Mutational and computational analysis of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor. Involvement of basic and hydrophobic residues in receptor activation and G protein coupling

Light control of G protein signaling pathways by a novel photopigment

Channelopsins and photo-regulated ion channels make it possible to use light to control electrical activity of cells. This powerful approach has lead to a veritable explosion of applications, though it is limited to changing membrane voltage of the target cells. An enormous potential could be tapped if similar opto-genetic techniques could be extended to the control of chemical signaling pathways. Photopigments from invertebrate photoreceptors are an obvious choice—as they do not bleach upon illumination -however, their functional expression has been problematic. We exploited an unusual opsin, pScop2, recently identified in ciliary photoreceptors of scallop. Phylogenetically, it is closer to vertebrate opsins, and offers the advantage of being a bi-stable photopigment. We inserted its coding sequence and a fluorescent protein reporter into plasmid vectors and demonstrated heterologous expression in various mammalian cell lines. HEK 293 cells were selected as a heterologous system for functional analysis, because wild type cells displayed the largest currents in response to the G-protein activator, GTP-γ-S. A line of HEK cells stably transfected with pScop2 was generated; after reconstitution of the photopigment with retinal, light responses were obtained in some cells, albeit of modest amplitude. In native photoreceptors pScop2 couples to G_o; HEK cells express poorly this G-protein, but have a prominent Gq/PLC pathway linked to internal Ca mobilization. To enhance pScop2 competence to tap into this pathway, we swapped its third intracellular loop—important to confer specificity of interaction between 7TMDRs and G-proteins—with that of a G_q-linked opsin which we cloned from microvillar photoreceptors present in the same retina. The chimeric construct was evaluated by a Ca fluorescence assay, and was shown to mediate a robust mobilization of internal calcium in response to illumination. The results project pScop2 as a potentially powerful optogenetic tool to control signaling pathways.

Gpr176 is a Gz-linked orphan G-protein-coupled receptor that sets the pace of circadian behaviour

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) participate in a broad range of physiological functions. A priority for fundamental and clinical research, therefore, is to decipher the function of over 140 remaining orphan GPCRs. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the brain's circadian pacemaker, governs daily rhythms in behaviour and physiology. Here we launch the SCN orphan GPCR project to (i) search for murine orphan GPCRs with enriched expression in the SCN, (ii) generate mutant animals deficient in candidate GPCRs, and (iii) analyse the impact on circadian rhythms. We thereby identify Gpr176 as an SCN-enriched orphan GPCR that sets the pace of circadian behaviour. Gpr176 is expressed in a circadian manner by SCN neurons, and molecular characterization reveals that it represses cAMP signalling in an agonist-independent manner. Gpr176 acts independently of, and in parallel to, the Vipr2 GPCR, not through the canonical Gi, but via the unique G-protein subclass Gz.

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the central regulator of circadian rhythms. Here the authors identify mouse Gpr176 as a pace modulator of this circadian clock and characterize its mode of action as coupling to Gz rather than Gi subunits.

Gating function of isoleucine-116 in TM-3 (position III:16/3.40) for the activity state of the CC-chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A conserved amino acid within a protein family indicates a significance of the residue. In the centre of transmembrane helix (TM)-5, position V:13/5.47, an aromatic amino acid is conserved among class A 7TM receptors. However, in 37% of chemokine receptors - a subgroup of 7TM receptors - it is a leucine indicating an altered function. Here, we describe the significance of this position and its possible interaction with TM-3 for CCR5 activity.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The effects of [L203F]-CCR5 in TM-5 (position V:13/5.47), [I116A]-CCR5 in TM-3 (III:16/3.40) and [L203F;G286F]-CCR5 (V:13/5.47;VII:09/7.42) were determined in G-protein- and β-arrestin-coupled signalling. Computational modelling monitored changes in amino acid conformation.

KEY RESULTS

[L203F]-CCR5 increased the basal level of G-protein coupling (20-70% of Emax ) and β-arrestin recruitment (50% of Emax ) with a threefold increase in agonist potency. In silico, [I116A]-CCR5 switched χ1-angle in [L203F]-CCR5. Furthermore, [I116A]-CCR5 was constitutively active to a similar degree as [L203F]-CCR5. Tyr(244) in TM-6 (VI:09/6.44) moved towards TM-5 in silico, consistent with its previously shown function for CCR5 activation. On [L203F;G286F]-CCR5 the antagonist aplaviroc was converted to a superagonist.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The results imply that an aromatic amino acid in the centre of TM-5 controls the level of receptor activity. Furthermore, Ile(116) acts as a gate for the movement of Tyr(244) towards TM-5 in the active state, a mechanism proposed previously for the β2 -adrenoceptor. The results provide an understanding of chemokine receptor function and thereby information for the development of biased and non-biased antagonists and inverse agonists.

G-protein-coupled receptors, Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia

The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway has become an important model to study the cell biology of primary cilia, and reciprocally, the study of ciliary processes provides an opportunity to solve longstanding mysteries in the mechanism of vertebrate Hh signal transduction. The cilium is emerging as an unique compartment for G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling in many systems. Two members of the GPCR family, Smoothened and Gpr161, play important roles in the Hh pathway. We review the current understanding of how these proteins may function to regulate Hh signaling and also highlight some of the critical unanswered questions being tackled by the field. Uncovering GPCR-regulated mechanisms important in Hh signaling may provide therapeutic strategies against the Hh pathway that plays important roles in development, regeneration and cancer.

Molecular dynamics simulations on the Tre1 G protein-coupled receptor: exploring the role of the arginine of the NRY motif in Tre1 structure

BACKGROUND

The arginine of the D/E/NRY motif in Rhodopsin family G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is conserved in 96% of these proteins. In some GPCRs, this arginine in transmembrane 3 can form a salt bridge with an aspartic acid or glutamic acid in transmembrane 6. The Drosophila melanogaster GPCR Trapped in endoderm-1 (Tre1) is required for normal primordial germ cell migration. In a mutant form of the protein, Tre1sctt, eight amino acids RYILIACH are missing, resulting in a severe disruption of primordial germ cell development. The impact of the loss of these amino acids on Tre1 structure is unknown. Since the missing amino acids in Tre1sctt include the arginine that is part of the D/E/NRY motif in Tre1, molecular dynamics simulations were performed to explore the hypothesis that these amino acids are involved in salt bridge formation and help maintain Tre1 structure.

RESULTS

Structural predictions of wild type Tre1 (Tre1+) and Tre1sctt were subjected to over 250 ns of molecular dynamics simulations. The ability of the model systems to form a salt bridge between the arginine of the D/E/NRY motif and an aspartic acid residue in transmembrane 6 was analyzed. The results indicate that a stable salt bridge can form in the Tre1+ systems and a weak salt bridge or no salt bridge, using an alternative arginine, is likely in the Tre1sctt systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The weak salt bridge or lack of a salt bridge in the Tre1sctt systems could be one possible explanation for the disrupted function of Tre1sctt in primordial germ cell migration. These results provide a framework for studying the importance of the arginine of the D/E/NRY motif in the structure and function of other GPCRs that are involved in cell migration, such as CXCR4 in the mouse, zebrafish, and chicken.

Gpr3 stimulates Aβ production via interactions with APP and β-arrestin2

The orphan G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) GPR3 enhances the processing of Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) to the neurotoxic beta-amyloid (Aβ) peptide via incompletely understood mechanisms. Through overexpression and shRNA knockdown experiments in HEK293 cells, we show that β-arrestin2 (βarr2), a GPCR-interacting scaffold protein reported to bind γ-secretase, is an essential factor for GPR3-stimulated Aβ production. For a panel of GPR3 receptor mutants, the degree of stimulation of Aβ production correlates with receptor-β-arrestin binding and receptor trafficking to endocytic vesicles. However, GPR3’s recruitment of βarr2 cannot be the sole explanation, because interaction with βarr2 is common to most GPCRs, whereas GPR3 is relatively unique among GPCRs in enhancing Aβ production. In addition to β-arrestin, APP is present in a complex with GPR3 and stimulation of Aβ production by GPR3 mutants correlates with their level of APP binding. Importantly, among a broader selection of GPCRs, only GPR3 and prostaglandin E receptor 2 subtype EP2 (PTGER2; another GPCR that increases Aβ production) interact with APP, and PTGER2 does so in an agonist-stimulated manner. These data indicate that a subset of GPCRs, including GPR3 and PTGER2, can associate with APP when internalized via βarr2, and thereby promote the cleavage of APP to generate Aβ.

Structural features of the G-protein/GPCR interactions

BACKGROUND

The details of the functional interaction between G proteins and the G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been subjected to extensive investigations with structural and functional assays and a large number of computational studies.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The nature and sites of interaction in the G-protein/GPCR complexes, and the specificities of these interactions selecting coupling partners among the large number of families of GPCRs and G protein forms, are still poorly defined.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Many of the contact sites between the two proteins in specific complexes have been identified, but the three dimensional molecular architecture of a receptor-Gα interface is only known for one pair. Consequently, many fundamental questions regarding this macromolecular assembly and its mechanism remain unanswered.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

In the context of current structural data we review the structural details of the interfaces and recognition sites in complexes of sub-family A GPCRs with cognate G-proteins, with special emphasis on the consequences of activation on GPCR structure, the prevalence of preassembled GPCR/G-protein complexes, the key structural determinants for selective coupling and the possible involvement of GPCR oligomerization in this process.

The ciliary G-protein-coupled receptor Gpr161 negatively regulates the Sonic hedgehog pathway via cAMP signaling

The primary cilium is required for Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling in vertebrates. In contrast to mutants affecting ciliary assembly, mutations in the intraflagellar transport complex A (IFT-A) paradoxically cause increased Shh signaling. We previously showed that the IFT-A complex, in addition to its canonical role in retrograde IFT, binds to the tubby-like protein, Tulp3, and recruits it to cilia. Here, we describe a conserved vertebrate G-protein-coupled receptor, Gpr161, which localizes to primary cilia in a Tulp3/IFT-A-dependent manner. Complete loss of Gpr161 in mouse causes midgestation lethality and increased Shh signaling in the neural tube, phenocopying Tulp3/IFT-A mutants. Constitutive Gpr161 activity increases cAMP levels and represses Shh signaling by determining the processing of Gli3 to its repressor form. Conversely, Shh signaling directs Gpr161 to be internalized from cilia, preventing its activity. Thus, Gpr161 defines a morphogenetic pathway coupling protein kinase A activation to Shh signaling during neural tube development.

Classification of G proteins and prediction of GPCRs-G proteins coupling specificity using continuous wavelet transform and information theory

The coupling between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) regulates various signal transductions from extracellular space into the cell. However, the coupling mechanism between GPCRs and G proteins is still unknown, and experimental determination of their coupling specificity and function is both expensive and time consuming. Therefore, it is significant to develop a theoretical method to predict the coupling specificity between GPCRs and G proteins as well as their function using their primary sequences. In this study, a novel four-layer predictor (GPCRsG_CWTIT) based on support vector machine (SVM), continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and information theory (IT) is developed to classify G proteins and predict the coupling specificity between GPCRs and G proteins. SVM is used for construction of models. CWT and IT are used to characterize the primary structure of protein. Performance of GPCRsG_CWTIT is evaluated with cross-validation test on various working dataset. The overall accuracy of the G proteins at the levels of class and family is 98.23 and 85.42%, respectively. The accuracy of the coupling specificity prediction varies from 74.60 to 94.30%. These results indicate that the proposed predictor is an effective and feasible tool to predict the coupling specificity between GPCRs and G proteins as well as their functions using only the protein full sequence. The establishment of such an accurate prediction method will facilitate drug discovery by improving the ability to identify and predict protein-protein interactions. GPCRsG_CWTIT and dataset can be acquired freely on request from the authors.

GPCR Conformations: Implications for Rational Drug Design

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise a large class of transmembrane proteins that play critical roles in both normal physiology and pathophysiology. These critical roles offer targets for therapeutic intervention, as exemplified by the substantial fraction of current pharmaceutical agents that target members of this family. Tremendous contributions to our understanding of GPCR structure and dynamics have come from both indirect and direct structural characterization techniques. Key features of GPCR conformations derived from both types of characterization techniques are reviewed.

Constitutive activity and inverse agonism at the α(₁a) and α(₁b) adrenergic receptor subtypes

The α(1b)-adrenergic receptor (AR) was, after rhodopsin, the first G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in which point mutations were shown to trigger constitutive (agonist-independent) activity. Constitutively activating mutations have been found in other AR subtypes as well as in several GPCRs. This chapter briefly summarizes the main findings on constitutively active mutants of the α(1a)- and α(1b)-AR subtypes and the methods used to predict activating mutations, to measure constitutive activity of Gq-coupled receptors and to investigate inverse agonism. In addition, it highlights the implications of studies on constitutively active AR mutants on elucidating the molecular mechanisms of receptor activation and drug action.

Facilitatory interplay in alpha 1a and beta 2 adrenoceptor function reveals a non-Gq signaling mode: implications for diversification of intracellular signal transduction

Agonist occupied alpha(1)-adrenoceptors (alpha(1)-ARs) engage several signaling pathways, including phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis, calcium mobilization, arachidonic acid release, mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation, and cAMP accumulation. The natural agonist norepinephrine (NE) activates with variable affinity and intrinsic efficacy all adrenoceptors, and in cells that coexpress alpha(1)- and beta-AR subtypes, such as cardiomyocytes, this leads to coactivation of multiple downstream pathways. This may result in pathway cross-talk with significant consequences to heart physiology and pathologic state. To dissect signaling components involved specifically in alpha(1A)- and beta(2)-AR signal interplay, we have developed a recombinant model system that mimics the levels of receptor expression observed in native cells. We followed intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization to monitor in real time the activation of both G(q) and G(s) pathways. We found that coactivation of alpha(1A)- and beta(2)-AR by the nonselective agonist NE or via a combination of the highly selective alpha(1A)-AR agonist A61603 and the beta-selective agonist isoproterenol led to increases in Ca(2+) influx from the extracellular compartment relative to stimulation with A61603 alone, with no effect on the associated transient release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores. This effect became more evident upon examination of an alpha(1A)-AR variant exhibiting a partial defect in coupling to G(q), and we attribute it to potentiation of a non G(q)-pathway, uncovered by application of a combination of xestospongin C, an endoplasmic reticulum inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor blocker, and 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, a nonselective storeoperated Ca(2+) entry channel blocker. We also found that stimulation with A61603 of a second alpha(1A)-AR variant entirely unable to signal induced no Ca(2+) unless beta(2)-AR was concomitantly activated. These results may be accounted for by the presence of alpha(1A)/beta(2)-AR heterodimers or alternatively by specific adrenoceptor signal cross-talk resulting in distinct pharmacological behavior. Finally, our findings provide a new conceptual framework to rationalize outcomes from clinical studies targeting alpha- and beta-adrenoceptors.

Preferential binding of allosteric modulators to active and inactive conformational states of metabotropic glutamate receptors

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G protein coupled receptors that play important roles in synaptic plasticity and other neuro-physiological and pathological processes. Allosteric mGluR ligands are particularly promising drug targets because of their modulatory effects--enhancing or suppressing the response of mGluRs to glutamate. The mechanism by which this modulation occurs is not known. Here, we propose the hypothesis that positive and negative modulators will differentially stabilize the active and inactive conformations of the receptors, respectively. To test this hypothesis, we have generated computational models of the transmembrane regions of different mGluR subtypes in two different conformations. The inactive conformation was modeled using the crystal structure of the inactive, dark state of rhodopsin as template and the active conformation was created based on a recent model of the light-activated state of rhodopsin. Ligands for which the nature of their allosteric effects on mGluRs is experimentally known were docked to the modeled mGluR structures using ArgusLab and Autodock softwares. We find that the allosteric ligand binding pockets of mGluRs are overlapping with the retinal binding pocket of rhodopsin, and that ligands have strong preferences for the active and inactive states depending on their modulatory nature. In 8 out of 14 cases (57%), the negative modulators bound the inactive conformations with significant preference using both docking programs, and 6 out of 9 cases (67%), the positive modulators bound the active conformations. Considering results by the individual programs only, even higher correlations were observed: 12/14 (86%) and 8/9 (89%) for ArgusLab and 10/14 (71%) and 7/9 (78%) for AutoDock. These findings strongly support the hypothesis that mGluR allosteric modulation occurs via stabilization of different conformations analogous to those identified in rhodopsin where they are induced by photochemical isomerization of the retinal ligand--despite the extensive differences in sequences between mGluRs and rhodopsin.

Two model system of the alpha1A-adrenoceptor docked with selected ligands

In this study, we have developed a two model system to mimic the active and inactive states of a G-protein coupled receptor specifically the alpha1A adrenergic receptor. We have docked two agonists, epinephrine (phenylamine type) and oxymetazoline (imidazoline type), as well as two antagonists, prazosin and 5-methylurapidil, into two alpha1A receptor models, active and inactive. The best docking complexes for both agonists had hydrophilic interactions with D106, while neither antagonist did. Prazosin and oxymetazoline had hydrophobic interactions with F308 and F312. We predict from our study that the active state is stabilized by the interaction of F193 with I114, L197, V278, F281, and V282. The active state is further stabilized by the interaction of F312 with L75, V79, and L80. We also predict that the inactive state of the receptor is stabilized by the interaction of F312 with W102, F288, and M292.

Amino acids in the COOH-terminal region of the oxytocin receptor third intracellular domain are important for receptor function

Previously, residue K6.30 in the COOH-terminal region of the third intracellular domain (3iC) of the oxytocin (OT) receptor (OTR) was identified as important for receptor function leading to phospholipase C activation in both OTR and the vasopressin V(2) receptor (V(2)R) chimera V(2)ROTR3iC. Substitution of either A6.28K or V6.30K in wild-type V(2)R did not recapitulate the increase in phosphatidylinositide (PI) turnover observed in V(2)ROTR3iC. Hence, the role of K6.30 may be context-specific. Deletion of two NH(2)-terminal OTR3iC segments in the V(2)ROTR3iC chimera did not diminish vasopressin-stimulated PI turnover, whereas deletion of RVSSVKL (residues 6.19-6.25) reduced receptor expression. Deletion of this sequence in wild-type OTR reduced expression by 50% without affecting affinity for [(3)H]OT. This OTR mutant was unable to activate PI turnover or extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation. The effects of alanine substitution for individual residues in RVSSVKL indicated differential importance for OTR function. The R6.19A substitution lost high-affinity sites for [(3)H]OT and the ability to stimulate PI turnover. Affinity for [(3)H]OT and membrane expression was not affected by any other substitutions. OTR-V6.20A and OTR-K6.24A mutants functioned as well as wild-type OTR, whereas OTR S6.21A, S6.22A, and V6.23A mutants exhibited impaired abilities to activate PI turnover (20-40% of OTR), and the OTR-L6.25A mutant exhibited constitutive activity. In conclusion, specific amino acids in the RVSSVKL segment in the COOH-terminal region of the third intracellular domain of OTR influence the ability of OTR to activate G protein-mediated actions.

Constitutive activity and inverse agonism at the α1adrenoceptors

Mutations of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) can increase their constitutive (agonist-independent) activity. Some of these mutations have been artificially introduced by site-directed mutagenesis, others occur spontaneously in human diseases. The alpha(1B)adrenoceptor was the first GPCR in which point mutations were shown to trigger receptor activation. This article briefly summarizes some of the findings reported in the last several years on constitutive activity of the alpha(1)adrenoceptor subtypes, the location where mutations have been found in the receptors, the spontaneous activity of native receptors in recombinant as well as physiological systems. In addition, it will highlight how the analysis of the pharmacological and molecular properties of the constitutively active adrenoceptor mutants provided an important contribution to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the mechanism of receptor activation and inverse agonism.

The highly conserved DRY motif of class A G protein-coupled receptors: beyond the ground state

Despite extensive study of heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the precise mechanism of G protein activation is unknown. The role of one highly conserved stretch of residues, the amino acids glutamic acid/aspartic acid-arginine-tyrosine (i.e., the E/DRY motif), has received considerable attention with respect to regulating GPCR conformational states. In the consensus view, glutamic acid/aspartic acid maintains the receptor in its ground state, because mutations frequently induce constitutive activity (CA). This hypothesis has been confirmed by the rhodopsin ground-state crystal structure and by computational modeling approaches. However, some class A GPCRs are resistant to CA, suggesting alternative roles for the glutamic acid/aspartic acid residue and the E/DRY motif. Here, we propose two different subgroups of receptors within class A GPCRs that make different use of the E/DRY motif, independent of the G protein type (G(s), G(i), or G(q)) to which the receptor couples. In phenotype 1 receptors, nonconservative mutations of the glutamic acid/aspartic acid-arginine residues, besides inducing CA, increase affinity for agonist binding, retain G protein coupling, and retain an agonist-induced response. In contrast, in second phenotype receptors, the E/DRY motif is more directly involved in governing receptor conformation and G protein coupling/recognition. Hence, mutations of the glutamic acid/aspartic acid residues do not induce CA. Conversely, nonconservative mutations of the arginine of the E/DRY motif always impair agonist-induced receptor responses and, generally, reduce agonist binding affinity. Thus, it is essential to look beyond the rhodopsin ground-state model of conformational activation to clarify the role of this highly conserved triplet in GPCR activation and function.

Inactive and active states and supramolecular organization of GPCRs: insights from computational modeling

Herein we make an overview of the results of our computational experiments aimed at gaining insight into the molecular mechanisms of GPCR functioning either in their normal conditions or when hit by gain-of-function or loss-of-function mutations. Molecular simulations of a number of GPCRs in their wild type and mutated as well as free and ligand-bound forms were instrumental in inferring the structural features, which differentiate the mutation- and ligand-induced active from the inactive states. These features essentially reside in the interaction pattern of the E/DRY arginine and in the degree of solvent exposure of selected cytosolic domains. Indeed, the active states differ from the inactive ones in the weakening of the interactions made by the highly conserved arginine and in the increase in solvent accessibility of the cytosolic interface between helices 3 and 6. Where possible, the structural hallmarks of the active and inactive receptor states are translated into molecular descriptors useful for in silico functional screening of novel receptor mutants or ligands. Computational modeling of the supramolecular organization of GPCRs and their intracellular partners is the current challenge toward a deep understanding of their functioning mechanisms.

Predicting G-protein coupled receptors-G-protein coupling specificity based on autocross-covariance transform

Determining G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) coupling specificity is very important for further understanding the functions of receptors. A successful method in this area will benefit both basic research and drug discovery practice. Previously published methods rely on the transmembrane topology prediction at training step, even at prediction step. However, the transmembrane topology predicted by even the best algorithm is not of high accuracy. In this study, we developed a new method, autocross-covariance (ACC) transform based support vector machine (SVM), to predict coupling specificity between GPCRs and G-proteins. The primary amino acid sequences are translated into vectors based on the principal physicochemical properties of the amino acids and the data are transformed into a uniform matrix by applying ACC transform. SVMs for nonpromiscuous coupled GPCRs and promiscuous coupled GPCRs were trained and validated by jackknife test and the results thus obtained are very promising. All classifiers were also evaluated by the test datasets with good performance. Besides the high prediction accuracy, the most important feature of this method is that it does not require any transmembrane topology prediction at either training or prediction step but only the primary sequences of proteins. The results indicate that this relatively simple method is applicable. Academic users can freely download the prediction program at http://www.scucic.net/group/database/Service.asp.

Structure-function relationships of the luteinizing hormone receptor

Of the 800-900 genes in the human genome that appear to encode G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), two are known to encode receptors that bind the three heterodimeric human gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone (LH), chorionic gonadotropin (CG), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). LH and CG bind to a common receptor, LHR, and FSH binds to a paralogous receptor. These GPCRs contain a relatively large ectodomain (ECD), responsible for high-affinity ligand binding, and a transmembrane portion, as in the other GPCRs. The ECD contains nine leucine-rich repeats capped by N-terminal and C-terminal cysteine-rich regions. The overall goal of this research is to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which CG and LH bind to and activate LHR and the latter, in turn, activates Gs alpha. A combination of molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis, coupled with binding and signaling studies in transiently transfected HEK 293 cells expressing wild-type and mutant forms of LHR, has been used to develop and test models for the LHR ECD, the CG-LHR ECD complex, and the structural changes in the transmembrane helices and intracellular loops, particularly loop 2, that accompany receptor activation. In addition, a single-chain CG-LHR complex was designed in which a fusion protein of the two subunits of human CG was linked to full-length LHR. This ligand-receptor complex was shown to be constitutively active in cellular models and in transgenic mice, the latter of which exhibit precocious puberty. From a combination of molecular modeling, site-directed mutagenesis, genetic/protein engineering, and receptor characterization in cellular and animal models, considerable insight is being developed on the mechanisms of normal and aberrant activation of LHR.

A Genetic-Function-Approximation-Based QSAR Model for the Affinity of Arylpiperazines toward α1 Adrenoceptors

The genetic function approximation (GFA) algorithm has been used to derive a three-term QSAR equation able to correlate the structural properties of arylpiperazine derivatives with their affinity toward the alpha1 adrenoceptor (alpha1-AR). The number of rotatable bonds, the hydrogen-bond properties, and a variable belonging to a topological family of descriptors (chi) showed significant roles in the binding process toward alpha1-AR. The new model was also compared to a previous pharmacophore for alpha1-AR antagonists and a QSAR model for alpha2-AR antagonists with the aim of finding common or different key determinants influencing both affinity and selectivity toward alpha1- and alpha2-AR.

The DRY motif as a molecular switch of the human oxytocin receptor

The human oxytocin receptor is known to exhibit promiscuous activity by coupling to both Galpha(q) and Galpha(i) G proteins to activate distinct signaling pathways. A single-amino acid substitution within the highly conserved E/DRY motif at the cytosolic extension of helix 3 [i.e., D136(3.49)N] increased the rate of both basal and agonist-stimulated inositol phosphate (IP(3)) accumulation of the receptor. Furthermore, like for a typical constitutively active receptor, the partial agonist arginine vasopressin behaved as a full agonist for the D136(3.49)N mutant. Subsequently, both oxytocin and arginine vasopressin showed an increased potency in stimulating IP3 accumulation as compared to the wild-type receptor. Very interestingly, our experiments provide strong evidence that the D136(3.49)N mutant inhibits receptor signaling via Galpha(i)-mediated pathways while increasing the activity through the Galpha(q)-mediated pathways. Molecular simulations of the free and OT-bound forms of wild-type OTR and of the D136(3.49)N constitutively active mutant suggest that the receptor portions close to the E/DRY and NPxxY motifs are particularly susceptible to undergoing structural modification in response to activating mutations and agonist binding. Furthermore, computational modeling suggests that the OT-bound form of wild-type OTR is able to explore more states than the OT-bound form of the D136(3.49)N constitutively active mutant, consistent with its G protein promiscuity. Taken together, these observations emphasize the important role of the E/DRY motif not only in receptor activation but also in the promiscuity of G protein coupling. Knowledge of the mechanism of selective G protein coupling could aid drug discovery efforts to identify signaling specific therapies.

Historical review: Negative efficacy and the constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors

The idea that a receptor can produce signalling without agonist intervention and that several antagonists can be 'active' in repressing such spontaneous activity is contained in the concept of ligand-induced conformational changes. Yet, this idea was neglected by pharmacologists for many years. In this article, we review the events that brought inverse agonism and constitutive activity to general attention and made this phenomenon a topic of current research. We also suggest a classification of antagonists based on the cooperativity that links their primary site of interaction with other functional domains of the receptor.

Comparison of class A and D G protein-coupled receptors: common features in structure and activation

All G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) share a common seven TM helix architecture and the ability to activate heterotrimeric G proteins. Nevertheless, these receptors have widely divergent sequences with no significant homology. We present a detailed structure-function comparison of the very divergent Class A and D receptors to address whether there is a common activation mechanism across the GPCR superfamily. The Class A and D receptors are represented by the vertebrate visual pigment rhodopsin and the yeast alpha-factor pheromone receptor Ste2, respectively. Conserved amino acids within each specific receptor class and amino acids where mutation alters receptor function were located in the structures of rhodopsin and Ste2 to assess whether there are functionally equivalent positions or regions within these receptors. We find several general similarities that are quite striking. First, strongly polar amino acids mediate helix interactions. Their mutation generally leads to loss of function or constitutive activity. Second, small and weakly polar amino acids facilitate tight helix packing. Third, proline is essential at similar positions in transmembrane helices 6 and 7 of both receptors. Mapping the specific location of the conserved amino acids and sites of constitutively active mutations identified conserved microdomains on transmembrane helices H3, H6, and H7, suggesting that there are underlying similarities in the mechanism of the widely divergent Class A and Class D receptors.

Different structural requirements for the constitutive and the agonist-induced activities of the beta2-adrenergic receptor

We converted Ser-207, located in helix 5 of the beta2-adrenergic receptor, into all other natural amino acids. To quantify receptor activation as a receptor number-independent parameter and directly related to G(s) activation, we expressed the mutants in a G alpha(s)-tethered form. GTP exchange in such constructs is restricted to the fused alpha-subunit and is a linear function of the receptor concentration. Except S207R, all other mutants were expressed to a suitable level for investigation. All mutations reduced the binding affinities of the catechol agonists, epinephrine and isoproterenol, and the extent of reduction was unrelated to the residue ability to form hydrogen bonds. Instead, both enhancements and reductions of affinity were observed for the partial agonist halostachin and the antagonist pindolol. The mutations also enhanced and diminished ligand-induced receptor activation, but the effects were strictly ligand-specific. Polar residues such as Asp and His exalted the activation by full agonists but suppressed that induced by the partial agonists halostachin and dichloroisoproterenol. In contrast, hydrophobic residues such as Ile and Val augmented partial agonist activation. Only Ile and Lys produced a significant increase of constitutive activity. The effects on binding and activity were not correlated, nor did such parameters show any clear correlation with up to 78 descriptors of amino acid physicochemical properties. Our data question the idea that Ser-207 is exposed to the polar crevice in the unbound receptor. They also suggest that the active receptor form induced by a full agonist might be substantially different from that caused by constitutive activation.

Novel human alpha1a-adrenoceptor single nucleotide polymorphisms alter receptor pharmacology and biological function

We identified nine naturally-occurring human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the alpha(1a)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1a)AR) coding region, seven of which result in amino acid change. Utilizing rat-1 fibroblasts stably expressing wild type alpha(1a)AR or each SNP at both high and low levels, we investigated the effect of these SNPs on receptor function. Compared with wild type, two SNPs (R166K, V311I) cause a decrease in binding affinity for agonists norepinephrine, epinephrine, and phenylephrine, and also shift the dose-response curve for norepinephrine stimulation of inositol phosphate (IP) production to the right (reduced potency) without altering maximal IP activity. In addition, SNP V311I and I200S display altered antagonist binding. Interestingly, a receptor with SNP G247R (located in the third intracellular loop) displays increased maximal receptor IP activity and stimulates cell growth. The increased receptor signaling for alpha(1a)AR G247R is not mediated by altered ligand binding or a deficiency in agonist-mediated desensitization, but appears to be related to enhanced receptor-G protein coupling. In conclusion, four naturally-occurring human alpha(1a)AR SNPs induce altered receptor pharmacology and/or biological activity. This finding has potentially important implications in many areas of medicine and can be used to guide alpha(1a)AR SNP choice for future clinical studies.

A FlAsH-based FRET approach to determine G protein–coupled receptor activation in living cells

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from cyan to yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP/YFP) is a well-established method to monitor protein-protein interactions or conformational changes of individual proteins. But protein functions can be perturbed by fusion of large tags such as CFP and YFP. Here we use G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation in living cells as a model system to compare YFP with the small, membrane-permeant fluorescein derivative with two arsen-(III) substituents (fluorescein arsenical hairpin binder; FlAsH) targeted to a short tetracysteine sequence. Insertion of CFP and YFP into human adenosine A(2A) receptors allowed us to use FRET to monitor receptor activation but eliminated coupling to adenylyl cyclase. The CFP/FlAsH-tetracysteine system gave fivefold greater agonist-induced FRET signals, similar kinetics (time constant of 66-88 ms) and perfectly normal downstream signaling. Similar results were obtained for the mouse alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor. Thus, FRET from CFP to FlAsH reports GPCR activation in living cells without disturbing receptor function and shows that the small size of the tetracysteine-biarsenical tag can be decisively advantageous.

Mutations in the carboxy-terminus of the third intracellular loop of the human recombinant VPAC1 receptor impair VIP-stimulated [Ca2+]i increase but not adenylate cyclase stimulation

The vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) VPAC1 receptor is preferentially coupled to Galphas protein that stimulates adenylate cyclase activity and also to Galphaq and Galphai proteins that stimulate the inositol phosphate/calcium pathway. Previous studies indicated the importance of the third intracellular loop of the receptor for G protein coupling. By site-directed mutation of the human recombinant receptor expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, we identified two domains in this loop that contain clusters of basic residues conserved in most of the G-protein-coupled seven transmembrane domains receptors. We found that mutations in the proximal domain (K322) reduced the capability of VIP to increase adenylate cyclase activity without any change in the calcium response, whereas mutations in the distal part of the loop (R338, L339, R341) markedly reduced the calcium increase and Galphai coupling but only weakly the adenylate cyclase activity. Thus, the interaction of different G proteins with the VPAC1 receptor involves different receptor sub-domains.

Toward the active conformations of rhodopsin and the beta2-adrenergic receptor

Using sets of experimental distance restraints, which characterize active or inactive receptor conformations, and the X-ray crystal structure of the inactive form of bovine rhodopsin as a starting point, we have constructed models of both the active and inactive forms of rhodopsin and the beta2-adrenergic G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The distance restraints were obtained from published data for site-directed crosslinking, engineered zinc binding, site-directed spin-labeling, IR spectroscopy, and cysteine accessibility studies conducted on class A GPCRs. Molecular dynamics simulations in the presence of either "active" or "inactive" restraints were used to generate two distinguishable receptor models. The process for generating the inactive and active models was validated by the hit rates, yields, and enrichment factors determined for the selection of antagonists in the inactive model and for the selection of agonists in the active model from a set of nonadrenergic GPCR drug-like ligands in a virtual screen using ligand docking software. The simulation results provide new insights into the relationships observed between selected biochemical data, the crystal structure of rhodopsin, and the structural rearrangements that occur during activation.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) could be subclassified into 7 families (A, B, large N-terminal family B-7 transmembrane helix, C, Frizzled/Smoothened, taste 2, and vomeronasal 1 receptors) among mammalian species. Cloning and functional studies of GPCRs have revealed that the superfamily of GPCRs comprises receptors for chemically diverse native ligands including (1) endogenous compounds like amines, peptides, and Wnt proteins (i.e., secreted proteins activating Frizzled receptors); (2) endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules; and (3) photons and exogenous compounds like odorants. The combined use of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling approaches have provided detailed insight into molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, receptor folding, receptor activation, G-protein coupling, and regulation of GPCRs. The vast majority of family A, B, C, vomeronasal 1, and taste 2 receptors are able to transduce signals into cells through G-protein coupling. However, G-protein-independent signaling mechanisms have also been reported for many GPCRs. Specific interaction motifs in the intracellular parts of these receptors allow them to interact with scaffold proteins. Protein engineering techniques have provided information on molecular mechanisms of GPCR-accessory protein, GPCR-GPCR, and GPCR-scaffold protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations have revealed that the inactive state conformations are stabilized by specific interhelical and intrahelical salt bridge interactions and hydrophobic-type interactions. Constitutively activating mutations or agonist binding disrupts such constraining interactions leading to receptor conformations that associates with and activate G-proteins.

Functional characterization of melanocortin-3 receptor variants identify a loss-of-function mutation involving an amino acid critical for G protein-coupled receptor activation

Although melanocortin-4 receptor mutations are the cause of the most common monogenic form of obesity, the involvement of the melanocortin-3 receptor (MC3R) in the pathogenesis of obesity is unknown. Earlier studies failed to identify any mutations in obese patients except for the identification of two variants (K6T and I81V) that likely represent polymorphisms. However, a potential mutation (I183N) was recently reported from patients having high-fat contents. We report here the functional characterization of these variants. We show that K6T and I81V have ligand binding and signaling properties similar to wild-type (wt) MC3R, indicating that they are indeed polymorphisms. However, the other variant, I183N, completely lacks signaling in response to agonist stimulation, although it binds ligand with normal affinity and with only slightly decreased capacity. Coexpression of the wt and I183N MC3Rs showed that I183N does not exert dominant-negative activity on wt MC3R. These results provide supporting evidence for the hypothesis proposed in the original case report that MC3R mutation might be a genetic factor that confers susceptibility to obesity, likely due to haploinsufficiency. Further mutations at I183 revealed a discrete requirement for I183 in agonist-induced MC3R activation. The corresponding residue is also important for agonist-induced human melanocortin-4 receptor and lutropin receptor activation. In summary, we identify a residue that is critical for activation of G protein-coupled receptors.

The basic residues in the membrane-proximal C-terminal tail of the rat melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 are required for receptor function

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that plays a key role in food intake. It acts through two G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), MCH1R and MCH2R, of which MCH1R is the primary regulator of food intake. We have previously reported that N-linked glycosylation of the extracellular domain of MCH1R is necessary for cell surface expression and signal transduction. We now report a role for the rat MCH1R C-terminal region. We constructed serial C-terminal truncation mutants and determined the resulting changes in protein expression, cell surface expression, ligand binding, and MCH-stimulated calcium influx. By analyzing two mutants, deltaT317 (deletion of 36 C-terminal amino acids) and deltaR321 (deletion of 32 C-terminal amino acids), we found that the region between Phe(318) and Arg(321)) was responsible for signal transduction. A more detailed analysis was performed with single or multiple residue mutations. Single mutations of Arg(319), Lys(320), or Arg(321) exhibited a decrease in the cell surface expression, whereas mutations of either Arg(319) or Lys(320), but not Arg(321), showed a significant reduction in the calcium influx. Furthermore, simultaneous mutations of Arg(319) and Lys(320) produced a pronounced decrease in the efficacy of calcium influx stimulation compared with single mutations. A computational analysis revealed a dibasic amino acid motif that is conserved among many class 1 GPCRs and may be part of the amphiphilic cytoplasmic helix 8 (an eight-cytoplasmic helix). Our results therefore provide new insights into the role of the putative helix 8 in the regulation of GPCR function.

Synthesis, screening, and molecular modeling of new potent and selective antagonists at the alpha 1d adrenergic receptor

In the present study, more than 75 compounds structurally related to BMY 7378 have been designed and synthesized. Structural variations of each part of the reference molecule have been introduced, obtaining highly selective ligands for the alpha(1d) adrenergic receptor. The molecular determinants for selectivity at this receptor are essentially held by the phenyl substituent in the phenylpiperazine moiety. The integration of an extensive SAR analysis with docking simulations using the rhodopsin-based models of the three alpha(1)-AR subtypes and of the 5-HT(1A) receptor provides significant insights into the characterization of the receptor binding sites as well as into the molecular determinants of ligand selectivity at the alpha(1d)-AR and the 5-HT(1A) receptors. The results of multiple copies simultaneous search (MCSS) on the substituted phenylpiperazines together with those of manual docking of compounds BMY 7378 and 69 into the putative binding sites of the alpha(1a)-AR, alpha(1b)-AR, alpha(1d)-AR, and the 5-HT(1A) receptors suggest that the phenylpiperazine moiety would dock into a site formed by amino acids in helices 3, 4, 5, 6 and extracellular loop 2 (E2), whereas the spirocyclic ring of the ligand docks into a site formed by amino acids of helices 1, 2, 3, and 7. This docking mode is consistent with the SAR data produced in this work. Furthermore, the binding site of the imide moiety does not allow for the simultaneous involvement of the two carbonyl oxygen atoms in H-bonding interactions, consistent with the SAR data, in particular with the results obtained with the lactam derivative 128. The results of docking simulations also suggest that the second and third extracellular loops may act as selectivity filters for the substituted phenylpiperazines. The most potent and selective compounds for alpha(1d) adrenergic receptor, i.e., 69 (Rec 26D/038) and 128 (Rec 26D/073), are characterized by the presence of the 2,5-dichlorophenylpiperazine moiety.

Structural features of the inactive and active states of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptors: Insights from molecular simulations

Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of both subtypes 1 and 2 of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor (MCHR1 and MCHR2, respectively) in their free and hormone-bound forms have been carried out. The hormone has been used in its full-length and truncated forms, as well as in 16 mutated forms. Moreover, MCHR1 has been simulated in complex with T-226296, a novel orally active and selective antagonist. The comparative analysis of an extended number of receptor configurations suggests that the differences between inactive (i.e., free and antagonist-bound) and active (i.e., agonist-bound) states of MCHRs involve the receptor portions close to the E/DRY and NPxxY motifs, with prominence to the cytosolic extensions of helices 2, 3, 6, and 7. In fact, the active forms of these receptors share the release of selected intramolecular interactions found in the inactive forms, such as that between R3.50 of the E/DRY motif and D2.40, and that between Y7.53 of the NPxxY motif and F7.60. Another feature of the active forms of both MCHRs is the approach of "helix 8" to the cytosolic extension of helix 3. These features of the active forms are concurrent with the opening of a cleft at the cytosolic end of the helix bundle. For both MCHRs, the agonist-induced chemical information transfer from the extracellular to the cytosolic domains is mediated by a cluster of aromatic amino acids in helix 6, following the ligand interaction with selected amino acids in the extracellular half of the receptor.

The N Terminus of the Human α1D-Adrenergic Receptor Prevents Cell Surface Expression

We previously reported that truncation of the N-terminal 79 amino acids of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors (Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs) greatly increases binding site density. In this study, we determined whether this effect was associated with changes in alpha(1D)-AR subcellular localization. Confocal imaging of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged receptors and sucrose density gradient fractionation suggested that full-length alpha(1D)-ARs were found primarily in intracellular compartments, whereas Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs were translocated to the plasma membrane. This resulted in a 3- to 4-fold increase in intrinsic activity for stimulation of inositol phosphate formation by norepinephrine. We determined whether this effect was transplantable by creating N-terminal chimeras of alpha(1)-ARs containing the body of one subtype and the N terminus of another (alpha(1A)NT-D, alpha(1B)NT-D, alpha(1D)NT-A, and alpha(1D)NT-B). When expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, radioligand binding revealed that binding densities of alpha(1A)-or alpha(1B)-ARs containing the alpha(1D)-N terminus decreased by 86 to 93%, whereas substitution of alpha(1A)- or alpha(1B)-N termini increased alpha(1D)-AR binding site density by 2- to 3-fold. Confocal microscopy showed that GFP-tagged alpha(1D)NT-B-ARs were found only on the cell surface, whereas GFP-tagged alpha(1B)NT-D-ARs were completely intracellular. Radioligand binding and confocal imaging of GFP-tagged alpha(1D)- and Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs expressed in rat aortic smooth muscle cells produced similar results, suggesting these effects are generalizable to cell types that endogenously express alpha(1D)-ARs. These findings demonstrate that the N-terminal region of alpha(1D)-ARs contain a transplantable signal that is critical for regulating formation of functional bindings, through regulating cellular localization.

Direct optical recording of intrinsic efficacy at a G protein-coupled receptor

Full and partial agonists activate receptors to varying degrees, presumably by inducing full or partial conformational changes in the receptor protein. Varying degrees of partial agonism corresponding to varying intrinsic efficacies have been demonstrated for many compounds acting at G-protein-coupled receptors, but a method to determine intrinsic efficacies directly at the receptor level has so far been lacking. Here we describe a method that allows the direct monitoring of agonist-induced conformational changes in G-protein-coupled receptors. The cyan (CFP) and yellow (YFP) variants of the green fluorescent protein were fused to the receptors. This resulted in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between the CFP- and YFP-moieties. The extent of FRET was reduced in the presence of an agonist. The FRET signal strictly followed agonist occupancy of the receptor. Using the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor as a model system, the full agonist noradrenaline produced a full signal, the partial agonist clonidine produced only a partial signal, and the antagonist phentolamine had no effect. Thus, optical recording of the agonist-induced conformational change in a G-protein-coupled receptor allows the direct analysis of the intrinsic efficacies of agonists.

Chemotaxis Receptors and Signaling

Chemotaxis is an important cellular response common in biology. In many chemotaxing cells the signal that regulates movement is initiated by G protein-coupled receptors on the cell surface that bind specific chemoattractants. These receptors share important structural similarities with other G protein-coupled receptors, including rhodopsin, which currently serves as the best starting point for modeling their structures. However, the chemotaxis receptors also share a number of relatively unique structural features that are less common in other GPCRs. The chemoattractant ligands of chemotaxis receptors exhibit a broad variety of sizes and chemical properties, ranging from small molecules and peptides to protein ligands. As a result, different chemotaxis receptors have evolved specialized mechanisms for the early steps of ligand binding and receptor activation. The mechanism of transmembrane signaling is currently under intensive study and several alternate mechanisms proposing different conformational rearrangements of the transmembrane helices have been proposed. Some chemotaxis receptors are proposed to form dimers, and in certain cases dimer formation is proposed to play a role in transmembrane signaling. In principle the structural and dynamical changes that occur during transmembrane signaling could be specialized for different receptors, or could be broadly conserved. Extensive mutagenesis studies have been carried out, and have begun to identify critical residues involved in ligand binding, receptor activation, and transmembrane signaling.

Dimers of class A G protein-coupled receptors function via agonist-mediated trans-activation of associated G proteins

The histamine H1 receptor and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor are G protein-coupled receptors that elevate intracellular [Ca2+] via activation of Gq/G11. Assessed by co-immunoprecipitation and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer they both exist as homo-dimers. The addition of the G protein G11alpha to the C terminus of these receptors did not prevent dimerization. Agonists produced a large stimulation of guanosine 5'-3-O-([35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding to receptor-G protein fusions containing wild type forms of both polypeptides. For both receptors this was abolished by incorporation of G208AG11alpha into the fusions. Mutation of a highly conserved leucine in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor also eliminated agonist function but not binding. Co-expression of the two non-functional but complementary fusion constructs reconstituted agonist-mediated binding of [35S]GTPgammaS in membranes of HEK293 cells and elevation of [Ca2+]i in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking both Gq and G11. Co-expression of the histamine H1 receptor- and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor-G11alpha fusions allowed detection of functional hetero-dimeric complexes, whereas co-expression of histamine H1 receptor-G11alpha with increasing amounts of L151Dalpha1b-adrenoreceptor resulted in decreasing levels of histamine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Co-expression of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor with a fusion protein incorporating the N-terminal domain and transmembrane helix 1 of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor and G11alpha did not result in agonist activation of the G protein but did indicate a role for transmembrane helix 1 in dimerization. These data demonstrate that dimers of these class A receptors function via trans-activation of associated G proteins.

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Dark-adapted Rhodopsin in an Explicit Membrane Bilayer: Coupling between Local Retinal and Larger Scale Conformational Change

The light-driven photocycle of rhodopsin begins the photoreceptor cascade that underlies visual response. In a sequence of events, the retinal covalently attached to the rhodopsin protein undergoes a conformational change that communicates local changes to a global conformational change throughout the whole protein. In turn, the large-scale protein change then activates G-proteins and signal amplification throughout the cell. The nature of this change, involving a coupling between a local process and larger changes throughout the protein, may be important for many membrane proteins. In addition, functional work has shown that this coupling occurs with different efficiency in different lipid settings. To begin to understand the nature of the efficiency of this coupling in different lipid settings, we present a molecular dynamics study of rhodopsin in an explicit dioleoyl-phosphatidylcholine bilayer. Our system was simulated for 40 ns and provides insights into the very early events of the visual cascade, before the full transition and activation have occurred. In particular, we see an event near 10 ns that begins with a change in hydrogen bonding near the retinal and that leads through a series of coupled changes to a shift in helical tilt. This type of event, though rare on the molecular dynamics time-scale, could be an important clue to the types of coupling that occur between local and large-scale conformational change in many membrane proteins.

Induction of pro-angiogenic signaling by a synthetic peptide derived from the second intracellular loop of S1P3 (EDG3)

The G-protein-coupled receptors of the endothelial differentiation gene (EDG) family mediate pro-angiogenic activities, such as endothelial cell proliferation, chemotaxis, and vessel morphogenesis. We synthesized and tested the effects of a 9-amino acid peptide (KRX-725), derived from the second intracellular loop of S1P3 (EDG3). KRX-725 mimics the effects of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), the natural ligand of S1P3, by triggering a Gi-dependent MEK-ERK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase) signal transduction pathway. Using aortic rings as an ex vivo model of angiogenesis, vascular sprouting was assessed in the presence of KRX-725 or S1P. KRX-725 induced extensive and dense vascular sprouts, which contain an elaborated organization of endothelial and smooth muscle layers, including lumen formation. When KRX-725 or S1P was combined with proangiogenic factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), stem cell factor, or vascular endothelial growth factor, the effect was synergistic, leading to further enhancement of vascular sprouting. KRX-725 also initiated neovascularization in a mouse corneal pocket assay in vivo and showed synergism with bFGF. The specificity of KRX-725 was demonstrated via peptide-induced receptor internalization of S1P3 but not S1P1. The ability of a short peptide to stimulate extensive angiogenesis and to synergize with pro-angiogenic factors suggests that KRX-725 may serve as a useful agent in treating pathologic conditions such as peripheral vascular disease, cardiac ischemia, or tissue grafts.

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Ligand-Induced Chemical Information Transfer in the 5-HT1A Receptor

Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of the 5-HT(1A) receptor in its empty as well as agonist- (i.e. active) and antagonist-bound (i.e. nonactive) forms have been carried out. The agonists 5-HT and (R)-8-OH-DPAT as well as the antagonist WAY100635 have been employed. The results of this study strengthen the hypothesis that the receptor portions close to the E/DRY/W motif, with prominence to the cytosolic extensions of helices 3 and 6, are particularly susceptible to undergo structural modification in response to agonist binding. Despite the differences in the structural/dynamics behavior of the two agonists when docked into the 5-HT(1A) receptor, they both exert a destabilization of the intrahelical and interhelical interactions found in the empty and antagonist-bound receptor forms between the arginine of the E/DRY sequence and both D133(3.49) and E340(6.30). For both agonists, the chemical information transfer from the extracellular to the cytosolic domains is mediated by a cluster of aromatic amino acids in helix 6, following the ligand interaction with selected amino acids in the extracellular half of the receptor, such as D116(3.32), S199(5.42), Y195(5.38), and F361(6.51). A significant reduction in the bend at P360(6.50), as compared to the empty and the antagonist-bound receptor forms, is one of the features of the agonist-bound forms that is related to the breakage of the interhelical salt bridge between the E/DRY arginine and E340(6.30). Another structural feature, shared by the agonist-bound receptor forms and not by the empty and antagonist-bound forms, is the detachment of helices 2 and 4, as marked by the movement of W161(4.50) away from helix 2, toward the membrane space.

Mutational uncoupling of alpha1A-adrenergic receptors from G proteins also uncouples mitogenic and transcriptional responses in PC12 cells

Activation of human alpha1A-adrenergic receptors in PC12 cells causes many second messenger, mitogenic, and transcriptional responses. We examined the role of G protein activation in these responses by uncoupling the receptor through deletion of the first three amino acids from the third intracellular loop (Delta208-210). Expression levels of retrovirus-transfected wild-type and Delta(208-210) alpha1A-adrenergic receptors in PC12 cells were similar and showed identical binding affinities for antagonists. However, the potency of the agonist norepinephrine was increased 9-fold by the Delta (208-210) mutation. In PC12 cells expressing the Delta (208-210) construct, calcium and inositol phosphate responses to norepinephrine were essentially abolished. The strong activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways seen upon stimulation of wild-type alpha1A-adrenergic receptors in PC12 cells was abolished by the Delta (208-210) mutation, as was activation of the tyrosine kinase Pyk2. Norepinephrine also activates several transcriptional reporters through alpha1A-adrenergic receptors in PC12 cells, including reporters for activator protein 1, serum response element, cAMP response element, nuclear factor-kappaB, nuclear factor of activated T cells, gamma-interferon-activated sequence, and signal transducer and activator of transcription. All these transcriptional responses were abolished by the Delta (208-210) mutation. Overexpression of Galpha16 did not rescue any of these responses. These data suggest that known second messenger, mitogenic, and transcriptional effects of alpha1A-adrenergic receptors in PC12 cells all require G protein activation.