High prevalence of skin test positivity in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma

Targeted GATA3 knockdown in activated T cells via pulmonary siRNA delivery as novel therapy for allergic asthma

GATA3 gene silencing in activated T cells displays a promising option to early-on undermine pathological pathways in the disease formation of allergic asthma. The central transcription factor of T helper 2 (Th2) cell cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 plays a major role in immune and inflammatory cascades underlying asthmatic processes in the airways. Pulmonary delivery of small interfering RNAs (siRNA) to induce GATA3 knockdown within disease related T cells of asthmatic lungs via RNA interference (RNAi) presents an auspicious base to realize this strategy, however, still faces some major hurdles. Main obstacles for successful siRNA delivery in general comprise stability and targeting issues, while in addition the transfection of T cells presents a particularly challenging task itself. In previous studies, we have developed and advanced an eligible siRNA delivery system composed of polyethylenimine (PEI) as polycationic carrier, transferrin (Tf) as targeting ligand and melittin (Mel) as endosomolytic agent. Resulting Tf-Mel-PEI polyplexes exhibited ideal characteristics for targeted siRNA delivery to activated T cells and achieved efficient and sequence-specific gene knockdown in vitro. In this work, the therapeutic potential of this carrier system was evaluated in an optimized cellular model displaying the activated status of asthmatic T cells. Moreover, a suitable siRNA sequence combination was found for effective gene silencing of GATA3. To confirm the translatability of our findings, Tf-Mel-PEI polyplexes were additionally tested ex vivo in activated human precision-cut lung slices (PCLS). Here, the formulation showed a safe profile as well as successful delivery to the lung epithelium with 88% GATA3 silencing in lung explants. These findings support the feasibility of Tf-Mel-PEI as siRNA delivery system for targeted gene knockdown in activated T cells as a potential novel therapy for allergic asthma.

Effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma: A retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND

We conducted the first real-world study of treatment with omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, in Chinese patients with severe allergic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was the steroid-sparing effect of omalizumab after 12 and 16 weeks of treatment. Characteristics of the patient population, treatment patterns, response rate, and other measures of therapeutic effectiveness were also reported.

METHODS

This nationwide, retrospective, real-world study was conducted in patients with severe allergic asthma who were treated with omalizumab in China. Data, including demographics, Asthma Control Test (ACT) and laboratory and lung function test results, and omalizumab use information, were extracted from patient records collected as part of a previously conducted real-world survey (Asthma Group of the Respiratory Disease Society of the Chinese Medical Association).

RESULTS

In total, 139 patient records were included; 131 and 118 patients remained on treatment at the ≥12- and ≥16-week time points, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation age and median asthma duration (interquartile range) were 47.4 ± 14.3 and 7 (4, 15) years, respectively; 75.6% of patients had a history of allergic disease. Reductions (versus baseline) in inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonists or oral corticosteroids were reported in 61.1% and 63.6% of patients at ≥12 and ≥ 16 weeks, respectively. There were significant improvements in ACT scores (6.08, P < .001) and nitric oxide fraction in exhaled air (-13.0, P = .01) from baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that age and allergic medical history were predictors of omalizumab treatment response. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Real-world omalizumab treatment was efficacious and well-tolerated in Chinese patients with severe allergic asthma.

Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma: A real-life study

Background: The efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma have been established in both randomized controlled trials and real-life studies. Objective: To evaluate the sustained effectiveness and safety of long-term treatment with omalizumab in a real-world setting. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients treated with omalizumab for at least 8 years in four asthma clinics in Greece. Pulmonary function, asthma control, oral corticosteroids (OCS) dose, and exacerbations were recorded before treatment, 6 months later, and annually thereafter. Adverse events were also recorded. Results: Forty-five patients (66.7% women), mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 55.3 ± 12.2 years, were included. The duration of treatment with omalizumab was 10.6 ± 1.2 years. The annual exacerbation rate decreased from 4.1 before omalizumab initiation to 1.1 after 1 year of treatment and remained low up to the 8th year of treatment (p < 0.001). From the 19 patients who were receiving OCS at baseline, 21.1% patients discontinued after 6 months, 47.4% were still on OCS after 4 years of therapy, and 31.6% were on OCS after 8 years. With regard to the OCS dose, 36.8% of the patients reduced the dose ≥ 50% after 6 months and 68.4% achieved 50% reduction after 2 years. The mean daily OCS dose before omalizumab initiation was 7.8 mg of prednisolone or the equivalent, reduced to 4.7 mg/day after 6 months, which reached 1.6 mg/day after 8 years (p < 0.001). Treatment with omalizumab resulted in significant improvements of asthma control and lung function. No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: In this real-life study, omalizumab resulted in significant and sustained improvements in asthma exacerbations, asthma control, and lung function, and had a steroid sparing effect and a good safety profile.

Immunologic Pathophysiology and Airway Remodeling Mechanism in Severe Asthma: Focused on IgE-Mediated Pathways

Despite the expansion of the understanding in asthma pathophysiology and the continual advances in disease management, a small subgroup of patients remains partially controlled or refractory to standard treatments. Upon the identification of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and other inflammatory mediators, investigations and developments of targeted agents have thrived. Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically targets the circulating IgE, which in turn impedes and reduces subsequent releases of the proinflammatory mediators. In the past decade, omalizumab has been proven to be efficacious and well-tolerated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma in both trials and real-life studies, most notably in reducing exacerbation rates and corticosteroid use. While growing evidence has demonstrated that omalizumab may be potentially beneficial in treating other allergic diseases, its indication remains confined to treating severe allergic asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria. Future efforts may be bestowed on determining the optimal length of omalizumab treatment, seeking biomarkers that could better predict treatment response and as well as extending its indications.

Omalizumab and long-term quality of life outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: a systematic review

Background:

Asthma is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory airways disease, with a considerable impact on quality of life (QoL). To express the effects of asthma on patients’ subjective experience, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represent an important instrument. The asthma QoL questionnaire (AQLQ) is one of the main PROs among these.

Materials and methods:

To identify long-term asthma-related QoL outcomes associated with omalizumab therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, we developed a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Published real-world effectiveness studies of adults or adolescents (12 years or older) with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma treated with omalizumab for at least 48 weeks were reviewed. Sources used were Medline (PubMed), the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar up to February 2018. In addition, a cross-referencing search was conducted to complete the revision.

Results:

A total of 255 potential papers were identified in the first search through the database. After full-text viewing, eight articles were finally included in the review. We summarized the results according to the study design, patient baseline characteristics and effectiveness outcomes assessed by AQLQ score results: variation from baseline to the end of study. Results confirmed the long-term benefits of omalizumab as an add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. Since there is a lot of evidence on omalizumab effectiveness, we aimed to focus on how a therapy can change patient’s QoL in a long time period. Data showed long-term effects of omalizumab treatment on subjective (PROs) and objective (lung function, corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, asthma exacerbation) effectiveness measures.

Conclusion:

Studies included in our review were observational trials that, due to their design, present a potential risk of selection bias in the patients included. Beyond this limit, the evaluation of QoL using the AQLQ showed a clear increase over time, following both 48 weeks and 9 years of observation, where QoL improvements still were significant over baseline values.

Omalizumab lowers asthma exacerbations, oral corticosteroid intake and blood eosinophils: Results of a 5-YEAR single-centre observational study

Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody which binds to human immunoglobulins E (IgE), thus preventing their interactions with both high affinity and low affinity IgE receptors. Therefore, omalizumab is currently recommended for add-on biological therapy of uncontrolled allergic asthma, mainly characterized by type 2 airway eosinophilic inflammation. Because omalizumab has been the first, and for a long time the only available monoclonal antibody for add-on treatment of type 2 asthma, some long-term studies have been published which provide a clear evidence of the therapeutic effectiveness of the anti-IgE pharmacological strategy. Within this context, the present single-centre observational study refers to 15 patients with severe allergic asthma, treated with omalizumab for at least 5 years at the Respiratory Unit of "Magna Græcia" University Hospital located in Catanzaro, Italy. In these asthmatic subjects we observed significant increases in asthma control test (ACT) score, with respect to baseline (14.60 ± 2.97), after 1 year (19.20 ± 2.98; p < 0.0001) and 5 years (21.67 ± 2.38; p < 0.0001) of add-on treatment with omalizumab. More importantly, omalizumab significantly lowered the number of annual asthma exacerbations (baseline: 3.66 ± 2.01) after 1 year (0.83 ± 1.14; p < 0.0001) and 5 years (0.63 ± 0.99; p < 0.0001), respectively. This excellent therapeutic outcome made it possible to drastically decrease the daily oral intake of prednisone (baseline: 22.50 ± 5.17 mg) after 1 year (1.83 ± 4.06 mg; p < 0.0001), as well as after 5 years (1.66 ± 3.61 mg; p < 0.0001). With regard to lung function, omalizumab significantly and persistently enhanced FEV₁ (baseline: 1636 ± 628.4 mL) after 1 year (2000 ± 679.7 mL; p < 0.05) and 5 years (1929 ± 564.8 mL; p < 0.05), respectively. Such relevant clinical and functional improvements were associated with reductions of blood eosinophil counts (baseline: 646.0 ± 458.9 cells/μl), already detectable after 1 year (512.7 ± 327.8 cells/μl; not significant), which reached the threshold of statistical significance after 5 years (326.0 ± 171.8 cells/μl; p < 0.05). Therefore, these real-life data referring to our single-centre observational investigation further corroborate the long-term therapeutic ability of omalizumab to improve several clinical, functional and haematological signatures of severe type 2 asthma.

Improvement of patient-reported outcomes in severe allergic asthma by omalizumab treatment: the real life observational PROXIMA study

Background

Data on the prevalence of perennial versus seasonal allergic asthma in Italy are lacking; moreover, there is limited evidence on the effect of omalizumab on patient-reported outcomes in Italian patients with severe allergic asthma. PROXIMA, an observational, multicenter study, was designed to assess the prevalence of perennial versus seasonal allergic asthma (cross-sectional phase) and the effect of omalizumab on improving illness perception, quality of life (QoL) and asthma control of Italian patients with severe allergic asthma (longitudinal phase).

Methods

The study included a cross-sectional phase (n = 357) and a longitudinal phase (n = 123): during the longitudinal phase, patients received omalizumab (75–600 mg subcutaneously every month) and were followed-up for 12 months. The primary parameter of cross-sectional phase was prevalence of perennial allergic asthma and that of longitudinal phase was proportion of patients with asthma control (assessed using asthma control questionnaire [ACQ]). Secondary parameters assessed were patients’ disease perception, level of asthma control, exacerbation rate during both cross-sectional and longitudinal phases, and patients' compliance to and persistence with omalizumab, and patients' QoL during the longitudinal phase.

Results

Most patients (95.8%) had perennial allergies; 81% had polysensitization. Of 99 patients in the per-protocol set, 95 (95.96% [95% CI: 89.98–98.89%]) achieved asthma control (ACQ < 4) at both 6 and 12 months of omalizumab treatment; ACQ score decreased after 6 and 12 months (P < 0.0001). Omalizumab treatment resulted in a significant improvement in QoL and patients’ illness perception and 87% decrease in exacerbation rate. The compliance rate with omalizumab was high (73.2%). No new safety signals were identified during treatment.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that in severe allergic asthma, omalizumab improves patient-reported outcomes such as patients’ illness perception and QoL, while confirming improvement of asthma control and exacerbation rate reduction in Italian patients.

Real-world safety and efficacy of omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma: A long-term post-marketing study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) is an approved add-on therapy for Japanese patients with severe allergic asthma. As directed by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Japan, a post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study on omalizumab was conducted between 2009 and 2017.

METHODS

The PMS observed safety and efficacy of omalizumab in patients treated with open-label omalizumab for 52 weeks (with optional 2-year extension period). Primary safety outcomes included incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Primary efficacy outcomes included physician-assessed global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE). Asthma-exacerbation-related events including requirement for additional systemic steroid therapy, hospitalization, emergency room visits, unscheduled doctor visits, and absenteeism were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 3893 patients registered, 3620 (age [mean ± SD] 59.3 ± 16.11 years) were evaluated for 52 weeks; 44.12% were aged ≥65 years and 64.45% were women. Overall, 32.24% reported AEs and 15.30% reported serious AEs. ADRs were seen in 292 (8.07%) patients. GETE results showed that the majority of patients experienced clinical improvements (58.29% at 16 weeks and 62.40% at 52 weeks). Nearly half of all patients (47.96%) were free from asthma exacerbations after therapy. Omalizumab also reduced all events related to asthma exacerbations. No specific ADRs were observed in the elderly population.

CONCLUSIONS

This post-marketing study confirmed the clinically meaningful benefits of omalizumab in a majority of patients from Japan, and showed safety and efficacy in a real-life clinical setting to be consistent with previous reports.

Moving toward consensus on diagnosis and management of severe asthma in adults

Asthma is a considerable health problem with an increasing global prevalence. The burden of severe asthma is expected to notably increase in the following years. Some misleading concepts that sometimes appear in the literature can drive the physician responsible for a patient's management to make incorrect decisions. Furthermore, some of the concepts that appear in the literature and in the guidelines may not be clear to understand, follow or adapt to regional and local realities. This could again drive the physicians responsible for a patient's management to make incorrect clinical judgments. In this article, we review the definition, prevalence and immunopathology of severe asthma, describe the asthma phenotypes, clinical features and comorbidities, the diagnosis of severe asthma and personalized asthma treatment. At the end, we offer a treatment approach based on literature publications, personalized medicine and marketed biologic treatment options.

Evidence in immunotherapy for paediatric respiratory allergy: Advances and recommendations

Allergic respiratory diseases are major health problems in paediatric population due their high level of prevalence and chronicity, and to their relevance in the costs and quality of life. One of the most important risk factors for the development of airway diseases in children and adolescents is atopy. The mainstays for the treatment of these diseases are avoiding allergens, controlling symptoms, and preventing them through sustained desensitization by allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT is a treatment option that consists in the administration of increasing amounts of allergens to modify the biological response to them, inducing long-term tolerance even after treatment has ended. This treatment approach has shown to decrease symptoms and improve quality of life, becoming cost effective for a large number of patients. In addition, it is considered the only treatment that can influence the natural course of the disease by targeting the cause of the allergic inflammatory response. The aim of this publication is to reflect the advances of AIT in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory diseases in children and adolescents reviewing articles published since 2000, establishing evidence categories to support the strength of the recommendations based on evidence. The first part of the article covers the prerequisite issues to understand how AIT is effective, such as the correct etiologic and clinical diagnosis of allergic respiratory diseases. Following this, the article outlines the advancements in understanding the mechanisms by which AIT achieve immune tolerance to allergens. Administration routes, treatment regimens, dose and duration, efficacy, safety, and factors associated with adherence are also reviewed. Finally, the article reviews future advances in the research of AIT.

Biologics in asthma--the next step toward personalized treatment

Asthma is a multifaceted disease and is associated with significant impairment and risk, and a therapeutic response that is highly variable. Although current treatments are usually effective for patients with mild-to-moderate disease, patients with more severe asthma are often unresponsive to current efforts, and there remains a need for agents with properties that may achieve control in these individuals. There is ongoing research to identify bioactive molecules that contribute to the pathophysiology of asthma, and many of these have been identified as potential therapeutic targets to improve control of this disease. As a consequence of these efforts, monoclonal antibodies have been developed and tested as to their effectiveness in the treatment of asthma. The assessment of these new treatments has identified particular pathways that, in selected patients, have shown benefit. The following review will discuss the current and future use of biological agents for the treatment of asthma, their efficacy, and how certain patient phenotypes and endotypes may be associated with biomarkers that may be used to select treatments to achieve greatest effectiveness of their use. As knowledge of the effects of these biological agents in asthma emerges, as well as the patients in whom they are most beneficial, the movement toward personalized treatment will follow.

New insights into the treatment of severe asthma in children

Severe asthma accounts for 0.5% of the general paediatric population and 4.5% of children with asthma, representing the major burden of asthma-health-care-associated costs. After ensuring a diagnosis of asthma and excluding difficult-to-treat patients with co-morbidities and non-adherence profiles, there remains children with real therapy-resistant asthma for whom the recommendations are to treat beyond guidelines. We describe new insights into the treatment of severe asthma in children, regarding both "classic drugs" (corticosteroids, bronchodilators) and innovative biological therapies targeting airway inflammation and impaired innate immunity. All of these new avenues remain to be studied and validated in children and will require fine clinical and biological phenotyping.

Infection-related asthma

The role of infection in asthma is varied in that it may exacerbate established asthma or contribute to the initial development of the clinical onset of asthma. Mounting evidence implicates both roles with particular viral pathogens, namely human rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus, among the most likely culprits in asthma inception. Once asthma is present, infection, particularly viral infection, is a common precipitant of asthma exacerbations. Bacterial infections and colonization also have been associated with exacerbation and recurrent wheeze, an effect that may be independent or a cofactor with viruses. Atypical bacterial infections such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae and fungi in the case of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, also play a potential role in inducing and exacerbating this disease. In addition, certain individuals may have a genetic predisposition toward viral-induced wheezing and the development of asthma. This article will discuss host and environmental factors, common pathogens, clinical characteristic, and genetic influences associated with infection-related asthma.

Omalizumab in patients with allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma and IgE/bodyweight combinations above those in the initially approved dosing table

BACKGROUND

When first approved in the European Union (EU), the omalizumab dosing table had upper bodyweight and IgE limits of 150 kg and 700 IU/mL, respectively. In this study, we assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of omalizumab in patients with IgE/bodyweight combinations above those in the original dosing table.

METHODS

A multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study assessed the safety, PK and PD of omalizumab in 32 patients with mild-to-moderate allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma. Patients received two subcutaneous injections of omalizumab at one of three dosage levels (450, 525, or 600 mg), chosen according to baseline IgE (300-2000 IU/mL) and bodyweight (40-150 kg), with a 14-day interval between injections.

RESULTS

Overall, 69 adverse events (AEs), none of them serious, were reported by 26 (81.3%) patients. Analysis of laboratory measurements, vital signs and ECG data revealed no adverse findings of clinical relevance. The PK profile was consistent with previous data for lower doses. Mean maximum decrease of free IgE from screening was ≥99% for all three doses, and mean free IgE concentrations remained <25 ng/mL for at least 2 weeks after the second dose. The reductions in free IgE were consistent with levels previously associated with clinical improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and PK/PD findings from this study are consistent with previous data, and supported the extension of the omalizumab dosing table to include those patients with higher IgE/bodyweight combinations. Clinical trial registry and registration number: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00546143).

Omalizumab protects against allergen- induced bronchoconstriction in allergic (immunoglobulin E-mediated) asthma

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab has been shown to suppress responses to inhaled allergens in allergic asthma patients with pretreatment immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≤700 IU/ml. To extend current dosing tables, we evaluated the potential of high omalizumab doses to block allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with higher IgE levels.

METHODS

Asthmatic adults (18-65 years; body weight 40-150 kg) were divided into groups according to screening IgE (group 1: 30-300 IU/ml; group 2: 700-2,000 IU/ml) and randomized 2:1 to omalizumab/placebo every 2 or 4 weeks for 12-14 weeks. Allergen bronchoprovocation (ABP) testing was performed before treatment and at weeks 8 and 16. The primary efficacy endpoint, the early-phase allergic response (EAR), was defined as the maximum percentage drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 s during the first 30 min after ABP. Serum free IgE was determined as a pharmacodynamic endpoint, and the exhaled fractional concentration of nitric oxide (FE(NO)) was an exploratory endpoint.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the study. Omalizumab improved EAR; at week 8, EAR was 23.1% for placebo, 9.3% in group 1 (p = 0.018 versus placebo) and 5.6% in group 2 (p < 0.001). At week 16, EAR was 20%, 11.8% (p = 0.087) and 5.1% (p < 0.001), respectively. Free IgE decreased in groups 1 and 2 and remained <50 ng/ml in all patients during weeks 6-16. Omalizumab completely suppressed FE(NO) increases after ABP in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Omalizumab blocked early asthmatic responses over a broad range of IgE/body weight combinations. Extending the dosing tables enables omalizumab to benefit a wider range of patients.

Key findings and clinical implications from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study

Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma are an understudied population but account for considerable asthma morbidity, mortality, and costs. The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study was a large, 3-year, multicenter, observational cohort study of 4756 patients (n=3489 adults ≥ 18 years of age, n=497 adolescents 13-17 years of age, and n=770 children 6-12 years of age) with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. TENOR's primary objective was to characterize the natural history of disease in this cohort. Data assessed semiannually and annually included demographics, medical history, comorbidities, asthma control, asthma-related health care use, medication use, lung function, IgE levels, self-reported asthma triggers, and asthma-related quality of life. We highlight the key findings and clinical implications from more than 25 peer-reviewed TENOR publications. Regardless of age, patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma demonstrated high rates of health care use and substantial asthma burden despite receiving multiple long-term controller medications. Recent exacerbation history was the strongest predictor of future asthma exacerbations. Uncontrolled asthma, as defined by the 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines' impairment domain, was highly prevalent and predictive of future asthma exacerbations; this assessment can be used to identify high-risk patients. IgE and allergen sensitization played a role in the majority of severe or difficult-to-treat asthmatic patients.

Update on optimal use of omalizumab in management of asthma

Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody recently approved for the treatment of severe allergic asthma. This drug inhibits allergic responses by binding to serum IgE, thus preventing interaction with cellular IgE receptors. Omalizumab is also capable of downregulating the expression of high affinity IgE receptors on inflammatory cells, as well as the numbers of eosinophils in both blood and induced sputum. The clinical effects of omalizumab include improvements in respiratory symptoms and quality of life, paralleled by a reduction of asthma exacerbations, emergency room visits, and use of systemic corticosteroids and rescue bronchodilators. Omalizumab is relatively well-tolerated, and only rarely induces anaphylactic reactions. Therefore, this drug represents a valid option as add-on therapy for patients with severe persistent allergic asthma inadequately controlled by high doses of standard inhaled treatments.

Clinical and immunological determinants of severe/refractory asthma (SRA): association with Staphylococcal superantigen-specific IgE antibodies

BACKGROUND

Demographic and immunological determinants of severe refractory asthma (SRA) are not well characterized. Because Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins with superantigenic activity have been associated with upper and lower airway inflammation, we aimed to evaluate the association of sensitization to Staphylococcal enterotoxins with asthma severity and various asthma phenotypes.

METHODS

The study included 109 patients with SRA diagnosed according to the American Thoracic Society Workshop 2000, and 101 patients with nonsevere asthma, followed for at least 12 months. Specific IgE to Staphylococcus enterotoxins and total IgE and eosinophil cationic protein concentrations were measured in serum with immunoassays.

FINDINGS

A significant risk for severe asthma was associated with female gender [Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.04], history of wheezing in childhood (OR = 2.47), presence of hypersensitivity to aspirin (OR = 1.96) and with body mass index (OR = 3.08). The mean level of enterotoxin-specific IgE was 3-fold higher in patients with severe asthma when compared to patients with nonsevere asthma (P = 0.01). Serum-specific IgE to enterotoxins was significantly associated with low respiratory function parameters (FEV₁, FEV₁/FVC and MEF 25/75) and increased airway reversibility in response to albuterol. The presence of specific IgE to enterotoxin carried a significant risk for patients to have serum total IgE level above 100 kU/l (OR = 7.84).

INTERPRETATION

Specific immunological response to enterotoxins is associated with clinical and immunological parameters of asthma severity, suggesting a role for Staphylococcal enterotoxins in the asthma pathogenesis.

Modeling the effects of omalizumab over 5 years among patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma

OBJECTIVE

Omalizumab is a monoclonal antibody indicated for adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma whose symptoms are inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. Omalizumab has been demonstrated to improve health outcomes of asthmatic patients as compared to placebo. However, to date, the trials conducted have been relatively short (less than 1 year) and have been restricted to a limited set of patients who met the clinical study criteria. This study examined the expected effects of omalizumab over 5 years on a representative sample of all patients eligible for omalizumab in the US.

METHODS

The Archimedes Asthma Model was used to simulate the following treatment scenarios for US patients age 12 and older with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma: (1) Current asthma treatment (CAT) (treatment according to National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines, without use of omalizumab, and with adherence levels as observed in the National Asthma Survey); (2) Guideline asthma treatment (GAT) without omalizumab (NHLBI guidelines without use of omalizumab, assuming perfect adherence); (3) GAT plus omalizumab; and (4) GAT plus omalizumab with steroid reduction. The simulation was run for 5 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptom days, asthma exacerbations, emergency room/urgent care (ER/UC) visits, hospitalizations, and medication use.

RESULTS

For the full simulated population of omalizumab-eligible patients, the simulation forecasted that omalizumab would decrease cumulative exacerbations by 30%, ER/UC visits by 37%, and hospitalizations by 38% over 5 years. Among responders to omalizumab, assuming that 60.5% of patients respond, the results suggest that omalizumab would decrease cumulative exacerbations by 50%, ER/UC visits by 62%, and hospitalizations by 63% over 5 years. In addition, the simulation predicted that omalizumab would allow 45% of patients who are taking more than the minimum steroid dose to reduce their steroid dose, while maintaining similar asthma control as achieved in the GAT plus omalizumab arm (no steroid dose reduction) and better asthma control than following treatment protocols that do not include omalizumab.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this simulation, omalizumab is effective for those who respond, reducing serious events by more than 50% among the responder group, while also allowing many patients to reduce their steroid dose.

Are chronic urticaria, analgesic intolerance and seasonal rhinitis markers of different severities and phenotypes of the asthma they accompany?

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease that presents with different clinical phenotypes. We aimed to compare the patients with asthma diagnosis alone with the patients, who, in addition to their asthma had accompanying analgesic intolerance (AI), chronic urticaria (CU) or seasonal rhinitis (SR) if there are any distinctions and specific characteristics of these defined patient groups.

METHODS

Eighty-four asthma patients diagnosed with SR, 46 with CU, 75 with AI and 71 patients with asthma alone were enrolled to the study retrospectively. The reference group for the comparisons was the group with asthma diagnosis alone.

RESULTS

The mean age of all patients was 37.2±13 (15-80) and 70.7% of them were females. Asthma patients with SR had a significantly earlier onset of asthma (age: 27.4±10.8 and 34.5±15.9; respectively, p<0.01), significantly better pulmonary function tests and were significantly more atopic (92.9% and 28.8%; p<0.001). Moderate-to-severe asthma significantly correlated with older age at the time of diagnosis, older age of asthma onset, higher body mass index, less atopy and fewer pollen sensitivity. Asthma severity of patients with SR was significantly milder than the reference group (OR: 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.8). Asthma with AI tended to be more severe although the relation was insignificant (OR:1.6 95% CI:0.8-3.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma patients with SR have significantly milder and earlier onset of asthma, better pulmonary function tests and are significantly more atopic while asthma with AI tends to be more severe. Asthma with CU does not show a specific phenotypic characteristic.

Relationship between pretreatment specific IgE and the response to omalizumab therapy

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, has proven efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe persistent allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma. While previous analyses have had some limited success in predicting which patients will gain greatest benefit based on pretreatment baseline characteristics, it remains important to try to improve this predictability.

METHODS

Following a run-in phase, patients (12-75 years) inadequately controlled despite current therapy were randomized to receive omalizumab or placebo for 28 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study (INNOVATE). Univariate analyses were performed to assess whether pretreatment specific IgE serum levels and related variables could be identified that were predictive of a response to omalizumab patients (n = 337) enrolled in INNOVATE. Response was measured via variables including exacerbations, QoL, FEV(1) and physicians' overall assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients (90.5%) were sensitive to more than one allergen and the majority of patients were positive to D1 Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D2 Dermatophagoides farinae. Patients with relatively high values of D1 or D2, but with these making a relatively low contribution to total specific IgE load, appeared to attain most benefit from omalizumab. However, no consistent predictive effect for omalizumab response was observed either for total specific IgE or levels of IgEs specific for individual allergens.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, pretreatment allergen-specific IgE levels do not provide any better prediction of response to treatment as compared with pretreatment total IgE. At present, the most reliable method of identifying patients who respond to omalizumab treatment remains a physician's assessment.

Omalizumab in the treatment of severe asthma: efficacy and current problems

Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody recently approved for the treatment of severe allergic asthma. This drug inhibits allergic responses by binding to serum IgE, thus preventing their interactions with cellular IgE receptors. Omalizumab is also capable of downregulating the expression of high-affinity IgE receptors on inflammatory cells, as well as the numbers of eosinophils in both blood and induced sputum. The clinical effects of omalizumab include relevant improvements in respiratory symptoms and quality of life, paralleled by a marked reduction of asthma exacerbations, emergency room visits, and use of systemic corticosteroids and rescue bronchodilators. Omalizumab is relatively well tolerated, and only rarely induces anaphylactic reactions. Therefore, this drug represents a valid option as add-on therapy for patients with severe persistent allergic asthma, inadequately controlled by high doses of standard inhaled treatments.

Racial disparities in asthma-related health outcomes in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND

The underlying reasons for racial disparities in asthma morbidity are not well understood. Multivariate epidemiologic studies evaluating the presence and extent of racial differences in a large cohort of adults with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze an extensive array of clinical and patient-reported outcomes, using multivariate analysis with a sequential approach, to explain racial differences in asthma-related outcomes in one of the largest cohorts of difficult-to-treat asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Black and white patients (> or = 18-years-old at baseline) were included (n = 2,128). Differences between the 2 racial groups were assessed using several outcome measures at month 12. Assessments were adjusted for confounding variables using a sequence of statistical models.

RESULTS

Most patients were white (88.6%). Blacks were slightly younger, less educated, and more likely to live in urban areas than whites. Blacks were more likely to have severe asthma and to be treated with 3 or more long-term controllers. Poorer quality of life, more asthma control problems, and higher risk of emergency department visits were observed in blacks compared with whites; differences were not explained by adjustment for broad sets of confounding variables. Differences in asthma-related health outcomes remained statistically significant after adjusting for asthma severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma is a serious health problem in blacks and is not explained by differences in demographics, severity, or other health conditions.

Asthma: a syndrome composed of heterogeneous diseases

OBJECTIVE

To review the concept that asthma comprises distinct heterogeneous inflammatory disorders characterized by patients showing different phenotypes with distinct genetic components, environmental causes, and immunopathologic signa-

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed databases from 1950 to the present time were searched for relevant articles and references regarding the heterogeneity of asthma.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles that described the various phenotypes of asthma were used for this review.

RESULTS

Asthma is unlikely to be a single disease but rather a series of complex, overlapping individual diseases or phenotypes, each defined by its unique interaction between genetic and environmental factors. These conditions include syndromes characterized by allergen-exacerbated, nonallergic, and aspirin-exacerbated factors along with syndromes best distinguished by their pathologic findings (eosinophilic, neutrophilic, pauci-granulocytic), response to therapy (corticosteroid resistant), and natural history (remodeling prone). Additional phenotypes will almost certainly be identified as advances in genetics and other profiling methods are made and will be accompanied by the availability of clear biomarkers for distinguishing among them.

CONCLUSIONS

Responses to asthma medications vary considerably among patients, likely reflecting, at least in part, the differing sensitivities of the various asthma phenotypes. Selecting the best possible treatment course in individual patients will be aided by clearly identifying the different phenotypes. Physicians need to recognize this when making decisions to adjust treatment to improve asthma control.

Subspecialty differences in asthma characteristics and management

OBJECTIVE

To determine the nature and extent to which asthma characteristics and management differ between allergy and pulmonary subspecialists.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used baseline data from 3342 adults enrolled in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study, a multicenter, observational cohort recruited from subspecialty practices across the United States. Information on physician subspecialty, asthma history, allergic status, lung function, medication use, and recent health care use was collected from January 1, 2001, through April 30, 2004, via study coordinator-administered interviews and self-administered validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

In the TENOR study, 2407 patients (72%) were treated by allergists and 935 (28%) by pulmonologists. Patients treated by pulmonologists were more likely to be black, be less educated, and have lower incomes than those treated by allergists. Pulmonary patients had more severe asthma as indicated by physician assessment, Global Initiative for Asthma classification, lung function, and number of asthma control problems. Regular use of a short-acting beta-agonist and systemic corticosteroid use were also higher among pulmonologist-treated patients than allergist-treated patients, consistent with greater asthma severity. Although evidence of allergic disease was prevalent in both types of patients, those treated by an allergist were more likely to receive skin testing or immunotherapy. In multivariate analyses adjusted for demographic differences, patients treated by pulmonologists were more likely to report health care use for asthma in the past 3 months.

CONCLUSION

In general, asthma patients treated by pulmonologists have lower socioeconomic status, have more severe disease, require more medication, and report greater health care use than those treated by allergists.

Aeroallergen sensitization correlates with PC(20) and exhaled nitric oxide in subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma

BACKGROUND

Aeroallergen sensitization in adult asthmatic patients from a wide geographic area has not been correlated with patients' characteristics, markers of airways inflammation, and lung function.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed data obtained from the Asthma Clinical Research Network trials to determine the relationship of aeroallergen sensitization to age, sex, ethnicity, and markers of inflammation and airways function.

METHODS

Skin testing (14 epicutaneous) was performed on 1338 subjects with objectively diagnosed mild-to-moderate asthma from 11 Asthma Clinical Research Network studies. Skin testing used identical techniques and a quality assurance program to ensure uniformity across centers.

RESULTS

Ninety-five percent of the subjects had at least 1 positive skin test response. Of these, 14% had positive reactions to 1 or 2 allergens and 81% had positive reactions to 3 or more allergens, and 2% of subjects reacted only to seasonal allergens, 26% only to perennial allergens, and 67% to both. Increasing IgE and exhaled nitric oxide values, decreasing PC(20) values, and minority ethnicity significantly correlated with the number of positive skin test responses. Subjects with late-onset asthma were less likely to be sensitized; nonetheless, 89% of subjects older than 60 years had positive responses.

CONCLUSION

Ninety-five percent of patients with mild-to-moderate asthma might have an allergic component. Age does not significantly affect aeroallergen sensitization, but the pattern of allergic sensitization varies with ethnicity and geography. Measures used to characterize asthma, such as IgE, exhaled nitric oxide, and PC(20) values, are correlated with aeroallergen sensitization.