Accuracy and validity of observational estimates of wrist and forearm posture

A systematic literature review of computer vision-based biomechanical models for physical workload estimation

Ergonomic risks, driven by strenuous physical demands in complex work settings, are prevalent across industries. Addressing these challenges through detailed assessment and effective interventions enhances safety and employee well-being. Proper and timely measurement of physical workloads is the initial step towards holistic ergonomic control. This study comprehensively explores existing computer vision-based biomechanical analysis methods for workload assessment, assessing their performance against traditional techniques, and categorising them for easier use. Recent strides in artificial intelligence have revolutionised workload assessment, especially in realistic work settings where conventional methods fall short. However, understanding the accuracy, characteristics, and practicality of computer vision-based methods versus traditional approaches remains limited. To bridge this knowledge gap, a literature review along with a meta-analysis was completed in this study to illuminate model accuracy, advantages, and challenges, offering valuable insights for refined technology implementation in diverse work environments.

K-score: A novel scoring system to quantify fatigue-related ergonomic risk based on joint angle measurements via wearable inertial measurement units

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders have been recognized as a global problem that affects millions of people annually. Fatigue is one of the main contributors to musculoskeletal disorders. Thus, this study investigated fatigue detection based on the measured body motion by wearable inertial measurement units. We quantified the body motion during manual handling tasks using a novel kinematic score (i.e., K-score), and the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). K-score and REBA were calculated using joint angles. Nevertheless, unlike REBA, K-score showed a significant correlation (Spearman's correlation coefficient of ρ(302) = 0.21, p < 0.05) with electromyography (EMG) signal amplitude, which was affected by muscle fatigue. Therefore, in-field measurement of K-score using inertial measurement units could detect the fatigue-induced change of body motion in long-duration manual handling tasks. Our proposed K-score can be used to assess fatigue-related ergonomic risk in long-term and real-world working conditions without the need for tedious EMG recording at workplaces.

Evaluation of a New Simplified Inertial Sensor Method against Electrogoniometer for Measuring Wrist Motion in Occupational Studies

Wrist velocity is an important risk factor for work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the elbow/hand, which is also difficult to assess by observation or self-reports. This study aimed to evaluate a new convenient and low-cost inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based method using gyroscope signals against an electrogoniometer for measuring wrist flexion velocity. Twelve participants performed standard wrist movements and simulated work tasks while equipped with both systems. Two computational algorithms for the IMU-based system, i.e., IMU_norm and IMU_flex, were used. For wrist flexion/extension, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of median wrist flexion velocity compared to the goniometer were <10.1°/s for IMU_norm and <4.1°/s for IMU_flex. During wrist deviation and pronation/supination, all methods showed errors, where the IMU_norm method had the largest overestimations. For simulated work tasks, the IMU_flex method had small bias and better accuracy than the IMU_norm method compared to the goniometer, with the MAEs of median wrist flexion velocity <5.8°/s. The results suggest that the IMU-based method can be considered as a convenient method to assess wrist motion for occupational studies or ergonomic evaluations for the design of workstations and tools by both researchers and practitioners, and the IMU_flex method is preferred. Future studies need to examine algorithms to further improve the accuracy of the IMU-based method in tasks of larger variations, as well as easy calibration procedures.

Wrist Posture Estimation Differences and Reliability Between Video Analysis and Electrogoniometer Methods

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intrarater agreement of estimated wrist angles using video and to compare wrist angles from video analysis to electrogoniometers.

BACKGROUND

Video analysis is used frequently in ergonomic assessments, but factors including parallax and complex angles may influence wrist angle estimates. Electrogoniometers are an alternative to video, but may not be reliable in complex postures. Given the limitations of each method, there is a need to determine the suitability of the measurement methods for field use.

METHOD

Ten participants performed frame-by-frame wrist (flexion-extension, radioulnar deviation) and forearm (pronation-supination) posture estimation for worker tasks from three camera views (top, side, and oblique). Workers were equipped with electrogoniometers to record wrist posture during the tasks. The video estimate data was compared between 2 days and to sensor data.

RESULTS

Percent agreement between participants ranged from 53% to 81% across all ratings. Agreement was highest from the side view (66%, κ = 0.56) for flexion-extension and top view for radioulnar deviation (77%, κ = 0.52) and pronation-supination (69%, κ = 0.58). Video-electrogoniometer agreement was lower, with peak agreement from the top view for flexion-extension (57%, κ = 0.49) and radioulnar deviation (68%, κ = 0.30) and the oblique view for pronation-supination (53%, κ = -0.1).

CONCLUSION

Participant estimate agreement was moderate-substantial overall and aligns with previous reports. Disagreement between video and electrogoniometers may be attributed to camera angle and parallax effects and the small magnitude of wrist motions compared to other joints.

Development of a Wearable Human-Machine Interface to Track Forearm Rotation via an Optical Sensor

The goal of this research was to develop an intuitive wearable human-machine interface (HMI), utilizing an optical sensor. The proposed system quantifies wrist pronation and supination using an optical displacement sensor. Compared with existing systems, this HMI ensures intuitiveness by relying on direct measurement of forearm position, minimizes involved sensors, and is expected to be long-lasting. To test for feasibility, the developed HMI was implemented to control a prosthetic wrist based on forearm rotation of able-bodied subjects. Performance of optical sensor system (OSS) prosthesis control was compared to electromyography (EMG) based direct control, for six able-bodied individuals, using a clothespin relocation task. Results showed that the performance of OSS control was comparable to direct control, therefore validating the feasibility of the OSS HMI.

Ergonomic Risk Assessment during an Informal Hand-Made Cookware Operation: Extending an Existing Model

The work conducted in the informal sector is highly variable within and between days. Characterizing ergonomic exposures remains a challenge because of unstructured work settings and schedules. The existing ergonomic risk assessment tools have been widely used in formal work settings with a narrow range of exposure, and for predefined tasks that primarily constitute a daily routine. There is limited information in the literature on how they have been applied in informal workplaces. The aim of this study was to extend an existing risk assessment tool and to evaluate the applicability of the extended tool by assessing ergonomic exposure related to hand-made cookware operations. Eighteen hand-made cookware makers were recruited from six sites. A walkthrough risk assessment questionnaire was used to collect information on workers, tasks, work stations and workplace structures. The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) screening tool was extended by including duration and vibration. An action priority matrix was used to guide intervention. According to the RULA action levels, the workers required investigation and changes soon, and immediate investigation and changes. The use of an action priority matrix was appropriate, and indicated that all the workers assessed were within the high to very high exposure domain and required immediate corrective measures. The methodology used proved to be an effective and reliable strategy for identifying ergonomic exposure among hand-made cookware makers.

Differences between risk situations identified using a self-reported questionnaire and an observational method

BACKGROUND

This study investigates work-related musculoskeletal disorders risk estimation by frequently as used as ergonomic methods in the field.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the difference in risk estimation by an in-house observational method and a self-reported questionnaire, and to evaluate the complementary aspects of these methods.

METHODS

A sample of 15 operators who worked on the assembly workstations was selected from a truck manufacturing plant. The risk assessment of these workstations (28 scenarios) was performed by the observational method and the self-reported questionnaire. The agreement between both methods to identify risk situations was measured with the weighted Kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The observational method and the self-reported questionnaire deployed on the same activity estimated different risk situations.

CONCLUSION

This analysis does not reveal that one tool is more powerful than the other one, but shows the probability of different risk estimation. The complementary effect of each method might be considered for further investigation concerning musculoskeletal risk factors.

Prototype System for Measuring and Analyzing Movements of the Upper Limb for the Detection of Occupational Hazards

In the work environment, there are usually different pathologies that are related to Repetitive Efforts and Movements (REM) that tend to predominantly affect the upper limbs. To determine whether a worker is at risk of suffering some type of pathology, observation techniques are usually used by qualified technical personnel. In order to define from quantitative data if there is a risk of suffering a pathology due to movements and repetitive efforts in the upper limb, a prototype of a movement measurement system has been designed and manufactured. This system interferes minimally with the activity studied, maintaining a reduced cost of manufacture and use. The system allows the study of the movements made by the subject in the work environment by determining the origin of the Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) from the movements of the elbow and wrist, collecting data on the position and accelerations of the arm, forearm and hand, and taking into account the risk factors established for suffering from an MSD: high repetition of movements, the use of a high force in a repetitive manner, or the adoption of forced positions. The data obtained with this system can be analyzed by qualified personnel from tables, graphs, and 3D animations at the time of execution, or stored for later analysis.

Quantification of Exposure to Risk Postures in Truck Assembly Operators: Neck, Back, Arms and Wrists

The study assessed the proportion of time in risky postures for the main joints of the upper limbs in a truck assembly plant and explored the association with musculoskeletal symptoms. Fourteen workstations (13 individuals) of a truck assembly plant were selected, and seven sensors were placed on the body segments of the participants. The sensors included tri-axial accelerometers for the arms and back, inclinometers for the neck and electro-goniometry for quantifying flexion/extension of the right and left hands. The proportions of time in moderate awkward postures were high at all workstations. Neck and wrist excessive awkward postures were observed for most workstations. The average values of the 91st percentile for back flexion and right/left arm elevation were 25°, 62°, and 57°, respectively. The 91st and 9th percentile averages for neck flexion/extension were 35.9° and −4.7°, respectively. An insignificant relationship was found between the percentage of time spent in awkward upper limb posture and musculoskeletal symptoms. The findings provide objective and quantitative data about time exposure, variability, and potential risk factors in the real workplace. Quantitative measurements in the field provide objective data of the body postures and movements of tasks that can be helpful in the musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) prevention program.

An ergonomics study on wrist posture when using laparoscopic tools in four techniques in minimally invasive surgery

PURPOSE

With reference to four minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cholecystectomies, the aims were (a) to recognize the factors influencing dominant wrist postures manifested by the surgeon; (b) to detect risk factors involved in maintaining deviated wrist postures; (c) to compare the wrist postures of surgeons while using laparoscopic tools.

METHODS

Video films were recorded during live surgeries. The films were synchronized with wrist joint angles obtained from wireless electrogoniometers placed on the surgeon's hand. The analysis was conducted for five laparoscopic tools used during all surgical techniques.

RESULTS

The most common wrist posture was extension. In the case of one laparoscopic tool, the mean values defining extended wrist posture were distinct in all four surgical techniques. For one type of surgical technique, considered the most beneficial for patients, more extreme postures were noticed regarding all laparoscopic tools. We recognized a new factor, apart from the tool's handle design, that influences extreme and deviated wrist postures. It involves three areas of task specification including the type of action, type of motion patterns and motion dynamism.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes proved that the surgical technique which is best for the patient imposes the greatest strain on the surgeon's wrist. .

Real time RULA assessment using Kinect v2 sensor

The evaluation of the exposure to risk factors in workplaces and their subsequent redesign represent one of the practices to lessen the frequency of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. In this paper we present K2RULA, a semi-automatic RULA evaluation software based on the Microsoft Kinect v2 depth camera, aimed at detecting awkward postures in real time, but also in off-line analysis. We validated our tool with two experiments. In the first one, we compared the K2RULA grand-scores with those obtained with a reference optical motion capture system and we found a statistical perfect match according to the Landis and Koch scale (proportion agreement index = 0.97, k = 0.87). In the second experiment, we evaluated the agreement of the grand-scores returned by the proposed application with those obtained by a RULA expert rater, finding again a statistical perfect match (proportion agreement index = 0.96, k = 0.84), whereas a commercial software based on Kinect v1 sensor showed a lower agreement (proportion agreement index = 0.82, k = 0.34).

Comparison of three methods for evaluation of work postures in a truck assembly plant

This study compared the results of three risk assessment tools (self-reported questionnaire, observational tool, direct measurement method) for the upper limbs and back in a truck assembly plant at two cycle times (11 and 8 min). The weighted Kappa factor showed fair agreement between the observational and direct measurement method for the arm (0.39) and back (0.47). The weighted Kappa factor for these methods was poor for the neck (0) and wrist (0) but the observed proportional agreement (P_o) was 0.78 for the neck and 0.83 for the wrist. The weighted Kappa factor between questionnaire and direct measurement showed poor or slight agreement (0) for different body segments in both cycle times. The results revealed moderate agreement between the observational tool and the direct measurement method, and poor agreement between the self-reported questionnaire and direct measurement. Practitioner Summary: This study provides risk exposure measurement by different common ergonomic methods in the field. The results help to develop valid measurements and improve exposure evaluation. Hence, the ergonomist/practitioners should apply the methods with caution, or at least knowing what the issues/errors are.

Inter- and intra- observer reliability of risk assessment of repetitive work without an explicit method

A common way to conduct practical risk assessments is to observe a job and report the observed long term risks for musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of ergonomists' risk assessments without the support of an explicit risk assessment method. Twenty-one experienced ergonomists assessed the risk level (low, moderate, high risk) of eight upper body regions, as well as the global risk of 10 video recorded work tasks. Intra-observer reliability was assessed by having nine of the ergonomists repeat the procedure at least three weeks after the first assessment. The ergonomists made their risk assessment based on his/her experience and knowledge. The statistical parameters of reliability included agreement in %, kappa, linearly weighted kappa, intraclass correlation and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. The average inter-observer agreement of the global risk was 53% and the corresponding weighted kappa (K_w) was 0.32, indicating fair reliability. The intra-observer agreement was 61% and 0.41 (K_w). This study indicates that risk assessments of the upper body, without the use of an explicit observational method, have non-acceptable reliability. It is therefore recommended to use systematic risk assessment methods to a higher degree.

Ergonomic analysis of construction worker's body postures using wearable mobile sensors

Construction jobs are more labor-intensive compared to other industries. As such, construction workers are often required to exceed their natural physical capability to cope with the increasing complexity and challenges in this industry. Over long periods of time, this sustained physical labor causes bodily injuries to the workers which in turn, conveys huge losses to the industry in terms of money, time, and productivity. Various safety and health organizations have established rules and regulations that limit the amount and intensity of workers' physical movements to mitigate work-related bodily injuries. A precursor to enforcing and implementing such regulations and improving the ergonomics conditions on the jobsite is to identify physical risks associated with a particular task. Manually assessing a field activity to identify the ergonomic risks is not trivial and often requires extra effort which may render it to be challenging if not impossible. In this paper, a low-cost ubiquitous approach is presented and validated which deploys built-in smartphone sensors to unobtrusively monitor workers' bodily postures and autonomously identify potential work-related ergonomic risks. Results indicates that measurements of trunk and shoulder flexions of a worker by smartphone sensory data are very close to corresponding measurements by observation. The proposed method is applicable for workers in various occupations who are exposed to WMSDs due to awkward postures. Examples include, but are not limited to industry laborers, carpenters, welders, farmers, health assistants, teachers, and office workers.

Photograph-based ergonomic evaluations using the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA)

The Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) was developed to assess musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk factors for computer workstations. This study examined the validity and reliability of remotely conducted, photo-based assessments using ROSA. Twenty-three office workstations were assessed on-site by an ergonomist, and 5 photos were obtained. Photo-based assessments were conducted by three ergonomists. The sensitivity and specificity of the photo-based assessors' ability to correctly classify workstations was 79% and 55%, respectively. The moderate specificity associated with false positive errors committed by the assessors could lead to unnecessary costs to the employer. Error between on-site and photo-based final scores was a considerable ∼2 points on the 10-point ROSA scale (RMSE = 2.3), with a moderate relationship (ρ = 0.33). Interrater reliability ranged from fairly good to excellent (ICC = 0.667-0.856) and was comparable to previous results. Sources of error include the parallax effect, poor estimations of small joint (e.g. hand/wrist) angles, and boundary errors in postural binning. While this method demonstrated potential validity, further improvements should be made with respect to photo-collection and other protocols for remotely-based ROSA assessments.

Partly visible periods in posture observation from video: prevalence and effect on summary estimates of postures in the job

This paper investigated the extent to which observers rated clearly visible postures on video differently from partly visible postures, and whether visibility affected full-shift posture summaries. Trunk and upper arm postures were observed from 10,413 video frames representing 80 shifts of baggage handling; observers reported postures as fully or only partly visible. Postures were summarized for each shift into several standard metrics using all available data, only fully visible frames, or only partly visible frames. 78% of trunk and 70% of upper arm postural observations were inferred. When based on all data, mean and 90th percentile trunk postures were 1.8° and 5.6° lower, respectively, than when based only on fully visible situations. For the arm; differences in mean and 90th percentile were 0.7° and 8.2°. Daily posture summaries were significantly influenced by whether partly visible postures are included or not.

A technical support tool for joint range of motion determination in functional diagnostics - an inter-rater study

Background

The examination of joint range of motion (RoM) is part of musculo-skeletal functional diagnostics, used, for example, in occupational examinations. Various examination methodologies exist that have been optimized for occupational medical practice, which means they were reduced to the most necessary and feasible measures and examinations for efficiency and usability reasons. Because of time constraints in medical examinations in occupational settings, visual inspection is commonly used to quantify joint RoM. To support medical examiners, an inertial sensor-based measurement system (CUELA) was adapted for joint RoM examination in these settings. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the measurement tool in functional diagnostics under conditions close to clinical practice.

Methods

The joint RoM of twenty healthy subjects were examined by three physicians, who were simultaneously using the measurement tool. Physicians were blinded to the measurement results and the other physicians. Active RoM was examined on the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine while passive RoM was examined on the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, and knee, resulting in a total of 40 joint examination angles. The means, standard deviations, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC_3,k), and Bland-Altman-Plots were calculated using MatLab for statistical analysis.

Results

Most measurement results were in accordance with expected joint RoMs. All examinations showed an acceptable repeatability. In active RoM examinations, the ICC of inter-rater reliability varied between 0.79 and 0.95. In passive RoM examination the ICC varied between 0.71 and 0.96, except examination angles at the elbow and knee extension (ICC: 0.0-0.77).

Conclusion

The reliability and objectivity of active RoM examinations were improved by the measurement tool compared with examiners. In passive RoM examinations of upper and lower extremities, the increase of objectivity by the measurements was limited for some examination angles by external factors such as the individual examiner impact on motion execution or the given joint examination conditions. Especially the elbow joint examination requires further development to achieve acceptable reliability. A modification in the examination method to reduce the examiner impact on measurement and the implementation of a more complex calibration procedure could improve the objectivity and reliability of the measurement tool in passive joint RoM examination to be applicable on nearly the whole body.

Development of Human Posture Simulation Method for Assessing Posture Angles and Spinal Loads

Video-based posture analysis employing a biomechanical model is gaining a growing popularity for ergonomic assessments. A human posture simulation method of estimating multiple body postural angles and spinal loads from a video record was developed to expedite ergonomic assessments. The method was evaluated by a repeated measures study design with three trunk flexion levels, two lift asymmetry levels, three viewing angles and three trial repetitions as experimental factors. The study comprised two phases evaluating the accuracy of simulating self and other people's lifting posture via a proxy of a computer-generated humanoid. The mean values of the accuracy of simulating self and humanoid postures were 12° and 15°, respectively. The repeatability of the method for the same lifting condition was excellent (~2°). The least simulation error was associated with side viewing angle. The estimated back compressive force and moment, calculated by a three dimensional biomechanical model, exhibited a range of 5% underestimation. The posture simulation method enables researchers to simultaneously quantify body posture angles and spinal loading variables with accuracy and precision comparable to on-screen posture matching methods.

Impact of experience when using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment to assess postural risk in children using information and communication technologies

The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) is an observation-based screening tool that has been used to assess postural risks of children in school settings. Studies using eye-tracking technology suggest that visual search strategies are influenced by experience in the task performed. This study investigated if experience in postural risk assessments contributed to differences in outcome scores on the RULA and the visual search strategies utilized. While wearing an eye-tracker, 16 student occupational therapists and 16 experienced occupational therapists used the RULA to assess 11 video scenarios of a child using different mobile information and communication technologies (ICT) in the home environment. No significant differences in RULA outcome scores, and no conclusive differences in visual search strategies between groups were found. RULA can be used as a screening tool for postural risks following a short training session regardless of the assessor's experience in postural risk assessments.

The Spatial Dependency of Shoulder Muscle Demands for Seated Lateral Hand Force Exertions

As the modern workplace is dominated by submaximal repetitive tasks, knowledge of the effect of task location is important to ensure workers are unexposed to potentially injurious demands imposed by repetitive work in awkward or sustained postures. The purpose of this investigation was to develop a three-dimensional spatial map of the muscle activity for the right upper extremity during laterally directed submaximal force exertions. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from fourteen muscles surrounding the shoulder complex as the participants exerted 40N of force in two directions (leftward, rightward) at 70 defined locations. Hand position in both push directions strongly influenced total and certain individual muscle demands as identified by repeated measures analysis of variance (P< .001). During rightward exertions individual muscle activation varied from 1 to 21% MVE and during leftward exertions it varied from 1 to 27% MVE with hand location. Continuous prediction equations for muscular demands based on three-dimensional spatial parameters were created with explained variance ranging from 25 to 73%. The study provides novel information for evaluating existing and proactive workplace designs, and may help identify preferred geometric placements of lateral exertions in occupational settings to lower muscular demands, potentially mitigating fatigue and associated musculoskeletal risks.

The natural angle between the hand and handle and the effect of handle orientation on wrist radial/ulnar deviation during maximal push exertions

The purpose of this experiment was to quantify the natural angle between the hand and a handle, and to investigate three design factors: handle rotation, handle tilt and between-handle width on the natural angle as well as resultant wrist radial/ulnar deviation ('RUD') for pushing tasks. Photographs taken of the right upper limb of 31 participants (14 women and 17 men) performing maximal seated push exertions on different handles were analysed. Natural hand/handle angle and RUD were assessed. It was found that all of the three design factors significantly affected natural handle angle and wrist RUD, but participant gender did not. The natural angle between the hand and the cylindrical handle was 65 ± 7°. Wrist deviation was reduced for handles that were rotated 0° (horizontal) and at the narrow width (31 cm). Handles that were tilted forward 15° reduced radial deviation consistently (12-13°) across handle conditions.

PRACTITIONER SUMMARY

Manual materials handling (MMH) tasks involving pushing have been related to increased risk of musculoskeletal injury. This study shows that handle orientation influences hand and wrist posture during pushing, and suggests that the design of push handles on carts and other MMH aids can be improved by adjusting their orientation to fit the natural interface between the hand and handle.

Factors that might give rise to musculoskeletal disorders when mothers lift children in the home

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this research was to identify the risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders present when mothers lift normally developing children weighing between 20 and 31 lbs (9-14 kg) in the home.

METHOD

Twenty five mothers aged 28-40 years completed Sanders and Morse's (2005) self-report survey of pain and high-risk practices. In addition, the OMLITH, a structured checklist for observing mothers lifting children in the home, was developed. Criteria to rate variables relating to the load (child), environment, person (mother) and task as low, moderate or high risk were developed, on the basis of published manual handling assessments. The mothers were observed performing 87 lifts, and risk factors were rated.

RESULTS

The majority of participants reported low back pain (64%). They self-rated bending while carrying a child as most stressful, and various other tasks involving carrying; prolonged bending, squatting or stooping; and lifting a child as physically stressful. At least one risk factor related to the load was recorded in all 87 observations, with moderate to high risk most frequently related to the child's weight (73.6%) or the mother's grip on the child (93.1%). Common environmental factors presenting a moderate to high risk related to space constraints (59.7% of tasks) and equipment (58.6%). Factors related to the mothers' strength and fitness (57.5% of tasks) commonly posed moderate to high risk, as did horizontal reach distances (82.8%), vertical lift distances (78.2%) and reaches above shoulder height or below mid thigh level (88.5%). Trunk rotation greater than 45° or combining rotation and side bending while lifting resulted in a moderate to high risk rating in 72.4% of tasks. The developmental age of the child interacted with weight to increase or decrease the requirement for lifting.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders are present to a significant degree, and further research in this area is warranted.

The validity and interrater reliability of video-based posture observation during asymmetric lifting tasks

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate the validity and interrater reliability of a video-based posture observation method for the major body segment angles during asymmetric lifting tasks.

BACKGROUND

Observational methods have been widely used as an awkward-posture assessment tool for ergonomics studies. Previous research proposed a video-based posture observation method with estimation of major segment angles during lifting tasks. However, it was limited to symmetric lifting tasks. The current study extended this method to asymmetric lifting tasks and investigated the validity and the interrater reliability.

METHOD

Various asymmetric lifting tasks were performed in a laboratory while a side-view video camera recorded the lift, and the body segment angles were measured directly by a motion tracking system. For this study, 10 raters estimated seven major segment angles using a customized program that played back the video recording, thus allowing users to enter segment angles. The validity of estimated segment angles was evaluated in relation to measured segment angles. Interrater reliability was assessed among the raters.

RESULTS

For all the segment angles except trunk lateral bending, the estimated segment angles were strongly correlated with the measured segment angles (r > .8), and the intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.75.

CONCLUSION

The proposed observational method was able to provide a robust estimation of major segment angles for asymmetric lifting tasks based on side-view video clips. The estimated segment angles were consistent among raters.

APPLICATION

This method can be used for assessing posture during asymmetric lifting tasks. It also supports developing a video-based rapid joint loading estimation method.

The effect of viewing angle on wrist posture estimation from photographic images using novice raters

Observational assessment of wrist posture using photographic methods is theoretically affected by camera view angle. A study was conducted to investigate whether wrist flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation postures were estimated differently by raters depending on the viewing angle and compared to predictions using a quantitative 2D model of parallax. Novice raters (n=26) estimated joint angles from images of wrist postures photographed from ten different viewing angles. Results indicated that ideal views, orthogonal to the plane of motion, produced more accurate estimates of posture compared to non-ideal views. The neutral (0°) posture was estimated the most accurately even at different viewing angles. Raters were more accurate than model predictions. Findings demonstrate a need for more systematic methods for collecting and analyzing photographic data for observational studies of posture. Renewed caution in interpreting existing studies of wrist posture where viewing angle was not controlled is advised.

Qual modelo de eletrogoniômetro é mais adequado para avaliar movimentos do punho?

INTRODUÇÃO: O eletrogoniômetro é utilizado em contexto ocupacional para registro dos movimentos do punho. No entanto, diferentes tamanhos de sensores são utilizados, o que pode dificultar a comparação entre os resultados. OBJETIVO: Avaliar dois sensores de tamanho diferentes para verificar o desempenho de ambos em uma amostra com variáveis antropométricas definidas. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Participaram 13 sujeitos (7 mulheres e 6 homens; idade 23 ± 2,6 anos; massa 57 ± 3,8 kg e altura 1,63 ± 4,1 m). Foram utilizados dois sensores com 65 e 110 mm de comprimento (XM65 e XM110, respectivamente) e um dispositivo de aquisição de dados (Datalog, Biometrics). Medidas antropométricas dos participantes foram registradas. Cada indivíduo realizou movimentos de flexão/extensão e desvios ulnar/radial, atingindo amplitude máxima, na posição pronada do antebraço. A ordem de realização dos movimentos e colocação dos sensores foi aleatorizada. Os dados foram analisados descritivamente e estatisticamente (análise multivariada). Foi calculada a variação entre as tentativas (variabilidade intraindividual) e entre os sensores por meio do valor RMS (root mean square). RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença significativa entre os sensores para todos os movimentos. A variabilidade intraindividual máxima foi de 2,2º. Houve diferença significativa entre os gêneros para a flexão e o desvio ulnar, sendo as mulheres as que apresentam valores maiores que os homens. A variabilidade máxima entre os sensores foi de 7,1º. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar de não identificar diferença significante entre os sensores, verificou-se que o sensor XM110 sofria abaulamento durante a extensão. Portanto, para indivíduos com altura até 1,8 m, os dados obtidos pelos diferentes sensores são comparáveis.

Reliability of distal upper extremity posture matching using slow-motion and frame-by-frame video methods

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of video playback speed on posture matching reliability of the distal upper extremity.

BACKGROUND

Video is frequently used in ergonomic assessments, yet there remains a need to determine the effects of viewing speed on posture observations.

METHOD

Participants were 7 graduate students experienced with posture-based observational methods. Categorical posture scales were used to evaluate forearm pronation/supination, wrist flexion/extension, wrist radioulnar deviation,and hand activity from workplace video at three playback speeds (quarter, half, and real time). Wrist flexion/extension was also evaluated with a frame-by-frame video method.

RESULTS

Posture counts increased with slower viewing speeds for the wrist and hand, but percentage durations in each posture category were similar for all methods. Posture matching interrater reliability scores increased with slow-motion video playback but remained low even for quarter-time video playback. The highest interrater scores were found in the frame-by-frame analysis of wrist flexion/extension for three posture categories (percentage agreement = 84.9% +/- 1.3%; kappa = 0.54 +/- 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Although slower video playback speeds increased the number of posture counts for the wrist and hand scales, percentage durations were similar, and reliability scores increased only slightly with slow-motion video playback.

APPLICATION

Reviewing video using slow-motion or frame-by-frame methods improves distal upper extremity posture matching reliability. However, ergonomic assessment tools based on percentage duration may not be appreciably enhanced by slowing viewing speed. Thus, the increased viewing time with slower playback should be justified with respect to assessment needs.

Determining the optimal size for posture categories used in video-based posture assessment methods

Currently, there are no standards for the development of posture classification systems used in observation-based ergonomic posture assessment methods. This study was conducted to determine if an optimal posture category size for different body segments and posture views could be established by examining the trade-off between magnitude of error and the number of posture category misclassification errors made. Three groups (trunk flexion/extension and lateral bend; shoulder flexion/extension and adduction/abduction; elbow flexion/extension) of 30 participants each selected postures they perceived to correctly represent the video image shown on a computer screen. For each view, 10 images were presented for five different posture category sizes, three times each. The optimal posture category sizes established were 30 degrees for trunk, shoulder and elbow flexion/extension, 30 degrees for shoulder adduction/abduction and 15 degrees for trunk lateral bend, suggesting that posture category size should be based on the body segment and view of the image being assessed. Across all conditions, the posture category sizes were comparable to those used in published ergonomic tools.

Interrater reliability of posture observations

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this research were (a) to study the interrater reliability of a posture observation method, (b) to test the impact of different posture categorization systems on interrater reliability, and (c) to provide guidelines for improving interrater reliability.

BACKGROUND

Estimation of posture through observation is challenging. Previous studies have shown varying degrees of validity and reliability, providing little information about conditions necessary to achieve acceptable reliability.

METHOD

Seven raters estimated posture angles from video recordings. Different measures of interrater reliability, including percentage agreement, precision, expression as interrater standard deviation, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), were computed.

RESULTS

Some posture parameters, such as the upper arm flexion and extension, had ICCs > or = 0.50. Most posture parameters had a precision around the 10 degrees range. The predefined categorization and 300 posture categorization strategies showed substantially better agreement among the raters than did the 10 degrees strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Different interrater reliability measures described different aspects of agreement for the posture observation tool. The level of agreement differed substantially between the agreement measures used. Observation of large body parts generally resulted in better reliability. Wider width angle intervals resulted in better percentage agreement compared with narrower intervals. For most postures, 30 degrees-angle intervals are appropriate. Training aimed at using a properly designed data entry system, and clear posture definitions with relevant examples, including definitions of the neutral positions of the various body parts, will help improve interrater reliability.

APPLICATION

The results provide ergonomics practitioners with information about the interrater reliability ofa postural observation method and guidelines for improving interrater reliability for video-recorded field data.

Relationships between observational estimates and physical measurements of upper limb activity

This study examined the internal validity of observational-based ergonomic job analysis methods for assessing upper limb force exertion and repetitive motion. Six manual tasks were performed by multiple 'workers' while direct measurements were made to quantify force exertion and kinematics of the upper limb. Observational-based analyses of force and upper limb motion/repetition were conducted by 29 professional ergonomists. These analysts overestimated the magnitude of individual force exertions - temporal aspects of force exertion (duty cycle) were estimated more accurately. Estimates of the relative severity of repetitive motions among the jobs were accurate. Absolute counts of repetitive motions were less accurate. Modest correlations (r(2) = 0.28 to r(2) = 0.50) were observed between ratings of hand activity level and measured joint velocities. Ergonomic job analyses relying on systematic observation should be applied and interpreted with consideration given to the capabilities and limitations of analysts in estimating the physical risk factors. These findings are relevant to a better understanding of the internal validity of ergonomic job analysis methods based on systematic observation.

Reliability of assessing upper limb postures among workers performing manufacturing tasks

The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of assessing upper limb postures of workers performing manufacturing tasks. Assessment of neck, shoulder, and wrist postures of 20 manufacturing employees was conducted by two raters observing digital video files using Multimedia Video Task Analysis (MVTA). Generalizability theory was used to estimate the inter- and intra-rater reliability. The results demonstrated good to excellent inter-rater reliability for neck and shoulder postures and fair to excellent inter-rater reliability for wrist postures. Intra-rater posture assessment demonstrated good to excellent reliability for both raters in all postures of the neck, shoulder, and wrist. This study demonstrated that posture assessment of manufacturing workers using MVTA is a reliable method.

Assessment of physical demands and comparison of multiple exposure definitions in a repetitive sawmill job: board edger operator

The primary objectives of the study were to 1) describe the physical exposures in a sawmill job with a high incidence of upper extremity musculoskeletal injuries in terms of multiple measures of posture, exertion and frequency (with varying definitions) and 2) to examine the comparability of those definitions. Surface electromyography and electrogoniometry were used to quantify the muscle demands and joint motions. Fourteen board edger operators from two sawmill facilities participated. All exposure assessments, with the exception of surface EMG measurements, were performed on the production lines. EMG measurements were performed within the facility in a location removed from the production line. The measurements showed that, on average, ranges of motions of 59, 102 and 84 degrees respectively in the planes of wrist radial/ulnar deviation, flexion/extension and pronation/supination were required to perform the job. Significant differences (p < .001) were observed between ranges of motion defined by peak postures and those due to peak postures required to perform the primary task only. Performance of the primary task required an average of 32% of maximum voluntary contraction from the forearm muscles assessed. Repetitions per day ranged, on average, from 2,015 to 9,365. Incidence of reported upper extremity musculoskeletal injuries in the two facilities assessed was found to be higher with the greater total exposure. However, examination of the trend with a standardized measure of injury incidence was not possible.

Incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome among automobile assembly workers and assessment of risk factors

OBJECTIVES

This study defined the incidence rate of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) among active assembly workers and evaluated risk factors.

METHODS

This study followed 189 automobile assembly workers over 1 year. Incident cases were defined as workers who had no current or prior history of CTS and were subsequently diagnosed with CTS by means of active surveillance during the study.

RESULTS

The estimated annual incidence rate ranged from 1% to 10%, depending on the case definition. Significant predictors for CTS include a higher baseline median-ulnar peak latency difference, history of wrist/hand/finger tendonitis, history of diabetes, nonneutral wrist and elbow postures, and a lower self-reported social support.

CONCLUSIONS

This is similar to other prospective studies that demonstrate both ergonomic and medical history are independent risk factors for development of CTS.

Analysis of an observational rating scale for repetition, posture, and force in selected manufacturing settings

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to quantify the interrater reliability of a set of scales that assess repetition, posture, and force as used on site when examining industrial work.

BACKGROUND

Interrater reliability of observational assessment methods can vary depending on the definition of the methods and situations in which they are used.

METHOD

In several industries, 846 jobs were assessed using pairs of analysts to rate the repetition, force, and posture of the upper limbs. Twelve analysts with varying experience levels participated.

RESULTS

Using an interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), force and repetition had reliability values of .60 and .71 before and .82 and .87 after discussion, respectively. After discussion, peak posture ratings had ICCs of .60 to .83. ICCs for average posture ratings ranged from .31 to .51 initially to .55 to .67 in final ratings. Less experienced analysts changed their initial ratings more than did the senior investigators.

CONCLUSION

The high interrater reliability of the repetition and force metrics indicates that a single analyst is appropriate for basic job assessment. Posture ratings benefit greatly from a two-analyst system. Average postures should be assessed across a full range of the scale for interrater reliability assessment. Analyst pairs should be rotated to avoid forming biases.

APPLICATION

For basic assessments of forceful exertions and repetitive motions, a single analyst can be used, reducing the resource requirements for both industry and large epidemiological studies.

Accuracy and validity of observational estimates of shoulder and elbow posture

This study investigated the accuracy of video-based observational posture analysis for the elbow and shoulder. Posture analyses were conducted by 28 ergonomists for four jobs presented on a traditional VHS format video recording. Estimates of posture from the observational-based methods were compared with values measured directly with an optical motion capture system. Ergonomists used categorical posture scales and a continuous visual analog scale to estimate the peak and most frequently occurring or average posture for each job. Use of a three-category scale resulted in misclassifications of peak and most frequently occurring elbow and shoulder posture with a probability averaging 30.1%. With the six-category posture scale this average probability of misclassification increased to 64.9%. Using a continuous visual analog scale peak shoulder elevation was the only posture for which the average error among ergonomists' estimates was significantly different from zero (p<0.05). Correlations between the estimated postures and measured postures were higher and statistically significant (p<0.05) for elbow flexion and shoulder elevation (r2 between 0.45 and 0.66) but were considerably lower and not significant (r2 between 0.03 and 0.18) for the peak and average horizontal shoulder abduction. Ergonomists' estimates of the temporal distribution of shoulder posture, indicating the duration severity of the posture, appeared to be biased such that the percentage of the cycle time in each posture category was estimated as more uniformly distributed than the measured values indicated.