Gal80 confers specificity on HAT complex interactions with activators

Soft repression and chromatin modification by conserved transcriptional corepressors

Transcriptional regulation in eukaryotic cells involves the activity of multifarious DNA-binding transcription factors and recruited corepressor complexes. Together, these complexes interact with the core transcriptional machinery, chromatin, and nuclear environment to effect complex patterns of gene regulation. Much focus has been paid to the action of master regulatory switches that are key to developmental and environmental responses, as these genetic elements have important phenotypic effects. The regulation of widely-expressed metabolic control genes has been less well studied, particularly in cases in which physically-interacting repressors and corepressors have subtle influences on steady-state expression. This latter phenomenon, termed "soft repression" is a topic of increasing interest as genomic approaches provide ever more powerful tools to uncover the significance of this level of control. This review provides an oversight of classic and current approaches to the study of transcriptional repression in eukaryotic systems, with a specific focus on opportunities and challenges that lie ahead in the study of soft repression.

Transcriptional repressor Gal80 recruits corepressor complex Cyc8-Tup1 to structural genes of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL regulon

Under non-inducing conditions (absence of galactose), yeast structural genes of the GAL regulon are repressed by Gal80, preventing interaction of Gal4 bound to UAS_GAL promoter motifs with general factors of the transcriptional machinery. In this work, we show that Gal80 is also able to interact with histone deacetylase-recruiting corepressor proteins Cyc8 and Tup1, indicating an additional mechanism of gene repression. This is supported by our demonstration that a lexA–Gal80 fusion efficiently mediates repression of a reporter gene with an upstream lexA operator sequence. Corepressor interaction and in vivo gene repression could be mapped to a Gal80 minimal domain of 65 amino acids (aa 81-145). Site-directed mutagenesis of selected residues within this domain showed that a cluster of aromatic-hydrophobic amino acids (YLFV, aa 118-121) is important, although not solely responsible, for gene repression. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, Cyc8 and Tup1 were shown to be present at the GAL1 promoter in a wild-type strain but not in a gal80 mutant strain under non-inducing (derepressing) growth conditions. Expression of a GAL1–lacZ fusion was elevated in a tup1 mutant (but not in a cyc8 mutant) grown in derepressing medium, indicating that Tup1 may be mainly responsible for this second mechanism of Gal80-dependent gene repression.

Transcriptional regulatory proteins in central carbon metabolism of Pichia pastoris and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

System-wide interactions in living cells and discovery of the diverse roles of transcriptional regulatory proteins that are mediator proteins with catalytic domains and regulatory subunits and transcription factors in the cellular pathways have become crucial for understanding the cellular response to environmental conditions. This review provides information for future metabolic engineering strategies through analyses on the highly interconnected regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris and identifying their components. We discuss the current knowledge on the carbon catabolite repression (CCR) mechanism, interconnecting regulatory system of the central metabolic pathways that regulate cell metabolism based on nutrient availability in the industrial yeasts. The regulatory proteins and their functions in the CCR signalling pathways in both yeasts are presented and discussed. We highlight the importance of metabolic signalling networks by signifying ways on how effective engineering strategies can be designed for generating novel regulatory circuits, furthermore to activate pathways that reconfigure the network architecture. We summarize the evidence that engineering of multilayer regulation is needed for directed evolution of the cellular network by putting the transcriptional control into a new perspective for the regulation of central carbon metabolism of the industrial yeasts; furthermore, we suggest research directions that may help to enhance production of recombinant products in the widely used, creatively engineered, but relatively less studied P. pastoris through de novo metabolic engineering strategies based on the discovery of components of signalling pathways in CCR metabolism. KEY POINTS: • Transcriptional regulation and control is the key phenomenon in the cellular processes. • Designing de novo metabolic engineering strategies depends on the discovery of signalling pathways in CCR metabolism. • Crosstalk between pathways occurs through essential parts of transcriptional machinery connected to specific catalytic domains. • In S. cerevisiae, a major part of CCR metabolism is controlled through Snf1 kinase, Glc7 phosphatase, and Srb10 kinase. • In P. pastoris, signalling pathways in CCR metabolism have not yet been clearly known yet. • Cellular regulations on the transcription of promoters are controlled with carbon sources.

Quantitative imaging of chromatin decompaction in living cells

Chromatin organization is highly dynamic and regulates transcription. Upon transcriptional activation, chromatin is remodeled and referred to as "open," but quantitative and dynamic data of this decompaction process are lacking. Here, we have developed a quantitative high resolution-microscopy assay in living yeast cells to visualize and quantify chromatin dynamics using the GAL7-10-1 locus as a model system. Upon transcriptional activation of these three clustered genes, we detect an increase of the mean distance across this locus by >100 nm. This decompaction is linked to active transcription but is not sensitive to the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A or to deletion of the histone acetyl transferase Gcn5. In contrast, the deletion of SNF2 (encoding the ATPase of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex) or the deactivation of the histone chaperone complex FACT lead to a strongly reduced decompaction without significant effects on transcriptional induction in FACT mutants. Our findings are consistent with nucleosome remodeling and eviction activities being major contributors to chromatin reorganization during transcription but also suggest that transcription can occur in the absence of detectable decompaction.

Quantitative imaging of chromatin decompaction in living cells

Chromatin organization is highly dynamic and regulates transcription. Upon transcriptional activation, chromatin is remodeled and referred to as “open,” but quantitative and dynamic data of this decompaction process are lacking. Here, we have developed a quantitative high resolution–microscopy assay in living yeast cells to visualize and quantify chromatin dynamics using the GAL7-10-1 locus as a model system. Upon transcriptional activation of these three clustered genes, we detect an increase of the mean distance across this locus by >100 nm. This decompaction is linked to active transcription but is not sensitive to the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A or to deletion of the histone acetyl transferase Gcn5. In contrast, the deletion of SNF2 (encoding the ATPase of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex) or the deactivation of the histone chaperone complex FACT lead to a strongly reduced decompaction without significant effects on transcriptional induction in FACT mutants. Our findings are consistent with nucleosome remodeling and eviction activities being major contributors to chromatin reorganization during transcription but also suggest that transcription can occur in the absence of detectable decompaction.

The 9aaTAD Is Exclusive Activation Domain in Gal4

The Gal4 protein is a well-known prototypic acidic activator that has multiple activation domains. We have previously identified a new activation domain called the nine amino acid transactivation domain (9aaTAD) in Gal4 protein. The family of the 9aaTAD activators currently comprises over 40 members including p53, MLL, E2A and other members of the Gal4 family; Oaf1, Pip2, Pdr1 and Pdr3. In this study, we revised function of all reported Gal4 activation domains. Surprisingly, we found that beside of the activation domain 9aaTAD none of the previously reported activation domains had considerable transactivation potential and were not involved in the activation of transcription. Our results demonstrated that the 9aaTAD domain is the only decisive activation domain in the Gal4 protein. We found that the artificial peptides included in the original Gal4 constructs were results of an unintended consequence of cloning that were responsible for the artificial transcriptional activity. Importantly, the activation domain 9aaTAD, which is the exclusive activation domain in Gal4, is also the central part of a conserved sequence recognized by the inhibitory protein Gal80. We propose a revision of the Gal4 regulation, in which the activation domain 9aaTAD is directly linked to both activation function and Gal80 mediated inhibition.

Analyzing negative feedback using a synthetic gene network expressed in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo

Background

A complex network of gene interactions controls gene regulation throughout development and the life of the organisms. Insights can be made into these processes by studying the functional interactions (or “motifs”) which make up these networks.

Results

We sought to understand the functionality of one of these network motifs, negative feedback, in a multi-cellular system. This was accomplished using a synthetic network expressed in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo using the yeast proteins Gal4 (a transcriptional activator) and Gal80 (an inhibitor of Gal4 activity). This network is able to produce an attenuation or shuttling phenotype depending on the Gal80/Gal4 ratio. This shuttling behavior was validated by expressing Gal3, which inhibits Gal80, to produce a localized increase in free Gal4 and therefore signaling. Mathematical modeling was used to demonstrate the capacity for negative feedback to produce these varying outputs.

Conclusions

The capacity of a network motif to exhibit different phenotypes due to minor changes to the network in multi-cellular systems was shown. This work demonstrates the importance of studying network motifs in multi-cellular systems.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0330-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A targeted gene expression system using the tryptophan repressor in zebrafish shows no silencing in subsequent generations

The ability to visualize and manipulate cell fate and gene expression in specific cell populations has made gene expression systems valuable tools in developmental biology studies. Here, we describe a new system that uses the E. coli tryptophan repressor and its upstream activation sequence (TrpR/tUAS) to drive gene expression in stable zebrafish transgenic lines and in mammalian cells. We show that TrpR/tUAS transgenes are not silenced in subsequent generations of zebrafish, which is a major improvement over some of the existing systems, such as Gal4/gUAS and the Q-system. TrpR transcriptional activity can be tuned by mutations in its DNA-binding domain, or silenced by Gal80 when fused to the Gal4 activation domain. In cases in which more than one cell population needs to be manipulated, TrpR/tUAS can be used in combination with other, existing systems.

Rapid GAL gene switch of Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on nuclear Gal3, not nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of Gal3 and Gal80

The yeast transcriptional activator Gal4 localizes to UAS(GAL) sites even in the absence of galactose but cannot activate transcription due to an association with the Gal80 protein. By 4 min after galactose addition, Gal4-activated gene transcription ensues. It is well established that this rapid induction arises through a galactose-triggered association between the Gal80 and Gal3 proteins that decreases the association of Gal80 and Gal4. How this happens mechanistically remains unclear. Strikingly different hypotheses prevail concerning the possible roles of nucleocytoplasmic distribution and trafficking of Gal3 and Gal80 and where in the cell the initial Gal3-Gal80 association occurs. Here we tested two conflicting hypotheses by evaluating the subcellular distribution and dynamics of Gal3 and Gal80 with reference to induction kinetics. We determined that the rates of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking for both Gal80 and Gal3 are slow relative to the rate of induction. We find that depletion of the nuclear pool of Gal3 slows the induction kinetics. Thus, nuclear Gal3 is critical for rapid induction. Fluorescence-recovery-after-photobleaching experiments provided data suggesting that the Gal80-Gal4 complex exhibits kinetic stability in the absence of galactose. Finally, we detect Gal3 at the UAS(GAL) only if Gal80 is covalently linked to the DNA-binding domain. Taken altogether, these new findings lead us to propose that a transient interaction of Gal3 with Gal4-associated Gal80 could explain the rapid response of this system. This notion could also explain earlier observations.

Multiple metabolic signals influence GAL gene activation by modulating the interaction of Gal80p with the transcriptional activator Gal4p

Transcriptional status of the genes needed for galactose utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the interplay between the prototypical transcriptional activator Gal4p and the inhibitor protein Gal80p. Relief of the inhibition from Gal4p requires the interaction between Gal80p and the galactokinase paralog, Gal3p. Here, we present evidence that decrease in the intracellular levels of ATP or NADP(H) impairs the GAL gene expression. All these induction defects are rescued by overproducing Gal3p or producing Gal4p mutants with reduced interaction with Gal80p. We further demonstrate that removal of Gal80p from the GAL gene promoter is impaired in these mutants, and that NADP(H) cooperates with Gal3p in causing the dissociation of Gal80p from the in vitro preformed DNA-bound Gal80p-Gal4p complex. We also show that Gal80p is only partially removed from the GAL gene promoter in a mitochondria fusion-deficient mutant where the cotranscriptional mRNA processing is crippled. The efficient dissociation is restored by Gal4p mutants with altered interaction with Gal80p and is correlated with the recovered GAL gene expression. These results indicate that multiple metabolic signals exist to facilitate the efficient and appropriate dissociation of Gal80p from Gal4p by Gal3p to achieve the fully active state of Gal4p in the nucleus.

A tryptophan-rich peptide acts as a transcription activation domain

Background

Eukaryotic transcription activators normally consist of a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain (DBD) and a transcription activation domain (AD). While many sequence patterns and motifs have been defined for DBDs, ADs do not share easily recognizable motifs or structures.

Results

We report herein that the N-terminal domain of yeast valyl-tRNA synthetase can function as an AD when fused to a DNA-binding protein, LexA, and turn on reporter genes with distinct LexA-responsive promoters. The transcriptional activity was mainly attributed to a five-residue peptide, WYDWW, near the C-terminus of the N domain. Remarkably, the pentapeptide per se retained much of the transcriptional activity. Mutations which substituted tryptophan residues for both of the non-tryptophan residues in the pentapeptide (resulting in W₅) significantly enhanced its activity (~1.8-fold), while mutations which substituted aromatic residues with alanine residues severely impaired its activity. Accordingly, a much more active peptide, pentatryptophan (W₇), was produced, which elicited ~3-fold higher activity than that of the native pentapeptide and the N domain. Further study indicated that W₇ mediates transcription activation through interacting with the general transcription factor, TFIIB.

Conclusions

Since W₇ shares no sequence homology or features with any known transcription activators, it may represent a novel class of AD.

Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms

The rapid activation of gene expression in response to stimuli occurs largely through the regulation of RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription. In this Review, we discuss events that occur during the transcription cycle in eukaryotes that are important for the rapid and specific activation of gene expression in response to external stimuli. In addition to regulated recruitment of the transcription machinery to the promoter, it has now been shown that control steps can include chromatin remodelling and the release of paused polymerase. Recent work suggests that some components of signal transduction cascades also play an integral part in activating transcription at target genes.

Yeast Gal4: a transcriptional paradigm revisited

During the past two decades, the yeast Gal4 protein has been used as a model for studying transcriptional activation in eukaryotes. Many of the properties of transcriptional regulation first demonstrated for Gal4 have since been shown to be reiterated in the function of several other eukaryotic transcriptional regulators. Technological advances based on the transcriptional properties of this factor--such as the two-hybrid technology and Gal4-inducible systems for controlled gene expression--have had far-reaching influences in fields beyond transcription. In this review, we provide an updated account of Gal4 function, including data from new technologies that have been recently applied to the study of the GAL network.

Spreading of a corepressor linked to action of long-range repressor hairy

Transcriptional repressor proteins play key roles in the control of gene expression in development. For the Drosophila embryo, the following two functional classes of repressors have been described: short-range repressors such as Knirps that locally inhibit the activity of enhancers and long-range repressors such as Hairy that can dominantly inhibit distal elements. Several long-range repressors interact with Groucho, a conserved corepressor that is homologous to mammalian TLE proteins. Groucho interacts with histone deacetylases and histone proteins, suggesting that it may effect repression by means of chromatin modification; however, it is not known how long-range effects are mediated. Using embryo chromatin immunoprecipitation, we have analyzed a Hairy-repressible gene in the embryo during activation and repression. When inactivated, repressors, activators, and coactivators cooccupy the promoter, suggesting that repression is not accomplished by the displacement of activators or coactivators. Strikingly, the Groucho corepressor is found to be recruited to the transcribed region of the gene, contacting a region of several kilobases, concomitant with a loss of histone H3 and H4 acetylation. Groucho has been shown to form higher-order complexes in vitro; thus, our observations suggest that long-range effects may be mediated by a "spreading" mechanism, modifying chromatin over extensive regions to inhibit transcription.

Galactose metabolism in yeast-structure and regulation of the leloir pathway enzymes and the genes encoding them

The enzymes of the Leloir pathway catalyze the conversion of galactose to a more metabolically useful version, glucose-6-phosphate. This pathway is required as galactose itself cannot be used for glycolysis directly. In most organisms, including the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, five enzymes are required to catalyze this conversion: a galactose mutarotase, a galactokinase, a galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase, a UDP-galactose-4-epimerase, and a phosphoglucomutase. In yeast, the genes encoding these enzymes are tightly controlled at the level of transcription and are only transcribed under specific sets of conditions. In the presence of glucose, the genes encoding the Leloir pathway enzymes (often called the GAL genes) are repressed through the action of a transcriptional repressor Mig1p. In the presence of galactose, but in the absence of glucose, the concerted actions of three other proteins Gal4p, Gal80p, and Gal3p, and two small molecules (galactose and ATP) enable the rapid and high-level activation of the GAL genes. The precise molecular mechanism of the GAL genetic switch is controversial. Recent work on solving the three-dimensional structures of the various GAL enzymes proteins and the GAL transcriptional switch proteins affords a unique opportunity to delve into the precise, and potentially unambiguous, molecular mechanism of a highly exploited transcriptional circuit. Understanding the details of the transcriptional and metabolic events that occur in this pathway can be used as a paradigm for understanding the integration of metabolism and transcriptional control more generally, and will assist our understanding of fundamental biochemical processes and how these might be exploited.

A yeast catabolic enzyme controls transcriptional memory

It has been postulated that chromatin modifications can persist through mitosis and meiosis, thereby securing memory of transcriptional states. Whether these chromatin marks can self-propagate in progeny independently of relevant trans-acting factors is an important question in phenomena related to epigenesis. "Adaptive cellular memory" displayed by yeast cells offers a convenient system to address this question. The yeast GAL genes are slowly activated by Gal4 when cells are first exposed to galactose, but their progeny, grown in glucose media, exhibit a fast activation mode upon re-exposure to this sugar. This "galactose memory" persists for several generations and was recently proposed to involve chromatin modifications and perinuclear topology of the GAL genes cluster. Here, we perform a heterokaryon assay demonstrating that this memory does not have a chromatin basis but is maintained by cytoplasmic factor(s) produced upon previous galactose induction. We show that Gal3, the cytoplasmic rate-limiting factor that releases the Gal4 activator, is dispensable for preserving galactose memory. Instead, the important memory determinant is a close Gal3 homolog, the highly expressed Gal1 galactokinase, the residual activity of which preserves memory in progeny cells by rapidly turning on the Gal4 activator upon cells' re-exposure to galactose.

Multi-tasking on chromatin with the SAGA coactivator complexes

Over the past 10 years, much progress has been made to understand the roles of the similar, yet distinct yeast SAGA and SLIK coactivator complexes involved in histone post-translational modification and gene regulation. Many different groups have elucidated functions of the SAGA complexes including identification of novel components, which have conferred additional distinct functions. Together, recent studies demonstrate unique attributes of the SAGA coactivator complexes in histone acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and deubiquitination. In addition to roles in transcriptional activation with the 19S proteasome regulatory particle, recent evidence also suggests functions for SAGA in elongation and mRNA export. The modular nature of SAGA allows this approximately 1.8 MDa complex to organize its functions and carry out multiple roles during transcription, particularly under conditions of cellular stress.

A functional analysis ofKlSRB10: implications inKluyveromyces lactis transcriptional regulation

The function of KlSRB10 has been studied by diverse approaches. Primer extension analysis reveals several transcription start sites, position - 17 from ATG being predominant. Deletion of KlSRB10 diminishes growth in ethanol and decreases KlCYC1 transcript levels. A second phenotype associated with this deletion affects growth in galactose. These phenotypes are independent of the specific sequence connecting the ATP binding cassette and the kinase domain of Srb10p in yeasts. KlSrb10p is not necessary for LAC4 repression mediated by KlGal80p, as deduced by construction of a Klgal80Deltasrb10Delta double mutant. In the two-hybrid system, KlSrbp10p interacts with the protein encoded by KLLA0E08151g (KlSrbp11p).

The Galactose Switch in Kluyveromyces lactis Depends on Nuclear Competition between Gal4 and Gal1 for Gal80 Binding

The Gal4 protein represents a universally functional transcription activator, which in yeast is regulated by protein-protein interaction of its transcription activation domain with the inhibitor Gal80. Gal80 inhibition is relieved via galactose-mediated Gal80-Gal1-Gal3 interaction. The Gal4-Gal80-Gal1/3 regulatory module is conserved between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis. Here we demonstrate that K. lactis Gal80 (KlGal80) is a nuclear protein independent of the Gal4 activity status, whereas KlGal1 is detected throughout the entire cell, which implies that KlGal80 and KlGal1 interact in the nucleus. Consistently KlGal1 accumulates in the nucleus upon KlGAL80 overexpression. Furthermore, we show that the KlGal80-KlGal1 interaction blocks the galactokinase activity of KlGal1 and is incompatible with KlGal80-KlGal4-AD interaction. Thus, we propose that dissociation of KlGal80 from the AD forms the basis of KlGal4 activation in K. lactis. Quantitation of the dissociation constants for the KlGal80 complexes gives a much lower affinity for KlGal1 as compared with Gal4. Mathematical modeling shows that with these affinities a switch based on competition between Gal1 and Gal4 for Gal80 binding is nevertheless efficient provided two monomeric Gal1 molecules interact with dimeric Gal80. Consistent with such a mechanism, analysis of the sedimentation behavior by analytical ultracentrifugation demonstrates the formation of a heterotetrameric KlGal80-KlGal1 complex of 2:2 stoichiometry.

A comparative analysis of the GAL genetic switch between not-so-distant cousins: Saccharomyces cerevisiae versus Kluyveromyces lactis

Despite their close phylogenetic relationship, Kluyveromyces lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have adapted their carbon utilization systems to different environments. Although they share identities in the arrangement, sequence and functionality of their GAL gene set, both yeasts have evolved important differences in the GAL genetic switch in accordance to their relative preference for the utilization of galactose as a carbon source. This review provides a comparative overview of the GAL-specific regulatory network in S. cerevisiae and K. lactis, discusses the latest models proposed to explain the transduction of the galactose signal, and describes some of the particularities that both microorganisms display in their regulatory response to different carbon sources. Emphasis is placed on the potential for improved strategies in biotechnological applications using yeasts.

Mechanism of Transcription Factor Recruitment by Acidic Activators

Many transcriptional activators are intrinsically unstructured yet display unique, defined conformations when bound to target proteins. Target-induced folding provides a mechanism by which activators could form specific interactions with an array of structurally unrelated target proteins. Evidence for such a binding mechanism has been reported previously in the context of the interaction between the cancer-related c-Myc protein and the TATA-binding protein, which can be modeled as a two-step process in which a rapidly forming, low affinity complex slowly converts to a more stable form, consistent with a coupled binding and folding reaction. To test the generality of the target-induced folding model, we investigated the binding of two widely studied acidic activators, Gal4 and VP16, to a set of target proteins, including TATA-binding protein and the Swi1 and Snf5 subunits of the Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex. Using surface plasmon resonance, we show that these activator-target combinations also display bi-phasic kinetics suggesting two distinct steps. A fast initial binding phase that is inhibited by high ionic strength is followed by a slow phase that is favored by increased temperature. In all cases, overall affinity increases with temperature and, in most cases, with increased ionic strength. These results are consistent with a general mechanism for recruitment of transcriptional components to promoters by naturally occurring acidic activators, by which the initial contact is mediated predominantly through electrostatic interactions, whereas subsequent target-induced folding of the activator results in a stable complex.

Proteomic analysis of chromatin-modifying complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies novel subunits

Epigenetics is the alteration of phenotype without affecting the genotype. An underlying molecular mechanism of epigenetics is the changes of chromatin structure by covalent histone modifications and nucleosome reorganization. In the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, two of the most well-studied macromolecular complexes that perform these epigenetic changes are the ATP-dependent Swi/Snf chromatin-remodelling complex and the SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex. To understand fully the mechanism by which these large protein complexes perform their functions in the cell, it is crucial that all the subunits of these complexes are identified. In an attempt to identify new subunits associated with SAGA and Swi/Snf, we used tandem affinity purification, followed by a multidimensional protein identification technology to analyse the subunit composition. Our analysis identified two novel proteins, one associated with SAGA, YPL047W (Sgf11), and another associated with Swi/Snf, Rtt102.

Integrative analysis of genome-wide experiments in the context of a large high-throughput data compendium

Biological systems are orchestrated by heterogeneous regulatory programs that control complex processes and adapt to a dynamic environment. Recent advances in high-throughput experimental methods provide genome-wide perspectives on such regulatory programs. A considerable amount of data on the behavior of model systems in a variety of conditions is rapidly accumulating. Still, the dominant paradigm is to analyze new genome-wide experiments separately from any other extant data, for example, by clustering the new data alone. Here we introduce a new methodology for analyzing the results of a new functional genomic study vis-à-vis a large compendium of previously published results from heterogeneous experimental techniques. We demonstrate our methodology on Saccharomyces cerevisiae, using a compendium of some 2000 experiments from 60 different publications. Most importantly, we show how the integrated analysis reveals unexpected connections among biological processes, and differentiates between novel and known effects in the analyzed experiments. Such characterization is impossible when new data sets are studied in isolation. Our results exemplify the power of the integrative approach in the analysis of genomic scale data sets and call for a paradigm shift in their study.

Activation of the Gal1 Gene of Yeast by Pairs of 'Non-Classical' Activators

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators work by recruiting to DNA the transcriptional machinery, including protein complexes required for chromatin modification, transcription initiation, and elongation. Which of these complexes must be directly recruited to trigger transcription? We test various "non-classical" transcription activators (comprising a component of the transcriptional machinery fused to a DNA binding domain) for their abilities to activate transcription of a chromosomally integrated reporter in yeast. Among these newly constructed fusion proteins, none efficiently activated transcription when working on its own. However, in several instances transcription was activated by a pair of such fusion proteins tethered to adjacent sites on DNA. In each of these cases, one fusion protein bore a component of the SAGA complex, and the other bore a component of the Mediator complex. Transcription was also activated by certain tripartite fusion proteins comprising a Mediator and a SAGA component fused to a DNA binding domain. The results are consistent with the finding that the classical activator Gal4, working at the GAL1 promoter, activates transcription by (at least in part) independently recruiting SAGA and Mediator.

An in vitro assay to study the recruitment and substrate specificity of chromatin modifying enzymes

Post-translational modifications of core histones play an important role in regulating fundamental biological processes such as DNA repair, transcription and replication. In this paper, we describe a novel assay that allows sequential targeting of distinct histone modifying enzymes to immobilized nucleosomal templates using recombinant chimeric targeting molecules. The assay can be used to study the histone substrate specificity of chromatin modifying enzymes as well as whether and how certain enzymes affect each other's histone modifying activities. As such the assay can help to understand how a certain histone code is established and interpreted.

Rad6 plays a role in transcriptional activation through ubiquitylation of histone H2B

Covalent modifications of the histone N tails play important roles in eukaryotic gene expression. Histone acetylation, in particular, is required for the activation of a subset of eukaryotic genes through the targeted recruitment of histone acetyltransferases. We have reported that a histone C tail modification, ubiquitylation of H2B, is required for optimal expression of several inducible yeast genes, consistent with a role in transcriptional activation. H2B was shown to be ubiquitylated and then deubiquitylated at the GAL1 core promoter following galactose induction. We now show that the Rad6 protein, which catalyzes monoubiquitylation of H2B, is transiently associated with the GAL1 promoter upon gene activation, and that the period of its association temporally overlaps with the period of H2B ubiquitylation. Rad6 promoter association depends on the Gal4 activator and the Rad6-associated E3 ligase, Bre1, but is independent of the histone acetyltransferase, Gcn5. The SAGA complex, which contains a ubiquitin protease that targets H2B for deubiquitylation, is recruited to the GAL1 promoter in the absence of H2B ubiquitylation. The data suggest that Rad6 and SAGA function independently during galactose induction, and that the staged recruitment of these two factors to the GAL1 promoter regulates the ubiquitylation and deubiquitylation of H2B. We additionally show that both Rad6 and ubiquitylated H2B are absent from two regions of transcriptionally silent chromatin but present at genes that are actively transcribed. Thus, like histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 79 methylation, two modifications that it regulates, Rad6-directed H2B ubiquitylation defines regions of active chromatin.

Targeting activity is required for SWI/SNF function in vivo and is accomplished through two partially redundant activator-interaction domains

The SWI/SNF complex is required for the expression of many yeast genes. Previous studies have implicated DNA binding transcription activators in targeting SWI/SNF to UASs and promoters. To determine how activators interact with the complex and to examine the importance of these interactions, relative to other potential targeting mechanisms, for SWI/SNF function, we sought to identify and mutate the activator-interaction domains in the complex. Here we show that the N-terminal domain of Snf5 and the second quarter of Swi1 are sites of activation domain contact. Deletion of both of these domains left the SWI/SNF complex intact but impaired its ability to bind activation domains. Importantly, while deletion of either domain alone had minor phenotypic effect, deletion of both resulted in strong SWI/SNF related phenotypes. Thus, two distinct activator-interaction domains play overlapping roles in the targeting activity of SWI/SNF, which is essential for its function in vivo.

Roles of the conserved CCAAT and GC boxes of the human and mouse type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor genes

Embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells are used widely to study the molecular mechanisms that regulate the transcription of genes during mammalian embryogenesis. The type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor (TbetaR-II) gene is expressed at very low levels by mouse EC cells prior to differentiation. Differentiation of EC cells results in increases of both the steady-state levels of TbetaR-II mRNA and the activity of the TbetaR-II promoter. Several cis-regulatory elements have been shown previously to regulate the TbetaR-II gene. This study focuses on the role of a CCAAT box and three GC boxes in the regulation of the human and mouse TbetaR-II promoters in EC-differentiated cells. We demonstrate that the CCAAT box and two flanking GC boxes, Sp A and Sp B, function as positive regulatory elements in the human TbetaR-II promoter, and that the transcription factor complex NF-Y positively regulates the human TbetaR-II promoter through the CCAAT box motif. We also show that the CCAAT box and the downstream GC box Sp B, which are conserved between the human and mouse promoters, behave as positive regulatory elements in the mouse TbetaR-II promoter. In addition, we demonstrate that the transcription factor Sp1 can bind to the Sp B GC box in vitro. Finally, we show that a GC box located 25 bp upstream of the major transcription start site of the TbetaR-II gene plays a minimal role in the function of the TbetaR-II promoter in EC-differentiated cells. Together, our studies highlight important differences and similarities in the cis-regulatory elements that regulate the human and mouse TbetaR-II promoters.

Independent recruitment in vivo by Gal4 of two complexes required for transcription

We use a modified form of ChIP to analyze the recruitment of seven sets of proteins to the yeast GAL genes upon induction. We resolve three stages of recruitment: first SAGA, then Mediator, and finally Pol II along with four other proteins (including TBP) bind the promoter. In a strain lacking SAGA, Mediator is recruited with a time course indistinguishable from that observed in wild-type cells. Our results are consistent with the notion that a single species of activator, Gal4, separately contacts, and thereby directly recruits, SAGA and Mediator.

Function and selectivity of bromodomains in anchoring chromatin-modifying complexes to promoter nucleosomes

The functions of the SAGA and SWI/SNF complexes are interrelated and can form stable "epigenetic marks" on promoters in vivo. Here we show that stable promoter occupancy by SWI/SNF and SAGA in the absence of transcription activators requires the bromodomains of the Swi2/Snf2 and Gcn5 subunits, respectively, and nucleosome acetylation. This acetylation can be brought about by either the SAGA or NuA4 HAT complexes. The bromodomain in the Spt7 subunit of SAGA is dispensable for this activity but will anchor SAGA if it is swapped into Gcn5, indicating that specificity of bromodomain function is determined in part by the subunit it occupies. Thus, bromodomains within the catalytic subunits of SAGA and SWI/SNF anchor these complexes to acetylated promoter nucleosomes.

SALSA, a variant of yeast SAGA, contains truncated Spt7, which correlates with activated transcription

Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase (SAGA) is a previously described histone acetyltransferase/transcriptional coactivator complex in yeast. At promoters of certain genes (HIS3 and TRP3), SAGA has an inhibitory function involving a nonproductive TATA-binding protein interaction mediated by the Spt3 and Spt8 subunits. Related to this, Spt8-less SAGA is a major form of the complex under activating conditions for these genes. In the present study, we purify this activation-specific complex, called SALSA (SAGA altered, Spt8 absent). Besides lacking Spt8, SALSA contains Spt7 subunit that is truncated. Examining the role of this subunit, we find that C-terminally truncated SPT7 resulted in derepressed HIS3 transcription. Furthermore, when grown in rich media (repressing conditions), wild-type cells yielded predominantly SAGA, but Spt7 C-terminal truncations resulted primarily in a form of complex similar to SALSA. Thus, SALSA-like structure and activating function can be partially recapitulated in yeast by truncating the C terminus of Spt7. Overall, these results lead to a model that for a subset of promoters SAGA is inhibitory through Spt3, Spt8, and an Spt8-interacting subdomain of Spt7, whereas SALSA is a form of complex for positive transcriptional regulation. These data clarify a mechanism by which a transcriptional regulatory complex can switch between positive and negative modulation.