The effect of dexmedetomidine on inflammatory inhibition and microglial polarization in BV-2 cells

Remimazolam inhibits postoperative cognitive impairment after cardiopulmonary bypass by alleviating neuroinflammation and promoting microglia M2 polarization

Postoperative cognitive impairment (POCD) is a complication of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Remimazolam is an ultra-short acting benzodiazepine that can be used for anesthesia or sedation during surgery. This study investigated the role of remimazolam in inflammasome activation and microglia polarization using CPB rat model and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced microglia model. The cognitive function of rats was evaluated by Morris water maze. TUNEL assay was performed to detect apoptosis. Inflammatory cytokines concentration were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to assess the expression of inflammasome and M1/M2-related microglia markers. Flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the expression of CD16/32 and CD206 in microglia. The results showed that remimazolam improved the memory and learning abilities in CPB rats. CPB rats and LPS-treated microglia showed increased apoptosis, pro-inflammatory cytokines level, and inflammasome expression as well as decreased microglia activation, while the results were reversed after remimazolam treatment. Besides, remimazolam treatment promoted the expression of M2-related markers in LPS-treated microglia. Nigericin treatment reversed the increased M2-related mRNA levels and the decreased apoptosis and inflammatory responses induced by remimazolam treatment. In conclusion, remimazolam attenuated POCD after CPB through regulating neuroinflammation and microglia M2 polarization, suggesting a new insight into the clinical treatment of POCD after CPB.

Clinical adverse events to dexmedetomidine: a real-world drug safety study based on the FAERS database

Objective

Adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine were analyzed using data from the FDA's FAERS database, spanning from 2004 to the third quarter of 2023. This analysis serves as a foundation for monitoring dexmedetomidine's safety in clinical applications.

Methods

Data on adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine were standardized and analyzed to identify clinical adverse events closely linked to its use. This analysis employed various signal quantification analysis algorithms, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS).

Results

In the FAERS database, dexmedetomidine was identified as the primary suspect in 1,910 adverse events. Our analysis encompassed 26 organ system levels, from which we selected 346 relevant Preferred Terms (PTs) for further examination. Notably, adverse drug reactions such as diabetes insipidus, abnormal transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring, acute motor axonal neuropathy, and trigeminal cardiac reflex were identified. These reactions are not explicitly mentioned in the drug's specification, indicating the emergence of new signals for adverse drug reactions.

Conclusion

Data mining in the FAERS database has elucidated the characteristics of dexmedetomidine-related adverse drug reactions. This analysis enhances our understanding of dexmedetomidine's drug safety, aids in the clinical management of pharmacovigilance studies, and offers valuable insights for refining drug-use protocols.

The role of anesthesia in peri‑operative neurocognitive disorders: Molecular mechanisms and preventive strategies

Peri-operative neurocognitive disorders (PNDs) include postoperative delirium (POD) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Children and the elderly are the two populations most vulnerable to the development of POD and POCD, which results in both high morbidity and mortality. There are many factors, including neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, that are associated with POD and POCD. General anesthesia is a major risk factor of PNDs. However, the molecular mechanisms of PNDs are poorly understood. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a useful sedative agent with analgesic properties, which significantly improves POCD in elderly patients. In this review, the current understanding of anesthesia in PNDs and the protective effects of DEX are summarized, and the underlying mechanisms are further discussed.

Brain protective effect of dexmedetomidine vs propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation in non-brain injured patients

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine and propofol are two sedatives used for long-term sedation. It remains unclear whether dexmedetomidine provides superior cerebral protection for patients undergoing long-term mechanical ventilation.

AIM

To compare the neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients without brain injury.

METHODS

Patients who underwent mechanical ventilation for > 72 h were randomly assigned to receive sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol. The Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) was used to evaluate sedation effects, with a target range of -3 to 0. The primary outcomes were serum levels of S100-β and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) every 24 h. The secondary outcomes were remifentanil dosage, the proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation, and the time and frequency of RASS scores within the target range.

RESULTS

A total of 52 and 63 patients were allocated to the dexmedetomidine group and propofol group, respectively. Baseline data were comparable between groups. No significant differences were identified between groups within the median duration of study drug infusion [52.0 (IQR: 36.0-73.5) h vs 53.0 (IQR: 37.0-72.0) h, P = 0.958], the median dose of remifentanil [4.5 (IQR: 4.0-5.0) μg/kg/h vs 4.6 (IQR: 4.0-5.0) μg/kg/h, P = 0.395], the median percentage of time in the target RASS range without rescue sedation [85.6% (IQR: 65.8%-96.6%) vs 86.7% (IQR: 72.3%-95.3), P = 0.592], and the median frequency within the target RASS range without rescue sedation [72.2% (60.8%-91.7%) vs 73.3% (60.0%-100.0%), P = 0.880]. The proportion of patients in the dexmedetomidine group who required rescue sedation was higher than in the propofol group with statistical significance (69.2% vs 50.8%, P = 0.045). Serum S100-β and NSE levels in the propofol group were higher than in the dexmedetomidine group with statistical significance during the first six and five days of mechanical ventilation, respectively (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine demonstrated stronger protective effects on the brain compared to propofol for long-term mechanical ventilation in patients without brain injury.

Feasibility study of use of desflurane combined with dexmedetomidine in inhibiting postoperative neurocognitive disorders in elderly patients under general anesthesia: A perspective study

This study aimed to explore whether the combined application of desflurane and dexmedetomidine (Dex) reduces the occurrence of postoperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) in patients. We selected patients in our hospital who underwent surgery under general anesthesia, and divided them into two groups: Dex and desflurane (Dex + Des) and desflurane (Des) groups. The data of patients were collected and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was used to assess cognitive status. The blood cell counts were determined preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 3, and 6, and the percentage of neutrophils and lymphocytes were also recorded. The statistical methods used were the independent-samples t-test and the χ 2 test. Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the correlation between PND and inflammation. The incidence of PND in the Dex + Des group was lower than that in the Des group. The postoperative MMSE scores in the Dex + Des group were higher than those in the Des group (p = 0.032). The percentage of neutrophils in the Dex + Des group was significantly lower than that in the Des group on the first and third days after surgery (p = 0.007; p = 0.028). The MMSE scores on the first day after surgery were negatively correlated with the multiple changes in white blood counts and the percentage of neutrophils (r = -0.3038 and -0.3330). Dex combined with Des reduced the incidence of PND and reduced the postoperative inflammatory cell counts.

Recent Advances in the Clinical Value and Potential of Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist, has sedative, anxiolytic, analgesic, sympatholytic, and opioid-sparing properties and induces a unique sedative response which shows an easy transition from sleep to wakefulness, thus allowing a patient to be cooperative and communicative when stimulated. Recent studies indicate several emerging clinical applications via different routes. We review recent data on dexmedetomidine studies, particularly exploring the varying routes of administration, experimental implications, clinical effects, and comparative advantages over other drugs. A search was conducted on the PubMed and Web of Science libraries for recent studies using different combinations of the words “dexmedetomidine”, “route of administration”, and pharmacological effect. The current routes, pharmacological effects, and application categories of dexmedetomidine are presented. It functions by stimulating pre- and post-synaptic α2-adrenoreceptors within the central nervous system, leading to hyperpolarization of noradrenergic neurons, induction of an inhibitory feedback loop, and reduction of norepinephrine secretion, causing a sympatholytic effect, in addition to its anti-inflammation, sleep induction, bowel recovery, and sore throat reduction effects. Compared with similar α2-adrenoceptor agonists, dexmedetomidine has both pharmacodynamics advantage of a significantly greater α2:α1-adrenoceptor affinity ratio and a pharmacokinetic advantage of having a significantly shorter elimination half-life. In its clinical application, dexmedetomidine has been reported to present a significant number of benefits including safe sedation for various surgical interventions, improvement of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, sedation for compromised airways without respiratory depression, nephroprotection and stability of hypotensive hemodynamics, reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative shivering incidence, and decrease of intraoperative blood loss. Although the clinical application of dexmedetomidine is promising, it is still limited and further research is required to enhance understanding of its pharmacological properties, patient selection, dosage, and adverse effects.

Dexmedetomidine Alleviates Microglia-Induced Spinal Inflammation and Hyperalgesia in Neonatal Rats by Systemic Lipopolysaccharide Exposure

Noxious stimulus and painful experience in early life can induce cognitive deficits and abnormal pain sensitivity. As a major component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection mimics clinical symptoms of bacterial infections. Spinal microglial activation and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in the pathogenesis of LPS-induced hyperalgesia in neonatal rats. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) possesses potent anti-neuroinflammatory and neuroprotective properties through the inhibition of microglial activation and microglial polarization toward pro-inflammatory (M1) phenotype and has been widely used in pediatric clinical practice. However, little is known about the effects of DEX on LPS-induced spinal inflammation and hyperalgesia in neonates. Here, we investigated whether systemic LPS exposure has persistent effects on spinal inflammation and hyperalgesia in neonatal rats and explored the protective role of DEX in adverse effects caused by LPS injection. Systemic LPS injections induced acute mechanical hyperalgesia, increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum, and short-term increased expressions of pro-inflammatory cytokines and M1 microglial markers in the spinal cord of neonatal rats. Pretreatment with DEX significantly decreased inflammation and alleviated mechanical hyperalgesia induced by LPS. The inhibition of M1 microglial polarization and microglial pro-inflammatory cytokines expression in the spinal cord may implicate its neuroprotective effect, which highlights a new therapeutic target in the treatment of infection-induced hyperalgesia in neonates and preterm infants.

Dexmedetomidine exerts cerebral protective effects against cerebral ischemic injury by promoting the polarization of M2 microglia via the Nrf2/HO-1/NLRP3 pathway

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral ischemic injury is associated with long-term disability. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) can exert neuroprotective effects on cerebral ischemic/reperfusion injury. The present study explored the mechanism of Dex in cerebral ischemic injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To this end, the permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (p-MCAO) mouse model was established and treated with Dex or/and Nrf2 inhibitor ML385. Subsequently, microglia were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) in sugar-free environment and thereafter treated with Dex, Nrf2 inhibitor, and NLRP3 lentiviral overexpression vector, respectively.

RESULTS

Dex alleviated the neurobehavioral deficit of p-MCAO mice, reduced brain water content, relieved pathological changes, and reduced cerebral infarction size. Dex promoted the polarization of microglia from M1 to M2, thus ameliorating oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. Our results showed that Dex promoted M2-polarization of microglia in vivo and in vitro by promoting HO-1 expression via Nrf2 nuclear import. Moreover, the Nrf2/HO-1 axis inhibited the activation of NLRP2 inflammasome and NLRP3 overexpression reversed the effect of Dex.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Dex promoted M2-polarization of microglia and attenuated oxidative stress and inflammation, and thus protected against cerebral ischemic injury by activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway and inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome.

Adjusting vascular permeability, leukocyte infiltration, and microglial cell activation to rescue dopaminergic neurons in rodent models of Parkinson's disease

Animal studies have indicated that increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and inflammatory cell infiltration are involved during the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD). This study used C16, a peptide that competitively binds to integrin α_vβ₃ and inhibits inflammatory cell infiltration, as well as angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), an endothelial growth factor crucial for blood vessel protection, to reduce inflammation and improve the central nervous system (CNS) microenvironment in murine models of PD. The combination of C16 and Ang-1 yielded better results compared to the individual drugs alone in terms of reducing dopaminergic neuronal apoptosis, ameliorating cognitive impairment, and electrophysiological dysfunction, attenuating inflammation in the CNS microenvironment, and improving the functional disability in PD mice or rats. These results suggest neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties of the C16 peptide plus Ang-1 in PD.

The effects of anaesthetics and sedatives on brain inflammation

Microglia are involved in many dynamic processes in the central nervous system (CNS) including the development of inflammatory processes and neuromodulation. Several sedative, analgesic or anaesthetic drugs, such as opioids, ∝2-adrenergic agonists, ketamine, benzodiazepines and propofol can cause both neuroprotective and harmful effects on the brain. The purpose of this review is to present the main findings on the use of these drugs and the mechanisms involved in microglial activation. Alpha 2-adrenergic agonists, propofol and benzodiazepines have several pro- or anti-inflammatory effects on microglia. Long-term use of benzodiazepines and propofol causes neuroapoptotic effects and α2-adrenergic agonists may attenuate these effects. Conversely, morphine and fentanyl may have proinflammatory effects, causing behavioural changes in patients and changes in cell viability in vitro. Conversely, chronic administration of morphine induces CCL5 chemokine expression in microglial cells that promotes their survival.

Modulation of microglial phenotypes by dexmedetomidine through TREM2 reduces neuroinflammation in heatstroke

No FDA approved pharmacological therapy is available to reduce neuroinflammation following heatstroke. Previous studies have indicated that dexmedetomidine (DEX) could protect against inflammation and brain injury in various inflammation-associated diseases. However, no one has tested whether DEX has neuro-protective effects in heatstroke. In this study, we focused on microglial phenotypic modulation to investigate the mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory effects of DEX in vivo and in vitro. We found that DEX treatment reduced the expression of CD68, iNOS, TNF-α, and IL-1β, and increased the expression of CD206, Arg1, IL-10 and TGF-β in microglia, ameliorating heatstroke induced neuroinflammation and brain injury in mice. TREM2, whose neuro-protective function has been validated by genetic studies in Alzheimer's disease and Nasu-Hakola disease, was significantly promoted by DEX in the microglia. TREM2 esiRNA reversed the DEX-induced activation of PI3K/Akt signalling. Overall these findings indicated that DEX may serve, as a potential therapeutic approach to ameliorate heatstroke induced neuroinflammation and brain injury via TREM2 by activating PI3K/Akt signalling.

The immunomodulatory mechanism of dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine has been increasingly introduced into the perioperative care of surgical patients. Because a subset of anesthetics/sedatives are immunomodulatory, it is critical to understand the role of dexmedetomidine in our host immune functions. Here we reviewed the role of dexmedetomidine in different immune cells. We also reviewed published clinical articles that described the role of dexmedetomidine in organ injury, cancer surgery, and infection. In animal studies, dexmedetomidine attenuated organ injury. In clinical studies, dexmedetomidine was associated with an improvement in outcomes in cardiac surgery and transplant surgery. However, there is a paucity in research examining how dexmedetomidine is associated with these outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand its clinical application from immunological standpoints.

Dexmedetomidine alleviates pulmonary edema through the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) via the PI3K/Akt/Nedd4-2 pathway in LPS-induced acute lung injury

Dexmedetomidine (Dex), a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor (α2AR) agonist, has an anti-inflammatory property and can alleviate pulmonary edema in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute lung injury (ALI), but the mechanism is still unclear. In this study, we attempted to investigate the effect of Dex on alveolar epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in the modulation of alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) and the underlying mechanism. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used to induce acute lung injury (ALI) in rats and alveolar epithelial cell injury in A549 cells. In vivo, Dex markedly reduced pulmonary edema induced by LPS through promoting AFC, prevented LPS-induced downregulation of α-, β-, and γ-ENaC expression, attenuated inflammatory cell infiltration in lung tissue, reduced the concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, and increased concentrations of IL-10 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). In A549 cells stimulated with LPS, Dex attenuated LPS-mediated cell injury and the downregulation of α-, β-, and γ-ENaC expression. However, all of these effects were blocked by the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, suggesting that the protective role of Dex is PI3K-dependent. Additionally, Dex increased the expression of phosphorylated Akt and reduced the expression of Nedd4-2, while LY294002 reversed the effect of Dex in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, a PI3K agonists, promoted the expression of phosphorylated Akt and reduced the expression of Nedd4-2 in LPS-stimulated A549 cells, indicating that Dex worked through PI3K, and Akt and Nedd4-2 are downstream of PI3K. In conclusion, Dex alleviates pulmonary edema by suppressing inflammatory response in LPS-induced ALI, and the mechanism is partly related to the upregulation of ENaC expression via the PI3K/Akt/Nedd4-2 signaling pathway.

C16 peptide and angiopoietin-1 protect against LPS-induced BV-2 microglial cell inflammation

AIMS

Pathological alterations in the brain can cause microglial activation (MA). Thus, inhibiting MA could provide a new approach for treating neurodegenerative disorders.

MAIN METHODS

To investigate the effect of C16 peptide and angiopoietin-1 (Ang1) on inflammation following MA, we stimulated microglial BV-2 cells with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and used dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a positive control. Specific inhibitors of Tie2, αvβ3 and α5β1 integrins, and PI3K/Akt were applied to investigate the neuron-protective and anti-inflammatory effects and signaling pathway of C16 + Ang1 treatment in the LPS-induced BV-2 cells.

KEY FINDINGS

Our results showed that C16 + Ang1 treatment reduced the microglia M1 phenotype but promoted the microglia M2 phenotype. In addition, C16 + Ang1 treatment suppressed leukocyte migration across human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells, reduced the levels of pro-inflammatory factors [inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), interleukin (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α)], and cellular apoptosis factors (caspase-3 and p53), and decreased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, but promoted anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) expression and cell proliferation in the LPS-activated BV-2 cells. The signaling pathways underlying the neuron-protective and anti-inflammatory effects of C16 + Ang1 may be mediated by Tie2-PI3K/Akt, Tie2-integrin and integrin-PI3K/Akt.

SIGNIFICANCE

The neuron-protective and anti-inflammatory effects of C16 + Ang1 treatment included M1 to M2 microglia phenotype switching, blocking leukocyte transmigration, decreasing apoptotic and inflammatory factors, and promoting cellular viability.

Dexmedetomidine Inhibits Neuroinflammation by Altering Microglial M1/M2 Polarization Through MAPK/ERK Pathway

Neuroinflammation is critical in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases. Microglial pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) status determines the outcome of neuroinflammation. Dexmedetomidine exerts anti-inflammatory effects in many neurological conditions. Whether dexmedetomidine functions via modulation of microglia M1/M2 polarization remains to be fully elucidated. In the present study, we investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of dexmedetomidine on the neuroinflammatory cell model and explored the potential mechanism. BV2 cells were stimulated with LPS to establish a neuroinflammatory model. The cell viability was determined with MTT assay. NO levels were assessed using a NO detection kit. The protein levels of IL-10, TNF-α, iNOS, CD206, ERK1/2, and pERK1/2 were quantified using Western blotting. LPS significantly increased pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α and NO, and M1 phenotypic marker iNOS, and decreased anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 and M2 phenotypic marker CD206 in BV2 cells. Furthermore, exposure of BV2 cells to LPS significantly raised pERK1/2 expression. Pretreatment with dexmedetomidine attenuated LPS-elicited changes in p-ERK, iNOS, TNF-α, NO, CD206 and IL-10 levels in BV2 cells. However, co-treatment with dexmedetomidine and LM22B-10, an agonist of ERK, reversed dexmedetomidine-elicited changes in p-ERK, iNOS, TNF-α, NO, CD206 and IL-10 levels in LPS-exposed BV2 cells. We, for the first time, showed that dexmedetomidine increases microglial M2 polarization by inhibiting phosphorylation of ERK1/2, by which it exerts anti-inflammatory effects in BV2 cells.