Executive function moderates naltrexone effects on methamphetamine-induced craving and subjective responses

Is Naltrexone Effective and Safe for Treating Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Use Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023401796) of randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness and safety of naltrexone as a standalone pharmacotherapy for amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder (ATSUD).

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and trial registries on April 11, 2023, and updated on September 24, 2024, to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of naltrexone for the treatment of ATSUD. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines were followed for reporting the study. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed with the Cochrane Risk-of-bias Assessment tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Risk ratios (RRs) or Peto odds ratio were estimated for binary outcomes as appropriate. Standardized mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Five studies (n = 419 participants) were eligible. We found no significant difference between naltrexone and placebo for amphetamine-type stimulant use (RR = 0.903, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.698 to 1.167, P = 0.44, I2 = 96.1%; 4 studies), study retention (RR = 1.055, 95% CI = 0.942 to 1.182, P = 0.35, I2 = 45.0%; 4 studies), end-of-treatment craving (standardized mean difference = 0.069, 95% CI = -0.272 to 0.410, P = 0.69, I2 = 0.0%; 2 studies), and serious adverse events (odds ratio = 1.086, 95% CI = 0.414 to 2.849, P = 0.87, I2 = 0.0%; 3 studies). The quality of evidence was low to very low.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence does not support the use of standalone naltrexone to treat ATSUD. Significant research efforts must be put toward to identify effective pharmacotherapies to complement psychosocial interventions for ATSUD.

Pharmacological Treatments for Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Current Status and Future Targets

The illicit use of the psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH) is a major concern, with overdose deaths increasing substantially since the mid-2010s. One challenge to treating METH use disorder (MUD), as with other psychostimulant use disorders, is that there are no available pharmacotherapies that can reduce cravings and help individuals achieve abstinence. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the molecular targets that have been tested in assays measuring the physiological, the cognitive, and the reinforcing effects of METH in both animals and humans. Several drugs show promise as potential pharmacotherapies for MUD when tested in animals, but fail to produce long-term changes in METH use in dependent individuals (eg, modafinil, antipsychotic medications, baclofen). However, these drugs, plus medications like atomoxetine and varenicline, may be better served as treatments to ameliorate the psychotomimetic effects of METH or to reverse METH-induced cognitive deficits. Preclinical studies show that vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitors, metabotropic glutamate receptor ligands, and trace amine-associated receptor agonists are efficacious in attenuating the reinforcing effects of METH; however, clinical studies are needed to determine if these drugs effectively treat MUD. In addition to screening these compounds in individuals with MUD, potential future directions include increased emphasis on sex differences in preclinical studies and utilization of pharmacogenetic approaches to determine if genetic variances are predictive of treatment outcomes. These future directions can help lead to better interventions for treating MUD.

Daily Naltrexone Use Does Not Adversely Affect Physical, Cognitive or Marksmanship Performance in U.S. Army Soldiers

INTRODUCTION

Considering the potential of weaponized opioids, evaluating how prophylactic countermeasures affect military-relevant performance is necessary. Naltrexone is a commercially available Food and Drug Administration-approved medication that blocks the effects of opioids with minimal side effects. However, the effects of naltrexone on the health and performance of non-substance abusing military personnel are not well described in the existing literature.

METHODS

Active duty U.S. Army Soldiers (n = 16, mean ± SD, age: 23.1 ± 5.3 y) completed a series of physical, cognitive, and marksmanship tasks during a 4-day pretrial, a 7-day active trial, and a 4-day post-trial phase. During the active trial, participants were administered 50 mg of oral naltrexone daily. Physiological and biological processes were monitored with a daily review of systems, sleep monitoring, biochemistry, and hematology blood panels.

RESULTS

Naltrexone did not negatively affect physical performance, cognitive functioning, marksmanship, or sleep duration (P > 0.05). Improvements were observed during the active trial compared to the pretrial phase in cognitive tasks measuring logical relations (P = 0.05), matching to sample (P = 0.04), math speed (P < 0.01), math percent correct (P = 0.04), and spatial processing (P < 0.01). Results from biochemistry and hematology blood panels remained within clinically normative ranges throughout all phases of the study. No participants were medically withdrawn; however, one participant voluntarily withdrew due to nausea and reduced appetite.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary (7-day) daily use of naltrexone was safe and did not negatively affect physical performance, cognitive functioning, marksmanship ability, or sleep in a healthy cohort of U.S. Army Soldiers.

Comparative Effects of Cognitive Rehabilitation and Photobiomodulation on Drug Craving in Treatment-Seeking Opioid Addicts

Background: Drug addiction refers to a maladaptive pattern of drug use that frequently leads to substance abuse problems and accompanying cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Among the crucial criteria of drug addiction, craving stands out as a potent factor contributing to ongoing drug abuse and relapse following period of abstinence. To date, there is no definitive method for eradicating opioid cravings. The introduction of novel neurocognitive interventions, such as cognitive rehabilitation and photobiomodulation (PBM), into the realm of psychiatric treatments holds promise due to the parallels between drug addiction and other psychiatric disorders. These innovative techniques offer potential value in addressing drug addiction. Objective: This study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation and PBM in alleviating drug cravings among individuals undergoing addiction treatment in clinical settings. Methods: The research used randomized clinical trial as the chosen research method. The statistical population encompassed all clients receiving treatment for addiction at clinics, selected through the convenience sampling method, with α = 0.05 significance level and an effect size of 85%. Gpower software was utilized to determine three equal groups. Sixty-three participants, each having a mean total score higher than 3 out of 5 on the Desire for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ), were randomly assigned to two experimental groups (n = 21 each) and a control group (n = 21). For the assessment of immediate and periodic opioid craving, the DDQ and the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale were used. In the low-level laser group, an 810 nm wavelength with continuous irradiation was applied twice a week at a distance of 1 cm by 1 cm to the prefrontal part of the brain for duration of 6 weeks (12 sessions). In the brain rehabilitation group, the stop signal and n-back tasks software were used twice a week for period of 6 weeks (comprising 12 sessions, each lasting 30 min). Results: The results demonstrated that each intervention significantly reduced drug craving in both the post-test and follow-up phases compared to the control group. The Bonferroni post hoc test indicated that PBM was more effective than cognitive rehabilitation in terms of working memory (WM) and inhibitory control for reducing drug craving (p < 0.05). Conclusions: While both PBM and cognitive rehabilitation targeting WM and inhibitory control effectively reduced opioid drug craving, low-level laser therapy proved to be more effective than cognitive rehabilitation in this regard.

p-Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway Involved in Methamphetamine-induced Executive Dysfunction through Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Apoptosis in the Dorsal Striatum

Methamphetamine (METH) abuse is known to cause executive dysfunction. However, the molecular mechanism underlying METH induced executive dysfunction remains unclear. Go/NoGo experiment was performed in mice to evaluate METH-induced executive dysfunction. Immunoblot analysis of Nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), phosphorylated Nrf2 (p-Nrf2), heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1), Glucose Regulated Protein 78(GRP78), C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), Bcl-2, Bax and Caspase3 was performed to evaluate the levels of oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and apoptosis in the dorsal striatum (Dstr). Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity was conducted to evaluate the level of oxidative stress. TUNEL staining was conducted to detect apoptotic neurons. The animal Go/NoGo testing confirmed that METH abuse impaired the inhibitory control ability of executive function. Meanwhile, METH down-regulated the expression of p-Nrf2, HO-1 and GSH-Px and activated ER stress and apoptosis in the Dstr. Microinjection of Tert-butylhydroxyquinone (TBHQ), an Nrf2 agonist, into the Dstr increased the expression of p-Nrf2, HO-1, and GSH-Px, ameliorated ER stress, apoptosis and executive dysfunction caused by METH. Our results indicated that the p-Nrf2/HO-1 pathway was potentially involved in mediating methamphetamine-induced executive dysfunction by inducing endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in the dorsal striatum.

Multiple comparison of different noninvasive brain stimulation and pharmacologic interventions in patients with methamphetamine use disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

In recent decades, the prevalence of amphetamine and methamphetamine use disorders has at least doubled in some regions/countries, with accompanying high risks of drug overdose-associated mortality. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods may be effective treatments. However, the comparative efficacy of the NIBS protocol for amphetamine/methamphetamine use disorder (AUD/MUD) remains unknown to date. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of various NIBS methods/protocols for AUD/MUD management.

METHODS

A frequentist model-based NMA was conducted. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of NIBS and guideline-recommended pharmacologic treatments to reduce craving severity in patients with either AUD or MUD.

RESULTS

Twenty-two RCTs including 1888 participants met the eligibility criteria. Compared with the sham/placebo group (study = 19, subjects = 891), a combination of intermittent theta burst stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and continuous TBS over the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex (study = 1, subjects = 19) was associated with the largest decreases in craving severity [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.50; 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) = -2.70 to -0.31]. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left DLPFC was associated with the largest improvements in depression and quality of sleep (study = 3, subjects = 86) (SMD = -2.48; 95%CIs = -3.25 to -1.71 and SMD = -2.43; 95%CIs = -3.38 to -1.48, respectively). The drop-out rate of most investigated treatments did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

The combined TBS protocol over the prefrontal cortex was associated with the greatest improvement in craving severity. Since few studies were available for inclusion, additional large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Applying the Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment to derive neurofunctional domains in individuals who use methamphetamine

The Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment (ANA) was proposed as a neuroscience-informed clinical framework to understand heterogeneity in addiction encompassing dysfunction in three domains: incentive salience, negative emotionality, and executive functions. The ANA has been validated in the alcohol field but has not been extended to other substances. Thus, the objective of the current study was to replicate and extend the ANA framework to methamphetamine use disorder. Non-treatment seeking individuals (N = 185) who reported regular methamphetamine use completed a deep phenotyping battery comprising self-report and behavioral measures that assessed methamphetamine craving and emotional withdrawal symptoms, mood and anxiety symptomatology, risk-taking behaviors, working memory, attention, and impulsivity. Factor analytic techniques were used in an iterative manner to derive latent factors that explained biobehavioral variation in the sample. The relationship between factor scores and demographic and clinical indicators of methamphetamine use were examined to assess the construct validity of the latent factors. Deep phenotyping combined with factor analytic techniques implicated three intercorrelated neurofunctional domains that map on to the proposed ANA domains: incentive salience, negative emotionality, and executive function. Each of the domains were associated with demographic and clinical indicators of methamphetamine use providing initial support for their construct validity. The ANA framework holds promise for explaining heterogeneity in addiction by identifying neuroscience-informed phenotypes. Knowledge from the ANA framework may be applied to advance precision medicine and inform medications development for a host of substance use disorders, particularly those with no approved pharmacotherapy such as methamphetamine.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2020

This paper is the forty-third consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2020 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Traumatic Brain Injury and Treatment of Behavioral Health Conditions

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common neurological condition that results from an external force altering normal brain function, whether temporarily or permanently. A concussion is one type of TBI. TBIs vary greatly in severity, which concomitantly creates tremendous variability in their manifestation. The fingerprint of TBI is damage to the frontal areas of the brain, which, with sufficient magnitude, results in impairment of a person's ability to regulate cognition, emotion, and behavior. These consequences of TBI make recognition in the context of treating behavioral health conditions of utmost importance. TBI not only causes behavioral health problems but also produces associated deficits that can undermine the effectiveness of treatment for a behavioral health condition. This overview delineates key characteristics of TBI and describes its association with behavioral health conditions. Mechanisms underlying the relationship between TBI and behavioral health are presented, and a series of recommendations for professionals are proposed. This article is intended to raise awareness about TBI and simultaneously introduce key concepts for accommodating the effects of TBI in behavioral health care.