Efficacy and safety of semaglutide for weight management: evidence from the STEP program

The blood pressure-lowering property of subcutaneous semaglutide: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

PURPOSE

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide (GLP1) receptor agonist with unprecedented weight-lowering and anti-hyperglycemic properties. Recent clinical trials reported that subcutaneous semaglutide can modulate blood pressure; however, its effect on blood pressure widely varied in different studies and different subgroups of patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from the inception to July 18, 2024. Due to high heterogeneity, a random-effects model was adopted to pool data.

RESULTS

Twenty clinical trials with 15,312 participants in the placebo group and 18,231 participants in the semaglutide group were included in this study. Subcutaneous semaglutide significantly decreased both systolic (WMD - 3.71 mmHg, 95% CI (-4.29, -3.13), I2: 50.2%) and diastolic (WMD - 1.10 mmHg, 95% CI (-1.58, -0.63), I2: 69.7%) blood pressure. Subgroup analyses indicated that the blood pressure-lowering property of subcutaneous semaglutide was greater among patients without diabetes, with lower baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), baseline body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m2, dose of semaglutide more than 1 mg/week, baseline systolic blood pressure equal or less than 130 mmHg, weight loss greater than 10 kg, and BMI reduction greater than 3 kg/m2. In addition, a treatment length of 50 to 100 weeks was associated with greater blood pressure-lowering effects in subgroup analysis. After adjusting for other factors, meta-regression revealed that placebo-adjusted weight change was independently correlated with the effect of semaglutide on systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous semaglutide can significantly decrease systolic and diastolic blood pressure, particularly in selected groups of patients.

Effect of Semaglutide in Individuals With Obesity or Overweight Without Diabetes

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in individuals with obesity or overweight without diabetes. Obesity is a significant public health concern, associated with various comorbidities and reduced quality of life. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has emerged as a promising pharmacological intervention for weight management. This review synthesizes findings from multiple clinical trials, highlighting the impact of semaglutide on weight loss, metabolic parameters, and overall health outcomes in non-diabetic populations. The review also addresses methodological considerations, including study design, participant selection, and outcome measures, to assess the robustness of the evidence. Ethical considerations and potential conflicts of interest are discussed to ensure transparency in the research process. The findings indicate that semaglutide is associated with significant weight reduction and improvement in obesity-related health markers, suggesting its potential as a valuable treatment option for individuals struggling with obesity. Limitations of the current literature and recommendations for future research directions are also presented, emphasizing the need for further studies to explore the long-term effects and generalizability of semaglutide treatment in diverse populations.

Anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The anti-inflammatory effect could be one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. Determining the anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide was the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomised clinical trials that have quantified the effect of semaglutide on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels compared to placebo or a control group (other glucose-lowering drugs). The primary outcome was CRP index (final CRP/basal CRP). A random-effects model was used.

Results

Thirteen randomised clinical trials were considered eligible (n = 26,131). Overall, semaglutide therapy was associated with lower CRP index values compared to the placebo group (SMD -0.56; 95% CI -0.69 to -0.43, I 2 92%) or the control group (SMD -0.45; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.23, I 2 82%).Such an association was similarly observed when different treatment regimens (subcutaneous vs. oral) or different populations (patients with or without T2DM) were analysed. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust.

Conclusion

The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of semaglutide was associated with a reduction in inflammation irrespective of the population evaluated or the treatment regimen used. These findings would explain one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO [CRD42024500551].

Changes in body weight and composition, metabolic parameters, and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with subcutaneous semaglutide in real-world clinical practice

Subcutaneous once-weekly (ow) semaglutide is a recent treatment option for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity, but real-world data on weight loss and associated changes in body composition, nutrients intake, and quality of life are still scarce. This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022. Clinical information was collected after 6 months (T6) and 12 months (T12) from semaglutide initiation (T0). Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) was performed to measure changes in body composition. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the 36 - items Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered as patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Changes in continuous endpoints (weight, body composition, nutrients intake, other clinical parameters, and PROs) were assessed using mixed models for repeated measurements. Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study. After 6 months from semaglutide initiation, body weight significantly decrease by -4.69 Kg (95%CI -6.19;-3.19) (primary endpoint). After 12 months, body weight was further reduced (-5.38 Kg; 95%CI -7.79;-2.97). At BIA, fat mass was significantly reduced by 2.1 Kg after 6 months but only slightly reduced after 12 months vs. baseline; lean mass was also significantly reduced by over 3 Kg both at 6 and 12 months. Intake of all nutrients declined in the first 6 months of therapy, although only lipids reduction reached the statistical significance (-6.73 g; p=0.02). Statistically significant improvements in BMI, waist circumference, glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid profile were documented. Satisfaction with treatment (DTSQ questionnaire) and mental health (MCS score of SF-36 questionnaire) significantly increased during the follow-up. The study documented real-world benefits of semaglutide for treating obesity in T2D subjects, with important changes on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Loss of lean mass associated with weight loss warrants attention; parallel strategies to preserve skeletal muscle and improve physical function, i.e. nutritional education and structured exercise, are of great importance.

A meta-analysis of the incidence of acne vulgaris in patients treated with GLP-1 agonists

Background

With the emerging popularity of GLP-1 receptor agonists, patients are noticing acne vulgaris side effects that are seemingly related to the concurrent treatment with the drug. Due to the correspondence between these drugs' relatively recent emergence in the U.S. market and their high demand, it is important to investigate what is currently known in the literature so that patients can be properly informed.

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship, or lack thereof, between glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist usage and acne-related side effects in patients.

Methods

A web-based analysis of 6 GLP-1 receptor agonists (3 with a once-weekly dosing schedule, and 3 with a once-daily dosing schedule) was conducted on PubMed online database. Boolean criteria were used to narrow the search. Included in the meta-analysis were 45 research articles that fulfilled the search criteria.

Results

The results of the search showed that from the following long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, dulaglutide, exenatide extended release, and semaglutide (Wegovy), no conclusive acne side effects were reported. In addition, the results also showed that from the following short-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide, lixisenatide, and semaglutide (Rybelsus), no conclusive acne side effects were reported.

Limitations

Limitations of this study include a limited amount of literature regarding the relationship between GLP-1 agonists and acne vulgaris.

Conclusion

It is unlikely that GLP-1 agonists themselves are directly responsible for the acne that some patients may develop during treatment. Rather, it is more probable that the weight loss yielded by treatment with these drugs may induce intrinsic physiologic and hormonal changes that induce or exacerbate acne vulgaris in such patients.

An Assessment of Semaglutide Safety Based on Real World Data: From Popularity to Spontaneous Reporting in EudraVigilance Database

Some glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), first used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have been approved for the treatment of obesity in patients with or without T2DM (liraglutide-LIR, semaglutide-SEM, and tirzepatide-TIR). Social media had an important influence on the off-label use of GLP-1 RAs for obesity, especially for SEM. We analyzed the Google queries related to SEM to assess people's interest in this drug. We also investigated the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by searching the EudraVigilance database (EV) for Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) that reported SEM as the suspected drug and performed a descriptive and a disproportionality analysis. The data obtained for SEM were compared to other GLP-1 RAs. SEM had the highest proportions of searches on Google associated with the term "weight loss" and presented the lowest number of severe ADRs, but it also had the highest number of ICSRs reported in EV. Even though no unexpected safety issues have been reported for it until now, SEM has a hi3gh tendency for overdose reports. The most frequent off-label use was reported for SEM and TIR. In order to lower the risks of ADRs, the off-label use should be reduced and carefully monitored.

Semaglutide in Cardiometabolic Diseases: SELECTing the Target Population

Cardiovascular diseases remain the main cause of death and disability worldwide. Despite the tremendous improvement in pharmacological, minimally invasive and rehabilitative strategies, global deaths due to cardiovascular diseases are still increasing. Additional risk factors have been recently proposed, and thanks to scientific progress, novel drugs for the control of the main risk factors focusing on the cardiometabolic pathways have been identified. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists represent an innovative step in the management of patients affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition to their significant efficacy on glycemic homeostasis, some members of this class of drugs have indications in the treatment of obesity. Furthermore, accumulated evidence in the literature has finally suggested a protective role in cardiovascular health. The possible role of GLP-1R agonist drugs (GLP-1RAs) on the mechanisms underlying chronic inflammation and the almost ubiquitous distribution of GLP-1 receptors could explain the enormous versatility of these drugs. Semaglutide is a GLP-1RA recently proven to be effective in cardiovascular outcomes. In the present article, we will review the available data on semaglutide in light of the most recent publications to better characterize the target population achieving cardiovascular benefits.

Female obesity: clinical and psychological assessment toward the best treatment

Obesity is a heterogeneous condition which results from complex interactions among sex/gender, sociocultural, environmental, and biological factors. Obesity is more prevalent in women in most developed countries, and several clinical and psychological obesity complications show sex-specific patterns. Females differ regarding fat distribution, with males tending to store more visceral fat, which is highly correlated to increased cardiovascular risk. Although women are more likely to be diagnosed with obesity and appear more motivated to lose weight, as confirmed by their greater representation in clinical trials, males show better outcomes in terms of body weight and intra-abdominal fat loss and improvements in the metabolic risk profile. However, only a few relatively recent studies have investigated gender differences in obesity, and sex/gender is rarely considered in the assessment and management of the disease. This review summarizes the evidence of gender differences in obesity prevalence, contributing factors, clinical complications, and psychological challenges. In addition, we explored gender differences in response to obesity treatments in the specific context of new anti-obesity drugs.

Potent incretin-based therapy for obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of semaglutide and tirzepatide on body weight and waist circumference, and safety

Potent incretin-based therapy shows promise for the treatment of obesity along with reduced incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and obesity. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the incretin-based obesity treatments, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg and tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg, in people with obesity without diabetes. Of the 744 records identified, seven randomized controlled trials (n = 5140) were included. Five studies (n = 3288) investigated semaglutide and two studies (n = 1852) investigated tirzepatide. The treatment effect, shown as placebo-subtracted difference, on body weight was -15.0% (95% CI, -17.8 to -12.2) with -12.9% (95% CI, -14.7 to -11.1) for semaglutide and -19.2% (95% CI, -22.2 to -16.2) for tirzepatide. The treatment effect on waist circumference was -11.4 cm (95% CI, -13.7 to -9.2) with -9.7 cm (95% CI, -10.8 to -8.5) for semaglutide and -14.6 cm (95% CI, -15.8 to -13.4) for tirzepatide. The adverse events related to semaglutide and tirzepatide were primarily of mild-to-moderate severity and mostly gastrointestinal, which was more frequent during the dose-titration period and leveled off during the treatment period. This emphasizes that once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg and tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg induce large reductions in body weight and waist circumference and are generally well-tolerated.

Adjuvant Glucose-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for Suboptimal Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review

Addressing suboptimal weight loss post-bariatric surgery poses a challenge. While glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) show promise in managing obesity, their role as an adjuvant treatment after bariatric surgery remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic literature review focused on the efficacy and safety of GLP1-RA in bariatric surgery patients with insufficient weight loss or distant weight regain. Our literature search identified 1167 articles, with 10 (involving 594 patients) meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria for detailed review. GLP1-RA therapy resulted in 5 to 17% weight loss over 6 to 12 months, with 10-50% experiencing non-severe side effects like nausea. Overall, GLP1-RA emerges as an effective adjuvant therapy for patients experiencing inadequate weight loss or regain after bariatric surgery, offering a viable alternative to revision surgery.

A Real-World Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Semaglutide for Weight Loss

Introduction Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the great efficacy of semaglutide in achieving significant weight loss in overweight and obese adults. However, real-world data about its effectiveness are still limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness and adverse events of semaglutide for weight management in a real-life setting, excluding patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods This is a retrospective chart review of 40 overweight or obese individuals with a median age of 47 years, weight of 111.7 kg, and body mass index (BMI) of 39.7 kg/m2 who were prescribed semaglutide for weight management. Results After three months of semaglutide administration, the median weight reduction was 7.4 kg (6.6% of the baseline weight), with 28 (70%) and eight patients (20%) achieving greater than 5% (5.6 kg) and 10% (11.2 kg) weight loss, respectively. Among 25 patients with six-month data, 22 (88%), 17 (68%), and eight (32%) patients exceeded 5% (5.6 kg), 10% (11.2 kg), and 15% (16.8 kg) weight loss, respectively. The maintenance semaglutide dose was 1 mg in 16 cases and 2 mg in nine cases, leading to a similar weight loss of 13.6% (14.9 kg) and 12.8% (14 kg), respectively. Relatively low response rates were observed in males, with seven responders out of 12 (58.4%) compared to 24 out of 28 (85.8%) in females (P value = 0.057), and in five out of nine (55.6%) among those with a history of psychiatric disease. The rate of adverse events was 26 out of 40 patients (65%), mostly mild to moderate and of short duration, leading to discontinuation in only a single case (2.5%). Conclusion This retrospective study demonstrated the significant effectiveness of semaglutide for weight loss, even at lower than approved maintenance doses, combined with a good safety profile. Therefore, semaglutide may dramatically change the landscape of obesity treatment.

A systematic review of the effect of semaglutide on lean mass: insights from clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is associated with significant weight loss, yet its impact on lean body mass remains insufficiently understood. This review investigates the effect of semaglutide on lean mass in the context of obesity management.

METHODOLOGY

This study investigates through different databases (PubMed, Elsevier, and Google Scholar) from 2016 for randomized control trials (RCTs) or observational studies that assessed the use of semaglutide in overweight or obese patients, regardless of whether they have type 2 diabetes or not. The studies compared semaglutide to a placebo or alternative medications.

RESULTS

Six studies with 1,541 overweight or obese adults were included, and significant weight reductions were observed primarily due to fat mass loss. While the lean mass remained stable in some cases, notable reductions ranging from almost 0% to 40% of total weight reduction were observed in others. Noteworthy decreases in lean mass were particularly evident in larger trials, yet the proportion of lean mass relative to total body mass increased, suggesting a positive overall outcome.

CONCLUSION

Semaglutide displays potential for weight loss primarily through fat mass reduction. However, concerns arise from notable reductions in lean mass, especially in trials with a larger number of patients.

Acute pancreatitis due to different semaglutide regimens: An updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Some concerns persist regarding the safety of semaglutide. The objective of this updated meta-analysis is to assess the risk of acute pancreatitis with the use of semaglutide, assessing the results according to the different administration regimens.

METHODS

We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled studies of semaglutide therapy that report acute pancreatitis. This meta-analysis was performed in line with PRISMA guidelines. A global and stratified analysis according to the therapeutic scheme used was performed using the fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eligible trials of semaglutide, including 34,721 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. Globally, semaglutide therapy was not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.2, I2 0%). When we analysed the studies according to the different schemes used, the results were similar (group with oral semaglutide: OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.10-1.60, I2 0%; group with low subcutaneous doses of semaglutide: OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.40-1.90, I2 0%; group with high subcutaneous doses of semaglutide: OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-1.20, I2 0%; interaction p-value=0.689).

CONCLUSION

This updated meta-analysis demonstrates that the use of semaglutide is not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared to placebo. In the stratified analysis, the results were similar with the different semaglutide regimens analysed.

Treatment of obesity with medications binding the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor: what is the current state of play?

INTRODUCTION

Obesity, marked by abnormal fat accumulation, poses significant health risks, necessitating effective therapeutic interventions. The focus of this review is to elucidate the importance of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor-binding medications in addressing obesity-related health deteriorations.

AREAS COVERED

Exploring the mechanisms, efficacy, and safety profiles, this review comprehensively assesses medications selectively or non-selectively binding the GLP-1 receptor for obesity treatment. A meticulous analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 data positions retatrutide, CagriSema, survudotide, tirzepatide, semaglutide, and liraglutide in order of effectiveness. While showcasing their efficacy and safety, the review acknowledges the ongoing phase 3 studies, highlighting the need for further exploration of contraindications, dosage, and potential adverse effects to inform personalized treatment decisions.

EXPERT OPINION

The ongoing anticipation of long-term benefits, particularly sustained weight loss and cardiovascular outcomes, underscores the significance of future treatment algorithms for addressing the disease of obesity.

Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonists: What the Orthopaedic Surgeon Needs to Know

» Orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to encounter patients with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes taking glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists for weight loss.» GLP-1 agonists are an effective treatment for weight loss with semaglutide and tirzepatide being the most effective agents. Randomized controlled trials using these agents have reported weight loss up to 21 kg (46 lb).» The use of GLP-1 agonists preoperatively can improve glycemic control, which can potentially reduce the risk of postoperative complications. However, multiple cases of intraoperative aspiration/regurgitation have been reported, potentially related to the effect of GLP-1 agonists on gastric emptying.» While efficacious, GLP-1 agonists may not produce sufficient weight loss to achieve body mass index cutoffs for total joint arthroplasty depending on individual patient factors, including starting bodyweight. Multifactorial approaches to weight loss with focus on lifestyle modification in addition to GLP-1 agonists should be considered in such patients.» Although GLP-1 agonists are efficacious agents for weight loss, they may not be accessible or affordable for all patients. Each patient's unique circumstances should be considered when creating an ideal weight loss plan during optimization efforts.

Beyond the Cardiovascular Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: Body Slimming and Plaque Stabilization. Are New Statins Born?

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by lipid and inflammatory cell deposits in the inner layer of large- and medium-sized elastic and muscular arteries. Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases and the overall and cardiovascular mortality, and it is a pro-atherogenic factor that induces atherosclerosis development and/or accelerates its progression through a multifactorial process. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are a new class of drugs, belonging to the armamentarium to fight type 2 DM, that have shown robust reductions in atherosclerotic events and all-cause mortality in all studies. Preclinical studies have shown that GLP-1RAs play a role in the immunomodulation of atherosclerosis, affecting multiple pathways involved in plaque development and progression. In this review, we wanted to explore the translational power of such preclinical studies by analyzing the most recent clinical trials investigating the atheroprotective effect of GLP-1RAs.

Embracing the Pros and Cons of the New Weight Loss Medications (Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, Etc.)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The history of multiple weight loss medications has been a concerning paradox based on an increased cardiovascular risk despite significant reductions in adipose tissue and weight. A new class of weight loss medications could change this past narrative based on early preliminary results of cardiovascular risk (not events-still need to be determined) and weight reduction in non-diabetics that acutely competes with results achieved with bariatric surgery. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the advantages and disadvantages of these newer medications, and how they could impact urology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Weight loss of - 15 to - 20% compared to baseline has become plausible in the short-term and preliminary guidance to reduce acute and chronic adverse events are receiving attention. However, the cost, access, conflicts of interest, supply chain, life-long adherence issues, and the long-term diverse implications on mental and physical health when exposed to this class of medications (GLP-1 agonists) are unknown. The profound caloric reductions should also result in baseline or ongoing nutritional deficiency testing, and general and specific dietary recommendations, which could theoretically mimic some bariatric surgery pre- and post-surgical protocols but has yet to be studied. Regardless, the potential impact of these medicines within a variety of medical specialties needs clinical research. Current and future lifestyle interventions, dietary patterns, and medicines in the weight loss category need to be held to a paradigm whereby cardiovascular health should improve with significant weight loss without a negative impact on mental health. In urology, the ability to impact cancer risk, ED, FSD, incontinence, infertility, nephrolithiasis, and multiple other endpoints are plausible (based on bariatric surgery data) but need preliminary clinical research. Other medicines with a similar or even larger potential impact are in clinical trials, and thus, a concise overview for clinicians and researchers was needed for objective guidance. Currently, comprehensive lifestyle changes utilized with and without these medications continue to garner positive mental, physical, and legacy effects, which suggest that they are as necessary as ever in the treatment of the numerous conditions impacted by unhealthy weight gain.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Chronic Weight Management

Rates of obesity have risen over the past few decades. Subsequently, the popularity of the pharmaceutical weight-loss drug market has grown over the past few years to meet growing demand. Among the most commonly prescribed drugs for weight management, many are glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 agonists) which are also utilized for the management of type 2 diabetes. There is a substantial and growing body of research comparing the efficacy of different clinical trials and examining long-term safety. This literature review examines the rise of off-label prescribing practices in the management of weight, with a focus on GLP-1 agonists. Physicians and patients should be aware of the unique aspects of existing treatment options, the impacts of off-label prescribing, and the effects of these medications. This review emphasizes the importance of informed decision-making, as well as the need for further research to guide future clinical practice.

What Is Best for Weight Loss? A Comparative Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analogue

Obesity is a global health concern, necessitating effective weight-loss interventions. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of semaglutide, a pharmacotherapeutic option, with bariatric surgery, a commonly utilized surgical intervention, for weight reduction. A systematic review of clinical trials, including the STEP (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People) trials, sustain trials, pioneer trials, and the STAMPEDE (Surgical Treatment and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently) trial, was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of these interventions. The analysis of the clinical trials revealed that semaglutide demonstrated significant weight reduction in participants. However, adverse effects such as gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances, increased pulse rate, and rare cases of thyroid cancer were observed. Long-term effects showed partial weight regain and a return of certain cardiometabolic variables to baseline levels after semaglutide withdrawal. Comparatively, bariatric surgery, as demonstrated in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) consortium and supported by the STAMPEDE trial, exhibited higher efficacy in weight reduction and the management of obesity-induced complications such as diabetes. The STAMPEDE trial demonstrated that bariatric surgery, specifically Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG), led to a significantly higher percentage of patients achieving desired diabetes treatment targets compared to medical therapy alone. While bariatric surgery showed superior efficacy, it also carried a higher risk of complications. In contrast, semaglutide presented a noninvasive alternative with significant weight reduction and lower incidences of adverse effects. In conclusion, this study highlights that bariatric surgery, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, remains a highly effective intervention for weight loss and management of obesity-induced complications. However, semaglutide represents a valuable noninvasive alternative, offering significant weight reduction and lower risks of adverse effects. The choice between these interventions should be based on individual patient characteristics and a comprehensive assessment of the risk-benefit profile.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists to expand the healthy lifespan: Current and future potentials

To help ensure an expanded healthy lifespan for as many people as possible worldwide, there is a need to prevent or manage a number of prevalent chronic diseases directly and indirectly closely related to aging, including diabetes and obesity. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have proven beneficial in type 2 diabetes, are amongst the few medicines approved for weight management, and are also licensed for focused cardiovascular risk reduction. In addition, strong evidence suggests several other beneficial effects of the pleiotropic peptide hormone, including anti-inflammation. Consequently, GLP-1 RAs are now in advanced clinical development for the treatment of chronic kidney disease, broader cardiovascular risk reduction, metabolic liver disease and Alzheimer's disease. In sum, GLP-1 RAs are positioned as one of the pharmacotherapeutic options that can contribute to addressing the high unmet medical need characterising several prevalent aging-related diseases, potentially helping more people enjoy a prolonged healthy lifespan.