Increased phosphorylation of histone H1 in mouse fibroblasts transformed with oncogenes or constitutively active mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

Cellular Energy Sensor Sirt1 Augments Mapk Signaling to Promote Hypoxia/Reoxygenation-Induced Catch-up Growth in Zebrafish Embryo

Animal growth is blunted in adverse environments where catabolic metabolism dominates; however, when the adversity disappears, stunted animals rapidly catch up to age-equivalent body size. This phenomenon is called catch-up growth, which we observe in various animals. Since growth retardation and catch-up growth are sequential processes, catabolism or stress response molecules may remain active, especially immediately after growth resumes. Sirtuins (Sirt1-7) deacetylate target proteins in a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent manner, and these enzymes govern diverse alleys of cellular functions. Here, we investigated the roles of Sirt1 and its close paralog Sirt2 in the hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced catch-up growth model using zebrafish embryos. Temporal blockade of Sirt1/2 significantly reduced the growth rate of the embryos in reoxygenation, but it was not evident in constant normoxia. Subsequent gene knockdown and chemical inhibition experiments demonstrated that Sirt1, but not Sirt2, was required for the catchup growth. Inhibition of Sirt1 significantly reduced the activity of mitogen-activated kinase (Mapk) of embryos in the reoxygenation condition. In addition, co-inhibition of Sirt1- and Igf-signaling did not further reduce the body growth or Mapk activation compared to those of the Igf-signaling-alone-inhibited embryos. Furthermore, in the reoxygenation condition, Sirt1- or Igf-signaling inhibition similarly blunted Mapk activity, especially in anterior tissues and trunk muscle, where the sirt1 expression was evident in the catching-up embryos. These results suggest that the catch-up growth requires Sirt1 action to activate the somatotropic Mapk pathway, likely by modifying the Igf-signaling.

Aberrant Function of the C-Terminal Tail of HIST1H1E Accelerates Cellular Senescence and Causes Premature Aging

Histones mediate dynamic packaging of nuclear DNA in chromatin, a process that is precisely controlled to guarantee efficient compaction of the genome and proper chromosomal segregation during cell division and to accomplish DNA replication, transcription, and repair. Due to the important structural and regulatory roles played by histones, it is not surprising that histone functional dysregulation or aberrant levels of histones can have severe consequences for multiple cellular processes and ultimately might affect development or contribute to cell transformation. Recently, germline frameshift mutations involving the C-terminal tail of HIST1H1E, which is a widely expressed member of the linker histone family and facilitates higher-order chromatin folding, have been causally linked to an as-yet poorly defined syndrome that includes intellectual disability. We report that these mutations result in stable proteins that reside in the nucleus, bind to chromatin, disrupt proper compaction of DNA, and are associated with a specific methylation pattern. Cells expressing these mutant proteins have a dramatically reduced proliferation rate and competence, hardly enter into the S phase, and undergo accelerated senescence. Remarkably, clinical assessment of a relatively large cohort of subjects sharing these mutations revealed a premature aging phenotype as a previously unrecognized feature of the disorder. Our findings identify a direct link between aberrant chromatin remodeling, cellular senescence, and accelerated aging.

The Profile of Post-translational Modifications of Histone H1 in Chromatin of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Linker histone H1 is one of the main chromatin proteins which plays an important role in organizing eukaryotic DNA into a compact structure. There is data indicating that cell type-specific post-translational modifications of H1 modulate chromatin activity. Here, we compared histone H1 variants from NIH/3T3, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), and mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (MALDI-FT-ICR-MS). We found significant differences in the nature and positions of the post-translational modifications (PTMs) of H1.3-H1.5 variants in ES cells compared to differentiated cells. For instance, methylation of K75 in the H1.2-1.4 variants; methylation of K108, K148, K151, K152 K154, K155, K160, K161, K179, and K185 in H1.1, as well as of K168 in H1.2; phosphorylation of S129, T146, T149, S159, S163, and S180 in H1.1, T180 in H1.2, and T155 in H1.3 were identified exclusively in ES cells. The H1.0 and H1.2 variants in ES cells were characterized by an enhanced acetylation and overall reduced expression levels. Most of the acetylation sites of the H1.0 and H1.2 variants from ES cells were located within their C-terminal tails known to be involved in the stabilization of the condensed chromatin. These data may be used for further studies aimed at analyzing the functional role played by the revealed histone H1 PTMs in the self-renewal and differentiation of pluripotent stem cells.

A Nanoprinted Model of Interstitial Cancer Migration Reveals a Link between Cell Deformability and Proliferation

Metastatic progression of tumors requires the coordinated dissemination of cancerous cells through interstitial tissues and their replication in distant body locations. Despite their importance in cancer treatment decisions, key factors, such as cell shape adaptation and the role it plays in dense tissue invasion by cancerous cells, are not well understood. Here, we employ a 3D electrohydrodynamic nanoprinting technology to generate vertical arrays of topographical pores that mimic interstitial tissue resistance to the mesenchymal migration of cancerous cells, in order to determine the effect of nuclear size, cell deformability, and cell-to-substrate adhesion on tissue invasion efficiency. The high spatial and temporal resolution of our analysis demonstrates that the ability of cells to deform depends on the cell cycle phase, peaks immediately after mitosis, and is key to the invasion process. Increased pore penetration efficiency by cells in early G1 phase also coincided with their lower nuclear volume and higher cell deformability, compared with the later cell cycle stages. Furthermore, artificial decondensation of chromatin induced an increase in cell and nuclear deformability and improved pore penetration efficiency of cells in G1. Together, these results underline that along the cell cycle cells have different abilities to dynamically remodel their actin cytoskeleton and induce nuclear shape changes, which determines their pore penetration efficiency. Thus, our results support a mechanism in which cell proliferation and pore penetration are functionally linked to favor the interstitial dissemination of metastatic cells.

Interphase H1 phosphorylation: Regulation and functions in chromatin

Many metazoan cell types differentially express multiple non-allelic amino acid sequence variants of histone H1. Although early work revealed that H1 variants, collectively, are phosphorylated during interphase and mitosis, differences between individual H1 variants in the sites they possess for mitotic and interphase phosphorylation have been elucidated only relatively recently. Here, we review current knowledge on the regulation and function of interphase H1 phosphorylation, with a particular emphasis on how differences in interphase phosphorylation among the H1 variants of mammalian cells may enable them to have differential effects on transcription and other chromatin processes.

What is the role of histone H1 heterogeneity? A functional model emerges from a 50 year mystery

For the past 50 years, understanding the function of histone H1 heterogeneity has been mired in confusion and contradiction. Part of the reason for this is the lack of a working model that tries to explain the large body of data that has been collected about the H1 subtypes so far. In this review, a global model is described largely based on published data from the author and other researchers over the past 20 years. The intrinsic disorder built into H1 protein structure is discussed to help the reader understand that these histones are multi-conformational and adaptable to interactions with different targets. We discuss the role of each structural section of H1 (as we currently understand it), but we focus on the H1's C-terminal domain and its effect on each subtype's affinity, mobility and compaction of chromatin. We review the multiple ways these characteristics have been measured from circular dichroism to FRAP analysis, which has added to the sometimes contradictory assumptions made about each subtype. Based on a tabulation of these measurements, we then organize the H1 variants according to their ability to condense chromatin and produce nucleosome repeat lengths amenable to that compaction. This subtype variation generates a continuum of different chromatin states allowing for fine regulatory control and some overlap in the event one or two subtypes are lost to mutation. We also review the myriad of disparate observations made about each subtype, both somatic and germline specific ones, that lend support to the proposed model. Finally, to demonstrate its adaptability as new data further refines our understanding of H1 subtypes, we show how the model can be applied to experimental observations of telomeric heterochromatin in aging cells.

Comprehensive Catalog of Currently Documented Histone Modifications

Modern techniques in molecular biology, genomics, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics have identified a large number of novel histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs), many of whose functions are still under intense investigation. Here, we catalog histone PTMs under two classes: first, those whose functions have been fairly well studied and, second, those PTMs that have been more recently identified but whose functions remain unclear. We hope that this will be a useful resource for researchers from all biological or technical backgrounds, aiding in their chromatin and epigenetic pursuits.

Borealin dimerization mediates optimal CPC checkpoint function by enhancing localization to centromeres and kinetochores

The Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) localizes to centromeres where it activates the mitotic checkpoint in response to inappropriate inter-kinetochore tension. This error correction function is essential for proper chromosome segregation. Here we define several critical features of CPC localization and function. First, the Borealin dimerization domain suppresses dynamic exchange at the centromere to allow optimal CPC function. Second, Borealin dimerization is essential to target a subpopulation of CPC proximal to the kinetochore when the mitotic spindle is disrupted. This subpopulation is also needed for full CPC checkpoint function. The existence of a pool of CPC at the kinetochore suggests that error correction is more complicated than predicted from the Aurora B phosphorylation gradient model. Finally, Haspin kinase plays a key role in maintaining the slowly exchanging centromere Borealin pool, while Aurora B and Mps1 play minimal roles in maintaining CPC localization once cells are in mitosis.

Histone H1 phosphorylation in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. The need for new clinical biomarkers in breast cancer is necessary to further predict prognosis and therapeutic response. In this article, the LC-MS histone H1 phosphorylation profiles were established for three distinct breast cancer cell lines. The results show that the extent of H1 phosphorylation can distinguish between the different cell lines. The histone H1 from the metastatic cell line, MDA-MB-231, was subjected to chemical derivitization and LC-MS/MS analysis. The results suggest that the phosphorylation at threonine 146 is found on both histone H1.2 and histone H1.4. Cell lines were then treated with an extracellular stimulus, estradiol or kinase inhibitor LY294002, to monitor changes in histone H1 phosphorylation. The data show that histone H1 phosphorylation can increase and decrease in response to extracellular stimuli. Finally, primary breast tissues were stained for the histone H1 phosphorylation at threonine 146. Variable staining patterns across tumor grades and subtypes were observed with pT146 labeling correlating with tumor grade. These results establish the potential for histone H1 phosphorylation at threonine 146 as a clinical biomarker in breast cancer.

Pin1 promotes histone H1 dephosphorylation and stabilizes its binding to chromatin

The prolyl isomerase Pin1 stimulates the dephosphorylation of histone H1, stabilizing its binding to chromatin at transcriptionally active chromatin.

Histone H1 plays a crucial role in stabilizing higher order chromatin structure. Transcriptional activation, DNA replication, and chromosome condensation all require changes in chromatin structure and are correlated with the phosphorylation of histone H1. In this study, we describe a novel interaction between Pin1, a phosphorylation-specific prolyl isomerase, and phosphorylated histone H1. A sub-stoichiometric amount of Pin1 stimulated the dephosphorylation of H1 in vitro and modulated the structure of the C-terminal domain of H1 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Depletion of Pin1 destabilized H1 binding to chromatin only when Pin1 binding sites on H1 were present. Pin1 recruitment and localized histone H1 phosphorylation were associated with transcriptional activation independent of RNA polymerase II. We thus identify a novel form of histone H1 regulation through phosphorylation-dependent proline isomerization, which has consequences on overall H1 phosphorylation levels and the stability of H1 binding to chromatin.

H1 histones: current perspectives and challenges

H1 and related linker histones are important both for maintenance of higher-order chromatin structure and for the regulation of gene expression. The biology of the linker histones is complex, as they are evolutionarily variable, exist in multiple isoforms and undergo a large variety of posttranslational modifications in their long, unstructured, NH₂- and COOH-terminal tails. We review recent progress in understanding the structure, genetics and posttranslational modifications of linker histones, with an emphasis on the dynamic interactions of these proteins with DNA and transcriptional regulators. We also discuss various experimental challenges to the study of H1 and related proteins, including limitations of immunological reagents and practical difficulties in the analysis of posttranslational modifications by mass spectrometry.

iTRAQ analysis of a cell culture model for malignant transformation, including comparison with 2D-PAGE and SILAC

To study human cancer development, cell culture models for malignant transformation can be used. In 1999 Hahn and Coworkers introduced such a model system and established herewith a basis for research on human tumorigenesis. Primary human fibroblasts are sequentially transduced with defined genetic elements (hTERT, SV40 ER, and H-RasV12), resulting in four defined cell lines, whereby the last has a fully transformed phenotype. In order to get a deeper insight into the molecular biology of human tumorigenesis, we compared the proteomes of these four cell lines following a multimethod concept. At the beginning we assumed SILAC and sample fractionation with COFRADIC is the method of choice to analyze the cell culture model for malignant transformation. Here, the compared samples are combined before sample preparation, thus avoiding differences in sample preparation, and using COFRADIC notably reduces sample complexity. Because 2D-PAGE is a standard method for the separation and visualization of closely related proteomes, we decided to analyze and compare the proteomes of these four cell lines in a first approach by differential 2D-PAGE. Surprisingly, we discovered much more unique results with iTRAQ and sample fractionation with SCX than with the combination of 2D-PAGE and SILAC-COFRADIC. Moreover, iTRAQ outperforms the other strategies not only in number of yielded results but also in analysis time. Here, we present the iTRAQ quantification results and compare them with the results of 2D-PAGE and SILAC-COFRADIC. We found changes in the protein level at each transition. Thereby, SV40 has the strongest impact on the proteome. In detail we identified 201 regulated proteins. Beside others, these proteins are involved in cytoskeleton, RNA processing, and cell cycle, such as CDC2, hnRNPs, snRNPs, collagens, and MCM proteins. For example, MCM proteins are up-regulated and collagens are down-regulated due to SV40 ER expression. Furthermore we made the observation that proteins containing the same domain have analogous regulation profiles during malignant transformation. For instance, several proteins containing a CH or LIM domain are down-regulated. Moreover, by this study and the defined cell culture model, changes could be clearly matched to specific steps during tumorigenesis.

Human gene control by vital oncogenes: revisiting a theoretical model and its implications for targeted cancer therapy

An important assumption of our current understanding of the mechanisms of carcinogenesis has been the belief that clarification of the cancer process would inevitably reveal some of the crucial mechanisms of normal human gene regulation. Since the momentous work of Bishop and Varmus, both the molecular and the biochemical processes underlying the events in the development of cancer have become increasingly clear. The identification of cellular signaling pathways and the role of protein kinases in the events leading to gene activation have been critical to our understanding not only of normal cellular gene control mechanisms, but also have clarified some of the important molecular and biochemical events occurring within a cancer cell. We now know that oncogenes are dysfunctional proto-oncogenes and that dysfunctional tumor suppressor genes contribute to the cancer process. Furthermore, Weinstein and others have hypothesized the phenomenon of oncogene addiction as a distinct characteristic of the malignant cell. It can be assumed that cancer cells, indeed, become dependent on such vital oncogenes. The products of these vital oncogenes, such as c-myc, may well be the Achilles heel by which targeted molecular therapy may lead to truly personalized cancer therapy. The remaining problem is the need to introduce relevant molecular diagnostic tests such as genome microarray analysis and proteomic methods, especially protein kinase identification arrays, for each individual patient. Genome wide association studies on cancers with gene analysis of single nucleotide and other mutations in functional proto-oncogenes will, hopefully, identify dysfunctional proto-oncogenes and allow the development of more specific targeted drugs directed against the protein products of these vital oncogenes. In 1984 Willis proposed a molecular and biochemical model for eukaryotic gene regulation suggesting how proto-oncogenes might function within the normal cell. That model predicted the existence of vital oncogenes and can now be used to hypothesize the biochemical and molecular mechanisms that drive the processes leading to disruption of the gene regulatory machinery, resulting in the transformation of normal cells into cancer.

Lysyl oxidase regulates MMTV promoter: indirect evidence of histone H1 involvement

Lysyl oxidase (LOX) is the enzyme that facilitates the cross-linking of collagen and elastin, although other functions for this enzyme have been indicated. Of these other functions, we describe herein the ability of LOX to regulate several gene promoters, like collagen III, elastin, and cyclin D1. We have previously demonstrated a specific binding between LOX and histone H1, in vitro. Therefore, we investigated whether LOX would affect the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter and its glucocorticoid regulation, which depends on the phophorylation status of histone H1. Our results show that the over-expression of recombinant human LOX was able to trigger MMTV activity, both in the presence and absence of glucocorticoids. Moreover, we demonstrated that histone H1 from cells expressing recombinant LOX contained isodesmosine and desmosine, indicating specific lysyl-oxidase-dependent lysine modifications. Finally, we were able to co-immunoprecipitate the exogenous LOX and histone H1 from the LOX transfected cells. The data are compatible with a decreased positive charge of histone H1, owing to deamination by LOX of its lysine residues. This event would favor H1 detachment from the target DNA, and consequent opening of the MMTV promoter structure to the activating transcription factors. The presented data, therefore, suggest a possible histone-H1-dependent mechanism for the modulation of MMTV promoter by LOX.

A peek into the complex realm of histone phosphorylation

Although discovered long ago, posttranslational phosphorylation of histones has been in the spotlight only recently. Information is accumulating almost daily on phosphorylation of histones and their roles in cellular physiology and human diseases. An extensive cross talk exists between phosphorylation and other posttranslational modifications, which together regulate various biological processes, including gene transcription, DNA repair, and cell cycle progression. Recent research on histone phosphorylation has demonstrated that nearly all histone types are phosphorylated at specific residues and that these modifications act as a critical intermediate step in chromosome condensation during cell division, transcriptional regulation, and DNA damage repair. As with all young fields, apparently conflicting and sometimes controversial observations about histone phosphorylations and their true functions in different species are found in the literature. Accumulating evidence suggests that instead of functioning strictly as part of a general code, histone phosphorylation probably functions by establishing cross talk with other histone modifications and serving as a platform for recruitment or release of effector proteins, leading to a downstream cascade of events. Here we extensively review published information on the complexities of histone phosphorylation, the roles of proteins recognizing these modifications and the resuting physiological outcome, and, importantly, future challenges and opportunities in this fast-moving field.

Histone H1 interphase phosphorylation becomes largely established in G1 or early S phase and differs in G1 between T-lymphoblastoid cells and normal T cells

Background

Histone H1 is an important constituent of chromatin, and is involved in regulation of its structure. During the cell cycle, chromatin becomes locally decondensed in S phase, highly condensed during metaphase, and again decondensed before re-entry into G₁. This has been connected to increasing phosphorylation of H1 histones through the cell cycle. However, many of these experiments have been performed using cell-synchronization techniques and cell cycle-arresting drugs. In this study, we investigated the H1 subtype composition and phosphorylation pattern in the cell cycle of normal human activated T cells and Jurkat T-lymphoblastoid cells by capillary electrophoresis after sorting of exponentially growing cells into G₁, S and G₂/M populations.

Results

We found that the relative amount of H1.5 protein increased significantly after T-cell activation. Serine phosphorylation of H1 subtypes occurred to a large extent in late G₁ or early S phase in both activated T cells and Jurkat cells. Furthermore, our data confirm that the H1 molecules newly synthesized during S phase achieve a similar phosphorylation pattern to the previous ones. Jurkat cells had more extended H1.5 phosphorylation in G₁ compared with T cells, a difference that can be explained by faster cell growth and/or the presence of enhanced H1 kinase activity in G₁ in Jurkat cells.

Conclusion

Our data are consistent with a model in which a major part of interphase H1 phosphorylation takes place in G₁ or early S phase. This implies that H1 serine phosphorylation may be coupled to changes in chromatin structure necessary for DNA replication. In addition, the increased H1 phosphorylation of malignant cells in G₁ may be affecting the G₁/S transition control and enabling facilitated S-phase entry as a result of relaxed chromatin condensation. Furthermore, increased H1.5 expression may be coupled to the proliferative capacity of growth-stimulated T cells.

Human linker histones: interplay between phosphorylation and O-β-GlcNAc to mediate chromatin structural modifications

Eukaryotic chromatin is a combination of DNA and histone proteins. It is established fact that epigenetic mechanisms are associated with DNA and histones. Initial studies emphasize on core histones association with DNA, however later studies prove the importance of linker histone H1 epigenetic. There are many types of linker histone H1 found in mammals. These subtypes are cell specific and their amount in different types of cells varies as the cell functions. Many types of post-translational modifications which occur on different residues in each subtype of linker histone H1 induce conformational changes and allow the different subtypes of linker histone H1 to interact with chromatin at different stages during cell cycle which results in the regulation of transcription and gene expression. Proposed O-glycosylation of linker histone H1 promotes condensation of chromatin while phosphorylation of linker histone H1 is known to activate transcription and gene regulation by decondensation of chromatin. Interplay between phosphorylation and O-β-GlcNAc modification on Ser and Thr residues in each subtype of linker histone H1 in Homo sapiens during cell cycle may result in diverse functional regulation of proteins. This in silico study describes the potential phosphorylation, o-glycosylation and their possible interplay sites on conserved Ser/Thr residues in various subtypes of linker histone H1 in Homo sapiens.

Role of nuclear architecture in epigenetic alterations in cancer

It is widely accepted that cancer results from an array of epigenetic and genetic alterations, particularly aberrant epigenetic patterns that are a hallmark of every cancer type studied. Another well-known feature of cancer cells is the array of abnormalities in their nuclear structure. Although it is known that nuclear structure has an important role in the regulation of gene expression, we know little about the direct relationship between nuclear structural alterations and aberrant epigenetic patterns in cancer. Here, we discuss some of the recent studies from our lab and others to understand the relationship between alterations of nuclear architecture and aberrant epigenetic patterns in cancer cells. Although the precise relationship remains elusive, we suggest that changes in nuclear structure and composition could alter long-range genomic interactions and cause global epigenetic changes during tumorigenesis. We emphasize the need for further studies to elucidate the direct relationship between nuclear structure alterations and aberrant epigenetic patterns in cancers.

Tissue polarity-dependent control of mammary epithelial homeostasis and cancer development: an epigenetic perspective

The basoapical organization of monolayered epithelia is defined by the presence of hemidesmosomes at the basal cellular pole, where the cell makes contacts with the basement membrane, and tight junctions at the opposite apical pole. In the mammary gland, tight junctions seal cell-cell contacts against the lumen and separate the apical and basolateral cell membranes. This separation is critical to organize intracellular signaling pathways and the cytoskeleton. The study of the impact of the highly organized apical pole, and notably apical polarity regulators (Crb complex, Par complex, and Scrib, Dlg, Lgl proteins) and tight junction proteins on cell phenotype and gene expression has revealed an intricate relationship between apical polarity and the cell nucleus. The goal of this review is to highlight the role of the apical pole of the tissue polarity axis in the epigenetic control of tissue phenotype. The organization of the apical pole and its importance in mammary homeostasis and tumorigenesis will be emphasized before presenting how apical polarity proteins impact gene expression indirectly, by influencing signal transduction and the location of transcription regulators, and directly, by participating in chromatin-associated complexes. The relationship between apical polarity and cell nucleus organizations might explain how apical polarity proteins could switch from nuclear repressors to nuclear promoters of cancerous behavior following alterations in the apical pole. The impact of apical polarity proteins on epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression will be discussed in light of increased evidence supporting a role for apical polarity in the fate of breast neoplasms.

Histone H1 subtypes differentially modulate chromatin condensation without preventing ATP-dependent remodeling by SWI/SNF or NURF

Although ubiquitously present in chromatin, the function of the linker histone subtypes is partly unknown and contradictory studies on their properties have been published. To explore whether the various H1 subtypes have a differential role in the organization and dynamics of chromatin we have incorporated all of the somatic human H1 subtypes into minichromosomes and compared their influence on nucleosome spacing, chromatin compaction and ATP-dependent remodeling. H1 subtypes exhibit different affinities for chromatin and different abilities to promote chromatin condensation, as studied with the Atomic Force Microscope. According to this criterion, H1 subtypes can be classified as weak condensers (H1.1 and H1.2), intermediate condensers (H1.3) and strong condensers (H1.0, H1.4, H1.5 and H1x). The variable C-terminal domain is required for nucleosome spacing by H1.4 and is likely responsible for the chromatin condensation properties of the various subtypes, as shown using chimeras between H1.4 and H1.2. In contrast to previous reports with isolated nucleosomes or linear nucleosomal arrays, linker histones at a ratio of one per nucleosome do not preclude remodeling of minichromosomes by yeast SWI/SNF or Drosophila NURF. We hypothesize that the linker histone subtypes are differential organizers of chromatin, rather than general repressors.

Site-specifically phosphorylated forms of H1.5 and H1.2 localized at distinct regions of the nucleus are related to different processes during the cell cycle

The cell cycle-associated phosphorylation of histone H1.5 is manifested as three discrete phosphorylated forms, occurring exclusively on Ser(17), Ser(172), and Ser(188) during interphase. During late G2 and mitosis the up-phosphorylation occurs exclusively on threonine at either Thr(137) or Thr(154) to build the tetraphosphorylated forms of H1.5, whereas the pentaphosphorylated forms result from phosphorylation at Thr(10). To determine the kinetic and spatial distribution of histone H1 phosphorylation within the nucleus of synchronized Hela cells we localized three distinct phosphorylation sites of histone subtype H1.5 using affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies generated against phosphorylated Ser(17), Ser(172), and Thr(10). Immunofluorescence labeling of synchronized HeLa cells using the specific antibodies revealed that phosphorylation of H1.5 Ser(17) appeared early in G1 at discrete speckles followed by phosphorylation of Ser(172). Thr(10) phosphorylation started during prophase, showed highest phosphorylation levels during metaphase, and disappeared clearly before chromatin decondensation occurred. Experiments using the kinase inhibitor staurosporine indicate the involvement of different kinases at the various phospho-sites. Colocalization studies revealed that Ser(172) phosphorylation of H1.5 and H1.2 does colocalize to DNA replication and transcription sites. These results favor the idea that the various site-specifically phosphorylated forms of H1.5 and H1.2 localized at distinct regions of the nucleus are related to different functions during the cell cycle.

Molecular dynamics of histone H1This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process

The histone H1 family of nucleoproteins represents an important class of structural and architectural proteins that are responsible for maintaining and stabilizing higher-order chromatin structure. Essential for mammalian cell viability, they are responsible for gene-specific regulation of transcription and other DNA-dependent processes. In this review, we focus on the wealth of information gathered on the molecular kinetics of histone H1 molecules using novel imaging techniques, such as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. These experiments have shed light on the effects of H1 phosphorylation and core histone acetylation in influencing chromatin structure and dynamics. We also delineate important concepts surrounding the C-terminal domain of H1, such as the intrinsic disorder hypothesis, and how it affects H1 function. Finally, we address the biochemical mechanisms behind low-affinity H1 binding.

Chromatin-modifying enzymes as therapeutic targets--Part 2

BACKGROUND

Part 1 of this review described the importance of histone acetylases, deacetylases, methylases and demethylases in transcriptional control and their potential as therapeutic targets. However, precise gene regulation requires the involvement of more than just the addition or removal of acetyl and methyl groups on histones. Histone phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, SUMOylation and poly-ADP-ribosylation, as well as ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes, play equally pivotal roles in the maintenance of transcriptional fidelity. Accordingly, the enzymes responsible for these modifications are also misregulated in various disease states.

OBJECTIVE

To review the complex roles of chromatin-modifying enzymes in gene regulation and to highlight their potential as therapeutic targets.

METHODS

This review is based on recent published literature and online resources.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

In this second and final part of the review, we discuss the importance of these other histone and nucleosome modifying enzymes in gene transcription as well as their therapeutic potential.

Histone H1 and its isoforms: contribution to chromatin structure and function

The lysine-rich H1 histone family in mammals includes eleven different subtypes, and thus it is the most divergent class of histone proteins. The central globular H1 domain asymmetrically interacts with DNA at the exit or entry end of the nucleosomal core DNA, and the C-terminal domain has a major impact on the linker DNA conformation and chromatin condensation. H1 histones are thus involved in the formation of higher order chromatin structures, and they modulate the accessibility of regulatory proteins, chromatin remodeling factors and histone modification enzymes to their target sites. The major posttranslational modification of H1 histones is phosphorylation, which reaches a peak during G2 and mitosis. Phosphorylation is, however, also involved in the control of DNA replication and it contributes to the regulation of gene expression. Disruption of linker histone genes, initially performed in order to delineate subtype-specific functions, revealed that disruption of one or two H1 subtype genes is quantitatively compensated by an increased expression of other subtypes. This suggests a functional redundancy among H1 subtypes. However, the inactivation of three subtypes and the reduction of the H1 moiety in half finally resulted in a phenotypic effect. On the other hand, studies on the role of particular subtypes at specific developmental stages in lower eukaryotes, but also in vertebrates suggest that specific subtypes of H1 participate in particular systems of gene regulation.

Global changes in and characterization of specific sites of phosphorylation in mouse and human histone H1 Isoforms upon CDK inhibitor treatment using mass spectrometry

Global changes in the phosphorylation state of human H1 isoforms isolated from UL3 cells have been investigated using mass spectrometry. Relative changes in H1 phosphorylation between untreated cells and cells treated with dexamethasone or various CDK inhibitors were determined. The specific cyclin-dependent kinase consensus sites of phosphorylation on the histone H1 isoforms that show changes in phosphorylation were also investigated. Three sites of phosphorylation on histone H1.4 isoforms have been identified.

Histone H1 of Trypanosoma cruzi is concentrated in the nucleolus region and disperses upon phosphorylation during progression to mitosis

Phosphorylation of histone H1 is intimately related to the cell cycle progression in higher eukaryotes, reaching maximum levels during mitosis. We have previously shown that in the flagellated protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, which does not condense chromatin during mitosis, histone H1 is phosphorylated at a single cyclin-dependent kinase site. By using an antibody that recognizes specifically the phosphorylated T. cruzi histone H1 site, we have now confirmed that T. cruzi histone H1 is also phosphorylated in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Differently from core histones, the bulk of nonphosphorylated histone H1 in G(1) and S phases of the cell cycle is concentrated in the central regions of the nucleus, which contains the nucleolus and less densely packed chromatin. When cells pass G(2), histone H1 becomes phosphorylated and starts to diffuse. At the onset of mitosis, histone H1 phosphorylation is maximal and found in the entire nuclear space. As permeabilized parasites preferentially lose phosphorylated histone H1, we conclude that this modification promotes its release from less condensed and nucleolar chromatin after G(2).

Chromatin-modifying proteins in cancer

Chromatin-modifying proteins mold the genome into areas that are accessible for transcriptional activity and areas that are transcriptionally silent. This epigenetic gene regulation allows for different transcriptional programs to be conducted in different cell types at different timepoints-despite the fact that all cells in the organism contain the same genetic information. A large amount of data gathered over the last decades has demonstrated that deregulation of chromatin-modifying proteins is etiologically involved in the development and progression of cancer. Here we discuss how epigenetic alterations influence cancer development and review known cancer-associated alterations in chromatin-modifying proteins.

Chromatin organization and nuclear microenvironments in cancer cells

Nuclear morphometric descriptors such as nuclear size, shape, DNA content and chromatin organization are used by pathologists as diagnostic markers for cancer. However, our knowledge of events resulting in changes in nuclear shape and chromatin organization in cancer cells is limited. Nuclear matrix proteins, which include lamins, transcription factors (Sp1) and histone modifying enzymes (histone deacetylases), and histone modifications (histone H3 phosphorylation) have roles in organizing chromatin in the interphase nucleus, regulating gene expression programs and determining nuclear shape. Histone H3 phosphorylation, a downstream target of the Ras-mitogen activated protein kinase pathway, is involved in neoplastic transformation. This article will review genetic and epigenetic events that alter chromatin organization in cancer cells and the role of the nuclear matrix in determining nuclear morphology.

Convergence and extension movements mediate the specification and fate maintenance of zebrafish slow muscle precursors

During vertebrate gastrulation, concurrent inductive events and cell movements fashion the body plan. Convergence and extension (C&E) gastrulation movements narrow the vertebrate embryonic body mediolaterally while elongating it rostrocaudally. Segmented somites are shaped and positioned by C&E alongside the notochord and differentiate into skeleton, fast, and slow muscles during somitogenesis. In zebrafish, simultaneous inactivation of non-canonical Wnt signaling components Knypek and Trilobite strongly impairs C&E gastrulation movements. Here we show that knypek;trilobite double mutants exhibit a severe deficit in slow muscles and their precursor, adaxial cells, revealing essential roles of C&E movements in adaxial cell development. Adaxial cells become distinguishable in the presomitic mesoderm during late gastrulation by their expression of myogenic factors and axial-adjacent position. Using cell tracing analyses and genetic manipulations, we demonstrate that C&E movements regulate the number of prospective adaxial cells specified during gastrulation by determining the size of the interface between the inductive axial and target presomitic tissues. During segmentation, when the range of Hedgehog signaling from the axial tissue declines, tight apposition of prospective adaxial cells to the notochord, which is achieved by convergence movements, is necessary for their continuous Hedgehog reception and fate maintenance. We provide direct evidence to show that the deficiency of adaxial cells in knypek;trilobite double mutants is due to impaired C&E movements, rather than an alteration in Hedgehog signal and its reception, or a cell-autonomous requirement for Knypek and Trilobite in adaxial cell development. Our results underscore the significance of precise coordination between cell movements and inductive tissue interactions during cell fate specification.

Analysis of mitotic phosphorylation of borealin

Background

The main role of the chromosomal passenger complex is to ensure that Aurora B kinase is properly localized and activated before and during mitosis. Borealin, a member of the chromosomal passenger complex, shows increased expression during G2/M phases and is involved in targeting the complex to the centromere and the spindle midzone, where it ensures proper chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Borealin has a consensus CDK1 phosphorylation site, threonine 106 and can be phosphorylated by Aurora B Kinase at serine 165 in vitro.

Results

Here, we show that Borealin is phosphorylated during mitosis in human cells. Dephosphorylation of Borealin occurs as cells exit mitosis. The phosphorylated form of Borealin is found in an INCENP-containing complex in mitosis. INCENP-containing complexes from cells in S phase are enriched in the phosphorylated form suggesting that phosphorylation may encourage entry of Borealin into the chromosomal passenger complex. Although Aurora B Kinase is found in complexes that contain Borealin, it is not required for the mitotic phosphorylation of Borealin. Mutation of T106 or S165 of Borealin to alanine does not alter the electrophoretic mobility shift of Borealin. Experiments with cyclohexamide and the phosphatase inhibitor sodium fluoride suggest that Borealin is phosphorylated by a protein kinase that can be active in interphase and mitosis and that the phosphorylation may be regulated by a short-lived phosphatase that is active in interphase but not mitosis.

Conclusion

Borealin is phosphorylated during mitosis. Neither residue S165, T106 nor phosphorylation of Borealin by Aurora B Kinase is required to generate the mitotic, shifted form of Borealin. Suppression of phosphorylation during interphase is ensured by a labile protein, possibly a cell cycle regulated phosphatase.

Analyses of linker histone--chromatin interactions in situ

Recent studies, using cytometric techniques based on fluorescence microscopy, have provided new information on how linker histones interact with chromatin in vivo or in situ. In particular, the use of green fluorescent proteins (GFPs) has enabled detailed studies of how individual H1 subtypes, and specific motifs in them, interact with chromatin in vivo. Furthermore, the development of cytochemical methods to study the interaction between linker histones and chromatin using DNA-binding fluorochromes as indirect probes for linker histone affinity in situ, in combination with highly sensitive and specific analytical methods, has provided additional information on the interactions between linker histones and chromatin in several cell systems. Such results verified that linker histones have a substantially higher affinity for chromatin in mature chicken erythrocytes than in frog erythrocytes, and they also indicated that the affinity decreased during differentiation of the frog erythrocytes. Furthermore, in cultured human fibroblasts, the linker histones showed a relatively high affinity for chromatin in interphase, whereas it showed a significantly lower affinity in highly condensed metaphase chromosomes. This method also enables the analysis of linker histone affinity for chromatin in H1-depleted fibroblasts reconstituted with purified linker histones. No consistent correlation between linker histone affinity and chromatin condensation has so far been detected.

beta-catenin signaling and regulation of cyclin D1 promoter in NRK-49F cells transformed by down-regulation of the tumor suppressor lysyl oxidase

Lysyl oxidase is the enzyme that is essential for collagen and elastin cross-linking. Previous investigations showed that lysyl oxidase is down-regulated in many human tumors and ras-transformed cells. Recently, we proved that antisense down-regulation of lysyl oxidase in NRK-49F cells induced phenotypic changes and oncogenic transformation, characterized by p21(ras) activation and beta-catenin/cyclin D1 up-regulation. In the present paper, we examined beta-catenin intracellular distribution and its association with E-cadherin. We observed an increased association between E-cadherin and beta-catenin in the lysyl-oxidase down-regulated cells during serum starvation. Moreover, we found that beta-catenin cytoplasmic and nuclear levels were increased, suggesting a failure of its down-regulation by the APC-GSK-3beta system, in particular the GSK-3beta phosphorylation of ser-33/37 and thr-41 of beta-catenin. Finally, we investigated the mechanisms leading to the observed cyclin D1 up-regulation. We showed that in the antisense lysyl oxidase cells the cyclin D1 promoter was activated through the LEF and the ATF/CRE sites in the proximal promoter. While the promoter activation through LEF is compatible with beta-catenin signaling, we investigated the possibility that the CRE-dependent activation might be linked to the down-regulation of lysyl oxidase. In fact, up-regulation of lysyl oxidase in a COS-7 cell model showed a significant diminution of the CREB protein binding to the cyclin D1 promoter, leading to a dramatic inhibition of its activity and a significant down-regulation of cyclin D1 protein level in vivo. Finally, our study describes some major anomalies occurring in lysyl oxidase down-regulated fibroblasts, related to beta-catenin signaling and cyclin D1 expression.

Histone H1 Phosphorylation Occurs Site-specifically during Interphase and Mitosis

H1 histones, isolated from logarithmically growing and mitotically enriched human lymphoblastic T-cells (CCRF-CEM), were fractionated by reversed phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography, subjected to enzymatic digestion, and analyzed by amino acid sequencing and mass spectrometry. During interphase the four H1 subtypes present in these cells differ in their maximum phosphorylation levels: histone H1.5 is tri-, H1.4 di-, and H1.3 and H1.2, only monophosphorylated. The phosphorylation is site-specific and occurs exclusively on serine residues of SP(K/A)K motifs. The phosphorylation sites of histone H1.5 from mitotically enriched cells were also examined. In contrast to the situation in interphase, at mitosis there were additional phosphorylations, exclusively at threonine residues. Whereas the tetraphosphorylated H1.5 arises from the triphosphosphorylated form by phosphorylation of one of two TPKK motifs in the C-terminal domain, namely Thr137 and Thr154, the pentaphosphorylated H1.5 was the result of phosphorylation of one of the tetraphosphorylated forms at a novel nonconsensus motif at Thr10 in the N-terminal tail. Despite the fact that histone H1.5 has five (S/T)P(K/A)K motifs, all of these motifs were never found to be phosphorylated simultaneously. Our data suggest that phosphorylation of human H1 variants occurs nonrandomly during both interphase and mitosis and that distinct serine- or threonine-specific kinases are involved in different cell cycle phases. The order of increased phosphorylation and the position of modification might be necessary for regulated chromatin decondensation, thus facilitating processes of replication and transcription as well as of mitotic chromosome condensation.

Sfrp1 and Sfrp2 regulate anteroposterior axis elongation and somite segmentation during mouse embryogenesis

Regulation of Wnt signaling is essential for embryonic patterning. Sfrps are secreted Wnt antagonists that directly interact with the Wnt ligand to inhibit signaling. Here, we show that Sfrp1 and Sfrp2 are required for anteroposterior (AP) axis elongation and somitogenesis in the thoracic region during mouse embryogenesis. Double homozygous mutations in Sfrp1 and Sfrp2 lead to severe shortening of the thoracic region. By contrast, a homozygous mutation in one or the other exerts no effect on embryogenesis, indicating that Sfrp1 and Sfrp2 are functionally redundant. The defect of a shortened thoracic region appears to be the consequence of AP axis reduction and incomplete somite segmentation. The reduction in the AP axis is partially due to abnormalities in cell migration of pre-somitic mesoderm from the end of gastrulation. Aberrant somite segmentation is associated with altered oscillations of Notch signaling, as evidenced by abnormal Lfng and Hes7 expression during somitogenesis in the thoracic region. This study suggests that Wnt regulation by Sfrp1 and Sfrp2 is required for embryonic patterning.

Abnormalities of chromatin in tumor cells

Nuclear morphometric descriptors such as nuclear size, shape, DNA content and chromatin organization are used by pathologists as diagnostic markers for cancer. Tumorigenesis involves a series of poorly understood morphological changes that lead to the development of hyperplasia, dysplasia, in situ carcinoma, invasive carcinoma, and in many instances finally metastatic carcinoma. Nuclei from different stages of disease progression exhibit changes in shape and the reorganization of chromatin, which appears to correlate with malignancy. Multistep tumorigenesis is a process that results from alterations in the function of DNA. These alterations result from stable genetic changes, including those of tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes and DNA stability genes, and potentially reversible epigenetic changes, which are modifications in gene function without a change in the DNA sequence. DNA methylation and histone modifications are two epigenetic mechanisms that are altered in cancer cells. The impact of genetic (e.g., mutations in Rb and ras family) and epigenetic alterations with a focus on histone modifications on chromatin structure and function in cancer cells are reviewed here.

Histone modifications as a platform for cancer therapy

Tumorigenesis and metastasis are a progression of events resulting from alterations in the processing of the genetic information. These alterations result from stable genetic changes (mutations) involving tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes (e.g., ras, BRAF) and potentially reversible epigenetic changes, which are modifications in gene function without a change in the DNA sequence. Mutations of genes coding for proteins that directly or indirectly influence epigenetic processes will alter the cell's gene expression program. Epigenetic mechanisms often altered in cancer cells are DNA methylation and histone modifications (acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation). This article will review the potential of these reversible epigenetic processes as targets for cancer therapies.

The H1 phosphorylation state regulates expression of CDC2 and other genes in response to starvation in Tetrahymena thermophila

In Tetrahymena thermophila, highly phosphorylated histone H1 of growing cells becomes partially dephosphorylated when cells are starved in preparation for conjugation. To determine the effects of H1 phosphorylation on gene expression, PCR-based subtractive hybridization was used to clone cDNAs that were differentially expressed during starvation in two otherwise-isogenic strains differing only in their H1s. H1 in A5 mutant cells lacked phosphorylation, and H1 in E5 cells mimicked constitutive H1 phosphorylation. Sequences enriched in A5 cells included genes encoding proteases. Sequences enriched in E5 cells included genes encoding cdc2 kinase and a Ser/Thr kinase. These results indicate that H1 phosphorylation plays an important role in regulating the pattern of gene expression during the starvation response and that its role in transcription regulation can be either positive or negative. Treatment of starved cells with a phosphatase inhibitor caused CDC2 gene overexpression. Expression of the E5 version of H1 in starved cells containing endogenous, wild-type H1 caused the wild-type H1 to remain highly phosphorylated. These results argue that Cdc2p is the kinase that phosphorylates Tetrahymena H1, establish a positive feedback mechanism between H1 phosphorylation and CDC2 expression, and indicate that CDC2 gene expression is regulated by an H1 phosphatase.

Stimulation of the Ras-MAPK pathway leads to independent phosphorylation of histone H3 on serine 10 and 28

The Ras-mitogen activated protein kinase (Ras-MAPK) pathway plays an integral role in the formation of human malignancies. Stimulation of this pathway results in phosphorylation of histone H3 at serines 10 and 28 and expression of immediate-early genes. Phosphorylated (serine 10) H3, which is also acetylated on lysine 14, is associated with immediate-early genes. In this report, we investigated the relationship between these two H3 phosphorylation events in parental and ras-transformed fibroblasts. Immunoblot analyses of two-dimensional gel patterns demonstrated that all three H3 variants were phosphorylated after stimulation of the Ras-MAPK pathway and during mitosis. Following stimulation of the Ras-MAPK pathway, H3 phosphorylated on serines 10 and 28 was excluded from regions of highly condensed chromatin and was present in increased levels in ras-transformed cells. Although H3 phosphorylated at serine 10 or 28 was dynamically acetylated, H3 phosphorylated at serine 28 had a higher steady state of acetylation than that of H3 phosphorylated at serine 10. When visualized with indirect immunofluorescence, most foci of phosphorylated serine 28 H3 did not co-localize with foci of H3 phosphorylated on serine 10 or phosphoacetylated on serine 10 and lysine 14, suggesting that these two phosphorylation events act separately to promote gene expression.

The Ras-MAPK signal transduction pathway, cancer and chromatin remodeling

Stimulation of the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway results in a multitude of events including expression of the immediate-early genes, c-fos and c-myc. Downstream targets of this stimulated pathway are the mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinases (MSK) 1 and 2, which are histone H3 kinases. In chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, it has been shown that the mitogen-induced phosphorylated H3 is associated with the immediate-early genes and that MSK1/2 activity and H3 phosphorylation have roles in chromatin remodeling and transcription of these genes. In oncogene-transformed fibroblasts in which the Ras-MAPK pathway is constitutively active, histone H1 and H3 phosphorylation is increased and the chromatin of these cells has a more relaxed structure than the parental cells. In this review we explore the deregulation of the Ras-MAPK pathway in cancer, with an emphasis on breast cancer. We discuss the features of MSK1 and 2 and the impact of a constitutively activated Ras-MAPK pathway on chromatin remodeling and gene expression.Key words: Ras, mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway, histone H3 phosphorylation, MSK1, breast cancer.

Neural regeneration in the chick retina

In warm-blooded vertebrates, possibilities for retinal regeneration have recently become reality with the discovery of neural stem cells in the mature eye. A number of different cellular sources of neural stem cells have been identified. These sources include stem cells at the retinal margin, pigmented cells in the ciliary body and iris, non-pigmented cells in the ciliary body and Müller glia within the retina. This review focuses on recent reports of neural stem cells and regeneration in the postnatal chicken retina. In the chicken eye sources of neurogensis and regeneration include: (1) retinal stem cells at the peripheral edge of the retina; (2) Müller glia in central regions of the retina; (3) non-pigmented epithelial cells in the posterior portion of the ciliary body; and (4) possibly pigmented cells in the pars plana of the ciliary body. This review discusses the similarities between the retinal progenitor cells in the postnatal eye and those found in the embryo. In addition, I discuss combinations of growth factors, (insulin, IGF-I, EGF and FGF2) that are capable of stimulating the proliferation and production of neurons from neural progenitors, non-neural epithelial cells, and postmitotic support cells in the avian eye. In summary, the mechanisms that regulate the proliferation and differentiation of cells with neurogenic potential are beginning to be understood and the postnatal chicken eye has proven to be a useful model system to study retinal regeneration.

Elevated expression of the estrogen receptor prevents the down-regulation of p21Waf1/Cip1 in hormone dependent breast cancer cells

Expression of an estrogen receptor alpha (ER) transgene in hormone independent breast cancer and normal breast epithelial cells arrests cell cycling when estradiol is added. Although endogenously expressed ER does not typically affect estradiol-induced cell cycling of hormone dependent breast cancer cells, we observed that elevated expression of a green fluorescent protein fused to ER (GFP-ER) hindered entry of estrogen treated MCF-7 cells into S phase of the cell cycle. In analyses of key cell-cycle regulating proteins, we observed that GFP-ER expression had no affect on the protein levels of cyclin D1, cyclin E, or p27, a cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor. However, at 24 h, p21 (Waf1, Cip1; a Cdk2 inhibitor) protein remained elevated in the high GFP-ER expressing cells but not in non-GFP-ER expressing cells. Elevated expression of p21 inhibited Cdk2 activity, preventing cells from entering S phase. The results show that elevated levels of ER prevented the down-regulation of p21 protein expression, which is required for hormone responsive cells to enter S phase.

The dynamic mobility of histone H1 is regulated by cyclin/CDK phosphorylation

The linker histone H1 is involved in maintaining higher-order chromatin structures and displays dynamic nuclear mobility, which may be regulated by posttranslational modifications. To analyze the effect of H1 tail phosphorylation on the modulation of the histone's nuclear dynamics, we generated a mutant histone H1, referred to as M1-5, in which the five cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation consensus sites were mutated from serine or threonine residues into alanines. Cyclin E/CDK2 or cyclin A/CDK2 cannot phosphorylate the mutant in vitro. Using the technique of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we observed that the mobility of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-M1-5 fusion protein is decreased compared to that of a GFP-wild-type H1 fusion protein. In addition, recovery of H1 correlated with CDK2 activity, as GFP-H1 mobility was decreased in cells with low CDK2 activity. Blocking the activity of CDK2 by p21 expression decreased the mobility of GFP-H1 but not that of GFP-M1-5. Finally, the level and rate of recovery of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-M1-5 were lower than those of CFP-H1 specifically in heterochromatic regions. These data suggest that CDK2 phosphorylates histone H1 in vivo, resulting in a more open chromatin structure by destabilizing H1-chromatin interactions.

No tail co-operates with non-canonical Wnt signaling to regulate posterior body morphogenesis in zebrafish

The vertebrate posterior body is formed by a combination of the gastrulation movements that shape the head and anterior trunk and posterior specific cell behaviors. Here, we investigated whether genes that regulate cell movements during gastrulation [no tail (ntl)/brachyury, knypek (kny) and pipetail (ppt)/wnt5] interact to regulate posterior body morphogenesis. Both kny;ntl and ppt;ntl double mutant embryos exhibit synergistic trunk and tail shortening by early segmentation. Gene expression analysis in the compound mutants indicates that anteroposterior germ-layer patterning is largely normal and that the tail elongation defects are not due to failure to specify or maintain posterior tissues. Moreover, ntl interacts with ppt and kny to synergistically regulate the posterior expression of the gene encoding bone morphogenetic protein 4 (bmp4) but not of other known T-box genes, fibroblast growth factor genes or caudal genes. Examination of mitotic and apoptotic cells indicates that impaired tail elongation is not simply due to decreased cell proliferation or increased cell death. Cell tracing in ppt;ntl and kny;ntl mutants demonstrates that the ventral derived posterior tailbud progenitors move into the tailbud. However, gastrulation-like convergence and extension movements and cell movements within the posterior tailbud are impaired. Furthermore, subduction movements of cells into the mesendoderm are reduced in kny;ntl and ppt;ntl mutants. We propose that Ntl and the non-canonical Wnt pathway components Ppt and Kny function in parallel, partially redundant pathways to regulate posterior body development. Our work initiates the genetic dissection of posterior body morphogenesis and links genes to specific tail-forming movements. Moreover, we provide genetic evidence for the notion that tail development entails a continuation of mechanisms regulating gastrulation together with mechanisms unique to the posterior body.

Demonstration of in vitro interaction between tumor suppressor lysyl oxidase and histones H1 and H2: definition of the regions involved

Lysyl oxidase (LOX) is the enzyme that cross-links extracellular collagen and tropoelastin and is involved in tumor suppressor activity. Based on the existent homologies between lysine-rich regions of tropoelastin and the "lysine-rich" histone H1, we tested the possibility that H1 could be a new nuclear target. Our study shows that LOX could actually interact specifically not only with histone H1, but also with histone H2. Mechanisms and significance of these interactions are discussed in detail.

Characterization of stably transfected fusion protein GFP-estrogen receptor-alpha in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells

Tagging hormone receptors with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) has increased our knowledge of ligand dependent sub-cellular trafficking of hormone receptors. However, the effect of the tagged hormone receptor expression on the corresponding wild type hormone receptor and endogenous gene expression has not been investigated. In this study, we constructed a MCF-7 cell line stably expressing GFP-tagged human estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) under control of the tetracycline-on system to determine the effect of GFP-ER expression on cell proliferation and expression of endogenous ER and hormone-responsive genes. Further, the inducible system was applied to determine the ligand dependent turnover rates of GFP-ER protein and mRNA. Our results demonstrate that GFP-ER expression did not affect cell cycling. Independent of ligand, GFP-ER markedly reduced the level of endogenous ER mRNA and protein, suggesting that ER negatively autoregulates its expression. Cisplatin cross-linking studies showed that GFP-ER is associated with nuclear DNA in situ, suggesting that GFP-ER is partially replacing ER at estrogen response elements. Furthermore, GFP-ER expression did not affect the estradiol induced temporal expression of hormone responsive genes c-myc and pS2.

Histone H1(S)-3 phosphorylation in Ha-ras oncogene-transformed mouse fibroblasts

Phosphorylation of linker histone H1(S)-3 (previously named H1b) and core histone H3 is elevated in mouse fibroblasts transformed with oncogenes or constitutively active mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase (MEK). H1(S)-3 phosphorylation is the only histone modification known to be dependent upon transcription and replication. Our results show that the increased amounts of phosphorylated H1(S)-3 in the oncogene Ha-ras-transformed mouse fibroblasts was a consequence of an elevated Cdk2 activity rather than the reduced activity of a H1 phosphatase, which our studies suggest is PP1. Induction of oncogenic ras expression results in an increase in H1(S)-3 and H3 phosphorylation. However, in contrast to the phosphorylation of H3, which occurred immediately following the onset of Ras expression, there was a lag of several hours before H1(S)-3 phosphorylation levels increased. We found that there was a transient increase in the levels of p21(cip1), which inhibited the H1 kinase activity of Cdk2. Cdk2 activity and H1(S)-3 phosphorylated levels increased after p21(cip1) levels declined. Our studies suggest that persistent activation of the Ras-MAPK signal transduction pathway in oncogene-transformed cells results in deregulated activity of kinases phosphorylating H3 and H1(S)-3 associated with transcribed genes. The chromatin remodelling actions of these modified histones may result in aberrant gene expression.