Left-handedness in cardiac surgery: who's right?

Left-handedness in otolaryngology, who is right?

Objectives

This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of left-handedness (LH) among otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORLHN) practitioners, investigate dexterity's impact on LH trainees, and identify common patterns in their training to improve the training experience.

Methods

A web-based survey was distributed anonymously via email to members of the Saudi Otorhinolaryngology Society. The survey targeted ORLHN attending consultants, board-certified registrars, and current residents. It consisted of three sections: the first focused on the experience of attending consultants in training LH individuals, the second investigated common maneuvers employed by rhinologists, and the third explored the experiences and impacts reported by LH trainees.

Results

The study included 174 participants, and found a 13.2% LH prevalence among them. Rhinologists showed disparities, with 50% advising trainees to stand on the left side of the bed and use their left hand for the scope, whereas the other half asked otherwise. Additionally, 94.4% of the participants had not encountered any courses specifically tailored for LH trainees. Among LH trainees, 57% and 41% reported difficulties in learning and performing side-specific procedures such as functional endoscopic sinus surgery and endoscopic septoplasty, respectively, often attempting to switch to their nondominant hand, and feeling disadvantaged due to their laterality.

Conclusions

Left-handedness presents challenges for both LH trainees and their trainers in surgical specialties, particularly in ORLHN, in which specific positioning and instruments are crucial to gain access to the desired surgical field. Despite these challenges, there is insufficient support for LH individuals. We recommend encouraging LH trainees to openly disclose and discuss their left-handedness, provide them with mentors, establish standardized operating room setups and techniques, supply appropriate instruments, and demonstrate flexibility in accommodating their needs.

Level of evidence

Level 5.

Left-Handed Palming of the Needle Driver: A Technical Report for Surgical Trainees

Left-handed surgical trainees are uniquely challenged when learning how to suture using standard needle drivers designed for right-handed individuals and often feel disadvantaged in comparison to their right-handed peers. "Palming," a suturing technique that improves suturing mechanics and efficiency, cannot be achieved in the standard manner using the left hand. This paper proposes a previously undescribed technique for palming using the left hand that provides many of the same benefits as standard palming methods using the right hand, potentially reducing a common source of inequity in surgical training.

Issues and Strategies in Training Left-Handed Surgeons

Left-hand dominance in surgery is a trait historically regarded as disadvantageous to both the trainee and trainer. The aim of this editorial was to identify challenges faced by left-handed trainees and trainers across multiple surgical specialties and to propose strategies that could be implemented during surgical training. Multiple themes were identified including left-handed surgeons experiencing discrimination due to their handedness. Additionally, a higher incidence of ambidexterity among left-handed trainees was noted, suggesting that left-handed surgeons may be adapting to a lack of accommodations for left-hand trainees. Also explored were the effects of handedness in training vs practice and the effects of handedness across subspecialties including orthopedic surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, and plastic surgery. Solutions discussed involved teaching both right-handed and left-handed surgeons' ambidexterity, pairing left-handed surgeons with left-handed trainees, having left-handed instruments available, adapting the surgical environment to the operating surgeon, communicating laterality, utilizing simulation centers or virtual reality, and encouraging prospective research looking at best-practices.

Left handedness in cardiac surgery-boon or bane?

Left-handed individuals consist of around 11% of the population and true ambidextrous consists of only 2-3% of the total population. Almost a similar ratio is seen in medical profession also. Difficulties are obvious for left-handed cardiac surgeons in the operating room due to regular right-handed instruments, laterality, and positioning of the patients. In this article, we discuss about the problems and the potential solutions for left-handed cardiac surgeons.

The Right Way to Teach Lefties - Exploring the Experiences of Left-Handed Trainees and Surgeons

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the educational experiences of left-handed (LH) surgeons and provides recommendations for educating LH trainees, who face challenges due to their handedness.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A mixed methods analysis was performed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with LH trainees, LH attendings, and right-handed (RH) attendings representing 4 hospitals within a large academic hospital system. Questions were curated from current literature to explore the educational experiences of LH trainees. Inductive and iterative coding techniques were employed to manually generate themes. Laterality questionnaires for skills in daily life and surgery were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Laterality questionnaires demonstrate that LH trainees and surgeons are more mixed-handed and use their nondominant hand to a greater extent in surgery compared to daily life than RH attendings. Key themes were identified in the dimension of learning, including that initial decisions for which hand to use remain fixed throughout career, LH learning is largely self-directed, forced conformation to RH norms and microaggressions are common, LH instruments are rarely practical, and LH surgeons are advantaged with situational ambidexterity. Key themes related to teaching include that communication regarding handedness is lacking, RH surgeons are often unaware of/resistant to a LH approach, the onus is on the trainee to suggest accommodations to use their left hand, and attendings rarely effectively mentor LH learners in using their left hand.

CONCLUSIONS

Left-handed surgeons face challenges in an environment designed for RH individuals, represented by themes regarding learning and teaching experiences of LH surgeons told by themselves and their teachers. Recommendations were created for LH trainees in learning, all attendings in teaching, LH attendings in their opportunity to mentor, and surgical societies in supporting LH trainees. Development of resources for LH trainees could fill a substantial gap. Exploration of how LH surgeons evolve situational ambidexterity could benefit all surgeons.