Presenting features and outcomes of cranial-limited and large-vessel giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study

Clinical features, imaging use, and management in giant cell arteritis: a retrospective single-center study

This study examines the characteristics of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), the utilization of imaging in GCA diagnosis, and variations in GCA management among specialties. Subjects were identified from the Dallas VAMC database spanning 2010 to 2021 using ICD-9/10 codes for GCA and polymyalgia rheumatica, and a list of temporal artery biopsies (TAB). Patients lacking sufficient data to meet the ACR 1990 classification criteria for GCA were excluded. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Among 209 identified patients, 41 were excluded due to insufficient data for ACR classification. The cohort comprised 91.9% males with a median age of 69. Of the remaining 168 patients, 42 received a final diagnosis of GCA, and 15 of these were confirmed with a positive TAB. The most reported initial symptoms were visual disturbances (75.5%) and headaches (67.7%). Ophthalmology was the initial physician for 46% of patients. GCA correlated with co-existing autoimmune diseases, glucocorticoid-sparing treatments, and consultation with a rheumatologist (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in clinical features or management of the positive and negative TAB GCA groups. GCA presents with heterogeneous symptoms making diagnosis challenging. Scalp tenderness and headaches were significantly higher in GCA patients, but sub-group analysis revealed no significant differences among GCA patients. Vascular assessments and adjunct imaging modalities are underutilized. The establishment of multidisciplinary or fast-track clinics may enhance the optimization of GCA management. Key Points • The most common presenting symptoms were blurry vision/visual loss (75.5%), headache (67.7%), and scalp tenderness (35.9%) in descending order. • In sub-group analysis, no significant differences were found between GCA sub-groups, but when compared to the non-GCA group, were found to have significantly higher rates of headache and scalp tenderness. • Compared to other specialties, rheumatologists were more likely to use advanced imaging, and to prescribe glucocorticoid-sparing treatments. • Systematic and comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary approach could improve diagnosis and management.

Vascular ultrasound as a follow-up tool in patients with giant cell arteritis: a prospective observational cohort study

Objectives

To evaluate relapses in giant cell arteritis (GCA), investigate the utility of vascular ultrasound to detect relapses, and develop and assess a composite score for GCA disease activity (GCAS) based on clinical symptoms, ultrasound imaging activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP).

Methods

Patients with GCA were prospectively followed with scheduled visits, including assessment for clinical relapse, protocol ultrasound examination, and CRP. At each visit, patients were defined as having ultrasound remission or relapse. GCAS was calculated at every visit.

Results

The study included 132 patients, with a median follow-up time of 25 months [interquartile range (IR) 21]. The clinical relapse rate was 60.6%. There were no differences in relapse rates between GCA subtypes (cranial-GCA, large vessel (LV)-GCA, and mixed-GCA) (p = 0.83). Ultrasound yielded a sensitivity of 61.2% and a specificity of 72.3% for diagnosing GCA- relapse in our cohort. In 7.7% of follow-up visits with clinical relapses, neither high CRP nor findings of ultrasound relapse were registered. In comparison, in 10.3% of follow-up visits without symptoms of clinical relapse, there were both a high CRP and findings of ultrasound relapse.

Conclusion

We found moderate sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound as a monitoring tool for relapse in this prospective cohort of GCA patients. The extent or subtype of vasculitis at the diagnosis did not influence the number of relapses. Based on a combination of clinical symptoms, elevated CRP, and ultrasound findings, a composite score for GCA activity is proposed.

The DANIsh VASculitis cohort study: protocol for a national multicenter prospective study including incident and prevalent patients with giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica

The DANIsh VASculitis cohort study, DANIVAS, is an observational national multicenter study with the overall aim to prospectively collect protocolized clinical data and biobank material from patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) diagnosed and/or followed at Danish rheumatology departments. A long-term key objective is to investigate whether the use of new clinically implemented diagnostic imaging modalities facilitates disease stratification in the GCA-PMR disease spectrum. In particular, we aim to evaluate treatment requirements in GCA patients with and without large-vessel involvement, treatment needs in PMR patients with and without subclinical giant cell arteritis, and the prognostic role of imaging with respect to aneurysm development. Hence, in GCA and PMR, imaging stratification is hypothesized to be able to guide management strategies. With an established infrastructure within rheumatology for clinical studies in Denmark, the infrastructure of the Danish Rheumatologic Biobank, and the possibility to cross-link data with valid nationwide registries, the DANIVAS project holds an exceptional possibility to collect comprehensive real-world data on diagnosis, disease severity, disease duration, treatment effect, complications, and adverse events. In this paper, we present the research protocol for the DANIVAS study. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05935709.

Cranial involvement in giant cell arteritis

Since its first clinical description in 1890, extensive research has advanced our understanding of giant cell arteritis, leading to improvements in both diagnosis and management for affected patients. Imaging studies have shown that the disease frequently extends beyond the typical cranial arteries, also affecting large vessels such as the aorta and its proximal branches. Meanwhile, advances in comprehending the underlying pathophysiology of giant cell arteritis have given rise to numerous potential therapeutic agents, which aim to minimise the need for glucocorticoid treatment and prevent flares. Classification criteria for giant cell arteritis, as well as recommendations for management, imaging, and treat-to-target have been developed or updated in the last 5 years, and current research encompasses a broad spectrum covering basic, translational, and clinical research. In this Series paper, we aim to discuss the current understanding of giant cell arteritis with cranial manifestations, describe the clinical approach to this condition, and explore future directions in research and patient care.

Large vessel giant cell arteritis

Giant cell arteritis is the principal form of systemic vasculitis affecting people over 50. Large-vessel involvement, termed large vessel giant cell arteritis, mainly affects the aorta and its branches, often occurring alongside cranial giant cell arteritis, but large vessel giant cell arteritis without cranial giant cell arteritis can also occur. Patients mostly present with constitutional symptoms, with localising large vessel giant cell arteritis symptoms present in a minority of patients only. Large vessel giant cell arteritis is usually overlooked until clinicians seek to exclude it with imaging by ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), or [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT. Although the role of imaging in treatment monitoring remains uncertain, imaging by MRA or CTA is crucial for identifying aortic aneurysm formation during patient follow up. In this Series paper, we define the large vessel subset of giant cell arteritis and summarise its clinical challenges. Furthermore, we identify areas for future research regarding the management of large vessel giant cell arteritis.

Giant cell arteritis: incidence and phenotypic distribution in Western Norway 2013-2020

Objectives

There is an increasing awareness of the spectrum of phenotypes in giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, there is sparse evidence concerning the phenotypic distribution which may be influenced by both genetic background and the environment. We established a cohort of all GCA-patients in the Bergen Health Area (Western Norway), to describe the phenotypic distribution and whether phenotypes differ with regards to incidence and clinical features.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study including all GCA-patients in the Bergen Health Area from 2013-2020. Data were collected by reviewing patient records, and patients considered clinically likely GCA were included if they fulfilled at least one set of classification criteria. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) and imaging results were used to classify the patients according to phenotype. The phenotype "cranial GCA" was used for patients with a positive TAB or halo sign on temporal artery ultrasound. "Non-cranial GCA" was used for patients with positive findings on FDG-PET/CT, MRI-, or CT angiography, or wall thickening indicative of vasculitis on ultrasound of axillary arteries. Patients with features of both these phenotypes were labeled "mixed." Patients that could not be classified due to negative or absent examination results were labeled "unclassifiable".

Results

257 patients were included. The overall incidence of GCA was 20.7 per 100,000 persons aged 50 years or older. Overall, the cranial phenotype was dominant, although more than half of the patients under 60 years of age had the non-cranial phenotype. The diagnostic delay was twice as long for patients of non-cranial and mixed phenotype compared to those of cranial phenotype. Headache was the most common clinical feature (78% of patients). Characteristic clinic features occurred less frequently in patients of non-cranial phenotype compared to cranial phenotype.

Conclusion

The overall incidence for GCA was comparable to earlier reports from this region. The cranial phenotype dominated although the non-cranial phenotype was more common in patients under 60 years of age. The diagnostic delay was longer in patients with the non-cranial versus cranial phenotype, indicating a need for examination of non-cranial arteries when suspecting GCA.

Association Between Vascular 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake at Diagnosis and Change in Aortic Dimensions in Giant Cell Arteritis : A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) who have vascular 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at diagnosis are at increased risk for thoracic aortic complications.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the association between vascular FDG uptake at diagnosis and the change in aortic dimensions.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University Hospitals Leuven.

PATIENTS

106 patients with GCA and FDG positron emission tomography (PET) imaging 3 days or less after initiation of glucocorticoids.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients had PET and computed tomography (CT) imaging at diagnosis and CT imaging yearly for a maximum of 10 years. The PET scans were scored 0 to 3 in 7 vascular areas and summed to a total vascular score (TVS). The PET scan results were positive when FDG uptake was grade 2 or greater in any large vessel. The association between vascular FDG uptake and aortic dimensions was estimated by linear mixed-effects models with random intercept and slope.

RESULTS

When compared with patients with a negative PET scan result, those with a positive scan result had a greater increase in the diameter of the ascending aorta (difference in 5-year progression, 1.58 mm [95% CI, 0.41 to 2.74 mm]), the diameter of the descending aorta (1.32 mm [CI, 0.38 to 2.26 mm]), and the volume of the thoracic aorta (20.5 cm³ [CI, 4.5 to 36.5 cm³]). These thoracic aortic dimensions were also positively associated with TVS. Patients with a positive PET scan result had a higher risk for thoracic aortic aneurysms (adjusted hazard ratio, 10.21 [CI, 1.25 to 83.3]).

LIMITATION

The lengthy inclusion and follow-up period resulted in missing data and the use of different PET machines.

CONCLUSION

Higher TVS was associated with greater yearly increase in thoracic aortic dimensions. Performing PET imaging at diagnosis may help to estimate the risk for aortic aneurysm formation.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

Imaging in diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction of large vessel vasculitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To update the evidence on imaging for diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction in large vessel vasculitis (LVV) to inform the 2023 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations on imaging in LVV.

METHODS

Systematic literature review (SLR) (2017-2022) including prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies (>20 participants) on diagnostic, monitoring, outcome prediction and technical aspects of LVV imaging. Diagnostic accuracy data were meta-analysed in combination with data from an earlier (2017) SLR.

RESULTS

The update retrieved 38 studies, giving a total of 81 studies when combined with the 2017 SLR. For giant cell arteritis (GCA), and taking clinical diagnosis as a reference standard, low risk of bias (RoB) studies yielded pooled sensitivities and specificities (95% CI) of 88% (82% to 92%) and 96% (95% CI 86% to 99%) for ultrasound (n=8 studies), 81% (95% CI 71% to 89%) and 98% (95% CI 89% to 100%) for MRI (n=3) and 76% (95% CI 67% to 83%) and 95% (95% CI 71% to 99%) for fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET, n=4), respectively. Compared with studies assessing cranial arteries only, low RoB studies with ultrasound assessing both cranial and extracranial arteries revealed a higher sensitivity (93% (95% CI 88% to 96%) vs 80% (95% CI 71% to 87%)) with comparable specificity (94% (95% CI 83% to 98%) vs 97% (95% CI 71% to 100%)). No new studies on diagnostic imaging for Takayasu arteritis (TAK) were found. Some monitoring studies in GCA or TAK reported associations of imaging with clinical signs of inflammation. No evidence was found to determine whether imaging severity might predict worse clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound, MRI and FDG-PET revealed a good performance for the diagnosis of GCA. Cranial and extracranial vascular ultrasound had a higher pooled sensitivity with similar specificity compared with limited cranial ultrasound.

Effectiveness of a two-year tapered course of tocilizumab in patients with giant cell arteritis: A single-centre prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of tocilizumab tapering and withdrawal in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

GCA patients eligible for tocilizumab were prospectively enrolled. Tocilizumab was administered weekly for the first 12 months, every-other-week for an additional 12 months, then discontinued. Relapses on tocilizumab were managed with temporary increases in systemic glucocorticoids or addition of methotrexate. Primary outcome was relapse-free survival at month 6 after tocilizumab suspension. Relapse-free survival on tocilizumab, imaging response, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

23 GCA patients were enrolled. Reasons for tocilizumab start were relapse (n = 14), persistence of activity (n = 5), or steroid-related adverse events (n = 4). At tocilizumab start, two patients were on methotrexate, which was maintained. Fourteen patients had extracranial vascular involvement on 18FDG-PET/CT. During the first 12 months, four patients (17%) had clinical relapse. At every-other-week tocilizumab start, all patients were in clinical remission, two patients had active vasculitis on 18FDG-PET/CT; two patients were on steroid therapy, and four patients were taking methotrexate. Two patients (9%) relapsed while on every-other-week tocilizumab. At tocilizumab suspension, no patient was on steroid therapy and no patient had signs of active vasculitis on 18FDG-PET/CT. In the 6 months after tocilizumab discontinuation, six patients (26%) relapsed. No new or unexpected safety findings were identified.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab tapered over a two-year period was effective to induce and maintain remission in GCA. Relapses on tocilizumab were minor and responded to incremental changes in therapy. A significant proportion of patients relapsed in the 6 months after therapy suspension.

Giant cell arteritis: Update on clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis affecting people older than 50 years. The last decades have shed new light on the clinical paradigm of this condition, expanding its spectrum beyond cranial vessel inflammation. GCA can be now considered a multifaceted vasculitic syndrome encompassing inflammation of cranial and extra-cranial arteries and girdles, isolated or combined. Such heterogeneity often leads to diagnostic delays and increases the likelihood of acute and chronic GCA-related damage. On the other hand, the approach to suspected GCA patients has been revolutionized by the introduction of vascular ultrasound which allows a rapid, cost-effective, and non-invasive GCA diagnosis. Likewise, the use of tocilizumab is now part of the therapeutic algorithm of GCA and ensures a satisfactory disease control even in steroid-refractory patients. Nonetheless, some aspects of GCA still need to be clarified, including the clinical correlation of different histological patterns, and the prevention of long-term vascular complications. This narrative review depicts the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of GCA most relevant in clinical practice, with a focus on clinical updates and novelties introduced over the last decade.

Looking ahead: giant-cell arteritis in 10 years time

Although great improvements have been achieved in the fields of diagnosing and treating patients with giant-cell arteritis (GCA) in the last decades, several questions remain unanswered. The progressive increase in the number of older people, together with growing awareness of the disease and use of advanced diagnostic tools by healthcare professionals, foretells a possible increase in both prevalence and number of newly diagnosed patients with GCA in the coming years. A thorough clarification of pathogenetic mechanisms and a better definition of clinical subsets are the first steps toward a better understanding of the disease and, subsequently, toward a better use of existing and future therapeutic options. Examination of the role of different imaging techniques for GCA diagnosing and monitoring, optimization, and personalization of glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive agents, further development and introduction of novel drugs, identification of prognostic factors for long-term outcomes and management of treatment discontinuation will be the central topics of the research agenda in years to come.