Dementia Caregivers and Live Discharge from Hospice: What Happens When Hospice Leaves?

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Hospice Live Discharge

Hospice care is designed to support the medical and psychosocial needs of individuals with serious illness and their caregivers through the dying process. Some individuals, though, leave hospice prior to death, generally referred to as disenrollment or a "live discharge." Live discharge from hospice is a common and often distressing issue for hospice patients, their caregivers, and also for hospice professionals and agencies. This paper discusses common issues surrounding live discharge that clinicians and other healthcare professionals should consider when dealing with live discharge in their own clinical practices. Where applicable, we provide practical steps for hospice and palliative care clinicians to better support patients and families through this critical care transition. Further, we offer strategic directions interprofessional clinicians can take to affect systemic change to improve live discharge experiences.

Home Health Care and Hospice Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without a Diagnosis of Dementia

Background: Home health care is a core benefit of Medicare and Medicaid insurance programs and includes services to improve health, maintain health, or slow health decline. Objective: To examine the relationship between home health care use during the last three years of life and hospice use in the last six months of life among Medicare beneficiaries with and without dementia. Design: Nationally representative retrospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: Medicare beneficiaries with at least three years of continuous enrollment who died in 2019 in the United States (n = 2,169,422). Measurements: The primary outcome was hospice use, and the secondary outcome was hospice duration. The independent variable was a composite of the presence and timing of home health care initiation during the last three years of life. Results: Home health care was used by 46.4% of Medicare beneficiaries and hospice care was used by 53.1% of beneficiaries, with 28.3% using both. Compared with beneficiaries who did not use home health care, those who started home health care before the last year of life (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.56-1.58) or during the last year of life (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.74-1.77) were more likely to use hospice. The effects were stronger in those without a diagnosis of dementia (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.90-1.94) compared with those without a dementia diagnosis (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.32-1.35) who started home health in the final year of life. Conclusions: Receiving home health care in the final years of life is associated with increased hospice use at the end-of-life in Medicare beneficiaries with and without a dementia diagnosis.

Hospice Readmission, Hospitalization, and Hospital Death Among Patients Discharged Alive from Hospice

Importance

Transitions in care settings following live discharge from hospice care are burdensome for patients and families. Factors contributing to risk of burdensome transitions following hospice discharge are understudied.

Objective

To identify factors associated with 2 burdensome transitions following hospice live discharge, as defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based retrospective cohort study included a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries using 2014 to 2019 Medicare claims data. Data were analyzed from April 22, 2023, to March 4, 2024.

Exposure

Live hospice discharge.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multivariable logistic regression examined associations among patient, health care provision, and organizational characteristics with 2 burdensome transitions after live hospice discharge (outcomes): type 1, hospice discharge, hospitalization within 2 days, and hospice readmission within 2 days; and type 2, hospice discharge, hospitalization within 2 days, and hospital death.

Results

This study included 115 072 Medicare beneficiaries discharged alive from hospice (mean [SD] age, 84.4 [6.6] years; 71892 [62.5%] female; 5462 [4.8%] Hispanic, 9822 [8.5%] non-Hispanic Black, and 96 115 [83.5%] non-Hispanic White). Overall, 10 381 individuals (9.0%) experienced a type 1 burdensome transition and 3144 individuals (2.7%) experienced a type 2 burdensome transition. In adjusted models, factors associated with higher odds of burdensome transitions included identifying as non-Hispanic Black (type 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.36-1.58; type 2: aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.51-1.90), hospice stays of 7 days or fewer (type 1: aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21; type 2: aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.53-1.90), and care from a for-profit hospice (type 1: aOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.62-1.96; type 2: aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.52). Nursing home residence (type 1: aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.72; type 2: aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.54) and hospice stays of 180 days or longer (type 1: aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.68; type 2: aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.69) were associated with lower odds of burdensome transitions.

Conclusion and Relevance

This retrospective cohort study of burdensome transitions following live hospice discharge found that non-Hispanic Black race, short hospice stays, and care from for-profit hospices were associated with higher odds of experiencing a burdensome transition. These findings suggest that changes to clinical practice and policy may reduce the risk of burdensome transitions, such as hospice discharge planning that is incentivized, systematically applied, and tailored to needs of patients at greater risk for burdensome transitions.

Knowledge Gaps in End-Of-Life Family Caregiving for Persons Living With Dementia: A Study of Hospice Clinician Perspectives

INTRODUCTION

More than 35% of hospice care recipients 65 and older have a dementia diagnosis. Yet family care partners of persons living with dementia report feeling unprepared to address their hospice recipient's changing needs nearing end of life. Hospice clinicians may have unique insight into the knowledge needs of family care partners and strategies for end-of-life dementia caregiving.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 hospice physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, and social workers. Interview transcripts were deductively analyzed using thematic analysis to examine clinicians' perspectives on gaps and strategies related to family care partner knowledge about end-of-life dementia caregiving.

RESULTS

We identified 3 themes related to gaps in family care partners' knowledge: dementia is a progressive, fatal disease; end-of-life symptoms and symptom management in persons living with advanced dementia; and understanding hospice goals and guidelines. Three themes related to clinicians' strategies to increase knowledge included: providing education; teaching strategies to facilitate coping and preparedness for end-of-life care; and communicating with empathy.

DISCUSSION

Clinicians perceive gaps in knowledge specific to dementia and end of life among family care partners. These gaps include a lack of understanding of Alzheimer's symptom progression and strategies to manage common symptoms. Recommendations for approaches to reduce knowledge gaps include providing education and strategies delivered with empathy toward the family care partner experience.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians who work with persons living with dementia receiving hospice care have valuable insights regarding family care partners' gaps in knowledge. Implications on the training and preparation of hospice clinicians working with this care partner population are discussed.

Live Discharge of Hospice Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: A Systematic Review

Background: Hospice is intended to promote the comfort and quality of life of dying patients and their families. When patients are discharged from hospice prior to death (ie, experience a "live discharge"), care continuity is disrupted. This systematic review summarizes the growing body of evidence on live discharge among hospice patients with Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias (ADRD), a clinical subpopulation that disproportionately experiences this often burdensome care transition. Methods: Researchers conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Reviewers searched AgeLine, APA PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL Plus with Full Text, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (Core Collection). Reviewers extracted data and synthesized findings from 9 records, which reported findings from 10 individual studies. Results: The reviewed studies, which were generally of high quality, consistently identified diagnosis of ADRD as a risk factor for live discharge from hospice. The relationship between race and live hospice discharge was less clear and likely dependent upon the type of discharge under investigation and other (eg, systemic-level) factors. Research on patient and family experiences underscored the extent to which live hospice discharge can be distressing, confusing, and associated with numerous losses. Conclusion: Research specific to live discharge among ADRD patients and their families is limited. Synthesis across included studies points to the importance for future research to differentiate between types of live discharge-revocation vsversus decertification-as these are vastly different experiences in choice and circumstances.

Caregiver experiences of hospice dementia care: a systematic review and meta-ethnography

OBJECTIVES

Hospices are regarded as gold standard providers of end-of-life care. The term hospice, however, is broadly used, and can describe a type of care offered in a variety of health care services (e.g. nursing homes). It thus becomes complex for families to decide between services. We aimed to review the evidence around the experience of family carers of people with dementia accessing in-patient hospice settings for end-of-life care.

METHOD

We registered the review protocol on PROSPERO. We used PerSPE(C)TiF to systematically organise our search strategy. The evidence was reviewed across six databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, ISI Web, and CINAHL. We used meta-ethnography as per the eMERGe guidance for data interpretation.

RESULTS

Four studies were included. Two third-order constructs were generated through meta-ethnography: expectations of care and barriers to quality of care. We found that carers had expectations of care, and these could change over time. If discussion was not held with hospice staff early on, the carers could experience reduced care quality due to unmatched expectations. Unmatched expectations acted as barriers to care and these were found in terms of carers not feeling adequately supported, and/or having the person discharged from hospice, which would entail increased care responsibility for carers.

CONCLUSION

In view of an increase in new dementia cases over time and with hospice services being under pressure, integrating palliative care services within community-based models of care is key to reducing the risk of having inadequate and under resourced services for people with dementia.

Improving Policy and Practices of Hospice Live Discharge: A Historical Exploration of the Medicare Hospice Benefit

Hospice care in the US is heavily regulated to ensure access to the Medicare Hospice Benefit (MHB) for individuals with serious illness. Policy changes to the MHB, many of which intended to minimize potential fraud (e.g. focused medical reviews; documentation requirements for certifications, recertifications, and discharges; requirements of physician narratives and face-to-face visits), directly impact current hospice discharge practices and experiences. When patients revoke hospice or are unable to be recertified due to a stabilized condition, they lose access to the holistic philosophy of care and experience additional stressors with increased potential for burdensome transitions. Patients with chronic conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease or related dementias, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or heart failure are more likely to have longer length of stays and are more often discharged alive from hospice. Few policy changes have been made to account for growing incidents of patients dying of chronic illness though the policy was originally created primarily for cancer patients, reflecting a time when most patients were dying of cancer. This manuscript describes the uniquely American phenomenon of a hospice live discharge, reviews relevant and historical policies, and provides recommendations for future research, policy, and practice to better support patients and families during this critical healthcare transition.

Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Caregiver Perspectives on Hospice Re-Enrollment Following a Hospice Live Discharge

Background: The number of individuals dying of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) is steadily increasing and they represent the largest group of hospice enrollees. In 2020, 15.4% of hospice patients across the United States were discharged alive from hospice care, with 5.6% decertified due to being "no longer terminally ill." A live discharge from hospice care can disrupt care continuity, increase hospitalizations and emergency room visits, and reduce the quality of life for patients and families. Furthermore, this discontinuity may impede re-enrollment into hospice services and receipt of community bereavement services. Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of caregivers of adults with ADRDs around hospice re-enrollment following a live discharge from hospice. Design: We conducted semistructured interviews of caregivers of adults with ADRDs who experienced a live discharge from hospice (n = 24). Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results: Three-quarters of participants (n = 16) would consider re-enrolling their loved one in hospice. However, some believed they would have to wait for a medical crisis (n = 6) to re-enroll, while others (n = 10) questioned the appropriateness of hospice for patients with ADRDs if they cannot remain in hospice care until death. Conclusions: A live discharge for ADRD patients impacts caregivers' decisions on whether they will choose to re-enroll a patient who has been discharged alive from hospice. Further research and support of caregivers through the discharge process are necessary to ensure that patients and their caregivers remain connected to hospice agencies postdischarge.

Identifying Key Domains and Implementation Challenges for a Live Discharge From Hospice Protocol

Background: Hospice agencies lack an explicit live discharge process to guide practitioners in transitioning these patients and their primary caregivers (PCGs) out of hospice care. Based on previous research and input from an advisory committee, a live discharge protocol (LDP) was drafted with .three general areas of assessment: 1) concrete services; 2) psychosocial assessment; and 3) 30-day post discharge follow-up phone call. This study sought to gather perspectives from hospice social workers on the proposed assessment components and other needs in implementing a LDP. Methods: Purposive, convenience sampling occurred over 4 months. Participants were hospice social workers (n = 14) recruited through personal and professional contacts and social media. Four focus groups were conducted via Zoom. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Three major themes appeared: 1) benefits and challenges of having a structured discharge protocol (n = 14); 2) need for specific LDP roles across team members (n = 11); and 3) education and clear boundaries for both patients/PCGs and professionals (n = 9). Conclusions: All three assessment components of the preliminary LDP were deemed necessary by participants; however, implementation challenges were both unique for each agency and reflective of the broader hospice culture. Further research is needed to measure the impact of the LDP.

Hospice Quality, Race, and Disenrollment in Hospice Enrollees With Dementia

Background: Racial and ethnic minoritized people with dementia (PWD) are at high risk of disenrollment from hospice, yet little is known about the relationship between hospice quality and racial disparities in disenrollment among PWD. Objective: To assess the association between race and disenrollment between and within hospice quality categories in PWD. Design/Setting/Subjects: Retrospective cohort study of 100% Medicare beneficiaries 65+ enrolled in hospice with a principal diagnosis of dementia, July 2012-December 2017. Race and ethnicity (White/Black/Hispanic/Asian and Pacific Islander [AAPI]) was assessed with the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) algorithm. Hospice quality was assessed with the publicly-available Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey item on overall hospice rating, including a category for hospices exempt from public reporting (unrated). Results: The sample included 673,102 PWD (mean age 86, 66% female, 85% White, 7.3% Black, 6.3% Hispanic, 1.6% AAPI) enrolled in 4371 hospices nationwide. Likelihood of disenrollment was higher in hospices in the lowest quartile of quality ratings (vs. highest quartile) for both White (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.12 [95% confidence interval 1.06-1.19]) and minoritized PWD (AOR range 1.2-1.3) and was substantially higher in unrated hospices (AOR range 1.8-2.0). Within both low- and high-quality hospices, minoritized PWD were more likely to be disenrolled compared with White PWD (AOR range 1.18-1.45). Conclusions: Hospice quality predicts disenrollment, but does not fully explain disparities in disenrollment for minoritized PWD. Efforts to improve racial equity in hospice should focus both on increasing equity in access to high-quality hospices and improving care for racial minoritized PWD in all hospices.

Conceptualizing the Value of Pediatric Concurrent Hospice Care

Given that pediatric concurrent hospice care has been available for more than a decade, it is appropriate to seek an understanding of the value of this care delivery approach. Value is the cost associated with achieving beneficial health outcomes. In pursuit of this goal, the current literature on pediatric concurrent hospice care was synthesized and used to develop a model to explain its value. Because of its relevance, the Value Assessment Framework was used to conceptualize the value of pediatric concurrent hospice care. This framework gauges the value of a health care service through 2 components: long-term effect and short-term affordability. The framework considers comparative clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, other benefits or disadvantages, contextual considerations, and potential budget impact. Evidence from the literature suggested that the value of concurrent care depended on clinical outcomes evaluated, costs examined, medical services used, care coordinated, context considered, and budget impacted. The literature demonstrated that pediatric concurrent hospice care does offer significant value for children and their families. The conceptual model highlighted the need for a comprehensive approach to assessing value. The model is a useful framework for future research examining the value of concurrent hospice care.

A national study of disenrollment from hospice among people with dementia

BACKGROUND

People with dementia (PWD) are at high risk for hospice disenrollment, yet little is known about patterns of disenrollment among the growing number of hospice enrollees with dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational cohort study of 100% Medicare beneficiaries with dementia aged 65 and older enrolled in the Medicare Hospice Benefit between July 2012 and December 2017. Outcome measures included hospice-initiated disenrollment for patients whose rate of decline ceased to meet the Medicare hospice eligibility guideline of "expected death within 6 months" (extended prognosis) and patient-initiated disenrollment (revocation). Hospice, regional, and patient risk factors and variation were assessed with multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 867,695 hospice enrollees with dementia, 70,945 (8.2%) were disenrolled due to extended prognosis and 43,133 (5.0%) revoked within 1-year of their index admission. There was substantial variation in hospice provider disenrollment due to extended prognosis (10th-90th percentile 4.5%-14.6%, adjusted median odds ratio (MOR) 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82, 1.91) and revocation (10th-90th percentile 2.5%-10.1%, MOR 2.09, 95% CI 2.03, 2.14). Among hospital referral regions (HRR), there was more variation in revocation (10th-90th percentile 3.5%-7.6%, MOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.34, 1.47) than extended prognosis (10th-90th percentile 7.0%-9.5%, MOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.18, 1.27), with much higher revocation rates noted in HRRs located in the Southeast and Southern California. A number of patient and hospice characteristics were associated with higher odds of both types of disenrollment (younger age, female sex, minoritized race and ethnicity, Medicaid dual eligibility, Medicare Part C enrollment), while some were associated with revocation only (more comorbidities, newer, smaller, and for-profit hospices).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationally representative study of hospice enrollees with dementia, hospice disenrollment varied by type of hospice, geographic region, and patient characteristics including age, sex, race, and ethnicity. These findings raise important questions about whether and how the Medicare Hospice Benefit could be adapted to reduce disparities and better support PWD.

Hospice interventions for persons living with dementia, family members and clinicians: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hospice care was initially designed for seriously ill individuals with cancer. Thus, the model and clinicians were geared toward caring for this population. Despite the proportion of persons living with dementia (PLWD) receiving hospice care substantially increased over the past 10 years, and their longer lengths of stay, established hospice interventions for this population are scarce. No systematic review has previously evaluated those interventions that do exist. We synthesized hospice intervention studies for PLWD, their families, and hospice professionals by describing the types of interventions, participants, outcomes, and results; assessing study quality; and identifying promising intervention strategies.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using a comprehensive search of five databases through March 2021 and follow-up hand searches. Included studies were peer-reviewed, available in English, and focused on hospice interventions for persons with dementia, and/or care partners, and clinicians. Using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria, data was extracted guided by the Cochrane Checklist, and quality was assessed using a 26-item Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Checklist.

RESULTS

The search identified 3235 unique studies in total, of which 10 studies met inclusion criteria. The search revealed three types of interventions: clinical education and training, usual care plus care add-on services, and "other" delivered to 707 participants (mostly clinicians). Five studies included underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. Outcomes measured knowledge and skills, psychosocial and health outcomes, feasibility, and acceptability, with significant improvements in six studies. Study quality was reflective of early-stage research with clinical education and training strategies showing deliberate progression towards real-world efficacy testing.

IMPLICATIONS

Hospice interventions for PLWD are sparse and in early-phase research. More research is needed with rigorous designs, diverse samples, and outcomes considering the concordance of care.

Hospice Improves Care Quality For Older Adults With Dementia In Their Last Month Of Life

The Medicare hospice benefit was originally designed around a cancer disease paradigm but increasingly serves people living with dementia. At this time, almost half of all older adults receiving hospice care have dementia. Yet there is minimal evidence as to whether hospice benefits people living with dementia outside of nursing facilities. We asked whether and how the perceived quality of last-month-of-life care differed between people with and without dementia and whether hospice use among people living with dementia was associated with perceived quality of care compared with the quality of care for those who did not use hospice. We used nationally representative data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study and Medicare claims from the period 2011-17 to examine the impact of hospice enrollment on proxy perceptions of last-month-of-life care quality. Proxies of people living with dementia enrolled in hospice compared with proxies of those not enrolled more often reported care to be excellent (predicted probability: 52 percent versus 41 percent), more often reported having anxiety or sadness managed (67 percent versus 46 percent), and less often reported changes in care settings in the last three days of life (10 percent versus 25 percent). There were no differences in the impact of hospice on proxy ratings of care for people with and without dementia. Policy makers should consider these benefits when weighing changes to hospice policy and regulations that may affect people living with dementia.

Impact of Comorbid Dementia on Patterns of Hospice Use

Background: The evidence base for understanding hospice use among persons with dementia is almost exclusively based on individuals with a primary terminal diagnosis of dementia. Little is known about whether comorbid dementia influences hospice use patterns. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of comorbid dementia among hospice enrollees and its association with hospice use patterns. Design: Pooled cross-sectional analysis of the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) linked to Medicare claims. Subjects: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in the United States who enrolled with hospice and died between 2004 and 2016. Measurements: Dementia was assessed using a validated survey-based algorithm. Hospice use patterns were enrollment less than or equal to three days, enrollment greater than six months, hospice disenrollment, and hospice disenrollment after six months. Results: Of 3123 decedents, 465 (14.9%) had a primary hospice diagnosis of dementia and 943 (30.2%) had comorbid dementia and died of another illness. In fully adjusted models, comorbid dementia was associated with increased odds of hospice enrollment greater than six months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.09) and hospice disenrollment following six months of hospice (AOR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.43-4.553). Having a primary diagnosis of dementia was associated with increased odds of hospice enrollment greater than six months (AOR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.86-3.68), hospice disenrollment (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.32-2.51), and hospice disenrollment following six months of hospice (AOR = 4.31, 95% CI: 2.37-7.82). Conclusion: Approximately 45% of the hospice population has primary or comorbid dementia and are at increased risk for long hospice enrollment periods and hospice disenrollment. Consideration of the high prevalence of comorbid dementia should be inherent in hospice staff training, quality metrics, and Medicare Hospice Benefit policies.

The Forgotten and Misdiagnosed Care Transition: Live Discharge From Hospice Care

Every aspect of the United States healthcare industry presents transitions in care—hospitalizations, rehabilitation, long-term care placement—each requiring careful attention. With a goal of maintaining safety during a known point of vulnerability for patients, discharge planning is required in hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies under Medicare guidelines. Yet, no required discharge planning or clear guidelines are available for a discharge from hospice; it is a forgotten care transition in our healthcare system. Of the 1.6 million Medicare recipients hospices serve each year, hospices discharge 17.4% alive. Under Medicare regulations, if clinicians cannot document acceptable patient decline, then patients are decertified from hospice categorized as “no longer terminally ill”, otherwise known as a live discharge. These patients are often referred to as “not dying fast enough,” or “failure to die on time,” as ultimately, they are still dying, and they are still terminally ill, just not within the prescribed 6-month framework. This paper outlines what is known about the occurrences and experiences of live discharge from hospice care and provides suggestions for improving both practice and policy.

Live discharge from hospice for people living with dementia isn't "graduating"-It's getting expelled

This editorial comments on the article by Luth et al. in this issue.

Survival in hospice patients with dementia: the effect of home hospice and nurse visits

BACKGROUND

Hospice patients with dementia are at increased risk for live discharge and long lengths of stay (>180 days), causing patient and family caregiver stress and burden. The location and timing of clinician visits are important factors influencing whether someone dies as expected, in hospice, or experiences a live discharge or long length of stay.

OBJECTIVE

Examine how home hospice and nurse visit frequency relate to dying in hospice within the Medicare-intended 6-month period.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Non-profit hospice agency.

PARTICIPANTS

Three thousand eight hundred and thirty seven patients with dementia who received hospice services from 2013 to 2017.

METHODS

Multivariable survival analyses examined the effects of receiving home hospice (vs. nursing home) and timing of nurse visits on death within 6 months of hospice enrollment, compared to live discharge or long length of stay. Models adjust for relevant demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine percent (39%) of patients experienced live discharge or long length of stay. Home hospice patients were more likely to experience live discharge or long length of stays (HR for death: 0.77, 95%CI: 0.69-0.86, p < 0.001). Frequency of nurse visits was inversely associated with live discharge and long lengths of stay (HR for death: 2.87, 95%CI: 2.47-3.33, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Nearly 40% of patients with dementia in our study experienced live discharge or a long length of stay. Additional research is needed to understand why home hospice may result in live discharge or a long length of stay for patients with dementia. Nurse visits were associated with death, suggesting their responsiveness to deteriorating patient health. Hospice guidelines may need to permit longer stays so community-dwelling patients with dementia, a growing segment of hospice patients, can remain continuously enrolled in hospice and avoid burden and costs associated with live discharge.

Adaptation and Piloting for Hospice Social Workers of Aliviado Dementia Care, a Dementia Symptom Management Program

BACKGROUND

Forty-five percent of hospice patients currently have a primary or secondary diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or related disorders. However, few programs have focused specifically on assisting hospices in providing evidence-based symptom management to persons living with dementia (PLWD).

OBJECTIVE

To adapt and pilot the training component of Aliviado Dementia Care, a dementia symptom management quality improvement program originally developed for home healthcare, for use by social workers as part of the hospice interdisciplinary team.

DESIGN

A prospective pre-post design was utilized, measuring knowledge, confidence, and attitudes at baseline, and immediately and 1-month post-training. Analysis was performed using paired t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA.

SUBJECTS

Hospice social workers currently practicing in the United States with at least 1 year of experience.

MEASUREMENTS

The Dementia Symptom Knowledge Assessment and a post-training continuing education evaluation form.

RESULTS

Forty-six subjects were enrolled, of whom 26 completed the first post-test and 23 both post-tests. There was a poor baseline level of knowledge and confidence in caring for PLWD. Significant improvements occurred following training, particularly in implementing non-pharmacologic interventions for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) (16.64% increase, p < .0001) and confidence in managing behavioral symptoms (16.86%, p = .01) and depression (25.18%, p < .0001). Changes were maintained over time. All respondents were either very satisfied or satisfied with the quality and content of the program.

CONCLUSIONS

The training modules of Aliviado Dementia Care were successfully tailored for use by hospice social workers, showing significant improvement in knowledge and confidence in caring for behavioral symptoms in PLWD. Future work will examine whether the larger program, including this training, can subsequently improve patient outcomes in hospice.

Live Discharge From Hospice: A Systematic Review

Live discharges from hospice may occur because of patient choice or provider choice. However, when discharges occur before death, patients and families may feel abandoned and left to manage care needs previously provided by hospice. The purpose of this systematic review was to better understand the nature of live discharges, including frequency, patient characteristics, and hospice characteristics. Of 44 studies identified for review, 13 met inclusion criteria and were published between 2008 and 2018. Live discharge rates varied from 5% to 23%. Patients' prehospice characteristics varied widely based on diagnosis, comorbidities, gender, race, and ethnicity. Hospice characteristics indicated that the likelihood of a live discharge was increased for patients enrolled in for-profit hospices and in rural areas. Only 2 studies captured the patient/family perspective of the live discharge experience, finding that the loss of hospice support was fraught with difficulties. A need for further study of the live discharge experience and the practices of hospices with high live discharge rates was identified.

Live discharge from hospice care: psychosocial challenges and opportunities

Hospice social workers face many challenges in attempts to replicate or supplement the holistic support and unique services hospice provides for individuals discharged alive. This discontinuity in care can impact the types of supports needed by individuals and caregivers, which may or may not be accessible within their community. Patients and families who have access to community-based palliative care programs following a discharge generally tend to navigate the process with fewer challenges. This qualitative study (N = 24) explored both the challenges of the live discharge process and the opportunities within social work practice in the US. Results from this study emphasize the need for a framework to better approach a live discharge to ensure appropriate supports are accessible for all patients and caregivers. Specifically, results highlight both the concrete and psychosocial challenges in live discharges as a result of tension between current eligibility requirements and individual feelings and needs. Social workers also provided suggestions to improve the live discharge process, including attention to communication and preparation. This paper outlines specific challenges of live discharge from hospice, a framework for understanding presented challenges, and implications for policy and practice.

A Theoretical Exploration of Live Discharge from Hospice for Caregivers of Adults with Dementia

Patients with dementia may be discharged from hospice if their condition stabilizes. The loss of professional support and an already complex grief process needs careful attention. A live discharge presents a unique experience for each hospice patient, caregiver, and hospice team, which varies from traditional bereavement theories used to describe the grieving process. This article explores live discharge from hospice for caregivers of adults with dementia through a theoretical lens of Symbolic Interactionism (SI) and Attachment Theory (AT). The theories of SI and AT support and assist in understanding the experience of caregivers who lose hospice support due to ineligibility. In addition, caregivers watch the gradual deterioration and psychological loss of someone with dementia while they remain alive described as an ambiguous loss. Ambiguous loss as a subset of traditional bereavement theories provides a framework for this exploration and provides a relevant illustration of the complex needs. This article will conclude with implications for social work practice. It is important for hospice clinicians to be aware of current termination practices necessary to manage appropriate attachments, support the symbolic meaning of the hospice experience, validate the ambiguous losses, and maintain a sense of hope through a live discharge from hospice.

Race, Ethnicity, and Other Risks for Live Discharge Among Hospice Patients with Dementia

OBJECTIVES

The end-of-life trajectory for persons with dementia is often protracted and difficult to predict, placing these individuals at heightened risk of live discharge from hospice. Risks for live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline among patients with dementia are not well established. Our aim was to identify demographic, health, and hospice service factors associated with live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline among hospice patients with dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A large not-for-profit agency in New York City.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2629 hospice patients with dementia age 65 years and older.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was live discharge from hospice due to condition stabilization or failure to decline (vs death). Measures include demographic factors (race/ethnicity, Medicaid, sex, age, marital status, parental status), health characteristics (primary dementia diagnosis, comorbidities, functional status, prior hospitalization), and hospice service (location, length of service, number and timing of nurse visits).

RESULTS

Logistic regression models indicated that compared with white hospice patients with dementia, African American and Hispanic hospice patients with dementia experienced increased risk of live discharge (African American: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34-4.38; Hispanic: aOR = 2.99; 95% CI = 1.81-4.94). Home hospice (aOR = 7.57; 95% CI = 4.04-14.18), longer length of service (aOR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.04-1.05), and more days between nurse visits and discharge (aOR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.56-2.21) were also associated with live discharge.

CONCLUSION

To avoid burdensome and disruptive transitions out of hospice in patients with dementia, interventions to reduce live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline should be tailored to meet the needs of African American, Hispanic, and home hospice patients. Policies regarding sustained hospice eligibility should account for the variable and protracted end-of-life trajectory of patients with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:551-558, 2020.

Current Practices of Live Discharge from Hospice: Social Work Perspectives

Hospice provides holistic support for individuals living with terminal illness and to their caregivers during the bereavement period. However, some individuals who enroll in hospice services are decertified as they do not experience a decline in health as quickly as required by current regulations, a practice referred to as a live discharge. The interruption in care can affect the physical and psychosocial care needs for individuals and caregivers and leave hospice clinicians with questions about how to best support them. However, there are no formal guidelines to support this process. This qualitative study (N = 24) explored the current practices of hospice social workers across the United States engaged in the live discharge process. Results from this study emphasize the need to bridge the gaps between policy and practice. Specifically, results highlight the challenges hospice social workers face to replicate or supplement the holistic support and unique services hospice provides for individuals discharged alive, and suggest further research to develop live discharge guidelines to identify appropriate support for patients and their caregivers who no longer meet hospice eligibility requirements.

Identifying palliative care needs in people with dementia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dementia is now recognized as a progressive life-limiting illness where many patients can benefit from access to palliative care.

RECENT FINDINGS

The present review has focused on three areas namely, advanced care planning in supporting palliative care for dementia, hospice provision for people with dementia and provision of care within family home. In advanced care planning, there is little research on systematically developed and implemented advance care planning interventions or whether they achieve desired outcomes for end-of-life care. There is limited research on hospice-based care for patients with dementia and most studies are U.S. based. Equally studies exploring how family carers can be supported and facilitated to care at home for the person with dementia to the end of life are exploratory rather than determining what factors may be important.

SUMMARY

There are relatively few studies, especially quantitative studies or intervention studies being carried out to determine most effective means of providing palliative care for people with dementia, particularly with respect to advanced care planning, the provision of hospice-based care and support at home. Despite increased public awareness of dementia as a terminal illness, more research is required to support patients with dementia and their families at the end of life.