Role of the 70-kDa subunit of human replication protein A (I). Single-stranded dna binding activity, but not polymerase stimulatory activity, is required for DNA replication

Decoding Cancer Variants of Unknown Significance for Helicase-Nuclease-RPA Complexes Orchestrating DNA Repair During Transcription and Replication

All tumors have DNA mutations, and a predictive understanding of those mutations could inform clinical treatments. However, 40% of the mutations are variants of unknown significance (VUS), with the challenge being to objectively predict whether a VUS is pathogenic and supports the tumor or whether it is benign. To objectively decode VUS, we mapped cancer sequence data and evolutionary trace (ET) scores onto crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy structures with variant impacts quantitated by evolutionary action (EA) measures. As tumors depend on helicases and nucleases to deal with transcription/replication stress, we targeted helicase–nuclease–RPA complexes: (1) XPB-XPD (within TFIIH), XPF-ERCC1, XPG, and RPA for transcription and nucleotide excision repair pathways and (2) BLM, EXO5, and RPA plus DNA2 for stalled replication fork restart. As validation, EA scoring predicts severe effects for most disease mutations, but disease mutants with low ET scores not only are likely destabilizing but also disrupt sophisticated allosteric mechanisms. For sites of disease mutations and VUS predicted to be severe, we found strong co-localization to ordered regions. Rare discrepancies highlighted the different survival requirements between disease and tumor mutations, as well as the value of examining proteins within complexes. In a genome-wide analysis of 33 cancer types, we found correlation between the number of mutations in each tumor and which pathways or functional processes in which the mutations occur, revealing different mutagenic routes to tumorigenesis. We also found upregulation of ancient genes including BLM, which supports a non-random and concerted cancer process: reversion to a unicellular, proliferation-uncontrolled, status by breaking multicellular constraints on cell division. Together, these genes and global analyses challenge the binary “driver” and “passenger” mutation paradigm, support a gradient impact as revealed by EA scoring from moderate to severe at a single gene level, and indicate reduced regulation as well as activity. The objective quantitative assessment of VUS scoring and gene overexpression in the context of functional interactions and pathways provides insights for biology, oncology, and precision medicine.

The meiosis-specific MEIOB-SPATA22 complex cooperates with RPA to form a compacted mixed MEIOB/SPATA22/RPA/ssDNA complex

During meiosis, programmed double-strand breaks are repaired by homologous recombination (HR) to form crossovers that are essential to homologous chromosome segregation. Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) containing intermediates are key features of HR, which must be highly regulated. RPA, the ubiquitous ssDNA binding complex, was thought to play similar roles during mitotic and meiotic HR until the recent discovery of MEIOB and its partner, SPATA22, two essential meiosis-specific proteins. Here, we show that like MEIOB, SPATA22 resembles RPA subunits and binds ssDNA. We studied the physical and functional interactions existing between MEIOB, SPATA22, and RPA, and show that MEIOB and SPATA22 interact with the preformed RPA complex through their interacting domain and condense RPA-coated ssDNA in vitro. In meiotic cells, we show that MEIOB and SPATA22 modify the immunodetection of the two large subunits of RPA. Given these results, we propose that MEIOB-SPATA22 and RPA form a functional ssDNA-interacting complex to satisfy meiotic HR requirements by providing specific properties to the ssDNA.

Replication protein A and more: single-stranded DNA-binding proteins in eukaryotic cells

Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play essential roles in DNA replication, recombinational repair, and maintenance of genome stability. In human, the major SSB, replication protein A (RPA), is a stable heterotrimer composed of subunits of RPA1, RPA2, and RPA3, each of which is conserved not only in mammals but also in all other eukaryotic species. In addition to RPA, other SSBs have also been identified in the human genome, including sensor of single-stranded DNA complexes 1 and 2 (SOSS1/2). In this review, we summarize our current understanding of how these SSBs contribute to the maintenance of genome stability.

RPA homologs and ssDNA processing during meiotic recombination

Meiotic homologous recombination is a specialized process that involves homologous chromosome pairing and strand exchange to guarantee proper chromosome segregation and genetic diversity. The formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) during meiotic recombination differs from those during mitotic recombination in that the homologous chromosome rather than the sister chromatid is the preferred repair template. The processing of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) formed on intermediate recombination structures is central to driving the specific outcomes of DSB repair during meiosis. Replication protein A (RPA) is the main ssDNA-binding protein complex involved in DNA metabolism. However, the existence of RPA orthologs in plants and the recent discovery of meiosis specific with OB domains (MEIOB), a widely conserved meiosis-specific RPA1 paralog, strongly suggest that multiple RPA complexes evolved and specialized to subdivide their roles during DNA metabolism. Here we review ssDNA formation and maturation during mitotic and meiotic recombination underlying the meiotic specific features. We describe and discuss the existence and properties of MEIOB and multiple RPA subunits in plants and highlight how they can provide meiosis-specific fates to ssDNA processing during homologous recombination. Understanding the functions of these RPA homologs and how they interact with the canonical RPA subunits is of major interest in the fields of meiosis and DNA repair.

Opposing roles for two molecular forms of replication protein A in Rad51-Rad54-mediated DNA recombination in Plasmodium falciparum

The bacterial RecA protein and its eukaryotic homologue Rad51 play a central role in the homologous DNA strand exchange reaction during recombination and DNA repair. Previously, our lab has shown that PfRad51, the Plasmodium falciparum homologue of Rad51, exhibited ATPase activity and promoted DNA strand exchange in vitro. In this study, we evaluated the catalytic functions of PfRad51 in the presence of putative interacting partners, especially P. falciparum homologues of Rad54 and replication protein A. PfRad54 accelerated PfRad51-mediated pairing between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and its homologous linear double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in the presence of 0.5 mM CaCl₂. We also present evidence that recombinant PfRPA1L protein serves the function of the bacterial homologue single-stranded binding protein (SSB) in initiating homologous pairing and strand exchange activity. More importantly, the function of PfRPA1L was negatively regulated in a dose-dependent manner by PfRPA1S, another RPA homologue in P. falciparum. Finally, we present in vivo evidence through comet assays for methyl methane sulfonate-induced DNA damage in malaria parasites and accompanying upregulation of PfRad51, PfRad54, PfRPA1L, and PfRPA1S at the level of transcript and protein needed to repair DNA damage. This study provides new insights into the role of putative Rad51-interacting proteins involved in homologous recombination and emphasizes the physiological role of DNA damage repair during the growth of parasites.

Homologous recombination plays a major role in chromosomal rearrangement, and Rad51 protein, aided by several other proteins, plays a central role in DNA strand exchange reaction during recombination and DNA repair. This study reports on the characterization of the role of P. falciparum Rad51 in homologous strand exchange and DNA repair and evaluates the functional contribution of PfRad54 and PfRPA1 proteins. Data presented here provide mechanistic insights into DNA recombination and DNA damage repair mechanisms in this parasite. The importance of these research findings in future work will be to investigate if Rad51-dependent mechanisms are involved in chromosomal rearrangements during antigenic variation in P. falciparum. A prominent determinant of antigenic variation, the extraordinary ability of the parasite to rapidly change its surface molecules, is associated with var genes, and antigenic variation presents a major challenge to vaccine development.

Coordination of DNA-PK activation and nuclease processing of DNA termini in NHEJ

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), particularly those induced by ionizing radiation (IR), are complex lesions that can be cytotoxic if not properly repaired. IR-induced DSB often have DNA termini modifications, including thymine glycols, ring fragmentation, 3'-phosphoglycolates, 5'-hydroxyl groups, and abasic sites. Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is a major pathway responsible for the repair of these complex breaks. Proteins involved in NHEJ include the Ku 70/80 heterodimer, DNA-PKcs, processing proteins including Artemis and DNA polymerases μ and λ, XRCC4, DNA ligase IV, and XLF. We will discuss the role of the physical and functional interactions of DNA-PK as a result of activation, with an emphasis on DNA structure, chemistry, and sequence. With the diversity of IR induced DSB, it is becoming increasingly clear that multiple DNA processing enzymes are likely necessary for effective repair of a break. We will explore the roles of several important processing enzymes, with a focus on the nuclease Artemis and its role in processing diverse DSB. The effect of DNA termini on both DNA-PK and Artemis activity will be analyzed from a structural and biochemical view.

Redox control of protein-DNA interactions: from molecular mechanisms to significance in signal transduction, gene expression, and DNA replication

Protein-DNA interactions play a key role in the regulation of major cellular metabolic pathways, including gene expression, genome replication, and genomic stability. They are mediated through the interactions of regulatory proteins with their specific DNA-binding sites at promoters, enhancers, and replication origins in the genome. Redox signaling regulates these protein-DNA interactions using reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species that interact with cysteine residues at target proteins and their regulators. This review describes the redox-mediated regulation of several master regulators of gene expression that control the induction and suppression of hundreds of genes in the genome, regulating multiple metabolic pathways, which are involved in cell growth, development, differentiation, and survival, as well as in the function of the immune system and cellular response to intracellular and extracellular stimuli. It also discusses the role of redox signaling in protein-DNA interactions that regulate DNA replication. Specificity of redox regulation is discussed, as well as the mechanisms providing several levels of redox-mediated regulation, from direct control of DNA-binding domains through the indirect control, mediated by release of negative regulators, regulation of redox-sensitive protein kinases, intracellular trafficking, and chromatin remodeling.

Multiple human single-stranded DNA binding proteins function in genome maintenance: structural, biochemical and functional analysis

DNA exists predominantly in a duplex form that is preserved via specific base pairing. This base pairing affords a considerable degree of protection against chemical or physical damage and preserves coding potential. However, there are many situations, e.g. during DNA damage and programmed cellular processes such as DNA replication and transcription, in which the DNA duplex is separated into two single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) strands. This ssDNA is vulnerable to attack by nucleases, binding by inappropriate proteins and chemical attack. It is very important to control the generation of ssDNA and protect it when it forms, and for this reason all cellular organisms and many viruses encode a ssDNA binding protein (SSB). All known SSBs use an oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide binding (OB)-fold domain for DNA binding. SSBs have multiple roles in binding and sequestering ssDNA, detecting DNA damage, stimulating strand-exchange proteins and helicases, and mediation of protein-protein interactions. Recently two additional human SSBs have been identified that are more closely related to bacterial and archaeal SSBs. Prior to this it was believed that replication protein A, RPA, was the only human equivalent of bacterial SSB. RPA is thought to be required for most aspects of DNA metabolism including DNA replication, recombination and repair. This review will discuss in further detail the biological pathways in which human SSBs function.

Initiation of new DNA strands by the herpes simplex virus-1 primase-helicase complex and either herpes DNA polymerase or human DNA polymerase alpha

A key set of reactions for the initiation of new DNA strands during herpes simplex virus-1 replication consists of the primase-catalyzed synthesis of short RNA primers followed by polymerase-catalyzed DNA synthesis (i.e. primase-coupled polymerase activity). Herpes primase (UL5-UL52-UL8) synthesizes products from 2 to approximately 13 nucleotides long. However, the herpes polymerase (UL30 or UL30-UL42) only elongates those at least 8 nucleotides long. Surprisingly, coupled activity was remarkably inefficient, even considering only those primers at least 8 nucleotides long, and herpes polymerase typically elongated <2% of the primase-synthesized primers. Of those primers elongated, only 4-26% of the primers were passed directly from the primase to the polymerase (UL30-UL42) without dissociating into solution. Comparing RNA primer-templates and DNA primer-templates of identical sequence showed that herpes polymerase greatly preferred to elongate the DNA primer by 650-26,000-fold, thus accounting for the extremely low efficiency with which herpes polymerase elongated primase-synthesized primers. Curiously, one of the DNA polymerases of the host cell, polymerase alpha (p70-p180 or p49-p58-p70-p180 complex), extended herpes primase-synthesized RNA primers much more efficiently than the viral polymerase, raising the possibility that the viral polymerase may not be the only one involved in herpes DNA replication.

The binding of topoisomerase I to T antigen enhances the synthesis of RNA-DNA primers during simian virus 40 DNA replication

Topoisomerase I (topo I) is required for the proper initiation of simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication. This enzyme binds to SV40 large T antigen at two places, close to the N-terminal end and near the C-terminal end of the helicase domain. We have recently demonstrated that the binding of topo I to the C-terminal site is necessary for the stimulation of DNA synthesis by topo I and for the formation of normal amounts of completed daughter molecules. In this study, we investigated the mechanism by which this stimulation occurs. Contrary to our expectation that the binding of topo I to this region of T antigen provides the proper unwound DNA substrate for initiation to occur, we demonstrate that binding of topo I stimulates polymerase alpha/primase (pol/prim) to synthesize larger amounts of primers consisting of short RNA and about 30 nucleotides of DNA. Topo I binding also stimulates the production of large molecular weight DNA by pol/prim. Mutant T antigens that fail to bind topo I normally do not participate in the synthesis of expected amounts of primers or large molecular weight DNAs indicating that the association of topo I with the C-terminal binding site on T antigen is required for these activities. It is also shown that topo I has the ability to bind to human RPA directly, suggesting that the stimulation of pol/prim activity may be mediated in part through RPA in the DNA synthesis initiation complex.

Timed interactions between viral and cellular replication factors during the initiation of SV40 in vitro DNA replication

The initiation of SV40 (simian virus 40) DNA replication requires the co-operative interactions between the viral Tag (large T-antigen), RPA (replication protein A) and Pol (DNA polymerase alpha-primase) on the template DNA. Binding interfaces mapped on these enzymes and expressed as peptides competed with the mutual interactions of the native proteins. Prevention of the genuine interactions was accomplished only prior to the primer synthesis step and blocked the assembly of a productive initiation complex. Once the complex was engaged in the synthesis of an RNA primer and its extension, the interfering effects of the peptides ceased, suggesting a stable association of the replication factors during the initiation phase. Specific antibodies were still able to disrupt preformed interactions and inhibited primer synthesis and extension activities, underlining the crucial role of specific protein-protein contacts during the entire initiation process.

Replication protein A and gamma-H2AX foci assembly is triggered by cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks

Human replication protein A (RPA p34), a crucial component of diverse DNA excision repair pathways, is implicated in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. To evaluate its role in DSB repair, the intranuclear dynamics of RPA was investigated after DNA damage and replication blockage in human cells. Using two different agents [ionizing radiation (IR) and hydroxyurea (HU)] to generate DSBs, we found that RPA relocated into distinct nuclear foci and colocalized with a well-known DSB binding factor, gamma-H2AX, at the sites of DNA damage in a time-dependent manner. Colocalization of RPA and gamma-H2AX foci peaked at 2 h after IR treatment and subsequently declined with increasing postrecovery times. The time course of RPA and gamma-H2AX foci association correlated well with the DSB repair activity detected by a neutral comet assay. A phosphatidylinositol-3 (PI-3) kinase inhibitor, wortmannin, completely abolished both RPA and gamma-H2AX foci formation triggered by IR. Additionally, radiosensitive ataxia telangiectasia (AT) cells harboring mutations in ATM gene product were found to be deficient in RPA and gamma-H2AX colocalization after IR. Transfection of AT cells with ATM cDNA fully restored the association of RPA foci with gamma-H2AX illustrating the requirement of ATM gene product for this process. The exact coincidence of RPA and gamma-H2AX in response to HU specifically in S-phase cells supports their role in DNA replication checkpoint control. Depletion of RPA by small interfering RNA (SiRNA) substantially elevated the frequencies of IR-induced micronuclei (MN) and apoptosis in human cells suggestive of a role for RPA in DSB repair. We propose that RPA in association with gamma-H2AX contributes to both DNA damage checkpoint control and repair in response to strand breaks and stalled replication forks in human cells.

Coordinated regulation of replication protein A activities by its subunits p14 and p32

The heterotrimeric replication protein A (RPA) has multiple essential activities in eukaryotic DNA metabolism and in signaling pathways. Despite extensive analyses, the functions of the smallest RPA subunit p14 are still unknown. To solve this issue we produced and characterized a dimeric RPA complex lacking p14, RPADeltap14, consisting of p70 and p32. RPADeltap14 was able to bind single-stranded DNA, but its binding mode and affinity differed from those of the heterotrimeric complex. Moreover, in the RPADeltap14 complex p32 only minimally recognized the 3'-end of a primer in a primer-template junction. Partial proteolytic digests revealed that p14 and p32 together stabilize the C terminus of p70 against degradation. Although RPADeltap14 efficiently supported bidirectional unwinding of double-stranded DNA and interacted with both the simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen and cellular DNA polymerase alpha-primase, it did not support cell-free SV40 DNA replication. This inability manifested itself in a failure to support both the primer synthesis and primer elongation reactions. These data reveal that efficient binding and correct positioning of the RPA complex on single-stranded DNA requires all three subunits to support DNA replication.

Recruitment of replication protein A by the papillomavirus E1 protein and modulation by single-stranded DNA

With the exception of viral proteins E1 and E2, papillomaviruses depend heavily on host replication machinery for replication of their viral genome. E1 and E2 are known to recruit many of the necessary cellular replication factors to the viral origin of replication. Previously, we reported a physical interaction between E1 and the major human single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA). E1 was determined to bind to the 70-kDa subunit of RPA, RPA70. In this study, using E1-affinity coprecipitation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based interaction assays, we show that E1 interacts with the major ssDNA-binding domain of RPA. Consistent with our previous report, no measurable interaction between E1 and the two smaller subunits of RPA was detected. The interaction of E1 with RPA was substantially inhibited by ssDNA. The extent of this inhibition was dependent on the length of the DNA. A 31-nucleotide (nt) oligonucleotide strongly inhibited the E1-RPA interaction, while a 16-nt oligonucleotide showed an intermediate level of inhibition. In contrast, a 10-nt oligonucleotide showed no observable effect on the E1-RPA interaction. This inhibition was not dependent on the sequence of the DNA. Furthermore, ssDNA also inhibited the interaction of RPA with papillomavirus E2, simian virus 40 T antigen, human polymerase alpha-primase, and p53. Taken together, our results suggest a potential role for ssDNA in modulating RPA-protein interactions, in particular, the RPA-E1 interactions during papillomavirus DNA replication. A model for recruitment of RPA by E1 during papillomavirus DNA replication is proposed.

Bimodal interaction between replication-protein A and Dna2 is critical for Dna2 function both in vivo and in vitro

We have previously shown that replication- protein A (RPA), the heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA binding protein of eukaryotes, plays a role in Okazaki fragment processing by acting as a molecular switch between the two endonucleases, Dna2 and Fen1, to ensure the complete removal of primer RNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The stimulation of Dna2 endonuclease activity by RPA requires direct protein-protein interaction. In this report we have analyzed genetically and biochemically the interaction of Dna2 with RPA. RFA1, the gene encoding the large subunit of RPA, displayed allele-specific interactions with DNA2 that included synthetic lethality and intergenic complementation. In addition, we identified physical and functional interactions between these proteins and found that RPA binds Dna2 predominantly through its large subunit, Rpa1. Consistent with the mapping of synthetic lethal mutations, robust interaction localizes to the C-termini of these proteins. Moreover, the N-terminal domains of Dna2 and Rpa1 appear to be important for a functional interaction because the N-terminal domain of RPA1 was required to maximally stimulate Dna2 endonuclease activity. We propose that a bimodal interaction of Dna2 with Rpa1 is important for Dna2 function both in vivo and in vitro. The relevance of each interaction with respect to the function of the Dna2 endonuclease activity is discussed.

Heterogeneous expression and functional analysis of two distinct replication protein A large subunits from Cryptosporidium parvum

Replication protein A is a single stranded DNA-binding protein that has multiple roles in eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Typically, eukaryotic replication protein A is a stable heterotrimeric complex with three subunits of 70 kDa (RPA1), 32 kDa (RPA2) and 14 kDa (RPA3). We have previously cloned and characterised an RPA1 subunit from Cryptosporidium parvum, which shares high homology with other eukaryotic replication protein A 1 proteins, but lacks an N-terminal domain. Here, we have identified a second replication protein A 1 (termed CpRPA1B) from the ongoing C. parvum genome-sequencing project. The deduced protein sequence to CpRPA1B shows only 16% sequence identity with CpRPA1, indicating that two different types of RPA1 subunits are present in C. parvum. The CpRPA1B gene predicts a 75.5 kDa peptide similar in size to those of higher eukaryotes, but in contrast to the 53.9 kDa N-terminal short-type CpRPA1 protein. However, western blot analysis suggested that, although the entire CpRPA1B open reading frame might be translated, the protein may be cleaved by posttranslational modification, similar to that observed with the replication protein A 1 gene product in Plasmodium falciparum. Indirect immunofluorescence studies indicated a diffused pattern for both proteins in sporozoites. However, differential localisation was observed with CpRPA1 to the anterior region that contains the apical-complex and CpRPA1B to the central region in/or around the nuclei of the sporozoites. Both CpRPA1 and CpRPA1B full-length open reading frames were expressed for functionality assays. The CpRPA1 and CpRPA1B recombinant proteins were expressed in bacterial Escherichia coli as maltose-binding protein fusion proteins and the entire fusion proteins were assayed for their DNA-binding properties. Studies indicate that CpRPA1B binds ssDNA of >or=5 nucleotides (dT), while CpRPA1 only binds ssDNA >or=20 nucleotides (dT). This study indicates that C. parvum possesses two different types of replication protein A large subunits (replication protein A 1), both differing significantly from their hosts.

Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication: regulation and mechanisms

The accurate and timely duplication of the genome is a major task for eukaryotic cells. This process requires the cooperation of multiple factors to ensure the stability of the genetic information of each cell. Mutations, rearrangements, or loss of chromosomes can be detrimental to a single cell as well as to the whole organism, causing failures, disease, or death. Because of the size of eukaryotic genomes, chromosomal duplication is accomplished in a multiparallel process. In human somatic cells between 10,000 and 100,000 parallel synthesis sites are present. This raises fundamental problems for eukaryotic cells to coordinate the start of DNA replication at each origin and to prevent replication of already duplicated DNA regions. Since these general phenomena were recognized in the middle of the 20th century the regulation and mechanisms of the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication have been intensively investigated. These studies were carried out to find the essential factors involved in the process and to determine their functions during DNA replication. These studies gave rise to a model of the organization and the coordination of DNA replication within the eukaryotic cell. The elegant experiments carried out by Rao and Johnson (1970) (1), who fused cells in different phases of the cell cycle, showed that G1 cells are competent for replication of their chromosomes, but lack a specific diffusible factor required to activate their replicaton machinery and showed that G2 cells are incompetent for DNA replication. These findings suggested that eukaryotic cells exist in two states. In G1 phase, cells are competent to initiate DNA replication, which is subsequently triggered in S phase. After completion of S phase, cells in G2 are no longer able to initiate DNA replication and they require a transition through mitosis to reenable initiation of DNA replication to take place in the next S phase. The Xenopus cell-free replication system has proved a good model system in which to study DNA replication in vitro as well as the mechanism preventing rereplication within a single cell cycle (2). Studies using this system resulted in the development of a model postulating the existence of a replication licensing factor, which binds to chromatin before the G1-S transition and which is displaced during replication (2, 3). These results were supported by genetic and biochemical experiments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) (4, 5). The investigation of cell division cycle mutants and the budding yeast origin of replication resulted in the concept of a prereplicative and a postreplicative complex of initiation proteins (6-9). These three individual concepts have recently started to merge and it has become obvious that initiation in eukaryotes is generally governed by the same ubiquitous mechanisms.

Replication protein A is required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, meiotic recombination is initiated by transient DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs). These DSBs undergo a 5' --> 3' resection to produce 3' single-stranded DNA ends that serve to channel DSBs into the RAD52 recombinational repair pathway. In vitro studies strongly suggest that several proteins of this pathway--Rad51, Rad52, Rad54, Rad55, Rad57, and replication protein A (RPA)--play a role in the strand exchange reaction. Here, we report a study of the meiotic phenotypes conferred by two missense mutations affecting the largest subunit of RPA, which are localized in the protein interaction domain (rfa1-t11) and in the DNA-binding domain (rfa1-t48). We find that both mutant diploids exhibit reduced sporulation efficiency, very poor spore viability, and a 10- to 100-fold decrease in meiotic recombination. Physical analyses indicate that both mutants form normal levels of meiosis-specific DSBs and that the broken ends are processed into 3'-OH single-stranded tails, indicating that the RPA complex present in these rfa1 mutants is functional in the initial steps of meiotic recombination. However, the 5' ends of the broken fragments undergo extensive resection, similar to what is observed in rad51, rad52, rad55, and rad57 mutants, indicating that these RPA mutants are defective in the repair of the Spo11-dependent DSBs that initiate homologous recombination during meiosis.

Plasmodium falciparum possesses a cell cycle-regulated short type replication protein A large subunit encoded by an unusual transcript

DNA replication in Plasmodium parasites takes place at multiple distinct points during their complex life cycle in the mosquito and vertebrate hosts. Although several parasite proteins involved in DNA replication have been described, the various mechanisms engaged in DNA metabolism of this major pathogen remain largely unexplored. As a step toward understanding this complex network, we describe the identification of Plasmodium falciparum replication protein A large subunit (pfRPA1) through affinity purification and mass spectral analysis of a purified 55-kDa factor. Gel retardation experiments revealed that pfRPA is the major single-stranded DNA binding activity in parasite protein extracts. The activity was expressed in a cell cycle-dependent manner with peak activities in late trophozoites and schizonts, thus correlating with the beginning of chromosomal DNA replication. Accordingly, the pfrpa1 message was detected in parasites 20-24 h post-invasion which is in agreement with the expression of other P. falciparum DNA replication genes. Our results show that pfRPA1 is encoded by an unusual 6.5-kb transcript containing a single open reading frame of which only the C-terminal 42% of the deduced protein sequence shows homologies to other reported RPA1s. Like the orthologues of other protozoan parasites, pfRPA1 lacks the N-terminal protein interaction domain and is thus remarkably smaller than the RPA1s of higher eukaryotes.

Structure of the RPA trimerization core and its role in the multistep DNA-binding mechanism of RPA

The human single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA) binds DNA in at least two different modes: initial [8-10 nucleotides (nt)] and stable ( approximately 30 nt). Switching from 8 to 30 nt mode is associated with a large conformational change. Here we report the 2.8 A structure of the RPA trimerization core comprising the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of subunit RPA70 (DBD-C), the central DNA-binding domain of subunit RPA32 (DBD-D) and the entire RPA14 subunit. All three domains are built around a central oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding (OB)-fold and flanked by a helix at the C-terminus. Trimerization is mediated by three C-terminal helices arranged in parallel. The OB-fold of DBD-C possesses unique structural features; embedded zinc ribbon and helix-turn-helix motifs. Using time-resolved proteolysis with trypsin, we demonstrate that the trimerization core does not contribute to the binding with substrates of 10 nt, but interacts with oligonucleotides of 24 nt. Taken together, our data indicate that switching from 8-10 to 30 nt mode is mediated by DNA binding with the trimerization core.

Functional analysis of the four DNA binding domains of replication protein A. The role of RPA2 in ssDNA binding

Replication Protein A (RPA), the heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein of eukaryotes, contains four ssDNA binding domains (DBDs) within its two largest subunits, RPA1 and RPA2. We analyzed the contribution of the four DBDs to ssDNA binding affinity by assaying recombinant yeast RPA in which a single DBD (A, B, C, or D) was inactive. Inactivation was accomplished by mutating the two conserved aromatic stacking residues present in each DBD. Mutation of domain A had the most severe effect and eliminated binding to a short substrate such as (dT)12. RPA containing mutations in DBDs B and C bound to substrates (dT)12, 17, and 23 but with reduced affinity compared with wild type RPA. Mutation of DBD-D had little or no effect on the binding of RPA to these substrates. However, mutations in domain D did affect the binding to oligonucleotides larger than 23 nucleotides (nt). Protein-DNA cross-linking indicated that DBD-A (in RPA1) is essential for RPA1 to interact efficiently with substrates of 12 nt or less and that DBD-D (RPA2) interacts efficiently with oligonucleotides of 27 nt or larger. The data support a sequential model of binding in which DBD-A is responsible for the initial interaction with ssDNA, that domains A, B, and C (RPA1) contact 12-23 nt of ssDNA, and that DBD-D (RPA2) is needed for RPA to interact with substrates that are 23-27 nt in length.

Zinc finger proteins as potential targets for toxic metal ions: differential effects on structure and function

Zinc finger structures are frequently found in transcription factors and DNA repair proteins, mediating DNA-protein and protein-protein binding. As low concentrations of transition metal compounds, including those of cadmium, nickel, and cobalt, have been shown to interfere with DNA transcription and repair, several studies have been conducted to elucidate potential interactions of toxic metal ions with zinc-binding protein domains. Various effects have been identified, including the displacement of zinc, e.g., by cadmium or cobalt, the formation of mixed complexes, incomplete coordination of toxic metal ions, as well as the oxidation of cysteine residues within the metal-binding domain. Besides the number of cysteine and/or histidine ligands, unique structural features of the respective protein under investigation determine whether or not zinc finger structures are disrupted by one or more transition metals. As improper folding of zinc finger domains is mostly associated with the loss of correct protein function, disruption of zinc finger structures may result in interference with manifold cellular processes involved in gene expression, growth regulation, and maintenance of the genomic integrity.

Role of zinc-finger motif in redox regulation of human replication protein A

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric zinc-finger protein complex involved in DNA replication, repair, and genetic recombination. Unlike other zinc-finger proteins, RPA's zinc-finger motif is not essential for its single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding activity, but is involved in redox regulation of its single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding activity. To get an insight into the regulation of RPA-ssDNA interaction, wild-type RPA (wt-RPA) and zinc-finger mutant were examined for ssDNA binding activity using surface plasmon resonance technique. Interaction of wt-RPA with ssDNA under nonreducing conditions was very weak (KD x 2.33 x 10(-8) M) compared with that under reducing conditions (KD = 7.35 x 10(-11) M), whereas ssDNA binding affinity of the zinc-finger mutant was not affected by redox. The divalent ion chelator, o-phenanthroline, significantly reduced wt-RPA-ssDNA interaction, but had no effect on the zinc-finger mutant. The inhibitory effect of o-phenanthroline on RPA-ssDNA interaction was reversed by Zn(II), but not by other divalent cations, suggesting that Zn(II) is the unique metal coordinating the zinc-finger cysteines in redox regulation of RPA-ssDNA interaction. In DNA repair, redox affected RPA's interaction with damaged DNA, but not its role in stabilizing the xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA)-damaged DNA complex, suggesting that the zinc-finger motif may mediate the transition of RPA-XPA interaction to a stable RPA-XPA-damaged DNA complex in a redox-dependent manner.

Replication protein A in Pyrococcus furiosus is involved in homologous DNA recombination

Single-stranded DNA-binding protein in Bacteria and replication protein A (RPA) in Eukarya play crucial roles in DNA replication, repair, and recombination processes. We identified an RPA complex from the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrococcus furiosus. Unlike the single-peptide RPAs from the methanogenic archaea, Methanococcus jannaschii and Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus, P. furiosus RPA (PfuRPA) exists as a stable hetero-oligomeric complex consisting of three subunits, RPA41, RPA14, and RPA32. The amino acid sequence of RPA41 has some similarity to those of the eukaryotic RPA70 subunit and the M. jannaschii RPA. On the other hand, RPA14 and RPA32 do not share homology with any known open reading frames from Bacteria and Eukarya. However, six of eight archaea, whose total genome sequences have been published, have the open reading frame homologous to RPA32. The PfuRPA complex, but not each subunit alone, specifically bound to a single-stranded DNA and clearly enhanced the efficiency of an in vitro strand-exchange reaction by the P. furiosus RadA protein. Moreover, immunoprecipitation analyses showed that PfuRPA interacts with the recombination proteins, RadA and Hjc, as well as replication proteins, DNA polymerases, primase, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and replication factor C in P. furiosus cells. These results indicate that PfuRPA plays important roles in the homologous DNA recombination in P. furiosus.

Rfc4 interacts with Rpa1 and is required for both DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The large subunit of replication protein A (Rpa1) consists of three single-stranded DNA binding domains and an N-terminal domain (Rpa1N) of unknown function. To determine the essential role of this domain we searched for mutations that require wild-type Rpa1N for viability in yeast. A mutation in RFC4, encoding a small subunit of replication factor C (RFC), was found to display allele-specific interactions with mutations in the gene encoding Rpa1 (RFA1). Mutations that map to Rpa1N and confer sensitivity to the DNA synthesis inhibitor hydroxyurea, such as rfa1-t11, are lethal in combination with rfc4-2. The rfc4-2 mutant itself is sensitive to hydroxyurea, and like rfc2 and rfc5 strains, it exhibits defects in the DNA replication block and intra-S checkpoints. RFC4 and the DNA damage checkpoint gene RAD24 were found to be epistatic with respect to DNA damage sensitivity. We show that the rfc4-2 mutant is defective in the G(1)/S DNA damage checkpoint response and that both the rfc4-2 and rfa1-t11 strains are defective in the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Thus, in addition to its essential role as part of the clamp loader in DNA replication, Rfc4 plays a role as a sensor in multiple DNA checkpoint pathways. Our results suggest that a physical interaction between Rfc4 and Rpa1N is required for both roles.

Zinc affects the conformation of nucleoprotein filaments formed by replication protein A (RPA) and long natural DNA molecules

Replication protein A is the major single strand DNA binding protein of human cells, composed of three subunits with molecular weights of 70, 32, and 14 kDa. Most of the DNA binding activity of RPA has been mapped to the largest subunit that contains two OB-fold DNA binding domains and a third, OB-like structure in the carboxyterminal domain (CTD). This third domain resembles an OB-fold with a zinc binding domain inserted in the middle of the structure, and has recently been shown to carry a coordinated Zn(II) ion. The bound metal ion is essential for the tertiary structure of the RPA70-CTD, and appears to modulate its DNA binding activity when tested with synthetic oligonucleotides. We show here that zinc strongly affects the conformation of nucleoprotein filaments formed between RPA and long natural DNA molecules. In these experiments, the CTD is dispensable for DNA binding and the unwinding of long double stranded DNA molecules. However, using band shift assays and electron microscopy, we found that RPA-DNA complexes contract at zinc concentrations that do not affect the conformations of complexes formed between DNA and a RPA70 deletion construct lacking the CTD. Our data suggest that nucleoprotein complexes with RPA in its natural, zinc-bearing form may have a compact rather than an extended conformation.

Species specificity of human RPA in simian virus 40 DNA replication lies in T-antigen-dependent RNA primer synthesis

Replication protein A (RPA) is a three-subunit protein complex with multiple functions in DNA replication. Previous study indicated that human RPA (h-RPA) could not be replaced by Schizosaccharomyces pombe RPA (sp-RPA) in simian virus 40 (SV40) replication, suggesting that h-RPA may have a specific function in SV40 DNA replication. To understand the specificity of h-RPA in replication, we prepared heterologous RPAs containing the mixture of human and S.pombe subunits and compared these preparations for various enzymatic activities. Heterologous RPAs containing two human subunits supported SV40 DNA replication, whereas those containing only one human subunit poorly supported DNA replication, suggesting that RPA complex requires at least two human subunits to support its function in SV40 DNA replication. All heterologous RPAs effectively supported single-stranded (ss)DNA binding activity and an elongation of a primed DNA template catalyzed by DNA polymerase (pol) alpha and delta. A strong correlation between SV40 DNA replication activity and large tumor antigen (T-ag)-dependent RNA primer synthesis by pol alpha-primase complex was observed among the heterologous RPAs. Furthermore, T-ag showed a strong interaction with 70- and 34-kDa subunits from human, but poorly interacted with their S.pombe counterparts, indicating that the specificity of h-RPA is due to its role in RNA primer synthesis. In the SV40 replication reaction, the addition of increasing amounts of sp-RPA in the presence of fixed amount of h-RPA significantly reduced overall DNA synthesis, but increased the size of lagging strand, supporting a specific role for h-RPA in RNA primer synthesis. Together, these results suggest that the specificity of h-RPA in SV40 replication lies in T-ag-dependent RNA primer synthesis.

The majority of human replication protein A remains complexed throughout the cell cycle

Replication Protein A (RPA), the replicative single-strand DNA binding protein from eukaryotic cells, is a stable heterotrimeric complex consisting of three polypeptides. Cytological studies have investigated the subcellular distribution and association characteristics of the three RPA subunits during different stages of the cell cycle with varying results. In this study, various HeLa cell fractions were subjected to separation by either immunoprecipitation or velocity sedimentation. These separations were evaluated by immunoblotting for specific RPA subunits to determine whether the RPA in these fractions retains its heterotrimeric association. Immunoprecipitation of either the large (RPA70) or middle-sized (RPA32) subunit of RPA followed by immunoblotting for the other subunits demonstrate that RPA remains complexed throughout the G(1), S and G(2) phases of the cell cycle. Immunoprecipitation and sedimentation separations of both the nucleosolic and chromatin-bound RPA populations from both cycling and nocodazole-blocked cells showed that the majority of RPA remains complexed under all conditions examined. Consistent with previous reports, hypotonic extracts from 293 cells were shown to contain some RPA32 not complexed with RPA70. These results indicate that in some cell types, extracts may contain small amounts of RPA32 free of RPA70; however, in HeLa cells the majority of RPA clearly remains complexed as a heterotrimer throughout the cell cycle.

Protein-protein interactions of the primase subunits p58 and p48 with simian virus 40 T antigen are required for efficient primer synthesis in a cell-free system

DNA polymerase alpha-primase (pol-prim, consisting of p180-p68-p58-p48), and primase p58-p48 (prim(2)) synthesize short RNA primers on single-stranded DNA. In the SV40 DNA replication system, only pol-prim is able to start leading strand DNA replication that needs unwinding of double-stranded (ds) DNA prior to primer synthesis. At high concentrations, pol-prim and prim(2) indistinguishably reduce the unwinding of dsDNA by SV40 T antigen (Tag). RNA primer synthesis on ssDNA in the presence of replication protein A (RPA) and Tag has served as a model system to study the initiation of Okazaki fragments on the lagging strand in vitro. On ssDNA, Tag stimulates whereas RPA inhibits the initiation reaction of both enzymes. Tag reverses and even overcompensates the inhibition of primase by RPA. Physical binding of Tag to the primase subunits and RPA, respectively, is required for these activities. Each subunit of the primase complex, p58 and p48, performs physical contacts with Tag and RPA independently of p180 and p68. Using surface plasmon resonance, the dissociation constants of the Tag/pol-prim and Tag/primase interactions were 1.2 x 10(-8) m and 1.3 x 10(-8) m, respectively.

Zinc finger of replication protein A, a non-DNA binding element, regulates its DNA binding activity through redox

Eukaryotic replication protein A (RPA) is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein with multiple functions in DNA replication, repair, and genetic recombination. RPA contains an evolutionarily conserved 4-cysteine-type zinc finger motif (X(3)CX(2-4)CX(12-15)CX(2)C) that has a potential role in regulation of DNA replication and repair (Dong, J., Park, J-S., and Lee, S-H. (1999) Biochem. J. 337, 311-317 and Lin, Y.-L., Shivji, M. K. K., Chen, C., Kolodner, R., Wood, R. D., and Dutta, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1453-1461), even though the zinc finger itself is not essential for its DNA binding activity (Kim, D. K., Stigger, E., and Lee, S.-H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15124-15129). Here, we show that RPA single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding activity is regulated by reduction-oxidation (redox) through its zinc finger domain. RPA-ssDNA interaction was stimulated 10-fold by the reducing agent, dithiothreitol (DTT), whereas treatment of RPA with oxidizing agent, diazene dicarboxylic acid bis[N,N-dimethylamide] (diamide), significantly reduced this interaction. The effect of diamide was reversed by the addition of excess DTT, suggesting that RPA ssDNA binding activity is regulated by redox. Redox regulation of RPA-ssDNA interaction was more effective in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl or higher. Cellular redox factor, thioredoxin, was able to replace DTT in stimulation of RPA DNA binding activity, suggesting that redox protein may be involved in RPA modulation in vivo. In contrast to wild-type RPA, zinc finger mutant (cysteine to alanine mutation at amino acid 486) did not require DTT for its ssDNA binding activity and is not affected by redox. Together, these results suggest a novel function for a putative zinc finger in the regulation of RPA DNA binding activity through cellular redox.

Molecular interaction map of the mammalian cell cycle control and DNA repair systems

Eventually to understand the integrated function of the cell cycle regulatory network, we must organize the known interactions in the form of a diagram, map, and/or database. A diagram convention was designed capable of unambiguous representation of networks containing multiprotein complexes, protein modifications, and enzymes that are substrates of other enzymes. To facilitate linkage to a database, each molecular species is symbolically represented only once in each diagram. Molecular species can be located on the map by means of indexed grid coordinates. Each interaction is referenced to an annotation list where pertinent information and references can be found. Parts of the network are grouped into functional subsystems. The map shows how multiprotein complexes could assemble and function at gene promoter sites and at sites of DNA damage. It also portrays the richness of connections between the p53-Mdm2 subsystem and other parts of the network.

Cryptosporidium parvum possesses a short-type replication protein A large subunit that differs from its host

Replication protein A (RPA) consisting of three subunits is a eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein involved in DNA replication, repair and recombination. We report here the identification and characterization of a RPA large subunit (CpRPA1) gene from the apicomplexan Cryptosporidium parvum. The CpRPA1 gene encodes a 53.9-kDa peptide that is remarkably smaller than that from other eukaryotes (i.e. approximately 70 kDa) and is actively expressed in both free sporozoites and parasite intracellular stages. This short-type RPA large subunit has also been characterized from one other protist, Crithidia fasciculata. Three distinct domains have been identified in the RPA large subunit of humans and yeasts: an N-terminal protein interaction domain, a central ssDNA-binding area, and a C-terminal subunit-interacting region. Sequence analysis reveals that the short-type RPA large subunit differs from that of other eukaryotes in that only the domains required for ssDNA binding and heterotrimer formation are present. It lacks the N-terminal domain necessary for the binding of proteins mainly involved in DNA repair and recombination. This major structural difference suggests that the mechanism for DNA repair and recombination in some protists differs from that of other eukaryotes. Since replication proteins play an essential role in the cell cycle, the fact that RPA proteins of C. parvum differ from those of its host suggests that RPA be explored as a potential chemotherapeutic target for controlling cryptosporidiosis and/or diseases caused by other apicomplexans.

Interactions of the papovavirus DNA replication initiator proteins, bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 and simian virus 40 large T antigen, with human replication protein A

Papovaviruses utilize predominantly cellular DNA replication proteins to replicate their own viral genomes. To appropriate the cellular DNA replication machinery, simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen (Tag) binds to three different cellular replication proteins, the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex, the replication protein A (RPA) complex, and topoisomerase I. The functionally similar papillomavirus E1 protein has also been shown to bind to the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex. Enzyme-linked immunoassay-based protein interaction assays and protein affinity pull-down assays were used to show that the papillomavirus E1 protein also binds to the cellular RPA complex in vitro. Furthermore, SV40 Tag was able to compete with bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 for binding to RPA. Each of the three RPA subunits was individually overexpressed in Escherichia coli as a soluble fusion protein. These fusion proteins were used to show that the E1-RPA and Tag-RPA interactions are primarily mediated through the 70-kDa subunit of RPA. These results suggest that different viruses have evolved similar mechanisms for taking control of the cellular DNA replication machinery.

A novel assay for examining the molecular reactions at the eukaryotic replication fork: activities of replication protein A required during elongation

Studies to elucidate the reactions that occur at the eukaryotic replication fork have been limited by the model systems available. We have established a method for isolating and characterizing Simian Virus 40 (SV40) replication complexes. SV40 rolling circle complexes are isolated using paramagnetic beads and then incubated under replication conditions to obtain continued elongation. In rolling circle replication, the normal mechanism for termination of SV40 replication does not occur and the elongation phase of replication is prolonged. Thus, using this assay system, elongation phase reactions can be examined in the absence of initiation or termination. We show that the protein requirements for elongation of SV40 rolling circles are equivalent to complete SV40 replication reactions. The DNA produced by SV40 rolling circles is double-stranded, unmethylated and with a much longer length than the template DNA. These properties are similar to those of physiological replication forks. We show that proteins associated with the isolated rolling circles, including SV40 T antigen, DNA polymerase alpha, replication protein A (RPA) and RF-C, are necessary for continued DNA synthesis. PCNA is also required but is not associated with the isolated complexes. We present evidence suggesting that synthesis of the leading and lagging strands are co-ordinated in SV40 rolling circle replication. We have used this system to show that both RPA-protein and RPA-DNA interactions are important for RPA's function in elongation.

Alternative conformations of human replication protein A are detected by crosslinks with primers carrying a photoreactive group at the 3'-end

To analyze the influence of single-stranded template extension of DNA duplex on the conformation of human replication protein A (RPA) bound to DNA we have designed two template-primer systems differing by the size of the single-stranded template tail (9 and 19 nucleotides (nt)). Base-substituted photoreactive dUTP analogs were used as substrates for elongation of radiolabeled template-primer by DNA polymerase beta in the absence or in the presence of RPA. Following UV-crosslinking it was demonstrated that the pattern of RPA subunit labeling and consequently RPA arrangement near the 3'-end of the primer is strongly dependent upon the length of the template extension.

Identification and characterization of a single-stranded DNA-binding protein from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii

Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play essential roles in DNA replication, recombination, and repair in bacteria and eukarya. We report here the identification and characterization of the SSB of an archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii. The M. jannaschii SSB (mjaSSB) has significant amino acid sequence similarity to the eukaryotic SSB, replication protein A (RPA), and contains four tandem repeats of the core single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding domain originally defined by structural studies of RPA. Homologous SSBs are encoded by the genomes of other archaeal species, including Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum and Archaeoglobus fulgidus. The purified mjaSSB binds to ssDNA with high affinity and selectivity. The apparent association constant for binding to ssDNA is similar to that of RPA under comparable experimental conditions, and the affinity for ssDNA exceeds that for double-stranded DNA by at least two orders of magnitude. The binding site size for mjaSSB is approximately 20 nucleotides. Given that RPA is related to mjaSSB at the sequence level and to Escherichia coli SSB at the structural level, we conclude that the SSBs of archaea, eukarya, and bacteria share a common core ssDNA-binding domain. This ssDNA-binding domain was presumably present in the common ancestor to all three major branches of life.

Identification and characterization of the fourth single-stranded-DNA binding domain of replication protein A

Replication protein A (RPA), the heterotrimeric single-stranded-DNA (ssDNA) binding protein (SSB) of eukaryotes, contains two homologous ssDNA binding domains (A and B) in its largest subunit, RPA1, and a third domain in its second-largest subunit, RPA2. Here we report that Saccharomyces cerevisiae RPA1 contains a previously undetected ssDNA binding domain (domain C) lying in tandem with domains A and B. The carboxy-terminal portion of domain C shows sequence similarity to domains A and B and to the region of RPA2 that binds ssDNA (domain D). The aromatic residues in domains A and B that are known to stack with the ssDNA bases are conserved in domain C, and as in domain A, one of these is required for viability in yeast. Interestingly, the amino-terminal portion of domain C contains a putative Cys4-type zinc-binding motif similar to that of another prokaryotic SSB, T4 gp32. We demonstrate that the ssDNA binding activity of domain C is uniquely sensitive to cysteine modification but that, as with gp32, ssDNA binding is not strictly dependent on zinc. The RPA heterotrimer is thus composed of at least four ssDNA binding domains and exhibits features of both bacterial and phage SSBs.

The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells

Replication of the two template strands at eukaryotic cell DNA replication forks is a highly coordinated process that ensures accurate and efficient genome duplication. Biochemical studies, principally of plasmid DNAs containing the Simian Virus 40 origin of DNA replication, and yeast genetic studies have uncovered the fundamental mechanisms of replication fork progression. At least two different DNA polymerases, a single-stranded DNA-binding protein, a clamp-loading complex, and a polymerase clamp combine to replicate DNA. Okazaki fragment synthesis involves a DNA polymerase-switching mechanism, and maturation occurs by the recruitment of specific nucleases, a helicase, and a ligase. The process of DNA replication is also coupled to cell-cycle progression and to DNA repair to maintain genome integrity.

Mutants with changes in different domains of yeast replication protein A exhibit differences in repairing the control region, the transcribed strand and the non-transcribed strand of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MFA2 gene

We have analysed the removal of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) at nucleotide resolution from the MFA2 gene of wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in strains harbouring mutations in one of the yeast replication protein A (RPA) genes, RFA1. This gene codes for the 70 kDa subunit of RPA and it has previously been shown to have a role in nucleotide excision repair. Here two RFA1 mutants were examined: rfa1-M2 which is mutated in the protein interaction domain and rfa1-M4 which is mutated in the DNA-binding domain. A distinct difference in the removal of CPDs from the MFA2 sequence of these two mutants was observed. Compared to the parental strain, there was no defect in CPD removal in the rfa1-M2 mutant. Contrarily, the rfa1-M4 mutant was totally defective in the global repair of CPDs from the non-transcribed strand and the non-transcribed portions of the strand containing the transcribed sequence, yet it was able to perform reduced transcription coupled repair of the transcribed strand. These results indicate that the role of the DNA-binding domain of RPA is different for global repair versus transcription coupled nucleotide excision repair.

Functional analysis of human replication protein A in nucleotide excision repair

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a three-subunit protein complex (70-, 34-, and 11-kDa subunits) involved in DNA replication, repair, and recombination. Both the 70- (p70) and 34-kDa (p34) subunits interact with Xeroderma pigmentosum group A complementing protein (XPA), a key protein involved in nucleotide excision repair. Our deletion analysis indicated that no particular domain(s) of RPA p70 was essential for its interaction with XPA, whereas 33 amino acids from the C terminus of p34 (p34Delta33C) were necessary for the XPA interaction. Furthermore, mutant RPA lacking the p34 C terminus failed to interact with XPA, suggesting that p34, not p70, is primarily responsible for the interaction of RPA with XPA. RPA stimulated the interaction of XPA with UV-damaged DNA through an RPA-XPA complex on damaged DNA sites because (i) the RPA mutant lacking the C terminus of p34 failed to stimulate an XPA-DNA interaction, and (ii) the ssDNA binding domain of RPA (amino acids 296-458) was necessary for the stimulation of the XPA-DNA interaction. Two separate domains of p70, a single-stranded DNA binding domain and a zinc-finger domain, were necessary for RPA function in nucleotide excision repair. The mutant RPA (RPA:p34Delta33C), which lacks its stimulatory effect on the XPA-DNA interaction, also poorly supported nucleotide excision repair, suggesting that the XPA-RPA interaction on damaged DNA is necessary for DNA repair activity.

Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism

Replication protein A (RPA) is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein identified as an essential factor for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. To understand the in vivo functions of RPA, we mutagenized the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RFA1 gene and identified 19 ultraviolet light (UV) irradiation- and methyl methane sulfonate (MMS)-sensitive mutants and 5 temperature-sensitive mutants. The UV- and MMS-sensitive mutants showed up to 10(4) to 10(5) times increased sensitivity to these agents. Some of the UV- and MMS-sensitive mutants were killed by an HO-induced double-strand break at MAT. Physical analysis of recombination in one UV- and MMS-sensitive rfa1 mutant demonstrated that it was defective for mating type switching and single-strand annealing recombination. Two temperature-sensitive mutants were characterized in detail, and at the restrictive temperature were found to have an arrest phenotype and DNA content indicative of incomplete DNA replication. DNA sequence analysis indicated that most of the mutations altered amino acids that were conserved between yeast, human, and Xenopus RPA1. Taken together, we conclude that RPA1 has multiple roles in vivo and functions in DNA replication, repair, and recombination, like the single-stranded DNA-binding proteins of bacteria and phages.

The RPA32 subunit of human replication protein A contains a single-stranded DNA-binding domain

Replication protein A (RPA) is a conserved nuclear single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein. Human RPA (hRPA) comprises three subunits of approximately 70, 32, and 14 kDa (hRPA70, hRPA32 and hRPA14). RPA is known to bind ssDNA through two ssDNA-binding domains in the RPA70 subunit. Here, we demonstrate that the complex of hRPA32 and hRPA14 has an ssDNA-binding domain. Limited proteolysis of the hRPA14.32 complex defined a core dimer composed of the central region of hRPA32 (amino acids 43-171) and RPA14. The core dimer bound ssDNA with an affinity of approximately 10-50 microM, which is at least 100-fold more avid than the DNA-binding affinity of the intact dimer. Analysis of the predicted secondary structure of hRPA32 suggests that amino acids 63-150 of hRPA32 form an ssDNA-binding domain similar in structure to each of those in hRPA70. The complex of hRPA14 and hRPA32-(43-171) in turn formed a trimeric complex with the C-terminal region of hRPA70 (amino acids 436-616). The ssDNA-binding affinity of this trimeric complex was 3 to 5-fold higher than hRPA14.32-(43-171) alone, suggesting a role for the C terminus of hRPA70 in ssDNA binding.

The evolutionarily conserved zinc finger motif in the largest subunit of human replication protein A is required for DNA replication and mismatch repair but not for nucleotide excision repair

The largest subunit of the replication protein A (RPA) contains an evolutionarily conserved zinc finger motif that lies outside of the domains required for binding to single-stranded DNA or forming the RPA holocomplex. In previous studies, we showed that a point mutation in this motif (RPAm) cannot support SV40 DNA replication. We have now investigated the role of this motif in several steps of DNA replication and in two DNA repair pathways. RPAm associates with T antigen, assists the unwinding of double-stranded DNA at an origin of replication, stimulates DNA polymerases alpha and delta, and supports the formation of the initial short Okazaki fragments. However, the synthesis of a leading strand and later Okazaki fragments is impaired. In contrast, RPAm can function well during the incision step of nucleotide excision repair and in a full repair synthesis reaction, with either UV-damaged or cisplatin-adducted DNA. Two deletion mutants of the Rpa1 subunit (eliminating amino acids 1-278 or 222-411) were not functional in nucleotide excision repair. We report for the first time that wild type RPA is required for a mismatch repair reaction in vitro. Neither the deletion mutants nor RPAm can support this reaction. Therefore, the zinc finger of the largest subunit of RPA is required for a function that is essential for DNA replication and mismatch repair but not for nucleotide excision repair.

Expression of an ortholog of replication protein A1 (RPA1) is induced by gibberellin in deepwater rice

Internodes of deepwater rice are induced to grow rapidly when plants become submerged. This adaptation enables deepwater rice to keep part of its foliage above the rising flood waters during the monsoon season and to avoid drowning. This growth response is, ultimately, elicited by the plant hormone gibberellin (GA). The primary target tissue for GA action is the intercalary meristem of the internode. Using differential display of mRNA, we have isolated a number of genes whose expression in the intercalary meristem is regulated by GA. The product of one of these genes was identified as an ortholog of replication protein A1 (RPA1). RPA is a heterotrimeric protein involved in DNA replication, recombination, and repair and also in regulation of transcription. A chimeric construct, in which the single-stranded DNA-binding domain of rice RPA1 was spliced into the corresponding region of yeast RPA1, was able to complement a yeast rpa1 mutant. The transcript level of rice RPA1 is high in tissues containing dividing cells. RPA1 mRNA levels increase rapidly in the intercalary meristem during submergence and treatment with GA before the increase in the level of histone H3 mRNA, a marker for DNA replication.

Replication protein A: a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism

Replication protein A [RPA; also known as replication factor A (RFA) and human single-stranded DNA-binding protein] is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein that is required for multiple processes in eukaryotic DNA metabolism, including DNA replication, DNA repair, and recombination. RPA homologues have been identified in all eukaryotic organisms examined and are all abundant heterotrimeric proteins composed of subunits of approximately 70, 30, and 14 kDa. Members of this family bind nonspecifically to single-stranded DNA and interact with and/or modify the activities of multiple proteins. In cells, RPA is phosphorylated by DNA-dependent protein kinase when RPA is bound to single-stranded DNA (during S phase and after DNA damage). Phosphorylation of RPA may play a role in coordinating DNA metabolism in the cell. RPA may also have a role in modulating gene expression.

Physical interaction between human RAD52 and RPA is required for homologous recombination in mammalian cells

The yeast RAD52 protein is essential for DNA double-strand break repair, and meiotic and mitotic recombination. RPA is a protein complex of three subunits (70, 34, and 11 kDa) that has been shown to be involved in DNA replication, nucleotide excision repair, and homologous recombination. Here, we demonstrate a physical interaction between human RAD52 and RPA in vivo and in vitro. In addition, the domain (amino acids 221-280) in RAD52 protein that mediates the interaction with the 34-kDa subunit of RPA was also determined. Overexpression of mutant RAD52 proteins lacking the interaction domain (amino acids 221-240, 241-260, and 261-280) failed to induce homologous recombination in monkey cells. We have previously shown that overexpression of human RAD52 induced homologous recombination in these cells. These results suggest that direct physical interactions between RAD52 and RPA are essential for homologous recombination in mammalian cells.