Biomarker S100B in plasma a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in an emergency department

S100B vs. "GFAP and UCH-L1" assays in the management of mTBI patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare for the first time the performance of "GFAP and UCH-L1" vs. S100B in a cohort of patients managed for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) according to actualized French guidelines.

METHODS

A prospective study was recently carried at the Emergency Department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital in France. Patients with mTBI presenting a medium risk of complications were enrolled. Blood S100B and "GFAP and UCHL-1" were sampled and measured according to French guidelines. S100B was measured in patients with samples within 3 h of trauma (Cobas®, Roche Diagnostics), while GFAP and UCHL-1 were measured in all patients (samples <3 h and 3-12 h) using another automated assay (i-STAT® Alinity, Abbott).

RESULTS

For sampling <3 h, serum S100B correctly identifies intracranial lesions with a specificity of 25.7 % (95 % CI; 19.5-32.6 %), a sensitivity of 100 % (95 % CI; 66.4-100 %), and a negative predictive value of 100 % (95 % CI; 92.5-100 %). For sampling <12 h, plasma "GFAP and UCH-L1" levels correctly identify intracranial lesions with a specificity of 31.7 % (95 % CI; 25.7-38.2 %), a sensitivity of 100 % (95 % CI; 73.5-100 %), and a negative predictive value of 100 % (95 % CI; 95-100 %). Comparison of specificities (25.7 vs. 31.7 %) did not reveal a statistically significant difference (p=0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

We highlight the usefulness of measuring plasma "GFAP and UCH-L1" levels to target mTBI patients (sampling within 12 h post-injury) and optimize the reduction of CT scans.

Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements Using Two Automated Immunoassays (i-STAT® and Alinity®) for the Management of Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Preliminary Results from a French Single-Center Approach

The measurement of blood glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) may assist in the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This study aims to compare GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using a handheld device with those measured using a core laboratory platform. We enrolled 230 mTBI patients at intermediate risk of complications. Following French guidelines, a negative S100B value permits the patient to be discharged without a computed tomography scan. Plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 levels were retrospectively measured using i-STAT® and Alinity® i analyzers in patients managed within 12 h post-trauma. Our analysis indicates a strong correlation of biomarker measurements between the two analyzers. Cohen's kappa coefficients and Lin's concordance coefficients were both ≥0.7, while Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.94 for GFAP and 0.90 for UCH-L1. Additionally, the diagnostic performance in identifying an intracranial lesion was not significantly different between the two analyzers, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of approximately 30%. GFAP and UCH-L1 levels measured using Abbott's i-STAT® and Alinity® i platform assays are highly correlated both analytically and clinically in a cohort of 230 patients managed for mTBI according to French guidelines.

Clinical value of S100B in detecting intracranial injury in elderly patients with mild traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

The biomarker S100B is a sensitive biomarker to detect traumatic intracranial injury in patients mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Higher blood values of S100B, resulting in lower specificity and decreased head computed tomography (CT) reduction has been regarded as one of shortcomings in patients over 65 years of age. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of plasma S100B to detect intracranial injury in elderly patients with mTBI.

METHODS

A posthoc analysis was performed of a larger prospective cohort study. Previous recorded patient variables and plasma values of S100B from patients with mTBI who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) within 6 h of injury, underwent a head CT and had a blood sample drawn as part of their routine clinical care, were partitioned at 65 years of age. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of plasma S100B for predicting traumatic intracranial lesions on head CT, with a cut-off set at 0.105 μg/L, were calculated. Results were compared with data from an additional systematic review on the accuracy of S100B to detect intracranial injury in elderly patients with mTBI.

RESULTS

Data of 240 patients (48.4 %) of 65 years or older were analyzed. Sensitivity and NPV of S100B were 89 % and 86 % respectively, which is lower than among younger patients (both 97 %). The specificity decreased stepwise with older age: 22 %, 18 %, and 5 % for the age groups 65-74, 75-84, and ≥ 85 years old, respectively. The meta-analysis comprised 4 studies and the current study with data from 2166 patients. Pooled data estimated the sensitivity of s100B as 97.4 % (95 % CI 83.3-100 %) and specificity as 17.3 % (95 % CI 9.5-29.3 %) to detect intracranial injury in elderly patients with mTBI.

CONCLUSION

The biomarker S100B at the routine threshold has a limited clinical value in the management of elderly mTBI patients mainly due to a poor specificity leading to only a small decrease in head CTs. Alternate cut-off values and combining several plasma biomarkers with clinical variables may be useful strategies to increase the accuracy of S100B in (subgroups of) elderly mTBI patients.

The S100B Protein: A Multifaceted Pathogenic Factor More Than a Biomarker

S100B is a calcium-binding protein mainly concentrated in astrocytes in the nervous system. Its levels in biological fluids are recognized as a reliable biomarker of active neural distress, and more recently, mounting evidence points to S100B as a Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern molecule, which, at high concentration, triggers tissue reactions to damage. S100B levels and/or distribution in the nervous tissue of patients and/or experimental models of different neural disorders, for which the protein is used as a biomarker, are directly related to the progress of the disease. In addition, in experimental models of diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, traumatic and vascular acute neural injury, epilepsy, and inflammatory bowel disease, alteration of S100B levels correlates with the occurrence of clinical and/or toxic parameters. In general, overexpression/administration of S100B worsens the clinical presentation, whereas deletion/inactivation of the protein contributes to the amelioration of the symptoms. Thus, the S100B protein may be proposed as a common pathogenic factor in different disorders, sharing different symptoms and etiologies but appearing to share some common pathogenic processes reasonably attributable to neuroinflammation.

Role of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Protein-Induced Activation of Microglia and Mast Cells in the Pathogenesis of Neuro-COVID

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). About 45% of COVID-19 patients experience several symptoms a few months after the initial infection and develop post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), referred to as "Long-COVID," characterized by persistent physical and mental fatigue. However, the exact pathogenetic mechanisms affecting the brain are still not well-understood. There is increasing evidence of neurovascular inflammation in the brain. However, the precise role of the neuroinflammatory response that contributes to the disease severity of COVID-19 and long COVID pathogenesis is not clearly understood. Here, we review the reports that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can cause blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction and damage neurons either directly, or via activation of brain mast cells and microglia and the release of various neuroinflammatory molecules. Moreover, we provide recent evidence that the novel flavanol eriodictyol is particularly suited for development as an effective treatment alone or together with oleuropein and sulforaphane (ViralProtek®), all of which have potent anti-viral and anti-inflammatory actions.