Evaluation of artificial neural networks in the classification of primary oesophageal dysmotility

Systematic review with meta-analysis: artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of oesophageal diseases

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been applied to endoscopy and questionnaires for the evaluation of oesophageal diseases (ODs).

AIM

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of AI in the diagnosis of malignant and benign OD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic and the Cochrane Library. A bivariate random-effect model was used to calculate pooled diagnostic efficacy of AI models and endoscopists. The reference tests were histology for neoplasms and the clinical and instrumental diagnosis for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were estimated.

RESULTS

For the diagnosis of Barrett's neoplasia, AI had AUROC of 0.90, sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.86, PLR 6.50, NLR 0.13 and DOR 50.53. AI models' performance was comparable with that of endoscopists (P = 0.35). For the diagnosis of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.97, 0.95, 0.92, 12.65, 0.05 and DOR 258.36, respectively. In this task, AI performed better than endoscopists although without statistically significant differences. In the detection of abnormal intrapapillary capillary loops, the performance of AI was: AUROC 0.98, sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.94, PLR 14.75, NLR 0.07 and DOR 225.83. For the diagnosis of GERD based on questionnaires, the AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.99, 0.97, 0.97, 38.26, 0.03 and 1159.6, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AI demonstrated high performance in the clinical and endoscopic diagnosis of OD.

Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases

Artificial intelligence (AI) has enormous potential to support clinical routine workflows and therefore is gaining increasing popularity among medical professionals. In the field of gastroenterology, investigations on AI and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have mainly focused on the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract. However, numerous CAD tools have been tested also in upper GI disorders showing encouraging results. The main application of AI in the upper GI tract is endoscopy; however, the need to analyze increasing loads of numerical and categorical data in short times has pushed researchers to investigate applications of AI systems in other upper GI settings, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and motility disorders. AI and CAD systems will be increasingly incorporated into daily clinical practice in the coming years, thus at least basic notions will be soon required among physicians. For noninsiders, the working principles and potential of AI may be as fascinating as obscure. Accordingly, we reviewed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and original research articles regarding the performance of AI in the diagnosis of both malignant and benign esophageal and gastric diseases, also discussing essential characteristics of AI.

Artificial neural network classification of pharyngeal high-resolution manometry with impedance data

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To use classification algorithms to classify swallows as safe, penetration, or aspiration based on measurements obtained from pharyngeal high-resolution manometry (HRM) with impedance.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series evaluating new method of data analysis.

METHODS

Multilayer perceptron, an artificial neural network (ANN), was evaluated for its ability to classify swallows as safe, penetration, or aspiration. Data were collected from 25 disordered subjects swallowing 5- or 10-mL boluses. Following extraction of relevant parameters, a subset of the data was used to train the models, and the remaining swallows were then independently classified by the ANN.

RESULTS

A classification accuracy of 89.4 ± 2.4% was achieved when including all parameters. Including only manometry-related parameters yielded a classification accuracy of 85.0 ± 6.0%, whereas including only impedance-related parameters yielded a classification accuracy of 76.0 ± 4.9%. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded areas under the curve of 0.8912 for safe, 0.8187 for aspiration, and 0.8014 for penetration.

CONCLUSIONS

Classification models show high accuracy in classifying swallows from dysphagic patients as safe or unsafe. HRM-impedance with ANN represents one method that could be used clinically to screen for patients at risk for penetration or aspiration.

Application of classification models to pharyngeal high-resolution manometry

PURPOSE

The authors present 3 methods of performing pattern recognition on spatiotemporal plots produced by pharyngeal high-resolution manometry (HRM).

METHOD

Classification models, including the artificial neural networks (ANNs) multilayer perceptron (MLP) and learning vector quantization (LVQ), as well as support vector machines (SVM), were evaluated for their ability to identify disordered swallowing. Data were collected from 12 control subjects and 13 subjects with swallowing disorders; for this experiment, these subjects swallowed 5-ml water boluses. Following extraction of relevant parameters, a subset of the data was used to train the models, and the remaining swallows were then independently classified by the networks.

RESULTS

All methods produced high average classification accuracies, with MLP, SVM, and LVQ achieving accuracies of 96.44%, 91.03%, and 85.39%, respectively. When evaluating the individual contributions of each parameter and groups of parameters to the classification accuracy, parameters pertaining to the upper esophageal sphincter were most valuable.

CONCLUSION

Classification models show high accuracy in segregating HRM data sets and represent 1 method of facilitating application of HRM to the clinical setting by eliminating the time required for some aspects of data extraction and interpretation.