Disseminated tumor cells in the blood of patients with gastric cancer are an independent predictive marker of poor prognosis

TUMOR MARKERS EXPRESSION LEVELS IN GASTRIC CANCER PATIENT'S PERIPHERAL BLOOD BY RT-PCR ASSESSMENT

BACKGROUND

Hematological recurrence is the second most frequent cause of failure in the treatment of gastric cancer. The detection of circulating tumor markers in peripheral blood by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) method may be a useful tool to predict recurrence and determine the patient's prognosis. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the association between the tumor markers level in peripheral blood and its impact on patient survival.

AIMS

To evaluate the expression of the circulating tumor markers CK20 and MUC1 in peripheral blood samples from patients with gastric cancer by qRT-PCR, and to verify the association of their expression levels with clinicopathological characteristics and survival.

METHODS

A total of 31 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were prospectively included in this study. CK20 and MUC1 expression levels were analyzed from peripheral blood by the qRT-PCR technique.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant (p>0.05) association between CK20 expression levels and clinical, pathological, and surgical features. Higher MUC1 expression levels were associated with female patients (p=0.01). There was a correlation between both gene levels (R=0.81, p<0.001), and CK20 level and tumor size (R=0.39, p=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

CK20 and MUC1 expression levels could be assessed by qRT-PCR from total peripheral blood samples of patients with gastric cancer. CK20 levels were correlated to MUC1 levels as well as to tumor size. There was no difference in disease-free survival and overall survival regarding both genetic markers expression in this series.

Circulating tumor cells in gastric cancer: developments and clinical applications

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which are shed from primary tumor or metastatic sites into the bloodstream and subsequently seed into distant tissues, are considered as the precursors of metastases. Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly heterogeneous malignant tumor. With regard to the diagnosis of GC, secondary pathological biopsy is difficult, while invasive examination is harmful to patients. In recent years, CTCs have made great progress in tumor diagnosis, prognosis prediction, efficacy detection and treatment guidance, but the research on the role of CTCs in GC remains limited. The following sections review the landmark studies demonstrating the technical approaches of CTCs monitoring in the field of GC. Moreover, we highlight the clinical application of CTCs numbers and phenotypes in monitoring the therapeutic efficacy and judging patient prognosis by sequential blood analyses.

Association between circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood and the prognosis of gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Background

Research on the correlation between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and gastric cancer (GC) has increased rapidly in recent years. However, whether CTCs are associated with GC patient prognosis is highly controversial.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the value of CTCs to predict the prognosis of GC patients.

Design

A meta-analysis.

Data Sources and Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that reported the prognostic value of CTCs in GC patients before October 2022. The association between CTCs and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of GC patients was assessed. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sampling times (pre-treatment and post-treatment), detection targets, detection method, treatment method, tumor stage, region, and HR (Hazard Ratio) extraction methods. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing individual studies to assess the stability of the results. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, Egger's test, and Begg's test.

Results

We initially screened 2000 studies, of which 28 were available for further analysis, involving 2383 GC patients. The pooled analysis concluded that the detection of CTCs was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.933, 95% CI 1.657-2.256, p < 0.001), DFS/RFS (HR = 3.228, 95% CI 2.475-4.211, p < 0.001), and PFS (HR = 3.272, 95% CI 1.970-5.435, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the subgroup analysis stratified by tumor stage (p < 0.01), HR extraction methods (p < 0.001), detection targets (p < 0.001), detection method (p < 0.001), sampling times (p < 0.001), and treatment method (p < 0.001) all showed that CTC detection was associated with poor OS and DFS/RFS for GC patients. Furthermore, the study showed that CTCs were associated with the poor DFS/RFS of GC when CTCs were detected for patients from Asian or No-Asian regions (p < 0.05). In addition, higher CTCs predicted poorer OS for GC patients who are from Asian regions (p < 0.001), but without statistical difference for GC patients from No-Asian regions (p = 0.490).

Conclusion

CTC detection in peripheral blood was associated with poor OS, DFS/RFS, and PFS in patients with GC.

Association Between Liquid Biopsy and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Reports regarding liquid biopsy and gastric cancer (GC) have emerged rapidly in recent decades, yet their prognostic value still remains controversial. This study was aimed to assess the impact of liquid biopsy, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free nucleic acids, on GC patients' prognosis.

Methods: PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were searched for studies that report GC patient survival data stratified by CTC/circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)/circulating miRNAs' status. The hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for patients' overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded or calculated depending on circulating target status.

Results: We initially identified 4,221 studies, from which 43 were eligible for further analysis, comprising 3,814 GC patients. Pooled analyses showed that detection of certain CTCs, ctDNA, and circulating miRNA was associated with poorer OS (CTCs: HR = 1.84, 95%CI 1.50–2.26, p < 0.001; ctDNA: HR = 1.78, 95%CI 1.36–2.34, p < 0.001; circulating miRNA: HR = 1.74, 95%CI 1.13–2.69, p < 0.001) and DFS/PFS (CTCs: HR = 3.39, 95%CI 2.21–5.20, p < 0.001; ctDNA: HR = 2.38, 95%CI 1.31–4.32, p = 0.004; circulating miRNA: HR = 3.30, 95%CI 2.39–4.55, p < 0.001) of GC patients, regardless of disease stage and time point at which sample is taken (at baseline or post-treatment).

Conclusions: The presence of CTCs and/or cellular components identifies a group of GC with poorer prognosis. Among circulating markers, CTCs demonstrated a stronger and more stable predictive value for late-stage disease and among Mongolian populations with GC. Less data are available for ctDNA and miRNA; however, their presence may also reflect aggressive biology and warrants further prospective study.

Prognostic and predictive blood biomarkers in gastric cancer and the potential application of circulating tumor cells

Gastric cancer (GC), with its high incidence and mortality rates, is a highly fatal cancer that is common in East Asia particularly in China. Its recurrence and metastasis are the main causes of its poor prognosis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or other blood biomarkers that are released into the circulating blood stream by tumors are thought to play a crucial role in the recurrence and metastasis of gastric cancer. Therefore, the detection of CTCs and other blood biomarkers has an important clinical significance; in fact, they can help predict the prognosis, assess the staging, monitor the therapeutic effects and determine the drug susceptibility. Recent research has identified many blood biomarkers in GC, such as various serum proteins, autoantibodies against tumor associated antigens, and cell-free DNAs. The analysis of CTCs and circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the peripheral blood of patients with gastric cancer is called as liquid biopsy. These blood biomarkers provide the disease status for individuals and have clinical meaning. In this review, we focus on the recent scientific advances regarding CTCs and other blood biomarkers, and discuss their origins and clinical meaning.

Pathway of peritoneal carcinomatosis maybe hematogenous metastasis rather than peritoneal seeding

Goals

This study aimed to summarize the clinicopathological data of the cases of gastric cancer or colon cancer with regular metastasis in the mesentery of small intestine and explore the pathway of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 5 cases of gastric cancer and 3 cases of colon cancer with regular metastasis in the mesentery of the small intestine from January 2014 to June 2016, including clinical information, gross manifestations during operation, treatment, and pathology.

Results

The clinical characteristics of all 8 cases were fully collected. The symptoms were various without specificity. All patients were found to present with metastasis in peritoneum during operation and the metastatic lesions arranged along the blood vessels orderly. The metastatic lesions of all studied patients were proved to be malignant carcinoma histopathologically, the same as the original tumor. Tumor emboli were seen in the vessel and invasive neoplastic foci was also seen in the vascular wall.

Conclusions

The traditional view that peritoneal carcinomatosis is due to seeding has no sufficient basis. Hematogenous metastasis maybe the real way of peritoneal carcinomatosis combined with clinical presentation.

Cross-Sectional Location of Gastric Cancer Affects the Long-Term Survival of Patients as Tumor Invasion Deepens

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of gastric cancer is generally determined by tumor depth and lymph node metastasis, while the effect of cross-sectional tumor location on prognosis remains unclear.

METHODS

This study recruited patients who had been diagnosed with gastric cancer and who underwent gastrectomy from 1989 to 2012. The cross-sectional locations of the gastric cancers were classified into four regions: the lesser (LC) and greater curvatures (GC), and anterior (AW) and posterior walls (PW).

RESULTS

Overall, 4820 patients were enrolled in this study. The most common site of gastric cancer among the four cross-sectional locations was the LC (46.4%), while the proportions of PW (19.9%), AW (18.4%), and GC (15.4%) were similar. Overall survival differed statistically (p = 0.013) according to the cross-sectional location, and the 5-year overall survival of those with tumors with a GC location was significantly worse (p = 0.003) than for the other three locations. In subgroup multivariate analysis, GC location was an independent prognostic indicator for a worse clinical outcome at T stage 3-4b (hazard ratio 1.365, 95% confidence interval 1.150-1.620, p < 0.001). In addition, a GC gastric cancer had a higher recurrence rate in terms of peritoneal seeding compared with other locations.

CONCLUSIONS

The cross-sectional location of gastric cancer is associated with long-term survival. A GC location predicts a worse prognosis, especially in gastric cancer patients with deeper T stages.

Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in blood from patients with gastric cancer

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) have been focused on as a target for detecting occult tumors, predicting therapeutic responses and prognoses, and monitoring postoperative recurrence in the clinical management of patients with various malignancies, including gastric cancer. Recent advances in molecular diagnostic tools have contributed to high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CTC. A conspicuous disparity exists in the incidence of CTC among studies. However, a close relationship has been reported between positivity for CTC and well‐known prognostic clinicopathological factors including depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, stage, and lymphatic and venous invasion in patients with gastric cancer. According to most studies published on the clinical impact of CTC, the presence of CTC negatively affects the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Moreover, the study of CTC based on a meta‐analysis demonstrated their importance as a poor prognostic indicator. In clinical management, pre‐ and post‐therapeutic monitoring of CTC using liquid biopsy may be useful for early detection of subclinical patients or disease recurrence, prediction of tumor progression, and administrative control of adjuvant chemotherapy. Although their functional properties remain unclear, molecular profiling of CTC may contribute to the development of personalized treatment that effectively inhibits tumor progression in patients with advanced gastric cancer. We herein review the clinical significance of CTC as a promising blood marker and therapeutic target in patients with gastric cancer.

Circulating tumour cells predict survival in gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis

AIM OF THE STUDY

The prognostic value of the detection of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in gastric cancer has been studied intensely in recent years. However, the application of different technologies led to inconsistent results between the studies. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of published studies to summarise the evidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medline and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched up to March 2013 using "circulating tumor cells" and "gastric cancer" as search terms. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for prognostic outcomes and clinical characteristics were extracted from each study. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated using random or fixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Twelve studies enrolling 774 patients were included. The combined HR estimate for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were 1.41 (95% CI: 1.28-1.62), 2.99 (95% CI: 2.01-4.45) and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.02-2.62), respectively. Subgroup analysis concerning detection methods and sampling time showed that results of RT-PCR for the OS group and RT-PCR for the DFS group suggest a prognostic significance of CTC detection (pooled HR [95% CI]: 1.45 [1.28-1.65], I(2) = 38%, p = 0.13; 2.99 [2.01-4.45], I(2) = 0%, p = 0.32). In addition, results of the baseline CTC detection group also indicated a significant prognostic value to predict OS and DFS (pooled HR [95% CI]: 1.47 [1.19-1.82], I(2) = 38%, p = 0.14; 2.99 [2.01-4.45], I(2) = 0%, p = 0.32). We simultaneously found that the detection of CTCs correlated with pathological stage (pooled OR [95% CI]: 2.95 [1.65-5.28], I(2) = 56%, p = 0.03), lymph node status (pooled OR [95% CI]: 2.26 [1.50-3.41], I(2) = 37%, p = 0.09), the depth of invasion (pooled OR [95% CI]: 3.21 [1.38-7.43], I(2) = 72%, p = 0.002), and distant metastasis (pooled OR [95% CI]: 2.68 [1.25-5.73], I(2) = 43%, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of CTCs is associated with poorer prognosis in gastric cancer patients.

Circulating tumor cells are predictive of poor response to chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) on the treatment outcome for metastatic gastric cancer (GC) following palliative chemotherapy.

METHODS

CTCs were isolated from 7.5 mL of whole blood from 100 patients with metastatic GC by anti-EpCAM antibody coated magnetic particles using the CTC-Profiler (Veridex). Correlations between CTC counts and clinicopathological variables, progression-free survival and overall survival were examined.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and August 2010, 100 metastatic GC patients were enlisted. Among 100 patients, 5 or more CTCs (CTC-positive) were detected in 27 of 95 patients (28%). Even though the clinical characteristics of the CTC-positive and CTC-negative groups were not significantly different, the treatment response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the CTC-positive group was significantly poorer (progressive disease: 23.4% vs. 60.0% in CTC-negative vs. CTC-positive group, respectively; p = 0.004). The median progression-free survival of the CTC-positive group was substantially shorter than that of the CTC-negative group (59 days vs. 141 days; p = 0.004). For overall survival, CTC-positive group had significantly shorter survival than CTC-negative group (median OS, 120 days vs. 220 days; p = 0.030). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that CTC positivity was an independent adverse factor for progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests CTCs are associated with poor response to chemotherapy in metastatic GC-patients.

Contactin 1: A potential therapeutic target and biomarker in gastric cancer

Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, gastric cancer remains one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and early diagnosis remains a challenge. The lack of effective methods to detect these tumors early is a major factor contributing to the high mortality in patients with gastric cancer, who are typically diagnosed at an advanced stage. Additionally, the early detection of metastases and the curative treatment of gastric cancer are difficult to achieve, and the detailed mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. Thus, the identification of valuable predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets to improve the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer is becoming increasingly important. Contactin 1 (CNTN1), a cell adhesion molecule, is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored neuronal membrane protein that plays an important role in cancer progression. The expression of CNTN1 is upregulated in primary lesions, and its expression level correlates with tumor metastasis in cancer patients. The current evidence reveals that the functions of CNTN1 in the development and progression of cancer likely promote the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells via the VEGFC/FLT4 axis, the RHOA-dependent pathway, the Notch signaling pathway and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition progression. Therefore, CNTN1 may be a novel biomarker and a possible therapeutic target in cancer treatment in the near future.

Detection and cultivation of circulating tumor cells in gastric cancer

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are important targets for treatment and critical surrogate markers when evaluating cancer prognosis and therapeutic response. A sensitive methodology for detecting CTCs in gastric cancer (GC) patients is needed. In this study we demonstrate a device for enrichment and cultivation of CTCs. In total, 22 patients with GC, all candidates for surgery, were enrolled in the study. Peripheral blood samples were collected before surgery, and patients were re-evaluated within operation and divided into two groups: resectable and non-resectable GC. A new size-based separation test for enrichment and cultivation of CTCs was used (MetaCell^®). In addition to cytomorphological analysis, gene expression of tumor associated genes (Cytokeratin-18, Cytokeratin-19, Cytokeratin-20, Cytokeratin-7, EPCAM, MUC1, HER2, EGFR) and of leukocyte markers (e.g. CD45, CD68) was tested in enriched CTC fractions. CTCs were detected in 59 % of the patients studied (n = 13/22). CTCs were detected in seven patients of the resection group (7/10, 70 %) and six of the non-resectable group (6/12, 50 %). Enrichment of the viable CTCs allowed subsequent successful cultivation in vitro. The cytomorphological characterization of the CTCs was a prerequisite of random gene expression testing in CTC-positive samples. In CTC-positive samples gene expression of cytokeratin 18 and 19 was elevated in comparison to the whole blood gene expression analysis. CTCs were found to be present in both resectable and non-resectable gastric cancer patients. The size-based separation platform for CTCs may be used for in vitro cultivation, as well as in subsequent molecular analysis if desired. The sensitivity of CTC-detection could be enhanced by the combination of cytomorphological and molecular analysis.

Meta-analysis shows that circulating tumor cells including circulating microRNAs are useful to predict the survival of patients with gastric cancer

Background

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are metastatic cells disseminated into the bloodstreams. They have been proposed to monitor disease progression for decades. However, the prognostic value of CTCs in gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the topic.

Methods

A systematic search was made for relevant studies in academic data bases, involving the Medline, Embase, and Science Citation Index. Data on prognosis of GC patients, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were extracted when possible. The meta-analysis was performed with the random effects model and the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their associated 95% confident intervals (95%CIs) were computed as effect measures.

Results

Twenty six studies (including 40 subgroups) with peripheral blood samples of 1950 cases from 10 countries were included in the final analysis. The pooled results showed that GC patients with detectable CTCs (including circulating miRNAs) had a tendency to experience shortened RFS (HR = 2.91, 95% CI [1.84-4.61], I² = 52.18%, n = 10). As for patient deaths, we found a similar association of CTC (including circulating miRNAs) presence with worse OS (HR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.49-2.12], I² = 30.71%, n = 30). Additionally, subgroup analyses indicated strong prognostic powers of CTCs, irrespective of geographical, methodological, detection time and sample size differences of the studies.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis shows that CTCs (including circulating miRNAs) can predict the survival of GC patients. Large prospective studies are warranted to determine the best sampling time points, detection methods in homogeneous patients with GC in the future.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-773) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) detected by RT-PCR and its prognostic role in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of published literature

Objective

The prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is controversial in gastric cancer (GC). We performed a meta-analysis of available studies to assess its prognostic value detected by RT-PCR for patients diagnosed with GC.

Methods

EMBase, PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Google Scholar database search was conducted on all studies reporting the outcomes of interest. The studies were set up according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by using a random-effects model; hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were set as effect measures. The information about trial design, results from the data was independently extracted. Heterogeneity of the studies was tested for each pooled analysis.

Results

Nineteen studies published matched the selection criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. CTCs positivity was significantly associated with poor relapse free survival (RFS) (HR 2.42, 95% CI: [1.94–3.02]; P<0.001) and poor overall survival (OS) (HR 2.42, 95% CI: [1.94–3.02]; P<0.001). CTCs positivity were also significantly associated with regional lymph nodes (RLNs) metastasis (RR 1.42, 95% CI: [1.20–1.68]; p<0.0001), depth of infiltration (RR 1.51, 95% CI: [1.27–1.79]; p<0.0001), vascular invasion (RR  = 1.43, 95% CI: [1.18–1.74], p = 0.0002) and TNM stage(I,II versus III) (RR 0.63, 95% CI [0.48–0.84]; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Preoperative CTCs positivity indicates poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer, and associated with poor clinicopathological prognostic factors.

Stem cell-like circulating tumor cells indicate poor prognosis in gastric cancer

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which have stem cell-like characteristics, might play a crucial role in cancer metastasis. CD44 has been identified as gastric cancer (GC) stem cell (CSC) marker. Here, the prognostic significance of CD44-positive CTCs in GC patients was investigated. CTCs were detected in 27 of 45 GC patients. The presence of CTCs was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and recurrence (P = 0.007, P = 0.035, and P = 0.035, resp.). Nineteen of the 27 CTC-positive patients had CD44-positive CTCs. These patients were more likely to develop metastasis and recurrence than patients with CD44-negative CTCs. CD44-positive CTC counts were higher in recurrent patients than in the nonrecurrent ones (means 4.8 and 1.9, resp.; P = 0.010). Furthermore, 13 of 19 patients with CD44-positive CTCs developed recurrent disease, and the mean time to recurrence was shorter than that in patients with CD44-negative CTCs (10.54 ± 5.55 and 19.13 ± 9.72 months, resp.; P = 0.04). COX proportional hazards model indicated that the presence of CD44-positive CTCs and TNM stage were independent predictors of recurrence for GC (P = 0.030 and 0.008). So identifying the stem cell-like CTC subset may provide more clinically useful prognostic information than only detecting CTCs.

Liquid biopsy of gastric cancer patients: Circulating tumor cells and cell-free nucleic acids

To improve the clinical outcomes of cancer patients, early detection and accurate monitoring of diseases are necessary. Numerous genetic and epigenetic alterations contribute to oncogenesis and cancer progression, and analyses of these changes have been increasingly utilized for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes in malignant diseases including gastric cancer (GC). Surgical and/or biopsy specimens are generally used to understand the tumor-associated alterations; however, those approaches cannot always be performed because of their invasive characteristics and may fail to reflect current tumor dynamics and drug sensitivities, which may change during the therapeutic process. Therefore, the importance of developing a non-invasive biomarker with the ability to monitor real-time tumor dynamics should be emphasized. This concept, so called “liquid biopsy”, would provide an ideal therapeutic strategy for an individual cancer patient and would facilitate the development of “tailor-made” cancer management programs. In the blood of cancer patients, the presence and potent utilities of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) such as DNA, mRNA and microRNA have been recognized, and their clinical relevance is attracting considerable attention. In this review, we discuss recent developments in this research field as well as the relevance and future perspectives of CTCs and cfNAs in cancer patients, especially focusing on GC.

Detection of circulating tumour cells in gastric and hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review was conducted to summarize the use of circulating tumour cell (CTC) detection as a prognostic indicator in gastric cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Databases (MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched to identify studies that reported the detection of CTCs in patients with gastric cancer or HCC.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies in patients with gastric cancer and 10 studies in patients with HCC, with a total of 793 and 577 patients, respectively, met the specific inclusion criteria for further analysis. Heterogeneity and potential bias among the studies prevented any statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

Several methodological techniques have allowed the detection of CTCs in patients with gastric cancer or HCC, but the studies identified in this report generally reported on small cohorts and there was heterogeneity and potential bias in the studies. This highlights the need for large systematic multicentre clinical trials to confirm the potential prognostic benefit of detecting CTCs in patients with cancer.

Ten-year follow-up of a prospective trial for the targeted therapy of gastric cancer with the human monoclonal antibody PAT-SC1

The fully human monoclonal antibody PAT-SC1 is specific for an isoform of CD55 (decay-accelerating factor) designated CD55^PAT-SC1. This antigen is expressed in the majority (80%) of gastric cancers (GCs), and the antibody induces tumour cell-specific apoptosis in vitro as well as in vivo. PAT-SC1, therefore, has been deemed promising as a therapeutic agent. Here, we describe the results of an academic clinical study performed in a neoadjuvant setting with resectable GC patients. Patients undergoing treatment for GC between 1997 and 2001 were tested for CD55^PAT-SC1 expression. Fifty-one resectable patients that tested positively received a single administration of 20 mg PAT-SC1 48 h prior to surgery. They underwent standard surgery with either subtotal or total gastrectomy with bursectomy, omentectomy and a modified D2-lymphadenectomy, aimed at R0 resection. Primary endpoints of the present study were to evaluate side-effects of the PAT-SC1 antibody treatment and to evaluate histopathological effects such as tumour regression and induction of apoptosis. Long-term survival was a secondary endpoint. Administration of PAT-SC1 appeared safe with only reversible side-effects according to WHO grade I and II. Despite the low-dose of the antibody, 81.6% of the patients showed signs of increased apoptosis within the primary tumour and 60% showed signs of tumour cell regression. Comparison of the 10-year survival rates of the R0-resected CD55^PAT-SC1-positive patients treated with the PAT-SC1 antibody with a historical collective of R0-resected CD55^PAT-SC1-positive patients not treated with PAT-SC1 indicated a survival benefit in the treated patients. Furthermore, comparison of the patient survival of CD55^PAT-SC1-positive vs. CD55^PAT-SC1-negative groups suggested that CD55^PAT-SC1 antigen expression is an independent predictor of poor survival in a Cox regression analysis. Antibody PAT-SC1 may be a useful additive therapeutic agent in the treatment of patients with CD55^PAT-SC1-expressing GCs. In combination with radical standard surgery, PAT-SC1 given as an adjuvant or neoadjuvant immunotherapeutic agent induces apoptosis in tumour cells which may improve survival of these patients. Because of the human origin and its specific binding to the CD55^PAT-SC1 antigen, PAT-SC1 was well tolerated in this trial.

A pilot study assessing the incidence and clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in esophagogastric cancers

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been found to be of clinical utility in predicting response to treatment and prognosis in several malignancies. Less is known of the prevalence and clinical relevance of CTCs in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, with the available data arising from heterogeneous patient populations using varied detection methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A pilot study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of CTCs in patients with advanced esophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients were eligible if they had advanced disease and either had received no prior therapy or had progressed after prior chemotherapy. Blood samples for CTC analysis were obtained at baseline and during the course of treatment. The CellSearch immunomagnetic CTC detection platform was used.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with metastatic esophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Eighteen received first-line EOX (epirubicin/oxaliplatin/capecitabine) chemotherapy (± panitumumab) and had baseline samples suitable for CTC analysis. At baseline, ≥ 2 CTCs were detected in 8 patients (44%). Overall tumor response rate was 60% in patients with < 2 CTCs and 37.5% in patients with ≥ 2 CTCs. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.1 and 10.5 months and 5.2 and 6.1 months in the groups of patients with < 2 CTCs and ≥ 2 CTCs, respectively. The study was prematurely discontinued, owing to the withdrawal of commercial support.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CTCs in locally advanced or metastatic esophagogastric cancer may be clinically relevant. Investigation of the potential clinical utility of CTCs is warranted in a larger cohort of patients with esophagogastric cancer.

An isolation technique to prevent the spread of tumor cells during radical gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma located on the anterior wall of the gastric antrum

OBJECTIVE

To report an isolation technique for reducing the spread of tumor cells during radical gastrectomy for lesions located on the anterior wall of the gastric antrum.

METHODS

The isolation technique involves using linear cutting staplers and a waterproof membrane to completely "block" and isolate the area to be resected. Blood samples from the portal vein and peritoneal wash samples were obtained immediately after laparotomy and during surgical resection. RT-PCR was used to determine levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20). Carbon nanoparticles were injected into the subserosa of the blocked region before resection to determine lymph flow out of the region.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients (median age, 59 years; range, 22-73 years), with tumors on the anterior wall of the gastric antrum were included (blocking group, n = 40; non-blocking group, n = 36). In the blocking group, the carbon nanoparticles did not flow beyond the blocking line. There were no significant differences between the groups in CEA or CK20 mRNA levels in portal vein blood or peritoneal wash fluid immediately after laparotomy. CEA and CK20 levels were significantly lower in portal vein blood in the blocking group during tumor resection. During a median follow-up of 30 months, the incidence of metastasis or recurrence in the blocking group was lower than the non-blocking group, although it did not reach statistical significance (17.9% vs. 25.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The blocking technique can reduce hematogenous and lymphatic spread of tumor cells into the systemic circulation, and may prevent metastasis or recurrence after radical gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.

[Disseminated and circulating tumor cells in gastrointestinal oncology]

Circulating (CTC) and disseminated tumor cells (DTC) represent two different steps of the metastatic process. As with other types of cancer, the recent development of techniques for the detection of CTC and DTC respectively in the blood and bone marrow of patients generated many results in digestive cancers. However, the interpretation of these results and of the prognostic value of CTC/DTC is often limited by the small cohort size and the heterogeneity of detection methods. The aim of this article is to review the different results and their clinical impact, and discuss the possible use of CTC and DTC as new biomarkers. First of all, it is important to take into account the variability of epithelial markers used for the initial stage of immunoselection of CTC/DTC as well as that of molecular or cytological markers used for the second stage of detection. In esophageal, gastric, pancreatic and hepatocellular carcinomas, and in the ileal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, some studies showed a correlation between the detection of CTC and/or DTC and a clinical pejorative course, whether these tumors were at localized or metastatic stages. On colorectal cancer in the adjuvant setting, a recent meta-analysis showed an association between the detection of CTC in peripheral blood and disease-free survival or overall survival. These results are consistent with those of a study that identified detection of CTC as a prognostic factor for relapse in stage II. This last study concluded that it was necessary to achieve long-term evaluation of CTC as a biomarker to guide the decisions of chemotherapy for stage II. In metastatic colorectal cancer, the FDA approved in 2007 the use of pretherapeutic levels of CTC and its variations per-treatment, determined by CellSearch(®) technology, as a tool in treatments management. However, the modalities of this monitoring have to be specified and clinical benefit or the cost-effectiveness of a treatment based on this new biomarker has to be evaluated. Finally, the qualitative and quantitative monitoring of CTC could be a non-invasive tool to monitor changes in tumor biology throughout the disease, and thereby improve the understanding of the processes of dissemination and therapeutic resistance.

Disseminated and circulating tumor cells in gastrointestinal oncology

Circulating (CTCs) and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) are two different steps in the metastatic process. Several recent techniques have allowed detection of these cells in patients, and have generated many results using different isolation techniques in small cohorts. Herein, we review the detection results and their clinical consequence in esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colorectal, and liver carcinomas, and discuss their possible applications as new biomarkers.

Survivin gene levels in the peripheral blood of patients with gastric cancer independently predict survival

BACKGROUND

The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC) is considered a promising tool for improving risk stratification in patients with solid tumors. We investigated on whether the expression of CTC related genes adds any prognostic power to the TNM staging system in patients with gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

Seventy patients with TNM stage I to IV gastric carcinoma were retrospectively enrolled. Peripheral blood samples were tested by means of quantitative real time PCR (qrtPCR) for the expression of four CTC related genes: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 (CK19), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Survivin (BIRC5).

RESULTS

Gene expression of Survivin, CK19, CEA and VEGF was higher than in normal controls in 98.6%, 97.1%, 42.9% and 38.6% of cases, respectively, suggesting a potential diagnostic value of both Survivin and CK19. At multivariable survival analysis, TNM staging and Survivin mRNA levels were retained as independent prognostic factors, demonstrating that Survivin expression in the peripheral blood adds prognostic information to the TNM system. In contrast with previously published data, the transcript abundance of CEA, CK19 and VEGF was not associated with patients' clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Gene expression levels of Survivin add significant prognostic value to the current TNM staging system. The validation of these findings in larger prospective and multicentric series might lead to the implementation of this biomarker in the routine clinical setting in order to optimize risk stratification and ultimately personalize the therapeutic management of these patients.

The intraportal injection model: a practical animal model for hepatic metastases and tumor cell dissemination in human colon cancer

Background

The development of new therapeutic strategies for treatment of metastasized colorectal carcinoma requires biologically relevant and adequate animal models that generate both reproducible metastasis and the dissemination of tumor cells in the form of so-called minimal residual disease (MRD), an expression of the systemic character of neoplastic disease.

Methods

We injected immunoincompetent nude mice intraportally with different numbers (1 × 10⁵, 1 × 10⁶ and 5 × 10⁶ cells) of the human colon carcinoma cell lines HT-29 and SW-620 and investigated by histological studies and CK-20 RT-PCR the occurrence of hematogenous metastases and the dissemination of human tumor cells in bone marrow.

Results

Only the injection of 1 × 10⁶ cells of each colon carcinoma cell line produced acceptable perioperative mortality with reproducible induction of hepatic metastases in up to 89% of all animals. The injection of 1 × 10⁶ cells also generated tumor cell dissemination in the bone marrow in up to 63% of animals with hepatic metastases.

Conclusion

The present intraportal injection model in immunoincompetent nude mice represents a biologically relevant and adequate animal model for the induction of both reproducible hepatic metastasis and tumor cell dissemination in the bone marrow as a sign of MRD.

Recent advances in conventional and molecular prognostic factors for gastric carcinoma

Despite radical surgery, the prognosis of patients who have gastric carcinoma remains unsatisfactory because of the intrinsic but unpredictable aggressiveness of this malignancy. During the past decade an ever-growing list of molecular prognostic factors has been proposed based on the discovery of the mechanisms underlying gastric cancer aggressiveness. Studies performed in larger and more homogeneous series of patients and adequate statistical analysis are warranted before any of the candidate biomarkers can be implemented in the routine clinical setting for the identification of patients at higher risk and thus for the selection of candidates for adjuvant or more aggressive therapies.

Epithelial molecular markers in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer

Despite the modest improvements in patient survival from colorectal cancer in the last few decades, the overall five-year survival rate remains at 40 to 45 percent. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer; however, nearly one-half of all patients who undergo a potentially curative resection will relapse because of undetected micrometastasis. The fact that the overall survival rate remains poor strongly suggests that the dissemination of these cells occurs early in the disease process and emphasizes the need for finding feasible diagnostic methods with sufficient sensitivity and specificity. The most commonly used technique for the detection of nucleic acid material of disseminated tumor cells is the polymerase chain reaction. We critically review the literature on DNA and messenger ribonucleic acid molecular markers that have been used for the detection of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer and other solid tumors as appropriate for comparison. The cytokeratins, particularly cytokeratin 19 and cytokeratin 20, are the most investigated prognostic markers, but even for these questions remain about their clinical value, and hence most recent studies are utilizing a combination of factors. There is an urgent need for standardized isolation and analysis techniques to be adopted thus allowing large-scale, appropriately controlled, multicenter trials to be undertaken on the most promising candidate markers.

[Minimal residual tumor in gastrointestinal carcinoma. Relevance to prognosis and oncologic surgical consequences]

Isolated tumor cells as a consequence of minimal residual disease are often not detectable by routine diagnostic procedures. However, before or after surgery, isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes, the peritoneal cavity, blood, or bone marrow can frequently be identified by immunohistochemical or molecular methods. Failure to reveal the presence of such cells results in under-staging of tumor patients and may constitute the source of unexpected tumor recurrence after radical surgery. These facts emphasize the importance of isolated tumor cells at least as a surrogate marker. The frequency of appearance of isolated tumor cells in different organ systems also depends on the type of primary tumor. Developments in modern detection methods have led to increasing sensitivity but at the expense of specificity. Isolated tumor cells demonstrate remarkable heterogeneity with respect to proliferative potential and tumorigenicity. This characteristic is also reflected by a striking variability in the expression of various genes conditioning the aforementioned biological behavior. Unfortunately there is also remarkable heterogeneity in methods used for sampling and processing patient material as well as for the enrichment and detection of isolated tumor cells. Despite the ongoing controversies concerning detection methods and biological significance of isolated tumor cells, several clinical trials providing data supporting the prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease should also be considered for gastrointestinal carcinoma. In future this finding should be integrated in the planning of trials in surgical oncology, and "minimal residual disease" should receive stronger attention as a stratification criterion in such clinical studies.

Impact of disseminated tumor cells in gastrointestinal cancer

The detection of epithelial cells by sensitive immunological and molecular methods in blood, lymph nodes or bone marrow of gastrointestinal cancer patients may open a new approach to clinical metastasis research. The phenotypic and genomic characterization of these cells is of great value in the prediction of the further course of the disease and the monitoring of response to treatment. In addition, the role of ultrastaging in blood, lymph nodes and bone marrow of cancer patients for the indication of multimodal therapy is discussed in this review. The impact of prognostic or predictive factors for new treatment protocols in patients with gastrointestinal cancer was evaluated as well as the correlation with clinical factors.

N/A

N/A