Anti-transglutaminase IgA ELISA: clinical potential and drawbacks in celiac disease diagnosis

Investigation into celiac disease in Indian patients with portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on celiac disease in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis or idiopathic noncirrhotic intrahepatic portal hypertension (NCIPH). Our objective was to evaluate for celiac disease in patients with portal hypertension in India.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with portal hypertension having cryptogenic chronic liver disease (cases) and hepatitis B- or C-related cirrhosis (controls) were prospectively enrolled. We studied tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody and duodenal histology in study patients.

RESULT

Sixty-one cases (including 14 NCIPH patients) and 59 controls were enrolled. Celiac disease was noted in six cases (including two NCIPH patients) as compared to none in controls. In a significant proportion of the remaining study subjects, duodenal biopsy showed villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, and lamina propria inflammation, not accompanied by raised intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs); this was seen more commonly in cases as compared to controls. An unexpectedly high rate of tTG antibody positivity was seen in study subjects (66 %) of cases as compared to 29 % in controls (p-value < 0.001), which could indicate false-positive test result.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 10 % of patients with unexplained portal hypertension (cryptogenic chronic liver disease) had associated celiac disease. In addition, an unexplained enteropathy was seen in a significant proportion of study patients, more so in patients with cryptogenic chronic liver disease. This finding warrants further investigation.

Celiac disease in adult patients: specific autoantibodies in the diagnosis, monitoring, and screening

The increasing prevalence of celiac disease (CD), especially in adults, its atypical clinical presentation, and the strict, lifelong adherence to gluten-free diet (GFD) as the only option for healthy state create an imperative need for noninvasive methods that can effectively diagnose CD and monitor GFD. Aim. Evaluation of anti-endomysium (EmA) and anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-A) antibodies in CD diagnosis, GFD monitoring, and first degree relatives screening in CD adult patients. Methods. 70 newly diagnosed Greek adult patients, 70 controls, and 47 first degree relatives were tested for the presence of EmA and tTG-A. The CD patients were monitored during a 3-year period. Results. EmA predictive ability for CD diagnosis was slightly better compared to tTG-A (P = 0.043). EmA could assess compliance with GFD already from the beginning of the diet, while both EmA and tTG-A had an equal ability to discriminate between strictly and partially compliant patients after the first semester and so on. Screening of first degree relatives resulted in the identification of 2 undiagnosed CD cases. Conclusions. Both EmA and tTG-A are suitable markers in the CD diagnosis, in the screening of CD among first degree relatives, having also an equal performance in the long term monitoring.

Prevalence of serum celiac antibody in patients with IBD in Japan

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in Japan has increased, the prevalence of celiac disease is considered very low with the lowest genetic disposition. IBD is reported as the most common comorbidity because of the high positive rate of serological celiac markers. The aim of this study was to examine the current incidence of celiac disease, especially in IBD patients in Japan, where both wheat consumption and incidence of IBD have increased.

METHODS

A total of 172 patients with IBD and 190 controls in Japan were screened for serum antibody of tissue transglutaminase and deaminated gliadin peptide. In sero-positive patients, HLA testing and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with duodenal biopsy was performed. Some of the sero-positive patients started a gluten-restricted or unrestricted diet, and serological change was determined.

RESULTS

The positivity of both serum antibodies was significantly higher in IBD and correlated with disease activity. However, no biopsy-defined or HLA-defined true celiac disease was found. A decrease in serum antibody titers was observed with a gluten-restricted diet.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increased incidence of IBD and high positivity for serum celiac antibody in Japanese IBD patients, no true-positive celiac disease was noted, suggesting the presence of gluten intolerance in these populations.

Prevalence of serological markers for celiac disease (IgA and IgG class antigliadin antibodies and IgA class antiendomysium antibodies) in patients with autoimmune rheumatologic diseases in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

CONTEXT

Patients with autoimmune rheumatologic conditions and celiac disease tend to have a variety of autoantibodies, many of which have no clear pathogenic role. The literature contains frequent reports of celiac disease being more prevalent in patients with rheumatologic diseases, although this remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of positive serum tests for celiac disease, particularly IgA and IgG antigliadin (AGA) antibodies and IgA antiendomysium antibodies (EmA) in patients with autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. A second aim was to correlate positive serum tests with prednisone and immunosuppressant medication.

METHODS

A total of 190 adults and pediatric patients with a variety of autoimmune rheumatologic diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthrophathies) were evaluated and tested for IgA and IgG antigliadin-antibodies and IgA antiendomysium antibodies. Patients with positive serum tests underwent endoscopic duodenal biopsies for pathology studies.

RESULTS

There were four positive sera (2.1%) for AGA IgA, all of which tested negative for AGA IgG and EmA. Three sera (1.6%) tested positive for AGA IgG; all were negative for AGA IgA and EmA. The EmA test at a 1:2.5 serum dilution tested positive in 94 patients (49.5%); at a 1:5 serum dilution it was positive in 41 patients (21.6%). Eleven subjects tested positive for EmA at 1:40 dilution; and all of these tested negative for IgA tissue antitransglutaminase (tTG) antibodies. Nine of the 11 EmA-positive patients and all 7 patients with positive antigliadin antibodies tests underwent duodenal endoscopic biopsies, and no significant changes were demonstrated in their duodenal mucosa. A positive EmA was associated with elevated optical density AGA IgA readings; however, there was no relationship between positive EmA and AGA IgG optical density readings. Prednisone and immunosuppressant use were unrelated to AGA IgA optical density readings or AGA IgG readings. These drugs were associated with fewer positive EmA tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive AGAA, AGAG or EmA results are probably nonspecific for the presence of celiac disease among autoimmune rheumatologic disease patients. The intake of prednisone and immunosuprressant drugs seems to reduce the prevalence of IgA EmA, but it does not interfere with antigliadin antibodies tests.Further studies are required to estimate more accurately the prevalence of this disease in rheumatologic patients.

Comparison of commercially available serologic kits for the detection of celiac disease

BACKGROUND

The sensitivity and specificity of current antihuman tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA assays used to detect celiac disease reportedly approach 100%. In addition, the sensitivity of new generation deamidated gliadin peptide (alpha-DGP) antibody assays has also been reported to be similar to the tTG IgA assays. In routine clinical practice, however, the sensitivities and specificities of these tests for diagnosing celiac disease seem to be lower.

AIM

We analyzed sensitivities and specificities of 4 IgA tTG and 3 deamidated gliadin peptide (alpha-DGP) kits.

METHODS

The performance of 4 tTG IgA assays, A: Inova (Hu red blood cell), B: Binding site (rHu Ag), C: Eurospital (rHu Ag), D: Immco (rHu Ag) and 3 Inova alpha-DGP assays, E: alpha-DGP-IgA, F: alpha-DGP-IgG, and G: alpha-DGP-IgA+G was evaluated using sera from different subsets of celiac disease patients and controls; group 1: active celiac disease n=28, group 2: gluten-free diet n=54, group 3: healthy controls n=40, group 4: disease controls n=57(Crohn's disease n=17, chronic hepatitis n=40).

RESULTS

Using the manufacturer's cut-off values, the sensitivities and specificities of different kits ranged from 71.4% to 96.4% and 87.5% to 100%, respectively. When group 1 was compared with disease controls, sensitivities remained the same but specificities decreased. Receiver operating characteristic plot derived cut-off values modified decision thresholds in all assays except kit (G). Kappa analysis demonstrated variable degrees of agreement. All assays demonstrated higher sensitivities for patients with higher grades of villous atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall sensitivity was at or below 90%, which is lower than that reported in the literature. Performance of the recombinant and red blood cell antigen-based tTG assays was similar, whereas the alpha-DGP assays demonstrated lower values. Receiver operating characteristic plot derived cut-off values altered test results. Many factors affect the results of these tests and clinicians should be aware of their limitations.

Determining IgA and IgG antigliadin, IgA antitransglutaminase, and antiendomysial antibodies in monkey esophagus and in umbilical cord for diagnosis of celiac disease in developing countries

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficiency of determining IgA and IgG antigliadin antibodies (IgA- and IgG-AGA, respectively), antitransglutaminase (TgA), and anti-endomysial antibodies (AEA) in human umbilical cord (CO) and monkey esophagus for diagnosis of celiac disease; to determine the correlation between serological markers and celiac disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 400 patients were divided in 3 groups: group 1 with 37 patients with celiac disease, group 2 with 208 patients with no enteropathies, and group 3 with 155 patients with other enteropathies. IgA-AGA, IgG-AGA, and TgA were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, whereas AEA was evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity of IgA-AGA were 81.1% and 95.2%, of IgG-AGA 89.2% and 95.2%, of TgA 83.9% and 96.8%, of AEA-CO 87.9% and 100%, and of AEA of monkey esophagus 88.6% and 100%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 75.0%, 76.7%, 83.9%, and 100%. Negative predictive values were 96.6%, 98.0%, 96.8%, and 97.7% for IgA-AGA, IgG-AGA, TgA, and AEA, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a strong association between AEA-CO and celiac disease and a good correlation with other markers (TgA, IgA-AGA, and IgG-AGA).

CONCLUSIONS

TgA has been recommended for screening patients with celiac disease. Considering the similar sensitivity and specificity of IgA-AGA and TgA and their correlations in the multivariate analysis, both are applicable for this purpose. However, because TgA tests are highly costly and celiac disease is associated with IgA deficiency, the determination of IgA-AGA and IgG-AGA, followed by AEA-CO, is suitable for screening in developing countries, provided a cutoff point for these examinations is established. The results of antiendomysial antibodies in umbilical cord overlapped those in monkey esophagus. Therefore, umbilical cord should be used as a substrate instead of specimens from endangered species.

Screening for celiac disease in Tunisian patients with Graves’ disease using anti-endomysium and anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies

OBJECTIVE

Celiac disease (CD) can be associated with autoimmune thyroid diseases. The aim of this study was to screen for CD in patients with Graves' disease in Tunisia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sera from 161 patients with Graves' disease were tested for IgA class anti-endomysium antibodies (AEA) using indirect immunofluorescence on cryostat sections of human umbilical cord and for IgA class anti-human tissue transglutaminase antibodies (AtTG) by ELISA.

RESULTS

AEA were positive in 6 out of 161 (3.7%) patients with Graves' disease and all 6 patients were also positive for AtTG. Four of these 6 patients with positive serological markers of CD underwent duodenal biopsy; three had marked villous atrophy, one has normal histological picture and two did not agree to undergo biopsy. The prevalence of biopsy confirmed CD in patients with Graves' disease was 1.86% (3/161).

CONCLUSION

Patients with Graves' disease are at substantial risk of CD and therefore antibody screening for CD may be included in the work-up of these patients. Either AEA or AtTG may be used.

Systematic review: the use of serology to exclude or diagnose coeliac disease (a comparison of the endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibody tests)

BACKGROUND

With the appreciation of the high prevalence of coeliac disease there is increasing use of serology in screening asymptomatic people and testing those with suggestive features.

AIM

To compare the sensitivities and specificities of the endomysial antibody and the tissue transglutaminase antibody tests.

METHODS

Using electronic databases a search was made for relevant papers using the terms tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibody.

RESULTS

Both the endomysial antibody and tissue transglutaminase antibody have very high sensitivities (93% for both) and specificities (>99% and >98% respectively) for the diagnosis of typical coeliac disease with villous atrophy. Human recombinant tissue transglutaminase performs much better than guinea pig tissue transglutaminase. Review of studies comparing endomysial antibody with human recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibody shows that endomysial antibody more often has a higher specificity and human recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibody more often has a higher sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The human recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibody is the preferred test for screening asymptomatic people and for excluding coeliac disease in symptomatic individuals with a low pretest probability (i.e. <25%) for coeliac disease. Furthermore, it has a number of practical and financial advantages. If the pretest probability is >25%, biopsy is preferred as the post-test probability of coeliac disease with a negative test is still >2%.

Utility in clinical practice of immunoglobulin a anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody for the diagnosis of celiac disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The diagnosis of celiac disease often relies on the anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody test. The aim of this study was to evaluate its sensitivity and specificity in clinical practice with the use of commercial laboratories, in which the test characteristics might differ from research laboratories.

METHODS

We identified 122 patients with suspected celiac disease who had anti-tTG antibody serologies as well as upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsies. Those with celiac disease were classified as either classic (with diarrhea or other symptoms of malabsorption) or silent (asymptomatic). Biopsies from celiac disease patients were classified as either partial (Marsh IIIA) or total (Marsh IIIB or IIIC) villous atrophy.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the anti-tTG antibody test were 70.6%, 65.0%, 91.1%, and 30.2%, respectively. The sensitivity was 90.0% for patients with total villous atrophy and 42.3% for patients with partial villous atrophy (P < .0001). There were differences in both sensitivity and specificity between the 2 most commonly used commercial laboratories. The sensitivity for Lab #1 was 40.0% versus 86.4% for Lab #2 (P < .0001). The specificity for Lab #1 was 100.0%, and it was 41.7% for Lab #2 (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of the anti-tTG antibody in clinical practice is not as high as previously reported in research laboratories. The sensitivity is significantly lower in patients with partial villous atrophy. There is also significant variability in test characteristics among major commercial laboratories in the United States. These results need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

Performance of antibodies against tissue transglutaminase for the diagnosis of celiac disease: meta-analysis

A meta-analysis of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for antibodies against tissue transglutaminases (tTG) of various origins in celiac disease (CD) diagnosis was carried out. Twenty-one studies, with untreated CD patients and healthy/CD-free controls, were included in the meta-analysis. The diagnostic accuracy was estimated using a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and pooled sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp). Multiple assays within a study were treated by considering all the assays within a study and by analyzing the most popular assay (i.e., the commercial anti-tTTG ELISA most frequently utilized in the papers in which multiple assays were included). The SROC curve indicated the absence of heterogeneity, and the superiority of recombinant human tTG (rh-tTG) and purified human tTG (ph-tTG) compared to guinea pig-tTG (gp-tTG). The sensitivities (most popular assay) for rh-tTG, ph-tTG, and gp-tTG were 94%, 90%, and 92%, respectively, and the specificities were 97%, 92%, and 96%, respectively. A sensitivity analysis (exclusion of studies with bias) altered the results of ph-tTG: Se, 95%; Sp, 98%. The sensitivities (all individual assays) for rh-tTG, ph-tTG, and gp-tTG were 94%, 94%, and 91%, respectively, and the specificities were 95%, 94%, and 89%, respectively. Human tTG ELISA is sensitive and specific, and it can be used for mass screening. Sensitivity analysis showed that ph-tTG might perform better.

Low specificity of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

The association between celiac disease (CD) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is well documented in medical literature; however, a high frequency of false positive results of the anti-transglutaminase (anti-tTG) test has been reported in patients with PBC. To verify if the positive results for anti-tTG autoantibody are false positives due to cross reactivity with mitochondrial antigens, we studied 105 adult patients affected with PBC, positive for anti-mitochondrial M2 antibodies. Anti-tTG IgA antibodies were studied by using six different immunoenzymatic assays that employ the tTG antigen obtained from different sources (human recombinant, placenta, red blood cells, and guinea pig liver). On the whole, 28 out of 105 PBC subjects tested positive for anti-tTG IgA antibodies, but only two were eventually found to be affected by CD; the other 26 were shown to be false positive. The specificity of the various antigenic substrates ranged from 88.5% of the human erythrocytes tTG to 97.1% of the human recombinant tTG. The results of this study showed that a true association between PBC and CD was present in only 2% of the patients and that, in most cases, the false positive results were attributable to the type of substrate utilized in the assay.

Increased prevalence of anti-gliadin IgA-antibodies with aberrant duodenal histopathological findings in patients with IgA-nephropathy and related disorders

BACKGROUND

Antibodies present in coeliac disease may occur in IgA-nephropathy. This raises the question of food intolerance in the disease. Evidence for a true correlation between the two disorders has however been scarce.

DESIGN

Sera from 89 patients with IgA-nephropathy and 13 other patients with IgA deposits in the glomeruli of kidney biopsies were analysed for IgA-antibodies to gliadin, endomysium and tissue transglutaminase (92/102 patients).

RESULTS

Eleven out of 89 (12.4%) of the patients with IgA-nephropathy and five of the 13 others (38%) had elevated titres of IgA-antibodies to gliadin but, in all cases but one, normal IgA-antibodies to endomysium. Patients with IgA-nephropathy and elevated IgA-antibodies to gliadin had elevated total serum IgA more frequently than patients who had not (p<0.01). Two patients with IgA-nephropathy and one with Hennoch Schönlein's purpura had elevated IgA-antibodies to tissue transglutaminase. Small bowel biopsy in 7 out of 11 IgA-antibodies to gliadin positive patients with IgA-nephropathy was pathologic in three cases (two with Marsh I) . One patient with chronic glomerulnephritis also had Marsh I.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no increased frequency of verified coeliac disease in 89 patients with IgA-nephropathy. Two patients with IgA-nephropathy and one patient with chronic glomerulonephritis with IgA deposits in the kidney biopsy had a Marsh I histopathology. The findings suggest a possible link of celiac disease to IgA-nephropathy and a role for antibodies to food antigens in this disorder.

Calcium activation of tissue transglutaminase in radioligand binding and enzyme-linked autoantibody immunoassays in childhood celiac disease

BACKGROUND

Conflicting data have been published concerning the effect of calcium on binding of autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) in celiac disease (CD).

METHODS

IgA-tTG and IgG-tTG were measured with radioligand binding assays (RBA) using human recombinant (hr) (35)S-tTG produced in lysate of rabbit reticulocytes and with guinea pig (gp) tTG ELISA in 51 CD children (median: 5.7 years) and 35 controls (median: 2.2 years). Assays were performed with and without calcium.

RESULTS

In hr-tTG RBA, IgA-tTG levels remained unchanged after calcium detecting 50/51 CD children and 1/35 controls (p<0.0001). IgG-tTG levels decreased with calcium (p<0.0001) in CD children and detected 48/51 with and 49/51 without calcium as compared to 1/35 controls (p<0.0001). In gp-tTG ELISA, levels increased with calcium (p<0.0001) making it possible to detect an additional three to a total of 50/51 with IgA-tTG and 13 to 39/51 CD children with IgG-tTG compared to 4/35 and 8/35 controls (respectively, p<0.0001). Rabbit reticulocytes displayed calcium-dependent tTG activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium increased binding of IgA-tTG and IgG-tTG in the ELISA test. The reverse effect observed in RBA may be explained by competitive binding between calcium activated native rabbit reticulocyte tTG and hr (35)S-tTG. tTG autoantibody assays may need taking calcium into account for accurate diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for CD.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies used as markers for IgA-deficient celiac disease patients

The role of immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA-tTG) as predictors of untreated celiac disease (CoD) is well documented, and the presence and levels of these antibodies are most accurately monitored with native or recombinant human antigens. However, IgA-deficient CoD patients are not identified by IgA serology, and conflicting results concerning the diagnostic validity of IgG antibodies against gliadin (IgG-AGA), endomysium (IgG-EmA), and tTG (IgG-tTG) have been reported. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of IgG-tTG for the detection of CoD in IgA-deficient patients. Samples from 115 IgA-deficient and 200 IgA-sufficient subjects were collected and tested for the presence of IgA and IgG antibodies against tTG, EmA, and AGA. Antibodies against tTG were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on recombinant human tTG, and antibodies against EmA were determined by immunofluorescence. The values for IgG-tTG showed a higher correlation (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.91) with those for IgG-EmA for the IgA-deficient subjects than for the IgA-sufficient subjects (r = 0.88). The overall concordance of the positive and negative results between IgG-tTG and IgG-EmA was 97%, and the IgG-tTG assay discriminated between IgG-EmA-positive and -negative subjects with IgA deficiency at a rate of 100%. Elevated levels of IgG-tTG and IgG-EmA were measured in 70% of the IgA-sufficient subjects. IgG-tTG detection with recombinant human tTG is a good alternative to IgG-EmA detection, and the addition of IgG-tTG assessment to present screening methods may improve the ability to identify IgA-deficient subjects with CoD.

Tissue transglutaminase antibodies in celiac disease, comparison of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and a dot blot assay

AIMS

The purpose of our study is to determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a dot blot assay for the detection of IgA class anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA-AtTGA) and to compare these results with those of IgA class anti-endomysium antibodies (IgA-AEA), IgA class anti-reticulin antibodies (IgA-ARA) and IgA class anti-gliadin antibodies (IgA-AGA).

PATIENTS

Serum samples from 143 patients (97 children, 46 adults) with untreated celiac disease (CD) confirmed by intestinal biopsy and 74 disease controls (64 children, 10 adults) were studied. Methods. - The anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies were detected by dot blot assay and an ELISA using guinea pig tissue transglutaminase (gp-tTG) as antigen. The anti-endomysium antibodies were detected by an indirect immunofluorescence technique on cryostat sections of human umbilical cord. The anti-reticulin antibodies were also investigated by indirect immunofluorescence on cryostat sections of kidney, liver and stomach of rat. The anti-gliadin antibodies were determined by an ELISA.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of an ELISA for the detection of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies was 86% in children and 87% in adults and the sensitivity of dot blot assay was 57% in children and 54% in adults. The specificity of an ELISA and dot blot for the detection for anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies was, respectively, 96% and 88% lower than that of anti-endomysium antibodies (100%). The sensitivity of anti-gliadin antibodies was 97% in children and 91% in adults and their specificity was 85%. The sensitivity of anti-reticulin antibodies was 94% in children and 87% in adults. Their specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity and specificity of an ELISA for the detection of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies were better than that of dot blot assay. However, this dot blot assay could screen four celiac patients who have not had anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies by an ELISA. The sensitivity of anti-endomysium antibodies was better than that of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, anti-reticulin antibodies and anti-gliadin antibodies but in children aged less than 2 years, the sensitivity of anti-gliadin antibodies was better than that of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies.

What are the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for celiac disease? Do sensitivity and specificity vary in different populations?

A number of serologic tests are available commercially for identifying individuals who require an intestinal biopsy examination to diagnose celiac disease (CD). The aim of this study was to determine which test, or combination of tests, was most sensitive and specific for this purpose. We performed a literature review of studies that determined the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for CD. Studies that compared biopsy examination-confirmed cases of CD with controls with normal intestinal histology were selected for analysis. Sensitivities and specificities for the antigliadin tests were highly variable. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G-based antigliadin (AGA) tests generally were poor in both parameters whereas the IgA-based test was poorly sensitive but more specific. The IgA endomysium (EMA-IgA) and tissue transglutaminase (TTG-IgA) tests were both highly sensitive and specific with values for both parameters exceeding 95% in most studies. There were no identifiable differences between adults and children with respect to these tests. There was no evidence that a combination of tests was better than a single test using either the EMA IgA or TTG IgA. Either the EMA-IgA or TTG-IgA test is most useful for identifying individuals with CD. The variability and generally lower accuracy associated with the AGA tests make them unsuitable for screening purposes. There is no advantage to using a panel of tests as opposed to a single test. Because these data were obtained largely from studies conducted in a research setting, it is possible the tests will be less accurate when used in the clinical setting.

Cytokine production by intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte subsets in celiac disease

One of the earliest signs of mucosal immune activation in celiac disease (CD) is an increase in the intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) count in the small intestinal epithelium. Though most of those IELs express T cell receptor (TcR)-alphabeta chains, CD is characterized by an increase in TcR-gammadelta+ IELs and by the loss of CD3- IELs. There is currently little evidence that these changes in IEL subset distribution are of relevance in the pathogenesis of CD. We aimed to determine the pattern of cytokine production by IEL subsets isolated from duodenal biopsy specimens from control subjects and CD patients at different stages of the disease. We quantified the capacity of IEL subsets to produce IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 by intracellular staining by flow cytometry. All IEL subsets studied displayed a type I cytokine profile in both CD and control subjects, with TcR-alphabeta+ IELs being the main IFN-y producers. Untreated CD exhibited a trend toward a superior accumulation of IFN-gamma per cell but a reduced proportion of INF-gamma+ cells in vitro in association with a significantly increased apoptotic rate of IELs. IL-4 was almost undetectable in all cases and IL-10 showed a tendency to increase in treated and "silent" celiac patients. IEL subsets have a similar Th1 profile in controls and CD patients, and the superior in vitro apoptosis of IELs from CD patients may reflect their superior in vivo activation. The induction of IL-10-dependent regulatory Tr1 responses may be of potential clinical significance in this disease and merits further investigation.

Antibody levels in adult patients with coeliac disease during gluten-free diet: a rapid initial decrease of clinical importance

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of antibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) has been shown valuable in the diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) but how quickly serum titres decrease after introduction of a gluten-free diet (GFD) is not known in adults. CD is a well-recognized disorder amongst the general population and many persons try a GFD for fairly vague symptoms before they seek medical advice. Therefore, it is important to determine the time that the serologic tests remain predictive of the disease after the introduction of a GFD.

METHODS

Sera were taken from 22 consecutively biopsy-proven adult patients with CD in connection with the diagnostic biopsy. The patients were followed for 1 year and sera were taken after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after start of a GFD. Sera were stored at -20 degrees C and analysed for IgA antibodies against gliadin, endomysium and two different commercial tTG assays based on recombinant human tTG (tTGrh) and guinea-pig liver (tTGgp).

RESULTS

Twenty patients could be followed during GFD and all antibody titres fell sharply within 1 month after introduction of a GFD and continued to decline during the survey interval. Thirty days after beginning the diet only 58, 84, 74 and 53% of all patients had positive antibody levels of tTGrh, tTGgp, EmA and AGA respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As the antibodies used to confirm the diagnosis of CD fall rapidly and continue to decline following the introduction of a GFD, it is important that health care providers carefully inquire about the possibility of self-prescribed diets before patients sought medical attention.

Anti-human versus anti-guinea pig tissue transglutaminase antibodies as the first-level serological screening test for coeliac disease in the general population

BACKGROUND

So far the reliability of the anti-guinea pig and anti-human tissue transglutaminase antibodies for the coeliac disease diagnosis has been evaluated in selected groups of patients.

AIM

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of anti-human versus anti-guinea pig tissue transglutaminase in the coeliac disease screening of the general population.

SUBJECTS

Two healthy Italian populations living in Marche region and in Western Sardinia.

METHODS

Both anti-guinea pig and anti-human tissue transglutaminase were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based commercially available kit (Eu-tTG, Eurospital, Trieste, Italy).

RESULTS

During the period 1999-2001, 3541 subjects (1500 from "continental" Italy and 2041 from Sardinia) were screened for coeliac disease using both anti-guinea pig and anti-human tissue transglutaminase as first-level tests. Both these tests were negative in 3439/3541 sera, while 29 resulted positive for both of them and 73 showed discordant results. Overall, 50 intestinal biopsies were performed in 22, 21 and 7 subjects with positivity to both screening tests, to anti-guinea pig and to anti-human tissue transglutaminase alone, respectively. A coeliac disease diagnosis was made in 25 subjects giving an overall prevalence of 1:126 individuals. The anti-tissue transglutaminase specificity and sensitivity were 98 and 92% for guinea pig and 99.6 and 96% for human tissue transglutaminase, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-human tissue transglutaminase test should definitely replace the anti-guinea pig-derived one as first-level screening tool for identifying all subjects who need the second-level investigations (small intestinal biopsy).

IgA and IgG tissue transglutaminase antibody prevalence and clinical significance in connective tissue diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, and primary biliary cirrhosis

An association between celiac disease (CD) and other autoimmune diseases such as connective tissue diseases (CTD), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has been reported in several studies. However, a high rate of false positives in autoantibody testing was noted, especially when tissue transglutaminase (tTG) from guinea pig liver was used. Thus, the real prevalence of CD in CTD, IBD, and PBC is unclear. In a case-control study, 400 patients with CTD, 170 with IBD, 48 with PBC, and 120 healthy subjects were investigated for CD by the analysis of IgA and IgG tTG antibodies using the more specific human recombinant tTG immunoenzymatic assay. Patients and controls with positive findings were further tested for antiendomysial antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and HLA typing, and those found positive by either of these tests underwent duodenal biopsy to confirm a possible diagnosis of CD. Twelve patients were positive for IgA or IgG tTG antibodies, showing an overall prevalence of 1.9%. Only 1 healthy subject (0.8%) had a low level positive reaction for IgA anti-tTG. Among the 12 patients and the healthy subject, only 2 (1 SLE and 1 ulcerative colitis patient) were subsequently confirmed to be affected with CD by positive EMA, HLA, and small bowel biopsy findings. The highest rate of false positives was found in PBC patients (10.4%). For these reasons, serological screening testing for CD is not recommended in CTD patients or in subjects affected with IBD or PBC, unless there is a relevant clinical suspicion of CD.

Autoantibodies in the diagnosis and management of liver disease

Autoantibodies are nonpathogenic manifestations of immune reactivity, and they may occur in acute and chronic liver diseases. Autoantibodies may be consequences rather than causes of the liver injury, and they should be regarded as diagnostic clues rather than etiologic markers. Conventional autoantibodies used in the categorization of autoimmune liver disease are antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and atypical perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Ancillary autoantibodies that enhance diagnostic specificity, have prognostic connotation, or direct treatment are antibodies to endomysium, tissue transglutaminase, histones, doubled-stranded DNA, and actin. Autoantibodies that have an emerging diagnostic and prognostic significance are antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, liver cytosol type 1, and nuclear pore complex antigens. Autoantibodies of uncertain clinical value that remain under investigation are antibodies to chromatin, lactoferrin, and Saccharomyces cervisiae. Continued recognition and characterization of autoantibodies should improve diagnostic precision, provide prognostic indices, and elucidate target autoantigens. These advances may in turn clarify pathogenic mechanisms, facilitate the development of animal models, and generate novel site-specific therapies.

Recombinant autoantigens for diagnosis and therapy of autoimmune diseases

The characteristic of autoimmune diseases resides in the existence of T- and B-cell autoreactivity when directed against self-proteins. Thus autoantibodies are considered to be of diagnostic relevance. The advent of recombinant protein expression technology has made it possible to produce economically high-quality autoantigens for use in immunoassays for detecting autoantibodies in patients' sera. The intention of this short review is to give the reader a brief description of autoantigen production methodologies with their advantages, disadvantages and the limitations of these techniques in the diagnostics of autoimmune diseases. Further possible usage of recombinant autoantigens as tools in investigation and therapy of autoimmune diseases is discussed.

Human recombinant anti-transglutaminase antibody testing is useful in the diagnosis of silent coeliac disease in a selected group of at-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia, unexplained chronic hypertransaminasaemia (CHT) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are common gastrointestinal situations that have been related to coeliac disease. Antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) have been claimed recently to be highly effective as a screening method for coeliac disease.

AIM

To assess the prevalence of coeliac disease by means of detection of antibodies against human tTG in the above-mentioned groups of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A control group consisted of 165 normal blood donors. Patient groups comprised 90 CHT patients, 102 HCV patients and 92 functional dyspepsia patients. All patients were tested for anti-tTG (immunoglobulin A, IgA) antibodies. Anti-endomysium (IgA) antibodies (AEA) and antigliadin (IgA) antibodies (AGA) and antigliadin (immunoglobulin G, IgG) antibodies (AGG) were also tested. When anti-tTG or AEA was positive, a duodenal biopsy was recommended.

RESULTS

One of 165 blood donors, three of 92 functional dyspepsia patients, four of 90 CHT patients and none of 102 HCV patients were positive for anti-tTG antibodies. In the anti-tTG-positive group, all but one were AEA-positive. There were no AEA- or AGA IgA-positives that revealed a negative anti-tTG test. Duodenal biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of coeliac disease in all the cases. Statistically significant differences were found between the controls and the functional dyspepsia group and between the controls and the CHT group, but not between the controls and the HCV group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CHT and functional dyspepsia may represent a true oligosymptomatic form of coeliac disease. In such conditions, the detection of anti-tTG antibodies is useful as a screening method. Coeliac disease is not an autoimmune manifestation of HCV, so screening for coeliac disease in HCV patients cannot be recommended.

New developments in celiac disease

Celiac disease remains a challenge to the clinician and scientist. It is clearly more prevalent than was previously suspected. Much interest is seen in identifying the genetic factors, which predispose to disease and the environmental agents that can trigger it. Genome-wide searches have identified a number of chromosomal susceptibility loci. Specific gliadin epitopes are being analyzed. New diagnostic options include the tissue transglutaminase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Neurologic disease and bone disease are intriguing complications of celiac disease and are gradually being defined.

Production of recombinant human tissue transglutaminase using the baculovirus expression system, and its application for serological diagnosis of coeliac disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tissue transglutaminase was identified as the main autoantigen in coeliac disease (CD) but enzyme immunoassays applying the commercially available antigen from guinea pig liver show insufficient specificity and sensitivity for diagnosis as compared with endomysium antibodies (EmA). The aim of this present study was to develop a new method for the cloning and expression of human tissue transglutaminase (hu-tTG) and to test hu-tTG in the serological diagnosis of CD.

METHODS

Hu-tTG was cloned and expressed using a baculovirus system and SF9 insect cells. The enzyme carried a C-terminal His tag allowing efficient affinity purification from cell lysates. The recognition of hu-tTG by human sera was checked by using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For this, 35 patients with active CD were compared with 144 controls (18 patients with bioptically excluded CD, 89 blood donors, 30 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and seven patients with cystic fibrosis).

RESULTS

The ELISA using hu-tTG showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.6%. Titres of antibodies against hu-tTG (anti-hu-tTG) were positively correlated with EmA titres. All results negative for EmA were also negative for anti-hu-tTG. There were, however, EmA positive results up to a titre of 1 : 80 below the cut-off for anti-hu-tTG. For comparison, antibodies against guinea pig tissue transglutaminase (anti-gp-tTG) were determined in parallel. All patients with anti-hu-tTG below the cut-off were also negative for anti-gp-tTG. However, there were eight patients positive for anti-hu-tTG but negative for anti-gp-tTG.

CONCLUSIONS

The new test reaches and even exceeds diagnostic efficiency of EmA for coeliac diagnosis.

Tissue transglutaminase antibodies in patients with end-stage heart failure

OBJECTIVE

For celiac disease (CD), screening a trend has recently emerged to measure tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA) by immunoassays instead of the more laborious endomysial antibodies (EmA), as they recognize the same target, tissue transglutaminase (tTG). However, a high rate of false-positive results has been reported in some patient series with diseases known to be associated with CD. Moreover, tTG is a ubiquitous, multifunctional enzyme, overexpressed in experimental models of heart failure. Therefore, we assessed the specificity of tTGA assays in a large series of EmA-negative patients with end-stage heart failure.

METHODS

We studied 288 patients with end-stage heart failure and 60 blood donors. No subject had clinical evidence of CD or IgA deficiency, and all were EmA negative. Serum IgA and IgG tTGA were measured by means of commercial kits using as substrate, either guinea pig or recombinant human tTG. Blocking studies and Western blots were also performed using recombinant human tTG.

RESULTS

All blood donor sera were IgA tTGA negative. IgA tTGA positivity was observed in 47.6% and 49.1% of patients with heart failure using, respectively, guinea pig tTG and recombinant human tTG as substrates. Preincubation of positive sera with recombinant human tTG resulted in 81% blocking of IgA tTGA in immunoassay. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of antibodies against recombinant human tTG. IgA tTGA-positive sera were also IgG tTGA positive.

CONCLUSIONS

IgA and IgG tTGA occur in a large number of EmA-negative patients with end-stage heart failure, and their presence is unlikely to be caused by concomitant CD.

The use of a single serological marker underestimates the prevalence of celiac disease in Israel: a study of blood donors

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies suggest that celiac disease was previously underdiagnosed. To find out whether antiendomysial antibodies underestimate the prevalence of celiac disease, we elected to use a strategy combining multiple serological markers to explore the prevalence of celiac disease in Israel and the usefulness of the various antibodies in screening for celiac disease.

METHODS

Serum samples from 1571 healthy blood donors were tested. A small intestinal biopsy was offered to all patients who tested positive for either human tissue transglutaminase antibodies, an ELISA kit based on antiendomysium (EMA-ELISA), immunoglobulin A antigliadin verified by antiendomysial immunofluorescence antibodies, and to patients who were IgA deficient with elevated antigliadin IgG.

RESULTS

A total of 59 subjects (3.8% of study population) were offered an intestinal biopsy based on serological findings, and 30 of 59 patients agreed to undergo intestinal biopsy (1.9% of study population). Celiac disease was diagnosed in 10 patients, establishing a prevalence of at least 1:157 in the general population (0.6%, CI = 0.3-1.1%). Using any serological marker alone would have underestimated the prevalence of celiac disease, as it was diagnosed in only two patients who tested positive for endomysial immunofluorescence antibodies (prevalence of 1:786, 0.1%, CI = 0.02-0.5%), six patients positive for tissue transglutaminase (prevalence of 1:262, 0.4%, CI = 0.1-0.9%), and seven patients positive for ELISA-EMA (prevalence of 1:224, 0.45%, CI = 0.2-0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of celiac disease in Israel is at least 1:157 in the general population, confirming its underdiagnosis in previous studies. The disparity between the various serological markers suggest that the use of one serological marker is insufficient for establishing the true prevalence of celiac disease.

A comparison of 13 guinea pig and human anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody ELISA kits

AIMS

Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) is a major autoantigen recognised by IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (IgA EMA). Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA tTG) have therefore been developed as an alternative serological screening test to IgA EMA for coeliac disease (CD). The use of human tTG (h-tTG), as opposed to guinea pig liver tTG (gpl-tTG), in these assays has been reported to produce superior results. This study compared 13 commercial IgA tTG ELISA kits to ascertain their performance characteristics in the diagnosis of CD in patients with biopsy confirmed disease compared with controls. All patients and controls were adults aged 21 years or older.

METHODS

Sera from the following groups of patients were tested in each kit: (1) 49 patients with CD confirmed on small bowel biopsies (all IgA EMA positive); (2) 34 patients with small bowel biopsies that were not consistent with CD; and (3) 30 patients with biopsy confirmed inflammatory bowel disease. All controls were negative for IgA EMA and were not IgA deficient. Sensitivities and specificities were determined using both the manufacturers' recommended cut off points and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis derived decision thresholds. The area under the curve (AUC) for each ROC plot was also calculated and compared between kits.

RESULTS

In general, the h-tTG based IgA tTG ELISA kits demonstrated superior performance (especially specificity) compared with the gpl-tTG based kits, although 100% sensitivity and specificity (comparable to the IgA EMA assay) was obtained in only one recombinant h-tTG based kit.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of h-tTG in IgA tTG ELISA kits is generally, but not universally, associated with superior performance. Factors other than antigen source are important in determining kit performance.

Tissue transglutaminase-serology markers for coeliac disease

Serology markers of coeliac disease (CD) - antigliadin IgA/IgG antibodies (AGA/AGG) with purified alpha-gliadin, antiendomysium IgA antibodies (EmA) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (atTG) IgA/IgG antibodies--determined in 1451 serum samples, were analysed with respect to different screening algorithms. Determination of atTG using five ELISA methods was compared taking into account the impact of human recombinant antigen and IgG class of atTG. A subgroup of 119 patients undergoing small intestinal biopsy was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity of CD markers. The highest sensitivity (94%) was obtained for AGG, and the highest specificity (93.5%) was obtained for EmA. All coeliac disease patients were detected using the combination of all four CD markers, resulting in 100% sensitivity. CD and type 1 diabetes mellitus autoantigens were determined in 139 diabetic patients. The atTG IgA mean value (16.7 IU/ml) was higher in the antiglutamate dehydrogenase antibody (GAD)-positive subgroup, where at least one CD marker was positive in 83.6% subjects. In the GAD-negative subgroup atTG IgA was 8.73 lU/ml and at least one CD marker was positive in 57.4% subjects. atTG in IgA and IgG classes could be recommended as valuable serological markers of CD in the differential diagnosis of malabsorption as well as in various screening algorithms. ELISA determination of atTG with human antigen could increase the specificity, especially in patients with other autoimmune diseases.

Recombinant autoantigens

Autoimmune diseases frequently manifest themselves in fulminating immune reactions involving T and B cells that lead to the appearance of circulating autoantibodies. Such antibodies are considered to be of diagnostic relevance and may be pathognomonic for their associated autoimmune diseases. The advent of recombinant protein expression technology has made it possible to economically produce high quality autoantigens for use in immunoassays to detect autoantibodies in patients' sera. This short review is intended to give the reader a brief description of the various autoantigen production methodologies with their advantages and disadvantages, and the limitations of these techniques in the diagnostics of autoimmune diseases.