Steroid hormone receptor-mediated histone deacetylation and transcription at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

A novel dissociative steroid VBP15 reduces MUC5AC gene expression in airway epithelial cells but lacks the GRE mediated transcriptional properties of dexamethasone

Overproduction of secretory mucins contributes to morbidity/mortality in inflammatory lung diseases. Inflammatory mediators directly increase expression of mucin genes, but few drugs have been shown to directly repress mucin gene expression. IL-1β upregulates the MUC5AC mucin gene in part via the transcription factors NFκB while the glucocorticoid Dexamethasone (Dex) transcriptionally represses MUC5AC expression by Dex-activated GR binding to two GRE cis-sites in the MUC5AC promoter in lung epithelial cells. VBP compounds (ReveraGen BioPharma) maintain anti-inflammatory activity through inhibition of NFκB but exhibit reduced GRE-mediated transcriptional properties associated with adverse side-effects and thus have potential to minimize harmful side effects of long-term steroid therapy in inflammatory lung diseases. We investigated VBP15 efficacy as an anti-mucin agent in two types of airway epithelial cells and analyzed the transcription factor activity and promoter binding associated with VBP15-induced MUC5AC repression. VBP15 reduced MUC5AC mRNA abundance in a dose- and time-dependent manner similar to Dex in the presence or absence of IL-1β in A549 and differentiated human bronchial epithelial cells. Repression was abrogated in the presence of RU486, demonstrating a requirement for GR in the VBP15-induced repression of MUC5AC. Inhibition of NFκB activity resulted in reduced baseline expression of MUC5AC indicating that constitutive activity maintains MUC5AC production. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated lack of GR and of p65 (NFκB) binding to composite GRE domains in the MUC5AC promoter following VBP15 exposure of cells, in contrast to Dex. These data demonstrate that VBP15 is a novel anti-mucin agent that mediates the reduction of MUC5AC gene expression differently than the classical glucocorticoid, Dex.

Minireview: The versatile roles of lysine deacetylases in steroid receptor signaling

Lysine deacetylases have been known to regulate nuclear receptor function for many years. In the unliganded state, nuclear receptors that form heterodimers with retinoid X receptors, such as the retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors, associate with deacetylases to repress target genes. In the case of steroid receptors, binding of an antagonist ligand was initially reported to induce association of deacetylases to prevent activation of target genes. Since then, deacetylases have been shown to have diverse functions in steroid receptor signaling, from regulating interactions with molecular chaperones to facilitating their ability to activate transcription. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent studies on the role of deacetylases in steroid receptor signaling, which show deacetylases to be highly versatile regulators of steroid receptor function.

Class I lysine deacetylases facilitate glucocorticoid-induced transcription

Nuclear receptors use lysine acetyltransferases and lysine deacetylases (KDACs) in regulating transcription through histone acetylation. Lysine acetyltransferases interact with steroid receptors upon binding of an agonist and are recruited to target genes. KDACs have been shown to interact with steroid receptors upon binding to an antagonist. We have shown previously that KDAC inhibitors (KDACis) potently repress the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter through transcriptional mechanisms and impair the ability of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to activate it, suggesting that KDACs can play a positive role in GR transactivation. In the current study, we extended this analysis to the entire GR transcriptome and found that the KDACi valproic acid impairs the ability of agonist-bound GR to activate about 50% of its target genes. This inhibition is largely due to impaired transcription rather than defective GR processing and was also observed using a structurally distinct KDACi. Depletion of KDAC1 expression mimicked the effects of KDACi in over half of the genes found to be impaired in GR transactivation. Simultaneous depletion of KDACs 1 and 2 caused full or partial impairment of several more GR target genes. Altogether we found that Class I KDAC activity facilitates GR-mediated activation at a sizable fraction of GR-activated target genes and that KDAC1 alone or in coordination with KDAC2 is required for efficient GR transactivation at many of these target genes. Finally, our work demonstrates that KDACi exposure has a significant impact on GR signaling and thus has ramifications for the clinical use of these drugs.

Glucocorticoid receptor and histone deacetylase-2 mediate dexamethasone-induced repression of MUC5AC gene expression

Airway occlusion in obstructive airway diseases is caused in part by the overproduction of secretory mucin glycoproteins through the up-regulation of mucin (MUC) genes by inflammatory mediators. Some pharmacological agents, including the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Dex), repress mucin concentrations in lung epithelial cancer cells. Here, we show that Dex reduces the expression of MUC5AC, a major airway mucin gene, in primary differentiated normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner, and that the Dex-induced repression is mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and two glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) in the MUC5AC promoter. The pre-exposure of cells to RU486, a GR antagonist, and mutations in either the GRE3 or GRE5 cis-sites abolished the Dex-induced repression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays showed a rapid temporal recruitment of GR to the GRE3 and GRE5 cis-elements in the MUC5AC promoter in NHBE and in A549 cells. Immunofluorescence showed nuclear colocalization of GR and histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2) in MUC5AC-expressing NHBE cells. ChIP also showed a rapid temporal recruitment of HDAC2 to the GRE3 and GRE5 cis-elements in the MUC5AC promoter in both cell types. The knockdown of HDAC2 by HDAC2-specific short interfering RNA prevented the Dex-induced repression of MUC5AC in NHBE and A549 cells. These data demonstrate that GR and HDAC2 are recruited to the GRE3 and GRE5 cis-sites in the MUC5AC promoter and mediate the Dex-induced cis repression of MUC5AC gene expression. A better understanding of the mechanisms whereby glucocorticoids repress MUC5AC gene expression may be useful in formulating therapeutic interventions in chronic lung diseases.

Cellular GCN5 is a novel regulator of human adenovirus E1A-conserved region 3 transactivation

The largest isoform of adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) contains a unique region termed conserved region 3 (CR3). This region activates viral gene expression by recruiting cellular transcription machinery to the early viral promoters. Recent studies have suggested that there is an optimal level of E1A-dependent transactivation required by human adenovirus (hAd) during infection and that this may be achieved via functional cross talk between the N termini of E1A and CR3. The N terminus of E1A binds GCN5, a cellular lysine acetyltransferase (KAT). We have identified a second independent interaction of E1A with GCN5 that is mediated by CR3, which requires residues 178 to 188 in hAd5 E1A. GCN5 was recruited to the viral genome during infection in an E1A-dependent manner, and this required both GCN5 interaction sites on E1A. Ectopic expression of GCN5 repressed transactivation by both E1A CR3 and full-length E1A. In contrast, RNA interference (RNAi) depletion of GCN5 or treatment with the KAT inhibitor cyclopentylidene-[4-(4'-chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl]hydrazone (CPTH2) resulted in increased E1A CR3 transactivation. Moreover, activation of the adenovirus E4 promoter by E1A was increased during infection of homozygous GCN5 KAT-defective (hat/hat) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) compared to wild-type control MEFs. Enhanced histone H3 K9/K14 acetylation at the viral E4 promoter required the newly identified binding site for GCN5 within CR3 and correlated with repression and reduced occupancy by phosphorylated RNA polymerase II. Treatment with CPTH2 during infection also reduced virus yield. These data identify GCN5 as a new negative regulator of transactivation by E1A and suggest that its KAT activity is required for optimal virus replication.

Regulation of foamy viral transcription and RNA export

Foamy viruses (FVs) are distinct members of the retrovirus (RV) family. In this chapter, the molecular regulation of foamy viral transcription, splicing, polyadenylation, and RNA export will be compared in detail to the orthoretroviruses. Foamy viral transcription is regulated in early and late phases, which are separated by the usage of two promoters. The viral transactivator protein Tas activates both promoters. The nature of this early-late switch and the molecular mechanism used by Tas are unique among RVs. RVs duplicate the long terminal repeats (LTRs) during reverse transcription. These LTRs carry both a promoter region and functional poly(A) sites. In order to express full-length transcripts, RVs have to silence the poly(A) signal in the 5' LTR and to activate it in the 3' LTR. FVs have a unique R-region within these LTRs with a major splice donor (MSD) at +51 followed by a poly(A) signal. FVs use a MSD-dependent mechanism to inactivate the polyadenylation. Most RVs express all their genes from a single primary transcript. In order to allow expression of more than one gene from this RNA, differential splicing is extensively used in complex RVs. The splicing pattern of FV is highly complex. In contrast to orthoretroviruses, FVs synthesize the Pol precursor protein from a specific and spliced transcript. The LTR and IP-derived primary transcripts are spliced into more than 15 different mRNA species. Since the RNA ratios have to be balanced, a tight regulation of splicing is required. Cellular quality control mechanisms retain and degrade unspliced or partially spliced RNAs in the nucleus. In this review, I compare the RNA export pathways used by orthoretroviruses with the distinct RNA export pathway used by FV. All these steps are highly regulated by host and viral factors and set FVs apart from all other RVs.

Control of nuclear receptor function by local chromatin structure

Steroid hormone receptors regulate gene transcription in a highly tissue-specific manner. The local chromatin structure underlying promoters and hormone response elements is a major component involved in controlling these highly restricted expression patterns. Chromatin remodeling complexes, as well as histone and DNA modifying enzymes, are directed to gene-specific regions and create permissive or repressive chromatin environments. These structures further enable proper communication between transcription factors, co-regulators and basic transcription machinery. The regulatory elements active at target genes can be either constitutively accessible to receptors or subject to rapid receptor-dependent modification. The chromatin states responsible for these processes are in turn determined during development and differentiation. Thus access of regulatory factors to elements in chromatin provides a major level of cell selective regulation.

The L2a element is a mouse CD8 silencer that interacts with MAR-binding proteins SATB1 and CDP

Previous transgenic-reporter and targeted-deletion studies indicate that the subset-specific expression of CD8αβ heterodimers is controlled by multiple enhancer activities, since no silencer elements had been found within the locus. We have identified such a silencer as L2a, a previously characterized ∼ 220 bp nuclear matrix associating region (MAR) located ∼ 4.5 kb upstream of CD8α. L2a transgenes driven by the E8(I) enhancer showed no reporter expression in thymic subsets or T cells in splenic, inguinal and mesenteric lymph node peripheral T cells. Deletion of L2a resulted in significant reporter de-repression, even in the CD4(+)CD8(+) double positive (DP) thymocyte population. L2a contains binding sites for two MAR-interacting proteins, SATB1 and CDP. We found that that binding of these factors was markedly influenced by the content and spacing of L2a sub-motifs (L and S) and that SATB1 binds preferentially to the L motif both in vitro and in vivo. A small fraction of the transgenic CD8 single positive (SP) thymocytes and peripheral CD8(+) T cells bypassed L2a-silencing to give rise to variegated expression of the transgenic reporter. Crossing the L2a-containing transgene onto a SATB1 knockdown background enhanced variegated expression, suggesting that SATB1 is critical in overcoming L2a-silenced transcription.

Disruption of histone modification and CARM1 recruitment by arsenic represses transcription at glucocorticoid receptor-regulated promoters

Chronic exposure to inorganic arsenic (iAs) found in the environment is one of the most significant and widespread environmental health risks in the U.S. and throughout the world. It is associated with a broad range of health effects from cancer to diabetes as well as reproductive and developmental anomalies. This diversity of diseases can also result from disruption of metabolic and other cellular processes regulated by steroid hormone receptors via aberrant transcriptional regulation. Significantly, exposure to iAs inhibits steroid hormone-mediated gene activation. iAs exposure is associated with disease, but is also used therapeutically to treat specific cancers complicating an understanding of iAs action. Transcriptional activation by steroid hormone receptors is accompanied by changes in histone and non-histone protein post-translational modification (PTM) that result from the enzymatic activity of coactivator and corepressor proteins such as GRIP1 and CARM1. This study addresses how iAs represses steroid receptor-regulated gene transcription. PTMs on histones H3 and H4 at the glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-activated mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter were identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis following exposure to steroid hormone±iAs. Histone H3K18 and H3R17 amino acid residues had significantly different patterns of PTMs after treatment with iAs. Promoter interaction of the coactivator CARM1 was disrupted, but the interaction of GRIP1, a p160 coactivator through which CARM1 interacts with a promoter, was intact. Over-expression of CARM1 was able to fully restore and GRIP1 partially restored iAs-repressed transcription indicating that these coactivators are functionally associated with iAs-mediated transcriptional repression. Both are essential for robust transcription at steroid hormone regulated genes and both are associated with disease when inappropriately expressed. We postulate that iAs effects on CARM1 and GRIP1 may underlie some of its therapeutic effects and as well be associated with its toxic effects.

A shifting paradigm: histone deacetylases and transcriptional activation

Transcriptional repression and silencing have been strongly associated with hypoacetylation of histones. Accordingly, histone deacetylases, which remove acetyl groups from histones, have been shown to participate in mechanisms of transcriptional repression. Therefore, current models of the role of acetylation in transcriptional regulation focus on the acetylation status of histones and designate histone acetyltransferases, which add acetyl groups to histones, as transcriptional coactivators and histone deacetylases as corepressors. In recent years, an accumulation of studies have shown that these enzymes also target non-histone proteins and that histone deacetylases have clear roles as coactivators at a variety of genes, some of which are key regulators of cell growth and survival. This review summarizes the evidence for histone deacetylases as coactivators and provides models of coactivation mechanisms, some of which integrate roles of acetylated histones and non-histone proteins in transcription.

Dynamic histone acetylation/deacetylation with progesterone receptor-mediated transcription

Histone acetylation is a highly dynamic posttranslational modification that plays an important role in gene expression. Previous work showed that promoter histone deacetylation is accompanied by progesterone receptor (PR)-mediated activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. We investigated the role of this deacetylation and found that this histone deacetylation is not a singular event. In fact, histone acetylation at the MMTV promoter is highly dynamic, with an initial increase in acetylation followed by an eventual net deacetylation of histone H4. The timing of increase in acetylation of H4 coincides with the time at which PR, RNA polymerase II, and histone acetyltransferases cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein and p300 are recruited to the MMTV promoter. The timing in which histone H4 deacetylation occurs (after PR and RNA polymerase II recruitment) and the limited effect that trichostatin A and small interfering RNA knockdown of histone deacetylase (HDAC)3 have on MMTV transcription suggests that this deacetylation activity is not required for the initiation of PR-mediated transcription. Interestingly, two HDACs, HDAC1 and HDAC3, are already present at the MMTV before transcription activation. HDAC association at the MMTV promoter fluctuates during the hormone treatment. In particular, HDAC3 is temporarily undetected at the MMTV promoter within minutes after hormone treatment when the histone H4 acetylation increases but returns to the promoter near the time when histone acetylation levels start to decline. These results demonstrate the dynamic nature of coactivator/corepressor-promoter association and histone modifications such as acetylation during a transcription activation event.

Cyclooxygenase-2 regulation in colon cancer cells: modulation of RNA polymerase II elongation by histone deacetylase inhibitors

We are interested in the mechanism of cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) regulation in colon cancer cells because this knowledge could provide insight into colon carcinogenesis and suggest ways to suppress Cox-2 expression in colon tumors. Studying the HT-29 colon cancer cell line as a model, we found that Cox-2 mRNA and protein levels were activated over 10-fold by the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Moreover, we found that the histone deacetylase inhibitors butyrate and trichostatin A could block Cox-2 activation in a gene-specific manner. TNF-alpha and butyrate did not significantly affect Cox-2 promoter activity, mRNA stability, or negative regulation by the Cox-2 3'-untranslated RNA region. A nuclear run-on assay showed that TNF-alpha increased Cox-2 transcription, whereas butyrate was suppressive. Because butyrate has been reported to suppress polymerase elongation on the c-myc gene, we employed the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay to determine the influence of butyrate and trichostatin A on polymerase distribution on the Cox-2 gene. These data indicated that butyrate restricted polymerase elongation from exon 1 to 2 on both the c-myc and Cox-2 genes. We propose that histone deacetylases regulate a transcriptional block on the Cox-2 and c-myc genes and that this block may be a potential target for pharmacological intervention.

Sex steroids reduce DNaseI accessibility of androgen receptor promoter in adult male mice brain

We have previously reported that androgen receptor (AR) expression is inversely correlated to its promoter methylation and is regulated by sex steroids. As chromatin structure plays an important role in transcriptional regulation, the effect of sex steroids on DNaseI accessibility of chromatin of AR promoter was examined in the brain cortex of adult and old mice of both sexes. Nuclei were digested with different concentrations of DNaseI and the extracted DNA was further cleaved by PstI and analyzed by Southern hybridization with DIG-labeled 695-bp AR promoter. With 50 U DNaseI, the intensity of PstI-specific 1.45-kb band was lower in intact female as compared to male groups, suggesting increased nuclease accessibility in female than male. Although gonadectomy increased DNaseI accessibility remarkably in male and female of both ages, testosterone decreased the accessibility in adult but increased in old male. Estradiol, on the other hand, decreased DNaseI accessibility in both adult male and old female but increased in old male and adult female. Thus, these findings suggest that the chromatin conformation of AR promoter varies with age and sex and its accessibility to DNaseI is reduced by testosterone and estradiol in the brain cortex of adult male mice.

Chromatin-dependent E1A activity modulates NF-kappaB RelA-mediated repression of glucocorticoid receptor-dependent transcription

The role of chromatin-dependent regulatory mechanisms in the repression of glucocorticoid-dependent transcription from the murine mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter by p65 and E1A was investigated by using chromatin and transiently transfected reporters. The p65 RelA subunit of NF-kappaB represses MMTV expression on either transient or integrated reporters. In contrast, the viral oncoprotein E1A represses a transient but not an integrated MMTV. E1A repression is attenuated by chromatin, suggesting p65 but not E1A manipulates chromatin appropriately to inhibit the GR. Coexpression of p65 and E1A additively represses the transient MMTV but restores the transcriptional activation of the chromatin MMTV in response to glucocorticoids. This indicates that E1A has a dominant chromatin-dependent activity that attenuates repression by p65. E1A, p65, and GR bind the MMTV promoter, and chromatin remodeling enhances binding on both repressed and activated promoters. In addition, p65 requires Brg for repression of the integrated MMTV. This suggests that neither p65 repression nor E1A attenuation of repression results from an inhibition of remodeling that prevents transcription factor binding. Furthermore, p300/CBP is also required for both repression and attenuation by p65 and E1A. E1A and p65 mutants that do not bind p300/CBP are inactive, indicative of a requirement for p300/CBP-dependent complex formation for both repression and attenuation with chromatin. These data suggest that both the p65-dependent repression and the E1A-mediated attenuation of repression require the Brg1-dependent chromatin remodeling function and p300/CBP-dependent complex formation at a promoter assembled within chromatin.

Modifying chromatin to permit steroid hormone receptor-dependent transcription

Lipophilic hormones, including steroids, exert their physiological effects through binding to high-affinity superfamily of steroid hormone receptor (SR) proteins that function as ligand-dependent DNA binding transcription factors. To date, SR proteins are among a few transcription factors shown to directly interact with higher order chromatin structures to regulate gene expression. To perturb chromatin, SRs employ enzymatic multicomplexes that can either remodel or modify chromatin. Here we examine the current state of knowledge concerning multicomplex chromatin remodeling/modification machines and SR-dependent transcription. We will focus on the role of these protein-protein and chromatin-protein interactions in vivo with the MMTV promoter as a primary model. In addition, we discuss emerging evidence implicating chaperone proteins and proteasome degradation machinery in SR-mediated gene regulation within chromatin.

Interaction of maize Opaque-2 and the transcriptional co-activators GCN5 and ADA2, in the modulation of transcriptional activity

Maize Opaque-2 (ZmO2), a bZip class transcription factor has been shown to activate the transcription of a series of genes expressed in the maturation phase of endosperm development. Activation requires the presence of one or more enhancer binding sites, which confer the propensity for activation by ZmO2 on heterologous promoters and in heterologous plant cell types, such as tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. The region of ZmO2 required for conferring transcriptional activation has been localised to a stretch of acidic residues in the N-terminal portion of the ZmO2 sequence, which is conserved between O2-related bZip factor sequences. Previously we identified the maize homologues of yeast transcriptional co-activators GCN5 and ADA2 that are implicated in nucleosome modification and transcription. In the present study we have shown that transcriptional modulation by ZmO2 involves the intranuclear interaction of ZmO2 with ZmADA2 and ZmGCN5. Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) based techniques have enabled us to estimate the intracellular site of these intermolecular interactions. As a functional readout of these intranuclear interactions, we used the ZmO2 responsive maize b-32 promoter to drive the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) in the presence and absence of ZmGCN5 and ZmADA2. Our results suggest that the likely recruitment of ZmADA2 and ZmGCN5 modulates the transactivation of b-32 promoter by ZmO2 and that there may be a competition between ZmGCN5 and ZmO2 for binding to the amino-terminal of ZmADA2. The results may be taken as a paradigm for other processes of transcriptional modulation in planta involving acidic activation domains.

Trichostatin A reduces hormone-induced transcription of theMMTVpromoter and has pleiotropic effects on its chromatin structure

The deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) has long been used to study the relationship between gene transcription and the acetylation status of chromatin. We have used Xenopus laevis oocytes to study the effects of TSA on glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-dependent transcription and we have related these effects to changes in the chromatin structure of a reporter mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. We show that TSA induces a low level of constitutive transcription. This correlates with a change of acetylation pattern and a more open chromatin structure over the MMTV chromatin, and with specific acetylation and remodeling events in the promoter region. Specifically, a repositioning of initially randomly positioned nucleosomes along the distal MMTV long terminal repeat is seen. This nucleosome rearrangement is similar to the translational nucleosome positioning that occurs upon hormone activation. We also note a reduced hormone response in the presence of TSA. TSA effects have for a long time been associated with transcriptional activation and chromatin opening through inhibition of the deacetylation of histones. However, our results and those of others show that TSA-induced changes in expression and chromatin structure can be quite different in different promoter contexts and, thus, the effects of TSA are more complex than previously believed.

Progesterone receptor deficient in chromatin binding has an altered cellular state

Our previous work has shown that the progesterone receptor (PR) can exist in two distinct functional states in mammary adenocarcinoma cells. The differences in function included the ability to activate a promoter in organized chromatin, sensitivity to ligand, and ligand-independent activation. To determine whether these functional differences were because of altered cellular processing, we carried out biochemical analyses of the functionally distinct PRs. Although the majority of PR is localized to the nucleus, biochemical partitioning resulted in a loosely bound (cytosolic) fraction, and a tightly bound (nuclear) fraction. In the absence of progestins, the functionally distinct PRs differed significantly in partitioning between the two fractions. To characterize these fractions further, we analyzed interactions of unliganded PR with chaperones by coimmunoprecipitation. We determined that PR in the cytosolic fraction associated with hsp90 and p23. In contrast, PR in the nuclear fraction consisted of complexes containing hsp90, p23, and FKBP51 as well as PR that was dimerized and highly phosphorylated. Hormone treatment significantly reduced the formation of all PR-chaperone complexes. The hsp90 inhibitor, geldanamycin, similarly blocked transcriptional activity of both functionally distinct receptors. However, the two forms of the PR differed in their ability to associate with the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in organized chromatin. These findings provide new information about the composition and distribution of mature progesterone receptor complexes in mammary adenocarcinoma cells, and suggest that differences in receptor subcellular distribution have a significant impact on their function. These findings also reveal that transiently expressed steroid receptors may not always be processed like their endogenous counterparts.

Inhibition of MMTV transcription by HDAC inhibitors occurs independent of changes in chromatin remodeling and increased histone acetylation

Increased histone acetylation has been associated with activated gene transcription and decreased acetylation with repression. However, there is a growing number of genes known, which are downregulated by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors through unknown mechanisms. This study examines the mechanism by which the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter is repressed by the HDAC inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA). We find that this repression is transcriptional in nature and that it occurs in the presence and absence of glucocorticoids. TSA decreases MMTV transcription at a rapid rate, reaching maximum in 30-60 min. In contrast with previous reports, the repression does not correlate with an inhibition of glucocorticoid-induced nuclease hypersensitivity or NF1-binding at the MMTV promoter. Surprisingly, TSA does not induce sizable increases in histone acetylation at the MMTV promoter nor does it inhibit histone deacetylation, which accompanies deactivation of the glucocorticoid-activated MMTV promoter. Repression of MMTV transcription by TSA does not depend on the chromatin organization of the promoter because a transiently transfected MMTV promoter construct with a disorganized nucleoprotein structure was also repressed by TSA treatment. Mutational analysis of the MMTV promoter indicates that repression by TSA is mediated through the TATA box region. These results suggest a novel mechanism that involves acetylation of nonhistone proteins necessary for basal transcription.

Arabidopsis histone acetyltransferase AtGCN5 regulates the floral meristem activity through the WUSCHEL/AGAMOUS pathway

Histone acetyltransferases, which are able to acetylate histone and non-histone proteins, play important roles in gene regulation. Many histone acetyltransferases are related to yeast Gcn5, a component of two transcription regulatory complexes SAGA and ADA. In this work, by characterizing a mutation in the Arabidopsis GCN5 gene (AtGCN5) we studied the regulatory function of this gene in controlling floral meristem activity. We show that in addition to pleiotropic effects on plant development, this mutation also leads to the production of terminal flowers. The flowers show homeotic transformations of petals into stamens and sepals into filamentous structures and produce ectopic carpels. The phenotypes correlate to an expansion of the expression domains within floral meristems of the key regulatory genes WUSCHEL (WUS) and AGAMOUS (AG). These results suggest that AtGCN5 is required to regulate the floral meristem activity through the WUS/AG pathway. This study brings new elements on the elucidation of specific developmental pathways regulated by AtGCN5 and on the control mechanism of meristem regulatory gene expression.

Formation of higher-order secondary and tertiary chromatin structures by genomic mouse mammary tumor virus promoters

Agarose multigel electrophoresis has been used to characterize the structural features of isolated genomic mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoters. The mouse 3134 cells used for these studies contain approximately 200 stably integrated tandem repeats of a 2.4-kb MMTV promoter fragment. Inactive, basally active, and hormonally activated genomic promoters were liberated by restriction digestion of isolated nuclei, recovered in low-salt nuclear extracts, and electrophoresed in multigels consisting of nine individual agarose running gels. Specific bands were detected and characterized by Southern and Western blotting. We find that transcriptionally inactive promoters contain TBP and high levels of histone H1, and are present to varying extents in both untreated and dexamethasone (DEX)-treated 3134 cells. In contrast, the basally active promoter, present in untreated cells, is bound to RNA Pol II, TBP, and Oct1, contains acetylated H3 tail domains, and is depleted of histone H1. The DEX-activated promoter possessed similar composition as the basal promoter, but also contains stably bound Brg1. Strikingly, all forms of the MMTV promoter condense into higher-order secondary and/or tertiary chromatin structures in vitro in the presence of Mg2+. Thus, genomic MMTV promoter chromatin retains the ability to form classical higher-order structures under physiological salt conditions, even after dissociation of H1 and binding of several transcription factors and multiprotein complexes. These results suggest that transcriptionally active eukaryotic promoters may function in a locally folded chromatin environment in vivo.

Deacetylase activity is required for recruitment of the basal transcription machinery and transactivation by STAT5

The signal transducer and activator of transcription STAT5 plays a major role in the cellular response to cytokines, but the mechanism by which it activates transcription remains poorly understood. We show here that deacetylase inhibitors (trichostatin A, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, and sodium butyrate) prevent induction of endogenous STAT5 target genes, implying that a deacetylase activity is required for that process. Microarray analyses revealed that this requirement is common to all STAT5 target genes. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we show that, following STAT5 DNA binding, deacetylase inhibitors block transcription initiation by preventing recruitment of the basal transcription machinery. This inhibition is not due to effects on histone H3 and H4 acetylation or chromatin remodeling within the promoter region. This novel mechanism of transactivation by STAT5 provides a rationale for the use of deacetylase inhibitors for therapeutic intervention in STAT5-associated cancers.

CBP recruitment and histone acetylation in differential gene induction by glucocorticoids and progestins

We have analyzed histone acetylation at the steroid-responsive mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter in five separate cell lines that express functional glucocorticoid and/or progesterone receptors. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays reveal that glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors bind the MMTV promoter after hormone addition but that receptor binding is not associated with an increase in acetylation of histone H3 or H4. We have, however, found one exception to this rule. Previously we described a cell line [T47D(C&L)] that displayed a remarkable differential induction of MMTV by glucocorticoids and progestins. At one chromosomal locus (MMTV-luciferase), MMTV is preferentially induced by glucocorticoids, whereas at another locus within the same cell (MMTV-CAT), MMTV is activated by both glucocorticoids and progestins. Here we show that the glucocorticoid-mediated induction of MMTV-luciferase is accompanied by increased recruitment of CBP to the promoter and increased histone H3 and H4 acetylation, whereas the hormonal induction of MMTV-CAT in the same cell exhibits a more modest CBP recruitment without any increase in histone acetylation. These studies suggest that increased histone acetylation may serve a potentiating function for MMTV promoter activation at certain loci. However, increased histone acetylation is not requisite for steroid-mediated induction of transcription at all genes.

Getting into chromatin: how do transcription factors get past the histones?

Transcriptional activators and the general transcription machinery must gain access to DNA that in eukaryotes may be packaged into nucleosomes. In this review, I discuss this problem from the standpoint of the types of chromatin structures that these DNA-binding proteins may encounter, and the mechanisms by which they may contend with various chromatin structures. The discussion includes consideration of experiments in which chromatin structure is manipulated in vivo to confront activators with nucleosomal binding sites, and the roles of nucleosome dynamics and activation domains in facilitating access to such sites. Finally, the role of activators in facilitating access of the general transcriptional machinery to sites in chromatin is discussed.

Chromatin remodeling by nuclear receptors

The eukaryotic genome is structurally organized into nucleosomes to form chromatin, which regulates gene expression, in part, by controlling the accessibility of regulatory factors. When packaged as chromatin, many promoters are transcriptionally repressed, thus reducing the access of transcription factors to their binding sites. However, nuclear receptors (NRs) are a group of transcription factors that have the ability to access their binding sites in this repressive chromatin structure. Nuclear receptors are able to bind to their sites and recruit chromatin-remodeling proteins such as ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes and histone-modifying enzymes, resulting in transcriptional activation. In this review, we present the role of NRs in recruiting these chromatin-modifying enzymes by means of an extensively studied model system, the glucocorticoid receptor-mediated transactivation of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. We use these findings as a template to begin to understand the effect of chromatin changes on gene expression during spermatogenesis.

Dynamics of histone acetylation in vivo. A function for acetylation turnover?

Histone acetylation, discovered more than 40 years ago, is a reversible modification of lysines within the amino-terminal domain of core histones. Amino-terminal histone domains contribute to the compaction of genes into repressed chromatin fibers. It is thought that their acetylation causes localized relaxation of chromatin as a necessary but not sufficient condition for processes that repackage DNA such as transcription, replication, repair, recombination, and sperm formation. While increased histone acetylation enhances gene transcription and loss of acetylation represses and silences genes, the function of the rapid continuous or repetitive acetylation and deacetylation reactions with half-lives of just a few minutes remains unknown. Thirty years of in vivo measurements of acetylation turnover and rates of change in histone modification levels have been reviewed to identify common chromatin characteristics measured by distinct protocols. It has now become possible to look across a wider spectrum of organisms than ever before and identify common features. The rapid turnover rates in transcriptionally active and competent chromatin are one such feature. While ubiquitously observed, we still do not know whether turnover itself is linked to chromatin transcription beyond its contribution to rapid changes towards hyper- or hypoacetylation of nucleosomes. However, recent experiments suggest that turnover may be linked directly to steps in gene transcription, interacting with nucleosome remodeling complexes.

Helix 12 in the human estrogen receptor (hER) is essential for the hER function by overcoming nucleosome repression in yeast

When exogenous human estrogen receptor (hER) binds with estrogen, it can activate transcription of target genes in yeast cells. The estrogen dose-response expression patterns in yeast are very similar to those in human cells. This implies that hER may function in yeast cells via mechanisms similar to those in human cells. In this study, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used to dissect mechanisms of hER-activated transcription in yeast. The hER contains two transcription activation domains: ER-AF-1 and ER-AF-2 (LBD or HBD). In both human and wild-type yeast cells, hER must bind with estrogen in order to activate transcription. In those cells, ER-AF-2 is independently active upon hormone binding, but ER-AF-1 by itself is inactive. In a mutagenesis screen, we found a mutant strain in which the ER-AF-1 was independently active. It was determined that this mutant strain carried a Tup1 mutation. More interestingly, a small hER fragment ER-AF-0, containing neither ER-AF-1 nor ER-AF-2, was also fully active in the DeltaTup1 cells. This suggests that in this strain, hormone binding is not required for transcription activation by hER. It is known that the Tup1/Ssn6 complex plays an important role in general transcription repression by protecting histone acetylation sites thus stabilizing nucleosomes. In the DeltaTup1 cells, nucleosomes are known to be unstable because histones can be easily accessed by acetylase and cause nucleosome disassociation. Two point mutations in helix 12 (H12) in ER-AF-2, which abolished hER function in human cells, also completely abolished hER function in the wild-type yeast cells. This suggested that H12 is essential for hER transcription activation function. However, hER with the H12 mutation is able to activate transcription in DeltaTup1 cells. This indicates that the normal function of H12 is required for transcription activation by hER only if nucleosomes are not acetylated and are therefore stable. The results of this work suggest that there is a close relationship between hER function and nucleosome remodeling. It also provides insight about H12 activity and its functional relationship with other domains in hER. We propose here that H12 is essential for hER function by recruiting strong nucleosome remodeling proteins to the promoter region thus overcoming nucleosome repression.

Attenuation of glucocorticoid signaling through targeted degradation of p300 via the 26S proteasome pathway

The effects of acetylation on gene expression are complex, with changes in chromatin accessibility intermingled with direct effects on transcriptional regulators. For the nuclear receptors, both positive and negative effects of acetylation on specific gene transcription have been observed. We report that p300 and steroid receptor coactivator 1 interact transiently with the glucocorticoid receptor and that the acetyltransferase activity of p300 makes an important contribution to glucocorticoid receptor-mediated transcription. Treatment of cells with the deacetylase inhibitor, sodium butyrate, inhibited steroid-induced transcription and altered the transient association of glucocorticoid receptor with p300 and steroid receptor coactivator 1. Additionally, sustained sodium butyrate treatment induced the degradation of p300 through the 26S proteasome pathway. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 restored both the level of p300 protein and the transcriptional response to steroid over 20 h of treatment. These results reveal new levels for the regulatory control of gene expression by acetylation and suggest feedback control on p300 activity.

Dynamic behavior of transcription factors on a natural promoter in living cells

Through the use of photobleaching techniques, we examined the dynamic interaction of three members of the transcription apparatus with a target promoter in living cells. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) interacting protein 1 (GRIP-1) exhibits a half maximal time for fluorescent recovery (tau(R)) of 5 s, reflecting the same rapid exchange as observed for GR. In contrast, the large subunit (RPB1) of RNA polymerase II (pol II) required 13 min for complete fluorescence recovery, consistent with its function as a processive enzyme. We also observe a complex induction profile for the kinetics of GR-stimulated transcription. Our results indicate that GR and GRIP-1 as components of the activating complex are in a dynamic equilibrium with the promoter, and must return to the template many times during the course of transcriptional activation.

Components of the SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex are required for repressed transcription of ARG1 in rich medium

Transcriptional regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ARG1 gene is controlled by positive and negative elements. The transactivator Gcn4p is required for activation in minimal medium, while arginine repression requires the ArgR/Mcm1 regulatory complex, which binds to two upstream arginine control elements. We have found that the coordinated regulation of ARG1 requires components of the SAGA chromatin-remodeling complex. Using gcn5 deletion strains and a Gcn5 protein carrying the E173Q mutation in the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) region, we show that the HAT activity of Gcn5p is required for repression of ARG1 in rich medium. Similar increases in expression were seen upon deletion of other SAGA components but not upon deletion of the ADA-specific component, Ahc1p. Chromatin immunoprecipitations using antibodies to acetylated H3 confirmed that a decrease in the level of acetylated histones at the ARG1 promoter correlated with increased ARG1 expression. Up-regulation of ARG1 in the absence of Gcn5p also correlated with increased binding of TATA-binding protein to the promoter. The analysis of promoter deletions showed that Gcn5/Ada repression of ARG1 was mediated through the action of the ArgR/Mcm1 regulatory complex. In addition, studies with minimal medium demonstrated a requirement for the Ada proteins in activation of ARG1. This suggests that SAGA has a dual role at ARG1, acting to repress transcription in rich medium and activate transcription in minimal medium.

The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A blocks progesterone receptor-mediated transactivation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in vivo

Post-translational modifications of histones play an important role in modulating gene transcription within chromatin. We used the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter, which adopts an ordered nucleosomal structure, to investigate the impact of a specific inhibitor of histone deacetylase, trichostatin A (TSA), on progesterone receptor-activated transcription. TSA induced global histone hyperacetylation, and this effect occurred independently of the presence of hormone. Interestingly, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis revealed no significant change in the level of acetylated histones associated with the MMTV promoter following high TSA treatment. In human breast cancer cells, in which the MMTV promoter adopts a constitutively "open" chromatin structure, treatment with TSA converted the MMTV promoter into a closed structure. Addition of hormone did not overcome this TSA-induced closure of the promoter chromatin. Furthermore, TSA treatment resulted in the eviction of the transcription factor nuclear factor-1 from the promoter and reduced progesterone receptor-induced transcription. Kinetic experiments revealed that a loss of chromatin-remodeling proteins was coincident with the decrease in MMTV transcriptional activity and the imposition of repressed chromatin architecture at the promoter. These results demonstrate that deacetylase inhibitor treatment at levels that induce global histone acetylation may leave specific regulatory regions relatively unaffected and that this treatment may lead to transcriptional inhibition by mechanisms that modify chromatin-remodeling proteins rather than by influencing histone acetylation of the local promoter chromatin structure.

In vivo repression of an erythroid-specific gene by distinct corepressor complexes

To assess the mechanisms of repression of the erythroid-specific carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) locus we used chromatin immunoprecipitation and show that an NCoR-histone deacetylase (HDAC)3 complex is recruited by the nuclear receptor v-ErbA to the intronic HS2 enhancer turning it into a potent silencer. Furthermore we demonstrate that efficient CAII silencing requires binding of a MeCP2-targeted HDAC-containing corepressor complex to the hypermethylated CpG-island at the promoter. Activation of transcription by either AZAdC or thyroid hormone results in loss of one of the two corepressor complexes. Thyroid hormone further replaces the enhancer-bound NCoR-corepressor complex by the TRAP220 coactivator. Treatment with the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) causes activation of CAII transcription and histone H3 and H4 hyperacetylation at the enhancer, apparently without affecting binding of the two corepressor complexes. Unexpectedly, histone H3 and H4 at the fully repressed promoter are already hyperacetylated despite the close apposition of the MeCP2-targeted HDAC complex. Acetylation of histone H4, but not H3, at the promoter is moderately increased following TSA treatment. Our data suggest that the hyperacetylated but repressed CAII promoter is (partially) remodeled and primed for activation in v-ErbA-transformed cells.