1
|
Braack KJ, Miles T, Amat F, Brown DJ, Atlas MD, Kuthubutheen J, Mulders WH, Prêle CM. Using x-ray micro computed tomography to quantify intracochlear fibrosis after cochlear implantation in a Guinea pig model. Heliyon 2023; 9:e19343. [PMID: 37662829 PMCID: PMC10474428 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) allow individuals with profound hearing loss to understand speech and perceive sounds. However, not all patients obtain the full benefits that CIs can provide and the cause of this disparity is not fully understood. One possible factor for the variability in outcomes after cochlear implantation, is the development of fibrotic scar tissue around the implanted electrode. It has been hypothesised that limiting the extent of fibrosis after implantation may improve overall CI function, and longevity of the device. Currently, histology is often used to quantify the extent of intracochlear tissue growth after implantation however this method is labour intensive, time-consuming, often involves significant user bias, and causes physical distortion of the fibrosis. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate x-ray micro computed tomography (μCT) as a method to measure the amount and distribution of fibrosis in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantation. Adult guinea pigs were implanted with an inactive electrode, and cochleae harvested eight weeks later (n = 7) and analysed using μCT, to quantify the extent of tissue reaction, followed by histological analysis to confirm that the tissue was indeed fibrotic. Cochleae harvested from an additional six animals following implantation were analysed by μCT, before and after contrast staining with osmium tetroxide (OsO4), to enhance the visualisation of soft tissues within the cochlea, including the tissue reaction. Independent analysis by two observers showed that the quantification method was robust and provided additional information on the distribution of the response within the cochlea. Histological analysis revealed that μCT visualised dense collagenous material and new bone formation but did not capture loose, areolar fibrotic tissue. Treatment with OsO4 significantly enhanced the visible tissue reaction detected using μCT. Overall, μCT is an alternative and reliable method that can be used to quantify the extent of the CI-induced intracochlear tissue response and will be a useful tool for the in vivo assessment of novel anti-fibrotic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kady J. Braack
- School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Tylah Miles
- Institute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Farah Amat
- School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Daniel J. Brown
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Marcus D. Atlas
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
| | - Jafri Kuthubutheen
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
| | | | - Cecilia M. Prêle
- Institute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
- School of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang Z, Chen S, Zhang G, Almadhor A, Li R, Li M, Abbas M, Nguyen Le B, Zhang J, Huang Y. Nanocatalysts as fast and powerful medical intervention: Bridging cochlear implant therapies and advanced modelling using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) for effective treatment of infections. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2023:116285. [PMID: 37301496 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
As human population growth and waste from technologically advanced industries threaten to destabilise our delicate ecological equilibrium, the global spotlight intensifies on environmental contamination and climate-related changes. These challenges extend beyond our external environment and have significant effects on our internal ecosystems. The inner ear, which is responsible for balance and auditory perception, is a prime example. When these sensory mechanisms are impaired, disorders such as deafness can develop. Traditional treatment methods, including systemic antibiotics, are frequently ineffective due to inadequate inner ear penetration. Conventional techniques for administering substances to the inner ear fail to obtain adequate concentrations as well. In this context, cochlear implants laden with nanocatalysts emerge as a promising strategy for the targeted treatment of inner ear infections. Coated with biocompatible nanoparticles containing specific nanocatalysts, these implants can degrade or neutralise contaminants linked to inner ear infections. This method enables the controlled release of nanocatalysts directly at the infection site, thereby maximising therapeutic efficacy and minimising adverse effects. In vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that these implants are effective at eliminating infections, reducing inflammation, and fostering tissue regeneration in the ear. This study investigates the application of hidden Markov models (HMMs) to nanocatalyst-loaded cochlear implants. The HMM is trained on surgical phases in order to accurately identify the various phases associated with implant utilisation. This facilitates the precision placement of surgical instruments within the ear, with a location accuracy between 91% and 95% and a standard deviation between 1% and 5% for both sites. In conclusion, nanocatalysts serve as potent medicinal instruments, bridging cochlear implant therapies and advanced modelling utilising hidden Markov models for the effective treatment of inner ear infections. Cochlear implants loaded with nanocatalysts offer a promising method to combat inner ear infections and enhance patient outcomes by addressing the limitations of conventional treatments.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schraivogel S, Aebischer P, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W. Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1183116. [PMID: 37288065 PMCID: PMC10242064 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1183116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction and objectives Maintaining the structural integrity of the cochlea and preserving residual hearing is crucial for patients, especially for those for whom electric acoustic stimulation is intended. Impedances could reflect trauma due to electrode array insertion and therefore could serve as a biomarker for residual hearing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between residual hearing and estimated impedance subcomponents in a known collective from an exploratory study. Methods A total of 42 patients with lateral wall electrode arrays from the same manufacturer were included in the study. For each patient, we used data from audiological measurements to compute residual hearing, impedance telemetry recordings to estimate near and far-field impedances using an approximation model, and computed tomography scans to extract anatomical information about the cochlea. We assessed the association between residual hearing and impedance subcomponent data using linear mixed-effects models. Results The progression of impedance subcomponents showed that far-field impedance was stable over time compared to near-field impedance. Low-frequency residual hearing demonstrated the progressive nature of hearing loss, with 48% of patients showing full or partial hearing preservation after 6 months of follow-up. Analysis revealed a statistically significant negative effect of near-field impedance on residual hearing (-3.81 dB HL per kΩ; p < 0.001). No significant effect of far-field impedance was found. Conclusion Our findings suggest that near-field impedance offers higher specificity for residual hearing monitoring, while far-field impedance was not significantly associated with residual hearing. These results highlight the potential of impedance subcomponents as objective biomarkers for outcome monitoring in cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Schraivogel
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Aebischer
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weder
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department of ENT—Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Evaluation of the hearing preservation and tissue response of dexamethasone and hyaluronic acid delivery during cochlear implantation on cats in a three-month period study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2023; 50:228-234. [PMID: 35879150 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of DX and HA on hearing preservation and tissue response with cochlear implantation in a cat mode. METHODS 11 cats were bilaterally implanted with Nurotron electrode. According to the different treatment, 22 ears were subdivided into four following groups: Electrode (E) only, Electrode +HA (E+H), Electrode + DX (E+DX), and Electrode +HA +DX (E+H+DX). Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) thresholds were recorded before and 3 months after surgery. After 3 months of cochlear implantation histopathological assessment of all cochleae were performed . RESULTS At low frequencies, the mean ABR thresholds shift in animals treated with E+H+DX demonstrated a statistically significant difference. The proportion of cochleae showing fibrous tissue and new bone formation was 50% in E+H+DX group, 66.7% in E+DX group, 83.3% in E+H group and 100% in E group. CONCLUSION United HA and DX local delivery could provide better protection against hearing loss at low-frequency threshold and could more effectively reduce the trauma related to electrode insertion and the fibrous tissue formation around the electrode.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jwair S, Ramekers D, Thomeer HGXM, Versnel H. Acute effects of cochleostomy and electrode-array insertion on compound action potentials in normal-hearing guinea pigs. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:978230. [PMID: 36845413 PMCID: PMC9945226 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.978230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly used in cochlear implant (CI) surgery, in order to monitor the effect of insertion of the electrode array aiming to preserve residual hearing. However, obtained results are often difficult to interpret. Here we aim to relate changes in ECochG responses to acute trauma induced by different stages of cochlear implantation by performing ECochG at multiple time points during the procedure in normal-hearing guinea pigs. Materials and methods Eleven normal-hearing guinea pigs received a gold-ball electrode that was fixed in the round-window niche. ECochG recordings were performed during the four steps of cochlear implantation using the gold-ball electrode: (1) Bullostomy to expose the round window, (2) hand-drilling of 0.5-0.6 mm cochleostomy in the basal turn near the round window, (3) insertion of a short flexible electrode array, and (4) withdrawal of electrode array. Acoustical stimuli were tones varying in frequency (0.25-16 kHz) and sound level. The ECochG signal was primarily analyzed in terms of threshold, amplitude, and latency of the compound action potential (CAP). Midmodiolar sections of the implanted cochleas were analyzed in terms of trauma to hair cells, modiolar wall, osseous spiral lamina (OSL) and lateral wall. Results Animals were assigned to cochlear trauma categories: minimal (n = 3), moderate (n = 5), or severe (n = 3). After cochleostomy and array insertion, CAP threshold shifts increased with trauma severity. At each stage a threshold shift at high frequencies (4-16 kHz) was accompanied with a threshold shift at low frequencies (0.25-2 kHz) that was 10-20 dB smaller. Withdrawal of the array led to a further worsening of responses, which probably indicates that insertion and removal trauma affected the responses rather than the mere presence of the array. In two instances, CAP threshold shifts were considerably larger than threshold shifts of cochlear microphonics, which could be explained by neural damage due to OSL fracture. A change in amplitudes at high sound levels was strongly correlated with threshold shifts, which is relevant for clinical ECochG performed at one sound level. Conclusion Basal trauma caused by cochleostomy and/or array insertion should be minimized in order to preserve the low-frequency residual hearing of CI recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Jwair
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Dyan Ramekers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hans G. X. M. Thomeer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Huib Versnel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands,*Correspondence: Huib Versnel,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Chu TSM, Chan J. The 100 Most-Cited Manuscripts in Hearing Implants: A Bibliometrics Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e33711. [PMID: 36793822 PMCID: PMC9925031 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to characterise the most frequently cited articles on the topic of hearing implants. A systematic search was carried out using the Thomson Reuters Web of Science Core Collection database. Eligibility criteria restricted the results to primary studies and reviews published from 1970 to 2022 in English dealing primarily with hearing implants. Data including the authors, year of publication, journal, country of origin, number of citations and average number of citations per year were extracted, as well as the impact factors and five-year impact factor of journals publishing the articles. The top 100 papers were published across 23 journals and were cited 23,139 times. The most-cited and influential article describes the first use of the continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy utilised in all modern cochlear implants. More than half of the studies on the list were produced by authors from the United States, and the Ear and Hearing journal had both the greatest number of articles and the greatest number of total citations. To conclude, this research serves as a guide to the most influential articles on the topic of hearing implants, although bibliometric analyses mainly focus on citations. The most-cited article was an influential description of CIS.
Collapse
|
7
|
Van de Heyning PH, Dazert S, Gavilan J, Lassaletta L, Lorens A, Rajan GP, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Tavora-Vieira D, Topsakal V, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Weiss NM, Polak M. Systematic Literature Review of Hearing Preservation Rates in Cochlear Implantation Associated With Medium- and Longer-Length Flexible Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays. Front Surg 2022; 9:893839. [PMID: 36034377 PMCID: PMC9407249 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.893839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe last two decades have demonstrated that preoperative functional acoustic hearing (residual hearing) can be preserved during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. However, the relationship between the electrode array length and postoperative hearing preservation (HP) with lateral wall flexible electrode variants is still under debate.Aims/ObjectivesThis is a systematic literature review that aims to analyze the HP rates of patients with residual hearing for medium-length and longer-length lateral wall electrodes.MethodA systematic literature review methodology was applied following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations to evaluate the HP rates of medium-length and longer-length lateral wall electrodes from one CI manufacturer (medium length FLEX 24, longer length FLEX 28 and FLEX SOFT, MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria). A search using search engine PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) was performed using the search terms “hearing preservation” or “residual hearing” and “cochlear implant” in “All fields.” Articles published only in English between January 01, 2009 and December 31, 2020 were included in the search.ResultsThe HP rate was similar between medium-length (93.4%–93.5%) and longer (92.1%–86.8%) electrodes at 4 months (p = 0.689) and 12 months (p = 0.219). In the medium-length electrode group, patients under the age of 45 years had better HP than patients above the age of 45 years.ConclusionsBoth medium-length and longer electrode arrays showed high hearing preservation rates. Considering the hearing deterioration over time, implanting a longer electrode at primary surgery should be considered, thus preventing the need for future reimplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Correspondence: Paul H Van de Heyning
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Javier Gavilan
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos, III, (CIBERER-U761), Madrid, Spain
| | - Artur Lorens
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Gunesh P Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
- Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H Skarzynski
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Dayse Tavora-Vieira
- Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Audiology Department, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels Health Campus, Belgium
| | - Shin-ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nora M Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marek Polak
- Department of Electrophysiology, R&D, MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choi AM, Brenner MJ, Gorelik D, Erbele ID, Crowson MG, Kadkade P, Takashima M, Santa Maria PL, Hong RS, Rose AS, Ostrander BT, Rabbani CC, Morrison RJ, Weissbrod PA, Tate AD, Kain JJ, Lina IA, Shaffer SR, Ahmed OG. New Medical Device and Therapeutic Approvals in Otolaryngology: State of the Art Review of 2021. OTO Open 2022; 6:2473974X221126495. [PMID: 36171808 PMCID: PMC9511340 DOI: 10.1177/2473974x221126495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate new medical devices and drugs pertinent to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery that were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2021. Data Sources Publicly available FDA device and drug approvals from ENT (ear, nose, and throat), anesthesia, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, and general surgery FDA committees. Review Methods FDA device and therapeutic approvals were identified and reviewed by members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery’s Medical Devices and Drugs Committee. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevance of devices and drugs to otolaryngologists. Medical devices and drugs were then allocated to their respective subspecialty fields for critical review based on available scientific literature. Conclusions The Medical Devices and Drugs Committee reviewed 1153 devices and 52 novel drugs that received FDA approval in 2021 (67 ENT, 106 anesthesia, 618 general surgery and plastic surgery, 362 neurosurgery). Twenty-three devices and 1 therapeutic agent relevant to otolaryngology were included in the state of the art review. Advances spanned all subspecialties, including over-the-counter hearing aid options in otology, expanding treatment options for rhinitis in rhinology, innovative laser-safe endotracheal tubes in laryngology, novel facial rejuvenation and implant technology in facial plastic surgery, and advances in noninvasive and surgical treatment options for obstructive sleep apnea. Implications for Practice FDA approvals for new technology and pharmaceuticals present new opportunities across subspecialties in otolaryngology. Clinicians’ nuanced understanding of the safety, advantages, and limitations of these innovations ensures ongoing progress in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M. Choi
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael J. Brenner
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel Gorelik
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isaac D. Erbele
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew G. Crowson
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Prajoy Kadkade
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Sunnyside, New York, USA
| | - Masayoshi Takashima
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Peter L. Santa Maria
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Robert S. Hong
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA
| | - Austin S. Rose
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Benjamin T. Ostrander
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Cyrus C. Rabbani
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert J. Morrison
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Philip A. Weissbrod
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alan D. Tate
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joshua J. Kain
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ioan A. Lina
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Scott R. Shaffer
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Marlton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Omar G. Ahmed
- Medical Devices and Drugs Committee, American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Avasarala VS, Jinka SK, Jeyakumar A. Complications of Cochleostomy Versus Round Window Surgical Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2022; 14:e25451. [PMID: 35774686 PMCID: PMC9239322 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
10
|
Lee SY, Jeon H, Kim Y, Choi HY, Carandang M, Yoo HS, Choi BY. Natural course of residual hearing preservation with a slim, modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Am J Otolaryngol 2022; 43:103382. [PMID: 35151931 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding residual hearing preservation and its natural course following cochlear implantation is important for developing rehabilitation strategies for hearing loss. However, non-uniform evaluation criteria and varying surgical skills pose challenges in fair comparison of the effect of different electrodes on residual hearing preservation. We compared the effect of a slim modiolar electrode (SME) and a slim straight electrode (SSE), implanted by a single surgeon, on progression of residual hearing using different parameters, based on cross-sectional and longitudinal audiological analyses. METHODS Patients with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) ≤85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz and who underwent minimally traumatic surgical techniques were included. The progression of residual hearing using threshold shifts, hearing preservation rate according to the HEARRING classification, and maintenance of functional low-frequency hearing potentially qualifying for a hybrid stimulation was analyzed up to five time points throughout the 1-year follow-up period. RESULTS Threshold shifts and hearing preservation rates according to the HEARRING classification of the electrodes were comparable from 3 months through 12 months postoperatively. Maintenance of functional low-frequency hearing, required for the usage of a hybrid stimulation, was similar for both electrodes. A substantial proportion of implantees with SME use a hybrid stimulation, resulting in long-term use. However, a difference in the pattern of postoperative residual hearing preservation between the two electrodes is possible, probably due to differences in their physical characteristics and location. Specifically, correlation analysis exhibited that significantly less tight modiolar proximity negatively affect the residual hearing preservation, albeit only at 3 months postoperatively, among patients with the SME. CONCLUSION Collectively, both SME and SSE implantation showed favorable residual hearing preservation. Our findings further refine the recently proposed hearing preservation with the SME and suggest that the physical characteristics and location of electrodes, in terms of electrode-to-modiolus distance, could affect loss of acoustic hearing in various ways.
Collapse
|
11
|
Walia A, Shew MA, Lefler SM, Kallogjeri D, Wick CC, Holden TA, Durakovic N, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA. Is Characteristic Frequency Limiting Real-Time Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation? Front Neurosci 2022; 16:915302. [PMID: 35937872 PMCID: PMC9354607 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.915302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings during cochlear implantation have shown promise in estimating the impact on residual hearing. The purpose of the study was (1) to determine whether a 250-Hz stimulus is superior to 500-Hz in detecting residual hearing decrement and if so; (2) to evaluate whether crossing the 500-Hz tonotopic, characteristic frequency (CF) place partly explains the problems experienced using 500-Hz. Design Multifrequency ECochG comprising an alternating, interleaved acoustic complex of 250- and 500-Hz stimuli was used to elicit cochlear microphonics (CMs) during insertion. The largest ECochG drops (≥30% reduction in CM) were identified. After insertion, ECochG responses were measured using the individual electrodes along the array for both 250- and 500-Hz stimuli. Univariate regression was used to predict whether 250- or 500-Hz CM drops explained low-frequency pure tone average (LFPTA; 125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) shift at 1-month post-activation. Postoperative CT scans were performed to evaluate cochlear size and angular insertion depth. Results For perimodiolar insertions (N = 34), there was a stronger linear correlation between the largest ECochG drop using 250-Hz stimulus and LFPTA shift (r = 0.58), compared to 500-Hz (r = 0.31). The 250- and 500-Hz CM insertion tracings showed an amplitude peak at two different locations, with the 500-Hz peak occurring earlier in most cases than the 250-Hz peak, consistent with tonotopicity. When using the entire array for recordings after insertion, a maximum 500-Hz response was observed 2-6 electrodes basal to the most-apical electrode in 20 cases (58.9%). For insertions where the apical insertion angle is >350 degrees and the cochlear diameter is <9.5 mm, the maximum 500-Hz ECochG response may occur at the non-apical most electrode. For lateral wall insertions (N = 14), the maximum 250- and 500-Hz CM response occurred at the most-apical electrode in all but one case. Conclusion Using 250-Hz stimulus for ECochG feedback during implantation is more predictive of hearing preservation than 500-Hz. This is due to the electrode passing the 500-Hz CF during insertion which may be misidentified as intracochlear trauma; this is particularly important in subjects with smaller cochlear diameters and deeper insertions. Multifrequency ECochG can be used to differentiate between trauma and advancement of the apical electrode beyond the CF.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lenarz T, Buechner A, Gantz B, Hansen M, Tejani VD, Labadie R, O'Connell B, Buchman CA, Valenzuela CV, Adunka OF, Harris MS, Riggs WJ, Fitzpatrick D, Koka K. Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e72-e78. [PMID: 34739427 PMCID: PMC8671360 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare intraoperative intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) with hearing preservation outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) subjects. DESIGN Intraoperative electrocochleography was performed in adult CI subjects who were recipients of Advanced Bionics' Bionics LLC precurved HiFocus MidScala or straight HiFocus SlimJ electrode arrays. ECochG responses were recorded from the most apical electrode contact during insertion. No changes to the insertions were made due to ECochG monitoring. No information about insertion resistance was collected. ECochG drops were estimated as the change in amplitude from peak (defined as maximum amplitude response) to drop (largest drop) point after the peak during insertion was measured following the peak response. Audiometric thresholds from each subject were obtained before and approximately 1 month after CI surgery. The change in pure tone average for frequencies between 125 Hz and 500 Hz was measured after surgery. No postoperative CT scans were collected as part of this study. RESULTS A total of 68 subjects from five surgical centers participated in the study. The study sample included 30 MidScala and 38 SlimJ electrodes implanted by approximately 20 surgeons who contributed to the study. Although a wide range of results were observed, there was a moderate positive correlation (Pearson Correlation coefficient, r = 0.56, p < 0.01) between the size of the ECochG drop and the magnitude of pure tone average change. This trend was present for both the MidScala and SlimJ arrays. The SlimJ and MidScala arrays produced significantly different hearing loss after surgery. CONCLUSION Large ECochG amplitude drops observed during electrode insertion indicated poorer hearing preservation. Although the outcomes were variable, this information may be helpful to guide surgical decision-making when contemplating full electrode insertion and the likelihood of hearing preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Lenarz
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas Buechner
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bruce Gantz
- University of Iowa, Department of Otolaryngology, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Marlan Hansen
- University of Iowa, Department of Otolaryngology, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Viral D Tejani
- University of Iowa, Department of Otolaryngology, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Robert Labadie
- Vanderbilt University and Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Brendan O'Connell
- Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Associates, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Craig Alan Buchman
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Carla V Valenzuela
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Oliver F Adunka
- The Ohio State University, Department of Otolaryngology, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - William J Riggs
- The Ohio State University, Department of Otolaryngology, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Douglas Fitzpatrick
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Otolaryngology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kanthaiah Koka
- Advanced Bionics LLC, Research and Technology, Valencia, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kostevich IV, Kuzovkov VE, Lilenko AS, Sugarova SB. [The significance of microanatomy of the round window in terms of cochlear implantation]. Vestn Otorinolaringol 2021; 86:42-47. [PMID: 34783472 DOI: 10.17116/otorino20218605142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Sensoneural hearing loss is a polyetiological disease, which is often a secondary reflection of systemic pathology and is associated with damage of the cochlea and auditory nerve receptors. An important point in the surgical stage of cochlear implantation is the introduction of an implant active electrode into the cochleostomy spiral channel through the cochleostoma or round window. However, the issue of intra-cochlear structures surgical trauma in such surgical intervention seems to be very important, as it may reduce the success of subsequent rehabilitation. Therefore, the study of the anatomy of the round window and adjuscent areas was the objective of this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I V Kostevich
- St. Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - V E Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - A S Lilenko
- St. Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - S B Sugarova
- St. Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech, St. Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Imsiecke M, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W. Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users. Ear Hear 2021; 41:868-882. [PMID: 31592902 PMCID: PMC7676483 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing and different electrode insertion depths and to investigate the influence on speech reception. The effects of different fitting strategies-meet, overlap, and a newly developed masking adjusted fitting (UNMASKfit)-on speech reception are compared. If electric-acoustic masking has a detrimental effect on speech reception, the individualized UNMASKfit map might be able to reduce masking and thereby enhance speech reception. DESIGN Fifteen experienced MED-EL Flex electrode recipients with ipsilateral residual hearing participated in a crosssover design study using three fitting strategies for 4 weeks each. The following strategies were compared: (1) a meet fitting, dividing the frequency range between electric and acoustic stimulation, (2) an overlap fitting, delivering part of the frequency range both acoustically and electrically, and (3) the UNMASKfit, reducing the electric stimulation according to the individual electric-on-acoustic masking strength. A psychoacoustic masking procedure was used to measure the changes in acoustic thresholds due to the presence of electric maskers. Speech reception was measured in noise with the Oldenburg Matrix Sentence test. RESULTS Behavioral thresholds of acoustic probe tones were significantly elevated in the presence of electric maskers. A maximum of masking was observed when the difference in location between the electric and acoustic stimulation was around one octave in place frequency. Speech reception scores and strength of masking showed a dependency on residual hearing, and speech reception was significantly reduced in the overlap fitting strategy. Electric- acoustic stimulation significantly improved speech reception over electric stimulation alone, with a tendency toward a larger benefit with the UNMASKfit map. In addition, masking was significantly inversely correlated to the speech reception performance difference between the overlap and the meet fitting. CONCLUSIONS (1) This study confirmed the interaction between ipsilateral electric and acoustic stimulation in a psychoacoustic masking experiment. (2) The overlap fitting yielded poorer speech reception performance in stationary noise especially in subjects with strong masking. (3) The newly developed UNMASKfit strategy yielded similar speech reception thresholds with an enhanced acoustic benefit, while at the same time reducing the electric stimulation. This could be beneficial in the long-term if applied as a standard fitting, as hair cells are exposed to less possibly adverse electric stimulation. In this study, the UNMASKfit allowed the participants a better use of their natural hearing even after 1 month of adaptation. It might be feasible to transfer these results to the clinic, by fitting patients with the UNMASKfit upon their first fitting appointment, so that longer adaptation times can further improve speech reception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Imsiecke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Benjamin Krüger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all,' Hanover, Germany
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all,' Hanover, Germany
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all,' Hanover, Germany
| | - Waldo Nogueira
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence ‘Hearing4all,' Hanover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Imsiecke M, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W. Amplitude Growth Functions of Auditory Nerve Responses to Electric Pulse Stimulation With Varied Interphase Gaps in Cochlear Implant Users With Ipsilateral Residual Hearing. Trends Hear 2021; 25:23312165211014137. [PMID: 34181493 PMCID: PMC8243142 DOI: 10.1177/23312165211014137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Amplitude growth functions (AGFs) of electrically evoked compound action
potentials (eCAPs) with varying interphase gaps (IPGs) were measured in cochlear
implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing (electric-acoustic stimulation
[EAS]). It was hypothesized that IPG effects on AGFs provide an objective
measure to estimate neural health. This hypothesis was tested in EAS users, as
residual low-frequency hearing might imply survival of hair cells and hence
better neural health in apical compared to basal cochlear regions. A total of 16
MED-EL EAS subjects participated, as well as a control group of 16 deaf cochlear
implant users. The IPG effect on the AGF characteristics of slope, threshold,
dynamic range, and stimulus level at 50% maximum eCAP amplitude
(level50%) was investigated. AGF threshold and
level50% were significantly affected by the IPG in both EAS and
control group. The magnitude of AGF characteristics correlated with electrode
impedance and electrode-modiolus distance (EMD) in both groups. In contrast, the
change of the AGF characteristics with increasing IPG was independent of these
electrode-specific measures. The IPG effect on the AGF level50% in
both groups, as well as on the threshold in EAS users, correlated with the
duration of hearing loss, which is a predictor of neural health. In EAS users, a
significantly different IPG effect on level50% was found between
apical and medial electrodes. This outcome is consistent with our hypothesis
that the influence of IPG effects on AGF characteristics provides a sensitive
measurement and may indicate better neural health in the apex compared to the
medial cochlear region in EAS users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Imsiecke
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All," Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All," Hannover, Germany
| | - Waldo Nogueira
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All," Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A Novel Capacitive Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Sensing System to Discriminate Failure Patterns. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:713-720. [PMID: 33661236 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The research is to propose a sensing system to ensure the electrode array being correctly placed inside the cochlea. Instead of applying extra sensors to the array, the capacitive information from multiple points of the array is gathered and analyzed to determine the state and behavior of the electrode array. METHODS The sensing system measures electrode bipolar capacitances between multiple pairs of electrodes during the insertion. The principal component analysis (PCA) method is then applied to analysis the recorded data to discriminate insertion patterns. RESULTS In total, 384 capacitance profiles from electrode pair (1, 2), and electrode pair (15, 16) were analyzed and compared. In an account of both the electrode pairs, the threshold distance was examined to be d = 1.99 at the average comparison type. The experiment results showed the success rate is over 80% to identify buckling during the insertion on a 2D cochlear model. CONCLUSION This early-stage investigation shows great potential compared with the current practice, which does not provide any feedback to surgeons. The system demonstrates the feasibility of a sensing method for auto-reoccupation electrodes behavior, and it will help surgeons to avoid misplacement of the electrode array inside the cochlea.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sosna-Duranowska M, Tacikowska G, Gos E, Krupa A, Skarzynski PH, Skarzynski H. Vestibular Function After Cochlear Implantation in Partial Deafness Treatment. Front Neurol 2021; 12:667055. [PMID: 34093414 PMCID: PMC8175845 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.667055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Cochlear implantation is a fully accepted method of treating individuals with profound hearing loss. Since the indications for cochlear implantation have broadened and include patients with low-frequency residual hearing, single-sided deafness, or an already implanted ear (meaning bilateral cochlear implantation), the emphasis now needs to be on vestibular protection. Materials and Methods: The research group was made up of 107 patients operated on in the otorhinolaryngosurgery department: 59 females and 48 males, aged 10.4–80.2 years (M = 44.4; SD = 18.4) with hearing loss lasting from 1.4 to 56 years (M = 22.7; SD = 13.5). The patients underwent cVEMP, oVEMP, a caloric test, and vHIT assessment preoperatively, and, postoperatively, cVEMP and oVEMP at 1–3 months and a caloric test and vHIT at 4–6 months. Results: After cochlear implantation, there was postoperative loss of cVEMP in 19.2% of the patients, oVEMP in 17.4%, reduction of caloric response in 11.6%, and postoperative destruction of the lateral, anterior, and posterior semicircular canal as measured with vHIT in 7.1, 3.9, and 4% respectively. Conclusions: Hearing preservation techniques in cochlear implantation are connected with vestibular protection, but the risk of vestibular damage in never totally eliminated. The vestibular preservation is associated with hearing preservation and the relation is statistically significant. Informed consent for cochlear implantation must include information about possible vestibular damage. Since the risk of vestibular damage is appreciable, preoperative otoneurological diagnostics need to be conducted in the following situations: qualification for a second implant, after otosurgery (especially if the opposite ear is to be implanted), having a history of vestibular complaints, and when there are no strict audiological or anatomical indications on which side to operate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elzbieta Gos
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Krupa
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Henryk Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.,Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ludwig S, Riemann N, Hans S, Christov F, Ludwig JM, Saxe J, Arweiler-Harbeck D. Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:1233-1242. [PMID: 33830367 PMCID: PMC8897335 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing. METHODS A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85 dB and/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60 dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (n = 17), while all others belonged to the noRH group (n = 30). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison. RESULTS We compared 17 RH-30 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A§E® phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Ludwig
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Niklas Riemann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefan Hans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Christov
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- ENT Practice Cologne-Bonn, Wesseling, Germany
| | - Johannes Maximilian Ludwig
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Judith Saxe
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Diana Arweiler-Harbeck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Intra-cochlear fibrous tissue formation around the electrode following cochlear implantation affects the electrode impedance as well as electrode explantation during reimplantation surgeries. Applying corticosteroids in cochlear implantation is one way of minimizing the intra-cochlear fibrous tissue formation around the electrode. It were J. Kiefer, C. von Ilberg, and W. Gstöttner who proposed the first idea on drug delivery application in cochlear implantation to MED-EL in the year 2000. During the twenty years of translational research efforts at MED-EL in collaboration with several clinics and research institutions from across the world, preclinical safety and efficacy of corticosteroids were performed leading to the final formulation of the electrode design. In parallel to the drug eluting CI electrode development, MED-EL also invested research efforts into developing tools enabling delivery of pharmaceutical agents of surgeon's choice inside the cochlea. The inner ear catheter designed to administer drug substances into the cochlea was CE marked in 2020. A feasibility study in human subjects with MED-EL CI featuring dexamethasone-eluting electrode array started in June 2020. This article covers the milestones of translational research towards the drug delivery in CI application that took place in association with MED-EL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ingeborg Hochmair
- MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geraete Gesellschaft m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Copson B, Wijewickrema S, Ma X, Zhou Y, Gerard JM, O'Leary S. Surgical approach to the facial recess influences the acceptable trajectory of cochlear implantation electrodes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:137-147. [PMID: 33547488 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06633-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide practical guidance to the operative surgeon by mapping the location, where acceptable straight-line virtual cochlear implant electrode trajectories intersect the facial recess. In addition, to investigate the influence of facial recess preparation, virtual electrode width and surgical approach to the cochlea on these available trajectories. METHODS The study was performed on imaging data from eight cadaveric temporal bones within the University of Melbourne Virtual Reality (VR) Temporal Bone Surgery Simulator. The facial recess was opened to varying degrees, and acceptable trajectory vectors with varying diameters were calculated for electrode insertions via cochleostomy or round window membrane (RWM). The percentage of acceptable insertion vectors through each location of the facial recess was visually represented using heatmaps. RESULTS Seven of the eight bones allowed for acceptable vector trajectories via both cochleostomy and RWM approaches. These acceptable trajectories were more likely to lie superiorly within the facial recess for insertion via the round window, and inferiorly for insertion via cochleostomy. Cochleostomy insertions required a greater degree of preparation and skeletonisation of the junction of the facial nerve and chorda tympani within the facial recess. The width of the virtual electrode had only marginal impact on the availability of acceptable trajectories. Heatmaps emphasised the intimate relationship the acceptable trajectories have with the facial nerve and chorda tympani. CONCLUSION These findings highlight the differences in the acceptable straight-line trajectories for electrodes when implanted via the round window or cochleostomy. There were notable exceptions to both surgical approaches, likely explained by the variation of hook region anatomy. The methodology used in this study holds promise for translation to patient specific surgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Copson
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
| | - Sudanthi Wijewickrema
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Xingjun Ma
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Yun Zhou
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Jean-Marc Gerard
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Stephen O'Leary
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Level 5, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32, Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Preservation of residual hearing is one of the main goals in present cochlear implantation surgery. Especially for this purpose, smaller and softer electrode carriers were developed that are to be inserted through the round window membrane to minimize trauma. By using these electrodes and insertion technique, residual hearing can be preserved in a large number of patients. Unfortunately, some of these patients with initially preserved residual hearing after cochlear implantation lose it later on. The reason for this is unknown but it is speculated about a correlation with an increase in impedance, since increased impedance values are linked to intracochlear inflammation and tissue reaction. Our hypothesis for this study design was that an increase in impedance predicts changes in residual hearing under clinical conditions. DESIGN Data of all adult patients (N = 122) receiving a Hybrid-L24 cochlear implant at our center between 2005 and early 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Impedance values in Common Ground mode as measured during clinical routine and referring audiological test data (audiometric thresholds under headphones) were collected. Changes between consecutive measurements were calculated for impedance values and hearing thresholds for each patient. Correlations between changes in impedances and acoustic hearing thresholds were calculated. Average values were compared as well as patients with largest impedance changes within the observation period were evaluated separately. RESULTS Group mean values of impedances were between 5 and 7 kΩ and stable over time with higher values on basal electrode contacts compared with apical contacts. Average hearing thresholds at the time of initial fitting were between 40 to 50 dB (250 Hz) and 90 dB (1 kHz) with a loss of about 10 dB compared with preoperative values. Correlation between impedance changes and threshold changes was found, but too inconsistently to imply a true relationship. When evaluating the 20 patients with the largest impedance changes during the observation period (all >1 kΩ from one appointment to the next one), some patients were found where hearing loss is timely connected and highly correlated with an unusual impedance change. But large impedance changes were also observed without affecting hearing thresholds and hearing loss was found without impedance change. CONCLUSIONS Changes in impedance as measured during clinical routine cannot be taken as an indicator for a late acoustic hearing loss.
Collapse
|
22
|
Cochlear Implantation With a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode Array: Functional and Anatomical Changes in Non-Human Primates. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e812-e822. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
23
|
Schart-Morén N, Erixon E, Li H, Rask-Andersen H. Cochlear implantation and residual hearing preservation long-term follow-up of the first consecutively operated patients using the round window approach in Uppsala, Sweden. Cochlear Implants Int 2020; 21:246-259. [PMID: 32515304 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1755102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: We conducted a long-term follow-up study to investigate the time course of residual hearing in our first 21 consecutively operated cochlear implant (CI) patients using the round window (RW) approach . The study may provide additional information about the influence of a flexible lateral wall electrode array on cochlear function. Methods: Data were available for long-term follow-up (>5 years) in 15 patients. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) was assessed at 0.125-8 kHz preoperatively, and at one, three and >5 years postoperatively. Insertion angle, number of electrodes inside the cochlea, user-time of the processor and stimulation strategy were documented. Results: Twelve out of 15 patients had residual hearing after a follow-up period of five years (mean 86 months, range: 61-103 months). Four out of 15 patients had >75% complete hearing preservation (HP), 8 out of 15 had 25-75% partial HP and 3 out of 15 patients had complete loss of hearing. There was a high correlation between insertion angle and HP. Conclusion: Long-term HP was possible in 12 out of 15 cases. Even patients with complete hearing loss at long-term follow-up showed high performance in speech understanding and were full-time users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Schart-Morén
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Elsa Erixon
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hao Li
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helge Rask-Andersen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Predicting Postoperative Cochlear Implant Performance Using Supervised Machine Learning. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e1013-e1023. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
25
|
Slim Perimodiolar Arrays Are as Effective as Slim Lateral Wall Arrays for Functional Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e674-e679. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
26
|
Sosna M, Tacikowska G, Pietrasik K, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH. Vestibular status in partial deafness. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 87:379-388. [PMID: 31874831 PMCID: PMC9422694 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The hair cells of the cochlea and the vestibulum are closely connected and may be susceptible to the same noxious factors. The relationship between their function has been a continuing field of investigation. The indications for cochlear implantation have been broadened and now include the patients with partial deafness. This raises the question of their vestibular status. Objective The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is any difference between the vestibular function of patients with low frequency residual hearing and those with totally deaf ears. Methods A total of 360 ears with profound sensorineural hearing loss were analysed before cochlear implantation. The patients were divided into four groups, according to their low frequency residual hearing (Group 1 ‒ normal or slightly elevated low frequency residual hearing; Group 2 ‒ elevated threshold but still usable hearing at low frequencies; Group 3 – non-functional residual hearing; Group 4 ‒ no detectable hearing threshold within the limits of the audiometer). The patients underwent vestibular tests: cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, caloric test and video-head impulse test. Results The rates of elicited responses in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential were as follows: in Group 1 (59.3 %); Group 2 (57.5 %); Group 3 (35.2 %); Group 4 (7.7 %). For ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential the percentage of correct outcomes was: Group 1 (70.8 %); Group 2 (56.0 %); Group 3 (40.0 %); Group 4 (14.3 %). For the caloric test we counted normal responses in 88.9 % of Group 1; 81.6 % of Group 2; 57.9 % of Group 3; 53.3 % of Group 4. For video-head impulse test we also found markedly better results in Group1, followed by Group 2, and much worse in Group 3 and 4. Conclusion Patients with partial deafness not only have a better cochlea but also better vestibular function, which needs to be protected. In summary, the better the low frequency residual hearing, the better the vestibular status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Sosna
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Department of Otoneurology, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Kajetany, Poland.
| | - Grazyna Tacikowska
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Department of Otoneurology, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Pietrasik
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Department of Otoneurology, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Kajetany, Poland; Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Poland; Medical University of Warsaw, Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chow AHC, Cai T, McPherson B, Yang F. Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0221405. [PMID: 31437206 PMCID: PMC6705822 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Different guidelines are adopted in clinics and countries to assess pure tone hearing sensitivity in children with otitis media with effusion (OME). Some guidelines specify a broad range of audiometric frequencies that must be tested and from which average thresholds determined, while others leave test frequencies unspecified. For guidelines that suggest specific frequencies there are various pure tone frequencies and frequency ranges given. The present study investigated whether (1) a full range of audiometric frequencies is required to evaluate hearing loss caused by OME in children, or if neighboring frequencies provide essentially the same threshold information, and (2) if different combinations of test frequency pure tone averaging calculations may affect decision criteria for surgical treatment. In a retrospective cohort study, right and left ear air conduction pure tone threshold data were obtained, from 125 Hz to 8 kHz, for 96 children with OME aged 4 to 12 years. Paired t-tests, correlation tests (Pearson’s r, Cronbach’s alpha, intraclass correlation) and absolute differences were used to examine the relationships among pure tone audiometric (PTA) frequencies for all ears with hearing loss. 168 ears were found to have OME-related hearing loss. Only the 125 Hz—250 Hz comparison showed no statistically significant difference between neighboring thresholds. However, only the 4 kHz and 8 kHz comparison showed a clinically significant mean difference of ≥ 10 dB. When viewing individual differences, comparison between 250 Hz and 500 Hz, 125 Hz and 500 Hz, and 4 kHz and 8 kHz, showed a large number of ears with clinically significant differences between test frequencies. Comparisons among low frequency 3 PTA average (500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz), high frequency 3 PTA average (1 kHz, 2 kHz, 4 kHz), and 4 frequency PTA average (500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, 4 kHz) showed no statistically significant differences, with very strong correlations for all comparisons. In addition, for all the combinations of PTA averages, no clinically significant differences were found for the various comparisons or among individual results. Clinically, testing hearing sensitivity in the 125 Hz to 8 kHz range is worthwhile in evaluating hearing sensitivity in children with OME due to large individual variability across audiometric frequencies. However, frequencies tested for criterion averages for surgical treatments of children with OME may be restricted to 3 frequency PTA averages, either an average of 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz or an average of 1 kHz, 2 kHz, 4 kHz, as no clinically significant differences were found using these or a 4 frequency averaging technique. For research purposes, 250 Hz can proxy for hearing thresholds at 125 Hz; and the low frequency 3 PTA average, high frequency 3 PTA average and 4 frequency PTA average may be used interchangeably, as no statistically significant differences were found among these measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Hiu Ching Chow
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ting Cai
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Bradley McPherson
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Feng Yang
- Department of Speech Therapy, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Effects of Various Trajectories on Tissue Preservation in Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Micro-Computed Tomography and Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging Study. Ear Hear 2019; 40:393-400. [PMID: 29952804 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) anatomy and potential damage to the hook region of the human cochlea following various trajectories at cochlear implantation (CI). The goal was to determine which of the approaches can avoid lesions to the soft tissues, including the basilar membrane and its suspension to the lateral wall. Currently, there is increased emphasis on conservation of inner ear structures, even in nonhearing preservation CI surgery. DESIGN Micro-computed tomography and various CI approaches were made in an archival collection of macerated and freshly fixed human temporal bones. Furthermore, synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging was used to reproduce the soft tissues. The 3D anatomy was investigated using bony and soft tissue algorithms, and influences on inner ear structures were examined. RESULTS Micro-computed tomography with 3D rendering demonstrated the topography of the round window (RW) and osseous spiral laminae, while synchrotron imaging allowed reproduction of soft tissues such as the basilar membrane and its suspension around the RW membrane. Anterior cochleostomies and anteroinferior cochleostomies invariably damaged the intracochlear soft tissues while inferior cochleostomies sporadically left inner ear structures unaffected. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that cochleostomy approaches often traumatize the soft tissues at the hook region at CI surgery. For optimal structural preservation, the RW approach is, therefore, recommended.
Collapse
|
29
|
Sosna M, Tacikowska G, Pietrasik K, Skarżyński H, Lorens A, Skarżyński PH. Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment-electro acoustic stimulation (PDT-EAS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276:1951-1959. [PMID: 31053967 PMCID: PMC6581932 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05425-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Although the cochlear implantation procedure does not interfere with vestibular structures directly, both the vestibulum and the cochlea share the same inner ear fluid space, and this fluid may be responsible for transferring possibly damaging forces from one to the other. The purpose of the study is to assess postoperative vestibular function after partial deafness treatment–electro-acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) cochlear implantation. Methods Fifty-five patients were included in the study (30 females, 25 males, age 11–80, mean 41.8 ± 19.35). cVEMP and oVEMP were performed preoperatively and 1–3 months after cochlear implantation. Caloric and vHIT tests were conducted preoperatively and 4–6 months after cochlear implantation. Results Our study shows that, based on a wide range of electrodes, use of PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. It gives a rate of saccular damage of 15.79%, utricular damage of 19.04%, and a horizontal semicircular canal response reduction of 15.79%. Conclusions PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that the risk of vestibular damage cannot be totally eliminated even when hearing preservation techniques are adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Sosna
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Otoneurology, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17 Street, 05-830, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Grażyna Tacikowska
- Department of Otoneurology, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17 Street, 05-830, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Pietrasik
- Department of Otoneurology, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17 Street, 05-830, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Henryk Skarżyński
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17 Street, 05-830, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Artur Lorens
- Department of Auditory Implant and Perception, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17 Street, 05-830, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H Skarżyński
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17 Street, 05-830, Kajetany, Poland.
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Poland.
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sierra C, Calderón M, Bárcena E, Tisaire A, Raboso E. Preservation of Residual Hearing After Cochlear Implant Surgery With Deep Insertion Electrode Arrays. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40:e373-e380. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
31
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is known that the insertion of the intracochlear electrode is critical procedure because the damage around cochlear structures can deteriorate hearing restoration. To reduce the trauma during the electrode insertion surgery, we developed a thin and flexible intracochlear electrode array constructed with carbon nanotube (CNT) bundles. METHODS Each CNT bundle was used for an individual electrode channel after coated with parylene C for insulation. By encapsulating eight CNT bundles with silicone elastomer, an 8-channel intracochlear electrode array was fabricated. The mechanical and electrochemical characteristics were assessed to evaluate the flexibility and feasibility of the electrode as a stimulation electrode. The functionality of the electrode was confirmed by electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABR) recorded from a rat. RESULTS The proposed electrode has a thickness of 135 μm at the apex and 395 μm at the base. It was demonstrated that the CNT bundle-based electrodes require 6-fold the lower insertion force than metal wire-based electrodes. The electrode impedance and the cathodic charge storage capacitance (CSCc) were 2.70 kΩ ∠-20.4° at 1 kHz and - 708 mC/cm2, respectively. The eABR waves III and V were observed when stimulation current is greater than 50 μA. CONCLUSION A thin and flexible CNT bundle-based intracochlear electrode array was successfully developed. The feasibility of the proposed electrode was shown in terms of mechanical and electrochemical characteristics. A proposed CNT bundle-based intracochlear electrode may reduce the risk of trauma during electrode insertion surgery.
Collapse
|
32
|
Cieśla K, Wolak T, Lorens A, Heimler B, Skarżyński H, Amedi A. Immediate improvement of speech-in-noise perception through multisensory stimulation via an auditory to tactile sensory substitution. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2019; 37:155-166. [PMID: 31006700 PMCID: PMC6598101 DOI: 10.3233/rnn-190898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing loss is becoming a real social and health problem. Its prevalence in the elderly is an epidemic. The risk of developing hearing loss is also growing among younger people. If left untreated, hearing loss can perpetuate development of neurodegenerative diseases, including dementia. Despite recent advancements in hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) technologies, hearing impaired users still encounter significant practical and social challenges, with or without aids. In particular, they all struggle with understanding speech in challenging acoustic environments, especially in presence of a competing speaker. OBJECTIVES In the current proof-of-concept study we tested whether multisensory stimulation, pairing audition and a minimal-size touch device would improve intelligibility of speech in noise. METHODS To this aim we developed an audio-to-tactile sensory substitution device (SSD) transforming low-frequency speech signals into tactile vibrations delivered on two finger tips. Based on the inverse effectiveness law, i.e., multisensory enhancement is strongest when signal-to-noise ratio is lowest between senses, we embedded non-native language stimuli in speech-like noise and paired it with a low-frequency input conveyed through touch. RESULTS We found immediate and robust improvement in speech recognition (i.e. in the Signal-To-Noise-ratio) in the multisensory condition without any training, at a group level as well as in every participant. The reported improvement at the group-level of 6 dB was indeed major considering that an increase of 10 dB represents a doubling of the perceived loudness. CONCLUSIONS These results are especially relevant when compared to previous SSD studies showing effects in behavior only after a demanding cognitive training. We discuss the implications of our results for development of SSDs and of specific rehabilitation programs for the hearing impaired either using or not using HAs or CIs. We also discuss the potential application of such a set-up for sense augmentation, such as when learning a new language.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Cieśla
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Medical Neurobiology, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Hadassah Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tomasz Wolak
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Artur Lorens
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Benedetta Heimler
- Department of Medical Neurobiology, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Hadassah Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Henryk Skarżyński
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Amir Amedi
- Department of Medical Neurobiology, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Hadassah Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
- The Cognitive Science Program, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Manrique M, Ramos Á, de Paula Vernetta C, Gil-Carcedo E, Lassaletta L, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Espinosa JM, Batuecas Á, Cenjor C, Lavilla MJ, Núñez F, Cavalle L, Huarte A. Guideline on Cochlear Implants. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2017.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
34
|
Welch C, Dillon MT, Pillsbury HC. Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Hearing Preservation. Semin Hear 2018; 39:414-427. [PMID: 30374212 PMCID: PMC6203459 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1670707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Hearing loss affects 30 million people in the United States, and a subset of these patients have normal low-frequency hearing and ski-sloped high-frequency hearing loss. For these patients, hearing aids alone may not provide adequate benefit. Cochlear implantation alone has been utilized to improve speech perception. The addition of high-frequency electric hearing to low-frequency acoustic hearing in these patients is beneficial. Technical improvements have allowed preservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implant recipients, allowing for electric and acoustic stimulation in the same ear with significant improvements in speech perception, sound localization, music appreciation, and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Margaret T. Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Harold C. Pillsbury
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The Human Cochlear Aqueduct and Accessory Canals: a Micro-CT Analysis Using a 3D Reconstruction Paradigm. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39:e429-e435. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
36
|
Mangado N, Pons-Prats J, Coma M, Mistrík P, Piella G, Ceresa M, González Ballester MÁ. Computational Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Surgery Outcomes Accounting for Uncertainty and Parameter Variability. Front Physiol 2018; 9:498. [PMID: 29875673 PMCID: PMC5975103 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation (CI) is a complex surgical procedure that restores hearing in patients with severe deafness. The successful outcome of the implanted device relies on a group of factors, some of them unpredictable or difficult to control. Uncertainties on the electrode array position and the electrical properties of the bone make it difficult to accurately compute the current propagation delivered by the implant and the resulting neural activation. In this context, we use uncertainty quantification methods to explore how these uncertainties propagate through all the stages of CI computational simulations. To this end, we employ an automatic framework, encompassing from the finite element generation of CI models to the assessment of the neural response induced by the implant stimulation. To estimate the confidence intervals of the simulated neural response, we propose two approaches. First, we encode the variability of the cochlear morphology among the population through a statistical shape model. This allows us to generate a population of virtual patients using Monte Carlo sampling and to assign to each of them a set of parameter values according to a statistical distribution. The framework is implemented and parallelized in a High Throughput Computing environment that enables to maximize the available computing resources. Secondly, we perform a patient-specific study to evaluate the computed neural response to seek the optimal post-implantation stimulus levels. Considering a single cochlear morphology, the uncertainty in tissue electrical resistivity and surgical insertion parameters is propagated using the Probabilistic Collocation method, which reduces the number of samples to evaluate. Results show that bone resistivity has the highest influence on CI outcomes. In conjunction with the variability of the cochlear length, worst outcomes are obtained for small cochleae with high resistivity values. However, the effect of the surgical insertion length on the CI outcomes could not be clearly observed, since its impact may be concealed by the other considered parameters. Whereas the Monte Carlo approach implies a high computational cost, Probabilistic Collocation presents a suitable trade-off between precision and computational time. Results suggest that the proposed framework has a great potential to help in both surgical planning decisions and in the audiological setting process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nerea Mangado
- BCNMedTech, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Pons-Prats
- International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Martí Coma
- International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Gemma Piella
- BCNMedTech, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mario Ceresa
- BCNMedTech, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electrical stimulation is normally performed on ears that have no hearing function, i.e., lack functional hair cells. The properties of electrically-evoked responses in these cochleae were investigated in several previous studies. Recent clinical developments have introduced cochlear implantation (CI) in residually-hearing ears to improve speech understanding in noise. The present study documents the known physiological differences between electrical stimulation of hair cells and of spiral ganglion cells, respectively, and reviews the mechanisms of combined electric and acoustic stimulation in the hearing ears. DATA SOURCES Literature review from 1971 to 2016. CONCLUSIONS Compared with pure electrical stimulation the combined electroacoustic stimulation provides additional low-frequency information and expands the dynamic range of the input. Physiological studies document a weaker synchronization of the evoked activity in electrically stimulated hearing ears compared with deaf ears that reduces the hypersynchronization of electrically-evoked activity. The findings suggest the possibility of balancing the information provided by acoustic and electric input using stimulus intensity. Absence of distorting acoustic-electric interactions allows exploiting these clinical benefits of electroacoustic stimulation.
Collapse
|
38
|
Imsiecke M, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing. Hear Res 2018; 364:25-37. [PMID: 29673567 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In order to investigate the temporal mechanisms of the auditory system, psychophysical forward masking experiments were conducted in cochlear implant users who had preserved acoustic hearing in the ipsilateral ear. This unique electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) population allowed the measurement of threshold recovery functions for acoustic or electric probes in the presence of electric or acoustic maskers, respectively. In the electric masking experiment, the forward masked threshold elevation of acoustic probes was measured as a function of the time interval after the offset of the electric masker, i.e. the masker-to-probe interval (MPI). In the acoustic masking experiment, the forward masked threshold elevation of electric probe stimuli was investigated under the influence of a preceding acoustic masker. Since electric pulse trains directly stimulate the auditory nerve, this novel experimental setup allowed the acoustic adaptation properties (attributed to the physiology of the hair cells) to be differentiated from the subsequent processing by more central mechanisms along the auditory pathway. For instance, forward electric masking patterns should result more from the auditory-nerve response to electrical stimulation, while forward acoustic masking patterns should primarily be the result of the recovery from adaptation at the hair-cell neuron interface. Electric masking showed prolonged threshold elevation of acoustic probes, which depended significantly on the masker-to-probe interval. Additionally, threshold elevation was significantly dependent on the similarity between acoustic stimulus frequency and electric place frequency, the electric-acoustic frequency difference (EAFD). Acoustic masking showed a reduced, but statistically significant effect of electric threshold elevation, which did not significantly depend on MPI. Lastly, acoustic masking showed longer decay times than electric masking and a reduced dependency on EAFD. In conclusion, the forward masking patterns observed for combined electric-acoustic stimulation provide further insights into the temporal mechanisms of the auditory system. For instance, the asymmetry in the amount of threshold elevation, the dependency on EAFD and the time constants for the recovery functions of acoustic and electric masking all indicate that there must be several processes with different latencies (e.g. neural adaptation, depression of spontaneous activity, efferent systems) that are involved in forward masking recovery functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Imsiecke
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
| | - Benjamin Krüger
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4All', Hanover, Germany.
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4All', Hanover, Germany.
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4All', Hanover, Germany.
| | - Waldo Nogueira
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4All', Hanover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Manrique M, Ramos Á, de Paula Vernetta C, Gil-Carcedo E, Lassaletta L, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Espinosa JM, Batuecas Á, Cenjor C, Lavilla MJ, Núñez F, Cavalle L, Huarte A. Guideline on cochlear implants. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2018; 70:47-54. [PMID: 29598832 DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2017.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the last decade numerous hospitals have started to work with patients who are candidates for a cochlear implant (CI) and there have been numerous and relevant advances in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss that extended the indications for cochlear implants. OBJECTIVES To provide a guideline on cochlear implants to specialists in otorhinolaryngology, other medical specialities, health authorities and society in general. METHODS The Scientific Committees of Otology, Otoneurology and Audiology from the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC), in a coordinated and agreed way, performed a review of the current state of CI based on the existing regulations and in the scientific publications referenced in the bibliography of the document drafted. RESULTS The clinical guideline on cochlear implants provides information on: a) Definition and description of Cochlear Implant; b) Indications for cochlear implants; c) Organizational requirements for a cochlear implant programme. CONCLUSIONS A clinical guideline on cochlear implants has been developed by a Committee of Experts of the SEORL-CCC, to help and guide all the health professionals involved in this field of CI in decision-making to treathearing impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Manrique
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España.
| | - Ángel Ramos
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Carlos de Paula Vernetta
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Elisa Gil-Carcedo
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otoneurología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER-U761), Madrid, España
| | - Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otoneurología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Juan Manuel Espinosa
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otoneurología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Ángel Batuecas
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otoneurología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Carlos Cenjor
- Miembros de la Comisión de Otoneurología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - María José Lavilla
- Miembros de la Comisión de Audiología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Faustino Núñez
- Miembros de la Comisión de Audiología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Laura Cavalle
- Miembros de la Comisión de Audiología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| | - Alicia Huarte
- Miembros de la Comisión de Audiología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears. Sci Rep 2017; 7:12500. [PMID: 28970567 PMCID: PMC5624923 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12298-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in cochlear implant (CI) technology allow for acoustic and electric hearing to be combined within the same ear (electric-acoustic stimulation, or EAS) and/or across ears (bimodal listening). Integration efficiency (IE; the ratio between observed and predicted performance for acoustic-electric hearing) can be used to estimate how well acoustic and electric hearing are combined. The goal of this study was to evaluate factors that affect IE in EAS and bimodal listening. Vowel recognition was measured in normal-hearing subjects listening to simulations of unimodal, EAS, and bimodal listening. The input/output frequency range for acoustic hearing was 0.1–0.6 kHz. For CI simulations, the output frequency range was 1.2–8.0 kHz to simulate a shallow insertion depth and the input frequency range was varied to provide increasing amounts of speech information and tonotopic mismatch. Performance was best when acoustic and electric hearing was combined in the same ear. IE was significantly better for EAS than for bimodal listening; IE was sensitive to tonotopic mismatch for EAS, but not for bimodal listening. These simulation results suggest acoustic and electric hearing may be more effectively and efficiently combined within rather than across ears, and that tonotopic mismatch should be minimized to maximize the benefit of acoustic-electric hearing, especially for EAS.
Collapse
|
41
|
Yanov YK, Kuzovkov VE, Lilenko AS, Kostevich IV, Sugarova SB, Amonov AS. [Topographic anatomy of the hook region and its significance for the choice of the surgical technique for the cochlear implantation]. Vestn Otorinolaringol 2017. [PMID: 28631670 DOI: 10.17116/otorino20178234-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The mode of the introduction of the active electrode of a cochlear implant into the cochlea remains a key issue as far as cochlear implantation is concerned. Especially much attention has recently been given to the relationship between the anatomical features of the basal region of the cochlea (the so-called 'fish hook') and the possibility to approach it. We have undertaken the attempt to optimize the approach to the tympanic canal (scala tympanica) of the cochlea with a view to reducing to a minimum the risk of an injury to the cochlear structures in the course of cochlear implantation. A total of 35 cadaveric temporal bones were examined to measure the fine structures of the hook region and evaluate the risk of their damages associated with various approaches to the tympanic canal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu K Yanov
- Sankt-Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat and Nose Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia, 190013
| | - V E Kuzovkov
- Sankt-Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat and Nose Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia, 190013
| | - A S Lilenko
- Sankt-Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat and Nose Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia, 190013
| | - I V Kostevich
- Sankt-Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat and Nose Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia, 190013
| | - S B Sugarova
- Sankt-Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat and Nose Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia, 190013
| | - A Sh Amonov
- Republican Research and Practical Medical Centre of Pediatrics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 100179
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zanetti D, Nassif N, Redaelli de Zinis LO. Factors affecting residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA 2017; 35:433-41. [PMID: 26900250 PMCID: PMC4755056 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The likelihood of residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation (CI) is related to surgical factors such as type of cochleostomy (trans-fenestral vs. promontorial), use of lubricants and protective drugs, and device-related factors such as shape, length and flexibility of the array. We investigated the impact of these factors on the hearing preservation rate in adults and children with conventional audiological indications to CI. Eighty-two children aged 1-9 years and 73 adults (16-79 years) received a CI in the right (59%) or left ear (41%). An anterior-inferior promontorial cochleostomy was performed in 143 ears (92%); a trans-fenestral approach was used in 12 (8%). A perimodiolar electrode was implanted in 144 ears (93%), and a straight electrode in the remaining 11 (7%). Overall, some post-operative hearing was retained in 39% of ears. The rate of preservation was higher at the low than at the high frequencies. When correlated with age, side of implant, implant model and type of cochleostomy, the mean threshold variations did not reach statistical significance for any of these variables. A slight trend in favour of better residual hearing preservation in children vs. adults was seen, especially at lower frequencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Zanetti
- Audiology Department, University of Milano, IRCSS Policlinico "Ca' Granda", Milano, Italy
| | - N Nassif
- Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - L O Redaelli de Zinis
- Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Cochlear implantation (CI) surgery is a very successful technique, performed on more than 300,000 people worldwide. However, since the challenge resides in obtaining an accurate surgical planning, computational models are considered to provide such accurate tools. They allow us to plan and simulate beforehand surgical procedures in order to maximally optimize surgery outcomes, and consequently provide valuable information to guide pre-operative decisions. The aim of this work is to develop and validate computational tools to completely assess the patient-specific functional outcome of the CI surgery. A complete automatic framework was developed to create and assess computationally CI models, focusing on the neural response of the auditory nerve fibers (ANF) induced by the electrical stimulation of the implant. The framework was applied to evaluate the effects of ANF degeneration and electrode intra-cochlear position on nerve activation. Results indicate that the intra-cochlear positioning of the electrode has a strong effect on the global performance of the CI. Lateral insertion provides better neural responses in case of peripheral process degeneration, and it is recommended, together with optimized intensity levels, in order to preserve the internal structures. Overall, the developed automatic framework provides an insight into the global performance of the implant in a patient-specific way. This enables to further optimize the functional performance and helps to select the best CI configuration and treatment strategy for a given patient.
Collapse
|
44
|
The Effect of Systemic Steroid on Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation via Round Window Approach: A Guinea Pig Model. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38:962-969. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
45
|
Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Hear Res 2017; 350:226-234. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
46
|
The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function. Ear Hear 2017; 38:e241-e255. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
47
|
Mady LJ, Sukato DC, Fruit J, Palmer C, Raz Y, Hirsch BE, McCall AA. Hearing Preservation: Does Electrode Choice Matter? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157:837-847. [PMID: 28608735 DOI: 10.1177/0194599817707167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective Evaluate if electrode design affects hearing preservation (HP) following cochlear implantation (CI) with full-length electrodes. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral academic center. Subjects and Methods Forty-five adults with low-frequency hearing (≤85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz) who underwent unilateral CI with full-length electrode arrays made by 1 manufacturer were included. HP was calculated with (1) mean low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) at 250 and 500 Hz (MEAN method), (2) a percentile method across the audiometric frequency spectrum generating an S-value (HEARRING method), and (3) functional if hearing remained ≤85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz. Audiometric testing was performed approximately 1 month and 1 year postoperatively, yielding short-term and long-term results, respectively. Results Of 45 patients who underwent CI, 46.7% received lateral wall (LW) and 53.3% received perimodiolar (PM) electrodes. At short-term follow-up, LW electrodes were associated with significantly better HP than PM (LFPTA method: 27.7 vs 39.3 dB, P < .05; S-value method: 48.2 vs 21.8%, P < .05). In multivariate regression of short-term outcomes, LW electrode use was a significant predictor of better HP ( P < .05). At long-term follow-up, electrode type was not associated with HP. Younger patient age was the only significant predictor of long-term HP on multivariate analysis ( P < .05). Conclusion The LW electrode is associated with short-term HP, suggesting its design is favorable for limiting trauma to the cochlea during and directly following CI. Other factors, including age, are relevant for maintaining HP over the long term. The data support further investigation into what modifiable factors may promote long-term HP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila J Mady
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel C Sukato
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jenifer Fruit
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Catherine Palmer
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,2 Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yael Raz
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,3 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Barry E Hirsch
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,2 Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew A McCall
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Koch RW, Ladak HM, Elfarnawany M, Agrawal SK. Measuring Cochlear Duct Length - a historical analysis of methods and results. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 46:19. [PMID: 28270200 PMCID: PMC5341452 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-017-0194-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cochlear Duct Length (CDL) has been an important measure for the development and advancement of cochlear implants. Emerging literature has shown CDL can be used in preoperative settings to select the proper sized electrode and develop customized frequency maps. In order to improve post-operative outcomes, and develop new electrode technologies, methods of measuring CDL must be validated to allow usage in the clinic. Purpose The purpose of this review is to assess the various techniques used to calculate CDL and provide the reader with enough information to make an informed decision on how to conduct future studies measuring the CDL. Results The methods to measure CDL, the modality used to capture images, and the location of the measurement have all changed as technology evolved. With recent popularity and advancement in computed tomography (CT) imaging in place of histologic sections, measurements of CDL have been focused at the lateral wall (LW) instead of the organ of Corti (OC), due to the inability of CT to view intracochlear structures. After analyzing results from methods such as directly measuring CDL from histology, indirectly reconstructing the shape of the cochlea, and determining CDL based on spiral coefficients, it was determined the three dimensional (3D) reconstruction method is the most reliable method to measure CDL. 3D reconstruction provides excellent visualization of the cochlea and avoids errors evident in other methods. Due to the number of varying methods with varying accuracies, certain guidelines must be followed in the future to allow direct comparison of CDL values between studies. Conclusion After summarizing and analyzing the interesting history of CDL measurements, the use of standardized guidelines and the importance of CDL for future cochlear implant developments is emphasized for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Koch
- Biomedical Engineering, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
| | - Hanif M Ladak
- Biomedical Engineering, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mai Elfarnawany
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Sumit K Agrawal
- Biomedical Engineering, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,London Health Science Centre, University Hospital, Room B1-333, 339 Windermere Rd, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rah YC, Lee MY, Kim SH, Kim DH, Eastwood H, O'Leary SJ, Lee JH. Extended use of systemic steroid is beneficial in preserving hearing in guinea pigs after cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2016; 136:1213-1219. [PMID: 27466708 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1206965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
CONCLUSION Seven-day administration of systemic steroids was more effective in preserving hearing for 12 weeks after cochlear implantation (CI) than a 3-day delivery. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of extended delivery of systemic steroids to preserve hearing in guinea pigs after CI. METHODS Dexamethasone (4 mg/ml) was delivered parenterally via a mini-osmotic pump for either 3 or 7 days. A dummy CI electrode was inserted via cochleostomy approach in 8-week-old guinea pigs. Auditory thresholds were assessed from tone burst auditory brainstem responses (2, 8, 16, 24, and 32 kHz) at 1 day prior to CI, and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after implantation. Histologic evaluation of the cochleae was carried out. RESULTS No differences were observed in hearing thresholds among groups before CI. Significant hearing preservation was achieved at 8, 16, 24, and 32 kHz only in the 7-day infusion group compared with the control group at 1 week after CI. The same trend was maintained at 4 weeks (16, 24 kHz) and 12 weeks (16, 24, and 32 kHz). Histologic review of the 7-day infusion group revealed less fibrosis and ossification in the scala tympani and the preservation of more spiral ganglion cells, compared with the control group.
Collapse
|
50
|
Torres R, Kazmitcheff G, De Seta D, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Nguyen Y. Improvement of the insertion axis for cochlear implantation with a robot-based system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 274:715-721. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4329-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|