The superagonistic activity of bovine thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and the human TR1401 TSH analog is determined by specific amino acids in the hinge region of the human TSH receptor

Characterization of a human thyroid microtissue model for testing thyroid disrupting chemicals

Perturbation of thyroid hormone (T4) synthesis is known to cause numerous developmental, metabolic, and cognitive disorders in humans. Due to species differences in sensitivity to chemical exposures, there is a need for human-based in vitro approaches that recapitulate thyroid cellular architecture and T4 production when screening. To address these limitations, primary human thyrocytes, isolated from healthy adult donor tissues and cryopreserved at passage one (p'1) were characterized for cellular composition, 3D follicular architecture, and thyroglobulin (TG)/T4 expression and inhibition by prototype thyroid disrupting chemicals (TDC). Flow analysis of the post-thaw cell suspension showed >80% EpCAM-positive cells with 10%-50% CD90-positive cells. When seeded onto 96-well Matrigel®-coated plates and treated with bovine thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), thyrocytes formed 3D microtissues during the initial 4-5 days of culture. The microtissues exhibited a stable morphology and size over a 14-day culture period. TG and T4 production were highest in microtissues when the proportion of CD90-positive cells, seeding density and thyroid stimulating hormone concentrations were between 10%-30%, 6K-12K cells per well, and 0.03-1 mIU/mL, respectively. At maximal TG and T4 production levels, average microtissue diameters ranged between 50 and 200 µm. The T4 IC50 values for two prototype TPO inhibitors, 6-propyl-2-thiouracil and methimazole, were ∼0.7 µM and ∼0.5 µM, respectively, in microtissue cultures treated between days 9 and 14. Overall, p'1 cryopreserved primary human thyrocytes in 3D microtissue culture represent a promising new model system to prioritize potential TDC acting directly on the thyroid as part of a weight-of-evidence hazard characterization.

Obesity and Thyroid Axis

Development of obesity is primarily the result of imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure. Thyroid hormones influence energy expenditure by regulating cellular respiration and thermogenesis and by determining resting metabolic rate. Triiodothyronine influences lipid turnover in adipocytes and impacts appetite regulation through the central nervous system, mainly the hypothalamus. Thyroid-stimulating hormone may also influence thermogenesis, suppress appetite and regulate lipid storage through lipolysis and lipogenesis control. Subclinical hypothyroidism may induce changes in basal metabolic rate with subsequent increase in BMI, but obesity can also affect thyroid function via several mechanisms such as lipotoxicity and changes in adipokines and inflammatory cytokine secretion. The present study investigated the complex and mutual relationships between the thyroid axis and adiposity.

The intramolecular agonist is obligate for activation of glycoprotein hormone receptors

In contrast to most rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors, the glycoprotein hormone receptors (GPHR) have a large extracellular N-terminus for hormone binding. The hormones do not directly activate the transmembrane domain but mediate their action via a, thus, far only partially known Tethered Agonistic LIgand (TALI). The existence of such an intramolecular agonist was initially indicated by site-directed mutation studies and activating peptides derived from the extracellular hinge region. It is still unknown precisely how TALI is involved in intramolecular signal transmission. We combined systematic mutagenesis studies at the luteinizing hormone receptor and the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), stimulation with a drug-like agonist (E2) of the TSHR, and structural homology modeling to unravel the functional and structural properties defining the TALI region. Here, we report that TALI (a) is predisposed to constitutively activate GPHR, (b) can by itself rearrange GPHR into a fully active conformation, (c) stabilizes active GPHR conformation, and (d) is not involved in activation of the TSHR by E2. In the active state conformation, TALI forms specific interactions between the N-terminus and the transmembrane domain. We show that stabilization of an active state is dependent on TALI, including activation by hormones and constitutively activating mutations.

TSHR Signaling Stimulates Proliferation Through PI3K/Akt and Induction of miR-146a and miR-155 in Thyroid Eye Disease Orbital Fibroblasts

Purpose

To investigate the molecular pathways that drive thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR)–induced cellular proliferation in orbital fibroblasts (OFs) from thyroid eye disease (TED) patients.

Methods

Orbital fibroblasts from TED and non-TED patients were treated with TSH and changes in gene expression and proliferation were measured. To determine the role of TSHR, TSHR-specific siRNA was used to deplete TSHR levels. Proliferation was measured by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. PI3K/Akt activation was analyzed by Western blot. The PI3K inhibitor LY294002 was used to investigate PI3K/Akt signaling in OF proliferation. Expression of TSHR, inflammatory cytokines, proliferation related genes and miR-146a and miR-155 were measured by qPCR.

Results

Orbital fibroblasts from TED patients proliferate significantly more than non-TED OFs in response to TSH. TSH-induced proliferation was dependent upon TSHR expression and required the PI3K/Akt signaling cascade. TSHR activation stimulated miR-146a and miR-155 expression. TED OFs produced significantly more miR-146a and miR-155 than non-TED OFs. MiR-146a and miR-155 targets, ZNRF3 and PTEN, which both limit cell proliferation, were decreased in TSH treated OFs.

Conclusions

These data reveal that TSHR signaling in TED OFs stimulates proliferation directly through PI3K/Akt signaling and indirectly through induction of miR-146a and miR-155. MiR-146a and miR-155 enhance TED OF proliferation by reducing expression of target genes that normally block cell proliferation. TSHR-dependent expression of miR-146a and miR-155 may explain part of the fibroproliferative pathology observed in TED.

Thyrotropin Causes Dose-dependent Biphasic Regulation of cAMP Production Mediated by Gs and Gi/o Proteins

The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor (TSHR) signals via G proteins of all four classes and β-arrestin 1. Stimulation of TSHR leads to increasing cAMP production that has been reported as a monotonic dose-response curve that plateaus at high TSH doses. In HEK 293 cells overexpressing TSHRs (HEK-TSHR cells), we found that TSHR activation exhibits an "inverted U-shaped dose-response curve" with increasing cAMP production at low doses of TSH and decreased cAMP production at high doses (>1 mU/ml). Since protein kinase A inhibition by H-89 and knockdown of β-arrestin 1 or β-arrestin 2 did not affect the decreased cAMP production at high TSH doses, we studied the roles of TSHR downregulation and of Gi/Go proteins. A high TSH dose (100 mU/ml) caused a 33% decrease in cell-surface TSHR. However, because inhibiting TSHR downregulation with combined expression of a dominant negative dynamin 1 and β-arrestin 2 knockdown had no effect, we concluded that downregulation is not involved in the biphasic cAMP response. Pertussis toxin, which inhibits activation of Gi/Go, abolished the biphasic response with no statistically significant difference in cAMP levels at 1 and 100 mU/ml TSH. Concordantly, co-knockdown of Gi/Go proteins increased cAMP levels stimulated by 100 mU/ml TSH from 55% to 73% of the peak level. These data show that biphasic regulation of cAMP production is mediated by Gs and Gi/Go at low and high TSH doses, respectively, which may represent a mechanism to prevent overstimulation in TSHR-expressing cells. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We demonstrate biphasic regulation of TSH-mediated cAMP production involving coupling of the TSH receptor (TSHR) to Gs at low TSH doses and to Gi/o at high TSH doses. We suggest that this biphasic cAMP response allows the TSHR to mediate responses at lower levels of TSH and that decreased cAMP production at high doses may represent a mechanism to prevent overstimulation of TSHR-expressing cells. This mechanism could prevent chronic stimulation of thyroid gland function.

Structural-Functional Features of the Thyrotropin Receptor: A Class A G-Protein-Coupled Receptor at Work

The thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) is a member of the glycoprotein hormone receptors, a sub-group of class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). TSHR and its endogenous ligand thyrotropin (TSH) are of essential importance for growth and function of the thyroid gland and proper function of the TSH/TSHR system is pivotal for production and release of thyroid hormones. This receptor is also important with respect to pathophysiology, such as autoimmune (including ophthalmopathy) or non-autoimmune thyroid dysfunctions and cancer development. Pharmacological interventions directly targeting the TSHR should provide benefits to disease treatment compared to currently available therapies of dysfunctions associated with the TSHR or the thyroid gland. Upon TSHR activation, the molecular events conveying conformational changes from the extra- to the intracellular side of the cell across the membrane comprise reception, conversion, and amplification of the signal. These steps are highly dependent on structural features of this receptor and its intermolecular interaction partners, e.g., TSH, antibodies, small molecules, G-proteins, or arrestin. For better understanding of signal transduction, pathogenic mechanisms such as autoantibody action and mutational modifications or for developing new pharmacological strategies, it is essential to combine available structural data with functional information to generate homology models of the entire receptor. Although so far these insights are fragmental, in the past few decades essential contributions have been made to investigate in-depth the involved determinants, such as by structure determination via X-ray crystallography. This review summarizes available knowledge (as of December 2016) concerning the TSHR protein structure, associated functional aspects, and based on these insights we suggest several receptor complex models. Moreover, distinct TSHR properties will be highlighted in comparison to other class A GPCRs to understand the molecular activation mechanisms of this receptor comprehensively. Finally, limitations of current knowledge and lack of information are discussed highlighting the need for intensified efforts toward TSHR structure elucidation.

Rearrangement of the Extracellular Domain/Extracellular Loop 1 Interface Is Critical for Thyrotropin Receptor Activation

The thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with a characteristic large extracellular domain (ECD). TSHR activation is initiated by binding of the hormone ligand TSH to the ECD. How the extracellular binding event triggers the conformational changes in the transmembrane domain (TMD) necessary for intracellular G protein activation is poorly understood. To gain insight in this process, the knowledge on the relative positioning of ECD and TMD and the conformation of the linker region at the interface of ECD and TMD are of particular importance. To generate a structural model for the TSHR we applied an integrated structural biology approach combining computational techniques with experimental data. Chemical cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry yielded 17 unique distance restraints within the ECD of the TSHR, its ligand TSH, and the hormone-receptor complex. These structural restraints generally confirm the expected binding mode of TSH to the ECD as well as the general fold of the domains and were used to guide homology modeling of the ECD. Functional characterization of TSHR mutants confirms the previously suggested close proximity of Ser-281 and Ile-486 within the TSHR. Rigidifying this contact permanently with a disulfide bridge disrupts ligand-induced receptor activation and indicates that rearrangement of the ECD/extracellular loop 1 (ECL1) interface is a critical step in receptor activation. The experimentally verified contact of Ser-281 (ECD) and Ile-486 (TMD) was subsequently utilized in docking homology models of the ECD and the TMD to create a full-length model of a glycoprotein hormone receptor.

Synthetic gene network restoring endogenous pituitary-thyroid feedback control in experimental Graves' disease

Graves' disease is an autoimmune disorder that causes hyperthyroidism because of autoantibodies that bind to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) on the thyroid gland, triggering thyroid hormone release. The physiological control of thyroid hormone homeostasis by the feedback loops involving the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis is disrupted by these stimulating autoantibodies. To reset the endogenous thyrotrophic feedback control, we designed a synthetic mammalian gene circuit that maintains thyroid hormone homeostasis by monitoring thyroid hormone levels and coordinating the expression of a thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antagonist (TSHAntag), which competitively inhibits the binding of thyroid-stimulating hormone or the human autoantibody to TSHR. This synthetic control device consists of a synthetic thyroid-sensing receptor (TSR), a yeast Gal4 protein/human thyroid receptor-α fusion, which reversibly triggers expression of the TSHAntag gene from TSR-dependent promoters. In hyperthyroid mice, this synthetic circuit sensed pathological thyroid hormone levels and restored the thyrotrophic feedback control of the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis to euthyroid hormone levels. Therapeutic plug and play gene circuits that restore physiological feedback control in metabolic disorders foster advanced gene- and cell-based therapies.

Targeting the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor with small molecule ligands and antibodies

INTRODUCTION

The thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) is the essential molecule for thyroid growth and thyroid hormone production. Since it is also a key autoantigen in Graves' disease and is involved in thyroid cancer pathophysiology, the targeting of the TSHR offers a logical model for disease control.

AREAS COVERED

We review the structure and function of the TSHR and the progress in both small molecule ligands and TSHR antibodies for their therapeutic potential.

EXPERT OPINION

Stabilization of a preferential conformation for the TSHR by allosteric ligands and TSHR antibodies with selective modulation of the signaling pathways is now possible. These tools may be the next generation of therapeutics for controlling the pathophysiological consequences mediated by the effects of the TSHR in the thyroid and other extrathyroidal tissues.

Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor's Extracellular Hinge Region

The human lutropin (hLH)/choriogonadotropin (hCG) receptor (LHCGR) can be activated by binding two slightly different gonadotropic glycoprotein hormones, choriogonadotropin (CG) - secreted by the placenta, and lutropin (LH) - produced by the pituitary. They induce different signaling profiles at the LHCGR. This cannot be explained by binding to the receptor's leucine-rich-repeat domain (LRRD), as this binding is similar for the two hormones. We therefore speculate that there are previously unknown differences in the hormone/receptor interaction at the extracellular hinge region, which might help to understand functional differences between the two hormones. We have therefore performed a detailed study of the binding and action of LH and CG at the LHCGR hinge region. We focused on a primate-specific additional exon in the hinge region, which is located between LRRD and the serpentine domain. The segment of the hinge region encoded by exon10 was previously reported to be only relevant to hLH signaling, as the exon10-deletion receptor exhibits decreased hLH signaling, but unchanged hCG signaling. We designed an advanced homology model of the hormone/LHCGR complex, followed by experimental characterization of relevant fragments in the hinge region. In addition, we examined predictions of a helical exon10-encoded conformation by block-wise polyalanine (helix supporting) mutations. These helix preserving modifications showed no effect on hormone-induced signaling. However, introduction of a structure-disturbing double-proline mutant LHCGR-Q303P/E305P within the exon10-helix has, in contrast to exon10-deletion, no impact on hLH, but only on hCG signaling. This opposite effect on signaling by hLH and hCG can be explained by distinct sites of hormone interaction in the hinge region. In conclusion, our analysis provides details of the differences between hLH- and hCG-induced signaling that are mainly determined in the L2-beta loop of the hormones and in the hinge region of the receptor.

New Frontier in Glycoprotein Hormones and Their Receptors Structure-Function

Last two decades of structure-function studies performed in numerous laboratories provided substantial progress in understanding basic science, physiological, pathophysiological, pharmacological, and comparative aspects of glycoprotein hormones (GPHs) and their cognate receptors. Multiple concepts and models developed based on experimental data in the past stood the test of time and have been, at least in part, confirmed and/or remained compatible with the new structures resolved at the atomic level. Major advances in understanding of the ligand-receptor relationships are heralding the dawn of a new era for GPHs and their receptors, although many basic questions still remain unanswered. This article examines retrospectively several basic science aspects of GPH super-agonists and related "biosuperiors" in a broader context of the advances in the ligand-receptor structure-function relationships and new mechanistic models generated based on the structure elucidation. Due to selective focus of my comments and perspectives in certain parts, the reader is directed to the most relevant publications and reviews in the field for more comprehensive analyses.

Influence of the hinge region and its adjacent domains on binding and signaling patterns of the thyrotropin and follitropin receptor

Glycoprotein hormone receptors (GPHR) have a large extracellular domain (ECD) divided into the leucine rich repeat (LRR) domain for binding of the glycoprotein hormones and the hinge region (HinR), which connects the LRR domain with the transmembrane domain (TMD). Understanding of the activation mechanism of GPHRs is hindered by the unknown interaction of the ECD with the TMD and the structural changes upon ligand binding responsible for receptor activation. Recently, our group showed that the HinR of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) can be replaced by those of the follitropin (FSHR) and lutropin receptor (LHCGR) without effects on surface expression and hTSH signaling. However, differences in binding characteristics for bovine TSH at the various HinRs were obvious. To gain further insights into the interplay between LRR domain, HinR and TMD we generated chimeras between the TSHR and FSHR. Our results obtained by the determination of cell surface expression, ligand binding and G protein activation confirm the similar characteristics of GPHR HinRs but they also demonstrate an involvement of the HinR in ligand selectivity indicated by the observed promiscuity of some chimeras. While the TSHR HinR contributes to specific binding of TSH and its variants, no such contribution is observed for FSH and its analog TR4401 at the HinR of the FSHR. Furthermore, the charge distribution at the poorly characterized LRR domain/HinR transition affected ligand binding and signaling even though this area is not in direct contact with the ligand. In addition our results also demonstrate the importance of the TMD/HinR interface. Especially the combination of the TSHR HinR with the FSHR-TMD resulted in a loss of cell surface expression of the respective chimeras. In conclusion, the HinRs of GPHRs do not only share similar characteristics but also behave as ligand specific structural and functional entities.

(99m)Tc-labeled-rhTSH analogue (TR1401) for imaging poorly differentiated metastatic thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

Differentiated thyroid carcinomas originating from thyroid follicular cells are frequent tumors of the thyroid with relatively good prognosis due to improved surgical techniques and follow-up procedures. Poorly differentiated thyroid cancers, which lose iodine uptake ability, in most cases still express thyrotropin (TSH) receptors (TSHR). Therefore, the aim of this study was to radiolabel a superagonist recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) analogue for imaging poorly differentiated thyroid cancer.

METHODS

The TSHR superagonist, TR1401, was labeled with (99m)Tc using an indirect method via succinimidyl-6-hydrazinonicotinate hydrochloride conjugation. In vitro quality controls included SDS-PAGE, cysteine challenge, and cell-binding assay on TSHR positive cell lines (JP09 and ML-1). In vivo studies included tumor targeting experiments in athymic nude CD-1 mice xenografted with several different TSHR positive cells (JP09, K1, and ML-1) and TSHR negative cells (JP02) as control.

RESULTS

The superagonist rhTSH analogue TR1401 was labeled with high labeling efficiency (>95%) and high specific activity (9250 MBq/mg). The labeled molecule retained its biologic activity and structural integrity. In tumor targeting experiments, a focal uptake of radiolabeled TR1401 was observed in TSHR positive cells but not in TSHR negative cells. The same observation was made in a dog with spontaneous intraglandular thyroid cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to radiolabel the rhTSH superagonist analogue TR1401 with (99m)Tc efficiently with retention of in vitro and in vivo binding capacity to TSHR. The relative role of such novel radiopharmaceutical versus (131)I scanning of thyroid cancer will require future histopathologic and clinical studies, but it may open new perspectives for presurgical staging of thyroid cancer, and diagnosis of radioiodine negative local relapses and/or distant metastases.

Novel insights on thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor signal transduction

The TSH receptor (TSHR) is a member of the glycoprotein hormone receptors, a subfamily of family A G protein-coupled receptors. The TSHR is of great importance for the growth and function of the thyroid gland. The TSHR and its endogenous ligand TSH are pivotal proteins with respect to a variety of physiological functions and malfunctions. The molecular events of TSHR regulation can be summarized as a process of signal transduction, including signal reception, conversion, and amplification. The steps during signal transduction from the extra- to the intracellular sites of the cell are not yet comprehensively understood. However, essential new insights have been achieved in recent years on the interrelated mechanisms at the extracellular region, the transmembrane domain, and intracellular components. This review contains a critical summary of available knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of signal transduction at the TSHR, for example, the key amino acids involved in hormone binding or in the structural conformational changes that lead to G protein activation or signaling regulation. Aspects of TSHR oligomerization, signaling promiscuity, signaling selectivity, phenotypes of genetic variations, and potential extrathyroidal receptor activity are also considered, because these are relevant to an understanding of the overall function of the TSHR, including physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological perspectives. Directions for future research are discussed.

Research resource: novel structural insights bridge gaps in glycoprotein hormone receptor analyses

The first version of a glycoprotein hormone receptor (GPHR) information resource was designed to link functional with structural GPHR information, in order to support sequence-structure-function analysis of the LH, FSH, and TSH receptors (http://ssfa-gphr.de). However, structural information on a binding- and signaling-sensitive extracellular fragment (∼100 residues), the hinge region, had been lacking. A new FSHR crystal structure of the hormone-bound extracellular domain has recently been solved. The structure comprises the leucine-rich repeat domain and most parts of the hinge region. We have not only integrated the new FSHR/FSH structure and the derived homology models of TSHR/TSH, LHCGR/CG, and LHCGR/LH into our web-based information resource, but have additionally provided novel tools to analyze the advanced structural features, with the common characteristics and distinctions between GPHRs, in a more precise manner. The hinge region with its second hormone-binding site allows us to assign functional data to the new structural features between hormone and receptor, such as binding details of a sulfated tyrosine (conserved throughout the GPHRs) extending into a pocket of the hormone. We have also implemented a protein interface analysis tool that enables the identification and visualization of extracellular contact points between interaction partners. This provides a starting point for comparing the binding patterns of GPHRs. Together with the mutagenesis data stored in the database, this will help to decipher the essential residues for ligand recognition and the molecular mechanisms of signal transduction, extending from the extracellular hormone-binding site toward the intracellular G protein-binding sites.

Blocking type TSH receptor antibodies

TSH receptor (TSHR) autoantibodies (TRAbs) play a key role in the pathogenesis of Graves' disease. In the majority of patients, TRAbs stimulate thyroid hormone synthesis via activation of the TSHR (stimulating TRAbs, TSHR agonists). In some patients, TRAbs bind to the receptor but do not cause activation (blocking TRAbs, TSHR antagonists). Isolation of human TSHR monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) with either stimulating (M22 and K1-18) or blocking activities (5C9 and K1-70) has been a major advance in studies on the TSHR. The binding characteristics of the blocking MAbs, their interaction with the TSHR and their effect on TSHR constitutive activity are summarised in this review. In addition, the binding arrangement in the crystal structures of the TSHR in complex with the blocking MAb K1-70 and with the stimulating MAb M22 (2.55 Å and 1.9 Å resolution, respectively) are compared. The stimulating effect of M22 and the inhibiting effect of K1-70 on thyroid hormone secretion in vivo is discussed. Furthermore the ability of K1-70 to inhibit the thyroid stimulating activity of M22 in vivo is shown. Human MAbs which act as TSHR antagonists are potentially important new therapeutics. For example, in Graves' disease, K1-70 may well be effective in controlling hyperthyroidism and the eye signs caused by stimulating TRAb. In addition, hyperthyroidism caused by autonomous TSH secretion should be treatable by K1-70, and 5C9 has the potential to control hyperthyroidism associated with TSHR activating mutations. Furthermore, K1-70 has potential applications in thyroid imaging as well as targeted drug delivery to TSHR expressing tissues.

Extended and structurally supported insights into extracellular hormone binding, signal transduction and organization of the thyrotropin receptor

The hormone thyrotropin (TSH) and its receptor (TSHR) are crucial for the growth and function of the thyroid gland. The TSHR is evolutionary linked with the receptors of follitropin (FSHR) and lutropin/choriogonadotropin (LHR) and their sequences and structures are similar. The extracellular region of TSHR contains more than 350 amino acids and binds hormone and antibodies. Several important questions related to functions and mechanisms of TSHR are still not comprehensively understood. One major reason for these open questions is the lack of any structural information about the extracellular segment of TSHR that connects the N-terminal leucine-rich repeat domain (LRRD) with the transmembrane helix (TMH) 1, the hinge region. It has been shown experimentally that this segment is important for fine tuning of signaling and ligand interactions. A new crystal structure containing most of the extracellular hFSHR region in complex with hFSH has recently been published. Now, we have applied these new structural insights to the homologous TSHR and have generated a structural model of the TSHR LRRD/hinge-region/TSH complex. This structural model is combined and evaluated with experimental data including hormone binding (bTSH, hTSH, thyrostimulin), super-agonistic effects, antibody interactions and signaling regulation. These studies and consideration of significant and non-significant amino acids have led to a new description of mechanisms at the TSHR, including ligand-induced displacements of specific hinge region fragments. This event triggers conformational changes at a convergent center of the LRRD and the hinge region, activating an “intramolecular agonistic unit” close to the transmembrane domain.

The thyrotropin receptor hinge region as a surrogate ligand: identification of loci contributing to the coupling of thyrotropin binding and receptor activation

The TSH receptor (TSHR) hinge region, the least well understood component, bridges the leucine-rich repeat and transmembrane domains. We report data on clusters of hinge charged residues the mutation of which to Ala is compatible with cell surface expression and normal, or near normal, TSH binding affinity yet with a relative reduction in receptor activation. Mutation to Ala of E409 at the junction with the transmembrane domain was the most potent in uncoupling TSH binding and signal transduction (~22-fold less sensitive than the wild-type TSHR) and was unique among the residues studied in reducing both the amplitude and the sensitivity of the ligand-induced signal. Unexpectedly, a dual E409A/D410A mutation partially corrected the major suppressive effect of TSHR-E409A. The combined Ala substitution of a cluster of positively charged hinge residues (K287, K290, K291, R293; termed "K3R1") synergistically reduced sensitivity to TSH stimulation approximately 21-fold without altering the TSH binding affinity. Simultaneous Ala substitutions of a cluster of acidic hinge residues D392, E394, and D395 (termed "DE392-5A") partially uncoupled TSH binding from signal transduction (4.4-fold reduction in sensitivity), less than for E409A and K3R1A. Remarkably, the combination of the K3R1A and DE392-5A mutations was not additive but ameliorated the major uncoupling effect of K3R1A. This lack of additivity suggests that these two clusters contribute to a common signaling pathway. In summary, we identify several TSHR hinge residues involved in signal transmission. Our data support the concept that the hinge regions of the TSHR (and other glycoprotein hormone receptors) act as surrogate ligands for receptor activation.

Antibody protection reveals extended epitopes on the human TSH receptor

Stimulating, and some blocking, antibodies to the TSH receptor (TSHR) have conformation-dependent epitopes reported to involve primarily the leucine rich repeat region of the ectodomain (LRD). However, successful crystallization of TSHR residues 22-260 has omitted important extracellular non-LRD residues including the hinge region which connects the TSHR ectodomain to the transmembrane domain and which is involved in ligand induced signal transduction. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to determine if TSHR antibodies (TSHR-Abs) have non-LRD binding sites outside the LRD. To obtain this information we employed the method of epitope protection in which we first protected TSHR residues 1-412 with intact TSHR antibodies and then enzymatically digested the unprotected residues. Those peptides remaining were subsequently delineated by mass spectrometry. Fourteen out of 23 of the reported stimulating monoclonal TSHR-Ab crystal contact residues were protected by this technique which may reflect the higher binding energies of certain residues detected in this approach. Comparing the protected epitopes of two stimulating TSHR-Abs we found both similarities and differences but both antibodies also contacted the hinge region and the amino terminus of the TSHR following the signal peptide and encompassing cysteine box 1 which has previously been shown to be important for TSH binding and activation. A monoclonal blocking TSHR antibody revealed a similar pattern of binding regions but the residues that it contacted on the LRD were again distinct. These data demonstrated that conformationally dependent TSHR-Abs had epitopes not confined to the LRDs but also incorporated epitopes not revealed in the available crystal structure. Furthermore, the data also indicated that in addition to overlapping contact regions within the LRD, there are unique epitope patterns for each of the antibodies which may contribute to their functional heterogeneity.

The hinge region of human thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor operates as a tunable switch between hormone binding and receptor activation

The mechanism by which the hinge regions of glycoprotein hormone receptors couple hormone binding to activation of downstream effecters is not clearly understood. In the present study, agonistic (311.62) and antagonistic (311.87) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against the TSH receptor extracellular domain were used to elucidate role of the hinge region in receptor activation. MAb 311.62 which identifies the LRR/Cb-2 junction (aa 265–275), increased the affinity of TSHR for the hormone while concomitantly decreasing its efficacy, whereas MAb 311.87 recognizing LRR 7–9 (aa 201–259) acted as a non-competitive inhibitor of Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) binding. Binding of MAbs was sensitive to the conformational changes caused by the activating and inactivating mutations and exhibited differential effects on hormone binding and response of these mutants. By studying the effects of these MAbs on truncation and chimeric mutants of thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), this study confirms the tethered inverse agonistic role played by the hinge region and maps the interactions between TSHR hinge region and exoloops responsible for maintenance of the receptor in its basal state. Mechanistic studies on the antibody-receptor interactions suggest that MAb 311.87 is an allosteric insurmountable antagonist and inhibits initiation of the hormone induced conformational changes in the hinge region, whereas MAb 311.62 acts as a partial agonist that recognizes a conformational epitope critical for coupling of hormone binding to receptor activation. The hinge region, probably in close proximity with the α-subunit in the hormone-receptor complex, acts as a tunable switch between hormone binding and receptor activation.

Immunopathogenesis of Graves' ophthalmopathy: the role of the TSH receptor

Graves' ophthalmopathy is an inflammatory autoimmune disorder of the orbit. The close clinical and temporal relationships between Graves' hyperthyroidism and ophthalmopathy have long suggested that both conditions derive from a single systemic process and share the thyrotropin receptor as a common autoantigen. This receptor is expressed not only in thyroid follicular cells, but also in orbital fibroblasts with higher levels measured in orbital cells from ophthalmopathy patients than in cells from normal individuals. Recent studies from several laboratories have shown that thyrotropin receptor activation in orbital fibroblasts enhances hyaluronic acid synthesis and adipogenesis, both cellular functions that appear to be upregulated in the diseased orbit. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling cascade, along with other effector pathways including adenylyl cyclase/cAMP, appears to mediate these processes. Future therapies for this condition may involve inhibition of thyrotropin receptor signaling in orbital fibroblasts.

Thyrotropic activity of recombinant human glycoprotein hormone analogs and pituitary mammalian gonadotropins in goldfish (Carassius auratus): insights into the evolution of thyrotropin receptor specificity

Thyrotropin (TSH) is a pituitary glycoprotein hormone heterodimer that binds to its G-protein coupled receptor (TSH-R) at the thyroid to promote the synthesis and secretion of thyroid hormone. Very little is known about TSH-TSH-R interactions in teleost fish. Mammalian gonadotropins have been reported to have an intrinsic ability to activate teleost fish TSH-Rs, suggesting the TSH-R in teleost fish is more promiscuous than in other vertebrates. In this study we utilized the goldfish T(4)-release response and recombinant human TSH analogs as in vivo tools to evaluate the structural constraints on hormone-receptor interactions. We found that four positively charged lysines substituted for neutral or negatively charged amino acids within positions 11-20 of the glycoprotein hormone subunit α (GSUα) significantly increased biological activity of hTSH in fish, as it does in mammals. We further found that bovine follicle stimulating hormone but not luteinizing hormone, whose GSUα subunits also contain four lysine or arginine amino acid residues in the N-terminal portion of GSUα, was thyrotropic in goldfish, suggesting gonadotropin β subunit contributes to the heterothyrotropic activity. Though recombinant human FSH did not produce a dose-dependent increase in T(4), thyrotropic activity could be acquired with the addition of positively charged amino acids at the N-terminal portion of its GSUα, confirming the importance of the charge on those amino acids for activation of the goldfish TSH-R. These studies demonstrate that mammalian glycoprotein hormone analogs can be utilized to evaluate the conservation of receptor binding and activation mechanisms between fish and mammals.

A stimulatory thyrotropin receptor antibody enhances hyaluronic acid synthesis in graves' orbital fibroblasts: inhibition by an IGF-I receptor blocking antibody

CONTEXT

Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) is characterized by expanded volume of the orbital fat and extraocular muscle tissues and elevated levels of TSH receptor autoantibodies (TRAb). The expansion of orbital tissues involves accumulation of hyaluronic acid (HA) within the orbit.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether a monoclonal stimulatory TRAb (M22) impacts HA synthesis in GO orbital cells and, if so, whether this might be blocked by an IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR)-blocking antibody (1H7) or inhibitors of various downstream signaling cascades.

DESIGN

GO orbital fibroblast cultures (n = 6) were treated with M22, bovine TSH (bTSH), or IGF-I in serum-free medium. Some cultures also received 1H7, LY294002, rapamycin, or protein kinase A inhibitor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

HA production and phosphorylated Akt levels in media or immunoblotting for phosphorylated Akt were measured.

RESULTS

M22 or bTSH stimulated HA synthesis (2.1-fold with 100 ng/ml M22 and 1.9-fold with 10 U/liter bTSH; P < 0.05 each). M22-induced HA synthesis was inhibited by LY294002 or rapamycin but not by protein kinase inhibitor. HA synthesis stimulated by M22 or IGF-I was inhibited by 1H7 (mean 36.6 ± 5.6% and mean 45.8 ± 7.6%, respectively; P < 0.05 each). Similarly, M22- or IGF-I-stimulated Akt phosphorylation was inhibited by 1H7 (mean 54 ± 9.6 and 36.1 ± 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.01 each).

CONCLUSIONS

The stimulatory TRAb M22 increases HA production in undifferentiated GO orbital fibroblasts via phosphoinositide 3-kinase/phosphorylated AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin activation. Blockade of IGF-IR inhibits both HA synthesis and Akt phosphorylation induced by M22 or IGF-I in these cells, suggesting that TSH receptor and IGF-IR signaling may be closely linked in the GO orbit.

The hinge region of the TSH receptor stabilizes ligand binding and determines different signaling profiles of human and bovine TSH

The hinge region (HinR) is a variable structure of glycoprotein hormone receptors. Its amino acid composition and length is different for glycoprotein hormone receptors and connects the ligand binding domain with the serpentine domain. The role of the HinR of the receptors for TSH, follitropin (FSH), and LH/choriogonadotropin (LHCG) in receptor and signaling specificity is unknown. To investigate the role of the HinR for ligand binding, signal generation, and for the transmission of the signal towards the serpentine domain, we replaced the HinR of the TSH receptor (TSHR) by those of LHCG receptor and FSH receptor and introduced constitutively activating mutations and one mutation deficient for bovine (b)TSH binding in these chimeras. Functional characterization of the TSHR variants was carried out after transient transfection of COS-7 cells by determination of the cell surface expression, ligand binding, and recombinant human (rh)TSH or bTSH activation of second messengers. We show that the HinR of the TSHR stabilizes hormone binding regarding ligand affinity and retention time of the bound ligand as determined by dissociation experiments. Introduction of a constitutively activating extracellular loop mutation in these constructs lead to partially restored binding patterns. These findings indicate that the HinR-extracellular loop interface is besides signaling also important for bTSH binding. Furthermore, data for G protein signaling reveal that the activity of bTSH, but not of rhTSH, depends on the TSHR HinR, which was indicated by a significant right shift in the dose-response curves for G(s) and G(q) activation for TSHR chimeras harboring the LHCG receptor and FSH receptor HinR, respectively. Moreover, we identified different G protein signaling profiles for bTSH and rhTSH, which cannot be explained by the characterized HinR. For future studies regarding structure and function of the TSHR, it will be necessary to characterize TSHR variants with both or more ligands.

Identification of novel TSH interaction sites by systematic binding analysis of the TSHR hinge region

In which ways the binding of the thyroid stimulating hormone to the extracellular domain of its receptor leads to activation of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) is currently only incompletely understood. It is known that TSH binding to the TSHR depends on the interaction with the leucine-rich repeat and sulfation at Y385 of the hinge region. Recently it was also shown that electrostatic interactions between positive charges of bovine (b) TSH and the residues E297, E303, and D382 of the hinge region contribute to hormone-TSHR binding. After the identification of these first TSH binding sites in the hinge region, it was apparent that multiple positions in this region remained to be characterized for their roles in hormone binding. The goal of this study was therefore to clarify whether further contact points of TSH exist in the structurally undefined hinge region. Therefore, we systematically analyzed 41 uncharacterized residues of the TSHR hinge region as single mutants regarding differences between cell surface expression and bTSH binding. Indeed, we identified further amino acids of the hinge region with influence on bTSH binding. Some of these contribute to a new binding domain from human TSHR position F381 to D386. These hinge mutants with influence on bTSH binding were also analyzed for binding of the superagonistic human TSH analog TR1401 demonstrating that these positions also have an impact on TR1401 binding. Moreover, side chain variations revealed that different amino acid properties like the negative charge, aromatic as well as hydrophilic characteristics, contribute to maintain the hormone-TSHR hinge interaction.

Effects of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone superagonists on thyroidal uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and radioiodide

BACKGROUND

Superagonist analogs of human thyroid-stimulating hormone (hTSH) may stimulate the uptake of (131)I-iodide and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) in thyroid carcinomas to a greater degree than hTSH. We herein report the potency and efficacy of two hTSH analogs, TR1401 and TR1402, to stimulate radioiodide and (18)F-FDG uptake in FRTL-5 cells and compared the effects of hTSH and TR1401 on radioiodide uptake in the thyroid in vivo in mice.

METHODS

The effects of hTSH analogs on intracellular levels of cAMP, uptake of (131)I-iodide, and (18)F-FDG were studied in FRTL-5 cells to determine the stimulatory potency and efficacy of the compounds by calculating half-maximum effective concentration (EC(50)) values and maximal stimulatory effects (E(max)). Biodistribution studies (n = 96) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging studies (single animals) on thyroid (125)I/(124)I-iodide uptake were performed with T3-suppressed CD-1 mice in a dose-dependent manner (3, 10, and 30 μg/animal).

RESULTS

The EC(50) values of TR1401 and TR1402 demonstrated a 90-fold or 800-fold higher potency for their capacity to increase intracellular cAMP levels in comparison with hTSH (p < 0.05). Similar results were demonstrated for the stimulation of (18)F-FDG uptake. Bovine TSH, TR1401, and TR1402 were 85%-490% more potent to increase iodide uptake than hTSH (p < 0.05). TR1402 was 30% more efficacious to stimulate iodide uptake than hTSH. The agonist-induced increase in radiotracer uptake was paralleled by increases in NIS and GLUT-1 expression. Ex vivo biodistribution studies showed an increased iodide uptake in the thyroid of TR1401-treated mice at the low dose of 3 μg/animal in comparison with hTSH-treated mice (n = 16, p < 0.05). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging studies confirmed the increased thyroidal iodide uptake in TR1401-treated mice in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

TR1401 and TR1402 have considerably higher potency than hTSH to stimulate thyroidal iodide and (18)F-FDG uptake in vitro. Moreover, in vivo studies indicated that at low but not higher doses, TR1401 induced an enhanced ability for the thyroid to concentrate iodide compared with hTSH. These properties makes TR1401 and TR1402 interesting candidates for use in humans to enhance uptake of radioiodine and (18)F-FDG by metastases and recurrences of thyroid carcinoma.

Defining structural and functional dimensions of the extracellular thyrotropin receptor region

The extracellular region of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) can be subdivided into the leucine-rich repeat domain (LRRD) and the hinge region. Both the LRRD and the hinge region interact with thyrotropin (TSH) or autoantibodies. Structural data for the TSHR LRRD were previously determined by crystallization (amino acids Glu(30)-Thr(257), 10 repeats), but the structure of the hinge region is still undefined. Of note, the amino acid sequence (Trp(258)-Tyr(279)) following the crystallized LRRD comprises a pattern typical for leucine-rich repeats with conserved hydrophobic side chains stabilizing the repeat fold. Moreover, functional data for amino acids between the LRRD and the transmembrane domain were fragmentary. We therefore investigated systematically these TSHR regions by mutagenesis to reveal insights into their functional contribution and potential structural features. We found that mutations of conserved hydrophobic residues between Thr(257) and Tyr(279) cause TSHR misfold, which supports a structural fold of this peptide, probably as an additional leucine-rich repeat. Furthermore, we identified several new mutations of hydrophilic amino acids in the entire hinge region leading to partial TSHR inactivation, indicating that these positions are important for intramolecular signal transduction. In summary, we provide new information regarding the structural features and functionalities of extracellular TSHR regions. Based on these insights and in context with previous results, we suggest an extracellular activation mechanism that supports an intramolecular agonistic unit as a central switch for activating effects at the extracellular region toward the serpentine domain.

The hinge region: an important receptor component for GPHR function

Glycoprotein hormone receptors (GPHRs) are members of the seven-transmembrane-spanning receptor family characterized by a large ectodomain. The hinge region belongs to a part of the GPHR ectodomain for which the three-dimensional structure has not yet been deciphered, leaving important questions unanswered concerning ligand binding and GPHR activation. Recent publications indicate that specific residues of the hinge region mediate hormone binding, receptor activation and/or intramolecular signaling for the three GPHRs, emphasizing the importance of this region. Based on these findings, the hinge region is involved at least in part in hormone binding and receptor activation. This review summarizes functional data regarding the hinge region, demonstrating that this receptor portion represents a link between ligand binding and subsequent GPHR activation.

TSH receptor monoclonal antibodies with agonist, antagonist, and inverse agonist activities

Autoantibodies in autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) bind to the TSH receptor (TSHR) and can act as either agonists, mimicking the biological activity of TSH, or as antagonists inhibiting the action of TSH. Furthermore, some antibodies with antagonist activity can also inhibit the constitutive activity of the TSHR, that is, act as inverse agonists. The production of animal TSHR monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) with the characteristics of patient autoantibodies and the isolation of human autoantibodies from patients with AITD has allowed us to analyze the interactions of these antibodies with the TSHR at the molecular level. In the case of animal MAbs, advances such as DNA immunization allowed the production of the first MAbs which showed the characteristics of human TSHR autoantibodies (TRAbs). Mouse MAbs (TSMAbs 1-3) and a hamster MAb (MS-1) were obtained that acted as TSHR agonists with the ability to stimulate cyclic AMP production in CHO cells expressing the TSHR. In addition, a mouse TSHR MAb (MAb-B2) that had the ability to act as an antagonist of TRAbs and TSH was isolated and characterized. Also, a mouse TSHR MAb that showed TSH antagonist and TSHR inverse agonist activity (CS-17) was described. Furthermore, a panel of human TRAbs has been obtained from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with AITD and extensively characterized. These MAbs have all the characteristics of TRAbs and are active at ng/mL levels. To date, two human MAbs with TSHR agonist activity (M22 and K1-18), one human MAb with TSHR antagonist activity (K1-70) and one human MAb (5C9) with both TSHR antagonist and TSHR inverse agonist activity have been isolated. Early experiments showed that the binding sites for TSH and for TRAbs with thyroid stimulating or blocking activities were located on the extracellular domain of the TSHR. Extensive studies using TSHRs with single amino acid mutations identified TSHR residues that were important for binding and biological activity of TSHR MAbs (human and animal) and TSH. The structures of several TSHR MAb Fab fragments were solved by X-ray crystallography and provided details of the topography of the antigen binding sites of antibodies with either agonist or antagonist activity. Furthermore stable complexes of the leucine-rich repeat domain (LRD) of the TSHR with a human MAb (M22) with agonist activity and with a human MAb (K1-70) with antagonist activity have been produced and their structures solved by X-ray crystallography at 2.55 and 1.9Å resolution, respectively. Together these experiments have given detailed insights into the interactions of antibodies with different biological activities (agonist, antagonist, and inverse agonist) with the TSHR. Although the nature of ligand binding to the TSHR is now understood in some detail, it is far from clear how these initial interactions lead to functional effects on activation or inactivation of the receptor.

Human TSH receptor ligands as pharmacological probes with potential clinical application

The biologic role of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH; thyrotropin) as an activator (agonist) of the TSH receptor (TSHR) in the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis is well known and activation of TSHR by recombinant human TSH is used clinically in patients with thyroid cancer. TSHR ligands other than TSH could be used to probe TSHR biology in thyroidal and extrathyroidal tissues, and potentially be employed in patients. A number of different TSHR ligands have been reported, including TSH analogs, antibodies and small-molecule, drug-like compounds. In this review, we will provide an update on all these classes of TSHR agonists and antagonists but place emphasis on small-molecule ligands.