesticate (900 million according to the World Atlas) and are sometimes used as a proxy for human presence. Dogs were the first and therefore arguably most important species ever to be domesticated. It is widely accepted that the domestic dog is a descendent of Pleistocene gray wolves (Canis lupus), possibly of a population now extinct. How can an extant canid, the dingo (Canis dingo or Canis familiaris), whose status as a species and as a domesticate is controversial, improve our understanding of the ancient process of domesticating the dog? Here I review anatomical, behavioral, biogeographic, and molecular evidence on the appropriate status of dingoes in a historical context. Dingoes are now the major apex predator in Australia aside from humans. Different sources of evidence have suggested different times of arrival in Greater Australia for humans and canids and different degrees of intimacy or domestication between humans and canids. Just as domestic dogs are often accorded near‐human status, dingoes have special relationships with human families, but reproductively and behaviorally they remain independent. In sum, traits of the dingo reflect its lupine ancestry, a certain degree of accommodation to human company, and unique adaptations to the demands of its habitat. Emphasizing that domestication is a long‐term process, not an event, helps clarify the ambiguous status of dingoes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pat Shipman
- Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|