Core histone acetylation is regulated by linker histone stoichiometry in vivo

Modulations of DNA Contacts by Linker Histones and Post-translational Modifications Determine the Mobility and Modifiability of Nucleosomal H3 Tails

Post-translational histone modifications and linker histone incorporation regulate chromatin structure and genome activity. How these systems interface on a molecular level is unclear. Using biochemistry and NMR spectroscopy, we deduced mechanistic insights into the modification behavior of N-terminal histone H3 tails in different nucleosomal contexts. We find that linker histones generally inhibit modifications of different H3 sites and reduce H3 tail dynamics in nucleosomes. These effects are caused by modulations of electrostatic interactions of H3 tails with linker DNA and largely depend on the C-terminal domains of linker histones. In agreement, linker histone occupancy and H3 tail modifications segregate on a genome-wide level. Charge-modulating modifications such as phosphorylation and acetylation weaken transient H3 tail-linker DNA interactions, increase H3 tail dynamics, and, concomitantly, enhance general modifiability. We propose that alterations of H3 tail-linker DNA interactions by linker histones and charge-modulating modifications execute basal control mechanisms of chromatin function.

Role of H1 linker histones in mammalian development and stem cell differentiation

H1 linker histones are key chromatin architectural proteins facilitating the formation of higher order chromatin structures. The H1 family constitutes the most heterogeneous group of histone proteins, with eleven non-allelic H1 variants in mammals. H1 variants differ in their biochemical properties and exhibit significant sequence divergence from one another, yet most of them are highly conserved during evolution from mouse to human. H1 variants are differentially regulated during development and their cellular compositions undergo dramatic changes in embryogenesis, gametogenesis, tissue maturation and cellular differentiation. As a group, H1 histones are essential for mouse development and proper stem cell differentiation. Here we summarize our current knowledge on the expression and functions of H1 variants in mammalian development and stem cell differentiation. Their diversity, sequence conservation, complex expression and distinct functions suggest that H1s mediate chromatin reprogramming and contribute to the large variations and complexity of chromatin structure and gene expression in the mammalian genome.

Spatial heterogeneity of dynamics of H1 linker histone

Linker histone H1 participates in maintaining higher order chromatin structures. It is a dynamic protein that binds to DNA and exchanges rapidly with a mobile pool. Therefore, the dynamics of H1 were probed in the nuclei of intact, live cells, using an array of microscopy techniques: fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), pair correlation functions (pCF) and fluorescence anisotropy. Combination of these techniques yielded information on H1 dynamics at small (1–100 μs: FCS, RICS, anisotropy), moderate (1–100 ms: FCS, RICS, pCF) and large (1–100 s: pCF and FRAP) time scales. These results indicate that the global movement of H1 in nuclei (at distances >1 µm) occurs at the time scale of seconds and is determined by processes other than diffusion. Moreover, a fraction of H1, which remains immobile at the time scale of tenths of seconds, is detectable. However, local (at distances <0.7 µm) H1 dynamics comprises a process occurring at a short (~3 ms) time scale and multiple processes occurring at longer (10–2,500 ms) scales. The former (fast) process (corresponding probably to H1 diffusion) is more pronounced in the nuclear regions characterized by low H1 concentration, but the latter (slow, attributable to H1 binding) in the regions of high H1 concentration. Furthermore, some regions in nuclei (possibly containing dense chromatin) may constitute barriers that impair or block movement of H1 histones within short (<1 µm) distances.

Individual differences in the effect of social defeat on anhedonia and histone acetylation in the rat hippocampus

Major depression is a growing problem worldwide with variation in symptoms and response to treatment. Individual differences in response to stress may contribute to such observed individual variation in behavior and pathology. Therefore, we investigated depressive-like behavior following exposure to repeated social defeat in a rat model of individual differences in response to novelty. Rats are known to exhibit either high locomotor activity and sustained exploration (high responders, HR) or low activity with minimal exploration (low responders, LR) in a novel environment. We measured anhedonia using the sucrose preference test in HR and LR rats following exposure to social defeat stress or in basal, non-defeated conditions. We then compared histone acetylation in the hippocampus in HR and LR defeat and non-defeated rats and measured mRNA levels of histone deacetylases (HDAC) 3, 4, 5, and Creb binding protein (CBP). We found that basally, HR rats consumed more sucrose solution than LR rats, but reduced consumption after exposure to defeat. LR rats' preference was unaffected by social defeat. We found that HR rats had higher levels of histone acetylation on H3K14 and H2B than LR rats in non-stress conditions. Following defeat, this acetylation pattern changed differentially, with HR rats decreasing acetylation of H3K14 and H2B and LR's increasing acetylation of H3K14. Acetylation on histone H4 decreased following defeat with no individual variation. Basal differences in CBP expression levels may underlie the observed acetylation pattern; however we found no significant effects of defeat in levels of HDACs 3, 4, 5 in the hippocampus.

Molecular dynamics of histone H1This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process

The histone H1 family of nucleoproteins represents an important class of structural and architectural proteins that are responsible for maintaining and stabilizing higher-order chromatin structure. Essential for mammalian cell viability, they are responsible for gene-specific regulation of transcription and other DNA-dependent processes. In this review, we focus on the wealth of information gathered on the molecular kinetics of histone H1 molecules using novel imaging techniques, such as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. These experiments have shed light on the effects of H1 phosphorylation and core histone acetylation in influencing chromatin structure and dynamics. We also delineate important concepts surrounding the C-terminal domain of H1, such as the intrinsic disorder hypothesis, and how it affects H1 function. Finally, we address the biochemical mechanisms behind low-affinity H1 binding.

Chromatin dynamics inTriturus cristatusoogenesis: an epigenetic approach

Oogenesis is a critical event in the formation of female gametes, whose role in development is to transfer genomic information to the next generation. During this process, the gene expression pattern changes dramatically concomitant with genome remodelling, while genomic information is stably maintained. The aim of the present study was to investigate the chromatin architecture in newt oocytes. Using fluorescence microscopy, as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunohistochemical method and RE-ChIP assay, some peculiar aspects of chromatin and chromosome organization and evolution in crested newt oogenesis were investigated. We focussed our investigations on detection of certain epigenetic modifications (H4 hyperacetylation, H2A ubiquitinylation and cytosine methylation) at the rRNA gene (18S–5.8S–28S) promoter region. Our findings suggest that there is an involvement of some epigenetic modifications as well as of linker histone variants in chromatin architecture dynamics during crested newt oogenesis.

Trichostatin-A induces differential changes in histone protein dynamics and expression in HeLa cells

Trichostatin-A (TSA), a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, results in enhanced acetylation of core histones thereby disrupting chromatin organization within living cells. We report on changes in chromatin organization and the resultant alteration in nuclear architecture following treatment with TSA using fluorescence imaging. TSA triggers an expected increase in the euchromatin fraction which is accompanied by a significant increase in nuclear volume and alterations in chromatin compaction mapped using fluorescence anisotropy imaging. We observe differential changes in the mobility of core and linker histones as measured by fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) methods. Further TSA induces a differential increase in linker histone transcription and increased phosphorylation of linker histone proteins accompanying an expected increase in core histone acetylation patterns. Thus subtle feedback responses triggered by changes in chromatin configurations impinge selectively on linker histone mobility and its expression. These observations have implications for understanding the role of HDAC in the dynamic maintenance of chromatin organization.

Drosophila ribosomal proteins are associated with linker histone H1 and suppress gene transcription

The dynamics and function of ribosomal proteins in the cell nucleus remain enigmatic. Here we provide evidence that specific components of Drosophila melanogaster ribosomes copurify with linker histone H1. Using various experimental approaches, we demonstrate that this association of nuclear ribosomal proteins with histone H1 is specific, and that colocalization occurs on condensed chromatin in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed that specific ribosomal proteins are associated with chromatin in a histone H1-dependent manner. Overexpression of either histone H1 or ribosomal protein L22 in Drosophila cells resulted in global suppression of the same set of genes, while depletion of H1 and L22 caused up-regulation of tested genes, suggesting that H1 and ribosomal proteins are essential for transcriptional gene repression. Overall, this study provides evidence for a previously undefined link between ribosomal proteins and chromatin, and suggests a role for this association in transcriptional regulation in higher eukaryotes.

Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells

Differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells from a pluripotent to a committed state involves global changes in genome expression patterns. Gene activity is critically determined by chromatin structure and interactions of chromatin binding proteins. Here, we show that major architectural chromatin proteins are hyperdynamic and bind loosely to chromatin in ES cells. Upon differentiation, the hyperdynamic proteins become immobilized on chromatin. Hyperdynamic binding is a property of pluripotent cells, but not of undifferentiated cells that are already lineage committed. ES cells lacking the nucleosome assembly factor HirA exhibit elevated levels of unbound histones, and formation of embryoid bodies is accelerated. In contrast, ES cells, in which the dynamic exchange of H1 is restricted, display differentiation arrest. We suggest that hyperdynamic binding of structural chromatin proteins is a functionally important hallmark of pluripotent ES cells that contributes to the maintenance of plasticity in undifferentiated ES cells and to establishing higher-order chromatin structure.

Chromatin Compaction at the Mononucleosome Level

Using a previously described FRET technique, we measured the distance between the ends of DNA fragments on which nucleosomes were reconstituted from recombinant and native histones. This distance was analyzed in its dependence on the DNA fragment length, concentration of mono- and divalent counterions, presence of linker histone H1, and histone modifications. We found that the linker DNA arms do not cross under all conditions studied but diverge slightly as they leave the histone core surface. Histone H1 leads to a global approach of the linker DNA arms, confirming the notion of a "stem structure". Increasing salt concentration also leads to an approach of the linker DNAs. To study the effect of acetylation, we compared chemically acetylated recombinant histones with histones prepared from HeLa cells, characterizing the sites of acetylation by mass spectroscopy. Nucleosomes from chemically acetylated histones have few modifications in the core domain and form nucleosomes normally. Acetylating all histones or selectively only H3 causes an opening of the nucleosome structure, indicated by the larger distances between the linker DNA ends. Selective acetylation of H4 distances the linker ends for short fragments but causes them to approach each other for fragments longer than 180 bp.

Many players, one goal: how chromatin states are inherited during cell division

Replication of genomic material is a process that requires not only high fidelity in the duplication of DNA sequences but also inheritance of the chromatin states. In the last few years enormous effort has been put into elucidating the mechanisms involved in the correct propagation of chromatin states. From all these studies it emerges that an epigenetic network is at the base of this process. A coordinated interplay between histone modifications and histone variants, DNA methylation, RNA components, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling, and histone-specific assembly factors regulates establishment of the replication timing program, initiation of replication, and propagation of chromatin domains. The aim of this review is to examine, in light of recent findings, how so many players can be coordinated with each other to achieve the same goal, a correct inheritance of the chromatin state.

Using quantitative imaging microscopy to define the target substrate specificities of histone post-translational-modifying enzymes

Until recently, identifying the specificities of enzymes that post-translationally modify core histones was performed in vitro using synthetic peptides, purified mononucleosomes or short nucleosome arrays. Unfortunately, the variable results obtained for identical enzymes are often dependent on the in vitro conditions employed. These results are consistent with the conclusion that the manner in which histone tails are presented to the modifying enzymes dramatically affects specificity. Because traditional in vitro biochemical approaches do not accurately recapitulate higher-order chromatin structure or consider the influences that additional chromatin binding proteins may have on determining the specificity of modifying enzymes, the development of new and innovative approaches is warranted. Here, we describe a novel in situ microscopy approach that accurately assesses enzyme substrate specificities through single cell measurements performed under physiologically relevant conditions. This approach couples the spatial resolving power of microscopy with robust statistical analyses to determine the substrate specificities of transiently expressed enzymes using histone modification- and residue-specific antibodies. This methodology can also be applied to measuring changes in the abundance of histone modifications as cells traverse the cell cycle.

Parathymosin affects the binding of linker histone H1 to nucleosomes and remodels chromatin structure

Linker histone H1 is the major factor that stabilizes higher order chromatin structure and modulates the action of chromatin-remodeling enzymes. We have previously shown that parathymosin, an acidic, nuclear protein binds to histone H1 in vitro and in vivo. Confocal laser scanning microscopy reveals a nuclear punctuate staining of the endogenous protein in interphase cells, which is excluded from dense heterochromatic regions. Using an in vitro chromatin reconstitution system under physiological conditions, we show here that parathymosin (ParaT) inhibits the binding of H1 to chromatin in a dose-dependent manner. Consistent with these findings, H1-containing chromatin assembled in the presence of ParaT has reduced nucleosome spacing. These observations suggest that interaction of the two proteins might result in a conformational change of H1. Fluorescence spectroscopy and circular dichroism-based measurements on mixtures of H1 and ParaT confirm this hypothesis. Human sperm nuclei challenged with ParaT become highly decondensed, whereas overexpression of green fluorescent protein- or FLAG-tagged protein in HeLa cells induces global chromatin decondensation and increases the accessibility of chromatin to micrococcal nuclease digestion. Our data suggest a role of parathymosin in the remodeling of higher order chromatin structure through modulation of H1 interaction with nucleosomes and point to its involvement in chromatin-dependent functions.

Trypanosomatid histones

The histones are responsible for packaging and regulating access to eukaryotic genomes. Trypanosomatids are flagellated protists that diverged early from the eukaryotic lineage and include parasites that cause disease in humans and other mammals. Here, we review the properties of histones in parasitic trypanosomatids, from gene organization and sequence to expression, post-translational modification and function within chromatin. Phylogenetic and experimental analysis indicates that certain specifically conserved histone sequence motifs, particularly within the N-terminal 'tail' domains, possibly represent functionally important modification substrates conserved throughout the eukaryotic lineage. For example, histone H3 contains a highly conserved methylation substrate. Trypanosomatids also possess at least three variant histones. Among these is an orthologue of H2A.Z, a histone involved in protecting 'active' chromatin from silencing in yeast. Histones provide docking platforms for a variety of regulatory factors. The presence of histone modification and variant histones in trypanosomatids therefore represents evidence for a network that provides the discrimination required to regulate transcription, recombination, repair and chromosome replication and segregation.

Quantitative analysis of CBP- and P300-induced histone acetylations in vivo using native chromatin

In vivo, histone tails are involved in numerous interactions, including those with DNA, adjacent histones, and other, nonhistone proteins. The amino termini are also the substrates for a number of enzymes, including histone acetyltransferases (HATs), histone deacetylases, and histone methyltransferases. Traditional biochemical approaches defining the substrate specificity profiles of HATs have been performed using purified histone tails, recombinant histones, or purified mononucleosomes as substrates. It is clear that the in vivo presentation of the substrate cannot be accurately represented by using these in vitro approaches. Because of the difficulty in translating in vitro results into in vivo situations, we developed a novel single-cell HAT assay that provides quantitative measurements of endogenous HAT activity. The HAT assay is performed under in vivo conditions by using the native chromatin structure as the physiological substrate. The assay combines the spatial resolving power of laser scanning confocal microscopy with simple statistical analyses to characterize CREB binding protein (CBP)- and P300-induced changes in global histone acetylation levels at specific lysine residues. Here we show that CBP and P300 exhibit unique substrate specificity profiles, consistent with the developmental and functional differences between the two HATs.

Histone H1 and the dynamic regulation of chromatin function

Eukaryotic DNA is organized in a complex structure called chromatin. Although a primary function of chromatin is compaction of DNA, this must done such that the underlying DNA is potentially accessible to factor-mediated regulatory responses. Chromatin structure clearly plays a dominant role in regulating much of eukaryotic transcription. The demonstration that reversible covalent modification of the core histones contribute to transcriptional activation and repression by altering chromatin structure and the identification of numerous ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes provide strong support for this view. Chromatin is much more dynamic than was previously thought and regulation of the dynamic properties of chromatin is a key aspect of gene regulation. This review will focus on recent attempts to elucidate the specific contribution of histone H1 to chromatin-mediated regulation of gene expression.

Histone H1 Is required for proper regulation of pyruvate decarboxylase gene expression in Neurospora crassa

We show that Neurospora crassa has a single histone H1 gene, hH1, which encodes a typical linker histone with highly basic N- and C-terminal tails and a central globular domain. A green fluorescent protein-tagged histone H1 chimeric protein was localized exclusively to nuclei. Mutation of hH1 by repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) did not result in detectable defects in morphology, DNA methylation, mutagen sensitivity, DNA repair, fertility, RIP, chromosome pairing, or chromosome segregation. Nevertheless, hH1 mutants had mycelial elongation rates that were lower than normal on all tested carbon sources. This slow linear growth phenotype, however, was less evident on medium containing ethanol. The pyruvate decarboxylase gene, cfp, was abnormally derepressed in hH1 mutants on ethanol-containing medium. This derepression was also found when an ectopically integrated fusion of the cfp gene promoter to the reporter gene hph was analyzed. Thus, Neurospora histone H1 is required for the proper regulation of cfp, a gene with a key role in the respiratory-fermentative pathway.

Overexpression of the Linker histone-binding protein tNASP affects progression through the cell cycle

NASP is an H1 histone-binding protein that is cell cycle-regulated and occurs in two major forms: tNASP, found in gametes, embryonic cells, and transformed cells; and sNASP, found in all rapidly dividing somatic cells (Richardson, R. T., Batova, I. N., Widgren, E. E., Zheng, L. X., Whitfield, M., Marzluff, W. F., and O'Rand, M. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30378-30386). When full-length tNASP fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) is transiently transfected into HeLa cells, it is efficiently transported into the nucleus within 2 h after translation in the cytoplasm, whereas the NASP nuclear localization signal (NLS) deletion mutant (NASP-DeltaNLS-GFP) is retained in the cytoplasm. In HeLa cells synchronized by a double thymidine block and transiently transfected to overexpress full-length tNASP or NASP-DeltaNLS, progression through the G(1)/S border is delayed. Cells transiently transfected to overexpress the histone-binding site (HBS) deletion mutant (NASP-DeltaHBS) or sNASP were not delayed in progression through the G(1)/S border. By using a DNA supercoiling assay, in vitro binding data demonstrate that H1 histone-tNASP complexes can transfer H1 histones to DNA, whereas NASP-DeltaHBS cannot. Measurement of NASP mobility in the nucleus by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching indicates that NASP mobility is virtually identical to that reported for H1 histones. These data suggest that NASP-H1 complexes exist in the nucleus and that tNASP can influence cell cycle progression through the G(1)/S border through mediation of DNA-H1 histone binding.

Histone H1 variants differentially inhibit DNA replication through an affinity for chromatin mediated by their carboxyl-terminal domains

Multiple forms of histone H1 are found in most mammalian tissues, and diversity in their temporal and spatial expression likely corresponds to diversity in function. Here, using Xenopus egg extracts, we show that while the somatic H1s significantly inhibit DNA replication in Xenopus sperm nuclei, little or no inhibition is seen in the case of the testes-specific variant, H1t. We suggest that differences in H1-chromatin interactions might explain some of the diversity in H1 function. To demonstrate this, we show that the somatic H1 variants preferentially assemble into chromatin relative to H1t. Differences in chromatin structure are seen depending on whether chromatin assembly occurs in the presence of somatic H1s or H1t. These data suggest that the mechanistic basis for some of the functional differences of H1 variants lies in their relative affinity for chromatin. Using a series of domain-switch mutants of H1(0) and H1t we identify the H1 carboxyl-terminal domains as the domains responsible for the differential affinity for chromatin and, concurrently, for the differential effects of H1 variants upon DNA replication.

Histone H1 represses estrogen receptor alpha transcriptional activity by selectively inhibiting receptor-mediated transcription initiation

Chromatin is the physiological template for many nuclear processes in eukaryotes, including transcription by RNA polymerase II. In vivo, chromatin is assembled from genomic DNA, core histones, linker histones such as histone H1, and nonhistone chromatin-associated proteins. Histone H1 is thought to act as a general repressor of transcription by promoting the compaction of chromatin into higher-order structures. We have used a biochemical approach, including an in vitro chromatin assembly and transcription system, to examine the effects of histone H1 on estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha)-mediated transcription with chromatin templates. We show that histone H1 acts as a potent repressor of ligand- and coactivator-regulated transcription by ER alpha. Histone H1 exerts its repressive effect without inhibiting the sequence-specific binding of ER alpha to chromatin or the overall extent of targeted acetylation of nucleosomal histones by the coactivator p300. Instead, histone H1 acts by blocking a specific step in the ER alpha-dependent transcription process, namely, transcription initiation, without affecting transcription reinitiation. Together, our data indicate that histone H1 acts selectively to reduce the overall level of productive transcription initiation by restricting promoter accessibility and preventing the ER alpha-dependent formation of a stable transcription pre-initiation complex.

Nuclear gene transcription and chromatin in Trypanosoma brucei

As in other eucaryotes, the nuclear genome in Trypanosoma brucei is organised into silent domains and active domains transcribed by distinct RNA polymerases. The basic mechanisms underlying eucaryotic gene transcription are conserved between humans and yeast, and understood in some detail in these cells. Meanwhile, relatively little is known about the transcription machinery, the chromatin templates or their interactions in trypanosomatids. Here, I discuss and compare nuclear gene transcription in T. brucei with transcription in other eucaryotes focusing in particular on mono-allelic transcription of genes that encode the variant surface glycoproteins.

Higher-order folding of heterochromatin: Protein bridges span the nucleosome arrays

In interphase eukaryotic nuclei, chromatin is divided into two morphologically distinct types known as heterochromatin and euchromatin. It has been long suggested that the two types of chromatin differ at the level of higher-order folding. Recent studies have revealed the features of chromatin 3D architecture that distinguish the higher-order folding of repressed and active chromatin and have identified chromosomal proteins and their modifications associated with these structural transitions. This review discusses the molecular and structural determinants of chromatin higher-order folding in relation to mechanism(s) of heterochromatin formation and genetic silencing during cell differentiation and tissue development.Key words: heterochromatin, nucleosome, histone, higher-order folding, chromatin 3D structure.

Nucleosomes and the chromatin fiber

During the past year and a half, significant progress has been made in understanding the structure and dynamics of nucleosomes and the chromatin fiber, the mechanism of action of the core histone amino termini, the structure and function of histone variants, and the function of linker histones in the chromatin fiber.