NMR structural characterization of a minimal peptide antagonist bound to the extracellular domain of the corticotropin-releasing factor1 receptor

Structural and Functional Insights into CRF Peptides and Their Receptors

Corticotropin-releasing factor or hormone (CRF or CRH) and the urocortins regulate a plethora of physiological functions and are involved in many pathophysiological processes. CRF and urocortins belong to the family of CRF peptides (CRF family), which includes sauvagine, urotensin, and many synthetic peptide and non-peptide CRF analogs. Several of the CRF analogs have shown considerable therapeutic potential in the treatment of various diseases. The CRF peptide family act by interacting with two types of plasma membrane proteins, type 1 (CRF1R) and type 2 (CRF2R), which belong to subfamily B1 of the family B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This work describes the structure of CRF peptides and their receptors and the activation mechanism of the latter, which is compared with that of other GPCRs. It also discusses recent structural information that rationalizes the selective binding of various ligands to the two CRF receptor types and the activation of receptors by different agonists.

Peripheral CRF-R1/CRF-R2 antagonist, astressin C, induces a long-lasting blockade of acute stress-related visceral pain in male and female rats

Peptide CRF antagonists injected peripherally alleviate stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity (SIVH) to colorectal distension (CRD) in rodents. Here we further evaluated the dose and time-dependent inhibitory activity of several long-acting peptide CRF receptor antagonists related to astressin on SIVH, focusing on astressin C (AstC), which previously showed high efficacy on stress-related alterations of HPA axis and gut secretomotor functions. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats pretreated subcutaneously (SC) with AstC were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with CRF 15 min later. The visceromotor responses (VMR) to graded phasic CRD (10, 20, 40 and 60 mmHg) were monitored at basal, 15 min and up to 1-8 days after pretreatment. Two other astressin analogs, hexanoyl-astressin D (Hex-AstD) and [CαMeVal^19,32]-AstC, were also tested. The response to IP CRF was sex-dependent with female rats requiring a higher dose to exhibit visceral hyperalgesia. Pretreatment with AstC (30-1000 µg/kg) resulted in a dose-related inhibition of IP CRF-induced SIVH and diarrhea in both sexes. The highest dose prevented SIVH and diarrhea up to 5-7 days after a single SC injection and was lost on day 7 (females) and day 8 (males) but reinstated after a second injection of AstC on day 8 or 9 respectively. [CαMeVal^19,32]-AstC and Hex-AstD (1000 µg/kg in males) also prevented SIVH. These data show the potent long-lasting anti-hyperalgesic effect of AstC in an acute model of SIVH in both male and female rats. This highlights the potential of long-acting peripheral CRF antagonists to treat stress-sensitive irritable bowel syndrome.

Prediction of amphipathic helix-membrane interactions with Rosetta

Amphipathic helices have hydrophobic and hydrophilic/charged residues situated on opposite faces of the helix. They can anchor peripheral membrane proteins to the membrane, be attached to integral membrane proteins, or exist as independent peptides. Despite the widespread presence of membrane-interacting amphipathic helices, there is no computational tool within Rosetta to model their interactions with membranes. In order to address this need, we developed the AmphiScan protocol with PyRosetta, which runs a grid search to find the most favorable position of an amphipathic helix with respect to the membrane. The performance of the algorithm was tested in benchmarks with the RosettaMembrane, ref2015_memb, and franklin2019 score functions on six engineered and 44 naturally-occurring amphipathic helices using membrane coordinates from the OPM and PDBTM databases, OREMPRO server, and MD simulations for comparison. The AmphiScan protocol predicted the coordinates of amphipathic helices within less than 3Å of the reference structures and identified membrane-embedded residues with a Matthews Correlation Constant (MCC) of up to 0.57. Overall, AmphiScan stands as fast, accurate, and highly-customizable protocol that can be pipelined with other Rosetta and Python applications.

Amphipathic helices are important targets as antibacterial peptides and as domains of membrane proteins that play a role in sensing the membrane environment. Understanding how amphipathic helices interact with membrane enables us to design better peptides and understand how membrane proteins use them to interact with their environment. However, there is a limited number of tools available for the modeling of amphipathic helices in membranes. Implicit membrane models can be used for this purpose as simplistic representations of the membrane environment. In this work, we developed the AmphiScan protocol that can be used to predict membrane coordinates of amphipathic helices starting with a helix structure in an implicit membrane environment. We benchmarked the performance of AmphiScan on engineered LK peptides, naturally-occurring amphipathic helices, and hydrophobic and hydrophilic peptides. Our approach provides a reliable and customizable tool to model amphipathic helix–membrane interactions, and pose a platform for the screening of amphipathic helix properties in silico.

Discovery of a stable tripeptide targeting the N-domain of CRF1 receptor

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and its CRF1 receptor (CRF₁R) play a central role in the maintenance of homeostasis. Malfunctioning of the CRF/CRF₁R unit is associated with several disorders, such as anxiety and depression. Non-peptide CRF₁R-selective antagonists have been shown to exert anxiolytic and antidepressant effects on experimental animals. However, none of them is in clinical use today because of several side effects, thus demonstrating the need for the development of other more suitable CRF₁R antagonists. In an effort to develop novel CRF₁R antagonists we designed, synthesized and chemically characterized two tripeptide analogues of CRF, namely (R)-LMI and (S)-LMI, having their Leu either in R (or D) or in S (or L) configuration, respectively. Their design was based on the crystal structure of the N-extracellular domain (N-domain) of CRF₁R/CRF complex, using a relevant array of computational methods. Experimental evaluation of the stability of synthetic peptides in human plasma has revealed that (R)-LMI is proteolytically more stable than (S)-LMI. Based on this finding, (R)-LMI was selected for pharmacological characterization. We have found that (R)-LMI is a CRF antagonist, inhibiting (1) the CRF-stimulated accumulation of cAMP in HEK 293 cells expressing the CRF₁R, (2) the production of interleukins by adipocytes and (3) the proliferation rate of RAW 264.7 cells. (R)-LMI likely blocked agonist actions by interacting with the N-domain of CRF₁R as suggested by data using a constitutively active chimera of CRF₁R. We propose that (R)-LMI can be used as an optimal lead compound in the rational design of novel CRF antagonists.

Current understanding of the structure and function of family B GPCRs to design novel drugs

Family B of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their ligands play a central role in a number of homeostatic mechanisms in the endocrine, gastrointestinal, skeletal, immune, cardiovascular and central nervous systems. Alterations in family B GPCR-regulated homeostatic mechanisms may cause a variety of potentially life-threatening conditions, signifying the necessity to develop novel ligands targeting these receptors. Obtaining structural and functional information on family B GPCRs will accelerate the development of novel drugs to target these receptors. Family B GPCRs are proteins that span the plasma membrane seven times, thus forming seven transmembrane domains (TM1-TM7) which are connected to each other by three extracellular (EL) and three intracellular (IL) loops. In addition, these receptors have a long extracellular N-domain and an intracellular C-tail. The upper parts of the TMs and ELs form the J-domain of receptors. The C-terminal region of peptides first binds to the N-domain of receptors. This 'first-step' interaction orients the N-terminal region of peptides towards the J-domain of receptors, thus resulting in a 'second-step' of ligand-receptor interaction that activates the receptor. Activation-associated structural changes of receptors are transmitted through TMs to their intracellular regions and are responsible for their interaction with the G proteins and activation of the latter, thus resulting in a biological effect. This review summarizes the current information regarding the structure and function of family B GPCRs and their physiological and pathophysiological roles.

Studies of a murine monoclonal antibody directed against DARC: reappraisal of its specificity

Duffy Antigen Receptor for Chemokines (DARC) plays multiple roles in human health as a blood group antigen, a receptor for chemokines and the only known receptor for Plasmodium vivax merozoites. It is the target of the murine anti-Fy6 monoclonal antibody 2C3 which binds to the first extracellular domain (ECD1), but exact nature of the recognized epitope was a subject of contradictory reports. Here, using a set of complex experiments which include expression of DARC with amino acid substitutions within the Fy6 epitope in E. coli and K562 cells, ELISA, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and flow cytometry, we have resolved discrepancies between previously published reports and show that the basic epitope recognized by 2C3 antibody is ²²FEDVW²⁶, with ²²F and ²⁶W being the most important residues. In addition, we demonstrated that ³⁰Y plays an auxiliary role in binding, particularly when the residue is sulfated. The STD-NMR studies performed using 2C3-derived Fab and synthetic peptide corroborated most of these results, and together with the molecular modelling suggested that ²⁵V is not involved in direct interactions with the antibody, but determines folding of the epitope backbone.

Structure and mechanism for recognition of peptide hormones by Class B G-protein-coupled receptors

Class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are receptors for peptide hormones that include glucagon, parathyroid hormone, and calcitonin. These receptors are involved in a wide spectrum of physiological activities, from metabolic regulation and stress control to development and maintenance of the skeletal system. As such, they are important drug targets for the treatment of diabetes, osteoporosis, and stress related disorders. Class B GPCRs are organized into two modular domains: an extracellular domain (ECD) and a helical bundle that contains seven transmembrane helices (TM domain). The ECD is responsible for the high affinity and specificity of hormone binding, and the TM domain is required for receptor activation and signal coupling to downstream G-proteins. Although the structure of the full-length receptor remains unknown, the ECD structures have been well characterized for a number of Class B GPCRs, revealing a common fold for ligand recognition. This review summarizes the general structural principles that guide hormone binding by Class B ECDs and their implications in the design of peptide hormone analogs for therapeutic purposes.

Biophysical characterization of G-protein coupled receptor-peptide ligand binding

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous membrane proteins allowing intracellular responses to extracellular factors that range from photons of light to small molecules to proteins. Despite extensive exploitation of GPCRs as therapeutic targets, biophysical characterization of GPCR-ligand interactions remains challenging. In this minireview, we focus on techniques that have been successfully used for structural and biophysical characterization of peptide ligands binding to their cognate GPCRs. The techniques reviewed include solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, solid-state NMR, X-ray diffraction, fluorescence spectroscopy and single-molecule fluorescence methods, flow cytometry, surface plasmon resonance, isothermal titration calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy. The goal herein is to provide a cohesive starting point to allow selection of techniques appropriate to the elucidation of a given GPCR-peptide interaction.

[¹²⁵I]YP20: a novel radioligand specific for the extracellular domain of the CRF₁ receptor

The peptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) binds to the CRF₁ receptor via a two-domain mechanism such that the extracellular domain (ECD) of the receptor captures the CRF's C-terminus to facilitate the binding of CRF's N-terminus to the juxta-membrane or "J"-site. Known small molecule antagonists bind to the J-site while known CRF₁ receptor peptide radioligands bind to both sites. We report here the in vitro binding properties of the first radioligand that binds exclusively to the ECD of the CRF₁ receptor. This ligand, which we named [¹²⁵I]Yamada peptide 20 ([¹²⁵I]YP20), is a radiolabeled analog of a synthetic peptide first reported by Yamada et al. (2004). We confirmed its high affinity for the [¹²⁵I]CRF binding site on the hCRF₁ receptor and also found it to potently antagonize CRF-stimulated cAMP production in hCRF₁-CHO cells. Under optimized conditions, 20 pM [¹²⁵I]YP20 reproducibly bound to hCRF₁-CHO membranes with a pharmacology consistent with binding specific to the ECD of the CRF₁ receptor. Saturation binding studies revealed the presence of a high affinity site with an estimated K(d) of ≈0.9 nM. The kinetic association of 20 pM [¹²⁵I]YP20 binding best fit to a rapid component (t(1/2)=0.69 min) and a sluggish component (t(1/2)=42 min). [¹²⁵I]YP20's specific binding was rapidly reversible with dissociation kinetics also best described by two phases (t(1/2)=0.92 min and t(1/2)=11.7 min). While [¹²⁵I]YP20's binding kinetics are complex, its high affinity and pharmacological specificity indicate that it is an excellent radioligand for probing the ECD site of the CRF₁ receptor.

Allosteric modulators of class B G-protein-coupled receptors

Class B GPCR’s are activated by peptide ligands, typically 30-40 amino acid residues, that are involved in major physiological functions such as glucose homeostasis (glucagon and glucagon-like peptide 1), calcium homeostasis and bone turnover (parathyroid hormone and calcitonin), and control of the stress axis (corticotropin-releasing factor). Peptide therapeutics have been developed targeting these receptors but development of nonpeptide ligands, enabling oral administration, has proved challenging. Allosteric modulation of these receptors provides a potential route to developing nonpeptide ligands that inhibit, activate, or potentiate activation of these receptors. Here the known mechanisms of allosteric modulators targeting Class B GPCR’s are reviewed, particularly nonpeptide antagonists of the corticotropin-releasing factor 1 receptor and allosteric enhancers of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. Also discussed is the potential for antagonist ligands to operate by competitive inhibition of one of the peptide binding sites, analogous to the Charniere mechanism. These mechanisms are then used to discuss potential strategies and management of pharmacological complexity in the future development of allosteric modulators for Class B GPCR’s.

Progress in corticotropin-releasing factor-1 antagonist development

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonists have been sought since the stress-secreted peptide was isolated in 1981. Although evidence is mixed concerning the efficacy of CRF(1) antagonists as antidepressants, CRF(1) antagonists might be novel pharmacotherapies for anxiety and addiction. Progress in understanding the two-domain model of ligand-receptor interactions for CRF family receptors might yield chemically novel CRF(1) receptor antagonists, including peptide CRF(1) antagonists, antagonists with signal transduction selectivity and nonpeptide CRF(1) antagonists that act via the extracellular (rather than transmembrane) domains. Novel ligands that conform to the prevalent pharmacophore and exhibit drug-like pharmacokinetic properties have been identified. The therapeutic utility of CRF(1) antagonists should soon be clearer: several small molecules are currently in Phase II/III clinical trials for depression, anxiety and irritable bowel syndrome.

A comparison of ligand based virtual screening methods and application to corticotropin releasing factor 1 receptor

Ligand based virtual screening approaches were applied to the CRF1 receptor. We compared ECFP6 fingerprints, FTrees, Topomers, Cresset FieldScreen, ROCS OpenEye shape Tanimoto, OpenEye combo-score and OpenEye electrostatics. The 3D methods OpenEye Shape Tanimoto, combo-score and Topomers performed the best at separating actives from inactives in retrospective experiments. By virtue of their higher enrichment the same methods identified more active scaffolds. However, amongst a given number of active compounds the Cresset and OpenEye electrostatic methods contained more scaffolds and returned ranked compounds with greater diversity. A selection of the methods were employed to recommend compounds for screening in a prospective experiment. New CRF1 actives antagonists were found. The new actives contained different underlying chemical architecture to the query molecules, results indicative of successful scaffold-hopping.

Drugability of extracellular targets: discovery of small molecule drugs targeting allosteric, functional, and subunit-selective sites on GPCRs and ion channels

Beginning with the discovery of the structure of deoxyribose nucleic acid in 1953, by James Watson and Francis Crick, the sequencing of the entire human genome some 50 years later, has begun to quantify the classes and types of proteins that may have relevance to human disease with the promise of rapidly identifying compounds that can modulate these proteins so as to have a beneficial and therapeutic outcome. This so called 'drugable space' involves a variety of membrane-bound proteins including the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), ion channels, and transporters among others. The recent number of novel therapeutics targeting membrane-bound extracellular proteins that have reached the market in the past 20 years however pales in magnitude when compared, during the same timeframe, to the advancements made in the technologies available to aid in the discovery of these novel therapeutics. This review will consider select examples of extracellular drugable targets and focus on the GPCRs and ion channels highlighting the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) type 1 and gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors, and the Ca(V)2.2 voltage-gated ion channel. These examples will elaborate current technological advancements in drug discovery and provide a prospective framework for future drug development.

Molecular recognition of corticotropin-releasing factor by its G-protein-coupled receptor CRFR1

The bimolecular interaction between corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), a neuropeptide, and its type 1 receptor (CRFR1), a class B G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), is crucial for activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in response to stress, and has been a target of intense drug design for the treatment of anxiety, depression, and related disorders. As a class B GPCR, CRFR1 contains an N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD) that provides the primary ligand binding determinants. Here we present three crystal structures of the human CRFR1 ECD, one in a ligand-free form and two in distinct CRF-bound states. The CRFR1 ECD adopts the alpha-beta-betaalpha fold observed for other class B GPCR ECDs, but the N-terminal alpha-helix is significantly shorter and does not contact CRF. CRF adopts a continuous alpha-helix that docks in a hydrophobic surface of the ECD that is distinct from the peptide-binding site of other class B GPCRs, thereby providing a basis for the specificity of ligand recognition between CRFR1 and other class B GPCRs. The binding of CRF is accompanied by clamp-like conformational changes of two loops of the receptor that anchor the CRF C terminus, including the C-terminal amide group. These structural studies provide a molecular framework for understanding peptide binding and specificity by the CRF receptors as well as a template for designing potent and selective CRFR1 antagonists for therapeutic applications.

Allosteric ligands for the corticotropin releasing factor type 1 receptor modulate conformational states involved in receptor activation

Allosteric modulators of G-protein-coupled receptors can regulate conformational states involved in receptor activation ( Mol Pharmacol 58: 1412-1423, 2000 ). This hypothesis was investigated for the corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 (CRF(1)) receptor using a novel series of ligands with varying allosteric effect on CRF binding (inhibition to enhancement). For the G-protein-uncoupled receptor, allosteric modulation of CRF binding was correlated with nonpeptide ligand signaling activity; inverse agonists inhibited and agonists enhanced CRF binding. These data were quantitatively consistent with a two-state equilibrium underlying the modulation of CRF binding to the G-protein-uncoupled receptor. We next investigated the allosteric effect on CRF-stimulated G-protein coupling. Ligands inhibited CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation regardless of their effect on the G-protein-uncoupled state. The modulators reduced CRF E(max) values, suggesting that they reduced the efficacy of a CRF-bound active state to couple to G-protein. Consistent with this hypothesis, the modulators inhibited binding to a guanine nucleotide-sensitive state. Together, the results are quantitatively consistent with a model in which 1) the receptor exists in three predominant states: an inactive state, a weakly active state, and a CRF-bound fully active state; 2) allosteric inverse agonists stabilize the inactive state, and allosteric agonists stabilize the weakly active state; and 3) antagonism of CRF signaling results from destabilization of the fully active state. These findings imply that nonpeptide ligands differentially modulate conformational states involved in CRF(1) receptor activation and suggest that different conformational states can be targeted in designing nonpeptide ligands to inhibit CRF signaling.

Structure of the N-terminal domain of a type B1 G protein-coupled receptor in complex with a peptide ligand

The corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) family of ligands and their receptors coordinate endocrine, behavioral, autonomic, and metabolic responses to stress and play additional roles within the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and other systems. The actions of CRF and the related urocortins are mediated by activation of two receptors, CRF-R1 and CRF-R2, belonging to the B1 family of G protein-coupled receptors. The short-consensus-repeat fold (SCR) within the first extracellular domain (ECD1) of the CRF receptor(s) comprises the major ligand binding site and serves to dock a peptide ligand via its C-terminal segment, thus positioning the N-terminal segment to interact with the receptor's juxtamembrane domains to activate the receptor. Here we present the 3D NMR structure of ECD1 of CRF-R2beta in complex with astressin, a peptide antagonist. In the structure of the complex the C-terminal segment of astressin forms an amphipathic helix, whose entire hydrophobic face interacts with the short-consensus-repeat motif, covering a large intermolecular interface. In addition, the complex is characterized by intermolecular hydrogen bonds and a salt bridge. These interactions are quantitatively weighted by an analysis of the effects on the full-length receptor affinities using an Ala scan of CRF. These structural studies identify the major determinants for CRF ligand specificity and selectivity and support a two-step model for receptor activation. Furthermore, because of a proposed conservation of the fold for both the ECD1s and ligands, this structure can serve as a model for ligand recognition for the entire B1 receptor family.