Evidence that proteolysis of Gal4 cannot explain the transcriptional effects of proteasome ATPase mutations

A novel ubiquitin-proteasome system regulation of Sgf73/ataxin-7 that maintains the integrity of the coactivator SAGA in orchestrating transcription

Ataxin-7 maintains the integrity of Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase (SAGA), an evolutionarily conserved coactivator in stimulating preinitiation complex (PIC) formation for transcription initiation, and thus, its upregulation or downregulation is associated with various diseases. However, it remains unknown how ataxin-7 is regulated that could provide new insights into disease pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions. Here, we show that ataxin-7's yeast homologue, Sgf73, undergoes ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation. Impairment of such regulation increases Sgf73's abundance, which enhances recruitment of TATA box-binding protein (TBP) (that nucleates PIC formation) to the promoter but impairs transcription elongation. Further, decreased Sgf73 level reduces PIC formation and transcription. Thus, Sgf73 is fine-tuned by ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) in orchestrating transcription. Likewise, ataxin-7 undergoes ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation, alteration of which changes ataxin-7's abundance that is associated with altered transcription and cellular pathologies/diseases. Collectively, our results unveil a novel UPS regulation of Sgf73/ataxin-7 for normal cellular health and implicate alteration of such regulation in diseases.

The Cellular Location of Rad23, a Polyubiquitin Chain-Binding Protein, Plays a Key Role in Its Interaction with Substrates of the Proteasome

Well-studied structural motifs in Rad23 have been shown to bind polyubiquitin chains and the proteasome. These domains are predicted to enable Rad23 to transport polyubiquitylated (polyUb) substrates to the proteasome (Chen and Madura, 2002 [1]). The validation of this model, however, has been hindered by the lack of specific physiological substrates of Rad23. We report here that Rad23 can bind Ho-endonuclease (Ho-endo), a nuclear protein that initiates mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We observed that the degradation of Ho-endo required export from the nucleus, in agreement with a previous report (Kaplun et al., 2003 [2]), and suggests that Rad23 can traffic proteins out of the nucleus. In agreement, the subcellular distribution of Rad23 is noticeably altered in genetic mutants that disrupt nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Significantly, the location of Rad23 affected its binding to polyUb substrates. Mutations in nuclear export stabilized substrates, and caused accumulation in the nucleus. Importantly, Rad23 also accumulated in the nucleus in an export mutant, and bound to higher levels of polyUb proteins. In contrast, Rad23 is localized in the cytosol in rna1-1, a nucleocytoplasmic transport mutant, and it forms reduced binding to polyUb substrates. These and other studies indicate that substrates that are conjugated to polyubiquitin chains in the nucleus may rely on an export-dependent mechanism to be degraded by the proteasome. The evolutionary conservation of Rad23 and similar substrate-trafficking proteins predicts an important role for export in the turnover of nuclear proteins.

TOR Facilitates the Targeting of the 19S Proteasome Subcomplex To Enhance Transcription Complex Assembly at the Promoters of the Ribosomal Protein Genes

TOR (target of rapamycin) has been previously implicated in transcriptional stimulation of the ribosomal protein (RP) genes via enhanced recruitment of NuA4 (nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4) to the promoters. However, it is not clearly understood how TOR enhances NuA4 recruitment to the promoters of the RP genes. Here we show that TOR facilitates the recruitment of the 19S proteasome subcomplex to the activator to enhance the targeting of NuA4 to the promoters of the RP genes. NuA4, in turn, promotes the recruitment of TFIID (transcription factor IID, composed of TATA box-binding protein [TBP] and a set of TBP-associated factors [TAFs]) and RNA polymerase II to the promoters of the RP genes to enhance transcriptional initiation. Therefore, our results demonstrate that TOR facilitates the recruitment of the 19S proteasome subcomplex to the promoters of the RP genes to promote the targeting of NuA4 for enhanced preinitiation complex (PIC) formation and consequently transcriptional initiation, hence illuminating TOR regulation of RP gene activation. Further, our results reveal that TOR differentially regulates PIC formation (and hence transcription) at the non-RP genes, thus demonstrating a complex regulation of gene activation by TOR.

Two Distinct Regulatory Mechanisms of Transcriptional Initiation in Response to Nutrient Signaling

SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase) and TFIID (transcription factor IID) have been previously shown to facilitate the formation of the PIC (pre-initiation complex) at the promoters of two distinct sets of genes. Here, we demonstrate that TFIID and SAGA differentially participate in the stimulation of PIC formation (and hence transcriptional initiation) at the promoter of PHO84, a gene for the high-affinity inorganic phosphate (P_i) transporter for crucial cellular functions, in response to nutrient signaling. We show that transcriptional initiation of PHO84 occurs predominantly in a TFIID-dependent manner in the absence of P_i in the growth medium. Such TFIID dependency is mediated via the NuA4 (nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4) histone acetyltransferase (HAT). Intriguingly, transcriptional initiation of PHO84 also occurs in the presence of P_i in the growth medium, predominantly via the SAGA complex, but independently of NuA4 HAT. Thus, P_i in the growth medium switches transcriptional initiation of PHO84 from NuA4-TFIID to SAGA dependency. Further, we find that both NuA4-TFIID- and SAGA-dependent transcriptional initiations of PHO84 are facilitated by the 19S proteasome subcomplex or regulatory particle (RP) via enhanced recruitment of the coactivators SAGA and NuA4 HAT, which promote TFIID-independent and -dependent PIC formation for transcriptional initiation, respectively. NuA4 HAT does not regulate activator binding to PHO84, but rather facilitates PIC formation for transcriptional initiation in the absence of Pi in the growth medium. On the other hand, SAGA promotes activator recruitment to PHO84 for transcriptional initiation in the growth medium containing Pi. Collectively, our results demonstrate two distinct stimulatory pathways for PIC formation (and hence transcriptional initiation) at PHO84 by TFIID, SAGA, NuA4, and 19S RP in the presence and absence of an essential nutrient, P_i, in the growth media, thus providing new regulatory mechanisms of transcriptional initiation in response to nutrient signaling.

Ubiquitin–Proteasome System Regulation of an Evolutionarily Conserved RNA Polymerase II-Associated Factor 1 Involved in Pancreatic Oncogenesis

The evolutionarily conserved RNA polymerase II-associated factor 1 (Paf1) from yeast to humans regulates transcription and associated processes, and thus, malfunctions and/or misregulations of Paf1 are associated with cellular pathologies. Indeed, Paf1 (also known as PD2 or pancreatic differentiation 2) is found to be upregulated in poorly differentiated cancer cells, and such upregulation is involved in cellular transformation or oncogenesis. However, the basis for Paf1 upregulation in these cells remains largely unknown. In light of this, we have tested here the idea that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) regulates the cellular abundance of Paf1. In this direction, we analyzed the role of UPS in regulation of Paf1's abundance in yeast. We find that Paf1 undergoes ubiquitylation and is degraded by the 26S proteasome in yeast, thus deciphering UPS regulation of an evolutionarily conserved factor, Paf1, involved in various cellular processes at the crossroads of the cancer networks. Likewise, Paf1 undergoes proteasomal degradation in well-differentiated, but not poorly differentiated, pancreatic cancer cells, hence pointing to the UPS in upregulation of Paf1 in poorly differentiated cancers. Collectively, our results reveal UPS regulation of Paf1 and suggest downregulation of UPS in elevating Paf1's abundance in poorly differentiated cancers.

The 9aaTAD Is Exclusive Activation Domain in Gal4

The Gal4 protein is a well-known prototypic acidic activator that has multiple activation domains. We have previously identified a new activation domain called the nine amino acid transactivation domain (9aaTAD) in Gal4 protein. The family of the 9aaTAD activators currently comprises over 40 members including p53, MLL, E2A and other members of the Gal4 family; Oaf1, Pip2, Pdr1 and Pdr3. In this study, we revised function of all reported Gal4 activation domains. Surprisingly, we found that beside of the activation domain 9aaTAD none of the previously reported activation domains had considerable transactivation potential and were not involved in the activation of transcription. Our results demonstrated that the 9aaTAD domain is the only decisive activation domain in the Gal4 protein. We found that the artificial peptides included in the original Gal4 constructs were results of an unintended consequence of cloning that were responsible for the artificial transcriptional activity. Importantly, the activation domain 9aaTAD, which is the exclusive activation domain in Gal4, is also the central part of a conserved sequence recognized by the inhibitory protein Gal80. We propose a revision of the Gal4 regulation, in which the activation domain 9aaTAD is directly linked to both activation function and Gal80 mediated inhibition.

Regulation of Antisense Transcription by NuA4 Histone Acetyltransferase and Other Chromatin Regulatory Factors

NuA4 histone lysine (K) acetyltransferase (KAT) promotes transcriptional initiation of TATA-binding protein (TBP)-associated factor (TAF)-dependent ribosomal protein genes. TAFs have also been recently found to enhance antisense transcription from the 3' end of the GAL10 coding sequence. However, it remains unknown whether, like sense transcription of the ribosomal protein genes, TAF-dependent antisense transcription of GAL10 also requires NuA4 KAT. Here, we show that NuA4 KAT associates with the GAL10 antisense transcription initiation site at the 3' end of the coding sequence. Such association of NuA4 KAT depends on the Reb1p-binding site that recruits Reb1p activator to the GAL10 antisense transcription initiation site. Targeted recruitment of NuA4 KAT to the GAL10 antisense transcription initiation site promotes GAL10 antisense transcription. Like NuA4 KAT, histone H3 K4/36 methyltransferases and histone H2B ubiquitin conjugase facilitate GAL10 antisense transcription, while the Swi/Snf and SAGA chromatin remodeling/modification factors are dispensable for antisense, but not sense, transcription of GAL10. Taken together, our results demonstrate for the first time the roles of NuA4 KAT and other chromatin regulatory factors in controlling antisense transcription, thus illuminating chromatin regulation of antisense transcription.

Functions of the proteasome on chromatin

The proteasome is a large self-compartmentalized protease complex that recognizes, unfolds, and destroys ubiquitylated substrates. Proteasome activities are required for a host of cellular functions, and it has become clear in recent years that one set of critical actions of the proteasome occur on chromatin. In this review, we discuss some of the ways in which proteasomes directly regulate the structure and function of chromatin and chromatin regulatory proteins, and how this influences gene transcription. We discuss lingering controversies in the field, the relative importance of proteolytic versus non-proteolytic proteasome activities in this process, and highlight areas that require further investigation. Our intention is to show that proteasomes are involved in major steps controlling the expression of the genetic information, that proteasomes use both proteolytic mechanisms and ATP-dependent protein remodeling to accomplish this task, and that much is yet to be learned about the full spectrum of ways that proteasomes influence the genome.

The 26S proteasome and initiation of gene transcription

Transcription activation is the foremost step of gene expression and is modulated by various factors that act in synergy. Misregulation of this process and its associated factors has severe effects and hence requires strong regulatory control. In recent years, growing evidence has highlighted the 26S proteasome as an important contributor to the regulation of transcription initiation. Well known for its role in protein destruction, its contribution to protein synthesis was initially viewed with skepticism. However, studies over the past several years have established the proteasome as an important component of transcription initiation through proteolytic and non-proteolytic activities. In this review, we discuss findings made so far in understanding the connections between transcription initiation and the 26S proteasome complex.

Mechanisms of antisense transcription initiation from the 3' end of the GAL10 coding sequence in vivo

In spite of the important regulatory functions of antisense transcripts in gene expression, it remains unknown how antisense transcription is initiated. Recent studies implicated RNA polymerase II in initiation of antisense transcription. However, how RNA polymerase II is targeted to initiate antisense transcription has not been elucidated. Here, we have analyzed the association of RNA polymerase II with the antisense initiation site at the 3' end of the GAL10 coding sequence in dextrose-containing growth medium that induces antisense transcription. We find that RNA polymerase II is targeted to the antisense initiation site at GAL10 by Reb1p activator as well as general transcription factors (e.g., TFIID, TFIIB, and Mediator) for antisense transcription initiation. Intriguingly, while GAL10 antisense transcription is dependent on TFIID, its sense transcription does not require TFIID. Further, the Gal4p activator that promotes GAL10 sense transcription is dispensable for antisense transcription. Moreover, the proteasome that facilitates GAL10 sense transcription does not control its antisense transcription. Taken together, our results reveal that GAL10 sense and antisense transcriptions are regulated differently and shed much light on the mechanisms of antisense transcription initiation.

Ubiquitin and proteasomes in transcription

Regulation of gene transcription is vitally important for the maintenance of normal cellular homeostasis. Failure to correctly regulate gene expression, or to deal with problems that arise during the transcription process, can lead to cellular catastrophe and disease. One of the ways cells cope with the challenges of transcription is by making extensive use of the proteolytic and nonproteolytic activities of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Here, we review recent evidence showing deep mechanistic connections between the transcription and ubiquitin-proteasome systems. Our goal is to leave the reader with a sense that just about every step in transcription-from transcription initiation through to export of mRNA from the nucleus-is influenced by the UPS and that all major arms of the system--from the first step in ubiquitin (Ub) conjugation through to the proteasome-are recruited into transcriptional processes to provide regulation, directionality, and deconstructive power.

The 19S proteasome subcomplex promotes the targeting of NuA4 HAT to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes to facilitate the recruitment of TFIID for transcriptional initiation in vivo

Previous studies have implicated SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase) and TFIID (Transcription factor-IID)-dependent mechanisms of transcriptional activation in yeast. SAGA-dependent transcriptional activation is further regulated by the 19S proteasome subcomplex. However, the role of the 19S proteasome subcomplex in transcriptional activation of the TFIID-dependent genes has not been elucidated. Therefore, we have performed a series of chromatin immunoprecipitation, mutational and transcriptional analyses at the TFIID-dependent ribosomal protein genes such as RPS5, RPL2B and RPS11B. We find that the 19S proteasome subcomplex is recruited to the promoters of these ribosomal protein genes, and promotes the association of NuA4 (Nucleosome acetyltransferase of histone H4) co-activator, but not activator Rap1p (repressor-activator protein 1). These observations support that the 19S proteasome subcomplex enhances the targeting of co-activator at the TFIID-dependent promoter. Such an enhanced targeting of NuA4 HAT (histone acetyltransferase) promotes the recruitment of the TFIID complex for transcriptional initiation. Collectively, our data demonstrate that the 19S proteasome subcomplex enhances the targeting of NuA4 HAT to activator Rap1p at the promoters of ribosomal protein genes to facilitate the recruitment of TFIID for transcriptional stimulation, hence providing a new role of the 19S proteasome subcomplex in establishing a specific regulatory network at the TFIID-dependent promoter for productive transcriptional initiation in vivo.

The proteasome and its regulatory roles in gene expression

Cumulative evidence indicates that the proteasome, which is mainly known as a protein-degrading machine, is very essential for gene expression. Destructive functions of the proteasome, i.e., ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic activity, are significant for activator localization, activator destruction, co-activator/repressor destruction and PIC disassembly. Non-proteolytic functions of the proteasome are important for recruitment of activators and co-activators to promoters, ubiquitin-dependent histone modification, transcription elongation and possibly maturation of mRNA via the facilitation of mRNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. In this review, we discuss how the proteasome regulates transcription at numerous stages during gene expression. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The 26S Proteasome: When degradation is just not enough!

APC-targeted RAA1 degradation mediates the cell cycle and root development in plants

Protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is necessary for a normal cell cycle. As compared with knowledge of the mechanism in animals and yeast, that in plants is less known. Here we summarize research into the regulatory mechanism of protein degradation in the cell cycle in plants. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC), in the E3 family of enzymes, plays an important role in maintaining normal mitosis. APC activation and substrate specificity is determined by its activators, which can recognize the destruction box (D-box) in APC target proteins. Oryza sativa root architecture-associated 1 (OsRAA1) with GTP-binding activity was originally cloned from rice. Overexpression of of OsRAA1 inhibits the growth of primary roots in rice. Knockdown lines showed reduced height of seedlings because of abnormal cell division. OsRAA1 transgenic rice and fission yeast show a higher proportion of metaphase cells than that of controls, which suggests a blocked transition from metaphase to anaphase during mitosis. OsRAA1 co-localizes with spindle tubulin. It contains the D-box motif and interacts with OsRPT4 of the regulatory particle of 26S proteasome. OsRAA1 may be a cell cycle inhibitor that can be degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and its disruption is necessary for the transition from metaphase to anaphase during root growth in rice.

No Splicing, no dicing: non-proteolytic roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in transcription

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) is responsible for most programmed turnover of proteins in eukaryotic cells, and this activity has been known for some time to be involved in transcriptional regulation. More recently, intersections of the UPP and transcription have been discovered that are not proteolytic in nature and appear to revolve around the chaperonin-like activities of the ATPases in the 19 S regulatory subunit of the proteasome. Moreover, monoubiquitylation, which does not signal degradation, has been found to be a key modification of many transcription factors and histones. These various non-proteolytic roles of the UPP in transcription are reviewed here, and plausible mechanistic models are discussed.

The hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin is required to protect transactivator-promoter complexes from destabilization by the proteasomal ATPases

Mono-ubiquitylation of a transactivator is known to promote transcriptional activation of certain transactivator proteins. For the Sacchromyces cerevisiae transactivator, GAL4, attachment of mono-ubiquitin prevents destabilization of the DNA-transactivator complex by the ATPases of the 26S proteasome. This inhibition of destabilization depends on the arrangement of ubiquitin; a chain of ubiquitin tetramers linked through lysine 48 did not display the same protective effect as mono-ubiquitin. This led to an investigation into the properties of ubiquitin that may be responsible for this difference in activity between the different forms. We demonstrate the ubiquitin tetramers linked through lysine 63 do protect from proteasomal-mediated destabilization. In addition, we show that the mutating the isoleucine residue at position 44 interferes with proteasomal interaction in vitro and will abolish the protective activity in vivo. Together, these data implicate the hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin as required to protect transactivators from destabilization by the proteasomal ATPases.

FACT and the proteasome promote promoter chromatin disassembly and transcriptional initiation

The packaging of the eukaryotic genome into chromatin represses gene expression by blocking access of the general transcription machinery to the underlying DNA sequences. Accordingly, eukaryotes have developed a variety of mechanisms to disrupt, alter, or disassemble nucleosomes from promoter regions and open reading frames to allow transcription to occur. Although we know that chromatin disassembly from the yeast PHO5 promoter is triggered by the Pho4 activator, the mechanism is far from clear. Here we show that the Pho4 activator can occupy its nucleosome-bound DNA binding site within the PHO5 promoter. In contrast to the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) complex in assembling chromatin within open reading frames, we find that FACT is involved in the disassembly of histones H2A/H2B from the PHO5 promoter during transcriptional induction. We have also discovered that the proteasome is required for efficient chromatin disassembly and transcriptional induction from the PHO5 promoter. Mutants of the degradation function of the proteasome have a defect in recruitment of the Pho4 activator, whereas mutants of the ATPase cap of the proteasome do recruit Pho4 but are still delayed for chromatin assembly. Finally, we rule out the possibility that the proteasome or ATPase cap is driving chromatin disassembly via a potential ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activity.

Physical and functional interactions of monoubiquitylated transactivators with the proteasome

Destabilization of activator-DNA complexes by the proteasomal ATPases can inhibit transcription by limiting activator interaction with DNA. Modification of the activator by monoubiquitylation protects the activator from this destabilization activity. In this study, we probe the mechanism of this protective effect of monoubiquitylation. Using novel label transfer and chemical cross-linking techniques, we show that ubiquitin contacts the ATPase complex directly, apparently via Rpn1 and Rpt1. This interaction results in the dissociation of the activation domain-ATPase complex via an allosteric process. A model is proposed in which activator monoubiquitylation serves to limit the lifetime of the activator-ATPase complex interaction and thus the ability of the ATPases to unfold the activator and dissociate the protein-DNA complex.

Activation domain-dependent monoubiquitylation of Gal4 protein is essential for promoter binding in vivo

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gal4 protein is a paradigmatic transcriptional activator containing a C-terminal acidic activation domain (AD) of 34 amino acids. A mutation that results in the truncation of about two-thirds of the Gal4AD (gal4D) results in a crippled protein with only 3% the activity of the wild-type activator. We show here that although the Gal4D protein is not intrinsically deficient in DNA binding, it is nonetheless unable to stably occupy GAL promoters in vivo. This is because of the activity of the proteasomal ATPases, including Sug1/Rpt6, which bind to Gal4D via the remainder of the AD and strip it off of DNA. A mutation that suppressed the Gal4D "no growth on galactose" phenotype repressed the stripping activity of the ATPase complex but not other activities. We further demonstrate that Gal4D is hypersensitive to this stripping activity because of its failure to be monoubiquitylated efficiently in vivo and in vitro. Evidence is presented that the piece of the AD that is deleted in Gal4D protein is likely a recognition element for the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that modifies Gal4. These data argue that acidic ADs comprise at least two small peptide subdomains, one of which is responsible for activator monoubiquitylation and another that interacts with the proteasomal ATPases, coactivators and other transcription factors. This study validates the physiological importance of Gal4 monoubiquitylation and clarifies its major role as that of protecting the activator from being destabilized by the proteasomal ATPases.

Nucleotide excision repair and the ubiquitin proteasome pathway—Do all roads lead to Rome?

It is clear that components of the proteasome and the ubiquitin proteasome pathway play a direct mechanistic role in the regulation of a variety of DNA repair processes. Intriguingly, a wealth of evidence suggests that this is also the case during the regulation of gene transcription. Here we review our current understanding of how the ubiquitin proteasome pathway influences nucleotide excision repair, and discuss how studies that investigate the role of this pathway in the regulation of gene transcription might also contribute to our mechanistic understanding of its role in DNA repair.

The role of the proteasomal ATPases and activator monoubiquitylation in regulating Gal4 binding to promoters

Recent studies have shown that the intersection between transcription and proteins involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway encompasses both proteolytic and nonproteolytic functions. Examples of the latter type include evidence that monoubiquitylation of some transcriptional activators stimulates their activity. In addition, the proteasomal ATPases are recruited to many active promoters through binding to activators and play an important, nonproteolytic role in promoter escape and elongation. In this study, we report the discovery of a new nonproteolytic activity of the proteasome (specifically the proteasomal ATPases): the active destabilization of activator-promoter complexes. This reaction depends on the presence of an activation domain and ATP. Destabilization is inhibited in vitro and in vivo if the protein is monoubiquitylated or if ubiquitin is genetically fused to the activator. The fact that monoubiquitylated activator is resistant to the "stripping" activity of the proteasomal ATPases may explain, in part, why some activators require this modification in order to function efficiently.

Distinct functions of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway influence nucleotide excision repair

The Rad23/Rad4 nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein complex functions at an early stage of the NER reaction, possibly promoting the recognition of damaged DNA. Here we show that Rad4 protein is ubiquitinated and degraded in response to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and identify a novel cullin-based E3 ubiquitin ligase required for this process. We also show that this novel ubiquitin ligase is required for optimal NER. Our results demonstrate that optimal NER correlates with the ubiquitination of Rad4 following UV radiation, but not its subsequent degradation. Furthermore, we show that the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) regulates NER via two distinct mechanisms. The first occurs independently of de novo protein synthesis, and requires Rad23 and a nonproteolytic function of the 19S regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome. The second requires de novo protein synthesis, and relies on the activity of the newly identified E3 ubiquitin ligase. These studies reveal that, following UV radiation, NER is mediated by nonproteolytic activities of the UPP, via the ubiquitin-like domain of Rad23 and UV radiation-induced ubiquitination of Rad4.

Molecular biology: what ubiquitin can do for transcription

Ubiquitin, the peptide 'tag' that targets eukaryotic proteins for degradation by the proteasome, has also been implicated in transcriptional activation. The mechanism of gene activation might include recruitment of a transcriptional elongation factor by ubiquitinated activators.

Proteasome inhibition alters the transcription of multiple yeast genes

The 26S proteasome degrades denatured proteins and other proteins targeted for destruction by covalent modification. Here we show that impaired proteasome function influences the transcription of numerous yeast genes. Of 6144 genes present on the macroarray filters used in this study, approximately 5% showed measurable mRNA decreases and 2% showed mRNA increases following 30 min of proteasome inhibition. Northern blot hybridization shows that this response is time- and dose-dependent and occurs with either pharmacological or genetic impairment of the proteasome. A number of splicing factors possess the PEST motif found in certain proteasome substrates. However, mRNA levels drop with proteasome inhibition without obvious increases in intron-bearing pre-mRNA, indicating that splicing is not generally impaired when proteome activity is blocked. Chimeric gene constructs, nuclear run-on experiments, and transcriptional inhibition studies show that for members of three functional groups (i.e., ribosomal protein genes, histone genes, and heat shock protein genes) changes in mRNA levels occur largely by transcriptional modulation. In addition, these studies reveal a possible new means of modulating kinetochore levels through CEP3 expression. Together these data strongly support the view that proteasome activity plays a significant role in the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression.

Proteasomal ATPases link ubiquitylation of histone H2B to methylation of histone H3

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, methylation of histone H3 at active genes is an epigenetic mark that distinguishes active from silent chromatin and functions as a short-term "memory" of recent transcription. Methylation of H3 at lysine residues K4 and K79 depends on ubiquitylation of histone H2B, but the mechanisms linking H2B ubiquitylation to H3 methylation are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that proteasomal ATPases Rpt4 and Rpt6 function to connect these two histone modifications. We show that recruitment of proteasome subunits to chromatin depends on H2B ubiquitylation and that mutations in Rpt4 and Rpt6 disrupt H3 methylation at K4 and K79 but leave H2B ubiquitylation intact. Consistent with their role in H3 methylation, we also find that mutations in Rpt4 and 6-but not components of the 20S proteasome-disrupt telomeric gene silencing. These data reveal that proteasome subunits function in epigenetic gene regulation by linking chromatin modifications that establish the histone code.

How the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls transcription

Gene transcription and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis are two processes that have seemingly nothing in common: transcription is the first step in the life of any protein and proteolysis the last. Despite the disparate nature of these processes, a growing body of evidence indicates that ubiquitin and the proteasome are intimately involved in gene control. Here, we discuss the deep mechanistic connections between transcription and the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and highlight how the intersection of these processes tightly controls expression of the genetic information.

Physical association of the APIS complex and general transcription factors

It has recently been demonstrated that a fragment of the proteasome, called the APIS complex, plays an important role in RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription. Here, it is shown that the APIS complex is physically associated with many general transcription factors, including components of yeast FACT (Cdc68/Pob3), TFIID, TFIIH, and the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Depletion of this APIS transcription factor complex from a yeast whole cell extract resulted in reduced transcription, indicating that it is functionally relevant. The APIS/transcription factor complex does not include detectable levels of the 20S proteolytic sub-unit of the proteasome. Furthermore, immunopurified 26S proteasome contains little or no transcription factors, suggesting that transcription factors and the 20S bind competitively to the APIS complex. These data add to the growing body of evidence that the APIS complex has a role in transcription, independent of its role in proteolysis and, furthermore, argues that it functions in association with the general transcription complex.

The Gal4 activation domain binds Sug2 protein, a proteasome component, in vivo and in vitro

An in vivo protein interaction assay was used to search a yeast cDNA library for proteins that bind to the acidic activation domain (AD) of the yeast Gal4 protein. Sug2 protein, a component of the 19 S regulatory particle of the 26 S proteasome, was one of seven proteins identified in this screen. In vitro binding assays confirm a direct interaction between these proteins. SUG2 and SUG1, another 19 S component, were originally discovered as a mutation able to suppress the phenotype of a Gal4 truncation mutant (Gal4(D)p) lacking much of its AD. Sug1p has previously been shown to bind the Gal4 AD in vitro. Taken together, these genetic and biochemical data suggest a biologically significant interaction between the Gal4 protein and the 19 S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Indeed, it is demonstrated here that the Gal4 AD interacts specifically with immunopurified 19 S complex. The proteasome regulatory particle has been shown recently to play a direct role in RNA polymerase II transcription and the activator-19 S interaction could be important in recruiting this large complex to transcriptionally active GAL genes.

The 19S complex of the proteasome regulates nucleotide excision repair in yeast

Previous studies suggest that the amino-terminal ubiquitin-like (ubl) domain of Rad23 protein can recruit the proteasome for a stimulatory role during nucleotide excision repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this report, we show that the 19S regulatory complex of the yeast proteasome can affect nucleotide excision repair independently of Rad23 protein. Strains with mutations in 19S regulatory subunits (but not 20S subunits) of the proteasome promote partial recovery of nucleotide excision repair in vivo in rad23 deletion mutants, but not in other nucleotide excision repair-defective strains tested. In addition, a strain that expresses a temperature-degradable ATPase subunit of the 19S regulatory complex manifests a dramatically increased rate of nucleotide excision repair in vivo. These data indicate that the 19S regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome can negatively regulate the rate of nucleotide excision repair in yeast and suggest that Rad23 protein not only recruits the 19S regulatory complex, but also can mediate functional interactions between the 19S regulatory complex and the nucleotide excision repair machinery. The 19S regulatory complex of the yeast proteasome functions in nucleotide excision repair independent of proteolysis.

The 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II

It is generally thought that the primary or even sole activity of the 19S regulatory particle of the 26S proteasome is to facilitate the degradation of polyubiquitinated proteins by the 20S-core subunit. However, we present evidence that the 19S complex is required for efficient elongation of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) in vitro and in vivo. First, yeast strains carrying alleles of SUG1 and SUG2, encoding 19S components, exhibit phenotypes indicative of elongation defects. Second, in vitro transcription is inhibited by antibodies raised against Sug1, or by heat-inactivating temperature-sensitive Sug1 mutants with restoration of elongation by addition of immunopurified 19S complex. Finally, Cdc68, a known elongation factor, coimmunoprecipitates with the 19S complex, indicating a physical interaction. Inhibition of the 20S proteolytic core of the proteasome has no effect on elongation. This work defines a nonproteolytic role for the 19S complex in RNAP II transcription.