DnaA-stimulated transcriptional activation of orilambda: Escherichia coli RNA polymerase beta subunit as a transcriptional activator contact site

Transcriptional Activity of the Bacterial Replication Initiator DnaA

In bacteria, DnaA is the most conserved DNA replication initiator protein. DnaA is a DNA binding protein that is part of the AAA+ ATPase family. In addition to initiating chromosome replication, DnaA can also function as a transcription factor either as an activator or repressor. The first gene identified to be regulated by DnaA at the transcriptional levels was dnaA. DnaA has been shown to regulate genes involved in a variety of cellular events including those that trigger sporulation, DNA repair, and cell cycle regulation. DnaA's dual functions (replication initiator and transcription factor) is a potential mechanism for DnaA to temporally coordinate diverse cellular events with the onset of chromosome replication. This strategy of using chromosome replication initiator proteins as regulators of gene expression has also been observed in archaea and eukaryotes. In this mini review, we focus on our current understanding of DnaA's transcriptional activity in various bacterial species.

The transcriptional regulator IscR integrates host-derived nitrosative stress and iron starvation in activation of the vvhBA operon in Vibrio vulnificus

For successful infection of their hosts, pathogenic bacteria recognize host-derived signals that induce the expression of virulence factors in a spatiotemporal manner. The fulminating food-borne pathogen Vibrio vulnificus produces a cytolysin/hemolysin protein encoded by the vvhBA operon, which is a virulence factor preferentially expressed upon exposure to murine blood and macrophages. The Fe-S cluster containing transcriptional regulator IscR activates the vvhBA operon in response to nitrosative stress and iron starvation, during which the cellular IscR protein level increases. Here, electrophoretic mobility shift and DNase I protection assays revealed that IscR directly binds downstream of the vvhBA promoter P vvhBA , which is unusual for a positive regulator. We found that in addition to IscR, the transcriptional regulator HlyU activates vvhBA transcription by directly binding upstream of P vvhBA , whereas the histone-like nucleoid-structuring protein (H-NS) represses vvhBA by extensively binding to both downstream and upstream regions of its promoter. Of note, the binding sites of IscR and HlyU overlapped with those of H-NS. We further substantiated that IscR and HlyU outcompete H-NS for binding to the P vvhBA regulatory region, resulting in the release of H-NS repression and vvhBA induction. We conclude that concurrent antirepression by IscR and HlyU at regions both downstream and upstream of P vvhBA provides V. vulnificus with the means of integrating host-derived signal(s) such as nitrosative stress and iron starvation for precise regulation of vvhBA transcription, thereby enabling successful host infection.

GlnR Dominates Rifamycin Biosynthesis by Activating the rif Cluster Genes Transcription Both Directly and Indirectly in Amycolatopsis mediterranei

Because of the remarkable efficacy in treating mycobacterial infections, rifamycin and its derivatives are still first-line antimycobacterial drugs. It has been intensely studied to increase rifamycin yield from Amycolatopsis mediterranei, and nitrate is found to provide a stable and remarkable stimulating effect on the rifamycin production, a phenomenon known as "nitrate-stimulating effect (NSE)". Although the NSE has been widely used for the industrial production of rifamycin, its detailed molecular mechanism remains ill-defined. And our previous study has established that the global nitrogen regulator GlnR may participate in the NSE, but the underlying mechanism is still enigmatic. Here, we demonstrate that GlnR directly controls rifamycin biosynthesis in A. mediterranei and thus plays an essential role in the NSE. Firstly, GlnR specifically binds to the upstream region of rifZ, which leads us to uncover that rifZ has its own promoter. As RifZ is a pathway-specific activator for the whole rif cluster, GlnR indirectly upregulates the whole rif cluster transcription by directly activating the rifZ expression. Secondly, GlnR specifically binds to the upstream region of rifK, which is also characterized to have its own promoter. It is well-known that RifK is a 3-amino-5-hydroxybenzoic acid (AHBA, the starter unit of rifamycin) synthase, thus GlnR can promote the supply of the rifamycin precursor by directly activating the rifK transcription. Notably, GlnR and RifZ independently activate the rifK transcription through binding to different sites in rifK promoter region, which suggests that the cells have a sophisticated regulatory mechanism to control the AHBA biosynthesis. Collectively, this study reveals that GlnR activates the rif cluster transcription in both direct (for rifZ and rifK) and indirect (for the whole rif cluster) manners, which well interprets the phenomenon that the NSE doesn't occur in the glnR null mutant. Furthermore, this study deepens our understanding about the molecular mechanism of the NSE.

A dual promoter system regulating λ DNA replication initiation

Transcription and DNA replication are tightly regulated to ensure coordination of gene expression with growth conditions and faithful transmission of genetic material to progeny. A large body of evidence has accumulated, indicating that encounters between protein machineries carrying out DNA and RNA synthesis occur in vivo and may have important regulatory consequences. This feature may be exacerbated in the case of compact genomes, like the one of bacteriophage λ, used in our study. Transcription that starts at the rightward pR promoter and proceeds through the λ origin of replication and downstream of it was proven to stimulate the initiation of λ DNA replication. Here, we demonstrate that the activity of a convergently oriented pO promoter decreases the efficiency of transcription starting from pR. Our results show, however, that a lack of the functional pO promoter negatively influences λ phage and λ-derived plasmid replication. We present data, suggesting that this effect is evoked by the enhanced level of the pR-driven transcription, occurring in the presence of the defective pO, which may result in the impeded formation of the replication initiation complex. Our data suggest that the cross talk between the two promoters regulates λ DNA replication and coordinates transcription and replication processes.

Helicase loading at chromosomal origins of replication

Loading of the replicative DNA helicase at origins of replication is of central importance in DNA replication. As the first of the replication fork proteins assemble at chromosomal origins of replication, the loaded helicase is required for the recruitment of the rest of the replication machinery. In this work, we review the current knowledge of helicase loading at Escherichia coli and eukaryotic origins of replication. In each case, this process requires both an origin recognition protein as well as one or more additional proteins. Comparison of these events shows intriguing similarities that suggest a similar underlying mechanism, as well as critical differences that likely reflect the distinct processes that regulate helicase loading in bacterial and eukaryotic cells.

Replicating DNA by cell factories: roles of central carbon metabolism and transcription in the control of DNA replication in microbes, and implications for understanding this process in human cells

Precise regulation of DNA replication is necessary to ensure the inheritance of genetic features by daughter cells after each cell division. Therefore, determining how the regulatory processes operate to control DNA replication is crucial to our understanding and application to biotechnological processes. Contrary to early concepts of DNA replication, it appears that this process is operated by large, stationary nucleoprotein complexes, called replication factories, rather than by single enzymes trafficking along template molecules. Recent discoveries indicated that in bacterial cells two processes, central carbon metabolism (CCM) and transcription, significantly and specifically influence the control of DNA replication of various replicons. The impact of these discoveries on our understanding of the regulation of DNA synthesis is discussed in this review. It appears that CCM may influence DNA replication by either action of specific metabolites or moonlighting activities of some enzymes involved in this metabolic pathway. The role of transcription in the control of DNA replication may arise from either topological changes in nucleic acids which accompany RNA synthesis or direct interactions between replication and transcription machineries. Due to intriguing similarities between some prokaryotic and eukaryotic regulatory systems, possible implications of studies on regulation of microbial DNA replication on understanding such a process occurring in human cells are discussed.

High-mobility-group a-like CarD binds to a DNA site optimized for affinity and position and to RNA polymerase to regulate a light-inducible promoter in Myxococcus xanthus

The CarD-CarG complex controls various cellular processes in the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus including fruiting body development and light-induced carotenogenesis. The CarD N-terminal domain, which defines the large CarD_CdnL_TRCF protein family, binds to CarG, a zinc-associated protein that does not bind DNA. The CarD C-terminal domain resembles eukaryotic high-mobility-group A (HMGA) proteins, and its DNA binding AT hooks specifically recognize the minor groove of appropriately spaced AT-rich tracts. Here, we investigate the determinants of the only known CarD binding site, the one crucial in CarD-CarG regulation of the promoter of the carQRS operon (P(QRS)), a light-inducible promoter dependent on the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factor CarQ. In vitro, mutating either of the 3-bp AT tracts of this CarD recognition site (TTTCCAGAGCTTT) impaired DNA binding, shifting the AT tracts relative to P(QRS) had no effect or marginally lowered DNA binding, and replacing the native site by the HMGA1a binding one at the human beta interferon promoter (with longer AT tracts) markedly enhanced DNA binding. In vivo, however, all of these changes deterred P(QRS) activation in wild-type M. xanthus, as well as in a strain with the CarD-CarG pair replaced by the Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans CarD-CarG (CarD(Ad)-CarG(Ad)). CarD(Ad)-CarG(Ad) is functionally equivalent to CarD-CarG despite the lower DNA binding affinity in vitro of CarD(Ad), whose C-terminal domain resembles histone H1 rather than HMGA. We show that CarD physically associates with RNA polymerase (RNAP) specifically via interactions with the RNAP β subunit. Our findings suggest that CarD regulates a light-inducible, ECF σ-dependent promoter by coupling RNAP recruitment and binding to a specific DNA site optimized for affinity and position.

Biofilm formation in Escherichia coli cra mutants is impaired due to down-regulation of curli biosynthesis

Cra is a pleiotropic regulatory protein that controls carbon and energy flux in enteric bacteria. Recent studies have shown that Cra also regulates other cell processes and influences biofilm formation. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of Cra in biofilm formation in Escherichia coli. Congo red-binding studies suggested that curli biosynthesis is impaired in cra mutants. Microarray analysis of wild-type and mutant E. coli cultivated in conditions promoting biofilm formation revealed that the curli biosynthesis genes, csgBAC and csgDEFG, are poorly expressed in the mutant, suggesting that transcription of genes required for curli production is regulated by Cra. Four putative Cra-binding sites were identified in the curli intergenic region, which were experimentally validated by performing electromobility shift assays. Site-directed mutagenesis of three Cra-binding sites in the promoter region of the csgDEFG operon suggests that Cra activates transcription of this operon upon binding to operator regions both downstream and upstream of the transcription start site. Based on the Cra-binding sites identified in this and other studies, the Cra consensus sequence is refined.

Mutations in β' subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase perturb the activator polymerase functional interaction required for promoter clearance

Transcription activator C employs a unique mechanism to activate mom gene of bacteriophage Mu. The activation process involves, facilitating the recruitment of RNA polymerase (RNAP) by altering the topology of the promoter and enhancing the promoter clearance by reducing the abortive transcription. To understand the basis of this multi-step activation mechanism, we investigated the nature of the physical interaction between C and RNAP during the process. A variety of assays revealed that only DNA-bound C contacts the β' subunit of RNAP. Consistent to these results, we have also isolated RNAP mutants having mutations in the β' subunit which were compromised in C-mediated activation. Mutant RNAPs show reduced productive transcription and increased abortive initiation specifically at the C-dependent mom promoter. Positive control (pc) mutants of C, defective in interaction with RNAP, retained the property of recruiting RNAP to the promoter but were unable to enhance promoter clearance. These results strongly suggest that the recruitment of RNAP to the mom promoter does not require physical interaction with C, whereas a contact between the β' subunit and the activator, and the subsequent allosteric changes in the active site of the enzyme are essential for the enhancement of promoter clearance.

Combinatorial regulation by MrpC2 and FruA involves three sites in the fmgE promoter region during Myxococcus xanthus development

Starvation causes cells in a dense population of Myxococcus xanthus to change their gliding movements and construct mounds. Short-range C-signaling between rod-shaped cells within mounds induces gene expression that promotes differentiation into spherical spores. Several C-signal-dependent genes have been shown to be regulated by cooperative binding of two transcription factors to the promoter region. These FruA- and MrpC2-regulated genes (designated fmg) each exhibit a different arrangement of binding sites. Here, we describe fmgE, which appears to be regulated by three sites for cooperative binding of FruA and MrpC2. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed that association of MrpC2 and/or its longer form, MrpC with the fmgE promoter region, depends on FruA, consistent with cooperative binding of the two proteins in vivo. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with purified His(10)-MrpC2 and FruA-His(6) indicated cooperative binding in vitro to three sites in the fmgE promoter region. The effects of mutations on binding in vitro and on expression of fmgE-lacZ fusions correlated site 1 (at about position -100 relative to the transcriptional start site) with negative regulation and site 2 (just upstream of the promoter) and site 3 (at about position +100) with positive regulation. Site 3 was bound by His(10)-MrpC2 alone, or the combination of His(10)-MrpC2 and FruA-His(6), with the highest affinity, followed by site 1 and then site 2, supporting a model in which site 3 recruits MrpC2 and FruA to the fmgE promoter region, site 1 competes with site 2 for transcription factor binding, and site 2 occupancy is required to activate the promoter but only occurs when C-signaling produces a high concentration of active FruA.

Replication of plasmids derived from Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages in starved Escherichia coli

The pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) depends on the expression of stx genes that are located on lambdoid prophages. Effective toxin production occurs only after prophage induction, and one may presume that replication of the phage genome is important for an increase in the dosage of stx genes, positively influencing their expression. We investigated the replication of plasmids derived from Shiga toxin (Stx)-converting bacteriophages in starved E. coli cells, as starvation conditions may be common in the intestine of infected humans. We found that, unlike plasmids derived from bacteriophage λ, the Shiga toxin phage-derived replicons did not replicate in amino acid-starved relA(+) and relA(-) cells (showing the stringent and relaxed responses to starvation, respectively). The presence of the stable fraction of the replication initiator O protein was detected in all tested replicons. However, while ppGpp, the stringent response effector, inhibited the activities of the λ P(R) promoter and its homologues from Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages, these promoters, except for λ P(R), were only weakly stimulated by the DksA protein. We suggest that this less efficient (relative to λ) positive regulation of transcription responsible for transcriptional activation of the origin contributes to the inhibition of DNA replication initiation of Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages in starved host cells, even in the absence of ppGpp (as in starved relA(-) hosts). Possible clinical implications of these results are discussed.

DnaA protein interacts with RNA polymerase and partially protects it from the effect of rifampicin

The Escherichia coli DnaA protein forms an oligomer at the origin and initiates chromosome replication with the aid of architectural elements and transcription by RNA polymerase. Rifampicin inhibits initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase and thus also initiation of replication. Here, we report that wild-type cells undergo rifampicin-resistant initiation of replication during slow growth in acetate medium. The rifampicin-resistant initiation was prevented by reducing the availability of DnaA. In vitro experiments showed that the DnaA protein interacted with RNA polymerase and that it afforded a partial protection from the negative effect of rifampicin. It is possible that rifampicin-resistant rounds of replication occur when a surplus of DnaA is available at the origin. In rich medium wild-type cells do not exhibit rifampicin-resistant rounds of replication, possibly indicating that there is no surplus DnaA, and that DnaA activity is the factor limiting the process of initiation. During growth in acetate medium, on the contrary, DnaA activity is not limiting in the same way because an initiation potential is present and can be turned into extra rounds of replication when rifampicin is added. The result suggests that regulation of replication initiation may differ at different growth rates.

IHF- and SeqA-binding sites, present in plasmid cloning vectors, may significantly influence activities of promoters

Escherichia coli Integration Host Factor (IHF) regulates transcription from some bacterial and phage promoters by affecting DNA topology. Here we demonstrate that IHF affects transcription from bacteriophage lambdapR promoter and the ptac promoter located on plasmids that contain IHF-binding sites. The IHF consensus sites are abundant and they can bind the IHF protein as shown in in vitro studies. The SeqA protein has a role in the complex regulation of pR activity, together with other factors altering DNA topology. Down-regulation of the transcription from ptac in the absence of IHF, together with IHF- and SeqA-mediated effects on pR, suggest that DNA topology cannot be underestimated when assessing in vivo promoters' activity. This may have a significant impact on experiments employing recombinant genes cloned in plasmids and on choosing appropriate plasmid vectors.

Modulation of lambda plasmid and phage DNA replication by Escherichia coli SeqA protein

SeqA protein, a main negative regulator of the replication initiation of the Escherichia coli chromosome, also has several other functions which are still poorly understood. It was demonstrated previously that in seqA mutants the copy number of another replicon, the lambda plasmid, is decreased, and that the activity of the lambda p(R) promoter (whose function is required for stimulation of ori lambda) is lower than that in the wild-type host. Here, SeqA-mediated regulation of lambda phage and plasmid replicons was investigated in more detail. No significant influence of SeqA on ori lambda-dependent DNA replication in vitro was observed, indicating that a direct regulation of lambda DNA replication by this protein is unlikely. On the other hand, density-shift experiments, in which the fate of labelled lambda DNA was monitored after phage infection of host cells, strongly suggested the early appearance of sigma replication intermediates and preferential rolling-circle replication of phage DNA in seqA mutants. The directionality of lambda plasmid replication in such mutants was, however, only slightly affected. The stability of the heritable lambda replication complex was decreased in the seqA mutant relative to the wild-type host, but a stable fraction of the lambda O protein was easily detectable, indicating that such a heritable complex can function in the mutant. To investigate the influence of seqA gene function on heritable complex- and transcription-dependent lambda DNA replication, the efficiency of lambda plasmid replication in amino acid-starved relA seqA mutants was measured. Under these conditions, seqA dysfunction resulted in impairment of lambda plasmid replication. These results indicate that unlike oriC, SeqA modulates lambda DNA replication indirectly, most probably by influencing the stability of the lambda replication complex and the transcriptional activation of ori lambda.

Mechanisms of physiological regulation of RNA synthesis in bacteria: new discoveries breaking old schemes

Although in bacterial cells all genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase, there are 2 additional enzymes capable of catalyzing RNA synthesis: poly(A) polymerase I, which adds poly(A) residues to transcripts, and primase, which produces primers for DNA replication. Mechanisms of actions of these 3 RNA-synthesizing enzymes were investigated for many years, and schemes of their regulations have been proposed and generally accepted. Nevertheless, recent discoveries indicated that apart from well-understood mechanisms, there are additional regulatory processes, beyond the established schemes, which allow bacterial cells to respond to changing environmental and physiological conditions. These newly discovered mechanisms, which are discussed in this review, include: (i) specific regulation of gene expression by RNA polyadenylation, (ii) control of DNA replication by interactions of the starvation alarmones, guanosine pentaphosphate and guanosine tetraphosphate, (p)ppGpp, with DnaG primase, (iii) a role for the DksA protein in ppGpp-mediated regulation of transcription, (iv) allosteric modulation of the RNA polymerase catalytic reaction by specific inhibitors of transcription, rifamycins, (v) stimulation of transcription initiation by proteins binding downstream of the promoter sequences, and (vi) promoter-dependent control of transcription antitermination efficiency.

Combinatorial regulation of genes essential for Myxococcus xanthus development involves a response regulator and a LysR-type regulator

Myxococcus xanthus is a bacterium that undergoes multicellular development. C-signaling influences gene expression and movement of cells into aggregates. Expression of the dev operon, which includes genes essential for efficient sporulation, depends in part on C-signaling and reaches its highest level in cells within aggregates, ensuring that spores form within fruiting bodies. Here, an upstream DNA element was found to be essential for dev promoter activity and was bound by FruA, a response regulator in the C-signaling pathway. A second positive regulatory element, located approximately 350 bp downstream of the dev transcriptional start site, was bound by LadA, a newly identified transcription factor in the LysR family. Typically, LysR-type transcription factors bind upstream of the promoter and activate transcription in response to a coinducer. LadA appears to activate transcription from an unusual location for a LysR family member and likely subjects dev transcription to a different cue than does FruA. A ladA mutant exhibited similar developmental defects as dev mutants, suggesting that LadA may be devoted to dev regulation, unlike FruA, which regulates many developmental genes. FruA and LadA act on a regulatory region spanning >400 bp to bring about proper temporal and spatial expression of the dev operon, resembling the regulation of developmental genes in multicellular eukaryotes.

Switch from theta to sigma replication of bacteriophage lambda DNA: factors involved in the process and a model for its regulation

Bacteriophage lambda genome is one of the classical model replicons in studies on the regulation of DNA replication. Moreover, since genes coding for Shiga toxins are located in genomes of lambdoid phages, understanding of mechanisms controlling lambda DNA replication may be of bio-medical importance. During lytic development of bacteriophage lambda, its genome is replicated according to the theta (circle-to-circle) mode early after infection, and then it is switched to the sigma (rolling circle) mode. Two mechanisms of regulation of this switch were proposed recently and both suggested a crucial role for directionality of lambda DNA replication. Whereas one hypothesis assumed transient impairment of ClpP/ClpX-mediated proteolysis of the lambdaO initiator protein, another suggested a crucial role for transcriptional activation of the orilambda region and factors involved in the control of the p (R) promoter activity. Here we demonstrate that mutations in clpP and clpX genes had little influence on both directionality of lambda DNA replication and appearance of sigma replication intermediates. On the other hand, regulators affecting activity of the p (R) promoter (responsible for initiation of transcription, which activates orilambda) directly or indirectly influenced directionality of lambda DNA replication to various extents. Therefore, we conclude that regulation of the efficiency of transcriptional activation of orilambda, rather than transient impairment of the lambdaO proteolysis, is responsible for the control of the switch from theta to sigma replication, and propose a model for this control.

Stimulation of the lambda pR promoter by Escherichia coli SeqA protein requires downstream GATC sequences and involves late stages of transcription initiation

Escherichia coli SeqA protein is a major negative regulator of chromosomal DNA replication acting by sequestration, and thus inactivation, of newly formed oriC regions. However, other activities of this protein have been discovered recently, one of which is regulation of transcription. SeqA has been demonstrated to be a specific transcription factor acting at bacteriophage lambda promoters p(I), p(aQ) and p(R). While SeqA-mediated stimulation of p(I) and p(aQ) occurs by facilitating functions of another transcription activator protein, cII, a mechanism for stimulation of p(R) remains largely unknown. Here, it has been demonstrated that two GATC sequences, located 82 and 105 bp downstream of the p(R) transcription start site, are necessary for this stimulation both in vivo and in vitro. SeqA-mediated activation of p(R) was as effective on a linear DNA template as on a supercoiled one, indicating that alterations in DNA topology are not likely to facilitate the SeqA effect. In vitro transcription analysis demonstrated that the most important regulatory effect of SeqA in p(R) transcription occurs after open complex formation, namely during promoter clearance. SeqA did not influence the appearance and level of abortive transcripts or the pausing during transcription elongation. Interestingly, SeqA is one of few known prokaryotic transcription factors which bind downstream of the regulated promoter and still act as transcription activators.

Transcriptional inactivation of a regulatory site for replication of Vibrio cholerae chromosome II

The bacterium Vibrio cholerae has two chromosomes. The origin of replication of chromosome I is similar to that of Escherichia coli. The origin-containing region of chromosome II (oriCII) resembles replicons of plasmids such as P1, except for the presence of an additional gene, rctA [Egan, E. S. & Waldor, M. K. (2003) Cell 114, 521-530]. The oriCII region that includes the initiator gene, rctB, can function as a plasmid in E. coli. Here we show that RctB suffices for the oriCII-based plasmid replication, and rctA in cis or trans reduces the plasmid copy number, thereby serving as a negative regulator. The inhibitory activity could be overcome by increasing the concentration of RctB, suggesting that rctA titrates the initiator. Purified RctB bound to a DNA fragment carrying rctA, confirming that the two can interact. Although rctA apparently works as a titrating site, it is nonetheless transcribed. We find that the transcription attenuates the inhibitory activity of the gene, presumably by interfering with RctB binding. RctB, in turn, repressed the rctA promoter and, thereby, could control its own titration by modulating the transcription of rctA. This control circuit appears to be a putative novel mechanism for homeostasis of initiator availability.

The bacteriophage lambda DNA replication protein P inhibits the oriC DNA- and ATP-binding functions of the DNA replication initiator protein DnaA of Escherichia coli

Under the condition of expression of lambda P protein at lethal level, the oriC DNA-binding activity is significantly affected in wild-type E. coli but not in the rpl mutant. In purified system, the lambda P protein inhibits the binding of both oriC DNA and ATP to the wild-type DnaA protein but not to the rpl DnaA protein. We conclude that the lambda P protein inhibits the binding of oriC DNA and ATP to the wild-type DnaA protein, which causes the inhibition of host DNA synthesis initiation that ultimately leads to bacterial death. A possible beneficial effect of this interaction of lambda P protein with E. coli DNA initiator protein DnaA for phage DNA replication has been proposed.

Fine Tuning and Cross-talking of TGF-β Signal by Inhibitory Smads

Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-beta family, including TGF-beta, bone morphorgenic protein (BMP), and activn, plays an important role in essential cellular functions such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, tissue remodeling, angiognesis, immune responses, and cell adhesions. TGF-beta predominantly transmits the signals through serine/threonine receptor kinases and cytoplasmic proteins called Smads. Since the discovery of TGF-beta in the early 1980s, the dysregulation of TGF-beta /Smad signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of human diseases. Among signal transducers in TGF-beta/Smad signaling, inhibitory Smads (I-Smads), Smad6 and Smad7, act as major negative regulators forming autoinhibitory feedback loops and mediate the cross-talking with other signaling pathways. Expressions of I-Smads are mainly regulated on the transcriptional levels and post-translational protein degradations and their intracellular levels are tightly controlled to maintain the homeostatic balances. However, abnormal levels of I-Smads in the pathological conditions elicit the altered TGF-beta signaling in cells, eventually causing TGF-beta-related human diseases. Thus, exploring the molecular mechanisms about the regulations of I-Smads may provide the therapeutic clues for human diseases induced by the abnormal TGF-beta signaling.

Essentiality of the early transcript in the replication origin of the lactococcal prolate phage c2

The genome of the prolate-headed lytic lactococcal bacteriophage c2 is organized into two divergently oriented blocks consisting of the early genes and the late genes. These blocks are separated by the noncoding origin of DNA replication. We examined the functional role of transcription of the origin in a plasmid model system. Deletion of the early promoter P(E)1 abolished origin function. Introduction of mutations into P(E)1 which did not eliminate promoter activity or replacement of P(E)1 with an unrelated but functional promoter did not abolish replication. The A-T-rich region upstream of P(E)1, which is conserved in prolate phages, was not required for plasmid replication. Replacement of the P(E)1 transcript template sequence with an unrelated sequence with a similar G+C content abolished replication, showing that the sequence encoding the transcript is essential for origin function. Truncated transcript and internal deletion constructs did not support replication except when the deletion was at the very 3' end of the DNA sequence coding for the transcript. The P(E)1 transcript could be detected for all replication-proficient constructs. Recloning in a plasmid vector allowed detection of P(E)1 transcripts from some fragments that did not support replication, indicating that stability of the transcript alone was not sufficient for replication. The data suggest that production of a transcript of a specific length and with a specific sequence or structure is essential for the function of the phage c2 origin in this model system.

Identification of the domains for DNA binding and transactivation function of C protein from bacteriophage Mu

The C protein, a middle gene product of bacteriophage Mu, is the determinant of the transition from middle to late gene expression. C activates transcription from four late gene promoters, P(lys), P(I), P(P), and P(mom) by binding to a site overlapping their -35 elements. Site-specific, high-affinity binding of C to its recognition sequence results in both axial and torsional distortion of DNA at P(mom), which appears to play a role in recruitment of RNA polymerase to the promoter for mom gene transactivation. To identify the regions of C protein important for its function, deletion and site-directed mutagenesis were carried out. We demonstrate here that a helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif located toward the carboxy terminal end of the protein is the DNA-binding domain and amino acid residues involved in transactivation overlap the HTH motif. Mutagenesis studies also aided in the identification of the region important for dimerization. Structure-based sequence alignment and molecular modeling in conjunction with mutational analysis suggest that the HTH motif is part of a three-helix bundle, with remarkable similarity to paired (prd), a developmental regulatory protein from Drosophila. Additional key residues identified in the model to be crucial for C protein structure and DNA binding were shown to be important by mutagenesis. These results provide a structural framework for C function and insight into the mechanism of transactivation at the mom promoter.

The mechanism of regulation of bacteriophage lambda pR promoter activity by Escherichia coli DnaA protein

Apart from its function as an initiator of DNA replication, the Escherichia coli DnaA protein is also a specific transcription factor. It activates and represses a number of promoters. However, mechanisms of transcription stimulation by DnaA remained unknown. Bacteriophage lambda pR promoter is one of the promoters activated by DnaA. It was reported previously that DnaA binds downstream of the pR promoter and perhaps interacts with the RNA polymerase beta subunit. Here we demonstrate that DnaA positively regulates transcription from pR by stimulation of two steps in transcription initiation: RNA polymerase binding to the promoter region and promoter escape. For this transcription activation, two weak DnaA boxes located downstream of pR are necessary and sufficient. Such a mechanism of transcription activation and location of the activator-binding sites relative to the transcription start point are unusual in prokaryotes. Changes in the distance between the transcription start point and the first DnaA box by 5 and 10 bp and alterations in the orientation of these boxes did not abolish the stimulation of transcription by DnaA, but the efficiency of the promoter activation was different for various mutations. It seems plausible that formation of higher order nucleoprotein structures, involving DNA looping, is necessary for effective stimulation of the pR promoter. At high concentrations, DnaA is a repressor of pR rather than an activator. This repression was found to be because of inhibition of RNA polymerase binding to the promoter region.

Interplay between DnaA and SeqA proteins during regulation of bacteriophage lambda pR promoter activity

DnaA and SeqA proteins are main regulators (positive and negative, respectively) of the chromosome replication in Escherichia coli. Nevertheless, both these replication regulators were found recently to be also transcription factors. Interestingly, both DnaA and SeqA control activity of the bacteriophage lambdap(R) promoter by binding downstream of the transcription start site, which is unusual among prokaryotic systems. Here we asked what are functional relationships between these two transcription regulators at one promoter region. Both in vivo and in vitro studies revealed that DnaA and SeqA can activate the p(R) promoter independently and separately rather than in co-operation, however, increased concentrations of one of these proteins negatively influenced the transcription stimulation mediated by the second regulator. This may suggest a competition between DnaA and SeqA for binding to the p(R) regulatory region. The physiological significance of this DnaA and SeqA-mediated regulation of p(R) is demonstrated by studies on lambda plasmid DNA replication in vivo.

Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis heat shock gene htpG is under positive control

The heat shock genes of Bacillus subtilis are assigned to four classes on the basis of their regulation mechanisms. While classes I and III are negatively controlled by two different transcriptional repressors, class II is regulated by the alternative sigma factor sigma(B). All heat shock genes with unidentified regulatory mechanisms, among them htpG, constitute class IV. Here, we show that expression of htpG is under positive control. We identified a DNA sequence (GAAAAGG) located downstream of the sigma(A)-dependent promoter of htpG. The heat inducibility of the promoter could be destroyed by inversion, nucleotide replacements, or removal of this DNA sequence. Fusion of this sequence to the vegetative lepA promoter conferred heat inducibility. Furthermore, we were able to show that the heat induction factor is dependent on the absolute temperature rather than the temperature increment and that nonnative proteins within the cytoplasm fail to induce htpG.

The bacterial replication initiator DnaA. DnaA and oriC, the bacterial mode to initiate DNA replication

The initiation of replication is the central event in the bacterial cell cycle. Cells control the rate of DNA synthesis by modulating the frequency with which new chains are initiated, like all macromolecular synthesis. The end of the replication cycle provides a checkpoint that must be executed for cell division to occur. This review summarizes recent insight into the biochemistry, genetics and control of the initiation of replication in bacteria, and the central role of the initiator protein DnaA.

Composition of the lambda plasmid heritable replication complex

Previous studies indicated during replication of plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda (the so-called lambda plasmids), that, once assembled, replication complex can be inherited by one of the two daughter plasmid copies after each replication round, and may function in subsequent replication rounds. It seems that similar processes occur during replication of other DNA molecules, including chromosomes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, apart from some suggestions based on genetic experiments, composition of the lambda heritable replication complex remains unknown. In amino acid-starved Escherichia coli relA mutants, replication of lambda plasmid DNA is carried out exclusively by the heritable replication complex as assembly of new complexes is impaired due to inhibition of protein synthesis. Here, using a procedure based on in vivo cross-linking, cell lysis, immunoprecipitation with specific sera, de-cross-linking and PCR analysis, we demonstrate that the lambda heritable replication complex consists of O, P, DnaB and, perhaps surprisingly, DnaK proteins.

Stress responses and replication of plasmids in bacterial cells

Plasmids, DNA (or rarely RNA) molecules which replicate in cells autonomously (independently of chromosomes) as non-essential genetic elements, play important roles for microbes grown under specific environmental conditions as well as in scientific laboratories and in biotechnology. For example, bacterial plasmids are excellent models in studies on regulation of DNA replication, and their derivatives are the most commonly used vectors in genetic engineering. Detailed mechanisms of replication initiation, which is the crucial process for efficient maintenance of plasmids in cells, have been elucidated for several plasmids. However, to understand plasmid biology, it is necessary to understand regulation of plasmid DNA replication in response to different environmental conditions in which host cells exist. Knowledge of such regulatory processes is also very important for those who use plasmids as expression vectors to produce large amounts of recombinant proteins. Variable conditions in large-scale fermentations must influence replication of plasmid DNA in cells, thus affecting the efficiency of recombinant gene expression significantly. Contrary to extensively investigated biochemistry of plasmid replication, molecular mechanisms of regulation of plasmid DNA replication in response to various environmental stress conditions are relatively poorly understood. There are, however, recently published studies that add significant data to our knowledge on relations between cellular stress responses and control of plasmid DNA replication. In this review we focus on plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda that are among the best investigated replicons. Nevertheless, recent results of studies on other plasmids are also discussed shortly.

Lambdap(o), a promoter for oop RNA synthesis, has a role in replication of plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda

Transcription initiated at the bacteriophage lambdap(o) promoter gives a short RNA, called oop RNA. Early studies led to a proposal that this transcript plays a role in the initiation of lambda DNA replication. In fact, the p(o) promoter is located in the lambda replication region and it was suggested that oop RNA may be a primer for replication proceeding leftward from orilambda. However, since in vitro experiments demonstrated that primers for lambda DNA replication are produced by the dnaG gene product (DnaG primase) and subsequent in vivo studies indicated that oop RNA is an antisense RNA for the lambda cII gene expression, the above-mentioned hypothesis has fallen into oblivion. Nevertheless, here we demonstrate that the p(o) promoter plays a role in lambda DNA replication, indeed. We found that lambda plasmids bearing a mutation that inactivates p(o) occur in Escherichia coli cells in a copy number significantly lower than wild-type lambda plasmids. Amplification of lambdap(o)(-) plasmids during the relaxed response was less efficient relative to lambdap(o)(+) plasmids suggesting less frequent initiation of replication from orilambda in the absence of transcription from p(o). This suggestion was confirmed by measurement of incorporation of [(3)H]thymidine into lambda plasmid DNA during pulse-labeling experiments. Therefore, we propose that transcription from the p(o) promoter stimulates replication initiation at orilambda as suggested a long time ago, however, contrary to that suggestion, we assume that the process of p(o)-initiated transcription per se but not the transcription product (oop RNA) might play a role at early steps of lambda DNA replication.

The double mechanism of incompatibility between lambda plasmids and Escherichia coli dnaA(ts) host cells

For plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda, the initiation of bidirectional DNA replication from orilambda depends on the stimulation of transcription from the p(R) promoter by the host replication initiator protein DnaA. Certain Escherichia coli dnaA(ts) mutants cannot be transformed by wild-type lambda plasmids even at the temperature permissive to cell growth. This plasmid-host incompatibility appeared to be due to inefficient stimulation of transcription from the p(R) promoter by the mutant DnaA protein. This paper shows that there is a second mechanism for the incompatibility between lambda plasmids and dnaA(ts) hosts, exemplified in this study by the dnaA46 mutant. This is based on the competition between the lambda P protein and the host DnaA and DnaC proteins for DnaB helicase. Both mechanisms must be operative for the incompatibility.

SeqA, the Escherichia coli origin sequestration protein, is also a specific transcription factor

The SeqA protein is a negative regulator of initiation of DNA replication in the Escherichia coli chromosome. Here, we demonstrate that SeqA stimulates transcription from the bacteriophage lambda pR promoter both in vivo and in vitro. The activity of the lambda pL promoter was found not to be affected by this protein. SeqA-mediated stimulation of pR was dependent on the state of template methylation: transcription was activated on fully methylated and hemimethylated templates but not on an unmethylated template. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assay and electron microscopy, we demonstrated that SeqA interacts specifically with a pR promoter region located on both fully methylated and hemimethylated DNA molecules, but not on unmethylated DNA. The activity of SeqA was found to affect the initiation of lambda plasmid replication positively in vivo, probably via pR-dependent expression of lambda replication genes and transcriptional activation of ori lambda. We conclude that, apart from its function in the control of DNA replication, SeqA is also a specific transcription factor.

Regulation of the switch from early to late bacteriophage lambda DNA replication

There are two modes of bacteriophage lambda DNA replication following infection of its host, Escherichia coli. Early after infection, replication occurs according to the theta (theta or circle-to-circle) mode, and is later switched to the sigma (sigma or rolling-circle) mode. It is not known how this switch, occurring at a specific time in the infection cycle, is regulated. Here it is demonstrated that in wild-type cells the replication starting from orilambda proceeds both bidirectionally and unidirectionally, whereas in bacteria devoid of a functional DnaA protein, replication from orilambda is predominantly unidirectional. The regulation of directionality of replication from orilambda is mediated by positive control of lambda p(R) promoter activity by DnaA, since the mode of replication of an artificial lambda replicon bearing the p(tet) promoter instead of p(R) was found to be independent of DnaA function. These findings and results of density-shift experiments suggest that in dnaA mutants infected with lambda, phage DNA replication proceeds predominantly according to the unidirectional theta mechanism and is switched early after infection to the sigma mode. It is proposed that in wild-type E. coli cells infected with lambda, phage DNA replication proceeds according to a bidirectional theta mechanism early after infection due to efficient transcriptional activation of orilambda, stimulated by the host DnaA protein. After a few rounds of this type of replication, the resulting increased copy number of lambda genomic DNA may cause a depletion of free DnaA protein because of its interaction with the multiple DnaA-binding sites in lambda DNA. It is proposed that this may lead to inefficient transcriptional activation of orilambda resulting in unidirectional theta replication followed by sigma type replication.

Novel group of virulence activators within the AraC family that are not restricted to upstream binding sites

Several regulators within the AraC family control the expression of genes known or thought to be required for virulence of bacterial pathogens. One of these, Rns, activates transcription from an unprecedented variety of binding-site locations. Although nearly all prokaryotic activators bind within a small region upstream and adjacent to the promoter that they regulate, Rns does not bind within this region to activate its own promoter, Prns. Instead, to activate Prns, Rns requires one binding site 224.5 bp upstream and one downstream of the transcription start site. We show in this study that several other AraC family activators recognize the same binding sites as Rns and share with it the ability to utilize a downstream binding site. Like Rns, other members of this group of activators positively regulate the expression of virulence factors in pathogenic bacteria. These regulators are also able to activate transcription from promoter-proximal upstream binding sites since they are able to substitute for Rns at Pcoo, a promoter with only upstream binding sites. Thus, Rns is the prototype for a group of regulators, which include CfaR, VirF, AggR, and CsvR and which activate transcription from locations that are more diverse than those of any other known activator.

Activation of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) LEE2 and LEE3 operons by Ler

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) produces attaching and effacing lesions (AE) on epithelial cells. The genes involved in the formation of the AE lesions are contained within a pathogenicity island named the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE). The LEE comprises 41 open reading frames organized in five major operons: LEE1, LEE2, LEE3, LEE4 and tir. The first gene of the LEE1 operon encodes a transcription activator of the other LEE operons that is called the LEE-encoded regulator (Ler). The LEE2 and LEE3 operons are divergently transcribed with overlapping -10 promoter regions, and gene fusion studies have shown that they are both activated by Ler. Deletion analysis, using lacZ reporter fusions, of the LEE2 and LEE3 promoters demonstrated that deletions extending closer to the LEE2 transcription start site than -247 bp lead to loss of activation by Ler, whereas only 70 bp upstream of the LEE3 transcription start site is required for Ler-mediated activation. We have purified Ler as a His-tagged protein and used it to perform DNA-binding assays with LEE2 and LEE3. We observed that Ler bound to a DNA fragment containing the -300 to +1 region of LEE2; however, it failed to bind to a DNA fragment containing the -300 to +1 region of LEE3, suggesting that Ler activates both operons by only binding to the regulatory region upstream of LEE2. The Ler-activatable LEE3:lacZ fusions extended to what would be -246 bp of the LEE2 operon. A lacZ fusion from the -300 to +1 region of LEE3 failed to be activated by Ler, consistent with our hypothesis that Ler activates the expression of LEE2 and LEE3 by binding to a region located downstream of the LEE3 transcription start site. DNase I footprinting revealed that Ler protected a region of 121 bp upstream of LEE2. Purified Ler mutated in the coiled-coil domain was unable to activate transcription and to bind to the LEE2 regulatory region. These data indicate that Ler may bind as a multimer to LEE2 and activate both divergent operons by a novel mechanism potentially involving changes in the DNA structure.

Rns, a virulence regulator within the AraC family, requires binding sites upstream and downstream of its own promoter to function as an activator

Strains of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli that express CS1 and CS2 pili require the transcriptional activator Rns, a member of the AraC family, for the expression of the pilin genes. Rns is also an activator of its own expression. However, the arrangement of its binding sites near its own promoter is unusual for a prokaryotic activator. Most activators have at least one binding site 30-80 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site, but Rns has a single upstream binding site centred at -227. Rns also has two binding sites downstream of the transcription start site centred at +43 and +82, a region generally thought to be reserved for repressors. In vitro, the binding of a MBP::Rns fusion protein to each of these sites facilitates the binding of RNA polymerase to the rns promoter and the formation of an open complex. In vivo, the upstream binding site and one downstream site are required for Rns-dependent activation of its promoter despite the atypical location of these binding sites for an activator. This suggests that Rns may represent a new class of prokaryotic activators.

Bacteriophage and host mutants causing the rolling-circle lambda DNA replication early after infection

There are two modes of bacteriophage lambda DNA replication during its lytic development in Escherichia coli cells. The circle-to-circle (theta) replication predominates at early stages of the phage growth, whereas rolling-circle (sigma) replication occurs late after infection to produce long concatemers that serve as substrates for packaging of lambda DNA into phage proheads. The mechanism regulating the switch from theta to sigma replication remains unknown. Our previous genetic studies indicated that the bacteriophage lambda Pts1piA66 mutant cannot replicate at 43 degrees C in the wild-type E. coli host, but it can replicate in the dnaA46(ts) mutant. Density shift experiments suggested that the parental DNA molecules of the infecting phage enter sigma replication. Here, using electron microscopy, we demonstrate that as soon as 5 min after infection of the dnaA46(ts) mutant by the lambdaPts1piA66 phage at 43 degrees C, the sigma replication intermediates are highly predominant over theta replication intermediates, contrary to the wild-type conditions (wild-type bacteria infected with the lambdaP(+) phage). The initiation of replication of the lambdaPts1piA66 mutant at 43 degrees C was strongly inhibited in the dnaA(+) host, as demonstrated by electron microscopy and by pulse-labeling of the phage-derived plasmid replicon. Implications for the mechanism of the regulation of the switch from theta to sigma replication mode are discussed.

Twelve species of the nucleoid-associated protein from Escherichia coli. Sequence recognition specificity and DNA binding affinity

The genome of Escherichia coli is composed of a single molecule of circular DNA with the length of about 47,000 kilobase pairs, which is associated with about 10 major DNA-binding proteins, altogether forming the nucleoid. We expressed and purified 12 species of the DNA-binding protein, i.e. CbpA (curved DNA-binding protein A), CbpB or Rob (curved DNA-binding protein B or right arm of the replication origin binding protein), DnaA (DNA-binding protein A), Dps (DNA-binding protein from starved cells), Fis (factor for inversion stimulation), Hfq (host factor for phage Q(beta)), H-NS (histone-like nucleoid structuring protein), HU (heat-unstable nucleoid protein), IciA (inhibitor of chromosome initiation A), IHF (integration host factor), Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein), and StpA (suppressor of td(-) phenotype A). The sequence specificity of DNA binding was determined for all the purified nucleoid proteins using gel-mobility shift assays. Five proteins (CbpB, DnaA, Fis, IHF, and Lrp) were found to bind to specific DNA sequences, while the remaining seven proteins (CbpA, Dps, Hfq, H-NS, HU, IciA, and StpA) showed apparently sequence-nonspecific DNA binding activities. Four proteins, CbpA, Hfq, H-NS, and IciA, showed the binding preference for the curved DNA. From the apparent dissociation constant (K(d)) determined using the sequence-specific or nonspecific DNA probes, the order of DNA binding affinity were determined to be: HU > IHF > Lrp > CbpB(Rob) > Fis > H-NS > StpA > CbpA > IciA > Hfq/Dps, ranging from 25 nM (HU binding to the non-curved DNA) to 250 nM (Hfq binding to the non-curved DNA), under the assay conditions employed.

Mechanism of repression of the aroP P2 promoter by the TyrR protein of Escherichia coli

Previously, we have shown that expression of the Escherichia coli aroP P2 promoter is partially repressed by the TyrR protein alone and strongly repressed by the TyrR protein in the presence of the coeffector tyrosine or phenylalanine (P. Wang, J. Yang, and A. J. Pittard, J. Bacteriol. 179:4206-4212, 1997). Here we present in vitro results showing that the TyrR protein and RNA polymerase can bind simultaneously to the aroP P2 promoter. In the presence of tyrosine, the TyrR protein inhibits open complex formation at the P2 promoter, whereas in the absence of any coeffector or in the presence of phenylalanine, the TyrR protein inhibits a step(s) following the formation of open complexes. We also present mutational evidence which implicates the N-terminal domain of the TyrR protein in the repression of P2 expression. The TyrR binding site of aroP, which includes one weak and one strong TyrR box, is located 5 bp downstream of the transcription start site of P2. Results from a mutational analysis show that the strong box (which is located more closely to the P2 promoter), but not the weak box, plays a critical role in P2 repression.

Regulation of bacteriophage lambda development by guanosine 5'-diphosphate-3'-diphosphate

On infection of its host, Escherichia coli, bacteriophage lambda can follow one of two alternative developmental pathways: lytic or lysogenic. Here we demonstrate that the "lysis-versus-lysogenization" decision is influenced by guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), a nucleotide that is synthesized in E. coli cells in response to amino acid or carbon source starvation. We found that the efficiency of lysogenization is the highest at ppGpp concentrations somewhat higher than the basal level; too low and too high levels of ppGpp result in less efficient lysogenization. Maintenance of the already integrated lambda prophage and phage lytic development were not significantly influenced in the host lacking ppGpp. We found that the level of HflB/FtsH protease, responsible for degradation of the CII protein, an activator of "lysogenic" promoters, depends on ppGpp concentration. The highest levels of HflB/FtsH was found in bacteria lacking ppGpp and in cells bearing increased concentrations of this nucleotide. Using lacZ fusions, we investigated the influence of ppGpp on activities of lambda promoters important at the stage of the lysis-versus-lysogenization decision. We found that each promoter is regulated differentially in response to the abundance of ppGpp. Moreover, our results suggest that the cAMP level may influence ppGpp concentration in cells. The mechanism of the ppGpp-mediated control of lambda development at the stage of the lysis-versus-lysogenization decision may be explained on the basis of differential influence of guanosine tetraphosphate on activities of p(L), p(R), p(E), p(I), and p(aQ) promoters and by dependence of HflB/FtsH protease level on ppGpp concentration.

The presence of two DnaA-binding sequences is required for an efficient interaction of the Escherichia coli DnaA protein with each particular weak DnaA box region

Using an electron microscopic method for visualizing interactions of the Escherichia coli DnaA protein with weak DnaA-binding DNA sequences, we found that DnaA binds effectively to two separated weak DnaA box regions located on the same DNA fragment. As expected, no DnaA-DNA interactions were detected when both DnaA box regions were mutagenized to the sequence totally incapable of binding DnaA. However, when only one of these two regions was mutagenized, the lack of interactions between DnaA and DNA was observed not only at the scrambled DnaA box but also at the second weak DnaA box region. These results indicate that for the efficient binding of DnaA to a weak DnaA box region, the presence of at least two such DNA sequences is necessary. Our finding also suggests that binding of DnaA protein to weak DnaA box sequences may be cooperative. In addition, we found that DnaA-mediated transcription termination in vivo requires two DnaA boxes, one of them is a weak one. It seems, therefore, that some mechanisms of regulation of transcription and DNA replication by DnaA, that involve interactions of DnaA with weak DnaA boxes, may be more complicated than initially proposed.

Differential inhibition of transcription from sigma70- and sigma32-dependent promoters by rifampicin

Rifampicin is an antibiotic which binds to the beta subunit of prokaryotic RNA polymerases and prevents initiation of transcription. It was found previously that production of heat shock proteins in Escherichia coli cells after a shift from 30 degrees C to 43 degrees C is not completely inhibited by this antibiotic. Here we demonstrate that while activity of a pL-lacZ fusion (pL is a sigma70-dependent promoter) in E. coli cells is strongly inhibited by rifampicin, a p(groE)-lacZ fusion, whose activity is dependent on the sigam32 factor, retains significant residual activity even at relatively high rifampicin concentrations. Differential sensitivity to this antibiotic of RNA polymerase holoenzymes containing either the sigma70 or the sigma32 subunit was confirmed in vitro. Since the effects of an antibiotic that binds to the beta subunit can be modulated by the presence of either the sigma70 or the sigma32 subunit in the holoenzyme, it is tempting to speculate that binding of various sigma factors to the core of RNA polymerase results in different conformations of particular holoenzymes, including changes in the core enzyme.

Escherichia coli dnaA gene function and bacteriophage lambda replication

Allele specificity of the Escherichia coli dnaA gene function in the replication of plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda has been demonstrated previously. Here, using a series of dnaA temperature-sensitive mutants, we investigated dnaA allele specificity of the replication of phages lambda P+ and lambda Pts 1 pi A66. We found that phage lambda P+ produces its progeny efficiently at 43 degrees C irrespective of the dnaA allele, whereas lambda Pts 1 pi A66, which is unable to develop lytically in the dnaA+ host at this temperature, can replicate with different efficiency in certain dnaA mutants. Since the main role of DnaA in lambda development seems to be stimulation of transcription from the pR promoter, we measured the activity of this promoter (using a pR-lacZ fusion) and the abundance of pR-derived transcripts (by Northern blotting analysis) in dnaA+ host and dnaA(ts) mutants at 30 and 43 degrees C. We found significant differences in the activity of pR in various dnaA(ts) mutants at 30 degrees C, which indicate different levels of stimulation of this promoter by products of particular dnaA alleles at permissive temperature. Differential levels of DnaA-mediated stimulation of pR in various dnaA(ts) mutants were also found at 43 degrees C. Stimulation of the pR promoter by DnaA is necessary for both efficient production of the lambda replication proteins, O and P, and effective transcriptional activation of ori lambda. The differences in the efficiency of pR activation observed in dnaA mutants at 30 and 43 degrees C can explain the mechanisms of allele specificity of dnaA gene function in the replication of bacteriophage lambda and plasmids derived from this phage.

Replication and maintenance of lambda plasmids devoid of the Cro repressor autoregulatory loop in Escherichia coli

Plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda are known as lambda plasmids. These plasmids contain the ori lambda region and lambda replication genes O and P. Typical lambda plasmids also contain the cro gene, the product of which is a repressor of the pR promoter when present at relatively high concentrations. These genes stably maintain the plasmid in Escherichia coli at copy numbers of 20 to 50 per cell. According to a generally accepted model, stable maintenance of lambda plasmids is possible due to the Cro repressor autoregulatory loop (the cro gene is under control of pR). Here we demonstrate that lambda plasmids devoid of the Cro autoregulatory loop can also be stably maintained in E. coli strains. We present data for two such plasmids: pTC lambda 1 in which the pR-cro region has been replaced by the ptetA promoter and the tetR gene (coding for the TetR repressor), and a standard lambda plasmid with inactivated cro gene (lambda cro-null plasmid). Thus, the presence of the Cro repressor autoregulatory loop does not appear to be essential to the maintenance of lambda plasmids in vivo.

Excess production of phage lambda delayed early proteins under conditions supporting high Escherichia coli growth rates

Bacteriophage lambda is unable to lysogenize Escherichia coli hosts harbouring the rpoA341 mutation due to a drastic reduction in transcription from CII-activated lysogenic promoters (pE, pI and paQ). In addition, the level of early transcripts involved in the lytic pathway of lambda development is also decreased in this genetic background due to impaired N-dependent antitermination. Here, it is demonstrated that despite the reduced level of early lytic pL- and pR-derived transcripts, lytic growth of bacteriophage lambda is not affected in rich media. The level of the late lytic, pR-derived transcripts also remains unaffected by the rpoA341 mutation under these conditions. However, it was found that whilst there is no significant difference in the phage burst size in rpoA+ and rpoA341 hosts growing in rich media, phage lambda is not able to produce progeny in the rpoA341 mutant growing in minimal medium, in contrast to otherwise isogenic rpoA+ bacteria. Provision of an excess of the phage replication proteins O and P in trans or overproduction of the antitermination protein N restore the ability of phage lambda to produce progeny in the rpoA341 mutant under the latter conditions. These results suggest that in rich media phage lambda produces some early proteins in excess of that needed for its effective propagation and indicate that replication proteins may be limiting factors for phage lytic growth in poor media.

Replication of lambda plasmid DNA in the Escherichia coli cell cycle

The Cro repressor autoregulatory loop has long been considered the main regulatory process in controlling lambda plasmid replication initiation in Escherichia coli. However, we found recently that lambda plasmids can be maintained at a constant copy number in the absence of Cro function. Here we demonstrate that shortly after inactivation of the Cro repressor, the synthesis of lambda plasmid DNA increases significantly but is then stabilized at a level similar to that observed in the presence of the Cro function. We found that replication initiation of lambda plasmids carrying a functional cro gene proceeds randomly in the host cell cycle, but in the absence of Cro function the replication initiation of lambda plasmid DNA appears to be cell cycle dependent. The host DnaA protein appears to be at least one of the factors involved in the cell-cycle-specific control of lambda cro- plasmid replication. Therefore, it seems that the lambda cro- plasmid may serve as an amazingly simple model for studies on the regulation of DNA replication in the cell cycle.