1
|
Irwin MR, Straub RH, Smith MT. Heat of the night: sleep disturbance activates inflammatory mechanisms and induces pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2023; 19:545-559. [PMID: 37488298 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-00997-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Sleep has a homeostatic role in the regulation of the immune system and serves to constrain activation of inflammatory signalling and expression of cellular inflammation. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a misaligned inflammatory profile induces a dysregulation of sleep-wake activity, which leads to excessive inflammation and the induction of increased sensitivity to pain. Given that multiple biological mechanisms contribute to sleep disturbances (such as insomnia), and that the central nervous system communicates with the innate immune system via neuroendocrine and neural effector pathways, potential exists to develop prevention opportunities to mitigate the risk of insomnia in RA. Furthermore, understanding these risk mechanisms might inform additional insomnia treatment strategies directed towards steering and reducing the magnitude of the inflammatory response, which together could influence outcomes of pain and disease activity in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Irwin
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behaviour, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Rainer H Straub
- Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Neuroendocrine Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael T Smith
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Skov Schacksen C, Dyrvig AK, Henneberg NC, Dam Gade J, Spindler H, Refsgaard J, Hollingdal M, Dittman L, Dremstrup K, Dinesen B. Patient-Reported Outcomes From Patients With Heart Failure Participating in the Future Patient Telerehabilitation Program: Data From the Intervention Arm of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cardio 2021; 5:e26544. [PMID: 34255642 PMCID: PMC8285740 DOI: 10.2196/26544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background More than 37 million people worldwide have been diagnosed with heart failure, which is a growing burden on the health sector. Cardiac rehabilitation aims to improve patients’ recovery, functional capacity, psychosocial well-being, and health-related quality of life. However, cardiac rehabilitation programs have poor compliance and adherence. Telerehabilitation may be a solution to overcome some of these challenges to cardiac rehabilitation by making it more individualized. As part of the Future Patient Telerehabilitation program, a digital toolbox aimed at enabling patients with heart failure to monitor and evaluate their own current status has been developed and tested using data from a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that the patient filled in every alternate week for 1 year. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in quality of life and well-being among patients with heart failure, who are participants in the Future Patient Telerehabilitation program over the course of 1 year. Methods In total, 140 patients were enrolled in the Future Patient Telerehabilitation program and randomized into either the telerehabilitation group (n=70) or the control group (n=70). Of the 70 patients in the telerehabilitation group, 56 (80.0%) answered the patient-reported outcome questionnaire and completed the program, and these 56 patients comprised the study population. The patient-reported outcomes consisted of three components: (1) questions regarding the patients’ sleep patterns assessed using the Spiegel Sleep Questionnaire; (2) measurements of physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interaction, and quality of life assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in 10 dimensions; and (3) 5 additional questions regarding psychological well-being that were developed by the research group. Results The changes in scores during 1 year of the study were examined using 1-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. There were significant differences in the scores for most of the slopes of the scores from the dimensions of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (P<.05). Conclusions There was a significant increase in clinical and social well-being and quality of life during the 1-year period of participating in a telerehabilitation program. These results suggest that patient-reported outcome questionnaires may be used as a tool for patients in a telerehabilitation program that can both monitor and guide patients in mastering their own symptoms. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03388918; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03388918
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathrine Skov Schacksen
- Laboratory for Welfare Technology - Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, Sport Sciences - Performance and Technology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark
| | - Anne-Kirstine Dyrvig
- The Danish Clinical Quality Program- National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Odense, Denmark
| | - Nanna Celina Henneberg
- Laboratory for Welfare Technology - Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, Sport Sciences - Performance and Technology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark
| | - Josefine Dam Gade
- Laboratory for Welfare Technology - Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, Sport Sciences - Performance and Technology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark
| | - Helle Spindler
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Refsgaard
- Cardiology Ward, Regional Hospital Viborg, Viborg, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Dittman
- Networks Technology and Service Platforms, DTU Fotonik, Department of Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Kim Dremstrup
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Birthe Dinesen
- Laboratory for Welfare Technology - Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, Sport Sciences - Performance and Technology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Latocha KM, Løppenthin KB, Østergaard M, Jennum PJ, Christensen R, Hetland M, Røgind H, Lundbak T, Midtgaard J, Esbensen BA. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: protocol for the randomised, single-blinded, parallel-group Sleep-RA trial. Trials 2020; 21:440. [PMID: 32471477 PMCID: PMC7257190 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04282-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than half of patients with rheumatoid arthritis complain of insomnia, which is predominantly treated with hypnotic drugs. However, cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia is recommended as the first-line treatment in international guidelines on sleep. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis suffer from debilitating symptoms, such as fatigue and pain, which can also be linked to sleep disturbance. It remains to be determined whether cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia can be effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of the Sleep-RA trial is to investigate the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on sleep and disease-related symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The primary objective is to compare the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia relative to usual care on changes in sleep efficiency from baseline to week 7 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The key secondary objectives are to compare the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia relative to usual care on changes in sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, total sleep time, insomnia, sleep quality, fatigue, impact of rheumatoid arthritis and depressive symptoms from baseline to week 26 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS The Sleep-RA trial is a randomised controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Sixty patients with rheumatoid arthritis, insomnia and low-to-moderate disease activity will be allocated 1:1 to treatment with cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia or usual care. Patients in the intervention group will receive nurse-led, group-based cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia once a week for 6 weeks. Outcome assessments will be carried out at baseline, after treatment (week 7) and at follow-up (week 26). DISCUSSION Data on treatment of insomnia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are sparse. The Sleep-RA trial is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Because symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and insomnia have many similarities, we also find it relevant to investigate the secondary effects of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on fatigue, impact of rheumatoid arthritis, depressive symptoms, pain, functional status, health-related quality of life and disease activity. If we find cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia to be effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis this will add weight to the argument that evidence-based non-pharmacological treatment for insomnia in rheumatological outpatient clinics is eligible in accordance with the existing international guidelines on sleep. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03766100. Registered on 30 November 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Latocha
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
| | - K B Løppenthin
- Department of Oncology, Research unit for Cancer Late Effect, CASTLE, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P J Jennum
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Danish Center for Sleep Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - R Christensen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - M Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - H Røgind
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - T Lundbak
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - J Midtgaard
- The University Hospitals Centre for Health Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - B A Esbensen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roehrs T, Withrow D, Koshorek G, Verkler J, Bazan L, Roth T. Sleep and pain in humans with fibromyalgia and comorbid insomnia: double-blind, crossover study of suvorexant 20 mg versus placebo. J Clin Sleep Med 2020; 16:415-421. [PMID: 31992394 PMCID: PMC7075085 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.8220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES The chronic pain disorder, fibromyalgia, is associated with sleep disturbance, typically sleep maintenance. No studies have evaluated the effect of sleep medication on pain sensitivity in this population. Suvorexant, an orexin antagonist approved for treatment of insomnia, was evaluated for effects on both sleep and the pain of fibromyalgia. METHODS Women age 21 to 65 years with fibromyalgia and comorbid insomnia (n = 10) were treated, double-blind, for 9 nights each with suvorexant, 20 mg and placebo in counterbalanced order. All were in good psychiatric and stable physical health and met American College of Rheumatology 2010 criteria for fibromyalgia and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria for insomnia. Screening 8-hour polysomnography (PSG) was used to rule out other sleep disorders. On nights 8 and 9 of each treatment 8-hour PSG were collected and on days 1 and 8 pain sensitivity was assessed at 1100 and 1500 hours by measuring finger withdrawal latency (FWL) to a radiant heat stimulus at 5 randomly presented intensity levels. RESULTS Suvorexant versus placebo increased total sleep time (7.2 versus 6.7 hours, P < .05) and reduced wake after sleep onset (37 versus 67 minutes, P < .04) with no night effects or interaction. Latency to persistent sleep and sleep stage measures were not altered. FWL on both am and pm tests varied as a function of intensity (P < .001). Average FWL (over 5 intensities and both days) was increased relative to placebo on both the am (13.9 versus 13.1 seconds) and pm tests (15.8 versus 14.1 seconds, P < .03) following suvorexant the previous night. CONCLUSIONS Suvorexant 20 mg in patients with fibromyalgia, improved sleep time and reduced next-day pain sensitivity on assessments of FWL to a radiant heat stimulus. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: A double-blind cross-over, study to compare the hypnotic, daytime sleepiness/fatigue, and pain effects of nighttime administration of suvorexant 20 mg versus placebo in patients with fibromyalgia and comorbid insomnia; Identifier: NCT02684136; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02684136.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Roehrs
- Henry Ford Health System, Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Detroit, Michigan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Dana Withrow
- Henry Ford Health System, Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Gail Koshorek
- Henry Ford Health System, Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jelena Verkler
- Henry Ford Health System, Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Luisa Bazan
- Henry Ford Health System, Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Thomas Roth
- Henry Ford Health System, Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Detroit, Michigan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reynolds AC, Marshall NS, Hill CL, Adams RJ. Systematic review of the efficacy of commonly prescribed pharmacological treatments for primary treatment of sleep disturbance in patients with diagnosed autoimmune disease. Sleep Med Rev 2020; 49:101232. [PMID: 31911367 DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Sleep disturbances are commonly reported by patients with autoimmune disease, and are negatively related to both disease activity and quality of life. Despite the potential for sleep disturbance to exacerbate inflammatory pathways, acute management of sleep disturbance with pharmacological aids is not well understood in this patient group. The objective of this review was to determine the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for sleep disturbance to improve sleep outcomes in adult patients with diagnosed autoimmune disease. Four databases and grey literature were searched for randomized controlled trials which used a pharmacological treatment specifically to treat sleep disturbance in patients with diagnosed autoimmune disease, both in hospitalized and non-hospitalized settings. A sleep outcome was required to be the primary endpoint of the study. Of the 409 studies identified, a total of six were included in the systematic review. Risk of bias across the studies was largely unclear, making an assessment challenging; meta-analysis was not undertaken due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity between studies. While there appeared to be perceived improvement in self-reported sleep quantity and quality in existing studies with pharmacological treatment, there was also evidence of placebo effect on some measures. Relatively small numbers of patients have undergone gold-standard polysomnographic (PSG) recording of sleep which limits our knowledge of objectively determined sleep quantity and quality in patients with autoimmune disease receiving pharmacological treatment for sleep disturbance. Presently there is insufficient evidence to determine whether pharmacological treatment of sleep disturbance is beneficial for improving sleep quantity and quality in this patient group beyond rheumatoid arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Reynolds
- The Appleton Institute, CQ University Australia, 44 Greenhill Road, Wayville, SA, Australia; School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity Australia Adelaide Campus, Wayville, SA, Australia.
| | - Nathaniel S Marshall
- CIRUS, Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine L Hill
- Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia; Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Robert J Adams
- Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health: A Flinders Centre of Research Excellence, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia; Respiratory and Sleep Service, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Richards BL, Whittle S, Buchbinder R, Barrett C, Lynch N, Major G, Littlejohn G, Taylor A, Zochling J. Australian and New Zealand evidence-based recommendations for pain management by pharmacotherapy in adult patients with inflammatory arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 2014; 17:738-48. [PMID: 24889411 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.12388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM To develop Australian and New Zealand evidence-based recommendations for pain management by pharmacotherapy in adult patients with optimally treated inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS Four hundred and fifty-three rheumatologists from 17 countries including 46 rheumatologists from Australia and New Zealand participated in the 2010 3e (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative. Using a formal voting process, rheumatologists from 15 national scientific committees selected 10 clinical questions regarding the use of pain medications in IA. Bibliographic fellows undertook a systematic literature review for each question, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and 2008-09 EULAR/ACR abstracts. Relevant studies were retrieved for data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Rheumatologists from Australia and New Zealand used the evidence to develop a set of national recommendations. These recommendations were then formulated and assessed for agreement and the potential impact on clinical practice. The Oxford Levels of Evidence and Grade of Recommendation were applied to each recommendation. RESULTS The systematic reviews identified 49 242 references, from which 167 studies which met the pre-specified inclusion criteria. Combining this evidence with expert opinion led to the development of 10 final Australian and New Zealand recommendations. The recommendations relate to pain measurement, and the use of analgesic medications in patients with and without co-morbidities and during pregnancy and lactation. The recommendations reflect the clinical practice of the majority of the participating rheumatologists (mean level of agreement 7.24-9.65). CONCLUSIONS Ten Australian and New Zealand evidence-based recommendations regarding the management of pain by pharmacotherapy in adults with optimally treated IA were developed. They are supported by a large panel of rheumatologists, thus enhancing their utility in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan L Richards
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Løppenthin K, Esbensen BA, Jennum P, Østergaard M, Christensen JF, Thomsen T, Bech JS, Midtgaard J. Effect of intermittent aerobic exercise on sleep quality and sleep disturbances in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15:49. [PMID: 24559487 PMCID: PMC3996065 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 02/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor sleep is prevalent in patients with systemic inflammatory disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, and, in addition to fatigue, pain, depression and inflammation, is associated with an increased risk of co-morbidity and all-cause mortality. Whereas non-pharmacological interventions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis have been shown to reduce pain and fatigue, no randomized controlled trials have examined the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on improvement of sleep in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an intermittent aerobic exercise intervention on sleep, assessed both objectively and subjectively in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS/DESIGN A randomized controlled trial including 44 patients with rheumatoid arthritis randomly assigned to an exercise training intervention or to a control group. The intervention consists of 18 session intermittent aerobic exercise training on a bicycle ergometer three times a week. Patients are evaluated according to objective changes in sleep as measured by polysomnography (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes include changes in subjective sleep quality and sleep disturbances, fatigue, pain, depressive symptoms, physical function, health-related quality of life and cardiorespiratory fitness. DISCUSSION This trial will provide evidence of the effect of intermittent aerobic exercise on the improvement of sleep in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, which is considered important in promotion of health and well-being. As such, the trial meets a currently unmet need for the provision of non-pharmacological treatment initiatives of poor sleep in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01966835.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrine Løppenthin
- Research Unit of Nursing and Health Science, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bente Appel Esbensen
- Research Unit of Nursing and Health Science, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Poul Jennum
- Danish Centre for Sleep Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Frank Christensen
- University Hospitals Centre for Health Care Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tanja Thomsen
- Research Unit of Nursing and Health Science, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Julie Schjerbech Bech
- Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Julie Midtgaard
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- University Hospitals Centre for Health Care Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Pieh
- Schlafmedizinisches Zentrum, Psychiatrische Klinik der Universität Regensburg.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roth T, Price JM, Amato DA, Rubens RP, Roach JM, Schnitzer TJ. The effect of eszopiclone in patients with insomnia and coexisting rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study. PRIMARY CARE COMPANION TO THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY 2012; 11:292-301. [PMID: 20098520 DOI: 10.4088/pcc.08m00749bro] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2008] [Accepted: 01/23/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eszopiclone 3 mg, a nonbenzodiazepine medication/hypnotic indicated for the treatment of insomnia with comorbid rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study was conducted in 153 patients aged 25-64 years with American College of Rheumatology-defined RA who met DSM-IV criteria for insomnia. The data were collected from February to November of 2004. Patients were randomly assigned to either eszopiclone or placebo nightly for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week placebo run out. Efficacy was evaluated using patient reports of sleep (wake time after sleep onset [WASO], sleep latency [SL], and total sleep time [TST]), daytime function, pain, and RA assessments. Insomnia severity was evaluated using the Insomnia Severity Index. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS Eszopiclone significantly improved all patient-reported sleep measures (WASO, SL, and TST), sleep quality, depth of sleep, and daytime function (P < .05 vs placebo). At week 4, 48% of eszopiclone-treated patients had no clinically meaningful insomnia as assessed by ISI score (versus 30% of placebo-treated patients, P = .03). Eszopiclone was significantly better than placebo on some RA-associated pain measures: (1) overall (P = .05), pain (P = .006), and pain and other symptoms (P = .02) scores of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, (2) tender joint counts (P = .03) and pain severity scores (P = .023), (3) the activities domain of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (P = .04), and (4) the role physical (P = .03) and bodily pain (P = .01) scales of the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey. The most commonly reported adverse events with eszopiclone were unpleasant taste and transient increases in RA symptoms. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study of patients with insomnia comorbid with RA, eszopiclone 3 mg improved all assessed sleep and daytime function measures over the treatment period, as well as some measures of RA-associated pain, disability, and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00367965.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Roth
- Henry Ford Sleep Disorders Clinic, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Whittle SL, Colebatch AN, Buchbinder R, Edwards CJ, Adams K, Englbrecht M, Hazlewood G, Marks JL, Radner H, Ramiro S, Richards BL, Tarner IH, Aletaha D, Bombardier C, Landewé RB, Müller-Ladner U, Bijlsma JWJ, Branco JC, Bykerk VP, da Rocha Castelar Pinheiro G, Catrina AI, Hannonen P, Kiely P, Leeb B, Lie E, Martinez-Osuna P, Montecucco C, Ostergaard M, Westhovens R, Zochling J, van der Heijde D. Multinational evidence-based recommendations for pain management by pharmacotherapy in inflammatory arthritis: integrating systematic literature research and expert opinion of a broad panel of rheumatologists in the 3e Initiative. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51:1416-25. [PMID: 22447886 PMCID: PMC3397467 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2011] [Revised: 01/25/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop evidence-based recommendations for pain management by pharmacotherapy in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS A total of 453 rheumatologists from 17 countries participated in the 2010 3e (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative. Using a formal voting process, 89 rheumatologists representing all 17 countries selected 10 clinical questions regarding the use of pain medications in IA. Bibliographic fellows undertook a systematic literature review for each question, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and 2008-09 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR abstracts. Relevant studies were retrieved for data extraction and quality assessment. Rheumatologists from each country used this evidence to develop a set of national recommendations. Multinational recommendations were then formulated and assessed for agreement and the potential impact on clinical practice. RESULTS A total of 49,242 references were identified, from which 167 studies were included in the systematic reviews. One clinical question regarding different comorbidities was divided into two separate reviews, resulting in 11 recommendations in total. Oxford levels of evidence were applied to each recommendation. The recommendations related to the efficacy and safety of various analgesic medications, pain measurement scales and pain management in the pre-conception period, pregnancy and lactation. Finally, an algorithm for the pharmacological management of pain in IA was developed. Twenty per cent of rheumatologists reported that the algorithm would change their practice, and 75% felt the algorithm was in accordance with their current practice. CONCLUSIONS Eleven evidence-based recommendations on the management of pain by pharmacotherapy in IA were developed. They are supported by a large panel of rheumatologists from 17 countries, thus enhancing their utility in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel L Whittle
- Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia 5011, Adelaide, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain management is a high priority for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Muscle relaxants include drugs that reduce muscle spasm (for example benzodiazepines such as diazepam (Valium), alprazolam (Xanax), lorazepam (Ativan) and non-benzodiazepines such as metaxalone (Skelaxin) or a combination of paracetamol and orphenadrine (Muscol)) and drugs that prevent increased muscle tone (baclofen and dantrolene). Despite a paucity of evidence supporting their use, antispasmodic and antispasticity muscle relaxants have gained widespread clinical acceptance as adjuvants in the management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review was to determine the efficacy and safety of muscle relaxants in pain management in patients with RA. The muscle relaxants that were included in this review are the antispasmodic benzodiazepines (alprazolam, bromazepam, chlordiazepoxide,cinolazepam, clonazepam, cloxazolam, clorazepate, diazepam, estazolam, flunitrazepam, flurazepam, flutoprazepam, halazepam, ketazolam, loprazolam, lorazepam, lormetazepam, medazepam, midazolam, nimetazepam, nitrazepam, nordazepam, oxazepam, pinazepam, prazepam, quazepam, temazepam, tetrazepam, triazolam), antispasmodic non-benzodiazepines (cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol, chlorzoxazone, meprobamate, methocarbamol, metaxalone, orphenadrine, tizanidine and zopiclone), and antispasticity drugs (baclofen and dantrolene sodium). SEARCH METHODS We performed a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 4th quarter 2010), MEDLINE (1950 to week 1 November 2010), EMBASE (Week 44 2010), and PsycINFO (1806 to week 2 November 2010). We also searched the 2008 to 2009 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) abstracts and performed a handsearch of reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials which compared a muscle relaxant to another therapy (active, including non-pharmacological therapies, or placebo) in adult patients with RA and that reported at least one clinically relevant outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two blinded review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. Meta-analyses were used to examine the efficacy of muscle relaxants on pain, depression, sleep and function, as well as their safety. MAIN RESULTS Six trials (126 participants) were included in this review. All trials were rated at high risk of bias. Five cross-over trials evaluated a benzodiazepine, four assessed diazepam (n = 71) and one assessed triazolam (n = 15). The sixth trial assessed zopiclone (a non-benzodiazepine) (n = 40) and was a parallel group study. No trial duration was longer than two weeks while three single dose trials assessed outcomes at 24 hours only. Overall the included trials failed to find evidence of a beneficial effect of muscle relaxants over placebo, alone (at 24 hrs, 1 or 2 weeks) or in addition to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (at 24 hrs), on pain intensity, function, or quality of life. Data from two trials of longer than 24 hours duration (n = 74) (diazepam and zopiclone) found that participants who received a muscle relaxant had significantly more adverse events compared with those who received placebo (number needed to harm (NNTH) 3, 95% CI 2 to 7). These were predominantly central nervous system side effects, including dizziness and drowsiness (NNTH 3, 95% CI 2 to 11). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based upon the currently available evidence in patients with RA, benzodiazepines (diazepam and triazolam) do not appear to be beneficial in improving pain over 24 hours or one week. The non-benzodiazepine agent zopiclone also did not significantly reduce pain over two weeks. However, even short term muscle relaxant use (24 hours to 2 weeks) is associated with significant adverse events, predominantly drowsiness and dizziness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan L Richards
- Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopedics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Effects of Controlled Delta Sleep Deprivation on Experimental Pain in Healthy Subjects. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010. [DOI: 10.1300/j094v08n03_05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
13
|
|
14
|
Abstract
Arthritis is the leading cause of chronic illness in the United States. Seventy-two percent of the adults aged 55 years and older with arthritis report sleep difficulties. This review discusses sleep disorders associated with rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, Behcet's disease, seronegative spondyloarthropathies, osteoarthritis, sarcoidosis, and fibromyalgia. We describe the inter-relationship between sleep complaints, disease activity, depression, sleep deprivation, and cytokines. An algorithm for evaluation and treatment of sleep disorders associated with rheumatologic diseases is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivien C Abad
- Clinical Monitoring Sleep Disorders Center, Camino Medical Group, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Taibi DM, Bourguignon C, Taylor AG. Valerian Use for Sleep Disturbances Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis. Holist Nurs Pract 2004; 18:120-6. [PMID: 15222600 DOI: 10.1097/00004650-200405000-00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Complementary therapies are becoming increasingly popular, particularly for symptoms such as sleep disturbance. The herb valerian may be useful as a mild sleep aid in clinical populations, such as persons with rheumatoid arthritis. This article reviews valerian to inform healthcare providers of potential uses and safety considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana M Taibi
- Center for the Study of Complementary and Alternative Therapies, University of Virginia, School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bourguignon C, Labyak SE, Taibi D. Investigating sleep disturbances in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Holist Nurs Pract 2003; 17:241-9. [PMID: 14596374 DOI: 10.1097/00004650-200309000-00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and joint involvement. Most adults with RA experience sleep disturbances, including longer times before falling asleep, numerous awakenings during the night, and early morning wakening, resulting in excessive daytime sleepiness and fatigue. This article will review what is known about sleep disturbances and the biologic basis in adults with RA, the influence of ovarian hormone levels in women with RA, how medications may influence sleep in RA, and complementary and alternative therapies that may be useful in reducing sleep disturbances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Bourguignon
- Center for the Study of Complementary & Alternative Therapies, School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va 22908, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Wake/sleep complaints are very common in the rheumatic diseases, and include: insomnia, non-restorative sleep, frequent awakenings, daytime fatigue and excessive daytime sleepiness. Imprecise use of terminology has confused 'sleep dissatisfaction' (i.e. 'non-restorative sleep') with specific sleep disorders (i.e. 'insomnia' or 'sleep fragmentation') and 'fatigue' with 'daytime sleepiness'. This review examines current concepts from the literature of disparate disciplines pertaining to the complaint of poor sleep and daytime fatigue in patients with rheumatic disorders. The ability to monitor multiple physiologic parameters during sleep (polysomnography) has led to a greater understanding of normal and abnormal phenomena which occur during sleep, and has resulted in the identification of a variety of sleep disorders which have specific therapeutic implications. Actigraphy allows the prolonged monitoring of wake/sleep patterns, and the multiple sleep latency test permits the determination of physiologic sleepiness during the daytime. These techniques enable identification of objective sleep disorders in those whose complaint is subjective sleep dissatisfaction, and permit differentiation between the easily confused complaints of excessive daytime sleepiness and fatigue. The abnormal sleep/wake symptoms in patients with rheumatic diseases may not simply be a 'non-specific' or systemic effect of the disease. Some patients may have a specific sleep disorder (either independent from, or due to, the underlying rheumatic condition) which should be diagnosed and treated specifically. Conversely, subjective 'sleep dissatisfaction' does not necessarily imply an underlying sleep disorder. The primary intent of this review is to encourage systematic, objective study of sleep and daytime function in these common, often disabling conditions.
Collapse
|
19
|
Drewes AM. Pain and sleep disturbances with special reference to fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999; 38:1035-8. [PMID: 10556252 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.11.1035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|