Cellular strategies for accommodating replication-hindering adducts in DNA: control by the SOS response in Escherichia coli

Enrichment of plasmid pool from E. coli for mass sequencing to detect untargeted mutagenic events

Translesion synthesis (TLS) is an event to cope with DNA damages. During TLS, the responsible TLS polymerase frequently elicits untargeted mutagenesis as potentially a source of genetic diversity. Identifying such untargeted mutations in vivo is challenging due to the bulk of DNA that does not undergo TLS. Here, we present a protocol to enrich a plasmid pool that underwent Pol V-mediated TLS in Escherichia coli for mass sequencing. The concept of this protocol could be applied into any species.

For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Isogawa et al. (2018).

•

Design of a DNA substrate to detect TLS-associated mutagenic events in E. coli

•

Detailed steps to concentrate plasmid pools that have undergone TLS events

•

Concept of this protocol would be applicable to any species of interest

Recombinational repair in the absence of holliday junction resolvases in E. coli

Cells possess two major DNA damage tolerance pathways that allow them to duplicate their genomes despite the presence of replication blocking lesions: translesion synthesis (TLS) and daughter strand gap repair (DSGR). The TLS pathway involves specialized DNA polymerases that are able to synthesize past DNA lesions while DSGR relies on Recombinational Repair (RR). At least two mechanisms are associated with RR: Homologous Recombination (HR) and RecA Mediated Excision Repair (RAMER). While HR and RAMER both depend on RecFOR and RecA, only the HR mechanism should involve Holliday Junctions (HJs) resolvase reactions. In this study we investigated the role of HJ resolvases, RuvC, TopIII and RusA on the balance between RAMER and HR in E. coli MG1655 derivatives. Using UV survival measurements, we first clearly establish that, in this genetic background, topB and ruvC define two distinct pathways of HJ resolution. We observed that a recA mutant is much more sensitive to UV than the ruvC topB double mutant which is deficient in HR because of its failure to resolve HJs. This difference is independent of RAMER, the SOS system, RusA, and the three TLS DNA polymerases, and may be accounted for by Double Strand Break repair mechanisms such as Synthesis Dependent Strand Annealing, Single Strand Annealing, or Break Induced Replication, which are independent of HJ resolvases. We then used a plasmid-based assay, in which RR is triggered by a single blocking lesion present on a plasmid molecule, to establish that while HR requires topB, ruvC or rusA, RAMER is independent of these genes and, as expected, requires a functional UvrABC excinuclease. Surprisingly, analysis of the RR events in a strain devoid of HJ resolvases reveals that the UvrABC dependent repair of the single lesion present on the plasmid molecule can generate an excision track potentially extending to dozens of nucleotides.

Pol V-Mediated Translesion Synthesis Elicits Localized Untargeted Mutagenesis during Post-replicative Gap Repair

In vivo, replication forks proceed beyond replication-blocking lesions by way of downstream repriming, generating daughter strand gaps that are subsequently processed by post-replicative repair pathways such as homologous recombination and translesion synthesis (TLS). The way these gaps are filled during TLS is presently unknown. The structure of gap repair synthesis was assessed by sequencing large collections of single DNA molecules that underwent specific TLS events in vivo. The higher error frequency of specialized relative to replicative polymerases allowed us to visualize gap-filling events at high resolution. Unexpectedly, the data reveal that a specialized polymerase, Pol V, synthesizes stretches of DNA both upstream and downstream of a site-specific DNA lesion. Pol V-mediated untargeted mutations are thus spread over several hundred nucleotides, strongly eliciting genetic instability on either side of a given lesion. Consequently, post-replicative gap repair may be a source of untargeted mutations critical for gene diversification in adaptation and evolution.

The interplay at the replisome mitigates the impact of oxidative damage on the genetic integrity of hyperthermophilic Archaea

8-oxodeoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), a major oxidised base modification, has been investigated to study its impact on DNA replication in hyperthermophilic Archaea. Here we show that 8-oxodG is formed in the genome of growing cells, with elevated levels following exposure to oxidative stress. Functional characterisation of cell-free extracts and the DNA polymerisation enzymes, PolB, PolD, and the p41/p46 complex, alone or in the presence of accessory factors (PCNA and RPA) indicates that translesion synthesis occurs under replicative conditions. One of the major polymerisation effects was stalling, but each of the individual proteins could insert and extend past 8-oxodG with differing efficiencies. The introduction of RPA and PCNA influenced PolB and PolD in similar ways, yet provided a cumulative enhancement to the polymerisation performance of p41/p46. Overall, 8-oxodG translesion synthesis was seen to be potentially mutagenic leading to errors that are reminiscent of dA:8-oxodG base pairing.

Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in prokaryotes

The presence of unrepaired lesions in DNA represents a challenge for replication. Most, but not all, DNA lesions block the replicative DNA polymerases. The conceptually simplest procedure to bypass lesions during DNA replication is translesion synthesis (TLS), whereby the replicative polymerase is transiently replaced by a specialized DNA polymerase that synthesizes a short patch of DNA across the site of damage. This process is inherently error prone and is the main source of point mutations. The diversity of existing DNA lesions and the biochemical properties of Escherichia coli DNA polymerases will be presented. Our main goal is to deliver an integrated view of TLS pathways involving the multiple switches between replicative and specialized DNA polymerases and their interaction with key accessory factors. Finally, a brief glance at how other bacteria deal with TLS and mutagenesis is presented.

Translesion DNA synthesis across various DNA adducts produced by 3-nitrobenzanthrone in Escherichia coli

To analyze translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) across lesions derived from the air pollutant 3-nitrobenzanthrone in Escherichia coli, we constructed site-specifically modified plasmids containing single molecule adducts derived from 3-nitrobenzanthrone. For this experiment, we adopted a modified version of the method developed by Fuchs et al. [29]. Each plasmid contained one of the following lesions in its LacZ' gene: N-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-C8-N-ABA); 2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-N(2)-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-N(2)-C2-ABA); 2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-C8-C2-ABA); 2-(2'-deoxyadenosin-N(6)-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dA-N(6)-C2-ABA); N-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-3-acetylaminobenzanthrone (dG-C8-N-AcABA); or 2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-3-acetylaminobenzanthrone (dG-C8-C2-AcABA). All of the adducts inhibited DNA synthesis by replicative DNA polymerases in E. coli; however, the extent of the inhibition varied among the adducts. All five dG-adducts strongly blocked replication by replicative DNA polymerases; however, the dA-adduct only weakly blocked DNA replication. The induction of the SOS response increased the frequency of TLS, which was higher for the dG-C8-C2-ABA, dG-C8-N-AcABA and dG-C8-C2-AcABA adducts than for the other adducts. In our previous study, dG-C8-N-ABA blocked DNA replication more strongly and induced mutations more frequently than dG-N(2)-C2-ABA in human cells. In contrast, in E. coli the frequency of TLS over dG-N(2)-C2-ABA was markedly reduced, even under the SOS(+) conditions, and dG-N(2)-C2-ABA induced G to T mutations. All of the other adducts were bypassed in a less mutagenic manner. In addition, using E. coli strains that lacked particular DNA polymerases we found that DNA polymerase V was responsible for TLS over dG-C8-N-AcABA and dG-C8-C2-AcABA adducts.

Adduct formation and repair, and translesion DNA synthesis across the adducts in human cells exposed to 3-nitrobenzanthrone

3-Nitrobenzanthrone (3-nitro-7H-benz[d,e]anthracen-7-one, 3-NBA) is a potent environmental mutagen that is found in diesel exhaust fumes and airborne particulates. It is known to produce several DNA adducts, including three major adducts N-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-C8-N-ABA), 2-(2'-deoxyadenosin-N(6)-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dA-N(6)-C2-ABA), and 2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-N(2)-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-N(2)-C2-ABA) in mammalian cells. In the present study, we measured the quantity of the formation and subsequent reduction of these adducts in human hepatoma HepG2 cells that had been treated with 3-NBA using LC-MS/MS analysis. As a result, dG-C8-N-ABA and dG-N(2)-C2-ABA were identified as major adducts in the HepG2 cells, and dA-N(6)-C2-ABA was found to be a minor adduct. Treatment with 1μg/mL 3-NBA for 24h induced the formation of 2835±1509 dG-C8-N-ABA and 3373±1173 dG-N(2)-C2-ABA per 10(7) dG and 877±330 dA-N(6)-C2-ABA per 10(7) dA in the cells. The cellular DNA repair system removed the dG-C8-N-ABA and dA-N(6)-C2-ABA adducts more efficiently than the dG-N(2)-C2-ABA adducts. After a 24-h repair period, 86.4±11.1% of the dG-N(2)-C2-ABA adducts remained, whereas only 51.7±2.7% of the dG-C8-N-ABA adducts and 37.8±1.7% of the dA-N(6)-C2-ABA adducts were present in the cells. We also evaluated the efficiency of bypasses across these three adducts and their mutagenic potency by introducing site-specific mono-modified plasmids into human cells. This translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) assay showed that dG-C8-N-ABA blocked DNA replication markedly (its replication frequency was 16.9±2.7%), while the replication arrests induced by dG-N(2)-C2-ABA and dA-N(6)-C2-ABA were more moderate (their replication frequencies were 33.3±6.2% and 43.1±7.5%, respectively). Mutagenic TLS was observed more frequently in replication across dG-C8-N-ABA (30.6%) than in replication across dG-N(2)-C2-ABA (12.1%) or dA-N(6)-C2-ABA (12.1%). These findings provide important insights into the molecular mechanism of 3-NBA-mutagenesis.

Monitoring bypass of single replication-blocking lesions by damage avoidance in the Escherichia coli chromosome

Although most deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) lesions are accurately repaired before replication, replication across unrepaired lesions is the main source of point mutations. The lesion tolerance processes, which allow damaged DNA to be replicated, entail two branches, error-prone translesion synthesis (TLS) and error-free damage avoidance (DA). While TLS pathways are reasonably well established, DA pathways are poorly understood. The fate of a replication-blocking lesion is generally explored by means of plasmid-based assays. Although such assays represent efficient tools to analyse TLS, we show here that plasmid-borne lesions are inappropriate models to study DA pathways due to extensive replication fork uncoupling. This observation prompted us to develop a method to graft, site-specifically, a single lesion in the genome of a living cell. With this novel assay, we show that in Escherichia coli DA events massively outweigh TLS events and that in contrast to plasmid, chromosome-borne lesions partially require RecA for tolerance.

Mechanism of error-free and semitargeted mutagenic bypass of an aromatic amine lesion by Y-family polymerase Dpo4

The aromatic amine carcinogen 2-aminofluorene (AF) forms covalent adducts with DNA, predominantly with guanine at the C8 position. Such lesions are bypassed by Y-family polymerases such as Dpo4 via error-free and error-prone mechanisms. We show that Dpo4 catalyzes elongation from a correct 3′-terminal C opposite [AF]G in a nonrepetitive template sequence with low efficiency. This extension leads to cognate full-length product, as well as mis-elongated products containing base mutations and deletions. Crystal structures of the Dpo4 ternary complex with the 3′-terminal primer C base opposite [AF]G in the anti conformation and with the AF-moiety positioned in the major groove, revealed both accurate and misalignment-mediated mutagenic extension pathways. The mutagenic template/primer-dNTP arrangement is promoted by interactions between the polymerase and the bulky lesion, rather than by a base pairstabilized misaligment. Further extension leads to semi-targeted mutations via this proposed polymerase-guided mechanism.

Biological properties of single chemical-DNA adducts: a twenty year perspective

The genome and its nucleotide precursor pool are under sustained attack by radiation, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, chemical carcinogens, hydrolytic reactions, and certain drugs. As a result, a large and heterogeneous population of damaged nucleotides forms in all cells. Some of the lesions are repaired, but for those that remain, there can be serious biological consequences. For example, lesions that form in DNA can lead to altered gene expression, mutation, and death. This perspective examines systems developed over the past 20 years to study the biological properties of single DNA lesions.

Positive adaptive state: microarray evaluation of gene expression in Salmonella enterica Typhimurium exposed to nalidixic acid

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance among foodborne bacteria associated with food animal production is an important global issue. We hypothesised that antibiotics generate a positive adaptive state in Salmonella that actively contributes to the development of antimicrobial resistance. This is opposed to common views that antimicrobials only act as a passive selective pressure. Microarray analysis was used to evaluate changes in gene expression that occur upon exposure of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium ATCC 14028 to 1.6 microg/mL of nalidixic acid. The results showed a significant (P < 0.02) difference (fold expression differences >2.0) in the expression of 226 genes. Comparatively repressed transcripts included Salmonella pathogenicity islands 1 and 2 (SPI1 and SPI2). Induced genes included efflux pumps representing all five families of multidrug-resistance efflux pumps, outer membrane lipoproteins, and genes involved in regulating lipopolysaccharide chain length. This profile suggests both enhanced antimicrobial export from the cell and membrane permeability adaptations to limit diffusion of nalidixic acid into the cell. Finally, increased expression of the error-prone DNA repair mechanisms were also observed. From these data we show a highly integrated genetic response to nalidixic acid that places Salmonella into a positive adaptive state that elicits mutations. Evaluation of gene expression profile changes that occur during exposure to antibiotics will continue to improve our understanding of the development of antibiotic resistance.

Translesion synthesis past the C8- and N2-deoxyguanosine adducts of the dietary mutagen 2-Amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline in the NarI recognition sequence by prokaryotic DNA polymerases

2-Amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) is found in cooked meats and forms DNA adducts at the C8- and N2-positions of dGuo after appropriate activation. IQ is a potent inducer of frameshift mutations in bacteria and is carcinogenic in laboratory animals. We have incorporated both IQ-adducts into the G1- and G3-positions of the NarI recognition sequence (5'-G1G2CG3CC-3'), which is a hotspot for arylamine modification. The in vitro replication of the oligonucleotides was examined with Escherichia coli pol I Klenow fragment exo-, E. coli pol II exo-, and Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV (Dpo4), and the extension products were sequenced by tandem mass spectrometry. Replication of the C8-adduct at the G3-position resulted in two-base deletions with all three polymerases, whereas error-free bypass and extension was observed at the G1-position. The N2-adduct was bypassed and extended by all three polymerases when positioned at the G1-position, and the error-free product was observed. The N2-adduct at the G3-position was more blocking and was bypassed and extended only by Dpo4 to produce an error-free product. These results indicate that the replication of the IQ-adducts of dGuo is strongly influenced by the local sequence and the regioisomer of the adduct. These results also suggest a possible role for pol II and IV in the error-prone bypass of the C8-IQ-adduct leading to frameshift mutations in reiterated sequences, whereas noniterated sequences result in error-free bypass.

Pol III proofreading activity prevents lesion bypass as evidenced by its molecular signature within E.coli cells

Replication of genomes that contain blocking DNA lesions entails the transient replacement of the replicative DNA polymerase (Pol) by a polymerase specialized in lesion bypass. Here, we isolate and visualize at nucleotide resolution level, replication intermediates formed during lesion bypass of a single N-2-acetylaminofluorene-guanine adduct (G-AAF) in vivo. In a wild-type strain, a ladder of replication intermediates mapping from one to four nucleotides upstream of the lesion site, can be observed. In proofreading-deficient strains (mutD5 or dnaQ49), these replication intermediates disappear, thus assigning the degradation ladder to the polymerase-associated exonuclease activity. Moreover, in mutD5, a new band corresponding to the insertion of a nucleotide opposite to the lesion site is observed, suggesting that the polymerase and exonuclease activities of native Pol III enter a futile insertion-excision cycle that prevents translesion synthesis. The bypass of the G-AAF adduct located within the NarI sequence context requires the induction of the SOS response and involves either Pol V or Pol II in an error-free or a frameshift pathway, respectively. In the frameshift mutation pathway, inactivation of the proofreading activity obviates the need for SOS induction but nonetheless necessitates a functional polB gene, suggesting that, although proofreading-deficient Pol III incorporates a nucleotide opposite G-AAF, further extension still requires Pol II. These data are corroborated using a colony-based bypass assay.

Observing Translesion Synthesis of an Aromatic Amine DNA Adduct by a High-fidelity DNA Polymerase

Aromatic amines have been studied for more than a half-century as model carcinogens representing a class of chemicals that form bulky adducts to the C8 position of guanine in DNA. Among these guanine adducts, the N-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-aminofluorene (G-AF) and N-2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-acetylaminofluorene (G-AAF) derivatives are the best studied. Although G-AF and G-AAF differ by only an acetyl group, they exert different effects on DNA replication by replicative and high-fidelity DNA polymerases. Translesion synthesis of G-AF is achieved with high-fidelity polymerases, whereas replication of G-AAF requires specialized bypass polymerases. Here we have presented structures of G-AF as it undergoes one round of accurate replication by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase. Nucleotide incorporation opposite G-AF is achieved in solution and in the crystal, revealing how the polymerase accommodates and replicates past G-AF, but not G-AAF. Like an unmodified guanine, G-AF adopts a conformation that allows it to form Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds with an opposing cytosine that results in protrusion of the bulky fluorene moiety into the major groove. Although incorporation opposite G-AF is observed, the C:G-AF base pair induces distortions to the polymerase active site that slow translesion synthesis.

Altered translesion synthesis in E. coli Pol V mutants selected for increased recombination inhibition

Replication of damaged DNA, also termed as translesion synthesis (TLS), involves specialized DNA polymerases that bypass DNA lesions. In Escherichia coli, although TLS can involve one or a combination of DNA polymerases depending on the nature of the lesion, it generally requires the Pol V DNA polymerase (formed by two SOS proteins, UmuD' and UmuC) and the RecA protein. In addition to being an essential component of translesion DNA synthesis, Pol V is also an antagonist of RecA-mediated recombination. We have recently isolated umuD' and umuC mutants on the basis of their increased capacity to inhibit homologous recombination. Despite the capacity of these mutants to form a Pol V complex and to interact with the RecA polymer, most of them exhibit a defect in TLS. Here, we further characterize the TLS activity of these Pol V mutants in vivo by measuring the extent of error-free and mutagenic bypass at a single (6-4)TT lesion located in double stranded plasmid DNA. TLS is markedly decreased in most Pol V mutants that we analyzed (8/9) with the exception of one UmuC mutant (F287L) that exhibits wild-type bypass activity. Somewhat unexpectedly, Pol V mutants that are partially deficient in TLS are more severely affected in mutagenic bypass compared to error-free synthesis. The defect in bypass activity of the Pol V mutant polymerases is discussed in light of the location of the respective mutations in the 3D structure of UmuD' and the DinB/UmuC homologous protein Dpo4 of Sulfolobus solfataricus.

Properties and functions of Escherichia coli: Pol IV and Pol V

Escherichia coli possesses two members of the newly discovered class of Y DNA polymerases (Ohmori et al., 2001): Pol IV (dinB) and Pol V (umuD'C). Polymerases that belong to this family are often referred to as specialized or error-prone DNA polymerases to distinguish them from the previously discovered DNA polymerases (Pol I, II, and III) that are essentially involved in DNA replication or error-free DNA repair. Y-family DNA polymerases are characterized by their capacity to replicate DNA, through chemically damaged template bases, or to elongate mismatched primer termini. These properties stem from their capacity to accommodate and use distorted primer templates within their active site and from the lack of an associated exonuclease activity. Even though both belong to the Y-family, Pol IV and Pol V appear to perform distinct physiological functions. Although Pol V is clearly the major lesion bypass polymerase involved in damage-induced mutagenesis, the role of Pol IV remains enigmatic. Indeed, compared to a wild-type strain, a dinB mutant exhibits no clear phenotype with respect to survival or mutagenesis following treatment with DNA-damaging agents. Subtler dinB phenotypes will be discussed below. Moreover, despite the fact that both dinB and umuDC loci are controlled by the SOS response, their constitutive and induced levels of expression are dramatically different. In noninduced cells, Pol V is undetectable by Western analysis. In contrast, it is estimated that there are about 250 copies of Pol IV per cell. On SOS induction, it is believed that only about 15 molecules of Pol V are assembled per cell (S. Sommer, personal communication), whereas Pol IV levels reach approximately 2500 molecules. In fact, despite extensive knowledge of the individual enzymatic properties of all five E. coli DNA polymerases, much more work is needed to understand how their activities are orchestrated within a living cell.

Involvement of DnaE, the second replicative DNA polymerase from Bacillus subtilis, in DNA mutagenesis

In a large group of organisms including low G + C bacteria and eukaryotic cells, DNA synthesis at the replication fork strictly requires two distinct replicative DNA polymerases. These are designated pol C and DnaE in Bacillus subtilis. We recently proposed that DnaE might be preferentially involved in lagging strand synthesis, whereas pol C would mainly carry out leading strand synthesis. The biochemical analysis of DnaE reported here is consistent with its postulated function, as it is a highly potent enzyme, replicating as fast as 240 nucleotides/s, and stalling for more than 30 s when encountering annealed 5'-DNA end. DnaE is devoid of 3' --> 5'-proofreading exonuclease activity and has a low processivity (1-75 nucleotides), suggesting that it requires additional factors to fulfill its role in replication. Interestingly, we found that (i) DnaE is SOS-inducible; (ii) variation in DnaE or pol C concentration has no effect on spontaneous mutagenesis; (iii) depletion of pol C or DnaE prevents UV-induced mutagenesis; and (iv) purified DnaE has a rather relaxed active site as it can bypass lesions that generally block other replicative polymerases. These results suggest that DnaE and possibly pol C have a function in DNA repair/mutagenesis, in addition to their role in DNA replication.

How DNA lesions are turned into mutations within cells?

Genomes of all living organisms are constantly injured by endogenous and exogenous agents that modify the chemical integrity of DNA and in turn challenge its informational content. Despite the efficient action of numerous repair systems that remove lesions in DNA in an error-free manner, some lesions, that escape these repair mechanisms, are present when DNA is being replicated. Although replicative DNA polymerases are usually unable to copy past such lesions, it was recently discovered that cells are equipped with specialized DNA polymerases that will assist the replicative polymerase during the process of Translesion Synthesis (TLS). These TLS polymerases exhibit relaxed fidelity that allows them to copy past lesions in DNA with an inherent risk of generating mutations at high frequency. We present recent aspects related to the genetics and biochemistry of TLS and highlight some of the remaining hot topics of this field.

Lesion bypass in yeast cells: Pol eta participates in a multi-DNA polymerase process

Replication through (6-4)TT and G-AAF lesions was compared in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains proficient and deficient for the RAD30-encoded DNA polymerase eta (Pol eta). In the RAD30 strain, the (6-4)TT lesion is replicated both inaccurately and accurately 60 and 40% of the time, respectively. Surprisingly, in a rad30 Delta strain, the level of mutagenic bypass is essentially suppressed, while error-free bypass remains unchanged. Therefore, Pol eta is responsible for mutagenic replication through the (6-4)TT photoproduct, while another polymerase mediates its error-free bypass. Deletion of the RAD30 gene also reduces the levels of both accurate and inaccurate bypass of AAF lesions within two different sequence contexts up to 8-fold. These data show that, in contrast to the accurate bypass by Pol eta of TT cyclobutane dimers, it is responsible for the mutagenic bypass of other lesions. In conclusion, this paper shows that, in yeast, translesion synthesis involves the combined action of several polymerases.

Genetics of mutagenesis in E. coli: various combinations of translesion polymerases (Pol II, IV and V) deal with lesion/sequence context diversity

The biochemistry and genetics of translesion synthesis (TLS) and, as a consequence, of mutagenesis has recently received much attention in view of the discovery of novel DNA polymerases, most of which belong to the Y family. These distributive and low fidelity enzymes assist the progression of the high fidelity replication complex in the bypass of DNA lesions that normally hinder its progression. The present paper extends our previous observation that in Escherichia coli all three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, IV and V) are involved in TLS and mutagenesis. The genetic control of frameshift mutation pathways induced by N-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) adducts or by oxidative lesions induced by methylene blue and visible light is investigated. The data show various examples of mutation pathways with an absolute requirement for a specific combination of DNA polymerases and, in contrast, other examples where two DNA polymerases exhibit functional redundancy within the same pathway. We suggest that cells respond to the challenge of replicating DNA templates potentially containing a large diversity of DNA lesions by using a pool of accessory DNA polymerases with relaxed specificities that assist the high fidelity replicase.

The processivity factor beta controls DNA polymerase IV traffic during spontaneous mutagenesis and translesion synthesis in vivo

The dinB-encoded DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) belongs to the recently identified Y-family of DNA polymerases. Like other members of this family, Pol IV is involved in translesion synthesis and mutagenesis. Here, we show that the C-terminal five amino acids of Pol IV are essential in targeting it to the beta-clamp, the processivity factor of the replicative DNA polymerase (Pol III) of Escherichia coli. In vivo, the disruption of this interaction obliterates the function of Pol IV in both spontaneous and induced mutagenesis. These results point to the pivotal role of the processivity clamp during DNA polymerase trafficking in the vicinity of damaged-template DNA.

DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA postreplication repair (PRR) is defined as an activity to convert DNA damage-induced single-stranded gaps into large molecular weight DNA without actually removing the replication-blocking lesions. In bacteria such as Escherichia coli, this activity requires RecA and the RecA-mediated SOS response and is accomplished by recombination and mutagenic translesion DNA synthesis. Eukaryotic cells appear to share similar DNA damage tolerance pathways; however, some enzymes required for PRR in eukaryotes are rather different from those of prokaryotes. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PRR is centrally controlled by RAD6 and RAD18, whose products form a stable complex with single-stranded DNA-binding, ATPase and ubiquitin-conjugating activities. PRR can be further divided into translesion DNA synthesis and error-free modes, the exact molecular events of which are largely unknown. This error-free PRR is analogous to DNA damage-avoidance as defined in mammalian cells, which relies on recombination processes. Two possible mechanisms by which recombination participate in PRR to resolve the stalled replication folk are discussed. Recombination and PRR are also genetically regulated by a DNA helicase and are coupled to the cell-cycle. The PRR processes appear to be highly conserved within eukaryotes, from yeast to human.

Roles of DNA polymerases V and II in SOS-induced error-prone and error-free repair in Escherichia coli

DNA polymerase V, composed of a heterotrimer of the DNA damage-inducible UmuC and UmuD(2)(') proteins, working in conjunction with RecA, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein (SSB), beta sliding clamp, and gamma clamp loading complex, are responsible for most SOS lesion-targeted mutations in Escherichia coli, by catalyzing translesion synthesis (TLS). DNA polymerase II, the product of the damage-inducible polB (dinA ) gene plays a pivotal role in replication-restart, a process that bypasses DNA damage in an error-free manner. Replication-restart takes place almost immediately after the DNA is damaged (approximately 2 min post-UV irradiation), whereas TLS occurs after pol V is induced approximately 50 min later. We discuss recent data for pol V-catalyzed TLS and pol II-catalyzed replication-restart. Specific roles during TLS for pol V and each of its accessory factors have been recently determined. Although the precise molecular mechanism of pol II-dependent replication-restart remains to be elucidated, it has recently been shown to operate in conjunction with RecFOR and PriA proteins.

Mechanism of DNA polymerase II-mediated frameshift mutagenesis

Escherichia coli possesses three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, IV, and V) that were recently found to participate in translesion synthesis and mutagenesis. Involvement of these polymerases appears to depend on the nature of the lesion and its local sequence context, as illustrated by the bypass of a single N-2-acetylaminofluorene adduct within the NarI mutation hot spot. Indeed, error-free bypass requires Pol V (umuDC), whereas mutagenic (-2 frameshift) bypass depends on Pol II (polB). In this paper, we show that purified DNA Pol II is able in vitro to generate the -2 frameshift bypass product observed in vivo at the NarI sites. Although the Delta polB strain is completely defective in this mutation pathway, introduction of the polB gene on a low copy number plasmid restores the -2 frameshift pathway. In fact, modification of the relative copy number of polB versus umuDC genes results in a corresponding modification in the use of the frameshift versus error-free translesion pathways, suggesting a direct competition between Pol II and V for the bypass of the same lesion. Whether such a polymerase competition model for translesion synthesis will prove to be generally applicable remains to be confirmed.

DNA polymerase iota and related rad30-like enzymes

Until recently, the molecular mechanisms of translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), a process whereby a damaged base is used as a template for continued replication, was poorly understood. This area of scientific research has, however, been revolutionized by the finding that proteins long implicated in TLS are, in fact, DNA polymerases. Members of this so-called UmuC/DinB/Rev1/Rad30 superfamily of polymerases have been identified in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and archaea. Biochemical studies with the highly purified polymerases reveal that some, but not all, can traverse blocking lesions in template DNA. All of them share a common feature, however, in that they exhibit low fidelity when replicating undamaged DNA. Of particular interest to us is the Rad30 subfamily of polymerases found exclusively in eukaryotes. Humans possess two Rad30 paralogs, Rad30A and Rad30B. The RAD30A gene encodes DNA polymerase eta and defects in the protein lead to the xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) phenotype in humans. Very recently RAD30B has also been shown to encode a novel DNA polymerase, designated as Pol iota. Based upon in vitro studies, it appears that Pol iota has the lowest fidelity of any eukaryotic polymerase studied to date and we speculate as to the possible cellular functions of such a remarkably error-prone DNA polymerase.

All three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV and Pol V) are involved in induced mutagenesis

Most organisms contain several members of a recently discovered class of DNA polymerases (umuC/dinB superfamily) potentially involved in replication of damaged DNA. In Escherichia coli, only Pol V (umuDC) was known to be essential for base substitution mutagenesis induced by UV light or abasic sites. Here we show that, depending upon the nature of the DNA damage and its sequence context, the two additional SOS-inducible DNA polymerases, Pol II (polB) and Pol IV (dinB), are also involved in error-free and mutagenic translesion synthesis (TLS). For example, bypass of N:-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) guanine adducts located within the NAR:I mutation hot spot requires Pol II for -2 frameshifts but Pol V for error-free TLS. On the other hand, error-free and -1 frameshift TLS at a benzo(a)pyrene adduct requires both Pol IV and Pol V. Therefore, in response to the vast diversity of existing DNA damage, the cell uses a pool of 'translesional' DNA polymerases in order to bypass the various DNA lesions.

Discrimination between translesion synthesis and template switching during bypass replication of thymine dimers in duplex DNA

The goal of this study was to determine whether bypass replication occurs by translesion synthesis or template switching (copy choice) when a duplex molecule carrying a single cis,syn-cyclobutane thymine dimer is replicated in vitro by human cell extracts. Circular heteroduplex DNA molecules were constructed to contain the SV40 origin of replication and a mismatch opposite to or nearby the dimer. Control molecules with only the mismatch were also prepared. Heteroduplexes were methylated at CpG islands and replicated in vitro (30 min). Following bisulfite treatment, the nascent DNA complementary to the dimer-containing template was distinguished from the other three strands by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Cloning and sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products revealed that 80-98% carried the sequence predicted for translesion synthesis, with two adenines incorporated opposite the dimer. The fraction of clones with sequence predictive of template switching was reduced when extracts deficient in mismatch repair or nucleotide excision repair activities were used to replicate the heteroduplex molecules. These results support the conclusion that lesion bypass during in vitro replication of duplex DNA containing thymine dimers occurs by translesion synthesis.

Subunit-specific degradation of the UmuD/D' heterodimer by the ClpXP protease: the role of trans recognition in UmuD' stability

The Escherichia coli UmuD' protein is a subunit of the recently described error-prone DNA polymerase, pol V. UmuD' is initially synthesized as an unstable and mutagenically inactive pro-protein, UmuD. Upon processing, UmuD' assumes a relatively stable conformation and becomes mutagenically active. While UmuD and UmuD' by themselves exist in vivo as homodimers, when together they preferentially interact to form heterodimers. Quite strikingly, it is in this context that UmuD' becomes susceptible to ClpXP-mediated proteolysis. Here we report a novel targeting mechanism designed for degrading the mutagenically active UmuD' subunit of the UmuD/D' heterodimer complex, while leaving the UmuD protein intact. Surprisingly, a signal that is essential and sufficient for targeting UmuD' for degradation was found to reside on UmuD not UmuD'. UmuD was also shown to be capable of channeling an excess of UmuD' to ClpXP for degradation, thereby providing a mechanism whereby cells can limit error-prone DNA replication.

Factors that influence the mutagenic patterns of DNA adducts from chemical carcinogens

Carcinogens are generally mutagens, which is understandable given that tumor cells grow uncontrollably because they have mutations in critical genes involved in growth control. Carcinogens often induce a complex pattern of mutations (e.g., GC-->TA, GC-->AT, etc.). These mutations are thought to be initiated when a DNA polymerase encounters a carcinogen-DNA adduct during replication. In principle, mutational complexity could be due to either a collection of different adducts each inducing a single kind of mutation (Hypothesis 1a), or a single adduct inducing different kinds of mutations (Hypothesis 1b). Examples of each are discussed. Regarding Hypothesis 1b, structural factors (e.g., DNA sequence context) and biological factors (e.g., differing DNA polymerases) that can affect the pattern of adduct mutagenesis are discussed. This raises the question: how do structural and biological factors influence the pattern of adduct mutagenesis. For structural factors, three possibilities are considered: (Hypothesis 2a) a single conformation of an adduct giving rise to multiple mutations -- dNTP insertion by DNA polymerase being influenced by (e.g.) the surrounding DNA sequence context; (Hypothesis 2b) a variation on this ("dislocation mutagenesis"); or (Hypothesis 2c) a single adduct adopting multiple conformations, each capable of giving a different pattern of mutations. Hypotheses 2a, 2b and 2c can each in principle rationalize many mutational results, including how the pattern of adduct mutagenesis might be influenced by factors, such as DNA sequence context. Five lines of evidence are discussed suggesting that Hypothesis 2c can be correct for base substitution mutagenesis. For example, previous work from our laboratory was interpreted to indicate that [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG in a 5'-CGG sequence context (G115) could be trapped in a conformation giving predominantly G-->T mutations, but heating caused the adduct to equilibrate to its thermodynamic mixture of conformations, leading to a decrease in the fraction of G-->T mutations. New work is described suggesting that [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG at G115 can also be trapped predominantly in the G-->A mutational conformation, from which equilibration can also occur, leading to an increase in the fraction of G-->T mutations. Evidence is also presented that the fraction of G-->T mutations is higher when [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG at G115 is in ss-DNA ( approximately 89%) vs. ds-DNA ( approximately 66%), a finding that can be rationalized if the mixture of adduct conformations is different in ss- and ds-DNA. In summary, the factors affecting adduct mutagenesis are reviewed and five lines of evidence that support one hypothesis (2c: adduct conformational complexity can cause adduct mutational complexity) are discussed.

The processing of a Benzo(a)pyrene adduct into a frameshift or a base substitution mutation requires a different set of genes in Escherichia coli

Replication through a single DNA lesion may give rise to a panel of translesion synthesis (TLS) events, which comprise error-free TLS, base substitutions and frameshift mutations. In order to determine the genetic control of the various TLS events induced by a single lesion, we have chosen the major N2-dG adduct of (+)-anti-Benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide [(+)-anti-BPDE] adduct located within a short run of guanines as a model lesion. Within this sequence context, in addition to the major event, i.e. error-free TLS, the adduct also induces base substitutions (mostly G --> T transversions) and -1 frameshift mutations. The pathway leading to G --> T base substitution mutagenesis appears to be SOS independent, suggesting that TLS is most probably performed by the replicative Pol III holoenzyme itself. In contrast, both error-free and frameshift TLS pathways are dependent upon SOS-encoded functions that belong to the pool of inducible DNA polymerases specialized in TLS (translesional DNA polymerases), namely umuDC (Pol V) and dinB (Pol IV). It is likely that, given the diversity of conformations that can be adopted by lesion-containing replication intermediates, cells use one or several translesional DNA polymerases to achieve TLS.

polι, a remarkably error-prone human DNA polymerase

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 gene encodes DNA polymerase η. Humans possess two Rad30 homologs. One (RAD30A/POLH) has previously been characterized and shown to be defective in humans with the Xeroderma pigmentosum variant phenotype. Here, we report experiments demonstrating that the second human homolog (RAD30B), also encodes a novel DNA polymerase that we designate polι. polι, is a distributive enzyme that is highly error-prone when replicating undamaged DNA. At template G or C, the average error frequency was ∼1 × 10−2. Our studies revealed, however, a striking asymmetry in misincorporation frequency at template A and T. For example, template A was replicated with the greatest accuracy, with misincorporation of G, A, or C occurring with a frequency of ∼1 × 10−4 to 2 × 10−4. In dramatic contrast, most errors occurred at template T, where the misincorporation of G was, in fact, favored ∼3:1 over the correct nucleotide, A, and misincorporation of T occurred at a frequency of ∼6.7 × 10−1. These findings demonstrate that polι is one of the most error-prone eukaryotic polymerases reported to date and exhibits an unusual misincorporation spectrum in vitro.

poliota, a remarkably error-prone human DNA polymerase

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 gene encodes DNA polymerase eta. Humans possess two Rad30 homologs. One (RAD30A/POLH) has previously been characterized and shown to be defective in humans with the Xeroderma pigmentosum variant phenotype. Here, we report experiments demonstrating that the second human homolog (RAD30B), also encodes a novel DNA polymerase that we designate poliota. poliota, is a distributive enzyme that is highly error-prone when replicating undamaged DNA. At template G or C, the average error frequency was approximately 1 x 10(-2). Our studies revealed, however, a striking asymmetry in misincorporation frequency at template A and T. For example, template A was replicated with the greatest accuracy, with misincorporation of G, A, or C occurring with a frequency of approximately 1 x 10(-4) to 2 x 10(-4). In dramatic contrast, most errors occurred at template T, where the misincorporation of G was, in fact, favored approximately 3:1 over the correct nucleotide, A, and misincorporation of T occurred at a frequency of approximately 6.7 x 10(-1). These findings demonstrate that poliota is one of the most error-prone eukaryotic polymerases reported to date and exhibits an unusual misincorporation spectrum in vitro.

The early detection of frameshift mutations induced by a food-borne carcinogen in rats: a new tool for molecular epidemiology

The accumulation of genetic changes is considered as the main factor that determines the development of cancer. Recent progresses in genetics and molecular biology led to the discovery of many new molecular markers and to the development of techniques able to monitor these markers. As a consequence, molecular epidemiology has emerged as a powerful approach to study the ternary relationship between the environment, the behaviour and the genetic predisposition of each individual. Susceptibility to cancer is determined at different levels such as the genetic polymorphism of enzymes involved in the activation and detoxification of carcinogens, the polymorphism of genes that maintains the genome stability, like those involved in DNA repair or recombination processes, and finally the polymorphism in oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes. Consequently, the full assessment of each individual's genetic predisposition is a long and difficult task. As the accumulation of mutations in somatic cells integrates all these parameters, its measurement would facilitate the evaluation of the individual predisposition status, provided that a marker common to a large spectrum of carcinogens could be found. Our current studies on the molecular mechanisms of carcinogen-induced mutagenesis has revealed that G-rich repetitive sequences are mutational hot spots for several major classes of environmental genotoxins such as aromatic and heterocyclic amines, polycyclic hydrocarbons and oxidative agents. We thus consider the possibility that these sequences form a new class of biomarkers for carcinogen exposure. In order to validate this hypothesis, we designed a sensitive PCR-based assay able to detect specific mutations induced by a common food-borne carcinogen in the colon epithelium of rats exposed for a short period to this carcinogen. This assay is sensitive enough to allow early detection of induced mutations and therefore allows to differentiate between unexposed animal and those exposed for a period as short as 1 week.

Lesions in DNA: hurdles for polymerases

Translesion synthesis (TLS) is one of the DNA damage tolerance strategies, which have evolved to enable organisms to replicate their genome despite the presence of unrepaired damage. The process of TLS has the propensity to produce mutations, a potential origin of cancer, and is therefore of medical interest. Significant progress in our understanding of TLS has come primarily from studies of the bacterium Escherichia coli, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and, more recently, human cells. Results from these analyses indicate that the fundamental mechanism of TLS and the proteins involved have been conserved throughout evolution from bacteria to humans.

SOS mutagenesis results from up-regulation of translesion synthesis

Irradiation of DNA with ultraviolet light generates a variety of photolesions. Among them, are cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and (6-4) photoproducts blocking lesions that interfere with DNA replication if left unrepaired. In addition to efficient pre-replicative excision repair mechanisms, cells have evolved damage tolerance pathways enabling them to replicate lesion-containing DNA molecules either by directly replicating through the damaged base (translesion synthesis, TLS) or by employing the locally undamaged complementary strand thus avoiding the lesion (damage avoidance pathways, DA). Using double-stranded vectors with a single T(6-4)T UV lesion and a strand segregation analysis (SSA), we have measured the relative utilization of the two tolerance pathways (TLS and DA) in Escherichia coli. During the SOS response the error-prone TLS pathway is strongly stimulated ( approximately 20-fold) at the expense of the error-free DA pathways. Thus, up-regulation of TLS may turn out to be a general property of the SOS response; a similar conclusion was previously reached with the frameshift-inducing N-2-acetylaminofluorene adduct. Therefore, as far as its contribution to damaged DNA replication is concerned, the SOS response appears to be an induced mutator state rather than a survival strategy. Depending on the base inserted opposite the lesion, TLS can be error-free or mutagenic. In a wild-type strain, both forms of TLS are increased to a similar extent during the SOS response. In contrast, in a DeltaumuDC strain induction of TLS is totally abolished, demonstrating that the UmuDC proteins usually thought to be specifically involved in mutagenesis facilitate the recovery of both error-free and mutagenic replication intermediates in vivo.

Recombinational DNA repair in bacteria and the RecA protein

In bacteria, the major function of homologous genetic recombination is recombinational DNA repair. This is not a process reserved only for rare double-strand breaks caused by ionizing radiation, nor is it limited to situations in which the SOS response has been induced. Recombinational DNA repair in bacteria is closely tied to the cellular replication systems, and it functions to repair damage at stalled replication forks, Studies with a variety of rec mutants, carried out under normal aerobic growth conditions, consistently suggest that at least 10-30% of all replication forks originating at the bacterial origin of replication are halted by DNA damage and must undergo recombinational DNA repair. The actual frequency may be much higher. Recombinational DNA repair is both the most complex and the least understood of bacterial DNA repair processes. When replication forks encounter a DNA lesion or strand break, repair is mediated by an adaptable set of pathways encompassing most of the enzymes involved in DNA metabolism. There are five separate enzymatic processes involved in these repair events: (1) The replication fork assembled at OriC stalls and/or collapses when encountering DNA damage. (2) Recombination enzymes provide a complementary strand for a lesion isolated in a single-strand gap, or reconstruct a branched DNA at the site of a double-strand break. (3) The phi X174-type primosome (or repair primosome) functions in the origin-independent reassembly of the replication fork. (4) The XerCD site-specific recombination system resolves the dimeric chromosomes that are the inevitable by-product of frequent recombination associated with recombinational DNA repair. (5) DNA excision repair and other repair systems eliminate lesions left behind in double-stranded DNA. The RecA protein plays a central role in the recombination phase of the process. Among its many activities, RecA protein is a motor protein, coupling the hydrolysis of ATP to the movement of DNA branches.

Distinct roles for Rev1p and Rev7p during translesion synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Translesion synthesis (TLS) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires at least Rev1p and polymerase zeta (Pol zeta), a complex of the Rev3 polymerase and its accessory factor Rev7p. Although their precise role(s) are poorly characterized, in vitro studies suggest that each protein contributes to TLS in a manner dependent on the particular lesion and surrounding DNA sequence. In the present study, strand segregation analysis is used to attempt to identify the role(s) of the Rev1 and Rev7 proteins during TLS. This assay uses double-stranded plasmids containing a genetic marker opposite to a replication blocking lesion (N-2-acetylaminofluorene; AAF) to measure TLS quantitatively and qualitatively in vivo. The AAF adduct is localized within a repetitive sequence in a manner that allows the formation of misaligned primer-template replication intermediates. Elongation from a misaligned intermediate fixes a frameshift mutation (slipped TLS), while extension of the correctly aligned lesion terminus yields error-free (non-slipped) TLS. The results indicate that there is a strong requirement for Rev7p during Pol zeta-mediated TLS measured in vivo. Furthermore, Rev1p is needed only for non-slipped TLS; slipped TLS remains efficient in its absence, revealing a previously uncharacterized Rev1p activity similar to Escherichia coli UmuDC function. Specifically, this activity is required for elongation from a correctly aligned lesion terminus.

Novel human and mouse homologs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 gene encodes a novel eukaryotic DNA polymerase, pol eta that is able to replicate across cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers both accurately and efficiently. Very recently, a human homolog of RAD30 was identified, mutations in which result in the sunlight-sensitive, cancer-prone, Xeroderma pigmentosum variant group phenotype. We report here the cloning and localization of a second human homolog of RAD30. Interestingly, RAD30B is localized on chromosome 18q21.1 in a region that is often implicated in the etiology of many human cancers. The mouse homolog (Rad30b) is located on chromosome 18E2. The human RAD30B and mouse Rad30b mRNA transcripts, like many repair proteins, are highly expressed in the testis. In situ hybridization analysis indicates that expression of mouse Rad30b occurs predominantly in postmeiotic round spermatids. Database searches revealed genomic and EST sequences from other eukaryotes such as Aspergillus nidulans, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Brugia malayi, Caenorhabditis elegans, Trypanosoma cruzi, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Drosophila melanogaster that also encode putative homologs of RAD30, thereby suggesting that Rad30-dependent translesion DNA synthesis is conserved within the eukaryotic kingdom.

Analysis of DNA replication forks encountering a pyrimidine dimer in the template to the leading strand

Electron microscopy (EM) was used to visualize intermediates of in vitro replication of closed circular DNA plasmids. Cell-free extracts were prepared from human cells that are proficient (IDH4, HeLa) or deficient (CTag) in bypass replication of pyrimidine dimers. The DNA substrate was either undamaged or contained a single cis, syn thymine dimer. This lesion was inserted 385 bp downstream from the center of the SV40 origin of replication and sited specifically in the template to the leading strand of the newly synthesized DNA. Products from 30 minute reactions were crosslinked with psoralen and UV, linearized with restriction enzymes and spread for EM visualization. Extended single-stranded DNA regions were detected in damaged molecules replicated by either bypass-proficient or deficient extracts. These regions could be coated with Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein. The length of duplex DNA from a unique restriction site to the single-stranded DNA region was that predicted from blockage of leading strand synthesis by the site-specific dimer. These results were confirmed by S1nuclease treatment of replication products linearized with single cutting restriction enzymes, followed by detection of the diagnostic fragments by gel electrophoresis. The absence of an extended single-stranded DNA region in replication forks that were clearly beyond the dimer was taken as evidence of bypass replication. These criteria were fulfilled in 17 % of the molecules replicated by the IDH4 extract.

Sequence-dependent modulation of frameshift mutagenesis at NarI-derived mutation hot spots

The NarI sequence is known to be the strongest mutation hot spot for induced frameshift mutagenesis. Indeed, a single N-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) adduct induces -2 frameshift mutations (5'-GGCGAAFCC--> 5'-GGCC) more than 10(7)-fold over background mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. The mechanism of induction of the frameshift mutation involves a two nucleotide primer-template misalignment event during replication of the adduct-containing sequence. The slipped mutagenic intermediate (SMI) that is thus formed is strongly stabilised by the AAF residue. In order to understand the origin of the extreme susceptibility of this sequence to frameshift mutagenesis, we analysed AAF-induced mutagenesis at sequences 5'-NaGCGAAFCNb-3' containing the core dinucleotide GCGC repeat present in the NarI sequence flanked by variable nucleotides Na and Nb. The nature of nucleotide Nb was found to strongly modulate the frequency of induced -2 frameshift mutagenesis (up to 30 to 50-fold), while little if any effect could be attributed to nucleotide Na. The induction of -2 frameshifts, regardless of nucleotides Na and Nb, was found to be SOS-inducible but umuDC-independent as previously found for the authentic NarI sequence. The NarI sequence (GGCGCC) and sequence TGCGCA (Na=T, Nb=A) were found to be equally "hot" for -2 frameshift mutation induction compared to the sequence AGCGCT where induced mutagenesis was 30 to 50-fold lower.The analysis of replication events using constructions containing a strand marker across from the adduct site allowed us to demonstrate that the large difference in -2 frameshift mutagenesis is due to an intrinsic difference in the propensity of these sequences to slip during replication. How the nature of the nucleotide flanking the adduct on its 3'-side (Nb) differentially stabilises the SMI will be discussed in the light of recent structural data and theoretical models.

RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks

Replication arrest leads to the occurrence of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSB). We studied the mechanism of DSB formation by direct measure of the amount of in vivo linear DNA in Escherichia coli cells that lack the RecBCD recombination complex and by genetic means. The RuvABC proteins, which catalyze migration and cleavage of Holliday junctions, are responsible for the occurrence of DSBs at arrested replication forks. In cells proficient for RecBC, RuvAB is uncoupled from RuvC and DSBs may be prevented. This may be explained if a Holliday junction forms upon replication fork arrest, by annealing of the two nascent strands. RecBCD may act on the double-stranded tail prior to the cleavage of the RuvAB-bound junction by RuvC to rescue the blocked replication fork without breakage.

Inactivation of DNA proofreading obviates the need for SOS induction in frameshift mutagenesis

Translesion synthesis at replication-blocking lesions requires the induction of proteins that are controlled by the SOS system in Escherichia coli. Of the proteins identified so far, UmuD', UmuC, and RecA* were shown to facilitate replication across UV-light-induced lesions, yielding both error-free and mutagenic translesion-synthesis products. Similar to UV lesions, N-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF), a chemical carcinogen that forms covalent adducts at the C8 position of guanine residues, is a strong replication-blocking lesion. Frameshift mutations are induced efficiently by AAF adducts when located within short repetitive sequences in a two-step mechanism; AAF adducts incorporate a cytosine across from the lesion and then form a primer-template misaligned intermediate that, upon elongation, yields frameshift mutations. Recently, we have shown that although elongation from the nonslipped intermediate depends on functional umuDC+ gene products, elongation from the slipped intermediate is umuDC+-independent but requires another, as yet biochemically uncharacterized, SOS function. We now show that in DNA Polymerase III-proofreading mutant strains (dnaQ49 and mutD5 strains), elongation from the slipped intermediate is highly efficient in the absence of SOS induction-in contrast to elongation from the nonslipped intermediate, which still requires UmuDC functions.

Regulation of UmuD cleavage: role of the amino-terminal tail

An essential step in SOS mutagenesis is the RecA-mediated posttranslational processing of UmuD-like proteins to the shorter, but mutagenically active, UmuD'-like proteins. Interestingly, the UmuD-like proteins undergo posttranslational processing at different rates. For example, although the Escherichia coli UmuD (UmuDEc) and the Salmonella typhimurium UmuD (UmuDSt) proteins are 73% identical, UmuDSt is processed in vivo at a significantly faster rate than the UmuDEc protein. Here, we report experiments aimed at investigating the molecular basis of these phenotypic differences. The faster rate of UmuDSt cleavage probably does not result solely from a better interaction with RecA, since we observed that, in vitro, UmuDSt undergoes RecA-independent autocatalytic processing about four-times faster than UmuDEc. By constructing chimeric UmuD proteins, we determined that the amino-terminal tail of the UmuD proteins proximal to the Cys24-Gly25 cleavage site is mainly responsible for the difference in UmuDSt and UmuDEc cleavage rates. Site-directed mutagenesis of the UmuDEc protein suggests that most of the enhanced cleavage observed with the UmuDSt protein can be attributed to the presence of a Pro23 residue, juxtaposed to the cleavage site in UmuDSt. Furthermore, this proline residue appears to result in a UmuD protein that is a much better substrate for intermolecular cleavage. These findings clearly implicate the N-terminal tail of the UmuD-like proteins as playing an important and unexpected regulatory function in the maturation of the mutagenically active UmuD'-like mutagenesis proteins.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

Biochemical basis of SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: reconstitution of in vitro lesion bypass dependent on the UmuD'2C mutagenic complex and RecA protein

Damage-induced SOS mutagenesis requiring the UmuD'C proteins occurs as part of the cells' global response to DNA damage. In vitro studies on the biochemical basis of SOS mutagenesis have been hampered by difficulties in obtaining biologically active UmuC protein, which, when overproduced, is insoluble in aqueous solution. We have circumvented this problem by purifying the UmuD'2C complex in soluble form and have used it to reconstitute an SOS lesion bypass system in vitro. Stimulated bypass of a site-directed model abasic lesion occurs in the presence of UmuD'2C, activated RecA protein (RecA*), beta-sliding clamp, gamma-clamp loading complex, single-stranded binding protein (SSB), and either DNA polymerases III or II. Synthesis in the presence of UmuD'2C is nonprocessive on damaged and undamaged DNA. No lesion bypass is observed when wild-type RecA is replaced with RecA1730, a mutant that is specifically defective for Umu-dependent mutagenesis. Perhaps the most noteworthy property of UmuD'2C resides in its ability to stimulate both nucleotide misincorporation and mismatch extension at aberrant and normal template sites. These observations provide a biochemical basis for the role of the Umu complex in SOS-targeted and SOS-untargeted mutagenesis.

Mutagenesis and more: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS response

The cellular response to DNA damage that has been most extensively studied is the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Analyses of the SOS response have led to new insights into the transcriptional and post-translational regulation of processes that increase cell survival after DNA damage as well as insights into DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis, i.e., SOS mutagenesis. SOS mutagenesis requires the recA and umuDC gene products and has as its mechanistic basis the alteration of DNA polymerase III such that it becomes capable of replicating DNA containing miscoding and noncoding lesions. Ongoing investigations of the mechanisms underlying SOS mutagenesis, as well as recent observations suggesting that the umuDC operon may have a role in the regulation of the E. coli cell cycle after DNA damage has occurred, are discussed.

A single N-2-acetylaminofluorene adduct alters the footprint of T7 (exo-) DNA polymerase bound to a model primer-template junction

Bovine pancreatic deoxyribonuclease I (DNaseI) has been used to footprint T7 (exo-) DNA polymerase bound to a model primer-template junction. The polymerase was blocked at a specific position either by the omission of dCTP from the reaction mix or by the presence of a N-(deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-2-acetylaminofluorene (dGuo-AAF) adduct. This lesion has been shown to be a severe block for several DNA polymerases, both in in vitro primer elongation experiments, and during the in vivo replication of AAF-monomodified single-stranded vectors. The footprints obtained with unmodified primer-template DNA define two protected domains separated by an inter-region that remains sensitive to DNaseI, and several hypersensitive sites located on both strands. Binding of the polymerase to AAF monomodified duplexes results in the same protection pattern as that obtained with the unmodified duplexes. However, the hypersensitive sites either disappear or are dramatically reduced. The results suggest that the AAF lesion alters the correct positioning of the duplex DNA within the polymerase cleft.