Chloroethylclonidine and 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate recognize two different conformations of the human alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor

A selective and sensitive detection system for 4-thiouridine modification in RNA

4-Thiouridine (s4U) is a modified nucleoside, found at positions 8 and 9 in tRNA from eubacteria and archaea. Studies of the biosynthetic pathway and physiological role of s4U in tRNA are ongoing in the tRNA modification field. s4U has also recently been utilized as a biotechnological tool for analysis of RNAs. Therefore, a selective and sensitive system for the detection of s4U is essential for progress in the fields of RNA technologies and tRNA modification. Here, we report the use of biotin-coupled 2-aminoethyl-methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA biotin-XX) for labeling of s4U and demonstrate that the system is sensitive and quantitative. This technique can be used without denaturation; however, addition of a denaturation step improves the limit of detection. Thermus thermophilus tRNAs, which abundantly contain 5-methyl-2-thiouridine, were tested to investigate the selectivity of the MTSEA biotin-XX s4U detection system. The system did not react with 5-methyl-2-thiouridine in tRNAs from a T. thermophilus tRNA 4-thiouridine synthetase (thiI) gene deletion strain. Thus, the most useful advantage of the MTSEA biotin-XX s4U detection system is that MTSEA biotin-XX reacts only with s4U and not with other sulfur-containing modified nucleosides such as s2U derivatives in tRNAs. Furthermore, the MTSEA biotin-XX s4U detection system can analyze multiple samples in a short time span. The MTSEA biotin-XX s4U detection system can also be used for the analysis of s4U formation in tRNA. Finally, we demonstrate that the MTSEA biotin-XX system can be used to visualize newly transcribed tRNAs in S. cerevisiae cells.

Azi-medetomidine: Synthesis and Characterization of a Novel α2 Adrenergic Photoaffinity Ligand

Agonists at the α₂ adrenergic receptor produce sedation, increase focus, provide analgesia, and induce centrally mediated hypotension and bradycardia, yet neither their dynamic interactions with adrenergic receptors nor their modulation of neuronal circuit activity is completely understood. Photoaffinity ligands of α₂ adrenergic agonists have the potential both to capture discrete moments of ligand-receptor interactions and to prolong naturalistic drug effects in discrete regions of tissue in vivo. We present here the synthesis and characterization of a novel α₂ adrenergic agonist photolabel based on the imidazole medetomidine called azi-medetomidine. Azi-medetomidine shares protein association characteristics with its parent compound in experimental model systems and by molecular dynamics simulation of interactions with the α_2A adrenergic receptor. Azi-medetomidine acts as an agonist at α_2A adrenergic receptors, and produces hypnosis in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Azi-medetomidine competes with the α₂ agonist clonidine at α_2A adrenergic receptors, which is potentiated by photolabeling, and azi-medetomidine labels moieties on the α_2A adrenergic receptor as determined by mass spectrometry in a manner consistent with a simulated model. This novel α₂ adrenergic agonist photolabel can serve as a powerful tool for in vitro and in vivo investigations of adrenergic signaling.

Aminergic GPCR-Ligand Interactions: A Chemical and Structural Map of Receptor Mutation Data

The aminergic family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays an important role in various diseases and represents a major drug discovery target class. Structure determination of all major aminergic subfamilies has enabled structure-based ligand design for these receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis data provides an invaluable complementary source of information for elucidating the structural determinants of binding of different ligand chemotypes. The current study provides a comparative analysis of 6692 mutation data points on 34 aminergic GPCR subtypes, covering the chemical space of 540 unique ligands from mutagenesis experiments and information from experimentally determined structures of 52 distinct aminergic receptor-ligand complexes. The integrated analysis enables detailed investigation of structural receptor-ligand interactions and assessment of the transferability of combined binding mode and mutation data across ligand chemotypes and receptor subtypes. An overview is provided of the possibilities and limitations of using mutation data to guide the design of novel aminergic receptor ligands.

Involvement of the first transmembrane segment of human α(2) -adrenoceptors in the subtype-selective binding of chlorpromazine, spiperone and spiroxatrine

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Some large antagonist ligands (ARC239, chlorpromazine, prazosin, spiperone, spiroxatrine) bind to the human α(2A) -adrenoceptor with 10- to 100-fold lower affinity than to the α(2B)- and α(2C)-adrenoceptor subtypes. Previous mutagenesis studies have not explained this subtype selectivity.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The possible involvement of the extracellular amino terminus and transmembrane domain 1 (TM1) in subtype selectivity was elucidated with eight chimaeric receptors: six where TM1 and the N-terminus were exchanged between the α(2)-adrenoceptor subtypes and two where only TM1 was exchanged. Receptors were expressed in CHO cells and tested for ligand binding with nine chemically diverse antagonist ligands. For purposes of interpretation, molecular models of the three human α(2)-adrenoceptors were constructed based on the β(2)-adrenoceptor crystal structure.

KEY RESULTS

The affinities of three antagonists (spiperone, spiroxatrine and chlorpromazine) were significantly improved by TM1 substitutions of the α(2A)-adrenoceptor, but reciprocal effects were not seen for chimaeric receptors based on α(2B)- and α(2C)-adrenoceptors. Molecular docking of these ligands suggested that binding occurs in the orthosteric ligand binding pocket.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

TM1 is involved in determining the low affinity of some antagonist ligands at the human α(2A)-adrenoceptor. The exact mechanism is not known, but the position of TM1 at a large distance from the binding pocket indicates that TM1 does not participate in specific side-chain interactions with amino acids within the binding pocket of the receptor or with ligands bound therein. Instead, molecular models suggest that TM1 has indirect conformational effects related to the charge distribution or overall shape of the binding pocket.

Binding of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine as l-DOPA metabolites to human alpha(2)-adrenergic and dopaminergic receptors

The ability of l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA), l-DOPA-methyl ester and their major metabolites, dopamine, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), homovanillic (HVA), 3-O-methyldopa and 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) to bind to alpha(2) adrenergic and D1 and D2 dopamine receptors was assessed by radioligand binding to cloned human receptors expressed in cell lines. As anticipated, dopamine bound with high affinity to D1 (IC(50) 1.1 + or - 0.16 microM) and D2 (IC(50) 0.7 + or - 0.3 microM) dopamine receptors. However, dopamine also bound with high affinity to alpha(2A) (IC(50) was 2.6 + or - 0.5 microM), alpha(2C) (IC(50) 3.2 + or - 0.7 microM). 3-MT bound to alpha(2A) with high affinity (IC(50), 3.6 + or - 0.2 microM) though moderate affinity to alpha(2)c, D1 and D2 receptors (values of IC(50) were 55 + or - 14, 121 + or - 43, 36 + or - 14 microM, respectively). l-DOPA-methyl ester bound with high affinity to alpha(2) (IC(50) 17-36 microM) but not dopamine receptors (IC(50) 0.9-2.5 mM). l-DOPA, 3-O-methyldopa and DOPAC had no observable effect on binding to any of the receptors tested. These data suggest that the effects of l-DOPA in Parkinson's disease may result from actions of its metabolites dopamine and 3-MT on both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic receptors. These findings may provide explanations for the differences between l-DOPA and dopamine receptor agonists in mediating anti-parkinsonian effects and propensity to be associated with dyskinesia and motor complications such as wearing-off and on-off.

Regulators of G protein signaling proteins as central components of G protein-coupled receptor signaling complexes

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind directly to G protein alpha (Gα) subunits to regulate the signaling functions of Gα and their linked G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Recent studies indicate that RGS proteins also interact with GPCRs, not just G proteins, to form preferred functional pairs. Interactions between GPCRs and RGS proteins may be direct or indirect (via a linker protein) and are dictated by the receptors, rather than the linked G proteins. Emerging models suggest that GPCRs serve as platforms for assembling an overlapping and distinct constellation of signaling proteins that perform receptor-specific signaling tasks. Compelling evidence now indicates that RGS proteins are central components of these GPCR signaling complexes. This review will outline recent discoveries of GPCR/RGS pairs as well as new data in support of the idea that GPCRs serve as platforms for the formation of multiprotein signaling complexes.

Comparison of agmatine with moxonidine and rilmenidine in morphine dependence in vitro: role of imidazoline I(1) receptors

Moxonidine and rilmenidine are classical imidazoline I(1) receptor agonists, and used as anti-hypertension drugs in clinical practice. Agmatine is an imidazoline I(1) receptor endogenous ligand as well as its agonist, but more and more evidences suggest it has no influence on blood pressure. In the present study we compared the effects of moxonidine, rilmenidine and agmatine in the development of morphine dependence, and investigated the role of imidazoline I(1) receptor in the effects of these agents. Chinese hamster ovary cells co-expressing mu opioid receptor and imidazoline receptor antisera-selected protein (IRAS), the strong candidate for imidazoline I(1) receptor, were used as the cell line. cAMP overshoot, which represents an opioid dependent state in vitro, was measured to study the effects on morphine dependence. siRNA against IRAS was carried out to investigate the role of imidazoline I(1) receptor. Moxonidine and rilmenidine (0.01-10 microM) were ineffective on cAMP level in the cells when given alone, and failed to inhibit chronic morphine exposure, naloxone-precipitated cAMP overshoot when co-pretreated with morphine. Agmatine (0.01-10 microM) by itself was ineffective but co-pretreated with morphine concentration-dependently inhibited chronic morphine exposure, naloxone-precipitated cAMP overshoot in the cells. Furthermore, we found that the inhibitory effect of agmatine (100 nM and 1 microM) on cAMP overshoot was significantly reduced by siRNA against IRAS. This study indicates that agmatine can inhibit the development of morphine dependence in vitro, whereas moxonidine and rilmenidine have no the effect. Imidazoline I(1) receptor plays an important role in agmatine inhibiting morphine dependence.

Expression and characterization of the human alpha 2B-adrenoceptor in a vascular smooth muscle cell line

A vascular smooth muscle cell line stably expressing the human alpha 2B-adrenoceptor at a density of 1.5 pmol/mg membrane protein was generated by transfection of rat A7r5 cells. [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments and [3H]thymidine incorporation experiments indicated that the expressed receptors were functional, had the expected pharmacological characteristics and efficiently stimulated smooth muscle cell proliferation. Confocal fluorescence microscopy was used to visualize alpha2B-adrenoceptors in A7r5-alpha 2B cells and indicated that the receptors were mainly localized in the plasma membrane. The expression of the smooth muscle-specific marker alpha-actin was similar in transfected A7r5-alpha 2B cells and in non-transfected A7r5 wild-type cells. The generated A7r5-alpha 2B cell line will be a useful tool for studying the function and regulation of alpha 2B-adrenoceptors in vascular smooth muscle cells.

Molecular evolution of adrenoceptors and dopamine receptors: implications for the binding of catecholamines

We derived homology models for all human catecholamine-binding GPCRs (CABRs; the alpha-1, alpha-2, and beta-adrenoceptors and the D1-type and D2-type dopamine receptor) using the bovine rhodopsin-11-cis-retinal X-ray structure. Interactions were predicted from the endogenous ligands norepinephrine or dopamine and from the binding site and were used to optimize receptor-ligand interactions. Similar binding modes in the complexes agree with a large "binding core" conserved across the CABRs, that is, D3.32, V(I)3.33, T3.37, S5.42, S(A/C)5.43, S5.46, F6.51, F6.52, and W6.48. Model structures and docking simulations suggest that extracellular loop 2 could provide a common attachment point for the ligands' beta-hydroxyl via a hydrogen bond donated by the main-chain NH group of residue xl2.52. The modeled CABRs and docking modes are in good agreement with published experimental studies. Complementarity between the ligand and the binding site suggests that the bovine rhodopsin structure is a suitable template for modeling agonist-bound CABRs.

Conserved structural, pharmacological and functional properties among the three human and five zebrafish alpha 2-adrenoceptors

1. Zebrafish has five distinct alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. Two of these, alpha(2Da) and alpha(2Db), represent a duplicated, fourth alpha(2)-adrenoceptor subtype, while the others are orthologue of the human alpha(2A)-, alpha(2B)- and alpha(2C)-adrenoceptors. Here, we have compared the pharmacological properties of these receptors to infer structural determinants of ligand interactions. 2. The zebrafish alpha(2)-adrenoceptors were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and tested in competitive ligand binding assays and in a functional assay (agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding). The affinity results were used to cluster the receptors and, separately, the ligands using both principal component analysis and binary trees. 3. The overall ligand binding characteristics, the order of potency and efficacy of the tested agonists and the G-protein coupling of the zebrafish and human alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, separated by approximately 350 million years of evolution, were found to be highly conserved. The binding affinities of the 20 tested ligands towards the zebrafish alpha(2)-adrenoceptors are generally comparable to those of their human counterparts, with a few compounds showing up to 40-fold affinity differences. 4. The alpha(2A) orthologues and the zebrafish alpha(2D) duplicates clustered as close pairs, but the relationships between the orthologues of alpha(2B) and alpha(2C) were not clearly defined. Applied to the ligands, our clustering methods segregated the ligands based on their chemical structures and functional properties. As the ligand binding pockets formed by the transmembrane helices show only minor differences among the alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, we suggest that the second extracellular loop--where significant sequence variability is located --might contribute significantly to the observed affinity differences.

Model structures of α-2 adrenoceptors in complex with automatically docked antagonist ligands raise the possibility of interactions dissimilar from agonist ligands

Antagonist binding to alpha-2 adrenoceptors (alpha2-ARs) is not well understood. Structural models were constructed for the three human alpha2-AR subtypes based on the bovine rhodopsin X-ray structure. Twelve antagonist ligands (including covalently binding phenoxybenzamine) were automatically docked to the models. A hallmark of agonist binding is the electrostatic interaction between a positive charge on the agonist and the negatively charged side chain of D3.32. For antagonist binding, ion-pair formation would require deviations of the models from the rhodopsin structural template, e.g., a rotation of TM3 to relocate D3.32 more centrally within the binding cavity, and/or creation of new space near TM2/TM7 such that antagonists would be shifted away from TM5. Thus, except for the quinazolines, antagonist ligands automatically docked to the model structures did not form ion-pairs with D3.32. This binding mode represents a valid alternative, whereby the positive charge on the antagonists is stabilized by cation-pi interactions with aromatic residues (e.g., F6.51) and antagonists interact with D3.32 via carboxylate-aromatic interactions. This binding mode is in good agreement with maps derived from a molecular interaction library that predicts favorable atomic contacts; similar interaction environments are seen for unrelated proteins in complex with ligands sharing similarities with the alpha2-AR antagonists.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) could be subclassified into 7 families (A, B, large N-terminal family B-7 transmembrane helix, C, Frizzled/Smoothened, taste 2, and vomeronasal 1 receptors) among mammalian species. Cloning and functional studies of GPCRs have revealed that the superfamily of GPCRs comprises receptors for chemically diverse native ligands including (1) endogenous compounds like amines, peptides, and Wnt proteins (i.e., secreted proteins activating Frizzled receptors); (2) endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules; and (3) photons and exogenous compounds like odorants. The combined use of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling approaches have provided detailed insight into molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, receptor folding, receptor activation, G-protein coupling, and regulation of GPCRs. The vast majority of family A, B, C, vomeronasal 1, and taste 2 receptors are able to transduce signals into cells through G-protein coupling. However, G-protein-independent signaling mechanisms have also been reported for many GPCRs. Specific interaction motifs in the intracellular parts of these receptors allow them to interact with scaffold proteins. Protein engineering techniques have provided information on molecular mechanisms of GPCR-accessory protein, GPCR-GPCR, and GPCR-scaffold protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations have revealed that the inactive state conformations are stabilized by specific interhelical and intrahelical salt bridge interactions and hydrophobic-type interactions. Constitutively activating mutations or agonist binding disrupts such constraining interactions leading to receptor conformations that associates with and activate G-proteins.

Synergistic contributions of the functional groups of epinephrine to its affinity and efficacy at the beta2 adrenergic receptor

The structural basis of ligand affinity can be approached by studying the interactions between a drug and receptor residues; the basis for efficacy is more complex and must involve activation-associated conformational changes. We have used wild-type (WT), a constitutively active mutant (CAM), and a "constitutively inactive" mutant beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) to investigate changes in the binding site that accompany binding and activation. The active state (R(*)) probably involves repositioning of at least some of the agonist-contact residues, thereby optimizing their interactions with agonist and resulting in a higher affinity for agonist. A comparison of the binding affinities of a series of phenethylamine derivatives for WT revealed a remarkable synergism between the various functional groups present in epinephrine. Binding affinity was essentially unchanged with addition of beta-OH, N-CH(3), or catechol OHs to phenethylamine. In contrast, when each of these same groups was added to the appropriate compound, already containing the other two groups, to make epinephrine, the increase in affinity was quite large (60- to 120-fold). An initial interaction between two or more contacts may stabilize an intermediate conformation of beta(2)AR, R', either by altering amino acid side chain rotamer conformations or by a more global conformational change involving the repositioning of transmembrane segments. The pattern of these effects was different in the CAM in that fewer interactions were required to observe the synergistic effect, consistent with the hypothesis that the CAM mutation enriches the proportion of receptors in R(*) or in R' from which R(*) is more readily assumed.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand-receptor interactions in transmembrane domain V of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor

1. The structural determinants of catechol hydroxyl interactions with adrenergic receptors were examined using 12 alpha2-adrenergic agonists and a panel of mutated human alpha2A-adrenoceptors. The alpha2ASer201 mutant had a Cys --> Ser201 (position 5.43) amino-acid substitution, and alpha2ASer201Cys200 and alpha2ASer201Cys204 had Ser --> Cys200 (5.42) and Ser --> Cys204 (5.46) substitutions, respectively, in addition to the Cys --> Ser201 substitution. 2. Automated docking methods were used to predict the receptor interactions of the ligands. Radioligand-binding assays and functional [35S]GTPgammaS-binding assays were performed using transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells to experimentally corroborate the predicted binding modes. 3. The hydroxyl groups of phenethylamines were found to have different effects on ligand affinity towards the activated and resting forms of the wild-type alpha2A-adrenoceptor. Substitution of Ser200 or Ser204 with cysteine caused a deterioration in the capability of catecholamines to activate the alpha2A-adrenoceptor. The findings indicate that (i) Cys201 plays a significant role in the binding of catecholamine ligands and UK14,304 (for the latter, by a hydrophobic interaction), but Cys201 is not essential for receptor activation; (ii) Ser200 interacts with the meta-hydroxyl group of phenethylamine ligands, affecting both catecholamine binding and receptor activation; while (iii) substituting Ser204 with a cysteine interferes both with the binding of catecholamine ligands and with receptor activation, due to an interaction between Ser204 and the para-hydroxyl group of the catecholic ring.

Dissimilar pharmacological responses by a new series of imidazoline derivatives at precoupled and ligand-activated alpha 2A-adrenoceptor states: evidence for effector pathway-dependent differential antagonism

Whereas agonist-directed differential signaling at a single receptor subtype has become an accepted pharmacological concept, distinct behaviors by ligands that are assumed to be antagonists is less documented. The intrinsic activity and capacity of antagonism for a new series of imidazoline-derived adrenergic ligands analogous to dexefaroxan were investigated by measuring two distinct signaling pathways at the recombinant human alpha 2A-adrenoceptor (alpha 2A AR): 1) pertussis toxin-resistant guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding responses mediated by either a recombinant G alpha oCys351Ile or G alpha i2Cys352Ile protein in CHO-K1 cells, and 2) inhibition of cAMP formation in a stably transfected C6-glial cell line. Ligands could be differentiated as inverse agonists [i.e., 2-(4-methoxy-2-ethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; RX 851062], neutral antagonists [i.e., 2-(4-hydroxy-2-ethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; RX 851057], partial [i.e., 2-(4-chloro-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; RX 821008], and high-efficacy [i.e., 2-(6,7-dichloro-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; RX 821010] agonists at a precoupled alpha 2A AR state in the copresence of a G alpha oCys351Ile protein but not G alpha i2Cys352Ile protein by monitoring [35S]GTP gamma S binding responses. Neither positive nor negative efficacy was observed for these compounds by monitoring the adenylate cyclase pathway at a presumably low-affinity alpha 2A AR state. The capacity of the dexefaroxan analogs to antagonize the (-)-epinephrine-mediated [35S]GTP gamma S binding response at a G alpha oCys351Ile protein was inversely correlated with their magnitude of intrinsic activity and unrelated to their ligand binding affinity for the alpha 2A AR. On the other hand, their capacity to antagonize either (-)-epinephrine or 5-bromo-6-(2-imidazolin-2-ylamino)quinoxaline tartrate (UK 14304)-mediated inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation was not related with the rank order of antagonist capacity for the (-)-epinephrine-mediated [35S]GTP gamma S binding response. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that certain alpha2 AR ligands that are assumed to be antagonists, may yield dissimilar pharmacological responses, dependent on the investigated agonist-stimulated effector pathway.

Activation of CCR5 by chemokines involves an aromatic cluster between transmembrane helices 2 and 3

CCR5 is a G protein-coupled receptor responding to four natural agonists, the chemokines RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, and monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-2, and is the main co-receptor for the macrophage-tropic human immunodeficiency virus strains. We have previously identified a structural motif in the second transmembrane helix of CCR5, which plays a crucial role in the mechanism of receptor activation. We now report the specific role of aromatic residues in helices 2 and 3 of CCR5 in this mechanism. Using site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling in a combined approach, we demonstrate that a cluster of aromatic residues at the extracellular border of these two helices are involved in chemokine-induced activation. These aromatic residues are involved in interhelical interactions that are key for the conformation of the helices and govern the functional response to chemokines in a ligand-specific manner. We therefore suggest that transmembrane helices 2 and 3 contain important structural elements for the activation mechanism of chemokine receptors, and possibly other related receptors as well.

Bioinformatics and receptor mechanisms of psychotropic drugs

One important aspect in biotechnology is gene discovery and target validation for drug discovery. Information from the human genome (HUGO) project may be used to deduce the amino acid sequence of all proteins produced in the human body. However, knowing the amino acid sequence of a protein is not the same as knowing its function. Identification of novel molecular targets for discovery of new, safer and more efficient therapeutic drugs from the human genome sequences requires multidisciplinary research efforts, including proteomics, structural biology and bioinformatics. In addition to possible effects on gene expression, most of the currently used therapeutic drugs either have enzymes or membrane proteins as their molecular targets of action. These membrane proteins include transporters of small molecules across cell membranes, ion channels, or receptors that convey signals from one side of a membrane to the other. Our research group as well as others have used computational techniques, along with biotechnology, molecular biology and other experimental techniques, to construct detailed 3-dimensional models of transporter proteins and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are the molecular targets of action of psychotropic drugs. The models have been used to simulate the molecular dynamics and study the ligand binding and signal transduction mechanisms of these receptors. The use of bioinformatics, as exemplified in our modelling of GPCRs, is only one of the key factors for success in post-genomic research for new targets for therapeutic drugs.

The binding site of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors: the transmembrane segments and second extracellular loop

In the current chapter, we review approaches to the identification of the residues forming the binding sites for agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators in the family of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). We then review the structural bases for ligand binding and pharmacological specificity based on the application of these methods to muscarinic cholinergic, adrenergic, dopaminergic, serotonergic, and histaminergic receptors, using the high resolution rhodopsin structure as a template. Furthermore, we propose a critical role of the second extracellular loop in forming the binding site for small molecular weight aminergic ligands, much as this loop dives down into the binding-site crevice and contacts retinal in rhodopsin.

Phenoxybenzamine binding reveals the helical orientation of the third transmembrane domain of adrenergic receptors

Phenoxybenzamine (PB), a classical alpha-adrenergic antagonist, binds irreversibly to the alpha-adrenergic receptors (ARs). Amino acid sequence alignments and the predicted helical arrangement of the seven transmembrane (TM) domains suggested an accessible cysteine residue in transmembrane 3 of the alpha(2)-ARs, in position C(3.36) (in subtypes A, B, and C corresponding to amino acid residue numbers 117/96/135, respectively), as a possible site for the PB interaction. Irreversible binding of PB to recombinant human alpha(2)-ARs (90 nm, 30 min) reduced the ligand binding capacity of alpha(2A)-, alpha(2B)-, and alpha(2C)-AR by 81, 96, and 77%. When the TM3 cysteine, Cys(117), of alpha(2A)-AR was mutated to valine (alpha(2A)-C117V), the receptor became resistant to PB (inactivation, 10%). The beta(2)-AR contains a valine in this position (V(3.36); position number 117) and a cysteine in the preceding position (Cys(116)) and was not inactivated by PB (10 microm, 30 min) (inactivation 26%). The helical orientation of TM3 was tested by exchanging the amino acids at positions 116 and 117 of the alpha(2A)-AR and beta(2)-AR. The alpha(2A)-F116C/C117V mutant was resistant to PB (inactivation, 7%), whereas beta(2)-V117C was irreversibly inactivated (inactivation, 93%), confirming that position 3.36 is exposed to receptor ligands, and position 3.35 is not exposed in the binding pocket.

Molecular mechanism for agonist-promoted alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor activation by norepinephrine and epinephrine

We present a mechanism for agonist-promoted alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)-AR) activation based on structural, pharmacological, and theoretical evidence of the interactions between phenethylamine ligands and alpha(2A)-AR. In this study, we have: 1) isolated enantiomerically pure phenethylamines that differ both in their chirality about the beta-carbon, and in the presence/absence of one or more hydroxyl groups: the beta-OH and the catecholic meta- and para-OH groups; 2) used [(3)H]UK-14,304 [5-bromo-N-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-6-quinoxalinamine; agonist] and [(3)H]RX821002 [2-(2-methoxy-1,4-benzodioxan-2-yl)-2-imidazoline; antagonist] competition binding assays to determine binding affinities of these ligands to the high- and low-affinity forms of alpha(2A)-AR; 3) tested the ability of the ligands to promote receptor activation by measuring agonist-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in isolated cell membranes; and 4) used automated docking methods and our alpha(2A)-AR model to predict the binding modes of the ligands inside the alpha(2A)-AR binding site. The ligand molecules are sequentially missing different functional groups, and we have correlated the structural features of the ligands and ligand-receptor interactions with experimental ligand binding and receptor activation data. Based on the analysis, we show that structural rearrangements in transmembrane helix (TM) 5 could take place upon binding and subsequent activation of alpha(2A)-AR by phenethylamine agonists. We suggest that the following residues are important in phenethylamine interactions with alpha(2A)-AR: Asp113 (D(3.32)), Val114 (V(3.33)), and Thr118 (T(3.37)) in TM3; Ser200 (S(5.42)), Cys201 (C(5.43)), and Ser204 (S(5.46)) in TM5; Phe391 (F(6.52)) and Tyr394 (Y(6.55)) in TM6; and Phe411 (F(7.38)) and Phe412 (F(7.39)) in TM7.

Partial to complete antagonism by putative antagonists at the wild-type alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor based on kinetic analyses of agonist:antagonist interactions

1. Activation of the recombinant human alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor (alpha(2C) AR) by (-)-adrenaline in CHO-K1 cells transiently co-expressing a chimeric G(alpha q/i1) protein induced a rapid, transient Ca(2+) response with a high-magnitude followed by a low-magnitude phase which continued throughout the recorded time period (15 min). 2. Activation of the alpha(2C) AR by various alpha(2) AR agonists revealed the following rank order of high-magnitude Ca(2+) response [E(max) (%) versus 10 microM (-)-adrenaline]: UK 14304 (102+/-4)=talipexole (101+/-3)=(-)-adrenaline (100)=d-medetomidine (98+/-1)>oxymetazoline (81+/-4) reverse similarclonidine (75+/-5). 3. The methoxy- (RX 821002) and ethoxy-derivatives (RX 811059) of idazoxan and the dexefaroxan analogue atipamezole were fully effective as antagonists of both the high- and the low-magnitude Ca(2+) response. However, though acting as full antagonists of the high-magnitude response, the further putative alpha(2) AR antagonists idazoxan (27%), SKF 86466 (29%) and dexefaroxan (59%) reversed the low-magnitude response only partially. 4. In conclusion, kinetic analyses of agonist : antagonist interactions at the alpha(2C) AR demonstrate a wide spectrum of partial to complete antagonism of the low-magnitude Ca(2+) response for structurally related alpha(2) AR ligands.

Differential modes of agonist binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine(2A) serotonin receptors revealed by mutation and molecular modeling of conserved residues in transmembrane region 5

Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling were used to investigate the molecular interactions involved in ligand binding to, and activation of, the rat 5-hydroxytryptamine(2A) (5-HT(2A)) serotonin (5-HT) receptor. Based on previous modeling studies utilizing molecular mechanics energy calculations and molecular dynamics simulations, four sites (S239[5.43], F240[5.44], F243[5.47], and F244[5.48]) in transmembrane region V were selected, each predicted to contribute to agonist and/or antagonist binding. The F243A mutation increased the affinity of (+/-)4-iodo-2, 5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine, decreased the binding of alpha-methyl-5HT, N-omega-methyl-5HT, ketanserin, ritanserin, and spiperone and had no effect on the binding of 5-HT and 5-methyl-N, N-dimethyltryptamine. The F240A mutant had no effect on the binding of any of the ligands tested, whereas F244A caused an agonist-specific decrease in binding affinity (3- to 10-fold). S239A caused a 6- to 13-fold decrease in tryptamine-binding affinity and a 5-fold increase in affinity of 4-iodo-2, 5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine. A subset of the agonists used in binding studies were used to determine the efficacies and potencies of these mutants to activate phosphoinositide hydrolysis. The F243A and F244A mutations reduced agonist stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis, whereas the S239A and F240A mutations had no effect. There was little correlation between agonist binding and second messenger production. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations, considering these data, produced ligand-bound structures utilizing substantially different bonding interactions even among structurally similar ligands (differing by as little as one methyl group). Taken together, these results suggest that relatively minor changes in either receptor or ligand structure can produce drastic and unpredictable changes in both binding interactions and 5-HT(2A) receptor activation. Thus, our finding may have major implications for the future and feasibility of receptor structure-based drug design.

Regulation of alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor expression by chronic stress in neurons of the brain stem

Alpha(2)-Adrenoceptors are supposed to be important regulatory elements in responses to stress. Previous receptor binding studies in male tree shrews have shown that chronic psychosocial stress down-regulates binding sites for alpha(2)-adrenergic ligands in several brain stem nuclei. The aim of the present study was to quantify effects of chronic subordination stress on expression of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor subtype A gene in identified neurons of the brain stem. We partially cloned the alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor cDNA of the tree shrew (1.22 kb) and localized receptor RNA expression in brain stem neurons by in situ hybridization using a 35S-labeled cRNA probe (1.06 kb). To identify neurons expressing receptor mRNA, brain sections were first immunocytochemically stained with antibodies against tyrosine hydroxylase, phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase, or glutamate, and then processed for in situ hybridization. Furthermore, expression of receptor-specific RNA was quantified in single neurons of animals which had been psychosocially stressed during 4 weeks and in unstressed controls. We found strong in situ hybridization in the noradrenergic neurons of the locus coeruleus, but only weak labeling of A2 neurons in the solitary tract nucleus and no labeling of A1 neurons in the caudal ventrolateral medulla. Adrenergic neurons in the solitary tract nucleus (group C2) did not express the alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor, and C1 neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla showed only a minor labeling by the in situ probe. In contrast, large glutamatergic neurons in the lateral reticular nucleus were strongly labeled by the probe. Chronic psychosocial stress reduced alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor RNA expression in locus coeruleus neurons (-24.0%), in solitary tract neurons (-31.0%), and in neurons of the lateral reticular nucleus (-18.8%). These findings show that stress not only decreases the expression of the alpha(2A)-adrenergic autoreceptor in the locus coeruleus but also of alpha(2A)-heteroreceptors in glutamatergic neurons.

Disparate ligand-mediated Ca(2+) responses by wild-type, mutant Ser(200)Ala and Ser(204)Ala alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor: G(alpha15) fusion proteins: evidence for multiple ligand-activation binding sites

Ligand : receptor interactions were analysed at wt, mutant Ser(200)Ala and Ser(204)Ala alpha(2A) ARs by measuring Ca(2+) responses in CHO-K1 cells either by co-expression with a G(alpha15) protein or at a receptor : G(alpha15) protein stoichiometry of 1.0 using fusion proteins. The magnitude of the UK 14304-mediated Ca(2+) response as elicited by a G(alpha15) protein was largest with both mutant Ser(200)Ala and Ser(204)Ala alpha(2A)ARs compared to the wt alpha(2A) AR in the co-expression and fusion protein experiments. The activation profiles of the wt and both mutant alpha(2A) ARs as analysed by a series of alpha(2) AR agonists differed. d-Medetomidine and clonidine appeared most efficacious at the Ser(204)Ala alpha(2A) AR, whereas oxymetazoline was also partially active at the Ser(200)Ala alpha(2A) AR. Talipexole was silent at both mutant alpha(2A) ARs. The intrinsic activity of (-)-adrenaline was either absent or partial at the Ser(204)Ala and Ser(200)Ala alpha(2A) AR, respectively. This latter observation is related to its lower binding affinity for both mutant alpha(2A) ARs. Ligands characterized as antagonists at wt and Ser(200)Ala alpha(2A) ARs demonstrated either no intrinsic activity (i.e., RX 811059) or positive efficacy with a different rank order of maximal response at the Ser(204)Ala alpha(2A) AR (atipamezole=SKF 86466=idazoxan>dexefaroxan) than Asp(79)Asn alpha(2A) AR (atipamezole>idazoxan approximately SKF 86466>dexefaroxan) and Thr(373)Lys alpha(2A) AR (SKF 86466>atipamezole approximately idazoxan>dexefaroxan). These effects were only observed in the co-expression experiments at concentrations in line with their binding affinities. In conclusion, these Ca(2+) data suggest that multiple activation binding sites exist for these ligands at the alpha(2A) AR, and that their activation may be affected in different ways by the mutations being investigated.

On the spatial disposition of the fifth transmembrane helix and the structural integrity of the transmembrane binding site in the opioid and ORL1 G protein-coupled receptor family

Evidence from statistical cluster analyses of a multiple sequence alignment of G protein-coupled receptor seven-helix folds supports the existence of structurally conserved transmembrane (TM) ligand binding sites in the opioid/opioid receptor-like (ORL1) and amine receptor families. Based on the expectation that functionally conserved regions in homologous proteins will display locally higher levels of sequence identity compared with global sequence similarities that pertain to the overall fold, this approach may have wider applications in functional genomics to annotate sequence data. Binding sites in models of the kappa-opioid receptor seven-helix bundle built from the rhodopsin templates of Baldwin et al. (1997) [J. Mol. Biol., 272, 144-164] and Herzyk and Hubbard (1998) [J. Mol. Biol., 281, 742-751] are compared. The Herzyk and Hubbard template is found to be in better accord with experimental studies of amine, opioid and rhodopsin receptors owing to the reduced physical separation of the extracellular parts of TM helices V and VI and differences in the rotational orientation of the N-terminal of helix V that reveal side chain accessibilities in the Baldwin et al. structure to be out of phase with relative alkylation rates of engineered cysteine residues in the TM binding site of the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor. TM helix V in the Baldwin et al. template has been remodelled with a different proline kink to satisfy experimental constraints. A recent proposal that rotation of helix V is associated with receptor activation is critically discussed.

Three-dimensional models of alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor complexes provide a structural explanation for ligand binding

We have compared bacteriorhodopsin-based (alpha(2A)-AR(BR)) and rhodopsin-based (alpha(2A)-AR(R)) models of the human alpha(2A)-adrenengic receptor (alpha(2A)-AR) using both docking simulations and experimental receptor alkylation studies with chloroethylclonidine and 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate hydrobromide. The results indicate that the alpha(2A)-AR(R) model provides a better explanation for ligand binding than does our alpha(2A)-AR(BR) model. Thus, we have made an extensive analysis of ligand binding to alpha(2A)-AR(R) and engineered mutant receptors using clonidine, para-aminoclonidine, oxymetazoline, 5-bromo-N-(4, 5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-6-quinoxalinamine (UK14,304), and norepinephrine as ligands. The representative docked ligand conformation was chosen using extensive docking simulations coupled with the identification of favorable interaction sites for chemical groups in the receptor. These ligand-protein complex studies provide a rational explanation at the atomic level for the experimentally observed binding affinities of each of these ligands to the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor.