1
|
Moreira MDF, Gamboa OL, Pinho Oliveira MA. Cognitive-affective changes mediate the mindfulness-based intervention effect on endometriosis-related pain and mental health: A path analysis approach. Eur J Pain 2023; 27:1187-1202. [PMID: 37365715 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is poor knowledge about the therapeutic mechanisms of the conservative interventions for endometriosis. We hypothesized that the effects of a brief mindfulness-based intervention (bMBI) on pelvic pain intensity (PPI), pain unpleasantness (PU) and quality of life mental health (QoL-MH) are mediated by direct and indirect paths of changes in pain catastrophizing (PC), positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). METHODS A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of women with endometriosis, assigned to standard medical treatment (n = 32) and standard medical treatment plus bMBI (n = 31). We tested a series of parallel and serial mediators (PC, PA and NA) of the relationship between bMBI and outcomes (PPI, PU and QoL-MH). RESULTS The bMBI group demonstrated improvement in PA (Cohen's f2 = 0.12 [0.01, 0.36]), decreases in NA (Cohen's f2 = 0.06 [0.00, 0.24]) and PC (Cohen's f2 = 0.16 [0.02, 0.42]). The PC reduction mediated the effect of the bMBI on PPI and PU directly; however, the PC effect through PA increase mediated the PU marginally but not PPI changes. bMBI effect on Qol-MH was mediated directly by PA and NA. The PC improved Qol-MH through PA increase and Pain decrease but not via NA. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that bMBI impacts pain through changes in pain-related cognitive-affective factors. bMBI can improve QoL-MH by multiple pathways, including but not limited to pain reduction, highlighting the independent potential of improvement in affect to restore mental health in endometriosis. SIGNIFICANCE Brief mindfulness-based intervention improves endometriosis pain through pain-related cognitive-affective factors and quality of life mental health via pain and affect changes unrelated to pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Olga Lucia Gamboa
- EQness, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Psychology, A19 - Griffith Taylor Building, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gerhart J, Ramos K, Porter LS, Ravyts S, Malhotra S, Mossman B, Eaton England A, Alonzi S, Peyser T, Kim S, O'Mahony S, Burns JW, Hoerger M. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Behavioral Pain Management for Persistent Pain. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:992-998. [PMID: 36706441 PMCID: PMC10398738 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Seriously ill patients often experience persistent pain. As a part of a comprehensive repertoire of pain interventions, palliative care clinicians can help by using behavioral pain management. Behavioral pain management refers to evidence-based psychosocial interventions to reduce pain intensity and enhance functional outcomes and quality of life. Conceptualized using the biopsychosocial model, techniques involve promoting helpful behaviors (e.g., activity pacing, stretching, and relaxation exercises) and modifying underlying patterns of thinking, feeling, and communicating that can exacerbate pain. The authors have expertise in pain management, clinical health psychology, geropsychology, behavioral science, and palliative medicine. The article reviews the current evidence for behavioral interventions for persistent pain and provides 10 recommendations for behavioral pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Gerhart
- Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA
| | - Katherine Ramos
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura S. Porter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Scott Ravyts
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sonia Malhotra
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Medicine, University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Brenna Mossman
- Department of Psychology and Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Ashley Eaton England
- Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA
| | - Sarah Alonzi
- Department of Psychology, University of California—Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tristen Peyser
- Department of Psychology and Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Seowoo Kim
- Department of Psychology and Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Sean O'Mahony
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John W. Burns
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Hoerger
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Medicine, University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Department of Psychology and Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruano A, García-Torres F, Gálvez-Lara M, Moriana JA. Psychological and Non-Pharmacologic Treatments for Pain in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e505-e520. [PMID: 34952171 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Pain is the most fearful symptom in cancer. Although there is a relationship between psychosocial variables and oncologic pain, psychological and non-pharmacological treatments for pain management in cancer patients are not very widespread. OBJECTIVES To analyze the efficacy of psychological and non-pharmacological treatments for reducing pain in cancer patients. METHODS We performed a systematic review following the PRISMA protocol. In January 2021, data were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, including randomised controlled trials (RCT) published in the last five years (from 28 January, 2015 to December 15, 2020), in the English language and whose sample was patients with cancer pain. The database search used the following keywords: cancer, cancer-related pain, psychological intervention, non-pharmacologic intervention. The Cochrane risk of bias assess ment for randomised trials (RoB 2) was used for quality appraisal. RESULTS After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, ten papers were fully screened. The evidence suggested that the most effective interventions to reduce cancer pain were mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, guided imagery and progressive muscle relaxation and emotional and symptom focused engagement (EASE). Music therapy and brief cognitive behavioral strategies (CBS) require more research, while coping skills training and yoga did not show positive effects. Overall, we obtained a moderate size effect (d = 0.642, 95% CI: 0.125-1.158) favourable to psychological and non-pharmacologic treatments at post-treatment, which increased at follow-up (k = 5, d = 0.826, 95% CI: 0.141-1.511). CONCLUSION This study provides insight into psychological interventions which might be applied and contribute to cancer-related pain reduction in adults. Although the results are not completely consistent, they may shed light on psychology applications in the oncology environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Ruano
- Department of Psychology, University of Cordoba (A.R., F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain
| | - Francisco García-Torres
- Department of Psychology, University of Cordoba (A.R., F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain; Maimonides Institute for Research in Biomedicine of Cordoba (IMIBIC) (F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain; Reina Sofia University Hospital (F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain.
| | - Mario Gálvez-Lara
- Department of Psychology, University of Cordoba (A.R., F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain; Maimonides Institute for Research in Biomedicine of Cordoba (IMIBIC) (F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain; Reina Sofia University Hospital (F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain
| | - Juan A Moriana
- Department of Psychology, University of Cordoba (A.R., F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain; Maimonides Institute for Research in Biomedicine of Cordoba (IMIBIC) (F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain; Reina Sofia University Hospital (F.G.-T., M.G.-L., J.A.M.), Cordoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Effects of Mindfulness-Based Therapy for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2022; 29:432-445. [DOI: 10.1007/s10880-022-09862-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Charbonneau-Lefebvre V, Vaillancourt-Morel MP, Rosen NO, Steben M, Bergeron S. Attachment and Childhood Maltreatment as Moderators of Treatment Outcome in a Randomized Clinical Trial for Provoked Vestibulodynia. J Sex Med 2022; 19:479-495. [PMID: 35090839 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although distal developmental factors, such as attachment and childhood maltreatment (CM), are associated with the occurrence, severity, and adjustment to provoked vestibulodynia (PVD)-the most prevalent form of vulvodynia-no studies to date have examined whether these variables are related to treatment efficacy in the context of PVD. Attachment and CM may act as moderating variables when examining different treatment modalities, whereby individuals with more insecure attachment orientations (anxiety/avoidance) or a history of CM may benefit less from treatments with higher interpersonal contexts, such as sex and couple therapy-a recommended treatment for PVD. AIM The present randomized clinical trial (RCT) examined attachment and CM as predictors and moderators of sexual satisfaction, distress, and function at post-treatment and 6-month follow-up while comparing 2 treatments for PVD: Topical lidocaine, and a novel cognitive behavioral couple therapy focused on women's pain and partners' sexuality. METHODS One hundred eight women with PVD were randomized to a 12-week treatment of either lidocaine or couple therapy. Women completed questionnaires at pretreatment, post-treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. OUTCOMES (1) Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction; (2) Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised; (3) Female Sexual Function Index. RESULTS Both attachment and CM were significant moderators of treatment outcomes. At either post-treatment or 6-month follow-up, in the couple therapy condition, women with greater attachment avoidance had poorer outcomes on sexual distress, satisfaction and function, whereas women with higher levels of CM had poorer outcomes on sexual satisfaction and sexual function, compared to women in the lidocaine condition. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Although these novel findings need further replication, they highlight the importance for clinicians to take into account distal factors, for instance, attachment and CM, when treating sexual difficulties such as PVD, as these variables may affect more interpersonal dimensions of treatment (eg, trust, compliance, etc.) and ultimately, treatment progress. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS Using a rigorous RCT study design and statistical approach, this study is the first to examine attachment and CM as moderators in the treatment of sexual difficulties. It is however limited by the use of self-report measures, and further studies are necessary to validate the generalizability of current results to other sexual difficulties. CONCLUSION Findings support the role of interpersonal factors in the treatment of PVD and indicate that short-term psychological interventions, such as couple therapy, may be less beneficial for women with antecedents of CM and attachment insecurity. V Charbonneau-Lefebvre, M-P Vaillancourt-Morel, NO Rosen, et al. Attachment and Childhood Maltreatment as Moderators of Treatment Outcome in a Randomized Clinical Trial for Provoked Vestibulodynia. J Sex Med 2022;19:479-495.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Natalie O Rosen
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Marc Steben
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Groupe de médecine familiale La Cité du Parc Lafontaine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sophie Bergeron
- Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lognos B, Glondu-Lassis M, Senesse P, Gutowski M, Jacot W, Lemanski C, Amouyal M, Azria D, Guerdoux E, Bourgier C. [Non-pharmalogical interventions and breast cancer: What benefit in addition to radiotherapy?]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:637-645. [PMID: 34756691 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant radiotherapy is one of the major anticancer treatments in early breast cancer patients. Acute and late radio-induced effects may occur during or after breast cancer radiotherapy, and their medical management is a major issue for radiation oncologists. Here, the present review of literature embraces complementary non-pharmacological interventions, which could be combined to adjuvant radiotherapy in order to improve patients care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Béatrice Lognos
- Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France; UMR UA11 Institut Desbrest d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Inserm, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Maison de santé pluriprofessionnelle universitaire Pauline Lautaud, St Georges d'Orques, Prades le Lez, Vendargues, France.
| | - Murielle Glondu-Lassis
- Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France; UMR UA11 Institut Desbrest d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Inserm, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Senesse
- Département des Soins de Support, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), France
| | - Marian Gutowski
- Département de Chirurgie, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), France
| | - William Jacot
- Département d'oncologie Médicale, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), France
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Fédération Universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, ICM, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier, rue croix verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - Michel Amouyal
- Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- Fédération Universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, ICM, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier, rue croix verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Univ Montpellier, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - Estelle Guerdoux
- UMR UA11 Institut Desbrest d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Inserm, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Département des Soins de Support, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), France
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Fédération Universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, ICM, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier, rue croix verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Univ Montpellier, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Check DK, Winger JG, Jones KA, Somers TJ. Predictors of Response to an Evidence-Based Behavioral Cancer Pain Management Intervention: An Exploratory Analysis From a Clinical Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:391-399. [PMID: 33387606 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Interventions that teach patients cognitive and behavioral strategies for managing cancer pain have demonstrated effectiveness. Systematic reviews of such interventions call for research to inform their implementation in practice, including investigations into which patients are most likely to benefit. OBJECTIVES We aimed to identify predictors of response to an evidence-based behavioral intervention for cancer pain, pain coping skills training (PCST). METHODS We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized noninferiority trial comparing in-person to videoconference-based PCST. Using modified Poisson regression, we estimated the adjusted associations of patient characteristics with clinically meaningful reductions (≥30%) in pain severity and pain interference. RESULTS Of the 178 patients who were randomized, 135 completed at least one follow-up assessment and were included in this analysis. Proportions of patients experiencing reductions in pain severity and pain interference were 34% and 46%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, education level was associated with a reduction in pain severity (adjusted relative risk, some college or technical school vs. college or higher: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.93). Patients with colorectal cancer were 61% more likely to experience a reduction in pain interference than patients with breast cancer (95% CI:1.21-2.34). Marital status was also statistically significantly associated with pain interference reduction, with married patients less likely to experience a reduction in pain interference (adjusted relative risk, married vs. not: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98). CONCLUSION Our findings elucidate several subgroups of patients who may be especially likely to benefit from PCST, informing both targeted implementation efforts and opportunities to improve delivery for diverse patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon K Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Joseph G Winger
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelley A Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tamara J Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fukui J, Bantum E, Meister M, Lim S, Marumoto AD, Pagano I. A cross-sectional study of breast pain in a diverse population of breast cancer patients. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 3:e055. [PMID: 34458852 PMCID: PMC8389166 DOI: 10.1097/or9.0000000000000055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and postoperative breast pain has been reported to be anywhere from 25% to 60%. However, there is sparse data regarding racial/ethnic differences in breast pain among breast cancer patients. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional anonymous survey of breast cancer patients from the Hawaii Cancer Consortium over a 6-week period between 2019 and 2020. The 237 breast cancer participants were ages 29 to 98, 74% Asian, and mainly from outpatient oncology clinics. We evaluated the prevalence of breast pain in a diverse group of breast cancer patients and characterized the pain using a modified short-form McGill pain questionnaire (sfMPQ). RESULTS Eighty-fourrespondents(35.4%) reported breast pain. On univariable analysis, we found significant racial/ethnic differences in the amount of breast pain, where Chinese and Japanese participants reported significantly less pain compared to White participants on a 10-point pain scale. We found differences in breast pain according to age and endocrine therapy use as well as survey location, however, no differences were seen according to chemotherapy, radiation, or breast surgery. Based on the sfMPQ, the most common descriptors of breast pain were sensory (throbbing, shooting, and stabbing) compared to affective (tiring-exhausting, sickening, fearful, and punishing-cruel) characteristics. Although they were described as mild and intermittent, in women with breast pain, 33.4% reported the breast pain affected their sleep, 16.7% their work, and 15.4% their sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS Breast pain is a significant problem in our breast cancer community. This survey assessment has informed our understanding of breast pain in our diverse population. In turn, we are developing culturally appropriate pain management strategies to treat this challenging symptom common in breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jami Fukui
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Erin Bantum
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Madison Meister
- University of Louisville 2310S. Third Street, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| | - Shannon Lim
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | | | - Ian Pagano
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Predictors and moderators of outcomes in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy intervention for early breast cancer patients. Palliat Support Care 2021; 20:159-166. [PMID: 34158140 DOI: 10.1017/s147895152100078x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To deliver mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) efficiently, the present study aimed (1) to identify predictors and moderators of patients who benefit from MBCT for psychological distress and (2) to explore the initial treatment reaction to identify the optimal number of sessions that produce a significant clinical effect. METHODS This is the secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of MBCT for breast cancer patients (N = 74). We classified the participants into remitters vs. non-remitters, and responder vs. non-responders, according to the total score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at the end of the intervention. We conducted multivariate analyses to explore for predictors of response and remission. We adopted generalized estimating equations to explore the optimal number of sessions. RESULTS Sociodemographic and clinical backgrounds did not have significant influence on the treatment outcomes of the MBCT. Better program adherence, which was represented as the participants' better attendance to the MBCT program, was a significant predictor of both remission and response [odds ratio (OR) = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.89, p = 0.003, and OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.12-2.65, p = 0.013, respectively]. It was not until seventh session that the remission rate exceeded 50% and the response rate showed significance. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics did not significantly influence the treatment outcomes, while homework minutes and class attendance had significant effects on treatment outcomes. This implies that MBCT is recommended to any cancer patient, if he/she is motivated to the program, regardless of their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Patients are encouraged to attend a standard MBCT program (eight sessions) and do the assigned homework as intensely as possible. Further studies with larger sample and objective measurements are desired.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ngamkham S, Yang JJ, Smith EL. Thai Buddhism-Based Mindfulness for Pain Management in Thai Outpatients with Cancer: A Pilot Study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2021; 8:58-67. [PMID: 33426191 PMCID: PMC7785079 DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_43_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate Thai Buddhism-based Mindfulness (TBbM) feasibility based on recruitment and retention rates and to obtain preliminary data regarding changes (effect sizes) in pain severity and other outcomes when comparing control to intervention participants following TBbM use. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Outpatient Department at Sawanpracharak Hospital, Thailand, from April 2018 to February 2019. Seventeen participants completed the pretest and posttest. Both groups (control group [n = 10] and intervention group [n = 7]) received usual care and watched a 25-min educational video about cancer pain. The intervention group participated in a 3-day mindfulness training program at a Buddhist temple and continued practicing at home for 8 weeks. Data were collected at baseline and at 1 and 2 months postintervention. RESULTS One-hundred and thirty-five participants met the eligibility criteria; 112 (82%) declined to participate and 6 of 23 (26%) were lost to follow-up/dropped out. Control and intervention participants had an average age of 44 (± 8.77) and 56 years (± 7.41), respectively. When compared to the control group, the TBbM participants reported no statistically significant improvements in pain or other outcomes. While not statistically significant, the effect size indicated that pain did improve in the TBbM group (Cohen's d = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS Given the suboptimal recruitment and retention rates, modification of the intervention is warranted. Further, our findings suggest that the intervention had a moderate effect on pain. To evaluate efficacy, future adequately powered studies are needed to test a more feasible TBbM intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srisuda Ngamkham
- Department of Fundamental Nursing and Nursing Administration, Boromarajonani College of Nursing Sawanpracharak Nakhonsawan, Nakhonsawan, Thailand
| | - James J. Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ellen Lavoie Smith
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Referrals of Plastic Surgery Patients to Integrative Medicine Centers: A Review of Resource Utility. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 83:3-6. [PMID: 30633012 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000001761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrative medicine (IM) centers are becoming more established nationwide and provide an expansive range of therapeutic services. Given the high prevalence of IM usage among plastic surgery patients, we sought to define referrals rates to IM centers by plastic surgeons to investigate (1) the role of IM in the continuous care process of plastic surgery patients and (2) whether IM centers are being effectively utilized. METHODS Institutions with plastic surgery residency programs were identified using the American Medical Association's Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access System in January 2017. Data on the presence of a named IM center, director/administrator contact information, and types of therapeutic services offered were extracted. The total number of IM services at these centers was summed and tabulated for preliminary analyses. A survey questionnaire was sent to the center to ascertain referral patterns in February 2017. RESULTS Of 96 institutions with plastic and reconstructive surgery residency programs in North America, 49 (51%) provide IM services, and 24 (25%) have affiliated named IM centers of which we attained a survey response from 13 (54.5%). Of these centers, 10 (76.9%) evaluate more than 50 patients per week. Patient referrals to these centers were primarily from the department of medicine (73.8%) as opposed to surgery (13.1%) (P < 0.0001). An average of 0.77% of surgical referrals, or 0.077% of all referrals, arose from plastic and reconstructive surgery. CONCLUSIONS Plastic surgeons appear to infrequently refer patients to IM centers. Given the high prevalence of IM usage among our patient population, IM centers are an underutilized adjunct in the care of our patients. Further study into specific IM services that may benefit our patients would be helpful in increasing IM utilization in our field.
Collapse
|
12
|
Alexithymia in individuals with chronic pain and its relation to pain intensity, physical interference, depression, and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2020; 160:994-1006. [PMID: 31009416 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Numerous studies have examined how alexithymia (difficulty identifying and describing one's emotions and a preference for externally oriented thinking) relates to chronic pain and associated disability. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize individual studies that either assessed alexithymia in individuals with chronic pain vs controls or related alexithymia to pain intensity, physical interference, depression, and anxiety. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO from inception through June 2017; 77 studies met the criteria (valid assessment of alexithymia in adults or children with any chronic pain condition) and were included in analyses (n = 8019 individuals with chronic pain). Primary analyses indicated that chronic pain samples had significantly higher mean alexithymia scores compared with nonclinical (d = 0.81) and clinical nonpain (d = 0.55) controls. In chronic pain samples, alexithymia was significantly positively associated with pain intensity (d = 0.20), physical interference (d = 0.17), depression (d = 0.46), and anxiety (d = 0.43). Secondary meta-analyses of 14 studies that conducted partial correlations that controlled for negative affect-related measures revealed that alexithymia was no longer significantly related to pain intensity or interference. Meta-analysis findings demonstrated that alexithymia is elevated in individuals with chronic pain and related to greater pain intensity and physical interference, although the latter relationships may be accounted for by negative affect. Critical future work is needed that examines alexithymia assessed using non-self-report measures, develops a person-centered perspective on this construct, and identifies how alexithymia is relevant to the assessment and treatment of individuals with chronic pain.
Collapse
|
13
|
Psychological support for patients with cancer: evidence review and suggestions for future directions. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 12:276-292. [PMID: 30074924 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Psychological distress and mental health comorbidity are common in cancer. Various therapeutic frameworks have been used for interventions to improve psychological wellbeing and quality of life in cancer patients with mixed results. This article reviews contributions to that literature published since January 2017. RECENT FINDINGS The majority of new psychological intervention research in cancer has used cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or mindfulness-based interventions. CBT has been considered a gold-standard intervention and recent evidence justifies continuation of this. Recent reviews call into question the validity of evidence for mindfulness-based interventions. A smaller number of trials using acceptance and commitment therapy, meta-cognitive therapy, dignity therapy and coaching have emerged, and whereas findings are promising, additional fully powered trials are required. Weaker evidence exists for counselling, support-based and narrative therapy interventions. SUMMARY Efficacious, timely and acceptable psychological interventions are a necessary component of comprehensive cancer care. There is some way to go before the evidence conclusively points towards which interventions work for which cancer groups and for which specific outcomes. Methodological limitations must be addressed in future trials; at the forefront remains the need for fully powered, head-to-head comparison trials.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mindfulness-based interventions for cancer-related pain and depression: a narrative review of current evidence and future potential. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 13:81-87. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
15
|
Bovbjerg DH, Keefe FJ, Soo MS, Manculich J, Van Denburg A, Zuley ML, Ahrendt GM, Skinner CS, Edmond SN, Shelby RA. Persistent breast pain in post-surgery breast cancer survivors and women with no history of breast surgery or cancer: associations with pain catastrophizing, perceived breast cancer risk, breast cancer worry, and emotional distress. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:763-768. [PMID: 30747014 PMCID: PMC6612426 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1574023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background: Persistent breast pain (PBP) is prevalent among breast cancer survivors and has powerful negative psychological consequences. The present study provided a first test of the hypothesis that: (a) pain catastrophizing, (b) heightened perceived risk of cancer, and (c) worry that pain indicates cancer may be independent mediating links between breast cancer survivors' experiences of PBP and heightened emotional distress. Methodology: We assessed levels of PBP and psychological factors in breast cancer survivors (Survivor Group: n = 417; Stages I-IIIA; White = 88.7%; Age M = 59.4 years) at their first surveillance mammogram post-surgery (6-15 months). A comparison group of women without histories of breast surgery or cancer (Non-cancer Group: n = 587; White = 78.7%; Age M = 57.4 years) was similarly assessed at the time of a routine screening mammogram. All women completed measures of breast pain, pain catastrophizing, perceived breast cancer risk, and worry that breast pain indicates cancer, as well as measures of emotional distress (symptoms of anxiety, symptoms of depression, and mammography-specific distress). Analyses included race, age, BMI, education, and menopausal status as covariates, with significance set at 0.05. Results: As expected, PBP prevalence was significantly higher in the Survivor Group than in the Non-cancer Group (50.6% vs. 17.5%). PBP+ survivors also had significantly higher levels of emotional distress, pain catastrophizing, mammography-specific distress, and worry that breast pain indicates cancer, compared to PBP- survivors. Structural equation modeling results were significant for all hypothesized mediational pathways. Interestingly, comparisons of PBP+ to PBP- women in the Non-cancer Group showed similar results. Conclusion: These findings suggest the importance of (a) pain catastrophizing, (b) perceived breast cancer risk and, (c) worry that breast pain may indicate cancer, as potential targets for interventions aimed at reducing the negative psychological impact of PBP in post-surgery breast cancer survivors, as well as in unaffected women with PBP due to unknown reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mary S. Soo
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke University
| | | | | | | | - Gretchen M. Ahrendt
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh
- University of Colorado Hospital, University of Colorado
| | - Celette S. Skinner
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Sara N. Edmond
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke University
- VA Connecticut and the Yale School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ngamkham S, Holden JE, Smith EL. A Systematic Review: Mindfulness Intervention for Cancer-Related Pain. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2019; 6:161-169. [PMID: 30931361 PMCID: PMC6371675 DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_67_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Moderate-to-severe pain is a common problem experienced by patients with cancer. Although analgesic drugs are effective, adverse side effects are common and some analgesic drugs are addictive. Nonpharmacological treatment may be a way to treat cancer pain without causing negative side effects. Mindfulness is used as an effective nonpharmacological treatment to improve quality of life (QoL) and to address psychological problems including distress, anxiety, stress, and depression. However, the effect of mindfulness on pain severity has not been sufficiently investigated. Therefore, a systematic review was undertaken to describe the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions for pain and its underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. The search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and CINAHL and included only empirical studies published from 2008 to 2017. Search terms included mindfulness, mindfulness-based intervention, meditation, cancer, pain, and cancer-related pain. Six studies met the search criteria. These studies tested several types of intervention including mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, meditation with massage, and mindful awareness practices. Study outcomes include improved pain severity, anxiety, stress, depression, and QoL. However, most studies reviewed were conducted in the United States and Denmark. Further research is needed to test culturally appropriate mindfulness interventions to reduce pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srisuda Ngamkham
- Department of Nursing Administration and Professional Development, Boromarajonani College of Nursing Sawanpracharak Nakhonsawan, Nakhonsawan, Thailand
| | - Janean E Holden
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ellen Lavoie Smith
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wayne PM, Yeh GY, Mehta DH. Minding the Mind-Body Literature: Focusing on Women's Health and Pregnancy. J Altern Complement Med 2017; 23:655-658. [PMID: 28880571 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2017.29034.pjw] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
18
|
Holtmaat K, van der Spek N, Witte BI, Breitbart W, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Moderators of the effects of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors on personal meaning, psychological well-being, and distress. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25:3385-3393. [PMID: 28593462 PMCID: PMC5610658 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3757-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Purpose There is evidence to support that meaning-centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors (MCGP-CS) is an effective intervention for improving personal meaning and psychological well-being, as well as reducing psychological distress. In order to investigate which subpopulations MCGP-CS specifically benefits, this explorative study aims to analyze potential sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors that may moderate the effects. Methods Cancer survivors (N = 114) were randomly assigned to MCGP-CS, or care as usual (CAU). Potential moderators included age, sex, relationship, education, employment, religion, cancer type, tumor stage, cancer treatment, time since treatment, anxiety, depression, other negative life events, and previous psychological treatment. Outcome measures were the Personal Meaning Profile (PMP), Scales of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Assessment took place at baseline, post-intervention (short-term), and 3- and 6-month follow-ups (long-term). For each moderator, separate short-term and long-term linear mixed models were built. Results Short-term effect of MCGP-CS was moderated by (male) sex (on HADS-D; F(1,98) = 6.1, p = .015) and (a high level of) depressive symptoms at baseline (on SPWB; F(1,93) = 5.7, p = .019). Long-term effect of MCGP-CS was moderated by (not having received) previous psychological treatment (on HADS-total; F(3253) = 3.4, p = .017). Conclusions Most sociodemographic and clinical characteristics do not appear to moderate the positive effect of MCGP-CS on personal meaning. However, MCGP-CS appears to reduce depressive symptoms, particularly in males, and to improve purpose in life of survivors with depressive symptoms. In the long-term, MCGP-CS appears to reduce psychological distress in survivors who had not received psychological treatment in the past year. Trial registration: NTR3571
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Holtmaat
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia van der Spek
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,IDC Center for Psycho-Oncology Care, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit I Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William Breitbart
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Survivorship, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|