Identification of a silencing element in the human 15q11-q13 imprinting center by using transgenic Drosophila

Transgenic epigenetics: using transgenic organisms to examine epigenetic phenomena

Non-model organisms are generally more difficult and/or time consuming to work with than model organisms. In addition, epigenetic analysis of model organisms is facilitated by well-established protocols, and commercially-available reagents and kits that may not be available for, or previously tested on, non-model organisms. Given the evolutionary conservation and widespread nature of many epigenetic mechanisms, a powerful method to analyze epigenetic phenomena from non-model organisms would be to use transgenic model organisms containing an epigenetic region of interest from the non-model. Interestingly, while transgenic Drosophila and mice have provided significant insight into the molecular mechanisms and evolutionary conservation of the epigenetic processes that target epigenetic control regions in other model organisms, this method has so far been under-exploited for non-model organism epigenetic analysis. This paper details several experiments that have examined the epigenetic processes of genomic imprinting and paramutation, by transferring an epigenetic control region from one model organism to another. These cross-species experiments demonstrate that valuable insight into both the molecular mechanisms and evolutionary conservation of epigenetic processes may be obtained via transgenic experiments, which can then be used to guide further investigations and experiments in the species of interest.

Epigenetic mechanisms of genomic imprinting: common themes in the regulation of imprinted regions in mammals, plants, and insects

Genomic imprinting is a form of epigenetic inheritance whereby the regulation of a gene or chromosomal region is dependent on the sex of the transmitting parent. During gametogenesis, imprinted regions of DNA are differentially marked in accordance to the sex of the parent, resulting in parent-specific expression. While mice are the primary research model used to study genomic imprinting, imprinted regions have been described in a broad variety of organisms, including other mammals, plants, and insects. Each of these organisms employs multiple, interrelated, epigenetic mechanisms to maintain parent-specific expression. While imprinted genes and imprint control regions are often species and locus-specific, the same suites of epigenetic mechanisms are often used to achieve imprinted expression. This review examines some examples of the epigenetic mechanisms responsible for genomic imprinting in mammals, plants, and insects.

The Drosophila homolog of the mammalian imprint regulator, CTCF, maintains the maternal genomic imprint in Drosophila melanogaster

Background

CTCF is a versatile zinc finger DNA-binding protein that functions as a highly conserved epigenetic transcriptional regulator. CTCF is known to act as a chromosomal insulator, bind promoter regions, and facilitate long-range chromatin interactions. In mammals, CTCF is active in the regulatory regions of some genes that exhibit genomic imprinting, acting as insulator on only one parental allele to facilitate parent-specific expression. In Drosophila, CTCF acts as a chromatin insulator and is thought to be actively involved in the global organization of the genome.

Results

To determine whether CTCF regulates imprinting in Drosophila, we generated CTCF mutant alleles and assayed gene expression from the imprinted Dp(1;f)LJ9 mini-X chromosome in the presence of reduced CTCF expression. We observed disruption of the maternal imprint when CTCF levels were reduced, but no effect was observed on the paternal imprint. The effect was restricted to maintenance of the imprint and was specific for the Dp(1;f)LJ9 mini-X chromosome.

Conclusions

CTCF in Drosophila functions in maintaining parent-specific expression from an imprinted domain as it does in mammals. We propose that Drosophila CTCF maintains an insulator boundary on the maternal X chromosome, shielding genes from the imprint-induced silencing that occurs on the paternally inherited X chromosome.

See commentary: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/8/104

The human and mouse H19 imprinting control regions harbor an evolutionarily conserved silencer element that functions on transgenes in Drosophila

Differentially methylated regions have been characterized at a number of imprinted gene complexes with important roles in the regulation of monoallelic expression of one or more genes. The differentially methylated imprinting control region (ICR) located upstream of the murine H19 gene has been shown to control the imprinted expression of H19 and the coordinately regulated Igf2 gene by acting as a transcriptional silencer. In this study, we show that the murine ICR maintains this function when tested in an in vivo transgenic Drosophila assay in the absence of DNA methylation. Furthermore, the H19 ICR interacts distinctively with Drosophila promoters of different regulatory strengths. We also demonstrate that the comparable region upstream of the human H19 gene is a multipartite cis-regulatory element, demonstrating silencing function when tested in mammalian and Drosophila systems. These results indicate a conservation of the H19/Igf2 imprinting mechanism between humans and mice and further elucidate the functional activities of the H19 ICR. They demonstrate the value of Drosophila as an in vivo system for testing function and interaction of eukaryotic regulatory elements and that mechanisms of transcriptional cis-regulation in mammals and Drosophila are conserved.

Influence of in vitro manipulation on the stability of methylation patterns in the Snurf/Snrpn-imprinting region in mouse embryonic stem cells

Recent work on embryonic stem (ES) cells showed that stem cell-derived tissues and embryos, cloned from ES cell nuclei, often fail to maintain epigenetic states of imprinted genes. This deregulation is frequently associated with in vitro manipulations and culture conditions which might affect the cells potential to develop into normal fetuses. Usually, epigenetic instability is reported in differentially methylated regions of mostly growth-related imprinted genes. However, little is known about the epigenetic stability of genes that function late in organogenesis. Hence, we set out to investigate the epigenetic stability of neuronal genes and analyzed DNA methylation patterns in the Snurf/Snrpn imprinted cluster in several cultured mouse ES cell lines. We also determined the effects of in vitro stress factors such as consecutive passaging, trypsination, mechanical handling, single cell cloning, centrifugation, staurosporine-induced neurogenesis and the insertion of viral (foreign) DNA into the host genome. Intriguingly, none of these in vitro manipulations interfered with the stability of the methylation patterns in the analyzed neuronal genes. These data imply that, in contrast to growth-related genes like Igf2, H19, Igf2r or Grb10, the methylation imprints of the analyzed neuronal genes in the Snurf/Snrpn cluster may be particularly stable in manipulated ES cells.

Polycomb-group proteins are involved in silencing processes caused by a transgenic element from the murine imprinted H19/Igf2 region in Drosophila

A subset of autosomal genes undergo genomic imprinting which results in expression from only the paternal or maternal chromosome. While this phenomenon is restricted to mammals and angiosperms, the underlying silencing mechanisms appear to be evolutionarily conserved. A biallelically unmethylated DNaseI hypersensitive region (A6-A4) between the imprinted Igf2 and H19 genes is conserved in humans and mice and functions as a tissue-specific maintenance element for the imprinted growth factor IGF2. In order to analyse A6-A4 for potentially conserved transcriptional maintenance properties, we have generated transgenic Drosophila harbouring the element in a reporter construct. These flies depicted silencing of the reporter genes lacZ and mini -white. The silenced state of the mini -white gene showed variegation and sensitivity to temperature changes. In addition, two members of the conserved Polycomb group, Enhancer of zeste and Posterior sex combs, were needed for repression. Polycomb group proteins are essential for gene silencing during development. Our results indicate that Polycomb group proteins may also be involved in the regulation of mammalian imprinted genes.

Genome organization, function, and imprinting in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes

The chromosomal region, 15q11-q13, involved in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes (PWS and AS) represents a paradigm for understanding the relationships between genome structure, epigenetics, evolution, and function. The PWS/AS region is conserved in organization and function with the homologous mouse chromosome 7C region. However, the primate 4 Mb PWS/AS region is bounded by duplicons derived from an ancestral HERC2 gene and other sequences that may predispose to chromosome rearrangements. Within a 2 Mb imprinted domain, gene function depends on parental origin. Genetic evidence suggests that PWS arises from functional loss of several paternally expressed genes, including those that function as RNAs, and that AS results from loss of maternal UBE3A brain-specific expression. Imprinted expression is coordinately controlled in cis by an imprinting center (IC), a genetic element functional in germline and/or early postzygotic development that regulates the establishment of parental specific allelic differences in replication timing, DNA methylation, and chromatin structure.

DNA methylation in genomic imprinting, development, and disease

Changes in DNA methylation profiles are common features of development and in a number of human diseases, such as cancer and imprinting disorders like Beckwith-Wiedemann and Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes. This suggests that DNA methylation is required for proper gene regulation during development and in differentiated tissues and has clinical relevance. DNA methylation is also involved in X-chromosome inactivation and the allele-specific silencing of imprinted genes. This review describes possible mechanisms by which DNA methylation can regulate gene expression, using imprinted genes as examples. The molecular basis of methylation-mediated gene regulation is related to changes in chromatin structure and appears to be similar for both imprinted and biallelically expressed genes.

Silencing of gene expression: implications for design of retrovirus vectors

Transcriptional silencing of retroviruses poses a major obstacle to their use as gene therapy vectors. Silencing is most pronounced in stem cells which are desirable targets for therapeutic gene delivery. Many vector designs combat silencing through cis-modifications of retroviral vector sequences. These designs include mutations of known retroviral silencer elements, addition of positive regulatory elements and insulator elements to protect the transgene from negative position effects. Similar strategies are being applied to lentiviral vectors that readily infect non-dividing quiescent stem cells. Collectively these cis-modifications have significantly improved vector design but optimal expression may require additional intervention to escape completely the trans-factors that scan for foreign DNA, establish silencing in stem cells and maintain silencing in their progeny. Cytosine methylation of CpG sites was proposed to cause retroviral silencing over 20 years ago. However, several studies provide evidence that retrovirus silencing acts through methylase-independent mechanisms. We propose an alternative silencing mechanism initiated by a speculative stem cell-specific "somno-complex". Further understanding of retroviral silencing mechanisms will facilitate better gene therapy vector design and raise new strategies to block transcriptional silencing in transduced stem cells.

Maternal methylation imprints on human chromosome 15 are established during or after fertilization

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a neurogenetic disorder that results from the lack of transcripts expressed from the paternal copy of the imprinted chromosomal region 15q11-q13 (refs. 1,2). In some patients, this is associated with a deletion of the SNURF-SNRPN exon 1 region inherited from the paternal grandmother and the presence of a maternal imprint on the paternal chromosome. Assuming that imprints are reset in the germ line, we and others have suggested that this region constitutes part of the 15q imprinting center (IC) and is important for the maternal to paternal imprint switch in the male germ line. Here we report that sperm DNA from two males with an IC deletion had a normal paternal methylation pattern along 15q11-q13. Similar findings were made in a mouse model. Our results indicate that the incorrect maternal methylation imprint in IC deletion patients is established de novo after fertilization. Moreover, we found that CpG-rich regions in SNURF-SNRPN and NDN, which in somatic tissues are methylated on the maternal allele, are hypomethylated in unfertilized human oocytes. Our results indicate that the normal maternal methylation imprints in 15q11-q13 also are established during or after fertilization.

The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene

The transition to flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana is delayed in fwa mutant plants. FWA was identified by loss-of-function mutations in normally flowering revertants of the fwa mutant, and it encodes a homeodomain-containing transcription factor. The DNA sequence of wild-type and fwa mutant alleles was identical in the genomic region of FWA. Furthermore, the FWA gene is ectopically expressed in fwa mutants and silenced in mature wild-type plants. This silencing is associated with extensive methylation of two direct repeats in the 5' region of the gene. The late flowering phenotype, ectopic FWA expression, and hypomethylation of the repeats were also induced in the ddm1 hypomethylated background. Mechanisms for establishment and maintenance of the epigenetic mark on FWA are discussed.

Deletion of a silencer element disrupts H19 imprinting independently of a DNA methylation epigenetic switch

The H19 imprinted gene is silenced when paternally inherited and active only when inherited maternally. This is thought to involve a cis-acting control region upstream of H19 that is responsible for regulating a number of functions including DNA methylation, asynchronous replication of parental chromosomes and an insulator. Here we report on the function of a 1.2 kb upstream element in the mouse, which was previously shown to function as a bi-directional silencer in Drosophila. The cre-loxP-mediated targeted deletion of the 1.2 kb region had no effect on the maternal allele. However, there was loss of silencing of the paternal allele in many endodermal and other tissues. The pattern of expression was very similar to the expression pattern conferred by the enhancer elements downstream of H19. We could not detect an effect on the expression of the neighbouring imprinted Igf2 gene, suggesting that the proposed boundary element insulating this gene from the downstream enhancers was unaffected. Despite derepression of the paternal H19 allele, the deletion surprisingly did not affect the differential DNA methylation of the locus, which displayed an appropriate epigenetic switch in the parental germlines. Furthermore, the characteristic asynchronous pattern of DNA replication at H19 was also not disrupted by the deletion, suggesting that the sequences that mediate this were also intact. The silencer is therefore part of a complex cis-regulatory region upstream of the H19 gene and acts specifically to ensure the repression of the paternal allele, without a predominant effect on the epigenetic switch in the germline.

Conserved characteristics of heterochromatin-forming DNA at the 15q11-q13 imprinting center

Nuclear matrix binding assays (NMBAs) define certain DNA sequences as matrix attachment regions (MARs), which often have cis-acting epigenetic regulatory functions. We used NMBAs to analyze the functionally important 15q11-q13 imprinting center (IC). We find that the IC is composed of an unusually high density of MARs, located in close proximity to the germ line elements that are proposed to direct imprint switching in this region. Moreover, we find that the organization of MARs is the same at the homologous mouse locus, despite extensive divergence of DNA sequence. MARs of this size are not usually associated with genes but rather with heterochromatin-forming areas of the genome. In contrast, the 15q11-q13 region contains multiple transcribed genes and is unusual for being subject to genomic imprinting, causing the maternal chromosome to be more transcriptionally silent, methylated, and late replicating than the paternal chromosome. We suggest that the extensive MAR sequences at the IC are organized as heterochromatin during oogenesis, an organization disrupted during spermatogenesis. Consistent with this model, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization to halo nuclei demonstrates a strong matrix association of the maternal IC, whereas the paternal IC is more decondensed, extending into the nuclear halo. This model also provides a mechanism for spreading of the imprinting signal, because heterochromatin at the IC on the maternal chromosome may exert a suppressive position effect in cis. We propose that the germ line elements at the 15q11-q13 IC mediate their effects through the candidate heterochromatin-forming DNA identified in this study.

Chromosomal elements conferring epigenetic inheritance

Epigenetic regulation of transcription can lead to a stable differential expression of identical genetic information in the same cell or cell population. There is increasing evidence that higher order chromatin structures, involving specific multiprotein complexes, constitute one device to establish and maintain epigenetic marks. In addition, defined chromosomal elements conferring epigenetic inheritance of transcriptional expression states have recently been identified. During the period where the difference in expression of identical genes is established, these sequences appear to be used as switch elements by both negative and positive regulators. Once the epigenetic mark is "set", the elements maintain either the silenced or the activated expression state over many cell generations. Here we review recent data obtained from analyzing epigenetic gene regulation in different organisms and show that similarities in the underlying mechanisms appear to exist.

A silencer element identified in Drosophila is required for imprinting of H19 reporter transgenes in mice

The H19 gene is subject to genomic imprinting because it is methylated and repressed after paternal inheritance and is unmethylated and expressed after maternal inheritance. We recently identified a 1.1-kb control element in the upstream region of the H19 gene that functions as a cis-acting silencer element in Drosophila. Here we investigate the function of this element in mice. We demonstrate that both H19-lacZ and H19-PLAP reporter transgenes can undergo imprinting with repression and hypermethylation after paternal transmission at many integration sites. However, transgenes that were deleted for the 1.1-kb silencer element showed loss of paternal repression, but they did not show marked changes in the paternal methylation of the remaining upstream region. This study demonstrates that the 1.1-kb control element identified in Drosophila is required to silence paternally transmitted H19 minitransgenes in mice.

Genomic imprinting and position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Genomic imprinting is a phenomenon in which the expression of a gene or chromosomal region depends on the sex of the individual transmitting it. The term imprinting was first coined to describe parent-specific chromosome behavior in the dipteran insect Sciara and has since been described in many organisms, including other insects, plants, fish, and mammals. In this article we describe a mini-X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster that shows genomic imprinting of at least three closely linked genes. The imprinting of these genes is observed as mosaic silencing when the genes are transmitted by the male parent, in contrast to essentially wild-type expression when the same genes are maternally transmitted. We show that the imprint is due to the sex of the parent rather than to a conventional maternal effect, differential mitotic instability of the mini-X chromosome, or an allele-specific effect. Finally, we have examined the effects of classical modifiers of position-effect variegation on the maintenance and the establishment of the imprint. Factors that modify position-effect variegation alter the somatic expression but not the establishment of the imprint. This suggests that chromatin structure is important in maintenance of the imprint, but a separate mechanism may be responsible for its initiation.

In vivo nuclease hypersensitivity studies reveal multiple sites of parental origin-dependent differential chromatin conformation in the 150 kb SNRPN transcription unit

Human chromosome region 15q11-q13 contains a cluster of oppositely imprinted genes. Loss of the paternal or the maternal alleles by deletion of the region or by uniparental disomy 15 results in Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) or Angelman syndrome (AS), respectively. Hence, the two phenotypically distinct neurodevelopmental disorders are caused by the lack of products of imprinted genes. Subsets of PWS and AS patients exhibit 'imprinting mutations', such as small microdeletions within the 5' region of the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N ( SNRPN ) transcription unit which affect the transcriptional activity and methylation status of distant imprinted genes throughout 15q11-q13 in cis. To elucidate the mechanism of these long-range effects, we have analyzed the chromatin structure of the 150 kb SNRPN transcription unit for DNase I- and Msp I-hypersensitive sites. By using an in vivo approach on lymphoblastoid cell lines from PWS and AS individuals, we discovered that the SNRPN exon 1 is flanked by prominent hypersensitive sites on the paternal allele, but is completely inaccessible to nucleases on the maternal allele. In contrast, we identified several regions of increased nuclease hypersensitivity on the maternal allele, one of which coincides with the AS minimal microdeletion region and another lies in intron 1 immediately downstream of the paternal-specific hypersensitive sites. At several sites, parental origin-specific nuclease hypersensitivity was found to be correlated with hypermethylation on the allele contributed by the other parent. The differential parental origin-dependent chromatin conformations might govern access of regulatory protein complexes and/or RNAs which could mediate interaction of the region with other genes.

Imprinting-mutation mechanisms in Prader-Willi syndrome

Microdeletions of a region termed the "imprinting center" (IC) in chromosome 15q11-q13 have been identified in several families with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) or Angelman syndrome who show epigenetic inheritance for this region that is consistent with a mutation in the imprinting process. The IC controls resetting of parental imprints in 15q11-q13 during gametogenesis. We have identified a larger series of cases of familial PWS, including one case with a deletion of only 7.5 kb, that narrows the PWS critical region to <4. 3 kb spanning the SNRPN gene CpG island and exon 1. Identification of a strong DNase I hypersensitive site, specific for the paternal allele, and six evolutionarily conserved (human-mouse) sequences that are potential transcription-factor binding sites is consistent with this region defining the SNRPN gene promoter. These findings suggest that promoter elements at SNRPN play a key role in the initiation of imprint switching during spermatogenesis. We also identified three patients with sporadic PWS who have an imprinting mutation (IM) and no detectable mutation in the IC. An inherited 15q11-q13 mutation or a trans-factor gene mutation are unlikely; thus, the disease in these patients may arise from a developmental or stochastic failure to switch the maternal-to-paternal imprint during parental spermatogenesis. These studies allow a better understanding of a novel mechanism of human disease, since the epigenetic effect of an IM in the parental germ line determines the phenotypic effect in the patient.

Chromatin conformation of the H19 epigenetic mark

Genomic imprinting in mammals is an epigenetic process that results in differential expression of the two parental alleles. The tightly linked murine H19 and Igf2 genes are reciprocally imprinted: H19 is expressed from the maternal chromosome while Igf2 is expressed from the paternal chromosome. A single regulatory region in the 5' flank of the H19 gene has been implicated in silencing both genes. On the paternal chromosome, this region is heavily methylated at CpG residues, leading to repression of the H19 gene. The mechanism by which the same region in an unmethylated state on the maternal chromosome silences Igf2 is less well understood. We have probed the chromatin structure of the region by assessing its sensitivity to nuclease digestion. Two regions of nuclease hypersensitivity that are specific to the maternal chromosome were identified. These coincide with the region that is most heavily methylated on the paternal chromosome. As is the case with paternal methylation, hypersensitivity is present in all tissues surveyed, irrespective of H19 expression. We suggest that the chromatin structure of the maternal 5' flank of the H19 gene may represent an epigenetic mark involved in the silencing of Igf2.

Plant development: Medea's maternal instinct

The Arabidopsis MEDEA gene is required in maternal tissues to restrict cell proliferation in embryos. Molecular characterisation indicates that MEDEA encodes a Polycomb-group protein, particularly intriguing as MEDEA's maternal effects may be a consequence of genomic imprinting.

Sporadic imprinting defects in Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome: implications for imprint-switch models, genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis

The Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and the Angelman syndrome (AS) are caused by the loss of function of imprinted genes in proximal 15q. In approximately 2%-4% of patients, this loss of function is due to an imprinting defect. In some cases, the imprinting defect is the result of a parental imprint-switch failure caused by a microdeletion of the imprinting center (IC). Here we describe the molecular analysis of 13 PWS patients and 17 AS patients who have an imprinting defect but no IC deletion. Heteroduplex and partial sequence analysis did not reveal any point mutations of the known IC elements, either. Interestingly, all of these patients represent sporadic cases, and some share the paternal (PWS) or the maternal (AS) 15q11-q13 haplotype with an unaffected sib. In each of five PWS patients informative for the grandparental origin of the incorrectly imprinted chromosome region and four cases described elsewhere, the maternally imprinted paternal chromosome region was inherited from the paternal grandmother. This suggests that the grandmaternal imprint was not erased in the father's germ line. In seven informative AS patients reported here and in three previously reported patients, the paternally imprinted maternal chromosome region was inherited from either the maternal grandfather or the maternal grandmother. The latter finding is not compatible with an imprint-switch failure, but it suggests that a paternal imprint developed either in the maternal germ line or postzygotically. We conclude (1) that the incorrect imprint in non-IC-deletion cases is the result of a spontaneous prezygotic or postzygotic error, (2) that these cases have a low recurrence risk, and (3) that the paternal imprint may be the default imprint.

Imprinting in Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) are caused by deficiencies of gene expression from paternal or maternal chromosome 15q11-q13, respectively. Many advances have occurred during the past year. The gene for necdin was mapped in the PWS candidate region and found to be paternally expressed in mouse and human. The bisulfite method for analysis of methylation was established for genomic sequencing and diagnostics, and the methylation of Snrpn was studied in detail in the mouse. A region near the Snrpn promoter was shown to function as a silencer in Drosophila. Point mutations were found in the gene for E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase (UBE3A) identifying it as the AS gene, and tissue-specific imprinting (maternal expression) was shown in the human brain and in hippocampal neurons and Purkinje cells in the mouse.

Imprinting mechanisms in mammals

Imprinting is a genetic mechanism that determines expression or repression of genes according to their parental origin. Some imprinted genes occur in clusters in the genome. Recent work using transgenic mice shows that multiple cis-acting sequences are needed for correct imprinting. Mutation analysis in a normal chromosomal context reveals the importance of imprinting centres for regional establishment or maintenance of imprinting in a cluster. Elements that contribute to the function of imprinting centres and regional propagation of the imprints are CpG-rich differentially methylated regions (that during development retain germline imposed methylation or demethylation), direct repeat clusters, and unusual RNAs (antisense, non-translated etc.). The interaction of these cis elements with transacting factors such as methylase and chromatin factors establishes a hierarchical control system with local and regional effects.