Healthcare Utilization and Mortality After Hospice Live Discharge Among Medicare Patients With and Without Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

BACKGROUND

Little is known about post-discharge outcomes among patients who were discharged alive from hospice.

OBJECTIVE

To compare healthcare utilization and mortality after hospice live discharge among Medicare patients with and without Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims data of a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 153,696 Medicare FFS patients experienced live discharge from hospice between 2014 and 2019.

MEASURES

Two types of burdensome transition (type 1: live discharge from hospice followed by hospitalization and subsequent hospice readmission; type 2: live discharge from hospice followed by hospitalization with the patient deceased in the hospital), acute care utilization, hospice readmission, and mortality in the 30 and 180 days after live discharge and between live discharge and death.

RESULTS

Compared with non-ADRD patients, ADRD patients were less likely to experience burdensome transitions (type 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.98; type 2: aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.65-0.75), more likely to have ED visits (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09), less likely to die (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69-0.73), and less likely to be readmitted to hospice (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.89) 30 days after live discharge. Results of 180-day post-discharge outcomes were largely consistent with results of 30-day outcomes. Among patients who died as of December 31, 2019, ADRD patients were less likely to be hospitalized (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.92) and more likely to be readmitted to hospice (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16) between live discharge and death. Significant racial/ethnicity disparities in acute care utilization and mortality after live discharge existed in both ADRD and non-ADRD groups.

CONCLUSION

ADRD patients had lower mortality, a longer survival time, a lower rate of hospitalization, and an initially lower but gradually increasing rate of hospice readmission than non-ADRD patients after hospice live discharge. These different trajectories warrant further investigation of the eligibility of their initial hospice enrollment. Black patients had significantly worse outcomes after hospice live discharge compared with White patients.

Effectiveness of Pediatric Concurrent Hospice Care to Improve Continuity of Care

BACKGROUND

The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandated landmark hospice care legislation for children at end of life. Little is known about the impact of pediatric concurrent hospice care.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pediatric concurrent vs standard hospice care on end-of-life care continuity among Medicaid beneficiaries.

METHODS

Using national Medicaid data, we conducted a quasi-experimental designed study to estimate the effect of concurrent vs standard hospice care to improve end-of-life care continuity for children. Care continuity (i.e., hospice length of stay, hospice disenrollment, emergency room transition, and inpatient transition) was measured via claims data. Exposures were concurrent hospice vs standard hospice care. Using instrumental variable analysis, the effectiveness of exposures on care continuity was compared.

RESULTS

Concurrent hospice care affected care continuity. It resulted in longer lengths of stays in hospice (β = 2.76, P < .001) and reduced hospice live discharges (β = -2.80, P < .05), compared to standard hospice care. Concurrent care was not effective at reducing emergency room (β = 2.09, P < .001) or inpatient care (β = .007, P < .05) transitions during hospice enrollment.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides critical insight into the quality of care delivered for children at end of life. These findings have policy implications.

Electing Full Code in Hospice: Patient Characteristics and Live Discharge Rates

BACKGROUND

It is unknown how many hospice enrollees elect to be full code and if this is associated with higher hospice live discharge rates.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the rates of hospice enrollees electing full code, the characteristics predicting full code status, and the association of full code status with various hospice live discharge patterns.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of electronic medical record data.

SETTING/SUBJECTS

A total of 25,636 decedents enrolled in two Michigan hospices between 2009 and 2014.

MEASUREMENTS

Code status was defined as full code versus do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Covariates include demographics, location (home, hospice facility, nursing home, and hospital), primary diagnosis, and length of stay. Hospice live discharge was defined as short (0-14 days), medium (15-179 days), and long (>179 days).

RESULTS

A total of 12.9% of hospice enrollees elected full code status. This was significantly (p < 0.05) predicted by male sex, younger age, nonwhite race, home setting of care, and cancer diagnosis. Those with full code status had 1.76 times the adjusted odds of hospice live discharge compared with those with DNR orders (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-2.16) and 2.47 times the odds of short live discharge (95% CI 1.69-3.62) with no significant difference in long live discharge. The association of full code orders with hospice live discharge was stronger for nonwhite enrollees, with a live discharge rate of 23.8% versus 11.6% for African Americans with full code versus DNR orders.

CONCLUSIONS

Those electing full code status on admission to hospice are at high risk of live hospice discharge after short enrollments, particularly nonwhite enrollees.

Are Trends in Hospitalization Prior to Hospice Use Associated With Hospice Episode Characteristics?

This study expands current knowledge of factors associated with initiation of hospice care by examining prehospice patterns of medical care leading to Medicare hospice use and the relationships to hospice episode characteristics. Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study cohort offer the ability to control for measures that are not available in Medicare claims data, including marital status, nursing home residency, and education. For 1248 ARIC participants who used hospice (2006-2012), participant level trends in the number of hospital days per 30-day period over the year prior to hospice initiation were generated using a fixed-effects model. Logistic regression was used to estimate the associations between increasing hospital use over the year prior to hospice enrollment with key patient characteristics (diagnosis, age, and comorbidity) and episode characteristics (short hospice stay ending in death, long hospice stay, and live discharge). Participants with severe comorbidity (measured as a Charlson comorbidity index score greater than 5) had higher odds of increasing hospital use prior to hospice (odds ratio [OR] = 3.28, confidence interval [CI] = 2.25-4.78). Increasing hospital use did not vary by diagnosis but was associated with reduced odds of a live hospice discharge (OR = 0.55, CI = 0.34-0.88) or long stay in hospice (OR = 0.44, CI = 0.24-0.79) and increased odds of a short stay in hospice (OR = 1.92, CI = 1.36-2.71). The evidence that care patterns prior to hospice use are associated with hospice outcomes could facilitate development of interventions to improve timely hospice referral.