Event-related potentials in brain-injured patients with neuropsychological disorders: a review

Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600

PURPOSE

Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history.

METHOD

Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures.

RESULTS

One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history.

CONCLUSIONS

There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties.

Traumatic brain injury detection using electrophysiological methods

Measuring neuronal activity with electrophysiological methods may be useful in detecting neurological dysfunctions, such as mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This approach may be particularly valuable for rapid detection in at-risk populations including military service members and athletes. Electrophysiological methods, such as quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) and recording event-related potentials (ERPs) may be promising; however, the field is nascent and significant controversy exists on the efficacy and accuracy of the approaches as diagnostic tools. For example, the specific measures derived from an electroencephalogram (EEG) that are most suitable as markers of dysfunction have not been clearly established. A study was conducted to summarize and evaluate the statistical rigor of evidence on the overall utility of qEEG as an mTBI detection tool. The analysis evaluated qEEG measures/parameters that may be most suitable as fieldable diagnostic tools, identified other types of EEG measures and analysis methods of promise, recommended specific measures and analysis methods for further development as mTBI detection tools, identified research gaps in the field, and recommended future research and development thrust areas. The qEEG study group formed the following conclusions: (1) Individual qEEG measures provide limited diagnostic utility for mTBI. However, many measures can be important features of qEEG discriminant functions, which do show significant promise as mTBI detection tools. (2) ERPs offer utility in mTBI detection. In fact, evidence indicates that ERPs can identify abnormalities in cases where EEGs alone are non-disclosing. (3) The standard mathematical procedures used in the characterization of mTBI EEGs should be expanded to incorporate newer methods of analysis including non-linear dynamical analysis, complexity measures, analysis of causal interactions, graph theory, and information dynamics. (4) Reports of high specificity in qEEG evaluations of TBI must be interpreted with care. High specificities have been reported in carefully constructed clinical studies in which healthy controls were compared against a carefully selected TBI population. The published literature indicates, however, that similar abnormalities in qEEG measures are observed in other neuropsychiatric disorders. While it may be possible to distinguish a clinical patient from a healthy control participant with this technology, these measures are unlikely to discriminate between, for example, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or TBI. The specificities observed in these clinical studies may well be lost in real world clinical practice. (5) The absence of specificity does not preclude clinical utility. The possibility of use as a longitudinal measure of treatment response remains. However, efficacy as a longitudinal clinical measure does require acceptable test-retest reliability. To date, very few test-retest reliability studies have been published with qEEG data obtained from TBI patients or from healthy controls. This is a particular concern because high variability is a known characteristic of the injured central nervous system.

Simultaneous measurement of perceptual and motor cortical potentials: implications for assessing information processing in traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

Psychomotor slowing is a common manifestation of traumatic brain injury. Previous electrophysiological studies of traumatic brain injury have focused on abnormal attentional and perceptual responses to incoming stimuli. We hypothesize that traumatic brain injury is also associated with abnormal cortical components of motor execution.

DESIGN

To test this hypothesis, we analyzed event-related potentials of 22 subjects (11 with a history of severe traumatic brain injury and 11 age-matched healthy subjects) during oddball discrimination tasks. In addition to the usual stimulus-locked averaging of electrophysiological data to reveal cognitive components, such as the P300, we also analyzed subjects' response-locked data to reveal motor potential waveforms. To focus on generalized effects across modality, analyses were performed on composite measures from both auditory and visual event-related potentials.

RESULTS

(1) Traumatic brain injury subjects had abnormal P300 responses (with reduced amplitude and prolonged latency) in both sensory modalities. (2) Traumatic brain injury subjects' motor potential waveforms showed significantly reduced amplitude in both sensory modalities. (3) Abnormalities in P300 latency, amplitude, and motor potential amplitude (effect sizes = 1.2-1.5 SD) were greater than behavioral slowing, as measured by reaction times (0.7 SD). (4) P300 latency and motor potential amplitude together accounted for much of the reaction time prolongation (r = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the value of concurrently analyzing stimulus-locked and response-locked event-related potential data to evaluate cortical components of perceptual and motor processing. The present findings indicate that patients with traumatic brain injury have impairments in both the perceptual interpretation of incoming stimuli and the execution of motor responses and that both abnormalities contribute to psychomotor slowing in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Recognition without awareness in a patient with simultanagnosia

We report a psychophysiological study of "recognition without awareness" in patient 2354, who had severe but circumscribed atrophy in the occipitoparietal region bilaterally (caused by visual-variant Alzheimer's disease, documented by structural and functional neuroimaging) and an accompanying Balint syndrome that prevented her from recognizing the emotional valence of many highly charged negative visual scenes (e.g., a burned body). Despite this lack of overt recognition, patient 2354 nonetheless generated large amplitude skin conductance responses to highly charged negative pictures, demonstrating the same kind of recognition without awareness that has been reported previously in patients with bilateral occipitotemporal dysfunction and prosopagnosia [e.g., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1985). Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science, 228, 1453-1454.]. Our case complements both previous evidence of covert, nonconscious recognition in patients with prosopagnosia, and previous behavioral studies of patients with Balint syndrome that have shown evidence of "preattentive" visual processing. The findings add to the small but important set of empirical observations regarding nonconscious visual processing in neurological patients, and indicate that recognition without awareness can occur in the setting of dorsal visual stream dysfunction and Balint syndrome. The findings in our patient suggest that she has patent pathways from higher-order visual cortices to autonomic effectors in the amygdala or hypothalamus, even though the results of such information processing are not made available to conscious awareness.

The Effects of Increasing Stimulus Complexity in Event-Related Potentials and Reaction Time Testing: Clinical Applications in Evaluating Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

This study compared the effectiveness of P300 event related potentials (ERPs) and reaction time (RT) in discriminating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) from healthy control subjects. In particular, we examined how the use of more complex, ecologically relevant stimuli may affect the clinical utility of these tasks. We also evaluated how length of posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) and loss of consciousness (LOC) related to P300 and RT measures in our patient sample. There were 22 subjects (11 patients with TBI and 11 age-matched healthy control subjects). Four stimulus detection procedures were used: two using simple, conventional stimuli (auditory tone discrimination, AT; visual color discrimination, VC), and two using complex, ecologically relevant stimuli in the auditory and visual modalities (auditory word category discrimination, AWC; visual facial affect discrimination, VFA). Our results showed that RT measures were more effective in identifying TBI patients when complex stimuli were used (AWC and VFA). On the other hand, ERP measures were more effective in identifying TBI patients when simple stimuli were used (AT and VC). We also found a remarkably high correlation between duration of PTA and P300 amplitude.

Too Many Trees to See the Forest: Performance, Event-related Potential, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Integrative Congenital Prosopagnosia

Neuropsychological, event-related potential (ERP), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) methods were combined to provide a comprehensive description of performance and neurobiological profiles for K.W., a case of congenital prosopagnosia. We demonstrate that K.W.'s visual perception is characterized by almost unprecedented inability to identify faces, a large bias toward local features, and an extreme deficit in global/configural processing that is not confined to faces. This pattern could be appropriately labeled congenital integrative prosopagnosia, and accounts for some, albeit not all, cases of face recognition impairments without identifiable brain lesions. Absence of face selectivity is evident in both biological markers of face processing, fMRI (the fusiform face area [FFA]), and ERPs (N170). Nevertheless, these two neural signatures probably manifest different perceptual mechanisms. Whereas the N170 is triggered by the occurrence of physiognomic stimuli in the visual field, the deficient face-selective fMRI activation in the caudal brain correlates with the severity of global processing deficits. This correlation suggests that the FFA might be associated with global/configural computation, a crucial part of face identification.

Electrophysiologic Abnormalities of Auditory and Visual Information Processing in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

Through both auditory and visual modalities, we sought to explore the efficacy of event-related potentials in detecting residual cognitive impairments in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

Control subjects and TBI patients with favorable recovery were recruited. Pure tone and primary color discrimination tasks were utilized to elicit auditory and visual event-related potentials, respectively. All subjects were instructed to push a response button when they detected the target stimuli. Both behavioral and electrophysiologic responses were obtained simultaneously. We analyzed the event-related potential waveforms and examined the differences in amplitude, latency, behavioral reaction time, and response accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 11 TBI patients and 11 control subjects were tested. Results showed that (1) TBI patients had significantly lower P300 amplitude in both auditory (11.2 vs. 22. 7 microV) and visual (11.6 vs. 20.9 microV) domains, (2) TBI patients had significantly longer P300 latency in both auditory (355 vs. 294 msecs) and visual (376 vs. 341 msecs) modalities, and (3) although there was no significant difference in response accuracy (97.7%vs. 100%), reaction time for both auditory and visual tasks were significantly longer in TBI patients (auditory, 404 vs. 277 msecs; visual, 397 vs. 346 msecs).

CONCLUSION

Although TBI patients with good recovery showed similar response accuracy when compared with control subjects, they demonstrated significantly poorer performance in both electrophysiologic and behavioral responses. Diminished amplitudes and prolonged latencies in P300 responses indicate impaired organization and categorization of incoming sensory information; prolonged behavioral reaction times suggest slowing in the response execution process. Clinical and theoretical implications and goals for continued research are discussed.

Clinical applications of event-related potentials in brain injury

ERPs may extend the battery of neurophysiologic tests currently available for determining the functional integrity of the central nervous system and the capacity of cognition in patients with brain injury. The use of stimuli relevant for the patient can enhance the probability to record these waves in unconscious patients and in patients with cognitive impairment and enhance the predictive value on outcome. The experimental data in these patients still are not sufficient, however, to standardize the indications of ERPs in clinical practice. Their limitations, mainly the variability also present in normal individuals and the limited standardization and validation, must be considered, and they must be judged cautiously as a prognostic index. Nevertheless, ERPs might be applied as a useful supplement to neuropsychologic assessment.

Neurophysiological evaluation of late effects of adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy on cognitive function

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate late neurotoxicity of adjuvant high-dose (HD) chemotherapy versus standard-dose (SD) chemotherapy by event-related potentials (ERP) and quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a randomized study in high-risk breast cancer patients on the efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy, late effects on cognitive functioning were analyzed by neuropsychological tests. Cognitive impairment was found in 32% of the HD group, 17% of the SD group and in 9% of a control group of stage I breast cancer patients not treated with chemotherapy. In 17 consecutive patients in the HD group and 16 consecutive patients in the SD group neurophysiological tests were performed, consisting of P300 and qEEG. Results of patients treated with chemotherapy were compared with results of 14 control patients not treated with chemotherapy. All patients were tested two years after treatment.

RESULTS

Asymmetry of the alpha rhythm of > or =0.5 Hz was found in 7 HD patients, 2 SD patients and in none of the control patients (p = 0.01). No differences were found between the groups with regard to frequency of alpha rhythm, alpha blocking and latency of P300. No correlation was found between neurophysiological parameters and neuropsychological performance, except for an overall relation between the P300 latencies and the total number of deviant test scores.

CONCLUSION

Although the neurophysiological differences are subtle and the relation with the cognitive functioning in individual patients as measured by the neuropsychological examination is equivocal, the results suggest that there is neurophysiological support for cognitive dysfunction as a late complication of high-dose systemic chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Cognitive event-related potentials in neuropsychological assessment

Neuropsychology is a behavioral approach to studying the brain, and an integration of neuropsychology with on-line processing measures of brain function is important for advancing the understanding of brain-behavior relationships. Cognitive event-related potentials (ERPs) are on-line processing measures that are of interest to neuropsychologists because they are linked to familiar neuropsychological test paradigms and because they have reached a degree of standardization sufficient to make them applicable in individual assessment. A selective review of cognitive ERPs is given, focusing on studies of attention in the oddball paradigm and arguing that an adequate assessment of attention is basic in understanding higher order cognitive functions. General principles for using ERP data to supplement and clarify neuropsychological analysis are discussed, and available evidence on dementia and traumatic head injury is reviewed. It is concluded that ERPs are a useful supplement to neuropsychological assessment. Although diagnostic use of ERPs must be guarded because of limited standardization and validation, information-processing analysis with ERPs may aid significantly in interpretation of behavioral data.